This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
SUMMARY
1.
2.
3.
THE PHYSICAL LAWS OF REFERENCE _____________________________________________ 4 1.1
Heat and temperature __________________________________________________________ 4
1.2
Conduction: Fourier's law ________________________________________________________ 4
1.3
Convection: Newton's law _______________________________________________________ 6
1.4
Specific heat, latent heat, thermal capacity, thermal diffusivity _________________________ 8
1.5
Radiation and Stefan-Boltzmanns' law ____________________________________________ 10
1.6
The photon and the electromagnetic spectrum _____________________________________ 11
1.7
Transmissivity into the atmosphere ______________________________________________ 13
1.8
Planck's law _________________________________________________________________ 15
1.9
Wien's law___________________________________________________________________ 16
1.10
Stefan-Boltzman's law _________________________________________________________ 17
1.11
The black-body, the grey-body and the real-body ___________________________________ 18
1.12
Kirchoff's law: absorbance, emittance, reflectance and transmittance ___________________ 19
1.13
The radiance measured ________________________________________________________ 22
1.14
Emissivity ___________________________________________________________________ 24
1.15
Absorptivity _________________________________________________________________ 32
1.16
Transmissivity ________________________________________________________________ 33
1.17
Lambert's cosine law __________________________________________________________ 35
1.18
Materials with specular and diffuse reflectivity and measurements _____________________ 38
TECHNOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THERMAL IMAGING CAMERAS _______________ 39 2.1
Operation of infrared cameras __________________________________________________ 39
2.2
How to choose a thermal imaging camera _________________________________________ 48
2.3
Subjective and complementary characteristics: example of a thermal imaging camera. _____ 50
2.4
Possibilities offered by the image processing software _______________________________ 53
2.5
Spectral band ________________________________________________________________ 58
2.6
Temperature measurement range (RANGE) ________________________________________ 58
2.7
Geometric and optical parameters (FOV, AFOV, IFOV) ________________________________ 59
2.8
Slit response function (SRF) _____________________________________________________ 63
2.9
Choice of the FOV and of the IFOV ________________________________________________ 67
2.10
Thermal sensitivity (NETD) ______________________________________________________ 67
2.11
Spatial frequency, MRTD, MDTD _________________________________________________ 70
2.12
Influence of ambient temperature on the measurement ______________________________ 73
2.13
Saving and data capture: what can't be changed____________________________________ 74
2.14
How to obtain a good thermographic image _______________________________________ 74
THERMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT ____________________________________________ 77
1
4.
5.
3.1
Measurement of emissivity _____________________________________________________ 77
3.2
Techniques for measurement of reflected temperature _______________________________ 84
3.3
Quantifying the uncertainty of measurement_______________________________________ 91
3.4
Measurement of transmissivity __________________________________________________ 92
3.5
Problems relating to measurements through infrared windows ________________________ 98
3.6
Reliability of the measurement _________________________________________________ 104
3.7
Common errors and prejudices _________________________________________________ 106
3.8
The importance of the magnitudes of influence ____________________________________ 108
THERMOGRAPHY APPLIED TO ELECTRICAL YSTEMS ______________________________ 111 4.1
Definitions __________________________________________________________________ 111
4.2
Conditions for thermographic surveys on electrical systems __________________________ 112
4.3
Typical thermal anomalies in electrical installations ________________________________ 117
4.4
Transformers________________________________________________________________ 125
4.5
Thermographic surveys on transformers __________________________________________ 130
4.6
Thermographic surveys in transformation stations _________________________________ 133
4.7
Thermographic surveys on capacitors ____________________________________________ 144
4.8
Criteria for assessing the seriousness of anomalies _________________________________ 149
4.9
Electric motors ______________________________________________________________ 159
4.10
Thermographic check of photovoltaic systems _____________________________________ 171
4.11
Thermographic surveys on batteries and accumulators ______________________________ 179
4.12
The conduct of the thermographer in terms of electrical safety _______________________ 181
4.13
The calculation of savings achieved as a result of thermographic surveys _______________ 183
THERMOGRAPHY APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS _____________________________ 187 5.1
Measurement of the temperature of heat exchanger pipes in furnaces _________________ 187
5.2
Gas leak detection ___________________________________________________________ 195
5.3
The use of filters to measure thin plastic __________________________________________ 196
5.4
Moisture control in paper mills _________________________________________________ 199
5.5
Refractory control____________________________________________________________ 200
5.6
Controlling the levels in silos and tanks __________________________________________ 202
5.7
Checking of steam traps _______________________________________________________ 206
5.8
Research of corrosion under insulation ___________________________________________ 212
5.9
Temperature control on moulds ________________________________________________ 215
5.10
Control of fibreglass boats _____________________________________________________ 216
5.11
Various applications __________________________________________________________ 222
2
1. THE PHYSICAL LAWS OF REFERENCE This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44 1.1
Heat and temperature
Heat is a form of energy that is transferred between two bodies, or between two parts of the same body, that are found in different thermal conditions. Heat is therefore energy in transit then: it always flows from the points at higher temperature to those at a lower temperature, until a thermal equilibrium is reached, that is, until the two bodies reach the same temperature. Heat is measured in joules (J). Temperature, however, is an index of molecular agitation.
