Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
EX. No: 68/14 Geeta Vs Joginder Kumar PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Presen sent :
DH in pers person on alon along g with with Pro Proxy Counse unsell Sh. Ash Asho Kumar Tanwar. JD is absent.
Bailable warrants issued against the JD received back unexecuted. Report perused. It ap appe pear arss that that the the prese resenc nce e of the the JD cann cannot ot secured without taking further coercive steps against JD.
Hence, NBW's Hence, NBW's be issued against the JD through SHO concerned, returnable returnable for 07.07.2015.
(Manu (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Ex. No: Privacy Policy
29/14 Mamta Gupta Vs Ashok Khandelwal PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
DH in person. JD in person.
JD has handed over a sum of Rs. 15,000/- to the DH against receipt. List for further payment on 01.07 on 01.07.2015 .2015 at 2:00 P.M.
(Manu (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Ex. No: Privacy Policy
29/14 Mamta Gupta Vs Ashok Khandelwal PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
DH in person. JD in person.
JD has handed over a sum of Rs. 15,000/- to the DH against receipt. List for further payment on 01.07 on 01.07.2015 .2015 at 2:00 P.M.
(Manu (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up
CC No: 7/2/15 Lata Vs. Amerish Singhal etc. PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015.
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Pres Presen entt Privacy : Comp Co mpla lain inan antt in per perso son n Policy
alon along g with with Ld Ld coun counse sell Sh.K Sh.K.R .R
Kaushik. Respondents no. 1, 3 and 4 are absent. Vikas Ld. Counsel for respondents. respondents. Already have anSh. account? SignBhatia, in
Today again respondents have not appeared before the
court. It is orally submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the respondents that that respo sponden dent no. 1 has met with with an acc acciden ident. t. Henc enc respondents will not appear in person before the court today.
In the interest of justice, exemption of respondents no.
1, 3 and 4 is allowed for today only & they are directed to positively appear before the court on NDOH. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has file iled application for discharge respondent no. 4. Copy supplied.
Ld. counsel for the respondents has also supplied the
advance copy of the WS to the counsel for the complainant and submits that he shall place on record record the WS on NDOH.
At this stage, it is submitted by both the parties that they are ready to settle the present case.
Court also sees an element of settlement in the present
case. As such the present matter is referred referred to Mediation Centre Partie rtiess are dire irected ted to ap appe pear ar befo efore the the Mediatio Mediation n Cent
Dwarka Court, New Delhi on 05.06.2015 at 11.00 am & repor before this court on 21.07.2015. Ahlmad is directed to sent the file complete in respects well before date & time fixed. Sign up to vote on this title
(Manu (Man u Goel Not useful Useful Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Sign in
FIR No. 330/02 State Vs Roshan Lal PS Najafgarh
15.05.2015. PW3/SI Rajinder Kaur, No. 2131/D, CAW Cell, New Delhi (recalled for cross examination after 19.03.2015). On SA
XXXXXXXX by Sh. Haneef Mohammad, Mohammad, Ld. Counsel for accused person.
I was having the file for investigation from 19.08.2002
to 27.09.2002 and the same was given by the Reader. I had sent the
request notice to Sita Rani. I do not remember to all whom I have
sent the request notice. It might be possible that I have told Sita
Rani to bring Prem Kumar along with her. Sita Rani appeared on
the date mentioned in the notice. I have recorded the statement of
the Sita Rani on her second visit. I do not remember the date as to
when I have recorded the statement of Sita Rani and also when she
first visited. Only the statement of Sita Rani was recorded on her
second visit. However I did not record the statement of any person
on the first visit of Sita Rani. I do not remember the time when the
Sita Rani visited the CAW Cell. I even cannot tell as to whether Sita
Rani pre-lunch or post-lunch period as it is thirteen years old case. I do not remem member as to wheth hethe er Sita Rani ani came ame alon alone e
accompanied by someone. I had myself written the statement of
Sita Rani. I cannot tell as to how much duration Sita Rani stayed. I
neve neverr visi visite ted d the the hous house e of the the comp compla lain inan r the th accuse se Sign up to ant votet onothis titlee accu
personally. I do not remember as to whether I have asked them to Useful
Not useful
bring the original bill of stridhan bills. Again said I must have asked
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
them to bring the original stridhan bills. During my investigation
Sign Up bills were never handed over to me. I have not period original
mentioned the list of articles in the seizure memo which is already
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy not verified the bills Ex.PW3/A. I had
from the accused as well as
respective shops mentioned in the seizure memo as t
Already have an account? Sign in investigation is transferred from me and I have handed over the file
to the Reader of Inspector CAW Cell. The copy of the bills were
handed over to me by Prem Kumar. I cannot tell as to when Prem
Kumar came to me after the visit of Sita Rani. I have not made any
DD entry as to visit of Prem Kumar or as to handing over of the bills
as I have mentioned the same in case diary. Marriage card and
marriage photographs were also handed over by Prem Kumar. I do
not remember whether on that day Prem Kumar had come to CAW
Cell alone or accompanied by someone else. I had not made Sita
Rani to sign Section 161 CrPC statement. I have not received the complaint of the complainant on the basis of which FIR wa
registered as the file came to me after initial investigation. I have
You're Reading a Preview not done any proceedings relating to the accused persons. It is
full access with a free trial. wrong to suggest thatUnlock I have recorded the statement of Sita Rani on
my own. It is further wrong With to suggest Download Free Trialthat Sita Rani and Prem
Kumar did not meet me at any point of time. It is further wrong to
suggest that I have manipulated and fabricated the things/case. It is further wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely.
