IRP 22 Hazard and Risk Assessment Register Column Headings Column .etter Operational Phase
A
Categorization of the hazard scenario by operational phase.
I t em
B
te! nu!ber for hazards.
UBD/MPD/Both
C
dentification of "hether the hazard applies to #$D% &'D or $oth ($)
Hazard !enario "hat I#
D
-ingle 6eopardy state!ent used to identify potential proble!s due to failure in pre76ob planning% training% procedures% or euip!ent failure.
Appli!a$le
%
Choose *+* if *,azard -cenario hat f* applies to operation and */* if it does not.
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
(
A list of the potential conseuences (,-1 and /'T) of the *"hat if* occurring.
H%
)
The ris of a situation3e4ent "ith the potential to cause har! (to people% assets% or the en4iron!ent).
*P&
H
The ris of /on 'roducti4e Ti!e (/'T)% including lost ti!e and costs% for!ation da!age and3o r any de4iation fro! the plan.
Re'uired H H% Cr Criti!al Co Controls / a#eguards
O
Controls3safeguards% and detailed reco!!ended practices for high ris ,-1 ite!s and ref erenced to specific prescripti4e R' 22 enforced reuire!ents.
Considerations
+
Reco!!endations% considerations% and infor!ational state!ents on ho" to reduce% eli!inate% or !anage &ediu!38o" Ris ,-1 ite!s and all /'T ite!s.
A!tions to $e &aken / B, "ho and "hen
-
8ist of actions reuired to reduce3eli!inate the potential occurrence and3or se4erity if the hazard cannot be eli!inated entirely. ho 'arty3parties responsible for each action assigned. hen Date by "hich the action is to be co!pleted.
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
.
Categorization of the hazard scenario by p ri!ary responsible party.
Primar, Categor,
M
Categorization of the hazard scenario by pri!ary category (euip!ent% "ell progra!% etc.)
Risk Ranking se0erit, o# the e0ent 1!onse'uen!e multiplied $, likelihood o# o!!urren!e 3
High Risk 7 1ngineering% 'rocedures% and Training reuired to control3!itigate ris.
2
Medium Risk 7 'rocedures and Training reuired to control3!i tigate ris. -hould consider 1ngineering.
4
.o5 Risk 7 Training reuired to control3!itigate ris. -hould consider 1ngineering and 'rocedures.
)eneral *otes a$out Register Register is di4ided into 5 sections% coinciding "ith the operational phases of #$D3&'D3AD operations. Additional Additional ite!s !ay be added added to each each section by the R' R' co!!ittee co!!ittee or the end end user. user. The list of ite!s in the register is not not e:hausti4e e:hausti4e and "ill change change "ith ti!e ti!e as additional hazards are identified. 8ast ite! nu!ber used (as of 20;<70=7;;) is> 225 $egin any additional nu!bering "ith 229. /ote that ?;<2 "as deleted as it "as redundant. The R' 22 Co!!ittee in4ites organizations to share lessons learned and additions to the Risk Register by by e!ailing safety@enfor!.ca
June 2009
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
;
;
22.;.=.2 22.2.2.= 22.2..=
;
;
22.;.=.B 22.=.=.;
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
22.=.B
'otentially "ash3"ear casing bo"l% and cause RCD failure or $' failure. 'otential loss of "ell control if bo"l "ears out.
;
;
Fluid carryo4er !ay cause a fire% + en4iron!ental da!age3in6ury. da!age3in6ury. ait on right size euip!ent.
;
&'D 1uip!ent Rental
!rproper euip!ent size. nadeuate reuired surface bac + pressure. 'otential gas inflo". 'otential "ell control issues.
Threaded unions are used in high pressure pipe "or. &e!brane nitrogen is used in sour en4iron!ent
'oor uality control in /'T thread + design3!anufacture !ay result in flo"line failure. ,igh corrosion rate. + 'otential fla!!able conditions.
$T,
Condensate carryo4er
+
$T,
Failure to flush3purge lines% 4essels% surface euip!ent
;
$T,
!proper elly (suare 4s. he:)
;. 'lanning
2
$T,
8ease size inadeuate
;. 'lanning
=
$T,
Concurrent rig up of rig and #$D3&'D pacage causes confusion
+
;. 'lanning
B
$T,
!proper rig align!ent
+
;. 'lanning
<
$T,
!proper separator 7 too s!all
;. 'lanning
22=
&'D
;. 'lanning
$T,
;. 'lanning
#$D
;. 'lanning
5
-pill 7 en4iron!ental da!age -tart fire in i!!ediate 4icinity
;. 'lanning
;0
$T,
$arrier Failure
;. 'lanning
;;
$T,
nsufficient tan far! ber!s
,2- e:posure to personnel. 8o" + 4olu!e% high concentration. 'otential for in6ury3death. 8oss of $ arrier. + 'otential for in6ury3death. Release of drilling fluid to + en4iron!ent.
;. 'lanning
;2
$T,
eneral ,2- concerns
+ 'otential for in6ury3death.
2 of 2
9
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
RCD leaage. n6ury to personnel. #nable to run suare elly through + RCD. Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and cost). 'oor e!ergency response. 'roble!s fitting euip!ent on location. Decreased access3egress in case of + e!ergency. nadeuate flare spacing on location. Tree clearance could cause forest fire. Delay in rig up and startup of operations
;. 'lanning
;. 'lanning
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
#se he: elly% suare elly not reco!!ended. #se po"er s"i4el instead of elly. #se top dri4e instead of elly. #se coiled tubing. RCD supplier standard operating procedures 3 ris register. Drill string diagra!. Eerify rig specific l ayout accuracy. 'ri!ary #$D3&'D ser4ice supplier to pro4ide site specific lease spacing diagra!. 'ri!ary #$D3&'D ser4ice pro4ider to conduct site inspection as soon as possible. #se drill side pipe racs only (if possible). Eerify regulatory stac height3flaring reuire!ents.
Rig Rig Con Contr trac acto torr
Rig Rig 1ui 1uip! p!en entt
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
nsite super4isors to for!ulate rig up plan. Co!pany !an to coordinate o4erall strategy. -afety hand to be in4ol4ed during rig up.
perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents
22.2..=
Chec rig align!ent before nippling up $'3RCD. Chec rig align!ent during #$D3&'D operation.
Rig Contractor
RCD
;
22.;.=.B 22.;.=.<
Conduct re4ie" "ith reser4oir3production reser4oir3production engineers regarding potential inflo" rates. Re4ie" separator sizing reuire!ents "ith ser4ice co!pany.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
;
;
ne" R'22 section T$D
Conduct re4ie" "ith reser4oir3production reser4oir3production engineers regarding potential inflo" rates. Re4ie" separator sizing reuire!ents "ith ser4ice co!pany. Re4ie" offset infor!ation for the area.
&'D 1uip!ent &'D3#$D 'ro4ider 1uip!ent Rental
;
;
22.2.B.;
/o threaded unions to be used for other than shipping lines.
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
;
;
22.;.=.;
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
;
22.;.=.B 22.;.=.<
Consider use of ser4ice gas that does not contain o:ygen. Choose appropriately sized separator for flush production. Re4ie" procedures for transient operations (such as initial blo"do"n).
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
;
22.=.;=
;
;
;
;
22.;.=.B 22.=.;B
;
;
22.=.;=
'urge "ith an inert gas. Consider 2 barrier "hen pipe is static. ,igh ,2- content should !ae barrier policy !ore 4isible. Applicable pro4incial regulations to be follo"ed. 1uip!ent spacing% 4enting and issues regarding personnel safety !ust be addressed throughout the entire lease for the entire operation.
0B3;0320;
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany perating Co!pany perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra! -eparation 8ease &anage!ent
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
;
;
22.;.=. 22.=.;<
1li!inate one ele!ent of the reuire!ents for co!bustion (fuel% o:ygen% or ignition source). Consider inert gas operations. /e4er flo" returns to a closed separator. Add inert gas to reduce fla!!ability.
Air Drilling 7 #ne:pected 'otential for do"nhole fire and3or + hydrocarbon zone ignition at surface. encountered
;
;
22.;.=. 22.=.;<
#se inert gas if the ris of creating conditions suitable for co!bustion e:ists. Consider inert gas operations.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
#$D
Air Drilling 7 &ud ring occurs "ith co!bustible !i:ture in hole.
;
;
22.=.;<
&onitor hole cleaning and fluid influ: carefully "hile drilling. Consider inert gas operations.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
#$D
Coiled Tubing 7 Coil pac7off fails
;
;
22.=.; 22;.=. R'2;
$egin operation "ith ne" stripper ele!ents. nspect sealing ele!ents after each trip. $ac up ele!ents a4ailable on location. &onitor for leaage during operation.
RCD -uppli er
Trai ni ng
;
$T,
;
;
22.=.; R' 2;
Carefully define coil operating li!its. &onitor coil fatigue life. 'ressure test coil before 6ob. #se appropriate corrosion inhibitor pacage. &ini!ize high pressure coil cycling.
Coil Tubing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
ell 'rogra!
;. 'lanning
;=
#$D
Air Drilling 7 818 and #18 "ithin fla!!able li!its
;. 'lanning
;B
#$D
;. 'lanning
;<
;. 'lanning
;. 'lanning
Coiled Tubing 7 Coil string failure (do"nhole "ashout)
+
Fla!!able !i:ture% potential for fire3e:plosion.
'otential for do"hnole ignition. + 8oss of $,A% da!age to euip!ent% potential for in6ury3death% loss of "ell. as3Fluid at rig floor (potential hydrocarbon release% ignition or fire). + ,ar! to personnel. For!ation da!age if "ell !ust be illed. 'otential loss of "ell. For!ation da!age if "ell has to be + illed. ncreased ris to personnel "hile tripping. as3fluid release at rig floor (potential hydrocarbon release3ignition3fire). ,ar! to personnel. For!ation da!age if "ell !ust be illed. 1n4iron!ental da!age.
;. 'lanning
;5
$T,
Coiled Tubing 7 Coil string failure (surface "ashout)
+
;. 'lanning
;9
$T,
nadeuately 4ented *closed* at!ospheric tans.
'ressure build up in at!ospheric tans due to high liuid flo" rate or + high solution gas content leading to possible tan rupture% personnel in6ury or en4iron!ental spill.
;. 'lanning
20
$T,
Te!porary pipe and ha!!er union !is!atch
;. 'lanning
2;
$T,
Failure to note losses% possibly leading to loss3ic situation
;. 'lanning
22
$T,
,igh te!perature (i.e. ,',T "ells) e:ceeding $' seals te!perature rating
= of 2
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
ith se4eral and di4erse co!panies on site the potential for !is!atched ha!!er union connections are greatly + increased. Threat of personnel in6ury and en4iron!ental spills. 'ossible inadeuate returns !onitoring and3or flo" !odeling fails to recognize losses in zone of greater depletion3lo"er pore pressure than + planned for. 'ossibility of "ell ic e:ceeding euip!ent rating% personnel in6ury% euip!ent da!age or loss of "ell. ,',T "ells surface te!perature e:ceeding $'% etc. te!perature + rating leading to pre!ature failure% loss of contain!ent% personnel in6ury% loss of "ell control.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
.
