Chapter 4-Formation of Contract I Offer “An offer is a definite promise to be bound on specific terms” “An Express or implied statement of the term on which the maker is prepared to be contractually bound if its is accepted unconditionally. The offer may be made to one person, to a class of person or to the world at large, and only the person or one of the person to whom it is made may accept it” Calil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
Influenza
The offer may be made to one person, to a class of persons or to the world at large. Offer cannot be vague
Gunthing v Lynn
Lucky Horse
Vague statement cannot be an offer
An offer must be distinguished from invitation to treat or a mere supply of information. Supply Of Information Harvey v Facey
Price of Bumper Hall pen
A statement which sets out possible term of a contract is not an offer unless this is clearly indicated.
Bigg v Boyd Gibbons
Quick Sale
In the course of negotiations for sale, vendor‟s statement may be an offer
An invitation to treat “An indication that a person is prepared to receive offer with a view to entering into a binding contract" Auction Sales Payne v Cayne
Bid
Bid itself is the offer, which the auctioneer is free to accept or reject
Bramble finch cocks
An advertisement of goods for sale is usually an attempt to induce offers.
Advertisement Patridge v Crittenden
Page 1
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Exhibition of Goods for Sale Fisher v Bell
Offensive Weapon
Goods on display is not an offer
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists
Display of drugs in a self service shop
Displaying goods on the open shelves of a self service shop is an invitation to treat
Invitation to a tender
Termination of Offer An Offer may only be accepted when it is still open. In the absence of an acceptance an offer may be terminated. Rejection Hyde v Wrench
Sale of Property, Counter Offer
Outright rejection terminates an offer.
Counter Offer Counter offer is the final rejection of the original offer Request for information It is possible to respond to an offer by making a request for information; it is not a counter offer. Lapse of time An offer may be expressed to last for a specified time. If , however, there is no express time limit set, it expires after a reasonable time. Revocation of an offer Routledge v Grant
Offer to buy house, acceptance required within 6 weeks
If the offer remains open for acceptance for a specified time he may still revoke it within that time.
Condition
An offer may be conditional and if this condition is not satisfied the offer is not capable of being accepted.
Failure of a Condition Financing Ltd v Stimson
Termination by Death
Page 2
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Bradbury v Morgan
Death
The death of offeree terminates the offer, unless the offeree accepts the offer in the ignorance of the death.
Acceptance “ A positive act by a person to whom an offer has been made which, if conditional, brings a binding contract into effect” Acceptance may be by express words, by action or inferred from conduct. Silence Felthouse v Bindley
Nephew‟s Horse
There must be some act on the part of the offeree to indicate his acceptance.
Acceptance „subject to contract‟ Means that the offeree is agreeable to the terms of the offer but proposes that the parties should negotiate a formal contract Letters of intent Letters of intent are an indication be one party to another that they may place a contract with them. Acceptance of Tender (A tender to perform one task) Great Northern Railways v Witham
Supply of stores in series
A tender to supply or perform a series of things, is not accepted until an order is placed (Standing Offer)
Communication of Acceptance Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror and that it is not effective until this has been done. Waiver of Communication Prescribed mode of communication No mode of Communication prescribed
The Postal Rule Acceptance is complete as soon as letter is posted Page 3
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Adam v Lindsell
Post on Different dates
Where the use of the post is within the comtemplation of both parties, the acceptance is complete and effective as soon as the letter is posted, even though it may be delayed or even lost altogether in the post.
Household Fire and Carriage Accident Insurance v Grant
Application for shares
The intention to use the post for communication of acceptance may be deduced from the circumstances.
Cross Offer If two offers, identical in terms, cross in the post, there is no contract Unilateral Contract R v Clarke
Reward for information
There could not be acceptance without knowledge of the offer
Williams v Carwardine
Criminals book
Acceptance may still be valid even if the offer was not the sole reason for the action.
Collateral Contracts Where consideration in provided by the making of another contract.