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
FIR No. 170/14 State Vs Guddu PS Najafgarh
Sign Up
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
15.05.2015. PW1/HC Sultan Singh, NO. 78/SW, PS Dwarka South. Already have an account? Sign in
On SA
On 26.02.2014 I was posted at PS
Najafgarh as He
Constable. On that day I was working as DO and my duty timin
was from 4.00 pm to 12.00 midnight. On that day, SI Vikash had
presented one tehrir. I registered the above FIR. The copy of FIR is Ex.PW1/A(OSR) bearing my signature at Point A and I ma endorsement on the said tehrir. tehrir is Ex. PW1/B
My endorsement on the sai
bearing my signature at Point A. After
registration of the same I handed over the Copy of FIR and original rukka to SI Vikash as the investigation is marked to him. XXXXXXXXX by Sh. S.P.S Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for accused. You're Reading a Preview
I was on duty on that day between 4.00 pm to 12.00 midnight Unlock full access with a free trial.
I received the rukka on 9.00 pm. Only SI Vikash came to the Police
Download With Free Trial Station for registration of FIR. The complaint was converted into
rukka by making endorsement on the written complaint. It
correct that the complainant did not come to me along with SI
Vikash. It is correct that I had no personal knowledge regarding FIR except to the complaint sent to me. RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2)
Sign Up With Facebook
Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and FIR No. Privacy Policy
170/14 State Vs Guddu PS Najafgarh
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Accused Guddu is absent. Sh. S.P.S. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for accused. MHC(M) is present. PW/HC Sultan Singh and PW/Sunidhi are present. Exemption application on behalf of accused Gud
has been moved by Counsel. Heard. Considered.
For the reasons stated in the application, exemption of
the accused Guddu is allowed for today only subject to condition
You'reidentity Reading aof Preview that he shall not dispute the witness and the evidence Unlock full access with a free trial. shall be recorded in his absence.
PW1/HCDownload Sultan Singh examined, cross-examined and With Free Trial discharged. Complainant/PW Sunidhi is present today, howeve
she is discharged unexamined today as evidence recorded in other case.
Witness is bound down for NDOH. List for RPE on 06.06.2015. Remaining PW's be summoned for NDOH. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) Sign up to vote on this title-03 Dwarka N D. UsefulCourts, Not useful 15.05.2015.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2)
Sign Up With Facebook
Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up
FIR No. 143/13 State Vs Manohar Lal By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and PS Najafgarh Privacy Policy
15.05.2015. Already have anPal account? Sign in PW4/Ct. Jai Yadav, No. 1255/SW, Posting Sector 19, DCP Office DWarka. On SA
In the intervening night of 15.05.2013 and 16.05.2012 I
was posted at PS Najafgarh as Ct.. On that day I was on emergency
duty and my duty timing was from 8.00 pm to 8.00 am. On that day
W/SI Kavita had called me from my office to arrest the accused
Manohar Lal and he was arrested in my presence in the PS itself
vide arrest memo already Ex.PW1/B bearing my signature at Poin X. (accused Manohar Lal present in the court today correctl identified by witness).
Thereafter the accused was personally
search in my presence vide personal search already Ex.PW1/C Reading bearing my signatureYou're at Point Y . a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
XXXXXXXX by Sh. A.K. Thakur, Ld. Counsel Download With Free Trial for accused.
At around 12 in the night W/SI Kavita called me. W/SI
Kavita called me on my personal number. When W/SI Kavita called
me accused and complainant both are present in the PS Najafgarh only. RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up
FIR No. 143/13 State Vs Manohar Lal By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and PS Najafgarh Privacy Policy
15.05.2015. Already have Om an account? Sign in No. 803 Traffic, Posting Mayapuri Circle PW 3/HC Prakash, Delhi. On SA On 15.05.2013, I was posted at PS Najafgarh as Hea Constable. On that day I was working as DO and my duty timin
was from 12.00 midnight to 8.00 am. On that day W/SI Kavita had
presented Tehrir on which I registered the above FIR. The copy of
FIR is Ex.PW3/A(OSR) bearing my signature at Point A and I made
endorsement on the said rukka. My endorsement on the said rukka is Ex. PW3/B
bearing my signature at Point A .
Aft
registration of the same I handed over the Copy of FIR and original rukka to W/SI Kavita. The investigation is marked to W/SI Kavita. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access Ld. with aCounsel free trial. XXXXXXXX by Sh. A.K. Thakur, for accused.
