Best physics books for IIT JEE, AIPMT and PMT preparation authored by Pradeep Agarwal. This physics books for IIT JEE in two volumes is a comprehensive textbook that helps and guides student…Full description
Descrição: Numerical Methods in Chemical Enginnering.
Numerical Methods in Chemical Enginnering.Descripción completa
Distributed Operating Systems
Distributed Operating Systems
Distributed Operating Systems
Dr. Pradeep Peiris’ essay is on why the optimism about the progress towards meaningful reconciliation should be tempered with critical political analysis. Dr. Peiris’ reflections highlight the chal...Full description
Vijayadas Pradeep: I would like to clear the following doubt on Rasi drishti before proceeding to Graha Drishti. 1) How is Rasi drishti working? 2) What akes !hara and "thira aspect each other #Wh$ is the ad%acent sign a&oided 'certain angle is a ust for drishti)? () If planets are not present in Rasis undergoing Rasi drishti do such drishtis ha&e an$ effect? *) !an Rasi drishti be u ni&ersall$ applied? Sreenadh: I a not that failiar with Rasi Drishti and its application. I in&ite other learned eber to coent on +Rasi Drishti+ suppl$ing rele&ant ,uotes as well. Panditji: I a of the opinion that Rishis entioned -bha&a-. he$ did also ention rashis. Is /ha&a and rashi 'sign) one and the sae thing? I do not subscribe to cople0 di&ision of houses for the reasons of siplicit$ and like bha&a kundali with e,ual house di&isions eaning each with a (#degree span. "o soe grahas will change bha&as. he rashi kundali is used onl$ fro chandra 'oon). "o when I look at the kundali fro chandra lagna I call that rashi kundali and here onl$ sign positions are taken into account and it is sign 3 bha&a. 4ooking at kundali fro lagna I call it bha&a kundali and here the grahas do sift signs based on their degrees &is a &is lagna degree. Sreenadh: I don- find an$ stateent in support of considering Rasi and /ha&a as separate entities in te0ts before 1th centur$. /ut I do find stateents that support considering Rasi and /ha&a as one and the sae entities with the onl$ difference that Rasis starts fro 5ries and /ha&as starts fro 4agna. I support and agree with $ou point $ou raised 6 7Is /ha&a and rashi 'sign) one and the sae thing?89 I would sa$ $es the$ are. . :;ditor< hen =inita =inita referred to "an%a$ Rath and ">! school of thought connected with the use of the /H"@>aiini /H"@>aiini concept of Rashi drishti and the discussion branched to becae a criticis of ">! school of astrological thoughtA Vinita: Buote +I a not that failiar with Rasi Drishti and its application.+ Cn,uote I too wasnt till I got to hear "an%a$ Rath%i in the last 5tri 5tri class. Rasi drishti is e0plained in !hapter E of /H" which u ust alread$ be aware of. Fne of its applications according to >aiini "utra is in D#. 5ccording to this "utra Rasi drishti is to be seen to find the
connection with karakas. or instance the connection with etu through Rasi drishti indicates the path for oksha. Jou could perhaps listen to the ( audio of "an%a$%i-s class to understand one of the applications of Rasi drishti.
he other &er$ beautiful thing I found about the lecture was the intro to =edic =edic Kuerolog$ where the generation of nubers was copared to the wheels within the slot achine. Its &er$ e0hilarating to think that each one of us could ha&e a uni,ue nuber generated b$ the GR;5 I; "4F 5!HIK;. Sreenadh: Buote I a not that failiar with Rasi Drishti and its application. Cn,uote he reason behind was soething e lse. hat is Rasi drishti is not at all discussed in other schools of astrolog$ e0cept b$ arasara and >aiini. I was ore interested in the 5rsha >ain 'Garga) Ja&ana Ja&ana "chools of thought than Ja&ana arasara and >aiini for long 6 he reason being that the first 2 still reain une0plored. he new re&i&al strea is after arasara >aiini and others will e0plore it. It is work sharing. 5nd $ field sees to be different. arasara puts forward an$ new ethods # but let us first ha&e a clear idea of the ethods that were in use before hi. Jes Jes the fact that h e i0ed se&eral ideas of Ja&anachar$a with the true Indian s$ste holds e back to an e0tend. /ut $es he was greatL I don-t know uch about +>aiini s$ste+ and that too sees to be different fro the original strea # and I a still in doubt to what e0tend we can appreciate the i0ing of different streas@schools streas@schools of thought. Kow coing to "an%a$ Rath I appreciate his efforts and recentl$ got his book +!ru0 of =edic 5strolog$+ and $et $et to go through itit in detail. I appreciate his efforts efforts in bring into light the &arious dasa s$stes. /ut for that he sees to depend too uch on +>ataka ari%ata+ of recent origin. his te0t +>ataka ari%ata+ b$ +=id$a nadha suri+ is considered as a poetical elaboration of the concepts put forward in +=araha +=araha Hora+. /ut an$ of the concepts put forward in this te0t ++>ataka ari%ata+ does not find authentic classical support and to add an$ are +against+ the classical ideasL his is a te0t that should be approached onl$ with care # but still an appreciable and worth$ te0t. I a totall$ against the di&isional chart concept and its absurd e0planations put forward b$ "an%a$ Rath. he$ find no support fro classics and it sees that he is intentionall$ tr$ing to isinterpret the slokas as far as di&isional charts are concerned. Jes Jes It is his efforts on e0plaining &arious dasa s$stes that should be &alued than that funn$ 'since no classics supports it) di&isional charts concept which cae into light fro nowhere. I a stating this onl$ on the basing of ha&ing a passing &iew of his book + !ru0 of =edic astrolog$+. Jes but I should add that it is worth$ book for reading which gi&es a new outlook for the astrolog$ students and learners. I appreciate this. It sees that it is the period of renaissance for astrolog$. 4et it be !handra Hari =R "an%a$ Rath or our huble efforts # it is cau sing a new out look to eerge. Jes Jes this list is &ast a n ew thought and an inno&ati&e idea %oining hand in this tide e&er$ oent.
