HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
1
Transportat ion of Employees (Bus / pickup / truck)
R / N
Noncompliance to or violation of Qatar Traffic Law.
D
Damaged or slippery stairs
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Penalty
Physical injuries
L
B
Legal requirements are being complied. Drivers are licensed, trained and have the functional capability to operate the vehicle.
-
Maintenance and inspection is being done regularly.
-
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Additional controls required
Ensure continuous compliance High
1
Page
1 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Visitors
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
1
2
1
2
Remarks
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-25
Low
First aid kit is provided in the vehicle. Condition of Vehicle (Noise, Vibration, Dust and Heat)
D
Crowd during embarking and disembarking
D
Health issues
Physical injuries
B
B
Maintenance and inspection is being done regularly.
-
Queue is maintained embarking disembarking.
-
being during &
1
1
2
1
2
Low
1
1
2
1
2
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-26
-
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
3
3
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Page
2 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Visitors
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
First aid kit is provided in the vehicle. Unsafe driving
2
Transportat ion of material
R / N
D
Noncompliance to or violation of Qatar Traffic Law.
D
Condition of Vehicle (Noise, Vibration, Dust and Heat)
D
Fatalities, Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Penalty
L
Health issues
Competent driver been assigned.
has
-
2
1
18 Mediu m
Traffic rules & regulations are being complied
B
Legal requirements are being complied. Drivers are licensed, trained and have the functional capability to operate the vehicle.
-
Maintenance and inspection of vehicles are being done regularly
-
Provide defensive driving training
Ensure continuous compliance High
1
2
2
1
4
Low
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-13 Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-26
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
3
Material handling (Manual) by workers
R / N
Loading / unloading material
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Property damage, Physical injuries, Fatalities Physical injuries, property damage
B
Competent driver been assigned.
has
-
2
1
3
3
Significance
2
18 Mediu m
Traffic rules & regulations are being complied If possible Trolleys or wheelbarrows are being used. For heavy loads lifting equipment is being used to load / unload materials from vehicle. When lifting a load along with another person(s), communication with the other person(s) is maintained before lowering the load.
-
1
Page
3 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sub-Contractors
ME- 4894
Severity (1 to 5)
D
Job No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Unsafe driving
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
2
3
1
6
Low
Additional controls required
Remarks
Provide defensive driving training
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-02
For lifting heavy loads assistance is taken. Do not twist your body while carrying a heavy Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Adequacy of existing control measures
Personnel at risk
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Severity (1 to 5)
Spread (1 to 5)
B
Required PPE is utilized.
-
1
1
3
1
3
Slips & falls due to imbalance
D
Physical injuries.
B
Based on requirement additional personnel are utilized for manual handling. Walkways and Passageways are kept clear.
-
1
1
2
1
2
Gaps, if any
Others
Physical injuries.
Existing Control
Visitors
D
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Sub-Contractors
Sharp edges of material.
Hazards
Page
4 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Significance
Job No.
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
load Appropriate PPE is being used
4
Lifting (Material Handling Mechanical )
R / N
Incorrect information on permit/clearan ce
D /I
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Ground conditions
D /I
Property damage,
B
-
Low
Low
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18 Mediu m
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
Work Permit system shall be followed.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-10
Attention shall be paid on
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Spread (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Page
5 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Physical injuries.
Remarks
Additional controls required
uneven terrain structure. Hold pre-job meeting
safety
Work Permit system shall be followed.. Site safety followed Defective lifting equipment
D /I
Property damage, Physical injuries.
B
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
rules
are
Work Permit system shall be followed. Ensure lifting equipment (appliances and accessories) has valid certification. Ensure that lifting accessories are correctly colour coded Inspect equipment prior to use Ensure equipment regularly maintained
is
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Page
6 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Only approved lifting equipment is being used. Improper lifting
D /I
Physical injuries, property damage
B
Certified operators are operating equipment Banks man provided.
is
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Work Permit system shall be followed.
being
Lifting plan is prepared and followed prior to lifting of equipment / objects. Surrounding area is being barricaded wherever lifting activity is going to be done.
