Idealism Idealism denies the existence of mind-independent objects. For the idealist, “to be is to be perceived”; objects are nothing more than our experiences of them. The attraction of idealism is its econom. !e don"t don"t have direct access to the external #orld, it is generall agreed; all #e can access directl are our experiences. ! h, then, postulate the existence of anthing beond our experiences$ The idealist refuses to do so, holding that our experiences don"t represent objects, but rather constitute them, that there is nothing beond them. For the idealist, then, objects onl exist insofar as the are perceived. If I shut m ees, then unless there is someone else perceiving the objects that surround me, those objects #ill cease to exist, at least until I reopen m ees and perceive them once more. %etting aside its initial implausibilit, the main difficult #ith this vie# is that it cannot explain the consistenc of our experiences of the #orld. !h, #hen I reopen m ees, do I see the same objects that I sa# before$ !hat causes me to perceive those objects rather than an others$ !h, if t#o observers loo& in a single cupboard, and then compare #hat the sa#, #ill both observers" reports tall$ 'er&ele, the most famous idealist, had both an ans#er to this problem and a #a of avoiding the absurd suggestion that evertime I blin& m stud passes out of and bac& into existence in a fraction of a second( this ans#er is )od. )od, according to 'er&ele, is constantl perceiving everthing. Though I ma blin&, and so stop perceiving m stud, )od continues to perceive it #hether m ees are open or shut. * stud, therefore, never passes out of existence, for it is al#as perceived b )od. !hat is more, )od explains the consistenc in our perceptions. Though there ma be no mind-independent objects causing our experiences, and so ensuring that our various experiences are mutuall consistent, there is nevertheless something outside us causing our experiences and ensuring that the are consistent( )od. )od thus plas a central role in 'er&ele"s idealism.
in philosop in philosophy hy,, any view that stresses the central role of the ideal or the spiritual in the interpretation interpretation of experience. It may hold that the world or reality realityexists exists essentially as spirit or consciousness or consciousness,, that abstractions abstractions and and laws are more fundamental in reality than sensory things, or, at least, that whatever exists is known in dimensions that are chiefly mental—through and as ideas. Thus, the two basic forms of idealism are metaphysical metaphysical idealism, idealism, which asserts the ideality of reality, and epistemological idealism, which holds that in the knowledge process the mind mind can can grasp only the psychic or that that its objects are conditioned conditioned by by their perceptibility perceptibility.. In its metaphysics metaphysics,, idealism is thus directly opposed to materialism —the view that that the basic substance of the world is matter matter and and that it is known primarily through and as material forms and processes. processes. In its epistemology epistemology,, it is opposed to realism realism,, which holds that in human knowledge objects are grasped and seen as they really are—in their existence existence outside outside and independently of the mind. As a philosophy often expressed in bold and expansive syntheses, idealism is also opposed to various restrictive forms of thought to skepticism skepticism,, with occasional exceptions, as in the work of the !ritish "egelian #.". !radley$ !radley$ to logical positivism, positivism , which stresses observable facts and relations and therefore spurns the speculative %pretensions& %pretensions& of every metaphysics$ and sometimes to atheism atheism,, since the idealist sometimes extrapolates the concept of mind to embrace an infinite 'ind. The essential orientation of idealism can be sensed through some of its typical tenets %Truth is the whole, or the
Absolute&$ %to be is to be perceived&$ %reality reveals its ultimate nature more faithfully in its highest (ualities )mental* than in its lowest )material*&$ %the +go is both subject and object.& •
F.H. Bradley, detail of a portrait by R.G. Eves, 1924; in the collection of erton !olle"e, #$ford.
Courtesy of the Warden and Fellows of Merton College, Oxford; photograph, Thomas-Photos
philosophy of la+ realis &-)ho process philosophy 'atin (ver (verrois rois philosophy of reli"ion /antianis plralis and onis irrationalis pra"atis
hat idealism is may be clarified by approaching it in three ways through its basic doctrines and principles, through through its central (uestions and and answers, and through through its significant significant arguments. arguments.
