How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

1 of 29

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5740-how-move-mountains-leedskalnin-style...

User Name

Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy

How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style Homepage

Energetic Science Ministries

Register

Remember Me?

Password FAQ

Calendar

Today's Posts

Search

My Blog

Profiles

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > Last » LinkBack 05-21-2010, 01:42 AM

remelic Junior Member

Thread Tools #1 (permalink)

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 26


By Peter Shushmaruk ©2010 April 1, Shushmaruk Ltd. Where to begin, Prerequisite: If you want to understand what I'm talking about and you have never heard of the Coral Castle or Edward Leedskalnin, please do some research specifically about Magnetic Currents. This book will explain almost everything I have to say with experimentation. Ill begin by explaining the Perpetual Motion Holder quickly for clarity in case you are rusty on your Edward. Here is a picture

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


2 of 29


of Ed's own PMH (He had many). This is a very interesting device. Ed's PMH There are two coils on either side that are connected together to form a continuous loop. The coil on the left we will call the positive and the coil on the right we will call the negative. The beginning of the positive is connected to the end of the negative and the beginning of the negative is connected to the end of the positive. Ed has added two terminals, one is connected to the positive coil and the other is connected to the negative coil. These terminals are used to charge the PMH like a capacitor *except this one does not discharge when it gets full. The bar across the bottom is not physically connected in any way. It is only after you charge the PMH that this bar becomes magnetized to the 'U'. It is basically the light switch of the system. When the bar is on, the switch is on. When the bar is off, so is the PMH. When you charge the PMH using a car battery, you connect the negative to the negative of the car battery and when you connect the positives, you only need to make the connection for a second and then disconnect the battery. You can repeat this if you want but the PMH is already charged. The PMH will remain magnetized (charged) for an indefinite amount of time and will only discharge when the bar across the bottom is pulled off manually. This has been experimented on by Edward. According to him, he left one for several months before discharging it without loss of energy. The discharge is then released back out the coils as energy and you can see it by connecting a light-bulb to the ends of the leads before pulling the crossbar. The light will flash. Video Demonstration Ok, once you really understand that, lets move on to Ed's “Generator”... Magnets Setup: (Stacked five high)

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


3 of 29


Here is the magnetic polarity of the magnets used in Ed's flywheel. This pushes all the magnetic fields away from each other squeezing them into small pockets. This is also the reason for having them stacked five-high is so the middle magnetic field becomes compressed and multiplies in strength. Magnets with Vertical bolts and magnet strength Then with the addition of the vertical bolts, which are not primarily for support, are for the generation of a vertical field and to shape the magnetic field into a 3D pyramid over the flywheel. The eight bolts around the outside, that are inside the 'V' are used to draw in the magnetic field to limit its strength of the magnets they are in. The Four bolts on the inside are placed on the outside, between two 'Vs', to draw most of their magnetic field into the bolt. These twelve bolts are magnetized by induction from the 'Vs' and help to produce a vertical field above the flywheel as it is rotating. Magnetic Flywheel With Gates.

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


4 of 29


The iron plates that are shaped like semi-circles, on top of the flywheel are used to help shape the vertical magnetic field into a vortex as it is spinning. They attract the vertical magnetic fields and make magnetic “gates” that funnel magnets into the flywheel and out the sides. The handle also helps in generating the vertical field. Flywheel showing magnetic pyramid shape Here is an outline of what the magnetic pyramid would look like from the top. The green line is a diagram of the shape of the magnetic field caused by the induction of the bolts that hold it together. Ed working:

