Guidance notes on experimental work.
Section 1 – Treatment of uncertainties in Physics at AS and A2 level Preamble
One of the main aims of the practical work undertaken in GCE Physics is for candidates to develop a feeling for uncertainty in scientific data. Some of the treatment that follows may appear daunting. That is not the intention. The estimates of uncertainties that are required in this this spec specifi ifica catio tion n are more more in the the natu nature re of educ educat ated ed gues guesse sess than than stat statis istic ticall ally y soun sound d calculations. It is the intention that candidates be introduced early in the course to estimating uncertainties so that by the time their work is assessed, they have a relaxed attitude to it. The sections in PH1 on density determinations and resistivity are ideal for this. Definitions Uncertainty Uncertainty in measurements is unavoidable and estimates the range within which the answer is like likely ly to lie. This This is usua usuall lly y expr expres esse sed d as an abso absolu lute te valu value, e, but but can be give given n as a percentage. The normal way of expressing a measurement x0, with its uncertainty, u, is x0 ± u. This means that the true value of the measurement is likely to lie in the range x0 − u to x0 + u.
Note: The term “error” is used in many textbooks instead of uncertainty. This term implies that something has gone wrong and is therefore best avoided. Uncertainties can be split up into two different categories:
-
-
Random uncertainties uncertainties – These occur in any measured quantity. The uncertainty of each reading cannot be reduced by repeat measurement but the more measurements which are taken, the closer the mean value of the measurements measurements is likely to be to the “true” value of the quantity. Taking repeat readings is therefore a way of reducing the effect of random uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties – These can be due to a fault in the equipment, or design of the experiment e.g. possible zero error such as not taking into account the resistance of the leads when measuring the resistance of an electrical component or use of a ruler at a different temperature from the one at which it is calibrated. The effect of these cannot be reduced by taking repeat readings. If a systematic uncertainty is suspected, it must be tackled either by a redesign of the experimental technique or theoretical anal analys ysis is.. An exam exampl plee of this this sort sort of uncer uncerta tain inty ty,, the the orig origin in of whic which h rema remain inss mysterious, is in the determination of stellar distances by parallax. The differences between the distances, as determined by different observatories, often exceeds the standard uncertainties by a large margin.
Percentage uncertainty This is the absolute uncertainty expressed as a percentage of the best estimate of the true value of the quantity. Resolution This is the smallest quantity to which an instrument can measure
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Mistake This is the misreading of a scale or faulty equipment. Suspect results These are results that lie well outside the normal range e.g. points well away from a line or curve of best fit. They often arise from mistakes in measurement. measurement. These should be recorded recorded and reason for discarding noted by the candidate. How is the uncertainty in the measurement of a quantity estimated? 1. Estimat Estimation ion of uncerta uncertainty inty using using the spread spread of repeat repeat readi readings. ngs. Suppose the value a quantity x is measured several times and a series of different values obtained: x1, x2, x3…….. x xn. [Normally, in our work, n will be a small number, say 3 or 5].
Unless there is reason to suspect that one of the results is seriously out [i.e. it is anomalous], the best estimate of the true value of x is the arithmetic mean of the readings:
x1 + x2 + ........ xn n A reasonable estimate of the uncertainty is ½ the range:
Mean value x =
xmax − xmin , where xmax is the maximum maximum and xmin the minimum reading of 2 x [ignoring any anomalous readings] i.e.
u=
Example The following results were obtained for the time it took for an object to roll down a slope. 4.5 s, 4.8 s, 4.6 s, 5.1 s, 5.0 s
The best estimate of the true time is given by the mean which is:
t =
4.5 + 4.8 + 4.6 + 5.1 + 5.0 5
The uncertainty, u, is given by: u =
= 4.8s
5.1 − 4.5 = 0.3s 2
The final answer and uncertainty should be quoted, with units, to the same no. of decimal places and the uncertainty to 1 sig. fig i.e. t = 4.8 ± 0.3 s Note that, even if the initial results had be taken to the nearest 0.01 s, i.e. the resolution of an electronic stopwatch, the final result would still be given to 0.1 s because the first significant figure in the uncertainty is in the first place after the
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
2. Estimat Estimation ion of unce uncertai rtainty nty from from a single single reading reading
Sometimes there may only be a single reading. Sometimes all the readings may be identical. Clearly it cannot be therefore assumed that there is zero uncertainty in the reading(s). With analogue instruments, it is not expected that interpolated readings will be taken between divisions (this is clearly not possible with digital instrument anyway). Hence, the uncertainty cannot be less than ½ the smallest division of the instrument being used, and is recommended it be taken to be ± the smallest division. In some cases, however, it will be larger than this due to other uncertainties such as reaction time [see later] and manufacturer’s uncertainties. If other sources of random uncertainty are present, it is expected that in most cases repeat readings would be taken and the uncertainty estimated from the spread as above.
