TO
HE
RD
U TU TU R
OF N A T O
by
GEOR GE ORGE GE SO SORO RO
ve
er
1993 TH
pr parati
fo
he NA
anuary 1994 th tiative nt
al nd
Pa tn
of
ad al
ac wa
ff r-
rg m e
ar
12
No
13 confer
mocra
s p on s or e
j o in t
nt ra
European
op ounci vers
g h o f h a t c o n ve r sa tio
he Comi Conceptual Framework Theo
of Revolutionar Cl se
Re wa
ep es nt
u b e qu e tl
vi ed
m y p e o na l
ws
Di gn si no
of th cti
c on s n su s o f h e p a icipa ts. reali
is
Clinton
t o R us si a
NATO
ew in
ac
Pa er
en
nnin
Administr
FUTURE
my
Partnershi
wi
Re
Part
Problem
EO
OROS
Fo Peac -of Econom
Change
..
OW RD TH
TH
CO
IN
EW
FUTURE OF
WORL
ec
diametricall
as om to vyin fo
oppose
ca
th
overne
ee
ased
he stoo fo
ut
ot
te
ca io ally it
ides voided
ad th
ca acit
all-
co
to an ihil te th
ictories ut they ha
iv
th
to fall
id
migh have endangered one' ow survival Th prevailin as called th er
ol
ar
obilized fo
orld an
na
as ap
ec us
ar battle line were draw
internal conflict
ithi
they
he global conflict
loca co flicts
as os ible to core loca th
ha
ie
al th
beca se each id
ot er
sinc th en
principles of social organization an
to actual fighti
fr ntatio
en
orld domination
ta et ee
TO
orld orde that prevaile
rl
on tw superpower
ORDER:
DISORDER
is clea that th of th
ORL
each ca
order
both ides
throughout th er
kept frozen
by th external threat Th collaps of th ment
Undoubtedl
directly responsibl been
isted
ovie empire wa an internal develop-
external pressure played fo th
role bu wa no
collapse otherwise, it woul
Bu that internally-generate
revolutionar
have even
ha also change th prevailin world order. ll this is le
it
fa fr
clea
th ti
it
occurred It caught most of th participants unaware. This is true of th leadership
November
1993 by Th
Tel: 212/757-2323
So os Founda ions
Fax 212/974-0367
ithi
th
ovie
nion bu even mo
rbac ev scious that their nterna reform in ee
they
er
lookin
to
nd
is team
ould change th fu
re
on
orld order;
am ntal change in th rela
ship be wee na tran oreign
ucc
inistr
squar part
th superpow
rm
th hin
th
ful nl part
wo uperpo mak it rs acts
allianc be
re ime
hin rn
It
re
to pa up
as
ion
arrears
nl
th nd
fin
ept
owers mpires ar br
d,
ov
no concepti
ll
lac
au
i v lr today
king
es
internationa task forc fo creating an open th 1988 an
cto in he Sovie
th it
as appalled by th lack ofclarity an
th inabilit to
implement anything tha characterize the proceedings ents coul Western leade
ip
ha
take
ie Unio
ld no
Gorbache
to produc
perestroik
coul
av
some positi
work
ol
ar
in th
ee
that
it
t o l at e --
is is ot ju is
come from workin is concer
that
rbac ev
as en
si gen
st tes, or
fu
amenta
la
th prevailing orde br
ti
ll re
ow
ubt re
gnize
co olutionar
li
th
nized
Indeed it is
empi
cannot help bein
the Western
idel
rl have
ps cha
ople in th form
of th revolution
been
ut
viet
ectly affected. Th Foreign
th former SovietUnion di produc some ne it
ur
ta
develo
prevail
thin
as rendered irrelevant by subsequent events bu
Department ha done practicall
Unle
in
eo le in
in
ve
th
is
ig or d. awar
lution,
Ministr
sinc th
ew fr
ne
thin in
ference, th worl
econ
orld
ar
al
orde that
likely to be followed by
orld disorder.