Mediu m
Supervisor shall ensure that maintenance of lifting equipment / lifting gears is being done regularly. Check for the environmental conditions prior to lift. Keep all emergency sources ready Follow manufacturer’s instruction.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
Incorrect information on permit/clearan ce
D /I
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
Page
7 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
2
3
2
Significance
Others
Gaps, if any
Visitors
Existing Control
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Adequacy of existing control measures
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Job No.
Spread (1 to 5)
N
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
Working in Confined space
Hazards
Rev Date
00 (Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Activity
Rev No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
5
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
12
Additional controls required
Work permit system shall be followed.
Mediu m
Have a clear understanding of work to be performed and location
Remarks
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-08
Use all the emergency equipment’s mentioned in the work permit. Maintain entry / exit log. Lack of Communicatio n
D /I
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Work permit system shall be followed. Plan the work involving personnel responsible for preparation (isolation, depressurization, draining, venting, flushing, purging, gas testing etc.) of confined space. Place a Standby Person
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
8 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
near to confined space to maintain contact with the entrant and record entry / exit. Effective means of communication shall be established and maintained between personnel in the confined space and the standby man. Communication shall be visual, voice or a signal line. Keep emergency sources ready Train all the personnel involved in confined Space. Flammable & or Toxic Atmosphere
D /I
Health issues, burns, Fatalities
B
It is being ensured that the confined space is
-
1
1
2
4
2
16
Mediu m
Maintain awareness
gas leak by location
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
flushed, purged and thoroughly ventilated as required Work permit taken.
is
being
Ensure the space has oxygen for breathing.
Appropriate PPE is being used.
D /I
Property damage, Physical injuries
B
Suitable lights are being used for additional illumination working in confined space or as appropriate.
Additional controls required
Remarks
and wind direction.
H2S monitor is provided.
/
9 of 52
If monitor warning actuates leave area and use a predetermined escape route across wind.
Gas test is being carried out regularly.
Dark Insufficient Illumination
Page
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
confined sufficient normal
Use Breathing Apparatus (BA) if needed. -
1
1
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Ensure safe illumination suitable to hazardous area classification. Have adequate lighting to ensure the area is sufficiently illuminated at all time. Natural light is preferred because of access
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
10 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
restrictions, fouling of air hoses etc.
Heat Humidity
&
Improper emergency Equipment / Rescue team
D /I
D /I
Health issues
Health issues
B
Sufficient ventilation and air circulation inside confined space is provided whenever required. Provision of periodic break / rest to the entrant is being done.
-
1
2
2
1
4
Low
1
1
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Trained Standby man and Rescue Team shall be assigned. An emergency response plan shall be drawn up and well understood by all role players of the
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
11 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
rescue team. Standby man shall call immediately to the rescue team in case of confined space emergencies. Instruct the employees not to attempt any rescue operation if they see any person collapsed in the confined space or no communication from the employees working in the confined space unless they know the real situation (Risks and Hazards) and properly protected against the hazards. Call immediately the assigned rescue team. Instruct the employees that they should not take Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
12 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Sl No
Activity
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
any step in emotions to save their friends / colleagues during confined space emergencies. Ask them to call immediately to the emergency rescue team. Instruct the employees to remember emergency contact numbers of the rescue team 6
Gas Cutting
R
Defective Tools Equipment
/
D
Physical injuries, burns, property damage
B
Prior to work it is ensured that the cutting torch, hoses & gas cylinders are free from defect. The equipment and tools are adequately grounded to prevent accumulation of electrostatic charges. Maintenance of equipment is done regularly.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
Low
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
1
2
3
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
13 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Required PPE is used.
Fire Explosion
&
Heat Radiation
D
D
Property damage, Physical injuries, environment al issues
Health issues
B
B
Isolation of equipment is being done from all source of energy when not in use. Work location is shielded prior to work. Working areas are kept clean with no combustible material exists at work site. Fire extinguishers & fire hoses at work areas are kept ready. Firefighting & first aid training is provided.
-
Required PPE is provided. Periodic Rest is being provided.
-
1
1
1
6
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10 Low
1
1
2
1
2
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11
Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Burns, Property damage.
B
Work location is shielded prior to work.