;
;
22.=.; R' 2;
Carefully define coil operating li!its. &onitor coil fatigue life. 'ressure test coil before 6ob. #se appropriate corrosion inhibitor pacage. &ini!ize high pressure coil cycling. Run lea point bac into "ell if possible.
Coil Tubing Contractor
;
;
22.=.;< 22.;.=. R' 2;
1nsure installation design considers !a:i!u! input rates to closed at!ospheric tans and sufficiently sized 4ent lines are pro4ided.
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
;
;
22.2.B.;
1nsure clear policy and direction is pro4ided on acceptable te!porary pipe design and ha!!er unions. $an ha!!er unions "ith potential for !is!atch.
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
;
;
22.=.;2
1nsure adeuate !onitoring% early recognition of losses% "ell planned "ell control procedures.
Rig Contractor
&ud -yste!
;
;
22.;.=.;
For ,',T "ells consider use of additional te!perature !onitoring and 1-D procedures for Te!perature ,, conditions at $' stac. #se proper sealing rubber for high te!perature.
perating Co!pany
$' -yste!
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
;. 'lanning
2=
$T,
;. 'lanning
2B
$T,
;. 'lanning
2<
$T,
;. 'lanning
2
#$D
;. 'lanning
2
$T,
;. 'lanning
25
$T,
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
'orted floats are used
#nclear lines of authority nadeuate fire protection :ygen deficient en4iron!ents Response to alar! condition is not clearly defined &ultiple alar! syste!s on location
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
+
;
2
22.2.=
#se 2 non7ported float 4al4es. Run /RE as contingency for drop7in chec 4al4e.
+
Ris to personnel% euip!ent% en4iron!ent.
;
2
22.2.=
All lines of authority to be clearly defined in progra!3pre7 spud.
+ n6ury% loss of euip!ent.
;
2
22.;.=.
+ 'otential for in6ury.
;
2
22.=.=
dentify potentially o:ygen deficient areas and include in onsite orientation. orers in high ris areas !ust "ear appropriate !onitoring de4ice.
All
/3A
ell 'rogra! 8ease Reuire!ents
;
2
22.=.=
Clearly define response to alar! c onditions and co!!unicate the response to personnel on location.
perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents
+
Confusion on location increases ,-1 riss.
;
2
22.=.=
Clearly define response to alar! c onditions and co!!unicate the response to personnel on location.
perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents
#se enclosed cutting separation process. Eacuu! degas fluid3solids strea! before cuttings separation. &onitor3alar! any area "here there is a potential for a sour gas release.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
,2- 7 To:ic gas released during cuttings separation process.
+ 'otential for in6ury3death.
;
2
22.=.;=
;. 'lanning
=0
$T,
,2- 7 To:ic gas released fro! fluid storage syste!.
+ 'otential for in6ury3death.
;
2
22.=.;=
;. 'lanning
=;
$T,
+ 'otential for in6ury3death.
;
2
22.=.;= 22.;.=.2
;. 'lanning
=2
$T,
;. 'lanning
==
$T,
;. 'lanning
=B
$T,
;. 'lanning
=<
$T,
;. 'lanning
=
$T,
B of 2
perating Co!pany perating Co!pany
/RE
Confusion on location increases ,-1 riss.
$T,
&uster area is not clearly defined. ,2- 7 1lasto!er failure3inco!patibility -hortage of e:perienced people in planning stages
/RE -upplier
+
29
il $ased &ud 7 -olution gas release fro! drilling !ud
Primar, Categor,
'ressure co!!unicated to surface through drill pipe. Cannot hold bac pressure on annulus as pressure is co!unicated to surface through drill pipe.
;. 'lanning
,2- 7 To:ic gas release "hen sa!pling cuttings ,2- 7 !proper sour ser4ice !aterial selection
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
+
Rapid degradation of steel 7 not fit for ser4ice.
;
2
22.=.;=
+
Ris of fire3e:plosion and personnel e:posed to har!ful 4apors.
;
2
22.=.;0 22.=.;B
;
=
22.=.=
;
=
22.=.;=
2
;
ncreased ris for personnel to search location for !issing "orers. 8oss of $arrier. + 'otential for in6ury3death. nability to identify all safety critical + issues in the operation. +
#se enclosed fluid separation process. Eent tans through scrubbers. &onitor3alar! any area "here there is a potential for a sour gas release fro! the fluid storage syste!. 'urge "ith non7to:ic or inert gas before opening sa!pler. Full re4ie" of /AC1 &R 0;<3/AC1 ;<;< for , 2"ells. Re4ie" R' ; Critical -our Drilling Calculate 4olu!e of gas released fro! separator pressure to at!ospheric pressure. 8o" pressure separator reduces gas in solution. #se separate fluid storage syste! "ith totally enclosed and 4ented tans. Clearly define !uster area during "ellsite safety !eetings. Aniline testing elasto!ers. 'roper !aterial selection for elasto!ers. 1nsure that personnel planning the operation are co!petent to do so.
0B3;0320;
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider #$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider perating ell 'rogra! Co!pany #$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany perating Co!pany perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents ell 'rogra! /3A
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
;. 'lanning
Item
=
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
$T,
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
RCD leaage. n6ury to personnel. + 're!ature RCD ele!ent "ear. Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and cost).
2
2
;
;
;. 'lanning
=5
$T,
$,A plan includes running spiral drill collars or other non7 strippable co!ponents.
RCD leaage. n6ury to personnel. + #nable to strip through RCD ele!ent. Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and cost).
;. 'lanning
=9
$T,
oring on pad "ells
+
-i!ultaneous operations on pad "ells increases ris of ,-1 incidents.
2
;
;. 'lanning
B0
$T,
Cre" shortage and3or ine:perience
+
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
;
;. 'lanning
B;
$T,
/RE seal co!patibility "ith fluid
+ 'otential for /RE to fail pre!aturely.
2
;
;. 'lanning
B2
$T,
Rental euip!ent in poor repair
+
2
;
B=
$T,
,igh Rate Flaring
+
;. 'lanning
BB
$T,
,igh ,2- Flaring
;. 'lanning
B<
$T,
nadeuate lease spacing for flare.
< of 2
Primar, Categor,
#se dill pipe "ithout groo4es. #se pipe "ith no hardbanding. #se drillpipe "ith flush hardbanding. -er4ice elly to eli!inate s harp edges and ensuring elly is as straight as possible. RCD supplier pre76ob inspection.
Condition of drill pipe and elly (groo4es% e:ternal scale% etc.)
;. 'lanning
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
1uip!ent failure during critical ti!es !ay ele4ate e:isting ,-1 riss. 1:ceed 4olu!e li!its% -hut in "ell% cease operations.
2
;
1:ceed allo"able li!its for -2 7 + ;2ppb34olu!e. -hut in "ell% cease operations.
2
;
+ Ris of forest fire.
2
2
Drill pipe3elly inspection. RCD supplier -'s3ris register. Drill string diagra!. Gelly sa4ers "ith rubber inserts are not reco!!ended as they can se4erely da!age the RCD ele!ent. A4oid abrupt D transitions bet"een Gelly and drill pipe. Re4ie" all drill sting co!ponents for strippability and sealability "ith the RCD. -piral drill collars% 6ars% bu!per subs and stabilizers are not reco!!ended. Function3stripping tests of odd7profile $,A co!ponents (on and3or offsite) is reco!!ended. A4oid use of elly 4al4es "ith rubber casing sa4ers. Replace spiral DC "ith Rigid DC or ,D'.
22.=.2.2
Deter!ine "hether other operations "ill occur on pad at the sa!e ti!e as the drilling operation. 1nsure that one site super4isor is appointed and that lines of authority are clear. nsite orientation and training. -uper4isors to ensure that all personnel ha4e been trained in the 4arious co!ponents of the rig up operation. dentify tass in tool bo: safety !eetings. 1nsure all "orers understand their right to refuse unsafe "or% or reuest training3guidance for tass that they are not yet co!petent in. Consider 1&- onsite during rig up operations. Focus on shift change co!!unication infor!ation transfer. Chec R' 22.=.2.2 perational Co!!unications Consider !ultiple /REs in $,A. Consider !etal3!etal seals. Test seals "ith drilling fluid3reser4oir fluid prior to drilling operation. Consider profile nipple do"n hole as a bacup. nspect all rental euip!ent upon arri4al on location. ,igh ' "ell probability% build so!e HfatH into !odeling% calculations and per!it applications. A1R Directi4e 0> #pstrea! 'etroleu! ndustry Flaring% ncinerating% and Eenting (see """.aer.ca) as Chro!atograph to ualify !odeling. Continuous ,2- content !onitoring in fluid strea!. A1R Directi4e 0> #pstrea! 'etroleu! ndustry Flaring% ncinerating% and Eenting (see """.aer.ca) Consult appropriate forestry regulations. 1nsure reuired fire !itigation is in place (sprinler syste!% "ater storage% etc.) 0B3;0320;
Rig Contractor
Drill -tring
perating Co!pany
Drill -tring
perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents
All
/3A
/RE -upplier
/RE
perating Co!pany
All
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
-eparation DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
;. 'lanning
B
$T,
;. 'lanning
B
$T,
;. 'lanning
B5
$T,
;. 'lanning
B9
$T,
;. 'lanning
;. 'lanning
<0
<;
$T,
+
ncreased potential for ,-1 incidents such as slips% trips or falls.
2
2
+
Conta!ination of fluids on location "ith prior 6ob "aste.
2
2
nspect euip!ent upon arri4al and before being released.
perating Co!pany
Deter!ine responsibility during pre7spud and confir! in onsite safety !eetings. Co!!unicate riss of bears% etc. during safety !eeting. 1stablish protocol for personnel lea4ing location on foot.
perating Co!pany perating Co!pany
For!al Chain of co!!and. For!al locout3tagout3control of "or. For!al 'T38ogistics 'lan. Re4ie" R' -tandards for ellsite -uper4ision of Drilling% Co!pletions and oro4ers.
All
22.;.<.<
Cold 4enting (regulatory e:e!ption !ay be reuired). Auto!atic liuid high le4el shut7do"n in separator. Flare stac spacing% height and ground clearance fro! co!bustable !aterials. 'rocedures and euip!ent in place for !anaging separator le4el if le4el no high le4el shut7do"n. Audible and 4isual alar!. 1nsure adeuate redundancy of pressure shipping and pu!p shipping capacity.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
22.;.<.<
Auto!atic liuid lo" le4el shut7do"n in separator. 'rocedures and euip!ent in place for !anaging separator le4el if le4el no lo" le4el shut7do"n. Audible and 4isual alar!. 8183#18 gas !onitoring and alar!ing at the shaer 8iuid shipping to a re!ote tan syste!.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
#se of supple!entary fuel gas ('ropane). A1R Directi4e 0> #pstrea! 'etroleu! ndustry Flaring% ncinerating% and Eenting (see """.aer.ca)
perating Co!pany
'otential euip!ent failure if not used + properly.
2
2
+ Ris to personnel or "ildlife.
2
2
+
/oise% pressure% 4ibration% egress% co!!unication 7 &isco!!unication'otential for in6ury3death.