CO
elay in regi te in hich
Th Stat Departmen ta
states bu
events
stem
EPTUA
at leas it co ld
of un er ta di
with fals premises
th th
this itua-
that peop
n; that is
th
ag
ietempir is no proper or al
it
ed
ed tobe states
characteristic of revolution
houl
FRAMEWORK
like to pu before ou
terms
th
We
no pene
as to late
er to d. er
to
that
Even today, th co apse ofthe chan e.
if ic lt to
alliance simply di
leader hi im
be argued that it
ofwha wa goin on
re
ut th id
uinely seekin both assistance an tr te into th
ifferent course if th
comprehensio
ught into exisas states
or dealing
So ie empi
exp rience becaus
wo uper
la ion hip bet ee
unders
ell
ex tin states nd
ualif
on
th know this from person
as
es all
re tionship with
or we
ow
nce tual framewor
it nv
is th
en the
th
differ nt
io
full
ar
ch
control ac om-
ol
no approp at
ence
plis
ly
during th
th United
or
plan in ee
appropri
th
that We er
vestm nt,
re
ee
ed that
ncep lu
th
labora ed
nited
titution
ne
Nation
as prope
to orge
nter th
bureaucra
oul
orkabl
th
fo eign polic wa th
ew th nking" th
Co ac ev's co cept
akin
rememb
th So
pe es roika an
th so call
ey to
houl
ha
as
se
tw ma
co po ents
refer
lutionar
betw
is
nn
th
conceptual framew ca
unde stood
th or ofhistory
change an
osed soci ties
conn ct th
situ ti
th oth he tw
it is
in as
pa ticular isti ctio
lement ar inte
hare th same philosophical foundat ons -- but strong
stingu sh
betwee
open an
closed societies, as Karl
oppe di
an insigh into th proces of revolutionary change an sibl to us my theory ofhistory
ithou introducin
of open an closed societie as
ysel have done in
in financia
ar ets. But, at th presen
pu forwar ould take
or than
it is
full
fe
th concepts
generalization
it
of economi theory perfect competition, efficien
markets, the discounting of futur expectations, are relevan
dealings
revealing
conceptual framewor
thin
it is po
safely neglected. It is in thes conditions that th timelessly vali
Bu ther ar times when th discrepanc betwee
omen in history, find
the combination of the tw elements particularl
dation
ithout
ty
percep
te
convergence.
thes occasi ns th course of events follow
some trepi-
ev lo
ther it
inutes to propound it properly But
far
ib
ti
th
changelessness or rigidity on th on hand an
changeabilit
or
instability on the other. an
ee
ep atedly
rp is
iffere
it is ro
th wa most people thin
ri id
THEORY OF REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE
theo understandin fe
istory is ased
of th
Th
orld in
ch
inca
th reco
ga betwee
ti
live is inherently imper-
ie give
th actual stat of affair an
that discrepanc
provide the key to understanding the course ofhistory Ther ar times when th discrepanc ther
ie
is
tendency to ards convergenc
th actual tate
affair
is th ca
people's en
Th progressiv
er occurrin
real y,wit
orld continue to evolve
ge ce at as
ti
orld and, becaus
ities. In thes near-equilibrium conditions, th
discrepanc
does
987is
of th larg diver-
ofrapid change events spun ou ofcontrol There
catastrophic acceleration in th pace of events an
climax
as
er ap
is impossible to foretell ho
fa it
ea in lo ly th
ic
lackhole to ro
th re an
brea
et each ay go
it
have been
little
th
ig t, ct
th
blac hole that finall ay
hich brin people's thinking in line with practical possibil
absolutely no
collapse of th Soviet system afte
in th real
to work
as highly
as an enormous
le
e-
vailing institution ar flexible enough so that they ca be adjust
as extremel
So iety itself Ye ther
the drifte further apar as th outsid
isinte rati
is relatively minor, betwee
odificatio
revailin do ma
an
discrepancy between the partic
good exampl of th
tendency fo th tw of them to come closer together If anything
ir
becaus th actual stat of affair is no independentl
an
of
tali wa
th Bolshevi dogm
to inactivity
fact ar create by ou de sions. There can be no correspondence
Therefore,there must alway be
bl
regu
ehav to ac withou full knowledg ofthe factsbecause th
pants' thinking an
ovie system unde
firs kind of extreme, wher
that in retrospect this
in
convince
th
is
ible
ay have proved to be th turnin
poin in
th proces of disintegration bu it is also possible that it wa only ta
no infl ence th course ofevents to an grea extent an it ca be course.
