JNCIS-SEC-P2_2011-09-22

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2

Worldwide Education Services 1194 North Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net

This document is produced by Juniper Networks, Inc. This document or any part thereof may not b e reproduced or transmitted in any form under penalty of law, without the prior written permission of Juniper Networks Education Services. Juniper Networks, Junos, Steel-Belted Radius, NetScreen, and ScreenOS are registered tra demarks of Juniper Networks, Inc. in the United States and other countries. The Juniper Networks Logo, the Junos logo, and JunosE are trademarks of Ju niper Networks, Inc. All other trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks, or registered service marks are the property of their respective owners.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part Guide—Part 2. Copyright © 2011, Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in USA. The information in this document is current as of the date listed above. The information in this document has been carefully verified and is believed to be a ccurate for software Release 10.4R1.9. Juniper Networks assumes no responsibilities for any inaccuracies that may appear in this document. In no event will Juniper Networks be liable for direct, indirect, special, exemplary, incidental or consequential damages resulting from a ny defect or omission in this document, even if advised of the possibility of such damag es.

Juniper Networks reserves the right to change, modify, transfer, transfer, or otherwise revise this publication without notice. YEAR 2000 NOTICE Juniper Networks hardware and software products do not suffer from Year 2000 problems and hence are Year 2000 compliant. The Junos operating system has no known time-related limitations through the year 20 38. However, the NTP application is known to have some dif ficulty in the year 2036. SOFTWARE LICENSE The terms and conditions for using Juniper Networks software are described in the software license provided with the software, or to the extent applicable, in an agreement executed between you and Juniper Networks, or Juniper Networks agent. By using J uniper Networks software, you indicate that you understand a nd agree to be bound by its license terms and conditions. Generally speaking, the software license restricts the manner in which you are permitted to use the Juniper Networks software, may contain prohibitions against cer tain uses, and may state conditions under which the license is automatically terminated. You should consult the software license for further details.

Contents • iii

Welcome to the JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2. The purpose of this guide is to help you prepare for your JN0-331 exam and achieve your JNCIS-SEC credential. The contents of this document are based on the Junos Unified Threat Management (JUTM) course. This study guide covers Web filtering, antivirus, antispam, and content filtering. Students will gain experience in configuring and monitoring the Unified Threat Management (UTM) features of the Junos operating system.

www.juniper.net

Chap Chaptter 1: 1:

UTM UTM Ove Overvi rview ew

Chap Chaptter 2:

Anti Antisp spam am

Chapter Chapter 3: 3:

Full File-Based File-Based Antivirus Antivirus and Express Antivirus Antivirus

Chapte Chapterr 4:

Content Content Filte Filterin ring g and Web Web Filter Filtering ing

v

Frequently throughout this course, we refer to text that appears in a command-line interface in terface (CLI) or a graphical user interface (GUI). To make the language of these documents easier to read, we distinguish GUI and CLI text from chapter text according to the following table. Style

Description

Franklin Gothic

Normal text.

Courier New

Console text: •

Scre creen cap captures

•

Nonc Noncom omma mand nd-r -rel elat ated ed syntax

Usage Example Most of what you read in the Lab Guide and Student Guide.

commit complete Exiting configuration mode

GUI text elements: •

Menu names

•

Text fiel field d ent entry ry

Select File > Open , and then click Configuration.conf in the Filename text box.

You You will also frequently see cases where you must e nter input text yourself. Often these instances will be shown in the context of w here you must enter them. We use bold style to distinguish text that is input versus text that is simply displayed. Style

Description

Usage Example

Normal CLI

No distinguishing variant.

Physical interface:fxp0, Enabled

Normal GUI

View configuration history by clicking Configuration > History .

CLI Input

Text that you must enter.

GUI Input

lab@San_Jose>

show route

Select File > Save , and type config.ini in the Filename field.

Finally, this course distinguishes between regular text and syntax variables, and it also distinguishes between syntax variables where the value is already assigned (defined variables) and syntax variables where you must assign the value (undefined variables). Note that these s tyles can be combined with the input style as well. Style

Description

Usage Example

CLI Variable

Text where variable value is already assigned.

policy my-peers

GUI Variable

CLI Undefined Text where the variable’s value is

the user’s discretion or text where the variable’s value as shown in GUI Undefined the lab guide might differ from the value the user must input according to the lab topology.

vi

Click my-peers in the dialog. Type set policy policy-name.

ping 10.0.x.y Select File > Save , and type filename in the Filename field.

www.juniper.net

You can obtain information on the latest Education Services offerings, course dates, and class locations from the World Wide Web by pointing your Web browser to: http://www.juniper.net/training/education/.

The JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 was developed and tested using software Release 10.4R1.9. Previous and later versions of software might behave differently so you should always consult the documentation and release notes for the version of code you are running before reporting errors. This document is written and maintained by the Juniper Networks Education Services development team. Please send questions and suggestions for improvement to [email protected].

You can print technical manuals and release notes directly from the Internet in a variety of formats: •

Go to http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/.

•

Locate the specific software or hardware release and title you need, and choose the format in which you want to view or print the document.

Documentation sets and CDs are available through your local Juniper Networks sales office or account representative.

For technical support, co ntact Juniper Networks at http://www.juniper.net/customers/support/, or at 1-888-314-JTAC (within the United States) or 408-745-2121 (from outside the United States).

www.juniper.net

vii


Chapter 1: UTM Overview

•

The challenges that branch offices present to network managers;

•

The major features of Unified Threat Management (UTM);

•

How each major feature addresses the challenges of the branch office;

•

The SRX hardware devices on which UTM is available; and

•

The UTM features that require specific licenses.

A branch office network in today’s market significantly contributes to the bottom line and is c entral to an organization’s success. Branch offices normally includes a relatively smaller number of computing resources when compared to central facilities or headquarters locations. Branch offices are typically located where customer interactions occur, which means there is increased demand for supporting applications and assuring application performance, an increased demand for security. General security vulnerabilities exist for every branch office

UTM Overview • Chapter 1–1 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 network. These vulnerabilities include spam and phishing attacks, viruses, trojans and spyware infected files, unapproved website access, and unapproved content.

UTM security features are provided in the branch SRX devices, enabling a business to protect itself from spam, viruses, worms, spyware, trojans, and malware. With UTM, you can implement a comprehensive set of security features that include antispam, antivirus, Web filtering, and content filtering protection.

The graphic shows how traffic is forwarded through the Junos operating system flow module, and at which steps UTM features are performed. Chapter 1–2 • UTM Overview © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


As traffic travels inbound on an interface of the SRX device, security policies process the traffic. If the security policy contains a UTM policy that specifies the traffic being evaluated, a TCP proxy is used to process the matching traffic. The TCP proxy is used for both a TCP client and TCP server, to terminate and originate a TCP session. The TCP proxy feeds the data stream to the application proxy. The application proxy contains a protocol parse r, which extracts the application protocol information. The protocol information is evaluated by the various UTM feature modules.

The SRX Series for the branch provides comprehensive UTM features to protect against network-level and application-level attacks, and simultaneously stops content-based attacks. The antispam feature tags or blocks unwanted e-mail traffic by scanning inbound and outbound SMTP e-mail traffic.

The antivirus feature uses a scanning engine and virus signature databases to protect against virus-infected files, trojans, worms, spyware, and other malicious code.