2
;
2
Trying to flare "ith high C2 !olI
+ /o burn 7 cold 4ent.
2
2
il $ased &ud 7 ncreased solubility in oil based !ud (R 4ariability)
+
2
2
2
2
2
=
#$D
;. 'lanning
$T,
;. 'lanning
<<
#$D
$T, $T,
Coiled Tubing 7 -lips fail to hold $,A co!ponents Drill string /REs !issing or "rong size3thread Flare gun ignites forest or grassland
-pill 7 en4iron!ental da!age Fire% e:plosion fro! flare stac% personnel e:posure -eperator o4er7pressure
2
as at rig tans. + Fire% e:plosion% personnel e:posure.
<=
of 2
1uip!ent3'ersonnel Congestion
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
-eparator gas carry7 under do"n the liuid shipping lines
;. 'lanning
<
1:posure to "ildlife
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Conduct re4ie" of lighting reuire!ents "ith ser4ice co!panies at pre7spud. Consider constructing a lighting diagra!. Rent light to"ers as reuired.
+
$T,
;. 'lanning
1uip!ent not flushed3cleaned pre3post 6ob #nclear responsibility for rental euip!ent
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
-eparator liuid carry7 o4er into flare line and3or shipping pu!p failure
<2
<
nadeuate lighting.
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
$T,
;. 'lanning
;. 'lanning
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
'oor ,2- -tripping 3 -eparation. 'otential for in6ury3death.
Tools dropped in hole% resulting in lost + ti!e% high7ris fishing operation. 'otential gas3fluid release at rig floor. /o drill string "ell control. Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and + cost). Drill string da!age. + Ris to en4iron!ent3personnel.
;
2
2
=
perating Co!pany
8ease Reuire!ents
-eparation All 8ease Reuire!ents
8ease &anage!ent
ell 'rogra!
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
R'2;
&anage ris "ith appropriate procedures and checs to !ae sure slips are engaged and holding. Consult Tubing perations ait on R'2; correctCoiled /REs3subs. /RE supplier standard operating procedures3ris register. Drill stringusing diagra!. Consider an auto7ignition syste! if flaring in an area or ti!e of year "hen there is a high ris of fire.
0B3;0320;
Coil Tubing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
/RE -upplier
/RE
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
;. 'lanning
<5
$T,
RCD doesnt fit under sub
;. 'lanning
<9
$T,
1uip!ent a4ailable3Ti!ing
;. 'lanning
0
#$D
;. 'lanning
;
$T,
;. 'lanning
2
$T,
;. 'lanning
=
$T,
;. 'lanning
B
$T,
!properly specified 'D&s
Du!p subs in !otors are not blaned off -olids 7 Eac truc handling -olids 7 re7in6ection do"n drill string
<
$T,
;. 'lanning
$T,
Re7entry 7 Casing e:it debris in "ell
;. 'lanning
$T,
-olids 7 "aste !anage!ent
5
$T,
;. 'lanning
220
#$D
of 2
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Atte!pts to try and fit RCD could cause in6ury to personnel. Can not drill #$D3&'D. + Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and cost).
+
Flush 8iuid 'roduction Aspiration of 2 fro! a!bient air into the drillpipe or "ell
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and cost)
Air Drilling 7 ater influ: ,ole cleaning proble!s% delay in + is encountered operation. 're!ature RCD ele!ent "ear. rong size RCD stripper ele!ents on Drill pipe and3or tool location. 6oint size different than + Delay in drilling "ell (lost ti!e and planned cost). RCD fails !otor to pressure test. Freuent failures or poor
;. 'lanning
;. 'lanning
e l $ a ! i l p p A
perfor!ance increases nu!ber of trips reuired along "ith the + associated riss. ait on 'D&s suitable f or #$D3&'D en4iron!ent K te!perature and fluid co!patibility. ait on blaned du!p subs and3or + trip out of hole. + Release of to:ic gas near separator 'lugged $,A + Drill string "ashouts. ,igher and3or unstable $,'. Tight hole or stuc pipe. + 'lugged choe3separator du!p 4al4es. Da!age to bit and3or $,A. 1n4iron!entally responsible disposal + of , - conta!inated cuttings 2 1:ceed separator throughput capacity. + Release of burning oil3condensate fro! flare tip. 1:plosi4e !i:tures. Fire and e:plosion. + Da!age to do"nhole euip!ent and3or "ell casing.
=
;
=
;
=
;
Raise rig sub height by building up lease around casing bo"l. Eerify and chec eualizing line clearance if built too high. Change $' euip!ent. #se different rig. #se different RCD. Add pony sub under rig. RCD supplier to go to location to chec out rigHs sub prior to 6ob. Accurate $' stac7up and rig substructure clearance !easure!ents 1nsure adeuate co!!unications bet"een supplier and operator. Confir! ti!ing at pre7spud. perational plan should include contingency for s"itching to !ist% foa! and !ud operations. Drill string inspection. Eerify drill string size.
=
2
RCD supplier -'s3ris register. Drill string diagra!.
=
2
=
2
=
2
=
2
=
2
=
=
1nsure 'D& supplier is a"are of do"nhole operating en4iron!ent for application. nspect data for 'D&s recei4ed 4s. order placed. &otor supplier should be in4ol4ed in planning stage to ensure that the proper !otor specification is being supplied. For!al Co!!unication !ethod 7 radios -uction side discipline -uction -creens Consider !agnet36un baset run to clean out casing e:it. &onitor torue3drag carefully throughout drilling and tripping through e:it. A1R Directi4e <0> Drilling aste &anage!ent (see """.aer.ca) perating Co!pany "aste !anage!ent policies
=
;
;
R' ;5 22.;.<.<
,igh ' "ell probability% build so!e HfatH into !odeling% calculations% and per!it applications. 1nsure "ell is ne4er placed on 4acuu!. Al"ays fill drill string "ith liuid or inert gas during tripping. Al"ays !aintain !onitorable positi4e pressure on "ellbore. Conslut R';5 Fire and 1:plosion ,azard &anage!ent
0B3;0320;
RCD -upplier
RCD
perating Co!pany
/3A
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
Drill -tring
Directional Co!pany
'D&
Directional 'D& Co!pany perating 8ease &anage!ent Co!pany #$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
#$D -er4ice 'ro4ider
ell Control
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen 1nsure hand signals are in place for i!portant co!!unications. 1stablish radio protocol in safety !eeting. -upply sufficient head sets for !en "oring in high7 noise en4iron!ents. 1stablish battery changing schedule.
perating Co!pany 3 8ease &anage!ent #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
Co!pany !an to coordinate hoisting acti4ities "ith picer operator and super4isors. 're7fab $' co!ponents can be difficult to install in lo" clearance areas. -afety hand to be i n4ol4ed during rig up. -potting #'D3&'D euip!ent.
'icer perator 3 #$D3&'D 8ease &anage!ent -er4ice 'ro4ider
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
9
$T,
8oss of radio co!!unication
,ar! to personnel due to erroneous + co!!unications. 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
22.=.2.2
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
0
$T,
8ifting hazards
,ar! to personnel and3 or da!age to + euip!ent. 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
22.=.<
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
;
$T,
nadeuate or non7 e:istent "or platfor!s3barriers (i.e. RCD "or platfor!)
Trip and fall hazards particularly + around RCD installation3re!o4al and seal ele!ent change out.
;
;
nstall suitable "or decs and barriers for any ele4ated "or tass% particularly RCD installations. Adeuate co!!unication
perating Co!pany 3 RCD #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
2
$T,
A!bient te!peratures belo" freezing
'ossible freezing in piping dead legs% + liuid traps% etc. "ith resultant blocage.
;
;
Consider heat tracing and3or "ar! air3/ 2 circulation to !aintain clear lines. A4oid liuid traps in installation% utilize *clear line* start up procedure.
perating Co!pany 3 8ease &anage!ent #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
=
$T,
nadeuate or non7 e:istent electrical grounding of euip!ent sids
!properly or non7grounded + euip!ent sids leading to personnel in6ury and euip!ent do"nti!e.
;
;
!ple!ent an electrical grounding plan for the installation. nspect and test installation for electrical grounding.
All
All
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
B
$T,
nadeuate or non7 e:istent electrical locout3tagout procedures.
'ersonnel in6ury% euip!ent da!age + "hen pre!aturely po"ering up electrical circuits.
;
;
!ple!ent electrical locout3tagout procedures.
All
All
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
<
$T,
nadeuate or non7 e:istent locout3tagout procedures for utility supply (i.e. instru!ent air)
'ersonnel in6ury% euip!ent failure% en4iron!ental spills as a + conseuence of inad4ertent re!o4al of sidded euip!ent utility supply (i.e. instru!ent air).
;
;
!ple!ent locout3tagout procedures for te!porary sidded euip!ent utility supply.
All
All
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
$T,
/o high7pressure "arning signs on pipe"or
+ ncreased ris to personnel.
;
2
Re4ie" in safety !eetings. nspect prior to pressure testing. nspect te!porary pipe "or.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
$T,
RCD fails to pressure test
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
;
1nsure adeuate spares on location. Eisually chec rig annular (ring gasets3stud threads) prior to rig up. 1nsure proper rig align!ent.
RCD -upplier
RCD
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
5
$T,
$' ele!ents fail to pressure test
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
;
Rig Contractor
$' -yste!
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
9
$T,
'ri!ary flo" line fro! stac to separation euip!ent fails to pressure test
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
;
5 of 2
$' should be tested and ser4iced as per A1R Directi4es prior to 6ob. Rig should stoc spare co!ponents as appropriate. -er4ice co!pany !ust be able to de!onstrate &TR% certification for pipe"or. -upplier to pro4ide -' for rig up and pressure test. Rig !atting to be s upplied in !uddy3soft ground conditions to enable proper !aeup3align!ent of pipe"or.
0B3;0320;
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
Item
50
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
$T,
Cre" shortage and3or ine:perience
e l $ a ! i l p p A
+
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
-urface euip!ent !ay not be suitable in ter!s of pressure rating3flo" rate capability 7 "ait on + euip!ent. Fluid syste! !ay not be capable of achie4ing reuired pressure profile. 'ossibly pressurize !ud pu!p syste! through nitrogen in6ection line + (suction line !ay fail). as loc !ud pu!p.
5;
$T,
ell para!eters different fro! progra! 7 'R1--#R1
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
52
#$D
Failure to install chec 4al4e on each in6ection line
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
5=
$T,
ell para!eters different fro! progra! 7 ,2-
-urface euip!ent !ay not be suitable for handling sour fluid. + Additional concerns "ith regards to ,-1 for safe operations% fluid transportation% etc.
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
5B
$T,
'oor "eather
+
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
225
$T,
Fueling 1uip!ent
+ ,ar! to personnel and euip!ent.
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
5<
$T,
'oor ground conditions
+
5
#$D
Primar, Categor,
ce% !ud% une4en terrain can increase potential for slips% trips and falls.
2
;
2
;
2
;
2
;
2
2
nsite orientation and training. -uper4isors to ensure that all personnel ha4e been trained in the 4arious co!ponents of the rig up operation. dentify tass in tool bo: safety !eetings. 1nsure all "orers understand their right to refuse unsafe "or% or reuest training3guidance for tass that they are not yet co!petent in. Consider 1&- onsite during rig up operations. dentify ine:perienced cre"3short ter! cre" "ith green hand or green hard hats. ffsets to be analyzed as a guide for planning the operation. Assu!e "orst7case scenario "hen planning the "ell. Consider flush7production scenario encountered in #$D operations.
