CAMBRIDGE DELTA COURSE
PRACTICAL TEACHING ASSIGNMENT 4 PART 1
FOCUS ON
EXPERIMENTAL TEACHING ASSIGNMENT “Task – based learning as means of getting adult learners to communicate basically in the target language”
Candidate’s name: Paraskevi Andreopoulou Centre Number: GR 108 Candidate’s Number: Number of Words: Words: 2488
[Type text]
Page 1
Contents: 1. Introduc Introduction tion……… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………3 ……3
2. Professi Professiona onall interest interest in the area…………… area…………………… ……………… ……………… ……………3 ……3
3. Class Class Profile Profile – previou previouss teaching teaching situations situations………… ………………… ……………… ………….. …..4 4
4. Rationale Rationale for Task-based teaching………………… teaching………………………………… ……………………..5 ……..5
5. Aims Aims of the Lesson……… Lesson……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ………... ...5 5 5.1.Pre-Task 5.1.Pre-Task Stage……………………………………………………..5
6.
5.2.a. 5.2.b. 5.2.c.
Task…………………………………………………………..........6 Planning…………………………………………………………….6 Report………………………………………………………………7
5.3.a. 5.3.b 5.3.c.
Language Focus……………………………………………………..7 Analysis……………………………………………………………..7 Practice……………………………………………………………...8
Evaluat Evaluation ion of the Experime Experiment…… nt…………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ………..8 ..8
7. Conclusi Conclusion on and Profess Professiona ionall Developm Developmet…… et…………… ……………… ……………… ……………9 ……9
8. Referen References… ces………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………. ……...1 ..10 0
1. Ιntroduction [Type text]
Page 2
What would happen if we took a quite different approach in the classroom? Instead of beginning with the grammar, grammar, we could begin by teaching words and phrases and encouraging learners to make the best use they can of these. In the early stages, they will string these words and phrases together with the minimal grammar. As this happens, we increase the demands on the learners, requiring them to construct more complex meanings in a more listener / reader friendly way. As they are exposed to more and more language, they will begin to construct and use a more complex grammar, and we will try to devise activities to help them construct this complexity. (Willis D. Etp 2004). This essay will attempt to examine the use of task-based teaching in the EFL classroom and more specifically to explore its effectiveness in a group of false beginners of English for every day communication in their occupational contexts. In this respect, a task-based cycle will be used to make our adult learners take orders in a café, since the majority of them work for the catering industry.
2. Professional Interest in the area My professional interest in the area lies in the fact that my students work in the catering industry of the island where I live and occupy myself professionally; it is a place, where it mainly deals in the hotel and catering industry. Therefore, they need to be taught how to survive in an English-speaking work environment, especially in the high season. Those people need to learn the target language by picking useful words and phrases and only later to make sense of grammar (Willis J. 1996). When teaching beginners, we ought to give them a lot of exposure to the new language, and to make that exposure comprehensible; a task-based approach would possibly encourage them because it values what learners can achieve no matter how little language they have. It differs from the standard frame work in four main ways (Willis J, 1996): Firstly, there is much more weighting given to exposure; one result of this will be a longer pre-task phase (information-sharing) and a shorter task cycle (picture prompt for discussion in group work). Secondly, the cycle may well consist of sets of short tasks (listening and speaking) rather a long one. Thirdly, because there is less emphasis on public use of language until learners have gained confidence, the planning and report stages are either omitted or very short (short feedback sessions accompanied probably with questionnaires and whole class discussions), with the teacher giving the first reports informally. Finally, the language focus concentrates initially on words and phrases (food items and prices), only gradually progressing towards grammar (Can I have……. , I`ll have………, Yes, Yes, here you are…….., Is that all?)
[Type text]
Page 3
3. Class Profile- previous teaching situations It is a mixed-ability class of seven adult beginners of English; three of them are false beginners, although one of them would benefit more if she moved up to a Pre-Intermediate level and the rest four of them are real beginners; all of them are involved in the catering industry with the exception of an entrepreneur one (dealing in fuels). Real or false beginners in an EFL classroom may feel more vulnerable and shy when attempting to use the new target language in front of other students, whose language may be better than theirs, than if they were trying to make themselves understood outside class to a native speaker. It is also true they are not in a position of expressing fully and appropriately themselves in the target language (Willis J., 1996). All of them were taught in traditionally communicative methods of teaching in the past. Therefore, it will be rather difficult for them to comply with a new method of teaching, that is, pair and group work come into play from the beginning of the lesson with a variety of tasks to be fulfilled in the target language with whatever means of language students have at their disposal. According to Wright 1987 and White 1988 (cited in Skehan 1998) the 3PS-based approach has had an excellent relationship with teacher’s feelings of professionalism, since it is very comforting and it places then in charge of proceedings. The 3PS sequence is relatively easy to organize and comes bundled with a range of techniques which, also demonstrates the power relations within the classroom, since they are in charge of what is happening at all times. A second reason for the continued importance of this approach is that it lends itself very neatly to accountability, since it generates clear and tangible goals, precise syllabuses and a comfortably itemizable basis for the evaluation of effectiveness. The emphasis is on product, with the result that testing is seen as unproblematic, since it can focus on sampling whatever “items” underlie the syllabus.
