shdp foundation course application project plan

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES SCHOOL HEADS’ DEVELOPME! PRO"RAM# $O%DA!&OAL CO%RSE

Sc hoolHe ad’ sAppl i c at i onPr oj e ctI mpl e me me nt a t i onPa pe r TheSc hool Head’ sAppl i c at i onPr oj ec ti sar equi r ementf oraCer t i fi c at eofCompl et i oni n t h eFo un da t i o na lCo ur s eoft h eSc h oo lHe ad sDe v e l o pme ntPr o gr a m. m. The Pr oj ect r equi r es t he par t i ci pant t oi dent i f y a speci fic ar ea of school oper at i ons t hatr equi r ei mpr oveme mentand t hatwi l ldel i vert he besti mpacton schoolmeasur esi nt hr ee ( 3)t o si x( 6)mo mont hs.The choi ce ofpr oj ectwi l lbe der i ved f r om t het hr ee pr i or i t yconcer nshe/ shei dent i fied i nt heConceptNot e he / s hes ubmi t t e da tt hes t a r toft heFounda t i ona lCour s e.Pr oj e ctRe sul t swi l lbe pr ese nt ed by t he school head at a col l oqui um of Foundat i onal Cour se par t i ci pant s. Thi sI mpl ement at i onPapergui dest hesc hool headonpl anni ngf orhi s / herfi nal c hoi c e ofpr oj ec t .I tmus tbec ompl e t edands ubmi t t edbyt heendofModul e3. A.Pr oj ectCont ext

NEAP PROGRAM School Heads De'elopment Pro(ram ) $oundational Course Name of School Head RODER&C* D+ DE LEO Region Di!i"ion Di"#$ic# CR, SDO)VALE-%ELA, EAS! D&S!R&C! Name of School A!O&O M+ SERAP&O ELEME!AR. SCHOOL %e& change" in m& "chool inet/ percent 01234 of the learners in "rade 5 a" a $e"'l# of #hi" ($o)ec# cate(ori6ed as $rustration Le'el 7ith &DLE Status based on the comparati'e results of Phil)&R& Pretest What key changes do you want to see in your school as and Posttest 7ill demonstrateimproved demonstrate improved readin( readin( a result of your having abilit/ b/ at least one le'el hi(her at the end of attended the SHDP March 829:+ Foundational Course? What are your specic, veriale One)hundred percent 092234 of the learners in indicators of these changes? "rade 5 cate(ori6ed as $rustration Le'el 7ith &MROVEME! based on the comparati'e results of




Phil)&R& Pretest and Posttest 7ill demonstratesustained demonstratesustained readin( readin( abilit/ at the end of March 829:+

Ta$ge# Com(e#enc& &nstructional Leadership Im($o!emen# &nstructional &nstructional Leadership is the mana(ement of the school’s processes of producin( and What school head pro'idin( appropriate 0e;ecti'e and ecellent school’s a'ailable resources 0personnel, time, space and materials4 in enhancin( pupils’ learnin( outcome+ !hrou(h !hrou(h this pro?ect, pro?ect, & am prett/ prett/ sure that m/ @no7led(e in curriculum curriculum and instructions, sta; de'elopment, curriculum curriculum content and peda(o(ies, teachin( strate(ies, inno'ations 0in readin(4 and pro(rams and pro?ects 7ould be de'eloped+ School Mana(ement and Operation Li@e7ise, in doin( the pro?ect & could also be enhancin( m/ s@ills in school operations and mana(ement, so called mana(ement s/stem+ !his entails a sound and pro'en frame7or@ for mana(in( and impro'in( or(ani6ation’s policies and processes+ &t encompasses information sharin( 0'ision sharin(4, benchmar@in(, and team 7or@in( 0s/stems thin@in(4 to =ualit/, access and (ood (o'ernance in achie'in( the school’s (oals+ !hrou(h !hrou(h the implementation implementation of mana(ement s/stem, the school 7ould lead to# ris@s mana(ement and miti(ation e;ecti'e school’s operations, reduced costs, increased customers’ satisfaction, satisfaction, achie'ed continuous impro'ement, protected brand and reputation, e>cellent inno'ation, e;ecti'e teachin( learnin( processes and (ood relationship 7ith the sta@eholders+




