Center for Chemical Process Safety
A n I n t r o d u ct ct i o n t o I n h e r e n t l y S a f er e r D es esi g n
Revision # 1, October 19, 2009
© 2008, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
1
REVISION LOG Revision No: 1
Reason for Change(s): Original Issue
Date: 10/19/09
Copyright © 2009 by the American American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Engineers. All rights reserved.
Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5991 ISBN: 978-0-8169-1063-2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission permission of the copyright owner. AIChE and CCPS are trademarks owned by the American Institute of Chemical Chemical Engineers. These trademarks may not be used without the prior express written consent of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. The use of this product in whole whole or in part for commercial use is prohibited without prior express written consent of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. To obtain appropriate license license and permission for for such use contact contact CCPS, 646495-1371,
[email protected] [email protected]..
It is sincerely hoped that the information presented in this document will lead to an even more impressive safety record for the entire industry; however, neither the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, its consultants, CCPS Technical Steering Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, their employers’ officers and directors, warrant or represent, expressly or by implication, the correctness or accuracy of the content of the information presented presented in this document. document. As between (1) American American Institute of Chemical Chemical Engineers, its consultants, CCPS Technical Steering Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, and their employers’ officers and directors, and (2) the user of this document, the user accepts any legal liability or responsibility whatsoever for the consequence of its use or misuse.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
2
Inherentlysaferdesign(ISD)isaphilosophyforaddressingsafetyissuesinthedesign andoperationofchemicalprocessesandmanufacturingplants.WhenconsideringISD, thedesignertriestomanageprocessriskbyeliminatingorsignificantlyreducing hazards.Often,thetraditionalapproachtomanagingchemicalprocesssafetyhas acceptedtheexistenceandmagnitudeofhazardsinaprocess,andincorporated hardware,procedures,andmanagementsystemstoreduceprocessrisk.Where feasible,ISDprovidesmorerobustandreliableriskmanagement,andhasthepotential tomakethechemicalprocessingtechnologysimplerandmoreeconomicalby eliminatingtheneedforexpensivesafetysystemsandprocedures.However,whenone considersallofthemultiplerisksassociatedwithanytechnology,includingchemical processing,itisunlikelythatanyprocessorplantdesigncaneliminate all hazardsand hazardsand risk.Acombinationofinherent,hardware,procedural,andmanagementsystemswill alwaysberequiredtoadequatelymanageallprocessrisks. ISDaddressestheimmediateimpactofsingleevents(chemicalaccidents)onpeople, theenvironment,property,andbusiness.Inachemicalprocessingplant,thisgenerally meanstheimmediateimpactsoffires,explosions,andthereleaseoftoxicmaterials.In manycases,aninherentlysaferdesignwillalsobebeneficialforothertypesofprocess risk–forexample,environmentalrisk,chronichealthrisk,orrisktoconsumersorusers ofaproduct.Butthisisnotnecessarilytrue–forexample,anon-flammablesolventmay beinherentlysaferfromafireandexplosionriskviewpoint,butitmaybeaserious environmentalcontaminationhazard,oritmaybeachronichealthhazard.While engineersrecognizethepotentialbenefitsofISDinmanagingothertypesofprocess risk,themainintentofISDistoreducethefrequencyandpotentialimpactofchemical plantaccidents–fires,explosions,andacutetoxicexposures.Therefore,theapplication ofISDisoneconsiderationintheselectionofprocessandproducttechnology,butthe decisionaboutwhattechnologyoptionisbestoverallmustconsiderallrisks.