Page 4
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 5-Formation of Contract II Consideration A consideration in the sense of the law may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party, or some forbearance, detrement, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
Executed consideration is that which takes place at the present time Executory consideration is a promise given for a promise. That which takes place at some future time.
Past Consideration Re McArdle
Improvements to house
Past consideration is something which has already been done at the time the contract is made
Lamleigh v Braithwaite
Royal Pardon
When a request is made for a service this request may imply a promise to pay for it
Adequacy and sufficiency of consideration Adequacy Thomas v Thomas
Rent £1 per annum
It is presumed that each party is capable of serving his own interest, and the court will not seek to weigh up the comparative value of the promises or act exchanged
Wrappers of chocolate
Consideration is sufficient if it has some identifiable value
Sufficiency Chappell & co v Nestle co
Performance of exiting contractual duties Collins v Godefory
Provide evidence
Performance of an existing obligation imposed by statue is no consideration for a promised of reward
Glasbrook bros v Glamorgan
Extra Police force
If extra service is given that is sufficient consideration
Promise of additional reward
Page 5
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Stilk v Myrick
Two members of crew
The promise for an additional reward to perform existing contractual duties in not binding as there is no extra consideration
Hartley v Ponsonby
17 out of 36 crew members deserted
If a claimant does more than to perform an existing contractual duty, this may amount to consideration
William v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
Refurbish a block of flats
Practical benefit is also a valid consideration
Interest claimed
Waiver of any part of a party‟s right should be supported by consideration
Waiver of existing rights Foakes v Beer
Promissory Estoppel “If a creditor (Y) makes a promise (unsupported by consideration) to the debtor (X) that Y will not insist on the full discharge of the debt, and the promise is made with the intention that the X should act on it and he does so, Y stopped from retracting his promise, unless Z can be restored to his original location” Central London Property Trust v High Trees House
Half rent in war time
If someone has made a promise they can be prevented from denying it
Combe v Combe
Maintenance payment
Promissory estoppels is a shield not a sword it does not create new causes of action where none existed before
Intention to create legal relation “An agreement will only become a legally binding contract if the parties intend this to be so. This will be strongly presumed in the cases of business agreements but not presumed if the agreement is of a friendly, social or domestic nature” Husband and Wife Balfour v Balfour
For health reasons wife would not return
The fact that the parties are husband and wife does not mean that they cannot enter into a contract
Merritt v Merritt
Mortgage Payment
Invitation to treat was to be inferred
Barrister, allowance
Agreement between other family members may also be examined by the
Relatives Jones v Padavatton
Page 6
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
courts Commercial Agreements Rose and Frank v Crompton
Distributor in USA
In commercial agreements it is presumed that there was an intention to enter into a legally binding contract
Transaction binding in honor only Jones v Vernons Pools
Football pools coupon
If the parties state that an agreement is binding in honor only these amounts to an express denial of intention to create legal relations
Privity of Contract “As a general rule, only a person who is a party to a contract has enforceable rights or obligations under it. Third parties have no right of action save in certain exceptional instances” Tweddle v Atkinson
Pay sum of money to married daughter
A promises B that A will confer a benefit on C. Therefore, C cannot as a general rule enforce A‟s promise since C has given no consideration.
Dunlop v Selfridge
Do not sell tires at lower rate than agreed
A person cannot recover damages under a contract to which it was not a party
Beswick v Beswick
X transfer his business to his nephew
The third party can sue in another capacity.
Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detal Products Ltd
Confirmed the paint‟s suitability
Collateral Contracts
Exceptions
Forseeable loss to the third party Original beneficiary could claim full damages on behalf of the third party Statutory Exceptions:
Road Traffic Act 1972 Married woman‟s Property Act 1882 Contract (Rights of third parties) Act 1999
Page 7
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Contract (Rights of third parties) Act 1999 a) Where the contract itself expressly so provides b) Where the term confers a benefit of the third party, unless it appears that the contracting parties did not intend him to have the right to enforce it
Page 8
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 6- Terms of Contract Contract Terms “Statements made by the parties may be classified as terms or representations” Bannerman v White
Sulphur
Term is an important part of the contract, the party misled can claim for breach of the contract
Routledge v McKay
Sale of Motorcycle (wrong model)
A representation is something which includes the formation of the contract but which does not become a term of the contract
Express and Implied Terms “Terms clearly include in the contract are express terms. The law may complement or replace terms by implying terms into a contract” Implied Terms “ A term is the term expressly agreed by the parties to the contract” Terms implied by custom Hutton v Warren
Tenant Farmer
The parties may enter into a contract subject to custom of their trade. Any express term overrides a term which might be implied by custom
Inter Alia the lifts did not work
Terms may be implied if the court concludes that the parties intended those terms to apply to the contract
Terms Implied by Statute Sales of Good Act 1979 Terms implied by the courts Liverpool City Council v Irwin
Conditions and Warranties “Terms may be further classified as conditions and warranties”
A condition is the vital term, going to the root of the contract, breach of which entitles the injured party to treat the contract as discharged and claim damages. Page 9
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
A warranty is a term subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract, breach of which only entitles the injured party to claim damages.
Poussard v Spiers
Failure to sing in a an opening night
A Vital term of the contract was breached, which entitled the injured party to treat the contract as discharged
Bettini v Gye
3 out of 6 rehearsals
Only a minor term of the contract was breached, the injured party was not allowed to treat the contract as discharged but only claim damages
Innominate Terms When it not possible to determine whether a term is a condition or a warrant, such terms are classified as innominate terms If the consequences of the breach is not so serious the term cannot be treated as condition, hence injured party could not treat the contract as breached Exclusion Clauses “An exclusion clause may attempt to restrict one party‟s liability for breach of contract or for negligence” “A claue in a contract which purports to exclude liability altogether or to restrict it by limiting damages or by imposing other onerous conditions” a) Exclusion Clause must be incorporated into a contract before they have legal effect b) Exclusion Clauses are interpreted strictly Contractual Document Chapelton v Barry UDC
Pile of deck chairs
Where the exclusion clause is contained in an unsigned document it must be shown that this document is integral part of the contract
Slot Machine, Small Print
If a person signs a document containing a term, he is held to have agreed to the term even if he had not read the document
Signed Document L’Estrange v Graucob
Unsigned contracts and notices
Page 10
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Olley v Marlborough court Ltd
Notice in Bedroom
Each party must be aware of the contract‟s term before or at the time of entering into the agreement if they are to be binding
Holding fee of £5 plus VAT
Where a term is particularly unusual is should be highlighted otherwise it won‟t be incorporated into the contract
Onerous Terms Interfoto picture library Ltd v Stiletto visual programmers Ltd
Interpretation of Exclusion Clauses The „main‟ purpose rule By this, the court presumes that the clause was not intended to prevent the main purpose of the contract Fundamental Breach Photo Productions v Securicor Transports
Small Fire by guard
A properly drafted exclusion clause can cover any breach of contract under common law
The Unfair Contract Act 1977 Clauses which are void If an exclusion clause is made void by statute it is unnecessary to consider how other legal rules might affect it Clauses which are subject to a test of reasonableness George Mitchell Ltd v Finney lock seeds Ltd
Dutch winter cabbage seeds
Courts decides relying exclusively on the statutory ground of reasonableness
The statutory ground of reasonableness Smith v Eric S Bush
Surveyor‟s Report
It is sometimes unreasonable to disclaim liability
The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 This deals with consumer contracts and terms which have not been individually negotiated
Page 11
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
“A consumer is defined as „a natural person‟ who, in making a contract to which these regulations apply, is acting for purposes which are outside his business”
“An Unfair term is any term which causes a significant imbalance in the parties‟ rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer”
Page 12
