Project Report Edappally-Kuttippuram

1 Pro jec je c t Desc Desc ripti ip tio on 1.1 General Ministry Ministry of Shipp Shipp ing, Roa Roa d Transp ransp ort and Highwa ys, ys, Gove rnment o f Ind Ind ia ha s de c ided to t a ke up the de velop me nt o f va rious rious Nat Nat ional Highw Highw ays stretc stretc hes/ hes/ Co rridors rridors und er NHDP NHDP Pha se III program in the country concerning upgrading of capacity, safety, riding quality etc. to internationa l sta sta nd a rd s by fo ur/ six six-l -laning aning of highw a y stretc stretc hes/ hes/ Co rrido rrido rs tog ethe r with m ajor Port connectivity. NHAI has be en e ntrus NHAI ntrusted ted to imp lement the de velopm ent p roject s for few select ed stretc tretc hes/ hes/ corridors either through Public-Private Partnership (PPP) basis or its own budgetary sources or loans from ADB, ADB, W Worl orld d Ba nk etc . The NHAI has ac c ordingly ta ken up p roject p repa ration of certain stretches/ corridors of existing National Highways passing through various states of the country. The stret stret c h of 111. 111.73 73 km from from Kutt ipura m to Ed Ed a p a lly lly of NH 17 in the sta sta te o f Kera Kera la is a p a rt of t he NHDP-I NHDP-IIII project s. Nation al Highw Highw a ys Autho rity rity of Ind ia (NHAI) (NHAI) will will be the em ploye r and executing agency for the consultancy services and the standards of output required from the a pp ointed c onsul onsultants tants are are of international level level bo th in terms terms of q uality uality and ad herence to the ag reed time time sched ule. ule. M/ s Wilb Wilb ur Smith Smith Ass Assoc iat es Inc Inc . US USA in joint ven ture (JV) w ith Wilbur Smith Smith Ass Assoc iat es Pri Priva va te Limited hav e b een entrusted entrusted b y NHAI NHAI the t ask ask of c arrying arrying o ut t he Fea Fea sibility ibility Stud Stud ies and Environm nvironm enta l and Soc Soc ial Imp Imp ac t Ass Assess essme nt including p repa ration of Deta iled iled Projec t Rep ort for reha bilitation bilitation and upg rad ing ing to 4/6 lane lane divide divide d highw ay. This repo rt de a ls with e ssentia lly lly of Projec Projec t Rep Rep ort for rehab ilitation ilitation an d upg rad ing o f a stretc h of 111. 111.73 73 km on NH-1 NH-17 7 in the sta sta te o f Kerala Kerala to 4/6 la la ne d ivid ivid ed highwa y.

1.2 Project Outline The p rojec t ess essent ially co nsis nsists ts of c ond uc ting Fea Fea sibility ibility Stud Stud ies a nd E Environm nvironm ent a l a nd Soc ial Impact Assessment including preparation of Detailed Project Report for rehabilitation and up grad ing of a stretc stretc h of 111. 111.73 73km km on NH-1 NH-17 7 in the sta sta te of K Kerala erala to 4/6 la la ne d ivid ivid ed highway. Kodungallur bypass is excluded from the scope of work since it is executed by PWD, NH Division.

Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .

1. 1

Nat iona l High High wa ys Aut ho rity of India

Four Laning of NH-17 NH-17 from from Kuttipura m-Ed m-Ed ap ally in th e Sta Sta te of Kerala und er NHDP Phase III III on BOT Ba sis

Project Report

1.3 Objective The o b jec tives of t he p resent resent projec t c ove ring ring the stretc h of 111. 111.73 73 km o f NH-1 NH-17 7 (Kuttipuram (Kuttipuram – Eda pa lly lly ) in the sta sta te of Kerala Kerala include the following: To esta esta b lis lish the te c hnica l, ec ono mic al, environm environm enta l, soc ial, a nd financ ial feasibil feasibility ity of the project and prepa re d eta iled iled project rep orts for reha reha bilitation bilitation and upg rad ing ing of the e xisting isting 2-lane 2-lane Na tional Highwa Highwa y (NH) (NH) sec sec tions to 4-l 4-lane divide divide d c arriagew arriagew ay c onfiguration. onfiguration. The viab ility ility of the p roject d esigned esigned a s a p a rtia rtia lly lly ac c ess ess c ont rolled fa c ility ility sha sha ll b e established taking into account the requirements with regard to rehabilitation, upgrading and improvement based on highway design, pavement design, provision of service roads wh ereve r ne c ess essa ry, typ e of intersec intersec tions, und erp a sses/ es/ flyove rs/ rs/ ROB’s, OB’s, reha b ilita ilita tion a nd widening of existing and/or construction of new bridges and structures, road safety features, quantities of various items of works and cost estimates vis-à-vis the investment and financial return through through toll and other revenue. The Det ailed Project Rep ort (DPR (DPR) wo uld inter-a inter-a lia lia include d eta iled iled highw ay d esign, esign, de sign of pavement and overlay with options for flexible or rigid pavements, design of bridges and cross drainage structures, design of service roads, quantities of various items, detailed working drawings, detailed cost estimates, economic and financial viability analysis, environmental and social feasibility, environmental and social action plans as appropriate and documents required for tendering the project on commercial basis for international/Local competitive bidding. Detailed project preparation incorporating aspects of value engineering, quality audit and safet y aud it req req uir uireme nt in de sign a nd execution. Sc op e o f Services Services The sc op e o f servi servic c es as per sec sec tion 3 a nd 4 of the ToR, oR, include the following: Collec Collec tion tion of a ll sec sec onda ry da ta & review review of da ta a nd d oc uments related to the p roject roa ds and project influenc influenc e a rea . Deta iled iled reco nna iss issanc e survey survey Inventory and condition surveys for existing road & pavement, cross drainage structures and bridges. Identification of possible improvement of the existing alignment, central widening/one side wid ening, b y-pa ss, servi servic c e roa d s, etc with a lternatives and eva luation, shifti shifting ng of ut iliti ilities es,, trees to b e felled a nd p lante d a nd la nd a c quisiti quisition on req uirem uirem ents on Stri Strip p Plan Plan (Top (Top o Ma p s/ Sat ellite ellite Ima ge s). Identification of problem areas, where widening may not p hysica hysica l/e nvironm nvironm enta l/soc l/soc ial co nstraints nstraints within the pa rame ters of TOR TOR..

be

possible

for

Environmental and social studies and impact assessment including mitigation measures and resettlement studies. Traf fic surve ys, ys, T Toll oll Ra Ra te & Willing Willing ne ss to Pa y Toll Toll surve surve ys & Axle Loa d surve ys inc lud ing demand forecasting for the next 30 years and assessment of Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) as well as Capacity Assessment based on IRC 64-2001 and compare the Highway Capacity Ma nua l a nd RU RUCS CS.. Top og rap hy survey, survey, p av em ent investiga investiga tions, tions, ma terial a nd g eo tec hnica l investiga investiga tions. tions. Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .

Nat iona l High High wa ys Aut ho rity of India 1. 2


Project Report

Detailed design of horizontal and vertical alignment including cross sections, pavement structure, intersections, cross drainage structures and bridges, flyovers, interchanges, railway over bridges, user oriented facility along the road (road side amenities), road and other appurtenances. Detailed Detailed project p rep aration incorporating value engineering, engineering, qua lity aud it and safe safe ty aud it req uirem uirem ent in design design and implementa tion. Obtain all necessary clearance required for implementation of the project on the ground from from t he c onc erned a ge nc ies. ies. The c lient lient sha sha ll provid e the nec ess essary supp supp orting lett lett ers and any official fees as pe r the d ema nd not e iss issued b y the c onc erned a ge ncies from from whom the c learance s are being sought sought to e nab le implementa tion. Ra te a na lys lysis of no n-sc n-sc hed ule item item s, det ailed q uant ity takeo ff, B BOQ OQ a nd c ost ost estima estima tes. tes. Ec ono mic a nd financ ial an alysis alysis with fina nc ing o p tions like like BOT BOT,, Annuity, SP SPV et c . Prepa ration of sep arat e d oc ume nts for BOT BOT as well as EPC c ontrac ts for ea c h DPR DPR assignments.

1.4 Approach The Co nsul nsulta ta nt’s ap proac h to the p rojec t will will be in ac c ordanc e with the “ Desc Desc ript ion of Servic ervic es” es” given in the Contrac t Doc ument, unde rstand ing of the project ob jectives and further discussions with the Client during progress of the project study. The m ain ob jec tive of this c onsultanc onsultanc y servi servic c e c om prise prise of th e following :

1. The wid ening wo rk sha sha ll b e w ithin ithin the exis existing ROW ROW a void ing land a c q uisiti uisition, on, and retaining the existing pavement, cross drainage structures and bridges as fa r as p oss ossible w ithin the req uirem uirem en t o f IRC/ IRC/ MO SRT&H g uide line line s. 2. Evolve the most economical but sound proposals for the required roadwork and related b rid ge wo rks. ks. 3. Ca rry o ut e ngineering, ngineering, e c ono mic, e nvir nvironm enta l and soc ial fe asi asibility bility studies studies of the proposed road improvements keeping in view the aspect of PublicPriva riva te Pa rtne rship rship (PP (PPP) and a nd BOT / An nuity. nuit y. 4. Incorporate International “best practices” including use of ‘state of the art’ an d c om p ute r b a sed survey urvey a nd d esign esign tec hnique s (e.g. GPS, Tota l Sta tion Survey, co mp ute r a ided d esigns esigns (MX/ (MX/ MO SS/ Eq uivalent, etc ) for prepa ra tion of the technical proposal, development of designs, cost estimates, bid do c uments, uments, etc . 5. Prepare preliminary designs of the agreed road and related bridge works as a b asis asis for c om p leting Envir Environ on me nta l Ass Assess essme nt (EA) (EA) a nd Soc ial Imp Imp a c t Ass Assess essme nts (SIA) of Projec t A ffe c te d Person erson s (PAP) (PAP) as req req uired uired , c on fo rming to sound economic analysis. Also preparing land acquisition, social and environmental action plans such as Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), as appropriate.

Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .



Project Report

6. Conduc t d etailed etailed engineeri engineering d esi esign o f the p rop osed osed roa d and bridg bridg e w orks orks and prepare suitable number of bid documents required for tendering through International Competitive Bidding (ICB). 7. Provide reports and analysis suitable for meeting the standards and spe c ific ific a tions laid d ow n a c c ording to MO SRT&H, MOEF MOEF, CPWD, CPWD, Go vernme nt of India a nd ADB req uirem uirem ent s on environm environm ent al a nd soc ial ass assess essme nts. nts.

1.5 Projec t R Roa oa d The to ta l project stretc h(111. h(111.73 73 km) is loc a ted in the sta sta te o f Kerala, Kerala, a n impo rta nt s sta ta te in the 0 0 southern part of India between Latitudes of 75 55’ 55’ & 76 20’ 20’ and b etw een Longitude Longitude s of 10 100 10’ 32” & 100 55’ 55’ . The Sta Sta te is bo und ed by Karnat Karnat a ka in the North and East; b y the Arab ian Sea in the West and b y Ta milna d u in the Ea Ea st a nd Sout h. K Kera era la Sta Sta te c om p ris rises of 14 districts districts extend ing ove r an a rea o f 3886 38864 4 sq.km. sq.km. The p roject stretc stretc h c onne c ts Kuttipuram ( km km 318+00 318+000) 0) on Northern side a nd Ed Ed ap ally km 438+600 (Design Ch. Km 428+940) in the southern side and passing through Malapuram ,Thris hrissur and Ernakula rnakula m distri distric c ts. ts. It It a lso lso lead s to Ma nga lore, lore, G oa a nd Mum b ai from Kuttipuram, forming an important link connecting northern districts of Kerala which includes Kozhico d e, Ka Ka nnur, Ka Ka sa rgo d a nd Wa ya na d . NH-17 NH-17 links links to southe rn district district s of Kerala via . NH-4 NH -47. 7. K Kerala erala Sta te is an imp ortant tourist tourist d estination estination d ue t o its be a c hes a long its c oa st a nd generates heavy tourist volume throughout the year. It is an important and picturesque state in the southern part of India. It traverses generally through plain terrain (98%) and about 2% through rolling rolling t errain. errain. Mixed Mixed land use use o f res resident ident ial and ag ricultural ca n be see n through o ut the p rojec rojec t road c orridor. orridor. ItIt a lso lso p a sses through m a ny villag villag es an d t ow ns. ns. The uniq ue fe at ure of Kerala is its wide spread residential development and ribbon development along the Highw ay C orridor. orridor. The e ntire ntire Kerala Kerala sta sta te c a n be terme d a s sem i-urba i-urba n. The loc at ion of the project stretch is illustrated in Figure 1.1. Kodungallur bypass is excluded from the scope of wo rk sinc sinc e it is exec ute d b y PWD, PWD, NH Division Division




Project Report

Figu re 1.1: 1.1: Loc Loc atio n Ma p o f Projec Projec t Roa Roa d

1.5.1

Terrain errai n a nd La nd Use

The p rojec t roa d sta rts from km 318+0 318+000 00 at Kuttipuram , runs runs pa ra llel llel to c oa sta l line line a nd end s a t Ed Ed a p a lly lly a t km 438+6 438+600 00 (Design (Design Ch . Km Km 428+9 428+940) 40) whe re it joins NH 47. For a sma ll sec sec tion between Kuttipuram and Ponnani the project road runs towards the coast, parallel to Bha rata pu zha river. river. In In g ene ral terra terra in is p lain for a short leng th ne a r Kuttipuram Kuttipuram (km 320+00 320+000 0 to km 323+000) where it is rolling terrain. Land use along the alignment is mixed with residential, commercial and agricultural. Many religious structures also exist on the project corridor., (Plate 1.1 & 1.2)




Project Report

Plate 1.1 1.1:: Built-up Area s

1.5.2

Plate 1.2: Ag ricultura l Area s

Imp ortant Tow Tow ns and Villag Villag es

The p roject road p ass asses through nine m a jor towns a nd ma ny villag villag es. es. The m a jor towns a long the p roject roa d a re lis listed be low in Ta b le 1.1 Tab le 1.1 Major Towns Towns along the p rojec t road Existing Chainage

Design Chainage

Sl No

Nam e of Village

(km)