Nil. Opportunity given. Download With Free Trial
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
FIR No. 143/13 State Vs Manohar Lal PS Najafgarh
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Complainant in person.
Accused Manohar Lal in person along with Ld. Counse Sh. A.K. Thakur. PW3/HC Om Prakash and PW4/Ct. Jaipal Yad examined, cross-examined and discharged. List for PE on 14.07.2015. Remaining PW's be summoned for NDOH.
(Manu Goel Kharb) You're Reading a Preview MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Sign in
FIR No. 443/02 State Vs Rajesh & Ors. PS Najafgarh
15.05.2015. PW3/Ram Pyari W/o HarPal R/o RZ 1/70, New Roshan Pu Najafgarh, Delhi. Age about 70 years. On SA
The Marriage was solemnized at around 14-15 years
back of complainant Kiran with accused Virender. I had suggested
the boy to complainant's family being a relative of Kiran. After
sometime of the marriage there was a quarrel and police came at
the residence of accused Virender. I do not know anything else regarding this case. I had not given any statement to the police. At this stage, APP seeks permission to cross examin You'reLd Reading a Preview the witness. The same is allowed. Unlock full access with a free trial. XXXXXX by Ld. APP for the State.
Download With Free Trial
It is correct that Sukbir is my brother. It is also correct
that Sukbir had spent enough money in the marriage. It is correct
that Sukbir had given scooter, colour tv, fridge, all kind of furniture
and gold and silver jewelery articles. I have been told by one of the
neighbor that the mother in law of the complainant Kiran had
given beatings to her and consequently Virender left Kiran to her parental house. It is wrong to suggest that any of the accuse
demanded Rs. 2 lakhs or the plot from the complainant. I do not
remember whether the complainant Kiran came to me and told me Sign up to vote on this title
that accused persons were demanding Rs. 2 lakhs for the job of Not useful Useful
accused Virender. I also do not remember whether I went to the
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
reconciliation. I never went to the house of the accused Virender in
SignIt Upis wrong to suggest that the IO in this case have this regard.
recorded the statement. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Policy falsely atPrivacy the instance of the accused persons.
Already have an account? Sign in XXXXXXXX by Sh. J.D. Sharma , Ld. Counsel for accused person.
I have seen the above said articles which were given in the marriage.
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
FIR No. 443/02 State Vs Rajesh & Ors. PS Najafgarh
Sign Up
15.05.2015.
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Present :
Ld. APP for the State.
Complainant in person along with her father.
Already have an account? Sign in
Accused Saroj, Satbir, Sunita and Shakuntala in person. Accused Rajesh is absent. Accused Virender has already expired. Sh. J. D. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for accused persons.
Summon issued to PW DO/ASI Chinta Ram received back with the report that he has expired.
In view of the same, DO ASI Chinta Ram is dropped from the list of prosecution witnesses.
It is submitted by the counsel for accused persons that
accused Rajesh is unwell. Hence, he could not appear today before the court today.
You're Reading a Preview
At request of counsel for accused Rajesh, his Unlock full access with a free trial.
exemption is allowed for today only subject to condition that he
Download Withwitness Free Trialand the evidence shall be shall not dispute identity of the
recorded in his absence. PW3/Ram
Pyari
examined,
cross-examined
discharged. List for PE on 09.07.2015. Remaining PW's be summoned for NDOH. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Ntitle D. Sign up toCourts, vote on this 15.05.2015. Useful Not useful
an
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
Present :
FIR No : 343/11 State Vs Manoj Kumar PS: Najafgarh
Ld. APP for the State.
Already have an account? Sign in
Accused Manoj is absent. Sh. Deepak Mehar, Proxy Counsel for accused. Exemption application on behalf of accused Man
Kumar has been moved by Proxy Counsel. Heard. Considered.
For the reasons stated in the application, exemption of the accused Manoj Kumar is allowed for today only.
It is orally submitted by the proxy counsel for accused
that he will positively file quashing petition before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi before the NDOH.
In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is granted Reading a Preview to the accused to file You're the same. full access with a free trial. List forUnlock quashing of FIR/further proceedings
22.07.2015.
Download With Free Trial
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and CC No: Privacy Policy
419/2/14 Priyanka Vs Deepak Kakkar & Ors. PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh Ritesh Oberoi. Respondents no. 1, 2 & 4 are absent.
WS as well as income affidavit not filed the respondent
till date. Further respondents have not appeared before the court
despite repeated calls since morning. Accordingly, respondents no 1, 2 & 4 are proceeded ex-parte.
At this stage, Ld. counsel for the complainant has
placed on record the photocopy of order under Section 125 CrPC of
Ld. Family Court, Dwarka, whereby interim maintenance @ Rs. You're Reading a Preview
3,000/- per month is granted to the complainant apart from the Unlock full access with a free trial.
litigation expenses of Rs. 8,000/-.
In view of the same, submits that she is Download With complainant Free Trial not pressing for relief of interim maintenance before this court.
