Road safety is an issue of prime importance in all motorized countries. The road accident results a serious social and economic problems. Studies focused on geometric design and safety aim to imp...
Guidance notes on the use of bamboo as a material for structural scaffolding.
We are proud to present this booklet entitled “Guidelines for the City of Chicago Streetscape and Urban Design Program.” These guidelines have been prepared for community leaders, public o…Full description
a presentation of the AASHTO seismic design guidelinesFull description
Guidelines for base isolation design of structures.
F'OITEWORD Road Engineering Association of Malaysia (REAM), througlr the cooperation and support of various road authorities and engineering institutions in Malaysia, publishes a series of official
documents on STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, GUIDELINES, MANUALS and TECHNICAL NOTES which are related to road engineering. The aim of such publications is to achieve quality and consistency in road and highway construction. The cooperating bodies are:-
Public Works Department, Malaysia Malaysian Highway Authority Institution of Engineers, Malaysia Institution of Highways & Transportation (Malaysian Branch)
The production of such documents are carried out through several stages. The documents are initially compiled/drafted by the relevant Technical Committee and subsequently scrutinised by the relevant Standing Committee of REAM. They are finally endorsed by road authorities and practitioners of road engineering at a conference/workshop before publication. REAM welcomes feedback and suggestions which can update and improve these documents.
This GUIDE ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS is the revision of the existing Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8/86 "A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads" published by Jabatan Kerja Raya.
The revision was undertaken by the Standing Committee on Technology and Road Management of the Road Engineering Association of Malaysia (REAM) with the mandate given by the Director-General of Public Works Department, Malaysia.
The draft of this Arahan Teknik was presented and discussed at the Forum on Technology and Road Management in November 1997 and the 4th Maiaysian Road Conference in November 2000.
It is hoped that this Guide will will
address the shortcomings of Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8/86 and be accepted by the highway engineering fraternity in the country.
ROAD ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MALAYSIA 46-4, Jalan Bola Tarnpar 13114, Section 13,40100 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Tel:603-55136521 Fax:603-55136523 e-mail:[email protected]
ROAD ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MALAYSIA A GUIDE ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO.
INDEX
I.
INTRODUCTION
I
2.
ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS
z
2.1
ROAD CLASSIFICATION / HIERARCHY
2
2.2
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROADS
5
2.3
ACCESS CONTROL
6
)4
SELECTION OF DESIGN STANDARDS
8
DESIGN CONTROL AND CRITERIA
A
11
J.l
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE
ll
J.Z
TRAFFIC
12
3.3
DESIGN VEHICLES CHARACTERISTICS
l.+
J-+
SPEED
18
3.5
CAPACITY
20
ELEMENTS OF DESIGN
25
4.1
SIGHT DISTANCE
25
A'
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
a1 J+
+.J
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT
44
4.4
COMBINATION OF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
52
ALIGNMENT
5.
CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS
61
5.1
PAVEMENT
6l
5.2
LANE WIDTH & MARGINAL STRIPS
62
5.3
SHOULDERS
62
5.4
KERBS
66
5.5
SIDEWALKS
69
5.6
TRAFFIC BARRIERS
6q
5.7
MEDIANS
69
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) INDEX
PAGE NO. 5.8
SERVICE ROADS
10
5.9
U-TURN
73
BRIDGE AND STRUCTURE CROSS SECTION
16
BUS LAYBYES
to
5.
l0
5.t
6.
I
OTHER ELEMENTS AFFECTING GEOMETRIC
DESIGN
6.I ROAD SAFETY 6.2 DRAINAGE 6.3 LIGHTING 6.4 UTILITIES 6.5 SIGNING AND MARKINGS 6.6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6.1 EROSION CONTROL, LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
80 80 80
8I 81
8I 8I 82
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) TABLES
PAGE NO.
TABLE 2-I
CHARACTERISTICS OF ROAD CATEGORIES
A T
TABLE2-2A
SELECTION OF ACCESS CONTROL (RURAL)
8
TABLE2-28
SELECTION OF ACCESS CONTROL (URBAN)
8
TABLE 2-3
SELECTION OF DESIGN STANDARD
9
TABLE
DIMENSION OF DESIGN VEHICLES
14
TABLE 3-2A
DESIGN SPEED FOR RURAL ROADS
19
TABLE 3-2B
DESIGN SPEED FOR URBAN ROADS
1q
TABLE 3-3
CONVERSION FACTORS TO P.C.U.