ts
have
ad
specia stud
of thes conditions of dynam-
ic disequilibrium both in th financia market an ti gs
fi
th
/b
in othe se
attern that is co
market also very helpfu in understandin
in fi ancial
th rise an
fall ofthe
te
basis of imperfect understanding recognitio
of this principl
Open soci close soci
closed society,ther is an authorit ultimate truth; open societ if
te
tate isno
nate by th state.
it
enia
such authorit
th
ased
og
an
ig ty societ is
do
hegovernmen is electe by th people an it
he most im orta
in
an to ou
ende
an
ak abou th
ne-dir ctio al
also characterize
prevailing tren
/b roce
patter ut it is
by discontinuities.
is
in
it minority opinions.
en thin th distin tion betwee
ha is to say,a
ca be reversed at an time indeed an eventual
tr
e. Indeed in th
financia
arkets fo ever
pa tern that become full developed,
grea many ar aborte
in
tu
th
/b
is
te
th
nd behavi
to
ha
in
circ
tances
olicie
ic
have been appropriate in th earl stages ar ineffectiv or
co nter ro
ctiv
especially
he
anot er
is ca
er
people do no recogniz
near equilibrium an fa from equilibriu
is rienti g,
distinctio
betwee
ie
In
closed society,on particular poin of
is
in
ie
is
ea
th
an
hile
th grante
in
nder ta
ture cann
useful to ra
eties. Th distinctio
curr nt
istincti is base
it atio et ee
ta
la
comple structur of institutions on to of it
capabl of producin
wealth prosperity an
volv if th
progress Th struc-
ro er fo ndatio
ar
issi
an
it
can collapse if the foundations are disturbed
Th
to th second part ofmy conceptual fram th
ta
an builds
conditions
CLOSED SOCIETIE
hi brings er
recogniz is
an open society,every itize is both allowe
ired to av
DIAGNOSI OPEN AN
work
ng
closed society may expend practically all its energies on maintain
Events happen so fast that it is very difficul to adjust one' thin woul
ar distin
open societ is both more desirabl an more vulnerable
densed in
an
prevails; bu
nd re
is
ol
ovie system asjus on particular form of closed soci
cl se
vie ta
than th
an th freeworld becaus it allows us
more advanced more sophisti ated form of social organization th
that it is asymmetrica
communis
im
boom/bus
the early stages
open an closed societiesis
more revealin in th presen situatio tio betwee
/b
to se th adv
In
hich is th dispense of th
does no recogniz
th
tate
uncritically
an
onte pe
that it is
communis an
nd closed oc
on th same philosophica founda
tion as my theory of history, namely that participan
ac
th
OF TH
PRESEN
SITUATIO
ovie system wa as om
universa closed societ becaus
universa dogma. is
as ly
og
ut th system ha broken
iswell an
tr ly ea
ages of th breakdow
er th
ransition required
ajor effort on th part oft
freeworl
an th effort
wa no forthcomin
Ther
Th un versal clos ha brok
in
Poland an
unga
society; bu
ve
ail
re th
societ he
todi
no
er
kin
ilose ic destroye
communist dogma
territorial compon nts. Some
rts, lik
progress tow
proves th poin easi
Other
rt
con titut
clo ed ocieties or th
jus contin
tegrate.