"< an$ tides a$ clash each other e0changing energ$ or causing change of direction to an$ others. /ut the$ are all tides for sure. 4et us &alue the beaut$ of e&er$ tide we see around us.
Vinita: I wish $ou and others on this foru good luck in $our e0plorations. 5s 5s for e I get too uch daunted b$ this ocean of knowledge and all the wa&es.....I would like to %ust stand b$ and watch the pla$....hopi pla$....hoping ng that things would connect an$wa$....e&en without the knowledge @ %$otishati.
I forgot to add one point. Jou said< Buote Rasi drishti is to be seen to find the connection with karakas. or instance the connection with etu through Rasi drishti indicates the path for oksha. Cn,uote he point that instantaneousl$ originated in $ ind is that we ha&en-t $et discussed the point +How karakatwas 'significance) are considered?+ or +How significance of &arious things gets associated with planets+. he iportant point is< +5n$ planet can be a karaka for an$thing 'as per placeent)+L he sloka that instantaneousl$ coes to $ ind is 6
+5dhipa sar&a bha&ana karaka parikeertita+ eaning the lord of an$ house is significator for all the things indicated b$ that house. House and sign are the sae. "o it eans that that planet becoes the significator for e&er$thing indicated b$ that sign as wellL 5s told earlier "ignificance is assigned to 6 1) "igns 2) Houses *) Kakshatras () lanets 4et us take the ,uestion who is &id$a karaka? e is &id$a karaka >u is &id$a karaka "a is &id$a karaka especiall$ related to san$asa "u is &id$a karaka since sun represents ata o is &id$akaraka since o represents ind a is &id$akaraka especiall$ related to weapons etc. 5n$ 5n$ one can e0tend it and we would be in trouble if we are tr$ing to assign &id$a karakatwa to a single planet aloneL he sae is the situation when we are tr$ing to locate 5ta karaka and oksha karaka as wellL "o I a against the copartentaliMation copartentaliMation is karakatwas and let us be fle0ible in such issues as we are dealing with a sub%ect that follows holistic ethod. In this light if we are looking at 6
1) 5takaraka itr karaka etc concept 'arasara@>aiini) 'arasara@>aiini) 2) 5ssigning special fi0ed karakas to houses () "ahaas concept 'orgi&e $ ignorance # who coined that word?) 6 which as per classical astrolog$ is tered +"phuta Joga+ Joga+ 6 which associates a single thing with special longitudinal degrees. What should be our &iew? 5ll 5ll these are inno&ati&e ethods and should be appreciated. /ut are the$ part of the original strea of thought? I in&ite all to shed ore light on the issues in&ol&ed.
"< We should disuses the ,uestion +In how an$ ethods significance could get associated to a planet?- in detail. hat is also part of the basics. =inita %i thanks for the inforation shared and $ regards to "an%a$ %i as well. orgi&e $ ignorance # but I a $et to learn in detail /H" and >aiini sutra. Fr it is better to sa$ I a failiar with /H" to an e0tend 'at least about the concepts discussed in /H" that are in line with the con&entional astrolog$) but ha&e no idea about >aiini sutra till now. I should turn $ attention in those directions as well # but before that itself uch work to do in other areas. Vinita: In the fina finall tier er I supp suppos ose e e&er e&er$ $thing hing erg erges. es. "o what hat is the pur purpose pose of copartentaliMation copartentaliMation whether it is bha&as grahas arakatwas or whate&er... whate&er...