List for ex-parte complainant evidence/ex-parte final arguments on 07.07.2015 at 1:00 P.M. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
FIR No: 411/12 State Vs Rajesh Sharma & Ors. PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Accused persons are absent. Court notice not issued. Court notice be issued
accused persons to appear in person before the court 25.05.2015.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
FIR No: 230/07 State Vs Ranjeet etc. PS: Najafgarh
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Accused Brijesh and Urmila are permanently exempted. Accused Sewa Ram and Kumesh are absent. Sh. Aklant Jain, Ld. Counsel for accused persons. Final arguments heard.
List for clarifications, if any/orders on 25.05.2015 at 2:00 P.M.
(Manu Goel Kharb) You're Reading a Preview MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Sign in
CC No: 20/3/14 Rashmi Vs Neeraj Kumar PS: Najafgarh under Section156 (3) CrPC
15.05.2015. Present :
Complainant is absent. Complainant has not appeared before the cour
despite service of notice.
In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is granted
to appear in person before the court, failing which application shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. List for appearance of the complainant on 15.07.2015.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Courts, N D. Unlock full access with a Dwarka free trial. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Ex. No: 05/14 Sakshi Vs Lalit PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
DH in person. JD is absent.
Bailable warrants be issued against the JD in the sum of
Rs 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount, returnable for 03.07.2015.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
FIR No: 109/11 State Vs Sadhu Ram PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Accused is absent.
Smt. Kirpa Devi, Surety of the accused Sadhu Ram is absent.
Issue Bailable warrant against the Kirpa Devi in the sum of Rs 5,000/- with one surety in the like amount. Process under Section 82 CrPC issued against th accused Sadhu Ram received executed. Report perused.
Issue court notice to the process server to recording his statement for 27.06.2015. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Download With Free Trial Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
FIR No: 409/13 State Vs Mohan Bharti PS: Najafgarh
Sign Up
15.05.2015.
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Present Privacy : Ld. APP for State. Policy
Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Counsel for accused Mohan Bharti. Asmita is Already have anIO/ASI account? Sign in
present.
Ld. Counsel for the accused has moved an application
for modification of order dated 06.05.2015. He has moved another
application for grant of bail of accused Mohan Bharti under Section 437 CrPC. Status report filed by IO. Same be taken on record.
further submits that accused Mohan Bharti is not required for further investigation in this case. Submissions heard. Considered.
As the accused is in J/C since 09.05.2015 and
investigation qua him is complete, court deems it appropriate to
grant bail to accusedYou're Mohan Bharti. Both applications are allowed Reading a Preview
Accused Mohan Bharti is full admitted bail Unlock access with ato free trial.in the sum of Rs 20,000/ with one like surety and subject to following conditions:Download With Free Trial
1. Accused will co-operate in the investigation of this case. 2. Accused will not influence/ threaten / induce the witnesses.
3. If in case accused changes his residential address in future, he will give due written intimation to the IO.
4. The violation of above stated conditions will automatically result in cancellation of bail and forfeiture of surety. Both the applications stand disposed off. Copy of the order be given dasti. Sign up to vote on this title
(Manu Goel Not useful Useful Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
C C No: 398/2/14 Nirupama Vs Rohit PS: Dwk North
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in Present
Complainant is absent. Ms Alka Srivastava, Ld counsel for the complainant. Matter is still pending before Mediation Centre fo
16.05.15. At request, list for report regarding Mediation, any/further proceedings on 03.07.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
C C No: 266/2/14 Himanshi Vs Jitesh Lohchab PS: Dwk North
15.05.2015.
Statement ofaccount? complainant Himanshi W/o Sh. Jitender Lochab D/o Already have an Sign in Sh. Kuldeep Singh Dabas R/o 603A, Janak Residency, Plot no 12 Sec 18A, Dwarka, New Delhi, aged about 26 years. On SA
I have amicably settled the case with respondent no. 1 Sh. Jitesh Lohchab who is my husband, towards full and fin
settlement amount of Rs. 40 lakh out of which I have received Rs. 20
lakh (at the time of anticipatory bail & another at the time of first
motion). Third installment of Rs 10 Lakh is to be paid at the time of
filing second motion of divorce & the last installment of Rs 10 Lakh
at the time of quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement dated
19.01.2015 is Ex. P-1. I am ready to abide by all the terms and
conditions of the settlement. I may be permitted to withdraw the
You're Reading a Preview present case. I am giving this statement voluntarily without any Unlock full access with a free trial. force, threat, coercion or undue influence.
Download With Free Trial
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.15.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
C C No: 266/2/14 Himanshi Vs Jitesh Lohchab PS: Dwk North
15.05.2015.
Already have anof account? Sign in Lohchab S/o Sh. Rajinder Singh Lohchab Statement Sh. Jitesh R/o House no. 1095, Sector 1, Rohtak, Haryana. aged about 32 years. On SA I have amicably settled the case with the complainant
who is my wife towards full and final settlement amount of Rs. lacs out of which I have paid Rs. 20 lakhs (at the time anticipatory bail & another at the time of first motion). Thir
installment of Rs 10 Lakh will be paid by me at the time of filing
second motion of divorce & the last installment of Rs 10 Lakh at the time of
quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement date
19.01.2015 is already Ex. P-1. I will abide by all the terms and
conditions of the settlement. I am giving this statement voluntarily without any force, threat, coercion or undue influence. You're Reading a Preview
Unlock full access with a free trial.