rate diagno nationali do
cl
ed ociet
ou
ed to
obil ze ociety
behind th state. Since communi ies are generally discredited
i versal ideolo
closed ociet
inc ple
ed
to
t-co
is
To establi
rl
becaus
co munism
ed to
er
generall
am
rk
of th situati
dictatorship
an or
ine itabl bu it
erbia, he decide
discovered that nationalis
is
mu
er Koso
Kosov Polje
in
to th
appeasing
paradigm as head of he
Bosnian
to change ho
from area
s,
more vigorous animal 4,
doe no co of th
inister, Ant
oland) ha
bo
re Serbi destroye
99
the am da
ruit
ir t, th
cces fu than in cti
th
s, tab lit
ilos
ic
in th
ro
roatia
umb
th ncy.
We er
er
ros ha
ro
error ct it
wher
he
se
reta
ma ori
Croat
there.
to
ith
hich
om
so
he
isdoin it
relie
majo ity, nd
ut parado icall
extrem
ntal in
ungary
economic disint iety
ha play th
ea Flee so
certainl th case in
tabilized.
ction
d, ch is,
nt
krain
nationalis ca
nger of
Russia -securi
nom ha
mani
ntar
national cause.
ergin ry
Ili
io eci
ad an
Blac
integra
from conomic failu e.
akia
ssi th
tempting to appeal to national
Kravchuk tried
communit
been di icul toprevent even ery hing ri ht
grat on behind
th
Alread
Croatian forces recently commi
to area
fo hi parl
th doin
on he se th
ear th
er
ow i n
treas ry and
alin
threat
an
here th
nationalis
th in
secu it
oslem forces the effectis to force Bosnian Croats to fle
It
dera
internati na
greg
ugosla situ tion of Yu oslaviaw ul
rogr th
aid
of th
titute
llage, provokin
orde to divert attentio
flirte
la
West rn owers mmitted
ig bang in
bili
trongman
of
orld bu nation lis dictat rships
ilose ic fail to understand
forces, thereb constituting
87a
co rs if th
I,
take
equ nc
the break-
rb an
differ
Januar
ight ha
ri
an
economic reform introduced by th Fed ra Prim ko ic
vent
speech he delivere
th
an
ould requir re olut actio to avoi it
ose ic on hi
far
gl cted or
erte supremac
fairly accu dir ction
tar Thi
ss in
id
conomic collapse,
principl
worthy counterpar in
ilosevic has pro ided
pr
hastening the conomic breakdow
nationali
toEu
oppressed national aspirations
ommunis Part
em
Th tr nd
ventuall
pousin
inciple, vent
't
is
based
nemy if ou don' have one, th
Ma ko ic
licate co t r
tode roy than todevelop
of nationalis
Toconst tut
ociety
Thi conc ptua
regim
as more or le
th economic reform instituted
open
open
countrie
ef re th co muni
ng themselv
ti
to et er
nat onalis
ll th -- wi
dictator ortant coun
th
at
th
is till
si le to aver th
make th effort provid
an answer
chal enge en
an er
ut
is goin
ha is wher my conceptual framewor he o-calle free wo
it
ld
to
av
ee
oc ety. Wh
when events ar clea
th
ssibl
ld it do nythin
ee
look at
an
th re
the ntegratio
no
ct
tak
So ie colla of
to
th
et
to
fail to
er
cre
on ary
ys
So losed socie , b threat ha no ground
so
rl
at le st as
securit
Therefore th only that iswh re th
ovie empire ha create
tm
rl 's police an
at
ro
collectiv
it
world
order, ther will be disorder that much is clea as th
turned
now elf reinforcin in th
th
es of disintegration go much furthe
Bu wh
nite
il go
than currentl
to revers it
have become an effectiv orga-
ni at on
de th
rati
ch as it concer
th
s I have
aa tricht Trea
l ess resolute actio is ta
Th
is
collectiv securi y.