TheconceptofISDisnotreallynew,anditisnotreallyuniquetotheprocessindustries. Technologistshavealwaysrecognizedthevalueofeliminatingorreducinghazards. ApplyingISDwithoutca ApplyingISDwithoutcallingitbyth llingitbythatname,t atname,theysimply heysimplyconsidere consideredittobe dittobegood good design.Forexample,whenafamilyofstoneagecavedwellersdecidedtomovetoa cavehigherabovetheriverfollowingaflood,theywerepracticingISDbyeliminatingthe riskofhavingtheirhomeflooded.Theycouldhavestayedintheiroldcaveand managedtheriskinotherways–forexample,bybuildingadikearoundthecavemouth (hardware),orbyassigningafamilymembertomonitortheriverlevelandwarn everybodytomovethemselvesandtheirpossessionstohighergroundwhenaflood wasimminent(procedural). Thespecificterminology“InherentlySaferDesign”cameintouseintheprocess industriesinthe1970s.Followinga1974hydrocarbonvaporcloudexplosionat
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
3
Flixborough,England(Figure1),TrevorKletz,aseniorsafetyadvisorforICI,questioned theneedforsuchlargequantitiesofflammableortoxicmaterialsinamanufacturing plant,andtheneedforprocessingatelevatedtemperature andpressure.Kletzsuggestedthatindustryshouldre-directitsriskmanagementefforts towardeliminationofhazardswherefeasible.Insteadofdevotingextensiveresourcesto safetysystemsandprocedurestomanagetherisksassociated,industrycouldtryto identifyprocessmodificationswhichreduceoreliminatehazards–reducingthequantity ofhazardousmaterial,usingless hazardousmaterials,developing technologywhichoperatesatless severeconditions.Kletzandothers inthechemicalindustryestablished asetofprinciplesforISD,and providedmanyexamplesofits implementation.In1996,theCenter forChemicalProcessSafety (CCPS)publishedalandmarkbook, InherentlySaferChemical , Processes:ALifeCycleApproach , compilinguptodateinformationon industrythinkingonISD.In2009, CCPSpublishedasecondeditionof thisbook,incorporatingthelatest developmentsonISDbasedon morethanadecadeofadditionalindustrialexperience 1 .
Adjective.Existing Adjective.Existingasaness asanessentialcons entialconstituentorc tituentorcharacteris haracteristic;intrinsi tic;intrinsic. c. * FromtheLatin inharens,inhaerent -,presentparticipleof -,presentparticipleof inhaerere,toinhere. Whatdowemeanbyinherentlysaferdesign?Onedictionarydefinitionof“inherent”is “existinginsomethingasapermanentandinseparableelement.”Thismeansthatsafety isbuiltintotheprocess,notaddedon.Hazardsareeliminated,notcontrolled,andthe meansbywhichthehazardsareeliminatedaresofundamentaltothedesignofthe processthattheycannotbechangedordefeatedwithoutchangingtheprocess.Inmany casesthiswillresultinsimplerandcheaperplants.Ifextensivesafetysystemsare requiredtocontrolmajorhazards,theywillintroducecomplexitytoaplant,alongwith cost–bothintheinitialinvestmentforthesafetyequipmentandalsofortheongoing operatingcostformaintenanceandoperationofthesafetysystems.
F ourth Edition * Definition taken from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
4
BecausethephilosophyofISDistoeliminateorreducethehazardofaprocess,itis importanttounderstandwhatwemeanbytheword“hazard”.TheCenterforChemical ProcessSafety(CCPS)hasdefinedhazardas“aninherentphysicalorchemical characteristicthathasthepotentialforcausingharmtopeople,theenvironment,or property.” 2 Hazardsareintrinsictoamaterialoritsconditionsofuse.Someexamples ofhazardsare: Chlorineistoxicbyinhalation Gasolineisflammable Highpressuresteamcontainsalargeamountofpotentialenergy,bothfromits elevatedtemperatureandalsofromthehighpressure Thesehazardscannotbechanged,exceptbychangingthematerialortheconditionsof use. • • •
Chemicalprocesssafetystrategiescanbegroupedinfourcategories:Inherent, Passive,Active,andProcedural(Figure2).Ingeneral,inherentandpassivestrategies arethemostrobustandreliable,butelementsofallstrategieswillberequiredfora comprehensiveprocesssafetymanagementprogramwhenallhazardsofaprocessand plantareconsidered.