"oebod$ copared the different s$stes of astrolog$ to the different s$stes that work on coputers. ;ach works fine and independentl$ of the other and gi&es the desired result.
When I read about the predictions for raod aha%an the thought crossed $ ind that e&en e&en with with diffe differen rence ce of one $ear in the date of birth birth @ lagna lagna etc. the predi predicti ctions ons con&erged....not %ust of the deise but the life profile tooLLL
;ach person had &er$ con&incing reasons for the prediction. 'How con&incing I a no one to %udge because I know nothing of the sub%ect). a$be we should not i0 up s$stes because then we will get &er$ i0ed up results. ;ach branch of knowledge can shine on its own perhaps.
Sreenadh: Buote In the final tier I suppose e&er$thing erges. "o what is the purpose of copartentaliMation copartentaliMation whether it is bha&as grahas arakatwas or whate&er... whate&er...
Cn,uote Jes $ou are right. /ut the point is +ind can FK4J deal with classifications+ and so there is no other wa$ but to copartentaliMe. /ut it leads to the thought that e&er$ copartent 'or parts of the s$ste) is water proof and is not at all connected with the other. Where us whole does not ha&e an$ copartentaliMation@classification copartentaliMation@classification at allLL he is reason for $ stateent I a against copartentaliMation but fro the abo&e $ou could see that e 'or an$ one) ha&e to resort to classifications and copartentaliMation to an e0tend. here is no other wa$L It is the wa$ the ind works so we ha&e no escapeL It is soething like tr$ing to ha&e a grasp of the thing be$ond the s$ste fro within the s$ste 'or b$ using the s$ste) itself. "ince the s$ste is also part of the be$ond. It is again where the frae of reference coes into consideration.
Buote< a$be we should not i0 up s$stes because then we will get &er$ i0ed up results. Cn,uote he sae reasons for copartentaliMation applies here as well. 4et us stud$ the parts and then tr$ to get the total &iew and resol&e the +Wh$?+s. Ftherwise we will get unnecessaril$ confused. hat is wh$ +not i0ing the s$stes+ becoes iportant. Buote ;ach branch of knowledge can shine on its own perhaps. Cn,uote Jes Jes ;ach branch of knowledge can shine on its own. 5nd it can shine together onl$ in the hands of a person who is the true aster of all s$stesL ;&en those Rishis ne&er argued that the$ are aster of all and better than allL Jou Jou are e0actl$ on the cru0L Panditji: Fne thing =inita%i said caught $ e$e. Buote ;&en with a difference of one $ear the predictions con&erged e&en life profile. Cn,uote Fne will realiMe &er$ soon in this sub%ect that once the e&ent is known or the facts are known an$thing can be %ustified seen and e&en portra$ed as ob&ious. he odern da$ reliance on di&isions as di&isional charts $riads of dasas without understanding of how to appl$ the has copletel$ essed up a ll the things e&en ore. eople who introduce new paraeters soe with a classical reference interpreted to one-s con&enience and soe in&ented paraeters9 it is not too difficult to see 5KJ known e&ent in 5KJ chart. It will not surprise e if /ill Gates- Dhana Jogas Jogas are seen in $ chart if $ chart was presented as a authentic chart of /ill gates. ost $our own chart here and sa$ it belongs to latest newsakers and be assured that e&er$thing will be seen in that chart. he best %$otishi is one who uses tie#tested principles and applies the consistentl$ and if he fails in predictions atleast he has a foundation to go back to and refine his understanding. If one chases after new in&entions in %$otish there is no pra$er of e&er aking correct p redictions. !oing back to r. aha%an-s chart soeone shot at close range :;ditor< He is hinting at K Raos and adhu Kairs predictionsA there were onl$ three outcoes possible Death Reco&er$ with ipairent or full reco&er$. reco&er$. he third option with seriousness of the e&ent was reote. "o all one had to do was look at the latest reports and o&e in that direction. It is funn$ how a few predicted reco&er$ :;ditor< :;ditor< he is hinting at "an%a$ Raths predictionA after star news reported that things are ipro&ing. 5n 5n e&ent whose probabilit$ was N#N or at worst ((#((#(( does one reall$ need %$otish?