1.2
Conduction: Fourier's law
Heat conduction occurs between bodies at different temperatures, in direct contact with each other (fig. 1.1). The ability of a means to enable heat to flow is determined by its thermal conductivity k. The heat flows from high to low temperature The thermal resistance (R Thermal) is given by the unit of distance (L) divided by the thermal conductivity (K) (R Thermal = (T1 – T2)A/Q = L/K) (R Electric = V1 – V2/I)
Fig.1.1: heat conduction in a solid
Thermal conduction follows Fourier's Law: Φ=
Q k ∗ ( T i − T e) = A L
where: • Q/A is the heat flow [W/m2]; • k (or λ) Is the thermal conductivity [W/(m °C)]; • L is the thickness of the material relative to the direction of heat [m]; • Ti and Te are the inside and outside surface temperatures [°C or K], for example, if the body conducts heat from the inside warm surface to the outside cold surface. 4
A body is considered a good conductor when the thermal conductivity k is high. Air is a good insulator while water is not. Therefore if an insulation material that covers a wall absorbs water, its conductivity increases, increasing heat dispersions. The best thermal conductors are metals. The table in fig. 1.2 shows a number 2
Material
λ at 20°C (W/m Material °C) Steel with 5% Ni 29 Cast iron Steel with 30% Ni 105 Graphite Water (still liquid at 20°C) 0.63 Granite Heavy water 10÷100°C 0.56÷0,65 Lime plaster and gypsum Aluminum 206 Glass wool Still air 0.03 Spruce and pine wood Silver 420 Oak wood Asphalt 0.64 Linoleum Dry concrete 0.81 Marble Wet concrete 1.39 Solid dry bricks Cardboard 0.14÷0,23 Hollow dry bricks Plasterboard panels 0.21 Stone masonry Natural rubber 0.13÷0,23 Sandstone Celluloid 0.35 Compact limestone Compressed cellulose 0.24 Polystyrene Powdered cement 0.070 Dry sand Electrolytic iron 87 Wet sand Gypsum 0.39 Expanded cork Ice 2.20÷2.50 Common glass Fig. 1.2 - thermal conductivity (k) values of common materials
λ at 20°C (W/m °C) 50 4.9 3.13÷4,06 0.81 0.04÷0,05 0.13÷0,16 0.18 0.19 2.1÷3,5 0.46÷0,7 0.35÷0,81 1.39÷2,9 1.28÷1,74 0.7 0.03 0.32 1.16÷1,74 0.04 1÷2
2
Length L of the path of heat through the material influences the flow of heat: good thermal insulation is not therefore simply achieved with a material with a low k but also with the consistent thicknesses: the lower the heat dispersion the higher the thickness of the material. In summary: • the ratio k/L is defined thermal conductance and is measured in W·°C−1·m−2; •
the ratio L/k is defined thermal resistance R of the material, measured in W-1·°C*m 2;
•
total transmittance U, measured in W·°C-1·m−2, is the sum of the inverse of thermal resistance R with the superficial conductance resistances αi and αe (see paragraph 1.2.2).
EXAMPLE: 5 kW of heat are conducted by a wall which is 515° C through a surface of area 10 m², thickness 10 cm and thermal conductivity 0,3 W/mK. What is the temperature on the other side of the wall? Q = deltaT/R ⇒ delta T = Q*R = Q (L/kS) = 5000 Watt (0,1 m/(0,3 Watt*m*-1°C-1*10 m2)) = 166,7 °C Tcold = Twarm - deltaT = (515-166,7)°C = 348,3°C If a wall is composed of several layers of materials with different thermal conductivities, k1, k2, ..., kn having respective thicknesses s1, s2, ... sn, its total transmittance is: U = 1/Rtot = 1/(1/αi + s1/k1 + s2/k2 + …. sn/kn + 1/αe)sn/kn + 1/αe)
5
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
Fig. 1.25 – polar diagram of emissivity for non-metallic materials
For metals, the angular variation of emissivity can show the opposite behaviour, but with more limited variations and contained in the low values of these materials: note that in fig. 1.26 the diagram scale is different from the previous one. For example the emissivity of polished chrome (used for radiation screens) increases with the angle of emission, passing from 0.04 for an angle perpendicular to 0.14 to 80° from the normal to the surface.