Theinherentapproachtosafetyis,wherefeasible,toeliminateorgreatlyreducethe hazardbychangingtheprocesstousematerialsandconditionswhicharenonhazardousormuchlesshazardous.Thesechangesmustbeintegraltotheprocessor product,andnoteasilydefeatedorchangedwithoutfundamentallychangingthe processorplantdesign.Substitutingwaterforaflammable,andperhapstoxic,solvent asacarrierforapaintorcoating–usingwaterbasedlatexpaintsinsteadofoilbased paints–isanexample.Theeliminationoftheflammableortoxicsolventisaninherent characteristicoftheproductanditsmanufacturingprocess.Thehazardoffireor exposuretotoxicsolventvaporsiseliminated,bothinthemanufacturingprocessand alsothroughoutthemanufacturingsupplychainallthewaytotheproductuser.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
5
Passivesafetyfeaturesminimizehazardsusingprocessorequipmentdesignfeatures whichreduceeitherthefrequencyorconsequenceofanincidentwithouttheactive functioningofanydevice.Forexample,ifachemicalreactionwhichhasamaximum possiblepressureof5barincaseofarunawayreactionisdoneinareactordesignedto containapressureupto10bar,themaximumreactionpressurewillbecontainedwithin thereactorvessel.Thereactorcontainsthepressurebecauseofitsdesignand construction–thethicknessandstrengthofthemetalfromwhichitisfabricated,the strengthofthegasketsandboltswhichholdittogether,andit’sotherphysical components.Thiscontainmentisveryrobustandreliable–thereactordoesnotneedto sensehighpressureandtakeanyactiontocontainthepressure,andnomovingparts arerequiredtocontainthepressure.Butthehazard(5barpressure)stillexists,sothere issomeriskthatanincidentwilloccur,andthepassivestrategywouldbeconsidered lessrobustthananinherentstrategywhichwouldeliminateorreducethepressure.The reactormaybedamaged,corroded,improperlyconstructed,orcontainafaultygasket, forexample,anditispossiblethatitwouldfailtocontainthepressurefromtherunaway reaction.
Activesafetysyst Activesafetysystemsinclude emsincludeprocess processcontrols controlsystems,sa ystems,safetyinstr fetyinstrumenteds umentedsystems ystems (SIS),andautomaticincidentmitigationsystemssuchassprinklersystemstoextinguish afire.Theseactivesystemsaredesignedtosenseahazardousconditionandtakean appropriateaction.Activesystemsmaybedesignedtopreventanincident,orto minimizetheconsequencesofanincident.Forexample,atankmighthaveahighlevel interlockwhichshutsoffapumpfeedingthetankandclosesallfeedvalves–this systemisdesignedtopreventatankoverflow.Afiresprinklersystemisanactive systemdesignedtominimizetheconsequencesofafire–itdoesnotpreventthefire, andmaynotevenbeactivatedunlessafireisdetected.