(km)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pon na ni Ch a va kkad Va d a na p a lly lly Tripra ya r Kaip a ma ng a lam Ma thilaka m Ko d ung a llur Para vo or Ed a p a lly

337+600 337 +600 362+60 362+600 0 377+65 377+650 0 384+200 394+60 394 +600 0 400+80 400 +800 0 409+800 409 +800 422+400 422+400 438+400 438 +400

331+100 331 +100 356+3 356+300 00 370+80 370+800 0 377+510 387+180 387+180 399+10 399 +100 0 403+210 403+210 413+800 413 +800 429+400 429 +400

1.5.3

Carriage Carriage way and Formation

The exis existing ting roa d is an intermed intermed iate/ two -lane -lane c arriage arriage wa y of flexi flexible ble p ave ment varying varying from from 5.3 5.3 m to 7.5 m (e xcep t for a sma sma ll stretc h be tw ee n K Kuttipuram uttipuram to Tha Tha vanu r wh ere the carriageway is having only single lane width). Gravel shoulder of 1.0 m to 2.0 m wide has b een p rovid ed on either side side fo r the e ntire ntire lengt h. The c a rriag riag ew ay is ge nerally in go od condition with respect to the riding quality except for Kuttipuram – Ponnani section where the c ond ition ition of the roa roa d is ba d.

1.5.4

Pave ment c ondition

Pave ment co ndition ndition is ge nerally nerally fair fair to po or throug throug hout the co rridor excep t for a fe w sec sec tion whe re c ond ition ition o f pa veme nt is go od . The oc c urr urrenc e of alligato alligato r crac ks, ks, shr shrink inkag ag e c rac ks, ks, raveling and rutting a re observed observed fo r ent ire ire stretc stretc h. Pa tc hing is ob served a b out 10% of the total section. From the condition survey data, a subjective rating in the form of Condition Index (CI) values ha s be en c alc ulate d on the ba sis of various surfac urfac e d istres istress s me a surement s. CI values have b een arrived arrived at by summ summ ing e ac h d istres istress s value a nd suitab ly sub sub trac ting it from 100. The lesser the CI value, more prominent are the effects of various surface distresses. Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .



1.5.5

Project Report

Right of way

Exis xisting righ righ t of w a y of 8m t o 30m. ROW p illa illa rs a re miss missing a t m a ny Plac Plac es. Ta b le 1.2: Deta ils of e xisting ROW ROW Existing xisting Chaina ge (km )

Leng th

Ave rage ROW (m)

From

To

(m )

Left Left

Rig Rig ht

Tota l

318.000

320.000

2000

16.86

20.23 20 .23

38.01

320.000

322.000 322.0 00

2000

5.00

5.91

13.03

322.000

324.000 324.0 00

2000

4.50

4.43

10.63

324.000

326.000 326.0 00

2000

4.82

4.41

10.03

326.000

328.000 328.0 00

2000

4.55

4.37

8.92

328.000

330.000 330.0 00

2000

4.47

4.29

8.76

330.000

332.000 332.0 00

2000

5.42

5.98

13.99

332.000

334.000 334.0 00

2000

4.28

4.41

8.68

334.000

336.000 336.0 00

2000

5.32

5.29

11.37

336.000

338.000 338.0 00

2000

4.87

4.51

10.73

338.000

340.000 340.0 00

2000

6.83

7.90

17.26

340.000

342.000

2000

12.02

17.70 17 .70

32.49

342.000

344.000

2000

13.88

10.73 10 .73

24.87

344.000

346.000 346.0 00

2000

8.73

7.30

16.03

346.000

348.000 348.0 00

2000

7.39

8.49

15.88

348.000

350.000 350.0 00

2000

7.41

7.62

15.03

350.000

352.000 352.0 00

2000

6.40

5.76

12.15

352.000

354.000 354.0 00

2000

6.05

5.67

11.72

354.000

356.000 356.0 00

2000

6.78

6.89

13.67

356.000

358.000 358.0 00

2000

6.66

7.35

14.01

358.000

360.000 360.0 00

2000

7.51

7.42

14.94

360.000

362.000 362.0 00

2000

6.50

6.54

13.05

362.000

364.000 364.0 00

2000

6.94

7.36

15.03

364.000

366.000 366.0 00

2000

5.56

5.44

12.06

366.000

368.000 368.0 00

2000

7.62

6.16

15.20

368.000

370.000

2000

13.74

11.21 11 .21

27.57

370.000

372.000

2000

11.46

9.91

21.37

372.000

374.000 374.0 00

2000

8.78

8.07

16.85

374.000

376.000 376.0 00

2000

8.48

8.11

16.58

376.000

378.000

2000

8.35

10.60

18.94

378.000

380.000

2000

10.27

9.67

19.94

380.000

382.000

2000

10.70

11.40 11 .40

24.55




Project Report

Existing xisting Chaina ge (km )

Leng th

Ave rage ROW (m)

From

To

(m )

Left Left

Rig Rig ht

Tota l

382.000

384.000

2000

12.01

11.20 11 .20

25.54

384.000

386.000 386.0 00

2000

9.04

9.51

20.22

386.000

388.000

2000

10.04

8.77

20.73

388.000

390.000 390.0 00

2000

7.49

7.74

16.85

390.000

392.000 392.0 00

2000

9.15

7.93

18.73

392.000

394.000 394.0 00

2000

8.73

8.38

19.32

394.000

396.000 396.0 00

2000

9.08

7.18

18.17

396.000

398.000 398.0 00

2000

8.30

8.21

18.99

398.000

400.000 400.0 00

2000

7.09

6.78

15.82

400.000

402.000 402.0 00

2000

7.27

6.44

14.50

402.000

404.000 404.0 00

2000

6.49

8.05

14.78

404.000

406.000 406.0 00

2000

7.32

6.51

13.83

406.000

408.000 408.0 00

2000

6.18

6.04

12.82

408.000

410.000 410.0 00

2000

6.26

6.50

13.59

410.000

412.000 412.0 00

2000

5.61

5.58

11.29

412.000

414.000

2000

13.17

13.87 13 .87

29.08

414.000

416.000 416.0 00

2000

7.09

6.82

13.09

416.000

418.000 418.0 00

2000

3.86

3.88

7.74

418.000

420.000 420.0 00

2000

5.64

4.90

10.77

420.000

422.000 422.0 00

2000

4.79

4.73

9.52

422.000

424.000 424.0 00

2000

4.83

4.34

9.44

424.000

426.000 426.0 00

2000

5.62

5.53

11.14

426.000

428.000 428.0 00

2000

5.11

4.44

9.55

428.000

430.000 430.0 00

2000

6.45

6.33

13.03

430.000

432.000

2000

12.85

12.40 12 .40

29.73

432.000

434.000

2000

16.24

11.92 11 .92

21.39

434.000

436.000

2000

9.53

10.50

20.33

436.000

438.600

2000

11.15

4.74

16.09

1.5.6

Horizontal and Vertical Geometry

Horiz Horizont a l ge om et ry of NH-17 NH-17 is inferior ma inly at seven stretc hes at km 320+000 320+000 - km 323+000, 323+000, km 377+000 - km 378+000, km 385+000 – km 393+000, km 404+000 – km 411+000, km 414+500 – km 424+000, km 426+000 – km 428+000 and km 435+000 – km 438+600. Geometric deficiencies at these stretches are due to the presence of number of reverse curves and single curves having insufficient radius and lack of sight distance due to the buildings and c om p ound wa lls lls p roject ing on to the roa roa d . Presenc esenc e of these these stretc stretc hes ma kes travel on NHNH17 unsafe unsafe , pa rtic rtic ularly ularly due to t he m ove me nt of o ver sp sp eed ing of b uses uses.. There a re 62 curves Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .



Project Report

ha ving de sign spe spe ed be low the req uired uired sta nd ard . Som e of tho se c urves are show show n in in Plates 1.3 to 1.6. 1.6. Vertica Vertica l geom etry of the entire entire length o f the p rojec t is found satisfac atisfac tory exc exc ep t for a small stretch of km 320+000 – km 323+000 but this has no significance on the improvement proposal because of the Ponnani bypass.

Plate 1.3 1.3:: Sharp Curve at km 377 377+70 +700 0

Plate 1.4 1.4:: Sharp Curve at km 389 389+90 +900 0

Plate 1.5 :Sharp :Sharp Curve at km 396 396+80 +800 0

1.5.7

Plate 1.6: Sha rp Curve at km 432 432+20 +200 0

Drainag e Condition

The p roject roa d fa lls lls on hea vy ra ra infall a rea w ith averag e a nnua l rain fall mo re tha n 1500 1500mm mm The e xis xisting d rainag e c ond ition ition a long the projec t road is fair to po or. Deta Deta ils ils of d rains ava ilab ilab le a re g iven in in Tab le 1- 3

Tab le 1.3 Summ Summ ary of Deta ils of Existing Existing Drains

Sl No

Typ e of Drain

Length (m )

Width (m )

1 2 3 4

Lined Drain Ea rthe rn Drain Sto ne Ma son ry Built-up Drain

30.8 1.4 0.8 3

0.3-0.5 0.3-0.5 0.3-0.75 0.3-0.75 0.75-1 0.75-1 0.75




Project Report

Pla te 1.7: Built up Drain

1.5.8

Pla te 1.8: Line d Drain

Intersections

There a re 17 numb ers of m ajor junction s a nd 33 othe r imp imp ortant junctions p resent esent on t he project road. In addition to this, a large number minor crossroads are present along the project corridor which leads to intermediate villages. Plate 1.9 to 1.12 shows some of the intersections along the project road

              

    

            

               

           

         

      

Plate 1.9 1.9:: Kuttipuram Junction Junction at km 318+ 318+05 050 0

Plate 1.1 1.10: 0: Cham ravattom Junction km 334+800

                                        

                                    

Plate 1.1 1.11: 1: Ponna Ponna ni Byp Byp ass End Junctio n a t km 340+600

1.5.9

Plate 1.12: 1.12: Chava kka d Junction a t 363+200

Utilities

The ma jor utiliti utilities es along the c orridor orridor a re




•

Project Report

OFC OFC c a b les of BSNL, NL, Relian Relian c e Tele Tele p ho ne c a b les, les, Ca b les of Bharat hi Cellular Ltd Ltd , Ca bles of Asianet Asianet Sat ellite ellite Co mm unica tions etc

•

Wate r Sup p ly pipe lines lines of Kera Kera la Wa ter Autho rity, rity, Go vernmen t o f Kerala Kerala

•

Elec tric p osts osts,, overhe a d c a b les, les, tran sform ers et c

Utiliti tilities es are laid c ontinuously ontinuously through the entire leng th o f c orrido orrido rs. rs. Reloc Reloc a tion o f the se utiliti utilities es are a major issue.

1.5.10 Bridg es and Cross Dra Dra inag e Struc Struc tures There a re 15 Bridg es an d 124 c ulverts along the p roject stretc h. Tab le 1.4 : Bridg es and Culve rts alo ng the Projec t Stretc Stretc h Pa rtic ula rs

NH 17 (Existing Road)

NH 17 (Existing Road Falling Within Project Stretch) Existing

Number of Bridges & Culverts along Bypa sses/Rea es/Rea lignme nt Proposed

Ma jor b ridg es

8

5

4

Mino r b rid rid g es

7

3

4

Cu lvert s

124

91

82

Tota l numb er of Structures to be widened/constructed

189

1.5.11 Struc truc tures of R Religious eligious / A rche olog ic al Imp ortanc e Many religious structures are seen on either side of the project road. Kodungallur temple, Cheraman mosque etc are major among them (Plate 1.13 & 1.14). 1.14) . The a lignm lignm ent at these these loca tions has to b e c arefully arefully de c ided with minimum minimum distur disturba ba nc e. Guruvayur Guruvayur temple, a ma jor religious religious c entre in South India , is is only 2 km aw ay from t he p rojec rojec t c orrido orrido r (nea r Cha va kkad kkad .

Plate 1.14 1.14:: Kod Kod unga llur tem tem ple at 408+550

Plate 1.13 : Cheraman Mosque at 410+570

1.5.12 Existing facilities The list list o f existing existing fa c iliti ilities es along the p rojec t roa d are listed listed in Tab le 1.5 a nd Tab le 1.6 Ta b le 1.5 :Lis :Listt of Existing Existing fac ilitie s Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .



Sl No 1

Project Report

fac ilities Bus st o p s

Nos 20 (LHS) (LHS) 17(Bothsides)

2

Petrol pum p

24

3

Truck lay b a y

Nil

4

To ll p laza

3(km 369+125, 369+125, km 411+900, 411+900, km 430+800) 430+800)

5

Rest Are a

Nil

6

Servic e Roa d

1. km 408 408+20 +200 0 to km 408 408+40 +400 0 Servic e roa d of 7.1 m o n RHS RHS, 1.2m 1.2m m ed ian sepa rating c arriage arriage wa y and servi servic c e road 2. km 408+40 408+400 0 to km 408+600 408+600 Servic e roa d of 6.7m.

Tab le 1.6: Loc Loc atio n o f Petrol Petrol Pum p SL No 1

LHS(k HS(k m )

RHS(k HS(k m )

336+000

2

340+200

3

359+210

4

363+200

5

373+975

6

376+800

7

378+200

8

383+450

9

384+300

10 11

384+750 388+600

12

394+950

13

395+635

14

397+550

15

404+830

16

407+860

17

408+800

18

415+700

19

420+280

20 21

408+800

420+425 420+450

22

423+000

23

427+600

24

435+400

1.5.13 Othe r Fea Fea tures Properly planned, wayside amenities are non-existent on the project stretch. Reasonable bus and truck traffic are observed along the project road. A detailed study has been conducted for various amenities like rest areas, parking buses, bus she lters, lters, la la y-b yes for sic sic k veh icle s a nd ot he r user user rela rela te d fa c ilities ilities..




Project Report

1.6 Improvement Proposals •

Detailed analysis of the deficiencies and the suggested improvements are discussed in detail in later Chapters. A brief description of the proposed improveme nts in given given b elow.

1.6.1 Bypasses •

The ne c ess essity of b yp a ss is c onsid onsid ered a t ma ny pla c es. es. The fe a sibility ibility a nd v iab ility ility of the se ha s b ee n a ssess essed aft er co llec llec ting a nd an alyzing alyzing the field da ta . The b uilt uilt up areas with crowded commercial activities with immediate demand for byp ass asses are are at Ponnani, Cha vakkad, Vad ana pa lly, lly, Tr Trpiraya piraya r-Valap -Valap pa d, Chend rap pinni, pinni, Moonnup eed ika, ika, Ma thilakam thilakam Sec tion 1 and 2, Kod Kod unga llur llur,, Pa ravur, Ed a p a lly-Ma lly-Ma njume lkka lkka va la.. Summ a ry of th e p rop osed osed b yp a sses is lis liste d in Ta b le 1.7.