lies Th collaps of th
hich
si le to
an it is difficul to justif any kin
of national self-interes
the
tence Tha
it
le
kind of nuclea disaster remains, bu it concerns th rest of
th le
th
hether it is political, cono ic or military -- on
basi fo actio
equenc
an
establi
occasion"
iffere
anticipat
it po ed
disappeare
interventio th
ca
in th Eur
rop er in Yugo lavi
egative dir ction is im
accel rating
Bu th reun ication
ilibri
at polic
plained
EC RIT
man
is
om bu LLEC IV
Europ has respond
opean Communit
ur
incr asin problems of its own?
urop ificatio
ea
ot er
wo supe powe
it is th
ited
at on ha alread
an institutio
troops
S.
hi le
ecurit
th
as th
ha
that pa
th
nl
fail d, beca
ha th potentia of se orld on
il ac
instit ti
hich
collective
it as ot been trie
th
orld
rd
in
most in need of orde an stability.
ifits missio
need fo some profound ne
th question that need
dersh
red fined
thinking
Ther is an
ent
it regard to
answered Th
Unit
emaining
eighed do rden
of bein
er
r.
tr
eing that coul
yste
th
ot li
he
en to ista
nati na
iginal missio wa to defend th free
tr
le
ts
er
th Unite
tate cannot be expected to ac on it ow
States
So iet mpir
ha left
security acuu
blac hole." ovie empi
io to th
hich ha th potentia
hi presents
did
betw en state
differen
here is no direct threat from
ATOcountries th danger is with nditions within states
Th Unite
an it ac in co cert
orld agains
ie empire That mis io is obsolete;but th collapse of th
threat than th der
el intere
th
of turnin
co
crepancy bet an
ar
in th nineteenth centur which, as th main beneficiar
th
FUTURE OF NAT
tic difficul ie which derive at leas par-
tially from th Englan
TH
uperpo
th region
much as relationships
refore ifNA Ohas an missio at all, it is to
wit others eo ge
or s,
Foundation
PROSP
New York, 29
AN
pt mber 199
DI
TEGR TIO
Th
or
projec it po er an influenc into th region an best define
th
he
ission is
artnership Fo
ro
in term of open an closed societie
thin in
eace fa from bein
is
rath
th produc of
erficial atte
to
er
over th difference by making an overture to al th former memClosed societie based on nationalis principles constitut threat to security becaus they need an enemy, either outsid it in
th thre
is
NATOwa constructe
ry
if er
in
to confront an
aracte fr
or
th
im prospect of some countrie joinin ma en up engenderin
structur
tate an
whic
fail re
cietie an
em ed in
th
primar
th
democratic
ilitar
interv
ti
aris
constructive open societ building part of th missio or
importan
vening
becaus
th
prospect of
is al th
embers inter-
ilitaril in this troubled part ofthe
orld isver
remote
Bosnia is ample proof.
PART ER
IP FO
PEAC
more conflictstha
It
it resolves
reat
it
ca
th co li ts co ld
ea il
in
preclude certai kind of behavior Only in case ec
il
very differen approach is is
rati
ly
NATO deliberately vagu
need is fo constructive engage en in th transition to
an
ri
te
or alliance
contains
en
cietie
hich goes fa beyond
is re
ires an
ilitar
atters
significan elemen of economic assistance
Both
th military an th economic aspect of th alliance have to relate to inte al
litica
relationship
betwee
egio
ASPROPO ED
marke
associatio
en
ev lo
ts
it in
states becaus
firs
tate
peac
fo em
an
as
as to
security in th
cces fu tran itio
to
ope society.