-
1
1
1
3
2
Significance
Gaps, if any
Page
14 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sub-Contractors
ME- 4894
Severity (1 to 5)
D
Job No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Falling Sparks
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
6
Fire extinguishers are available at work place.
Low
Firefighting & first aid training is provided. Gas Cylinder
D
Property damage, Physical injuries
B
Isolation valve of cylinder is kept closed when not in use. Fire extinguishers are available at work place.
-
1
1
1
4
2
8
Mediu m
Keep Cylinders safely at least 5 meters away from the work location.
Firefighting & first aid training is provided. Appropriate PPE is used.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
7
Grinding / Metal cutting by cutter grinder
R
Falling Sparks.
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries
Eye injury
B
B
Proper wind up & housekeeping is being done at worksite. The accessories (torch, hoses & cylinders) not in use are disconnected and stored separately.
-
Face shield, goggles are used
-
1
1
1
Page
15 of 52
1
2
3
Significance
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Others
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Severity (1 to 5)
D
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Scattered Material
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
6 Low
1
1
1
1
2
3
6 Low
Hot material
D
Burn injuries.
B
Required PPE is Provided.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
Low
Slip of grinding machine
D
Physical injury
B
Required PPE is provided.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
Low
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17
Grinding machine has appropriate guarding system.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical Injury.
B
Grinding wheels are inspected and wheels are removed if expired or damaged.
-
1
1
1
Page
16 of 52
1
2
3
Significance
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Severity (1 to 5)
D
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Breakage of grinding wheel
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
6
Low
Grinding machine has appropriate guarding system. Required PPE is provided. Electricity
Noise
D
D
Electrocution, burns, electric shock.
B
Hearing impairment, deafness
B
M/C & wire condition is monitored.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6 Low
Maintenance of equipment is being done regularly.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-03
Low
Duration and intensity of exposure to noise is monitored. Appropriate
work
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Page
17 of 52
3
3
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
schedules with adequate rest period are maintained. Proper PPE’s (Ear Plugs or Ear Muffs) are used. 8
Welding
R
Defective Tools Equipment
/
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Required used
PPE
is
being
-
1
1
1
18
Mediu m
Ensure the gas Welding equipment (blowpipe, hoses, oxy-acetylene cylinders, pressure gauge) are free from defect.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17
Supervisor shall ensure that maintenance is being done regularly. Welding fumes
D
Health Issues
B
Required PPE is provided.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
Low
Proper ventilation and fume extraction equipment in case of welding inside an enclosure is provided. Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
B
Fire extinguishers & fire hoses are kept ready prior to work.
-
2
1
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
1
4
Low
Work location is being shielded. Areas are kept clean with no combustible material exists at work site.
Radiation from Welding Flame / Rays (Flash Eye)
D /I
Eye injuries
B
has
been
Wear the required PPE (Long Sleeve Coverall, apron, safety Goggle etc.)
-
1
1
1
18 of 52
1
2
3
6
Additional controls required
Remarks
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10
Isolation of equipment is done from all source of energy when not in use.
Fire fighter provided.
Page
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Property damage, Physical injuries, environment al issues
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
&
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Fire Explosion
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11
Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
Physical injuries, property damage
B
Flash Fire
Scattered Material
D
Back
D /I
D /I
Work location is shielded while work is in process.
-
1
1
1
2
3
B
Property damage, burns, environment al issues
B
Property damage, Physical
B
19 of 52
Additional controls required
Remarks
6 Low
aid
Equipment & wire condition is monitored. Welding equipment grounded.
Significance
1
Fire extinguishers are available at work place.
Electrocution, burns, electric shock.
Page
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Firefighting & first training is provided. Electricity
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Severity (1 to 5)
D /I
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Falling Sparks
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
is
Low
It is ensured that the flash back arrestor is in place between oxyacetylene hose & gas regulator.
-
Ensure proper wind up & housekeeping at worksite.
-
1
1
1
1
2
3
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-03
6 Low
1
1
1
1
2
3
6 Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
3
3
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Page
20 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
injuries, environment al issues
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
The accessories (regulator, blowpipe, hose, isolation valve, and gauge) not in use is disconnected from gas cylinder and stored separately. Walk ways and staircases are kept clear of materials, equipment’s and other items.