All
8ease &anage!ent
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
Discuss reuire!ents in pre7spud. Chec 4al4e to be installed do"nstrea! of all pu!ping euip!ent in operations using a ser4ice gas.
perating Co!pany 3 #$D Co!pression -er4ice 'ro4ider
ffsets to be analyzed as a guide for planning the operation. Assu!e "orst7case scenario "hen planning the "ell. 'lan for sour operations if there is e4en a s!all potential of encountering sour gas.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
-uper4isors ha4e obligation to stop unsafe "or3acti4ities.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
2
2
1nsuring adeuate fuel gage and grounding. Re4ie" -'s.
Rig Contractor 3 #$D3&'D All -er4ice 'ro4ider
2
2
Consider e:tensi4e use of rig !atting. -a"dust% etc. to be a4ailable to i!pro4e footing on sno"3ice in "inter operations.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
Co!pression -upplier
Co!pression
/RE
Co!pression or / 2 unit fails to start
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
=
;
Co!!ission in yard test if unit has been idle for a significant length of ti!e. -er4ice co!pany to sho" !aintenance records. nspect fuel tans before filling "ith diesel onsite.
Failure to pressure test increases + lielihood of a leaing /RE occurring.
=
;
'aper"or "ith /REs to include docu!entation of shop pressure test. Consider onsite pressure testing apparatus. ,a4e contingency procedures. ,a4e spare(s) /RE a4ailable.
/RE -upplier
+
=
;
Adeuate fuel filtering syste! to be in place for all critical co!ponents. nspect rental fuel storage tans before fi lling (especially B00 bbl tans not nor!ally used for fuel storage).
perating Co!pany 3 Co!pression #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
5
$T,
/REs fail to pressure test or no docu!entation of pressure test
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
55
$T,
'oor uality diesel fuel on location
9 of 2
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
1uip!ent da!age% and lost ti!e. 'u!p3co!pressor failure during #$D3&'D operations !ay result in "ell control issues.
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
59
$T,
Rig cre"s unfa!iliar "ith process
,ar! to personnel% euip!ent or + en4iron!ent. 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
22.;.<
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
90
$T,
Eal4es incorrectly positioned on stac or !anifold
+
'ossible o4erpressure of RCD or !anifold at surface. 'ossible fluid release to at!osphere3en4iron!ent.
;
;
22.;.< 22.=.B
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9;
$T,
-eparator not purged prior to lighting flare
+
'otential bacflash3e:plosion in separation euip!ent.
;
;
22.;.=.
4erpressure at surface% dead7 + heading pu!ps and other ,-1 concerns.
;
2
Detailed #$D3&'D progra! in place. ritten procedures for critical operations a4ailable on rig floor. Re4ie" procedures "ith all personnel in a safety !eeting before drillout. Consider dry run for critical procedures prior to drilling out. 'rocess flo" diagra! posted in dog house. al the pu!p lines before co!!encing drillout procedure. Consider labeling all 4al4es and !aring the! as nor!ally open or nor!ally closed. All "ell control piping to be blo"n dry and3or heated to pre4ent freezing. 'urge "ith nitrogen prior to lighting flare. 1nsure bacpressure syste! is operable on pressurized separator before lighting flare. 1nsure hand signals are in place for i!portant co!!unications. 1stablish radio protocol in safety !eeting. -upply sufficient head sets for !en "oring in high7 noise en4iron!ents. Re4ie" roles in safety !eeting. Test in6ection pu!ps during rig up and co!!issioning. -tore che!icals as per !anufacturers reco!!endations. Consider#$D connecting in6ection pu!ps to data syste!. Detailed progra! in place% including pu!p
perating Co!pany 3 Training #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
#$D3&'D Flare3Eent -yste! -er4ice 'ro4ider
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
92
$T,
'oor co!!unications during "ell conditioning
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9=
$T,
Che!ical in6ection pu!ps are not "oring or not calibrated.
Riss of carryo4er fro! separator + (en4iron!ental concern). Corrosion concerns.
2
2
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9B
#$D
'oorly designed hole conditioning procedure
1:cessi4e slugging and3or surface + pressure and flo" rates. 'ossible fluid carryo4er.
2
2
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9<
$T,
Data syste! not functioning properly
+
nability to react in real7ti!e to "ell conditioning e4ents. 'ossible errors in i! ple!enting hole conditioning pu!p schedule.
2
2
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9
$T,
For!ation integrity test insufficient for planned operations
#nable to apply #$D3 &'D progra!. + 'ossible "ell control concerns% lost ti!e or har! to personnel.
2
2
&ay reuire additional casing string or redesign of &'D3#$D operation. Re!edial ce!ent 6ob3re7drill and test.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
=
2
Drill out "hile pu!ping at high rate. Consider tooth bit 4ersus 'DC. &onitor torue and drag "hile drilling shoe. bser4e returns at s haer. Direct returns to shaer% bypassing separator. Control drill through plug. Consider drilling out "ith slic asse!bly.
perating Co!pany
Drill -tring
22.=.2.2
schedule. ritten procedure in doghouse3#$D control unit. 'rocedure re4ie"ed by engineering and discussed in safety !eeting. Test sensors and data syste! during c o!!issioning phase and confir! operation prior to drillout. 1nsure sensors are heat traced so that they donHt freeze and pro4ide erroneous data.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
#$D3&'D &ud -yste! -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
#$D3&'D Data Acuisition -er4ice 'ro4ider
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
9
$T,
Float shoe debris in "ell after drillout
,igher $,' than predicted. #nstable $,'. + -tuc pipe. 'lugged choe. Da!age to $,A3bit.
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
22B
&'D
n Casing Test
+ Da!age to euip!ent.
=
=
$it to casing c learance. Follo" detailed -'s. 1nsure ho!ogeneous !ud in hole.
&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
ell 'rogra!
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
95
$T,
Da!age to $,A during drillout
'otential har! to personnel if $,A floats fail. + 8ost ti!e and cost due to round trip. Co!pro!ised $,A integrity !ay result in a "ell control scenario.
=
2
Displace to gasified3drilling fluid syste! in controlled !anner after drillout. 1nsure all in6ection rate !eters are functioning and the reuired rate is being pu!ped. bser4e pressures during hole conditioning.
Directional Co!pany
&D
;0 of 2
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
=. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning
99
#$D
/RE not installed near surface prior to conditioning "ith co!pressible fluid
B. Drilling
;00
$T,
/o strategy for *planned* shut do"ns
+
B. Drilling
;0;
$T,
/o strategy for *unplanned* shut do"ns
B. Drilling
;02
$T,
$T,
B. Drilling
B. Drilling
B. Drilling
;; of 2
;0=
;0B
;0<
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
1:cessi4e bleed7off ti!e3connection ti!e. + 'ossibly reuire re7conditioning hole after long bleed7off ti!e to install /RE.
Reference and re4ie" drill string diagra!. Discuss in safety !eeting and confir! installation 4isually before co!!encing operations. Add drill string floats.
perating Co!pany 3 #$D /RE -er4ice 'ro4ider
=
2
Failure to consider t he shutdo"n seuence !ay result in hole proble!s% high pressures at surface% unnecessary "ell ill% etc.
;
;
22.=.9
Add c onti ngency plans.
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
+
Failure to consider t he shutdo"n seuence !ay result in hole proble!s% high pressures at surface% unnecessary "ell ill% etc.
;
;
22.=.9
Add c onti ngency plans.
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
-eparator fails
+
as release and har! to personnel3en4iron!ent.
;
;
22.;.=.< 22.2.B.<
-eparation euip!ent certification !ust be current. '-Es installed and relief lines rigged up. RigHs "ell control euip!ent rigged in and operational in case of catastrophic failure.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
Dead legs3liuid traps on per!anently piped sid euip!ent 7 increased incidence of internal corrosion% lea and3or rupture
-idded euip!ent "ith per!anent piping installations often incorporate pipe dead legs or liuid traps (i.e. concentric reducers instead of eccentric reducers) "here acidic or + corrosi4e liuids accu!ulate and are not easily flushed. 'ossible lea or rupture "ith resultant personnel% euip!ent and en4iron!ental conseuences.
;
;
Consider inspection of sidded euip!ent per!anent piping for dead legs and liuid traps and re!o4e or pro4ide !eans of inspection and docu!entation.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
Consider onsite #ltrasonic Thicness (#T) !onitoring progra!. &a:i!ize separator pressure to !ini!ize 4elocity in fl o" line. -er4ice co!pany to pro4ide erosion !anage!ent docu!ent. perate "ithin Flo" Control &atri: para!eters. Train on critical operations such as shutting in or di4erting to secondary flo" line. &aintain flo" 4elocities in pri!ary flo"line belo" (<< !3sec) in absence of detailed erosion !odeling. Reduce nu!ber of flo"line turns. 1nsure ;0 internal dia!eters spacing bet"een flo"line turns. This allo"s the flo" to straighten prior to the ne:t turn. 'ri!ary flo"line !ust contain targeted tees (turns) and be a !ini!u! ;0;. !! in outside dia!eter or larger. &a:i!ize liuid in6ection rate.
#$D3&'D ell 'rogra! -er4ice 'ro4ider
!ple!ent pipe inspection procedures and docu!entation prior to each rig up% and /DT "all thicness inspections at 4ulnerable points throughout operation. #T testing "hen possible.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
$T,
ashout occurs on pri!ary flo"line fro! $' stac to the separation euip!ent
as release on location. + 'ersonnel in6ury. Da!age to euip!ent.
;
;
22.=.9
$T,
'ipe "all thicness erosion
4er ti!e pipe "all erodes or corrodes leading to reduction in pressure integrity% possible lea or + rupture "ith resultant personnel% euip!ent and en4iron!ental conseuences.
;
;
22.2.2.B 22.2.2.;
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
;0
$T,
RCD drill string sealing ele!ent failure or RCD Control #nit Failure
as3,ydrocarbon fluid release at rig floor. + gnition and e:plosion ris. 'ossible for!ation da!age if "ell has to be illed.
;
;
B. Drilling
22<
&'D
Degasser fails3o4erflo"s
+ ,ar! to en4iron!ent.
2
2
B. Drilling
22
&'D
#se of secondary flo" line (rig bleed7off line)
+
8oss of "ell control. ,ar! to euip!ent and personnel.
;
;
B. Drilling
22
$T,
nadeuate3i!proper RCD size
,ar! to personnel or en4iron!ent. + Da!age to euip!ent. 'ossible loss of "ell control.
;
;
B. Drilling
;0
$T,
/o procedures in place for replacing RCD ele!ent
!properly atte!pting to change the RCD ele!ent !ay result in fires% + e:plosions or other catastrophic ,-1 e4ents. ,ar! to personnel.
;
;
B. Drilling
;05
$T,
RCD ele!ent deteriorates
+
Choe plugging% euip!ent da!age. Co!pro!ise of "ell control barrier.