Nickel - shiny Nickel - opaque
Fig. 1.26 – polar diagram of emissivity for polished metals
This may mean that within the same thermographic image, the points, shot with a lower angle, appear at temperatures other than those taken with a wider angle. In the example of the image in fig. 1.27, the surface of photovoltaic panels is warmer than the environment and the emissivity of their glass surface• falls with an increase in the angle of shooting (as for building and insulating materials), lower panels appears hotter than upper panels because their emissivity is greater (the angle between the shooting direction B of upper panels is greater than shooting of lower panels A). This creates the diversity of apparent temperature in photovoltaic modules of the image in fig. 1.27, with upper modules which seem colder than lower ones.
27
Figure 1.27 – points A and B are in the same image with different angle with respect to the perpendicular
Another factor that influences emissivity is the shape of the material: holes and concave forms cause multiple reflections of the radiation inside them and therefore an increase of emissivity. See images 1.28 in the image left, the body is warmer than the environment, in the image to the right it is cooler, but because of its low emissivity, the surface of the body appears in both cases to be at ambient temperature. The holes instead, because of their greater emissivity, better "reveal" the real body temperature. Note that the deeper holes have greater emissivity than those that are less deep.
Figure 1.28: influence of shape on emissivity – Images courtesy of Reidar Gustafsson
28
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
3. THERMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT As the thermal imaging camera measures a radiance Em which is the sum of the energy emitted (Ee), reflected (Er ) and eventually transmitted (Et) by the object (if it is not opaque), to determine the temperature of the object it is necessary (paragraph 2.1.4): •
to subtract from the total energy measured (Em) parts Er and Et to obtain the sole energy emitted, which is the only one able to provide information on the actual temperature of the object: Ee = Em – Er – Et
•
to divide the energy emitted for the emissivity ε of the surface of the object in order to understand which energy a black-body emits (Ecn) that is at the same temperature of the object (and within the same range of wavelength of the thermal imaging camera, where the real object is assumed to be grey):
Ecn = Ee / ε Only once these steps have been addressed is the thermal imaging camera able, by using the stored calibration curve it contains, to derive the temperature of the object. The calibration curve, as it is obtained in the laboratory, refers to a black-body, which does not reflect or transmit energy and has ε = 1: for this reason, it is necessary to determine the energy emitted by a black-body at the same temperature of the object, eliminating the reflected and transmitted components.
3.1
Measurement of emissivity
There are 5 methods to evaluate emissivity: 1. using standard values (the simplest but least reliable method): - organic materials have values of between 0.85 and 0.95 approximately - metals have very variable emissivity: generally low for shiny metals and high for those that are oxidised and painted 2. using emissivity tables with values reported depending on the wavelength 3. estimating the emissivity from similar objects and searching for a representative sample of them 4. locally modifying the emissivity of the object with known emissivity finishes (good procedure), for example, insulating tape, paint or sprays (all methods that bring the emissivity to approximately ε = 0.96≈0.98) 5. measuring the emissivity using standard procedures (eg. ASTM E-1933). 77
In the following, we will examine the methods for measuring the emissivity of an object. All the methods require contact with the object and involve modification of the object's temperature to at least 10°C above ambient temperature to be more reliable (the measurement of a body that is colder than the environment is most affected by reflected radiation and is therefore more uncertain). As the emissivity also depends on the temperature (see section 1.15.3), the methods determine the emissivity of the object at the temperature at which it is brought for measurement: if in the situation of actual measurement the object is found to be at a different temperature, its emissivity may also be different. In addition, the emissivity found experimentally also depends on the make and model of the thermal imaging camera used in the test (due to the different wavelength at which several thermal imaging cameras work even if for example it involves 2 models of thermal imaging cameras operating in the LW), and also for several measurements made with the same thermal imaging camera: in fact each measurement consists of 2 measurements (of the reflected temperature and of the object), each affected by random uncertainties. In the procedures defined by the ASTM E-1933 American Standard, the material required for the test is as follows: 1. a controlled environment, with uniform radiant temperature (walls at the same temperature, for example, air-conditioned room) and without air currents that might produce convective effects 2. calibrated thermal imaging camera with the possibility of setting emissivity and reflected temperature 3. a diffuse reflector of infrared radiation (see 3.2.2) 4. a system of heating the object to at least 20°C above ambient temperature 5. a system to bring locally the emissivity of the object to a value that is higher and known, for the procedure defined in paragraph 3.1.1 6. a calibrated contact thermometer (e.g. thermocouple), for the procedure defined in paragraph 3.1.2. In the following paragraphs 3.1.1 and 3.1.2, for performing steps 3, 4 and 5 it is recommended to read paragraph 3.2.2.