Tab le 1.7 1.7:: Summ Summ ary of Prop Prop osed Byp asses asses Nam e of by pa ss

Ponn a ni Ch a va kkad Va d a na p a lly Trpira ya r-Vala p p a d Ch en d rap p inni M oo nnu p ee d ika M a th ilaka m Sec tio n 1 M a th ilaka m Sec tio n 2 Kod ung un g a llur Para vur, vu r, EdapallyManjumelkkavala

Existing xisting Chaina ge (km )

Design Design Chaina ge (km )

Leng th

Start Chainage 319+450 363+200 363 +200 377+000 377+000 383+850 383 +850 390+000 390 +000 395+300 395 +300 39 398+700 8+700 40 405+500 5+500 407+700 414+450

End Chainage 340+350 365+400 365+400 380+200 380+200 387+200 387+200 391+900 391+900 397+250 397+250 403+000 403+000 406+060 406+060 411+800 426+160

Start Chainage 319+060 356+300 356+300 370+200 370+200 377+310 377+310 383+280 383+280 388+350 388+350 391+850 391+850 398+750 398+750 401+100 406+890

End Chainage 333+715 358+800 358+800 373+600 373+600 380+510 380+510 385+230 385+230 390+490 390+490 396+335 396+335 399+220 399+220 404+135 417+400

14.655 2.45 3.5 3.2 1.95 2.14 4.485 0.47 3.035 10.51

435+000

438+600

425+300

428+620

3.32

1.6.2 Widening Proposals Based on traffic considerations, geometric standards and existing site conditions it is propo sed to widen the p roject road into a 4 lane ca rriage wa y of the foll follow ow ing ing c onfiguration. onfiguration. •

Me dia n : 4 4.5 .5m/ m/ 1.2m 1.2m

•

Me dia n Shyaw Shyaw ay : 0.25 0.25m m

•

Shyaw ay at d ivid ivid er : 0.25 0.25m m

•

Ma in Carriage Carriage wa y in eac h direc direc tion : 7m 7m ( 2 x 3.5m 3.5m L Lane ane )

•

Servic e Roa d : 5.5m 5.5m o r 7m

•

Pa ved Sho ulde r : 1.5m 1.5m

•

Ea rthe n Sho Sho uld er : 2.0m 2.0m

•

Ea rthe n Drain o f suitab suitab le d imension imension

•

Proposed ROW: 45m

Typ ic a l Cross Cross Sec tio ns The C onsultant onsultant s ha ve p ropo sed a ROW of 45m b a sed on sett sett leme nt p at tern, Lan Lan d-use, d-use, Nat ure ure of BuiltBuilt-up up and Soc ially ially sens sensiti itive ve struct struct ures ures.. Wid Wid ening sc hem e fo r the p ropo sed projec t roa d a re arrived arrived b ased ased o n, •

Lane req uirem uirem ent b ased ased on traffic c ap ac ity analysis analysis

•

Req uirem uirem ent o f servi servic c e road s along built-up area s




Project Report

Propo sed wid ening / Cross Cross sec tion typ es are rep resente resente d b elow in Tab le 1.8 respectively. Tab le 1.8: Propo Propo sed Wide ning Typ e / CS CS-Existing Road Sl. No

Wide Wide ning Typ e/ CS

Leng th in m

1

Conc entric entric widening without Servi Servic c e Roa Roa d(m ed ian 2m)-1A 2m)-1A Ec c entric wid ening withou t Servic ervic e Roa d ( me dia n 2m)-1B 2m)-1B

14430.00

New Four lane witho ut Servic ervic e Roa d (med ian 2m)-1C 2m)-1C

6290 6290.0 .00 0

Co nc entric wid ening with Service Roa d (med ian 2m)-2A 2m)-2A Ec c entric wid ening with 7m Service Roa d (me d ian 2m)-2B 2m)-2B New Four lane with 7m Servic ervic e Roa d on b oth side(m ed ian 2m)-2C 2m)-2C New Fou r lane with 7m Servic e Roa d on LHS (me d ian 2m)-2D Und erp a ss Ap p roa c h with 4.5 me d ian with 5.5 5.5m m Slip lip Roa d -3B Und erp a ss Ap p roa c h a t 318 318+09 +090 0 with 5.5 5.5m m Slip lip Roa d -3C

6080 6080.0 .00 0 7380 7380.0 .00 0 4690 4690.0 .00 0 1590.0 159 0.00 0 650.00 650 .00 680.0 680.00 0

Sl. No


Leng th in m

1 2 3 4 5

RHS wid ening with ou t Servic e Roa d in in b yp a ss (me d ian 4.5 4.5m)-1D m)-1D New Fou r lane in b yp a ss(4.5 m me d ian)-1E New Fou r lane w ith 7m Servic e Roa d in b yp a ss(4.5 m me d ian )-2E Und erpa ss Ap p roac h with 4.5m 4.5m me d ian and 5.5m 5.5m Slip lip Roa d-3A ROB Ap proa c h (3D) (3D)

2255.00 2255.0 0 22225. 222 25.00 00 14635. 146 35.00 00 8925 8925.0 .00 0

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1582 15820. 0.00 00

Bypass

610.00

1.6.3 Pav em ent Design Design Pa vem ent is d esigne esigne d b a sed on M OSR OSRTH/IR H/IRC C sta sta nd a rds. rds. A Design Design life o f 15 years is a d op te d for Flex Flexible ible Pavem ent. Based Based on traffic ana lys lysis it is prop osed osed to ha ve d esign esign t ra ffic a s follows: Tab le 1.9: Design Design Traffic Traffic for m a in ca rriag rriag e wa ySec tion s

Design Traffic (M SA)

Sec tio n I: From From km 317+710 317+710 To km 357+250 357+250 (From (From km 318+000 To km 363+000) Se c tio n II: II: From From km 357+250 To To km 402+940 (From (From km 363+000 To km 407+000) Se c tio n III: III: From From km 402+940 To To km 428+620 (From (From km 407+000 To km 438+600)

20 35 45

For Servic e roa d s- 10. 10.0 0 msa msa is a d op te d . Design of Flexible Pavement Prop osed osed pa vement c om po sition ition for pa veme nt for the p rojec t road , as pe r IR IRC: 37 are g iven be low in in Tab le 1.10. 1.10.

