The Earth is Flat? 167 Discussion Points Disproving the Global Earth

THE EARTH IS FLAT? 167 Discussion Points Disproving The Global Earth

Bradon Edge

1

First Edition, September 2017 ©2017 by Bradon Edge All rights reserved Published in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Edge, Bradon The Earth Is Flat? 167 Discussion Points Disproving The Global Earth p.250 ISBN-13: 978-1537242798 ISBN-10: 1537242792 Printed in New York City

2

THE EARTH IS FLAT? 167 Discussion Points Disproving The Global Earth

3

4

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.” Buddha, 500 B.C.

5

6

NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR Whenever I hear or realize what I consider a truth, something in me suddenly and immediately perceives it. Others who do not as easily perceive it, those who do not share the same truth, often think I have lost my mind. But whenever I hear what I consider a truth, the very quality of it is such that immediately it fills my emptiness, my gap, my holes, because my own truth had been called forth. When I hear a truth, I immediately recognize it as such. It is not simply a truth to me because I can argue about it, because I can prove it, because I am convinced by it, no. It is my truth because I am transformed by it. It is a conversion, not a conviction.  That precise transformation is what occurred the first time I encountered the Earth-is-not-a-globe topic in the academic sense—my truth had been called forth. I wanted to know more—immediately. No, I had not lost my mind. I had, instead, without pause, bias or prejudice, analytically researched a topic that captivated my imagination and challenged my sense of logic. Examine the information on the following pages for even a few minutes, and you'll start to see it. You’ll start to see that this is not a joke. You’ll start to see that this is not just the biggest conspiracy of all time, it's the last one, the final one. This is the conspiracy that changes everything. Prior to reviewing the information found within, what I would like for all people to recognize is that their whole understanding of everything consists of beliefs given to them by others. These are the same beliefs that had been given to the them before, which had been given to the them before them, which had been given to the them before them, et cetera. Their beliefs are not their own and your beliefs are not your own. As it is very important to understand this in order to find your own truth, I will state it again: your beliefs are not your own. 7

To truly comprehend my claim that your beliefs—religious, political, societal, scientific or otherwise —were given to you, it is important to understand that your mind is not created by nature; your brain, however, was. Internalize that distinction. Your brain is the mechanism that belongs to the body, but your mind—what you think—is created and formed by the society in which you live—by the religion, by the church, by the ideology that your parents followed, by the educational system in which you were taught, by the mainstream media in all its forms, by all kinds of things.  Your brain was created by nature; your mind was created by society. This is why there is a Christian mind and a Hindu mind, an Islam mind and a Buddhist mind. Brains are natural, but minds are a created phenomenon. It depends on which flock of sheep you belong to. Was the flock of sheep Catholic? Then naturally you will behave like a Catholic.  Gandhi stated, “The only way to change our lives is by changing our minds.” I am not asking you to change any aspect of your life—that is something for you to consider. I am, however, suggesting you honestly and sincerely consider the origin—and thereby the validity—of your beliefs. The priests, the politicians, the media—the people who are in “power,” the people who have vested interests—don’t want you to know that you are above the mind, beyond the mind. Their whole effort has been to keep you identified with the mind because the mind is managed by them, not by you. You are being deceived in such a subtle way. The managers of your mind are eerily outside you.  Why do these managers of your mind not teach open-mindedness? Instead of open-mindedness, they teach rigidity and tunnel vision and push for and expect complete indoctrination that results in your acceptance of government cover-ups and historical deception. Why is it not acceptable to these managers of the mind for someone to have a belief other than theirs? Why is it unacceptable to allow individuality and free, uncontrolled thought? The answer is simple: because individuality is not manageable, individuality is impossible to control; individuality is impossible to enslave. Understand this: the child is not born into this world with any belief but rather with a very curious, doubting, skeptical consciousness. Doubt is natural; belief is unnatural. The societal construct, however, puts forth the purposeful effort to control our minds to think of doubt as the villain, not the hero. Belief, as a result, is imposed by parents, society, the educational systems, politicians, religions. All these people are—knowingly or unknowingly—in the service of ignorance, and they have served ignorance for thousands of years. They have kept humanity in darkness, and there was a reason for it: if humanity is in darkness, knows nothing of reality, then it can be exploited easily, enslaved easily, deceived easily, kept poor, dependent. I don’t want to be a slave by any connotation; hence, I choose doubt—I do not choose belief. Belief is simply the covering up of your ignorance. Belief never reveals to you the truth; it only gives you certain dogmas, creeds, and an illusion of knowledge is created through them. But that knowledge is nothing but delusion. Anything based on belief is fraudulent, fictitious, bogus. Reject the basic assumptions of civilization. Reject it all. Reject everything you have been told to believe. Doubt everything. And then go and inquire. Doubt is a sign of your intelligence. Doubt and inquire until you find. 8

When knowing is available, who is going to believe? In all paths there lies some truth and in all paths there lies some falsehood. You must spend your life sifting through them to find what is your truth—to discover what you know to be truth for yourself. To think things out, to research, to investigate for oneself is to make the decision all the greater because it was made rather than just given to you. The decision is greater because you used your mind.

Know, however—seeking your truth will bring you to places unexpected, emotionally, spiritually, and physically. It is not an easy path to be different—to actively seek truth as opposed to lazily accepting others’ truths as your own. It is even more difficult to have the courage to shed previous beliefs. Most people will not understand this shedding of previous beliefs. Most people are extremely uncomfortable without something to believe in. Even if the belief is that there is nothing, he has a great need to believe in that. Even though society usually discourages questions—especially questions that are excruciatingly difficult to answer honestly—it is in that very questioning we find truth. And if you have the courage to re-evaluate your entire life’s foundations—could anything be more important? Why am I such a fan of doubt? Because it leads you to inquiry, it raises questions, and it takes you into new adventures. It never allows you to remain ignorant. It goes on and on moving until you have found the light. Whether the search is regarding religion, health, politics, extraterrestrials,

9

the afterlife, the shape of the Earth, et cetera, doubt and inquiry will lead you to your personallyachieved truth. Can you see how finding your own personal truth cannot be any other way? People have been taught their entire lives to blindly and lazily accept whatever story is fed to them. The Earth is a globe. And they do. They bury their head in the sand and accept whatever is sold to them without any doubt. There is a globe on the teacher’s desk. And if an individual does at one point have even the smallest feeling of doubt, he is often hesitant to inquire. The Earth is really not spherical? The evidence is convincing. But, no way I’m talking about that! He does not want to stray too far from what is accepted in his community because he may be socially outcast. They will make fun of me. He is afraid that if he shares a different viewpoint, people will laugh, point, and snicker. What he needs to realize is that the people who laugh, point, and snicker at an individual who delves into honest inquiry are those who have been brainwashed by the media and their community into a deep, obsessive desire to "fit in." And the establishment—via church, media, educational system, et cetera—preys on this weakness. The media, for example, has labeled anyone who disagrees with what they claim is the “official story” as a conspiracy theorist, a kook, a nut job. And whether locally or throughout the world, whether within a high school hallway or a corporate boardroom, the weak individual will join in the fray—whatever the topic—and quickly disregard someone who seeks truth through thoughtful inquiry so he will not also get trampled by the other weak-minded. It is a somewhat obvious fact to point out that a conspiracy theorist has a keener awareness of what is going on around him just by the simple fact that he questions his reality. The flat Earth concept has endured for centuries? Let me look into that. Understand that the term “conspiracy theorist” is nothing more than a derogatory title used to dismiss a critical thinker. It is clear that if one thinks critically, he may not always be right—is anyone?—but I argue he will be much closer to truth as his mentality is constantly evolving, discarding false information and absorbing observable truths. A flat Earth has never been disproved. If you are someone who applies ridicule to those who ponder conspiracies, you are a fool. Yet, if you are one who believes everything you hear, you are a fool.  Are there conspiracies happening right now? Absolutely there are. Isn't it sensible to inquire about them? Absolutely it is. Doesn’t it, then, make sense to also embrace doubt in the same spirit? The answer, again, is absolutely yes. Once you realize and, more importantly, accept that your beliefs are not your own and that doubt has immense value, I encourage you to drop all that you have been taught by others. Get rid of it all. As Walt Whitman said, “Re-examine all you have been told. Dismiss what insults your soul.” Start fresh. Start clean, unencumbered. Internalize the concept that your beliefs are not your own and then put in your mind only that which is your truth—regardless of who agrees or disagrees. When I first came across the Earth-is-not-a-globe concept, I thought I would take just a few moments, look it over and easily prove it false. I still—many months of research later—cannot prove that the Earth is a sphere, a globe. I also cannot disprove the Earth is some variance of flat. Mark Twain once said, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Most people—the evidence shows—have been fooled. And most people—society illustrates— refuse to even entertain the possibility that they have been fooled: cognitive dissonance—I’m not in denial … I’m just very selective about the reality I choose to accept—and ego are the most likely barriers. Knowing this to be true, the best way to fully understand my—our—existence is to constantly and 10

openly challenge the mainstream beliefs of society, science and theology … and that is exactly what I have done and continue to do: I doubt everything—until I know—in the humble attempt to not be fooled, to move ever-so-slightly more toward the greater understanding, to come closer to an embrace of the hidden truths waiting to be discovered. To be the finest intellectual explorer you can be, I ask that you adopt an outlook that combines the rigorous objectivity of a true scientist with the beginner's mind of a Zen Master. Possess also a dispassionate curiosity and a healthy skepticism driven by expansiveness, not spite. To accomplish this, you will have to be willing to regularly suspend your current theories about the way the world works. Accept with good humor the possibility that what you've learned in the past may not be a reliable guide to understanding the fresh phenomenon that's right in front of you. Be suspicious of your biases, even the rational and benevolent ones. From The Truman Show: Mike Michaelson: Christof, let me ask you, why do you think that Truman has never come close to discovering the true nature of the world until now? Christof: We accept the reality of the world with which we’re presented. It’s that simple. The following pages—a result of intensive research, exhaustive crossreferencing, analysis and verification, as well as extensive editing and thoughtfulness regarding aesthetics—share a collection of facts, reason, logic and mathematical and scientific discussion points disproving a globeshaped Earth and supporting a flatEarth model without current, clearly defined parameters. That said, this presentation of material is in no way comprehensive: there is so much evolving evidence disproving the global Earth model—while at the same time strongly suggesting a electromagnetic, diamond-shaped, flat Earth model (Discussion Points 156 and 166)—or a simulation (which would account for the various, nagging anomalies)—or a combination of both—that it would be impossible to include it all herein. However, this book—simply a humble, discussion-based guidebook of accumulated information—is a snapshot in time and intends to facilitate an easy-to-digest introduction into what is possibly the greatest and most elaborate deception in the history of mankind. Remember, it’s okay to question what you have been taught. 11

12

THE EARTH IS FLAT? 167 Discussion Points Disproving The Global Earth

13

14

INTRODUCTION There is something crazily inconsistent with the facts that we are given to explain the reality in which we live. It is problematic that these facts are in no way consistent with the obvious realities we witness and experience each day. And if, when we see these inconsistencies, we do not, first, doubt and then, second, inquire, we are simply puppets in the master plan of some mysterious, elite

15

organization who has no interest in, at best, sharing truth and knowledge, or at worst, our health and spiritual well being. If we don’t question science when presented nonsense, and we instead ignorantly and blindly believe whatever we are told, then science is no longer forced or expected to be true science—science then becomes something else completely: it becomes a religion based on nothing more than faith. Science is supposed to be about methodology. Science is supposed to propose a question, do background research, construct a hypothesis, test that hypothesis by doing repeated and controlled experiments, analyze data and draw a conclusion and then communicate the results. More simply stated, science is expected to provide proven and indisputable answers based on repeated observations. If a scientist makes observations that don’t fit the hypothesis, then the scientist is obligated to discard the hypothesis—but that mostly is not what is happening regarding anything related to the globe-Earth model. The honest and true scientists who point out these sometimes ridiculous, blatant, scientific inconsistencies are simply, yet effectively, silenced. Conversely, the overwhelming majority of evidence that supports the global Earth model is based on faulty science and that faulty “science” is widely promoted and celebrated. Science has clearly lost its principle: it has been almost universally corrupted by corporations and governments, abandoning the moral and methodological principles of real science. Do we—as a society, as a world people—want science to be a religion where we simply accept whatever we are told on faith? If, collectively, we choose to ignore circumstances and situations when a hypothesis cannot be proven and when theories don’t match reality because we want the safety and reassurance of “science”—even if it’s wrong—okay, but let’s call it Science-ism and openly declare it a religion. Let’s brand science the belief system that it has almost universally become. Let’s stop pretending that science is a system for acquiring knowledge, because, like religious people who question the clergy or their religion, people are shamed if they question scientists or their science. Children are indoctrinated into scientific beliefs at a very young age—just as they are indoctrinated into religious and societal beliefs. Governments and “scientists” embrace and promote the global warming lie; they suppress free energy, waterpowered cars, and cures for cancer and 16

heart disease; and, all in the same breath, they lie about the real threats to humanity: Fukushima radiation, mercury in vaccines, fluoride in water, GMOs grown in open field experiments, and among others, the total medical fraud of toxic medications such as statin drugs. Unfortunately for humanity, by the time these indoctrinated children become adults, they don’t even consider questioning science because the belief that they must never question science or authority had been drilled into their mind. Most people live in a world where obedience and thinking the same as everyone else—fitting in, being accepted, not being ridiculed—are all that matter. It is imperative that you understand that flagrant dishonesty has rampaged through the scientific community—university, corporate and select independent—for centuries. Accepting that fact will allow you to best connect and engage with the evidence presented on the following pages. Why? Because as you will soon realize, for almost 500 years, the masses have been thoroughly deceived by a cosmic fairy-tale of astronomical proportions—a fairly tale actively supported by Science-ism. The people of the world have been taught a falsehood so gigantic and diabolical that it has blinded us from our own experience and common sense. This falsehood has blinded us from seeing the world and the universe as they truly are—as we truly are. Through pseudoscience books and programs, fake mass media, thought- and behavior-controlled public education at all levels and government propaganda (those who trust the government must have failed history), the world population has been systematically brain-washed, slowly indoctrinated over centuries into the unquestioned belief of the greatest lie of all time. A multi-generational conspiracy has succeeded, in the minds of the masses, to pick up the fixed Earth, shape it into a deformed ball, spin it in circles, and throw it around the Sun. The greatest cover-up of all time—NASA’s and Freemasonry’s (Discussion Point 159) biggest secret—with compliance from the hallowed universities—and you do not need to be a scientist to recognize it—is that we are living on a plane, not a planet: the evidence shows that Earth is the flat-ish and stationary center of the universe over and around which everything in the heavens revolves. Shockingly—and I realized this at the infancy of my research—nearly everything we have been taught about space, astronomy and the Earth is a lie. NASA, the ESA, the RASA, et cetera—with 17

considerable help, of course—have successfully fooled the entire world out of believing their own eyes, experience and intuition. Even so, intently and honestly contrast the decreasing faith in NASA’s Science-ism with the verifiable mathematical and scientific evidence coming from the Earth-is-not-aglobe community, and it is easy to see why this book represents only a minuscule fraction of the momentum supporting some variance of a flat-Earth model. Science-ism (or scientism), especially astrophysics, is the most fundamental and unaccountable cult on Earth. For example, Swiss Astronomer, Fritz Zwicky, noticed galaxies—what he told us were “galaxies”—in clusters rotating faster than their mass would theoretically allow and invented—not discovered, invented—Dark Matter to add more mass so the math would make sense. Furthermore, according to Newton's Laws and Relativity, it was expected that the stars at the edge of galaxies would be moving slower than the stars at the center, but they were moving at the same speeds. Clearly something was wrong with the laws of motion, but instead of looking to create a new model, astrophysicists agreed—not proved scientifically, but rather simply agreed—that there must be additional Dark Matter keeping these stars from being flung out into space. And of course, this additional Dark Matter had extra mass, and therefore, extra gravity; but it still did not work mathematically, so they invented—not discovered, invented—Dark Energy to fill the gap. Dark Matter and Dark Energy are both 100% invisible, 100% theoretical and 100% unproven, but it's what holds the entire cosmological model together. Do you see how astrophysics works? Unproven theories, speculation and pseudoscience are all that keeps the heliocentric model intact. Simply put, the heliocentric model—the model that is currently accepted by the majority— claims that the Earth is moving around a stationary Sun; all the while, the Earth spins on its own axis. By contrast, the geocentric model suggests that the Earth is the center of the Universe and that everything else revolves around it. It is important to note that both of these models are in fact theories—and although heliocentrism is the target, neither theory is supported in the book. Try this insanity on for size: the heliocentric model of the universe is made up of 68% Dark Energy, 27% Dark Matter, and the remaining 5% is Real Matter. Only 5% is observable, testable, repeatable and provable. Let that sink in. Dark Matter. Dark Energy. Gravity. Big Bang. Relativity. “Special” Relativity. Lorentz Contraction. All of these are fanciful inventions to prop up the failed and theoretical heliocentric model. They are actually all anti-scientific, wildly-speculative, untestable and unproven. We can no longer ignore the cosmological constant suggesting the universe is finely and precisely tuned: there is nearly a 0% chance it was created by an accidental Big Bang. That said, do I know the Earth is flat? No. No, of course I don’t. As Socrates surmised centuries ago, I don’t believe we can know anything with 100% certainty. Do I have all the answers? Again, no. No. The evidence, however, strongly disproves a spherical-Earth—and that is the focus of this book: disproving the spinning, spherical Earth. Although it is repeatedly referenced for the sake of

18

discussion and as the most likely alternative to a global Earth, this book does not attempt to prove a flat Earth. The evidence against a spherical Earth is derived from many different facets of science and philosophy. The simplest—but certainly not only—strategy is to rely on ones own senses to discern the true nature of the world around us. The world looks flat, the bottoms of clouds are flat, the movement of the Sun (Discussion Points 24, 71, 77, 80, 145, 147-8) all strongly assert the heliocentric model is false; these are all examples of your senses telling you that you do not live on a spherical, heliocentric world. This is using what's called an empirical approach, or an approach that relies on information from your senses—something most have forgotten or simply neglect to do. When using Descartes' method of Cartesian doubt to skeptically view the world around, one quickly finds that the notion of a spherical world is the theory which has the burden of proof, the burden of truth. When using the true scientific method—not Science-ism—and/or empirical evidence, you will discover—like, WOW!—that a globe-shaped Earth cannot be proven honestly. Am I open to being wrong? Absolutely. Yes. Yes. Yes. I embrace being wrong: being wrong is the quickest path to being right. But do I think I’m wrong? Not regarding this. No. No, I don’t. I am also prepared to be ridiculed by the ignorant majority. It is my position that support for the spinning globe—an unproven sphere—is based on faulty science and comes from blind faith, indoctrination and cognitive dissonance, all amendable. The truth is that we don’t know the truth about our world. Perhaps everything we see is a projection, perhaps this reality truly is a mathematically-created Matrix. Why not? Our DNA resembles a binary code, powerful evidence for a constructed reality. You could be somebody's avatar or Sim and you wouldn’t even know it. The flat-Earth movement could easily be simply another distraction from the real story. Sure. I’m very open to that. But if there is no gravity (read on) and if there is no real image of our planet (again, read on), anything is possible. NASA—as are other space agencies throughout the world—is creating and promoting simulation after simulation: they are hiding something. A flat Earth? Possibly. Maybe not. But they—undeniably —are hiding something. And once people realize the Earth is not a globe, the real question becomes this: What are they hiding? That said, do not read the following 167 logical, mathematical and scientific discussion points if you are worried that your comfortable world view might be challenged. However, if you are searching for answers to life’s most profound questions, analyzing and carefully considering any and all reasonable possibilities, then The Earth Is Flat? is for you. 19

BEFORE WE BEGIN: What Might A Flat Earth Look Like? We don't know. And those who do know—and they are out there—certainly aren’t telling. Taking into consideration that modern awareness regarding this subject is in its infancy, the exact geographical and topographical nature of a flat, stationary—likely four dimensional—Earth should not yet be expected to be definitively known: focused research is an ongoing and continuous effort. What the stunning and mind-boggling evidence already indisputably reveals, however, is that the Earth is not a globe—that we do know—and that is the focus of this book. It sounds ridiculous? Maybe at first: a likely result of unfamiliarity, cultural programming, indoctrination and cognitive dissonance, possibly some ego. But does it sound any more ridiculous than what you were taught in school, that the Earth is spinning on a wobbling axis at 1000 mph and flying around the Sun at 67,000 mph while the entire solar system rotates around the galaxy at 500,000 mph as the galaxy speeds through the cosmos at over 670,000,000 mph? If you believe the Earth is a globe, that is what you believe is happening right now as you read this. Does that not sound even more ridiculous? To best address what a flat Earth might look like, please reference the image on page 21, provided as a working model. As illustrated there, the Earth is likely flat and somewhat diamond-shaped. That said, the Earth may just as possibly be rectangular-shaped—or square—or something yet unimagined. There exists no claim within these pages that the Earth is unquestionably flat and diamond-shaped. Only the Aitoff, Collignon and Sinusoidal (image on page 21) projections, however, perfectly account for all the necessary requirements: the prime meridian (imagine a straight longitudinal line stretching from the North Pole to the South Pole) is half the distance of the equator, allowing the map to be half as tall as it is wide; the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn are the same length while the equator is longer than both; and the Northern and Southern Hemispheres both have equal "area". Observably, the Aitoff, Colignon and Sinusoidal all also succeed: correct, triangulated data regarding the distances between major cities and airports; accurate flight times; consistent star trails; two obvious poles; as well as reliable time zones. All of this is used to show that the Earth is either flat or a globe: yes, these requirements and observations fit both models; otherwise, billions of people would not have been fooled over the centuries. The data is not wrong, the Scientism-promoted and, therefore, societal-accepted hypothesis for what it fits—a global Earth—is wrong. But when scripture, fact and reason are all in agreement, it equates to an undeniable truth: the Earth is not a globe. [Whether you embrace the various scriptures or not, scripture clearly and unambiguously supports a flat Earth.] Please recall, however, that the only definitive claim made herein—based on observable, testable and repeatable evidence—is that the Earth is not a globe, anything further, even if supported by sound evidence, should be considered either an exploration of possibility and/or a working conclusion. Again—as it must be clearly understood—beyond knowing that the Earth is not a globe, the definite shape of the Earth is unknown. The much-loved and promoted, circular, Azimuthal Equidistant projection (Discussion Point 13) was nothing more than a starting point, a discarded first love, a likely attempt at disinformation that opened the door wide for endless ridicule and off-handed dismissal. Regardless of the mockery and intentional misdirection coming from those who control the national and worldwide dialogue, facts, new information and insight regarding the true make-up of the Earth are realized nearly every day, and as a result, confidence in one truth is at an all-time high: a global Earth is scientifically unprovable. 20

BEFORE WE BEGIN, PART TWO: Why Would They Lie About the Shape of the Earth? The answers to that question aren’t revealed on this page; they are, however, divulged and fully discussed in the Closing Thoughts on pages 231-237, just prior to the Index. Should you immediately skip the analogous rising action, conflict, climax and falling action and engage with the conclusion and subsequent denouement? Only you know. Perhaps you both appreciated and embraced William Shakespeare’s strategy when he revealed the deaths of both lead characters prior to even the first lines of dialogue in The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Perhaps you despised knowing. Perhaps you have long been skeptical and distrustful of those in positions of false authority. Perhaps already—only on page 21—the introductory information strongly resonates and, for you, the answer to Why? is paramount. You. Must. Know. Now. On the other hand, perhaps you are just now awakening. Perhaps this and other related topics have your head spinning. Perhaps you need to open yourself to this information slowly, step-by-step, processing each bit on its own merit, gradually piecing the individual puzzle pieces together, allowing yourself the necessary time to clearly see the big picture. Regarding that “big picture,” if you are sincerely interested in seeing it as clearly as possible, consider visiting a few Discussion Points (listed below in the final paragraph on this page) to get your mind right before turning to page 23. Regardless of your current state of mind, the information found on the following pages will likely cause the serious-minded a few, sleep-challenged nights. As it is, everything you thought you knew about the Earth is about to be pulled right out from underneath you. Everything is about to change. If your decision is to first get your mind right and consume pages 30, 76, 153, 156, 200 and 209 and/ or immediately understand why you have been deceived via the Closing Thoughts on pages 231-237, go— and then come right back here. If you feel better aboutturning only one page, do that … because Discussion Points 1-167 disproving the global Earth follow.

21

22

DISCUSSION POINT 1 The horizon always appears perfectly flat—360 degrees around the observer—regardless of altitude. All unedited balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. If there is no curvature nor consistent drop in elevation regarding the surface of the Earth, the Earth cannot be globe-shaped, ball-shaped or spherical.

Arguably, the most common statement made by someone who supports a spherical Earth is this: The Earth is too big to see the curvature. It isn't, but regardless of being able to see it, you would still have to be able to measure it—and spherical trigonometry provides us the way: the size of the imaginary sphere can be measured because we know the circumference. Any sphere with a known circumference can be measured for its curvature and compared to observation; hence, the formula used is the distance in miles squared times eight inches. If objects can be seen beyond the curve of the supposed spherical curvature (they can), ball-Earth advocates need to explain why that can be happening—because it does happen (Discussion Points 55-62)—a lot—and if the Earth is indeed a globe, seeing objects that should be hidden behind a curve certainly should not be happening. 23

If this book contained no more evidence than this first discussion point, the global Earth would already be undeniably disproven. Logical-thinking and open-minded people who are willing to let go of their ego, put in the brain effort, can accept that they have been deceived, are not hesitant to change the way they think, don’t worry about what the neighbors will say, and who are not psychologically dependent on their own version of the truth will understand and accept that if there is no curvature nor consistent drop in elevation regarding the Earth, then it is impossible for the Earth to be spherical—and there is no curvature nor drop; hence, the Earth is not a ball. Please, however, continue to the following 166 Discussion Points.

24

DISCUSSION POINT 2 The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained. A person never needs to look down to see the horizon. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as a person ascended, the horizon would remain fixed and the observer/camera would have to look down and tilt further and further to see it. No matter the size of the ball—Earth-sized in this example—the results are exactly the same. The horizon always drops from eye level as you increase in altitude.

If the Earth was indeed a huge ball, would there even be a horizon at all? Picture yourself at the top of a huge Ferris wheel: the Ferris wheel is always beneath you … with no horizon.

25

From Scientific American: “It may not take much technology to understand that Earth is not perfectly round, but it takes quite a bit of effort and equipment to determine its true shape.” Agreed. (And kudos to Scientific American for opening the door.) Simple and low-technology experiments—like those discussed herein—take huge, conclusive steps to prove the Earth is not a globe. However, empirical evidence alone—using our eyes and brain together—trusting our eyes, our senses—proves the Earth is not a globe. As most people only have faith in second-hand references they consider “facts,” I am a strong advocate for first-hand analysis (via the scientific method as well as the more simple, yet equally effective, empirical method). Thorough analysis should then be followed with honorable and purposeful debate. Debate needs to happen—especially regarding the finer, more tricky areas which certainly exist. People learn through virtuous, dignified, didactic debate. It is my position that any serious-minded debate regarding a ball-shaped Earth needs to begin with, “Show me the curvature or a consistent drop in elevation on the Earth.” Follow that up with, “Explain why the horizon is always eye-level.” Sincere, straightforward people will conclude there is no curvature nor elevation drop and the horizon is always eye-level. They will, by default if nothing else, concede the Earth is not a globe. Then the fun begins—scientifically, analytically, logically and philosophically. 26

DISCUSSION POINT 3

The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space, then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is thought to be an extended, flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.

Water is always flat and seeks equilibrium whatever the distance: this fact strongly conflicts with the global-Earth model. 27

DISCUSSION POINT 4 If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6-mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level. If the natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level (it is), and large bodies of water need to be contained (they do, see image above), and they do not conform to the exterior of shapes and objects (they don't, see image above), and approximately 71% of the Earth's surface is water (it is) ... how is it possible that you can be living on a spinning ball covered with water? (It isn't. And you don't.)

“The facts and experiments already advanced render it [that the Earth is not a globe] undeniable, that the surface of all the waters of the Earth are horizontal; and that, however irregular the upper outline of the land itself may be, the whole mass, land and water together, constitutes an immense, non-moving … plane.” Samuel Birley Rowbotham 28

DISCUSSION POINT 5 The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 100 miles long—without any locks—making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature and elevation drop were not taken into account. The canal was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The Manchester Ship Canal Company published the following in the Earth Review: “It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the Earth.” [Please see image insert.]

The absolute fact that there is no curvature nor elevation drop, that the horizon is always eye-level and that water always finds its flatness should be enough for anyone to embrace the possibility that maybe—just maybe—the Earth is not what we have been told; however, debating or even simply discussing this topic with someone who believes in the global-Earth model can be frustrating. The Big Blue Marble brainwashing starts in pre-school. From there, the cult-like beliefs are deeplyingrained by statist education and corporate media through actual contracts with complicit Hollywood companies and the United States' Department of Internal Affairs among many others. Those who believe in the globe model proudly defend their mental servitude, reflexively attacking free-thinking individuals with establishment-programmed talking points. It can be difficult for them to internalize that they are simply re-stating what they have been told to believe since their early childhood—and not what they have actually confirmed with their own senses. 29

DISCUSSION POINT 6 Before we get too deep into this information, it is of the utmost importance that the difference between real science and Science-ism (pseudoscience) is clearly understood. Please note also, that most independent and true, flat-Earth researchers are feverishly practicing science with integrity, while those who support the spherical-Earth model are likely practicing pseudoscience. How can you easily identify which is which? Take this book and start asking your teachers and university professors questions. If they are practicing true science with integrity, they will fall in line with those characteristics listed in the SCIENCE column above; if they are unwilling to debate, discuss, investigate, listen, provide logical answers or are blatantly dismissive, well, they are clearly practicing PSEUDOSCIENCE. If science is to believed, we must be able to trust the scientists. Unfortunately, we seem to be living in the golden age of pseudoscience, aka Science-ism.

30

DISCUSSION POINT 7 The Lieutenant-Colonel Portlock experiment used Oxy-hydrogen lamp, Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the Sun’s rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St. George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Portlock’s light should have remained hidden under an approximate mile and a half of curvature. It was not. It was clearly visible.

So what are we told is the curvature of a spherical Earth? To keep the answer as simple as possible, we are told the curvature drop is 8” per mile squared—this method, however, is only accurate for a couple hundred miles. As one travels down the globe, the elevation drop becomes the story as it is more and more pronounced the closer one gets to the equator. The globe is supposed to be on a 23.4° tilt with north always north. Depending where one is standing on the sphere (see Discussion Points 1 and 64), the degree of angle to the top changes; hence, the elevation drop will also change. Overall, the average fall in elevation on a globe-sized Earth is simply the radius divided by 1/4 circumference—3959 miles (radius) divided by 6225 miles (1/4 circumference)—which equals 0.6359 miles fall per mile or 3,358 feet per mile—that is more than 40,000 inches. Remember, the fall would be very slight at the globe’s North Pole and rather dramatic at the equator. Although the curvature of the Earth remains constant at a steady 8”—as we are told—the official-story, elevation drop would reveal far more obvious and consistently increasing numbers (see Discussion Point 1). For the sake of both conservative discussion and estimation, the 8” per mile squared will be referenced throughout this book. As a reader, please keep in mind that every curvature reference found in this book reflects the absolute lowest possible estimate and that the elevation drop in each presented example is much, much more dramatic. 31

For great insight regarding eclipses, plase search YouTube for The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth.

DISCUSSION POINT 8 According to global theory, a lunar eclipse occurs when the Sun, Earth and Moon are in a direct line; however, it is on record that since about the fifteenth century, over fifty eclipses have occurred while both the Sun and the Moon have been visible above the horizon. (See also Discussion Point 102.) If a lunar eclipse had happened only once while both the Sun and the Moon were visible, it would have unequivocally disproven the global theory. The fact it has occurred multiple times raises serious questions about the global-Earth model. For more on lunar eclipses, see Discussion Points 99-103. Also, I highly encourage you to search for and watch Square Earth-Lunar Eclipses Explained on YouTube for a fantastic, visual explanation. Additionally, according to the heliocentric model, Mercury and Venus orbit the Sun closer than the Earth (see image below). It should be impossible to see these planets at night—but they are clearly visible via telescope. As is visually and logically clear, only the dayside of Earth should be able to see these two planets.

32

DISCUSSION POINT 9 Allen Daves, a student of education, philosophy and archaeology: “If the government or NASA had said to you that the Earth is stationary, imagine that. And then imagine we are trying to convince people that, No, no it's not stationary, it's moving forward at 32 times rifle bullet speed and spinning at 1,000 miles per hour. We would be laughed at! We would have so many people telling us, You are crazy, the Earth is not moving! We would be ridiculed for having no scientific backing for this convoluted moving Earth theory. And not only that but then people would say, Oh, then how do you explain a fixed, calm atmosphere and the Sun's observable movement, how do you explain that? Imagine saying to people, No, no, the atmosphere is moving also but is somehow magically velcroed to the moving-Earth. The reason is not simply because the Earth is stationary. So what we are actually doing is what makes sense. We are saying that the moving-Earth theory is nonsense. The stationary-Earth theory makes sense and we are being ridiculed. You've got to picture it being the other way around to realize just how ridiculous this situation is. This theory from the government and NASA that the Earth is rotating and orbiting and leaning over and wobbling is absolute nonsense and yet people are clinging to it, tightly, like a teddy bear. They just can't bring themselves to face the possibility that the Earth is stationary though all the evidence shows it: we feel no movement, the atmosphere hasn't been blown away, we see the Sun move from east to west, everything can be explained by a motionless Earth without bringing in all these assumptions to cover up previous assumptions gone bad.”

David Wardlaw Scott

For insight that goes beyond the horizon line of convergence and takes the proof of no curvature to the next level—line of sight— please search YouTube for Flat Earth# The Definitive Flatness Test Shows 0% Curvature.

33

DISCUSSION POINT 10 Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature. All land surveyors, engineers and architects' daily work experience proves to them the Earth is not a ball. Science simply uses mathemagical excuses to explain the non-existing curvature of the Earth.

Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this: that it is—at minimum—8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of at minimum 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle.” Further, the London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving even at a very generous only 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail—an average length—would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. 34

DISCUSSION POINT 11 Rivers run down to sea level finding the easiest course, north, south, east, west and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball, then many rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill. The Mississippi River, in its 3000 miles, would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Paraguay, Parana and most other long rivers. One portion of the Nile River (pictured below) flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. This would be impossible on the global-Earth model.

The natural physics of water makes a global Earth highly suspect. The simplest and most obvious proof that everyone—regardless of education and/or indoctrination—can instantly grasp is that all the rivers run into the seas and oceans; however, no river flows from a sea or from an ocean. Why do the rivers flow to the oceans? Because the oceans are at the lowest point on Earth (sea level); therefore, a river can not flow up from the ocean: water always flows down from higher areas. This is rather clear evidence that the Earth is not what we have been told. The concept of a sea level has no place in a global-Earth model. In fact, heights are not measured from the center of any globe: sea level is used as a constant measurement because sea level is exactly the same everywhere on Earth —it is the accepted level of zero. Everything above sea level is above the zero height. Such an occurrence is only possible on a flat Earth. 35

DISCUSSION POINT 12 Whether you believe the Bible is the Word of God or rather a valuable, historical document, the Bible fully supports a variance of a flat-Earth model and does not in any way support the globalEarth model. The Bible—in clear terms—describes a fixed, flat Earth, around which the Sun, Moon, and stars revolve. Note that the definition of the word firmament (in the graphic below) has caused much debate. It has been used to denote solidity, expansion and/or heaven itself. The term firmament does not strictly mean a “solid dome” ceiling—or dome of any kind. Mostly, support for a solid dome seems to be a product of blind faith in a questionable translation. Outside of religious scripture, even shaky evidence to support a solid dome proves elusive. As man is unable to reach and study the firmament, its true composition is currently left to debate. Evidence also suggests that the firmament meets as a pyramid (not rounded as illustrated below) at the prime meridian. This is based on the 23.4 degree angle of the celestial ecliptic (Discussion Points 39, 41, 145 and 148). The firmament—3600 miles at the apex (equator and primer meridian axis, triangulated on the equator at equinox)—runs at that 23.4 degree angle above the Earth, and, whatever it is made of, has refractive qualities—along with the atmosphere—that makes the Sun appear through it the way it does.

The Bible is not the only ancient text supporting the flat-Earth model: the Koran, Srimad Bhagavatam (an epic, philosophical and literary ancient text that touches upon all fields of human 36

knowledge) and many other holy and/or historical books describe and purport the existence of a flat, stationary flat Earth. There are nearly 100 passages in the Bible alone that support the stationary, flat-Earth model, while, by contrast, condemning the rotating, global-Earth model. The Bible repeatedly affirms—without question—that the Earth is “outstretched” as a plane, with the outstretched heavens everywhere above (not all around). The Bible provides clear, scriptural evidence that the Earth is not a spinning ball—simple, independent research will confirm these claims. Three, easy-to-understand examples of a stationary Earth from within the Bible are as follows: •

1 Chronicles 16:30 and Psalm 96:10 both read, “He has fixed the Earth firm, immovable.”

•

Psalm 93:1 says, “The world also is established, that it cannot be moved.”

Without the globe-Earth model, the Big Bang model wouldn’t be considered; without the Big Bang model, the Theory of Evolution wouldn’t be on the table; without the Theory of Evolution, extraterrestrials from another star system seeding man is not as strongly considered. Without the fabricated story of the global Earth, without all of the accompanying lies and speculation clouding their thought, people start to think about the creator—and as you will read in the conclusion, that is exactly what the establishment does not want. “… let God be true, but every man a liar …” Romans 3:4 Christians—those who have been presented with this irrefutable information—face the understandably difficult dilemma of faith versus “scientific” and societal indoctrination. As the Bible is explicitly clear on this issue, a believer in Jesus is forced to either acknowledge and embrace that the Earth is not a spinning ball … or question his faith and the Word of God. For some, it will undoubtably prove to be a very difficult and unenviable position.