3.1.1
Technique using marker of known emissivity
The method of measurement of the emissivity with the marker with known emissivity required by ASTM E-1933 includes the following steps (fig. 3.1): 1. uniformly heat the object up to a temperature of at least 20°C higher than the ambient temperature and maintain it at a constant temperature 2. position the thermal imaging camera at the desired distance from the object, focussing on the area where the emissivity of the object to be measured 3. ensure the diffuse reflector is parallel to the object (see 3.2.2) 4. set the emissivity = 1 in the thermal imaging camera 78
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
3.2
Techniques for measurement of reflected temperature
The term "reflected temperature" refers to the radiation coming from other solid objects of the thermal scene that the object to be measured reflects towards the thermal imaging camera. In this sense the term "temperature" is improper: in fact it is a radiation. We use the term "reflected temperature" because in its measurement the thermal imaging camera converts radiation into apparent temperatures. In this sense, the "reflected temperature" is not a real temperature, but an apparent temperature, measured with the thermal imaging camera setting a value ε = 1. In the following, reference will then be made to "apparent reflected apparent temperature" or RAT. Why is the emissivity set to 1 for measurement of the RAT? The aim of measuring the RAT is to find the amount of radiation that does not come from the object but that it reflects towards the thermal imaging camera, in order to be able to exclude it from the total radiance measured and therefore to be able to determine the actual radiation emitted by the object and thus, knowing the emissivity, its temperature. Internally, the thermal imaging camera has a calibration curve that relates the measured irradiation unit (IU) with the temperature of the black-body used in the laboratory. The calibration curve is then referred to apparent temperatures (having black-body emissivity equal to 1) and from an object that does not cause reflections. In measurements on real objects (outside the laboratory), the radiance coming from the objects always presents a reflected component, which must be measured and excluded from the measurement. In measuring the RAT, the real "reflected temperature" is not relevant but an "apparent reflected temperature" from which, by means of the calibration curve, the reflected radiation to be subtracted from the total one measured is deduced. Fig. 3.7 clarifies the difference between the laboratory situation and the real situation: example 1 above shows the desired situation in the laboratory during calibration of the imager, with uniform radiant temperatures of all the walls. The figure below shows an example of the situation of actual measurement, which is much more complicated, with bodies at different temperatures that cause thermal reflections of different entities on the object to be measured.
84
Fig. 3.7 - example of a situation of laboratory (1) and real (2) measurement
The ASTM E-1862 standard and the ISO 18434-1 standard show the procedures for the measurement of RAT. 3.2.1
Direct technique
The "direct technique" for measuring the RAT required by the ASTM E-1862 standard involves 2 phases which correspond to the following steps. Phase 1 (fig. 3.8): You decide from which angle to shoot the object and the angle between the perpendicular to the object and the thermal imaging camera is evaluated
Fig. 3.8 - phase 1 of the determination of the RAT using the direct method
85
Phase 2 (fig. 3.9): 1. The thermal imaging camera is pointed at the object with specular angle compared to that of shooting (with angle equal to that evaluated in phase 1) and directed towards the source of radiation reflected 2. The emissivity is set to 1 and the lens is focused as if to measure the nearest object (focus of 0) 3. A thermal image of the background is taken and stored: the average apparent temperature over the whole image represents the RAT.
Fig. 3.9 - phase 2 of the determination of the RAT using the direct method
Repeat phases 1 and 2 at least 3 times. The arithmetic mean of the average values of each image of the RAT measured is the value to be set in the thermal imaging camera. In the image of fig. 3.10 shooting with focus at 0, the average RAT is 26.3°C. In the direct method the optical focus is set to 0 to capture as wide an area as possible.
Fig.3.10 - Blurred thermography of the background with frame over the entire image to assess the RAT
86
particular, if the wind direction is perpendicular to the wires, the cooling effect is greater, with a sensitive variation of temperature when the wind speed increases from 1 m/sec to 4 m/sec. The table in fig. 4.5 shows an example of correction coefficients of variations of temperature on a horizontal surface (other surfaces exhibit different coefficients). For example, if two points on the surface have a ∆T of 5 K with wind of 5 m/s (corresponding to a 2.06 correction coefficient), with absence of wind, the ∆T rises to 5 K • 2.06 = 10.3 K.