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


5 of 29


Here is a picture of Ed showing us how his generator works but he is also showing us something else. Look carefully at the device sitting on the wooden bench because this is the “missing pieces” of the machine. The long bar is showing polarization. *This bar has been aligned 90 degrees to the magnetic field of the Earth. When the flywheel is spinning the strong alternating flux pattern, pushes charged particles to either end of the bar and separates them into usable poles of perfectly balanced energy. One side positive and the other side negative. Two separate flows of energy in opposite directions. It has been coined, "Magneticity," by Edward Leedskalnin. Now look closely, just below that you will see that Ed has placed a chain-link in between two terminals and is using this polarized energy to charge up the chain-link. That's right. Let's take a closer look. Chain Link Setup

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


6 of 29


Here is what it looks like with the flywheel and the “separator” bar. The chain link is being treated like a PMH and he is charging the link up. There is no other reason for him placing a link there in this manner except to charge it up like a PMH. Chain Link Setup Closeup First you must understand that there are two fields involved in magnetism, a B-field and an H-field. When the chain-link is being charged, it generates another field that would normally orbit the link in the shape if a toroid but because there is another chain-link this field is inducted into the 90-degree link with great efficiency. There is no loss of either the b-field or the h-field down the line when they are connected in this way. I cant find the website but someone explained this effect of a chain shape and the efficiency of energy transfer for the links.

I will try to recreate the principles I learned on that website. The picture above shows three examples of how energy is transfered through induction. A) The light is lit but it is very dim because the process of induction is magnetic. The output voltage is very low. B) When there is a loop placed between the gap, there is no loss in voltage and the loop doesn't even need to make contact to transfer the energy. C) You can also put a loop of uninsulated wire across the gap to produce the same results as 'B'. This was the basic concept showing how a chain link structure inducts the magnetic field and transfered the voltage across the gap with 100% efficiency. Edward used this principle and may also be the reason he was able to get more energy out then was required. If you only need to power one field to make two spin then you are releasing two fields worth of energy on discharge.

Let's Continue: Ed's Chain "Crinkling" Above the flywheel the same chain is hanging and is being affected by the vertical field that is being produced and this is evident when you look at how the magnetic-field is causing the links to attract each other. So in essence he created a pole in the chain above the flywheel and this caused the magnetic energy to be pulled through the chain saturating it with magnetic energy. The longer the chain the more magnets he could collect. The Chain being charged Here is a simple version of what Ed is doing with the chain. He is using the vertical field to pull the magnets through the chain as he charges the horizontal chain link with balanced energy. Ok.... Here is Ed showing us how to collect the magnets, now if we want to use them, we have to separate them first according to Ed. So Ed would have to carry his chain over to the quarry without letting it touch the ground and he didn't use metal in his posts because this would weaken the magnets or discharge them. His A-frame is also wooden so to not interfere with the magnetic

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


7 of 29


energy in the chain. He then climbed up or setup the A-frame with charged block and tackle and connected the chain to the box above the A-frame. Whats in the box? I believe it to be nothing more then Ed's PMH. He put it in a box to keep the weather off the iron. We all know what happens when rain and oxygen meet iron. I think he was just trying to protect it from the weather and it also explains the “mysterious” cables running down the poles. The whole chain is connected to the PMH using the same principles of the 90 degree induction and you can just use winds of wire to connect the two together (The PMH in the box and the magnetized chain). As long as there is a physical connection in the form of a loop at 90 degrees to each other.

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


8 of 29


Then you need to stretch the chain strait so the magnetic energy can flow more efficiently, this is done by connecting the chain to the stone and allowing the natural weight of the stone to help in keeping the chain strait. Then you run your leads down to opposite sides of the stone along the *east and west axis so that the polarity of the leads is negative against the west face and positive against the east face. This matters since you can either cause the stone to weigh more or weigh less depending on the polarity you use. Climb the ladder to the top of the poles and pull the crossbar off to release the magnetic energy through the stone. This will cause all the energy in the chain to be discharged at once instantly through the stone, just like the light-bulb. Ed may have even used wires through the stones for help especially with his 30-ton stone. There is way more detail about this in my book, 'How To Move Mountains... The Ancient Way.' Especially about how he quarried the stone and what the phi-ratio has to do with vibrations in stone, the flywheel, and the ancient connection to it all. Thank you all for being interested.