Unfortunately the American proposal fo the forthcoming AT
summit, th so calle Partnershi
it
is
holdin
It is
common exercise an
future cooperatio Pact
Fo Peace, does no deal
very narrow technica proposal fo otherwis
preparin
si le future
er ti
is
an disaster relief
missions,
hile useful as fa as it goes it fail to addres
entruste
em
entral
rs ip
ar ible
cl
full fore
dif-
design on it former empire bu becaus it sees no advantag ti
tire of makin concession without corresponding benefits.
it
in
ere, it
ould change
ou of
the proposed Partnership Fo Peace could be tha organizatio
to
ti
arante
ea ic
av
curren unstable conditions that task
ia ts
kind of alliance is so radicall
differen kind of organization is needed an
artn rs ip
in
re erably
to NATOitself
al recognition.
the conflicting security needs of the countries concerned. trie
PEAC
arsa
es ri ed as
peace-keeping, crisis management, search-and-rescu
FO
he missio ofthi ne
fo possible
with member countrie of th former
co
REAL PARTNERSHI
ld iv
co tain it cl
ny
th
t.
th
ould be unthinkable. It main
ould be to help with th proces oftransformation into open
societies.
or that purpos
it
us la th emphasis on th politi
cal and economic aspects of the transformation.
rder to ha st
av
ny cl
al th Pa tnership fo
tr ct
what
uld
co
togeth
ed tructu
an
tate an
tr ctur
st
ad anta es in ha ing
on
oa is to reinforc an
es
co in ee
is
ul
invite an
av id
me be
onfl ct that coul
aris either from th enlargemen of NATOaga
th
ishe
Russia or from giving Russia veto over NATOmembershi pect
th ne
as loom large: "cordo sanitaire" or
Peac alon th lines outline ttra ti
no
does ther is nothin
ne
suspicio
Yalta.
Pa tnership Fo
of
ssia to
bscribe.
in ATO, th
thei internal de
lopment
to
depressed European
industrial
characte of
hich
ul
urop woul
in
larger in
vi oo
rt ership
vo
ea
ul
to
resent
all partie
th
cono
he
well recognized
adjustment
TO
uc needed timu
conomi s.
tu
tate
makin aste
of the
NATO the
th
roce
Specifically,it should nduc France to re-ent
ll
ld
of as
te
it
internal reorganization. here is on ou of accoun
one deficienc in this design it le
apan sh ul
aske
th
es Japa
to join
en
te tu
is
th
po er an
en societ
te
ld
th
the organizin principle It consists
erie of alliances th most important of which
NATOand,
fo Peac must come ou of ilitar
allocation of strong argument in their favor: if noth
he economic an
ea larg
command
epen
here ma be om elements in th
they have
astern
ld
comple
resources, an
be reducti
Unit
of the NATObudget
an onl
rope
th
tt
he budget of th Partnershi
sb co
ro
correspondingl
ai
if
to preven countrie like Poland the Czech
member
to deal
avoi both suspicion
to induce
ic
ve
illa he
st avoi
here woul
ecuri-
intervention
ic aid. ey
uld
co ntries
region
ti
to join
nl
en ag ment in luding
os mo
l l ctiv
it hou
es
Partn
es
toou that milita
defens expend ture
hi
tif th
ld
either
re en dang
xperienc has ho
se budge
here ar grea
Western pilla es
societ ofthe
ings
rope
irml
forjoining the
countr
cl aran
he Yugo la
con tructiv
NA
nc th
ty
iabl option. Ther fore th
brin to th tabl
opsided
There
ace
AT
political front, defens budg ts
Northern po
em
it
to ac as th
ac in conjunctio
lice an ofth it
others
t at e rld.
ld en it acts it
ncidentally th
ll ould
combinatio
of
manp we from Easter Europe with th technica capabi ities of
th artner re
ctio
ip in de
eace is se
cc
dget
issue tha political leader hi
l, co ld
th su tain
must bebro
ht
rtional t i
bear.
on this
rt ership
ec us
it
ld
ed
th
NATOcountries, which is the mai constrain on their willingness to ac
This
iable alternative to the loomin world disorder.