Basic doctrines and principles -ix common basic conceptions distinguish idealistic philosophy
The nion o! indi"idalit# and ni"ersalit# Abstract universals —such as %canineness,& %canineness,& which expresses the common common nature or essence that essence that the members of a class )e.g., individual dogs or wolves* share with one another—are acknowledged acknowledged by many philosophers. 'any idealists, however, emphasie the concept of a concrete universal, one that is also a concrete concrete reality, reality, such as %humankind& or %literature,& that can be imagined as gatherable into one specific thing. As opposed to the fixed formal abstract universal, the concrete universal is essentially dynamic, organic, and developing. Thus, universality and individuality merge.
The contrast $et%een conte&poraneit# and eternit# hereas most philosophers tend to focus on matters of contemporary concern, concern, idealists always seek a much wider perspective that embraces epochs epochs and eras in the broad sweep of history history.. In the words of the /0th1century rationalist rationalist philosopher philosopher !enedict !enedict de -pinoa, -pinoa , they strive to view the contemporary world %under the aspect of eternity.& Thus, in spite of the extensive formative influence influence of culture, idealists claim that their philosophy transcends the parochialism of a particular culture$ and idealisms are found, in fact fact,, in all the major cultures of the world. •
Benedict de %pino0a, paintin" by an anonyos artist; in the Her0o"liche Bibliothe,
The doctrine o! internal relations and the coherence theor# o! trth It seems natural to suppose, as nonidealists usually do, that the consideration of two things in their relatedness to one another can have no effect on the things themselves—i.e., that a relation is something in addition addition to the things or terms related and is thus external. 2n that basis, truth would be defined as a relation of correspondence between correspondence between a proposition and a state of affairs. The idealist believes, however, however, that that reality is more subtle than that. that. The relationship relationship between between a mineral deposit deposit and the business cycle, for example, is an internal one the deposit of an ore changes when prices render it profitable to mine the mineral. -imilarly, it is part of the essence of a brick that it is related to a wall or pavement. Thus, terms and relations logically determine one another. 3ltimate reality is therefore a system of judgments or propositions, propositions, and truth truth is is defined in terms of the coherence of those propositions with one another to form a harmonious whole. Thus, a successful spy is judged either a hero or a villain only in relation to a total system of international international relations, an accepted philosophy accepted philosophy of history, history, and the moral judgments involved. involved. There are therefore degrees of reality and degrees of truth within a system of truth cohering by internal relations, and the truth of a judgment reflects reflects its place in in that system.
The dialectical ðod BR&)(33&!( %)#R&E% •
&3 )HE 3E% 5 (R)% 6 !7')7RE
( 3e+ Hoe for (frican (erican History and !ltre
•
8E%)&F&E8 5 %*#R)% 6 RE!RE()
hy 8oes :/ %tand for a %trieot in Baseball<
•
%*#)'&GH) 5 %#!&E)
)he !ontroversy !ontroversy over Feal Feale e Genital !ttin" !ttin"
•
&3 )HE 3E% 5 %!&E3!E
*innin" 8o+n Hanity=s #t-of-(frica i"ration
%ee (ll %tories
Idealism seeks to overcome contradictions by penetrating into the overall coherent system of truth and continually creating new knowledge to be integrated with earlier discoveries. Idealism is thus friendly to all (uests for truth, whether in the natural or behavioral sciences or in art, religion, and philosophy. It seeks the truth in every positive judgment and in its contradictory as well. Thus, it traditionally uses thedialectical method of reasoning to remove the contradictions characteristic of human knowledge. -uch removal leads to a new synthetic judgment that incorporates in a higher truth the degree of truth that was present in each of the two lower judgments.