Peter. For More Information:

http://www.remelic.com *my explanation for this and may be incorrect because of lack of experimentation but I would appreciate anyone willing to confirm this hypothesis in any way. I would appreciate the results.

Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 04:03 PM.

Sponsored Links

First Call Jewel Electric Electrical services Reliable, Fast, Generators, Lighting, Panel, Repair firstcalljewel.com What is Quantum Jumping? Discover Why Thousands of People are "Jumping" to Change Their Life www.QuantumJumping.com Home Generator Systems Affordable Whole House Power by GE! Learn More About Home Generators. www.HomeStandbyGeneratorSystems

05-21-2010, 01:49 AM


#2 (permalink) Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 26

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


9 of 29


It wouldn't let me edit so here is a fixed link http://www.remelic.com Thanks

05-21-2010, 01:59 AM



Experiment

Here is a smaller version of the process that anyone can try to see if it works.

-A PMH, preferably built to Ed's specifications -The size of the stone: 3"D x 4"H x 8"L -The type of stone should be part of the experimentation but try a non-ferrous stone like limestone or a calcite-crystal first. -12-Volt Car Battery -Floating Container like a plastic or glass bowl. Charge up the PMH by tapping the switch on the negative terminal. Then pull the keeper/crossbar off the PMH. The theory is that the water level will change on the container holding the stone. If you reverse the poles you should notice the water level change in the opposite direction. This setup should lighten the stone by using static-discharge or magnetic-discharge? Peter Cheers to Ed.

05-21-2010, 02:00 AM

Xenomorph Senior Member

#4 (permalink) Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 463

Make sure to look into this: gravity waves found

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


10 of 29


05-21-2010, 06:50 AM

Harvey

#5 (permalink) Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,102

Senior Member

Great Job on those Images Peter. So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity? I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do. I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this. Cheers,

05-21-2010, 03:33 PM



Quote:

Originally Posted by Harvey Great Job on those Images Peter. So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity? I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do. I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this. Also, Ed said nothing about it reducing Gravity but he does say he understood gravity. He was obsessed with magnets and

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


11 of 29


according to this source: "A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' " - Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This theory only uses the PMH as its tool. Cheers,

I wouldn't say it has anything to do with gravity but i guess it could if you look at it like that. This is a magnetic effect. Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs.. When you discharge the chain you are discharging equal amounts of neg/pos magnets into the stone adding to its staticcharge and thus reducing it's mass until the stone reaches equilibrium again with its surroundings. This may be a wet dream but I believe in a Magnetic Universe and this is completely possible using magnetic particles as the lifters. Just because something isn't attracted or repelled by magnets does not mean it cannot be affected by them. After-all anything made of Atoms can be altered by magnets and if you have access to the magnetic particles then anything is possible. Peter Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 04:04 PM.

05-21-2010, 03:39 PM



"A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' " Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

05-21-2010, 04:39 PM

#8 (permalink)

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


12 of 29


Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 26


I will be experimenting so I will document the findings either way. If it goes well or not, it may answer other questions that have no relation so it's worth trying. I will keep you posted but don't expect results too soon. Maybe a month or two. Thanks. Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 04:05 PM.

05-21-2010, 07:48 PM

Harvey


Senior Member

Hi Peter, You have quoted me above, but then you have inserted a few lines there in my quote - essentially making it appear that I have said those things whereas I have not. This is a common mistake when quoting posts and is easily corrected. Edit your post and simply remove the lines you have inserted that appear before the '[/quote]' tag and add them after that tag and all will be fixed Best Regards, Harvey

05-21-2010, 08:02 PM



6/1/2011 1:27 PM


13 of 29


Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.

05-21-2010, 11:58 PM

Harvey


Senior Member

Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.

