Sociological and Anthropological Perspectives
Specific Objectives To define sociological perspective and understand the sociological imagination To distinguish the various types of sociological perspectives To define anthropological perspective To illustrate how these perspectives explain the nature of man, its culture, and its development in the society
The Sociological Perspective Sociology is broadly defined as the scientific study of social interaction/behavior and social organization. As an academic discipline, it helps in general enlightenment of social behavior and society, challenges popular myths (such as women as the weaker sex) and identifies social problems & designs solutions Sociology can be further divided into two subcategories. One is Microsociology which is the detailed study of what people say, do, and think moment by moment as they go about their daily lives. Second is Macrosociology which focuses upon large-scale and long-term social processes of organizations, institutions, and broad social patterns.
New Levels of Reality The Sociological Perspective is a distinctive point of view at the core of the discipline of Sociology that encourages people to examine aspects of the social environment in ways that delve beneath the surface. The Sociological perspective aims to examine human behavior not in isolation but in placing it in the larger social context. In a sense, by looking beyond the outer appearances of the social world, people likewise
encounter new levels of reality often ignored. Utilizing such view, this is like seeing the general in the particular which helps us recognize the general patterns in the behavior of particular people. Another view is seeing the strange in the particular wherein people come to experience the variations that exist in society such as deviance and others. This is also helpful in seeing individuality in social context, such as social forces are at work in society to influence most personal actions. The benefits of sociological perspectives are that through sociological perspective, it helps people critically assess commonsense ideas as applicable in their daily lives. It also reveals the opportunities and constraints in people’s lives and in the process empowers for active participants in society by identifying social forces and understanding their consequences. More importantly it facilitates a critical assessment of people’s ways of life especially in globally integrated village. In sum, the sociological view allows a wholistic view of the underlying forces or factors that mold the operation and dynamics of society. By using social perspective, it facilitates knowledge of the different facets and dynamics of society and social life, as well as in influence the policy makers craft decisions pertaining to pressing social behaviors issues. There are two underlying goals of sociological perspectives. One is to identify the prevailing patterns and influences on social behavior. Second is to provide the explanation for such patterns. The essence of the sociological imagination is the ability to see private experiences and personal difficulties as entwined with the structural arrangements of society and the prevailing time.
The Development of Sociology Auguste Comte: The Founder of Sociology Auguste Comte is commonly credited as being the founder of sociology. He coined the term sociology. He emphasized that the study of society must be scientific,
and he urged sociologists to employ systematic observation, experimentation, and comparative historical analysis as their methods. He divided the study of society into social statics and social dynamics. He saw Sociology as the product of a three-stage historical development: a) Theological stage (religious: responding to the supernatural); b) Metaphysical stage (natural rather than supernatural); Scientific stage (explicable science). Comte favored positivism – which is a way of understanding that is based on science
Harriet Martineau: Feminist and Methodologist Harriet Martineau wrote the first book on social research methods and was among the first to do systematic, scientifically based, social research. Her comparative analysis of slavery and the position of women in the Western world paved the way for feminist scholarship and the further pursuit of gender equality. Herbert Spencer and Social Darwinism. Herbert Spencer depicted society as a system, a whole made up of interrelated parts. He also set forth an evolutionary theory of historical development. Social Darwinism is Spencer's application of evolutionary notions and the concept of survival of the fittest to the social world. It also maintains that inequality is a social reality which is desirable. Equality in fact would only upset the societies. Karl Marx: The Role of Class Conflict. Karl Marx focused his search for the basic principles of history on the economic environments in which societies develop. He believed that society is divided into those who own the means of producing wealth and those who do not, giving rise to class conflict. Dialectical materialism is Marx's theory that development depends on the clash of contradictions and the creation of new, more advanced structures out of these clashes.
He espoused the idea that a perfect society is where everyone is equal and where the working class has prevailed over the elite ruling class. Émile Durkheim: Social Integration and Social Facts. Émile Durkheim was especially concerned with social solidarity, distinguishing between mechanical and organic solidarity. He contended that the distinctive subject matter of sociology should be the study of social facts.
