DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Agung, 2010, Pengertian Teknologi Informasi, by Posted download dari www.google.com Saturday, January 09, 2010 2. Anas, M., Mursidin, T., dan Firdaus. 2008. Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) dalam Pembelajaran di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Simposium Pendidikan.
3. Anatan, 2008, Service Excellence, Competing Through Competitiveness. Alfadelta, Bandung. 4. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. metode Jakarta.
Penelitian sosial. Binarupa Aksara,
5. ______________. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. 6. Brown, Linden and Pattinson, Hugh 1999. "Information Technology and telecommunications": Impacts on Strategic alliance information and management, pp 41-51, Sydney Australia. 7. Brown, S. P dan Robert, A. P. 1993. Antecedents and Consequences of alesperson Job Satisfaction : A Meta Analysis and Assesment of Causal Effects of Marketing, 30 (2): 63-77 8. Burch, J.G. 1992 System Analysis, Oesign and Implementation, Boston, Boyd and Fraser Publishing Co. 9. Chatman, Jennifer. A and Karen A. Jehn. 1994. Assasing The Relationship Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different Can You Be? Academy of Management Journal. Juni. Vol: 37. Pp. 304-309. 10. Chau, P.Y.K. dan Hu, P. J. 2002, “Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Profesionals: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Management Informations Systems. pp. 191-229. 11. Chin, W.W., and Todd, P.A. 2002. “On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: a Note of Caution,” MIS Quarterly. pp. 237-246. 12. Cooper, Donald R., Emory, C. William, 1996, Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Edisi ke lima, Dialih-bahasakan oleh Widyono Soetjipto, Ir., M.A., Uka Wikarya, Ir., Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta. 13. Cooper, Robert W. Zmud, 1990, Information Technology Implementation
Research: A Technological User Accepta. 14. Darsono Li, 2005. “Examining Information Technology Acceptance By Individual Professionals,” Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. pp. 155-178.
15. Desplaces, David. 2005. A Multilevel Approach to Individual Readiness to Change. The Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. Vol.7 No.1 pp.25-39 16. Dunnet, M.D. 1983. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand, Me Nally. 17. Etzioni, Amitai. 2001. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization. The Free Press, New York. 18. Gardner, C., dan Amoroso D.L. 2004. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Aceptance of Internet Technology by consumer,” Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Converence on system Sciences. 19. Gefen, D., dan Straub, D.W 1997. “Gender Difference in the perception and use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” (21:4). 20. Griffin, Ricky W, dan Ronald J. Ebert. 1996. Binis (Business), Forth Edition, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Jilid l, Pengkaji Materi Wgiono Ismangil, Prenhalindo, Jakarta. 21. Haag Stephen & Keen Peter, 1996. Information Technology, Tomorrow Advantage
Today. Artikel diakses tanggal 27 April http://www.articlesnatch.com/searchresult/technology/2
2009,
dari
22. Handoko, H. T. 1995. Manajemen Personalia Dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Liberty, Yogyakarta. 23. Harmadi, A., dan Hermana, B. 2005. Analisis Karakteristik Individu Dan Prilaku Pengguna Internet Banking: Reliabilitas Dan Validitas Instrumen Pengukuran Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi. ISBN: 979-756-061-6. 24. Haryanto. M. Y. 2002. Pengaruh faktor-faktor induvidual dalam penggunaan sistim informasi berbasis komputer terhadap kinerja karyawan, jurnal akuntansi dan bisnis vol 2 no 11, pebruari, 2002 25. Hodge,G. J dan Anthony, W. P. 1991. Organization Theory : A Strategic Approach, Fourth Edition, Allyn and bacon, Inc. USA 26. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W,M., dan Tam, K.Y. 2002. “Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:3), pp.97-124. 27. Indrajit, R.E., Mengukur Tingkat Kematangan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Untuk Institusi Pendidikan Suatu Pendekatan Kesiapan Pemegang Kepentingan (Stakeholder). Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi untuk Indonesia 3-4 Mei 2006, Aula Barat & Timur Institut Teknologi Bandung.