37

It is interesting to note that the Catholic Church upheld the truth about the nature of the Sun and a flat Earth for over a hundred years, then found themselves in a two-hundred-year battle for power with the creators/pushers (Discussion Point 159) of the heliocentric philosophy until the Church finally lost and, as a result, shockingly and dramatically modified their beliefs: the Vatican no longer holds any of their "sacred truths" to be sacred. Although the Bible’s scripture remains the same regarding this topic, the Church has completely changed its position regarding the Earth model since 1616, going as far as now endorsing the Big Bang, evolution and alien theories. The Church once emphatically supported a flat-Earth model—because scripture then and still now supports a flat Earth; however, the Catholic Church now disregards clearly written scripture found within the Bible and instead supports—with no explanation or supporting evidence—a global-Earth model. The following is the excerpted, official sentence the Catholic Church gave to Galileo in 1633. Why did the Church sentence Galileo? The Church sentenced him to prison because he claimed the Earth rotated and also orbited a stationary Sun—the heliocentric model. That is correct: the Church was so strongly against the ball-Earth model that it put people who promoted it is prison. Unfortunate for Galileo, the Church now perplexingly, stupefyingly and completely supports the ball-Earth model even though it is “false and wholly contrary to sacred and divine Scripture” (quoted from below). Read for yourself the Church’s strong 1633 position in favor of a flat Earth and against a spherical Earth and against people like Galileo who pushed the global-Earth, heliocentric model: We by the grace of God, cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, Inquisitors General, by the Holy Apostolic see specially deputed, against heretical depravity throughout the whole Christian Republic. Whereas you, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzo Galilei, Florentine, aged seventy years, were in the year 1615 denounced to this Holy Office for holding as true the false doctrine taught by many, that the sun is the centre of the world and immovable, and that the earth moves, and also with a diurnal motion; for having disciples to whom you taught the same doctrine; for holding correspondence with certain mathematicians of Germany concerning the same; for having printed certain letters, entitled “On the Solar Spots,” wherein you developed the same doctrine as true; and for replying to the objections from the Holy Scriptures, which from time to time were urged against it, by glossing the said Scriptures according to your own meaning: and whereas there was thereupon produced the copy of a document in the form of a letter, purporting to be written by you to one formerly your disciple, and in this diverse propositions are set forth, following the hypothesis of Copernicus [Discussion Point 53], which are contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture: This Holy Tribunal being therefore desirous of proceeding against the disorder and mischief thence resulting, which went on increasing to the prejudice of the Holy Faith, by command of his Holiness and of the most eminent Lords Cardinals of this supreme and universal Inquisition, the two propositions of the stability of the sun and the motion of the earth were by the theological “Qualifiers’s qualified as follows: The proposition that the sun is the centre of the world and does not move from its place is absurd and false philosophically and formally heretical, because it is expressly contrary to the Holy Scripture. The proposition that the earth is not the centre of the world and immovable, but that it moves, and also with a diurnal motion, is equally absurd and false philosophically, and theologically considered, at least erroneous in faith. But whereas it was desired at that time to deal leniently with you, it was decreed at the Holy Congregation held before his Holiness on the 25th February, 1616, that his Eminence the Lord Cardinal Bellarmine should order you to abandon altogether the said false doctrine, and, in the event of your refusal, that an injunction should be imposed upon you by the Commissary of the Holy Office, to give up the said doctrine, and not to teach it to others, nor to defend it, nor even discuss it; and failing your acquiescence in this injunction, that you should be imprisoned. And in execution of this decree, on the following day, at the Palace, and in the presence of his Eminence, the said Lord Cardinal 38

Bellarmine, after being gently admonished by the said Lord Cardinal, the command was intimated to you by the Father Commissary of the Holy Office for the time before a notary and witnesses, that you were altogether to abandon the said false opinion, and not in future to defend or teach it in any way whatsoever, neither verbally nor in writing; and upon your promising to obey you were dismissed. And in order that a doctrine so pernicious might be wholly rooted out and not insinuate itself further to the grave prejudice of Catholic truth, a decree was issued by the Holy Congregation of the Index, prohibiting the books which treat of this doctrine, and declaring the doctrine itself to be false and wholly contrary to sacred and divine Scripture. And whereas a book appeared here recently, printed last year at Florence, the title of which shows that you were the author, this title being: “Dialogue of Galileo Galilci on the Two Principal Systems of the World, the Ptolemaic and the Copernican”; and whereas the Holy Congregation was afterwards informed that through the publication of the said book, the false opinion of the motion of the earth and the stability of the sun was daily gaining ground; the said book was taken into careful consideration, and in it there was discovered a patent violation of the aforesaid injunction that had been imposed upon you, for in this book you have defended the said opinion previously condemned and to your face declared to be so, although in the said book you strive by various devices to produce the impression that you leave it undecided, and in express terms as probable: which however is a most grievous error, as an opinion can in no wise be probable which has been declared and defined to be contrary to Divine Scripture: Therefore by our order you were cited before this Holy Office, where, being examined upon your oath, you acknowledged the book to be written and published by you. … Invoking, therefore, the most holy name of our Lord Jesus Christ and of His most glorious Mother, and ever Virgin Mary, by this our final sentence, which sitting in judgment, with the counsel and advice of the Reverend Masters of sacred theology and Doctors of both Laws, our assessors, we deliver in these writings, in the cause and causes presently before us between the magnificent Carlo Sinceri, Doctor of both Laws, Proctor Fiscal of this Holy Office, of the one part, and you Galileo Galilei, the defendant, here present, tried and confessed as above, of the other part,’we say, pronounce, sentence, declare, that you, the said Galileo, by reason of the matters adduced in process, and by you confessed as above, have rendered yourself in the judgment of this Holy Office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely, of having believed and held the doctrine which is false and contrary to the sacred and divine Scriptures that the sun is the centre of the world and does not move from east to west, and that the earth moves and is not the centre of the world; and that an opinion may be held and defended as probable after it has been declared and defined to be contrary to Holy Scripture; and that consequently you have incurred all the censures and penalties imposed and promulgated in the sacred canons and other constitutions, general and particular, against such delinquents. From which we are content that you be absolved, provided that first, with a sincere heart, and unfeigned faith, you abjure, curse, and detest the aforesaid errors and heresies, and every other error and heresy contrary to the Catholic and Apostolic Roman Church in the form to be prescribed by us. And in order that this your grave and pernicious error and transgression may not remain altogether unpunished, and that you may be more cautious for the future, and an example to others, that they may abstain from similar delinquencies we ordain that the book of the “Dialogues of Galileo Galilei” be prohibited by public edict. We condemn you to the formal prison of this Holy Office during our pleasure, and by way of salutary penance, we enjoin that for three years to come, you repeat once a week the seven penitential Psalms. Reserving to ourselves full liberty to moderate, commute, or take off, in whole or in part, the aforesaid penalties and penance. And so we say, pronounce, sentence, declare, ordain, condemn and reserve, in this and any other better way and form which we can and may lawfully employ. 39

Globe model distance from Queenstown, New Zealand, to Santiago, Chile = 5861 miles on the globe-Earth model, 5861 miles on the square/diamondEarth model, and far over 10,000 miles on the AE/Gleason model. Why mention this? Because the AE/Gleason map is wildly, wholly inaccurate.

DISCUSSION POINT 13 The process for identifying a working world projection is through scientific and mathematical verification of the facts and then an application of those facts to the hypothesis followed by continued research. It is foolish to have a preconceived theory and force all other details to somehow fit: that is not science, that is Science-ism. Honest science demands authentication of the data if it is to be presented as truth. The Azimuthal Equidistant (AE) projection—by far the most commonly presented representation of a flat Earth—is a victim of Science-ism as it thas been proven to be tremendously flawed: inaccurate flight times, incorrect lengths of both Tropics compared to the equator, the vastly increased speed of the Moon, unrealistic daylight hours in the South, et cetera. Historical accounts will show that deliberate flat-Earth researchers were taken more seriously as a result of not promoting a bad model—i.e., the AE. The Mercator projection—alternatively—is what is used for navigation. Why does the Mercator map work for navigation? Because it uses a grid system of right angles that allows for accuracy—something that simply does not translate effectively on a spherical or a circular map. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) is the projection that all militaries utilize for navigation and other purposes. Militaries use the Mercator projection for a reason: it works. It is sensible to theorize that Mercator mapped the flat Earth and created the square map presented on this page. Although it is not definitive, research asserts that either the Sinusoidal (page 21) or the Mercator map is the most accurate projection representing the Earth. Am I claiming either of those projections as the representative map for the flat Earth? No. No. No. I’m simply sharing practical and accurate uses—and that should certainly count for something. Not because I believe it, but because it is irresponsible to discard any theory until proven incorrect, there seems an obligation to again introduce the idea that there exists more land than what we have been told. That said, there exists the possibility that more “worlds” (Discussion Point 36) beyond the North and South Poles of our potentially Sinusoidal-like, diamond, 4D realm (Discussion Point 166)—if this theory were one day proven accurate—it would raise a simple, yet extremely important question: Are we humans being forcibly kept away from the life forms inhabiting the other realms (Discussion Point 54), or are we being forcibly kept in this realm by the life forms here (Discussion Point 159) who may or may not be agents of the residents of the other realms and/or dimensions? 40

DISCUSSION POINT 14 No child or un-indoctrinated man in their right-mind would ever conclude or even conceive given to their own devices, based on their own personal observations, that the Earth was a spinning ball revolving around the Sun. Such imaginative theories nowhere present in anyone’s daily experience have required—and still require—massive amounts of constant propaganda to uphold the illusion. Sadly, it appears the same propagandistic strategies are being utilized to "sell" the Azimuthal Equidistant (AE) projection as the Holy Grail of a flat-Earth to anyone willing to listen and bite. As has been already stated—and will be repeated throughout this book—the AE does not accurately represent a flat Earth. The AE was intentionally planted in the flat-Earth community so both the armchair and the celebrity "scientists" would have an easy target to debunk to publicly "prove" even the idea of a flat-Earth as ridiculous. Notice that every topic found within this book is completely ignored in and banned from the public, mainstream discussion forums, while the AE is literally everywhere the mainstream mentions the flat Earth theory. Why? Why? That's easy: the discussion points found within this book are largely prohibited because they are valid points that go a long way toward disproving the global Earth lie; hence, these topics will never be discussed in any mainstream format. Only the AE/Gleason map, the circling Sun and Moon, the ice wall and other nonsense that was intentionally planted—and is, therefore, easily laughed at—is approved for mainstream discussion. Laughing along with the talking heads on the mainstream media appeals to most peoples' cognitive biases; and 90%—95%? 99%?—of the public will refuse to think for themselves and instead simply go along to get along, because it's comfortable and makes them feel cozy. Every time—every time—someone—it doesn't matter who—"debunks" the flat Earth, they are not actually debunking a flat-Earth, they are debunking an incorrect model, one placed there specifically for that exact purpose. (Furthermore, one should be highly skeptical and suspicious of the motivation behind anyone in the flat-Earth community still promoting the AE model.) Let's take one final look—an obvious one—illustrating why the AE is an obvious bust: Distance divided by time equals speed. The Sun always travels 1037 mph with less than a 2% fluctuation throughout the year. On the AE (image, left), there are three different size circles: the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn and the equator. If the the Sun travels Cancer at 1037 mph in 24 hours, how does it also travel Capricorn at 1037 mph in 24 hours when the Capricorn circle is much, much, much longer—nearly three times longer—than Cancer's? The Sun would have to increase its speed to over 1800 mph to complete the Capricorn circle in only 24 hours —but that is not what we see.

41

Knowing that commerical airline pilots are not allowed to speak to the media and are sworn to secrecy, please search YouTube for FLAT EARTH PILOT Risks Career to Film NO Curvature from Cockpit.

DISCUSSION POINT 15 If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles (40,233 km) in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space.” A pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph (804 km/h), if flying around a global Earth, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute; otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time, the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected. Pilots, however, do not dip the nose of the plane and course-correct downward, they do not compensate flight pattern in any way … nor, as a result of not doing these things, do they fly straight off into “outer space.” The fact that this never happens and that the horizon remains level at the pilot’s desired altitudes proves the Earth is not a ball. Furthermore, all airplanes always fly across the sky in a straight line. They never arch across a ball as they fly. A person sees this truth with his own eyes each and every day. If the Earth was a globe, and if the plane truly followed its curvature as it flew, the contrails would be visibly curved. They are not. The contrails and the motion of the plane are both straight, as if flying over a flat plane. In the flight data image below, the ground is depicted as being perfectly flat with the aircraft flying parallel.

YouTube suggestion: Interview with Commercial Airline Pilot: Globe Lie/Plane Earth Truth.

42

For some unintentional comedy from NASA regarding the non-rotation of the Earth, please search YouTube for Earth Spinning in 2 Different Directions. NASA Mistakes.

DISCUSSION POINT 16 The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary. Airy instead proved the Earth was flat and stationary. But … what exactly are stars? Again, the truth is that we don’t know. Academic institutions attempt to convince you that indisputable information about the stars is available, but the truth is … no. Consider the following: 1. Stars appear as tiny dots from the ISS (Discussion Point 128) . 2. Stars appear as the same dots to us from here on Earth. 3. However, between the ISS and Earth, there is a dense atmosphere that effectively scatters light. 4. If light exists as scattered photons deflected from their direct path—it does—then it doesn't reach your eye. 5. The fewer photons coming from a source, the more likely it is that scattering will result in too few photons reaching the eye to be detected/processed/rendered by the visual centre. Conclusion: Freckle-sized, dimly appearing lights approximately 43,000,000,000 km above the Earth should not be visible—yet as the authentic, zoomed-in star images to the right illustrate, they are visible. Both the Earth’s movement and the stars’ make-up and composition are not what we have been told. 43

"Never theorize before you have data. Invariably, you end up twisting facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." —Sherlock Holmes

DISCUSSION POINT 17 With Airy’s failure proving that the Earth does not rotate, the heliocentric theorists needed to quickly show with no further doubt that the Earth rotated. Enter two staunch supporters of heliocentricity, Albert Michelson and Edward Morley, who in 1887 set up a device which split up light: one beam in the direction of the Earth’s rotation, and one at right angles. The two light beams then recombined and hit a photographic plate. The difference in speed of the two beams would create an interference pattern. They expected to measure a speed of 30 km/s as that was the speed of the Earth’s supposed rotation, but instead registered a variable difference of between 1 and 10 km/s each time the experiment was repeated. They called this a “null” result. This proves that the Earth is not rotating and at the same time proved the existence of the ether. It didn’t stop there, Georges Sagnac and Henry Gale conducted similar experiments, but on a rotating platform, which again demonstrated the existence of the ether, already proven by default in 1871 and 1885 by combining the results from George Airy and Foucault’s Pendulum (Discussion Point 106), and also in 1887 by the Michelson-Morley experiment. For further study, please reference the Zig Zag Theory. How do you think the advocates of heliocentric theory responded? They made something up, of course. What else could they do but invent another wild theory to play down these solid, scientific results and lead us further into the pit of fallacy. Enter showbiz academic of the 20th century, Albert Einstein, and his special theory of relativity. Special relativity was invented to make sure all these experiments still gave heliocentric theory a chance of being correct. It needed objects to shrink to a specific size in direct proportion to its speed. However, these objects weren’t measured, and the concept had never been observed at all. It was metaphysical only. But, for the heliocentric crowd, it had to be correct, otherwise the unthinkable would be true. Making up a new branch of mathematics to explain the results of experiments that disagree with your worldview does not equate to proof. 44

DISCUSSION POINT 18 Real scientific experiments which are observable, testable and repeatable confirm that the Earth is not moving at any rate of speed or in any certain velocity and that there is no measurable curvature to the landscape and oceans of the world. What is uniquely interesting about some of these various experiments such as the Michelson-Morley, Airy’s Failure and the Gale and Sagnac experiments, is that these scientists were heliocentrists and these experiments initially conducted as an attempt to detect and measure the rate of speed at which the Earth was moving in axial spin. But when they failed to identify any such motion, these experiments all became evidence in support of the Biblical notion that the Earth is stationary, fixed, and unmoving. As scientifically verifiable and repeatable evidence, these experiments totally destroy allegations that the Earth is spinning at over 1000 mph at the equator while it spins daily in an annual orbit around the Sun. And so no matter what one contends the shape of the Earth is, it is most certainly affirmed that it is in no way moving. Here’s more: Olber’s Paradox states that if there were billions of stars which are also Suns, the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model. Please search Stars! Not What You Think They Are! for further discovery regarding the stars. The video shows clips taken from Calgary, Alberta, Canada, by Scott Price. He used a P900 camera at 4X speed video at low resolution, out to 2000mm. When the video is played back, it slows down the motion to 1/4 speed. Watching the video—and many, many others like it—you’ll see that stars are clearly not billions of light years away as we are told. Instead you will witness that they are within the zoom of a camera lens. You will also see that what we refer to as stars do not in any way emulate flaming Suns as we have been taught. What you will see are what appear to be glimmering light objects shining through water. The stars— like so many other things—are clearly not what we have been told. 45

DISCUSSION POINT 19 The stars revolve 360° in 24 hours in an anti-clockwise fashion around the north polar star in the Northern Hemisphere, and clockwise around the southern star in the Southern Hemisphere. This, you may think, is a good argument for a rotating Earth—and it is; on it’s own, however, it is also a good case for a flat and stationary one, as it demonstrates that either the Earth or the heavens is moving. However, after 6 months, those exact same stars are at the exact same location, as can be seen with the naked eye, at which they had been 6 months previously. The annual change in the position of stars in the sky is called stellar parallax. In actual fact, however, after 190,000,000 miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all. This lack of parallax is a big problem for heliocentric theory which states that every 24 hours the Earth rotates on its axis at 1675km/ h, revolving around the Sun at 107,000km/h, which in turn moves around the center of the galaxy at 900,000km/h, which moves in the universe at 2,160,000km/h.

The Big Dipper Apart from the atmosphere disappearing at these speeds, how is there no stellar parallax, especially—as they claim—all the other stars and galaxies are revolving around each other and the Earth as well? The sky must be a mess! If the heliocentric model were accurate, each new day would bring a brand new unique constellation in the sky at night with some new stars getting nearer so they can be seen with the naked eye and some traveling further away and disappearing never to return for thousands or millions of years. This lack of stellar parallax is the reason why advocates of heliocentric theory give the unbelievably enormous distances the heavenly bodies must be from Earth: they claim they can’t measure it. In truth, however, not only is there no evidence for such astronomical distances, but also it has now proven that the stars are approximately only 4000 miles away, likely far closer than that even. Does making stuff up to support a theory lacking any observational or experimental evidence sound like science to you?

46

DISCUSSION POINT 20 If Earth were truly constantly spinning eastwards at over 1000 mph (1609 km/h)—or slightly less, depending on your latitude—vertically-fired cannonballs and other projectiles should fall significantly due west. In actual fact, however, whenever this has been tested, vertically-fired cannonballs shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the ground no more than 2 feet away from the cannon, often directly back into the muzzle.

Additionally, if Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning together (they aren’t) eastwards over 1000 mph (1609 km/h) then north/south facing cannons should establish a control while eastfiring cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others. West-firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction cannons are fired, the distance covered is always the same. Don’t have a cannon handy? Darn. It’s okay. Do the exact same experiment using a bow and arrow. Further, you can prove the spinning Earth is nonsense by simply jumping up as high as you can. Really, it's that simple. What happens when you jump? You come straight down to where you were. If the Earth were indeed spinning at such a fast speed, shouldn't you land hundreds of feet away? If you were standing on the flat bed of a pick-up truck that was driving down a dirt road, and you jumped straight up, what would happen? You wouldn't fall straight down. You would fall out of the truck. The same thing does not happen when you jump from a standing position on the Earth because trucks move; the Earth doesn't. This experiment proves the Earth is not moving. For those who contend that the atmosphere moves with the Earth's spin and should, therefore, dramatically alter the outcome of the above experiments, ask them this: Does the atmosphere create resistance? No. It doesn’t, definitely not enough to cause one to fall back to the exact spot one jumped straight up from at the speed the Earth is supposedly spinning. The atmosphere isn't some sort of thick substance. It isn’t glue. Actually, the atmosphere is a combination of gases and water and dust. It is not connected to the Earth because of buoyancy (and density). It is, however, somehow contained—intriguing!—or these gases would escape because of said same buoyancy. 47

DISCUSSION POINT 21 Read the following out loud: The Earth is spinning on a wobbling axis at 1000 mph and flying around the Sun at 67,000 mph while the entire solar system rotates around the galaxy at 500,000 mph as the galaxy speeds through the Universe at over 670,000,000 mph. Do you hear how ridiculous that sounds? If the Earth were truly constantly spinning eastwards at over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), helicopters and hot-air balloons should be able to simply hover and float over the surface of the Earth and wait for their destinations to come to them. A helicopter which hovers above the ground at any height from 1 meter all the way to its upper limit of around 8000 meters never experiences the ground traveling 231km/h (at the poles) to 1675km/h (at the equator) west to east—or in any direction in fact. Those who believe in the globe-Earth model may attempt to claim (wrongly) that the Earth spins under a sniper's bullet which is in the air for only a few seconds, but will struggle tremendously trying to explain why the Earth does not also spin under helicopters, hot-air balloons, airplanes, et cetera, which are in the air for hours. (Please see a discussion of the Coriolis Effect in Discussion Point 107.) The inconvenient truth is that the Earth is stationary. The more an individual thinks and analyzes, the truth of a flat and stationary Earth becomes more and more obvious. According to the ball-Earth model, the atmosphere spins with the ground (except when it doesn't?). The Foucault Pendulum theory (Discussion Point 106) states that the swing of the pendulum is caused by the spin of the Earth. Supposedly, "science" claims, the Earth is spinning below the pendulum while the pendulum remains still (because it is in the air). At that point it doesn't matter how the pendulum works, because if the Focault Pendulum theory was correct, one could hover motionless in a helicopter and simply wait for one's destination to arrive ... but reality has proven to us over and over and over, that doesn't happen. This is simply another example of "science" contradicting themselves while lying to you. 48

DISCUSSION POINT 22 If Earth were truly constantly spinning eastwards at over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), during the Red Bull stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico, should have landed 2500 miles west into the Pacific Ocean but instead landed a few dozen miles East of the take-off point.

Regarding the spin of the Earth, astrophysicist Laurence Krauss in 2005 speaking on The Anomaly of The Axis of Evil in Cosmic Background Radiation and Observational Astrophysics: “But when you look at [the cosmic microwave background] map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the Earth around the Sun. Is this Copernicus (Discussion Point 53) coming back to haunt us? That’s crazy. We’re looking out at the whole universe. There’s no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the Earth around the Sun—the plane of the Earth around the Sun—the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.” Even honest astrophysicists see the problems regarding the supposed spinning of the Earth and, therefore, see the problem regarding the entire heliocentric model.

49

DISCUSSION POINT 23 The brutal truth is this: it is a waste of time for people to debate whether the Earth is flat or spherical. Why? Because Nikola Tesla already proved the flat Earth to be the reality, the truth. Not only that, but he proved that the Earth is alive and conscious. He did this by simply recording, and decoding, Mother Nature's heartbeats. They're known as The Schumann Resonances; they are also known as our—yours and my—circadian rhythms. These distinctly unique frequencies power the totally diverse production and regulate the activity of all of the matter that composes the Earth—and us. Tesla found that Mother Nature’s electromagnetic heartbeats perfectly correspond to all of the proper nonlinear rates that pulsate as all of the elements and that they constantly change according to every different pattern for size, time, place, and situation in existence. This is a magneto dielectric realm of creation that was intelligently designed and based on the science of electricity, not particlebased atoms. Outside of this place is Aether. Aether is totally spaceless and timeless. It connects all edges of the Earth. In short, Tesla proved Mother Nature is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. This tells us three important things about ourselves and where we live: 1) Earth is an infinite—flat and level—field, 2) there is no other natural power besides the Earth’s, and 3) all others energies are merely man-made frequencies of harnessed and converted—and, therefore, perverted—energy that seeks to imitate, override and replace the Earth’s perfect patterns. Tesla's greatest discovery was this entirely new kind of electricity he termed Radiant Matter, aka dielectricity, radiant energy, impulse electricity longitudinal waves. Why was this so amazing? His experiments revealed the existence of the Aether, the ever-present field that connects all things, the non-physical force behind all physical phenomena. He discovered that infinite energy lie within every inch of the Aether; he discovered that the ancient technologies were all generated from the Aether. [Our freedom in the future revolves around our study and further understanding of the Aether.] It was for this one, momentous discovery, and no other, that Tesla was discredited by the "elites", because it also proved that the intended use of the electromagnetic field by the electricallyconnected corporations, was not only immoral, but lethal—to our brains and bodies. The story goes that once he realized Mother Nature’s energy field was the sole source of our advanced levels of health and intelligence, including that which was his own, he refused to continue to abuse what he then knew was the only Matrix for them both. (Please research The Connection Between Us And The Schumann Resonances.) But, more than this, he was attempting to tell the public to do the same and this is something "The Powers That Be" could not have happening—as their entire system is designed to make, and keep, people asleep in all they are, think, say and do. 50

DISCUSSION POINT 24 Our eyes and experience—empirical evidence—tells us the Earth is flat, motionless and that everything in the sky revolves around us. Where is the empirical evidence that the Earth is a globe and that it orbits the Sun? Where is the empirical evidence that the Earth is spinning at 1000 miles per hour? Where is the empirical evidence that the Sun is 93,000,000 miles away? Where is the empirical evidence showing the horizon drop off ? Where is the empirical evidence showing trillions of tons of magically curving water? Where is the empirical evidence that gravity exists, behaves differently for different objects with different densities? Where is any empirical evidence? When we remove the fake, CGI images and the scientific theories which are presented as fact— theories are, by definition, not factual—and use our eyes and experience instead, we start to see it. However, when we cease to believe our own eyes and experience, we prostrate ourselves at the feet of the very pseudo-scientists who blinded us, to treat them as experts, astronomical priests who have special knowledge only they can access. By brainwashing us about something so gigantic and fundamental as the truth about our Earth, it makes every other kind of lesser indoctrination extremely simple in comparison: for example, the Sun does not set nor rise. It is scientifically proven—utilizing the scientific method, not Science-ism—that our eyes see in a single vanishing point perspective. This is called the Law of Perspective (Discussion Point 71), and it is scientifically observable, testable and repeatable. This gives an illusion of the Sun “setting” and “rising” when it is actually moving away from or toward the viewer into a single point of convergence.

[Yes, I reference YouTube. Truth is truth, regardless of the source.]

51

It would definitely be worth your time to search YouTube for Sunrise, Sunset for repeated visuals of the Sun’s movement across the sky as well as its single point of convergence. Also search for Sunset in a Flat Earth Kitchen REMASTERED for an excellent experiment and visual example on exactly how a Sunset and/or Sunrise work on a flat Earth.

DISCUSSION POINT 25 If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), then the average commercial airliner traveling 500mph should never be able to reach its eastward destinations before they come speeding up from behind. Likewise, westward destinations should be arrived at thrice the speed, but this is not the case. (See Discussion Point 144 for more on this.)

Quoting Heaven and Earth by Gabrielle Henriet: “If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus (Discussion Point 53), there is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the Earth was wrong, on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the Earth’s rotation. If the Earth rotates, as it is said, at 1,000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, it is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute. On the other hand, if flying took place in the direction opposite to that of the rotation, a distance of 1,500 miles would be covered in one hour, instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of 1,000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the Earth’s rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft flying at this rate in the same direction as that of the rotation could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in mid-air over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal.”

52

DISCUSSION POINT 26 If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), landing airplanes on such fast-moving runways which face all manner of directions—north, south, east, west or any directional combination—and obstacles—and would be practically impossible.

If a plane is flying east and must land on a north/south runway—a very common occurrence—there should be many problems. Because of the alleged rotation of the Earth, the plane ends up with a greater velocity to the east than north-south—after turning in the north/south direction to land on a north/south-orientated runway. There must be some mysterious, unknown force that can balance out these differences in velocities for all planes that fly east or west during their flights. How do we calculate this force? We can’t. Where does it come from? It doesn’t exist. The only way to get rid of the need for that mysterious force is to stop the Earth from spinning—which is the reality. If we can't calculate this force—and we can’t—the Earth does not spin. We are able to calculate forces and velocities for all situations throughout physics—but not this. There cannot be an exception for this. It is entirely acceptable to analyze atmosphere and gravity momentum theories when flying and landing with the rotation when attempting to solve this mystery; however, even those theories cannot be used to explain how planes fly and land against any alternate rotation. 53

DISCUSSION POINT 27 Where is the constant wind? If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), this should somewhere, somehow be seen, heard, felt or measured by someone—yet no one in history has ever experienced this alleged, 1000 mph, eastward motion. Meanwhile, however, we can hear, feel and experimentally measure even the slightest westward breeze.

The density of the Earth has been calculated at 5,515 kg/m3. The density of air is 1.204 kg/m3 at room temperature, 4580 times less dense than the Earth. A denser solid object does not carry a less dense gas along with it when it moves. This is self-evident as it is the basis of aerodynamics. A moving solid object (100km/h car) leaves a gas (air) behind, creating a 100km/h wind in the perceived opposite direction of the moving car. When the solid planes are more perpendicular, it will push gas (such as air) away from the solid object, such as a fan. The Earth—although taught to be a spinning, slightly squashed globe—would push a little air out into space due to its slight undulations but would essentially be very aerodynamic, like a man spinning a basketball. Heliocentric theory (the Sun is the center of the universe and that planets orbit around it) states that the Earth rotates at 1600km/h at the equator, 1049km/h in London, and 231km/h in Alert, Northern Canada. This rotation would cause winds of almost equal speeds on the Earth’s surface— constantly. The fastest wind speed ever recorded by man is a F5 tornado with wind speeds of 420-511 km/h. There is nowhere on Earth that has a constant wind speed of between 231km/h and 1675km/h. If there were, nobody living below Greenland could venture outside. We would be all living underground in caves. 54

DISCUSSION POINT 28 Sometimes there are days of no wind, sometimes a mild breeze. Our simple human observation and experience tells us that the wind travels in all kinds of directions, sometimes changing bythe second. If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards together over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), then clouds, wind and weather patterns could not casually and unpredictably go every which way, with clouds often traveling in opposing directions at varying altitudes simultaneously.

Thomas Winships states: in Zetetic Cosmogeny: “Let ‘imagination’ picture to the mind what force air would have which was set in motion by a spherical body of 8,000 miles in diameter, which in one hour was spinning round 1,000 mph, rushing through space at 65,000 mph and gyrating across the heavens? Then let ‘conjecture’ endeavor to discover whether the inhabitants on such a globe could keep their hair on? If the Globe Earth model rotates on its axis at the terrific rate of 1,000 miles an hour, such an immense mass would of necessity cause a tremendous rush of wind in the space it occupied. The wind would go all one way, and anything like clouds which got ‘within the sphere of influence’ of the rotating sphere, would have to go the same way. The fact that the Earth is at rest is proved by kite flying.”

55

DISCUSSION POINT 29 If I were to start at the top of the Earth and dig a hole in the downward direction straight through it, I should obviously emerge on the other side of the Earth feet first. Please see Diagram A. NASA, however, wants me to believe that somewhere in the middle of the core of the Earth, I magically flip and come out the other side head first. Please see Diagram B.

DIAGRAM A

DIAGRAM B

HOW?!

What does logic tell you?

56

DISCUSSION POINT 30 These nine sentient beings each thinks he or she is upright on a ball. This "belief" is simply a result of their successful indoctrination regarding the fictional gravity. Seemingly, "gravity" is so strong that it can not only pull people, dogs and Wookies down to Earth (while, um, being too weak to stop small birds from flying?), but it can also completely alter the perception of reality. [Please also see Discussion Points 31-32, 51 and 81-86.]

You honestly believe this is reality?

This is a total mind trick, and open-minded, independent-thinking people should be able to grasp this obvious deceit. If these exact same people, dog and Wookie were standing with their feet glued to a 100-foot-in-diameter ball in the exact same positions as illustrated above, there is no doubt that each of them would easily recognize they were obviously standing upright, upside down or at ninety-or-any-other-degree angles (Discussion Point 112). Yet when that ball is larger (think Earth-sized), the Cult of Science wants each individual to believe that he or she loses the ability to perceive reality as, well, reality. Apparently, gravity is not only a powerful force that selectively chooses where and when it wants to do gravity-like things (re: gravity ignores the scientific method), but it also has the magical quality of telling people how to perceive and/or ignore their reality. 57

DISCUSSION POINT 31 If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world’s oceans, buildings, people and atmosphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for gravity to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and planes to take-off and travel freely unabated in any direction.

The reason a hummingbird can fly in the air is the same reason a helium balloon can float with ease in the air: Archimedes’ Principle. Archimedes’ Principle states that any object partially or entirely immersed in a fluid or gas is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid or the gas displaced by the object. In other words, if the weight of the water displaced is less than the weight of the object, the object will sink; otherwise, the object will float, with the weight of the water displaced equal to the weight of the object. Floating doesn't depend of the fiction of gravity, it depends on density and fluid dynamics. If you drop a pen and it falls to the floor, it is because the pen is more dense than the air it displaces. The pen sinks in the ocean of gas that we are all immersed in—and it sinks because of density not because of gravity. If you drop a book, the book drops because it is heavier than the air—not because of an unseen force pushing or pulling it down. It is also why a balloon floats, why water finds its level and why smoke rises: because of density—weight density—not because of the fictional and unproven gravity fairy tale. 58

DISCUSSION POINT 32 If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular Earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures—humans included—to swim through such forcefully held water.

Despite the early-2016, psychological-operation-disguised-as-scientific-discovery of gravitational waves in fictional black holes millions of miles away (does anyone with an honest, analytical mind believe that false science?), gravity remains nothing more than an untestable hypothesis. “Either something is wrong with the experiments, or there is a flaw in our understanding of gravity,” says Mark Kasevich, a Stanford University physicist who conducted an unrelated measurement of the big G in 2007 using atom interferometry. “Further work is required to clarify the situation.” For an informative and well-presented analysis of gravity, please search Flat Earth: Disproving Gravity (In 15 Minutes or Less). The explanation about how the Sun would collide with the Earth once a year —assuming the heliocentric model—is logically brilliant.

59

DISCUSSION POINT 33 Ship captains—while navigating great distances at sea—never need to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their calculations. Both Plane Sailing and Great Circle Sailing, the most popular navigation methods, use plane, not spherical trigonometry, making all mathematical calculations on the assumption that the Earth is perfectly flat. If the Earth were in fact a sphere, such an errant assumption would lead to constant glaring inaccuracies. Plane Sailing has worked perfectly fine in both theory and practice for thousands of years, however, and plane trigonometry has time and again proven more accurate than spherical trigonometry in determining distances across the oceans.

Spherical trigonometry proves the absence of curvature—as does simple observation. CAD data (left) reveals there should be measurable curvature and it should be testable, observable and repeatable—but it is not. As should be clear by now: a sphere cannot exist without curvature—and there is no curvature on Earth; hence, the Earth is not a globe. 60

DISCUSSION POINT 34

As Science-ism is the sole trick that keeps the global-Earth dog-and-pony show alive, focusing on an alternate—yet directly related—unproven theory that has also been blindly accepted and taught as fact by “scientists” will only further illustrate the purposeful intent to deceive (Discussion Point 149). Charles Darwin, an English naturalist, presented an unproven theory in his 1859 book titled On the Origin of Species. In his work, Darwin proposed a simple explanation for life on Earth—that life evolved through a series of biological changes deriving from random genetic mutations in conjunction with a process known as natural selection. This supposes that that species best adapted to environmental change are best suited to survive. The idea of survival of the fittest is perhaps the best known of Darwin’s principles and has been taught in schools for several generations. The evolution account is also familiar—fish evolved into amphibians, which changed into reptiles, which became birds and mammals, which eventually evolved into humans. “However, it is far easier to explain this to schoolchildren—with cute illustrations and pictures of a line-up of apes (beginning with those having slumped shoulders, transitioning to those standing fully upright—than it is to prove,” cautioned Will Hart, author of The Genesis Race. In fact, Darwin’s theory continues to generate controversy because, as Hart pointed out, “it is only scientific theory taught worldwide that has yet to be proven by the rigorous standards of [real] science.”

61

62

Even after 157 years of effort, no one has been able to fully substantiate Darwin’s theories through documented fossil exhibits—or any other strategy. Yet Darwin’s theory of evolution continues to be taught in most schools. The late Harvard biologist Stephen Jay Gould noted, “All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups of species are characteristically lacking.”

Darwin never actually insisted that man descended from the ape. The was a calculated, faulty conclusion via the societal engineers. Darwin himself admitted to giant holes in his own theory. “If it could not be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down,” he wrote in On the Origin of Species. No such indisputable linkage to complex organs has yet been found. Scientists practicing Science-ism, however, fiercely and predictably embrace, promote and defend the faulty premise of human evolution. As is the case with the theory of gravity, these scientists—both ignorantly and purposefully—push false dichotomies to distract: in evolution’s case, from a Creator. 63

DISCUSSION POINT 35 Perfectly mirrored images are not possible on a curved surface—regardless of how slight the curve (Discussion Point 95). Water always finds its flatness. There is no curvature nor constant drop in elevation on Earth. The Earth is not a globe.