;
;
B. Drilling
;2 of 2
;09
;;0
$T,
#$D
Drill string failure ("ashout or t"ist7off)
Gelly hose failure
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
B. Drilling
B. Drilling
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
'ossible gas3hydrocarbon fluid at rig floor. + gnition and e:plosion ris. For!ation da!age due to "ell ill. 'ossible pipe light situation.
as3fluid release at rig fl oor. ,ar! to personnel. + gnition and e:plosion riss. For!ation da!age if "ell has to be illed.
;
;
;
;
22.2.2.= 22.2..= 22.=.
Chec rig align!ent before and during operation. &onitor RCD perfor!ance "hile drilling. Replace ele!ents as per supplierHs -'s before !a6or leaage occurs. ,a4e a bacup ele!ent ready for uic installation. Consider installing a ne" ele!ent during lo" ris t i!es (out of hole% prior to starting drilling after a trip% etc.). Co!plete regular inspection of the control unit and its operability. ndication of failure is to be considered a "ell control e4ent. Consider a redundant bac7up unit onsite. 1nsure degasser fluid le4el3capacity. perate "ithin "ell progra! specifications. perate "ithin euip!ent specifications.
RCD -upplier
RCD
&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
-eparation
perate "ithin "ell scope. 1nsure adeuate drilling fluid "eight and surface bac pressure (-$'). 1nsure adeuate ill !ud on location.
&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
ell 'rogra!
Re4ie" offset data for area. Follo" driling progra!. 'lan for !a:i!u! pressures e:pected. 1nsure contingency plans are in place.
All
RCD
22.2.2.= 22.=.
Reference supplierHs -'s for changing the RCD ele!ent. Rehearse eualizing procedure prior to conducting operations. $ac pressure reuired during process.
RCD -upplier
RCD
22.2.2.= 22.=.
Reference supplierHs -'s for the use and !aintenance of the RCD. ,a4e bearing3rubbers a4ailable.
RCD -upplier
RCD
22.=.9 22.=.;;
1stablish !a:i!u! torue li!it on pipe during drilling operations. nspect all drill string co!ponents according to the appropriate ris assessed A' or D-7; category. &onitor drilling data for signs of pipe "ashout. nclude drill string failure in planned3unplanned shut7 do"n procedures.
Rig Contractor
ell 'rogra!
22.2..B 22.=.9
Consider installing ne" elly hose prior to c o!!encing #$D operations. Gelly hose to be certified for hydrocarbon liuid ser4ice "hen using $&. Run surface drill pipe screens periodically and chec for rubber debris. 'ressure test elly hose prior to starting operations. Consider using a hose certified for gas ser4ice in high ris operations (natural gas in6ection% etc.). Gelly hose issues also apply to other fle:ible rubber co!ponents in the rigHs !ud circulation syste!.
Rig Contractor
Rig 1uip!ent
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
B. Drilling
;;;
$T,
Circulating through fle:ible hoses3shoc hose
Failure of hoses results in release of + hydrocarbons% potential in6ury to personnel.
;
;
22.2.2.;
,oses to be certified for hydrocarbon liuid ser4ice "hen using $&. 'ressure test hoses prior to starting operations. #se a hose certified for gas ser4ice in high ris operations (natural gas in6ection% etc.). #se hard line "hene4er possible.
B. Drilling
;;2
$T,
ell has to be illed for "ell control
For!ation da!age. + gnition and e:plosion riss. 'otential har! to personnel.
;
;
22.;.=.2 22.;.=.<
Gill fluid !ust be a4ailable on site% as per regulatory reuire!ents. Flo" control !atri: in place% and obser4ed. ell control procedure in place and rehearsed.
perating Co!pany
$T,
'oor understanding of the relationship of the #$D3&'D it and the rig it "ith regards to "ell control e4ents
Failure in "ell control procedure !ay + result in "ell control proble!s% loss of control% in6ury or death.
;
;
22.;.<
n7site orientation and training is to include "ell control considerations. Discuss at pre76ob safety !eeting.
RCD -upplier 3 #$D3&'D ell Control -er4ice 'ro4ider
$,A /RE failure
'ossible gas3reser4oir fluid co!!unication to surface. &ay reuire "ell ill to trip safely. + #nable to trip "ith re!edying the situation ("ell ill% set a plug% or retrie4e3replace /RE).
22.2.=.; 22.=.;0
Test /REs before initial installation. Replace $,A /REs after e4ery trip. nclude contingency to set a plug or another retrie4able /RE as deep as possible. nstall screens abo4e /RE to catch debris fro! the drill string. Run a !ini!u! of t"o /REs in the $,A.
perating Co!pany
&D Contractor 3 #$D3&'D &D -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
B. Drilling
;;=
;;B
$T,
B. Drilling
;;<
$T,
'D Failure3&D Annular 'ressure fails
perational para!eters often consider a4ailability of real ti!e 'D data. Absence of 'D data !ay result in + poor decision !aing regarding "ell control. 'ossible trip out of the hole (cost). #ncertainty regarding do"n hole pressure.
B. Drilling
;;
$T,
naccurate flo" si!ulation
+
'otential to operate outside of fl o" control !atri: due to "rong input data.
;
;
Rig Contractor
Rig 1uip!ent
ell Control
/RE
2
;
Re4ie" reuire!ents for ' D data and i!portance "ith directional co!pany prior to starting operations. nclude decision points in progra! regarding 'D data failure. &aintain a "ell calibrated t"o phase flo" ! odel throughout operation. #se pressure data obtained fro! &'D soft"are. !ple!ent pu!ping progra! in accordance "ith &D tool -'s to !ini!ize potential for tool failure. #$D progra! should include potential decision points to trip% including "hether the operation can safely proceed "ithout 'D data.
2
2
Re4ie" fluid data and si!ulation soft"are use "ith #$D ser4ice pro4ider.
#$D3&'D ell Control -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany 3 &'D /RE -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;;
$T,
Rig cre" una"are of dangers of trapped pressure belo" /RE
'ossible da!age to euip!ent% in6ury% + or loss of life i f /RE is broen out "ith trapped pressure belo" it.
;
;
22.2.=.; 22.;.<.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
B. Drilling
;;5
$T,
/o "ritten procedures in place for bleeding off the /RE
'ossible da!age to euip!ent% in6ury% + or loss of life i f /RE is broen out "ith trapped pressure belo" it.
;
;
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
perating Co!pany 3 &'D /RE -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;;9
$T,
nadeuate pressure rating for /RE bleed7off hose and tool
+
;
;
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
perating Co!pany 3 /RE /RE 'ro4ider
;= of 2
'ossible in6ury or loss of life if hose or tool fails.
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
B. Drilling
;20
$T,
/RE bleed7off hose in poor condition
+
'ossible in6ury or loss of life if hose fails.
;
;
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
B. Drilling
;2;
$T,
/RE bleed7off hose is not securely anchored
+
,ose !ay "hip and in6ure3ill personnel on the rig floor.
;
;
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
perating Co!pany
/RE
$T,
Retrie4able /RE unseats under pressure
#nseated /RE can cause serious + da!age to euip!ent or in6ury3death.
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced. Do not allo" unualified personnel to seat% inspect% or touch retrie4able /REs.
/RE -upplier
/RE
'ossible for!ation breado"n at + "ea point. ell control proble!s3blo"out.
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;22
;
;
22.=.;2
'otential for e:plosi4e !i:tures and3or fire (surface or do"nhole).
;
;
22.;.=. R' ;5
Job planning stage is to consider the air 4olu!e reuired to create a co!bustible3reacti4e !i:ture do"nhole based on the drilling fluids being used% reser4oir fluids% etc.
perating Co!pany
+
4erpressure of euip!ent% error in "ell control operations !ay result in euip!ent da!age or in6ury to personnel.
;
;
22.;.=.2 22.2.2.;
'LD to include electronic and !anual pressure !easure!ent points. Confir! reuire!ents at pre7spud and rig 4isit.
#$D3&'D Data Acuisition -er4ice 'ro4ider
-econdary flo" line tied in to #$D !anifold
+
#nclear "ell control strategy% responsibility for operating 4al4es3choes !ay result in "ell control proble!s.
;
;
22.;.=.2 22.2.2.;
Consult 'rocess Flo" Diagra!s for appropriate reco!!endations.
#$D3&'D ell Control -er4ice 'ro4ider
!properly configured $' stac
ell control proble!s !ay not be + dealt "ith safely% resulting in possible loss of "ell control.
;
;
22.;.=.2 22.2.2.;
Consult 'rocess Flo" Diagra!s for appropriate reco!!endations.
perating Co!pany
ell Control
nsufficient ill fluid 3 ill fluid density on location
+ 8oss of "ell control.
;
;
22.2.<
Reference appropriate regulatory body regarding !ini!u! ill fluid 4olu!e reuire!ents. Gill fluid !ust be readily accessible.
perating Co!pany
ell Control
B. Drilling
;2=
$T,
B. Drilling
;2B
#$D
Air introduced into circulating syste! "hile !aing drill pipe connection3tripping
+
B. Drilling
;2<
$T,
nsufficient pressure !easure!ent points
B. Drilling
;2
#$D
B. Drilling
;2
#$D
B. Drilling
;25
$T,
;29
$T,
B. Drilling
;=0
#$D
B. Drilling
;B of 2
;=;
&'D
;
/RE
Job planning !ust include !a:i!u! allo"able surface pressure for the !ud "eight used for the operation. perational ad6ust!ents !ust be !ade based on the for!ation integrity test3leaoff gradient. Consider installing a pressure relief 4al4e upstrea! of the choe.
ell is accidentally shut in "hile pu!ping single phase (liuid)
B. Drilling
;
perating Co!pany
Flo" through tubing spool or casing bo"l
+
Dual annular is used for surface pressure contain!ent
'otential hydrocarbon release% + pressure at the rig floor% etc. if the stripping annular fails.
1:cessi4e bac pressure during single7 phase (liuid) &'D operations
ashout belo" $' !ay result in loss of "ell control.
'ossible for!ation breado"n at + "ea point. ell control proble!s3blo"out.
ell 'rogra!
;
;
22.2.2.;
/o flo" allo"ed through any 2* (or s!aller) flo". /o flo" through eualization lines.
perating Co!pany 3 ell Control #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
;
;
22.;.=.2
-afety consideration are si!ilar to the use of RCDs. 1nsure that the design of the stac !eets reco!!ended practices.
RCD -upplier
RCD
22.=.;2
Job planning !ust include !a:i!u! allo"able surface pressure for the !ud "eight used for the operation. perational ad6ust!ents !ust be !ade based on the for!ation integrity test 3 leaoff gradient. Consider installing a pressure relief 4al4e upstrea! of the choe.
&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
Choe3Flo"line
;
;
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
B. Drilling
;=2
$T,
$lind ra! or pipe ra! failure.
+ 'otential loss of "ell control.
;
;
22.2.2.;
Flush $' stac prior to using co!ponents for operational purposes. Chec regulator pressure for ra!s and annular to ensure !a:i!u! closing pressures are obser4ed. &ini!ize cycling of $'s.
B. Drilling
;==
$T,
naccurate or insufficient 'ET !easure!ents
Failure to detect ics3losses (and + intensity) !ay result in "ell control incident.