Proceduralsafetyfeaturesincludestandardoperatingprocedures,safetyrulesand procedures,operatortraining,emergencyresponseprocedures,andmanagement systems.Forexample,anoperatormaybetrainedtoobservethetemperatureinthe reactorandapplyemergencycoolingifitexceedsaspecifiedcriticalvalue.Ingeneral, forahighhazardsystem,proceduralriskmanagementsystemsdonot,bythemselves, provideadequateriskmanagement.Humanreliabilityisnothighenough,andpeople oftencannotdiagnoseaproblem,determinetheappropriateaction,andtakethataction quicklyenough.However,proceduralsafetysystemswillalwaysbeapartofa comprehensiveriskmanagementprogram–ataminimumtheywillberequiredto ensureongoingmaintenanceandmanagementofactiveandpassivesafetysystems.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
6
CCPShascategorizedstrategiesfordesigninginherentlysaferprocessesintofour groups: Substitute–uselesshazardousmaterials,chemistry,andprocesses Examples:analternatesynthesischemistryforamoleculeuseslesstoxic o rawmaterials;waterbasedlatexpaintseliminatefire,toxicity,and environmentalhazardsassociatedwithsolventbasedpaints Minimize–usesmallquantitiesofhazardousmaterials,reducethesizeof equipmentoperatingunderhazardousconditionsuchashightemperatureor pressure Examples:nitroglycerinecanbemadeinacontinuouspipereactorwitha o fewkilogramsofinventoryinsteadofalargebatchreactorwithseveral thousandkilogramsofinventory Moderate–reducehazardsbydilution,refrigeration,processalternativeswhich operateatlesshazardousconditions Example:acombustiblesolidwashandledasapelletinsteadofafine o powder,reducingthedustexplosionhazard Simplify–eliminateunnecessarycomplexity,design“userfriendly”plants o Example:Oldpipingwhichwasnolongerneededbecauseofprocess modificationswasremovedfromaplant,makingitimpossibletoaccidently transfermaterialintoareactorthroughthatpipingbyoperatingerroror leakingvalves •
•
•
•
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
7
Processdesignstartswiththe selectionofabasictechnologyfora processoperation.Asthetechnology progressesthroughprocess development,conceptualplant design,scaleup,engineeringand detailedplantdesign,plant construction,startup,andongoing operationandfuturemodification, differentkindsofchoicesand decisionsarerequiredbychemists, engineers,andothertechnologists (Figure3).ThephilosophyofISD appliesatallstages,buttheavailable optionschange.Thebest opportunitiesforimplementationof inherentlysaferdesignareearlyin productorprocessresearchand development.Atthispoint,therehas notbeenanycommitmenttoa particulartechnology,resourceshavenotbeenexpendedonresearchanddevelopment whichwouldhavetobedoneoveragain,potentialcustomershavenotcommittedto usingproductsproducedbyacertaintechnologyanddevelopedtheirprocessestofit thisproduct,andcapitalhasnotbeencommittedtobuildaplanttoimplementa particulartechnology.Astheprocessmovesthroughthelifecycle,itbecomesmore difficulttochangethebasictechnology.However,itisnevertoolatetoconsiderISD– butoptionsforimplementationmaybemorelimitedinanexistingplant.Toillustratehow ISDcanbeappliedatvariouslevelsofprocessdevelopmentanddesign,disinfectionof drinkingwaterwillbeusedasanexampleprocess.
Therearemanywaystodisinfectwater–forexample,chlorination,ozone,ultraviolet light,radiation,andothers.ThesevarioustechnologieshavedifferingISD characteristicsrelativetodifferenthazardsofconcern.Forexample,chlorineistoxic andmayproducehazardouschlorinatedorganicmaterialsinwatercontainingcertain organicprecursors.Ozoneandultravioletlightprovidedisinfectionatthepointof treatment,butdonothaveresidualactivityshouldthewaterbecontaminated downstreamofthetreatmentplant.ToconsiderISDforbasictechnologyselection,the decisionmakermustunderstandallhazardsofconcernandtheinherentsafety characteristicsoftheavailableprocessoptionsrelativetothosehazards.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
8
Oncethebasictechnologyhasbeenselected,theremaybemanyoptionsavailablefor actualimplementationofthattechnology.Usingthewatertreatmentexample,assume thatchlorinationtechnologyhasbeenselected.Nowtheprocessdesignerhastodecide howchlorinationwillbeimplemented.Someoptionshemightconsiderinclude elementalchlorinegas,sodiumhypochlorite,orsolidchlorinatingagents.Eachoption hasspecificISDcharacteristicsrelativetovarioushazardsofconcern.Thedesigner mustalsoconsiderotherfactorssuchaseconomics,feasibilityofthetechnology,state ofdevelopment(proventechnology,anewprocesswhichhasneverbeenused,or somewhereinbetween),andotherriskconcerns(environmental,chronichealth,etc.).