9
Scaffolding (Erection)
R
Incorrect information on permit/clearan ce
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
18
Mediu m
Work permit system shall be followed. Have a clear understanding of work to be performed and location.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-14
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
B
-
-
1
1
1
3
3
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
Gaps, if any
Page
21 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Physical injuries, Property damage
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Ground conditions
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
18
Additional controls required
Remarks
Attention to be paid on uneven terrain structure. Mediu m
Do a Pre-job safety meeting prior to work. Site safety rules shall be followed.
Improper Transportation
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Traffic rules & regulations are followed. All loads transported in a pick-up (or utility) truck or other cargo vehicle is securely fastened and not exceeding the manufacturer’s specifications and legal limits for the vehicles.
-
1
1
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Shut off the engine and hand brake shall be applied when leaving the vehicle. The driver must leave his vehicle and not return to it until the loading / unloading activity is complete. Ensure that contractors shall traffic Rules Regulations.
subfollow &
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
If possible Trolleys or wheelbarrows are used. When lifting a load along with another person(s), communication with the other person(s) is maintained before lowering the load.
-
1
Page
22 of 52
2
2
1
Significance
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Others
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Severity (1 to 5)
D
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Material Handling (Manual)
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
4
Low
Appropriate PPE is being used Dropping tools & scaffold components, clips
D
Scaffold Collapse
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Hoists are used for lifting and dropping the loads.
-
1
1
1
2
2
4
It is ensured that tools belts are in good condition and are capable of securing tools. Inspection for all stages is being done. Graded wood is used.
Low
-
1
1
1
3
2
6 Low
Required PPE is used.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
B
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
Significance
-
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Page
23 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Physical injuries, Property damage
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Unstable scaffold
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
18
Mediu m
Additional controls required
Remarks
Inspect Scaffold prior to Handover for secure access, boards are adequate and any lapboard or plies are secured. Scafftag is secured to scaffold and is dated, signed off by qualified person.
Weak Damaged Scaffold
/
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
The scaffold tag must indicate the maximum load that it can bear. The scaffold shall be inspected, certified & tagged by the competent person confirming its stability & suitability. The scaffolding shall be inspected at least weekly for any damage due to weather condition (rain,
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Page
24 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
high wind etc) or other unsafe conditions.
10
Scaffolding (Dismantlin g)
R
Modified Scaffold
D
Unauthorized Removal of scaffolding
D
Incorrect information on permit/clearan ce
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18 Mediu m
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18 Mediu m
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
In case of any modification, addition in the scaffold, it shall be re-inspected & certified by competent person. Work permit system shall be followed
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-14
Work permit system shall be followed. Have a clear understanding of work to be performed and location.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
B
-
-
1
1
1
3
3
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
Gaps, if any
Page
25 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Physical injuries, Property damage
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Fall of objects / Tools
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
18
Mediu m
Remarks
Additional controls required
Take proper care while dismantling the scaffold to prevent fall of scaffold parts. Use proper PPE during removal of scaffold. If required barricade the area during dismantle work.
Unstable Scaffold
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18 Mediu m
Inspect the scaffold for its stability & support before removing in sequence. Required used.
Loaded Scaffolding
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
PPE
shall
be
Remove safely the load / equipment / tools from the scaffold before
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Page
26 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Remarks
Additional controls required
dismantling the scaffold. Required used
11
Painting
R
Unauthorized person
D
Incorrect information on permit/clearan ce
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
-
-
-
-
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
18
18
PPE
shall
be
Mediu m
Only authorized person shall remove the scaffold under the supervision of certified supervisor
Mediu m
Work Permit system shall be followed. Have a clear understanding of work to be performed and location.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-12
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
B
If possible Trolleys or wheelbarrows are used. When lifting a load along with another person(s), communication with the other person(s) is maintained before lowering the load.
-
2
1
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
1
Page
27 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Property damage, Physical injuries
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Material Handling (Manual)
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
4
Low
Additional controls required
Remarks
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-02
Lifting of heavy load is avoided. Appropriate provided. Defective Tools / Equipment (Spray Paint Gun, Hoses, pump)
D
Property damage, Physical injuries.