;
;
22.;.=.2
'LD to include electronic and !anual pressure !easure!ent points. Confir! reuire!ents at pre7spud and rig 4isit. #se of !ass flo" !eters.
#$D3&'D Data Acuisition -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;=B
$T,
Changing flash point of oil based drilling fluid
+
Flashpoint and fluid properties change "ith inflo".
;
;
22.=.;0
#se closed fluid storage syste! "hen drilling #$ "ith oil based syste!. &onitor fluid properties "hile drilling.
Rig Contractor
&ud -yste!
B. Drilling
;=<
$T,
nability to transfer fluid fro! storage tans to acti4e syste!
+
#nable to access fluid for "ell control purposes.
;
;
22.2.<
Confir! reuire!ents at pre7spud and rig 4isit.
perating Co!pany
ell Control
B. Drilling
;=
$T,
ellhead cellar full of liuid3!ud% i!!ersion hazard
+
'ossible i!!ersion hazard in the e4ent of a trip or fall.
;
2
22.=.=.;
'u!p out and barrier off cellar prior to RCD% etc. rig up.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
,igh inflo" rates could e:ceed separator ratings (liuids or gas). ncreased potential for pipe erosion. + 'ossibly suspend operations before planned TD. 1:ceed RCD pressure rating.
;
2
22.;.=.;
-ize separator for flush production e4ents. Accurately !easure return flo" para!eters 7 rates and pressures. De4elop and post Flo" Control !atri: in dog house and #$D3&'D control roo!.
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
All
ell Control
B. Drilling
;=
$T,
,igh7rate flush production encountered
B. Drilling
;=5
$T,
1-D closes on the pri!ary flo" line fro! the $' stac to the separation euip!ent
4er pressure RCD% resulting in + failure and3or gas release at rig floor. 1:ceed for!ation strength at shoe.
;
2
22.2.2.2
The use and benefits of and 1-D need to be "eighed against the potential hazards of operating the 1-D (intentionally or accidentally). #$D3&'D progra! should 6ustify the use (or lac thereof) of an 1-D.
#$D3&'D ell 'rogra! -er4ice 'ro4ider
'ossible ad4erse effects on fluid syste!. 'ossible surface separation + challenges or storage proble!s. Fla!!ability3e:plosion ris in Air Drilling operations.
;
2
22.=.;0
&onitor fluid trends for signs of oil3condensate production. 'rogra! to include contingency plans if oil3condensate production is a possibility% including dealing "ith e!ulsions.
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;=9
$T,
#nplanned condensate3oil production
B. Drilling
;B0
$T,
#nclear responsibilities of ey personnel on location.
Delay in i!ple!enting "ell control + procedures !ay increase the potential for a se4ere "ell control incident.
;
2
22.=.2
A diagra! containing ey personnel roles% responsibilities% and reporting structure i!pro4es co!!unications and data disse!ination on location.
perating Co!pany 3 8ease &anage!ent #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;B;
$T,
#nclear reporting lines3structure on location
Delay in i!ple!enting ey decisions + !ay result in "ell control incidents% e:ceeding euip!ent ratings% etc.
;
2
22.=.2
A diagra! containing ey personnel roles% responsibilities% and reporting structure i!pro4es co!!unications and data disse!ination on location.
perating Co!pany 3 8ease &anage!ent #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;B2
$T,
Failure to bleed off float do"n to at!ospheric pressure
+
Any trapped pressure belo" the /RE poses a ris to personnel.
;
2
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
perating Co!pany 3 /RE /RE 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;B=
$T,
$leed7off to at!osphere is located in an area "here "orers are present
+
orers are e:posed to flying debris% hazardous !ist.
;
2
22.2.=.;
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
#$D3&'D /RE -er4ice 'ro4ider
;< of 2
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
B. Drilling
Item
;BB
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
$T,
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
Top dri4e seal and3or "ash pipe failure
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
Release of gas3fluids at rig floor. + gnition3e:plosion ris. 'otential har! to personnel.
;
=
-er4ice and inspect before 6ob.
Rig Contractor
&D Contractor &D
#$D3&'D Flare3Eent -yste! -er4ice 'ro4ider
2
;
!ple!ent pu!ping progra! in accordance "ith &D tool -'s to !ini!ize potential for tool failure. Choose tools "ith a high &T$F in the de!anding #$D en4iron!ent.
2
2
Continuous pilot ignition syste!. ðane disperses rapidly into at!osphere. ,igh concentration of nitrogen !ay reduce flare ignition and co!bustion efficiency.
B. Drilling
;B<
$T,
&D tool failure
+ Trip out of the hole.
B. Drilling
;B
$T,
Flare pilot goes out
+
/onconfor!ance "ith regulatory reuire!ent to collect sa!ples. + 'otential har! to personnel% clearing plugged sa!ple catcher.
2
2
dours. 'otential e:plosi4e !i:ture. ptics for cre" of potential e:plosion ris.
22.=.;0
Consider dual sa!ple catcher !anifold syste!. &ust be able to isolate sa!ple catcher fro! pri!ary flo" line. -er4ice co!pany to pro4ide3follo" sa!ple catching procedure. Ad6ust sa!ple catching procedure based on 4olu!e of sa!ples caught each ti!e. Test in6ection pu!ps during rig up and co!!issioning. -tore che!icals as per !anufacturers reco!!endations. Consider connecting in6ection pu!ps to data syste!. -pear pu!ps3parts are to be a4ailable onsite. -"itch to second choe on dual7choe !anifold. nclude choe "ashout in the planned3unplanned shutdo"n operations. Follo" -'s. Follo" drilling progra!. -"itch to secondary choe. ,a4e adeuate !ud density on location. ,a4e contingency -'s.
Rig 1uip!ent
B. Drilling
;B
#$D
eological sa!pling syste! not "oring or plugged
B. Drilling
;B5
#$D
Che!ical in6ection pu!ps are not "oring or not calibrated
Riss of carryo4er fro! s eparator + (en4iron!ental concern). Corrosion concerns.
2
2
Te!porary loss of bac pressure control. + ,ar! to personnel or en4iorn!ent. Da!age to euip!ent. 'ossible loss of "ell control.
;
;
Flo"line erosion. + /oise (flaring). ,igher potential for euip!ent failure.
2
2
Follo" flo" control !atri: in progra!. 1nsure separator '-E capacity is appropriate for anticipated !a:i!u! possible gas flo" rate.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
/RE
B. Drilling
;B9
$T,
,igh surface bac presure or #$D3&'D choe "ashout
B. Drilling
;<0
$T,
,igher than planned gas3oil inflo" rates
B. Drilling
;<;
#$D -er4ice 'ro4ider
-a!ple Catcher
#$D -er4ice 'ro4ider
&ud -yste!
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
$T,
Da!age to "ellhead sealing areas
CanHt set tubing hanger. + Tubing hanger "onHt seal. ellhead leas.
2
2
/RE leaing "hile !aing a connection. -light in6ection gas3fluid blo" fro! drill + pipe at surface. 8ost ti!e to trip and replace leaing /RE.
Consider installing "ear bushing during #$D operation. &ae sure rig align!ent is good throughout operation. solate "ell "ith pacer3bridge plug% then run hanger3pressure test and chec sealing areas.
2
2
Test /REs before initial installation. nstall screens abo4e /RE to catch debris fro! the drill string. Run "ireline retrie4able /REs.
perating Co!pany
B. Drilling
;<=
$T,
/ear -urface /RE failure
B. Drilling
;
$T,
Failure to continuously !onitor data strea! accuracy
+
'ossibly designing "ell procedures based on "rong infor!ation.
2
2
Data technician or other responsible person to !aintain data syste! and assure data i ntegrity. All decision !aers on location should ha4e access to the real ti!e data strea!.
#$D3&'D Data Acuisition -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;<<
#$D
Che!icals are used in in6ection3return syste!
+
,ealth hazards of "orers e:posed to che!icals.
2
=
Appropriate protecti4e gear to be a4ailable based on &-D-3-D- sheets of all che!icals on location.
&ud Co!pany
&ud -yste!
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
B. Drilling
; of 2
;<
$T,
1:cessi4e casing "ear
+ 8oss of "ell.
2
=
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
B. Drilling
B. Drilling
Item
;<
;<5
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
$T,
8eas in lo" pressure tan far! pipe"or
$T,
-pill during offloading3loading drilling fluid
+
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
1n4iron!ental spill% potential fire + hazard. 1n4iron!ental spill% potential fire hazard.
2
=
1stablish procedure to !onitor for leas. 'rocedures !ust be in place for shipping fluid% ensuring that no pipe"or is o4er7pressured.
RCD -upplier
-eparation
Re4ie" trucing contractorHs -'s. nspect condition of trucing contractors shipping lines. All e!ployees !ust go through the onsite orientation.
Trucing Contractor
&ud -yste!
2
=
'lanned hole depth not achie4ed. + Costs incurred "ith sidetracing. 'ossible stuc pipe% loss of $,A.
=
;
1nsure botto!s up calculation ti!es for sa!ple retrie4al is accurate. &onitor changes in R'3inflo"3changes in directional control% and other drilling para!eters to flag lithology changes. &onitor changing 8D data% if a4ailable.
Directional Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
=
;
Follo" #$D progra! procedures. &onitor trends on data syste! for signs of increasing $,'% decreasing inflo" rates% etc.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
'rocedure in place for unplanned and planned shutdo"n of gas in6ection syste!. Consider bac7up co!pression reuire!ents. Co!pression euip!ent supplier to pro4ide !aintenance schedule 3 onsite parts list. as in6ection !etering !ay reuire freuent calibration checs and consideration for redundant !eters.
Co!pression -upplier
Co!pression
#$D -er4ice 'ro4ider
ell 'rogra!
B. Drilling
;<9
$T,
Drill out of zone into shale or coal
B. Drilling
;0
$T,
4erbalanced pressure spie
+ 'ossible for!ation da!age.
=
;
=
;
B. Drilling
;;
#$D
as in6ection syste! fails
'ossible o4erbalanced situation + (for!ation da!age). 8ost ti!e and cost.
B. Drilling
;2
#$D
&ist pu!p failure
8ost ti!e and cost. ,igher $,' than planned. + #nstable $,'. -tuc pipe3poor hole cleaning. &D failure.
B. Drilling
;=
$T,
$orehole instability
+
For!ation da!age. -tuc pipe. 8ost $,A3fishing costs. Target not reached.
=
;
B. Drilling
;B
$T,
Torue and drag are too high
+
'lanned hole depth is not achie4ed. Drill string failure. 'ipe bucling. -tuc pipe.
=
2
B. Drilling
;<
$T,
#nstable flo" in annulus
+
Co!pro!ised hole cleaning could increase potential for stuc pipe. Difficult to interpret inflo" rates and "ell beha4ior.
=
2
Conduct freuent !ud or foa! checs. Change pu!p rates3surface bac pressure to change flo" regi!e in "ellbore.
#$D3&'D ell 'rogra! -er4ice 'ro4ider
B. Drilling
;
$T,
,ole cleaning proble!s
+
For!ation da!age. -tuc pipe. 8ost $,A3fishing costs. Target not reached.