Atthispointinthep Atthispointintheprocesslif rocesslifecycle,th ecycle,thedesigne edesignermustcon rmustconsiderISD siderISDforaspe foraspecificplant cificplant design.Factorsmightinclude: Locationoftheplantrelativetosurroundingpopulation,in-plantoccupiedareas, sensitiveenvironmentalareas,etc. generallayoutoftheequipmentontheselectedplantsite numberofparallelsystemsandsizeofthosesystems(onebigplant,ortwoor moresmallerplants,forexample) •
• •
Ifweassumethatthedesignersofthisparticularwatertreatmentsystemhavedecided thatdisinfectionusinggaseouschlorineistheoptimumprocess,ISDshouldbe consideredwhendeterminingwherethefacilityislocatedinthecommunity,wherethe chlorineisstoredandhandledonthesiteoncethesitehasbeenselected,thenumber andsizeofthewaterchlorinationsystems,etc.
ThedesignershouldconsiderISDinthedetaileddesignofeachpieceofequipmentin theplant.Therearemanyoptionsinthedesignequipmentsuchasheatexchangers, chlorinevaporizers,andotherdevicesthatmightbeincludedinthewatertreatment plant.DifferentequipmentdesignswillhavedifferentISDcharacteristics–forexample, theinventoryofhazardousmaterialintheequipment.Also,thedetailedlayoutofthe equipmentwillimpactthingssuchasthelengthanddiameterofpipingcontaining hazardousmaterials.Considerationofhumanfactorsinthedesignofequipment,to minimizethepotentialformis-operationandhumanerror,willalsoresultinaninherently saferplant.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
9
Onceaplantisbuilt,ISDshouldbeconsideredinthedevelopmentofoperating proceduresandmaintenanceprocedures.Thesemustbeclear,logical,andconsistent withactualhumanbehavior.Also,theplantshouldconsiderISDoptionsthroughoutthe operationallifetime,particularlywhenmodificationsaremade,orifnewtechnology becomesavailable.
ISDisnotamagicbu ISDisnotamagicbulletwhichwillma lletwhichwillmakeallpote keallpotentialriskas ntialriskassociated sociatedwithchemica withchemical l processinggoaway.Forexample,inmanycasesitisnotpossibletoeliminateor reducethehazardbecausethecharacteristicofamaterialortechnologywhichmakesit hazardousisthesameasthecharacteristicwhichmakesituseful. Jetairlinerstypicallytravelatabout600milesperhour.Thisiswhatmakesthem useful–theycantransportyouhalfwayaroundtheworldinlessthanaday.But thatspeedalsomakesthemhazardous–anairplanetravelingat600milesper hourhasalargeamountofkineticenergywhichcancausemajordamageifithits something,aswellaslikelykillingallofthepassengers. Gasolineisflammable,andhasthepotentialforamajorfire.Buttheflammability ofgasolineisalsowhygasolineisuseful–itstoresalargeamountofenergyina smallmassofmaterialmakingitavaluabletransportationfuel. Chlorineistoxic.Thismakesithazardoustomostlife,includingpeopleand animals.Butthisisalsowhatmakesitusefulforkillingpathogenicorganismsin drinkingwatersothatpeoplecandrinkthewatersafely. •
•
•
Fortheseandotherhazardousmaterialsortechnologies,theimportantfactorin attainingthebenefitsofthetechnologyandmanagingthehazardiscontrol.Insome casestheremaybealternativetechnologieswhicharelesshazardousorwhichare easiertocontrol.But,formanytechnologies,therearenoinherentlysafertechnologies, thosetechnologiesarenoteconomicallyfeasible,orotherrisks(environmental,chronic healthrisks)areimportantenoughthatsocietychoosestouseatechnologywhichis lessinherentlysafe.Inthesecases,wemustrelyonpassive,active,andprocedural safetystrategiestomanagetherisk.Thesestrategiescanbehighlyeffective–travelby airplaneisextremelysafedespitethesignificantinherentrisksofflying.Thisisbecause ofthehighlyeffectivesafetymanagementsystemsinplaceintheairtransportsystem. Everytechnologyhasmultiplehazards.Asaneverydayexample,considerautomobile travel.Hazardsincludethespeedofthecar(kineticenergy),flammablefuel,toxicityof exhaustgases,hotsurfacesintheengine,apressurizedcoolingsystemfortheengine, electricity,andothers.Forachemicalprocess,hazardsmightincludeacutetoxicity, flammability,corrosiveness,chronictoxicity,reactivity,adverseenvironmentalimpacts, andothers.Thestatementthataprocessisinherentlysafercanonlybeinthecontextof onehazard,orperhapsseveralspecific,butnotall,hazards.Itishighlyunlikelythatany