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Download With Free Trial Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.15.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 266/2/14 Himanshi Vs Jitesh Lohchab PS: Dwk North
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Y Already have anChauhan. account? Sign in Respondent in person.
Parties had amicably settled the case before the court
on 28.02.2015 towards full and final settlement amount of Rs. 40
lakhs out of which complainant has already received Rs. 20 lakhs. Complainant submits that she wants to withdraw the prese application.
Separate statements of complainant and responden
has been recorded to this effect. Both the parties have undertaken to comply with all the terms and conditions of settlement. Submissions heard. Considered.
In view of statements of the complainant as well as of the respondent, the present mattera Preview is disposed off as settled. You're Reading File be consigned towith record room. Unlock full access a free trial. Download With Free Trial
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 133/2/14 Parvinder Vs Mohan Preet PS:Dwk North
Present
Complainant is absent. Already have anRespondent account? Sign in in person along with Ld counsel Ms Ranjeet Bedi. Matter is fixed for RE.
Counsel for the respondent submits that evidence of
the respondent is already on record, however, she seeks some time
to move an application for seeking opportunity to cross-examine the complainant. List for further proceedings on 08.07.15.
Court notice be issued to the complainant to appear before the court on the NDOH. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 You're Reading a Preview Dwarka Courts, N D. Unlock full access with a 15.05.2015. free trial. Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No:30/2/15 Neha Vs Naresh PS: Dwk North
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Ms Already have anMeenakshi account? Sign inGupta. Respondent no 1 in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Vikram Bawaja.
Replication as well as detailed income affidavit filed by the respondent. Copy of the same is supplied to the complainant.
Complainant submits that respondent has not filed his entire documents regarding expenses as mentioned in his affidavit. Respondent is directed to file the same positive before NDOH. List for arguments on interim relief on 29.06.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. You're Reading a Preview 15.05.2015.
Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
C C No: 374/2/14 Chander Bala Vs Gian Singh PS: Bindapur
15.05.2015. Already have an account? Sign in
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh. A .K. Thakur. Respondent in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Ravinder Kumar.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be taken on record. Matter is fixed for arguments on interim relief maintenance.
Counsel for the respondents submits that he has been
recently engaged in this case and seeks one last opportunity to file WS. He further submits that complainant was working as a maid You're Reading a Preview
the house of the respondent and later on she forged certa Unlock full access with a free trial.
documents of her daughter and showed the name of th
Download With Free Trial respondent as a father of her daughter in those documents. But the
fact is that respondent never married with the complainant.
Initially, counsel for the complainant submits tha
complainant is a legal married wife of the respondent, later on
counsel for the complainant submitted that complainant stayed in
a live-in relationship with the respondent for 18-19 years and later on married with him. Complainant also submits that she ha
mentioned in her application under Section 12 of PWDV Act that
respondent has stolen all the documents including the marriage photographs and GPA of the house.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Complainant is directed to lead evidence regarding her
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
(2) Sign Up
the matter can only proceed further after the preliminary issue of
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy marriage is decided.
List for further proceedings on 22.07.15. Already have an account? Sign in
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 234/2/14 Preeti Vs Vishal Gehlot PS: Najafgarh
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh Already have anJaved. account? Sign in Respondent no 1 in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Anil Kumar.
Matter is stated to be pending before Mediation centre for 29.05.15.
It is submitted by the counsel for the complainant that
complainant wants to get the birth certificate of her daughter but
same could not made because of lack of any identity proof of her husband and electricity bill of the house where the child was born.
Respondent submits that he will make efforts to look
for the above documents and bring in the court on the NDOH, if available.
At request, list for report regarding Mediation/further You're Reading a Preview
proceedings on 29.05.15.
Unlock full access with a free trial.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Download With Free Trial Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 82/10 State Vs Rakesh Sharma PS: Bindapur
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Already have anComplainant account? Sign in is absent. Accused in person.
Accused submits that he shall positively file second
motion of divorce before Family court on 20.05.15 & thereafter he will file quashing petition before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
At request, one last opportunity is granted to the accused failing which matter will proceed on merits. List for further proceedings on 02.07.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 330/02 State Vs Roshan Lal PS: Najafgarh
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. of in the complainant is present. Already have anMother account? Sign Accused Roshan in person along with Ld counsel Sh Haneef Mohammad. Accused Bhagwati Devi, Bhago Devi, Banto Devi, Pako Devi, Meera Devi and Darshan Chand are permanently exempted. PW3/Rajinder
Kaul
further
cross-examined
an
discharged.
Application u/s 311 CrPC was moved by the counsel for
the accused for recalling PW2 Sita Rani as a witness. It is stated on
the last date of hearing that mother of the counsel of the accused
got paralysis attack and hence, he could not appear before the court for cross-examination of the witness.