64

DISCUSSION POINT 36 The below is an intriguing imagining of a flat-Earth map. The "lost" map—supposedly "found" in a Buddhist temple—illustrates the dis-proven circular projection within a square border (for lack of better term). The familiar land masses are arranged in the center with circles adorning it. Additional, unfamiliar land masses are scattered outside the circles, but within the larger, square border. Although knowingly inaccurate as a result of the inclusion of the debunked AE/Gleason projection in the center, this concept plays directly into the camp-favorite theory that there exists more land (Discussion Points 37, 54 and 153) than the general world population has been told. The exact image you see on this page is likely nothing more than part of a larger psychological operation. However, knowing that most attempts at disinformation share a bit of resonating truth, and combined with the words of Nikola Tesla from Discussion Point 23 ("Earth is an infinite— flat and level—field" [although it is likely the word "infinite" references the Aether]), the possibility that more land exists is something that at least warrants light consideration. However, directly referencing the "map" to the left, apparently, all one needs to do is create fake maps, books, manuscripts and photos and make a mysterious sounding backstory about it/them and voila, gullible people will latch onto it because it "proves" what they want to believe. "LOOK! Here's an old map of the Earth that was discovered in some old, musty archive in a library in a distant land and its a map of the flat Earth!" Why is it often easy for those who support the ball-Earth model to debunk the flat-Earth concept even though the Earth is flat? They are able to do this because the ball-Earth, map math is 100% correct: if it wasn't, they wouldn't have been able to fool the masses for 500 years. The heavily promoted and widely accepted AE map simply does not correctly match the math of the globe—it is not correct. The failures of the AE/Gleason projections being clear, which maps do match the reverseengineered, ball-Earth math? The Mercator, Collignon, Aitoff and Sinusoidal projections. Serious and astute flat-Earth researchers of integrity are focusing their attention on those four maps. Regarding all projections, the outer edges/borders are actually irrelevant. The only aspect researched should be concerned about is the continental layout. In essence, forget the frame and focus only on the land masses. The correct formula for accuracy is that the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn are the same length while shorter than the equator, and the prime meridian is half the length of the equator. As a result of such working, real-life, global-Earth mathematics, it stands to reason that our flat Earth is half as tall as it is wide. 65

DISCUSSION POINT 37 Consider further—as research or entertainment—the following Preface taken directly from F. Amadeo Giannini’s Worlds Beyond the Poles: Physical Continuity of the Universe, a book published by Vantage Press in 1959: The following pages contain the first and only description of the realistic Universe of land, water, oxygen, and vegetation, where human and other forms of animal life abound. This is not a work of fiction, nor is it a technical analysis of anything. It is a simple recital of fact which transcends the most elaborate fiction ever conceived. It is diametrically opposed to the assumptions and mathematical conclusions of theorists and technicians throughout the ages. It is truth. These pages describe the physical land routes from the Earth to every land area in the universe about us, which is all land. Such routes extend from beyond the North Pose and the South Pole so-called “ends” of the Earth as decreed by theory. It will be adequately shown that there are no northern or southern limits to the Earth. It will thereby be shown where movement straight ahead for the Pole points, and on the same length as the Earth, permits of movement into celestial land areas appearing “up,” or out from the Earth. An original treatise basic to the book was written and has been expounded at American universities, 1927-1930. Since then, the U.S. Naval Research Bureau and the U.S. Navy’s exploratory forces have conclusively confirmed the work’s principal features. Since December 12, 1928, U.S. Navy polar expeditions have determined the existence of indeterminable land extent beyond both Pole points, out of bounds of the assumed “isloated globe” Earth as postulated by the Copernican Theory of 1543. On January 13, 1956, as this book was being prepared, a U.S. Naval air unit penetrated the extent of 2300 miles beyond the assumed South Pole end of the Earth. That flight was always over land and water and ice. For very substantial reasons, the memorable flight received negligible press notice. The United States and more than thirty other nations prepared unprecedented polar expeditions for 1957-58 to penetrate land now proved to extend without limit beyond both Pole points. My original disclosure of then-unknown land beyond the Poles, in 1926-28, was captioned by the press as “More daring than anything Jules Vernes ever conceived.” [Jules Gabriel Verne was a French author who pioneered the genre of science-fiction. He is best known for his novels Journey to the Center of the Earth (1864), Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea (1870) and Around the World in Eighty Days (1873).] Today, thirty years later, the United States, Russia, Argentina, and other nations have bases on that realistic land extent which is beyond the Earth. It is not space, as theory dictated; it is land and water of the same order that comprise known Earth territory. This work provides the first account of why it is unnecessary to attempt “shooting up,” or out, from the terrestrial level for journey to any of the astronomically named celestial land areas. It relates why such attempt would be futile. These pages present incontrovertible evidence that the same atmospheric density of the Earth prevails thought the entire Universe. Such feature proves that, except for the 66

presence of a gaseous sky envelope and underlying oxygen content equivalent to the of the Earth, we could never observe the luminous celestial areas designed as “star” or “planet.” It is shown here the in a determination of realistic cosmic values the observed luminous areas of the Universe about us represent celestial sky areas, and that they are as continuous and connected as all areas of this Earth’s continuous and connected sky. Hence it is shown that there are no “globular and isolated bodies” to be found throughout the whole Universe: they are elements of lens deception. Accordingly, the absence of celestial “bodies” precludes any possibility of bodies “circling or eclipsing in space.” This work is radically and rightfully opposed to astronomical conclusions of all ages. It depicts the illusions developing from all telescopic observations and photographs of the universe about us. It clearly explains and vividly illustrates why those lens-developed illusions have been mistakenly accepted as facts. The book is therefore unparalleled in the long history of man’s attempted interpretation and recording of the universe about us. It projects man’s first understanding of the factual and endless Universe which contains human life throughout its vast length and width—regardless of all abstract theory to the contrary. F.A.G. It is worth bringing to the attention of the reader that when the elitist-controlled Amazon.com takes it upon itself to provide the following disclosure regarding a book decades out of print, it only raises questions regarding the books content to informed and independent thinkers: CAUTION: World’s Beyond the Poles published in 1959 is controversial and NOT about the Hollow Earth. Evidently the book was published to damage the reputation of the Hollow Earth information available up to that point. The book is nothing but illogical mis-information, an attempt to discredit the true-story published in the late 1940s and 1950s of Admiral Byrd’s successful expeditions to Inner Earth. You Have Been Warned. 67

DISCUSSION POINT 38 If Earth were a spinning ball it would be impossible to photograph or record star-trail time-lapses turning perfect circles around Polaris anywhere but the North Pole. At all other vantage points the stars would be seen to travel more or less horizontally across the observer’s horizon due to the alleged 1000 mph (1609 km/h) motion beneath their feet (see the photograph with the red arrows, next page). In reality, however, Polaris’s surrounding stars can always be photographed turning perfect circles around the central star all the way down to the Tropic of Capricorn where the stars travel in a straight line from the East to the West (reference the insert photo at the top of page 69). Disclaimer: Although the images on these two pages are visually enhanced to more clearly see the movement of the stars, the photographs are in no other way manipulated or edited for content. Any photoshop effort is simply an enhancement of what already occurs naturally. This is testable, observable and repeatable.

Star-trails show the celestial equator is parallel to the terrestrial equator which are both straight lines (again, reference the insert photo, page 69, top right). This indisputably shows that the Earth is fixed and stationary and the heavens above are moving (Discussion Point 41). The ecliptic shows the 23.4° tilt of the sky (Figure 2.1 on page 71), not of the globe on it's axis. If Earth were a spinning ball revolving around the Sun, it would actually be impossible for star-trail photos to show perfect circles even at the North Pole. Since the Earth is also allegedly moving 67,000mph around the Sun, the Sun moving 500,000mph around the Milky Way, and the entire galaxy going 670,000,000mph, these four contradictory motions would make star-trail time-lapses all show irregular curved lines (again, reference the photograph with the red arrows, page 69, top left). Photographs such as those shown on these two pages do not allow for the possibility that the Earth moves around the Sun or that the Sun circles above the Earth—there simply is no argument 68

supporting either model. One could argue that theoretically the photographs show the spin of the Earth—and that theoretical, stand-alone possibility is acknowledged—however, once the movement of the Earth around the Sun and through the galaxy is also included, that argument falls apart. In summary, if you do an Internet search for either star trails time-lapse photography or star trail videos of star trails in both the South and the North, you will see the stars over the equator travel perfectly straight from the East to the West, exactly how the Sun and Moon travel. The stars, however, circle Polaris in the North and Sigma Octanis in the South. The South Pole star visibly wobbles in it's path of rotation, whereas Polaris at the North Pole nearly remains still. This testable, observable and repeatable truth clearly demonstrates two poles—or antipodes—and cannot be happening on either a spinning and orbiting globe or on the circular, flat-Earth model based on the AE projection.

Star trails are often mocked as fake or CGI; yet, car light trails are often photographed and their validity is never in question. The process used to achieve both is the same.

69

DISCUSSION POINT 39

Millions upon millions of years ago in the darkness of pre-history, Humanity was an infant, a child of Mother Nature, unawakened, dream-like, wrapped in the cloak of mental drowsiness. Then, somewhere along the line, like a stream of brilliance, came the divine beings—their exact origin debated and contested by historical, anthropological, spiritual and Biblical scholars alike. As a result of these visitors, self-consciousness awakened, and man became a dynamo of intellectual and emotional power capable of love, of hate, of glory, of defeat. Knowledge, more knowledge, and still greater knowledge, was required by the growing humans who looked with gratitude to the godlike beings who had come to awaken them. For many centuries they followed their guidance, as children today lovingly follow the footsteps of their mothers. At this early period there were no mystery colleges, no suppressed and hidden information (Discussion Point 149), the Ancient Wisdom was not ancient yet, not the "common heirloom" of all mankind, for as yet there had been no abuse of knowledge, and hence, no need for bodies kept hid and sacred from the world of men. Truth was freely accepted in that "Golden Age." Ancient wisdom—often positioned and universally accepted by true scholars and researchers as far more advanced than today’s so-called “modern civilization” (Discussion Point 149)—readily both accepted and promoted the flat, plane Earth as the accurate shape of the Earth. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat-Earth cosmography, including Greece prior to the classical period, the Bronze Age and Iron Age civilizations of the Near East prior to the Hellenistic period, India prior to the Gupta period (early centuries AD), and China prior to the 17th century. That paradigm was also typically held in the aboriginal cultures of the Americas. Further, the notion of a circular, flat Earth enclosed in a dome in the shape of an inverted bowl never appears in authentic and confirmed writings, art, images or other depictions of ancient wisdom. 70

It is only through recent, modern-age, intentional, psychological effort to misdirect and distract from the ancient truth that a circular-disc, inverted-bowl-domed Earth has been introduced (Discussion Points 13, 35, 146 and 153). The Ancient Hindu and the Japanese were not only aware of the square and/or diamond, flatness of our realm, they were even aware of the Fourth Dimensi (Discussion Point 145) and the Sun’s path along the ecliptic and the equator (Discussion Points 22, 38, 96, 145-146). The Ancient Chinese also knew the Earth was square and/or diamond and flat.

They also wrote about the tilt of the ecliptic in the sky.

71

Man seeks to dedicate his life to a higher end, a meaning that will justify it and outlive it. This yearning for the profound is the one thing that separates him from the remainder of the animal kingdom, other animals being content with leading a simple, biological existence. The wisdom of the ancients—the profound—is sought by few of humanity and understood by even fewer. Often considered the ultimate truth by scholars, ancient wisdom provides lost knowledge and sacred theories that still hold true, centuries and millennia later. Regarding that lost knowledge and those sacred theories that still hold true today, the Ancient Koreans—another civilization in a long, long line—also claimed that the Earth was flat and square and/or diamond while referencing the cardinal directions. As is clear, a long thread of ancient wisdom regarding a flat, square and/or diamond Earth has been formed, a thread running uninterruptedly from the dawn of mankind till our modern—newly awakening—era. Each age learns knowledge from the previous and adds to it—it is now our turn. The thread—if sought after—is accessible at all times, and in each age, some individuals tap into it while most ignore it. Based on the needs of the times, it expresses itself differently, but always with the same aim: to inspire and instruct man to fulfill his potential as a human being. To fulfill our potential as a human being, we must know from where we came. We must know how we arrived here. We must know this reasoning. It is in the search for those answers that this book exists. 


72

Further support for square-Earth comes from Cosmas Indicopleustes, an Egyptian monk of the Sixth Century A.D., who expended an astonishing ingenuity upon the development of a theory of the universe that would eliminate the increasingly popular notion that the Earth was a sphere. He vehemently claimed that the Earth is a rectangular, plane surface. Cosmas was filled with a holy hatred of the heresy of the "sophists" and the antipodes, and he evolved at last a figure of the universe modeled upon the design of the Tabernacle built by Moses in the wilderness, which, he pointed out, Moses himself had declared to be constructed upon the pattern of the visible world. This is also the exact way that God showed the Earth realm creation to Moses, and it is laid out precisely to scale and to measure and could not be altered. If one wants to use Biblical explanations (Discussion Point 12) to determine the shape of the Earth, then the Earth is flat, rectangular and covered with a tabernaclestyle tent while the stars are in the celestial ceiling at an angle of 23.4 degrees, moving from the East to the West in an ecliptic path. For those who take the time to look, there is nothing but answers to the true reality regarding where we live. Those who left us ancient wisdom knew the Earth's true shape. It is up to us—the people living today in this socially, emotionally and intellectually constructed time period—to read and learn from what they spent their entire lives creating for us. 73

DISCUSSION POINT 40 "We are more gullible and superstitious today than we were in the Middle Ages, and an example of modern credulity is the widespread belief that the Earth is round. The average man can advance not a single reason for thinking that the Earth is round. He merely swallows this theory because there is something about it that appeals to the Twentieth Century mentality.” Those above words come from George Bernard Shaw. Keep his words in mind—especially regarding gullibility—when considering the following evidence that the Earth is not a globe.

The Earth makes a full rotation every 24 hours—or so we are taught; therefore, the Earth will face the same direction at 12PM/noon no matter where it is in its supposed yearly orbit around the Sun. Study the above image. Using the Eiffel Tower as your placeholder, allow your mind to analytically re-create the teaching (or rather, the indoctrination) step-by-step, day-by-day, as you envision the Earth’s daily rotation and its yearly orbit. Do you see the problem? After 6 months, day should be night and night should be day; however, we do not observe this. As a result of this non-occurrence, it is plainly obvious that the Earth does not revolve around the Sun. That said, Mr. Shaw indirectly challenged you. He claimed the average person can not provide a single piece of reason for even thinking the Earth is a globe. Finish this book. Then, go ahead: try to prove George Bernard Shaw wrong. 74

If you prefer a video introduction, FLAT EARTH Astronomy—How the 2-Poled Celestial Sky and Retrograde Planetary Motion Work is suggested.

DISCUSSION POINT 41 The stars—holographic?—move from the East to the West across an arc set at 23.4 degrees (Discussion Points 39, 106, 145, and 148). When it comes to the luminaries, the theoretical possibility that they are "projected" from a sphere onto the actual firmament certainly seems a solid direction to explore. The sphere, of course, would likely need to be projecting though some sort of a "dimensional" aspect; that is, perhaps the sphere itself is not literally a 3-D object projecting onto the visible sky but instead exists as a "star orb" in 4D, the spiritual realms, the "heavens", et cetera. Along that line of reasoning, the star orb could be something like a "hyper-sphere" which overlaps the

Polaris remains stationary throughout the year as it always remains the most northern star.

lower three dimensional planes of existence, and thus, "projects" onto it.When one recognizes taht the stars are likely not physical objects (refer again to the images within Discussion Point 12), the above theory—yes, it is, at this stage, currently a working hypothesis following the scientific method— becomes more acceptable.

The above images help to illustrate both the movement and motion of the stars as well as their placement of the firmament. For a more in-depth analysis regarding this subject, please view the YouTube videos Motion of Stars Explained as well as Stars in the Firmament Explained the Earth is a Flat Square. 75

DISCUSSION POINT 42

The establishment spends billions annually on brainwashing and conditioning our kids. The spherical-Earth, false reality is reinforced at every opportunity, and it is reinforced without valid proof or genuine, scientific evidence. Our youth are taught to loooove the virtual prison constructed solely to stunt their consciousness. Our kids are taught to regard anyone who is not a victim of cultural conditioning as “crazy.” Their minds are programmed to rebel against truth whenever they hear it. That is the point of the entire educational system: it instils trust in false authority while our kids’ critical faculties are atrophied, so they become unable to think for themselves. Our youth—who become our cognitive dissonant adults—are taught to react to independent thinkers with childish, programmed responses and overlyemotional reactions. But this is the truth: it’s not your fault that you were lied to since birth. 76

DISCUSSION POINT 43 NASA and its buddy university helpers like to lie to you, the general public, about what they don't know. They want your money (government grants and budgets), and to get it, they tell you stories about things like the mysterious Dark Matter. Once you understand how they lie—and they lie a lot— only a minuscule amount of it documented on these pages—it will be as obvious as a kid with his hand caught in a cookie jar. The problem of deceit starts with—but is much larger than—NASA. Cognitive dissonance may prompt people to bluntly disregard the proven fact that half of the "science" published in the most prestigious scientific journals is false—lies. These reputed journals don’t only lie about astrophysics and a global-Earth, they also lie about GMOs, climate change, vaccines, marijuana and psychedelics (which are good) and pharmaceutical drugs (which are bad) … they lie about everything. This is relevant here because according to those who defend the global Earth model, published and mainstream “science” is their champion. But if half to most of science is admittedly wrong, false, fake, well, questioning the official globe story becomes that much easier and that much more necessary—and that much more difficult to defend. Search NASA's LIES - Dark Matter Debunked for one simple example of how using elementary logic and science’s own language actually proves the scientific community’s intentional deceit regarding Dark Matter. The possibility—likelihood?—that NASA is toying with us is only reinforced when they release to the public images such as the below official “photo” of Pluto. We see you, NASA. We see you. Regardless, it is worthwhile to note that NASA was not always called NASA. It being an arm of the United States military, it was originally titled the Army Ballistic Missile Agency—its sole purpose was to create weapons. As stated on NASA’s web page, NASA is not a part of the Department of Defense, nor of any other Cabinet-level department. NASA's administrator reports directly to the White House. The NOAA and all other agencies associated with the sky report to the Department of Defense. Why? The question, then, is this: what is NASA defending … or hiding? SEARCHABLE REFERENCES Nearly All Scientific Papers Controlled By Six Corporations Half Of All Published Scientific Literature Is Completely Fabricated Or False Why Most Published Research Findings Are False YouTube: Yes, There Is a Government Troll Training Program

Heaviside, JC Maxwell & CP Steinmetz said NO 77

DISCUSSION POINT 44 Controlled Opposition is the term used to describe “leaders” who arrive on the scene (almost out of nowhere) and offer us amazing nuggets of truth. These “facts” either wow us or confirm something we subconsciously knew, but wanted confirmation. As a result, these pied pipers get us to follow them like heroes. Ultimately, these sheep in wolves clothing spin us off into la la land—for example, claiming and preaching that the AE projection is the correct model of the flat Earth. It’s nearly impossible to have a well-known leader be real. That person would be compromised very quickly. It’s for this reason I highly recommend you not following anyone. In other words, be your own leader.


Regarding the concept of controlled opposition, Vladimir Lenin said itbest, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” This concept eludes public awareness to a scary degree. It’s similar to the reality of false flag operations (and its crisis actors), the epitome of carefully planned societal manipulation by unseen forces who have no regard for the human condition other than to control it. This is so very similar to the slogan of the nefarious Mossad: “By way of deception, thou shalt do war.” And the war is on us—for the subjugation, exploitation and control of us. The human race.

78

Nearly everything is misdirection, controlled opposition for the mind. This game of ruthless deception is endemic to the fabric of the entire Matrix. The obvious government-backed insurgences around the world, past and present, are perfect examples of controlled opposition on the political stage. As awful as that already is, the problem is way deeper than that. We’ve all been useful idiots at one time or other. No one’s been fully conscious or completely independent of these influences all of their lives. We all have had to compromise in some manner just to survive in the Matrix. This social landscape is an engineered one, and we help build and maintain it at varying degrees of conscious awareness until we disengage. Finding out the extent of our own involvement is a trip in itself, and will lead to many wonderful, sometimes disturbing discoveries. Even more so is realizing the source of information we were trusting was tainted, twisted and distorted, or as in most cases, a complete fabricated lie, propped up by the energy of those that believed it. Religion, politics, education and the economic meme are of course the most predominant in the mainstream mind. But important things like where we came from, why we’re even here and where we’re going are barely addressed. If these important things are addressed by the common mainstream outlets of religion, politics or education, it’s all gobbledygook designed to confuse and stifle the human spirit—or freeze it into a debilitating religious paradigm where we wait for the cavalry to save us and are told “the powers that be are ordained by God.” Psychological operations (PSYOPS) are Freemason-, cultural engineer-planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of fill-in-the-blank government’s psychological operations is to induce or reinforce behavior favorable to the fill-in-the-blank government objectives. The fact is this: there is controlled opposition to all important grassroots movements—flat Earth included (Discussion Point 74)—and there is substantial, undeniable proof of government agency manipulation, as well as counterintelligence groups and agents (planted as gate-keepers for the alternative news movement) being paid for the disruption of accurate information. The question is, “Why?” The answer is, “Because the Earth is not a globe, they know it and they don’t want you to know it.” When a school-of-thought steps closer to the truth, these agencies turn up the heat, deflect and re-direct. There is enough evidence now that to ignore the fact of controlled opposition (PSYOPS) is both naive and dangerous—in this age of information, being ignorant and uninformed is nothing more than a choice. United States PSYOP units and soldiers of all branches of the military—and there are many—are no longer prohibited by law from conducting PSYOP missions on domestic audiences. Whether you are an American or a citizen of another country (it may be the same in your country), think about that. 79

DISCUSSION POINT 45 If Earth were a spinning ball heated by a Sun 93 million miles away, it would be impossible to have simultaneously sweltering summers in Africa while just a few thousand miles away bone-chilling frozen Arctic/Antarctic winters experiencing little to no heat from the Sun whatsoever. If the heat from the Sun traveled 93 million miles to the Sahara Desert, it is absurd to assert that another 4000 miles (0.00004%) further to Antarctica would completely negate such sweltering heat resulting in such drastic differences. Simpler, if the Sun is 93,000,000 miles away, how is it possible to have summer in a valley with snow on its mountains?

Should such differences be possible if the Sun was actually 93,000,000 miles away? No. No, it certainly shouldn’t. So, then, why the dramatic difference in climate? Because the Sun is very local—only 3594 miles away (nowhere near 93,000,000 miles as we are told [Discussion Point 46]) and its light and warmth hit the Earth locally quite differently than our indoctrination tells us. Please briefly visit Discussion Point 146 on page 188 for a NASA-created image showing what they claim to be the size of the Sun relative to the size of the Earth. Once you see what NASA claims, ask yourself if the brainwashing regarding the Sun’s distance (discussed here and in the following Discussion Points 46-7 and multiple others as well) makes any logical sense at all. 80

DISCUSSION POINT 46 Iceland at 65 degrees north latitude is home to 870 species of native plants and abundant various animal life. Compare this with the Isle of Georgia at just 54 degrees south latitude where there are only 18 species of native plants and animal life is almost non-existent. While in the same latitude as Canada or England in the North where dense forests of various tall trees abound, the infamous Captain Cook wrote of Georgia that he was unable to find a single shrub large enough to make a toothpick. Cook wrote, “Not a tree was to be seen. The lands which lie to the south are doomed by nature to perpetual frigidness—never to feel the warmth of the Sun’s rays; whose horrible and savage aspect I have not words to describe. The contrasts between the limits of organic life in Arctic and Antarctic zones is very remarkable and significant.”

If you follow the guidance found to the right, you will know the height (from your location) of the firmament upon which the light—which we commonly reference as the Sun—is passing through. The Sun is possibly not a physical object inside the realm with us: the Sun may be in the non-realm—or non-space—which is why it can "hasten back to whence it came in the east" (Discussion Point 145) after it passes to the West from your location. Another theory is that the Sun is a transformer converting inertia or counter space into space by means of discharging magnetic radiations. Its power source is the ether itself, which is unlimited in energy, counter spacial, and incommensurable. Quantum levitation is also an area worthy of further study. Based on tidal effect, laser experiments, water engineering, among other telling aspects, it appears that the Sun and the Moon are exchanging energies in a salt-halogen electromagnetic reaction, a plasmatic discharge from the looks of the Moon’s surface (certainly not impact craters). 81

DISCUSSION POINT 47 If the Earth were truly a globe, the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions and areas of comparable latitude north and south of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics such as comparable temperatures, seasonal changes, length of daylight, plant and animal life. In reality, however, the Arctic/Antarctic regions and areas of comparable latitude north/south of the equator differ greatly in many ways entirely inconsistent with the ball model and entirely consistent with the flat model.

Antarctica is by far the coldest place on Earth with an average annual temperature of approximately -57 degrees Fahrenheit (almost 14 degrees Celsius), and a record low of -135.8 (-93 Celsius). The average annual temperature at the North Pole, however, is a comparatively warm 4 degrees (-15 Celsius). Throughout the year, temperatures in the Antarctic vary less than half the amount at comparable Arctic latitudes. The Northern Arctic region enjoys moderately warm summers and manageable winters, whereas the Southern Antarctic region never even warms enough to melt the perpetual snow and ice. On a tilting, wobbling, ball-Earth spinning uniformly around the Sun, Arctic and Antarctic temperatures and seasons should not vary so greatly.

82

DISCUSSION POINT 48

Long-distance, under-the-radar training proves that Air Force pilots do not nose dive to compensate for the curvature or drop in elevation of a spherical Earth, even flying at low altitudes. Also, Air Force jet pilot training is simulated on a flat Earth. If the Earth was globe-shaped, and the Air Force wanted to provide practical flight instruction to their students, why not use a ball-Earth simulation? The logical reason the Air Force uses a flat-Earth simulation is because the Air Force does want to provide practical flight instruction; hence, they use flat-Earth simulation because the Earth is not a sphere. Additionally, the Microsoft Flight Simulator—for real life flight simulation—uses an infinite, flat-Earth model. Even more, the training material given to flight dynamics students (above, left) is forced to assume—by reality—that the Earth is non-rotating and flat with zero Coriolis Effect. These above facts strongly suggest something, don't they? Perhaps it proves that endless, east-towest travel is reality on a flat Earth (Discussion Points 71, 79, 80, 144-5, 147)? The facts also support the plainly obvious (as does our own collective experience): the Earth is not a sphere and there exists no east-to-west barrier—there is no "edge"—or wall—ice or otherwise—nothing is impeding straight, east-to-west travel (further debunking the Azimuthal Equidistant map). It would also suggest, additionally, that the fixed-plane Earth must be doing something very special indeed. Please search Airplanes on a Spherical Earth: Earth Research Challenge for further information. 83

DISCUSSION POINT 49

We are told that we are simultaneously spinning and revolving and spiraling and shooting through space at 1000 miles per hour + 67,000 miles per hour + 500,000 miles per hour + 670,000,000 miles per hour. That means every year Earth supposedly traverses an approximate distance of 5,874,166,920,000 (5.8 trillion) miles through the cosmos. Keep these fantastic, astronomical numbers in mind while considering the following question: Wouldn’t every spacecraft or astronaut that has ever left Earth’s atmosphere be left stranded in the cold, dark vacuum of space as the planet shoots off at 670,000,000 miles per hour?

84

DISCUSSION POINT 50 An 180-grain projectile—aka a bullet—from a .308 rifle does an average speed of 1,400 miles per hour (2253 kilometers per hour) at around the 250 yards (228 meters) mark. At that speed, as the bullet gradually decelerates, it can accurately hit a quarter at over 1000 yards. Although accuracy begins to suffer miserably after a little over 1000 yards, it can still reach up to a mile. My point? Bullets are fast—so fast that the simile as fast as a bullet is often used to exaggerate speed. It is said that a space shuttle re-entering the Earth's atmosphere does so at 17,500 miles an hour. This means that a space shuttle travels an incredible 12 times the speed of a bullet from a high powered rifle. And—it is claimed—humans ride inside of it. Re-entering the atmosphere at that speed—after factoring in the supposed 0 resistance of “space”— would equate to the same thing as hitting a wall or coming to a complete and abrupt stop.

If a space shuttle traveling at 23,500 feet per second hits the atmosphere—even it it were approaching an atmosphere spinning in the same direction, deducting 1000 mph from calculations —it would be like a really, really, really super-fast train slamming into a parked car. NASA wants us to believe that a space shuttle or rocket or module or whatever—with human passengers—can hit the atmosphere with the energy of a small nuclear weapon and continue on its way unharmed. It’s illogical. 85

Did you know spiders are immune to gravity?

DISCUSSION POINT 51

What is so difficult to understand about gravity? Here, try to follow along: First, some really smart scientists somewhere took a "gravitational constant that is difficult to measure with high accuracy" (which they promptly labeled "empirical" while conveniently failing to mention how they came up with it in order to replicate the process) and which has an approximate value. So, an empirical constant with an approximate value. Okay? Then the really smart scientists from somewhere theorized—but have still never proven—that gravity is directly proportional with the product of the masses (for example, the mass of Planet 1 * the mass of Planet 2) and inversely proportional to the distance between them— squared, of course, to make it more far-reaching. The above formula came from this theorized empiricism—an oxymoron by any definition— where on a global Earth: F G m r

= the force the two planets pull on each other, = the gravitational, difficult to measure, approximate and empirical constant [What!?], = the masses of the two planets, while = is the distance between them.

Understand? More so, the Universe formed when EVERYTHING came out of absolutely NOTHING. This is what the really smart scientists claim—even though their claim blatantly contradicts their most fundamental law of physics: conservation of mass/energy. How all the chemical elements evolved from hydrogen is a totally different discussion, but suffice to say, it is probably the same way a dog evolves from a rock, if given enough time. Here, however, is the key part in which gravity boggles the mind and insults all logic (see also Discussion Points 31-32 and 81-86, among many others): We are taught that planets formed when simple particles—cosmic dust—expressed so much attraction to each other that they stuck together; however, today, planets—as we are told— constantly roam through cosmic dust yet fail to show even the smallest attractive force to it. 86

DISCUSSION POINT 52 Gabrielle Henriet, from Heaven and Earth: “The theory of the rotation of the Earth may once and for all be definitely disposed of as impracticable by pointing out the following inadvertence. It is said that the rotation takes twenty-four hours and that its speed is uniform, in which case, necessarily, days and nights should have an identical duration of twelve hours each all the year round [please see Discussion Point 146 for further imagery]. The Sun should invariably rise in the morning and set in the evening at the same hours, with the result that it would be the Equinox every day from the 1st of January to the 31st of December. One should stop and reflect on this before saying that the Earth has a movement of rotation. How does the system of gravitation account for the seasonal variations in the lengths of days and nights if the Earth rotates at a uniform speed in twenty-four hours!?”

We live within an illusion of consensus reality, very little of it true. The people who believe they live on a wobbling, rotating, spinning and racing ball are not stupid: they have simply been convinced by their indoctrination. 87

DISCUSSION POINT 53

Nicolaus Copernicus was a Renaissance mathematician and astronomer who formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at the center of the universe with the publication of this model in his book De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) just before his death in 1543. Nonetheless, Copernicus is credited with formulating the heliocentric, ball-Earth model, and his infamy deserves mention. 88

DISCUSSION POINT 54 Space aliens do not exist. Since solar systems, galaxies and universes do not exist (Discussion Points 41, 49-50, 75, 87-89, 124-130, 134-142, 155), it is simply not possible for space aliens to exist."Space" (which is also"area") requires magnetism to even exist. Space is the result of the loss of inertia from the aether expanding as magnetism through the agency of force and motion. There are no magnetic fields outside this place (the 4D Earth realm, Discussion Point 156); hence, the PacMan Effect (please see Discussion Point 145) and a potential world without "walls" as we understand them. As research continues, it is becoming easier to argue that the Earth is a magneto-dielectric realm. What certainly do exist, however, are life forms inhabiting other realms (it is simply not responsible to rule out this theory)—nearby or distant—above or below—and/or other dimensions. There is ample evidence to suggest that we are not here alone; we are simply not being visited by beings from distant planets in "outer space". Our three-dimensional, physical make-up—our bodies—prevents us (humans) from traveling beyond our realm. That, however, does not preclude other inter-dimensional "beings" from visiting here. Their spirit form is likely far less dense than ours. The Aether is still subjective insofar as there must be another form than ours that makes up the realm of the heavens. An important detail which one should note is that many ancient texts strongly insinuate that many worlds exist. They penetrate us but exist at a higher vibratory rate. Yes, there could technically exist an unlimited number of worlds in the same place if the frequencies are different. Modern science does not dispute this. There could also exist unlimited worlds attached to the top and bottom of this Earth. (It seems likely that the poles and PacMan would both make it impossible for additional worlds to be off to the sides: the North, the South, the East or the West. Pacman is literally the doorway between space and counter space. It is where the two fold over to meet each other.) Everything from Area 51 conspiracy talk to The History Channel's Ancient Aliens television show to the Star Wars and Star Trek movies has been a never-ending, elaborately devised conditioning to promote and deepen the acceptance that Earth is simply a tiny ball floating around aimlessly in an infinite universe, all to keep our minds far, far away from even entertaining the possibility that the Earth is not a globe. And for the most part, it has been a wildly successful strategy. Again, this is not to say we are alone. We are not. But instead of our neighbors visiting us from infinite space, they are visiting us from either another dimension or different frequencies or from other realms above and below our Earth realm. 89

DISCUSSION POINT 55 Anyone can prove the sea-horizon is perfectly straight and the entire Earth perfectly flat using nothing more than a level, tripods and a wooden plank. At any altitude above sea level, simply fix a 6-12 foot long, smooth, leveled board edgewise upon tripods and observe the skyline from eye-level behind it. The distant horizon will always align perfectly parallel with the upper edge of the board. Furthermore, if you move in a half-circle from one end of the board to the other whilst observing the skyline over the upper edge, you will be able to trace a clear, flat 10-20 miles depending on your altitude. This would be impossible if the Earth were a globe 25,000 miles in circumference; the horizon would align over the center of the board but then gradually, noticeably decline towards the extremities. Just ten miles on each side would necessitate an easily visible curvature of 66.6 feet and a far more dramatically increasing drop in elevation from each end to the center.

If curvature existed, it would be taught in schools. But it is not. It is not taught in any classroom. High school? Nope. General college? Nope. Architectural school? Nope. Mechanical? Nope? Engineer? Barely. Construction? Nope. Curvature is not taught because teaching curvature would expose that the Earth is not a sphere. 90

DISCUSSION POINT 56

If the Earth were actually a big ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the horizon would be noticeably curved even at sea level, and everything on or approaching the horizon would appear to tilt backwards or to the side slightly from your perspective. Distant buildings along the horizon would all look like the Leaning Tower of Pisa falling away from the observer. A hot-air balloon taking off and drifting steadily away from you on a ball-Earth would slowly and constantly appear to lean back more and more the farther away it flew, the bottom of the basket coming gradually into view as the top of the balloon disappears from sight. In reality, however, buildings, balloons, trees, people, anything and everything at right angles to the ground/horizon remains so regardless the distance or height of the observer. In short, if there is a visible or measurable curve, there must also be a visible and measurable tilt; however, neither exists, visible nor measurable.

91

DISCUSSION POINT 57 Samuel Rowbotham’s experiments at the Old Bedford Level—successfully re-created 178 years later in June 2016—proved conclusively the canal’s water to be completely flat over a 6 mile stretch. First he stood in the canal with his telescope held 8 inches above the surface of the water. Then his friend, in a boat with a 5-foot-tall flag, sailed the 6 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference the 6 mile stretch of water should have comprised an arc exactly 6 feet high in the middle, so the entire boat and flag should have ultimately disappeared, when in fact the entire boat and flag remained visible at the same height for the entire journey.

Dr. Rowbotham: “On the shore near Waterloo, a few miles to the north of Liverpool, a good telescope was fixed, at an elevation of 6 feet above the water. It was directed to a large steamer, just leaving the River Mersey, and sailing out to Dublin. Gradually, the mast-head of the receding vessel came nearer to the horizon, until, at length, after more than four hours had elapsed, it disappeared. The ordinary rate of sailing of the Dublin steamers was fully eight miles an hour; so that the vessel would be, at least, thirty-two miles distant when the mast-head came to the horizon. The 6 feet of elevation of the telescope would require three miles to be deducted for convexity, which would leave twenty-nine miles, the square of which, multiplied by 8 inches, gives 560 feet; deducting 80 feet for the height of the main-mast, and we find that, according to the doctrine of rotundity, the mast-head of the outward bound steamer should have been 480 feet below the horizon. Many other experiments of this kind have been made upon sea-going steamers, and always with results entirely incompatible with the theory that the Earth is a globe.”

92

DISCUSSION POINT 58 In a second experiment, Dr. Rowbotham affixed flags 5 feet high along the shoreline, one at every mile marker. Then using his telescope mounted just 5 feet behind the first flag, he looked over the tops of all 6 flags which lined up in a perfectly straight line. If the Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference the flags should have progressively dipped down after the first establishing line of sight, the second would have descended 8 inches, 32 inches for the third, 6 feet for the fourth, 10 feet 8 inches for the fifth, and 16 feet 8 inches for the sixth.

Dr. Rowbotham conducted several other experiments using telescopes, spirit levels, sextants and theodolites, special precision instruments used for measuring angles in horizontal or vertical planes. By positioning them at equal heights aimed at each other successively, he proved over and over the Earth to be perfectly flat for miles without a single inch of curvature or elevation drop. His findings caused quite a stir in the scientific community and thanks to 30 years of his efforts, the shape of the Earth became a hot topic of debate around the turn of the nineteenth century. Discussion Points 57-62 represent only a few of the endless experiments and realities that have proven the same conclusion over and over and over again without fail. These simple, observable, testable and repeatable experiments prove the Earth has no curvature nor consistent elevation drop. If the Earth has no curvature nor consistent elevation drop, the Earth cannot be a sphere. 93

DISCUSSION POINT 59 The distance across the Irish Sea from the Isle of Man’s Douglas Harbor to Great Orm’s Head in North Wales is 60 miles. If the Earth was a globe, the surface of the water between them would form a 60 mile arc, the center towering 1944 feet higher than the coastlines at either end. It is wellknown and easily verifiable, however, that on a clear day, from a modest altitude of 100 feet, the Great Orm’s Head is visible from Douglas Harbor. This would be completely impossible on a globe of 25,000 miles. Assuming the 100 foot altitude causes the horizon to appear approximately 13 miles off, the 47 miles remaining means the Welsh coastline should still fall an impossible 1472 feet below the line of sight.

The distance from which various lighthouse lights around the world are visible at sea far exceeds what could be found on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference. For example, the Dunkerque Lighthouse in Southern France at an altitude of 194 feet is visible from a boat that is 10 feet above sea level from 28 miles away. Spherical trigonometry dictates that if the Earth was a globe with the given curvature of 8 inches per mile squared—the very minimum that modern astronomy claims—this light should be hidden a minimum 190 feet below the horizon. 94

DISCUSSION POINT 60 The New York City skyline is clearly visible from Harriman State Park’s Bear Mountain 60 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, viewing from Bear Mountain’s 1,283 foot summit, the Pythagorean Theorem determining distance to the horizon being 1.23 times the square root of the height in feet, the NYC skyline should be invisible behind 170 feet of curved Earth.

The Statue of Liberty in New York stands 326 feet above sea level and on a clear day can be seen as far as 60 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, that would put Lady Liberty at an impossible 2,074 feet below the horizon. Also, from Washington’s Rock in New Jersey, at just a 400-foot elevation, it is possible on a clear day to see the skylines of both New York and Philadelphia in opposite directions at the same time covering a total distance of 120 miles. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, both of these skylines should be hidden behind over 800 feet of Earth’s curvature. 95

DISCUSSION POINT 61

A railgun is an electromagnetic projectile launcher. A railgun uses a pair of parallel conductors, or rails, along which a sliding armature is accelerated by the electromagnetic effects of a current that flows down one rail, into the armature and then back along the other rail. Because this weapon system fires a projectile of up to 230 miles (370 km) with a speed around Mach 7, if the Earth was curved (it isn't), this weapon would need to be fired directly through the Earth's curvature to reach its target. That this does not happen is further evidence the Earth is not a globe.

96

DISCUSSION POINT 62 This water surface laser measurement was done at Lake Balaton in Hungary. Four measurements were taken on the 15th and 16th of August 2016.

The 4th measurement distance was 6km (3.73 miles). The calibration was done at a distance of 720 meters (0.447 miles). The laser was 125cms (4.1 feet) above the lake's surface. The measurement started at 6:30AM and ended at 7:45AM. The air temperature was 17 Celsius (62 Fahrenheit), 79% humidity and the water temperature was at 22 Celsius (72 Fahrenheit). The coordinates of the laser and camera were 46.94922N 17.88929E. A 3W laser with adjustable collimator and 0.08mRad divergence was used. The observable, testable and repeatable conclusion: Water always finds its flatness and the Earth is not spherical. Please search Flat Earth Laser Test Proves the Flat Earth—Part 1 (Pre-Test) and Flat Earth Laser Test Proves the Flat Earth—Part 2 for more specifics and to view the actual preparation and measurement.

97

DISCUSSION POINT 63

Shouldn’t that nice astronaut man be blinded by the intense Moonlight that we see from—as we are taught—250,000 miles away? Does it make sense that the Moon is bright enough to cause light reflection on the oceans—as we observe every night—but fails to light up at all when man lands on it (Discussion Point 141)? Apparently, the Moon conveniently didn’t start glowing until the end of the Apollo Moon missions in 1977. 98

DISCUSSION POINT 64

Again, you really think this is normal?

Imagine you are standing next to the old man and his dog (see above) at the North Pole on the top of the imaginary globe. If this was reality, then all the land and sea would be falling away from you in an extremely dramatic and obvious increasing drop in elevation. When utilizing 8” per mile squared (Discussion Point 7) for curvature experiments, researchers must also work from the basis that everywhere is up. Theoretically, wherever you could stand on the globe would be the top—and up—for you in that moment. Even if you were thousands of miles from the North Pole—like Simba—the drop in elevation effect and experience would be the same for him as it would be for the old man and his dog, for Superman, for everyone—assuming a global Earth: everything would fall progressively away and curve dramatically downward from each individual. In reality, regardless of where a person, lion or superhero stands, that falling away and downward drop in elevation does not occur. Our experience clearly demonstrates that it does not matter where one stands on the Earth: the horizon is always eye level (Discussion Point 2). This eye-level horizon reality is observable, testable and repeatable, whereas the falling away and dramatic, downward drop in elevation is not. If there is no observable curvature (Discussion Point 1), the globe is proven false. 99

DISCUSSION POINT 65 The St. George’s Channel between Holyhead and Kingstown Harbor near Dublin is 60 miles across. When half-way across, a ferry passenger will notice behind him the light on Holyhead Pier as well as in front of them the Poolbeg Light in Dublin Bay. The Holyhead Pier light is 44 feet high, while the Poolbeg lighthouse 68 feet; therefore, a vessel in the middle of the channel, 30 miles from either side standing on a deck 24 feet above the water, can clearly see both lights. On a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, however, both lights should be hidden well below both horizons by over 300 feet.