Content filtering provides basic data loss prevention functionality. Content filtering filters traffic based on MIME type, file extension, and protocol commands.

Web filtering is an option that can use either a local Websense server or Internet-based SurfControl server. Web filtering is critical as a service for tracking productivity and corporate user behavior.



The graphic shows the CLI commands to verify UTM operation. The outputs shown are from an SRX240 device. The show security utm session command displays general UTM session information including maximum UTM sessions, allocated UTM sessions, and active UTM sessions. user@srx> show security utm UTM session info: Maximum sessions: Total allocated sessions: Total freed sessions: Active sessions:

session 4000 2267 2167 0

The show security utm status command displays whether the UTM service is running. user@srx> show security utm UTM service status: Running

status

The custom-objects hierarchy level is where you first begin to implement UTM on the SRX device. Custom objects are global parameters for all UTM features, and are used to create object lists. These object lists contain the building blocks of IP addresses, domain names, e-mail addresses, URL websites, and so on, used in the different UTM feature profiles.

The majority of UTM settings are configured within the feature profile. The feature profile defines the operation of each UTM feature. For example, the antivirus feature profile settings control how a protocol is scanned, and what the action will be when spam is identified.

The UTM policy is the central point where all the different feature profiles of UTM are applied. Security policies reference the UTM policy so that as traffic passes between zones, the SRX device can offer the increased security that UTM provides.

Chapter 1–4 • UTM Overview © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


The UTM policy within the Junos OS leverages security policies as a central point where traffic is classified and directed to the appropriate modules for processing. Traffic traversing the security zones of the SRX device are matched against a security policy. If the security policy contains a UTM policy that matches a protocol supported by UTM, namely SMTP, Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3) or Internet Me ssage Access Protocol (IMAP), Hypter text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), or FTP, then the application protocol data is sent to the UTM feature profile. Each feature profile determines the specific configuration for each feature (antivirus, content filtering, antispam).

UTM features are only suppor ted on high memory branch SRX platforms. You can verify the version (high memory or low memory) of the SRX device by running the show chassis hardware command. The graphic displays the UTM Overview • Chapter 1–5 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 output for this command. The chassis description will contain either an H or B after the SRX platform model number. In this case, the output shows SRX240-H . The H indicates high memory, and the B indicates a base memory (low memory) version. UTM requires the Junos OS version to be 9.5 or later. The SRX100 does not have a Content Security Accelerator (CSA), which is used with express antivirus, to improve data throughput performance.

The table illustrates which UTM features require a license.

Licenses must be used for successful operation of UTM features. The graphic displays the output of the show system license command. The output shows the licenses installed for each UTM feature.

Chapter 1–6 • UTM Overview © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


1.

The four supported features of UTM are antispam, antivirus, Web filtering, and content filtering. 2.

A UTM policy is used to apply a UTM feature profile to application traffic. A security policy is used to evaluate traffic between security zones of the SRX device. A UTM policy is applied to a security policy. 3.

The UTM features or subfeatures that do not require licensing are content filtering, Websense Web filtering, and local list Web filtering.



Chapter 2: Antispam

•

Antispam methods and terminology;

•

How UTM examines traffic for spam;

•

The configuration of an effective antispam UTM policy; and

•

The verification and monitoring of an antispam operation.

Spam consists of unwanted e-mail messages. These e-mail messages are usually sent by commercial, malicious, or fraudulent entities. Antispam is the ability to prevent spam before it enters the network. Antispam is one of several features—including content filtering, antivirus, and Web filtering—that make up Juniper’ s UTM suite on the SRX Series Services Gateway device. The antispam feature examines transmitted e-mail messages to identify spam. When the device detects a message deemed to be spam, it blocks the e-mail message or tags the e-mail message header or subject with a preprogrammed string. Two methods for performing antispam on the SRX device exist, which we discuss next.

Antispam • Chapter 2–1 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


The first type of antispam method we discuss is server-based antispam. Server-based antispam means that the SRX Series device uses a third-party vendor spam block list (SBL) server over the Internet to identify and eliminate spam. The SBL server uses a constantly updated, IP-based spam blocking service. It stays current by constantly adding to its IP list of known spammers.

The SRX device must meet a few requirements to use the SBL server. First, you must have a valid antispam license purchased and installed on the SRX device (like the licenses you installed during Lab 1). Also, you must have Internet connectivity with the SBL server. The entry for the third-party SBL server is predefined on the SRX device, and it is not configurable. Juniper has partnered with a particular vendor (Sophos) to provide server-based antispam functionality. Additionally, the Domain Name System (DNS) must be available to access the SBL server. Therefore, a name-server entry must be properly defined and working on the SRX device. The SRX device performs the SBL lookups through the DNS. The lookups are against the IP address of the e-mail sender or relaying agent. The DNS server then forwards each request to the SBL server, which returns a DNS response to the SRX device. The SRX device looks at the DNS response to determine if the e-mail sender is a spammer. This process automatically occurs when inbound or outbound e-mail traverses the SRX device. You can manually test or query the SBL server to determine whether an IP address is identified as spam.

Chapter 2–2 • Antispam © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


The second method of antispam filtering is the use of local lists. This method allows you to manually add an IP address, domain name entry, or e-mail address to whitelists and blacklists. The SRX device stores and enforces these lists locally. No license is required for local list spam filtering.

A whitelist contains the sources of the e-mail senders that you want the device to accept. The e-mail messages that match the whitelist are deemed harmless. A match allows the e-mail traffic through the SRX Series device.

A blacklist contains the e-mail sources that you want the device to reject. The e-mail messages that match the blacklist are deemed malicious. A match either blocks the e-mail message or tags the message, depending on the action specified in the antispam profile configuration. The tag option allows you to conf igure a message in the e- mail subject line, or in the protocol header of the packet. When you choose to tag the subject line, a user-defined string is added at the beginning of the subject of the e-mail. When you choose to tag the header, a user-defined string is added to the protocol header of the packet. You can configure entries o n either list by IP address, e-mail address, or domain name. You can use asterisk * or question mark ? wildcards on the local lists. You must precede all wildcard URLs with http://. You can only use the asterisk * wildcard character if it is at the beginning of the URL and is followed by a period. You can only use the question mark ? wildcard character at the end of the URL. The following wildcard syntax is supported: http:// *.juniper.net. The following wildcard syntax is not suppor ted: http://*.



The SRX device follows a specific order for checking antispam. The device first checks incoming e-mail against local whitelists and blacklists. If no match exists on either of these lists, the SRX device queries the SBL server for a match. If a match exists on any of these lists, the SRX device takes the action—depending upon which list was matched, and the default spam action either blocks or tags.

When configuring the local lists, you should know how the SRX device checks the lists. The sender’s IP address is checked first on the whitelist, and then the blacklist, and then the SBL ser ver. If no matching IP address is found, the device checks for the sender’s domain name on the whitelist, and then the blacklist. If no matching domain name is found, again the device looks for the sender’s e-mail address, again on the whitelist first, and then the blacklist. On either list, if multiple domain suffixes are configured, the SRX device matches against the longest suffix. For example, if the sender’s e-mail address has a domain name aaa.bbb.ccc, the SRX device looks to match “aaa.bbb.ccc”. If no match is found, it will try to match “bbb.ccc”, then “ccc”. The SRX device cannot do a partial match against IP addresses. Once a match occurs on a list, no more matching is processed.