The centralit# o! &ind in 'no%led(e and $ein(
) #7R /3#'E8GE
at=s &n a 3ae< *hilosopher Edition
Idealism is not reductive, as are opposing philosophies that identify mind with matter and reduce the higher level of reality to the protons andelectrons of mathematical physics. 2n the contrary, idealism
defends the principle that the lower is explained by the higher—specifically, that matter can be explained by mind but that mind cannot be explained by matter. The word spirit can be substituted for mind or even placed above it, and at one time % spiritualism& was used, especially in +urope, as a synonym for idealism.
The trans&tation o! e"il into (ood !#33E!) &)H BR&)(33&!(
4early all idealists accept the principle that the evils with which humankind has to deal may become ingredients in a larger whole that overcomes them. The American "egelian 5osiah 6oyce held that the larger whole is the Absolute 'ind, which keeps evils under control as a person might hold a viper under the sole of his boot. Along with that doctrine of the sublimation or transmutation of evil, 6oyce incorporated into his metaphysics a point from the irrationalism of Arthur -chopenhauer, itself avoluntaristic form of idealism, that is to say that %the world is my idea.& -chopenhauer, however, was probably the only idealist who defended the converse principle that good is transmuted into evil. •
(rthr %chopenhaer, 1>??.
r"h!# f&r 'unst und %es"h!"hte, (erl!n
Basic )estions and ans%ers In defining philosophical idealism in its historical development as a technical metaphysical doctrine, three most1difficult and irreducible (uestions arise. #rom the efforts to answer those (uestions there has been created an extensive literature that is the corpus of philosophical idealism.
Ulti&ate realit# The first of the three (uestions is metaphysical hat is the ultimate reality that is given in human experience7 "istorically, answers to this (uestion have fallen between two extremes. 2n the one hand is the skepticism of the /8th1century empiricist 9avid "ume, who held that the ultimate reality given in experience is the moment1by1moment flow of events in the consciousness of each individual. That concept compresses all of reality into a solipsistic specious present—the momentary sense experience of one isolated percipient. At the other extreme, followers of -pinoa adopted his definition of ultimate substance as that which can exist and can be conceived only by itself. According to the first principle of his system of pantheistic idealism, :od )or 4ature or -ubstance* is the ultimate reality given in human experience. In the early /;th century the :erman philosopher :eorg ilhelm #riedrich "egel said that this dogmatic absolutism was the lion
Geor" ilhel Friedrich He"el, oil paintin" by @aob von %chlesin"er, ") 1>2?; in the
*euts"he Fotothe+, *resden
The (i"en BR&)(33&!( '&%)% 6 A7&E%
•
(3&('% A7&
!apybaras
•
*H&'#%#*H 6 RE'&G '&%)
rder ost HorridC )he Grisliest 8eaths of Roan !atholic %aints
•
H&%)#R A7&
7.%. *residential Firsts
•
%!&E3!E '&%)
1D ays of 'ooin" at !ells
The second (uestion to arise in defining idealism is hat is given7 hat results can be obtained from a logical interpretation and elaboration of the given7 According to idealists, the result, though it is fre(uently something external to individual experience, is, nevertheless, a concrete universal, an
order system )like the invisible lattice structure of a crystal*, or an ideality in the sense explained earlier. In "egel
Chan(e The third (uestion is hat position or attitude is a thinker to take toward temporal becoming and change and toward the presence of ends and values within the given7 According to idealists, reason not only discovers a coherent order in nature but also creates the state and other cultural institutions, which together constitute the cultural order of a modern society. Idealistic political philosophers recognie the primacy of this cultural order over the private order or family and over the public order—the governing agencies and economic institutions. The conservation and enhancement of the values of all three orders constitute the basic moral objective of every people. A useful distinction drawn by the :erman philosopher +rnst =assirer, a member of the 'arburg school of 4eo1>antianism ) see below Types of philosophical idealism estern types*, between the efficient and the formative energies of a people emphasies the way in which those moral forces function the efficient energies are the conserving, and the formative are the creative forces in society. It is on the basis of that distinction that idealists have made a contribution to international ethics, which charges that no country has a right to use its efficient energies to exercise power over another people except to further the formative energies of that people, to enrich their cultural order. +thically, then, there can be no power over without power for$ i.e., economic exploitation is wrong. 'odern idealists have also created an idealistic philosophy of history. The ?@th1century Italian idealist !enedetto =roce expressed it in the formula %every true history is contemporary history&$ and at the same time in #rance, the subjective idealist Bon !runschvicg agreed. There are close relations between the philosophy of history and the philosophy of values. •
Benedetto !roce.
