Discussion of FRankenstein with its thematic elementsFull description
Full description
Full description
English for academic
RUBRICS DURING PERFORMANCE TASKFull description
Full description
Assignment for ENC 3241
R. C. Cooper CaseFull description
Full description
Full description
A reaction Essay on the life and works of Lee Kuan Yew and its implications in the Philippine Society
Its a essay that to describe the grade that i should gain for Critical Thinking Subject.
Full description
Full description
a critical analysis on the themes on Jane Austen's book, Emma.Full description
Full description
Descripción completa
Critical analysis essay guidelines
Full description
Critical Analysis of Sexism
elc
Insert surname
1
Name Affiliation Date Ethics and Science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Shelley’s Frankenstein Ethics and science have created crea ted a debate in the society with the religion disagreeing with any scientific research that is destructive and morally corruptive Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Shelley’s Frankenstein also addresses the same issue and uses a destructive e!p eriment in human physiology to prove how science can be unethical More specifically" the novel presents #ictor #ictor $ran%enstein" who is an arrogant scientist that is focused on achieving what he wants regardless of the overall outcome In fact" he creates a monster that ends up %illing his family members and friends too &e ends up living a stressful life since he wo nders how he will correct the mista%es that he had already created earlier Mary Shelley cautions the society against ignoring ethics during the scientific advancement" and she provides evidence to support that She proves that some research might have a potential to destroy and morally corrupt the society instead Shelley also believes that human brilliance should be fused with ethics to protect the society from any harm $ran%enstein’s creation is one of the manifestations of scientific advancement that lac%s the ethics that guides the society Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Shelley’s Frankenstein illustrate illustrate that ethics is one of the elements that will act as a limit of the scientific in'uiry in the society and proves that through the inability of $ran%enstein to control the monster after he had created it Mary Shelley shows how $ran%enstein was blinded b y his ambitions and never considered the safety of the society $ran%enstein showed how irresponsible he was" and he never consulted anyone or even considered the morality of the act &e even reveals that (so much has been done" far more will I achieve) treading in the steps already mar%ed" I will pioneer a new
Insert surname
*
way" e!plore un%nown powers" and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation+ ,Shelley" p -./ 0learly" he was focused on his ambitions and creating something e!traordinary but" he never considered the morality of the research Apart Apart from that" anyone that advised him against proceeding with the research was considered as an enemy $or instance" $ran%enstein insists that (the professors’ words enounced to destroy me 2 my soul was gripped by a palpable p alpable enemy+ ,Shelley" p -./ Indeed" his ambitions had blinded him from the morality that should be considered before underta%ing such research In the process" he failed to consider the limit of scientific in'uiry since he wanted to prove the professor and the society wrong 3o some e!tent" he wanted to achieve a divine status" which is totally unethical In fact" such a decision is in contrast to the way the society wor%s since 4o d is the only one with the ability to create beings Instead" he creates the monster" and he fails to nurture it into being a responsible creature ,&ogsette" 5-*/ All in all" Mary Shelley is trying to prove that ethical science is the a ppropriate way to achieve the re'uired advancement 0learly" unethical science has shown that a scientist can wor% on ideas that will even destroy the society if they are not no t controlled &ence" the ethics will be one of the things that will act as a limit to scientific in'uiry" and prioriti6e the safety of the society $ran%enstein insists on the dangers of separating science and the society since it amounts to the scientists lac%ing ethics that everyone should possess 3he novel illustrates how $ran%enstein preferred staying alone and away from the society in the name of intensive research More specifically" $ran%enstein believed li%e the society was a distraction from his research and staying alone was the only way to achieve the perfection he wants &e even insists that (natural philosophy 2 became nearly my sole occupation+ ,Shelley" p 51/ and that too% him away from his family and the entire en tire society In the process" he developed an inhumane
Insert surname
7
personality" and he could not understand what human nature entails $or instance" he believed that human nature was about creation and development but" he forgot about sociali6ation that instills morals in a creature 3he lac% of compassion and morals led to the death of his brother 8illiam 8illiam and his friend &enry Instead" being closer to the society and his family would have given $ran%enstein a chance to understand the sociali6ation and what human nature entails ,9ur%ett" 5:;/ Instead" he could have hav e restrained from creating a creature that lac%s a soul and ended up being a murderer Mary Shelley was vouching for morality since it asserts on the importance of life and the need to obey nature as well &owever" &oweve r" $ran%enstein believed that he had the ability to reanimate other creatures a nd still nurture them into being responsible people in the society &e forgot that morality is an important part of creation and people are supposed to abide by such guidelines &is entire research did not consider the safety and the wellbeing of the society since he did not contemplate con template the dangers of the monster staying in the society ,0ameron" 1:-/ In fact" he destroys the second monster that was supposed to be a partner of the first monster In In this case" he had seen the danger associated with the creatures and he was unwilling to create another one In conclusion" Mary Shelley proves that ethics is one of the elements that will restrict scientific advancement in the society $ran%enstein’s $ran%enstein’s arrogance blinded him from the ethics" and he was only focused on achieving the unreasonable ambitions he had Such ambitions pushed him into creating monsters that turned out to be destructive 9esides that" he even failed to control the same monsters" and he ended ende d up being stressed since it creates more harm h arm than he had e!pected Apart from that" the fact that he had stayed awa y from the society also turned him into being have an inhumane personality that also resulted in the creation of the monster All in all" it is clear that ethics will be important in controlling scientific advancement