2l
TABLE 3-4
LEVELS OF SERVICE
22
TABLE 3-5A
DESIGN LEVEL OF SERVICE AND VOLUME/
aA
3.1
CAPACITY RATIO (RURAL) TABLE 3-58
DESIGN LEVEL OF SERVICE AND VOLUME/
24
CAPACITY RATIO (URBAN) TABLE
4-1
TABLE4-2
MINIMUM STOPPING DISTANCE
zo
EFFECTS OF GRADES IN STOPPING SIGHT
2'7
DISTANCE _ WET CONDITIONS TABLE 4-3
DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE
28
TABLE 4-4
MINIMUM PASSING SIGHT DISTANCES
30
(2LANE-2WAY) TABLE 4-5
MINIMUM RADIUS
3s
TABLE 4-6
RELATIONSHIP OF DESIGN SPEED TO MAXIMUM
5l
RELATIVE PROFILE GRADIENTS
TABLE4.]A TABLE 4-78
TABLE 4-8 TABLE 4-9A
(RURAL) 38 DESIGN SUPERELEVATION TABLE (URBAN) 39 PAVEMENT WIDENING ON OPEN ROAD CURVES 43 MAXIMUM GRADES FOR RI. R2. Ul & U2 45 DESIGN SUPERELEVATION TABLE
STANDARD ROADS
TABLE 4-98
MAXIMUM GRADES FOR R3 AND R4 STANDARD 45 ROADS
TABLE 4-9C
MAXIMUM GRADES FOR U3 AND U4 STANDARD 45 ROADS
TABLE 4-9D
MAXIMUM GRADES FOR R5 STANDARD ROADS
TABLE 4-9E
MAXIMUM GRADES FOR U5 STANDARD ROADS
TABLE 4-9F
MAXIMUM GRADES FOR U6 AND R6 STANDARD ROADS
ul
A<
46
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) TABLES
PAGE NO.
TABLE 4-1OA
CREST VERTICAL CURVE (K VALUES)
50
TABLE 4-IOB
SAG VERTICAL CURVE (K VALUES)
51
TABLE
TYPICAL PAVEMENT SURFACE TYPE
6l
TABLE 5-2
LANE & MARGINAL STRIP WIDTHS
6l
TABLE 5-3A
USABLE SHOULDER WiDTH (RURAL)
64
TABLE 5-3B
PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH (URBAN)
65
TABLE 5-4
PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH (RURAL)
65
TABLE 5-5A
MEDIAN WIDTH (RURAL)
70
TABLE 5-58
MEDIAN WrDTH (URBAN)
70
TABLE 5-6
DESIRABLE DISTANCE BETWEEN U-TURNS
74
5-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) PAGES NO
FIGUR.ES
FIGURE 2-I
FLOW CHART FOR SELECION OFDESIGN STANDARDS IO
FIGURE
P DESIGN
FIGURE 3-3
VEHICLE SU DESIGN VEHICLE WB-15 DESIGN VEHICLE
FIGURE 3-4
RELATIONSHIP OF LEVEL OF SERVICE TO OPERATING 23
3-1
FIGURE 3-2
15
16
I1
SPEED AND VOLUME / CAPACITY RATIO FIGUR.E 4-1
MEASURING SIGHT DISTANCE ON PLAN
32
FIGURE 4-2
MEASURING SIGHT DISTANCE ON PROFILE
JJ
FIGURE 4-3
COMPARISON OF SIDE FRICTION FACTORS ASSUMED
35
FOR DESIGN OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ROADS FIGURE 4-4
4]
DIAGRAMMATIC PROFILES SHOWING METHODS OF ATTAINiNG SUPERELEVATION
FIGURE 4-5
4't
CRITICAL LENGTHS OF GRADE FOR DESIGN FOR TYPICAL HEAVY TRUCK OF 180kg/kw.