Creatin( A Student Centered Learnin( Climate !hrou(h !hrou(h the combined e;orts of the sta@eholders  internal and e>ternal, all to(ether 7e could deBnitel/ promote a child)friendl/, child)friendl/, (ender sensiti'e, safe and moti'atin( en'ironment+ !he pro?ect 7ould lead us to craft an inter'ention focusin( on the pupils 7ith di
De"c$i*e c'$$en# "i#'a#ion +($o*lem o$ o((o$#'ni#&, in &o'$ "chool #ha# &o' !7o !7o hundred hundred t7ent/ nine 08814 out of 92 92 "rade 5 need #o add$e"" #h$o'gh learners identiBed under $rustration Le'el in the &o'$ ($o)ec#Phil)&R& pretest this school /ear 829)829: are the respondents of the pro?ect+

Ti#le of A((lica#ion P$o)ec#

OOARD

O'erpo7erin( di
!o !o increase increase the readin( readin( le'el of the identiBed "rade "rade 5 under frustration le'el 7ith &DLE status b/ at least 123 at the end of March 829:+ !o !o sustain the the readin( le'el of all 092234 092234 identiBed "rade 5 under frustration le'el 7ith &MPROVEME! at the end of March 829:+

S#a$# da#e

Fanuar/ 829:  March 829: 829:

Leng#h of ($o)ec#

5 months




E6(ec#ed O'#('#"

At least 123 of the learners in "rade 5 cate(ori6ed in the $rustration Le'el 7ith &DLE Status based on the comparati'e results of Phil)&R& Pretest and Posttest 7ill demonstrate impro'ement in readin( abilit/ at the end of Pro?ect Pro?ect &mplementation+ One)hundred percent 092234 of the learners in "rade 5 cate(ori6ed in the $rustration Le'el 7ith &MROVEME! based on the comparati'e results of Phil)&R& Pretest and Posttest 7ill demonstrate sustainable readin( abilit/ at the end of the Pro?ect &mplementation

.ene4cia$&1ie"

"rade 5 Learners cate(ori6ed in the $rustration le'el based on Phil)&R& Pretest+

Iden#if& S'cce"" 'his pro#ect will e a success when the following Indica#o$" o$ mea"'$e" of indicators have een achieved and veried through "'cce"" uniased !eans( Result of the parallel Phil)&R& posttest Result of Oral Readin( !est conducted b/ the District Super'isor Result of the Oral Readin( !est conducted b/ the Master !eacher monthl/ • •

•

B.Act i onSt epsI dent i f ysi gni fi cantMi l es t onet ar get st hatc oul dbeac hi ev edbyt heendof30da y s ande v er y30da y st her eaf t er .Mi l es t onesar e( a)s i gni fi c antc hangesac hi e v ed; and/ or ,( b)maj ors t epst ak ent owar dsac hi e vi ngt hedes i r edi mpr o v ementi ny our school




Ta$ge# Mile"#one

Mile"#one 72 Da#a Collec#ion

Ac#ion"

Re"(on"i *le Pe$"on Who will do this step?

S'((o$# Needed f$om2

Ta$ge# Da#e When will this step e acco! plished ?

Ac#ion S#e( 7 Admini"#$a#ion of Phil3IRI Po"##e"# Action Step 8 Comparati'e Anal/sis of the Phil)&R& Pretest and Posttest

!eachers SP! M! School Head

Di'ision EPS in Fanuar/ En(lish, 5), Di'ision M 829: G E !eam

Action Step 5 &dentif/ the learners 7ith &DLE status and 7ith &MPROVEME!

Mile"#one 82 Planning fo$ #he S'"#aina*ili#& In#e$!en#ion"

Action Step 9

SP!

Con'ene the SP! to craft enhanced and sustainable readin( inter'entions

M!

Action Step 8

SH "rade 5 !eachers !eachers

(/ Fanuar/ Council, 91)95 Committe e Chairman of Education EPS in




Ta$ge# Mile"#one

Ac#ion"




Meet the "rade 5 !eachers !eachers to discuss discuss the crafted readin( inter'entions and the schedule for the e;ecti'e implementation of the Pro?ect

Action Step 5 Capacitate the "rade 5 !eachers !eachers about about the Readin( &nter'entions includin( Conte>tuali6ation Conte>tuali6ation and e
Parents

En(lish Di'ision LRMDS $ocal Person

Action Step  Conte>tuali6e Readin( Materials durin( LAC Session

Mile"#one 92 P$o)ec# Im(lemen#a#ion

Action Step 9

SP!