B
PPE
is
Inspection is done for the equipment / tool that shall be used for painting (such as Spray Paint Gun, Hoses, pump etc.) prior to work.
-
1
1
1
2
2
4
Low
The equipment and tools are grounded to prevent electricity hazards. Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
is
2
2
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Maintenance regularly.
Page
28 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
done
Required PPE is being used. Harmful vapour
Fire Explosion
D
&
D
Health issues
Property damage, Physical injuries, environment al issues
B
B
Required provided.
Suitable extinguishers ready.
PPE
is
-
1
1
8 Mediu m
are
fire kept
Isolation of equipment is done from all source of energy when not in use. Firefighting & first aid training is provided
-
2
1
2
3
3
18
Mediu m
Obtain MSDS for the paint as well as thinner. Ensure proper ventilation of the area. Store paint & thinners in safe & designated location away from source of ignition. Do not leave unattended the Spray Paint Gun & Hose with on condition Ensure there is no naked flame or spark generating equipment in the area where spray painting is to be done.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10 Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
12
Sand / Grit Blasting
R
Incompetent workers
of &
D
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Environment al issues
Physical injuries, property damage
B
B
B
Washing & cleaning facilities for personnel is provided.
-
-
Competent assigned.
-
is
2
Significance
3
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Others
2
12 Mediu m
Paints & thinners are stored in safe & designated location away from source of ignition. person
2
1
1
Page
29 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Health issues
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Contaminated Clothing
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Unsafe Storage Paint Thinner
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
1
2
2
Additional controls required
Remarks
Do not eat or smoke wearing paint soaked coverall / gloves. Wash hands properly before consuming any food.
4 Low
1
1
1
2
2
4
Low
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-23
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, property damage
B
-
-
1
1
1
Page
30 of 52
2
3
3
18
Significance
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Others
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Severity (1 to 5)
D
Job No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
/
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Defective Tools Equipment
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Mediu m
Additional controls required
Remarks
Only approved material & Equipment shall be used for blasting operations. Ensure the respiratory equipment such as air line hose, pressure regulator, filter is free from defect. Ensure flexible hose clamps & joints for blasting that shall be suitable for pressure rating of the system and shall be fastened. The equipment and tools shall be grounded to prevent electricity. Supervisor shall ensure the maintenance of equipment & tools are done regularly.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
31 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Required PPE & RPE shall be used.
Dust
Noise
Scattered Material
D
D
D
Health issues, injury
eye
B
Required PPE is provided.
-
1
1
1
2
3
3
18 Mediu m
Health issues, environment al issues
B Ear muffs / ear plugs are used.
environment al issues
B Proper wind up & housekeeping is done.
-
1
1
1
2
2
4
Enclose the blasting area with sheets and post warning notice. Sprinkle water prior to blasting activity on nearby surface.
Low
Maintenance of equipment is done regularly. -
1
1
1
2
2
4
Low
Walk ways, aisle are clear of materials, equipment’s and other Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
4
2
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Spread (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Page
32 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Sl No
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
items.
13
Work height
at
R
Improper protection
D /I
Property damage, Physical injuries
B
-
-
1
1
16
Mediu m
Fall protection devices such as harnesses shall be worn by all personnel if fixed access cannot be provided. Safety equipment shall be checked before use. All personnel shall ensure that they are capable of undertaking the task, both physically and mentally and do not work outside their own capabilities - as this may put both themselves and
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-01
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Spread (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Page
33 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
others in danger. Suitable breaks shall be taken as and when required (this will vary as to the type of work, i.e. hard or easy, hot or cold). Report any sign of dizziness , vertigo immediately to the Supervisor. R
Floor and Wall Openings and Stairways
D
Physical injuries
B
-
-
1
1
2
4
2
16
Mediu m
All floor, grating or roof openings within a building or other structure during the course of construction, alterations or repairing shall be closed with rigid covers (e.g. planks, concrete, metal etc.), fenced on all
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
34 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
sides by a standard railing and toe-board and safety notices placed. Every open-sided floor or platform 1.8 meters or more; above adjacent floor or ground level must be guarded by standard guardrail and toe board. Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment must be guarded. Crossing over the open trenches shall be designed & constructed Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
35 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
appropriately with proper hand rails & guardrails 14
Working on ladders
R
Defective stepladders
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Required PPE is used.