Application is strongly opposed by the Ld APP on the You're Reading a Preview
ground that accused had already taken sufficient opportunities to Unlock full access with a free trial.
cross-examine PW2. Download With Free Trial Submissions heard. Considered.
Court is of the opinion that accused should not suffer
due to his counsel's personal difficulty, hence, in the interest of
justice, application u/s 311 CrPC is allowed and accused is granted
only one effective opportunity to cross-examine PW2 Sita Rani, failing which no further opportunity will be granted. List for PE on 26.05.15.
PW2 Sita Rani and remaining witnesses be summoned for the NDOH. Sign up to vote on this title
(Manu Goel Kharb) Useful Not useful MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
FIR No: 246/12 State Vs Ravi Parashar PS: Bindapur
Sign Up
15.05.2015.
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
CHARGE
Already have anI, account? in ManuSign Goel
Kharb, MM/Mahila Court-03, New Delhi
do hereby charge you accused Ravi Parashar as under:-
That after the date of marriage i.e 21.03.2010 of the
complainant Bharti Kalra with you, at the matrimonial house and
at all other places as mentioned in complaint, within jurisdiction of
PS Bindapur, you Ravi Parashar subjected the complainant with cruelty in-connection with demand of dowry and thereb
committed an offence punishable U/s 498-A IPC and within my cognizance.
That on the same date and time, at the aforesaid place,
you Ravi Parashar was entrusted with the Stridhan articles of the
complainant which you refused to return on demand and thereby
Reading a U/s Preview committed offence You're punishable 406 IPC and within my
cognizance.
Unlock full access with a free trial.
And I hereby direct that you be tried by this court for Download With Free Trial the said offences. MM/Mahila Court -03
The charge is read over and explained to the accused, who is questioned as under : Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial? Ans I do not plead guilty and claim trial.
RO & AC
(Manu Goel Kharb) Sign up to vote on this title- 03 MM,(Mahila Court) UsefulCourts, Not useful Dwarka New Delhi. 15.05.15.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 246/12 State Vs Ravi Parashar PS: Bindapur
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. in person along with Ld counsel Sh Already have anComplainant account? Sign in Rajeev Pandey. Accused in person along with Ld. counsel Sh. Vinay Kumar Jha. Arguments on charge heard.
Counsel for the accused Ravi Parashar has conceded to the charges u/s 498A/406 IPC against the accused. In view of the same, charge for the offence u/
498A/406 IPC is framed against accused Ravi Parashar, to which the accused has pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. List for PE on 22.07.2015. PW's be summoned for the next date of hearing. You're Reading a Preview Unlock full access with a (Manu free trial. Goel
Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. Download With Free Trial 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 25/3/14 Bharti Vs Ravi Parashar PS: Bindapur
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel S Pandey. Already have anRajeev account? Sign in Accused in person along with Ld. counsel Sh. Vinay Kumar Jha. In ordersheet dated 24.11.2014, it is reflected th
counsel for the complainant mentioned that cognizance und
Section 494 IPC has been taken by this court in FIR no. 246/12, PS
Bindapur however in the latter case, cognizance is taken for the
offence under Section 498-A/406 IPC. Hence, one trial cannot be conducted in both these cases.
Summons in the present complaint case have already
been issued against the accused by the Court of Sh. Vikram, Ld.
MM, Dwarka Courts, and the accused has appeared in pursuance thereof.
You're Reading a Preview
List now for pre-charge evidence on 22.07.15. Unlock full access with a free trial.
Download With Free Trial Goel Kharb) (Manu
MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 396/2/14 Suman Vs Shailender Kumar PS: Dwk North
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh. J. Malik. Already have anRespondent account? Sign in no 1 in person.
Matter received back unsettled from Mediation Centre.
Detailed income affidavit filed by the respondent. Be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Vide this order, the court shall dispose off the application of the complainant regarding interim relief maintenance u/s 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domes Violence Act 2005.
Complainant has stated in her application that she got
married with the respondent no. 1 Shailender Kumar on 26.02.2009
according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and one girl child namely
Ananaya was born out on 02.06.2011 of the wedlock. But since the You're Reading a Preview date of marriage, she is being tortured and humiliated by th
Unlock full access with a free trial. respondents for bringing insufficient dowry. Complainant has also
mentioned about demanding money and drinking apart fro Download With Free Trial
various incidents of mental and physical cruelty at the hands of the
respondents. She further alleges that on more than one occasion,
respondents have thrown her out of the matrimonial home and
now since 03.06.2014, she is staying at her parental house and is
totally dependent on her parents for subsistence of herself & her
minor child. She further alleges that respondent no. 1 is gainfully
employed as a clerk-cum-cashier in Ramgarhia Cooperative Bank
Ltd at No 3, Satyam Park, Bagat Singh Road, Krishna Nagar, Delhi
Signmonth up to vote& onan thisextra title income and is drawing a salary of Rs 25,000/- per
Useful
Not useful
of Rs 10,000/- from his property at his native place.