$) oger-!ollet
Basic ar(&ents #our basic arguments found in the literature of idealism may be briefly summaried.
Esse est percipi* +To $e is to $e percei"ed, According to this argument, all the (ualities attributed to objects are sense (ualities. Thus, hardness is the sensing of a resistance to a striking action, and heaviness is a sensation of muscular effort when, for example, holding an object in one
Geor"e Bereley, detail of an oil paintin" by @ohn %ibert, ") 12; in the 3ational *ortrait
Courtesy of The .at!onal Portra!t %allery, ondon
The reciprocit# ar(&ent =losely related to the esse est percipi argument is the contention that subject and object are reciprocally dependent upon each other. It is impossible to conceive of a subject without an object, since the essential meaning of being a subject is being aware of an object and that of being an object is being an object to a subject, that relation being absolutely and universally reciprocal. =onse(uently, every complete reality is always a unity of subject and object—i.e., an immaterial ideality, a concrete universal.
The stical ar(&ent In the third argument, the idealist holds that in the individual
for example, it was made by Clato, to whom the final leap to the form of the :ood was mystical in nature. In Indian "indu Dedanta philosophy, it was made by the 8th1century monistic theologian -hankara and by the //th1century dualistic !rahmin theist 6amanuja. In !uddhism the claims were made by the sometimes mystical extreme subjectivism of the Dijnanavada school of 'ahayana )represented by Ashvaghosha in the /st and Asanga in the Eth century* and in =hina by the Fen school and by the 0th1century scholar "ui1neng, author of its basic classic Liu-Tsu t’anch’ing )%Clatform -cripture of the -ixth Catriarch&*. In Islamic lands it was made by -ufis )mystics* —in particular, by the /Gth1century Cersian writer 5alal al19in 6umi. And in the est during the late /;th and early ?@th centuries, it was made by several distinguished idealists in :ermany, by the seminal modern theologian #riedrich -chleiermacher $ in #rance, by the evolutionary intuitionist "enri !ergson, by the philosopher of action 'aurice !londel, and by the 5ewish religious existentialist 'artin !uber $ and in +nglish1speaking countries, by the -cottish metaphysician 5ames #rederick #errier and the American "egelian illiam +. "ocking. •
Raana, bron0e sclptre, 12th centry; fro a ishn teple in )hanavr district, &ndia.
Courtesy of the Inst!tut Fran0a!s de Pond!"h1ry
The ontolo(ical ar(&ent This famous argument originated as a proof of the existence of :od. It occurred to the //th1century thinker -t. Anselm of =anterbury, as an intuitive insight from his personal religious experience, that a being conceived to be perfect must necessarily exist, for otherwise that being would lack one of the essentials of perfection. :od
an immaterial ideality or concrete universal. According to "egel, %the ideality of the finite& is %the main principle of philosophy.&
T-PES O. PHILOSOPHICAL IDEALISM !erkeleyant, whose epochal work Kritik der reinen Vernunft )/08/$ ?nd ed. /080$ Critique of Pure Reason* presented a formalistic or transcendental idealism, so named because >ant thought that the human self, or %transcendental ego,& constructs knowledge out of sense impressions, upon which are imposed certain universal concepts that he called categories. Three systems constructed in :ermany in the early /;th century by, respectively, the moral idealist5ohann :ottlieb #ichte, the aesthetic idealist #riedrich -chelling, and "egel, all on a foundation laid by >ant, are referred to as objective idealism, in contrast to !erkeley
&anel /ant, print pblished in 'ondon, 1>12.