Due to the va riations iations ob served in the c harac teris teristic d eflec tion values along the project roa d, different different c om po sitions of pa vem ent layers have be en d esi esigne d fo r ove rlay a s show n in the Ta b le 1.10 as per IRC - 81. Tab le 1.10: 1.10: Flexible Flexible Pave me nt Design Design for Ov erlay and New Construction Construction Sections

Design


Reco mme nded Pavem ent Comp osit osition ion in mm Nat iona l High High wa ys Aut ho rity of India 1. 14


Traffic (MSA)

Project Report

For Strengthe ning & Wide Wide ning

For New Construction

Overlay Existing Road

New 2/ 4 Lane Lane Road

on

Widening Portion of Existing Existing Roa d

New Service Road (If required)

Sec tio n I: From From km 317+710 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 357 357+250 +250 + 85 DBM + 85 DBM + 50 BM 20 + 85 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 318+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 363+000) Se c tio n II: II: From From km 357+250 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 402 402+940 +940 + 95 DBM + 95 DBM + 50 BM 35 + 95 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 363+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 407+000) Se c tio n III: III: From From km 402+940 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 428 428+620 +620 + 105 DBM + 105 DBM + 50 BM 45 + 105 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 407+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 438+600) Re m a rks: rks: Overlay thickness on existing road is suitably modified to match with widening thickness to avo id ve rtic rtic al joints in DBM DBM layer. GSB GSB- Gra nular Sub Sub -ba se is p rovide d ove r sub sub g rad e soil of CBR > 10%. 10%. 500 500 mm Sub gra d e of CBR > 10% is p rovide d w hereve r the existing existing Sub g rad e soil CBR is < 10%. 10%. Pa ve me nt C om p osition osition is d esigne esigne d fo r 15 yea rs life. life. How ev er WMM & GSB GSB laye rs a re d esigne esigne d f or 20 yea rs life. life.

1.6.4 Service Roads Service roa ds are en visa visa ge d in c ong ested ested tow ns / village village s loc a tions to seg seg rega te the slow mo ving loc al traffic from the hig h-sp h-sp eed highw ay traffic . This will a lso lso c a ter to the ne ed of the local pedestrians and vehicles to travel without hindering the high-speed traffic along the highway. However heavily built-up locations where land acquisition will be a serious social iss issue a re exclude d from p rovid rovid ing with service service roa d s. In In view o f soc soc ial aspe aspe c ts a nd d ensity ensity of population of Kerala, the entire built-up needs to be provided with service road. But when considering the economy of the project, proposal of service roads are restricted to unavoidable locations. Ta b le 1.11 shows the location identified for the provision of service roa ds along the p rojec t roa roa d. Table 1.11 :Proposed Service Road Locations Existing Chainage (Km) (Km)

Design Design Chainag e (Km) (Km)

Sid e (LHS/ RHS

Sl. No .

From ro m

To

Fro m

To

1 2 3 4 5 6

318400 342000 342600 344460 349200 352200

318800 342300 343000 345400 350400 353090

318+440 335+570 336+100 338+100 342+740 345+770

318+670 335+900 336+600 338+930 343+940 346+690


/Both)

Length (km )

Width (m)

Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th LHS

230 330 500 830 1200 920

7 7 7 7 7 7



Sl. No .

Project Report

Existing Chainage (Km) (Km)

Design Design Chainag e (Km) (Km)

Sid e (LHS/ RHS

From ro m

To

Fro m

To

/Both)

353390 354060 354200 357600 363200 377000 383850 389920 392150 411800 414450 427000 427200 427700 431000 434200

346+690 346+990 347+660 350+610 353+420 369+670 375+930 382+010 383+900 385+060 401+000 406+450 406+900 410+650 417+160 418+220 418+420 418+920 423+370

346+990 347+660 347+800 351+210 356+370 370+580 377+520 383+290 384+280 385+340 404+020 406+900 410+580 416+250 418+220 418+420 418+920 422+100 424+500

Bo th LHS Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th RHS Bo th Bo th

7 353090 8 353390 9 354060 10 357000 11 359800 12 376400 13 382600 14 388600 15 16 17 407700 18 413100 19 414450 20 21 22 427000 23 427200 24 427700 25 432000 Tota l Len g th

Length (km )

300 670 140 600 2950 910 1590 1280 380 280 3020 450 3680 5600 1060 200 500 3180 1130 61670

Width (m)

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Slip Roads are proposed along with vehicular underpass . The Table 1.12 below gives the locations of slip roads. Table 1.12: Proposed Slip Road Existing xisting c hainag e

Design Design c hainag e

Side

Sl No

From ro m

To

From ro m

To

Both / LHS/ HS/ RHS

Length (m )

Width (m )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Byp a ss Byp a ss 362740 Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss 412490 412910 413160 425145 Byp a ss 433930

Bypa ss Bypa ss 363520 Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss 412910 413160 413305 425960 Bypa ss 433858

321920 330010 356370 370585 377520 379060 384280 388595 392585 405640 406060 406310 416345 425630 428370

322700 330800 357150 371365 378300 379840 385060 389385 393375 406060 406310 406455 417160 428200 428442

Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th RHS Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th

780 790 780 780 780 780 780 790 790 420 250 145 815 2570 72

5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5

1.6.5 Geometric Improvements




Project Report

The IRC IRC d esign esign sta sta nda rds ha ve b ee n followe d, kee ping the TOR in mind, w hile hile fo rmula ting the highw ay d esign esign sta sta nd ard s for the p rojec t. T The he Projec Projec t stretc stretc h o f NH-1 NH-17 7 in in Kerala Kerala traverses traverses throug h p lain a nd rolling rolling te rra rra ins. ins. Hen Hen c e, IRC IRC g uide lines lines (IR (IRC 73, 1980) 1980) “ Ge om et ric ric De sign Sta nda rd s for Rural Rural (Non-urb (Non-urb an) Highwa ys” ys” hav e b ee n used used for formulating t he d esign esign sta nd a rd s. The d esign esign spe spe ed s to b e a d op ted for various various c at eg ories of road are a s follows: follows: •

Ruling uling d esign esign sp sp eed of 100 100 kmp kmp h an d m inimum inimum sp eed of 80 kmp h for the NH-1 NH-17 7 in pla in terrain. terrain.

•

Design Design sp sp eed of 60 kmph for entranc e/ exis exist sli slip p road s;

•

Design Design spe spe ed of 40 kmp kmp h for service service a nd othe r roa roa d s.

Improvements to horizontal Geometry The ho riz rizonta l geo me tric tric de sign has b een c arried arried o ut using using Highw Highw ay Softw Softw a re Pac Pac kag es c om p lying lying with t he IR IRC C / MO RT&H req req uireme nts. nts. There a re 63 c urves w hic h d oe s not sa tisfy tisfy the d esign esign spe spe ed 100 100 kmp h. So g eo me tric tric imp rove me nts are p rop osed osed at t hese hese c urves urves . Imp rovem ents to Vertica Vertica l Geom etry Vertica Vertica l geom etry of the entire entire length of the project is found satisfac atisfac tory exc exc ep t for a sma ll stretch of km 320+000 – km 323+000 but this has no significance on the improvement proposal because of the Ponnani bypass.

1.6.6 Improvem ent o f Inters Intersec tions 23 major junctions and 33 minor junctions are proposed for improvements in the project stretch. 15 Vehicular Underpasses, are included in the improvement proposals which allow safe mo vem ent of c ross ross road traffic. The The lis lists of r junc junc tions p ropo sed for improve me nts are given in Ta b le 1.13 Tab le 1.13: 1.13: Deta Deta ils of Imp rove me nt of Intersec Intersec tions

Sl. No .