Advice for Specific apparatus Metre Rule
Take the resolution as ±1 mm. This may be unduly pessimistic, especially if care is taken to avoid parallax errors. It should be remembered that all length measurements using rules actually involve two readings – one at each end – both of which are subject to uncertainty. In many cases the uncertainty may be greater than this due to the difficulty in measuring the required quantity, for example due to parallax or due to the speed needed to take the reading e.g. rebound of a ball, in which case the precision could be ± 1 cm. In cases involving transient readings, it is expected that repeats are taken rather than relying on a guess as to the uncertainty. Standard Masses
For 20g, 50g, 100g masses the precision can be taken as being as being ±1g this is probably more more accurat accuratee than than the manufa manufactu cturer’ rer’ss [often [often about about 3%]. 3%]. Altern Alternativ atively, ely, if known known,, the manufacturer’s uncertainty can be used. Digital meters [ammeters/voltmeters]
The uncertainty can be taken as being ± the smallest measurable division. Strictly this is often too accurate as manufacturers will quote as bigger uncertainty. [e.g. 2% + 2 divisions] Thermometers
Standard -10 ºC to 110 ºC take precision as 1ºC Digital thermometers uncertainty could be ± 0.1ºC. However the actual uncertainty may be greater due to difficulty in reading a digital scale as an object is being heated or cooled, when the substance is not in thermal equilibrium with itself let alone with the thermometer..
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
The period of oscillation of a Pendulum/Spring
The resolution of a stop watch, used for measuring a period, is usually 0.01s. Reaction time would would increas increasee the uncert uncertain ainty ty and, and, althoug although h in making making measur measureme ements nts on oscill oscillatin ating g quantities it is possible to anticipate, the uncertainty derived from repeat readings is likely to be of the order of 0.1 s. To increase accuracy, often 10 (or 20) oscillations are measured. The absolute absolute error in the period [i.e. time for a single single oscillation] oscillation] is then 1/10 (or 1/20 respectively) of the absolute error in the time for 10 (20) oscillations e.g. 20 oscillations: Time = 15.8 ± 0.1 s [0.6%] 15.8 ± 0.1 ∴ Period = s = 0.790 ± 0.005 s 20 Note that the percentage uncertainty, p, in the period is the same as that in the overall time. In this case, p =
0.1 15.8
× 100% = 0.6%
(1 s.f.)
Digital vernier callipers/micrometer
Precision smallest measurable quantity usually ± 0.01mm Measuring cylinder / beakers/ burette
Smallest measurable quantity e.g. ± 1 cm³, but this depends upon the scale of the instrument. In the case of measuring the volume using the line on a beaker, the estimated uncertainty is likely to be much greater. Note candidates must be careful to avoid parallax when taking these measurements, and should state that all readings were taken at eye level. They should also measure to the bottom of the meniscus.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Determining the uncertainties in derived quantities. Please note that candidates entered for AS award will now be required to combine percentage uncertainties.
Very frequently in Physics, the values of two or more quantities are measured and then these are combined to determine another quantity; e.g. the density of a material is determined using the equation: m ρ = V To do this the mass, m, and the volume, V , are first measured. Each has its own estimated uncertainty and these must be combined to produce an estimated uncertainty in the density. The volume itself may have been determined by combining several independent quantity determinations [e.g. length, breadth and height for a rectangular solid or length and diameter for a cylindrical wire]. In most cases, quantities are combined either by multiplying or dividing and this will be 3 considered first. Multiplying by a constant, squaring (e.g. in 34 π r ), square rooting or raising to some other power are special cases of this and will be considered next. 1. Multi Multipl plyin ying g and and divid dividing ing:: The percentage uncertainty in a quantity, formed when two or more quantities are combined by either multiplication or division, is the sum of the uncertainties in the quantities which are combined. Example
The following results were obtained when measuring the surface area of a glass block with a 30cm rule, resolution 0.1cm Length = 9.7 ± 0.1 cm Width = 4.4 ± 0.1cm Note that these uncertainties are estimates from the resolution of the rule. This gives the following percentage errors: 0.1 ×100% = 1.0% 9.7 0.1 × 100% = 2.2% pW = Width 4.4 So the percentage error in the volume, pV
Length:
pL
=
= 1.0 + 2.2 = 3.2%
Hence surface area = 9.7 × 4.4 = 42.68 cm² ± 3.2 % The absolute error in the surface area is now 3.2% of 42.68 = 1.37 cm² Quoted to 1 sig. fig. the uncertainty becomes 1 cm² The correct result, then, is 43 ± 1cm² - Note that surface area is expressed to a number of significant figures which fits with the estimated uncertainty.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
So T 2 = 961 ± 4%. 4% × 961 = 40 (to 1.s.f) So the period is expressed as T = 960 ± 40 s. −
Note: x 1 is the same as 1/ x x. So the percentage uncertainty in 1/ x x is the same as that in x. Can you see why we ignore the − sign? Note: the percentage uncertainty in x is half the percentage uncertainty in x. 3. Multi Multipl plyin ying g by by a const constant ant In this case the percentage uncertainty is unchanged. So the percentage uncertainty in 3 x or 0.5 x or π x is the same as that in x.