100

DISCUSSION POINT 66 This is only one example of far, far, far too many to reference, but from the highland near Portsmouth Harbor in Hampshire, England, looking across Spithead to the Isle of Wight, the entire base of the island where water and land come together, composes a perfectly straight line 22 statute miles long. According to the ball-Earth theory, the Isle of Wight should decline 80 feet from the center on each side to account for the necessary curvature. The cross-hairs of a good theodolite (see image to the left or simply use a smart phone application as shown below) directed there, however, have repeatedly shown the land and water line to be perfectly level. Go ahead: test it yourself.

There currently exist absolutely zero experiments that prove the heliocentric model (the Earth is spinning and rotating around the Sun). There are no gadgets nor tools that do so either. What follows, however, is only an example of some honest science experiments (formerly very popular but now "hidden"), gadgets and tools—each referenced in the Index—that prove the Earth is stationary and not moving: Airy's Failure experiment, Michelson-Morley experiment, Michelson-Gale experiment, Bedford Level experiment, Sagnac experiments, Red-Shift Rainbows (physics), Allais Effect (debunking Foucault's Pendulum), gyroscope (mechanism in airplanes), Astrolabe (ancient star navigation gadget), Sun Dial (clock), Coriolis Effect (debunked), Railgun (U.S. Navy Military weapon). 101

DISCUSSION POINT 67 NASA and modern astronomy say the Earth is a giant ball tilted back, wobbling and spinning 1,000 mph around its central axis, traveling 67,000 mph in circles around the Sun, spiraling 500,000 mph around the Milky Way, while the entire galaxy rockets a ridiculous 670,000,000 mph through the Universe, with all of these motions originating from an alleged “Big Bang” cosmogenic explosion— from absolutely nothing—14 billion years ago. That’s a grand total of 670,568,000 mph in several different directions we’re all supposedly speeding along at simultaneously, yet rocks can remarkably withstand all that gyrating and movement and peacefully balance? When people believe something and a fact comes before them that does not fit their belief, they often throw out the fact instead of altering their belief system. That is called cognitive dissonance (Discussion Point 120). However, when a "scientist" refuses to alter a hypothesis when facts dictate he should, he is knowingly disregarding the scientific process: that is called dishonest. When a scientist is not willing to accept facts and alter a hypothesis, he is no more than a priest at the Church of Science.

The fact is that no one has ever seen, felt, heard, measured or proven that a single one of the previously mentioned motions exist whatsoever. So why doesn't "science" acknowledge this fact?

102

DISCUSSION POINT 68 NASA and modern astronomy say Polaris, the North Pole star, is somewhere between 323-434 light years, or about 2 quadrillion miles, away from us. Firstly, note that is between 1,938,000,000,000,000 - 2,604,000,000,000,000 miles making a difference of over six hundred trillion miles. If modern astronomy cannot even agree on the distance to stars within hundreds of trillions of miles, perhaps their “science” is flawed and their theory needs re-examining. However, even granting them their obscurely distant stars, it is impossible for heliocentrists to explain how Polaris manages to always remain generally stationary and perfectly aligned straight above the North Pole throughout Earth’s various alleged tilting, wobbling, rotating and revolving motions (Discussion Point 115).

Also, viewed from a ball-Earth, Polaris, situated directly over the North Pole, should not be visible anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere. For Polaris to be seen from the Southern Hemisphere of a globular Earth, the observer would have to be somehow looking “through the globe,” and miles of land and sea would have to be transparent. Polaris can be seen, however, up to over 20 degrees south latitude. Further, please consider that our Sun has supposedly moved 788,400,000,000 miles through the galaxy in the last 2000 years … yet Polaris hasn't moved … and the constellations continue to consistently reflect the exact behaviors they always have. 103

DISCUSSION POINT 69

Simulated reality is the hypothesis that reality could be simulated—for example by computer simulation—to a degree indistinguishable from "true" reality. It could contain conscious minds— us, theoretically—which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation. This is quite different from the current, technologically achievable concept of virtual reality. Virtual reality is easily distinguished from the experience of actuality; participants are never in doubt about the nature of what they experience. Simulated reality, by contrast, would be hard or impossible to separate from "true" reality. There has been much debate over this topic, ranging from philosophical discourse to practical applications in computing, and a possible flat Earth—whereas a simulation or holographic reality would account for the few remaining, nagging anomalies—has not been exempt from the discussion. Simulated, holographic or neither, for a globe-Earth model to be proven correct, it must provide solid evidence (it can not and does not). Along the same lines, for a flat-Earth to be proven correct, it must provide solid evidence (it can and does). Beyond that, if our universe was some kid playing a video game—such a reality cannot be ruled out—then intelligent design, as far as our universe goes, would be true; it could not be denied that we are simply video game characters. If true, our video game universe would have been made by a creator, but what about the creator’s universe? Who’s the kid? Who are his parents? Where do they come from? How did they come to be? 104

DISCUSSION POINT 70 We are told by NASA and every government-promoted, science book in existence that the Earth tilts at 23.4°. According to science, the Earth does not tilt back and forth each year. Has science ever witnessed or recorded this tilting? No. Never. Presumably then, this alleged titling must have happened at some point in the very distant past … but when? Billions of years ago? Yes, we are told. But man—we are also told—was not around billions of years ago … so how can science possibly know the precision of the Earth’s tilt?

If a basketball was tilted at 23.4° long before man existed—therefore no recorded reference point—how could anyone claim to know it was tilted from a different, original position—again, without any reference point—which would have even more dramatically pre-dated man’s existence?

Wait … how can a ball tilt?

105

For an excellent, visual explanation regrading perspective, please search YouTube for Flat Earth: Angular Resolution and Perspective.

DISCUSSION POINT 71 Some heliocentrists have tried to suggest that the Pole Star’s gradual declination overhead as an observer travels southward is proof of a globular Earth. The truth is far from it. The declination of the Pole Star or any other object is simply a result of the Law of Perspective on plane (flat) surfaces. The Law of Perspective dictates that the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes the farther one recedes from the object, until at a certain point the line of sight and the seemingly uprising surface of the Earth converges to a vanishing point (i.e. the horizon line) beyond which the object is invisible. In the ball-Earth model the horizon is claimed to be the curvature of the Earth, whereas in reality, the horizon is known and has proven to be simply the vanishing line of perspective based on the strength of your eyes, instruments, weather and altitude.

Please see the image on page 221 for an example of the Sun approaching the vanishing point. Our eyes see in a single point perspective, into a vanishing point of convergence where the ground meets the sky at the horizon. Whenever you have parallel lines on a flat plane, like railroad tracks that are equally parallel to each other, they will always converge into a single vanishing point and the lines all come together from both sides, top and bottom or ground and sky. The above graphically illustrates how vision and sight shrinks inward from all sides—its vanishing point effect. Can you see how it is impossible to see ridiculously far distances with the naked eye and how even telescopes can only help so much? Understanding these facts of science, how can NASA see planets and stars (Discussion Point 16) hundreds and thousands of light years away? Regardless of the level of telescopic amplification, the vanishing point effect will still occur. There is absolutely no way to overcome this. [In addition tho this entry, Discussion Points 24, 77, 80, 145 and 147-8 present a detailed analysis.] 106

Here is another illustration of how our eyes see into a single vanishing point perspective as well as why this gives an illusion of the Sun “setting” when it is actually moving away from the viewer into a single point of convergence.

The “X” (below, left) is a simple example of how our eyes see the vanishing point perspective. The hallway on the right illustrates an example of convergence. The light from the windows shining on the ceiling provides an example of the Sun moving away from the viewer into a single point of convergence. Also see Discussion Point 99 for further analysis.

For further assistance with the concepts of the Law of Perspective, convergence points and the vanishing point—as well as an excellent discussion regarding air density—please search for and view Flat Earth Sunset Experiment: Air Density!! AWESOME!! (also referenced in Discussion Point 77). 107

DISCUSSION POINT 72 There are several constellations which can be seen from far greater distances over the face of the Earth than should be possible if the world were a rotating, revolving, wobbling ball. For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees north latitude (the North Pole) all the way down to 30 degrees south latitude. For this to be possible on a ball-Earth the Southern observers would have to be seeing through hundreds or thousands of miles of bulging Earth to the Northern sky.

The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees north latitude, all the way to 55 degrees south latitude. Taurus, Pisces and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees north all the way to 65 degrees south. An observer on a ball-Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far. Aquarius and Libra (above photo) can both be seen from 65 degrees north to 90 degrees south. The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees north down to 80 degrees South, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees north all the way to 75 degrees south latitude. This visibility is only possible because the “North and South Hemispheres” are not part of a sphere at all but rather part of a flat plane.

108

DISCUSSION POINT 73 Quoting Marshall Hall: “In short, the Sun, Moon, and stars are actually doing precisely what everyone throughout all history has seen them do. We do not believe what our eyes tell us because we have been taught a counterfeit system which demands that we believe what has never been confirmed by observation or experiment. That counterfeit system demands that the Earth rotate on an 'axis' every 24 hours at a speed of over 1000 MPH at the equator. No one has ever, ever, ever seen or felt such movement (nor seen or felt the 67,000MPH speed of the Earth's alleged orbit around the Sun or its 500,000 MPH alleged speed around a galaxy or its retreat from an alleged 'Big Bang' at over 670,000,000 MPH!). Remember, no experiment has ever shown the Earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact must decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in WWII (down a chimney from 25,000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed) would have been impossible if calculated on an Earth moving below at several hundred MPH and changing constantly with the latitude.”

109

DISCUSSION POINT 74 The editor of the establishment-sponsored Live Science published an article in January of 2016 titled Flat Earth Theory Demonstrates The Alarming Gullibility Of People Everywhere. He wrote: There is perhaps no other Internet hoax that is more ludicrous than the Flat Earth Theory. We’re talking about the most nonsensical and preposterous, laughable and foolish hoax in history! Yes, it is that zany and loony, wacky and silly. Did you feel something when you read that? Did you feel a slight something—a something in your core—that made you feel bad for even stepping outside of the societal norm and for even entertaining the idea of a flat Earth? If you did, it’s because you have been wellprogrammed. We all have. Our cultural engineers have worked very hard and invested a great deal into making us feel that way. The article continues: What is truly shocking is the number of really smart and aware, well-intentioned and spiritually oriented individuals who are supporting this transparent pseudo-scientific sham. The article tells you that the flat Earth is a transparent pseudo-scientific sham, but it offers no real science to back up it’s claim. It can’t. If an article attempts to present either real science or pseudoscience to back up it’s claim, it is exposed as fraudulent (see Discussion Point 164 for an example). So instead of offering any evidence, the article instead goes on a psychological attack, attempting to scare people from investigating the topic on even a superficial level. The article is pure propaganda mixed with both intentionally disingenuous information and emotional fear-mongering. This from Natalie Wolchover in the same article: First, a brief tour of the worldview of a flat-earther: While writing off buckets of concrete evidence that Earth is spherical, they readily accept a laundry list of propositions that some would call ludicrous. The leading flatearther theory holds that Earth is a disc with the Arctic Circle in the center and Antarctica, a 150-foot-tall wall of ice, around the rim. NASA employees, they say, guard this ice wall to prevent people from climbing over and falling off the disc. Earth’s day and night cycle is explained by positing that the sun and moon are spheres measuring 32 miles (51 kilometers) that move in circles 3,000 miles (4,828 km) above the plane of the Earth. (Stars, they say, move in a plane 3,100 miles up.) Like spotlights, these celestial spheres illuminate different portions of the planet in a 24-hour cycle. Flat-earthers believe there must also be an invisible “antimoon” that obscures the moon during lunar eclipses. Those details make the flat-earthers’ theory so elaborately absurd it sounds like a joke, but many of its supporters genuinely consider it a more plausible model of astronomy than the one found in textbooks. In short, they aren’t kidding. First, there does not exist “buckets of concrete evidence that Earth is spherical.” That is an unsubstantiated claim. They conveniently offer none of this “evidence” because the evidence does not exist. Second, other than the distance of the Sun and the Moon from Earth (Discussion Points 90-91), not one bit of what the article claims a flat-Earth researcher believes is included in any of the 167 legitimate science- and evidence-based discussion points disproving the global Earth found within this book. Not one. 110

This book does not claim the Earth is disc-shaped. This book does not claim the Arctic Circle is in the middle of said disc. This book does not claim Antarctica is an Earth-surrounding, 150-foot-tall wall of ice. This book does not claim there is any way to “fall off ” the edge of said disc. This book does not claim anyone or anything is guarding an ice wall. This book does not claim the Sun and Moon move in circles above a circular Earth. This book does not claim there is an “anti-Moon.” The mainstream media, however, only mocks and laughs about the above, widely-promoted and clearly propagandistic talking points. Why? For two reasons: 1) Because that is what the talking heads are told to do by their masters, and 2) Because the cultural engineers know those above claims are nonsensical and easily disproven—because they intentionally planted that nonsensical and easily disproven information in late-2014 as part of their strategy to discredit flat-Earth research in its entirety. The mainstream media will only reference the “master approved” false claims: the media will not sincerely offer nor analytically discuss the indisputable facts—facts found throughout this book—facts that carry with them indisputable confirmation and are evidentiarily supported by the scientific method. Instead, they mock. Instead of using real science to shame the flat-Earth community, they resort to name calling. Ask yourself why noted astrophysicists—their reputations propped up and life-styles funded via grants by the controlling cultural engineers—won’t have a serious debate about the “science” surrounding the globe-Earth model. Resolutely, why won’t leading astrophysicists engage in a debate with serious and honest, flat-Earth researchers? Why won’t they? Because if a leading astrophysicist were to have a serious debate with a knowledgable flatEarth researcher, the astrophysicist would be exposed as a fraud—and he knows this. So to not risk exposure via serious debate, he will instead have a one-way conversation into a camera within the safe confines of a controlled “news” studio. Or he will write misleading, inflammatory articles where his strategy is to channel his inner bully and insult and attempt to intimidate instead of providing the claimed buckets of concrete evidence that Earth is spherical. Ask yourself this: if you were a notable astrophysicist and a flat-Earth researcher was suggesting that your life’s work is a fraud, and if you knew you had legitimate science and fact-based evidence on your side, wouldn’t you enjoy proving once-and-for-all the flat-Earth theory is nothing but nonsense? Wouldn’t you love to opportunity to further validate your years of study and decades of work? Wouldn’t you—assuming, of course, you had science, facts and buckets of concrete evidence on your side? Of course you would. The question here is this: Why do renowned and credentialed astrophysicists and other science royalty avoid—at all cost—a serious debate with a well-informed and well-studied flat-Earth researcher and instead resort to calling fellow, serious researchers childish names such as gullible, zany, foolish, crazy, wacky, loony, silly, conspiracy theorist, et cetera? What are they hiding from? They are hiding from the truth. 111

DISCUSSION POINT 75

This is Tiangong, the Chinese Space Station. We are told that Tiangong is racing through space at 18,000 miles per hour. Wow. So what amazing space photographer took this photograph at 8000 meters per second while also traveling at 18,000 miles per hour? And why no stars in the photograph? We are taught that there are billions of stars in the vacuum of space. Shouldn’t there be stars in the photograph? Oh, wait. That’s right. Every space agency across the plane— Chinese, Russian, American, and all the others—create computer generated images (CGI)—just like the ones above and to the right—and deceptively and deceivingly pass them off to the ignorant public as photographs (Discussion Points 136-140).

112

DISCUSSION POINT 76 Beautiful photographs of the Moon, aren’t they? (And, yes, they are actual photographs of the Moon taken by Robert House and Owen Giles Williams.) What is so incredibly interesting about these two photos is that they were taken at the exact same time (August 22, 2016, 11:58 PM, EST), respectively, one in North America (Alabama, USA) and the other in Sydney, Australia.

If the Earth is indeed a ball-shaped planet, how is it possible for the Moon to be seem at the exact same time from opposite sides of a sphere? The answer is simple: it can’t. The reason the Moon can be seen from two distant locations is because the Earth is not a ball but rather a flat, plane surface. Don’t believe it? Test it yourself. Furthermore, on September 16, 2016, at precisely 20:45 EST, the Moon was visibly observed from Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Canada, the United States, Mexico, Brazil, England, the Netherlands and Germany. If the Moon is visible from each of these distant locations—and some locations, we are told, are on opposite sides of a global Earth—then the Earth is provably not a globe.

113

DISCUSSION POINT 77 The appearance of a sunrise and a sunset on a flat Earth is attributed to both perspective (Discussion Point 24) and air density. Air is thicker at lower elevations, and therefore, more opaque. As the Sun moves away from our vantage point (sets), thicker air blocks it from our vision—starting first with the bottom of the Sun. When the Sun moves toward our vantage point (rises), the line of sight gradually rises above the thicker air into thinner and less opaque air, allowing for the Sun’s visibility—top first. Search for Flat Earth Sunset Experiment: Air Density!! Awesome!! In addition to providing the air density evidence that the perspective of a sunset and sunrise can happen on a flat Earth, the video also further explains air gradient, perspective, buoyancy, false horizon, false water line, time lapse, ships over the horizon, the Sun’s diameter and impossible distances.

114

DISCUSSION POINT 78 Is this your reality when you fly ”around” to different locations on the supposed global Earth?

Do you also experience rain and snow falling up? No? Then maybe it’s time to start asking some questions.

115

DISCUSSION POINT 79 No ships or planes have ever been known to circumnavigate the Earth in north/south directions. (Does this even happen in real life!? Apparently, no.) The fact that there has not yet been a single verified north/south circumnavigation of Earth serves as further evidence that the world is not a ball (as well as offering strong support for the PacMan theory introduced in Discussion Point 145).

116

DISCUSSION POINT 80 Magellan’s and others’ east/west circumnavigations of Earth are often quoted as proof of the ball model. In actual fact, however, sailing or flying at strategic angles—on most map projections: square (below), diamond, circular, et cetera—and eventually returning to one’s original location is no more difficult or mysterious than doing so on a globe (reference the red arrows). Just as an architect’s compass can place its center-point on a flat piece of paper and trace a circle either way around the “pole,” so can a ship or plane circumnavigate a flat-Earth—regardless of its shape.

Why are there also black arrows in the image? Because the red arrows represent an old-school— although admittedly logical—explanation to circumnavigation. The black arrows, however, represent the path of both the Sun and the Moon (between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn). Continued research is necessary to determine whether or not planes and ships are also able to follow this same path—as of now, it is unknown. However, on Earth, one can go in a straight line from the East to the West at any latitude and arrive back where they began. Since there is no curvature nor drop in elevation and since the Earth is not a sphere, logic dictates that the east/west path includes some sort of a closed loop of space/time (Discussion Point 145 will discuss the concept in greater detail.). The exact space/time “jump” location is also conveniently the International Date Line—the only location on Earth where it becomes the next day when it is crossed. Coincidence? 117

DISCUSSION POINT 81 The idea that people are standing, ships are sailing and planes are flying upside down on certain parts of Earth while others tilted at 90 degrees—and all other impossible angles—is complete absurdity. The idea that a man digging a hole straight down could eventually reach sky on the other side is ludicrous. Common sense tells every free-thinking person that there truly is an “up” and “down” in nature, unlike the “everything is relative” rhetoric of the Newtonian/Einsteinian paradigm. When asked his opinion on the theories of contemporary Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla (Discussion Point 23), in 1935, gave a scathing analysis of Relativity theory, calling it a “magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king.” Tesla’s own theorem went unpublished, yet his inventions displayed beautiful simplicity that reflected the natural order. Tesla, in 1931: “My explanations of natural phenomena arenot so involved as his [Einstein’s]. They are simpler, and … will throw light on many puzzling phenomena of the cosmos.” From Robert Otey’s Gravity is a Myth and Does Not Exist: “The force called gravity by Newton and later modified by Einstein and others, does not exist and is purely mythical in its creation. The consequences of this conclusion areimmense. It means that a huge list of non-existent entities have been conjured up by academic scientists based on the mathematics of a non-existent force. For example, the following are—in fact—false and mythical: dark matter, dark energy, black holes, singularities, event horizons, wimps, MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics), machos, neutron stars, gravitational collapse, gravitons, gravity waves, quantum gravity, inward pulling gravity, gravitational lensing, gravitational constant, Schwarzchild radius, gravitational radiation, frame dragging, general relativity, anti-gravity, virtual gravitons and quantum field theory.” On January 12, 2016 (note the date), Stuart Clark, astronomy journalist, wrote a warning in the science section of The Guardian: He unequivocally warned that the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) management team had successfully discovered a way to fake gravitational wave signals and had deceived the entire team of scientists involved. As ifon cue, on February 11, 2016, the fraudulent activity—promoted as science—dominated the mainstream media: Gravitational Waves Discovered from Colliding Black Holes The LIGO experiment has confirmed Albert Einstein’s prediction of ripples in spacetime and promises to open a new era of astrophysics. 118

DISCUSSION POINT 82 Lacantius, from On the False Wisdom of the Philosophers: “A sphere where people on the other side live with their feet above their heads, where rain, snow and hail fall upwards, where trees and crops grow upside-down and the sky is lower than the ground? The ancient wonder of the hanging gardens of Babylon dwindle into nothing in comparison to the fields, seas, towns and mountains that pagan philosophers believe to be hanging from the Earth without support.” Einstein’s Theory of Relativity basically states that the radius of the total velocity minus half the gravitational radius of the total velocity plus the force of gravity added to the total velocity equals negative eight pi times the force of gravity over the time of the total velocity. In simpler words: We take the total energy potential, slice it in half, add gravity in the middle, and over time, gravity becomes part of the whole. His equation says, "We add gravity in the middle and it becomes part of everything over time.” Einstein's equation could be interpreted as an intellectual joke on people who don't understand it. Forget Einstein, let’s take a quick look at simple biology. Even if gravity caused someone to stick to the underside of a spinning, gyrating, rotating and wobbling ball-Earth, they would still feel that they were inverted via the inner ear, et cetera. Go ahead, do a headstand for more than one minute: what do you feel? The indoctrinated will argue that there is no up or down in space, so they would, therefore, not feel the biological effects of walking around upside-down all day, every day. Reality, NASA and astrophysicists all agree, however, that when a person is standing on Earth, he or she is not in space, but rather (allegedly, of course) traveling through it on a physical object where directionality is yet a factor. Fake gravity does not trump real biology. 119

DISCUSSION POINT 83 The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before knighted Freemason “Sir” Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of “gravity” upon the world. It is a fact that objects placed in denser mediums rise up while objects placed in less dense mediums sink down. To fit with the heliocentric model which has no up or down, Newton instead claimed objects are attracted to large masses and fall towards the center. Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it as Newton claims “gravity” does with Earth, the Sun, Moon, stars and planets.

Newton only proposed the equation for gravity: he never actually finished it. Over one hundred years later in 1798, Henry Cavendish came in and—the accepted teaching is that he—finished Newton’s work with the Cavendish Method (the torsion rod experiment). When one takes a look at how the alleged equation for gravity was developed—as presented on NASA Fact Sheet—and the experiment that was allegedly used to determine the Gravitational Constant, the big G in the equation above, well, it appears that the original experiment (not an electrically-grounded replica) is impossible to reproduce. That is a huge problem since it was performed over 200 years ago. Over 200 years later … and science cannot duplicate the original Cavendish Method, you know, the scientific experiment that all of gravity is based on? (Please search Why the Cavendish Experiment Is Ridiculous—Flat Earth.) “Science” can’t duplicate it—and it has no problem with that? The entire model of the solar system depends on the gravitational constant being correct—and “science” openly accepts—without further inquiry—an experiment that was supposedly done 200 years ago and cannot be duplicated today. Really? 120

DISCUSSION POINT 84 As stated in Discussion Point 83, there has never been a single experiment in history showing an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause another smaller mass to orbit around it. The alleged, magic theory of gravity allows for oceans, buildings and people to remain forever stuck to the underside of a spinning ball while simultaneously causing objects like the Moon and satellites to remain locked in perpetual circular orbits around the Earth. If these were both true then people should be able to jump up and start orbiting circles around the Earth or the Moon should have long ago been sucked into the Earth. Neither of these theories have ever been experimentally verified and their alleged results are mutually exclusive. To claim the existence of a physical law without a single, practical, evidential example is hearsay, not science.

Scientist have discovered that people will believe anything when scientists say, “Scientists have discovered (fill in the blank).” Don’t think they don’t take advantage of this unfortunate truth.

121

DISCUSSION POINT 85 Gravity is the lynchpin that holds the heliocentric, ball-Earth theory together. As a result, physicists obediently tell us that gravity is invisible and undetectable to the human senses. We are indoctrinated to believe that gravity is what holds everything to everything else. Gravity is King Velcro—except, of course, for when itisn’t, like when a butterfly flies and flitters (Discussion Points 31 and 32). We are taught in our Halls of Indoctrination that the source of gravity is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass are brought towards one another. As a result of this magical concept, Newton theorized thatthe Earth’s ocean tides are caused by gravitational lunar attraction (see illustration, bottom). Okay, sure. Let’s analyze Newton’s theory: If the Moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter and the Earth 8,000 miles, using their own math and “law,” it follows that the Earth is 87 times more massive and, therefore, the larger object should attract the smaller to it, and not the other way around. If the Earth’s greater gravity is what keeps the Moon in orbit, it is impossible for the Moon’s lesser gravity to supersede the Earth’s gravity, especially at Earth’s sea level, where its gravitational attraction would even further out-trump the Moon’s. And if the Moon’s gravity truly did supersede the Earth’s causing the ocean tides to be drawn towards it, there should be nothing to stop them from continuing onwards and upwards towards their great attractor. Also, if the gravitational pull from the Moon was strong enough to pull the ocean waters, it reasons logically that the gravitational pull should also be strong enough to pull every ounce of our atmosphere into the infinite vacuum of space as well as pull the “satellites” out of their orbit and toward the Moon. 122

DISCUSSION POINT 86 Furthermore, the velocity and path of the Moon are uniform and should, therefore, exert a uniform influence on the Earth’s tides. In actuality, the Earth’s tides vary greatly and do not follow the Moon. Earth’s lakes, ponds, marshes and other inland bodies of water also inexplicably remain forever outside the Moon’s gravitational grasp.

If “gravity” was truly drawing Earth’s oceans up to it, all lakes, ponds, small puddles, glasses of water and all other bodies of standing water should certainly— regardless of composition— have tides as well. But they don’t. Why?

123

DISCUSSION POINT 87

It is known that boat engines generate thrust by pushing against water and airplane engines do the same by pushing against the atmosphere. The two most common ideas presented on the Internet— including NASA’s web site—as to how rockets generate thrust against the vacuum of space are: 1. Newton’s 3rd Law: for every force there is an equal and opposite, and 2. Newtons’s 2nd Law: Force = Mass x Acceleration. Neither idea works scientifically. It is impossible for a space shuttle or any other animate or inanimate object to have thrust in outer space. The problem with applying Newton’s 3rd is that the rocket’s propellant does not generate force in a vacuum, this according to the well-documented laws of both physics and chemistry. Newton’s 3rd Law, the number one response on the Internet to how a rocket generates thrust in space, is invalid. As it turns out, NASA does not fall into the 3rd Law trap, instead claiming that the thrust from a space rocket is generated using an egregious farce of Newton's 2nd law. NASA’s use of the 2nd Law is equally invalid, and is, in fact, a hideous misrepresentation of the laws of physics. NASA would receive a failing grade in any university’s freshman physics class. Yet the mainstream media, untrustworthy scientific journals and an unwitting public give an A+/100% to NASA, rewarding it for its pretty images, dramatic story lines and gutsy “astronaut” champions.

For well-detailed information regarding this topic, please search for Brian Mullin’s videos: Balls Out Physics Episode 5.0: Propulsion in Space Balls Out Physics Episode 5.1: Propulsion in a Vacuum Chamber Balls Out Physics Episode 5.2: Conservation of Momentum in Space 124

DISCUSSION POINT 88 Not once in its twenty-years of orbiting the Earth has the Hubble telescope managed to do the simple act of turning 180 degrees and take a picture of the Earth. Not once.

For the unaware, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is a space telescope that was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990—and remains in operation at the time of this publication. With a 2.4-meter (7.9foot) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments observe in the near ultra-violet, visible, and near infrared spectra. Hubble's orbit outside the distortion of Earth's atmosphere allows it—we are told by NASA—to take extremely high-resolution images with negligible background light. Hubble—we are told by NASA—has recorded some of the most detailed visible-light images ever, allowing—again, as we are told by NASA—a deep view into space and time. Many Hubble observations—we are told— have led to breakthroughs in astrophysics. Although it is not the first space telescope, Hubble is one of the largest and most versatile. Additionally, it is—we are told—a vital research tool. Wow. Sounds amazing! So … um … why not take a photo of the Earth?

125

The Air Force UAS remote-controlled, unmanned drone cannot keep a signal at 67,000 feet (and has a flight time of 80 hours), but the NASA Rover can be controlled at 33 million miles (with a battery life of—at the time of publication—4 years, 354 days and counting? [For additional perspective: a 2017 Tesla car battery will last 21 days before mandatory re-charge.] It's all absurd. Yet, these are the type of things that NASA and the engineered society expect you to believe.

DISCUSSION POINT 89 It is claimed that the other planets are spheres and so, therefore, Earth must also be a sphere. Firstly, Earth is a plane not a planet; furthermore, the shape of these “planets” in the sky have no bearing on the shape of the Earth beneath our feet. Secondly, these “planets” have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wandering stars” since they differ from the other fixed stars in their relative motions only. From On the Most Recent Phenomena of the Aetherial World in 1588, Tycho Brahe (astronomer, astrologer and alchemist) said this: “There really are not any spheres in the heavens. Those of which have been devised by the experts to save the appearances exist only in the imagination, for the purpose of enabling the mind to conceive the motion which the heavenly bodies trace in their course and, by the aid of geometry, to determine the motion numerically through the use of arithmetic."

When looked at with an unprejudiced, naked eye or through a telescope, the fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, not spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all admittedly fake computer-generated images—not photographs. 126

DISCUSSION POINT 90 When you observe the Sun and Moon you see two equally-sized equidistant circles tracing similar paths at similar speeds over a flat, stationary Earth (Discussion Point 145). The “experts” at NASA, however, claim your common-sense, every-day experience is false on all counts. They say the Earth is not flat but a big ball; not stationary but spinning around at approximately 1/3 mile per second; they say the Sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears, but Earth revolves around the Sun; the Moon, on the other hand, does revolve around the Earth, though not east to west as it appears, rather west to east; and the Sun is actually 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times farther away.

With haughty arrogance, the nearest hypnotized heliocentrist will inform you that the Sun is exactly 865,374 miles in diameter and 92.955,807 miles from the Earth and that the Moon is 2159 miles in diameter and 238,900 miles from Earth. Those measurements just happen to be the exact diameters and distances necessary for a viewer from Earth to falsely perceive them as being the same size. Yet one can clearly see the Sun and Moon are the same size and distance, one can see the Earth is flat, and one can feel the Earth is stationary—but according to the gospel of modern astronomy, one is wrong and a simpleton worthy of endless ridicule if one dares to trust ones own eyes and experience. 127

DISCUSSION POINT 91 Heliocentrists’ astronomical figures always sound perfectly precise, but they have historically been notorious for regularly and drastically changing them to suit their various models. For instance, in his time, Copernicus calculated the Sun’s distance from Earth to be 3,391,200 miles. The next century Johannes Kepler decided it was actually 12,376,800 miles away. Isaac Newton once said, “It matters not whether we reckon it 28 or 54 million miles distant for either would do just as well.” How scientific. Benjamin Martin calculated between 81 and 82 million miles. Thomas Dilworth claimed 93,726,900 miles. John Hind stated positively 95,298,260 miles. Benjamin Gould said more than 96 million miles. Christian Mayer thought it was more than 104 million. We are now at 93 million miles. Conversely, those who thought the Earth to be flat, consistently, throughout the ages, have used sextants and plane trigonometry to make such calculations and found —and still find today— the Sun and Moon both to be only about 30 miles in diameter and a few thousand miles from Earth (Discussion Points 45-6). That local distance is also logical as it is the only explanation that accounts for clouds being behind the Sun. For perspective, high-level clouds, called cirrus clouds, can reach heights of 20,000 feet (6,000 meters). The mile is an English unit of length of linear measure equal to 5,280 feet or 1,609.344 meters. I'll let you do the math. Although clouds are often thought to be seen behind the Sun. a , a sincere interest in comprehensive analysis demands the consideration that the appearance of clouds behind the Sun may only be an optical illusion. For a possible explanation, please view on YouTube, Explained, Why Clouds Sometimes Seem to be Behind the Sun. However, regardless of whether clouds are one day proven to be or not to be behind the Sun, the Sun is certainly not 3, 12, 28, 54, 82, 93, 95 or 104 million miles from the Earth. 128

DISCUSSION POINT 92 Evidence that the Sun is not millions of miles away is found by tracing the angle of Sun-rays back to their source above the clouds. There are thousands of pictures showing how sunlight comes down through cloud-cover at a variance of converging angles. The area of convergence is of course the Sun, and is clearly not millions of miles away, but rather relatively close to Earth, just above the clouds.

Our daily, repeatable observation shows us that the Sun is much closer and much smaller than we have been taught. If the Sun was 93,000,000 miles away and much, much larger than the Earth (Discussion Point 146), its light would be shining through all the cloud openings, not only illuminating locally as is seen in both the above photograph and our everyday experiences. Also, the horizon is flat (Discussion Point 1) and the water has found its flatness (Discussion Points 3 and 4)—as it does and as we repeatedly observe—without fail—in every real-life occurrence. If further interested, search Crepuscular Sun Rays Prove Flat Earth on YouTube.

129

DISCUSSION POINT 93 Amateur balloon footage taken above the clouds has provided stunning visual evidence that the Sun cannot be millions of miles away. One can clearly see a hot-spot reflecting on the clouds directly below the Sun’s spotlight-like influence. If the Sun were actually millions of miles away such a small, localized hot-spot could not occur. "How do you explain that it is daytime in England but night in Australia?" The Sun is much smaller and closer than we have been told, and it illuminates locally as it travels over the Earth (Discussion Point 145). Further, all light sources have limitations, even the Sun.

Also, as is clearly demonstrated in the above photo—and everywhere across the realm each and every day—the Sun is much smaller and much closer than we have been taught. It’s worth mentioning again: if the Sun was 93,000,000 miles away, its light would be shining through all the cloud openings, not illuminating locally as is shown here—and everywhere else, everyday. 130

DISCUSSION POINT 94 The heliocentric model claims seasons change based on the ball-Earth’s alleged “axial tilt” and “elliptical orbit” around the Sun, yet their flawed current model places us closest to the Sun (91,400,000 miles) in January when its actually winter, and farthest from the Sun (94,500,000 miles) in July when its actually summer throughout most of the Earth. It’s nonsense.

131

DISCUSSION POINT 95 The fact that the Sun and Moon’s reflections on water always form a straight-line path from the horizon to the observer proves the Earth is not a ball. If the Earth’s surface was curved, it would be impossible for the reflected light to curve over the ball from horizon to observer.

The Sun and the Moon’s straight-line reflection on an always-flat water surface is the exact manner in which car headlights have a straight-line reflection on an always-flat concrete surface on a rainy day. This is not a mere similarity, this is an exactitude. This is not a phenomenon, this is an every day, every time occurrence. Please view on YouTube Water and Light Prove Flat Earth (it’s spectacular). Also, test it yourself. Cover a piece of cardboard with aluminum, shiny side up. Place it on a straight, flat surface. Place a burning candle near the edge. Observe the light reflecting on the entire length, just like you see in both of the images and in the real world. Now slightly bend the cardboard: the reflection will not reach the end, the straight-line reflection does not occur. Conclusion: based on empirical and repeatable evidence, the light from both the Sun and the Moon is not reflecting on a sphere. 132

DISCUSSION POINT 96 There exist huge, centuries-old stone sundials and moon-dials all over the world. As it dates back to the Egyptian Period, around 1500 B.C., the sundial—in particular—is one of the oldest instruments used to measure time. It was commonly used in ancient Greece and Rome; in central Europe it was the most familiar method utilized to determine the time—even after the mechanical clock was developed in the 14th century. These centuries-old devices still tell the time today, right down to the precise minute just as perfectly as the day they were made.

How could these sundials continue to work correctly on a spinning ball that’s also spinning around the Sun that’s also racing through the Universe? If the Earth, Sun and Moon were truly subject to the number of contradictory revolving, rotating, wobbling and spiraling motions claimed by modern astronomy, it would be impossible for these monuments to so accurately tell time without constant adjustment. They, however, do work perfectly—because the Earth is both stable and flat.

133

DISCUSSION POINT 97 To quote William Carpenter, an English printer and author: “Why, in the name of common sense, should observers have to fix their telescopes on solid stone bases so that they should not move a hair’s-breadth if the Earth on which they fix them moves at the rate of nineteen miles in a second? Indeed, to believe that ‘six thousand million million million tons’ is ‘rolling, surging, flying, darting on through space forever’ with a velocity compared with which a shot from a cannon is a ‘very slow coach,’ with such unerring accuracy that a telescope fixed on granite pillars in an observatory will not enable a lynx-eyed astronomer to detect a variation in its onward motion of the thousandth part of a hair's-breadth is to conceive a miracle compared with which all the miracles on record put together would sink into utter insignificance. Since we can, in middle north latitudes, see the North Star, on looking out of a window that faces it—and out of the very same corner of the very same pane of glass in the very same window—all the year round, it is proof enough for anyman in his senses that we have made no motion at all and that the Earth is not a globe.”

DISCUSSION POINT 98 NASA and modern astronomy maintain that the Moon is a solid, spherical, Earth-like habitation which man has actually flown to and set foot on. They claim the Moon is a non-luminescent planetoid which receives and reflects all its light from the Sun. They claim the Moon is responsible for the ocean’s tides. The reality (that which we know to be observable, testable and repeatable based on empirical evidence, disregarding establishment-based lies), however, is that the Moon is not solid, there’s no landing on it (Discussion Point 141), it rotates/rolls on its circular edges, it emits its own light, it's generally the same size as the Sun, it's not a sphere, and it is not in any way an Earth-like planetoid which humans could set foot on. Something more ... doesn’t it seem impossible that the Moon always presents the same face to us? The Church of Science tells us it is simple physics and that the Moon rotates while it orbits Earth. They say the amount of time it takes the Moon to complete a revolution on its axis is the exact same it takes to circle our planet—about 27 days. As a result, the same lunar hemisphere always faces Earth. What fiction do the cultural engineers and the science priests use to try to explain this? In a word: gravity (please see pages 18-9, 41, 51, 58-9, 86, 118-23, 145, 158-60, 196, 216-17, 224-5). 134

DISCUSSION POINT 99 Using as an example the 1212 pillars of the Rameshvaram Temple (below, left) that was built by legendary Indian engineers 1740 years ago, let's re-visit the concepts of the Law of Perspective, convergence and the vanishing point (Discussion Point 71) to better understand how our eyes work as well as to better initially perceive the movement of the departing ("setting") and approaching ("rising") Sun. The loooooong hallway and the pillars of the temple provide an excellent example of how our eyes see into a single vanishing point perspective as well as why this gives an illusion of the Sun setting or rising when it is actually moving away from or moving toward the viewer into a single point of convergence (illustrated here as the black dot barely visible at the end of the hallway). Recalling that our eyes see in a single point perspective into a vanishing point of convergence where the ground meets the sky at the horizon, we understand and know that the floor isn't on an incline, the ceiling isn't declining, and the pillars are not disappearing from sight over the (nonexistent) curvature of the Earth. The manner in which our eyes work, however, allow for such misinterpretation— if we did not already know that both the floor and ceiling were flat and parallel to one another, we might think—based on what we saw—that they were inclining and declining until they met. It is the same manner in which our eyes work that allows for the belief that the Sun is setting—it isn't. The Sun simply moves farther away from you and appears to get smaller as it approaches and eventually meets with the horizon. 135

DISCUSSION POINT 100 The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrefy; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay. . This proves that Sunlight and Moonlight are different, unique, and opposites as they are in a flat and stationary model. The simple conclusion? The Moon does not reflect light from the Sun as we are indoctrinated to believe. Let's take a closer look at some facts:

3. 4. 5.