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 7- Breach of Contract Repudiatory Breach “A repudiatory breach occurs where a party indicates, either by words or by conduct, that he does not intend to honour his contractual obligations or commits a breach of condition or commit a breach which has very serious consequences for the injured party. It only occurs when performance is due” Anticipatory Breach “Where one party declares in advance that he will not perform his side of the bargain when the time for performance arrives, the other party may treat the contract as discharged forthwith, or continue with his obligations until actual breach occurs. His claim for damages will then depend upon what he has actually lost” Hochester v de la tour
European tour
The claimant can sue as soon as the anticipatory breach occurs
White & Carter (Councils) v McGregor
Litter bins
Repudiation does not, of itself, bring the contract to an end. It gives the innocent party the choice of affirmation or rejection
Affirmation after repudiation Damages “Damages are a common law remedy intended to restore the party who has suffered the loss to the same position he would have been in if the contract had been performed” The two tests applied to a claim for damages relate to remoteness of damage and measure of damages. Remoteness of Damages Hadley v Baxendale
Crank Shaft
The loss must arise naturally form the breach and in a manner which the parties may reasonably be supposed to have contemplated
Victoria Laundry (Windsor) v Newman Industries
Large Boilers
A loss outside the natural course of events will only be compensated if the exceptional circumstances are within the defendant‟s knowledge when he
Page 13
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
made the contract Measure of Damages “The measure of damages is that which will compensate for the loss incurred. It is not intended that the injured party should profit from a claim. Damages may be awarded for financial and non financial loss” C & P Haulage v Middleton
Renewable license
A claimant may seek to have his reliance interest protected, i.e. the position he would have been in had he not relied on the contract. This compensates for wasted expenditure
Anglia Television Ltd v Reed
Film Making
If a contract is speculative, it may be unclear what profit might result.
Market Price Rule The seller would have to compensate the buyer for any additional cost the buyer incurred over the contract cost and vice versa (when buying or selling the equivalent goods at market price) Non Financial Loss Jarvis v Swan Tours
Holiday accommodation at a winter sports centre
Damages could be recovered for mental distress where that is the main result of the breach
Alexander v Rolls Royce Motor cars Ltd
Repair of Rolls Royce
Breach of contract to repair a car did not give rise to any liability due to distress
Swimming Pool
If the claimant is seeking cost of cure for the defect which constituted the breach, he may be denied if it is wholly disproportionate to the breach
Cost of Cure Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth
Mitigation of loss In assessing the amount of damages it is assumed that the claimant will take any reasonable steps to reduce or mitigate his loss
Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clause
Page 14
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Liquidated damages can be defined as „a fixed or ascertainable sum agreed by the parties at the time of contracting, payable in the time of breach‟ A penalty clause can be defined as „a clause in a contract providing for a specified sum of money to be payable in the event of a subsequent breach. If its purpose is merely to deter a potential difficulty, it will be held void and the court will proceed to asses un liquidated damages‟
Action for Price A simple action for the price to recover the agreed sum should be brought if breach of contract is failure to pay the price Quantum Meruit De Barnardy v Harding
Advertise and sell tickets
Quantum Meruit‟s aim is to restore the claimant to the position he would have been in if the contract had never been made and is likely to be sought where one party performed part of his obligations and other party repudiates
Equitable Remedies Specific Performance The party in breach is ordered to perform his side of the contract Injunction Warner Bros Pictures Inc v Nelson
Film star Bette Davis
An injunction may be used to enforce a contract of personal service for which an order of specific performance would be refused
Recission It is a right which exists in certain circumstances, such as where a contract is voidable
Page 15
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 8- The Law of Torts Tort A tort is a civil wrong and the person wronged sues in a civil court for compensation or an injunction. The tort of negligence Negligence is the most important modern tort. To succeed in an action for negligence the claimant must prove that: The defendant had a duty of care There was a breach of that duty In consequence the claimant suffered injury, damage or loss Duty of care Donoghue v Stevenson
Decomposed snail
Anns v Merton London Borough Council Caparo Industries plc v Dickman
A person might owe a duty of care to another with whom he had no contractual relationship. Every person owes a duty of care to his “neighbour”. Development of the doctrine (Two stages must be tested)
Auditors
Auditors do not owe a duty of care to public at large (Three stage test)
Breach of duty of care The standard of reasonable care requires that the person concerned should do what a “reasonable man” would do. The following factors should be considered. Probability of Injury Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
Poisonous berries
A warning notice was not considered to be sufficient to protect children.
