Halaguena vs Pal, Labor Relations Law case digest. see theoverroad.wordpress.com for more.
digest corp lawFull description
Labor Law Case
Descrição completa
G.R. No. 134887, July 27, 2006 Immunity of State from SuitFull description
Descripción completa
Description complète
SSp 654
itroductin
Deskripsi lengkap
creditFull description
case digest
pFull description
DIGEST
G.R. No. L-48928 Case of MITA PARDO DE TAVERA vs. PHILIPPINE TUBERCULOSIS SOCIETY, INC.Full description
Transportation Law ReveiwerFull description
digest
admin digest
a
W.G. W.G. Philpotts Philpotts vs. Philippine Manufacturing Co. Co. Facts: The petitioner seeks to compel the respondent to permit the plaintif in person or an authorized agent/ attorney to inspect and examine the records o the business transacted by the company. company. Issue: Whether the right to inspect the records can be exercised by a proper agent or attorney o the stockholder as well as the stockholder Held: YE. The right o inspection gi!en to a stockholder can be exercised either by himsel or by any proper representati!e or atty"in"act# and either with or without the attendance o the stockholder. stockholder. $%& What a man may do in person# he may do through another. another. The right o inspection to stockholders o corporations are to be liberally construed and that said right may be exercised through any other properly authorized person.