6.

1. Sunlight is gold and yellow; Moonlight is white and blue-ish. 2. The Sun's light, as discussed above, is drying and preserving; while the Moon's light is damp and putrefactive. The Sun's rays can put out a common fire while the Moon's light will increase combustion. The light of the Sun falling upon certain chemicals produces a change of color such as photographic processes. The light of the Moon fails to produce the same effect. The Sun's light when concentrated by a number of mirrors, or a large lens produces a focus that is entirely non-luminous, but the heat is so great that metallic and alkaline substances are quickly fused; Earth and mineral compounds almost immediately vitrified; and all animals and vegetable structures are burned and destroyed in a few seconds. The Moon's light when concentrated produces a brilliant focus so luminous that it's difficult to look upon it, and yet there is no increase of temperature. In direct Sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct Moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in Moon shade.

Again, The Moon clearly does not reflect light from the Sun as we are indoctrinated to believe. If the Powers That Be are obviously lying about this, doesn't it stand to reason that they could just as easily be lying about many, many, many other things as well? For example, the shape of the Earth on which we live? 136

DISCUSSION POINT 101 To reiterate, in direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point, it can create significant heat while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the Lancet Medical Journal from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved theMoon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees. This means that sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties. Hence, the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light. Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; if a reflector’s surface is convex, then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection. Further, if the Moon is 250,000 miles out in the darkness of space —as astro-physics indoctrinate us to believe—how is it possible that there is often blue sky behind it?

Not only is the Moon likely self-luminescent, shining its own unique light, but it is also possibly translucent. When the waxing or waning Moon is visible during the day, it is possible to see the blue sky right through the Moon; when it is visible at night, the dark night sky is visible. And on a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and “planets” directly through the surface of the Moon. The Royal Astronomical Society has on record many such occurrences throughout history which all defy the heliocentric model. 137

DISCUSSION POINT 102 Many people think that modern astronomy’s ability to accurately predict lunar and solar eclipses is a result and proof positive of the heliocentric theory of the universe. The fact of the matter, however, is that eclipses have been accurately predicted by cultures worldwide for thousands of years before the “heliocentric ball-Earth” was even a glimmer in Copernicus’ imagination Discussion Point 8). Ptolemy, in the 1st century A.D., accurately predicted eclipses for six hundred years on the basis of a flat, stationary Earth with as equal precision as anyone living today. All the way back in 600 B.C., Thales accurately predicted an eclipse which ended the war between the Medes and Lydians.

Eclipses happen regularly with precision in 18-year cycles, so regardless of flat or globe Earth cosmologies, eclipses can be accurately calculated independent of such factors.. From NASA's website: "The periodicity and recurrence of eclipses is governed by the Saros cycle, a period of approximately 6,585.3 days (18 years 11 days 8 hours). It was known to the Chaldeans as a period when lunar eclipses seem to repeat themselves, but the cycle is applicable to solar eclipses as well."

138

DISCUSSION POINT 103 Another assumption and supposed proof for Earth’s globular shape: heliocentrists claim that lunar eclipses are caused by the shadow of the ball-Earth occulting the Moon. They claim the Sun, Earth, and Moon spheres perfectly align like three billiard balls in a row so that the Sun’s light casts the Earth’s shadow onto the Moon. Unfortunately for heliocentrists, this explanation is rendered completely invalid due to the fact that lunar eclipses have happened and continue to happen regularly when both the Sun and Moon are still visible together above the horizon. For the Sun’s light to be casting Earth’s shadow onto the Moon, the three bodies must be aligned in a straight 180 degree syzygy—an alignment of three celestial objects—but as early as the time of Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23 – AD 79), there are records of lunar eclipses happening while both the Sun and Moon are visible in the sky. Therefore, the eclipsor of the Moon cannot be the Earth/Earth’s shadow.

Another sticking point for the globe-Earth model is the manner in which we are told the rays of the Sun travel. We are told they travel completely parallel (please briefly view the image on page 87). However, if an eclipse is to work in the manner we are “taught,” the Sun’s rays must travel at the angle illustrated above. So which is it? Do the Sun’s rays travel parallel to one another—not allowing for their lunar eclipse—or do they travel at angles—allowing for their lunar eclipse but contradicting their own teachings of their globe-Earth model?

139

DISCUSSION POINT 104 Another favorite “proof ” of ball-Earthers is the appearance—from an observer on shore—of ships’ hulls being obfuscated by the water and disappearing from view when sailing away towards the horizon. Their claim is that ships’ hulls disappear before their mast-heads because the ship is beginning its declination around the convex curvature of the ball-Earth. Once again, however, their hasty conclusion is drawn from a faulty premise, namely that only on a ball-Earth could this phenomenon occur.

The fact of the matter is that the Law of Perspective on plane surfaces dictates and necessitates the exact same occurrence. For example, a girl wearing a dress walking away towards the horizon will appear to sink into the Earth the farther away she walks. Her feet will disappear from view first and the distance between the ground and the bottom of her dress will gradually diminish until after about half a mile when it will seem like her dress is touching the ground as she walks on invisible legs. Such is the case on plane surfaces, the lowest parts of objects receding from a given point of observation necessarily disappear before the highest.

140

DISCUSSION POINT 105 Not only is the disappearance of ship’s hulls explained by the Law of Perspective (Discussion Points 71 and 99, among others) on flat surfaces, it is proven undeniably true with the aid of a good telescope. If you watch aship sailing away into the horizon with the naked eye until its hull has completely disappeared from view under the supposed “curvature of the Earth,” then look through a telescope, you will notice the entire ship quickly zooms back into view, hull and all, proving that the disappearance was caused by the Law of Perspective, not by a wall of curved water. This also proves that the horizon is simply the vanishing line of perspective from your point of view, not the alleged “curvature” of Earth. In short, the horizon is not the curve of the Earth: it is simply the limit that your eyeballs can see.

The same people who will claim the Earth is much, much, much too large to see curvature or a consistent drop in elevation are the exact same people who will also claim to see a ship sail over the horizon— which, in that instance, in their eyes, would represent the curvature of the Earth. A person can either see the curvature of the Earth or he can’t: he can’t have it both ways.

141

DISCUSSION POINT 106 Foucault’s pendulums are often cited as proof of a rotating Earth; upon closer investigation, however, Foucault’s pendulums prove the opposite. [This examination began in Discussion Point 21.] To begin with, Foucault’s pendulums do not uniformly swing in any one direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to rotate and sometimes they rotate far too much. The behavior of the pendulum actually depends on 1) the initial force beginning its swing, 2) the ball-and-socket joint used which most-readily facilitates circular motion over any other, and mostly, 3) eclipses and the movement of the stars (this is discussed more below). The supposed rotation of the Earth is completely inconsequential and irrelevant to the pendulum’s swing. If the alleged constant rotation of the Earth effected the pendulums in any way, then there should be no need to manually start pendulums in motion. If the Earth’s diurnal rotation caused the 360 degree uniform diurnal rotation of pendulums, then there should not exist a stationary pendulum anywhere on Earth … but there are. Any pendulum consists of a cable or wire or string and a bob. Pendulums used in the Foucault experiment are expected to have as long a cable as possible (approximating 50+ feet) and a heavy symmetrical bob (approximating 250 pounds). All pendulums lose a bit of energy with each swing due to friction from air currents and vibrations in the cable and other factors—you can test this yourself with a pendulum of any size and weight. Thus, left to itself, the pendulum would swing in shorter and shorter arcs until after a few hours it will decrease almost to zero. To keep the Foucault Pendulum going, one must replace the energy lost with each swing. This can be done by giving the pendulum a little "kick" with each swing. To do this, two iron collars are attached to the cable near the top. There is a doughnutshaped electromagnet built into the ceiling, and the iron collar swings back and forth inside the hole of the doughnut. When the pendulum cable reaches a particular point in its swing, it is detected by an electronic device and the magnet is turned on at just the right time to give the collar (and thus the cable and the bob) a little "kick" in the exact direction of its natural swing. This restores the energy lost during the swing and keeps the pendulum from stopping. In other words, the pendulum is being manipulated in more ways than one; therefore, the theory is proven false, or inconclusive at best. [In all fairness and to maintain integrity, it is claimed by Science-ism that this acknowledged human interference has no effect on the direction of the swing, and therefore, does not interfere with the demonstration that the Earth is spinning.] Regardless, deceived crowds and the deceiving false "scientists" continued to say the pendulum moves in a way that that proves the Earth is rotating. However, the entire premise of the Foucault Pendulum was proven false (again) when Nobel Prize winner Maurice Allais observed something odd regarding the pendulum during an eclipse. The pendulum's movement was effected by what was happening in the heavens: the angle changed radically. This is an observable, testable and repeatable occurrence equating to scientific fact. The movement/ swing of the pendulum has absolutely nothing to do with a rotating Earth. It is the stars we clearly see rotating above our Earth (Discussion Point 41): the Foucault Pendulum experiment proves the movement of the stars, not the movement of the Earth. As expected, NASA is stalling. After repeated experiments again and again verifying the Allais Effect, they say, "Just one more time, please. Wait for another eclipse and we'll do the experiment again and re-evaluate."

Someone who uses the Coriolis Effect to claim the Earth is a globe wants you to believe that the Earth spins under a sniper's bullet; that same person, however, cannot explain why the Earth does not also spin under a hot-air balloon, a helicopter, a hummingbird, a bumblebee, a ...

DISCUSSION POINT 107 The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball-Earth. Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction. Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed rotation of the Earth. Despite this nonsense, the heliocentric “authorities” pushed it through with all their media power and academic might so that once this new mathematics was firmly established, they had carte blanche to sneak in other bad “science” when experimental observations went against them—like gravity, black holes, dark matter, wormholes and other such unobservable and unverifiable nonsense. One of the most nonsensical bits of bad science was the attempt to tie in the Coriolis Effect of a rotating Earth with observable atmospheric phenomena. The indoctrination: The Coriolis Effect is an effect whereby a mass moving in a rotating system experiences a force (the Coriolis force) acting perpendicular to the direction of motion and to the axis of rotation. When one does research on the Coriolis Effect on the Internet—especially regarding bullet trajectory—one will come across significant, planted disinformation claiming the Coriolis Effect is a variable/force which affects the bullet flight both on the horizontal and the vertical plane of the trajectory. A lazy and insincere researcher will find those bits of information and say, “Aha! The Earth is a globe! I knew it. The Coriolis Effect proves it!” More serious researchers would simply shake their heads and ask this of the lazy researcher: “Have you bothered to speak with any specialists—face-to-face—who would be forced to deal with this effect in their daily work?” Honest and sincere researchers have repeatedly found—through multiple personal inquiries—that the Coriolis Effect is never taken into consideration when firing a gun—dramatically disproving any global-Earth model. Take, for example, the blunt words of Wayne Lundy, a field artillery computer systems specialist in the United States Armed Forces: [There is] no curvature and we never account for the Coriolis Effect. Mr. Lundy, inarguably a specialist in this field, does not stand alone in his factual assessment: he is supported by countless other professionals working in the field. Internet research is often—but not always—valid; therefore, it is necessary to verify information via real world analysis and analytics. 143

DISCUSSION POINT 108 People claim that if the Earth were flat, they should be able to use a telescope and see clear across the oceans—they claim Americans on the West Coast should be able to see China. This is absurd, however, as the air is full of mist, dust particles, haze and precipitation—especially over the oceans, and especially at the lowest, densest layer of atmosphere that we inhabit. You can, however, use a telescope to zoom in much more of our flat Earth than would be possible on a ball 25,000 miles in circumference. As atmosphere is not transparent, even the best telescope will blur out long before you could see across an ocean. For a commonly recognizable example of only one element preventing such visible activity, simply picture the blurry haze over roads on hot, humid days. Add to that—and the other already-mentioned-above factors—air density, convergence lines, the vanishing point and the fact that you are not Superman, and it becomes clear that the claim that one should be able to see across the ocean—even with the assistance of a telescope—is absurd.

144

DISCUSSION POINT 109 We are taught that gravity is an undetectable, powerful force that holds oceans in place and firmly keeps 20-ton trucks embedded to the ground when on the underside of the globe. What is not taught is how gravity is so easily defied and defeated by a young child blowing bubbles or repeatedly tapping a balloon into the air.

145

DISCUSSION POINT 110 Pictures of the Moon appearing upside-down in the Southern Hemisphere and right-side up in the Northern Hemisphere are often cited as proof of the ball-Earth, but once again, upon closer inspection, provide evidence of a flat-Earth model. In fact, time-lapse photography shows the Moon itself turns clockwise on its edges (like a wheel) as it moves over the Earth. You can find pictures of the Moon at 360 degrees of various inclination from all over theEarth simply depending on where and when the picture was taken. See that “shadow” (below)? The shaded part of the Moon? If the Moon is truly reflecting light from the Sun as we are taught, why does a shadow appear? As the Moon is empirically proven to be its own light source, does it dim itself ? Is that even a shadow? These are question to which there appears to currently be no definitive answer. However, when watching the shadow line move across the face of the Moon using both cameras and telescopes, what is visually experienced is a beautiful, soft transition line. There is nothing—including a ball-Earth—sharp or physically in front of the Moon blocking out light. This truth has been empirically experienced over and over and over from various geographical areas on the Earth plane. As a result of mounting evidence, it has recently been theorized that the visible transition line represents the Moon’s passage through a "portal" (Discussion Point 145). As mentioned in Discussion Point 101, if one looks at a crescent Moon at twilight, one can see the stars through the “shadow.” The only explanations are that the Moon is 1) transparent or translucent at that point, 2) the stars exist physically closer at that point than the Moon itself does, and being of lesser magnitude in luminance, the stars do not appear as the Moon passes behind them, as the Moon is brighter, 3) the Moon is passing through a "portal", or 4) a combination of both 1) and 3). It is hereby acknowledged that another possibility could be something completely unimagined. 146

DISCUSSION POINT 111 Heliocentrists believe the Moon is a ball orbiting the Earth every 27+/- days even though its appearance is that of a flat, luminous disc that rotates on its edges. We only ever see the same one face (albeit at various inclinations) of the Moon, yet it is claimed that there is another “dark side of the Moon” which remains hidden. NASA states the Moon spins opposite the spin of the Earth in such a perfectly synchronized way that the motions cancel each other out so we will conveniently never be able to observe the supposed dark-side of the Moon outside of their terribly fake CGI images. The fact of the matter is, however, if the Moon were a sphere, observers in Antarctica and Canada, for examples, would see a different face from those at the equator, yet they do not—they simply see the same flat face rotated at various degrees.

See those shadows on the Moon (so we are told) in the above photos? If a ball-shaped Earth truly casts its shadow on the Moon, then, how is it possible that the shadow remains the exact same during the entire day and night? Shouldn’t the shadow be changing at the same pace that the Sun “sets”? The fact that we do not witness the shadow adjusting on the Moon is further evidence that the Sun, Moon and Earth are not what we have been told. 147

DISCUSSION POINT 112 Let's revisit the concept introduced in Discussion Points 30 and 64: Imagine a man is glued by his shoes to the base of a small, Earth-like sphere lifted up by a crane. The man would be fully aware that he is upside down. Increase both the size of the crane and sphere by ten times and do the same: the man still knows he is upside down. Make everything 100 times bigger: the man still knows he is upside down. So how big does the sphere need to be to give the man the perception that he is upright?

Walking around upside down on the bottom of a global Earth is a ridiculous premise. One could argue that the only way to believe such a nonsensical assertion is that one has been actually hypnotized by propaganda (Discussion Point 41). (Propaganda is "information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view". Propaganda is often associated with the psychological mechanisms of influencing and altering the attitude of a population toward a specific cause, position or political agenda in an effort to form a consensus to a standard set of belief patterns.) How can we possibly be walking around at all different angles on a big ball? How can we possibly be on anything other than some form of a flat plane? Forget for now about all the other questions, such as How does day and night work? We know they do. But we also know that no one is ever anything other than squarely on top of this Earth no matter in what country they are located. Ask yourself this: Is it possible to stand upright on the bottom of a ball regardless of the size of the ball? Also ask yourself this: Where are the live, NASA video feeds from space showing people walking around upside down and at 90-degree angles on a rotating Earth? 148

DISCUSSION POINT 113 The nature of a spinning gyroscope—and why they are useful—is that its axial orientation in free space remains fixed, regardless of the changing orientation of the object to which it is attached. If you absorb that phenomena and understand it, you immediately appreciate why gyroscopes are relied on in aircraft and submarines. They actually work. They tell the pilot where 'up' really is—even after the vehicle is pitching, rolling, and turning—without the pilot needing an external reference (like a horizon). So this behavior is observable, testable, repeatable, accepted and relied upon. This is a comfortable truth that I think reasonable people can agree on. The uncomfortable part comes when it is pointed out that the gyroscopes orientation should be unaffected by the Earth's movement, just as it is unaffected by the movement of a vehicle carrying it. That being said, why does the gyroscope not change orientation as the Earth moves? It should, but it doesn’t. The fact that the gyroscope does not change orientation as the Earth moves, clearly shows that gyroscope navigation is impossible on a global Earth—but it also shows that it is very possible on a flat Earth. Because the gyroscope resists the pull of Earth—it does not stay in alignment with “gravity” or with the surface of the Earth—it is easy to prove the Earth is flat by setting a gyroscope on a gimbal base where it could move freely and put it in motion with its axis in a vertical position, in the next six hours you should see the axis slowly move to a horizontal position as the base rotates with the globe Earth. If it doesn’t, then the Earth is not a spinning ball. Guess what? It doesn’t. The below is transcript from a radio show. Full disclosure demands I state I do not know the name of the caller (in response to Sean McCrary, US Navy Sea Sparrow Missile Instructor, and his claims in favor of a flat Earth); regardless, the caller’s—and McCrary’s—claims are easily verified. I am a professional pilot and certified flight instructor. I run my own business at a small airport in the midwest. In my previous 6 years teaching others how to fly I can absolutely verify that your recent guest's claims about the Gyroscopic Properties of the Aircraft's Attitude Indicator are correct! Robert did a great job in describing how it works and he was spot on. Never in any textbook or other literature have I read anything about correcting for a curved Earth. We rely on those instruments in bad weather and literally risk our lives trusting that the instruments will not deviate from straight-and-level ever. That alone was proof enough to a well-educated pilot to question everything that I thought I knew and I am now very much convinced that we have some serious examining to do regarding the world in which we live.

149

DISCUSSION POINT 114 From Samuel Rowbotham’s Zetetic Astronomy: “It is found by observation that the stars come to the meridian about four minutes earlier every twenty-four hours than the Sun, taking the solar time as the standard. This makes 120 minutes every thirty days, and twenty-four hours in the year. Hence all the constellations have passed before or in advance of the Sun in that time. This is the simple fact as observed in nature, but the theory of rotundity and motion on axes and in an orbit has no place for it. Visible truth must be ignored, because this theory stands in the way, and prevents its votaries from understanding it.”

In The Importance of Being Earnest, Oscar Wilde wrote, “The truth is rarely pure and never simple.” I include that quote here to support the following commentary about Mr. Rowbotham. Yes, it is proven that he was a Free Mason (Discussion Point 159); although this fact does demand closer scrutiny of his work (true science demands close scrutiny of all work, of course), however, if that scrutiny proves elements of Rowbotham’s work accurate, his Free Mason association does not and should not automatically eliminate that specific research nor its resulting logical insights—those truths should instead be embraced. As stated previously, truth is truth, regardless of the source. And, the evidence proves, that Mr. Rowbotham has provided much truth—and any dismissal of those truths is unjust. Winston S. Churchill said the following: “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.” Don’t let that be you. 150

DISCUSSION POINT 115 Throughout thousands of years the same constellations have remained fixed in their same patterns without moving out of position whatsoever. If the Earth were a big ball spinning around a bigger Sun spinning around a bigger galaxy shooting off from the Biggest Bang as NASA claims, it is impossible that the constellations would remain so fixed. Based on their model, we should, in fact, have an entirely different night sky every single night and never repeat exactly the same star pattern twice.

151

DISCUSSION POINT 116 Curvature—and the missing, dramatic and consistent drop in elevation—has been mentioned in this book probably more often than any other topic (Discussion Points 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 18, 33, 40, 48, 55, 58, 60-66, 105, 118, 121, 128, 131 and 147): as it is impossible to honestly debunk, it’s arguably the most vital piece of empirical and provable scientific evidence. It’s such a fun topic to discuss and include because, well, anyone with sensibility clearly understands two facts: 1. There is no curvature or consistent drop in elevation to the Earth’s surface, and 2. The fact that there is no curvature to the Earth’s surface is literally the smoking gun that single-handedly disproves the global-Earth model—everything else is simply details. Lake Baikal in Russia is another piece of that no curvature indisputable evidence.

Lake Baikal is 395 miles long. Lake Baikal freezes over every year. Lake Baikal does not have 20 miles of curved ice as the most modest Earth-curvature estimates claim it should. Just as water always finds it’s flatness (Discussion Point 4), the frozen waters of Lake Baikal does the same—indisputably.

152

DISCUSSION POINT 117 What you believe to be true … is it true? Or do you just believe that it is true because you were taught that is was true and never looked any further? When you are confronted with a truth that contradicts your cherished and long-held belief, do you instinctively recall your mainstream soundbites and regurgitate them on demand, just as your television trained you to do? You f ’ing conspiracy theorist nut job! You f ’ing tin foil hat dickbag! You’re f ’ing, batsh*t crazy! If so, your tantrum like reaction is the result of an under-developed ego that is struggling to mature and cope with the real world, a world that is clearly farremoved from the mainstream Disney World fairy tale you were promised as a child. It’s not your fault. You were taught in your school (Discussion Points 42 and 120) to be an obedient slave—we all were. It’s simply time to release and let go of all of

that indoctrination and free yourself from the chains of conditioning. You’re here on page 153, reading the 117th Discussion Point, you’ve just made up your mind one way or another about the flatness of Lake Baikal featured in Discussion Point 116, you’re in the midst of contemplating a topic that is very challenging to every person’s cognitive dissonance. You are not the person either referenced above or in either of the images. You are an individual who has or is breaking free from mental captivity. You deserve recognition. Consider yourself recognized. Keep reading. There’s so much more.

153

DISCUSSION POINT 118 In 2003, three University Geography professors collaborated in an experiment to prove that the State of Kansas is indeed actually flatter than a pancake. Using topographical geodetic surveys covering over 80,000 square miles it was determined that Kansas has a flatness ratio of 0.9997 over the entire state while the average pancake, precisely measured using a confocal laser microscope comes in at 0.957, making Kansas thereby literally flatter than a pancake.

In 2014, geographers at—again—the University of Kansas published a paper titled, “The Flatness of U.S. States” in Geographical Review, a peer-reviewed journal published by the American Geographical Society. KU Professor Jerome Dobson and his colleague Joshua Campbell, who works at the State Department's Office of the Geographer, conducted a “geomorphometric analysis” of the contiguous United States—a measure, basically, of the nation’s lumps and bumps. To do that, the pair developed a method for reckoning flatness, creating an algorithm that would allow them to develop a comprehensive estimate of states’ relative pancakery. Once they’d developed their algorithm, Dobson and Campbell processed elevation data, gathered from NASA’s Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, for the contiguous U.S.—48 states and the District of Columbia. The results? There are six states—Florida, Illinois, North Dakota, Louisiana, Minnesota, Delaware— that are even flatter than Kansas. It has been proven that nearly 600,000 square miles of the United States of America is flat, showing absolutely zero curvature or consistent elevation drop—directly contradicting NASA’s curvature claims. I will allow you to come to your own conclusions. 154

DISCUSSION POINT 119 Analyzing Reverend Thomas Milner’s Atlas of Physical Geography, we find that, “Vast areas exhibit a perfectly dead level, scarcely a rise existing through 1,500 miles from the Carpathians to the Urals. South of the Baltic the country is so flat that a prevailing north wind will drive the waters of the Stattiner Haf into the mouth of the Oder, and give the river a backward flow 30 or 40 miles. The plains of Venezuela and New Granada, in South America chiefly on the left of the Orinoco, are termed Ilanos, or level fields. Often in the space of 270 square miles the surface does not vary a single foot. The Amazon River (below) only falls 12 feet in the last 700 miles of its course; the La Plata has only a descent of one thirty-third of an inch a mile.”

155

DISCUSSION POINT 120

Where does cognitive dissonance come from? You may as well ask this question: “What does school really teach children?” 1. Truth comes from authority. 2. Intelligence is the ability to remember and repeat. 3. Accurate memory and repetition are rewarded. 4. Non-compliance is punished. 5. Conform: Intellectually and socially. Most people will say the Earth is a globe simply as a result of the 1-5 above—their cognitive dissonant indoctrination—often angrily (Discussion Point 117). Understanding the origin of cognitive dissonance is imperative.

156

DISCUSSION POINT 121 A few people claim to have seen the curvature of or elevation drop on the Earth through their airplane windows. The glass used in all commercial airplanes, however, is curved to remain flush with the fuselage. This creates a slight effect that bias people mistake for being the alleged curvature of the Earth. In actuality, the fact that you can see the horizon at eye-level at 35,000 feet out both port/starboard windows proves the Earth is flat. If the Earth were a ball, no matter how big, the horizon would stay exactly where it was and you would have to look down further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet, assuming the Earth is globular, you should see nothing but "outer-space" from the port and starboard windows, as the Earth/horizon are supposed to be below you. However, the horizon is always visible at eye level— looking out any window—because the Earth is not a globe-shaped sphere.

File number F71.a33, right, taken from GKN Aerospace (an engineering business that designs, manufactures and services systems and components for original equipment manufacturers) appears to confirm suspicions that airplane windows are modified to create the appearance of curvature. At equal pressure inside and outside, the dynamic module is flat. When the cabin pressure (p) is (>) greater than outside pressure (oP), the dynamic module flexes outward, forming a fisheye lens which creates the appearance of the Earth's curvature. 157

DISCUSSION POINT 122 If “gravity” magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball-Earth, that would mean the atmosphere near the equator would be spinning around at over 1000 mph (1609 km/h), the atmosphere over the mid-latitudes would be spinning around 500-750 mph, and gradually slower down to the poles where the atmosphere would be unaffected at 0 mph. In reality, however, the atmosphere at every point on Earth is equally unaffected by this alleged force, as it has never been measured or calculated and proven non-existent by—and this is only one example—the ability of airplanes to fly unabated in any direction without experiencing any such atmospheric changes.

If any of this “gravity” magically dragging the atmosphere with it was actually happening then rain and fireworks would behave entirely differently as they fell down through progressively slower and slower spinning atmosphere. Hot-air balloons would also be forced steadily faster eastwards as they ascended through the ever increasing atmospheric speeds—but, of course, they are not. 158

DISCUSSION POINT 123 If there were progressively faster and faster spinning atmosphere the higher the altitude that would mean it would have to abruptly end at some key altitude where the fastest layer of gravitized spinning atmosphere meets the supposed non-gravitized, non-spinning, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. NASA has never mentioned what altitude this impossible feat allegedly happens, but it is easily philosophically refuted by the simple fact that vacuums cannot exist connected to nonvacuums while maintaining the properties of a vacuum—not to mention, the effect such a transition would have on a rocket “space ship” would be disastrous. Get a thermos; break the vacuum seal. What happens? The vacuum sucks in the outside air to fill in the void. If space were a real vacuum, it would suck the atmosphere off the "planet". Not to mention a vacuum can only exist inside of some form of container. So how does a vacuum connect to a gas atmosphere? Can this be demonstrated in a lab experiment? Can a ball that spins 1037 mph while floating in a vacuum, while covered in water and gas and some of the water is perfectly still while it spins also be reproduced in a lab experiment?

Ball-believers often claim “gravity” magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower-atmosphere of the Earth in perfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non-spinning, non-gravitized, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. Such non-sensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, smoke, planes and projectiles all of which would behave very differently if both the ballEarth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards at 1000 mph (Discussion Point 109). 159

DISCUSSION POINT 124 All NASA and other “space agencies” rocket launches never go straight up. Every rocket forms a parabolic curve, peaks out, and inevitably starts falling back to Earth. The rockets which are declared “successful” are those few which don’t explode or start falling too soon but make it out of range of spectator view before crashing down into restricted waters and recovered. There is no magic altitude where rockets or anything else can simply go up, up, up and then suddenly just start “free-floating” in space. This is all a science-fiction illusion created by wires, green-screens, dark pools, some permed hair and Zero-G planes (Discussion Points 126-127). It is impossible for rockets or any type of jet propulsion engines to work in the alleged non-atmosphere of vacuum space because, without air/atmosphere to push against, there is nothing to propel the vehicle forward. Instead, the rockets and shuttles would simply spin around their own axis uncontrollably in all directions like a gyroscope. It would be impossible to fly to the Moon or go in any direction whatsoever, especially if “gravity” were real and constantly sucking you towards the closest densest body.

160

DISCUSSION POINT 125

The Gravitron and merry-go-round, the familiar and common amusement park and playground rides, both work in the complete opposite manner of the heliocentric- and Cult of Science-proposed theory of gravity. We are taught via our scholastic and societal indoctrination that when the Earth spins, we are pulled toward the center of the Earth. Okay ... but when the Gravitron or a merry-go-round spin, we are flung fiercely and unforgivingly against the wall or off the ride, pushed away from the center. Which explanation, which experience, feels more legitimate as a realistic, everyday occurrence? 161

DISCUSSION POINT 126 NASA and other space agencies have been caught time and again with air bubbles forming and floating off in their official “outer-space” footage. Astronauts have also been caught using scubaspace-gear, kicking their legs to move, and astronaut Luca Parmitano even almost drowned when water started filling up his helmet while allegedly on a “space-walk.” It is admitted that astronauts train for their “space-walks” in under-water training facilities like NASA’s “Neutral Buoyancy Lab,” but what is obvious from their “space bubbles” and other blunders is that all official “space-walk” footage is also fake and filmed under-water.

NASA, we are also told, invented foil that can withstand the Thermosphere's 2000C degree heat. Interestingly, firefighters are not using it. I wonder why? 162

It is definitely worth your time to view on YouTube, The Two Most Hilarious Things NASA Has Ever Said.

DISCUSSION POINT 127 Analysis of many interior videos from the “International Space Station” have shown the use of camera-tricks such as green-screens, harnesses and even wildly permed hair to achieve a zero-gravity type effect. Footage of astronauts seemingly floating in the zero-gravity of their “space station” is indistinguishable from “vomit comet” Zero-G airplane footage. By flying parabolic maneuvers this Zero-G floating effect can be achieved over and over again then edited together. For longer uncut shots, NASA has been caught using simple wires and green screen technology.

NASA astronaut Don Pettit recently stated regarding the ability to return to the Moon: "... we destroyed that technology ... " WHAT?! NASA either purposely or inadvertently destroyed the master plans on how to fly to the Moon? Oooooookay. More on this comedy in Discussion Points 141-42. 163

DISCUSSION POINT 128 The below, CGI-created image is what NASA would like you to believe is the International Space Station (ISS).

A few more questions regarding to the International Space Station (ISS): 1. How fast is the ISS moving? Answer: The ISS is moving at 17,500 mph—or 22 times faster than the speed of sound. 2. What metal was used to construct the ISS? Answer: The ISS is constructed mostly of aluminum. 3. How far from the Earth is the ISS? Answer: The ISS is 330 kilometers (at the Thermosphere) from Earth. 4. What is the temperature of the Thermosphere? Answer: The Thermosphere is about 2000C. 5. What is the melting point of aluminum? Answer: Aluminum melts at 660C. 6. Who or what took the above photograph? Answer: It’s not a photograph. It’s a computer generated image. Um. Okay. Really? Although it would be awesome to believe in something like the International Space Station, NASA’s “science” makes it very difficult. Also, it is an indisputable fact that NASA’s artistic renderings of all space photographs showing other planets, Earth’s curvature, satellites and space stations are fake and simply a tool for continued, deceitful indoctrination. 164

NASA claims one can observe with the human eye the International Space Station pass by overhead —while moving at a remarkable 4.76 miles per second!—22 times faster than the speed of sound!—proving its existence. Yet analysis of the “ISS” seen through zoom cameras proves it to be some type of hologram/drone, not a physical floating space-base. As you can see in the documentary ISS Hoax, when zooming in/out, the “ISS” dramatically and impossibly changes shape and color, displaying a prismatic rainbow effect until coming into focus much like an old television turning on/off. Consider this: if everything we are taught about the ISS is accurate, then astronauts aboard the ISS see fifteen sunrises and fifteen sunsets each day, averaging one every 45 minutes. Under this scenario and without atmosphere around it, the ISS would go from 248F to -228F (120C to -170C) every 45 minutes. The seals would crack and the solar panels would shatter—among other extreme difficulties—from the constant, rapid temperature changes … but, sure, okay. Whatever you say, NASA. If only a short time is set aside to analyze official NASA footage regarding the supposed International Space Station, it becomes blatantly obvious that we are being manipulated. Recall Discussion Point 61 regarding the United States military railgun. The railgun is a weapon that fires a small projectile electromagnetically at 5600 miles per hours (image, right). Compare and contrast that with the International Space Station, a rocket-propelled craft that weighs thousands of pounds and supposedly carries people, satellites, football jerseys and Halloween costumes. We are told the International Space Station travels at 17,500 miles per hour. Do you really believe the International Space Station travels three times faster than a fired railgun projectile? (Related: Discussion Point 50.)

Darn it! Wouldn’t it be so dreamy and wonderful if the ISS was real? 165

DISCUSSION POINT 129 Other than those launched from Antarctica and Sweden on massive helium balloons floating approximately 50 miles up, satellites are a hoax. The military keeps a round-the-clock, elite, highsecurity fleet of tail-hook recovery craft to recapture the classified, balloon-lifted equipment. The “geostationary communications satellite” was first created by Freemason science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke and supposedly became science-fact just a decade later. Before this, radio, television, and navigation systems like LORAN and DECCA were already well-established and worked fine using only ground-based technologies. Currently, massive fibre-optic cables connect the Internet across oceans (see image, below left), gigantic cell towers triangulate “GPS” (Discussion Point 143) signals, and ionospheric propagation allows radio waves to be transmitted—all without the aid of the science-fiction best-seller known as “satellites.” There are no satellites in space. Facebook bought a plane for Internet service. CEO Mark Zuckerberg: “We’ve been working on ways to beam Internet to people from the sky.” If there are already satellites, why is this work necessary? Dr. James Mac, United States Department of Defense: “If satellites existed, you wouldn’t need an airplane for pictures.” Exactly. But you do need an airplane for pictures because satellites don’t exist. Contrary to popular belief, Sirius Satellite Radio uses groundbased antennas. Contrary to popular belief, OnStar uses groundbased antennas. The mainstream media recently reported that Russian submarines were dangerously near various Internet cables, and if those cables were damaged, 99% of the world’s Internet communication would be lost. Apparently, the mainstream media told the truth for once, forgetting the satellite lie. As soon as a person crosses the imaginary border from the United States to Mexico, all GPS stops working. If GPS signals are truly sent from outer space, doesn’t that sound completely illogical? 166

DISCUSSION POINT 130 Satellites are allegedly floating around in the thermosphere where temperatures are claimed to be upwards of 4,530 degrees Fahrenheit. The metals used in satellites, however, such as aluminum, gold and titanium have melting points of 1221, 1948, and 3034 degrees, respectively, all far lower than they could possibly handle. Further, if the Moon’s gravitational force is powerful enough to effect Earth’s tides from 250,000 miles—as we are taught—away (Discussion Points 85-6), why is it that Earth’s gravity is not strong enough to pull satellites out of orbit?

Also, so-called “satellite” phones have been found to have reception problems in countries like Kazakhstan with very few cell phone towers. If the Earth were a ball with thousands of satellites surrounding it, such blackouts would not regularly occur in any rural countryside areas. Furthermore, there are now—as we are told by NASA—20,000 satellites and other artificial objects in “space.” That being the case, it is extremely perplexing that when NASA shares its “photographs” of the Earth, we never see a satellite in the photo—never. Satellites are a myth. 99% of international data are transmitted through submarine cables. For other means—domestically—high-altitude balloons, planes, drones, towers, antennas and parabolic reflectors are used. 167

DISCUSSION POINT 131 Radio was in use for purposes of communication long before the alleged satellites. These radio broadcasts are made from masts—often very, very tall masts (see below, left)—and the signals from an unregulated, 2-megawatt transmission can be received across essentially the entire globe. And that is a problem for those who endorse the global Earth model. Radio broadcasts are sent using electromagnetic radiation—and electromagnetic radiation can only travel in a straight line. Masts—regardless of its height—are not capable of transmitting around the curvature of the Earth. Yet, because early radio transmissions used very high power levels, there were many transmissions that reached hundreds and thousands of miles. When radio was first created, there were broadcasts that were done that are absolutely impossible to do on a spherical Earth—but very possible on a flat Earth. Decades after the introduction of radio, the USA and many other countries, in an effort to avoid drawing attention to it, passed laws limiting the maximum power of broadcasts from the radio masts that are in place today. Those who support the global Earth model will tell you that “relays” debunk this proof. However, back in the early part of the 20th Century, no such thing existed. The supposed reflective properties of the supposed ionosphere had to be “discovered”—i.e. fabricated—after these broadcasts in order to explain this phenomenon. They may also claim that the masts were operating under freak atmospheric conditions—another failed line of reasoning created to hide the fact that these transmissions were happening, and while they were happening, also destroying the myth of a global Earth. Unless a person can explain how—in the early 1900s—on a supposed spherical Earth—before fabricated relays—without freak atmospheric conditions—these straight-line-traveling, electromagnetic radiation signals—signals that cannot under any circumstance follow the curvature of the Earth—somehow magically reached their destination thousands of miles away … unless someone can explain that, they must concede that the Earth is not globe-shaped. 168

The Empire Service, the precursor to the BBC World Service in the early history of British radio, broadcast from London and sent its signal out to the entire British Empire. This—as we now know —was—and is—impossible unless the Earth is flat. The Empire Service was proving by its very existence that the spherical Earth was impossible. This was long before any government regulation was implemented to hide the fact that this was—and still is—possible. Even though this is historical fact, it seems most of the evidence of The Empire Service and similar radio broadcasts had been nearly wiped from existence. There is little proof remaining in the public domain that proves these broadcasts were made—it appears that there was a concentrated effort to identify and remove this information. However, a documentary produced in 1953 by General Electric titled The Transistor: A 1953 Documentary, Anticipating Its Coming Impact on Technology, discusses and documents a broadcast made in 1915 from Arlington, Virginia, that was picked up in Paris, France, and in Kauai, Hawaii, both locations thousands of miles from the source mast.