following determ determina inatio tions ns were were made made in order order to find find the Example: The following volume of a piece of wire: Diameter: d = 1.22 ± 0.02 mm Length: l = 9.6 ± 0.1 cm The percentage uncertainties are: pd = 1.6%; pl = 1.0%. 2
Working in consistent units, and applying the equation V
=
π d
4
l , we have:
V = 448.9 mm 3 The percentage uncertainty, pV = 1.6 × 2 + 1.0 = 4.2 % = 4 % (to 1 s.f.) [Note that π and 4 have no uncertainties.] So the absolute uncertainty u = 448.9 × 0.04 = 17.956 = 20 (1 s.f.) So the volume is expressed as V = 450 ± 20 mm 3. Multiply the percentage uncertainty 4. Adding Adding or subtract subtracting ing quantiti quantities es [A2 [A2 only] only] If 2 quantities are added or subtracted the absolute uncertainty is added. This situation does not arise very frequently frequently as most equations equations involve involve multiplication multiplication and division division only. The e.m.f. / p.d. equation equation for a power supply is an exception.
In all cases, when the final % uncertainty is calculated it can then be converted back to an absolute uncertainty and quoted 1 sig. figure. The final result and uncertainty should be quoted to the same number of decimal places
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Notes for purists: 1. When When workin working g at a high high academic academic level, where where many many repeat repeat measurem measurement entss are taken, taken, scientists often use “standard error” ε , a.k.a. “standard uncertainty”. Where this is used, the expression x0 ± ε is taken to mean that there is a 67% probability that the value of x x is in the range x0 − ε to x0 + ε , a 95% probability that it lies in the range x0 − 2ε to x0 + 2ε , a 98% probability that it is between x0 − 3ε and x0 + 3ε , etc. Our work on uncertainties will not involve this high-level approach. 2. The method which we use use here of estimating the uncertainty in an individual individual quantity takes takes no account of the number of readings. This is because it is expected that only a small number of readings will be taken. Detailed derivation of standard uncertainties (see above) involves taking the standard deviation of the readings and then dividing this by n − 1 , so
taking 10 readings would involve dividing σ by 3. 3. The above method method of combining combining uncertainties uncertainties has the merit of simplicity simplicity but it is unduly unduly pessimistic. If several quantities are combined, it is unlikely that the actual error ( sic) in all of them them is in the the same same dire direct ctio ion, n, i.e. i.e. all all + or all all −. Hence Hence adding adding the percen percentag tagee uncertainties overestimates the likely uncertainty in the combination. More advanced work involves adding uncertainties in quadrature: i.e. p =
p12
+
p2 2
+
done when standard uncertainties are employed (note 1 above). It is not intended that candidates pursue any of these courses!
p32
+ ......
. This is normally
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
GRAPHS [derivation of uncertainties from graphs is only expected in A2]
The following remarks apply to linear graphs: The points should be plotted with error bars. These should be centred on the plotted point and have a length equal to ymax − ymin [for uncertainties in the y values of the points]. If identical results results are obtained the precision precision of the instrumen instrumentt could be used. If the error bars are too small to plot this should be stated. If calculating a quantity such as gradient or intercept the steepest line and a least steep line should be drawn which are consistent with the error bars. It is often convenient to plot the centroid centroid of the points to help this process. process. This is the point ( x, y ) , the mean x value against the mean y value. The steepest and least steep lines should both pass through this point. . The maximum and minimum gradients, mmax and mmin, [or intercepts, cmax and cmin] can now be found and the results quoted as: gradient = intercept =
mmax
+ mmin
2
cmax + cmin 2
m max − m min 2 c max − c min ± 2 ±
Scales
Graph should cover more than ½ of the graph paper available and awkward scales [e.g. multip multiples les of 3] should should be avoide avoided. d. Rotati Rotation on of the paper paper throug through h π /4 [90° !] may be employed to give better coverage of the graph paper. Semi-log and log-log graphs [A2 only]
Students will be expected to be familiar with plotting these graphs as follows: x Semi-log: to investigate relationships of the form: y= ka . Taking logs: log y = log k + xlog a or ln y = ln k + xln a [It doesn’t matter which] So a plot of log y against x has a gradient log a and an intercept log k .
