reviewers's copyright to the authors.Full description
digest
DigestFull description
Full description
This is the digest of the Neypes v. Court of Appeals where the Neypes Rule originated. It is discussed for Civil Procedure.Full description
ObliconFull description
People V. Dy Case digest
ggFull description
Digest Agency DoctrineFull description
Civil ProcedureFull description
Prov remFull description
Right against self-incrimination, ConstiFull description
Constitutional Law IFull description
Pajamoya v. Manipon FACTS: On June 5, 1963 the plaintifs led in the Court o First Instance o a complaint alleging that the are co! o"ners pro!indi#iso o the parcel o land descri$ed in the complaint "hich is co#ered $ Original Certicate o %itle &o' 1()9 in the name o *iego +aomao' %hat the had ac-uired the land as an inheritance rom their late ather *iego +aomao. that the and their predecessor!in!interest had $een in actual, peaceul and uninterrupted possession o said propert in the concept o o"ners or a period o more than /( ears until the earl part o the ear 1956 "hen the deendants dispossessed them o said propert, resulting in their ha#ing sufered annual damages amounting to around +1,1(('(( representing the #alue o the crops o rice. mongo, corn and #egeta$les that the ailed to har#est. %he deendants deendants alleged that the are the the e0clusi#e e0clusi#e o"ners o a parcel o o land co#ered $ Original Certicate o %itle &o' 1(3 issued $ the o2ce o the egister o *eeds o +angasinan, the said land ha#ing $een adudicated to them in the cadastral proceedings o the 4alasi-ue' %he also claim the had ac-uired the land mentioned in their ans"er $ inheritance rom their deceased ather +io-uinto 4anipon, and that the and their predecessorsin!interest ha#e $een in actual, peaceul, and ad#erse possession o said land or more than /( ears, to the e0clusion o plaintifs. %he Court o First Instance Instance o +angasinan +angasinan made made a nding that that Original Certicate Certicate o %itle &o' &o' 1()9 held $ $ the plaintifs "as issued earlier than Original Certicate Certicate o %itle &o' &o' 1(3 held $ the deendants' deendants' %C 78FO, the Court, rendering udgment in a#or o the plaintifs and against the deendants, here$ here$ orders the latter to #acate the land in -uestion and deli#er possession thereo to the ormer "ho are entitled thereto as the heirs o *iego +aomao "ho is here$ declared the legal and la"ul o"ner o the said propert' :%he egister o *eeds or +angasinan is here$ ordered to cancel de ocio Original Certicate o %itle &o' 1(3' %he deendants deendants contend that that the lo"er court court erred erred in declaring declaring Original Certicate Certicate o %itle &o' 1(3 o herein appellants null and #oid not"ithstanding the act that this is not one o the relies praed or $ the appellees'
HELD: %he onl -uestion to $e resol#ed in the present appeal is "hich o the t"o original certicates o title should pre#ail;the &o' 1()9 held $ the plaintifs! appellees "hich "as issued in #irtue o the homestead patent, or the &o' 1(3 held $ the deendants!appellants deendants!appellants "hich "as issued in connection "ith the cadastral proceedings< &ecessaril, "hen one o the t"o titles is held to $e superior o#er the other, one should $e declared null and #oid and should $e ordered cancelled' cancelled' =nd i a part is declared to $e the o"ner o a parcel o land pursuant to a #alid certicate o title said part is entitled to the possession possession o the land co#ered $ said #alid title' %he decree o registration issued in the cadastral proceedings does not ha#e the efect
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
Trusted by over 1 million members
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.
o annulling the title that had pre#iousl $een issued in accordance "ith the pro#isions o the land egistration >a" ?=ct 96@' %hus, it has $een ruled $ $ this Court that that once a homestead homestead patent granted granted in accordance "ith the +u$lic >and =ct is registered pursuant to Aection 1BB o =ct 96?>and egistration =ct@, the certicate o title issued in #irtue o said patent has the orce and efect o a %orrens %itle under the >and egistration =ct' It is the settled rule in this urisdiction that "here t"o certicates o title are issued to diferent persons co#ering the same land in "hole or in part, the earlier in date must pre#ail as $et"een the original parties, and in o successi#e registration "here more than one certicate is issued o#er the land the person holding under the prior certicate is entitled to the land as against the person "ho relies on the second certicate'