Wind speed
Correction factor
m/s
km/h
<1
<3.6
1.00
2
7.2
1.36
3
10.8
1.64
4
14.4
1.86
5
18.0
2.06
6
21.6
2.23
7
25.2
2.40
8
28.8
2.50
figure 4.5 – table of correction factor to be applied to the T on a flat surface – source: Kaplan
For an electrical system, the condition of wind absence is worse, as convective cooling not being present, the temperature increase is greater; for this reason, in electrical substations where electric power is changed in voltage, and generally in systems located outside, failures rarely take place in the presence of wind but occur as soon as the wind calms down. In any case, it is advisable, for outdoor surveys to have both a thermometer an anemometer to document the weather conditions at the time of measurement.
4.2.6
The influence of the sun
Surveys can be affected by solar radiation: solar absorption causes a generalized increase in temperature and therefore "flattens" their differences between the components, making the identification of anomalies more difficult. In the images 4.6 it is possible to see an actual fault in the absence of solar radiation (left - ∆T = 24 K) and during irradiation (right – ∆T = 15 K), making it more difficult to recognise.
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
116
Fig. 4.6 – influence on DT of the solar absorption: (a): night – (b): day
In the image 4.7 we see in (a) a false anomaly caused by a solar flare, in (b) its reading with a sensitive camera in the SW, while in (c) the same reflection is seen with a sensitive camera in the LW. There is confirmation that the LW is less sensitive than SW to solar flares as it reads an apparent temperature that is lower than the SW.
Fig. 4.7 – Solar reflection and apparent temperature with SW and LW camera.
4.3 4.3.1
Typical thermal anomalies in electrical installations Impairment of connections
In electrical installations, to ensure continuity of the passage of current, the conductors are connected to each other and to the other components, with mechanical joints. Examples of electrical connections are the junction of terminals of conductors to receivers with screws or welding, clamps, pressure contacts, etc. Some connections may be visible, such as the terminal from the side of the load on a single-phase switch, others hidden inside a component, for example a contactor or a three-phase switch, or in power contacts of an electric motor.
117
power absorbed is all active power. In circuits with utilities that contain coils such as motors, welding machines, power supply units of fluorescent lamps and transformers, a part of the power absorbed is committed to excite magnetic circuits and is therefore not used as active power but as power usually called reactive power. In industrial facilities, most loads consist of motors and transformers that generate a magnetic field, which "lower" voltage and current causing the production of reactive energy (expressed in kVARh). The only "useful" power (able to transform electrical energy in mechanical work) is active power. Reactive power, can not only be transformed into mechanical work but also causes the transit into the network of inductive current. This inductive current causes a decrease in the transport capacity of "useful energy" from the cable as (if we assimilate the cord to a hypothetical pipe) its presence "steals" space from a certain amount of active energy. Inductive-reactive power therefore constitutes an additional load for generators, transformers and transmission and distribution lines, committing the energy supplier to oversize its generators at the expense of efficiency and also causing a greater drop in line voltage which translates into further active power losses. To work around this problem, capacitor batteries are inserted in parallel to the motors of the capacitors (capacitive loads) that counteract the effect of the inductive loads, aiming to bring into "phase" both voltage and current. For this reason it is called "power factor correction". For low voltage installations and with committed power greater than 15 kW, Italian regulations set the following: • when the average monthly power factor is less than 0.7, the user is obligated to subject the plant to power factor correction.
4.8
•
when the average monthly power factor is between 0.7 and 0.9, there is no obligation to correct the plant but the user pays a penalty for the reactive energy.
•
when the average monthly power factor is greater than 1 and less than 0.9, there is no obligation for power factor correction and no reactive energy fee is payable.
Criteria for assessing the seriousness of anomalies
In the USA the NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency) adopted the NFPA 70B: Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance recognising thermography as a valid technique for fire prevention of electrical origin. Thermographic surveys for electrical and industrial installations are a condition monitoring technique: periodic inspections to determine the operational status of the system or of the machine and the planning of actions depending on the severity of the problems identified. Condition maintenance is a technology suitable for complex systems such as industrial ones that involve not only intrinsic aspects of the system itself but also all the related issues (cost and time of intervention, availability of spare parts, economic damage due to stopping of production, safety and fire hazards, etc.). For condition maintenance, it is critical to have quantitative parameters, to monitor trends over time of these parameters and to have priority criteria for interventions.