No worries, I understand. As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true. Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it. Cheers, Harvey

Sponsored Links

Chegg ® Textbook Rentals Chegg is #1 in Textbook Rentals! Fast Delivery and Easy Returns www.Chegg.com Air Cooled Induction No Water Cooling Brazing, Soldering, Heated Pipes www.iTherm.com Anti Gravity Cars Big savings on anti gravity cars. 30 day money back guarantee. www.wallcruiser.com

05-22-2010, 12:51 AM

#12 (permalink)

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


14 of 29

Matthew Jones


Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Carolina, USA Posts: 1,267

Senior Member

Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic ....Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs..... Peter Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers. Its the same thing no matter the application. Nice stuff you wrote. Cheers Matt

05-22-2010, 02:07 AM



Quote:

Originally Posted by Harvey No worries, I understand. As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true. Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it. Cheers,

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


15 of 29


Harvey Ah sorry about that again. heh. I just noticed the line I forgot to quote. Quote:

Originally Posted by Harvey I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this. - This line should be quoted by Harvey in post #6.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew Jones Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers. Its the same thing no matter the application. Nice stuff you wrote. Cheers Matt I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it. Last edited by remelic : 05-22-2010 at 03:31 AM.

05-22-2010, 03:19 AM

Matthew Jones

#14 (permalink) Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Carolina, USA Posts: 1,267

Senior Member

Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


16 of 29


I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it. I don't want to argue semantics but... If that were the case it wouldn't pick up rocks. It wouldn't pick up anything. The generator creates negative energy, charges the PMH and the PMH emits an anti gravitational field. The charge come from a combination of magnetic fields. This can't be done with energy in its definition. EMF, Iron Induced magnetism, radiation, or anything the like. This is another beast altogether that is opposite of our understanding. It the same source for the constant acceleration and expansion of the universe. Planetary rotation and so on. And magnetism is not static in any form. Iron induced magnetics have constant rotating fields. If it were static there would be no more effect from the magnetism. One of the primary reasons people have to go over and over with the theory of this whole area of study is do to the semantics that everyone has to come up with every time we have a discussion. New words that could mean anything flying off the shelf as fast as one can imagine them. We have clear and well used definitions for most of this stuff, why can't they be used. Keep it simple, ya know? I apologize for being petty. Matt

05-22-2010, 03:27 AM



Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew Jones I apologize for being petty. No need to apologize, I listen to everyone. I will have to read into Negative Energy more to make a decision. Last edited by remelic : 05-22-2010 at 03:29 AM.

05-22-2010, 01:53 PM

#16 (permalink)

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


17 of 29


SuperCaviTationIstic

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 304

Senior Member

Ed's work seems to be most related to Viktor Schauberger's.... But, I think the pictures in the book The Secret World of Magnets show the link: Spintronics -The Secret World of Magnets (2006 by Howard Johnson) | Scribd It's about spintronics.... Nano magnetic vortexes One pole is implosive, one explosive

05-23-2010, 02:40 PM

Jetijs

#17 (permalink) Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Latvia Posts: 1,963

Senior Member

Hi Peter. I have a question. In your book you write that Eds PMH had aluminum tubes between the coils and the iron rod and the coils were wound on these aluminum tubes and then they would just slide on the U shaped iron rod. Where did you get this info? I have never heard of this. Leedskalning does not mention aluminum anywhere in his book. Also I have doubts that aluminum was easy to get in Eds time. Thanks, Jetijs

05-23-2010, 03:02 PM



Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetijs Hi Peter. I have a question. In your book you write that Eds PMH had aluminum tubes between the coils and the iron rod and

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


18 of 29


the coils were wound on these aluminum tubes and then they would just slide on the U shaped iron rod. Where did you get this info? I have never heard of this. Leedskalning does not mention aluminum anywhere in his book. Also I have doubts that aluminum was easy to get in Eds time. Thanks, Jetijs Good question... He did describe this on page 21 of Magnetic Current: Quote:

Make two spools from brass or aluminum six inches long and big enough for the bar to go in. Thanks Jetijs Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Addition Info.