Protective goggles
There was a higher standard of care owed to the employee because an injury to remaining good eye would blind him.
Seriousness of the risk Paris v Stepney Borough Council
Issues of practicality and cost Latimer v AEC Ltd
Slippery floor
Page 16
Duty of care is not breached because
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
reasonable step was taken. Common Practice Where an individual can prove their actions in line with common practice or custom it is likely that they would have met their duty of care Social Benefit Where an action if of some benefit, defendants may be protected from liability Professions and skill Persons who hold themselves out to possess a particular skill should be judged on what a reasonable person possessing the same skill would do in the situation Res ipsa loquitur Richley v Fould
Skidded car
“The thing speaks for itself.”
Mahon v Osborne
Leaving a swab
Leaving a swab inside a patient after and operation was not negligent
Causality and remoteness of damages The claimant must demonstrate that he suffered injury or loss as a “result” of the breach The „But for‟ test Barnett v Chelsea
Arsenic poisoning
The claimant must prove that if it was not „but for‟ the other‟s actions they would not have suffered damge
Premature baby
Court could not ascertain a direct casual link due to the presence of multiple causes
Multiple Causes Multiple causes: Wilsher v Essex AHA
Novus actus intervieniens McKew v Holland
Leg injury
The actions of the claimant may break the chain of causation (Act of Claimant)
Lamb v Camden LBC
Damaged house
Where a third party intervenes in the course of events the defendant will normally only be liable for damage until the intervention (Act of a third
Page 17
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
party) Carslogie Steamship Co Ltd v Royal
Damaged ship
Where the natural event is unforeseeable, the chain will be broken (Natural events)
Furnace oil
Liability is limited to damage that a reasonable man could have foreseen
Defective lock
A court may reduce the amount of damages paid to the claimant if the defendant establishes that they contributed to their own injury or loss.
Detonators
Where a defendant‟s actions carry the risk of a tort being committed they will have a defense if it can be proved that the claimant consented to the risk
Remoteness of Damage The Wagon Mound
Defences to negligence Contributory Negligence Sayers v Harlow UDC
Volenti non fit injuria ICI v Shatwell
Page 18
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 9-Professional negligence Professional negligence “Professional individuals and organizations have a special relationship with their clients and those who rely on their work. This is because they act in an “expert capacity” Special relationship “If someone possessed of a special skill undertakes….to apply that skill for the assistance of another person who relies on that skill, a duty of care will arise”
Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co
Hedly Byrne & Co v Heller and Partners Ltd
To establish a “special relationship” the person who made the statement must have done so in some professional or expert capacity. Statement about financial resources
Claim for negligence cannot succeed if there is a „disclaimer‟ even if the special relationship existed and duty of care is breached
The Caparo Decision “Auditors do not owe a duty of care to the public at large or to shareholders increasing their stakes” Caparo Industries plc v dickman and others
Auditors Takeover Bid Directors (the dickman brothers)
The auditor‟s duty did not extend to potential investors nor to existing shareholders increasing their stakes. It was a duty owed to the body of shareholders as whole.
ADT Ltd v BDO Binder Hamlyn
Joint auditor True & Fair view Potential buyer Meeting Difference &Interest
The courts expect a higher standard of care from accountants when giving advice on company acquisition since the losses can be so much greater.
Page 19
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 10- Employment Contract
An Employee is “an individual who has entered into, or works under a contract of employment”.
A Contract of Employment is a contract of service or apprenticeship, whether express or implied, and ( if it is express) whether it is oral or in writing.
