Jack Up drill rig movement operationFull description
lightning assessment
hnFull description
Full description
frsaDeskripsi lengkap
STP GUIDE TO RISK ASSESSMEN ASSESSMENTT 1.0
RISK ASSESSMENT Conducting risk assessments forms an important part of the STP Suppliers will be evaluated on their risk assessment as part of the ‘Key Criteria’ for each Pillar The same team/personnel should be used to conduct a risk assessment of all of the Criteria within a single Pillar, to ensure that risk prioritisation has been approached in the same way Where a Criteria is considered as ‘not applicable’ the risk assessment should be used to help
demonstrate why this may be the case
This guide details the 5 step process that should be used to carry out a risk assessment of Criteria within the STP:
1) Identify all risks that may arise from each Criteria, assuming no controls/remedial actions have been applied: Risks associated with each Criteria in each Pillar need to be included The Criteria and Guidance within each Criteria should be considered when identifying potential risks What are the hazards? Who or what might be affected and how?
2) Estimate the risks identified: Score the probability of the risk occurring, assuming no controls/remedial actions were in place, on a 1-5 scale Score the severity if the risk occurs, assuming no controls/remedial actions were in place, on a 1-5 scale
Probability: 5- Very Likely 4 – Likely 3 – Fairly Likely 2 – Unlikely 1 – Very unlikely
Y T I E E S I S E I
INCREASING PROBABILITY
Severity: 5 – Catastrophic 4 – Major 3 – Moderate 2 – Minor 1 – Insignificant
RISK ASSESSMENT 3) Evaluate the risks identified: Multiply together: Probability x Severity = Priority Score The priority score will enable a risk category to be identified (i.e. Unacceptable, Tolerable, Adequate, Acceptable), assuming that no controls/remedial actions were in place. Please note: while ‘Unacceptable’ and ‘Tolerable’ risks are referred to in the indicators under each Risk Assessment Criteria, the wording may be interchangeable, provided the same principle and the 5x5 matrix have been applied Describe the remedial actions for each risk (prioritised by probability and severity)
Y T I E E S I S E I
INCREASING PROBABILITY
4) Implement and record remedial actions: Make an individual accountable and set a deadline (remedial actions may be an ongoing process)
5) Review the assessment regularly and update if necessary. The Company should commit to review Risk Assessments annually or when a change occurs to ensure that they continue to effectively address all current and new issues – evidence of this commitment should be available Make sure all revisions of risk assessments are dated
RISK ASSESSMENT To ensure these 5 steps have been covered, a supplier may consider formatting their risk assessment in a tabulated format. An example of headings that should be included are detailed in the example below: Assuming no controls/remedial actions were in place
The assessments below are examples only to explain the methodology: Example: F2.2 Dust in the Workplace Date of Risk Assessment: 07/06/16 Pillar
Facility
G.P
F2. Emissions in the Work Place
Criteria
F2.2 Dust in the Workplace
Date of Review: 07/12/16 Risk
Affected Parties
Probability
Severity
Risk Level
PPE is not used
Employees
4
5
20 UNACCEPTABLE
Not complying with regulatory requirements
Business & Employees
4
5
20 UNACCEPTABLE
Poor engineering causing dust exposure
Facility Engineers & Employees
3
4
12 TOLERABLE
No dust capturing or suppression techniques
Facility Engineers & Employees
3
4
12 TOLERABLE
Remedial Action
Target Completion
Responsible
Probability
Severity
Risk Level
Employee training on PPE use (monthly sessions)
Ongoing, every month
H&S Manager
1
5
5 ADEQUATE
Implement improvements to meet regulatory requirements
1 week
Facility Manager
1
5
5 ADEQUATE
Ongoing Engineering maintenance. All mechanical improvements selected to reduce dust emissions
6 months
Facility Manager
2
4
8 ADEQUATE
Introduce water suppression practices & install dust extractors
3 months
H&S Manager
2
4
8 ADEQUATE
Assuming controls/remedial actions are in place
RISK ASSESSMENT Assuming no controls/remedial actions were in place
Example: P2.1 Employment of Children on Farm Date of Risk Assessment: 07/06/16
Date of Review: 07/12/16
Pillar
G.P
Criteria
Risk
Affected Parties
Probability
Severity
Risk Level
People
P2. Child Labour on Farms
P2.1. Employment of Children on Farm
Farmers do not know the age of employees
Farmer, Children
4
5
20 UNACCEPTABLE
Farmers are not aware of the law
Farmer, Children
4
5
20 UNACCEPTABLE
Farmers are using child labour
Farmer, Children
4
5
20 UNACCEPTABLE
Remedial Action
Target Completion
Responsible
Probability
Severity
Risk Level
Age Verification – checking of employee ID
1 month
Field Technician
2
5
10 TOLERABLE
Farmer Training
1 month
Field Technician
1
5
5 ADEQUATE
Farmer Training, followed by Sanctions (if no improvement)
1 month (Training) 3 months (Sanctions)
Field Technician
1
5
5 ADEQUATE
Assuming controls/remedial actions are in place
In both of these examples, a supplier can demonstrate firstly what the risk would be if they were not applying any controls/ remedial actions, then how any remedial actions can be applied to reduce the risk level.