05-25-2010, 07:14 PM

uusedman Senior Member

#19 (permalink) Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 206

Nice observation. Put it to work. However, nice work.

05-26-2010, 08:20 AM



Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic Good question... He did describe this on page 21 of Magnetic Current: Thanks Jetijs

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


19 of 29


Sorry I meant page 19... He describes how to build the PMH and he does say to use aluminum spools. I believe this has to do with the magnetic flux on the inside of the coil, and preventing direct contact with the iron. Also he needed to remove/reset the coils all the time so he needed a way to do this easily.

05-26-2010, 09:01 AM

#21 (permalink) Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 505

david lambright Senior Member how can you tell?

matt over at leedskalnin.com can tell you that once energized the coil does not even need to be there....at all....how can you tell if they know about Eds "best machine" as he called it..... they will use words like electricity, volts,amps etc.....blinded by electricity .... electricity is a by product of "magnetic current".....Ed did what he said he did.....as soon as i get confirmation that at least 1 [one] person is getting results,from replicating my device, i will post the video showing exactly how he did it....by demonstration, no theory, no computer generated graphics, just doing it........anyway, this saturday may 29 at River Road City Park, Salem, Oregon 97303, United States in the 2900 block....i will be showing my device....it will be interesting............david

Sponsored Links

Magnetic Sheeting Direct sales channel for Visual Magnetics products www.drytac.com Buy Strong Magnets Here

Top Quality Strong Magnets Huge Invertory. Beat Any Prices. www.Magnet4Sale.com

Magnetic Chucks Electromagnetic or Permanent for Sine Plates or Surface Grinders www.subtool.com

05-28-2010, 05:05 PM



Quote:

A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a "perpetual motion holder."

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


20 of 29


-Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This hypotheses only uses the PMH as its tool. Everything I said about how Ed did it does not contradict Ed's own words or photos. Saying he used speakers, or tones, or a strange spinning perpetual motion holder under the stone, does. Nor is their evidence to support these ideas. The way I see Ed, was a man trying to be scientific about his method. His photos and phrases can be taken literally once you see the world the way he did. If you take all his writings as truth you can then place yourself in his mindset and imagine things with the same detail that he did. If you want the resonant frequency of a stone, all you need to do is strike it with a hammer and listen to the stone with a microphone. You can also calculate the frequency by the given speed of sound in the stone and its dimensions. The only thing I could see Ed doing with these vibrations would be to strike the stone (perhaps once on each side) after inducing magnetic current to further align the magnetic domains (like you would to magnetize iron).

05-29-2010, 03:20 AM

leedskalnin Junior Member

#23 (permalink) Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 26

The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included ... Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic -Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This hypotheses only uses the PMH as its tool. Everything I said about how Ed did it does not contradict Ed's own words or photos. Saying he used speakers, or tones, or a strange spinning perpetual motion holder under the stone, does. Nor is their evidence to support these ideas. The way I see Ed, was a man trying to be scientific about his method. His photos and phrases can be taken literally once you see the world the way he did. If you take all his writings as truth you can then place yourself in his mindset and imagine things with the same detail that he did. If you want the resonant frequency of a stone, all you need to do is strike it with a hammer and listen to the stone with a microphone. You can also calculate the frequency by the given speed of sound in the stone and its dimensions. The only thing I could see Ed doing with these vibrations would be to strike the stone (perhaps once on each side) after inducing magnetic current to further align the magnetic domains (like you would to magnetize iron). Thank you Remelic nice thread and Ideas it seams you want to reveal some of the clues.