Photos)"om/2up!ter!mages
All those terms form backgrounds for modern estern idealisms, most of which are based either on >antant& and were thus called >antian idealists. +dward =aird, who imported :erman idealism into +ngland, and the :erman proponent of the philosophy of %as if,& "ans Daihinger, who held that much of humans< so1called knowledge reduces to pragmatic fictions, were >antian idealists or >antian transcendentalists. 2n that tradition are based the idealisms of the austerely religious essayist Thomas =arlyle in artor Resartus )/8GGHGE* and of the 4ew +ngland transcendentalism of 6alph aldo +merson. It must be stated, however, that >ant preferred the name critical idealism to that of transcendental idealism. Another group of idealists, adopting the motto %#rom >ant forward,& founded the so1called 'arburg school of 4eo1>antian idealism. They rejected the idealisms of #ichte, -chelling, and "egel and the classical 4ewtonian dynamics presupposed by >ant and built instead upon the new (uantum and relativity theories of modern physics. #ounded in the late /;th century by "ermann =ohen, champion of a new interpretation of >ant, and his colleague, the Clatonic scholar Caul 4atorp, who applied >antant, was shared by his disciple, the more1"egelian thinker !ernard !osan(uet —whose views were based upon oteant and appealed to advances in the physical, biological, and behavioral sciences to support those revisions. The cosmological argument, for example, was restated as the continuing relation of the cosmos to a world1ground that is spiritual in essence$ thus, the concept of :od as
a first cause is rejected. The concept of the fitness of the environment to life and to human history and other scientific concepts was used to modernie the teleological argument. 4evertheless, all of that revision was kept within the framework of idealistic metaphysics and epistemology. A theistic spiritual pluralism, which interprets reality in terms of a multitude of interacting psychic monads)elementary units*, was developed by the +nglish philosopher 5ames ard. 2n the other hand, an atheistic spiritual pluralism, which holds that reality consists entirely o f individual minds and their contents, was espoused by the =ambridge "egelian 5.'. +llis 'cTaggert. 9uring the late /;th century, a movement known as American "egelian idealism arose in the 3nited -tates. It found vigorous early expression in the work of .T. "arris, a central figure in a 'idwestern group of scholars known as the -t. ouis school. In its later development, American idealism split into two branches one of the aforementioned !radley1!osan(uet type and a second of the 6oyce1 "ocking type, so called because it was founded by 6oyce and developed by his disciple "ocking. The American philosopher of religion !orden Carker !owne founded another important American school, that of personalism, a >antian1 and otean1based variety of theistic idealism similar to the spiritual pluralism of ard. hereas most previous idealisms had stressed the rational as the highest category of reality and hence as its paradigm, personalism saw in the centred structures of personhood, both finite and infinite, an even higher category, displaying dimensions richer than the rational alone.Cersonalism was influentially developed in the 3nited -tates, most notably through the 'ethodist philosopher +.-. !rightman, known for his defense of the doctrine of a finite :od, and through the journal The Personalist , edited by one of !owneantian scholar 4orman >emp -mith
(lfred 3orth hitehead
Aesthetic idealism is devoted to philosophical theories of beauty in nature and in all forms of art. !ecause -chelling claimed that art is the best approach to an understanding of philosophy, his system is designated aesthetic idealism. Axiological idealism is a name referring to such philosophies as those of ilbur '. 3rban and others who developed idealistic theories of value and valuation. +thical idealism deals with moral values, rights, and obligations. -everal of the above1mentioned philosophers, such as #ichte and :reen, as well as the Clato scholar A.+. Taylor, the theistic pluralist "astings 6ashdall, and the absolutist .6. -orley, could be called ethical idealists in the sense that they produced well1thought1out systems of ethics. The writings of the :erman philosopher of life and action 6udolf +ucken also provide an excellent example of ethical idealism. Those classifications are not exhaustive. The actual existence of so many types of philosophical idealism, however, proves its fertility and ubi(uity.