-
1
1
2
4
2
16
Mediu m
Supervisor / Personnel shall visually examine stepladders prior to use to ensure that they are free from any defects. Stepladders shall never be painted, unless for identification, as this will hide any defects. Provide Tool box talk to workers.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Required PPE is used
-
1
1
2
4
2
Significance
Gaps, if any
16
Mediu m
Instability
D
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
Required PPE is used
-
1
1
Page
36 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sub-Contractors
ME- 4894
Severity (1 to 5)
D
Job No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Overloading
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
2
4
2
16
Mediu m
Additional controls required
Remarks
Stepladders are not designed to support more than one person at any one time and personnel shall ensure that they do not overload stepladder. Alternative access shall be considered if two or more personnel are required to work in the same area. Personnel shall ensure that stepladders have been levelled on an even surface and that they do not overreach and/or over-balance whilst working on the stepladder.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Page
37 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
A second person shall be in attendance at the bottom of the ladder at all times.
15
Working in adverse environmen tal conditions
R
High temperatures (hot)
D
Health issues
B / L
Working hours followed as regulations.
are per
-
1
1
1
1
3
3
9
Rest time is provided to reduce the effect of heat related disorders. Potable provided.
Low temperatures (cold)
D
Health issues
B / L
water
-
Mediu m
Train employees to recognize the warning signs / symptoms of early heat related disorders and work methods best suited to avoid heat.
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-27
Insists workers to consume more water during summer.
is
-
1
1
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Wear several layers of clothing rather than one thick layer. Wear gloves and a woollen liner / scarf / face
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-35
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
38 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
mask under the hard hat. Cover the ears too. Wear warm footwear with one or two pairs of warm socks. Workers taking certain medications or in poor physical condition or suffer from illnesses such as diabetes, high blood pressure, or cardiovascular disease are at increased risk and shall therefore check with a doctor for additional advice.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
B
-
-
1
1
2
2
Significance
2
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
8
Mediu m
16
Drilling
R
Particles while drilling
D
Physical injuries
B
Required PPE is used
-
1
1
3
1
3
17
Hammerin g
R
Improper handling hammer /Damaged.
D
Physical injuries
B
Hammers are inspected before use and defective hammers are removed. Required PPE is being provided.
-
1
1
3
1
3
of
Page
39 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Physical injuries, Property damage.
Existing Control
Others
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Severity (1 to 5)
D /I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Strong winds
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
Hazards
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Sl No
Activity
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
HRA No.
Low
Additional controls required
Remarks
Where work is to be carried out at heights or in places where potential falls are present, then suitable fall protection devices shall be implemented (such as harnesses, etc.). If at any time personnel feel risk on the job in hand, then stop work and report to the Supervisor.
Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
/
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, Property damage
B
The equipment and tools are adequately grounded to prevent electric hazard.
-
1
Page
40 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
1
3
1
Significance
Others
Visitors
Gaps, if any
Sub-Contractors
Existing Control
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Spread (1 to 5)
Defective Tools Equipment
ME- 4894
Adequacy of existing control measures (Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Hazards
Job No.
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
R
Rev Date
00
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Brazing
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Sl No
18
Activity
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
HRA No.
3
Additional controls required
Remarks
Low
Required PPE is used Fire Explosion
&
D
Property damage, Physical injuries, environment al issues
B
Fire extinguishers & fire hoses are kept ready.
-
1
2
2
1
4
Isolation of equipment is done from all source of energy when not in use. Low
Work location is being shielded. Areas are kept clean with no combustible material exists at work site. Fire fighter is assigned.
Radiation from Welding Flame / Rays (Flash
D
Eye injuries
B
Required PPE is used.
-
1
1
3
1
3
Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
3
1
Significance
1
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Spread (1 to 5)
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Page
41 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Visitors
ME- 4894
Sub-Contractors
Job No.
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Eye)
Falling Sparks
D
Physical injuries, property damage
B
Work location is being shielded.
