Adsorption is as an alternative technology to remove colour from wastewater. In this study, activated carbon, prepared from low cost palm oil fibre has been utilised as the adsorbent for the remov...
filter
Activated Carbon With NaclFull description
In this study, the activated carbon was prepared from Cassia alata seeds using Hydrochloric acid. Removal of Methyl Orange MO was assessed by varying parameters like pH, adsorbent dose, concentration, contact time and temperature. The adsorption effi
Synthesis of 1-phenyazo-2-naphtholFull description
The recent study explains about the removal of Pb II ions from aqueous solution using activated carbon prepared from Garlic waste. Garlic peels have been used for the production of Carbon by treating with conc.H2SO4 for metal ions removal. Fourier Tr
Biosorption of dye using biomass is an alternative technology to remove colour from aqueous solution. Palm ash has been utilized as adsorbent for the removal of disperse dye from aqueous solution....
The potential of Thespesia Populnea Seed TPS powder, for the removal of Congo red 4B CR dye from aqueous solution was investigated. The adsorbent was characterized by FTIR and SEM analysis. Batch adsorption studies were conducted and various paramete
Air-cathode Preparation With Activated Carbon as Catalyst
Wastewater Treatment by Filtration through Activated Carbon
Tugas Mata kuliah perencanaan bangunan air limbahFull description
chemical engineeringFull description
Full description
Damper Removal
4Full description
Full description
Piano music sheet
4.0 Results 4.1 Standard curve for the methylene blue dye from the stock solutions. Table 1: Absorbance at 664 nm read at different dye concentrations Dye o oncentration !m !m"#l$
0.00
Dye o oncentration !m"#%&ml$ 0.0000
Absorbance at 664 nm 0.0000
3.33
0.0832
1.5480
6.67
0.0167
1.6180
10.00
0.2500
1.7670
13.33
0.3330
1.9940
16.67
0.4170
2.1050
tandard Curve for the Methylene Blue Dy 2.5
f(x) = 0.12x + 0.35 R² = 0.85
2
1.5
Absorbance at 664 nm
Y-Valu -Values es Linear Linear (Y-Values) -Values )
1
0.5
0 0
2
4
6
8 10 1 2 14 1 6 18
Dye Concentration (mg/l)
'i"ure 1: Standard urve for (ethylene )lue Dye
4.% The dye concentration !m"#l$*
C e
obtained from the standard curve of methylene
dye* 'i"ure 1 from their res+ective absorbance read at every 1& mins interval. Table %: Absorbance at 664nm of control and , activated at every 1& mins interval and res+ective dye concentration !m"#l$* ontact Time* min
0 15 30 45 60
C e
C e
Absorbance at 664 nm ontrol
, activated
1.297 0.579 0.510 0.496 0.382
-ith carbon 1.297 0.493 0.452 0.339 0.262
* m"#l
ontrol
, activated -ith
7.7398 1.9024 1.3415 1.2276 0.3008
carbon 7.7398 1.2033 0.8699 -0.0488 -0.6748
Ce is concentration of dye solution in mg/l !ic! is o"tained from standard cur#e according to t!e res$ecti#e a"sor"ance read at 664 nm. %!e standard cur#e !as e&uation !ic! is y ' 0.1233 ( ) 0.345* !ere y is a"sor"ance at 664 nm !ile ( is t!e dye concentration in mg/l. +or Control, !en t ' 0* y ' 1.297* 1.297 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 7.7398 !en t ' 15* y ' 0.579* 0.579 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 1.9024 !en t ' 30* y ' 0.510* 0.510 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 1.3415 !en t ' 45* y ' 0.496* 0.496 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 1.2276 !en t ' 60* y ' 0.382* 0.382 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 0.3008 +or C acti#ated, !en t ' 0* y ' 1.297* 1.297 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 7.7398 !en t ' 15* y ' 0.493* 0.493 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 1.2033 !en t ' 30* y ' 0.452* 0.452 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' 0.8699 !en t ' 45* y ' 0.339* 0.339 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' -0.0488 !en t ' 60* y ' 0.262* 0.262 ' 0.123 ( ) 0.345* ( ' -0.6748
4. Removal /fficiency* of methylene blue dye by activated carbon immobilied -ith fun"al biomass over time. Table : Removal efficiency in each contact time ontact Time* min 0 15 30 45
/fficiency* 0 84.45 88.76 100.63
60
108.72
C 0−C e
y using
C 0
( 100 !ere C 0 is initial dye concentration at t!e "eginning of
"atc! "iosor$tion starts !ic! is at 0 minutes and C e is t!e dye concentration at e#ery 15 mins inter#al after t!e "atc! "iosor$tion started.