CRITICISM AND APPRAISAL 2bviously, some of the types of idealism in the above classifications conflict with one another. #or example, spiritual monism and spiritual pluralism are opposite types$ personalism rejects absolute idealism$ and atheistic spiritual pluralism is in sharp conflict with theistic spiritual pluralism. Those
and other debatable issues kept idealists in dialogue with each other, but each type tended to preserve itself. 2ver against those internal disputes stand the criticisms of the anti1idealists. The wide1ranging American realist 6alph !arton Cerry, for example, admitted that the primary approach of all philosophers to the problem of ultimate reality must be through their own thought, using their own ideas$ but that is a human predicament that was unjustifiably exploited by the idealists, according to Cerry, and turned into the %fallacious& esse est percipi argument. The famous %6efutation of Idealism& prepared by the meticulous =ambridge philosopher :.+. 'oore and a similar refutation by 6ussell rest upon the distinction between a subjectarl 'arx and his followers borrowed and adapted the dialectical argument of "egel and used it effectively to develop dialectical materialism, an archenemy of all idealisms. 'arxism posed a formidable opposition to idealism in the ?@th century. •
/arl ar$.
Courtesy of the trustees of the (r!t!sh Museum; photograph, 2)) Freeman 3 Co) td)
Idealists considered all of the foregoing criticisms to be external. Instead of answering them in detail, some idealists preferred to challenge the critics to make genuinely constructive efforts to build an ade(uate substitute for idealism—a system to be reached by seriously working at the problems from within philosophy. To produce such a substitute would re(uire careful reconsideration of the arguments of at least some of the above idealistic systems. Although it is now on the wane, at least in estern culture, the great idealist tradition has survived many other historical periods of turmoil and has often been reborn in prolonged periods of settled and peaceful social conditions. ill it rise again7 2nly the future holds the answer. !ut idealism shows evidence of being, perhaps, a reflection of some permanent aspect of the human spirit, and it may then be a perennial philosophy. In any case, it seems highly unlikely that such a rich heritage of philosophical thought will vanish entirely. FEEDBACK
.or General or /orld Philosophies The term metaphysics literally means beyond the physical. This area of philosophy focuses on the nature of reality. 'etaphysics attempts to find unity across the domains of experience and thought. At the metaphysical level, there are fourJ broad philosophical schools of thought that apply to education today. They are idealism, realism, pragmatism )sometimes called experientialism*, and existentialism. +ach will be explained shortly. These four general frameworks provide the root or base from which the various educational philosophies are derived. # $ fifth metaph"sical school of thought% called cholasticism% is largel" applied in Roman Catholic schools in the educational philosoph" called &Thomism'& !t combines idealist and realist philosophies in a framework that harmoni(ed the ideas of $ristotle% the realist% with idealist notions of truth' Thomas $quinas% )*++-)*,% was the theologian who wrote &umma Theologica%& formali(ing church doctrine' The cholasticism moement encouraged the logical and philosophical stud" of the beliefs of the church% legitimi(ing scientific inquir" within a religious framework'
Two of these general or world philosophies, idealism and realism, are derived from the ancient :reek philosophers, Clato and Aristotle. Two are more contemporary, pragmatism and existentialism. "owever, educators who share one of these distinct sets of beliefs about the nature of reality presently apply each of these world philosophies in successful classrooms. et us explore each of these metaphysical schools of thought. Idealism Idealism is a philosophical approach that has as its central tenet that ideas are the only true reality, the only thing worth knowing. In a search for truth, beauty, and justice that is enduring and everlasting, the focus is on conscious reasoning in the mind. Clato, father of Idealism, espoused this view about E@@ years !=, in his famous book, The Republic. Clato believed that there are two worlds. The first is the spiritual or mental world, which is eternal, permanent, orderly, regular, and universal. There is also the world of appearance, the world experienced through sight, touch, smell, taste, and sound, that is changing, imperfect, and disorderly. This division is often referred to as the duality of mind and body. 6eacting against what he perceived as too much of a focus on the immediacy of the physical and sensory world, Clato described a utopian