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


21 of 29


For those who want to know more about how Ed did that I fully recommend this thread: The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included ... The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included, page 1 The thread originator at the nick name of ALLIS0NE shows that he knows more that what he wrote in the thread. For me very nice clues there! Read his posts word by word. Regards Mahdi

05-29-2010, 04:20 AM

Matthew Jones

#24 (permalink) Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Carolina, USA Posts: 1,267

Senior Member

Quote:

The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included ... The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included, page 1 The thread originator at the nick name of ALLIS0NE shows that he knows more that what he wrote in the thread. For me very nice clues there! Read his posts word by word. He only has one problem. If what he says is true a magnet by itself will loose weight or gain weight based on the direction it is pointed down. But they don't. I don't post over there or I would let him know. The Earth is round (Despite what engineering says). The wire is simply pointing towards the pole on a vector that makes it appear it is going down. Remember a compass rotates 360 deg. The apparatus he describes is rotating at 720. He is not wrong about gravity though. It is magnetism we just haven't proven it yet. Though that experiment won't bring you any closer. Matt

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


22 of 29


05-29-2010, 12:12 PM

pha3z Member


Quote:

Originally Posted by david lambright ...anyway, this saturday may 29 at River Road City Park, Salem, Oregon 97303, United States in the 2900 block....i will be showing my device....it will be interesting............david OH MAN!! I just saw this thread today! And I'm all the way over in Missouri! I can't get to Oregon soon enough. I hope there is a video.

05-29-2010, 01:06 PM

mk1 Member

#26 (permalink) Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 72

Hi all I have been thinking and reading about Ed for some time now. Let put my 2 cent , the PMH is quite cool if you think about it it stores amps in a coil ... But once the charge is stored , only removing the keeper will release it . What if we put 2 additional coil and pulse one , what will come out from the other coil , will the stored charge get released or will it just go around ...

Now for the gravity machine , he once said he moved stone like water moved a iron nail . All i get from that is once the nail is rusted out it can be moved by water . Maybe a hint at some type of ferofuilde , use in the bowl ...

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


23 of 29


To me the machine is some emulation of a singularity (sun ,planet , black hole type deal) creating it own gravity ... Some interesting things it seems like could store electrical charge in granite. The glass bottle with coil around it , layden jar ? The fountain is a duplicate of the machine there is 2 horse shoe magnet missing ... Light gravity magnetism ... earth changes polarity from day time to night time , solar winds up going down in the day time , and opposite at night ... This will be fun ... Mark Btw one the picture where ED is turning the wheel look how the chain is crooked Last edited by mk1 : 05-29-2010 at 01:09 PM.

05-29-2010, 01:22 PM

IndianaBoys Senior Member

#27 (permalink) Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 173

MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor

This demonstration video may be relevant: MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor YouTube - MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor Best regards, IndianaBoys

05-30-2010, 05:10 AM

david lambright Senior Member


6/1/2011 1:27 PM


24 of 29


nobody showed... Quote:

Originally Posted by pha3z OH MAN!! I just saw this thread today! And I'm all the way over in Missouri! I can't get to Oregon soon enough. I hope there is a video. no one showed...but my niece saw it for the first time...so it was worth it!!! next saturday...saturday market in salem...the whole block....between summer and winter streets and union and marion streets in salem 9:00am to 3:00pm...i help my mom in law set up her booth there....lots of people! better for sure!....david...plenty of video then......

05-30-2010, 12:25 PM



Quote:

Originally Posted by david lambright no one showed...but my niece saw it for the first time...so it was worth it!!! next saturday...saturday market in salem...the whole block....between summer and winter streets and union and marion streets in salem 9:00am to 3:00pm...i help my mom in law set up her booth there....lots of people! better for sure!....david...plenty of video then......