[email protected]
28. Jogiyanto, HM. (1988), Sistem Informasi Akuntunsi Berbasis komputer Dasar dan komponen, Buku satu Edisi Pertama BPFE Yogyakarta. 29. Johan dan wijaya. T, 2005. Pengaruh computer anxety terhadap kealian penggunaan komputer. Jurnal studi indonesia vol2. No 3. Maret 30. Karahana, E., dan Straub, D.W. “The Psycological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use,”Information and Management (35:4), 1999, pp.237-250. 31. Kempton, John. 1995. Human Resources Management, Concepts and Experience. McGraw-Hill International Edition, USA. 32. Kotter, Jones P dan James L. Heskett. 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance: Current Issues and Themes. International Edition. Macmillan Business, New York. 33. _________. 1997. Corporate Culture and Performance: Current Issues and Themes. International Edition. Macmillan Business, New York. 34. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A. dan Larsenm K.R.T, 2003, “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future Communications of the Association for Information System,” pp. 752-780. 35. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. 2002, “Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information & Management. pp. 191-204. 36. Lucas J R, Henry C, 1994, Information Systems Concepts For Management, Fifth Edition, McGraw - Hill International Edition, United States. 37. Luthans, S, Fred. 2005. Organizational Behavior, Tokyo: Me Graw-Nill International Book Company. 38. Mar’at. M. 1998. Sikap Manusia Perubahan dan Pengukurannya. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. 39. Martin, EW, et al. 1994 Management Information Technology; What Manager Need Know, 2 Ed, Macinillan Publishing, New York. 40. Mathieson, K. 1991. ”Predicting User Intentions Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,“ Information System Research (2:3), pp.173-191. 41. McFarlan, Warren, F & McKenney, James L. 1987. Ledakan Informasi dan manajemen, Penerjemah Ir. Sidarta, Cetakan Pertama, PT. Dhama Aksara Perkasa, Jakarta. 42. McLeod, Jr, Raymond. 1995. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, terjemahan Hendra Teguh, edisi keenam, Penerbit PT Prenhallindo, Jakarta. 43. Mismail, Budiono 1995. Sistem Informasi Manajemen Berorientasi Komputer, Cetakan Pertama, Penerbit IKIP Malang, Malang.
44. Moeljono, Dj. 2003. “Budaya Korporat dan Keunggulan Korporasi”. Eleks Media Computindo IKAPI Jakarta. 45. Nasution. F. N. 2004. Penggunaan teknologi informasi berdasarkan aspek perilaku (behavioral aspect) USU Digital Library 46. Nazir, Moh. 1988. Metode Penelitian. Cetakan III. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. 47. Nimran, Umar. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi. Cetakan Pertama. CV Citra Media, Surabaya. 48. Ningtyas1, D.K., Virnawati, F., Prasetiyo, Paramitta, T.I., Simri, W. 2008. Analisis perilaku pengguna sistem e-learning. Proceeding, Seminar Ilmiah Nasional Komputer dan Sistem Intelijen (KOMMIT). ISSN : 1411-6286. 49. Nugroho, James A. 1990, Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi Dan Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Implementasi SIM, Tesis, UGM-Yogyakarta. 50. Nurniah. (2005), Kualitas dan Keefektifan Sistem Layanan Konsumen Mobile Banking (Studi Kasus BCA Cabang Malang), Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang. 51. Nurwono, Yuniarto. 1997, Manajemen Informasi, Pendekatan Global, Penerbit PT Elek Media Komputindo, Jakarta. 52. O' Brient, James D 1991, Management Information System, A Managerial End User Persectives International Student Edition Irwin, Boston. 53. Olson, M.H. 1992, "Remote Office Work: Implications for Individuals and rganizations," Center for Research on Technology Information Systems, New York University, New York, September. 54. O’Reilly, C & Chatman, J. 1996. Organization Commitment And Psychological Attachment: The Effect Of Compliance, Identification And Internalization On Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Management. February. Vol. VII. Pp 42-54. 55. Oswari, Teddy., Susy Suhendra, E., Harmoni, Ati., 2008 “Model Perilaku Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi: Pengaruh Variabel Prediktor, Moderating Effect, Dampak Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Produktivitas dan Kinerja Usaha Kecil, Seminar Ilmiah Nasional Komputasi dan Sistem Intelijen (KOMMIT 2008). 56. Robbins, Stephen P. 1996. Organizational Behaviour: Concept Controversies Application. Seventh Edition. Prenhalindo, Jakarta. 57. Roznowski, M dan Hullin, C. 1992. The Science Merit of Valid Measures of General Construct with Special Reference to Job Satisfaction and Job Withdrawal. Dalam Cranny, C. J. Smith, P. C dan Stones, E. F (Eds), Job Statisfaction: How People Feel About Their Jobs and How It Affects their Performance, 123-163, New York; Lexington Book. 58. Sagung, Rai, Darmini. 2008. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Pengaruh Pemanfaatan