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
149
Thermography is used not only to prevent catastrophic events but is especially useful as predictive maintenance to avoid plant stoppages that would cause interruptions of production with much more expensive consequences than simple repair of the fault. In Italy, ENEL has for many years recognised the effectiveness of thermography and has an operating procedure for thermographic surveys of transformation cabins and substations to prevent blackouts. It is essential to carry out the survey in the presence of adequate current load (the foreign technical standards, that are not unique, refer to 30%, 40% or 50% of the nominal load) to be sure that the thermal anomalies occur with temperature changes that are easily detectable and uniquely interpretable. The foreign technical standards have different criteria for assessing the gravity of an electrical anomaly: these are always related to its temperature. This can be "equivalent temperature" or the temperature difference between the component and the temperature of the air, or between the temperature difference between the component and a similar component that is in the same operating conditions.
4.8.1
Anomaly indices based on the correct temperature of the component
This criterion is based on the component temperature at full load at a fixed ambient temperature. To determine if the temperature of the component, thermographically detected, is less than that tolerable, two methods are used. To apply this, you need to know: • the thermal conductivity: if the fault is very high, it may dissipate heat efficiently by conduction towards other components. For this reason, certain standards allow in this case application of the lowest values of 2 to the exponent of which the current value is elevated in the formula of the Joule effect (section 4.2.1); in the absence of information, with the aim of operating safely, thermal conductivity is not considered and 2 is always applied as exponent •
the temperature at the maximum full load that can be tolerated by the component in question, and the relevant reference temperature to which it refers.
•
the maximum load
•
the load at the time of the inspection (e.g. measuring it by means of an amperometric clamp)
•
the ambient temperature at the time of the inspection (for method 2)
•
the reference ambient temperature (for method 2).
Method 1: for multiphase systems where the current is the same at every phase The temperature difference of the phase with the anomaly is evaluated using the formula:
∆T ∆
calculated
= ∆T ∆ phase x (Ifull load /Imeasured )2
150
Application example: during a thermographic survey on 3 electric cables with load of 30 A, a temperature is recorded with the thermal imaging camera that is 3°C higher than the others on the contract of one of these. The full load current is 100 A. A full load ∆Tcalculated is:
∆Tcalculated = 3°C 3° x (100 / 30)2 = 33°C The severity of the fault is evaluated “red” according to the table in fig. 4.51. Recommended action Possible fault, keep under observation Probable fault: verify as soon as possible Fault to be repaired immediately
∆Τ χcalculated (°C) at full load current χ <5 5 – 30 > 30
Fig. 4.51 – classification of the severity of the anomalies with method 1 of the corrected temperature
Method 2: for single-phase systems, for multiphase systems, in which the current is different at each phase, or whether it is necessary to evaluate whether the maximum overtemperature can be exceeded The maximum overtemperature is evaluated with the formula:
T correct = Tambient + (T full load - T
reference ambient
) (I measured / Ifull load )2
The Tcorrect is the "baseline" of a conductor with a thermal behaviour that is within the manufacturer's specifications, with the current and the ambient temperature present at the moment of thermographic inspection. If the Tmeasured is greater than Tcorrect, the component must be considered as being in fault phase. Application example: according to the standard EN 60439-1, the maximum operating temperature in normal operation for an EPR rubber cable is 90°C (reference temperature of 30°C): Cable type
Insulation class
PVC and non-reticulated polyethylene XLPE or EPR rubber
70°C 90°C
During a thermographic inspection, on the connection terminal stretch of the cable, with rated current of 100 A, a temperature of 31°C was detected. The ambient temperature measured is 20°C and the load at the time of the inspection was measured as being 30 A. Applying (3) and assuming an exponent N=2 we have: T
corrected
= 20°C (90-30)* (30/100)
2
= 25.4°C
By comparing the Tmeasured of 31°C with Tcorrected of 25,4°C we see that it is greater by approximately 5.6°C and therefore there is an abnormality. Therefore both the ambient temperature and the current affect the temperature of a component; the current is more important because the heat produced is proportional to the square of the circulating current. It is therefore essential to know the current at the time of the survey and this must be present consistently long enough to stabilise the temperature of the component. The time it takes for a constant flow of current to make the temperature of a component stationary depends on the thermal capacity of the latter and on other factors, sometimes up to one hour, but for low components of low mass, 15 or 30 minutes is sufficient. Typically, the full load condition will increase the magnitude of the problem if the measurement is carried out directly or if the area where the abnormality is present is directly visible to the thermal imaging camera. However, if the 151
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
5. THERMOGRAPHY APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS 5.1
Measurement of the temperature of heat exchanger pipes in furnaces
Measurement of the temperature of heat exchangers in furnaces is one of the most difficult thermographic applications because: •
• •
the temperature of the pipes, while very high, is lower than the internal temperature of the walls of the furnace (which is the reflected temperature during measurement of tubes): essentially you are then trying to measure a cold object in a hot environment there is the problem of radiation absorption due to the presence of combustion gases inside furnace, which preferably requires a MW camera with 3.9 micron filter there is uncertainty regarding the emissivity value of the pipes.
