Vda. de Bautista vs. Marcos

J UN

30

Vd a.DeBa us t i s t av .Ma r c os ,G. R.No .L 17 072( Oc t o be r31 ,1 961 )Ca s e Di g es t Own er s h i p>Own er s h i pi nGe Ge ne r a l>Ri g ht sofa nOwn er>Us e ,Po s s es s i o n,F r u i t san dDi s p os i t i o n Fa ct s : Mar c osobt ai n edal oa nf r om Baut i s t ase cu r e dbyamo mor t g ageofanunr egi s t er edpar c el ofl an d.I twa st ol as t f o r3y ea r san dt h ep os s es s i o no ft h el a ndmo r t g ag edwa st ob et u r n edo v ert oBa ut i s t ab ywa yofu su f r u ct . Mar c osfi l edanappl i c at i onf ort hei s s uan ceofaf r e ep at ento v ert hel and.Thef r eep at entwa si s s uedt oher a ndt h el a ndwa sr e gi s t e r e di nh ern ame . Mar c oswa sunabl et opa yhe rd ebtt oBaut i s t as ot hel at t erfi l edf ort hef or ec l os ur eofhe rmor t g ageont hel and gi v enasas ec ur i t y . I s s ue: Whe t herorno tBaut i s t acanf or ec l o set hel andma madeasase cur i t yf ort hedebt . He l d : No ,t h emo r t g ag ei sv o i dan di n eff ec t i v ebe c au s eMa r c o swa sno ty e tt h eo wn ero ft h el a ndwh ent h emo r t g ag e wa se x e c ut e d.He n c e,Ma r c o sc o ul dno te n c umb ert h es a met me oBa ut i s t a . Nei t herc oul dt hes ubs equentac qui s i t i onb yMar c osoft i t l eo ve rt hel a ndt hr ought hei s s uanc eofaf r e ep at ent v al i dat eandl eg al i z et hemo mor t g agesi nc eup ont hei s s uanc eoft hesai dpat ent ,t hel an dwasbr oughtun dert he oper at i onsoft hePubl i cLandLawt hatpr ohi bi t st het ak i ngofs ai dl andf ort hes at i s f ac t i onofdebt scont r ac t ed pr i ort ot hee xpi r at i onof5y ear sf r om t hei s suanc eoft hepat ent . Ma r c o sh adp os s es s or yr i g ht so v ert h el a ndbe f o r et h et i t l ewa sv e s t e di nh ern ame ,a ndt h es ep os s es s or y r i ght sc oul dval i dl ybet r ans f er r edt oBaut i s t a,asMa Mar c osdi di nt hedeedofmor t gage.