school base assessment test form is designed to help teachers prepare for the oral discussion with their students.Full description
Boleh digunakan untuk mengisi markah ULBS English Form 5.Full description
Carta Organisasi Ulbs 2018Full description
Descripción: Inteligencia de negocios
Descripción: Film scoring (slides)
Film scoring (slides)
Descripción completa
Inteligencia de negocios
Young Schema Questioannaire Scoring Sheet
ForensikFull description
Full description
ForensikDeskripsi lengkap
Test GHQFull description
Young Schema Questioannaire Scoring Sheet
scoringDeskripsi lengkap
MSDT Scoring
Contoh Penghitungan Skor MSDTFull description
ULBS (BI) SCORING Marks are awarded on a scale of 1 - 6 for each construct. Thus, the maximum score obtainable is 30 while the minimum is 5 for each assessment. The assessors are required to use the following bands and criteria for assessment. Marks will be awarded in 5 bands: Excellent Good Satisfactory Weak Very Weak
6 4–5 3 2 1
The following is a detailed description of the criteria for assessment: Score
Excellent 6
Good 4-5
Co nst ruc t
Criteria / Description
1
Speak / converse on a topic effectively (with appropriate response)
● Excellent ability to speak / converse / hold a discussion on a topic effectively ● Relevant and appropriate responses given (for Models 2, 3, 4)
2
Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation
● Very fluent and clear speech ● Correct and clear pronunciation with excellent articulation, intonation, word stress and rhythm
3
Speak coherently
● Effective and smooth flow of well-organised ideas
4
Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context
● Excellent use of language in terms of extensive vocabulary ● Interesting expressions used appropriately and effectively
5
Speak using correct grammar ● Excellent sentence structure and grammatically correct sentences to convey intended meaning effectively
1
Speak / converse on a topic effectively (with appropriate response)
● Good ability to speak / converse / hold a discussion on a topic effectively ● Mostly relevant and appropriate responses given (for Models 2, 3, 4)
2
Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation
● Fluent and clear speech ● Correct and clear pronunciation with good articulation, intonation, word stress and rhythm
3
Speak coherently
● Smooth flow of well-organised ideas
4
Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context
● Good use of language in terms of extensive vocabulary ● Interesting expressions used appropriately
5
Speak using correct grammar ● Good sentence structure and grammatically correct sentences to convey intended meaning
Satisfactory 3
Weak 2
Very Weak 1
1
Speak / converse on a topic effectively (with appropriate response)
● Satisfactory ability to speak / converse / hold a discussion on a topic ● Some relevant and appropriate responses given (for Models 2, 3, 4)
2
Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation
● Fairly fluent and clear speech ● Generally satisfactory pronunciation, intonation, word stress and rhythm with frequent lapses
3
Speak coherently
● Satisfactory flow and organization of ideas
4
Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context
● Satisfactory use of language ● Fair range of vocabulary
5
Speak using correct grammar ● Satisfactory sentence structure with some grammatical errors but meaning is fairly clear
1
Speak / converse on a topic effectively (with appropriate response)
● Limited ability to speak / converse / hold a discussion on a topic ● Very few relevant and appropriate responses given (for Models 2, 3, 4)
2
Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation
● Fluency is interrupted by consistent halting and long pauses ● Frequent errors in pronunciation, intonation and word stress
3
Speak coherently
● Minimal flow and organization of ideas
4
Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context
● Minimal use of language ● Limited vocabulary
5
Speak using correct grammar ● Poor sentence structure with consistent grammatical errors which disrupt meaning
1
Speak / converse on a topic effectively (with appropriate response)
● Little ability to speak / converse / hold a discussion on a topic ● Hardly any response
2
Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation
● Very little utterance ● Poor pronunciation and intonation
3
Speak coherently
● Hardly any flow and organization of ideas
4
Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context
● Hardly any use of language
5
Speak using correct grammar ● Excessive grammatical errors