Ferguson v John Dawson & Partners
Builder‟s laborer
In order to distinguish between employment and independent contractor the court will look at the reality of situation rather than the arrangements
Massey v Crown Life Assurance
Insurance Co.
Where there is some doubt as to the nature of the relationship the courts will then look at any agreement between the parties
Tests It is very important to know whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor. The court will apply a series of tests: Control Test Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths
Stevedores
The court will consider whether the employer has control over the way in which the employee performs his duties
Medical officer
The courts consider whether the employee is so skilled that he cannot be controlled in the performance of his duties. Lack of control indicates that an employee is not integrated into the employer‟s organization, and therefore not employed.
Integration Test Cassidy v Ministry of Health
Multiple ( economic reality ) Test Ready Mixed concrete v Ministry of Pension & National Insurance
Driver Liquid concrete
Courts also consider whether the employee was working on his own account and this requires numerous factors to be taken into account.
Page 20
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Agency workers Two cases are considered (a)Length of Service (b)Control over the worker Other
Relevant factors: Own tools & equipment Selection or appointment Payment of salary Delegation of work
O’Kelley v trusthouse forte plc
Waiter
It depends entirely on the facts of each case. When there is no „mutuality of obligations‟, there is no contract
Why distinguishing is important? Social Security
Implied terms
Taxation
VAT
Employment protection
Bankruptcy
Tortuous acts
Health and Safety
Common Law Duties Employee‟s duties: Fundamental duty of faithful service Reasonable competence Obedience Duty to account for all money and property Reasonable care and skill Personal service
Hivac Ltd v Park Royal
Spare time Directly competed
Even though the employees had not passed on any confidential information, they were still in breach of their duty of fidelity to the claimants.
Pepper v webb
Gardener
The gardener was in breach of his implied duty to obey as the instructions were lawful and Page 21
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
reasonable. Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co.v Ansell
Commissions
The company was justified in dismissing the claimant and he must account to it for the commissions.
Employer‟s duties Pay remuneration Indemnify the employee Health and safety Provide work Duty of mutual trust and confidence
Page 22
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
Chapter 11- Dismissal and Redundancy Summary dismissal Summary dismissal is where the employer dismisses the employee without notice. He may do this if the employee has committed a serious breach of contract Wilson v Racher
Gardener
Action succeeded because it was employer‟s own conduct that provoked the outburst
Constructive dismissal Constructive dismissal is where the employer commits a breach of contract, thereby causing the employee to resign Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
Advance Holiday Pay
If the employer is not in breach of contract, the employee cannot claim for constructive dismissal
Wrongful dismissal Wrongful dismissal is a common law concept arising in specific circumstances. It gives the employee an action for breach of contract Justification of dismissal Willful disobedience of a lawful order Misconduct Dishonesty Incompetence or neglect Gross negligence Immorality Drunkenness Unfair dismissal Unfair dismissal is a statutory concept introduced by employment protection legislation. As a rule, every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed Potentially fair reasons for dismissal Capability and Qualifications Conduct Redundancy Legal prohibition Some other substantial reason
Page 23
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq
International Sports Ltd v Thomson
Employee did not work for 25% of the time
The illnesses were unrelated and unverifiable so dismissal was fair
Remedies for Unfair dismissal Reinstatement Reinstatement is return to the same job without any break of continuity Re-engagement Re-engagement means that the employee is given new employment with the employer (or his successor or associate) on terms specified in the order. Compensation
Basic Award Compensatory award (up to £66,200) Punitive additional award (up to £380 per week)
Redundancy A dismissal is treated as caused by redundancy if the only or main reason is that: The employer has ceased, or intends to cease, to carry on the business in which the employee has been employed The requirement of that business for employees to carry on the work done by the employee have ceased or diminished High Table Ltd v Horst and Others
Waitresses
Dismissal was for genuine redundancy as the place of work was of the new employer was at the client company premises
Page 24
Compiled by: Ahmad Tariq