society in which education to body and soul all the beauty and perfection of which they are capable as an ideal. In his allegory of the cave, the shadows of the sensory world must be overcome with the light of reason or universal truth. To understand truth, one must pursue knowledge and identify with the Absolute 'ind. Clato also believed that the soul is fully formed prior to birth and is perfect and at one with the 3niversal !eing. The birth process checks this perfection, so education re(uires bringing latent ideas )fully formed concepts* to consciousness. In idealism, the aim of education is to discover and develop each individualKs abilities and full moral excellence in order to better serve society. The curricular emphasis is subject matter of mind literature, history, philosophy, and religion. Teaching methods focus on handling ideas through lecture, discussion, and -ocratic dialogue )a method of teaching that uses (uestioning to help students discover and clarify knowledge*. Introspection, intuition, insight, and whole1part logic are used to bring to consciousness the forms or concepts which are latent in the mind. =haracter is developed through imitating examples and heroes. Realism 6ealists believe that reality exists independent of the human mind. The ultimate reality is the world of physical objects. The focus is on the bodyLobjects. Truth is objective1what can be observed. Aristotle, a student of Clato who broke with his mentorKs idealist philosophy, is called the father of both 6ealism and the scientific method. In this metaphysical view, the aim is to understand objective reality through the diligent and unsparing scrutiny of all observable data. Aristotle believed that to understand an object, its ultimate form had to be understood, which does not change. #or example, a rose exists whether or not a person is aware of it. A rose can exist in the mind without being physically present, but ultimately, the rose shares properties with all other roses and flowers )its form*, although one rose may be red and another peach colored. Aristotle also was the first to teach logic as a formal discipline in order to be able to reason about physical events and aspects. The exercise of rational thought is viewed as the ultimate purpose for humankind. The 6ealist curriculum emphasies the subject matter of the physical world, particularly science and mathematics. The teacher organies and presents content systematically within a discipline, demonstrating use of criteria in making decisions. Teaching methods focus on mastery of facts and basic skills through demonstration and recitation. -tudents must also demonstrate the ability to think critically and scientifically, using
observation and experimentation. =urriculum should be scientifically approached, standardied, and distinct1discipline based. =haracter is developed through training in the rules of conduct. Pragmatism )+xperientialism* #or pragmatists, only those things that are experienced or observed are real. In this late /;th century American philosophy, the focus is on the reality of experience. 3nlike the 6ealists and 6ationalists, Cragmatists believe that reality is constantly changing and that we learn best through applying our experiences and thoughts to problems, as they arise. The universe is dynamic and evolving, a becoming view of the world. There is no absolute and unchanging truth, but rather, truth is what works. Cragmatism is derived from the teaching of =harles -anders Ceirce )/8G;1/;/E*, who believed that thought must produce action, rather than linger in the mind and lead to indecisiveness.