169

DISCUSSION POINT 132 We are nonsensically indoctrinated to believe that the Earth and its atmosphere spin together at such a perfect uniform velocity that no one in history has ever seen, heard, felt or measured the supposed 1000 mph (1609 km/h) movement. This is then often compared to traveling in a car at uniform velocity, where we only feel the movement during acceleration or deceleration. In reality, however, even with eyes closed, windows up, over smooth tar in a luxury car at a mere uniform 50mph, the movement absolutely can be felt. At 20 times this speed, Earth’s imaginary 1000 mph (1609 km/h) spin would most certainly be noticeable, felt, seen and heard by all.

People sensitive to motion sickness feel distinct unease and physical discomfort from motion as slight as an elevator or a train ride. This means that the 1000 mph (1609 km/h) alleged uniform spin of the Earth has no effect on such people, but add an extra 50mph uniform velocity of a car and their stomach starts turning knots. The idea that motion sickness is nowhere apparent in anyone at 1000 mph (1609 km/h), but suddenly comes about at 1050mph is ridiculous and proves the Earth is not in motion whatsoever. Additionally, the second law of thermodynamics, otherwise known as the Law of Entropy, along with the fundamental principles of friction/resistance determine the impossibility of Earth being a uniformly spinning ball. Over time, the spinning ball-Earth would experience measurable amounts of drag constantly slowing the spin and lengthening the amount of hours per day. As not the slightest such change has ever been observed in all of recorded history it is absurd to assume the Earth has ever moved an inch. 170

Meanwhile, at the South Pole ...

DISCUSSION POINT 133

Please note that in both the SUMMARY and the CONCLUDING REMARKS (below), NASA blatantly acknowledges that we live on a flat, non-rotating Earth. If we did not live on a flat, nonrotating Earth, NASA would not create performance reports regarding linear aircraft on such.

The original document—in its entirety—can be found on NASA’s official website: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf. 171

DISCUSSION POINT 134 People claim to see satellites with their naked eyes, but this is ridiculous considering they are smaller than a school bus and allegedly 100+ miles away. It is impossible to see anything so small that far away. Even using telescopes, no one claims to discern the shape of satellites but rather describes seeing passing moving lights, which could easily be any number of things from airplanes to drones to shooting stars or other unidentified flying objects. One thing is for certain: they are not satellites. Let’s assume a satellite is the exact same size as a school bus. Can you see a bus 100+ miles away? No. You can’t.

172

DISCUSSION POINT 135

We already know about NASA’s revelatory publication (Discussion Point 133) admitting a flat, nonrotating Earth. The above patent is further devastating evidence against a spherical Earth, this time proving the DOD also knows the Earth is not a globe. So what is this patent for? At its most basic, it is utilized by the United States Department of Defense to track and guide its military aircraft and ships. As a result, the DOD acknowledges that the Earth is not spherical. The original document can be found here (I strongly encourage you to cross-reference and analyze): http://www.google.ca/patents/US3858334. The jet in the photograph below is a SR-71 Blackbird. It’s top speed is 2193 mph (3529 kmph). At its top speed, it would travel 2193 miles in one hour, covering—at minimum—566 miles of curvature. As Discussion Point 15 introduced, this means the SR-71 would need to fly downward at a rate of 9.45 miles per minute—it doesn’t fly downward—to not end up in space—and it doesn’t end up in space … because the Earth is not a globe. For more, please view United States Air Force SR-71 Pilot Proves Flat Earth on YouTube. 173

DISCUSSION POINT 136 NASA claims there are upwards of 20,000 satellites floating around Earth’s upper-atmosphere sending us radio, television, GPS, and taking pictures of the planet. All these supposed satellite pictures, however, are admittedly “composite images, edited in Photoshop.” They claim to receive “ribbons of imagery” from satellites which must then be spliced together to create composite images of the Earth, all of which are clearly CGI and not photographs. If Earth were truly a ball with 20,000 satellites orbiting, it would be a simple matter to mount a camera and take some real photographs. The fact that no real satellite photographs of the supposed ball-Earth exist in favor of NASA’s “ribbons of composite CG imagery” is further evidence we are not being told the truth. If NASA really has put things into orbit, sent men to the Moon and launched probes into outer space, then why is there so much secrecy, subterfuge and fakery about it? And most condemning of all—why can’t NASA produce a single genuine photograph of the Earth from space?

This is the type of software NASA uses to show you Mars (Discussion Point 89), Pluto (Discussion Point 43), and endless other celestial bodies: . 174

DISCUSSION POINT 137 NASA has several alleged photographs of the ball-Earth which show several exact duplicate cloud patterns. The likelihood of having two or three clouds of the exact same shape in the same picture is as likely as finding two or three people with exactly the same fingerprints. The clouds were clearly copied and pasted in a computer program. There exist absolutely zero photographs of our Earth—none. An image from the Apollo 11 “footage” had been the widely used and circulated, textbook standard image of the Earth until 2002 when a new composite image was produced using Photoshop by NASA’s very own Robert Simmons. He is affectionately known as “Mr. Blue Marble” because he created our most recent Earth “photograph” using compiled composite images. As Mr. Simmons has helpfully both admitted and demonstrated, all of the “photographs” of Earth are, in fact, composite art work that has been Photoshopped. Said Simmons: “By 2002, we finally had enough data to make a snap shot of the entire Earth. So we did. The hard part was creating a flat map of the Earth’s surface with four months’ of satellite data. Reto Stockli, now at the Swiss Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, did much of this work. Then we wrapped the flat map around a ball. My part was integrating the surface, clouds, and oceans to match people’s expectations of how Earth looks from space. That ball became the famous Blue Marble.” Fascinating … but wouldn’t it be easier to simply take a photograph—just one photograph—from one of NASA’s oh-so-many “satellites” (Discussion Points 84-5, 128-131, 134, 142-3, 164.)? Apparently not. The good folks at NASA tell us the only whole Earth “photos” they have were taken during the Apollo 17 mission. The fact that this mission, along with all the other Apollo missions, never actually left the Earth (Discussion Point 141), is going to make finding these shots problematic. Why is it such a challenge for NASA to provide authentic photographs showing a ball-shaped Earth or authentic video showing a rotating Earth? Because the Earth is not a ball, and as a result, nearly everything NASA provides is—by default—fake. If you believe there have ever been photos taken of the Earth in its full global glory, you would be mistaken. If that makes you angry or agitated, you may be suffering from normalcy bias and/or cognitive dissonance. This is a natural occurrence afflicting those who have been told one thing only to discover they have been lied to. Watch the following YouTube video for one example of many admissions from NASA.gov that there has never been a direct photograph of the Earth: NASA's Robert Simmon AKA Mr Blue Marble Admits No Photographs of Earth. 175

DISCUSSION POINT 138 NASA graphics artists have placed things like faces, dragons, and even the word SEX into cloud patterns over their various CGI, ball-Earth pictures. Their recent 2015 Pluto pictures even clearly have a picture of Disney’s Pluto (Discussion Point 43) layered into the background. Such blatant fraud goes mostly unnoticed by the indoctrinated masses, but provides further evidence of the illegitimacy of NASA and their spinning ball planet mythos. Further, if you pick any cloud in the sky and watch for several minutes, two things will happen: the clouds will move and they will morph gradually changing shape. In official NASA footage of the spinning ball-Earth—such as the “Galileo” (interesting choice of name, considering Discussion Point 12) time-lapse video—clouds are constantly shown for 24+ hours at a time and not moving or morphing whatsoever. This is completely impossible, further proof that NASA produces fake CGI videos, and further evidence that Earth is not a spinning ball.

issile at the White Sands M n ke ta as w e ov ab o The phot agazine. ed in Air and Space M ur at fe d an 46 19 in e Rang 176

All pictures from NASA are "artist concepts" ... if it's fake, how is it real?

DISCUSSION POINT 139 When NASA’s images of the ball-Earth (and Moon) are closely compared to one another, the coloration of the land/oceans and relative size of the continents—and “planets”—are consistently so drastically different from one another as to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the pictures are all fake. NASA has repeatedly admitted that they can not travel far enough away to capture the entirety of Earth in one photo (Discussion Points 136-8, 142-3) ... so, then ... what are all of these!?

177

Fun Fact: The United States Air force has the largest movie studios and more equipment than any other Hollywood film studio. Hmmm ... why?

DISCUSSION POINT 140 Professional photo-analysts have dissected several NASA images of the ball-Earth and found undeniable proof of computer editing. For example, images of the Earth allegedly taken from the Moon have proven to be copied and pasted in. This is evidenced by rectangular cuts found—by adjusting brightness and contrast levels—in the black background around the “Earth.” If they were truly on the Moon and Earth was truly a ball, there would be no need to fake such pictures.

178

The Moon orbits Earth at a speed of 2,288 miles per hour (3,683 kilometers per hour). On Earth, the speed of sound at sea level — assuming an air temperature of 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius) — is 761.2 mph (1,225 km/h). The math shows that the Moon orbits Earth at slightly more than three times the speed of sound. Still think we landed on the Moon?

DISCUSSION POINT 141 The Apollo Moon landings were faked by NASA for two reasons: to gain political advantage and to further indoctrinate the masses. According to William Kaysing, a NASA contractor for Apollo, a classified interdepartmental memo rated the odds of a successful and survivable, manned lunar landing on its first attempt at “one in ten thousand.” If you do a search for actual footage from the Moon landing, you will discover it is all gone. Every reel. The telemetry data (see insert image) ... poof ... gone. Suspicious, to say the least, isn't it? Many respected researchers and skeptics of government and cultural narratives have put together a substantial and rather captivating case that the Moon landings were faked with the help of emerging television and film technologies.

They correctly posit that the government hired acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick to stage the landings by creating a convincing movie set in a secret location. Evidence to the support the idea that the video is indeed an elaborate forgery includes anomalies such as the appearance of multiple sources of light and the resulting intersecting shadows in the official NASA footage and photographs, the flag planted by Neil Armstrong seems to be waving in an environment with no wind, there is not an impact/blast crater from the lunar landing module, unexplainable objects appear in reflection on helmet visors, the hidden cables and unusual slow-motion effect of the astronauts walking on the lunar surface, the lack of visible stars in the background, a “rock” photographed on the Moon with a perfectly symmetrical “C,” layered cross-hairs on the official NASA photographs, the duplicate backdrops, the original Moon recordings were lost and erased, 179

fake lunar rock gifts, the admitted inability to travel through the Van Allen radiation belts, the missing 14,000 reels of telemetry data (which cannot be faked), et cetera. As damning—if not more—in the documentary A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, you can watch unofficial, leaked—yet obvious an unmistakable—NASA footage showing Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins, for almost an hour, using transparencies and camera-tricks to fake shots of a round Earth. They communicate over audio with control in Houston about how to accurately stage the shot, and someone keeps prompting them on how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired effect. Neil Armstrong claimed, when recording the stunt, to be 130,000 miles from Earth, half-way to the Moon; however, when the camera-tricks were finished, the viewer could see for themselves the “astronauts” were not more than a couple dozen miles above the Earth’s surface, likely flying in a high-altitude plane. NASA is clearly a deceitful organization. You don’t have to be a scientist to recognize these things. Here’s NASA’s own Terry Virts, the new Expedition 43 Commander of the International Space Station: “Right now we can only fly in Earth’s orbit. That is the farthest that we can go. This new system that we are building [Orion] is going to allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore. The Moon, Mars, asteroids, there are a lot of destinations that we could go to, and we are building these building block components to allow us to be able to do that eventually.” He said eventually. And here’s Chris Hadfield (remember him? Discussion Point 125), former Commander of the ISS: “ … we’ve been trying to grind out all the lessons that will eventually let us go to the Moon … ” He also said eventually. Both Hadfield and Virts said eventually. Both quotes are 100% in context. Research it yourself. Research also Thomas Baron, a NASA quality control and safety inspector. You’ll find that he was killed just before marking on the Apollo space program. Research also the many Apollo astronauts that died unlikely deaths. Consider the fact that all three Apollo 11 astronauts resigned shortly after their “return.” A simple YouTube search will provide you with days and days of evidence. I suggest you start here: NASA Fail Compilation. It appears clear why the “returning” men of the Apollo 11 mission appeared dejected and defeated—rather than triumphant—at their press conference. I speculate they were blackmailed—and are still—or they were carrying heavy guilt. I offer the one most likely reason that Neil Armstrong has never given an on-camera interview about the Moon landing mission after the press conference: the man doesn’t want to lie about the alleged greatest accomplishment of mankind. 180

DISCUSSION POINT 142 The grainy video footage and suspect photography regarding the faked Moon landings is one thing —albeit important—but many point to the existence of a dangerous concentration of solar and cosmic radiation, the Van Allen radiation belts, that surrounds the Earth as “smoking gun” proof that Apollo never made it to the Moon. In order for the Apollo, or any lunar mission or satellite, to be successful, the equipment and crew aboard the spacecraft would have to be adequately shielded from exposure from the intense radiation surrounding planet Earth. This problem—is still today—unresolved.

Regardless of unsolved problems, the above 4th grade art project (er, the Apollo spacecraft) somehow made it past the Van Allen radiation belts—both ways!—and landed on the Moon, or so NASA claims. But ... NASA engineer Kelly Smith admitted in 2014 that NASA has not been through the Van Allen radiation belt. “As we get further away from Earth, we’ll pass through the Van Allen belts, an area of dangerous radiation. Radiation like this could harm the guidance systems, onboard computers or other electronics on Orion. Naturally, we have to pass through this danger zone twice: once up and once back. But Orion has protection: shielding will be put to the test as the vehicle cuts through the waves of radiation. Sensors onboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study. We must solve these challenges before we send people through region space.” NASA, your navigation and guidance engineer for the Orion space exploration craft admitted that all Moon missions were faked as it has not yet been possible to get through the Van Allen belts. If man had traveled to the Moon and back—through the Van Allen radiation belts—on the Apollo missions, doesn’t it seems logical that NASA would re-utilize that same successful technology? But they don’t—because they didn’t. In 1958 Dr. James Van Allen—NASA employee—discovered these radiation belts of 100 REM/ hour (fatal to man after only 5 hours) that would prevent the Apollo astronauts from going higher than 1000 miles above the Earth. The radiation belt has been and still remains one of the biggest and most obvious barriers against man going to the Moon. Let’s assume for a moment man trained for and actually traveled to the Moon. If that was the reality, it is difficult to understand why the Apollo astronauts couldn't remember—they all claim they can’t remember—whether or not they passed through the Van Allen radiation belt. Really? Really? 181

DISCUSSION POINT 143 People claim Google Earth somehow proves the ball model without realizing that Google Earth (controlled, by the way, by the CIA) is simply a composite program of images taken from highaltitude planes—most commonly the Lockheed U-2 aircraft—drones, and street-level car-cameras superimposed onto a CGI model of a ball-Earth. The same could be just as easily modeled onto a diamond Earth or any other shape and, therefore, cannot be used as proof of Earth’s rotundity. Mark Aubin, Head Software Engineer, Google Earth: “For Google Earth we use our Google military grade drones at about 30,000 feet.”

Understand that GPS is old technology; it’s been in use since the 1940’s. It was called LORAN and was utilized until the 1990s. Further, global positioning system satellite signal simulators have been used for decades.. The patent for GPS "satellite" signals coming from a land-based transmitter was filed in 1989, published in 1992 (patent publication number US5093800 A). “This invention relates to electromagnetic wave transmitters, and more particularly, to a transmitter for producing an output signal which simulates an orbiting GPS (Global Positioning System) satellite.” Here is a test you can do for yourself that provides rather strong evidence that we are all dealing with terrestrial-based towers—not satellites. Simply board an aircraft and turn on your phone's GPS. You’ll obviously receive a good fix. When you climb in altitude, this “good fix” mysteriously fails. It’s really no mystery, though. If satellites were providing GPS positioning signals from far above the plane, the GPS would not fail; however, the GPS fails because the signal is coming from a landbased tower than is no longer within reach, far below an airplane flying at high altitude.

182

“Global” positioning—not “reality” positioning—simply and actually means where you would be if you were on a globe. This is the indoctrination:

The “GPS”—actually a triangulated terrestrial radio transmission—was created by the Department of Defense. The Department of Defense—working closely with Google, the Department of Education and multi-national corporations—makes sure that you see what they want you to see: a globe in every classroom. They also make sure you don’t see what the don’t want you to see (below image via Google Earth).

183

DISCUSSION POINT 144 If the Earth were constantly spinning eastwards at 1000 mph (1609 km/h), then airplane flight durations going eastwards vs. westwards should be significantly different. If the average commercial airliner travels 500mph, it follows that westbound equatorial flights should reach their destination at approximately thrice the speed as their eastbound return flights. In reality, however, the differences in east/westbound flight durations usually amount to a matter of minutes, and nothing near what would occur on a 1609 km/h spinning ball-Earth. The spinning ball model dictates that the Earth and atmosphere would be moving together at approximately 500mph at the midlatitudes where an LA to NYC flight takes place. The average commercial airliner traveling 500mph takes 5.5 hours traveling east with the alleged rotation of the Earth; the return flight west should take only 2.75 hours, but in fact we find the average NYC to LA flight takes 6 hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. Flights eastwards with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth from Tokyo to LA take an average of 10.5 hours; therefore, the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 5.25 hours, but in actual fact take an average of 11.5 hours, another flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. Flights eastwards with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth from NY to London take an average of 7 hours, therefore the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 3.5 hours, but in actual fact take an average of 7.5 hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. Flights eastwards from Paris to Rome with the alleged spin of the ball-Earth take an average of 2 hours; therefore, the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 1 hour, but in actual fact have an average flight duration of 2 hours 10 minutes, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. 184

For a helpful visual aid regarding this and the next few discussion points, please watch Flat Earth Diamond Time Date Zone Sun Rays on YouTube.

DISCUSSION POINT 145 The Sun and the Moon both travel in an established, never-ending, East-to-West pattern between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn along the tilted equatorial ecliptic (For visuals, please see Discussion Point 161). Yes, the sky—not the Earth—is tilted 23.4° (Discussion Point 70). This is observable, testable and repeatable and is also backed up by ancient wisdom (Discussion Point 39). The tilt accounts for the illusory appearance of the Sun’s and the Moon’s path being curved or rounded. Empirical observation regarding this is the exact same on a flat Earth as it would be on a global Earth. Yes, the tilt of the celestial ecliptic is the same on both models: the same angle they say accounts for the tilt of the Earth is actually the tilt of the sky. In actuality, this theory shows that the globe model precisely copies the flat Earth. Not accounting for cognitive dissonance, conditioning, indoctrination and psychological operations, this truth is likely an observable explanation for why the imaginary globe has been believed for nearly 500 years. This path—this pattern of both the Sun and the Moon, simply illustrated above—has been unaltered since the “beginning” (whenever that was). The Sun and Moon and stars—it is suspected—are timekeeping devices that were created for use as a means of navigating. What is also known is that their movements can be predicted down to the second and haven't changed—ever. If you are like me, then we are in agreement that we just want the full truth regarding the movement of the Sun and the Moon—a work in progress—nothing more, nothing less; hence, the following is taken directly from The Book of Enoch the Prophet (removed from the Bible by the establishment likely to hide information), Chapter LXXIII—and it coincides perfectly with what we observe each day: 6. Again it returns to the gate whence the sun goes forth, and in that completes the whole of its light. Then it declines from the sun, and enters in eight days into the sixth gate, and returns in seven days to the third gate, from which the sun goes forth. 7. When the sun proceeds to the fourth gate, the moon goes forth for seven days, until it passes from the fifth gate. 8. Again it returns in seven days to the fourth gate, and completing all its light, declines, and passes on by the first gate in eight days; 9. And returns in seven days to the fourth gate, from which the sun goes forth. I concur that the idea of gates (portals) seems like silly science fiction when the concept if first introduced—even though the arcade game PacMan has already shown you generally how gates (portals) would work. However, keep in mind, that if you believe in the global-Earth model, you believe in black holes (aren’t they very similar to portals?) and that the Earth is spinning on a wobbling 185

axis at 1000 mph and flying around the Sun at 67,000 mph while the entire solar system rotates around the galaxy at 500,000 mph as the galaxy speeds through the cosmos at over 670,000,000 mph. Do you believe that? As Enoch described—and as we witness every day—gates (portals) exist in the East and the West to allow the Sun and Moon to travel seamlessly from East to West. Yes, "portals" do exist—truly. Are we ready to know that they exist in our immediate reality, rather than just as the stuff of outer space and science fiction? Should we accept portals as the explanation (i.e. Tesla's Aether) for our immediate, functioning, dimensional reality? Possibly, yes. And, yes: this sounds like Star Trek and teleportation. Beam me up, Scotty! However, regarding the truth about our Earth, all possibilities should be considered until proven incorrect. In regard to portals, technically, they don't exist because Aether (Discussion Point 23) is counter spatial, so there is literally no space between the two sides. Consider the term "portals" referenced for the sake of reference and simplest understanding. Once people research Tesla and learn about Aether, it seems quite likely they will quickly understand the reality of it. Science has yet to explain IAAD (instantaneous action at a distance), which is part of the PacMan mystery and it (IAAD) is a naturally occurring event that has been verified to happen in several scientific experiments. But, yes!: at first read, this entire concept seems ridiculous! But once the topic is sincerely researched, the feeling of it being ludicrous is slowly and surely replaced with truly thoughtful consideration regarding not only its real-world possibility but also its likeliness. There exists a science that is generally not taught in public schools but instead is taught in occult and mystery schools, within secret societies (such as the Freemasons), et cetera. People indoctrinated by the mainstream hesitate to even entertain the concept of a non-globular Earth because they are missing the very simple yet important science of time and space. It is acknowledged here that it is quite possible that humans are three dimensional beings living in a fourth dimensional world with no true understanding as to how it works. The best we can do at this point—as this book attempts to do—is gather facts and inch toward conclusions based on those facts. That said, the openings in the vault of Heaven in the East and West are matched to the seasons. On the longest day of the year, the Sun enters (rises) and exits (sets) through the northernmost pair of gates. On the shortest day, it enters and exits through the southernmost pair. The return routes of both the Sun and Moon are outside our realm. Perhaps they rest in their “storerooms” during their time off. Storerooms? What? Psalms 19:4-6 suggests that the Sun holes up at the ends of the Earth until it is time to enter (rise) the realm. Enoch expands upon this idea in 1 Enoch 41:5 in which he, “saw the storerooms of the Sun and the Moon, from what place they go out and to which place they return.” Enoch discusses the solar and lunar motions at length (1 Enoch 72:2-5), explaining why the apparent azimuths of their entering (rising)and exiting (setting) varies with the season. 186

The explanation, found in the section called “The Book of the Heavenly Luminaries,” begins thus: This is the first commandment of the luminaries: The sun is a luminary whose egress is an opening of heaven, which is (located) in the direction of the east, and whose ingress is (another) opening of heaven, (located) in the west. I saw six openings through which the sun rises and six openings through which it sets. The moon also rises and sets through the same openings, and they are guided by the stars; together with those whom they lead, they are six in the east and six in the west heaven. All of them (are arranged) one after another in a constant order. There are many windows (both) to the right and the left of these openings. First there goes out the great light whose name is the sun; its roundness is like the roundness of the sky; and it is totally filled with light and heat. The chariot in which it ascends is (driven by) the blowing wind. The sun sets in the sky (in the west) and returns by the northeast in order to go to the east; it is guided so that it shall reach the eastern gate and shine in the face of the sky. Go outside. Watch and follow the Sun. Most likely, you’ve never done more than take a quick glance. Take some notes. You’ll start to realize many truths regarding the Sun. For example, referencing the photograph below, if the Sun was truly 93,000,000 miles away, the “sunset” would fade evenly across the entire horizon; but that is not the reality. The reality is that the Sun’s light shrinks and follows the Sun as it moves away. The Sun illuminates locally. It is too tiny to light up the entire horizon (Discussion Points 45-6, 52, 90, 146). Referencing Discussion Point 105 and the disappearance of ship’s hulls explained by the Law of Perspective (Discussion Point 71) on flat surfaces, it doesn’t work the same way regarding the Sun. It is not possible to bring the Sun back into vision using a telescope at ground level, but it can be brought back by a change in elevation—celebrity astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson even demonstrated this at the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest skyscraper in Dubai. The Sun is much larger and above the Earth; whereas ships are smaller and on the surface: this means that by the time the Sun moves far enough away that it “disappears,” it has moved significantly farther than the 3-4 miles at which a ship “disappears.” The ship can be brought back with a long lens telescope, but not at any distance—no matter what size lens is used, there will always be a point at which the ship can no longer be brought back, due to mirage effects and atmospheric density (Discussion Point 108). [YouTube suggestion: Questions for Neil DeGrasse Tyson Flat Earth.] There also exists recent speculation that the Sun is a non-physical, projection of light (Discussion Point 46). If the Sun as a projection of light were to be proven accurate, it would offer further explanation because once a projection of light moves beyond the scope of vision, it cannot be brought back. Lastly, perhaps this is simply explained as the Sun moving through its destined portal/ gate—it truly disappears from sight, only to return visible again in the East. Remember, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. 187

DISCUSSION POINT 146

The above is an image sourced directly from the NASA website. They use the image to show the representative sizes of the Sun and the Earth. According to NASA, the size of the Sun, in proportion to the Earth, is 329,360: 1. The diameter of the Sun exceeds the Earth’s by 112 times. The Earth—when compared to the Sun—appears, as visualized in the above “photograph”—as well as the “photograph” on the following page—to be a mere grain of sand. Not surprisingly, the numbers NASA provide supports the imagery that NASA provides. Do the numbers and imagery, however, support reality? Further, how can a big ball of fire exist in a 0% oxygen environment? We can ascertain a few truths from both NASA’s numbers and imagery.

188

First, the enormous expanse of light and heat—from the distance of 93,000,000 miles away— focused on a rotating grain of sand would cause the same season throughout. Look at NASA’s imagery. What does common sense tell you? Restating Discussion Point 45: If the Earth were a spinning ball heated by a Sun 93 million miles away, it would be impossible to have simultaneously sweltering summers in Africa while just a few thousand miles away bone-chilling frozen Arctic/Antarctic winters experiencing little to no heat from the Sun whatsoever. If the heat from the Sun traveled 93 million miles to the Sahara Desert, it is absurd to assert that another 4000 miles (0.00004%) further to Antarctica would completely negate such sweltering heat resulting in such drastic differences. Both NASA and astrophysicists worldwide claim that the seasons are caused by the Earth’s annual motion around the Sun at a mean distance of 92,500,000 miles. That claim is absurd (Discussion Point 52). Excerpting Discussion Point 47: If the Earth were truly a globe, the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions and areas of comparable latitude north and south of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics such as comparable temperatures, seasonal changes, length of daylight, plant and animal life. In reality, however, the Arctic/ Antarctic regions and areas of comparable latitude north/south of the equator differ greatly in many ways entirely inconsistent with the ball model and entirely consistent with a flat-Earth model (Discussion Points 145 and 164, among multiple others). New information at the time of this printing suggests that the Sun as we see it in the sky—and as NASA promotes (see the images within this Discussion Point)—is far from reality. Perhaps the Sun that we see is simply reflection and the Sun itself is actually a filament (search Flat Earth Sun —The Sun Is A Filament). Unlearn nearly everything you have been taught. Remove all brainwashing, conditioning, programming and indoctrination. Be responsible for your own education. As Isaac Asimov stated many years prior to today, “Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.”

189

DISCUSSION POINT 147 The flight distance from Los Angeles to Tokyo is 5487 miles. The flight goes in the westward direction—as illustrated by the white arrows below. If the flight was to travel in the eastward direction, it would be more than three times the distance; hence, the flight does not travel in the eastward direction—as illustrated by the red x. As these Los Angeles-to-Tokyo flights are provable—go ahead, book one, take the flight—the plane must fly off the Western side of the “map” and re-emerge in the East. If this is not true, the only other option is the globe (not the AE)—and it is abundantly clear that the Earth is not a globe. Flights such as Los Angeles-to-Tokyo provide curious, real-life evidence in support of the portal/ gate/PacMan concept originating from The Book of Enoch the Prophet from Discussion Point 145.

An additional note: The image to the right is what a map looks like when it is taken off a globe. Looking at this analytically, is there any surprise that all airports use a square, Mercator map? 190

There is no other way to explain that the stationary Earth receives the daylight hours that it does, other than by the Sun, Moon and stars traveling eastto-west continuously along the 23.4 degree, tilted firmament. No other explanation is sensible.

DISCUSSION POINT 148

N

Each location on the plane offers a different analemma shape. (Look up photos of analemmas taken from different locations, and you will see this is true.) The best way to prove this truth is that the Sun travels in a straight path across the equator twice a year on the equinoxes. On those days, everyone, everywhere sees the Sun rise at 90+/- degrees and set at 270+/- degrees and every location has the same 12+/- hours length of day. (The exceptions are the two polar areas which are slightly longer or shorter because of the 23.4 degree angle of the celestial ecliptic.) The image below illustrates an analemma.

S

Although it is an understandably significant obstacle for many (they are fighting against years of indoctrination and suppressed information [Discussion Point 149]), the image above will help one better understand how the Sun moves over a flat Earth. Instead of the terrain being a globe, flatten the surface of the image above and apply the angle of the arc, the celestial longitude ... then move the path of the Sun from north to south over the course of a year. The Sun arcs like it is going in a circle overhead. The arc path remains consistent, but the path of the arc adjusts higher or lower in the sky relative to your location: on the equinox, its path appears more straight, but on the solstice, it appears more north or south of your location. The circle is not parallel to the terrain but rather arcs at the 23.4 degree tilt. The celestial ecliptic includes all of the heavenly bodies with the exception of the wandering stars (planets). But the sky is a separate plane than the earth's surface, otherwise described as the celestial plane (sky) and terrestrial plane (surface). If you are in Florida, USA, in June, for example, you would see the Sun "rise" (arrive) north of your location, and you would see the Sun "set" (depart) north of your location; however, at midday/noon, the Sun would be south of your location. That is the arc. PacMan (Discussion Point 145) would then take care of the return to the East. 191

DISCUSSION POINT 149 Woe be to those who attempt to argue against conventional thinking, global Earth or otherwise. According to many independent researchers, there appears to be a conspiracy against any discovery that conflicts with prevailing wisdom. Consider the fate of Thomas E. Lee of the National Museum of Canada. In the early 1950s, Lee discovered sophisticated stone tools caught in ice on Manitoulin Island in Lake Huron. These tools were proven to be at least 65,000 years old and perhaps as old as 125,000 years, totally contradicting conventional theories concerning the date that such wellfashioned stone tools were first created. Following his discovery, Lee claimed he was “hounded” for his position, his work was misrepresented, and no one would publish his findings. Most of the artifacts he found “vanished,” and the museum director was fired for refusing to discharge Lee. The treatment of Lee is certainly not an isolated case. There exists in the scientific community a knowledge filter that screens out unwelcome evidence. The process of knowledge filtration has been going on for well over a century and continues right up to this present day. Realize, scientific institutions, such as the Smithsonian Institute and the National Geographic Society, are set up by the world’s elite factions to debunk, discredit, distort or simply ignore any scientific data that tends to

192

enlighten people about their true origins. In “science,” there is overwhelming evidence of misfeasance and malpractice. You can find many cases where it’s just an automatic process. It’s just human nature that a person will tend to reject things that don’t fit in with his particular world-view. A young paleontologist and expert on ancient whale bones at the Museum of Natural History in San Diego, when asked if he ever found signs of human markings on any of the bones, responded, “I tend to stay away from anything that has to do with humans because it’s too controversial.” Researcher and historian Martin Doutre related a conversation he had with a former National Park Service employee about an incident that took place at Arizona’s Canyon de Chelly National Monument in 1999. “A big washout had occurred in the canyon after torrential rains, and a number of skeletons were exposed at a few sites. All of the Park Service personnel were pressed into service to gather up and box up the newly revealed bones. However, in a somewhat sinister twist, all of the work was overseen by personnel from both the Smithsonian Institution and the FBI. The Park Service workers were forbidden to bring cameras to the site and were subjected to full body searches by the FBI when arriving in the morning and leaving at night. All of the skeletal remains and artifacts were carefully boxed up and taken away by the Smithsonian Institute. The Park Service workers were forced to sign secrecy agreements of non-disclosure of information related to their activities in the canyon.” In a follow-up email, the former Park Service employee offered further details of the find. She said in one grave was a “male, approximately seven-foot in height, [with] six fingers and six toes … the teeth were like human, except they had no canine (eye) teeth, and [had] extra-large molars and incisors. The skull was large—heavy jaw [with a] long, large cranium. Large eye sockets. Finger bones [were] extra-long, but small hands. Buried with beautiful pottery and baskets of fine weave— never seen anything similar. A necklace of fiber and feathers. He looked rather fresh for 6000 years old as the Smith [Smithsonian] people claimed. Clean bones—but not brittle …” Her description is especially interesting in light of a Biblical passage, II Samual 21:18-22, telling of giants related to Goliath with six fingers and toes. Some believe the Smithsonian has a huge underground warehouse in New York City, filled with thousands of skeletons, objects, and information that might prove embarrassing to conventional history. “It’s appalling that the American people are so blatantly denied access to very important archaeological evidence, which would quickly clarify mysteries related to long-term regional history,” said Doutre. “Whereas North American archaeology has been stagnated or has gone backwards for 130 years, all of the essential evidence is in the hands of the ‘authorities’ to rectify that abysmal situation, but is kept permanently under wraps and beyond the reach of the socially-engineered American public” (Discussion Point 159). The late Vine Deloria, an activist historian and author of the 1969 book Custer Died For Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto, also charged the Smithsonian with suppression of valuable historical information. “It’s probably better that so few of the ruins and remains were tied in with the Smithsonian because they give good reason to believe the ending of the Indiana Jones movie—a great warehouse where the real secrets of Earth history are buried,” he wrote. “Modern day archaeology and anthropology have nearly sealed the door on our imaginations, broadly interpreting the North American past as devoid of anything unusual in the way of great cultures characterized by a people of unusual demeanor. The great interloper of ancient burial grounds, the nineteenth century Smithsonian Institution, created a one-way portal, through which uncounted bones have been spirited. This door 193

and the contents of its vault are virtually sealed off to anyone but government officials. Among these bones may lay answers not even sought by these officials concerning the deep past.” British scientist James Smithson first founded the Smithsonian Institution and then bequeathed it to the United States despite having never visited there. Since the U.S. Government started funding and administrating the Smithsonian in 1836, the institution has been involved in several disputes over odd discoveries. A little research will reveal a long list of questionable actions taken by the Institute. Further, any mainstream scientist and academic who challenges gravity, the spherical Earth, the evolution orthodoxy, the Ice Age, et cetera, are immediately and unceremoniously excluded from that specific debate and most often find themselves unemployed, a grim reminder of the unforgiving nature of the status quo. Take as an additional example, the Ice Age—the conventional concept is that a layer of ice up to two miles thick in places extended all the way from the North Pole to where London and New York are located today and peaked about twenty thousand years ago. So much water was locked up as ice that the sea level worldwide was about 450 feet lower than it is now, and this lowering opened up land bridges, which made it possible for prehistoric humans to spread around the world. For the average, educated person, the truthfulness of this goes unquestioned. After all, not only is one brainwashed with it in school, but that brainwashing is reinforced by the many books, magazines, TV shows and movies—see the photo to the right—that take the reality of the Ice Age for granted. However, D.S. Allan and J.B. Delair, the authors of Cataclysm, say that the imagined ice sheets are fiction because the drift deposits and scratch marks, which constitute the primary physical evidence of the ice sheets, are better explained as the result of moving water (in effect, a great flood), rather than moving ice. It is thought that the idea of moving ice was chosen over moving water because a great flood meant catastrophism, while moving ice sheets means gradualism—and the doctrine of gradualism better serves the interest of the establishment than catastrophism. Likewise, the idea of a “missing link” between primates and modern man also has created a number of problems for modern science, 194

which suggests that our entire understanding of the timing and origin of the human race is likely flawed. When one considers all the factors, it is becoming more and more clear that conventional “science” is hiding a much stranger truth to the story of the human race.