End users use SMTP to send outbound e-mail, but they do not use SMTP to receive e-mail. On the diagram, User 1 is sending an e-mail to User 2. The arrows show the path of the e-mail message. SMTP is used to send User 1’s e-mail message to her local e-mail server. SMTP is again used to relay the message across the Internet to User 2’s local e-mail server. After User 2’s e-mail server receives the inbound e-mail message, the client connection between User 2 and his local e-mail server synchronizes through either Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3) or Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP). This distinction is important because as of Junos OS Release 10.4, the antispam feature supports filtering only on SMTP. It does not support antispam f iltering on POP3 nor IMAP.



Identifying spam means identifying the senders of spam e-mail. The SBL ser ver filters on an IP-based blacklist, and it considers IP addresses included in the lists to be invalid addresses for mail servers. Criteria must be met to list an e-mail server’s IP address as spam. The SBL criteria to determine spam i ncludes the following: •

Running an open relay service;

•

Running an open proxy (of various kinds);

•

Zombie hosts;

•

Dynamic IP range (which will unlikely host a mail server); and

•

A confirmed spam source (known IPs owned by spammers).

When no positive identification exists for spam on an e-mail message, the e-mail message passes normally.

Once the SRX device identifies spam, it either blocks o r tags the e-mail traffic. Blocked spam is dropped at either the connection level or e-mail level.

Blocked at the connection level: •

When the SMTP sender is identified as a spam sender based on its IP address or domain name, the SMTP connection is rejected.

•

An error message with a corresponding SMTP error code is sent to close the connection.

Blocked at the e-mail level: •

When the SMTP sender is identified as a spam sender based on its e-mail address, the e-mail is rejected.

•

An error message with a corresponding SMTP error code is sent back to the sender.

If the SRX device tags spam at the connection level (based on its IP address or domain name), it tags all e-mails on the connection. Otherwise, if the SRX device tags spam at the e-mail level, it tags just the individual e-mail message. The SRX device generates a log message each time it identifies a spam message. The log message contains information about the spam e-mail’s sender, the type of matching spam f ilter, and what action the SRX device took.



To prevent or reduce the volume of spam messages you receive, you must configure custom objects, an antispam profile, and a UTM policy. If you are using local list spam filtering, you must configure whitelists and blacklists under custom objects. If you are using only server-based spam filtering, you do not have to configure the local lists under custom objects. The antispam feature-profile is where you apply any local lists that are configured. The feature-profile also includes the configuration for the default spam action. Note that when you configure the antispam profile, you must either enable or disable the SBL server. Next, you create a UTM polic y that references the antispam profile, and finally, you assign the UTM policy to a security policy.



The graphic examines the CLI configuration for the UTM custom objects and feature profile for antispam. Under the custom-objects hierarchy, you configure the local whitelists and blacklists. Remember the matching order of the entries: by IP address, then domain name, then e-mail address. Under the feature-profile hierarchy, you apply the whitelists and blacklists, as well as configure the antispam profile settings under the sbl hierarchy level. After giving the profile a name (in this case we named the profile profile1), you can specify to use the SBL server with the configuration statement sbl-default-server . If you are not going to use the SBL server, configure no-sbl-default-server . You must configure no-sbl-default-server if you are only going to use local list filtering. Next, you specify the spam action, whether it is block or tag under the spam-action hierarchy (the command to block is block). With the spam action tag, you can tag either the subject or the header with either tag-subject or tag-header. You can specify only one tagging action.



The graphic demonstrates how to configure the UTM and security policies.You choose the name for the UTM policy. On the graphic, the policy is named spam1. Then, under the anti-spam level of the UTM policy, you specify the smtp-profile . In this case, the profile is named profile1. This profile is the SBL profile you created under the feature profile. Next, apply the UTM policy to the security policy. Be sure to verify that the security policy is the one referencing the two correct zones; the first zone is from where the external SMTP traffic comes, and the second zone is where your SMTP server is located. Apply the UTM policy under the then | permit | application-services hierarchy, as demonstrated in the graphic.

The screen capture demonstrates how to configure the UTM custom objects using the Junos Web user interface (J-Web). The UTM configuration is under the security menu on the left side. You begin by configuring the custom objects so that they can be used in the feature profile and UTM policies.



The screen capture demonstrates how to configure the antispam profile using the J-Web. Note that the custom objects must already be defined (which is shown on the previous screen capture), so that the whitelists and blacklists can be applied to the antispam profile. The user-defined profile shown on the screen capture is named test. When you edit the profile, you can use the default SBL server, or you can use the default action for identified spam. In this case, the Tag subject option is selected, with the custom tag string ***spam*** to appear in the subject line of the spam e-mail. Notice also that another profile is shown on the screen named junos-as-defaults. This profile is a predefined system profile, preconfigured with the antispam fallback options. You can view the defaults by using the following operational mode command:

show configuration groups junos-defaults security utm feature-profile anti-spam user@srx>

sbl { profile junos-as-defaults { sbl-default-server; spam-action block; custom-tag-string ***SPAM***; } }



The graphic introduces the test command, which you use to determine whether an e-mail sender will be identified as spam. The command is as follows:

test security utm anti-spam profile profile-name test-string

test-string

When an IP address is specified in the test string, the device checks both local whitelists and blacklists, and the SBL server. With a non-IP address test string (in other words, domain name or an e-mail address), the device checks only the local lists. Two examples of this command are shown on the graphic. The first command matches an IP address that is configured on the local blacklist. Note that the returned query value reports the IP address as spam. The second example matches against the domain name string juniper.net . The string is not matched against any list, and returns a value of NON SPAM.

Examine the commands to verify and monitor antispam operation on the SRX device. The first of these commands shows how many e-mails are scanned, tagged, or dropped: user@srx> show security utm UTM Anti Spam statistics:

anti-spam statistics

Total connections: 3 Denied connections: 0 Total greetings: 3 Denied greetings: 0 Total e-mail scanned: 3 White list hit: 1 Black list hit: 2 Spam total: 2 Spam tagged: 2 Spam dropped: 0 DNS errors: 0 Timeout errors: 0 Return errors: 0 Invalid parameter errors: 0


JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 Statistics start time: 11/12/2010 16:32:13 Statistics for the last 10 days (permitted emails / spams): day 1: 1/2

The output shows the total number of e-mail messages, how many hit the whitelist or blacklist, and the total number of spam messages. The next show command displays the antispam status for connections, including whitelist and blacklist server information: user@srx> show security utm SBL Whitelist Server: SBL Blacklist Server: msgsecurity.juniper.net DNS Server: Primary : Secondary: Ternary :

anti-spam status

208.67.222.222, Src Interface: ge-0/0/0 0.0.0.0, Src Interface: ge-0/0/8 0.0.0.0, Src Interface: ge-0/0/9

This command is especially helpful when verifying the SBL server status. From the output of this command, we see that the domain name used to reach the SBL server is msg security.juniper.net, and we see also that the DNS server is specified. The output of this command also lists the source interface used to reach the DNS server. In addition, the SRX device creates log messages each time spam is identified. Use the pipe symbol (|) and match option to display only the antispam log messages.

The code output shows two examples of log messages, both reporting that spam has been identified for [email protected]. The first log results from the spam action configured as block . When this action is configured, the log message states Deny reason . The second message results from the spam action configured as tag-subject . When this action is configured, the log message states Tag email subject reason .


JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 The graphic illustrates the topology we use for the next several sections. To make things simple, we focus on a single, external domain (xyz.com) to send inbound SMTP traffic through the SRX240 device. The objectives for this case study are the following: •

Configure the SRX device to tag inbound spam from [email protected] before it reaches the local user;

•

Make sure inbound e-mails from [email protected] are not tagged as spam, and are allowed to reach the local user;

•

Configure the default spam action to tag the subject line with the string ***spam*** ; and

•

Enable the SBL server to protect against other spam.

The first part of the UTM configuration is the custom objects. The local whitelist and blacklist have been defined. In this configuration, the whitelist is named white and the blacklist black . The white list contains the domain name xyz.com. The black list contains the e-mail address [email protected]. Because of how the lists are processed, this configuration accomplishes the objective in the case study. The e-mail address [email protected] will be blocked, whereas all other e-mails from xyz.com will be allowed. The next part of the configuration is the antispam feature-profile. You apply the whitelist and blacklist using the address-whitelist and address-blacklist commands. You create the antispam feature profile under the sbl hierarchy. This profile allows you to enable the SBL server and define the default spam action. In this case study, we enabled the SBL server and specified the default action to tag the subject line of the spam e-mail messages.



The graphic shows how to configure and apply the UTM and security policies. In the UTM policy, you must configure an antispam smtp-profile . This profile is the name of the SBL profile specified on the previous screen capture, under the feature-profile hierarchy for antispam.

With the SBL server enabled, you must also configure the name-server (DNS server). The address shown in the example is a public DNS ser ver. The graphic also demonstrates how to test the antispam profile to verify that what we configured on the lists will be properly matched. The CLI command is specifically testing the string “[email protected]”, which we configured under the blacklist. The output on the graphic shows that the SRX device identifies the string as spam (because it matched the local blacklist). Antispam • Chapter 2–13 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


1.

The global UTM configuration elements of antispam are whitelists and blacklists, configured as custom objects. 2.

The match importance order for identifying spam is IP address on the whitelist, IP address on the blacklist, IP address on the SBL server, domain name on the whitelist, domain name on the blacklist, e-mail address on the whitelist, and e-mail address on the blacklist. 3.

The CLI commands to verify antispam operation are test security utm anti-spam profile profile-name test-string test-string , show security utm anti-spam status, and show security utm anti-spam statistics.


Junos Unified Threat Management

Chapter 3: Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus

•

How the antivirus process examines traffic;

•

Differences between full file-based and express antivirus;

•

Antivirus configuration settings;

•

Available scanning options for supported protocols; and

•

Verifying antivirus functionality.

A virus is executable code that infects or attaches itself to other executable code to reproduce itself. Malicious viruses erase files, lock up end host systems, or otherwise interfere with network operation. Other viruses merely infect files and overwhelm the target host or network with bogus data. Additional virus-related threats include trojans, rootkits, and other types of malicious code. Viruses are usually spread by attaching themselves as files or scripts inside protocol traffic.

Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus • Chapter 3–1 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Antivirus is an established par t of the Unified Threat Management (UTM) suite on the Junos operating system, and is an important part of any enterprise network security strategy. The antivirus feature of the branch SRX gateway prevents viruses at the gateway before they enter the network. The SRX device uses an antivirus module that includes both a scan engine and a virus signature database. The antivirus module compares network traffic against known virus types. If a virus is detected, the file is dropped, and the originator of the traffic is notified. Antivirus scanning is a separately licensed subscription service. When your antivirus license key expires, you can continue to use locally stored antivirus signatures without any updates. But in that case, if the local database is deleted, antivirus scanning is disabled. Administrators can choose between two different types of antivirus scanning methods. Only one type of scanning method can be applied at a time.

The first scanning method we discuss is full file-based antivirus scanning. Juniper Networks has partnered with Kaspersky Lab to provide both the full file-based scan engine and the virus signature database. The full file-based antivirus scan engine inspects Application Layer data streams, searching for attached files in e-mail messages, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) traffic, and FTP downloads or FTP uploads. This scanning method also searches for embedded scripts when downloading HTTP Web pages. For the SRX device to scan FTP traffic, the FTP ALG must be enabled. When the scan engine flags a file or script for inspection, it collects received data packets until it has reconstructed the original application content, such as an e-mail file attachment, or embedded script. The scan engine caches the file (or script) in memory and compares it against the virus signature database for a match. Full file-based antivirus scanning has a high virus-detection rate, and protects against all types of viruses and malicious code, even polymorphic or metamorphic viruses. These viruses can change themselves. The diagram shows how the entire file is received and reconstructed before virus scanning begins. This process is CPU intensive. Available memory and CPU cycles limit the number of files that can be simultaneously scanned, as well as the size of files that can be scanned.

Chapter 3–2 • Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


The second antivirus scanning method is express antivirus scanning. Express antivirus is a less CPU-intensive alternative to the full file-based antivirus feature. The express antivirus feature, like the full antivirus feature, scans specific Application Layer traffic for v iruses against a virus signature database. However, unlike full antivirus, express antivirus does not reconstruct the original application content. Express scanning begins to scan data packets as they are received. With express antivirus, the virus scanning is executed by a hardware pattern-matching engine. This improves performance while scanning is occurring, but decrease the level of security provided. Express antivirus uses a different signature database than the full antivirus signature database. The express signature database targets only critical viruses and malware, including worms, trojans, and spyware. The database is smaller in size, and provides less coverage than the full antivirus signature database. Express antivirus does not protect against polymorphic or metamorphic viruses, because these viruses can change themselves. The engine utilizes pattern recognition only and does not use other heuristics to detect these types of viruses. The diagram shows file scanning occurring as the file is received, reducing overall data throughput latency.

The antivirus module contains a database with virus signature patterns. The SRX device checks files against the database for a match.This process is known as pattern matching. Both full file-based scanning and express sc anning perform pattern matching against a virus signature database, but in different ways. Full file-based antivirus sof tware pattern matching is where the CPU is responsible for performing the task of pattern matching. The express antivirus scanning engine offloads the pattern-matching operation to a hardware engine, the Content Security Accelerator (CSA), which significantly reduces CPU and memory usage. The CSA hardware engine is available on the SRX210, SRX220, SRX240, and SRX650 platforms, and yields higher data throughput performance at the expense of somewhat lower catch rates. Platforms not equipped with a CSA can still perform software pattern matching, but performance will be lower (UTM always requires the high-memory option).