Existing Chainage (km)

Design Chainage (km )

Roa d Lea ds To

Proposed Improvements

Junctio n

Major Junctions

1

318+090 318 +090

318+09 318+090 0

Kutt ipura m

3 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

2

319+440

319+060

Ponnani Start

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

3

Ponnani b yp a ss

330+400 330+400

Edappal,Ponnan i

5 legge d

Vehicular Underpass

4

Ponnani b yp a ss

332+420 332+420

Ponnani Kolimp olimp ad i

4 legge d

At grad e Junction

5

340+160

333+715

Ponnani End

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

358+800

Chavakkad Bypa ss End

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

370+200

Vadanappilly Realignment Start

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

6

7

365+590

376+930


Bypass

– Bypass



Sl. No .

8

9

10

11

12

13


380+270

380+980

387+100

389+885

392+040

395+170

Project Report


Roa d Lea ds To

373+600

Vadanappilly Rea lignm lignm ent End

3 legge d

At grad e Junc Junc tion

377+310

Tripra ya r Realignment Start

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

380+510

Tripra ya r Realignment Ends

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

383+285

Chendrapinni Realignment Start

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

385+230

Chendrapinni Realignment Ends

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

388+350

Moonnupeedika Bypa ss sta rt

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction


Junctio n

14

397+250

390+490

Moonnupeedika Bypa ss Ends

15

398+610

391+850

Mathilakam-1 Bypa ss Sta rt

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

396+335

Mathilakam-1 Bypa ss Ends

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

16

403+030

17

406+020

399+220

Mathilakam-2 Bypa ss Ends

18

407+970

401+100

Kodungallur Bypa ss Sta rt

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

19

411+780

404+135

Kodungallur Bypa ss End

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

406+890

Paravur Start

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

4 legg ed

Vehicular underpass

3 legge d

At grad e Junction

4 legg ed

Grad e sep a ra tor

Bypass

20

414+410

21

Paravur Byp a ss

411+400

Ernakulam,Parav ur

22

426+170

417+400

Paravur end s

23

438+670

428+940

Ernakulam City 438. 438.80 800 0 Aluva

322+310

Ponnani Bypass Crossing

Bypass

Minor Junc Junc tions

1

Ponnani Byp a ss


4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass



Project Report

Sl. No .



Roa d Lea ds To

Junctio n


2

343+2 343+240 40

336+8 336+840 40

Kad av an ad u

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

4 legg ed

At grade Junction unction

3

352+900

346+470

Kunnamkulam, Beac h

4

358+1 358+190 90

351+8 351+800 00

Aviyoor,Bea Aviyoor,Bea c h

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

5

358+7 358+730 30

352+3 352+340 40

Ma llad llad ,Bea ,Bea c h

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

6

363+110 363 +110

356+76 356+760 0

Ch a va kkad u

3 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

363+850

Pulikkakadavu, Benglamkadav u

3 legg ed

At grade Junction

4 legg ed


7

370+640

8

371+570

364+840

Pulikkakadavu, Mangalamkad avu

9

372+6 372+640 40

365+9 365+910 10

Ma rket,P rket,Polakkal olakkal

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

10

375+280

368+540

Manappad, Pokkanc okkanc heri

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction Junction

370+975

Vadanappally – Thriss hrissur Ro a d 4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

Tripra ya r Thriss hrissur Roa d

-

377+910

4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

Valappad Vill Villag ag e Roa d

–

379+450

4 legge d

Vehicular Underpass

381+350

Murinathode Beac h

3 legg ed


382+510

Kattoor, Kazhibr azhibram am

4 legge d


13

Vadanapall y Byp a ss Tripra ya rValappad Byp a ss Tripra ya rValappad Byp a ss

14

387+950

11

12

15

389+110

16

Chendrapin ni Byp a ss

384+670

Chandrappinni – Villag Villag e Roa d

17

405+420

398+750

Mathilakm Bypa ss sta rt

3leg 3leg ge d

At grad e Junction

4 leg ge d

Vehicular Underpass

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

18

Mathilakam I Bypa Byp a ss

392+980

Pallivalavu Tip p u Sulth Sulth a n Roa d

19

-

393+2 393+280 80

Iringa ringa lakkuda ,


4 legg ed

Vehicular Underpass



Project Report

Sl. No .



Roa d Lea ds To

Junctio n


20

413+560 413 +560

406+0 406+060 60

Mo ot ha kunna m

3 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

21

Paravur Byp a ss

416+755

Chungam, Byp a ss Cro ssing

4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

417+680

Karianthuruth, Kachanikode temp le

4 legg ed


418+300

Koorikuzhi, Kottuvallikavu temp le

4 legg ed


3 legge d

At grad e Junction

22

23

426+450

427+080

24

427+350

418+590

Koonammavu Hospital ospital

25

427+8 427+820 20

419+0 419+020 20

Aluva

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

420+400

Olanad, Devaswom pa da m

4 legg ed

At grade Junction

421+220

Puthenpalli, Varap uzha uzha

4 legge d

At grad e Junction

421+760

Mannamthuruth i, Varapuzha Varapuzha

4 legge d

At grad e Junction

4 legg ed


26 27

28

429+200 430+020

430+560

29

431+380

422+580

Njattuvetty ferry, Naduvil Naduvilpp ad i

30

431+800

423+000

Eloor, Cheranelloor Cheranelloor

4 legge d


31

433+5 433+535 35

424+7 424+735 35

Chitoo r road

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

32

Paravur Byp a ss

426+020

Byp a ss C ross

4 leg g e d

Vehicular Underpass

33

Edapally Byp a ss

426+620

Edappally Cross Roa d

4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

-

1.6.7 Underpass Underpasses is proposed at 15 locations for segregating local traffic and through traffic thus red ucing the c onge stion at the inters intersec tion. Ta b le 1.14: Prop Prop osal fo r Und Und erp a sses




Project Report

Sl. No


Design Design Chaina ge (Km)

Op ening Size ize

Usag e

1

318+090 318 +090

318+090 318 +090

1 x 10.5m x 5m

Ve hic ula r Und erp a ss

2

322+310 322 +310

1 x 10.5m x 5m

Ve hic ula r Unde rpa ss

3

Byp a ss Bypass

330+40 330+400 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m

Veh ic ular Und erp ass

4

363+110

356+76 356+760 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


5

Bypass

370+97 370+975 5

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


6

Bypass

377+91 377+910 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


7

Bypass

379+45 379+450 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


8

Bypass

384+67 384+670 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


9

Bypass

388+99 388+990 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


10

Bypass

392+98 392+980 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


11 12 13 14 15

413+560 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass

406+06 406+060 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m

Veh ic ular Und erp ass Vehic ular Und erp a ss Veh ic ular Und erp ass Veh ic ular Und erp ass Veh ic ular Und erp ass

411+400 416+75 416+755 5 426+02 426+020 0 426+62 426+620 0

x 5m x 5m x 5m x 5m x 5m

1.6.8 Flyover Flyove r is is p rop osed osed a t km 438+600 438+600 (Design (Design c h. 428+9 428+940) 40) whe re p rojec t roa d m ee ts NH-47 NH-47.T .The Deta ils ils of prop osed osed flyover is given in Ta b le 1.15 below. Ta b le 1.15: Prop Prop osal fo r Flyo ve r Sl. No


Design Chainage (Km) (Km)

Span

Foundation

1

438+600

428+940

5 x 35+1 35+1 x46+5x35-Se c o nd Tier ie r 10 x 35+1 x46+10x35-T x46+ 10x35-Third hird Tier ie r 10 x 21+1x 38+1x15-Arm