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
10
technologywilleverbeinherentlysaferwithrespecttoallpossiblehazards.Anychange toatechnologydesignedtoreduceoneormorehazardswillalsoimpactotherhazards, perhapssuchthatthesehazardswillbeincreasedornewhazardswillbeintroduced. Chlorofluorocarbon(CFC)refrigerantsprovideanexampleofISDconflicts.Whenfirst developedinthe1930s,CFCswereconsideredtobesaferalternativestoexisting refrigerantssuchasammoniaandlighthydrocarbons(theterm“inherentlysafer”was notinuseatthattime).CFCshavelowacutetoxicityandarenotflammable.Towardthe endofthe20 thcentury,theadverseenvironmentalimpactsofCFCswererecognized, andmanyofthemhavebeenphasedout.But,CFCsarestillinherentlysaferthanmany alternativeswithrespecttoflammabilityandacutetoxicityhazards.Societyhasdecided thatthepreviouslyunknownhazardofadverseenvironmentalimpactisunacceptable, andiswillingtoapplypassive,active,andproceduralriskmanagementstrategiesto managethehazardsassociatedwithCFCreplacementsforrefrigerationsystems. Differentpopulationsofpotentiallyimpactedpeoplemayperceivetheinherentsafetyof technologyoptionsdifferently.Forexample,foraprocesswhichrequiresrelativelysmall quantitiesofchlorinegas,aplantmayhaveachoicebetweensupplyin1toncylinders or90tonrailroadtankcars.Aneighborlocatedseveralmilesawayfromtheplantwould considerthe1toncylindersupplytobeinherentlysaferbecauseitisunlikelythataleak wouldimpacthimatthatdistance.Ontheotherhand,theplantoperatorswouldhaveto connectanddisconnectcylinders90timesforeveryonetimetheywouldhavehadto connectanddisconnectarailroadcar.Theywouldconsidertherailroadcartobe inherentlysaferbecausetheywouldbeimpactedbyanyrelease,evenasmallone.The operatorswouldhaveamuchhigherfrequencyofrelativelyhighriskoperations– connectinganddisconnectinghoseswhichcouldpotentiallycontainchlorine.Ofcourse, thesehazardscanbemanagedwithprocedures,personalprotectiveequipment,and othersafetymanagementsystems,butthesearenotinherent.Boththeneighborand theoperatorarecorrectintheirperceptionoftheISDcharacteristicsofthechlorine supplyoptions,buttheyareconcernedaboutdifferentkindsofincidents.Thechallenge forthedesignerofthesystemistounderstandtheseconflictingrequirementsandmake anintelligentchoice,includingconsiderationoftheentireriskmanagementsystem (inherent,passive,active,andprocedural). ItisalsoimportanttoconsiderwhetheranISDoptionactuallyreducesriskortransfersit somewhereelse,perhapsincreasingoverallrisk.Aplantmightreducethesizeofa hazardousmaterialstoragetankatthesite,reducinginventoryandsiterisk.Butuseof thesmallertankmayrequireachangefromshipmentofthematerialtotheplantfrom railroadtankcars(typicallyabout300,000poundshipmentsformanymaterials)to trucks(typicallyabout30,000poundshipments)becausethesmallertankcannot containmorethanatruckloadofmaterial.Nowtherewillbe10timesasmany shipments,andtheywillgobyroadratherthanbyrail.Dependingonthespecific characteristicsofaparticularplantlocation,roadshipmentmaybemorehazardous. Whilethesiteriskisreduced,theoverallrisktosocietymayactuallybeincreased.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
11
Howdoweincorporateinherentlysaferdesignphilosophiesintothedesignand operationofchemicalprocessingplants?Thebestansweristostartearlyinthelife cycle,andneverstop(Figure4).Thegreatestopportunitiesforfundamentalchangesto processesoccurearlyintheprocesslifecycle,duringinitialprocessconceptionand earlydevelopment.Atthisstage,theresearchermayhaveopportunitiestoselectless hazardousrawmaterialsandintermediatesorlesshazardouschemicalsynthesispaths fromamongthemanyoptionswhichmightbeavailable.However,itisnevertoolateto considerinherentsafety.Therearemanypublishedreportsofsignificantinherentsafety improvementsinplantswhichhavebeenoperatingformanyyears.