If soeone had predicted to hi that there is danger to his life before the e&ent I call it prediction9 rest is an e0ercise in futilit$. Vijayadas Pradeep: Buote It sees that $ou are speaking about +Rashi Drishti+ although $ou are using the wordings -for a Graha to influence-. Cn,uote Jou Jou are right I was pointing to Rashi drishti #though using --for a Graha to influence--. I feel as $ou ha&e said later in the ail Grahas placed in !hara Rashi ha&e a relation or necessit$ to interact with "thira and &ice#&ersa. his is a fi0ed aspect concerned with the nature of a Rashi. It is like one indi&idual sub%ected to specific circustances ha&ing a desire@need to interact with one fro another background. his has soething to do with the fundaentals of astrolog$ s$ste 'Wh$ !hara should aspect "thira). "oe reason is there behind the repetiti&e pattern of a) chara@sthira@ubha$a then again !hara b)Dharaa@5rtha@aa@oksha b)Dharaa@5rtha@aa@oksha c)ire@earth@water@air c)ire@earth@water@air etc. Buote hose stateents contradict. /$ the first stateent $ou are accepting that +Drishti is -related to- angle between planets@rashis+. Cn,uote Regarding angles I feel I was not clear enough # hough !hara aspects onl$ "thira it does not aspect the "thira ne0t to it. It eans it is not %ust the nature '!hara@"thira) '!hara@"thira) but the angle also atters for an aspect. hus for Rashi drishti the nature of rashis fors the basis but the basic rule of an angle is also needed for the grahas placed in those rashis. 5s Cbha$a rashis can can aspect onl$ Cbha$a Cbha$a rashis the ,uestion ,uestion of angle does not arise. he$ are in endras. 5ngle is the basic criterion. Graha decides Graha drishti while nature of the Rashi decides Rashi drishti. 5s $ou ha&e rightl$ rightl$ said these concepts concepts are alread$ incorporated incorporated if we we use all the paraeters like nature of rashi ale#feale dhara@artha enit$ enit$ a&sthas of planets etc etc. I feel progression of Rashisha&e links with the process of "rishti#"thiti#"ahara "rishti#"thiti#"ahara '!reation#"ustaining#Destructi '!reation#"ustaining#Destruction). on). Rashi drishti should be studied onl$ when we use tiing patterns based on Rashi &iM#Rashi dashas. hanks for the &aluable points gi&ing direction to our studies. Sreenadh:
We cannot be sure whether -Drishti- eans -relati&e angle between planets- or not. Ha&e a look at the ,uestion of 5r%un %i. We don-t know the e0act logic behind special Drishtis. ill ill we understand it we can not be sure what Drishti is although we can teporaril$ we can accept the definition -Graha Drishti is relati&e signs the planets influence fro the sign of their placeent-. /ut $es it does not look perfect. /ut till we e0plore the logic behind -"pecial Drishti- etc I don-t think we ha &e another choice. 5ccepting the definition definition -Drishti -Drishti eans relati&e relati&e angle between planets- planets- is a definition definition that has e0istence onl$ after "ripati and supporting it will bring to front the whole absurdit$ of considering sign and house separatel$ separatel$ calculating drishti percentage for all degrees etc. "o think twice before resorting to soe definitions concerning -Drishti-.
"< It takes tie for the stone fallen into the deep well to produce a sound. "o is the ind of the wise person. "o is the info that falls into the ind of the wise. He patientl$ waits long enough before foring conclusions and spells the out. "o please don-t %up into conclusions. Vijayadas Pradeep: hanks for the tips. 5s $ou ha&e rightl$ said it is unwise to reach fast conclusions. We will keep it open.
Kow regarding ,uestion fro 5r%un %i # "oe onths back i had attepted the astronoical angle of this in >$otish group site.
Iagine $ou are standing near a Huge /all. Jour &isibilit$ is %ust on the surface facing $ou. "un@ "un@e erc rcur ur$@ $@=e =enu nus s are are clos close e to eart earth h and and with within in the the inner inner circ circle le #asp #aspec ecti ting ng Oth Oth house'abhiukha).Fnce $ou start o&ing backwards &isibilit$ increases. /$ aspect sages are onl$ considering oorna 'coplete@full) drishti 'including special aspects). hus utual disposition between ;arth@ars gi&es ars to aspect *@E houses apart fro Oth.
Kow think think of >upite >upiterr # o&ing o&ing furthe furtherr back back #It #It gi&es gi&es a possi possibil bilit$ it$ for tangen tangenti tial al aspect aspects s Nth@th.hus $ou see the position of >upiter is the best position to get a general@broad o&er&iew of atters.
Kow think of "aturn # o&ing backwards # tr$ drawing tangential lines as if the$ are coing
fro a torch # the angle of &iew narrows# aspecting ( P 1.Wh$ the aspect is on 1th and not on 11th can be based on the utual disposition and angle@tilt.
Kow wh$ the$ are positioned like this. I feel the$ ha&e a role to pla$ on the said houses. hus astronoical positioning is %ust the pro%ection of siilar aspects within us. :;ditor< he thread stopped and none cae forward with new ideas to e0plain QRashi Drishti and the possib possible le logic logic behind behind the sae. sae. he ,uestion ,uestions s raised raised b$ =i%a$ =i%a$ada adas s rade radeep ep %i reained un#resol&ed e&en though soe knowledge sharing happenedA
