Home
Add Document
Sign In
Register
Salamera vs. Sandiganbayan
Home
Salamera vs. Sandiganbayan
digestFull description...
Author:
Atiya Crisostomo Punongbayan Akmad
20 downloads
302 Views
19KB Size
Report
DOWNLOAD .PDF
Recommend Documents
Socrates vs. Sandiganbayan
Criminal LAwFull description
30. Braza vs Sandiganbayan
gdFull description
jaylo vs. sandiganbayan
civil action
1. Chavez vs Sandiganbayan
Full text
Domondon vs Sandiganbayan Digest
Criminal ProcedureFull description
Soriano vs Sandiganbayan
graft caseFull description
Tanchanco vs. Sandiganbayan
Criminal Law - Criminal ImmunityFull description
Lecaroz vs. Sandiganbayan (Digest)
Full description
Jaylo vs Sandiganbayan
Jaylo vs SandiganbayanFull description
galman vs sandiganbayan
Full description
Galman vs Sandiganbayan
Galman vs Sandiganbayan case digest consti2
Miguel vs Sandiganbayan-REM
case
Tabuena vs. Sandiganbayan (Digest)
Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan
n/aFull description
Kimpo vs Sandiganbayan
CONFESSION TO A PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL (CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION)
Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan
mFull description
Daan vs. Sandiganbayan
case digestFull description
Regala vs. Sandiganbayan Digest
A short comprehensive digest of a case on ethicsFull description
Galman vs Sandiganbayan
Consti Law 2Full description
105-Sarigumba vs Sandiganbayan
CrimProFull description
Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan
Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan case digestFull description
Republic vs Sandiganbayan Case Digest
Human Rights, Constitutional Law
Enrile vs Sandiganbayan Case Digest
Case Digest
Santiago vs Sandiganbayan Case Digest
Public Offcr & AdminFull description
TITLE: Salamera vs. Sandiganbayan
303 SCRA 217, G.R. No. 121099 February 17, 1999 FACTS: The Sandiganbayan conviced !ayor Fide" Sa"a#era o$ Ca%iguran Aurora $or he cri#e o$ !a"ver%aion o$ &ub"ic &ro'ery. Thi% Thi% (a% abou he S#ih ) *e%%on *e%%on revo"ver gun ha (a% #orgaged o hi# by barangay chair#an Anonio +enavide. The %aid gun (a% o(ned and "icen%ed o &onciano +enavide. *hen he o(ner de#anded he reurn o$ hi% gun he "aer canno 'roduce he ie# becau%e i (a% con$i%caed by he 'o"ice during he chec-'oin (hen !ayor Sa"a#era and hi% %ecuriy (en o !ani"a. &onciano +enavide $i"ed a co#'"ain co #'"ain $or he$ again% he #ayor be$ore he Sandiganbayan. Sandiganba yan. The %aid gun, ha% no %aed va"ue. The cour $ind% he nece%%iy o$ a udicia" Noice o e%i#ae i% va"ue. ISSUE: *heher or no %uch /udicia" noice i% a %u$$icien evidence o a%%u#e he va"ue o$ he gun (hich i% he %ub/ec o$ he #a"ver%aion accu%aion. HELD: The cour can no a-e /udicia" noice o$ a di%'ued $ac. The cour #ay a-e /udicia" noice o$ #aer% o$ 'ub"ic -no("edge, or (hich are ca'ab"e o$ unue%ionab"e unu e%ionab"e de#on%raion, or ough o be -no(n o /udge% becau%e o$ heir /udicia" $uncion%. her(i%e, he cour #u% receive evidence o$ di%'ued $ac% (ih noice o he 'arie%. Thi% i% an innovaion inroduced in he Revi%ed Ru"e% o$ vidence he Su're#e Cour ado'ed on u"y 1, 199, (hich %hou"d no be un-no(n o he "o(er cour%. The ne( ru"e o$ evidence govern% hi% ca%e, %ince i (a% decided in 1994, %i5 year% a$er i% e$$eciviy.
×
Report "Salamera vs. Sandiganbayan"
Your name
Email
Reason
-Select Reason-
Pornographic
Defamatory
Illegal/Unlawful
Spam
Other Terms Of Service Violation
File a copyright complaint
Description
×
Sign In
Email
Password
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Our partners will collect data and use cookies for ad personalization and measurement.
Learn how we and our ad partner Google, collect and use data
.
Agree & close