In their popular 1993 book, Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson argued that the scientific community was suppressing shocking evidence. Both Cremo, a U.S. Navy veteran who attended George Washington University, and Thompson, who received a PhD in mathematics from Cornell University in 1974, became involved in the topic of creationism from the perspective of Hindu Vedic writings. Based on the study of these ancient works coupled with a multitude of archaeological anomalies found worldwide in the past two centuries, they concluded humans have existed on Earth for millions, perhaps billions, of years. But they claim such evidence has been suppressed. Needless to say, traditionalists—those practicing Science-ism—have called their work pseudoscience. The ridiculous arrogance found within the “scientific” community was further clearly noted by scientists Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend. In their introduction to their 1969 seminal work, Hamlet’s Mill, they commented that “the experts now are benighted by the current folk fantasy, which is the belief that they are beyond all this—critics without nonsense and extremely wise.” Cremo and Thompson provided a clear example of scientific suppression of evidence, recounting the discovery of sophisticated stone tools in Hueyatlaco, seventy-five miles southeast of Mexico City, in the 1960s. The tools rivaled the best work of Cro-Magnon man in Europe. More tools were found at the nearby site of El Horno. Both sets of tools seem to undoubtedly have come from layers of rock that are the same age. But what made the tools controversial was their age—they were dated to about 250,000 years ago. 195

A U.S. Geological Survey team headed by archaeologist Virginia Steen-McIntyre had established this age through the use of four separate dating methods, and their findings were confirmed by multiple peerreviewed studies—true scientific practice. If the dating had been accepted, “it would have revolutionized not only New World anthropology but the whole picture of human origins,” Cremo and Thompson noted. “Human beings capable of making the sophisticated tools found at Hueyatlaco are not thought to have come into existence until about 100,000 years ago in Africa.” Steen-McIntyre was both blocked and ridiculed when she tried to get her team’s conclusions published. In a note written in 1976, she stated, “I had found out through back fence gossip that [team members] Hal, Roald, and I are considered opportunists and publicity seekers in some circles because of Hueyatlaco, and I am still smarting from the blow.” She also soon found that she could not find more work in her chosen profession. She had been blacklisted. Writing to one editor of a scientific publication, H.J. Fullbright of the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Steen-McIntyre argued her case thusly: “Our joint article on the Hueyatlaco site is a real bombshell. It would place man in the New World ten times earlier than many archaeologists would like to believe. Worse, the bifacial tools that were found in situ are thought by most to be a sign of H[omo] sapiens. According to present theory, H.s. had not even evolved at that time, and certainly not in the New World. “Archaeologists are in a considerable uproar over Hueyatlaco. They refuse to even consider it. I’ve learned from second-hand sources that I’m considered by various members of the profession to be 1) incompetent; 2) a news monger; 3) an opportunist; 4) dishonest; 5) a fool. Obviously none of these opinions is helping my professional reputation! My only hope to clear my name is to get the Hueyatlaco article into print so that folks can judge the evidence for themselves.” She received no reply. Her article was not published, nor was it even returned to her. Had her article been published and its findings accepted, all anthropology textbooks would require rewriting. Cremo and Thompson commented the case, writing that it “opens a rare window in the actual process of data suppression in paleoanthropology, processes that involve a great deal of conflict and hurt.” When attempting to secure permission to reproduce photographs of the Hueyatlaco artifacts in a publication, Cremo and Thompson were informed that permission would be denied if they intended to mention the lunatic fringe date of 250,000 years. In a 1997 interview intended for Harper’s magazine but only published later in the Midwestern Epigraphic Journal, Steen-McIntyre was asked why respectable scientists and governments would resist anything at odds with the current scientific worldview. “Because it’s interwoven with the Theory of Evolution: accept one, you have to accept the other,” she responded, adding that Darwin’s theory

196

(Discussion Point 34)—like gravity (Discussion Points 31-32, 81-86)—is just a theory and “a shaky one at that.” “When the Theory of Evolution is taken to its logical conclusion,” Steen-McIntyre stated, “the only moral imperative demanded is ‘survival of the fittest.’ I don’t like it, for scientific reasons: it goes against the Second Law of Thermodynamics for one thing. I don’t like it for philosophical and religious reasons. I especially don’t like it because it helped ruin my career. The archaeologist in charge of the Hueyatlaco dig rejected our geological dates of a quarter-million years because, according to her belief, modern man, the maker of these tools, had not yet evolved 250,000 years ago. A classic case of arguing from theory to data, then tossing out the data that don’t fit.” Steen-McIntyre believed that her data was rejected by a superior due to a “matter of influence on her part and a lack of it on mine. She was an anthropologist, a graduate of Radcliffe and Harvard with powerful friends; I was a geologist with a new PhD from the University of Idaho, looking for a job.” The superior was Cynthia Irwin-Willians, who led the initial dig at Hueyatlaco. Though she had argued with Steen-McIntyre and called her “irresponsible,” she has never published a final report on the findings. Cremo was suspicious of activities by the Rockefeller Foundation in its funding of Canadian paleoanthropologist Davidson Black, who conducted research in China and “concluded” that humankind originated in Asia, specifically China and Tibet. Correspondence between Black and his superiors with the foundation indicated that Black’s work was part of a broader agenda. One letter

197

stated, “…thus we may gain information about our [human] behavior of the sort that can lead to wide and beneficial control.” Cremo saw this as meaning that the research was being funded with the specific goal of control. The question that should certainly be asked is this: Control by whom? “The motive to manipulate is not so hard to understand,” explained J. Douglas Kenyon, publisher of the magazine Atlantis Rising. “There’s a lot of social power connected with explaining who we are and what we are,” he says. “Somebody once said knowledge is power. You could also say that power is knowledge. Some people have particular power and prestige that enables them to dictate the agenda of our society. I think it’s not surprising that they are resistant to any change” (Discussion Point 159). Kenyon believes that scientists today have become a virtual priest class, exercising many of the rights and prerogatives that their forebears in the industrial-scientific revolution sought to wrest from an entrenched religious establishment. They set the tone and the direction for our civilization on a worldwide basis, he says. “If you want to know something today, you usually don’t go to a priest or a spiritually-inclined person, you go to one of these [scientific-type] people because they’ve convinced us that our world is a very mechanistic place, and everything can be explained mechanically by the laws of physics and chemistry which are currently accepted by the establishment … I think many people are starting to see that the world view they are presenting just doesn’t account for everything in human experience.” Brad Steiger, author of Worlds Before our Own, wrote, “Archaeologists, anthropologists, and various academicians who play the ‘origins of Man’ game, reluctantly and only occasionally acknowledge instances where unique skeletal and cultural evidence from the prehistoric record suddenly appear long before they should and in places they should not. These irritating artifacts destroy the orderly evolutionary line that academia has for so long presented to the public. Consequently, such data and ideas have been largely left buried in site reports, forgotten storage rooms, and dusty archives where one suspects that there is a great deal of suppressed, ignored and misplaced pre-historical cultural evidence that would alter the long-ago established

198

interpretations of human origins and provide us with a much clearer definition of what it means to be human.” Of course most mainstream -ologists and -isicists and -orians are not “in on it”—hardly any are, as most are likely honest and well-intending people. They are, however—knowingly or not—guilty, hypnotized spokespeople of a niche, elite-created grouping of inaccurate books and false theory. Regarding the suppression of free energy, Nikola Tesla (Discussion Points 23 and 81) constructed Wardenclyffe Tower on Long Island to establish intercontinental wireless transmission of electrical energy. Initially funded for $150,000, the majority of which came from American financier J.P. Morgan, the project—successfully demonstrated—was scrapped after Morgan realized that wireless energy would eliminate the profit from his investments in copper wiring. Furthermore, the United States’ Patent Office has a nine-member committee that screens energy patents in order to protect “national security.” The official government-released reasoning for such a committee goes something like this: The reason for suppressing certain types of energy inventions is that the knowledge behind them is also capable of producing tremendously destructive advanced electromagnetic weapons. Hence, many such new energy technologies, particularly those using the knowledge of advanced electromagnetic principles, are considered “dual use” technologies that are among the 4000 un-numbered patent applications confiscated in a vault at the US Patent and Trademark Office because of their military potential and the need to keep that knowledge from America’s enemies. The hidden—but very real—purpose of this committee is to actually find and remove from public access energy-related patents which could threaten the fossil fuel and power monopolies. It argues to reason that without this elite-sanctioned and -controlled committee, energy would be 100% safe and 100% free—absolutely zero electricity bills—for every human being across the Earth’s realm. The harsh punishment for a violation of this secrecy order, should an inventor exploit or even simply discusses his or her invention which is classified by a patent secrecy order, is twenty years in federal prison. In effect, the US Government brutally and suddenly orders unlucky energy inventors to keep absolutely quiet and not do any more work on their inventions—without compensation for their well-meaning efforts. Thus a shocked, intellectually shackled and frustrated inventor would end up losing everything he or she had invested in his or her invention. The public is also ruthlessly denied any benefits from the invention. The truth is that as a result of the hidden, altered and suppressed information from within the halls of anthropology, archaeology, geology, astrophysics, biology, botany, history, government, law, et cetera, we essentially know nothing accurate about where we live. We know little truth about the Earth. Regarding the suppression of information, researcher and author Lloyd Pye stated, “… science has collectively agreed to set its BS detector to go off if anything passes by it that is not already understood or does not fit accepted theories … peer pressure is crushing relative to subjects deemed ‘off limits’ for serious discussion and analysis. [These topics] are forbidden because their proof would utterly transform ‘reality’ as it is today. No scientist wants to be on the hot seat when a paradigm overturns, so they work diligently to keep these various genies corked up in bottles of ignorance and intimidation fueled by their ‘credentialed’ ridicule and disdain.”

199

DISCUSSION POINT 150

Whether one is aware of it or not, there are multiple cognitive biases—glitches, deficiencies or limitations in our thinking—that prevent us from thinking rationally and cause us to comfortably make questionable decisions and reach wildly erroneous conclusions. Most prominently, we love to agree with people who agree with us—our confirmation bias. We tend to be put off by individuals, groups, and news sources that make us feel uncomfortable or insecure about our views—what behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner called cognitive dissonance. It's this preferential mode of behavior that leads to the confirmation bias—the often unconscious act of referencing only those perspectives that fuel our pre-existing views, while at the same time ignoring or dismissing factual and valid, alternate opinions that threaten our cozy, world view. Somewhat similar to the confirmation bias is the in-group bias, a manifestation of our innate tribalistic tendencies. The neurotransmitter oxytocin that helps us to forge tighter bonds with people in our in-group, performs the exact opposite function for those on the outside: it makes us suspicious, fearful, and even disdainful of others and their opinions, regardless of how factual their information. We humans tend to be apprehensive of change, which often leads us to make choices that guarantee that things remain the same, or change as little as possible, the status-quo bias. Needless to say, this has ramifications in everything from politics to economics to world views. We like to stick to what we have been told and what we think we know. Though we're often unconscious of it, we love to go with the flow of the crowd. When the masses start to pick a winner or a favorite, that's when our individualized brains start to shut down and enter into a kind of "groupthink" or hive-mind mentality. The bandwagon effect is what often causes behaviors and social norms to propagate among groups of individuals—regardless of the evidence or motives in support. Much of this bias has to do with our built-in desire to fit in and conform. 200

DISCUSSION POINT 151 Over the years NASA has changed its story multiple times regarding the shape of the Earth. At first they maintained Earth was a perfect sphere. Then, in a 1958 NASA documentary titled U.S. Space Exploration, they stated, “…the true shape of our Earth: it is slightly pear shaped.” Then NASA returned to claiming the Earth was a perfect sphere, which again later changed to an “oblate spheroid” flattened at the poles, and then changed once again to being “pear shaped” as the Southern Hemisphere allegedly bulged out as well. Unfortunately for NASA, not one of their official pictures from throughout the years show an oblate spheroid or pear-shaped Earth. All their pictures —contrary to their words—show a perfectly spherical and admittedly CGI, fake Earth.

Further, if—as NASA claims—the Earth is indeed an oblate spheroid due to its intense rotation throughout its lifespan, then it seems logical that the other “planets” would also be oblate spheroids since they—as NASA claims—have also been spinning for thousands of years. It is exceptionally odd—when considering this logic—that every official “photo” of Mars, Pluto, et cetera, provided by NASA shows them as perfect of a spheroid as NASA’s CGI-created photos of Earth. 201

DISCUSSION POINT 152

Few people know it, but Einstein's version of spacetime—any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single interwoven continuum—debunks the global-Earth model. It does so because the mechanical version of spacetime used to define the creation of, and (preferred) behavior for, its (individual and collective) matter is based on the version of a past, present and future process, and the sequential type of calculations, that is born of its fallacy. The problem is that the mechanical equations, spawned by such a fallacious premise, simply don't match the simultaneous nature of biological reality, and this is exactly what Einstein's version of spacetime was saying. It screamed a big Hell, No! to the entire global establishment. So, if you'll please search and watch The Illusion of Time: Past, Present and Future All Exist Together, Brian Greene will give you an animated illustration of the difference between actual biological reality and the false version of spacetime that is the basis for the global model, all of its cosmology and its sequential system for the creation, and regulation, of society. But as you watch, also be aware of the fact that even his demonstration was twisted to give to you the visuals for sequentially-timed slices of reality that still equate to the sequential segments or increments of measurement used by mechanical physics. This was done to trick your brain/body into still perceiving a false premise for the simultaneous reality. It has no such slices of sequential time: theyneeded to be added to the visual equation, because it's the only way the makers of the global model can then throw into the picture their version of mechanical physics—as well as their globesequentially flowing through such a past, present and future version of spacetime reality—to make it appear as if it also fits in with Einstein's revelation. It doesn't at all. It doesn’t fit and the mechanics behind its version of the cosmos know it. The problem is that the rest of the population doesn't know it. But now you will.

202

In short, what Einstein refuted with his exposé was the Big Bang/Big Crunch (Evolutionary) Global Hoax of Man and validated the biological reality of Mother Nature, aka Matter (which is just another word for Mother, as well is Matrix), but he did it in such a way that only other physicists could, or would, understand it. When/where there is no version of past, present and future, there can also be no religious or secular version of a Big Bang-Creation/Big Crunch annihilation and its evolutionary, sequential process. The entire existence of such a model depends on thenotion—and the motion—of past, present and future events. Those events just don't occur in a nature that has no past, present or future events, but only those that happen all at once. The latter is a different kind of notion—and motion—that happens all together/now. In short, Einstein's revelation also discredits the sequential basis for every field of past, present and future thought and endeavor upon which has been built—all of man-made civilization—which is exactly why the true meaning of its implications and applications is kepthidden from the entire population. They’re the blind sheeple needed to keep that ball rolling. Since that type of existence is the only thing that has been forced on the general public for millenniums, they have no clue of how their own biological reality actually works. All their lives they've been compelled to live and work by nothing else but the mechanical physics of man-made spacetime. The application of its system to human brains/bodies has so damaged both that they wouldn't be able to perceive and understand biological spacetime if it was explained to them. All they know is the false version forced on them by the “laws” of a religious, political and scientific nature, the sequential effects of which really have physically prevented their brains/bodies from experiencing the benefits of the actual, natural state of infinite being that already exists for them here, now, on Earth and in their flesh. Only the applications of actual biological spacetimehave the infinite power to fill them with abundant life. One can't be in two states at the same time: the mechanical kind that is designed and enforced by man and the organic kind that is—and is induced by—the actual Matrix. People are either physically (which includes mentally and emotionally) experiencing the sequential states of consciousness created byman-made fallacies or they're physically (mentally and emotionally) experiencing the infinite state of consciousness that just comes with living in, and by, the actual effects of biological reality. The infinite reality found in Mother Nature’s version of spacetime is an entirely different Matrix than the global model, its equations, and (resulting) cosmology have imposed. People can't get it until they give up all that is based on the globe. Its just an ancient “sphereory” that is a man-made hoax. We already live in an infinite field of biological reality. Einstein knew that truth. So did Tesla. The question now is this: Do you? 203

DISCUSSION POINT 153 Perhaps the most admirable psychological operation (psyop) intentionally planted to distract and mislead flat-Earth researchers—second only to the flawed AE projection and its ice wall and circling Sun and Moon (Discussion Point 13)—is the mythology regarding Antarctica. It’s mostly a created fiction to make flat-Earth researchers look foolish and gullible; and sadly, in many—if not most—instances, the strategy has worked. It seems as likely—if not more likely—that truth may be found through a deep analysis of the mystery that is promoted as a frozen block of ice: Greenland. That said, there are always elements of truth or intent within psychological operations—sometimes insignificant, yet sometimes significant. Regardless, the story surrounding the Antarctica intrigue (and there certainly is intrigue)—starting with the factually verifiable—goes something like this: Admiral Richard Byrd, an American Naval Officer, pioneering American aviator, Polar explorer, Medal of Honor winner, aircraft navigator, was the highly honored and respected expedition leader to Antarctica in 1928. He again led an expedition to Antarctica in 1933-1935 (during which he established Freemason Lodge No. 777), and again led a third expedition in 1939-1940. In 1945 he led, not an expedition, but rather a military operation called Operation High Jump during which Byrd led 4700 men—highly militarized, it is worth mentioning—to the Antarctica’s South Pole for reasons still not revealed today. Between Antarctic adventures in 1954, Admiral Byrd sat for a television interview on a show titled Longines Chronoscope. During that interview Byrd stated that there was land beyond the South Pole larger than the United States. He also stated that the United States government would return to Antarctica year after year as the government was extremely interested in the continent. Other major countries were also engaged in the exploration of Antarctica at that time. Byrd claimed America’s interest was as a result of Antarctica being the most valuable and most important place in the world for science. He also claimed the continent to be the future of America—due to its untapped reservoir of untouched resources: coal, oil, minerals and uranium. In 1955-56, Byrd led a military operation titled Operation Deep Freeze to Antarctica. The mission was supposedly completed, and it is reported that Byrd returned home. 204

There was never another expedition, military or otherwise, conducted on Antarctica—ever. And it is at this point in the story, it is supposed, that the psychological warfare begins with multiple difficult-toverify pieces of information. Somewhere along the line, speculation became assumed as fact (yet possibly is), and that part of the story goes like this: Regardless of the endless natural resources off of which desperate governments and greedy corporations could profit, the interior of the Antarctic was proclaimed—and is still now—off limits. Antarctica has been a no-fly, no-drive, notravel, no-nothing zone ever since Admiral Byrd—it is theorized—found … something. The Antarctic Treaty was quickly signed in 1959–52 countries in total—and there will be no revision to the Treaty until 2041 at the earliest. A tourist or an explorer is allowed to visit limited outer areas of Antarctica, but supposedly there is an invisible line enforced by the military of nearly 20 different nations, and as a result, anything beyond is 100% sealed off. What makes this questionable is that verification of military presence is sketchy at best. [The Antarctic Treaty does not actually stop anyone from visiting, it merely requires tourists inform their foreign office/state department that they are not going to drill, kill penguins or do anything else unsavory.] Among many other things, the Antarctic Treaty states that no country shall have any military presence—zero—in Antarctica, that the area is for research only. Those who claim this information to be true, state the following question must be asked of the United Nations (an arguably corrupt organization itself) by at least one, non-participating country: If there is verifiable massive military buildup in Antarctica, why is the Treaty being violated by all nation signatories? Those who cling to the story state that an honest answer to the question would be quite revealing. If even any aspect of the "story" is true (no evidence supports this), there would likely be widespread agreement. Regardless, what lies deep within Antarctica is still a topic of extreme interest, and likely, just as extreme speculation. Is there anything beyond? Why can't we look for ourselves? Are there hidden ancestors, races or beings? Hidden realms? Hidden resources? Hidden history? Hidden operations? Why don’t we know these answers? Maybe the answer aligns somewhat with what Samuel Rowbotham had to say about Antarctica: How far the ice extends; how it terminates; and what exists beyond it, are questions to which no present human experience can reply. All we at present know is, that snow and hail, howling winds, and indescribable storms and hurricanes prevail; and that in every direction; human ingress is barred by unsealed escarpments of perpetual ice; extending farther than eye or telescope can penetrate, and becoming lost in gloom and darkness. Whether elusive answers and difficult-to-verify information are a result of the world’s military blocking entry (certainly unlikely) into Antarctica or really bad weather or a simple lack of motivation, it is believed that there are many mysteries surrounding the continent and just as many truths—flat Earth-related and otherwise—to be discovered in and beyond Antarctica (and Greenland). 205

DISCUSSION POINT 154 K2 (bottom photo), at 8,611 meters or 28,251 feet above sea level, is the second highest mountain in the world after Mount Everest. It is located on the China/Pakistan border. The photo from K2 shows the shadow of the mountain projected into China over hundreds of miles. The lines of the shadow are straight as an arrow: this would be impossible over a curved ball of any size.

206

DISCUSSION POINT 155 We never see meteor showers—or shooting stars—coming up over the horizon. We only see them coming down. If a person lives in the supposed Northern Hemisphere and there is a meteor shower in the supposed Southern Hemisphere, meteors should be seen coming up from under the horizon —but they never are: they are only seen coming down. This factual non-occurrence strongly suggests that the Earth is not a ball.

Halley’s Comet is a short-period comet visible from Earth—astrophysics tells us—every 75–76 years. How does it come back to visit us every 75-76 years if the Earth is randomly careening through the Universe at unfathomable, ridiculous speeds? Doesn’t it seem logical that it would have gone by us one time—and one time only—never to be seen again?

207

DISCUSSION POINT 156 Perhaps the occasionally referenced (by researchers) "circle" of the Earth is referring to the entirety of the Earth creation, which could, therefore, possibly be a giant torus (a surface formed by revolving a circle about a line)[image, left]. A diamond, flat Earth (Discussion Point 166) would exist (look closely at the image for the diamond) in the plane of inertia (the resistance of any physical object to any change in its state of motion), the green line, with poles on both sides—just as we see in reality. The space where the diamond is located, the plane of inertia, between two poles is also known as the Bloch Wall (the boundary between two domains in a magnetic material marked by a layer wherein the direction of magnetization is assumed to change gradually from one domain to the other). The lower, right image shows the real magnetic field of a magnet via a ferrocell (magnetic field viewer). The two dark spots are the poles of the magnet ... and it looks wildly similar to what one can observe daily in the sky (Discussion Point 166). If this is an accurate theory, it would prove beyond a doubt that we live within a torus and between two, magnetic poles (a fact widely accepted by all interested parties), the same as a common magnet. Just like the stars in the sky, the dark circles (right) within the magnetic field rotate in opposite directions. A diamond, flat Earth could quite possibly be a dielectric realm (insulated electrically, polarized by an applied electric field), not a rotating, orbiting, racing-through-the-infinitecosmos planetoid based on magical unicorn particles like gravitons, electrons or any other magic, Pixie particles theoretical scientists are forced to create to maintain faith and belief in their (provably false) theory. Nikola Tesla has already shown us the way (Discussion Point 23): the aether (the material that fills the region above the flat Earth's terra firma and bodies of water). Everything is either dielectricity, magnetism or electricity. There exist only two principles in existence: force and motion or inertia and acceleration. Everything must follow these laws, including the shape of the Earth. For more on magnetism, please search for VIDEO 106 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM: Gravity Doesn't Exist, Nor Does Magnetic Polarity. 208

DISCUSSION POINT 157 Allow yourself the uncomfortable luxury of changing your mind about those things you hold sacred. It warrants discussion at this point in the book to look at the psychology of why we have such a difficult time changing our minds. Many of us carry a dangerous self-righteousness that grows from the disconnect between information and insight. We have been told, conditioned and indoctrinated our entire lives to believe that the Earth is a globe. There is now information proving that the Earth is clearly not what we have been told. The information is available; however, our extreme distaste for being wrong, our self-righteousness—I know the Earth is a globe!—intrudes on the insight, prevents the insight that comes as a result of the information. It’s a conundrum most of us grapple with—on the one hand, the awareness that personal growth means transcending our smaller selves as we reach for a more dimensional, intelligent and enlightened understanding of the world, and on the other hand, the excruciating growing pains of evolving or completely abandoning our former, more inferior beliefs as we integrate new knowledge and insight into our comprehension of how life works. That discomfort, in fact, can be so intolerable that we often go to great lengths to disguise or deny our changing beliefs by paying less attention to information that contradicts our present convictions and more to that which confirms them. In other words, we fail the fifth tenet of Carl Sagan’s timelessly brilliant and necessary Baloney Detection Kit for critical thinking: “Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.” That humbling human tendency to attach ourselves to what we “believe” is known as the backfire effect, a psychological phenomena that helps explain how self-delusion is as much a part of the human condition as fingers and toes. Once something is added to your collection of beliefs, you protect it from harm. You do this instinctively and unconsciously when confronted with attitude-inconsistent information. Just as confirmation bias shields you when you actively seek information, the backfire effect defends you when the information seeks you, when it blindsides you. Coming or going, you stick to your beliefs instead of questioning them. When someone tries to correct you, tries to dilute your misconceptions, it backfires and strengthens those misconceptions instead. Over time, the backfire effect makes you less skeptical of those things that allow you to continue seeing your beliefs and attitudes as true and proper. But what makes this especially worrisome is that in the process of exerting effort on dealing with the cognitive dissonance produced by conflicting evidence, we actually end up building new memories and new neural connections that further strengthen our original convictions. This helps explain such gobsmacking statistics as the fact that, despite towering evidence proving otherwise, over 50% of Americans don’t believe the Earth is more than 6,000 years old. The same holds true regarding the Earth not being a globe: despite towering evidence proving otherwise, most people—99%+—simply do not want to believe the Earth is anything but a sphere—so much so, they will not even entertain a discussion, immediately dismissing the topic offhandedly.

209

This also explains why Benjamin Franklin’s strategy for handling haters—not the term Franklin used, of course—is particularly effective, and reminds us that this fantastic 1866 guide to the art of conversation still holds true in its counsel: “In disputes upon moral or scientific points, ever let your aim be to come at truth, not to conquer your opponent. So you never shall be at a loss in losing the argument, and gaining a new discovery.” If people were more interested in the truth than they were in being correct, minds would open with a flourish. Unfortunately, people do not want to hear your truth; they want to hear their opinion coming out of your mouth. The backfire effect is due in large part to our cognitive laziness—our minds simply prefer explanations that take less effort to process, and consolidating conflicting facts with our existing beliefs is enormously straining: the more difficult it becomes to process a series of statements, the less credit we give them overall. If during metacognition—the process of thinking about our own thinking—we take a step back and notice that one way of looking at an argument is much easier than another, we will tend to prefer the easier way to process information and then leap to the conclusion that it is also more likely to be correct. Simply presenting people with information does nothing in the way of helping them internalize it and change their beliefs accordingly. So where does this leave us? Perhaps a little humbled by our own fallible humanity, and a little more motivated to use tools like Sagan’s Baloney Detection Kit as 210

vital weapons of self-defense against the aggressive self-righteousness of our own minds. After all, Daniel Dennett was right in more ways than one when he wrote, “The chief trick to making good mistakes is not to hide them—especially not from yourself.” The below is a diagram of the scientific method as an ongoing process. Note that the very first step in this process is to Make Observations. The following are only five of many, many truths presented in single, simple, easily processed statements —truths that we should not be hiding from ourselves: 1. The Big Bang has never once been observed. It thereby fails the very first step in the ongoing process of the scientific method. 2. Water fixed to a supersonic, spinning ball (see image, left) —or any ball, for the sake of argument (see tennis ball, insert image)—because of an undetectable force has never been observed. As a result, it also undeniably fails the first step in the ongoing process of the scientific method. 3. A gradual change of species through spontaneous evolution has never been observed.es: Y evolution fails the first step in the ongoing process of the scientific method. 4. An object being attracted by another object due only to the mass of the larger object has never been observed. It also fails the first step in the ongoing process of the scientific method. 5. A number of objects orbiting another larger objectbecause of an undetectable force has never been observed. Like the four previous examples, this also fails. Everything that modern “science” claims proves a global Earth simply and truthfully cannot be proven—but people still believe the Earth is a globe because—they’ll say—they’ve seen lots of “pictures” and some over-their-heads, mathemagical formulas on paper. If a person was to analytically compare what a flat-Earth theorist can prove empirically with what a global-Earth theorist can prove empirically— this excludes all speculative theories and mathematical "explanations" that essentially work only on paper—the answer would be clear: the Earth is flat and stationary. Regarding the embarrassing lack of solid, scientific evidence that proves the Earth is indeed a globe, will you still allow cognitive dissonance to keep you in an intellectual chokehold? 211

DISCUSSION POINT 158 Cultures the world over throughout history have all—for the past 5000 years—described and purported the existence of a stationary, flat Earth (Discussion Point 39). Egyptians, Indians, Mayans, Chinese, Native Americans and literally every advanced, ancient civilization on Earth had a stationary, flat-Earth cosmology. Before Pythagoras, the idea of a spinning ball-Earth was nonexistent and even after Pythagoras it remained an obscure minority view until 2000 years later when Copernicus began reviving the heliocentric model.

Basic observation and common sense led mankind to believe the Earth was flat for thousands of years. What changed to only 500 years ago that made everyone believe we live on a giant, spinning ball? A brief, unmistakably unscientific, intuitive exchange with my friend Patrick: Me:

“What are your thoughts on the potential of a flat Earth?”

Patrick:

“I’m kinda going with 5000 years of ancient beliefs by advanced cultures—Mayan, Chinese, Hindu, Egyptian—instead of 500 years of lying a**holes.” 212

Who created, controls and teaches the world's population the ball-Earth lie? Undeniably and without a doubt, the 33° Freemasons. It is they who are responsible for the deceit. It is they who know for certain the shape of the Earth.

DISCUSSION POINT 159 Before a person can talk about what the world truly is—it is much easier to reveal what it is not and who controls it—one first needs to understand how the world was created; and therein lies a tremendous challenge. Most people would agree that our universe was created by something, either a heavenly being such as God, Vishnu, Yahweh, Allah, the Great Spirit, the One or—as atheists might believe —by a burst of energy from absolute nothingness that scientists estimate occurred about 13 billion years ago causing cosmic inflation milliseconds afterwards. It is after this consensus that the trouble begins. Millennia of warfare and millions of deaths have resulted from religious disputes over exactly who God is and which people meet God’s approval. There are also the Big Questions asked by humans down through the ages: Who are we? Where did we come from? Where are we going? The answers to such questions may be found in the oldest known accounts of human history—the stone tablets from ancient Sumer, which predate the Bible by more than three thousand years. They tell of fantastic flying machines, trips to other worlds, destructive battles on Earth, and even the creation of a slave race. There are detailed accounts of gods, goddesses, and demigods, kings and queens, champions, tyrants, priests, holy men, wars, and insurrections. Beginning with the world’s oldest known story—the quest of the great Sumerian king Gilgamesh, who claimed a non-human heritage—there exist enough tales of battles, court intrigues, jealousies, and adventures to rival any Hollywood blockbuster. But to understand the reality of these recorded stories, one must first understand that every aspect of our current “reality” is viciously controlled and painstakingly monitored by the upper echelon of Freemasonry: religion, education, medicine, science, politics, weather, the media, the military, the food supply, the economy, et cetera. Earth is not a spinning ball and nobody has ever landed on the Moon or gone into "outer-space." For centuries, most NASA astronauts and the leading heliocentrists have all been members of the same Freemasonic secret society, slowly yet successfully duping and molding the world. And they are the ones responsible for the fictitious global Earth story. From Pythagoras to Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Cavendish, Admiral Byrd, modern astronauts like Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins, to the director of NASA and Grand Commander of the 33° C. Fred Kleinknecht, the founding fathers of the spinning ball mythos have all been Freemasons. The fact that so many members of this, the largest and oldest secret society in existence, have all been co-conspirators bringing about this literal “planetary revolution” is beyond the possibility of coincidence and provides strong evidence of organized collusion in creating and maintaining this multi-generational deception. 213

DISCUSSION POINT 160 Quoting Terra Firma by David Wardlaw Scott: “The system of the Universe, as taught by Modern Astronomers, being founded entirely on theory, for the truth of which they are unable to advance one single real proof, they have entrenched themselves in a conspiracy of silence, and decline to answer any objections which may be made to their hypotheses … Copernicus himself, who revived the theory of the heathen philosopher Pythagoras, and his great exponent Sir Isaac Newton, confessed that their system of a revolving Earth was only a possibility, and could not be proved by facts. It is only their followers who have decorated it with the name of an ‘exact science,’ yea, according to them, ‘the most exact of all the sciences.’ Yet one Astronomer Royal for England once said, speaking of the motion of the whole solar system: ‘The matter is left in a most delightful state of uncertainty, and I shall be very glad if any one can help me out of it.’ What a very sad position for an ‘exact science’ to be in is this!”

Based on Plato's divided line of incommensurability as found in Plato's Republic, 509d-511, the Grand Unified Theory appears to be 1 over Phi to the power of negative three. There is only the consciously aware Aether. As Tesla verified, everything is magnetic, di-electric. We have be falsely taught that the world is made of atoms filled with magic, unicorn particles such as gravitons, photons and electrons, et cetera. Tesla clearly demonstrated how this was incorrect which led to his suppression. The truth appears to be that this is an electric creation based on the laws of Aether. In such a scenario, the Earth isn't necessarily flat or round, but rather a dielectric realm of creation. Pressures and density make the part we walk on flat. We follow the laws of electricity. The place we call Earth is a "realm of creation". It exists in the Aether as a magnetic bubble. The part we walk on, however, is very flat ... and not a ball. 214

DISCUSSION POINT 161 Continuing the discussion started in Discussion Points 145 and 148 (and briefly prior), the Sun and the Moon —holographic, filament, solid or otherwise, doesn't change the fact that—both travel in an established, never-ending, East-to-West pattern between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn along the tilted, equatorial ecliptic through a consciously aware Aether (Discussion Points 23, 54, 145, 156 and 160). The images on this page illustrate the movement of the Sun as the months pass—anyone can track the luminaries at www.timeanddate.com at anytime, so there should be no question regarding validity. Referencing every location north of the equator (image, left), when the Sun's path is closer to the Tropic of Capricorn, it is colder, winter. When the Sun's path is closer to the Tropic of Cancer, it is warmer, summer. These routes have been repeated for, well, for forever. If the Earth is partially a holographic projection (the stars in the sky?), then, therefore, the Earth indeed was created by intelligent design.

215

DISCUSSION POINT 162 From David Wardlaw Scott: “I remember being taught when a boy, that the Earth was a great ball, revolving at a very rapid rate around the Sun, and, when I expressed to my teacher my fears that the waters of the oceans would tumble off, I was told that they were prevented from doing so by Newton’s great law of Gravitation, which kept everything in its proper place. I presume that my countenance must have shown some signs of incredulity, for my teacher immediately added - I can show you a direct proof of this; a man can whirl around his head a pail filled with water without its being spilt, and so, in like manner, can the oceans be carried round the Sun without losing a drop. As this illustration was evidently intended to settle the matter, I then said no more upon the subject. Had such been proposed to me afterwards as a man, I would have answered somewhat as follows Sir, I beg to say that the illustration you have given of a man whirling a pail of water round his head, and the oceans revolving round the Sun, does not in any degree confirm your argument, because the water in the two cases is placed under entirely different circumstances, but, to be of any value, the conditions in each case must be the same, which here they are not. The pail is a hollow vessel which holds the water inside it, whereas, according to your teaching, the Earth is a ball, with a continuous curvature outside, which, in agreement with the laws of nature, could not retain any water.”

216

DISCUSSION POINT 163

Astronomers say the magical magnetism of gravity—as we’ve been taught—is what keeps all the oceans of the world stuck to the ball-Earth. They claim that because the Earth is so massive, by virtue of this mass itcreates a magical, unprovable force able to hold people, oceans and atmosphere tightly clung to the underside of the spinning ball. Unfortunately, however, they cannot provide any practical example of this on a scale smaller than the planetary (also theoretical). A spinning wet tennis ball (see page 210), for instance, has the exact opposite effect of the supposed ball-Earth. Any water poured over it simply falls off the sides, and giving it a spin results in water flying off 360 degrees like a dog shaking after a bath. Astronomers concede the wet tennis ball example displays the opposite effect of their supposed ball-Earth, butclaim that at some unknown mass, the magic adhesive properties of gravity suddenly kick in allowing the spinning wet tennis ball-Earth to keep every drop of “gravitized” water stuck to thesurface. When such an unproven theory goes against all experiments, experience and common sense, it is high time to drop the theory. 217

DISCUSSION POINT 164 This is what the societal engineers do when the feel threatened: they launch a campaign to discredit via the controlled mainstream media. They’ll publish articles like this excerpted one by Moriel Schottlender in Popular Mechanics in January of 2016: 10 Easy Ways You Can Tell For Yourself That The Earth Is Not Flat Then they’ll give it a Don’t-be-dumb!-stylized subtitle: The evidence is right in front of you! And just to make sure they hook you, they provide you a dreamy, computer-generated image (Discussion Points 24, 75, 111, 128, 135-140, 151, among many others) that they will tell you is an authentic picture taken by ESA astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti from the International Space Station (Discussion Points 125 and 128).

And immediately—before you even read one word—all of your conditioning, programming and indoctrination to never question authority and to conform and not be different will kick in, and you’ll say to yourself with a knowing, smug laugh ofsuperiority oozing with cognitive dissonance, “How can anyone believe the Earth is not a globe? There’s a photograph right there.”

218

The vast majority of the engineered society, while reading Mr. Schottlender’s article, will not once think for themselves because they’ve been taught to worship and obediently not question people in positions of false authority. They will unknowingly disengage the logical-thinking part of their brain and continue to allow their beliefs to be given to them (Please see Note From the Author). They will close their mind to any potential new information that might challenge their ego. They will not put in brain effort, refusing to accept that they could have possibly been deceived about something so significant and will refuse to change the way they think—regardless of the evidence. People will either consciously or subconsciously do all of these things because they are afraid of what their friends or co-workers or the neighbors might say if they knew he or she thought differently than they did … so those reading the article will remain psychologically dependent on the version of the truth that had long-ago been provided to them. They will ignore their own eyes and their own experiences and instead blindly and obediently accept exactly what the cultural engineers and their false priests tell them to accept. And then they will become someone like Mr. Schottlender who writes things like the following article—using words like ridiculous and phrases like kooky conspiracy theory to emotionally threaten the psychologically subservient members of society to willingly choose to agree with what is written— and the masses will obey their previous programming and nod their head in agreement. Mr. Schottlender’s article appears below in italics. Humanity has known the Earth to be round for a few millenia and I’ve been meaning to show more methods that prove the world is not flat. [People] claim it’s ridiculous to even bother rebutting [flat Earthers]—and I tend to agree. But the history of our species’ intellectual pursuit is important and interesting, and it’s very much well worth writing about. You don’t need to denounce all science and knowledge and believe in a kooky conspiracy theory to enjoy some historical factoids about humanity’s quest for space. On we go to the top 10 ways to know the Earth is unequivocally, absolutely, positively, 100% not flat! 1. The Moon Now that humanity knows quite positively that the Moon is not a piece of cheese or a playful god, the phenomena that accompany it (from its monthly cycles to lunar eclipses) are well-explained. It was quite a

219

mystery to the ancient Greeks, though, and in their quest for knowledge, they came up with a few insightful observations that helped humanity figure out the shape of our planet. Aristotle (who made quite a lot of observations about the spherical nature of the Earth) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the Earth’s orbit places it directly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow in the process), the shadow on the Moon’s surface is round. This shadow is the Earth’s, and it’s a great clue on the spherical shape of the Earth. Since the Earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical—absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat. Mr. Schottlender’s claim that the behavior of the Moon is well-explained is blatantly inaccurate. The explanations provided by the establishment are as false and lacking in factual knowledge as is Mr. Schottlender’s claim about the shadow.: their explanations are not well explained, they are simply often explained. It’s a significant difference. The Moon's phases are not always curved. Half moon is a straight line—always. The soft lines on the Moon often curve in the opposite direction than what a globe-Earth shadow should illustrate. There are many photos of the Sun and Moon in the sky at the same time; hence, the Earth cannot be creating the shadow we see. These facts are observable, testable and repeatable. Regarding the Foucault Pendulum, Schottlender’s claim was easily disproven in Discussion Point 106. Regarding the Moon and the phenomena that truly accompany it, including all of the above, please reference Discussion Points 8, 76, 99-103 and 110-112. Mr. Schottlender has clearly embraced the pseudoscience (Discussion Point 6) taught to him during his years of programming—and both his ego and his cognitive dissonance (Discussion Point 120) disallow him from trusting his own eyes and experience; instead, he chooses to continue worshipping at the alter of Science-ism, and he has chosen Aristotle to be a “celebrity priest” worthy of his worship. In this instance, however, Aristotle was either misquoted, misinterpreted or simply wrong—and we can observe this inaccuracy with our own eyes. No man is infallible, including Aristotle. 2. Ships and the Horizon If you’ve been next to a port lately, or just strolled down a beach and stared off vacantly into the horizon, you might have, perhaps, noticed a very interesting phenomenon: approaching ships do not just “appear” out 220

of the horizon (like they should have if the world was flat), but rather emerge from beneath the sea. But – you say – ships do not submerge and rise up again as they approach our view. The reason ships appear as if they “emerge from the waves” is because the world is not flat: it’s round.

It’s like he’s not even trying (or maybe this is the very best the cultural engineers can do?). His statist education fails him in the real world of observation, test and repeat. Please refer to the real science of the Law of Perspective, the vanishing point and the point of convergence in Discussion Points 71 and 105. 3. Varying Star Constellations The Earth [is] round judging from the different constellations one sees while moving away from the equator. The constellations are groupings that someone long ago selected to go together because they always remain together as they move across the sky. As a result of their never changing—their positions on the celestial plane have not changed since the dawn of man—constellations were easily identified. Mr. Schottlender’s claim is not even close to what occurs during real-world observation. Please refer to Discussion Points 19, 38, 68, 69, 108 and 115. Also, if Mr. Schottlender is referring to southern constellations vs. northern constellations, this is true and obvious and a part of the celestial tilt of the equatorial ecliptic which is 23.4° from low in the North to high in the South. This specific phenomenon has nothing to do with a globular, spinning Earth.