Max Weber: Subjectivity and Social Organization Max Weber said that a critical aspect of the sociological enterprise is the study of the intentions, values, beliefs, and attitudes that underlie people's behavior. He used the word Verstehen in describing his approach and contributed his notions of the ideal type and a value-free sociology. He is also important in his idea of the bureaucracy in governments. American Sociology In the United States, sociology and the modern university system arose together. The first department of sociology was established at the University of Chicago in 1893, and Chicago served as a "social laboratory" at the beginning of the century. Midcentury sociologists crafted survey techniques and refined models of society. "New breed" sociologists in the 1960s and 1970s refined Marxism and established new research approaches and perspectives. Contemporary Sociology
Contemporary movements in sociology include critical theory, feminism, and postmodern social theory. Theoretical Perspectives Contemporary sociologists acknowledge three general theoretical perspectives, or ways of looking at how various social phenomena are related to one another. These are the functionalist, the conflict, and the symbolic interactionist perspectives.
The Functionalist Perspective. The structural-functional-or, more simply, functionalist-perspective sees society as a system. Functionalists identify the structural characteristics and functions and dysfunctions of institutions, and distinguish between manifest functions and latent functions. Functionalists also typically assume that most members of a society share a consensus regarding their core beliefs and values. This is a framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. It emphasizes the importance of: a) Social Structure (any relatively stable pattern of social behavior); b) Social Functions (the consequences of any social pattern for the operation of society as a whole). However, its vision of society as stable and orderly ignores the inequalities of social class, race, ethnicity and gender that generate tension and conflict. The above led to the development of the Social-Conflict approach which sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change. The Conflict
Perspective
It is a framework for building theory that sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change. This perspective helps sociologists to investigate how factors such as race, gender, ethnicity, class and age are linked to unequal distribution of money, power, education and social prestige. Sociologists who espouse this perspective are W. E. B. Du Bois, and Karl Marx. It is applied in the analysis of ongoing conflicts between dominant and disadvantaged categories of people: rich and poor, men and women, employers and employees. The conflict approach draws much of its inspiration from the work of Karl Marx and argues that the structure of society and the nature of social relationships are the result of past and ongoing conflicts. For Marx, class conflict has been the raging conflict since the start of civilization. His dream was to eradicate class and create a classless society. Nonetheless, some critique this perspective in the sense that it ignores the influence of shared values and interdependence in promoting unity. Also it is argued that it lacks scientific objectivity and it takes society in broad strokes while losing sight of the individual. Nonetheless, this perspective is rather influential since it could not be denied that conflict is an ever present reality, no organization or society exist without it.
The Symbolic- Interaction Perspective Symbolic interactionists contend that society is possible because human beings have the ability to communicate with one another by means of symbols. They say that we act toward people, objects, and events on the basis of the meanings we impart to them. Consequently, people experience the world as constructed reality. It can be said that this perspective is on Micro-level orientation. It is a framework for building theory that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals.
Its Basic Assumptions are that: a) Human beings live in a world of symbols and attach meaning to virtually everything; b) Reality is how people define their surroundings, their duties towards others, and even their own identities. However, by concentrating on the individual, it loses sight of the influence of culture and social factors (class, gender, race etc). As symbols are important part of non-verbal human communication, it often includes gestures, postures, facial expressions, and others. Some examples of the symbols are described below. Symbols
Meaning Conveyed
Clenched Fist
Defiance
Salute
Respect
Moving Head Sideward
Rejection or No
L sign using Fingers
Loser or Laban Sign
This perspective assumes that gradual change in social norm is due to acceptance of new symbols. Symbols change as time change. Meanings that are often associated to symbols evolve depending on time and prevailing social norms. For example while wearing pink is always associated with being effeminate for example, there is now the other view that real men should not be afraid to wear pink, that in fact it is acceptable for men to explore fashion options/accessories/designs previously considered as exclusive province of women and not lose their being macho . In a sense, there is a redefinition of some symbols when people begin questioning long held beliefs.
Anthropological Perspectives Anthropology is a study that deals with the origin of man and society. Its theories range from traditional, modern to post-modern and as a discipline many of its concepts are borrowed from biology, psychology, sociology, economics, ecology and others. Over time, the discipline covers several million years, from the first proto-human ancestors to the
present. Likewise, as a study it covers the widest range of societies, from small huntergatherer bands to modern societies.