Respondent no 1 appeared before the court and filed
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
his reply to the application under section 23(2) of PWDV Act filed
Sign Up by the complainant wherein he denied all the allegations leveled by
the complainant. Respondent no. 1 has filed his income affidavit
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Policy today inPrivacy which he stated that his salary
as Rs 12,998/- per month
and he earns Rs. 54,000/- per annum as he is also working as a LIC Already have an account? Sign in agent.
I have heard the submission of both the parties and perused all the documents.
Complainant has not brought on record any documen
to show that respondent no 1 is earning Rs. 35,000/- per month.
Now the admitted position is that respondent no.1 is currently
earning around Rs. 17,500/- per month. So, keeping 2 portions of the admitted income for himself, respondent no. 1 Shailend
Kumar is directed to pay an interim maintenance of Rs. 4,300/- per
month for the complainant & Rs 4,300/- per month for the girl child
namely Ananaya from the date of filing of application till the date of final disposal of this case.
You're Reading a Preview Respondent no. 1 is further directed to clear the arrears Unlock full access with a free trial. of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the orde
Payment has to be made on the 5 thFree dayTrial of each month by depositing Download With
the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the details of which shall be provided by the complainant to th protection officer as well as respondent Shailender Kumar. Amount of maintenance paid in any other proceedin
shall be adjusted. Application stands disposed off with regard to the interim relief of maintenance. List for CE on 24.07.2015.
Sign upGoel to voteKharb) on this title (Manu Not useful-03 Useful Court) MM,(Mahila Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 13/2/15 Krishna Vs Joginder Kumar PS: Bindapur
Present
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Y Already have anDubey. account? Sign in Respondent no 1 in person along with Ld counsel Sh. S P Verma.
Vide this order, court shall dispose off the application
of the complainant regarding interim relief of maintenance u/s 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005.
Complainant has stated in her application that she got married with respondent no.1 Joginder Kumar on 13.02.20 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and 'twin' childr namely Lakshya & Deepika were born out of the wedlock
30.12.2006 but since the day of marriage, she is being tortured mentally and physically by the respondent no. 1 and othe respondents for demand of dowry. It is further alleged th You're Reading a Preview
respondent no. 1 is in a habit of drinking and harass her thereafter Unlock full access with a free trial.
and respondent no 1 pressurizes the complainant to seek a divorce
Download With Free Trial so that he can marry his girlfriend and also threatened her to
commit suicide if she does not leave him. Complainant submits
that she is not working and is solely dependent on her parents for subsistence of herself.
Respondent no. 1 appeared before the court and filed
his reply to the application under section 12 of PWDV Act filed by
the complainant wherein he denied all the allegations levelled by the complainant. In his detailed income affidavit, he ha
mentioned that he is doing a private job and drawing a salary of Rs Sign up to vote on this title
14,000/- per month and he has a liability to maintain the twin Useful Not useful
children who are living with him.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
perused all the documents.
SignComplainant Up has not brought on record any documen
to show the income of respondent no. 1. In the entire reply filed by
By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy there is no averment the respondent,
regarding the earnin
capacity of the complainant. Already have an account? Sign in
As per the submission made by respondent no 1, his
admitted salary is Rs 14,000/- per month. Respondent no. 1
liable to maintain his wife Krishna & the two children. So, keeping 2 portions of the admitted income for himself, respondent no.
Joginder Kumar is directed to pay an interim maintenance of Rs.
2,800/- per month for the complainant from the date of filing of application i.e. 20.01.15 till the date of final disposal.
Respondent no. 1 is further directed to clear the arrears of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the orde
Payment has to be made on the 5 th day of each month by depositing
the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the details of which shall be provided by the complainant to the You're a Preview protection officer as well asReading respondent no. 1 Joginder Kumar. full access with a free trial. Amount Unlock of maintenance paid in any other proceedin
shall be adjusted. Application stands off with regard to the Download With Freedisposed Trial interim relief of maintenance.
At this stage, complainant has moved another application u/s 23 (2) r/w Sec 21 of PWDV Act for seeki temporary custody of the children Lakshya & Deepika. Co supplied. List for reply/arguments on the application 29.05.2015. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) Sign up to vote on this title-03 Dwarka N D. UsefulCourts, Not useful 15.05.2015.
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 64/2/15 Shikha Vs Sahil Saran Sahai PS: Dwk North
Fresh file received from facilitation Centre. It be checked and registered. Already have an account? Sign in Present: Complainant in person along with Ld Counsel Sh. J Dev Solanki. This is an application filed u/s 12 of Protection Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. Sufficient material has been placed on record
proceed against respondents no 1 to 4. Summon be issued to
respondents no. 1 to 4 on filing of PF / RC within 5 working days. In
case of refusal or non-availability or house locked, summons be served by way of affixation.
Complainant has mentioned in para xiii at page no 8 of
the application that respondent no 1 is working in Dubai. Hence, Respondent no. 1 be summoned, at his Dubai address, to You're Reading a Preview
furnished by the complainant, at the time of filing PF. Unlock full access with a free trial.
Notice be issued to Protection Officer for filing DIR Download With Free Trial report within one week.