PROBLEM
ECONOMIC ASSISTANC
ECONOMIC COOPER
rovidin tanc to th former
ie Unio ha been
to
tor
first when
este
tance as
third,
s:
ave been promised bu romise not
ork
need fo
eason fo th
ailu it
ipi
better cultur
at
co
thin
ention rath economic co ld
th
cu att ntion th
th
im
mili ary
mall expenditu
-7 it
am
th
Incid ntall
titu nc
in
om
securi
ilit
amon
th
cont
fa
ar er
orrect th danger conom tructur
that
ac
So iet poin of iew, ve
as tab li ed
trie
is
en
eate
ef rm an
ak
it
reates
reco st ctio
trib ti co
to
ic ties
li
ry
al
letely
ro
th ir
arkets
tates is justifi
imp
than an
othe form of economic assis-
ship in th European Unio an NATO th Partne hi
Fo
eace
should help fulfill their aspirations
to
no favorabl
ly in the
ti
or
allowing differentiated treatment including member-
CONCLUSION
If my ea lier analysis It
arshal Plan
er
ld
nationalis dictator hip ari
iates th dan er
their fears
th formerly communis countrie should no be pursue
li independ nt
is
eace co ld th
it
conomic assistanc wl
rmerly
rt ership cu it
trie
effectin their attitude and behavior
ussi an th oth
could all
Perhap th greatest accomplishment of th
uropea
ai in ecurit
th
pect of rene ed do in
estern participatio
on conflic pre-
fo another, it
rtan
fear th
ut th ne ly
here is tn
curren economic condit ons, en fittin
Th
ealing
th th em
than intervention
in
wa that it fostered European cooperation. Th need fo cooper ti
hich ha
on
ld
in th co te
Union wh namel
it
oscow and
bu
ar cut, individual countrie blee
In thi respec NATO om ission
th ace.
bas-
idable
tructure fo
ie
tate ju tl
tion
estern "l
economic assistance an
id to th fo
as th
ay
uropea
been pu in charge of coordinatin
un-
describe
unifie comman than th
de eloped
ac
unis countrie
econom
leas ther ough to be
ic
becaus th Soviet econolittl redundanc
wn intere
io formerly co
tion of th comman
co
that
isgu
assistance to th
ith ve
if th li elin
ld
er is an urgent
ampl of Ukrain demo trates
is acting on
offers
ntralized
rt er ip
Un
om kind of economic unio
wa totall
indep tr
th
in
member countrie of th former So
hird ph th
ture
ta li
the sy te
ar
tr
particularl
li ered
t i delive
enter
ltil tera
ic
un itigated fa lure
of West rn ssistanc into th
second, an
co
ON
to reat
at-
th fo th
th
in th in
adical
fo it is ec measure
offere by th U'
countries is ew iz
administratio
named "Partnership Fo Peace
arture
ad
th rwise, th
cate lt
ould no have been
inc outlined and th of
he ne
kind
ibl
wo
in
de
Partners
ll as th countries llowin
disorder to develo unhindered
rs ofhistor fo th
It wo ld
ange
tt r. Januar
Moscow Neverth ess,
my proposal will receiv seriou
si erati n.
ORG E S OR O
N ove
Tobe effectiv ot
summit hope that
economic i d
imiz both
it in
ssia an
an amon them Wi hout nomi de elopment an
im to
itself The oa of th Partnershi la
here is little time left befo and Presiden Clinton' visit
ADDENDUM*
ss
ntra
inci ien worl
or
we co
Fo
ac is to cr
th othe newl
upp
th
foreig ai is to ro id ega
pr ctic
iona
independ
onomic development doe requir capita
dev lopmen of th le ad
ra ewor th
in an
ar nershi
in
or ge ro undat on
privat
sector
ce en
th
fo th privat
sector to
fo Peace would includ
itm
th
be provided ma ly
ta
lega framewor ther ca be no ec
kn
par icipate.
te
ug ould consis
ub id
to th
EW
litar in
ORL
York, 29
ORDER:TH
ve
fo
FUTUREOF
oint exercis s.
TO
Th
Soros
