Case Solution & Analysis for FormPrint Ortho500 by Frank V. Cespedes, Alisa Zalosh
IXSIR Winery of Lebanon Case Solution & Analysis, Case Study Solution. Contact us directly at casesolutionsavailable(at)gmail(dot)com if you want to order the above Case Solution.
Case solutin of Holly Fashion
Solution of the ACCRA beach hotel case.
Bill French case solutionFull description
supply chain
Descripción: Monmouth Case Solution for the Harvard Case
Case Solution of Iridium LLC
MedNet Case solution for Advertising
Full description
Nintendo strategy management case solutionFull description
negotiations, solutions, case study, national hockey league
caseFull description
Netscape valuation case solution
Bus decisionFull description
The solution of the Ikea Strategy Case studyFull description
Case on Starbucks
-
3.1-3.5
Operations in Service Industry, FitzsimmonsDescripción completa
Solution for BDVS case
Why did BDVS avoid negotiating with APG headquarters? he adquarters? From the case we understand that BDVS has a strong customer base(bench staff) and a good distributor system. They were positioned along the lines of quality and the customer came to BDVS for quality and not the price.APG was formed in the lines of bringing down the hospital’s cost by 3 -12% on the supply items. BDVS knew that their margin will be less if they were to take orders from the APG HQ.Even though there was a nationwide nationwide Purchasing agreements in vogue, APG didn’t restrict the individual member hospitals from procuring directly from the supplier of their choice. Hence BDVS did not se e APG as a barrier.Moreover it could also be inferre d that the Private label program was a gainst the BDVS as a brand.all these factors could have resulted in BDVS not negotiating with APG HQ. April 1985- July 1985 : How did the t he negotiations go? BDVS understood that there was a dire need to negotiate with APG as the central purchasing oragnisation has increased its strength with the member hospitals. The negotiations seemed to head no where.The situation seemed te nsed. Meeting 1 : APG side was ill prepared for the meeting.They put in wrong facts(Ex : 90 % of BDVS business was at stake) Meeting 2 : There was a marked progress in the manner APG was dealing, they went into specifics(Ex : price of every item purchased by every mem ber from every supplier) Meeting 3 : APG side was well prepared during this meeting.(Ex : They had bought in the est imates of prices in BDVS product category ) Meeting 4 : In here, APG pointed out rightly that the price at which BDVS was willing to supply was much higher than that of the competitors . They also wanted to find out if they could lower the prices. th
Aug 5 -How did the meeting go? Kozy and smith prposed a contact with prices prices approximately 20 % higher than the competitors.The proposal required delivery within 90 days and 95% of member hospitals purchases of venous blood collection tubes
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