Pressure Testing
N
Bursting of component / equipment
D
Rupture of Nitrogen Supply Hoses & Couplings
D
Physical injuries
Physical injuries, Health issues
1
3
Fire extinguishers are available at work place. Firefighting & first training is provided.
19
-
B
B
Low
aid
Manufacturer instructions are followed. Required PPE is being used.
-
Assigned persons are handling the pressure testing work. Manufacturer instructions are
-
1
1
3
1
3
Low
1
1
3
1
3
Low
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-44
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
1
2
1
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
42 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
followed. Supply hoses and couplings are rated for the required service and pressure. Regular monitoring is done by the supervisors and technicians. 20
Working in office
R
Slips and trips
D
Physical injuries
B
Work areas are kept clear of obstructions.
-
1
1
2 Low
Inspection is being done regularly. Electrical equipment (electric shocks or burns from using faulty electrical equipment)
D
Electrocution, Electric shock, burns, fires
B
Electrical equipment is operated in accordance with manufacturers' instructions.
-
1
1
4
3
12
Mediu m
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-09
Provide training on usage of firefighting equipment
Firefighting equipment is being provided.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Health issues (postural problems, eyestrains, headaches)
B
-
-
1
1
3
2
Significance
2
12
Additional controls required
Mediu m
Stress
D
Health issues
B
Working hours are followed according as per company schedule.
-
1
1
Page
43 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix) (Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Others
Existing Control
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Adequacy of existing control measures
Spread (1 to 5)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Severity (1 to 5)
D
Job No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
Display Screen Equipment
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
2
3
2
12
Mediu m
Remarks
Work planned shall include regular breaks from the computer. Tell staff to take medical consultation of any pain they have that may be linked to computer use. Reassessment shall be carried out at any change to work feature, eg. equipment, furniture or the work environment.
Remind staff that they can speak confidentially to manager or supervisors (on a noblame basis!) if they are
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
44 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
feeling unwell or ill at ease because of work.
21
Removing Bolts and Replacing parts
R
Improper tools
D
Improper handling of tools
D
Ergonomics
D
Physical injuries
B
Physical injuries
B
Health issues
B
Proper tools are used. Tools are inspected prior to use. Workers are aware about the appropriate tools that shall be used. Require PPE is used.
-
Care is taken while working with hand tools. Required PPE is provided.
-
Working long hours in an uncomfortable posture is avoided.
-
1
2
2
1
4
Low
1
2
2
1
4
Low
1
2
2
1
4 Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
Improper Housekeeping
D
Environment al issues, physical injuries, Health issues
B
Grouting
R
cement, aggregates, limestone, silica and dust
D
Health issues
Proper wind up & housekeeping is done regularly.
-
1
1
2
1
2
Walk ways, aisles are clear of materials, equipment’s and other items.
B
Page
45 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Significance
Others
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Visitors
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Adequacy of existing control measures
spillages are immediately
23
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Job No.
Spread (1 to 5)
R
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
House Keeping
Hazards
Rev Date
00 (Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Activity
Rev No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
22
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-28
Low
cleaned
Regular monitoring being done.
is
Required provided.
is
PPE
-
1
1
2
1
2
Low
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
Collapse of structure, fall of objects, unstable erection.
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical injuries, property damage
B
Proper fall protection measures are in place
-
1
1
Page
46 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
2
3
2
Significance
Gaps, if any
Others
Existing Control
Personnel at risk
Visitors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Adequacy of existing control measures
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sub-Contractors
ME- 4894
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Job No.
Spread (1 to 5)
R
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
Steel Erection
Hazards
Rev Date
00 (Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Activity
Rev No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
24
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
12
Additional controls required
Remarks
Lifting plan (sequence of erection, securing, temporary supports, crane access restriction etc.) is in place. Cranes & lifting accessories required for the job, are inspected maintained and valid certificate available from the third party.
Mediu m
Trained & competent erection personnel are employed. Warning signs and barricades are in place.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
26
DyePenetrating Test
N
Dust and flying particles
Penetrating material
D
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Health issues
Skin irritation
B
B
Required provided.
PPE
is
Washing provided.
facility
is
Safety goggles and coverall is being used during the test.