t t ' 0 min* fficiency '
7.7398 −7.7398 7.7398
( 100 ' 0
7.7398 −1.2033
t t ' 15 min* fficiency '
( 100 ' 84.45
7.7398 7.7398 −0.8699
t t ' 30 min* fficiency '
( 100 ' 88.76
7.7398 7.7398 + 0.0488
t t ' 45 min* fficiency '
( 100 ' 100.63
7.7398 7.7398 + 0.6748
t t ' 60 min* fficiency '
( 100 ' 108.72
7.7398
4.4 Amount of adsor+tion at e2uilibrium* 2 e in m"#" Table 4: Amount of adsor+tion at e2uilibrium in each contact time for activated carbon ontact Time*
2e*
min 0 15
m"#" 0.000 3.2683
ln 2e
1.1843
ln e
e#2e*
2.0464 0.1851
l#" 0.3682
30 45 60
3.4350 3.8943 4.2073
1.2340 1.3595 1.4368
-0.1394 -
0.2532 -0.0125 -0.1604
y using t!is formula* & e ' C0 Ce/ !ere is #olume of dye !ic! is 50 m or 0.05 and is t!e "iomass eig!t !ic! is 0.1 g. 0.05
t t ' 0 min* & e ' 7.7398 - 7.7398 (
0.1
' 0
0.05
t t ' 15 min* & e ' 7.7398 - 1.2033 (
' 3.2683
0.1 0.05
t t ' 30 min* & e ' 7.7398 - 0.8699 (
' 3.4350
0.1 0.05
t t ' 45 min* & e ' 7.7398 ) 0.0488 (
' 3.8943
0.1 0.05
t t ' 60 min* & e ' 7.7398 ) 0.6748 (
' 4.2073
0.1
Table &: Amount of adsor+tion at e2uilibrium in each contact time for control ontact Time*
2e*
min 0 15 30 45 60
m"#" 0 2.9187 3.1992 3.2561 3.7195
ln 2e
1.0711 1.1629 1.1805 1.3136
ln e
e#2e*
2.0464 0.6431 0.2938 0.2051 -1.2013
"#l 0.6518 0.4193 0.3770 0.0809
y using t!is formula* & e ' C0 Ce/ !ere is #olume of dye !ic! is 50 m or 0.05 and is t!e "iomass eig!t !ic! is 0.1 g. 0.05
t t ' 0 min* & e ' 7.7398 - 7.7398 (
0.1
' 0
0.05
t t ' 15 min* & e ' 7.7398 1.9024 (
0.1
' 2.9187
0.05
t t ' 30 min* & e ' 7.7398 1.3415 (
0.1
' 3.1992
0.05
t t ' 45 min* & e ' 7.7398 1.2276 (
0.1
' 3.2561
0.05
t t ' 60 min* & e ' 7.7398 0.3008 (
0.1
' 3.7195
Table 6: om+arison of ln e and ln 2e of ontrol and Activated arbon
ontrol
3ith Activated arbon
ln 2e -
ln e 2.0464
ln 2e -
ln e 2.0464
1.0711
0.6431
1.1843
0.1851
1.1629
0.2938
1.2340
-0.1394
1.1805
0.2051
1.3595
-
1.3136
-1.2013
1.4368
-
Table : om+arison of e !m"#5$ and e#2e !"#5$ of ontrol and Activated arbon ontrol
3ith Activated arbon
e !m"#5$
e#2e !"#5$
e !m"#5$
e#2e !"#5$
7.7398
-
7.7398
-
1.9024
0.6518
1.2033
0.3682
1.3415
0.4193
0.8699
0.2532
1.2276
0.3770
-0.0488
-0.0125
0.3008
0.0809
-0.6748
-0.1604
4.& ,lottin" of /2uilibrium data usin" 'reundlich !n 2 e vs n e$ and 5an"muir !e#2e vs e$ isotherms
1.6 R² = 0.66 1.4 1.2 1
n !e
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
n Ce 'i"ure %: 'reundlich !n 2 e vs n e$ ,lot for , activated -ith carbon 0.4
0.3
0.2
Ce/!e
0.1 R² = 0 0 -2
0
2
4
6
8
-0.1
-0.2
Ce 'i"ure : 5an"muir ! e#2e vs e$ ,lot for , activated -ith carbon
10
1.4 R² = 0.77 1.2 1 0.8
n !e
0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
n Ce 'i"ure 4: 'reundlich !n 2 e vs n e$ ,lot for ontrol
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
Ce/!e
R² = 0.24 Y-Values
0.3
Linear (Y-Values) 0.2
Linear (Y-Values)
0.1 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ce 'i"ure &: 5an"muir ! e#2e vs e$ ,lot for ontrol