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Section 2 – Ideas for practical work
Pr a c Density of regular solids [cuboids, [c uboids, cylinders] Identification of material using density.
Context Use Use of metr metree rule rule,, calli callipe pers rs,, micro microme meter ter,, balance Initial work on uncertainties Density of of li liquids an and ir irregular so solids Use of of me measuring cy cylinders Weig We ighi hing ng a rul rulee by by bal balan anci cing ng a loa loade ded d rul rulee Use Use of of P of M Acceleration of a trolley on a ramp [lots of Use Use of equa equati tion onss of moti motion on – grap graphs hs to variants here] determine acceleration Determination of g N.B. Not on spec but a useful intro to g by simple pendulum oscillation period measurements Investigation of a compound pendulum or a Ditto pin and pendulum I-V characteristics of diodes, lamps etc. Use of ammeters, voltmeters, variable resistors, potentiometers [pots]. Identification of the material of a wire by Vario Various us ways ways – sing single le meas measur urem emen ents ts / R determination of its resistivity against l . Uncertainty combinations. Variation of resistance with temperature for a Thermistor not on spec but it doesn’t matter metal wire [copper is good] and/or thermistor here. Could tie in with potential dividers to design a temperature sensor. Determination of resistance of a voltmeter by ! use of a series resistor. Investigation of currents in series and parallel circuits Deter Determi mina nati tion on of inte intern rnal al resi resist stan ance ce of a Direct use of V = E − Ir or use of power supply 1 1 r = + - use of reciprocals in graphical V E ER work. Sono Sonome meter ter – vari variat atio ion n of frequ frequen ency cy with with Use of reciprocals in graphical work leng length th – dete determ rmin inat atio ion n of the the spee speed d of transverse waves on the metal wire Measurement of the wavelength of microwaves by standing waves Measurement of the wavelength of
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Section 3 – Experimental techniques
The following is a selection of experimental techniques which it is anticipated that candidates will acquire during their AS and A2 studies. It is not exhaustive , but is intended to provide some guidance into the expectations of the PH3 and PH6 experimental tasks. Measuring instruments The use of the following in the context of individual experiments: micrometer eterss and callipers. callipers. These may be analog analogue ue or digital digital.. It is intend intended ed that that • microm candidates will have experience of the use of these instruments with a discrimination of at least 0.01 mm. A typical use is the determination of the diameter of a wire. • digital top-loading balances. • measuring cylinders and burettes. This is largely in the context of volume and density determination. • force meters (Newton meters). • stop watches with a discrimination of 0.01 s. It is also convenient to use stopwatches / clocks with a discrimination of 1 s. • rules with a discrimination of 1 mm. • digital multimeters with voltage, current and resistance ranges. The following (d.c.) ranges and discriminations illustrative the ones which are likely to be useful: 2V 0.001 V 20 V 0.01 V 10 A 0.01 A 2A 0.001 A 2 k Ω 1Ω 200 Ω 0.01 Ω Students should be familiar with the technique of starting readings on a high range to protect the instrument. • liquid in glass thermometers. -10 − 110°C will normally suffice, though candidates can be useful usefully ly introd introduce uced d to the advant advantage agess of restric restricted ted range range thermo thermomet meters ers.. Where Where appropriate, digital temperature probes may be used.
Experimental techniques The The purp purpos osee of PH3 PH3 is to test test the the abil abilit ity y of the the cand candid idat ates es to make make and and inte interp rpre rett measurements, with special emphasis on:
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
• • • •
• •
•
connecting ammeters so that the current flows through them, i.e. in series; the need to avoid having power supplies in circuits when a resistance meter is being employed; taking measurements of diameter at various places along a wire / cylinder and taking pairs of such measurements at right angles to allow for non-circular cross sections; determining a small distance measurement, e.g. the thickness or diameter of an object, by placing a number of identical objects in contact and measuring the combined value, e.g. measuring the diameter of steel spheres by placing 5 in line and measuring the extent of the 5; the use of potentiometers (N.B. not metre wire potentiometers) and variable resistors in circuits when investigating current-voltage characteristics; the determination of the period and frequency of an oscillating object by determining the time taken for a number of cycles [typically 10 or 20]; N.B. Although the concept of period is not on the AS part of the specification, it is likely to be used in PH3; the use of fiducial marks and no-parallax in sighting against scales and in period determinations.