Biological Theory of Evolution Charles Darwin shattered the long held belief of the creation of man as depicted in the bible. His Theory of Evolution advances the idea that the existence of man, and for that matter any specie, undergoes a process of natural evolution. Unlike the account in the Genesis wherein man actually is taken from the image and likeness of God, Darwin believed that man actually is genetically related to the apes and monkeys. Natural selection is nothing short of nature playing lottery, in which species in order to survive must adapt to the changes of the environment otherwise perish. His theory posits the idea that the world is a harsh environment wherein the weak loses and the strongest and the fittest survives. Gregor Mendel, a monk, supported this theory with his own theory on heredity from his own observation and propagation of plants and flowers. He discovered that traits are passed by the parent plants to their offspring—and such traits manifest depending whether the gene traits are dominant or recessive. With the advancement of science, the discovery of genes further supports this theory. This is explained for instance why some are diabetic mainly because their parents have been diabetic as well, even if they do not like sweets that much. Some people are predisposed to certain sickness mainly because that sickness runs within the family. The Theory of Social Evolution On this theory, evolution is not limited to species. This theory advances the idea that evolution also happens in societies. Like all species, change occurs in societies from one period of time to another which transforms the original culture. To this end Montesquieu said that societies normally undergo three stages of prevailing culture: 1)
hunting or savagery, 2) barbarism, 3) civilization. He also asserted that all societies undergo the same stages. Edward Tylor likewise supported this idea. He said that some traces of ancient cultural existence manifest even until the present time. There is for him a process of cultural evolution, wherein societies evolved from the simple to the complex. He also noted similarities among societies that led them find the same solutions independently. Cultural diffusion, on the other hand, is where one culture borrows from one another as a result of the contact between the two. Technology, for Lewis Morgan, is the root cause of the progressive evolution. With the invention and advancement of technology, it also spelt and continuously to do so, the change in culture. For example, while fifteen years ago cellphones were considered a luxury, such view is no longer valid as many would consider such gadget of communication a necessity. In fact, if a person does not know how to operate such gadget (or even the computer or the internet) he is considered as someone who is technologically Jurassic in orientation. The same could be said in terms of the effects brought about by fire, wheel, printing press, powder, and lately internet. As a theory, however, it has fallen from favor for the 20th century. Mostly, the critique against the theory is that it fails to explain why human society is not in uniform, and that it lacks the ethnographic data as evidence. Theory of Diffusionism and Acculturation Diffusion is the process by which cultural traits are transferred to another culture through interaction. Such interaction is possible through trade, war, migration, and others. In other words, this is a spreading of culture from the center to the peripheries. Nonetheless, culture exchange is never a one way street. When one culture borrows, it is but normal that it also lends some of its cultural traits to another culture. This theory advances the idea that there were limited/few cultural centers-- it could just even be one
culture,--from which cultural traits diffused. Thus, unlike social evolutionism which thinks that people innovate independently from one another, the theory of diffusion was more common and logical explanation for cultural change and spread. This is so since originality is rare, rather copying is the norm. Franz Boas, while not discounting the possibility of innovation, considered innovation more as a result of diffusion after all culture is mostly of foreign origin that are adopted to the cultural context of the community. This he referred to as diffusion and modification. Acculturation, on the other hand, is brought about by a dominant culture, which results to an increased similarity between two cultures. This is type of change of culture is often reciprocal and asymmetrical. This results to the absorption of the other culture. Diffusion and acculturation are interrelated. The difference lies that in diffusion it involves elements of the culture while for acculturation involves the whole culture. Historicism This theory believes that there is no universal meaning of culture. Rather, culture must be interpreted according to its unique and particular context and perspective. Several views likewise are embedded in historicism. One is that culture is superoganic which means that culture is separate with the individual, and that separate methodology is required in understanding a particular culture. Second is the view that culture is relative. It means that each culture is distinct, thus, it must not be judged using the criteria of another culture. For this view, it holds that culture has to be interpreted using the view of the original culture in order to fully grasp the importance and beauty of the practices in a particular culture. Third is the view is closely associated with individual personality. Culture is like an individual that possesses its own quirks, with more or less consistent patterns of thoughts and behavior. Such culture is but reflection of the emotional and characteristics of the individuals that make up the community. As such, culture is the ultimate expression of the personality of a particular society ala societal psychological average.
