Descripción: Caso de harvard American Connector Company , preguntas resultas
Resumen de caso Harvard sobre American Connector Company.Descripción completa
Hamlet-a great play by Shakespeare.The critical essay is written for M.A. English students and generally for literature lovers.Full description
Sheet Music
Sheet MusicDescription complète
.
Sheet Music
` How to Wind Up a Sick CompanyFull description
El origen de la tragedia griega como producto colateral del alfabeto fonético. Una propuesta de Derrick de Kerckhove.Full description
Ethan Berman CaseFull description
A beautiful pieceFull description
Clarineta em BbDescripción completa
full scoreFull description
Benjamin Franklin an American LIfe
Descripción: A beautiful piece
ASSIGNMENT 1 AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY: HOW A GOOD COMPANY DIED
WRITE A REPORT THAT OUTLINES THE REASONS (BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL) FOR BURGMASTER’S DEMISE, AND WHETHER OPERATION MANAGEMENT PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE DEMISE.
NAME
: RAFIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN
ID NO
: 819441
An American Tragedy : How a Good Company Died This case study tells us the story of Burgmaster Corp which is a machine tool maker company. Burgmaster was a thriving enterprise by 1965, when annual sales amounted to about $8 million. Although it needed backing to expand, it sold out to Buffalo-based conglomerate Houdaille Industries Inc. The case study also, informs us too many machine- tools and auto parts factories are silent, too many U.S. industries still can’t hold their own. Holland uses Burgmaster’s demise to explore some key issues of economic and trade policy. The LBO chocked off Burgmaster’s investment funds when foreign competition made them most necessary. Houdaille’s charge that a cartel led by the Japanese government had injured U.S. tool makers. Holland offers plenty of ammunition by creating enormous pressure to generate cash. Burgmaster pushed its products out as fast as possible. It shipped defective machines. It promised customers features that engineers hadn’t yet designed.
The Internal Forces for Burgmaster Corp Demise 1. The system for computerizing production scheduling was too crude; 2. High cost and much expensive machines; 3. Defective machines as a result of pushing products as fast as possible without regarding to quality and customers’ needs; 4. NO Cash to fund process and procedures to face competition; 5. No formula was a substitute for management involvement on the shop floor; 6. A dramatic depiction of supply snafus that resulted in delays and cost increases.
The External Forces for Burgmaster Corp Demise 1. The Government policies: tax laws and macroeconomics policies that encourage LBOs and speculation instead of productive investment; 2. Pentagon procurement policies for favouring machines over standard, low cost models;
exotic
,
custom
3. The industrial policy : Domestic tool makers were too complacent when imports seized the lower end of the product line , the ill prepared for change and struggling to restructure; 4. A cartel led by the Japanese government had injured U.S. tool makers; 5. Foreign competition made.
The role of the operations management in that demise i)
Companies must be competitive to sell their goods and services in the marketplace. This company didn’t follow the operations management principles or functions in its three major departments: finance, operations and marketing;
ii)
Burgmaster Corp didn’t identify customer needs. It didn’t follow the policy of low price and high quality;
iii)
It didn’t be able to reflect joint efforts of product and service design;
iv)
No match between financial resources, operations capabilities, supply chains and consumer needs;
v)
It didn’t follow inventory strategy to be competitive;
vi)
It neglected operations strategy;
vii)
It didn’t develop productivity measures for all operations;
viii)
It didn’t develop methods for achieving productivity improvements such as soliciting ideas from workers and re-examining the way work is done.