5ohn 9ewey )/8M;1/;M?* applied pragmatist philosophy in his progressive approaches. "e believed that learners must adapt to each other and to their environment. -chools should emphasie the subject matter of social experience. All learning is dependent on the context of place, time, and circumstance. 9ifferent cultural and ethnic groups learn to work cooperatively and contribute to a democratic society. The ultimate purpose is the creation of a new social order. =haracter development is based on making group decisions in light of conse(uences. #or Cragmatists, teaching methods focus on hands1on problem solving, experimenting, and projects, often having students work in groups. =urriculum should bring the disciplines together to focus on solving problems in an interdisciplinary way. 6ather than passing down organied bodies of knowledge to new learners, Cragmatists believe that learners should apply their knowledge to real situations through experimental in(uiry. This prepares students for citienship, daily living, and future careers. Existentialism The nature of reality for +xistentialists is subjective, and lies within the individual. The physical world has no inherent meaning outside of human existence. Individual choice and individual standards rather than external standards are central. +xistence comes before any definition of what we are. e define ourselves in relationship to that existence by the choices we make. e should not accept anyone elseKs
predetermined philosophical system$ rather, we must take responsibility for deciding who we are. The focus is on freedom, the development of authentic individuals, as we make meaning of our lives. There are several different orientations within the existentialist philosophy. -oren >ierkegaard )/8/G1/8MM*, a 9anish minister and philosopher, is considered to be the founder of existentialism. "is was a =hristian orientation. Another group of existentialists, largely +uropean, believes that we must recognie the finiteness of our lives on this small and fragile planet, rather than believing in salvation through :od. 2ur existence is not guaranteed in an after life, so there is tension about life and the certainty of death, of hope or despair. 3nlike the more austere +uropean approaches where the universe is seen as meaningless when faced with the certainty of the end of existence, American existentialists have focused more on human potential and the (uest for personal meaning. Dalues clarification is an outgrowth of this movement. #ollowing the bleak period of orld ar II, the #rench philosopher, 5ean Caul -artre, suggested that for youth, the existential moment arises when young persons realie for the first time that choice is theirs, that they are responsible for themselves. Their (uestion becomes ho am I and what should I do7 6elated to education, the subject matter of existentialist classrooms should be a matter of personal choice. Teachers view the individual as an entity within a social context in which the learner must confront othersK views to clarify his or her own. =haracter development emphasies individual responsibility for decisions. 6eal answers come from within the individual, not from outside authority. +xamining life through authentic thinking involves students in genuine learning experiences. +xistentialists are opposed to thinking about students as objects to be measured, tracked, or standardied. -uch educators want the educational experience to focus on cre ating opportunities for self1direction and self actualiation. They start with the student, rather than on curriculum content.
Existentialism is a philosoph that emphasi+es individual existence, freedom and choice. It is the vie# that humans define their own meaning in life, and tr to ma&e rational decisions despite existing in an irrational universe. It focuses on the uestion of human existence, and the feeling that there is no purpose or explanation at the core of existence. It holds that, as there is no
God or an other transcendent force, the onl #a to counter this nothingness and hence to find meaning in life is b embracing existence.
Thus, /xistentialism believes that individuals are entirel free and must ta&e personal responsibility for themselves although #ith this responsibilit comes angst, a profound anguish or dread. It therefore emphasi+es action, freedom and decision as fundamental, and holds that the onl #a to rise above the essentiall absurd condition of humanit #hich is characteri+ed b suffering and inevitable death is b exercising our personal freedom and choice a complete rejection of 0eterminism. 1ften, /xistentialism as a movement is used to describe those #ho refuse to belong to any school of thought, repudiating of the adeuacy of an bod of beliefs or sstems, claiming them to be superficial, academic and remote from life. 2lthough it has much in common #ith 3ihilism, /xistentialism is more a reaction against traditional philosophies, such as 4ationalism,/mpiricism and 5ositivism, that see& to discover an ultimate order and universal meaning in metaphsical principles or in the structure of the observed #orld. It asserts that people actuall ma&e decisions based on #hat has meaning to them, rather than #hat is rational. /xistentialism originated #ith the 67th 8entur philosophers %9ren :ier&egaard and Friedrich 3iet+sche, although neither used the term in their #or&. In the 67ean-5aul %artre, Albert Camus 676? - 67@<, and !imone de Beauvoir 67
"ain Beliefs