Fix for appearance and reply on 09.07.2015. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 180/12 State Vs Manish Kumar Suri PS: Bindapur
Cancellation report received from facilitation centre. It checked and registered. Already have an account? Sign in
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. Cancellation report perused. Considered. True copy of order of Hon’ble High Court of De
dated 27.02.2015 in Crl. M. C. no. 755/2015 titled Manish Kumar
Suri & Ors. Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. (Hon'ble Mr
Justice Manmohan Singh) received, vide which present FIR no
180/12, u/s 498A/406/34 IPC, PS Bindapur and the consequent proceedings have been quashed after settlement. In view of the same, accused stands discharged. Personal bond and surety bond of accused stan discharged. Original documents, if any, be released to th You're Reading a Preview
authorized persons on proper receipt and endorsement, if any, be Unlock full access with a free trial.
cancelled. Download With Free Trial File be consigned to Record Room.
(Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Dwarka Courts, N D. 15.05.2015.
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 737/14 State Vs Raju @ Thapa PS: Bindapur
Fresh chargesheet received from facilitation centre. It be checked and registered. Already have an account? Sign in
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. File perused. Considered. I
take
cognizance
of
the
offence
u
451/354/323/506/34 IPC against accused persons mentioned
column no 11 i.e. Raju @ Thapa & Harshit Kashyav. Ahlmad is directed to affix miscellaneous papers with the file.
Summons be issued to both the above named accused
persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of copies and regular bail on 09.07.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Unlock full access with a Dwarka free trial. Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 134/12 State Vs Devinder Kumar PS: Bindapur
Fresh chargesheet received from facilitation centre. It be checked and registered. Already have an account? Sign in
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. File perused. Considered.
I take cognizance of the offence u/s 498A/406/34 IPC
against accused persons mentioned in column no 11 i.e. Devinder Kumar, Premvati & Harbans Lal. Ahlmad is directed to af miscellaneous papers with the file.
Summons be issued to all the above named accused
persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of copies and regular bail on 08.07.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Unlock full access with a Dwarka free trial. Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
FIR No: 790/14 State Vs Roshan PS: Dwk North
Fresh chargesheet received from facilitation centre. It be checked and registered. Already have an account? Sign in
Present :
Ld. APP for the State. File perused. Considered.
I take cognizance of the offence u/s 354/354D IPC
against accused persons mentioned in column no 11 i.e. Roshan @
Santosh. Ahlmad is directed to affix miscellaneous papers with the file.
Summons be issued to the above named accused and
notice to his surety for appearance, supply of copies and regular bail on 07.07.15. (Manu Goel Kharb) MM,(Mahila Court) -03 Unlock full access with a Dwarka free trial. Courts, N D. 15.05.2015. You're Reading a Preview
Download With Free Trial
Sign up to vote on this title
Useful
Not useful
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
Search
Home
Saved
Sign up to download list_new2.asp(2)
0
110 views
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Sign In
Upload
Join
RELATED TITLES
0
list_new2.asp(2) Uploaded by vinaykumarjain
Sign Up With Facebook
Sign Up With Google
COURT FILES. or with email Save
Name Embed
Share
Lopez, James 10.20.17[2]
Print
Email Download
1
of 46
Ipc
State v. Hon. miller/martin,
Search document
Password
(at least 6 characters)
Send me updates from Scribd
Sign Up By registering a Scribd account, you agree to our Terms of Service and 15.05.2015. Privacy Policy
C C No: 194/2/14 Nisha Vs Chaitanya Kumar PS: Bindapur
Present:
Complainant in person with Counsel Sh. A.K. Thakur. Already have anRespondent account? Sign in no. 2 in person. Respondent no. 1 & 3 are absent. Sh. Amitabh Jha, Counsel on behalf of the respondents. Counsel for the respondents has moved separa
applications on behalf of respondent Chaitanya Kumar and Manju Roy for their exemption from personal appearance. Both th
applications are appended with medical documents of Chaitanya Kumar. Another application is moved by the counsel for th
respondent u/s 25 & 28 (2) of PWDV Act for waiver of cost imposed
upon all the respondents on the LDOH and for extension of time to
file WS and income affidavit of the respondent. In all the above
applications (exemption applications as well as waiver of cost and enlargement of time to file WS and detailed income affidavit You're Reading a Preview
counsel for the respondents has taken the same ground th Unlock full access with a free trial.
respondent no. 1 is suffering from severe mental disorder and is Downloadsince With Free under psychiatric treatment Jan.Trial 2015.
Applications are opposed by the complainant on the ground that she had filed the application under Section 12
PWDV Act long back but till date respondents have not even filed WS. Submissions heard. Considered.
Respondents have placed on record certain medica
documents and a certificate issued by the Psychiatric consultant
Dr. Sumit Pathare in which apart from other things the doctor has Sign up to vote on this title
specifically mentioned that patient is Useful not fit for travel whereas Not useful
generally, in medical field no psychiatric consultant gives
Home
Saved
Top Charts
Books
Audiobooks
Magazines
News
Documents
Sheet Music
Upload
Sign In
Join