However, it involves a valid application, also from a qualitative perspective (i.e. without a correct temperature measurement), due to the economic importance of these systems and the consequences for safety in the event of faults with them. The thermographic images provide information on areas of overheating, on the thermal imbalances and on the areas of formation of deposit deposits inside (called coke) and outside (called scale) of the pipe surfaces. Corrective actions taken as a result of the thermographic survey aim to achieve heating of the product that is as regular as possible. The thermographic method of inspecting refinery furnace pipes therefore allows correction of the effects of non-uniform flow and thus the opportunity to act in the presence of combustion problems by correctly adjusting the fuel ratios and optimizing the thermal load of the furnace (increasing or decreasing the heating). Most surveys on furnaces are conducted when the entire internal area of the furnace present neutral or negative pressure difference conditions relative to the outside such that the external air is sucked back inside and especially resulting in a situation where the products of combustion cannot be expelled outwards towards the thermographer, who "peeks" inside through a spy hole. Stringent safety procedures and preliminary meetings are necessary to ensure that the internal pressure of the furnace is never positive during the thermographic survey. Certain thermal imaging cameras that can be used in high temperature applications such as surveys in furnaces are equipped with a lens temperature measurement function that warns the operator when the lens is at the maximum temperature that it is able to withstand: Germanium lenses can become almost opaque at high temperatures.
5.1.1 Introduction Petrochemical furnaces are heat exchangers where the energy developed by the combustion of gas or oil is transferred to the circulating fluid in the internal pipes. The fluid has a known inlet temperature and its outgoing temperature must be such as to meet the demands of the industrial process downstream of the furnace. Energy losses, compared to the total heat developed by combustion, mainly occur in exhaust gases and through the walls of the furnace.
187
Fig. 5.1 – diagram of the operation of a furnace with heat exchanger
Many furnaces have a radiant section in the lower area and a convection section in the upper area, which correspond to the major modes of heat transfer in the respective positions (fig. 5.1). Radiant exchange is the most important one and, as such, the thermovector fluid comes from above, first the absorbs heat from the exhaust gases in the convection section (preheating) and then moves downwards to warm up to higher temperatures in the radiant section. The pipes of the heat exchanger must possess a high level of thermal conductivity (to maximise the heat exchange) and high resistance to temperature and pressure, and consist of special steel alloys. From the point of view of thermography, it is not important to know the exact chemical composition of steel but the radiative characteristics (to radiate energy towards the thermal imaging camera) and the absorptive characteristics (that enable the absorption of heat from the flames) of the surface of the pipe. The pipes often have an oxide "skin" when they are installed and show evidence of dirt and/or oxidation shortly after the start of their operation. The image in fig. 5.2 shows a thermographic image of pipes that have just been cleaned.
Pipes Fig. 5.2 – pipes just cleaned without significant abnormalities – source: eng. Ugo Giosafatto
[email protected]
188
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
Fig. 5.15 - paper reel wet section due to a water leak in the process – source: www.fluke.it
Image 5.16 shows a leak from a paper drying coil which causes a strip of moisture in the paper and deceleration of the rollers resulting in reduced production.
Image 5.16 - loss from drying coil – source: Robin Thon
Other parts of the system that can be controlled are the drying pump motors (similar to electric motors - see paragraph 4.9) and the paper dragging gear train units, identifying those that due to friction heat up excessively and intervening before the faults.
5.5
Refractory control
The thermographic inspection of tanks and pipes insulated with refractory material is a common and relatively simple application: the heat source is within the system and the lack of insulation is visible from the outside as a warmer area compared to the integral part. It is useful to perform periodic inspections of the refractory material and not just before a scheduled replacement. Periodic controls enable optimisation of the residual life of the refractory material only restoring it when necessary or avoiding catastrophic events when collapse of the refractory material occurs before the period envisaged. In fact a premature failure is not comparable to a failure of a motor or of an electric component (which can be easily replaced or repaired) but requires a total downtime of the system for a considerable period. The refractory material acts as a thermal protection of the steel shell (which would not be able to withstand the internal temperatures) in addition to containing the process heat. During operation of 200
the system, it is subjected to high thermal stress which also involves cycles of expansion and contraction, as well as internal pressures. If the receptacle or conduit is under pressure, the temperature resistance of the metal suffers and falls considerably. While for electrical systems, the survey must be carried out with as high a load as possible and in order to localise the weaknesses of a refractory lining, it is advisable to conduct the survey during the initial heating of the container. At this stage the refractory has not expanded and it is easier to identify fractures and cracks, as when instead the internal temperature has reached the maximum, they are not visible because the increase in volume has reduced considerably. See the images in fig. 5.17 where the image on the left was taken in the initial phase of heating and the image on the right when it is at full operation. The image on the left shows a refractory problem in the upper area that remains visible in the image to the right, and it will be a weak point in the future.