Thebestopportunitytoconsiderinherentlysaferdesignatallstagesintheprocesslife cycleistoincorporateinherentsafetyconsiderationsintotheprocesssafetyreviews thatarenormallydoneatthesestagesinthelifecycle.CCPSandothershave publishedchecklistswhichareusefulindoingthis.Inthenew2 ndeditionoftheCCPS bookoninherentlysaferdesign,thesechecklistsaresignificantlyimproved.And, inherentlysaferdesignphilosophycanbeconsideredinthecourseofaprocesshazard analysis,indetermininghowtorespondtoanidentifiedhazard.ThePHAteamis challengedtothinkaboutwaystoeliminateorminimizehazards,ratherthanaccepting thatthehazardexistsandfocusingitseffortsoncontrollingthathazard.Theteam shouldaskthefollowingquestions,inthisorder,onceithasidentifiedahazard: 1. Canthehazardbeeliminated? 2. Ifnot,canthemagnitudeofthehazardbesignificantlyreduced? 3. Dothealternativesidentifiedinquestions1and2increasethemagnitudeofany otherexistinghazards,orcreatenewhazards?Ifso,considerallhazardsin selectingthebestalternative.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
12
4. Whattechnicalandmanagementsystemsarerequiredtomanagethehazards whichinevitablywillremain? DesignersandPHAteamsoftenskipdirectlytothe4 thquestion,identifyingsystemsto managehazardswhoseexistenceisacceptedandbelievedtobeunavoidable.This maybetrueinmanycases,butnoPHAteamwillevereliminateorreduceahazardifit doesnotaskifthisispossible.PHAteamsshouldchallengethemselvestoeliminateor reducehazards,andthen,onlyifthisisnotpossible,shifttodesigningsystemsto manageriskfromhazardswhichcannotbeeliminated.
ThedesignerandoperatorofachemicalmanufacturingprocessshouldconsiderISD optionsthroughouttheprocesslifecycle,frominitialconceptionthroughresearchand development,plantdesign,construction,operation,modification,andeventual shutdown.UsuallythebestopportunityforimplementingISDisearlyinresearchand developmentbeforesignificantresourceshavebeenexpendedinprocessorproduct development,andbeforeaplanthasbeenbuilt.Thecompleteprocessandproductlife cyclealsoneedstobeconsideredtoavoidlocaloptimizationandtransferofriskfrom onesectoroftheoveralleconomytoanother.Thismeansconsiderationofraw materials,themanufacturingprocess,transportation,storageatallstagesinthesupply chain,enduse,andthesafetyconsequencesofchangingtechnology–demolitionofold facilitiesandconstructionofnewones. Allhazardsmustbe Allhazardsmustbeconsider consideredsotha edsothatinformed tinformeddecisions decisionscanbema canbemadeabout deabout conflictinggoalsandimpacts.Otherfactorsmustalsobeconsidered–economics, resourceallocation(includingcapital,researchanddevelopmentresources,operating costs),thefeasibility,reliability,andeffectivenessofotherprocessriskmanagement features(passive,active,procedural).Thismayresultindifferentchoicesfordifferent situations,evenforthesametechnology.Inadifferentenvironment,therelative importanceofdifferenthazardsorotherfactorsmaybedifferent,leadingtoadifferent choiceabouttheoptimaltechnology.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
13
JustaftermidnightonDecember3,1984,watercontaminationofatankofmethylisocyanate inBhopal,Indiainitiatedaseriesofeventsthatledtoacatastrophictoxicrelease,killingmore than3000residentsandinjuringover100,000. InFebruaryof1985,leadersfrom17oftheleadingchemicalandpetroleumcompaniesasked theAmericanInstituteofChemicalEngineers(AIChE)toleadacollaborativeglobaleffortto eliminatecatastrophicprocess incidentsby: •ADVANCINGstate-of-the-artprocesssafetytechnologyandmanagementpractices •SERVINGasapremierresourceforinformationonprocesssafety •FOSTERINGprocesssafetyinengineeringandscienceeducation •PROMOTINGprocesssafetyasakeyindustryvalue OnMarch25,1985,AIChEformedtheCenterforChemicalProcessSafety(CCPS)with chartermembercompanies.Intheyearsthatfollowed,CCPShasbeentheworldleaderin everyareaofprocesssafetyinformation,withover60guidelineandresourcebooksinprint, andanever-growingwebknowledgebase.CCPSmembershipnowexceeds100companies, headquarteredinmorethan15companiesinfourcontinentsandoperatingineverypartof theworld. ViewtheCCPSbookcatalog www.wiley.com/go/ccps www.wiley.com/go/ccps LearnaboutCCPSmembership www.aiche.org/CCPS/Corporate/index.aspx BrowsetheCCPSWebKnowledgeBase www.aiche.org/CCPS/Resources/KnowledgeBase/overview.aspx AttendCCPSeven AttendCCPSevents tswww.aiche.org/CCPS/Conferences/index.aspx www.aiche.org/CCPS/Conferences/index.aspx ContactCCPS
[email protected] ContactCCPS
[email protected]or+1.646.495.1372 or+1.646.495.1372 1
Center for Chemical Process Safety. Inherently Safer Chemical Processes: Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
2
Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures . 3rd Edition. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
© 2009, AIChE, published by Center for Chemical Process Safety
A Life Cycle Approach. 2nd Edtiion.
Become a corporate member of AIChE’s
CENTER FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SAFETY
CCPS members share a vision of a safer process industry Working together, The Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) and its member companies pool the resources, expertise, and knowledge needed to develop superior process safety management and technology. Members guide research research initiatives and enjoy access to the latest research findings by participating in the development of CCPS guideline, concept, and safety alert publications. Members also contribute to and benefit from CCPS’ extensive and coded databases of safety information. Representatives may serve on over 15 subcommittees and attend four Technical Steering Committees each year, as well as world-class conferences. They join a community of peers with whom they can confidentially discuss safety concerns and benchmark programs.
CCPS membership makes good business sense CCPS members share the costs and benefits of research, so every dollar goes farther. On average, CCPS members obtain safety R&D worth 70 times the value of their contribution. What’s more, membership delivers over $1.5 million in projects annually. Members of CCPS include major petroleum, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, as well as other manufacturers and users of chemicals, research centers, engineering contractors, safety consultants, insurance firms, and government agencies. CCPS members also benefit from: • • • •
• •
A large, effective network of colleagues who can help each other solve problems Learning from other industry experts Participating in development of process safety guidelines used by all of industry Exclusive programming at four Technical Steering Committee meetings per year, featuring workshops and special invited speakers. Free copies of new CCPS books and discounts on all other CCPS books. Preventing catastrophic process safety incidents
Membership contributions depend on the world value of the member's sales. CCPS and AIChE are both tax-exempt educational scientific organizations under IRS code 501 (c) (3), Federal I.D. No. 13-1623892. For more information on CCPS membership, contact CCPS at +1.646.495.1372 or
[email protected] [email protected]..
CCPS MEMBERS: A POWERFUL ALLIANCE