The virus database must stay current to continually match against new virus threats. Pattern update options are used for either scanning engine type to allow control of the antivirus engine and signature database updates. To manually update the virus signature database, specify the URL of the database server. If you do not specify a URL, a default URL is provided, which is the reco mmended configuration. We discuss the pattern update configuration later in the chapter. Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus • Chapter 3–3 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


One technique used to increase performance with antivirus scanning intelligent prescreening. Full file-based scanning begins to scan data after the SRX device has received all the packets of a file. Express scanning begins to scan data packets as they are received, but still scans all the packets of the file. Intelligent prescreening tells the antivirus scan engine to use the f irst packet or the first several packets of a file to determine if the file could poss ibly contain malicious code. The scan engine does a quick check on these first packets. If it finds that the file is unlikely infected, then the file is safe to bypass the normal scanning procedure. It is not necessary to store and scan the whole file. Intelligent prescreening behaves the same for both full file-based and express antivirus scanning. By default, intelligent prescreening is enabled to improve antivirus scanning performance. You can disable it with the following command:

set security utm feature-profile anti-virus kaspersky-lab-engine|juniper-express-engine profile profile-name scan-options no-intelligent-prescreening

The antivirus module is the software subsystem on the SRX device that scans specific Application Layer traffic to protect users from virus attacks and prevent viruses from spreading. The antivirus module analyzes traffic and sends data to a scan engine for virus scanning. The software subsystem consists of an application proxy, a scan manager, a scan engine and a virus signature database. A client establishes a TCP connection with a server and then starts a transaction. If the antivirus module is interested in the application protocol used, the traffic will be forwarded to the application proxy and the traffic gets parsed for attached files. The scan manager monitors the antivirus sessions and checks the properties of data content against the antivirus settings. If a scan request is sent out, the scan engine scans the data and queries the virus signature database. After scanning, the result is handled by the scan manager.



The graphic shows the full file-based antivirus flow process. The scan engine for this process is provided by Kaspersky Lab, as well as the virus signature database. When scanning is enabled, TCP data packets come into the SRX device and are handle d by the TCP proxy. The protocol parser inspects HTTP, e-mail, and FTP data streams, searching for attached files or embedded scripts. Scripts can be found when downloading Web pages. When the protocol parser flags a file for inspection, it caches the file (or embedded script) in memory to reassemble the original application content, and uses the scanning engine to search for viruses, trojans, rootkits, and other types of malicious code. If a virus is detected, the file is dropped immediately, and the sender of the traffic is notified. If no virus is found the traffic is forwarded through the SRX device.

The graphic demonstrates the express antivirus flow process. Express antivirus uses a modified version of the Kaspersky signature database. Express antivirus catch rates are lower than full file-based antivirus, but express antivirus is able to catch the most common viruses. The main advantage that express antivirus provides is higher throughput, as processing is hardware accelerated. Files are not lo cally stored, and packets can be inspected as they are forwarded through the SRX device. Packets still have to go through a TCP proxy and data buf fer because TCP streams must be reassembled and packets must be reordered. Express antivirus minimizes tran sfer delays because packets can be forwarded while virus scanning is taking place.

The antivirus module has global, policy-based, and profile-based settings. Global settings are general overall configurations for the antivirus module or settings that are not specific to an antivirus profile. Global antivirus Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus • Chapter 3–5 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 settings include UTM custom objects, where you can configure whitelists for specific HTTP traffic to bypass antivirus scanning. We discuss the operation and configuration of these lists later in the chapter.

Policy-based antivirus settings are configured through UTM policies. UTM policies control which protocol traffic is sent to the antivirus s canning engine. The UTM policy has antivirus profiles for FTP, HTTP, POP3, SMTP, and IMAP traffic. The UTM policy is applied to a security policy, which determines if the protocol of a traffic flow matches the antivirus profile. If the protocol traffic matches, it is sent to the antivirus module for virus scanning.

The majority of antivirus settings are configured within the antivirus feature profile. Profile-based antivirus settings control how each protocol is scanned within the antivirus module. The antivirus feature profile settings include the scanning options, such as sca n type, scan mode, content size limits, scanning timeout values, session throttling, and settings for scanning compressed files. The feature profile settings also define fallback and notification options.

The scanning options for full file-based scanning allow you to configure one of two different scan modes: all or by-extension . When the scan mode is set to all, the antivirus scanning engine scans every file regardless of the file extension. The diagram shows both inbound and outbound traffic passing different file types through an SRX240. Each of the file types shown are process for antivirus scanning.



The diagram shows an SRX240 using the by-extension scan mode. In this mode, the SRX device bases all scanning decisions on the traffic’s file extension. Only files that have a file extension matching the extension list are scanned. In the diagram, the local user sends a file with an extension XSLT, which does not match the file extension list, and is not scanned by antivirus. The SRX device has a default file extension list already preconfigured. To view the list, run the following command: user@srx# show

groups junos-defaults security utm custom-objects filename-extension 386;ACE;ARJ;ASP;BAT;BIN;BZ2;CAB;CHM;CLA;CMD;COM;CPL;DLL;DOC;DOT;DPL;DRV;DWG; ELF;EMF;EML;EXE;FON;FPM;GEA;GZ;HA;HLP;HTA;HTM;HTML;HTT;HXS;ICE;INI;ITSF;JAR; JPEG;JPG;JS;JSE;LHA;LNK;LZH;MBX;MD?;MIME;MSG;MSI;MSO;NWS;OCX;OTM;OV?;PDF;PHP; PHT;PIF;PK;PL;PLG;PP?;PRG;PRJ;RAR;REG;RTF;SCR;SH;SHS;SWF;SYS;TAR;TGZ;THE;TSP; VBE;VBS;VXD;WSF;WSH;XL?;XML;ZIP;

You cannot modify the default file extension list. However, you can configure a custom filename extension list to be used instead of the default list. If a file’s extension is not found on an extension list, the file is not scanned. If the file has no extension, the file is scanned for viruses.

The SRX antivirus feature supports compressed data detection, in case a virus is sent inside compressed data. Three kinds of compressed data exist: a compressed file (zip, rar, gzip), encoded data such as Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME), and packaged data (OLE, CAP, MSI, TAR, EML). As the virus sig nature database becomes larger and the scan algorithms become more sophisticated, the scan engine has the ability to look deeper into the data for embedded malware. As a result, it can uncover mor e layers of compressed data. Scanning compressed files is only supported for HTTP and POP3 traffic. Some files can be compressed multiple times. The SRX a ntivirus feature will decompress layers of files until it reaches either a user-configured decompress limit, or the device decompress layer limit, based on memory allocation. If a file exceeds the compression layer limit, the scan engine either drops or forwards the file based on the configured fallback options.



Antivirus requires the contents of files to be stored in memory to scan files for viruses. Due to resource constraints, a default device-dependent limit exists on the maximum content size for a file. The content size usually refers to file size, according to the content length field of the protocol header, or content size refers to the accumulated TCP payload size of the received packets. The limit for maximum content size is user-configurable. If a file exceeds the content size limit, the scan engine either drops or forwards the file based on the configured fallback options.

The SRX device can use a scanning timeout value for files that take too long to scan. The timeout value covers the time duration from when the scan request is generated to when the scan result is returned by the scan engine. The range is 1 to 1800 seconds. By default, it is 180 seconds. It is a parameter used in all protocols and each protocol can have a different value.

Session throttling restricts the amount of traffic a single source can consume at one time. The limit is an integer with 100 as the default setting. This integer refers to the maximum allowed s essions from a single s ource. You can change this default limit, but understand that if this limit is set high, the setting is comparable to no limit.