Orientation 7ith the parents of the sub?ect of the pro?ect

M! SH

(/ Council, Committe e Chairman

Fanuar/ 9 to March




Ta$ge# Mile"#one

Ac#ion"




&mplement the Readin( Readin( &nter'entions usin( the conte>tuali6ed materials and do7nloaded readin( materials from LRMDS of Education Action Step 8 Pro'ide incenti'e throu(h feedin( to dri'e the respondents attend re(ularl/ in the pro(ram

"rade 5 !eachers !eachers

EPS in En(lish Di'ision LRMDS $ocal Person

Action Step 5 Monitor and Super'ise the pro?ect re(ularl/

Mile"#one :2 On3 *oa$ding and Chec;ing

Pro'ide sustainable readin( materials and electronic readin( clips to address the learnin( st/les of the respondents Conduct monthl/ oral readin( tests to chec@ pro(ress

SP! M! SH "rade 5 !eachers !eachers

(/ Fanuar/ Council, to Committe March e 829: Chairman of Education EPS in En(lish Di'ision LRMDS




Ta$ge# Mile"#one

Ac#ion"




$ocal Person

C. Requi r edResour ces Pr o vi deSpec i fi cDet ai l soft heph y si c al andhumanr es our c esr equi r edt o s uc ces sf ul l yi mpl ementy ourAppl i c at i onPr oj ec t .

Mi Mile"#one

Re"o'$ce" Needed

.'dge#

A(($o!al" needed

Milestone 9# Data Collection

Reproduction of Phil) 5222 &R& Posttest

MOOE

Milestone 8# Plannin( for the Sustainabilit/ &nter'entions

Snac@s for the "rade 9222 5 teachers and SP! durin( meetin(

Canteen $und

222

Canteen $und

9222

Canteen $und

98222

MOOE

Snac@s for the LAC session and 7riteshop $eedin(

Milestone 5# Pro?ect Pro?ect Reproduction of &mplementation conte>tuali6ed readin( materials and do7nloaded RMs from LRMDS




A.Ri skManagem me entPl an Al l pr oj ec t sar eex pos edt or i s k .Ri s k sar eunpr edi c t abl eev ent st hatmi ghtor mi g htno thappen,a ndendang ert heac hi e v ementofy o urpr oj ec tobj ec t i v e s .You s houl dt her ef or ek nowwhatr i s k st opr i or i t i z eandwhatt odowhent her i s k happens.

Mi Mile"#one

Li;el& Ri";

Im(ac# on S(eci4c P$o)ec# if Ac#ion #o Ri"; Ha((en" P$e!en# Ri";

Milestone 9# Absentees Data Collection A'ailabilit/ of assessment !ool

Poor identiBcation of learners’ readin( le'el throu(h Validit/ and reliabilit/ of the comparati'e results of the testIresult Pretest and Posttest

Milestone 8# Schedule of Plannin( for the "rade 5 Sustainabilit/ !eachers !eachers and &nter'entions SP!

Poor Crafted Readin( &nter'ention

Milestone 5# Reproduction of Lo7 Pro?ect conte>tuali6ed Performance &mplementation readin( materials and do7nloaded RMs from

Mile"#one :2 A'ailabilit/ of On3*oa$ding Readin( and Chec;ing Assessment

If Ri"; Ha((en" S(eci4c Ac#ion #o Sof#en Im(ac# of Ri";

Orientation 7ith Home Visit the parents Constant information dissemination

!ime Bttin(

Re7ards Re7ards and Reco(nition

Pro'ision of &n'ol'ement of additional respondents’ locali6ed parents readin( materials such as articles in roadsheets and Ma(a6ines

&nconsistent &nconsistent and Crafted 'alid &ne
Adopted Oral Readin( Assessment from the




implementation department of the pro(ram

E.APPROVALS:

P$in#ed Name Prepared b/

Appro'ed b/

RODER&C* D+ DE LEO Principal & MEL&!O P+ -%RAO O&C  SDS

Signa#'$e

Da#e December 9:, 829

shdp foundation course application project plan

Recommend Documents