-
Radiograph y Testing
N
Radiations
I
Health issues
L
47 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
1
2
1
Significance
Others
Page
2
Additional controls required
Remarks
Low
-
1
1
2
1
2
Low
All waste materials are being disposed off properly 27
1
Visitors
Gaps, if any
Existing Control
Sub-Contractors
Personnel at risk
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Loss (Risk Consequence)
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Adequacy of existing control measures
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Spread (1 to 5)
R
Job No.
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
Insulation
Hazards
Rev Date
00 (Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Activity
Rev No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
25
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
-
High
Legal requirements are being complied. Use of radioactive substances shall be carried out in strict compliance with the Qatar’s Decree Law no 31 of the Year 2002 concerning Radiation Protection and the
Please Refer Procedure No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-45
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
48 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
Executive Rules of The Decree-Law no. (31) of the year 2002 concerning Radiation Protection. Petroserv’s radiography sub-contractor shall in addition to the above, comply with the safety requirements. Clear warning notices (in Arabic/English) shall be displayed at the point of access to the facility, and inventory checks carried out to confirm the location of sources and equipment. Required PPE shall be used.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT
Live Energy / Utility Services.
D
FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Physical Injuries, Health issues.
B
-
-
1
1
Page
49 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
3
4
2
24
Significance
Others
Gaps, if any
Visitors
Existing Control
Personnel at risk
Sub-Contractors
Loss (Risk Consequence)
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Adequacy of existing control measures
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Job No.
Spread (1 to 5)
N
24-11-2013
Severity (1 to 5)
LOTO (Isolation of Service Utility & Rerouting of Service Utility)
Hazards
Rev Date
00 (Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
Activity
Rev No.
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
28
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
High
Additional controls required
Remarks
A safe Lockout and Tagout procedure shall be implemented prior to work on or near electrical equipment or lines, Mechanical pressure systems and lines or equipment containing dangerous or hazardous material which can be energized, pressurized, activated, or released inadvertently. A safe lockout and tagout procedure is an operating procedure by which a person or a member of maintenance crew, may have a machine / equipment or part of the machine or equipment removed from and held out of service till the
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
50 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
completion of the job. A tag indicating “Danger! Do Not Operate” or equivalent shall be placed at the source of the equipment being serviced. The supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring that all personnel in his group understand the use and purpose of Locks and Hold Tags. He shall authorize attachment and removal of Locks and Hold Tags and ensure that locks and tags are installed and attached to the proper equipment. If Locks and Hold Tags are required on systems or equipment where hot work/cold work is to be Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Gaps, if any
Spread (1 to 5)
Existing Control
Page
51 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Severity (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Others
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
performed, attachment and/or removal of Locks and Hold Tags shall be authorized only by those persons authorized to issue/receive hot work/cold work permits. 29
PreCommissio ning / Commissio ning
R
System / Service failure
D
Physical injuries, Property damage.
-
-
1
1
3
4
2
24
High
All the internals of the system pipes and equipment must be cleaned out to ensure they are free from dirt, scale and construction debris and prevent damage to rotating equipment, control valves or cause line blockage during commissioning. The area shall be barricaded and all unsecured materials likely to be affected by
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00
HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK
Significance
Gaps, if any
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level
Existing Control
Page
52 of 52
Risk Assessment (See Risk management matrix)
Spread (1 to 5)
Loss (Risk Consequence)
Personnel at risk
Severity (1 to 5)
Adequacy of existing control measures
Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Others
ME- 4894
Visitors
Job No.
Sub-Contractors
24-11-2013
All Employees - 2Some Employees – 1/
Hazards
Rev Date
00
(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)
Activity
Rev No.
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)
PSL-ME-4894HRA-01 (Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)
Sl No
HRA No.
Additional controls required
Remarks
discharged air during blowing operations are to be removed or secured. Approved Method statements shall be strictly implemented along with Job safety analysis.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high. Project Engineer (Name, Signature & Date) Review By: Review By: As per IMSP Proc. No. As per IMSP Proc. No. Supervisor PSL-IMSP-10 & Date PSL-IMSP-10 & Date HSE Representative Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00