You can turn antivirus scanning on and off on a per protocol basis. If scanning for a protocol is disabled in an antivirus profile, no application intelligence exists for this protocol, and in most cases, traff ic using the protocol is not scanned. But if the protocol in question is based on another protocol for which scanning is enabled in an antivirus profile, then the traffic is scanned as that enabled protocol. The internal antivirus scan engine supports scanning for specific Application Layer transactions allowing you to select the content (HTTP, FTP, SMTP, POP3, or IMAP traffic) to scan. The graphic shows a general example of how HT TP traffic is intercepted and scanned. Ho st-A sends an HTTP request to a webserver. The SRX antivirus module intercepts the request, and par ses the protocol for files or scripts. When a file or script is identified, the data is passed to the antivirus scanner, which scans the data for viruses. After completing the scan, the antivirus scan engine follows one of two courses. I f no virus is detected, the device forwards the request to the webserver. If a virus is detected, the device drops the request and sends an HTTP message Chapter 3–8 • Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 reporting the infection to the client. Antivirus scanning is supported for HTTP GET, POST (includes HTTP upload), and PUT methods. RFC 2616 is the reference for these protocol methods. HTTP 1.0 and 1.1 are supported. HTTP trickling is a time-based mechanism used to prevent the HTTP client or HTTP server from timing-out during antivirus scanning. HTTP trickling forwards unscanned HTTP traffic to the requesting HTTP client to prevent the browser window from timing out while the scan manager examines downloaded HTTP files. The SRX device forwards small amounts of data in advance of transferring an entire scanned file. By default, trickling is disabled. HTTP trickling is only supported for HTTP connections.

When the SRX antivirus module parses traffic, it can identify file types that are not considered harmful and should not be scanned. HTTP MIME headers and URL information can be used to obtain information about the file type being carried. The URL whitelist is used in the Web filtering UTM feature, where URLs or IP addresses are always not scanned. The URL whitelist specifies traffic that can bypass antivirus scanning. The SRX device also uses MIME types to decide which traffic may bypass antivirus scanning. The graphic shows the order of HTTP processing with regards to antivirus scanning. URL whitelists are matched against first, followed by MIME whitelists. If no match occurs on either whitelist, the antivirus feature profile settings are followed for virus scanning. The URL and MIME whitelists are only valid for HTTP traffic.

When the scan engine detects a virus, the file is blocked. Notification options inform users of detected viruses. Different notification types are available. One option is the notification type message. When content is blocked with the notification type message, the application client still gets a successful response code, but with modified content containing a warning message. The warning message can be custom defined. With the notification type protocol-only message, a protocol-specific error code might be returned to the client, so that the client knows something happened, rather than assuming that the protocol transfer succeeded. For HTTP and FTP traffic, notifications are piggybacked in the protocols. For example, if a virus is found while doing an HTTP request, users will see a custom error message on the page they are tr ying to access. E-mail notifications for SMTP, IMAP, and POP3 protocols generate an error mail message, notifying the mail recipient (and optionally the sender) of the offending mail. Three different settings exist for e-mail notifications: •

Virus-detection/notify-mail-sender : When enabled, this e-mail notifies the sender when a virus is detected.

•

Fallback-block/notify-mail-sender : When enabled, this e-mail notifies the sender when other scan-codes or scanning errors are returned and a message is dropped. Full File-Based Antivirus and Express Antivirus • Chapter 3–9 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 •

Fallback-non-block/notify-mail-recipient: When enabled, this e-mail notifies the recipient when other scan-codes or scanning errors are returned and the message is passed.

Fallback options specify the actions to take when traffic cannot be scanned. The fallback actions are to either block , or log-and-permit . Traffic cannot be scanned because of special conditions: •

Content-size: If the content size exceeds a set limit, the content is passed or blocked depending on the max-content-size fallback option. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Corrupt-file: Corrupt file is the error returned by the scan engine when engine detects a corrupted file. The default action is PASS.

•

Decompress-layer : Decompress layer error is the error returned by the scan engine when the scanned file has too many compress ion layers. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Default: All the errors other than those in the above list fall into this category. This could include either unhandled system exceptions (internal errors) or o ther unknown errors. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Engine-not-ready : The scan engine is initializing itself, for example, loading the signature database. During this phase, it is not ready to scan a file. A file could either pass or be blocked according to this setting. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Out-of-resources: Virus scanning requires a great deal of memory and CPU resources. Due to resource constraints, memory allocation requests can be denied by the system. This failure could be returned by either scan engine (as a scan-code) or scan manager. When out-of-resources occurs, scanning is aborted. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Password-file: Password protected file is the error returned by the scan engine when the scanned file is protected by a password. The default action is PASS.

•

Timeout: Scanning a complex file could consume resources and time. If the time it is taking to scan exceeds the timeout setting in the antivirus profile, the processing is aborted and the content is passed or blocked without completing the virus checking. The decision is made based on the timeout fallback option. The default action is BLOCK.

•

Too-many-requests : If the total number of messages received concurrently exceeds the device limits, the content is passed or blocked depending on the too-many-request fallback option. The default action is BLOCK. (The allowed request limit is not configurable.)



The UTM custom-objects hierarchy contains global antivirus configuration settings. You can configure URL and MIME whitelists, and a filename extension list. The filename extension list is used in by-extension scan mode for full file-based antivirus. The extension list adds additional file extensions to the default list of extensions to be scanned. The graphic shows the c onfiguration for the URL whitelist, MIME whitelist, and filename extension list. The url-pattern name hierarchy defines the pattern list name, and value contains the entries for URLs that bypass antivirus scanning. The pattern name is applied to the custom-url-category value hierarchy level. The MIME whitelist consists of one or many MIME type entries. The MIME entry is case-insensitive. If the MIME entry ends with a '/' character, a prefix match is used. Otherwise, exact match is used. Two types of MIME lists exist, a MIME whitelist and a MIME exception list. The MIME whitelist is used for bypassing antivirus scanning. The MIME exception list is used for excluding some MIME types from the MIME whitelist. For example, if the MIME whitelist has video/ configured, and the exception list has video/x-shockwave-flash configured, traffic with MIME type video/ bypasses antivirus scanning, but traffic with MIME type video/x-shockwave-flash does not bypass antivirus scanning. The filename extension list contains value entries for file extensions that you want to add to the default file extension list. The filename extension list, MIME list, exception list, and custom URL category are all applied to the antivirus feature profile.



Updates to the pattern file are added as new viruses are discovered. The default antivirus pattern-update interval is 60 minutes. When Kaspersky Lab updates the signatures in its pattern database, the SRX device downloads these updates so that the antivirus scanner is using the most current signature database when scanning traffic. The process of downloading updates is the same for both full file-based antivirus and express antivirus protection. The graphic shows the configuration for pattern updates within the antivirus feature profile.

The security device can perform these updates automatically (the default), or you can manually perform a pattern update using the following CLI command: [edit] user@srx>

request security utm anti-virus kaspersky-lab-engine|juniper-express-engine pattern-update To verify that the pattern update is successful, run the show security utm anti-virus status command.

We review the output of this command later in the chapter.



The graphic shows the configuration for the fallback and notification options for antivirus. These settings are configured under the antivirus profile, and are the same for full file-based antivirus and express antivirus. The fallback options are taken when traffic is unable to be scanned, and all fallback options have an action of either block or log-and-permit . The notification options can be configured for fallback-block , fallback-non-block , or virus-detection .You can configure a custom notification message for all three options. You can specify the notification type of message or protocol-only for fallback-block and virus-detection options only.

UTM policies control which protocol traffic is sent to the antivirus scanning engine. The UTM policy shown in the graphic is named policy1, and has the antivirus profile av_profile applied for FTP download and HTTP traffic. Therefore, any FTP download or HTTP traffic that passes where the UTM policy is applied is processed by the antivirus module, and follows the settings defined in the antivirus profile.