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


25 of 29


Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found Please, people do some research before blindly following someone. David is making up things left right and center and everyone is eating it up here. The visual presentation is an optical illusions that is created by spinning objects. The light is being REFRACTED not bent. There are many well established physics to model this. Lazy Shadow. I gave a quote from another forum about how the digital camera can create distortions, and someone here asked me "What are his credentials?" and I had to laugh because the person asking me was blindly following someone claiming to "bend" light who hasn't even completed a normal grade 12 education:

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


26 of 29


Quote:

lets play!...refraction....what is causing the light to refract? no theories ...the light is being bent ....we know that part ....is it convection currents causing temperature differences?...are heat/convection causing this refraction? remember..this should be easy for someone of such vast intellect. i have NO formal schooling, [GED]...but what i do have is something you lack...truth ...now hold on,lets do this step by step so the readers can follow..should be easy....what exactly is causing the light to refract? ..choose your answer carefully! this should be easy[you know you are being baited,right?...take your time or blurt it out....it matters not.....there was a man who liked to do "thought experiments"....maybe you do this? i do and i know where this is going........magtricity...thats what Ed would have called it....theriously.........david......and since we are on the SAME subject...what did Eds generator generate? for the readers..........david lol MIT OpenCourseWare | Physics | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 | Home Don't take it from me (even though I've written books about magnetism, studied physics with a university professor of advanced mathematics, and completed university)... Here is a MIT lecture on refraction of light for those who want to learn that light can be REFRACTED by air density changes (such as heat waves), water, etc. Also some people are more sensitive to magnetic fields then others (well witcher) and it is no wonder that some people can feel the pulse from the device. Any spinning magnet causes a spinning magnetic field... who knew? (Nikola Tesla, Edward Leedskalnin, just to name two). This creates a pulse. But I honestly dont have time to argue this point. If you want to believe that "Gravity waves have been found" then go ahead. Just leave it out of this thread. If you want to discuss "Gravity waves" there is a thread for that: gravity waves found Cheers.

05-31-2010, 12:10 AM

david lambright Senior Member


making it up? Quote:

Originally Posted by remelic

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


27 of 29


Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found Please, people do some research before blindly following someone. David is making up things left right and center and everyone is eating it up here. The visual presentation is an optical illusions that is created by spinning objects. The light is being REFRACTED not bent. There are many well established physics to model this. Lazy Shadow. I gave a quote from another forum about how the digital camera can create distortions, and someone here asked me "What are his credentials?" and I had to laugh because the person asking me was blindly following someone claiming to "bend" light who hasn't even completed a normal grade 12 education:

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


28 of 29


lol MIT OpenCourseWare | Physics | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 | Home Don't take it from me (even though I've written books about magnetism, studied physics with a university professor of advanced mathematics, and completed university)... Here is a MIT lecture on refraction of light for those who want to learn that light can be REFRACTED by air density changes (such as heat waves), water, etc. Also some people are more sensitive to magnetic fields then others (well witcher) and it is no wonder that some people can feel the pulse from the device. Any spinning magnet causes a spinning magnetic field... who knew? (Nikola Tesla, Edward Leedskalnin, just to name two). This creates a pulse. But I honestly dont have time to argue this point. If you want to believe that "Gravity waves have been found" then go ahead. Just leave it out of this thread. If you want to discuss "Gravity waves" there is a thread for that: gravity waves found Cheers. so what am i making up?..... and being honest i got my ged in prison.....since when does education matter?.....so what you are saying is; i am less educated than you, this is true...how many discoveries have been made persons with little or no formal education?...[the illustration reminds me of megadeths symphony of destruction... ]...who was it who said "It is a magnetic pulse you are seeing. Magnetism bends light. The generator is only the generator and not responsible at all for the "anti-gravity" effect. It was his tool for drawing in magnetic energy. That is all. No one needs to go anywhere to understand this."...you!....you can bend light with a magnet....how exactly?.....i must admit though, i am glad i never went to "school"..better to learn nothing than to learn falsely.......if it is nothing, it will fall apart...we will see......david

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments

6/1/2011 1:27 PM


29 of 29


Posting Rules You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 PM. Energetic Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved

6/1/2011 1:27 PM

How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

Recommend Documents