4. Rat Ration ionale A particular lesson is going to be chosen on the grounds that the majority of students are engaged in the catering industry; the lesson deals with real authentic and simulated pieces of language in the form of dialogues for taking orders in the marketplace. Most of the students are engaged in that occupational field and need the target language to communicate in their work environment, especially in summer with customers arriving from every part of the world in the island. Drawing upon the group’s speaking sessions, I could say that they are looking forward to holding their posts in their work, since they fear they might lose their
[Type text]
Page 4
jobs, if they cannot speak English or might be relegated to another post in their work; another important factor is definitely a salary increase. The task-based lesson is expected to increase their language abilities, “to use language to achieve a specific outcome” (McKinnon & Rigby, 2004) and help them further their career.
5. Aims of the lesson Most lessons seem to serve more than one purpose, including presentation and practice of grammar, vocabulary and speaking development, further listening practice in the topic unit, pronunciation practice, presentation and development of functions and possibly cultural awareness at times. In a café was designed to be exploited in a number of task-based ways. This experimental lesson primary checks the effectiveness of task-based session in comparison to the conventional ones our students are familiar with. Furthermore, the lesson aims to consolidate in the learners` memory some specific lexical sets, revision of numbers and to encourage vocabulary development within their professional field. It also aids in using these authentic pieces of language in group and pair work, promoting collaboration among group members as well as developing their speaking skills through oral tasks-information sharing activities. Therefore, students will hopefully perceive that tasks relate closely to their needs and they will adopt an achievement orientation (Breen 1987:26 cited in Murphy 2003).
5.1 Pre-Task Stage Skehan 1996:24 claims that cognitive complexity in balance with cognitive familiarity will determine the extent to which active thinking is involved in doing the task and how easily it can be completed by drawing on existing schematic knowledge. The teacher as a facilitator introduces the topic (a task sheet with food items along with their prices ), states the context (a café), and students perform the dialogues in groups (as waiters and customers) with whatever language means they own. The students will focus on language forms that will be useful in the upcoming tasks; (Can- making requests, Will-spontaneous decision made at the moment of speaking) The teacher has ensured the text structure and vocabulary load are just beyond the students` current knowledge, so that redundancy can be activated to fill in for partial comprehension of certain parts of the text.
[Type text]
Page 5
5.2 Task – Planning - Report
5.2. A.Task: A.Task: During the task stage of the lesson, emphasis is placed on developing the vocabulary and speaking skills of the lesson, since our adult learners are to negotiate in groups about the outcome of the task (Willis 1988); they look at the menu of Liberty Café’ and with 8$ they must choose what they will eat, but, not exceed the specified sum of money; during the activity, the teacher circulates the groups, making sure the task is on the right track, clears up any misunderstandings and provides help with lexis and grammar.
5.2. B.Planning: At this stage, the two groupings work through on the task given above; learners look at the menu, once more, and try to guess , in teams, the price of each food item; then, they listen to the waitress taking the order from the customer and fill in the prices of the edible items; afterwards, each group member contributes to their findings, the group reporter writes down their oral contribution, no matter how correct or incorrect it is- at the same time, the group members develop their listening and speaking skills. The teacher’s teacher ’s role is to co-operate closely with students, aiding them in refining and polishing their language for their presentation, afterwards.
5.2. C.Report: At this stage, the reporter students from each grouping are invited to read out their oral or written reports to the other group members; it is very important at this moment, to provide the rest of the class with a reason for developing their listening or reading skills. After their reading out their reports, the other group members vote for the most successful presentation in terms of using proper English and a better way of expression. In the meantime, the teacher, as a listener, is to highlight some language regarded as central to the task& may ask for clarification or for more detail. The important thing, at this point, is that it is a fluency activity (reading out the report) which leads to accuracy (focus on the form of the language).
5.3
Language Focus – Analysis – Practice
5.3. a. Language Focus: [Type text]
Page 6
Skehan (1996:27) claims, at this stage, “It may lead learners to switch attention repeatedly between accuracy and restructuring and fluency”. The language focus stage of this lesson comprises a listening dialogue which highlights functions; learners focus on stressing the difference in meaning in a listening dialogue, in groups. Learners are going to listen to a dialogue between two customers and a waiter and need to find out what they will order; then, T hands out the tape script and ask from the two teams to look at and highlight a) what they can have – in green and b) what they will have – in yellow . They perform the listening activity, which guides them to language functions, and they check it out in their team; in this way, they are introduced to language functions, like a)can we have a large coffee? And b) I`ll have a small tea with lemon.