The graphic configuration shows the UTM policy policy1 applied to the security policy client-to-server . This policy is looked at for all traffic that passes between the client and server zones of the SRX device.

The output of the show security utm anti-virus status command displays the update server path, the pattern update status, and last result, as shown on the graphic. If the pattern update is successful, the l ast result will show that either a new database has been loaded, o r that the SRX device already has the latest database. When the pattern update is successful, the scan engine is ready. If the pattern update is not successful, the scan engine is not ready, and the fallback option engine-not-ready action is used.



A license must be used for successful antivirus operation. The top of the graphic shows the output for the show system license command. The output will show which license has been installed. In this case, it shows that the av_key_kaspersky_engine license has been successfully installed. If the SRX device does not have a license for antivirus, the show security utm anti-virus status command will display that a license is not installed.


JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 The show security utm anti-virus statistics command displays antivirus statistics for connections including clean files, infected files, and scan engine status. It also shows statistics for traffic that has matched any of the fallback options.

The graphic demonstrates how to match against the log messages to view if any viruses have been detected. Each time a virus is detected, the SRX device logs a message, indicating the source and destination addresses, the file name, and the source zone of the traffic.

1.

The two full file-based scan mode types are all and by-extension . The difference is that scan mode all scans every file regardless of the file extension, and scan mode by-extension only scans files matching the extension list. 2.

The methods available for HTTP traffic to bypass antivirus scanning are URL and MIME whitelists. They are defined under UTM custom objects. 3.

Intelligent prescreening improves scanning performance by eliminating the need to store and scan the entire file. It uses the first packet or the first several packets of a file to deter mine if the file could possibly contain malicious code.



Chapter 4: Content Filtering and Web Filtering

•

The purpose of content filtering and Web filtering;

•

The parameters used to configure content filtering and Web filtering;

•

Configuring content filtering and Web filtering; and,

•

Monitoring content filtering and Web filtering.

Content filtering is a feature that allows or blocks traffic based on the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME) type, file extension, protocol commands, and embedded object type. This feature is supported for HTTP, FTP, and mail protocols such as SMTP, Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3), and Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP). Once content is blocked, users can be notified by a custom message or e-mail depending on the protocol. This feature does not require a license.

Content filtering permits or blocks traffic based on the following parameters: •

MIME pattern: Identifies the type of traffic in HTTP and mail protocols.

•

File extension: Identifies the type of traffic by file type.

•

Protocol command: Identifies the type of commands protocols use. Using FTP as an example, the protocol commands are the commands between the FTP client and server, not the commands you type when using FTP. The following list are protocol command examples for the s upported protocols: –

HTTP : GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, OPTIONS, OTHERS

–

FTP : USER, PASS, ACCT, CWD, CDUP,SMNT, REIN, QUIT, PORT, PASV

–

SMTP : HELO, EHLO, MAIL, RCPT, DATA, SIZE, QUIT, VRFY, EXPN

–

POP3: APOP, DELE, LIST, NOOP, PASS, QUIT, RETR, RSET, STAT, TOP, UIDL, USER

–

IMAP : CAPABILITY, NOOP, LOGOUT, AUTHENTICATE, LOGIN, SELECT, EXAMINE

HTTP supports all the content filtering attributes which includes MIME patterns, file extensions, and protocol commands. HTTP traffic can also be blocked based on ActiveX, Java applet, cookies, EXE files, and ZIP files. The content filter checks every HTTP request between client and server. If the content filter is configured to block the Content Filtering and Web Filtering • Chapter 4–1 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 request using the protocol command list, it drops the request and sends back a page with an explanation. If the request is to download a file, it checks the response header for MIME type and file extension. The content filter also checks the file header for ActiveX and Java applet, and drops the response if any of them are configured in the blocked content. FTP supports the content filtering attributes file extensions and protocol commands. The content filter checks each command, and drops the command if it is configured in the protocol list or the file extension list. If the command is dropped, it sends back to the client the custom block message and the reason why. Content filtering support for FTP requires enabling the FTP ALG. Mail protocols support the content filtering attributes MIME patterns, file extensions, and protocol commands. Content filtering has a limited ability with MIME type and file extensions. Only one level of the e-mail header is scanned, which means recursive e-mail headers are not checked along with any encrypted attachments. Also, if the whole e-mail is MIME encoded, only the mime type is checked. The content filter checks each command, and drops the command if it is configured in the protocol list or the file extension list. If the command is dropped, It sends back an error code to the client with the explanation.

A message embedded in the protocol can be sent to the user, or an e-mail message can be sent. In both cases, the content of the message is configured by the administrator.

A content filter must coincide with a list of custom objects, which is a list of objects you want to allow or block. The one exception is with HTTP traffic, which can be configured to block content directly under the content filter. The graphic shows all the configuration options available for custom objects and content filtering. Custom objects options have the following configuration options: •

MIME pattern: This option enables the creation of a list that can be used for allowing or blocking MIME types. If the MIME pattern ends with a “/” (as an example, video/), prefix matching takes place. If the MIME pattern does not end with a “/”, exact matching occurs.

•

Filename extension: This option enables the creation of a list for blocking file extensions.

Chapter 4–2 • Content Filtering and Web Filtering © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Protocol command: This option enables the creation of a list that can be used for allowing or blocking protocol commands. The protocol commands are checked using a case-insensitive string comparison.

•

Block or permit command: The block-command list indicates the commands that are blocked, and the permit-command list has been designed as an exception list. If a command exists in the permit-command list, it will not be blocked, even if it exists in the block-command list. Commands that do not exist in the permit-command list will be allowed provided that they also do not exist in the block-command list.

•

Block extension: Allows you to apply the custom object filename-extension to block files based on the extension. You can also configure the predefined extension list junos-default-extension . Issue show groups junos-defaults security utm custom-objects to view predefined custom objects.

•

Block MIME : You can create a list to block MIME type video/, but allow video/quicktime. The block-mine exception list has a higher priority than block-mime list. You can also configure the predefined MIME list junos-default-bypass-mime .

•

Block content type: You can also block files based on ActiveX, Java applet, cookies, EXE or ZIP file type. The block-content-type configuration is for HTTP use only.

•

Notification options: Allows for the creation of a custom message sent to the client when traffic is blocked.

After you have created a content filtering profile, you cr eate a UTM policy and apply the c ontent filtering profile to the appropriate traffic you are filtering. The content filtering profile can be applied to multiple protocols. The final step is to apply the UTM policy to the appropriate security policy. The graphic shows the options available for applying the content filtering profile and where the UTM policy is applied to the security policy.

Content Filtering and Web Filtering • Chapter 4–3 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


The graphic illustrates the topology for this example. The next page shows the content filtering configuration steps to block downloading ZIP files using HTTP.

The steps for configuring a content filter: 1.

Configure the content filtering profile to block ZIP files for HTTP, with a custom message to be displayed in the webpage.

2.

Apply the content filtering profile to the UTM policy, under http-profile .

3.

Finally, apply the UTM policy to the appropriate security policy using the application-services extended permit action.



The screen capture shows what the client would see in the Web browser after trying to download a ZIP file.

The syslog messages logs permitted and blocked content, and the show security utm content-filtering statistics command counts how many times a custom object or HTTP blocked content has been blocked. The syslog messages must be configured with a severity of any or info.