=
2
Follo" &'D3#$D progra! for hole cleaning procedures and !onitoring. &onitor returns.
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
; of 2
'rocedure in place for unplanned and planned shutdo"n of gas in6ection syste!. Function test prior to starting operations. nstall screens in the suction line and ensure clean fluid is being pu!ped. &anage dra"do"n throughout all stages of the operations. nclude !ini!u! pressure to pre4ent breaout as a "ell design para!eter. A4oid e:iting into shale3coal sea!s% and a4oid planning a tra6ectory that crosses no"n trouble zones. &ini!ize ti!e in the hole "ithout circulating. Chec drill string specifications and recent inspections. !ple!ent good drilling practices 7 !ini!ize doglegs% !onitor hole cleaning para!eters% conduct "iper trips "hen reuired. nclude che!ical options for friction reducers in the planning stage of the "ell.
0B3;0320;
perating Co!pany 3 ell 'rogra! #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
=
2
ncreased hole cleaning concerns. 'ossible euip!ent da!age due to increased drill string3"ell purge ti!e reuired.
=
2
bser4e &D supplierHs reco!!endation for !a:i!u! allo"able nitrogen in6ection rate. ncrease a"areness of possible hole cleaning proble!s.
+
8ost ti!e and cost. #nstable $,'. 'ossible for!ation da!age fro! pressure spies.
=
2
-ur4eying proble!s
+
8ost ti!e and cost. #nstable $,'. 'ossible for!ation da!age fro! pressure spies.
=
2
$T,
Drill string integrity failure
+
as release at rig floor. 'otential pipe light.
;
;
22.=.;;
;2
$T,
'ipe light
+
Drill string e6ected fro! "ell. Da!age to euip!ent and3or in6ury3death of personnel. 'ipe bucling.
;
;
22.=.
<. Tripping
;=
#$D
,igh flo" rate fro! "ell
+
ncreased RCD "ear% pipe"or erosion.
;
;
<. Tripping
;B
$T,
RCD failure 7 stripping through RCD
!!ediate release of gas3"ellbore + fluids to the rig floor. Ris of ignition% in6ury or death.
;
!!ediate release of gas3"ellbore + fluids to the rig floor. Ris of ignition% in6ury or death.
#nplanned for!ation "ater production
8o" inflo" rates
+
$T,
1:cessi4e drill string connection ti!e
;0
$T,
<. Tripping
;;
<. Tripping
;
$T,
B. Drilling
;5
#$D
B. Drilling
;9
B. Drilling
Connection procedures in place and rehearsed. $ac pressure schedule a4ailable and updated by onsite 1ngineer to opti!ize connection procedure to !ini!ize $,' spies. Connection procedure discussed "ith &D personnel before being finalized. Connection procedure !ust consider &D tool reuire!ents and li!itations. Consideration for 1&&D tools for "hen in6ecting t"o7 phase fluids into drill string. 'ositi4e pulse &D has li!itations "ith t"o7phase fluids abo4e 207=0I gas 4olu!e fraction in the standpipe. Test integrity prior to drillout. Test drill string integrity "hen breaing out last near7 surface /RE.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
Rig Contractor
Training
&D Contractor &D
perating Co!pany
ell Control
'ipe light calculations to be updated based on current "ell para!eters. 'ipe light calculations need to be done befofe tripping out of the hole.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
22.;.=.; 22.;.=.< 22.2.2.B
Deter!ine decision points for "hen 4arious euip!ent is reuired% including push7pull euip!ent% and rig assisted snubbing units.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
22.2.2.= 22.;.=.<
perate RCD "ithin supplierHs specifications. nspect RCD ele!ent before tripping. Consider replacing RCD ele!ent "hen bit is bac at the shoe. Flo" "ell to reduce the fl o"ing "ell head pressure.
RCD -upplier
RCD
;
;
22.2.2.= 22.2.=.;
RCD -upplier
RCD
RCD -upplier
RCD
RCD -upplier
RCD
<. Tripping
;<
$T,
1ualizing procedure not i!ple!ented for changing RCD ele!ents
<. Tripping
;
$T,
RCD failure 7 "ith snubbing adaptor
!!ediate release of gas3"ellbore + fluids to the rig floor. Ris of ignition% in6ury or death.
;
;
22.=.
<. Tripping
;
$T,
RCD seal integrity is unno"n
Release of gas3"ellbore fluids to the + rig floor. Ris of ignition% in6ury or death.
;
;
22.2.2.= 22.=.
;5 of 2
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen &onitor fluid trends for signs of "ater production and !ae tra6ectory ad6ust!ents accordingly. #$D progra! to consider contingency "ith regards to pu!p rates reuired for hole c leaning (air77foa!7t"o7 phase transitions). Consider a contingency plan to deal "ith e!ulsions.
For!ation da!age to reser4oir section already drilled. + 'ossibly suspension of air drilling progra!. Fluid handling3storage3trucing issues.
B. Drilling
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
perate RCD "ithin supplierHs specifications. Follo" procedure reco!!ended by RCD supplier "hen eualizing pressure. Re4ie" $' diagra! during prespud. Eent bleedoff to a safe area. perate3install snubbing adaptor as per supplierHs specifications. nspect3pressure test integrity of snubbing adaptor pressure seal on RCD before co!!encing snubbing operations. ear de4ice should *lea* rather than fail catastrophically.
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
;
;
22.2.=.; 22.=.;0 22.=.
Release of in6ection gas at rig floor. 'ossible in6ury3death to personnel if bleed7off tool fails !echanically or hose co!es lose.
;
;
22.2.=.; 22.=.
!proper use of /REs are a leading cause of ,-1 incidents in #$D3&'D operations. Re4ie" supplierHs -'s and i!ple!ent their use in accordance "ith the R' referenced.
/RE -upplier
/RE
Deeper pipe light point. ncreased RCD "ear3failure potential.
;
;
22.;.=.; 22.;.=.<
'ipe light calculations and associated euip!ent reuire!ents to be updated based on current "ell para!eters.
perating Co!pany
ell Control
-nubbing unit to be euipped "ith fail safe slip design to pre4ent pipe light condition. 're76ob inspection !ini!izes the potential for euip!ent do"nti!e. #nsupported pipe length bucling calculations shall be !ade.
-nubbing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
Rig Contractor
ell Control
<. Tripping
;5
$T,
$,A /RE failure
<. Tripping
;9
$T,
/RE $leed7off tool fails
+
<. Tripping
;50
$T,
Reser4oir pressure is higher than anticipated
+
<. Tripping
;5;
#$D
-nubbing unit failure
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
22.=.
<. Tripping
;52
$T,
Annular $' failure
'otential gas release to surface. + 'otential loss of "ell control euip!ent.
;
;
22.2.2.;
<. Tripping
;5=
$T,
;
2
22.=. 22.=.9
<. Tripping
;5B
$T,
;
2
22.=.;;
<. Tripping
;5<
$T,
Earying outer dia!eters in $,A
ncreased cross sectional area + increases snubbing force and associated riss.
;
2
22.2.2.= 22.=.
<. Tripping
;5
$T,
Failure to properly torue pipe connections "hile tripping
+
'ipe connection !ay co!e apart. 'otential loss of $,A3"ellbore.
2
<. Tripping
;5
#$D
8o" gas flo" rate fro! reser4oir (M0.2< &&scfd)
+
8o" pressure at surface reduces ris to personnel and the en4iron!ent.
<. Tripping
;55
$T,
Flo"ing te!perature changes
+
'ossibility for hydrates. 'otential euip!ent da!age% in6ury3death to personnel if hydrate breas loose.
<. Tripping
;59
#$D
nadeuate space to rig up snubbing euip!ent
For!ation da!age if the "ell has to be illed for trips. + 'ossible in6uries to personnel if trying to rig up euip!ent in e:tre!ely tight space.
;9 of 2
Primar, Categor,
Test /REs before initial installation. Replace $,A /REs after e4ery trip. nclude contingency to set a plug or another retrie4able /RE as deep as possible. nstall screens abo4e /RE to catch debris fro! the drill string. Run a !ini!u! of t"o /REs in the $,A.
'ossible gas3reser4oir fluid co!!unication to surface. &ay reuire "ell ill to trip safely. + #nable to trip "ith re!edying the situation ("ell ill% set a plug or retrie4e3replace /RE).
ashout in pri!ary flo"line ("hile -tripping) $ucling% yield% or collapse of drill string
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
,igher surface pressure if "ell has to be shut in. Da!age to euip!ent. + n6ury to personnel. +
Consider the use of 4ariable pipe ra!s as bacup to the annular. Cannot change RCD ele!ent until Annular $' (and a second barrier) are both operational. 'rocedure in place (and rehearsed) to di4ert to secondary flo" line to fi: lea. Calculate bucling strength. Confir! calculations "ith !a:i!u! operating ,'.
perating Co!pany 3 /RE /RE 'ro4ider
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider -nubbing ell 'rogra! Contractor
#se !a:i!u! dia!eter for pipe light calculations. perate pipe hea4y and pipe light slips. A4oid running 6ars and bu!per subs. f stripping through RCD ensure all $,A co!ponents are strippable.
-nubbing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
;
Eery unliely scenario. Follo" -'s for !aing up and breaing out connections "hile tripping.
-nubbing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
2
2
ell is to be c onsidered li4e despite lo" inflo" rate. RCD to re!ain engaged at all ti!es 7 "ell is ne4er to be open to at!osphere. &onitor "ellhead flo"ing pressure for changes throughout operation.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
2
2
ðanol and in6ection pu!p a4ailable on site. Calculations should be done in the "ell planning stage to define the te!perature3pressure "indo" under "hich hydrates !ay de4elop.
#$D3&'D Choe3Flo"line -er4ice 'ro4ider
2
2
#$D progra! is to include the snubbing procedures and euip!ent to be used. -nubbing contractor should be in4ol4ed in pre7spud.
-nubbing Contractor
0B3;0320;
ell 'rogra!
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
e l $ a ! i l p p A
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
'ossible da!age to euip!ent. n6ury to personnel. + as3"ell bore fluids release to surface.
2
2
'rocedures to be re4ie"ed in a safety !eeting prior to co!!encing stripping3snubbing operations.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
'otential da!age to euip!ent. ,azard to personnel.
2
2
Rig up in best location possible. Conduct J-A and hazard assess!ent prior to co!!encing operations.
-nubbing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
<. Tripping
;90
#$D
Failure in co!!unications during stripping3snubbing operations
<. Tripping
;9;
#$D
Driller has poor 4isibility of "or floor due to snubbing unit or push pull unit
+
<. Tripping
;92
#$D
Co!ple: $,As% tubular di!ensions and inability to stage tools
+ as release at rig floor.
2
2
$,A tools3dra"ings are reuired in the planning stages. nly strippable co!ponents% or co!ponents that can be . staged in the hole easily should be installed.
-nubbing Contractor
ell 'rogra!
<. Tripping
;9=
#$D
/ear -urface /RE failure
#ncertainty "ith regards to "hether + near surface% or $,A /REs are leaing !ay tae so!e ti!e.