Functionalism Similar with the discussion on sociological functionalism, adherents to this view think that society is like a living society composed of several parts and organs. Members of the society are the different cogs that make up the entirety of the society, each with its own purpose and function. There are two existing views of functionalism. The first is bio-cultural or psychological functionalism. An individual has needs which the societal institutions addresses, such as in the aspects of education, economics, social control, and political organizations. Absent these instituted societal devices, an individual would be lost as to how to properly address his needs. The second view is the structuralist-functionalist which focuses more on social structure. Society is conceived as a system of relationships maintaining itself through cybernetic feedback, while institutions are orderly sets of relationships whose function is to maintain the society as a system. Individuals are dispensable in this view since they are merely treated as occupants of social roles. Social phenomena have to be constructed on a macro or social level. Cultural Materialism For this theory, production and reproduction dominate and determine the sectors of culture. Organizational aspects that exist in society are for the benefits of enhancing the productive capabilities of the society, lest they would not exist. Thus, law, government, and kinship are mere social constructs that serve the purpose of production. Social construct means that people agree that these organizational aspects, norms, and practices should exist for it serves the purpose of creating things which are desired by the society. While this view liberally borrows from the Marxist perspective of production as the material base of society, this view is devoid of class conflict. For this view, cultural materialism exists as only one feature of the society. Cognitive Anthropology
Cognitive anthropology regards culture of cognitive organization expressed through material phenomena. Hence, unlike cultural materialism, this view looks more on the relationship between human thought and human culture. Cognitive anthropologists study on how people understand and organize the material objects, events, and experiences the people they study perceive their world. Its chief aim is to present the logical system of thought of other people, according to criteria which can be discovered and replicated. Such logical rules exist on the ideas that exist on the minds. As such, the emphasis is on the rules, not the behavior. While it cannot predict human behavior, it delineates behavior deemed as acceptable and not acceptable per rules of the society in a given time and situation. It hopes that by understanding a particular culture through a sound theoretical explanation, it could create a cross-cultural comparison which could become a general theory of all culture. Structuralism This view is based on Claude Lévi-Strauss' view that people think about the world in terms of binary opposites, for example thin and fat, black and white, sunrise and sunset, birth and death, and that every culture can be understood in terms of these opposites. It proposed that there are hidden realities beneath all cultural expression. Structuralisms hope to understand the underlying meaning involved in all human though as expressed in cultural acts. Also, this view emphasizes that elements of culture must be understood in terms of their relationship to the entire system. Symbolic and Interpretative Technology This theory views culture as a symbolic system that arises primarily from human interpretations of the world. Such interpretations form a shared cultural system of meaning. It studies symbols and the processes by which human assign meaning to these symbols to address questions pertaining to human existence and social life. It views
culture as independent system of meaning which people deciphers through symbols and other rituals.
Notes to Remember Sociology - scientific study of social interaction/behavior and social organization Auguste Comte -the founder of sociology Karl Marx- Believed that class conflict exists in society The structural-functional perspective- sees society as a system The
Conflict Perspective- sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and
change Symbolic-Interaction Perspective-society is possible because human beings have the ability to communicate with one another by means of symbols Anthropology- is a study that deals with the origin of man and society Biological Theory of Evolution- believes that species undergoes the process of natural selection and that for species to survive they must adapt to the environmental changes Theory of Social Evolution- Like all species, change occurs in societies from one period of time to another which transforms the original culture Diffusion - process by which cultural traits are transferred to another culture through interaction Acculturation- wherein a dominant culture influences another culture, which results to an increased similarity between the two cultures Historicism- Believes that there is no universal meaning of culture. Rather, culture must be interpreted according to its unique and particular context and perspective Functionalism –this view think that society is like a living society composed of several parts and organs Cognitive anthropology- regards culture of cognitive organization expressed through material phenomena Structuralism- view that people think about the world in terms of binary opposites