The Junos Web user interface (J-Web) provides the same monitoring options as the CLI, and provides further statistics and graphs to display the blocked traffic.

Web filtering or URL filtering provides the ability to permit or deny access to specific URLs based on the category to which they belong. The Web filter intercepts HTTP requests, and a decis ion is then made with the HTTP re quest on an external server (SurfControl or Websense), or on the SRX device (whitelist or blacklist) to permit or block the request. Web filtering acts as a first line of defense. If a website is a known source of malware, what is easier than blocking access to that site? The supported three deployment options: •

SurfControl: This option uses an in-the-cloud server which keeps a database of categories for websites.

•

Websense: This option uses a locally administrated server which keeps a database of categories and Web filtering policies.

•

Local lists: This option uses configured whitelists and black lists on the SRX device.

Once traffic has been blocked, the client can receive a custom message in the Web browser.

The first and most common Web filtering method is to use the in-the-cloud or Internet SurfControl server. The SurfControl server stores a database of categories and associated URLs. The SurfControl option requires the purchase of a Juniper Web filtering license. The second option is the use of a local Websense server that must be purchased and managed locally. The Websense server maintains a database of categories and Web filtering policies. The Websense option does not require a Juniper Web filtering license. The third option is the use of local URL blacklists and whitelists. The local lists can be used in conjunction with the SurfControl or Websense option.



The SurfControl server stores a database of categories and associated URLs. Every time a user tries to access a site, the SRX device captures the requested URL and queries the SurfControl database. The server responds with the category of the website, which is used by a Web filtering policy on the SRX device to allow or deny access. The SRX device generates a log message indicating the action taken. If the action taken was to deny access, a custom message can be sent to the user. Once a site is associated with a category, the result is cached locally. Subsequent requests for the same URL do not require a new query to the centralized database. The main advantage of this solution is that users do not need to host the database, which often requires a redundant server infrastructure. The SurfControl database features: •

More than 26 million URLs;

•

Approximately 40 categories; and

•

More than 70 languages.

The Websense solution does not require a separate Juniper license, but utilizes a local database, which must be purchased separately from Websense. As opposed to querying the SurfControl server, the SRX device redirects the URL to the local Websense server. The Websense server contains both the category database and the Web filtering policies. The Websense server then compares the URL against its database and returns the result according to its configured policy. The response is then forwarded to the SRX device indicating whether the URL is allowed or denied. The Websense redirect server features: •

95 categories;

•

Support for over 100 protocols; Content Filtering and Web Filtering • Chapter 4–7 © 2011 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.


Local policy evaluation; and

•

Logging and reporting support.

This solution has the advantage of minimizing processing delays because the database is locally stored. The disadvantages are an administrator to keep the database current and multiple servers if you want redundancy.

You can also configure custom URL categories, which can be included in blacklists and whitelists that are evaluated on the SRX device. All URLs for each category in a blacklist are denied, while all URLs for each category in a whitelist are permitted. The processing order is as follows: 1.

A new URL is first compared to the blacklist URLs. If a match is found, the traffic is dropped without any further processing.

2.

If no match is found, the URL is evaluated against the whitelist, where traffic is allowed if a match is found.

3.

If no user defined category results in a match, processing continues either by SurfControl or Websense.



This graphic illustrates the configuration options available for SurfControl Web filtering. The SurfControl options are: •

Type: This option allows you to configure the type of Web filtering you are using. SurfControl is the default Web filtering type.

•

Cache : This option allows you to configure the size and duration of the cache. The cache is used for the URL categories from the SurfControl server.

•

Server : This option allows you to configure the host or address, and port of the SurfControl server. A server host or address is required.

•

Category : This option allows you to permit or block URLs based on the category with which the SurfControl server responds. You can also permit or block any custom categories you configure.

•

Default: This option allows you to configure a default permit or block action. If a URL does not match a category, the URL is either permitted or blocked. The default action is to permit the URL if the default option is not configured.

•

Custom block message: This option allows you to configure a custom message. The message will be seen by the client when a URL is blocked.

•

Fallback settings: This option allows you to permit or block URLs during the following error conditions:

•

–

Default: Default error condition;

–

Server connectivity : No connectivity to the Web filter server;

–

Timeout: A Web filter request times out; and

–

Too many requests: There are too many concurrent requests.

Timeout: This option allows you to configure the timeout value in seconds, after which a request is considered to have timed out.



The graphic illustrates the c onfiguration options available for Websense Web filtering. The Websense options are: •

Type: This option allows you to configure the type of Web filtering you are using. Websense must be configured or SurfControl will be used.

•

Server : This option allows you configure the host or address, and port of the Websense server.

•

Custom block message: This option allows you to configure a custom message. The message will be seen by the client when a URL is blocked.

•

Fallback settings: This option allows you to permit or block URLs during error conditions. The error conditions configuration options are the same as SurfControl.

•

Timeout: This option allows you to configure the timeout value in seconds, after which a request is considered to have timed out.

•

Sockets: This option allows you to configure the number of persistent sockets to be opened to the Websense server.

•

Account: This option allows you to configure the Websense server account.



Local Web filtering by default permits all URLs, therefore a URL pattern to allow URLs is not nee ded. You must only configure a whitelist if you configure the default action to block under the juniper-local profile. The Web filtering type must be configured for juniper-local , or the default Web filtering Sur fControl will be used. You must configure a URL pattern for the websites you want to block, and apply the URL pattern to a custom URL category. The custom URL category is then applied under the web-filtering hierarchy as a url-blacklist to block the URL. You can also configure the same custom message and fallback options as previously mentioned. The graphic shows how the URL pattern is associated with the cus tom URL category, and how the custom URL category associates with the Web fi lter.

The Web filtering profile must be applied to a UTM policy and the UTM policy must be applied to the appropriate security policy. The graphic shows where the Web filtering profile is applied to the UTM po licy, and where the UTM policy is applied to the security policy.



This graphic illustrates the topology for this example. The next few pages show the Web filtering configuration steps to block access to a bad website.

The graphic illustrates configuring URL patterns and applying the URL pattern to a custom URL category.



The graphic shows applying the custom URL categories under the Web filter, and creating a local profile with a custom block message. The URL whitelist and blacklist can be used with other Web filtering solutions, such as SurfControl.

The graphic shows where the Web filtering profile is applied to the UTM po licy, and where the UTM policy is applied to the security policy. You can also apply predefined Web filtering profiles to the UTM policy. To view the predefined Web filtering profiles, issue the show group junos-defaults security utm feature-profile web-filtering

command.


JNCIS-SEC Study Guide—Part 2 The following output shows the Web filtering UTM p olicy options: user@srx# set utm-policy policy1 web-filtering http-profile ? Possible completions: Web-filtering HTTP profile block-bad [security utm feature-profile web-filtering juniper-local profile] junos-wf-cpa-default [security utm feature-profile web-filtering surf-control-integrated profile] junos-wf-local-default [security utm feature-profile web-filtering juniper-local profile] junos-wf-websense-default [security utm feature-profile web-filtering websense-redirect profile]

The graphic shows what the client would see in the Web browser after trying to access a blocked website.

The syslog messages log permitted or blocked content, and the show security utm web-filtering statistics command counts how many times a URL was permitted or blocked. The syslog messages must be configured with a severity of any or info.


JNCIS-SEC-P2_2011-09-22

Recommend Documents