=
=
$leed off string% inflo" test and continue tripping if $,A /RE integrity e:ists. nly $,A /REs are a !a6or concern "hen tripping.
perating Co!pany
/RE
8ubricator spacing for staging in3out odd sized drill3"or string co!ponents
/ot able to re!o4e drill string co!ponents. ncrease drill string integrity ris "ith connections belo" lo"er!ost /RE. + $it !ust be pulled closer to the di4erter ele!ent prior to closing the blind ra! during tripping. Cannot install pacers and3or co!pletion asse!blies in "ell.
2
Adding spacer spool bet"een RCD and annular pre4enter. Adding a pony sub under the rig. -u!ping casing bo"l. #sing s!aller $' dia!eter. #sing double gate ra!s. Connection of lo"er!ost $' to tubing head spool (no D-A).
Rig Contractor
ell Control
Rig Contractor
ell Control
RCD -upplier
RCD
<. Tripping
22;
#$D
<. Tripping
222
#$D
8oss of drill string integrity belo" the lo"er!ost /RE
8oss of "ell control. + Fire3e:plosion.
. ireline
;9B
$T,
RCD adaptor fails
+
. ireline
;9<
#$D
+
. ireline
;9
#$D
ireline lubricator leas3fails. rease in6ector head fails
;
22.2.=.;
!!ediate release of gas3"ellbore fluids to the rig floor. Ris of ignition% in6ury or death.
;
;
22.=. 22.=.9
as3"ellbore fluids release at surface. 'otential har! to personnel.
2
2
2
2
Run "ireline $'s.
2
2
Fishing operation !ay reuire the "ell to be illed. 8oss of "eight of tools !ay cause the "ireline to be e:pelled out of the hole (e4en "ith a grease in6ector rigged up). Consider 8D as an alternati4e.
ireline Contractor
Fishing
2
2
&anual gauge !ust be installed on the lubricator.
ireline Contractor
ireline Tools
=
-tandard cased7hole3open7hole euip!ent is not set up for operating at high surface pressures. Run grease in6ector.
ireline Contractor
ell 'rogra!
+ as release at surface.
;9
#$D
8ogging tools get stuc in the hole
+ 8ost ti!e and cost.
. ireline
;95
#$D
/o pressure gauge on lubricator
+
. ireline
20 of 2
;99
#$D
nflo" test all connections belo" the lo"er!ost /RE prior to re!o4al fro! the "ell using annular pre4entor and RCD. Conduct !otor pu!p test prior to pulling !otor through RCD. &a:i!ize lubricator space to !ini!ize the nu!ber of connections belo" the lo"er!ost /RE that ha4e to be re!o4ed fro! the "ell prior to closing the blind ra!. Consider adding an /RE belo" the !otor and3or as close to the bit as possible. perate3install snubbing adaptor as per supplierHs specifications. nspect3pressure test integrity of snubbing adaptor pressure seal on RCD before co!!encing snubbing operations. 8o" probability of occurrence. 'ressure test "ith "ater or nitrogen before eualizing.
;
. ireline
#nable to run in hole due to pressure
2
'otential da!age to euip!ent% har! to personnel.
Delays (ti!e and cost). + as leas through pac7off.
2
0B3;0320;
ireline Contractor ireline Contractor
ireline Tools ireline Tools
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Item
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
. ireline
200
$T,
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
202
$T,
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
20=
$T,
'lug in tubing or tubing end plug fails
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
20B
#$D
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
20<
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
Operational Phase
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6 !proper RCD adapter on location 'ipe light condition occurs "hile running tubing
e l $ a ! i l p p A
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen RCD -upplier
RCD
22.=. 22.=.9
-a!e controls as stripping3snubbing drill pipe out of the hole are reuired.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
22.=. 22.=.9
-tabbing 4al4e "ith crosso4er to tubing connection !ust be !ade up and ready for use on the rig f loor. Consider ha4ing profile sub "ith nipple as part of tubular string.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
2
22.=.5 22.=.9
A double barrier is reuired "hen rigging out the $' stac.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
;
2
22.=.5
&aintain the ability to flo" the "ell to the separation pacage until the "ell head is secured. Chec for leas continuously "hile unbolting $'s. Geep nuts on "ell head studs "hile first raising $'s.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
2
2
Retrie4e plug and set a ne" plug.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
,igh surface pressure could cause a pipe light condition. 'otential da!age to euip!ent% in6ury to personnel.
2
2
'ipe light calculations !ust be !ade prior to pressure testing if pipe is in the hole "hile testing.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
+
Ti!e and cost. 'otentially ha4e to ill the "ell.
2
2
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
#nable to land dognut3tubing in "ellhead
+
Ti!e and cost. 'otentially ha4e to ill the "ell.
2
2
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
#$D
8iuid re!ains in the hole prior to "ell suspension3co!pletion
+ For!ation da!age !ay result (cost).
=
=
Conduct adeuate blo"7do"n of "ell (dry gas scenario) in liuid sensiti4e for!ations.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
$T,
ellhead fails or is da!aged during rig out
'otential hydrocarbon release at + surface. ,ar! to personnel.
;
;
ell suspension plan to be in place and appro4ed by operator. Rig out plan to be re4ie"ed on site.
perating Co!pany
ell 'rogra!
$T,
8ifting hazards
,ar! to personnel. + 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
Co!pany !an to coordinate hoisting acti4ities "ith picer operator% and super4isors. 're7fab $' co!ponents can be difficult to install in lo" clearance areas. -afety hand to be in4ol4ed during rig up.
'icer perator
8ease &anage!ent
$T,
8oss of radio co!!unication
,ar! to personnel due to erroneous + co!!unications. 8ost ti!e and cost.
1nsure hand signals are in place for i!portant co!!unications. 1stablish radio protocol in safety ! eeting. -upply sufficient head sets for !en "oring in high7 noise en4iron!ents. 1stablish battery changing schedule.
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
;
;
;
+ !!ediate gas flo" to surface.
;
'otential for bridge plug to lea after pressure testing
'ressure at surface "hile rigging out + $' can ha4e catastrophic ,-1 results.
#$D
Dognut leas "hen $'s are being rigged out
+
20
#$D
Tubing or "ireline set bridge plug fails to pressure test
+ #nable to nipple up "ell head.
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
20
#$D
'ressure testing a plug "ith pipe in the hole
+
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
205
$T,
Tight hole or stuc pipe "hen running tubing
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
209
#$D
. -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion
2;0
5. Rig ut
2;;
5. Rig ut
2; of 2
2;2
2;=
Primar, Categor,
Confir! reuire!ents for adaptor in pre7spud or "hen calling out the "ireline unit.
+ ait on euip!ent (ti!e and cost).
=
5. Rig ut
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
+
Da!age to euip!ent. n6ury to personnel.
as flo" at surface "ithout "ell control. 'ossible loss of "ell% in6ury3death to personnel.
;
;
1nsure good hole cleaning on last trip out of the hole "ith drillpipe3bit. Conduct scraper run prior to running production pacers. Run "ear bushing "hile drilling to !ini!ize potential of da!aging the "ellhead. /ote that the "ear bushing !ay also create a proble! in that it !ay be difficult to re!o4e. ritten procedure reco!!ended for landing the dognut.
22.=.9
22.=.<
22.=.=.=
0B3;0320;
DRAFT
R' 22 7 ,azard and Ris Assess!ent Register
Operational Phase
Item
e l $ a ! i l p p A
Rele0an!e 1UBD/MPD/ Both
Hazard !enario "hat I# 6
,ar! to personnel. + 8ost ti!e and cost.
;
;
&hreats/Conse'uen!es
Re'uired H% Controls / a#eguards
% & PCriti!al H *
5. Rig ut
2;B
$T,
5. Rig ut
2;<
$T,
Cre" shortage and3or ine:perience
+
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
;
5. Rig ut
2;
$T,
nadeuate lighting
+
ncreased potential for ,-1 i ncidents such as slips% trips or falls.
2
2
5. Rig ut
2;
$T,
'oor ground conditions
+
ce% !ud% une4en terrain can increase potential for slips% trips and falls.
2
2
5. Rig ut
2;5
$T,
'oor "eather
+
,ar! to personnel. 8ost ti!e and cost.
2
2
!properly purged euip!ent
'otential e:plosi4e gas release "hile rigging out. + Eessel entry for clean up is not possible "ith e:plosi4e gas in 4essel.
22 of 2
2;9
$T,
Primar, Categor,
A!tions to $e taken / B, "ho and "hen
Concurrent rig up of rig and #$D3&'D pacage causes confusion
5. Rig ut
Primar, Responsi$le Part,
Considerations
2
=
22.=.B
nsite super4isors to for!ulate rig up plan. Co!pany !an to coordinate o4erall strategy. -afety hand to be in4ol4ed during rig up. nsite orientation and training. -uper4isors to ensure that all personnel ha4e been trained in the 4arious co!ponents of the rig up operation. dentify tass in tool bo: safety !eetings. 1nsure all "orers understand their right to refuse unsafe "or% or reuest training3guidance for tass that they are not yet co!petent in. Consider 1&- onsite during rig up operations. Conduct re4ie" of lighting reuire!ents "ith ser4ice co!panies at pre7spud. Consider constructing a lighting diagra!. Rent light to"ers as reuired. Consider e:tensi4e use of rig !atting. -a"dust% etc. to be a4ailable to i!pro4e footing on sno"3ice in "inter operations. -uper4isors ha4e obligation to stop unsafe "or3acti4ities. 'urge lines "ith inert gas or "ater prior to rigging out. Chec 818 prior to using ha!!er on ha!!er unions 7 use brass ha!!er. #se separator that can be cleaned "ithout entering. 1nsure flare is distinguished.
0B3;0320;
perating Co!pany
Training
All
Training
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
perating Co!pany
8ease &anage!ent
#$D3&'D -eparation -er4ice 'ro4ider
DRAFT
;. 'lanning 2. Rig #p 3 'ressure Test 3 Co!!issioning =. Drill ut and ,ole Conditioning B. Drilling <. Tripping . ireline . -uspend ell for Rig ut or Co!pletion 5. Rig ut 9. ther ,azards and perations
#$D &'D $oth
=rd 'arty Rental All Coil Tubing Contractor Co!pression -upplier Directional Co!pany &'D 1uip!ent 'ro4ider &'D -er4ice 'ro4ider &ud Co!pany &D Contractor &D Contractor 3 #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider /RE -upplier perating Co!pany perating Co!pany 3 &'D -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany 3 /RE 'ro4ider perating Co!pany 3 #$D -er4ice 'ro4ider perating Co!pany 3 #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider 'icer perator 'icer perator 3 #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider RCD -upplier RCD -upplier 3 #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider Rig Contractor Rig Contractor 3 #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider -afety -er4ices -nubbing Contractor Trucing Contractor #$D -er4ice 'ro4ider #$D3&'D -er4ice 'ro4ider ireline Contractor
All $' -yste! Choe3Flo"line Co!pression Data Acuisition Drill -tring Fishing Flare3Eent -yste! 8ease Reuire!ents 8ease &anage!ent &ud -yste! &D &'D3#$D 1uip!ent Rental /3A /RE 'D& RCD Rig 1uip!ent -a!ple Catcher -eparation Training ell Control ell 'rogra! ireline ireline Tools
+ /