terhadap Teknologi Informasi dan Kinerja Individual di Bank Perkreditan Rakyat di Kabupaten Tabanan”. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana Denpasar. 59. Saleh, Syafradji. 1998, Kinerja Keunggulan Kompetitive (K3) Perusahaan, Perekat Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Bangsa Indonesia, Makalah Pengukuhan Guru Besar Marketing, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang. 60. Santoso, Singgih. 2000. SPSS Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional. Cetakan Kedua. Elex Media Computindo, Jakarta. 61. Sarwono, Jonathan. 2007 SPSS Analisis Jalur untuk Riset Bisnis. Edisi pertama. Penerbit C.V. Andi Ofset, Yogyakarta. 62. Schermerhorn, Jhon R. hunt, James G; Osborn, Richard. 1982. Managing Organizational Behavior, Jhon Wiley dan Sons, inc. USA 63. Scot, George M. 1994. Prinsip-Prinsip Sistem Informasi Management, Penerjemah Achmad Nashir Budiman, Cetakan Keempat, Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. 64. Siegel, L. and Irving M Lane 1987. Personnel and Organizational Psychology, second ed. Illionis ; Richard D. Irwih, inc. 65. _________. 2000. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta. 66. Singarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi. 1999. Metode Penelitian Survey. LP3ES, Jakarta. 67. Solimun. (2003). Metode Kuantitatif Untuk Manajemen, Diktat Kuliah Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya Malang. 68. Staw, Barry. M. 2000. Psychological Dimension of Organization Behavior, McMillan Publishing Company, New York. 69. Steven, B & Sayler, L. 2002. Manajemen Personalia: Segi Manusia dalam Organisasi, Pustaka Binaman Pressindo, Jakarta. 70. Stoner, James A. Freeman and R. Edward. 1996. Management, 4th Ed., Engleman Wood Cliff N.J. Prentice Hall, New York. 71. Straub, W. (1997), “Gender differences in the perception and use of Email: An extension to the UTAUT Model”, MIS Quarterly; Dec 1997; 21, 4; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 389. 72. Strauss, G. & Taylers, L.R. 1996. Manajemen Personalia: Segi Manusia Dalam Organisasi. Terjemahan Grace M. Hadikusuma dan Roch. Mutyati Hamzah. Jilid 1. Penerbit PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo, Jakarta. 73. Strees, R. M. 1985. Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavior View, Diterjemahkan oleh Magdalena Jamin, Efektivitas Organisasi : Kaidah Perilaku. Cetakan Kedua. Erlangga, Jakarta. 74. Sudjana. 1984. Metode Statistik. Edisi III. Penerbit Tarsito, Bandung.
75. Sugiarto,. 1992. Tahap Awal + Aplikasi Analisis Regresi. Penerbit Andi Offset, Yogyakarta. 76. Sugiarto, D. Siagian, L.T Sunaryanto, dan D.S. Oetomo. (2003). Tehnik Sampling. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. 77. Sugiyono. 2004. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Alfa Beta, Bandung. 78. Sun, H.,& Zhang, P. 2003. “A New Perspective to Analyze User Technology Acceptance,” Working Paper, Syracuse University. 79. Supranto, 2004. Analisis Multivariat arti dan Interpretasi. Penerbit Rineka Cipta Jakarta. 80. Swarno, Bambang. 2007. Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). Cetakan pertama, Alfabeta - Bandung. 81. Swasto S, Bambang. 1996. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Disertasi Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya. 82. Syarwhani, Wawan dan Nugroho Dewi Priyohadi. 2001. Corporate Culture Building: Menuju Organisasi yang Adaptif dan Kompetitif, Konsep Teori, Implementasi Budaya Perusahaan, dan Peranan Psikologi. Usahawan. XXX April 2000. 83. Szajna, B. 1994. “Software Evaluation and Choice Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument,” MIS Quarterly (18:3), pp.319-324. 84. Taylor, S., dan Todd, P.A. 1995. “Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience,” MIS Quarterly (19:4). 85. Taylor, S., dan Todd, P.A. 1999. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:2) 86. Tjahjono, Heru Kurnianto, 2004, Budaya organisasi & Balance Scorecard: Dimensi, Teori dan Praktek. UPFE – UMY, Yogyakarta. 87. Tjhai Fung Jin. 2003. “ Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi terhadap Kinerja Akuntan Publik”. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. 5:1 – 26. 88. Umar, Husein. 1999. Metode Riset ilmu administrasi Gramedia Pusataka Utama, Jakarta. 89. Venkatesh, V., and M.G.Morris, 2000. “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly (24:1), pp.115-139. 90. Venkatesh, V., and Davis V.D. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science (46:2), pp.186-204. 91. Wexley, Kenneth N. dan Yuke, Gary A, 1977. Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology. Richard d. Irwin inc, Home wood Illinois.
92. Wibowo, A. 2006. Kajian Tentang Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).