Syquia vs Board of Power and Waterworks Case Digest Administrative Law Quasi-Judicial FunctionFull description
Full description
Admin (4-6)
Public Offcr & AdminFull description
DigestFull description
Borja vs Comelec Case DigestFull description
Constitutional Law II - A , Atty. Tagarda-Mabilen
Case
law, obligations, oblicon, case digestFull description
case digest if alih vs castroFull description
law
Oblicon Case Digest
Classroom use; EvidenceFull description
G.R. No. L-51369, July 29, 1987Full description
case digest
succession case digestFull description
1US vs Valdez (Case Digest)Full description
Lee vs Tambago AC No. 5281Full description
SJS vs. Dangerous Drugs Board
570 SCRA 410 – Political Law – Qualifications of a Senator or a Congress Representative N!"# !$is is consoli%ate% wit$ Laserna vs &angerous &rugs 'oar% ()*R* No* 15+,--. an% Pi/entel vs C"L"C ()*R* No* 1,1,5+. n 20023 Repulic Act No* 1,5 or t$e Co/pre$ensive &angerous &rugs Act of 2002 was i/ple/ente%* Section -, t$ereof re6uires /an%ator %rug testing of can%i%ates for pulic office3 stu%ents of secon%ar an% tertiar sc$ools3 officers an% e/ploees of pulic an% private offices3 an% persons c$arge% efore t$e prosecutor8s office wit$ certain offenses* n &ece/er 200-3 C"L"C issue% Resolution No* ,4+,3 prescriing t$e rules an% regulations on t$e /an%ator %rug testing of can%i%ates for pulic office in connection wit$ t$e a 103 2004 snc$roni9e% national an% local elections* A6uilino Pi/entel3 :r*3 a senator an% a can%i%ate for re; election in t$e a elections3 file% a Petition for Certiorari an% Pro$iition un%er Rule ,5* n it3 $e seeoin t$e C"L"C fro/ i/ple/enting Resolution No* ,4+,* Accor%ing to Pi/entel3 t$e Constitution onl prescries a /a?i/u/ of five (5. 6ualifications for one to e a can%i%ate for3 electe% to3 an% e a /e/er of t$e Senate* @e sas t$at ot$ t$e Congress an% C"L"C3 re6uiring3 via RA 1,5 an% Resolution No* ,4+,3 a senatorial aspirant3 a/ong ot$er can%i%ates3 to un%ergo a /an%ator %rug test3 create an a%%itional 6ualification t$at all can%i%ates for senator /ust first e certifie% as %rug free* @e a%%s t$at t$ere is no provision in t$e Constitution aut$ori9ing t$e Congress or C"L"C to e?pan% t$e 6ualification re6uire/ents of can%i%ates for senator* ISSUE: $et$er or not Sec -, of RA 1,5 an% Resolution ,4+, are constitutional* HELD: No* Pi/entel8s contention is vali%* Accor%ingl3 Sec* -, of RA 1,5 is unconstitutional* t is asic t$at if a law or an a%/inistrative rule violates an nor/ of t$e Constitution3 t$at issuance is null an% voi% an% $as no effect* !$e Constitution is t$e asic law to w$ic$ all laws /ust confor/= no act s$all e vali% if it conflicts wit$ t$e Constitution* n t$e %isc$arge of t$eir %efine% functions3 t$e t$ree %epart/ents of govern/ent $ave no c$oice ut to iel% oe%ience to t$e co//an%s of t$e Constitution* $atever li/its it i/poses /ust e oserve%*
!$e provision BnDo person electe% to an pulic office s$all enter upon t$e %uties of $is office until $e $as un%ergone /an%ator %rug testE is not tenale as it enlarges t$e 6ualifications* C"L"C cannot3 in t$e guise of enforcing an% a%/inistering election laws or pro/ulgating rules an% regulations to i/ple/ent Sec* -,3 vali%l i/pose 6ualifications on can%i%ates for senator in a%%ition to w$at t$e Constitution prescries* f Congress cannot re6uire a can%i%ate for senator to /eet suc$ a%%itional 6ualification3 t$e C"L"C3 to e sure3 is also wit$out suc$ power* !$e rig$t of a citi9en in t$e %e/ocratic process of election s$oul% not e %efeate% unwarrante% i/positions of re6uire/ent not ot$erwise specifie% in t$e Constitution*