221

4. Shadows and Sticks If you stick a stick in the (sticky) ground, it will produce a shadow. The shadow moves as time passes (which is the principle for ancient Shadow Clocks). If the world had been flat, then two sticks in different locations would produce the same shadow. Imagine the Sun's rays (represented by yellow lines) hitting two sticks (white lines) some distance apart. If the Earth were flat, the resulting shadows would be the same length, no matter how far apart you place the sticks. But they don’t. This is because the earth is round, and not flat. Because the Earth is round, sticks placed at distant locations will throw shadows of different lengths. If Mr. Schottlender was seriously trying and not simply regurgitating his indoctrination talking points, he’d acknowledge that the same phenomenon he uses to claim the Earth is a globe would also occur on a flat Earth because the Sun moves overhead. The shadows from the two sticks in two locations would not be the same length on a flat Earth because the Sun is moving over the Earth (Discussion Points 145-146), creating the exact same effect Mr. Schottlender described above. 5. Seeing Farther from Higher Standing in a flat plateau, you look ahead of you towards the horizon. You strain your eyes, then take out your favorite binoculars and stare through them, as far as your eyes (with the help of the binocular lenses) can see. Then, you climb up the closest tree – the higher the better. You then look again, strain your eyes, stare through the binoculars out to the horizon. The higher up you are the farther you will see. Usually, we tend to relate this to Earthly obstacles, like the fact we have houses or other trees obstructing our vision on the ground, and climbing upwards we have a clear view, but that’s not the true reason. Even if you would have a completely clear plateau with no obstacles between you and the horizon, you would see much farther from greater height than you would on the ground. This is absolute nonsense. Regardless of whether the Earth was globular or flat, a person can only see as far as the vanishing point. Again, the Law of Perspective (Discussion Point 71) dictates that our aided or unaided eyesight can only see to a certain vanishing point, beyond which objects are invisible. Living on a globe and going high up in a tree does not give us super vision. 6. Ride a Plane If you’ve ever taken a trip out of the country, specifically long-destination trips, you could notice two interesting facts about planes and the Earth: Planes can travel in a relatively straight line a very long time and not fall off any edges. They can also circle the Earth without stopping. If you look out the window on a trans-Atlantic flight, you can, most of the times, see the curvature of the earth in the horizon. Yes, please, ride a plane. Take the challenge. See the truth for yourself. You will find that zero curvature is observable, testable and repeatable—over and over and over and over. Mr. Schottlender is either sadly ignorant, unwilling to put forth the effort to research his claims or he is purposely lying. Well, to his credit, he is telling the truth about planes being able to fly in a relatively straight line without flying over his fictional “edge” of the Earth: the reason airplanes can do this is because the 222

Earth is not a globe and the planes are indeed flying over a flat plane (Discussion Points 15, 48, 113 and 147). Regarding his second claim: there are currently no planes that are able to circle the Earth without stopping. There are two reasons for this: 1) that type of aircraft does not currently exist, and 2) the Earth is not a globe. Regarding his third claim, if a person looks out the window of a transAtlantic flight, the only possible way a person may think he or she sees curvature is if the window itself is intentionally engineered (Discussion Point 121) to create an illusory and slight appearance of curvature. Regardless, the horizon is both flat and eye-level on every flight ever taken—that is indisputable fact (Discussion Points 1 and 2). 7. Look at Other Planets The Earth is different from other planets, that much is true. After all, we have life, and we haven’t found any other planets with life (yet). However, there are certain characteristics all planets have, and it will be quite logical to assume that if all planets behave a certain way, or show certain characteristics – specifically if those planets are in different places or were created under different circumstances – our planet is the same. In other words: If so many planets that were created in different locations and under different circumstances show the same property, it’s likely that our own planet has the same property as well. All of our observations show planets are spherical (and since we know how they’re created, it’s also obvious why they are taking this shape). Unless we have a very good reason to think otherwise (which we don’t), our planet is very likely the same. In short, we don’t just suspect that our planet is spherical. We know it. We haven’t found life on any other planets—and we never will—because there are no other planets. The pool table is flat and yet the balls on it are round. One has zero to do with the other. It was all created for the purposes it was created. This is not only a simple example of Mr. Schottlender’s beliefs being given to him but also an example of his willing and unquestioned acceptance of those beliefs. He even makes clear that his “evidence” regarding his claim is nothing more than an assumption: “ … it will be quite logical to assume that if … ” He is certain of nothing. Mr. Schottlender is practicing pseudoscience (Discussion Point 6). The objects in the sky are for us to use to tell time, seasons, days, years. 223

Secondly, these “planets” have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wandering stars” since they differ from the other fixed stars in their relative motions only. When looked at with an unprejudiced, naked eye or through a telescope, the fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, not spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all admittedly fake computer-generated images—not photographs. Please reference Discussion Points 89, 139 and 151 to see how and why Mr. Schottlender’s analysis could not be more elementary and juvenile. 8. The Existence of Timezones The time in New York, at the moment these words are written, is 12:00pm. The sun is in the middle of the sky (though it’s hard to see with the current cloud coverage). In Beijing, it’s 12:00am, midnight, and the sun is nowhere to be found. In Adelaide, Australia, it is 1:30am. More than 13 hours ahead. There, the sunset is long gone – so much so, that it’s soon going to rise up again in the beginning of a new day. We have time zones because when the Sun is illuminating one side of the spherical Earth, the other side is dark. This can only be explained if the world is round, and rotating around its own axis. At a certain point when the sun is shining on one part of the Earth, the opposite side is dark, and vise versa. That allows for time differences and timezones, specifically ones that are larger than 12 hours. Another point concerning timezones, the sun and flat/spherical Earth: If the sun was a “spotlight” (very directionally located so that light only shines on a specific location) and the world was flat, we would have seen the sun even if it didn’t shine on top of us (as you can see in the drawing below). The same way you can see the light coming out of a spotlight on a stage in the theater, even though you – the crowd – are in the dark. The only way to create two distinctly separate timezones, where there is complete darkness in one while there’s light in the other, is if the world is spherical. Again, Mr. Schottlender is wrong. He is either obediently recalling his statist educational system’s indoctrination or he is blatantly lying when he claims, “This can only be explained if the world is round …” It’s a classic example of being unable to connect what we observe each day with reality. The simple and correct explanation for why we have time zones is not because the Earth is spinning on a wobbling axis at 1000 mph and flying around the Sun at 67,000 mph while the entire solar system rotates around the galaxy at 500,000 mph as the galaxy speeds through the cosmos at over 670,000,000 mph. The reason we have time zones is because the Earth is a stationary plane and the Sun moves overhead (Discussion Points 145-146). Which explanation resembles your daily observation and also makes logical sense? 9. The Center of Gravity There’s an interesting fact about mass: it attracts things to it. The force of attraction (gravity) between two objects depends on their mass and the distance between them. Simply said, gravity will pull toward the center of mass of the objects. To find the center of mass, you have to examine the object.

224

Consider a sphere. Since a sphere has a consistent shape, no matter where on it you stand, you have exactly the same amount of sphere under you. (Imagine an ant walking around on a crystal ball. From the insect's point of view, the only indication of movement would be the fact the ant is moving its feet. The shape of the surface would not change at all.) A sphere's center of mass is in the center of the sphere, which means gravity will pull anything on the surface toward the center of the sphere (straight down) no matter where it's located. Consider a flat plane. The center of mass of a flat plane is in its center (more or less – if you want to be more accurate, feel free to do the entire integration process), so the force of gravity will pull anything on the surface toward the middle of the plane. That means that if you stand on the edge of the plane, gravity will be pulling you toward the middle, not straight down like you usually experience. I am quite positive that, even for Australians, an apple falls downwards, not sideways. But if you have your doubts, I urge you to try dropping something – just make sure it’s nothing that can break or hurt you. There are interesting facts about mass and gravity. I agree. Let’s start with the fact that gravity is an unproven theory. Gravity has never been proven. Never. Not once. Gravity is essentially the only thing holding the globe-Earth myth together, so gravity (and the Theory of Evolution) is taught as fact and never questioned by anyone of “authority.” The truth is that gravity cannot be observed, tested or repeated. Gravity is a theory that has never been and simply cannot be proven. Claiming gravity as a definitive explanation for anything is anti-science (Discussion Point 6) and proves whomever does so as embracing pseudoscience. To easily dismiss Mr. Schottlender’s ignorant claims, please refer to gravity-related Discussion Points 24, 31-32, 81-86, 112, 123-124, 149 and 163. 10. Images from Space In the past 60 years of space exploration, we’ve launched satellites, probes, and people to space. Some of them got back, some of them still float through the solar system (and almost beyond it) and transmit amazing images over to our receivers on Earth. And in all of the photos, the Earth is (wait for it) spherical. The curvature of the Earth is also visible in the many, many, many, many photos snapped by astronauts on the International Space Station. Mr. Schottlender was probably an A+ student. He probably received 100% in his classes because he was able to blindly repeat the information given to him like a programmed robot. Sadly, all of his knowledge is demonstrably incorrect … wrong. We haven’t launched satellites. Please see Discussion Points 84-5, 128-131, 134, 142-3, 164. We haven’t sent people to space. Please see Discussion Points 124, 126-8, 140-2. All those satellite pictures and photographs from the International Space Station that Mr. Schottlender boasts about? They are admittedly—yes, NASA admits it—composite images, edited in Photoshop. They claim to receive “ribbons of imagery” from high-altitude aircraft which must then be spliced together to create composite images of the Earth, all of which are clearly CGI and not photographs. For further information and evidence, please review Discussion Points 75, 111, 125, 128 and 136-140.

225

DISCUSSION POINT 165 A conspiracy theory is an explanatory proposition that accuses two or more persons, a group, or an organization of having caused or covered up, through secret planning and deliberate action, an event or situation—often harmful or illegal. A conspiracy theorist, then, under most scenarios, is simply a person who questions known liars. The term “conspiracy theorist” was a term made popular by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency to stop critical thinkers from asking questions about the JFK assassination. In a memo called Countering Criticism of the Warren Report, the CIA set out to make the term “conspiracy theorist” a

weapon to be used against anyone who questioned the government’s secret activities and programs. In short, “conspiracy theorist” is nothing more than a derogatory title used to dismiss a critical thinker. Have conspiracies happened in the past? Yes, of course. Are there conspiracies happening right now? Absolutely there are. Isn't it sensible to inquire about them? Absolutely it is. 226

Some say the idea of an inter-generational world-wide conspiracy to delude the masses sounds implausible or unrealistic, but these people need only familiarize themselves with the works and writings of Freemasons themselves, for example John Robison who exposed this in his 1798 book, Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried Out in the Secret Meetings of the Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies. Supreme Commander of the 33rd degree Albert Pike was quite forth-coming in several letters regarding the Masons ultimate goal of world domination, and in the Zionist Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the exact plan by which this would be and has been carried out is completely disclosed.

227

DISCUSSION POINT 166 From Foundations of Many Generations by E. Eschini: “The one thing the fable of the revolving Earth has done, it has shown the terrible power of a lie, a lie has the power to make a man a mental slave, so that he dares not back the evidence of his own senses. To deny the plain and obvious movement of the Sun he sees before him. When he feels himself standing on an Earth utterly devoid of motion, at the suggestion of someone else he is prepared to [falsely] accept that he is spinning furiously round. When he sees a bird flying, and gaining over the ground, he is prepared to [falsely] believe that the ground is really traveling a great number of times faster than the bird.” It’s time for us—humanity—to focus our efforts on resisting further deceit and to systematically remove the nonsensical, global-Earth lies that have been forced upon us. It’s time to replace those false teachings with logical analysis and the evidence we gather through our daily experiences; and the truth is this: logic does not agree with nor do our daily observations match global-Earth dogma. Unquestionably, it’s a difficult and slightly scary process, this unlearning and re-learning. Still, we must try. That said, detailed below—within a working, magnetic (Discussion Point 156), flat-Earth model—are those very things we are able to observe and document every day, depending on our locations: the movement of the Sun and Moon (with likely portals/gates); triangulated flight times, distances and routes; the Southern Cross and Polaris; the constellations; and the rotating heavens above both the North and South Poles. Whether it is or is not the correct model of Earth, I don’t know (it is the only projection to reflect longitude and latitude in exact proportion on a flat surface); but I do know it is logical, and I do know that it accurately reflects the reality which we observe and in which we participate every single day.

228

DISCUSSION POINT 167 And finally, from Dr. Rowbotham: “Thus we see that this Newtonian philosophy is devoid of consistency; its details are the result of an entire violation of the laws of legitimate reasoning, and all its premises are assumed. It is, in fact, nothing more than assumption upon assumption, and the conclusions derived therefrom are willfully considered as things proved, and to be employed as truths to substantiate the first and fundamental assumptions. Such a ‘juggle and jumble’ of fancies and falsehoods extended and intensified as in theoretical astronomy is calculated to make the unprejudiced inquirer revolt with horror from the terrible conjuration which has been practised upon him; to sternly resolve to resist its further progress; to endeavour to over-throw the entire edifice, and to bury in its ruins the false honours which have been associated with its fabricators, and which still attach to its devotees. For the learning, the patience, the perseverance and devotion for which they have ever been examples, honour and applause need not be withheld; but their false reasoning, the advantages they have taken of the general ignorance of mankind in respect to astronomical subjects, and the unfounded theories they have advanced and defended, cannot be otherwise than regretted, and ought to be by every possible means uprooted.”

229

230

CLOSING THOUGHTS There are enough sensible, rational and logical questions that raise reasonable suspicion that we have been told untruths, that the Earth is not what we have been told. Once we accept that the Earth is not what we have been told, once that has been resolved, everything these governments have done and everything these universities have taught becomes illegitimate.

231

One reason—the lesser reason—why the truth about our Earth is so important is this: it reveals and spotlights their deception, it corners them. They don’t want to answer questions. Questions like, What is it? What’s it look like? Can we see it? How old is it? Who made it? What are you hiding? Is there more land? Who lives there? Their strong disinterest in answering questions is also why they will do anything they can to keep us—the people of the realm—fighting, to keep us distracted, to keep us at odds against each other, to divide us. These self-proclaimed elitists want us constantly busy paying attention to anything—anything and everything—just not what they are doing—hence, they offer us endless triviality to keep us preoccupied: manufactured celebrities and scandal, scripted television, 24-hours of breaking news, political theatre, fashion, hyped sporting and entertainment events, cinematic propaganda, controlled musicians, false flag news events, and worst of all, terrorism and war. They tell us who to hate, who to worship, what to watch, what to wear, what to eat, and worst of all, what to think and what to believe. Their rich, powerful corporations sell us idols to worship, slowly taking over the world while we tacitly believe their “science,” vote for their politicians, buy their products, listen to their music and watch their movies, sacrificing our souls at the altar of materialism. Many people think they are conscious—or entering a higher state of consciousness—or just now awakening—or simply moving in the right direction—but they are still a slave to distraction. When we—as a world population—become focused and determined, when we are not so willingly and easily distracted, we instantly become dangerous to the controlling establishment. Once people— millions and millions of people worldwide—start loudly asking questions, and once the governments can not satisfactorily answer those questions, the charade is over, everything changes and the era of their ruling over hypnotized masses will come to a necessary and abrupt end. When confronted about the truth surrounding the Earth, they can’t say they made a mistake: it can’t be explained as anything but the deception and control mechanism that it has been. This system has —these people have—been in power for over 500 years, ever since they gradually convinced the people of the world that they didn’t know where they lived. They created this fantastical scenario of a global Earth to make everyone feel insignificant and to follow—to worship, to revere, to succumb to—the politicians, ministers, scientists, et cetera, who they said knew better. And then they made their own people the politicians, ministers and scientists. And they will now do anything necessary to anyone necessary to keep that power. You’ve been deceived. It’s not your fault that you fell for the same hoax as the rest of the world. They are just better liars, better deceivers. They have no conscience. You do. You have a conscious. You can let go of your ego. You can stop feeling embarrassed. Nobody is going to laugh at you—except for those who ridiculously can’t let go of their ego. But the people who have caught on to the con? The people who have realized the power grab that has taken place over five centuries? The people who are awake and who can clearly see reality for what it is? They’re not going to laugh at you. They’re going to welcome you. Our eyes and experience tell us that the Earth is flat and motionless; our eyes and experience tells us that everything in the heavens revolves around us. But when we cease to believe our own senses, our own intuition, we lose the most important parts of ourselves, of who we are—and this is the real reason that knowing the truth about Earth matters. Earth being the flat, fixed center of the universe around which everything else revolves grants us— endows us—special importance and significance. We become the center of the universe. We regain

232

—we remember—our place as the most intelligent of the intelligent designer’s designs. We—each of us, everyone of us—becomes royal, magic, holy, divine. The question that people most often ask is this: Why would they do this? Why lie about the Earth? By turning the Earth into a spinning ball thrown around the Sun and shot through infinite space by a Godless Big Bang, they instantly and systematically turn humanity into a random, purposeless, meaningless accident of a blind, dumb universe. It is essentially trauma-based mind control beating the divinity out of us with psychological manipulation. People will claim that the spherical-Earthendless-universe theory cannot be used to devalue our spiritual selves … yet this is exactly what has happened.

The modern atheist, big bang, heliocentric, Globe-Earth, chance evolution paradigm spiritually controls humanity by removing the true God—not the God promoted by religion, but the true God —and, in essence, erasing the fact that we are here as a result of intelligent design. They have erased all of that and replaced that purposeful divine creation with haphazard, random, cosmic coincidence and illogical and uninspiring stories and parables. By removing Earth from the motionless center of the universe, these Freemasons have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete, self-absorbed, nihilistic indifference. That is a spirituallydeflating premise. If the Earth is the center of the universe, then the ideas of an intelligent designer, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent. However, if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then the idea of any God or a 233

specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible. And as a result of this indoctrinated implausibility, the most supreme parts of us—the royal, holy, magic and divine parts of us—slowly die. By laboriously destroying the wondrous spirit of the child inside each of us, by surreptitiously indoctrinating us—through years of oppressive, mundane, rote, anti-analytical education—into their falsely scientific, materialistic paradigm, not only do we lose faith in anything beyond the material, we gain absolute faith in possessions, superficiality, status, selfishness, hedonism and consumerism. If there is no intelligent designer, and if everyone is just an accident, then all that really matters is me, me, me. To quote Morris Kline, a writer on the history and philosophy of mathematics: “The heliocentric theory, by putting the Sun at the center of the universe ... made man appear to be just one of a possible host of wanderers drifting through a cold sky. It seemed less likely that he was born to live gloriously and to attain paradise upon his death. Less likely, too, was it that he was the object of God’s ministrations.” But we are. We are the ultimate objects of God’s attention.

There is still one more reason why the truth about the Earth is so important, and it is this: if the ruling authority found the firmament, and if they are hiding it, then they are also hiding God. They are hiding evidence of the builder or builders. They are hiding evidence of the creator or creators. They are hiding God. Hiding God could be considered one of the worst ideas of all time. If you are a person of any level faith—great or small—you certainly have a vested interest in justifying your faith. If a structure has been found that has, for all intents and purposes, the handprint of God on it, then the ruling 234

authority has no right to keep it from you. The meaning of life is out there somewhere on this realm, and it has been hidden from you. So why would they lie?

Why would they lie? Because … No globe = No rotation = No orbit = Not heliocentric = No Big Bang Theory = No Darwinism or Theory of Evolution = No Missing Link = Humanity’s existence is not random = 235

Science is fraudulent = Everything we have been told and taught via the education system, government and the media was a scripted lie = Information has been hidden and suppressed = Humanity is unique = Flat and stationary = Intelligent Design = Validation and widespread acceptance of a God/Creator = Mass awakening of mankind = Realization that humanity has been controlled and intentionally divided via race, religion, socio-economics, et cetera = Conflict instigators and perpetrators exposed = The end of tyranny by deception = Unified humanity = Humanitarian awakening = The end of hunger, bigotry, selfishness, jealousy, deceit, individualism = The end of mega-corporations = The end of war = The end of Freemason/elitist/New World Order/government control and profit off of humanity= Paradigm shift = The end to humanity’s servitude = The birth of humanity’s true freedom = Health, knowledge, abundance and harmony … for everyone. That’s why they would lie. That’s why they do lie.

236

The promotion of a global Earth—and the suppression and oppression of a—likely—flat Earth of some construction—is the most grotesque deception, cover-up and conspiracy in history. It has allowed them to control humanity. It has allowed them to mask the truth about our supreme, spiritual existence. It has allowed them to hide God. Humanity has been completely deluded and manipulated for 500 years. It has been long enough. If even only a few of the 167 previous discussion points carry truth, then we need to abandon the model we have been indoctrinated to accept. As was stated in the introduction, I don’t know for certain that the Earth is flat, but the evidence, and more so, my intuition—every royal, holy, magic and divine bone in my body—tells me that the Earth is not a globe, that the Earth is likely flat and di-electric, that I have found my truth, that I have finally taken my first steps along the path to knowing the one, true intelligent designer. Referencing life and the world in general, Aldous Huxley stated, “No. It’s not fools who turn mystics. It takes a certain amount of intelligence and imagination to realize the extraordinary queerness and mysteriousness of the world in which we live. The fools, innumerable fools, take it all for granted, skate about cheerfully on the surface and never think of inquiring what’s underneath.” Admittedly, to completely validate that the Earth is not a globe—or that the Earth is flat—or even a simulation—or a combination of both—NASA and the other promoters of the fraud would need to be publicly exposed through the mainstream outlets. Taxpayers could then demand back the trillions of dollars stolen and spent to promote their fraud, and people would then realize, Hey, we live in and on a created world. We did not evolve. And if we live on a created world, there must be a creator. It is exactly that revelation—that lie—they want to protect. The Earth is not a globe. The Earth, it appears, is flat. And while it may not be today, and it may not be tomorrow, one day, the curtain will close and this stage will be struck. And when the dust settles, no matter where you are right now, you’ll see the big picture. You will be shown what wonder really is. And as you leave this most magnificent of theaters, heading toward the next, my hope is that you will pause, look back at the stage and say, “I was actually in it, you know, right there in the thick of things … and it was a sight to see.”

237

238

INDEX A

Atlas of Physical Geography, 154 astronomy general, 102-3, 138, 214, 217 zetetic, 134, 150 atmosphere, 33, 43, 46-7, 52-6, 85, 124-5, 143-5, 158-60, 168, 184, 189 axis (see also Earth, axis), 68, 149, 186, 224 Azimuthal Equidistant (AE) projection, 20, 40-1, 65, 69, 78, 204

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, 180 aether, 50, 89, 186, 208, 214-5 air bubbles, 162 air density, 114 aircraft (airplane) curved window glass, 157, 223 dipping nose, 42, 172 flight times, 20 general, 42, 52-3, 115, 124, 149, 157-8, 163, 172, 184, 222-3 linear, 171 Lockheed U-2, 182 pilots, 42, 83 runway, 53 Airy’s Failure, 43-5 Aitoff projection, 20, 65 Aldrin, Buzz, 180, 213 altitude, 23, 25, 42, 90, 94, 106, 159-60, 167, 180, 182, 225 analemma, 191 ancient civilization, 212 ancient wisdom, 36-7, 70, 185 Antarctica (see also South Pole) general, 65, 66, 69, 80-2, 110-1, 147, 161, 189, 204-5 Treaty, 205 anthropology, 70, 193, 198-9 anti-gravity, 118, 217 anti-Moon, 110-1 anti-pode, 69 Apollo (Moon missions), 179-81 archeology, 199 archeological evidence, 193 Archimedes’ Principle, 58 Area 51, 89 Arctic, The (see also North Pole), 65, 68, 81-2, 110-1, 161 Aristotle, 219-20 Armstrong, Neil, 179-80, 213 Army Ballistic Missile Agency, 77 Around the World in 80 Days, 66 astronaut, 124, 162-3, 213 astrophysics (astrophysicists), 49, 77, 111, 125, 187, 199

B backfire effect, the, 209-10 beliefs, not your own, Note from the Author Bible, The, 36-7, 45, 70, 73, 185-7 Big Bang, Introduction, 37-8, 86, 102, 151, 109, 185 biological reality, 202 black holes, 118, 143 Bloch Wall, 208 Book of Enoch the Prophet, The, 148, 185-6 Book of the Heavenly Luminaries, The, 187 botany, 199 brainwashing (see also conditioning), 29, 51, 76, 110, 153, 189, 209, 219 bullet, 85 buoyancy, 47, 58, 114, 120 Byrd, Admiral Richard, 67, 204-5, 213 C Canada, Devon Island, 126 Catholic Church, 37-9 Cavendish, Henry, 120, 213 Cavendish Method, 120 cell tower, 166, 170 CGI, 51, 147, 174-8, 161, 182, 188-9, 199, 218, 224-5 CIA, 182, 226 circadian rhythms, 50 circumference Earth, 28, 31, 42, 91-3, 95-6 circumnavigation, 116-7 clouds, 19, 55-7, 128-30, 159, 174-6 cognitive bias, 200 cognitive dissonance, 76-7, 153, 156, 200, 219-20 239

Collignon projection, 20, 40, 65, 208, 228 Collins, Michael, 180, 213 combustion, 136 composite images, 174, 225 computer-aided design (CAD), 60 conditioning (also see brainwashing), 29, 51, 76, 110, 153, 189, 209, 219 confirmation bias, 200 conspiracy theory, 17, 219, 226-7 theorist, Note From the Author, 111, 153, 226-7 controlled opposition, 78-9 constellations, 46, 108, 150-1, 221, 228 convergence, point of, 51, 106-7, 129, 135, 144, 219 Copernicus, 49, 52, 88, 128, 138, 212-4 Coriolis Effect, 143 cosmogony, 33, 70, 102 Countering Criticism of the Warren Report, 225 Creator (creation, creationism), 37, 63, 195, 233-4, 236-7 crisis actors, 78 cultural engineers, 79, 110-1, 219-20 curvature general, 23, 26, 29, 31, 34, 42, 45, 60, 64, 92-7, 99-100, 129, 132, 141, 143, 152, 154, 157, 164, 172, 206, 222, 223 measurement, 28, 31, 92-6, 99 parabolic, 160 pythagorean proof of, 60

E Earth

eclipse

axis, 20, 45-6, 55, 102, 109, 131, 150 infinite, 36, 40, 50, 65, 66, 83, 89, 205 oblate spheroid, 201 orbit, 33, 45-6, 50-1, 54, 69, 74, 108, 120, 122, 125, 130, 134, 149, 161, 180, 219, 235 pear-shaped, 201 rotating, 33-4, 44-9, 52-7, 68-9, 74, 80, 84, 87, 108, 127, 131, 133-4, 142, 147, 149, 150-1, 158, 161, 175, 184, 201, 228 stationary, 33, 36-7, 43-5, 47-9, 52-7, 68-9, 84, 108, 127, 134, 149, 171, 172, 174, 212-3, 228-9

lunar 32, 138-9, 222 ecliptic, 49, 68, 71, 73, 185, 191, 221 education self, 189 statist, 29, 35, 76, 79, 153, 156, 186, 220, 224 ego, Note From The Author, 20, 24, 153, 219, 220, 232 Einstein, Albert, 44, 118-9, 202-3 electromagnetism, 50, 200 electromagnetic general, 50, 89, 96, 182, 199, 208 radiation, 81, 168 elevation, 23-24, 26, 28-9, 31, 55, 63, 83, 89, 92-3, 95-6, 99, 117, 141, 151, 154, 156, 187 empirical evidence, 26, 51, 55, 101, 106, 109, 127, 146, 148, 150 energy field, 50 equator celestial, 68, 191 general, 20, 31, 45, 54, 71, 82, 109, 147, 158, 170, 189, 221 terrestrial, 68 equatorial ecliptic, 49, 68, 71, 73, 185, 191, 221 equinox, 191 ether, 44 extra-terrestrials, 37-8, 89

D dark energy, 18, 118 dark matter, 18, 77, 118, 143 Darwinism (see also Theory of Evolution), 37, 38, 61, 63, 196 density, 54, 58, 66, 120, 144, 187, 214 debate didactic, 26 general, 111 di-electric, 50, 89, 208, 214 dimension(al), 40, 75, 89, 186, 209 dome, glass, 36, 83 Dryden Flight Research Facility, 171

240

gravity waves, 118 green screens, 160, 163 Greenland, 204-5 ground-based technology, 166, 168, 182 gyroscope, 149, 160

F FBI, 193 firmament, 36, 75, 81, Closing Thoughts Flat Earth Theory Demonstrates the Alarming Gullibility of People Everywhere, 110 Flatness of U.S. States, The, 154 Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race, 193 force, 86 Force the Line, 72 Foucault Pendelum, 44, 142, 220 Foundations of Many Generations, 228 Fourth Dimension, 51, 71, 186 Freemason, 17, 79, 120, 150, 153, 166, 186, 213, 226-7, 236 frequencies, 50

H Heaven and Earth, 52, 87 heliocentric, 18, 19, 37-8, 43-6, 49, 54-5, 59, 103, 106, 120, 128, 131, 213 hidden information, 70, 192-99, 205, 235 hoax, 36, 89, 110, 165-6 holographic universe, Note From the Author, 75, 104, 165, 215 horizon, 23, 25-6, 29, 42, 90-94, 99, 106, 114, 132, 141, 149, 157, 222-3 Hubble telescope, 125 Hueyatiaco, 196-7 humankind, originated, 197

G Galileo, 38-9, 176, 213 galaxy, 20, 46, 48, 68-9, 89, 102-3, 109, 151, 186, 224 gates (see also portals), 117, 148, 185, 228 geocentric, 18 geodetic (geodesic), 154 Geographical Review, 154 geology, 199 geomorphometric analysis, 154 Gleason projection, 65 God, 36-8, 79, 213, 219, Closing Thoughts Google Earth, 182-3 GPS, 166, 174 gravitational collapse, 118 constant, 118, 120 lensing, 118 radiation, 118 waves, 118 gravitons general, 118, 214 virtual, 118 gravity general, 18, 19, 41, 51, 57-9, 86, 118-23, 145, 158-61, 196, 216-17, 224-5 inward-pulling, 118 quantum, 118 Gravity is a Myth and Does Not Exist, 118

I Ice Age, The, 193 ice wall, 83, 110-1, 204 indoctrination, 19, 20, 35, 37, 51, 57, 87, 102, 110, 122, 153, 156, 176, 179, 183, 186, 189, 191, 209, 219, 222, 224 inertia, 208 International Date Line, 117 International Space Station, 43, 161, 163-5, 218, 225 Internet, 166 ionosphere, 168 J journals, scientific, 77 Journey to the Center of the Earth, 66 K Kanev, Georgi, 43-4, 62, 67, 89, 102, 122, 178 Kelly, Scott, 61 Kahnke, Michael, 60 Koran, The, 36 Kubrick, Stanley 179

241

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 171 National Geographic Society, 192 natural physics, 34 navigation, 40-1, 60, 66, 185 navigation system, 166 Neutral Buoyancy Lab, 162 Newton, Sir Isaac, 18, 118-9, 120, 122, 124,

L Lake Baikal, 152-3 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO), 118 laser measurement, 97 Law of Entropy, 170 Law of Perspective, 51, 106-7, 135, 140-1, 208, 220, 222

128, 213-4, 216 Newton’s 2nd Law, 124 Newton’s 3rd Law, 125 North Pole, The, (see also Arctic, The), 65, 68-9, 81-2, 110-1, 161, 189, 191, 228

M magnetic field, 200, 208 magnetic vortex, 200, 208 magnetism, 217 mainstream media, 29, 111, 118, 124, 217, Note From the Author Mars, 126, 180, 201 Matrix, the, 19, 50, 79 mental servitude, 29 Mercator projection, 40 metacognition, 210 Michelson-Morley experiment, 44-5 Microsoft Flight Simulator, 83 Milky Way, The, 68 Missing Link, The, 194 Moon distance from Earth, 98 elemental makeup, 134, 137, 148 landing, 98, 179-81, 200, 213 light, 98, 136-7 luminescent, 134, 137 movement, 20, 69, 117, 185-7, 228 reflection, 136-7 shadow, 139, 146, 219-220 Moon-dial, 133 Mother Nature, 50, 70 military, 40, 77, 172

O Old Bedford Level experiment, 92 Olber’s Paradox, 45 On the False Wisdom of the Philosophers, 119 On the Most Recent Phenomena of the Aetherial World, 126 On the Origin of Species, 63 Operation Deep Freeze, 204 Operation High Jump, 204 orbit GPS, 182 Earth, 33, 45-6, 50-1, 54, 108, 120, 122, 125, 130, 134, 149, 161, 180, 221, 237 Moon, 148 satellite, 174 Orion (space shuttle), 180-1 P Pac-Man, 185-6, 190-1 pancake, Earth is as flat as a, 154 parallax, stellar, 46 perspective, standing on Earth, 56-7, 99, 148 Photoshop, 174, 178, 225 plane trigonometry, 60 planet, 67, 107, 126, 164, 223 Pluto, 76-7, 201 polar expedition, 66 Polaris, 68-9, 103-4, 106, 108, 228 portals (see also gates), 117, 148, 186, 228 Portlock experiment, 31

N NASA (Army Ballistic Missile Agency), 77 NASA (space agency), 17, 18, 19, 28, 33, 36, 77, 85, 102-3, 105-6, 112, 120, 124-5, 127, 144, 147, 151, 155, 159, 160, 162-5, 167, 171-2, 173-9, 181, 200-1, 223, 225, 237 NASA’s Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 154 242

Swartzchild radius, 118 Science-ism (see also pseudoscience), 16, 17, 18, 19, 30, 39-40, 51, 57, 61, 63, 197, 222 scientific method, 30, 51, 111 scripture, 36-8 sea level, 29, 34-5, 90-1, 94-6, 122, 194, 205 seasons, 82, 87, 131, 186-7, 189, 223 Second Law of Thermodynamics, 170, 197 shovel through Earth, 56 singularities, 118 Sinusoidal projection, 20, 40, 65, 208, 228 Smithsonian Institute, 192-94 solar system, 20, 48, 89, 120, 180, 186, 214, 224-5 Southern Cross, 228 South Pole, The, (see also Antarctica), 65-7, 69, 80-2, 110-1, 147, 161, 189, 189, 191, 204-5, 228 space shuttle, 85 space travel, 179-81, 200, 213 space walk, 162 SR-71 Blackbird, 172 space loop (see also time loop), 117 Srimad Bhagavatam, 36 stars general, 20, 43, 45-6, 67, 73, 75, 107, 112, 134, 151, 185, 191, 228 wandering, 126, 223 star-trails, 68-9, 228 stone tools, 192, 195 submarine, 149, 167 Sumerian, 213 Sumner stone tablets, 213 Sun distance, 51, 80-1, 128-30, 189 distance traveled, 41, 103 elemental makeup, 81, 187 filament, Sun as a, 189 Law of Perspective, 187 movement, 20, 41, 51, 69, 71, 87, 103, 106-7, 109-10, 114, 117, 185-9, 191, 215, 221-2, 224, 228 set/rise, 51, 107, 114, 186-7 shadow, 139, 146, 219-220 size, 110, 127, 129-30 sunlight, 136-7, 139 Sundial, 133 suppressed information, 70, 191-99, 205 syzygy, 139

Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried Out in the Secret Meetings of the Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies, 227 propaganda, 17, 41, 77, 110, 148, 232 proportion, Sun-to-Earth, 188-9 propulsion, 124, 160 Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 227 pseudoscience (see also Science-ism), 16, 17, 18, 19, 30, 40, 46, 51, 61, 77, 105, 197, 222-3, 225-6 psychological operation (PSYOP), 59, 70, 79, 161, 204 Pythagoras, 212-4 Q quantum field theory, 118 R radiation, 181 radio broadcasts, 168 radio waves, 166 realm, 20, 40, 71, 89, 130, 186, 199, 231, 235 reflection on water, 64, 98, 132 relativity general, theory of, 18, 118-9 special, theory of, 18, 44 ribbons of imagery, 174, 225 rifle, 85 river, 35, 92, 154, 155 Rockefeller Foundation, 197 rocket, 124, 160, 200 railway, 34 Royal Astronomical Society, The, 137 Rowbotham, Samuel Birley, 28, 92-3, 150, 205, 229 S sacred geometry, 72 sacred truths, 38 Sagan, Carl, 209-10 Sahara Desert, 80, 189 satellites, 121, 161, 164, 166-8, 170, 172-3, 181, 225 scattering light, 43 Schumann Resonances, 50 243

United States Research Bureau, The, 66 United States Space Exploration, The, 201 Universe, 17-8, 46, 48-9, 54, 66-7, 88-9, 102, 133, 138, 207, 213-4, 232-4 Ursa Major, 108

T Ten Easy Ways You Can Tell for Yourself That the Earth is Not Flat, 218 Terra Firma, 214 telescopes, 92, 93, 106, 125-6, 134, 141, 144, 146, 170, 172, 187, 205, 223 tennis ball experiment, 217 Tesla, Nikola, 50, 65, 77, 118, 186, 199, 204-5, 208, 244 Theory of Evolution (see also Darwinism), 37, 38, 61, 63, 196 thermosphere, 164, 167 Tianong Space Station, 112 tides, ocean, 122-3 tilt axial, 68, 91, 131 planetary, 91, 105 sky, 71, 185 time loop (see also space loop), 117 time zones, 74, 224 torus, 208 Transistor: A 1953 Documentary, Anticipating Its Coming Impact on Technology, The, 169 trigonometry plane, 128 spherical, 28, 60, 94, 211 Tropic of Cancer, 20, 117, 185 Tropic of Capricorn, 20, 68, 117, 185

V vacuum of space, 124, 159-60 Van Allen, Dr. James, 181 Van Allen radiation belts, 180-81, 200 vanishing point, 106-7, 135, 144, 220-1 Vatican, The, 38 velocity, 170 Virts, Terry, 180 visibility, 144 W water

as above, as below, 36 flat and level, 27, 28, 29, 35, 51, 64, 97, 123, 129, 132 reflection, 64, 98, 132 wind, 54-5 Worlds Before Our Own, 198 Worlds Beyond the Poles: Physical Continuity of the Universe, 66

Z

U

zero-gravity, 160, 163 Zetetic Cosmogony, 57

United States Air Force, The, 83 United States Department of Defense, The, 77, 166, 183, 172 United States Department of Internal Affairs, The, 29 United States Navy, The, 66 Unites States Patent Office, The, 198

244

245

246

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Bradon craves thunderstorms, crashing waves, bluesy passion, laughable moments when people fall but aren't injured, warm and sunny days, all-night diners, illuminating discoveries, wood burning stoves and covered porches, wisdom, Oscar-worthy movies with smart dialogue, long highways, dolphins with which to swim, late nights out, horse-back riding along the shore, love, people who both curse and accept differences, the boogie, engrossing novels, sleeping under the stars, roller coasters, Southeast Asia, compassion, hand holding, the sand between his toes and the wind in his hair, howling wolves, basketball, people who get choked up when a dog dies in a movie, snorkeling, gothic castles and haunted houses, the seas, opportunities to blast AC/DC, moments to act like a kid, watching the Sun and Moon move across the sky, deep conversations, beach bonfires, the perfect hooded sweatshirt, mornings to sleep in, the idea of superheroes, mud baths, The Algarve, peace in his heart, dry wood crackling in an open fireplace, the moonlight, the hauntingly dreamy feeling that songs like Willie Nelson’s version of Stardust and Prince’s How Come You Don’t Call Me Anymore? provide, caves to explore by candlelight, natural hot springs, opportunities to give back, worn blue jeans, a dog shelter at which he may find his new best friend, and among other things, old friendships to nurture and new friendships to earn.

247

248

CONTACT [email protected] 249

250