5.3. B.Analysis: Whilst at their feedback stage after the listening, students highlight language function (Excuse me, can we have…., I’ll have a small tea with lemon) and students work within their teams the use and functions of them (requests) - teacher help is welcome at this point; later, they report as a team their findings in the class; they develop their grammar inductively by practicing repeating polite/impolite requests, in teams. Next, they listen to some requests and they decide in teams, whether they are polite /impolite, depending on stress.
5.3. C.Practice: At this final stage of the lesson, learners going to take on the roles of the waiter and customer and give/take orders, in different cafés authentic dialogues related to their job-field, in pairs, which they role-play, quite a few times, by switching roles. This time, they are to “activate the language they have learnt so far” (Estaire & Zanon 1994) in a role-play, in the context of cafe`s .The teacher`s role is to instruct clearly the tasks and to supervise the students, noting down any mistakes.
6. Evaluat Evaluation ion of the Experim Experiment ent In this section, I will try to comment on the success of this experimental lesson, evaluate the effectiveness of Task-Based Learning in the EFL classroom and to comment on whether the lesson aims were achieved.
[Type text]
Page 7
Generally speaking, I would say that the lesson`s aims were achieved; the students were able to use the phrases they were taught in the classroom, although they seemed to recite them from their books, at least in the role-play situation (practice stage) and in the dialogue performance (practice stage), without giving any lively ways of expression and proper intonation in their performances. On the contrary, they seemed to do quite well in the pre-task stage of the lesson (the picture prompts with the prices), since they questioned and answered in a rather comprehensible way – How How much is the water? 10.25 & how many are the apples? 10.75 - even though their communicative competence was insufficient- at least, they kept the conversation going; their mistakes were corrected after their presentation. At the task stage of the lesson (the one with eight dollars) students felt free to use any language means they owned in order to perform the task- they said { I take an apple, a Cola and beer – the Cola is 0.60, the apple is1.20 & the beer is 2.50} instead of “I get/ have”; at least, it made sense from the context- they also seemed to work well in their teams, since four of them worked for the same restaurant and the next three of them were friends. Furthermore, they enjoyed performing the listening task where they had to circle the appropriate edible item, because the conversation of the two customers was humorous from the way they expressed functions- they also didn’t encounter many problems with the prices of the menu. On the contrary, in the analysis stage of the lesson, functions was a bit problematic, since I had to wander around groups getting them to drill polite vs. impolite requests. The intonation also of polite/impolite requests was rather problematic for them to comprehend, since I had to play two- three times the tape script, until they realized the speaker tone. Finally, I would admit that task-based teaching worked for my students, since they had the opportunity to speak fluently from the beginning and towards the end of the lesson, they had to focus on accuracy.
7. Conclusion and Professional Development It has been a novelty for me and for my students to use a new, alternative teaching medium that it promotes learner autonomy; its format consisted of a pedagogic dialogue in which the teacher’s questions were invitations to learners to
[Type text]
Page 8
demonstrate their language abilities and their responses were from their role as learners, not assumed ones in simulated situations (Prabhu 1987). Both I and students were engaged in a sequence of tasks that helped us to express ourselves in the TL from scratch, develop social skills in teams and communicate freely as if they were in their work field. This experience has taught me that teachers should resort to other methods of teaching, if not completely satisfied with the conventional ones. Task-based instruction is a way of learning the target language spontaneously and freely from scratch.
Bibliography
Estaire S., and Zano`n J., 1994 “A task-based approach” Heineman
[Type text]
Page 9
McKinnon M., & Rigby N., “Task-Based Learning” {WWW Document}. Retrieved April 27th 2007 File://A:\Task-based learning.htm
Murphy J., ELT ELT Journal 57/4 October 2003 Oxford University University Press Prabhu N.S. 1987 “Second Language Pedagogy” Oxford University Press Skehan P., P., 1998 “A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning” Oxford University Press Skehan P., P., (1994:190,191-192) (1994:190,191-1 92) “A new approach to Course Design: Task Task th Based Learning” {WWW Document}. Retrieved 27 2007 File://A:\A New Approach to Course Design Task Based Learning.htm Willis J., 1996 “A Framework for Task-Based Learning” Longman
Willis D., 2004 “Towards a new Methodology”-main feature-English Teaching Professional , Modern English Publishing Ltd
Course book Language-to-Go 2002 {Elementary Level} by Simon le Maistre & Carina Lewis Pearson Education Limited - Longman
[Type text]
Page 10
[Type text]
Page 11