Fig. 5.17 – Refractory control during the heating phase – source: Sonny James – www.tdlir.com – www.learnndt.com
Often economic considerations can force postponing of the replacement of the refractory at critical points and it is therefore necessary to arrange localised cooling of the area with emergency resources such as water. If a tank or a duct has an inner structural system, this may result in thermal bridges that are visible from the outside, which should not be confused with abnormal areas. It is however necessary to systematically inspect all the visible areas as even if the refractory failure usually takes place at weak points such as curves, corners, welds, openings, there may be abnormalities in unexpected areas. It is therefore advisable to perform a preliminary visual investigation to ascertain whether there are areas that are difficult or dangerous to access. In the production of concrete, cylindrical rotary kilns are used where reactions take place through which the "unprocessed" flour is transformed into clinker. The rotary furnace is a metal cylinder clad on the inside in refractory material. During firing, the furnace rotates on its axis and gentle tipping allows advancement of the material in firing that enters the upper part, while upon discharge, the burner and its flame (powered by coal, heavy oil, are found with possible additions of alternative fuels). During this movement the firing material is transformed from its initial state to the so-called "clinkerised" state at a temperature of 1450°C. This process lends itself excellently to thermographic survey to detect the degradation of refractory areas (image 5.18).
201
Fig. 5.35 – installation of the thermal imaging camera on a tripod in front of the mould to be monitored – source: www.saige.it
Below (images in fig. 5.36) can be seen the extract from a sequence of images of the heating of a mould with a diameter of 800 mm for the creation of an anti seismic support in plastic, referred to in the previous images.
Fig. 5.36- extract of a sequence of images on a thermal transient that lasted over12 hours – source: www.saige.it
This is a limited preview of the book. You can buy the whole 226 pages book at:
5.10 Control of fibreglass boats 5.10.1
http://www.saige.it/Details.aspx?id=44
General information on materials and on the production process
Fibreglass is a composite material. Composite materials are part of the family of hybrid materials, and are made of materials with different phases and consequent interfaces to obtain properties that cannot be achieved with individual constituents. 216
Fibreglass is made from glass fibre strands applied in crossed layers that are distributed by infusing them with constituted resin usually from a solution of polyester in a monomer (styrene). The monomer in the presence of a catalyst and an accelerant, forms with the polyester chain a three-dimensional lattice (polymerisation) with passage of the resin from the liquid state to the solid state. To improve the quality of the interface between the glass fibres and the resin, it is necessary to improve the chemical compatibility between the 2 materials, thus the fibres may be treated with coatings (called finishes). Another secondary material used in the production process of fibreglass hulls is "gelcoat ", a varnish composed of organic macromolecules (polyester or pigmented epoxy resins) that are spread for staining and protection of the mould. The realisation of a fibre-glass hull involves the following steps: • the creation of a precise and solid wooden model •
treatment of the model with "gelcoat", sanding and polishing, following treatment with wax release agents to promote the detachment and the subsequent moulding which will be performed over this.
•
the spreading of a further layer of gelcoat for moulds, drying, and start of the deposition of the cross-sheeting of glass fibre in increasing weight with their impregnation with resin and the use of rollers to ensure their perfect grip and to remove air bubbles
•
insertion into the mould, with mesh network design, of structural stiffening elements in expanded polyurethane or wood, and metal plates for the fixing of the support frame
•
removal of the mould from the wooden model and its finish with gelcoat of the thickness from 0.5 to 0.8 mm: a thickness that is too low would not complete polymerisation of the resin and would not guarantee adequate coverage of the surface; high and poorly distributed thickness could encourage the formation of cracks or deformations due to differing polymerisation times
•
start of the production process of the actual artefact from the treated surface of the mould: the glass fibre MAT must be adhered to the resin surface to remove the air bubbles trapped in the resin, which would then promote the emergence of pockets by osmosis (blistering)
•
internal strengthening of the artefact with reinforcement elements in foam or wood and the insertion of structural bulkheads (marine plywood panels inserted in a perpendicular form to the major axis of the hull)
•
removal of the product from the mould and its completion with the cover and superstructure.
The thermal image in fig. 5.37 shows the boat's reinforcement structure:
Fig. 5.37: thermal image of fibreglass hull-source: www.saige.it
217