Pile

1.6.9 ROB A two lane ROB construction is in progress at km 437+700 (Design ch. 427+545) at Edappalli where the p roject roa d e nc ounter with a level c ross ossing. An ad ditional 12m 12m wide ROB ROB is p rop osed osed at t his loc at ion. Deta ils ils of p rop osed osed ROB a re given in Tab le 1.16 below Ta b le 1.16: Deta ils of Prop Prop osed ROB Sl. No



Span

Foundation

1

437+700

427+545

13 x 21.6+ 1 x 7.85+ 30+1 x 7.85+13 x 21.6

Pile

1.6.10 Bridg es and Cross Dra Dra inag e Struc Struc tures The p rop osal osal fo r Bri Brid d ge s & C ross oss Draina Draina ge structures during w idening a nd imp roveme nt is given in Ta b le 1.17 & 1.18 respectively. All new structures are proposed with 3 lane configuration Wilbur Smith Assoc iate s Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Four Laning o f NH-17 NH-17 from from Kuttipu ram - Eda pa lly lly in the state of Kerala under NHDP Phase III on BOTBasis

Projec t Rep Rep ort

Tab le 1.17: 1.17: Widening Widening / Imp rovem ent p roposal for Bridges Bridges Sl. No

Existing xisting Cha inag e (Km)


Propo sed Sc hem e

Spa n Arrangement

Typ e o f Sup Sup er structure

Typ e of Substructure Abutment

Pier

Typ e of Foundation

BRIDGES IDGES – Exi sting NH17 fall ing in Proj Proj ec t stretc h

1

319+030 319+030

318+820 318+820

New Fou r lan e

11x 32.5

PSC I g irde r

RCC Solid

RC C Rec t.

Circ ula r Pier

2

342+300 342+300

336+000 336+000

RC C

RC C Rec t.

Pile

369+520 369+520

362+890 362+890

Tw o

1 x 16 .5+ 7 x 24.5 + 1 x 16.5 12 x 26.5

PSC I g irde r

3

PSC I g irde r

RC C

RCC Rec t.

Well

4

382+400 382+400

375+670 375+670

Tw o

1 x 7.1

RCC Slab

RCC

-

Op en

5

412+180 412+180

404+860 404+860

Tw o

RC C

405+450 405+450

PSC I g irde ird e r

RC C

7

413+750 413+750

406+210 406+210

Tw o

RC C T-b ea m

RC C

RC C circular RC C circular -

Well

412+800 412+800

1 x 31.7 + 7 x 32.3 + 1 x 31.7 1 x 32.73 + 9 x 33.3 + 1 x 32.75 1 x 24

PSC I g irde ird e r

6

8

430+300 430+300

421+465 421+465

Tw o

1 x 16.0

RC C T-b ea m

RC C

-

Well

9

431+000 431+000

422+730 422+730

Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane Ad d ition a l lane

Tw o

4 x 20 + 5 x 30+3 x 50+ 1x 83 + 1x 120+1 x 83+ 3 x 50+5 x 30+3 x 20

PSC box +RCC box + RCC voided slab

RCC

New Fou r lane

3 x 18

RCC T-be a m

RCC

New Fo ur lan e

RCC / PSC be a m

RCC Solid

RC C T-b ea m RC C T-b ea m

Tw o

Tw o

Well Well

Well

BRIDGE IDG ES – By By p a sses

10

14+470-P 14+470-Pon on na ni

11 12

1+145Chavakkad 1+428 - Pa rav o or

13

1+716 - Pa rav o or

333+200333+200Ponnani 357+740Chavakkad 407+215 407+215 Paravoor 407+770 407+770 Paravoor

-

New Fou r lan e

1x20 1x20 + 1x30 1x30 + 1x20 1 x 18

-

New Fou r lan e

1 x 18

Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Inc. USA In Joint Joint Ve nture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .

Pile

RC C

RCC circular RCC circular -

RC C

-

Pile

Pile



Sl. No

Pile



14

2+244 - Pa rav o or

15

4+564 - Pa rav o or

16

9+080 Pa rav o or

408+085 408+085 Paravoor 410+620 410+620 Paravoor 416+300 416+300 Paravoor


Propo sed Sc hem e

Spa n Arrangement



Pier

Typ e of Foundation

-

New Fou r lan e

1 x 18

RC C T-b ea m

RC C

-

Pile

-

New Fou r lan e

3 x 25

PSC I g ird ird er

RC C

RCC Rec t.

Pile

New Fo ur lan e

3 x 30

PSC I g irde r

RC C Solid

RCC circular

Pile


Sl. No



14

2+244 - Pa rav o or

15

4+564 - Pa rav o or

16

9+080 Pa rav o or

408+085 408+085 Paravoor 410+620 410+620 Paravoor 416+300 416+300 Paravoor


Propo sed Sc hem e

Spa n Arrangement



Pier

-

New Fou r lan e

1 x 18

RC C T-b ea m

RC C

-

Pile

-

New Fou r lan e

3 x 25

PSC I g ird ird er

RC C

RCC Rec t.

Pile

New Fo ur lan e

3 x 30

PSC I g irde r

RC C Solid

RCC circular

Pile

Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Inc. USA In Joint Joint Ve nture With Wilbur Smith A ssoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Tab le 1.1 1.18: 8: Culve rt Propo Propo sal Pa rtic ula rs


Cu lvert s

124

Tota l numb er of Struct ures to be widened/constructed

NH 17 (Existi (Existing ng c ulve rts Falling Within Projec Projec t Stretc h)

Numb er of Culverts Culverts along Bypa sses/Rea es/Rea lignme nt

Existing

Proposed

91

82

173

Tab le1.19: List ist of Culve rts pro po sed for imp rove me nts Sl no

CD No. No .

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size ize o f Op ening

Typ e o f Struc ture

Proposal

Exisitng 1

318/1

Typ e of Foundation

317+795

317+795

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

Tab le 1.1 1.18: 8: Culve rt Propo Propo sal Pa rtic ula rs


Cu lvert s

124

Tota l numb er of Struct ures to be widened/constructed

NH 17 (Existi (Existing ng c ulve rts Falling Within Projec Projec t Stretc h)

Numb er of Culverts Culverts along Bypa sses/Rea es/Rea lignme nt

Existing

Proposed

91

82

173

Tab le1.19: List ist of Culve rts pro po sed for imp rove me nts Sl no

CD No. No .

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage



Proposal

Exisitng 1

318/1

317+795

317+795

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

2

318/2

317+885

317+885

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

3

319/1

318+065

318+065

Pipe 1X1.2

pipe

Reconstruction

4

319/2

318+895

318+515

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

Ponnani 5

320/1

bypass

319+090

Single cell 2x1.5

Box

Widening

6

320/2

bypass

319+468

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

7

320/3

bypass

319+510

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

8

320/4

bypass

319+825

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

9

321/1

bypass

320+020

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

10

321/2

bypass

320+510

Single cell 2x 1.5

Box

Widening

11

321/3

bypass

320+910

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

12

322/1

bypass

321+602

Single cell 2x1.5

Box

Widening

13

323/1

bypass

322+612

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Widening

14

323/2

bypass

322+935

Single cell 2x3

Box

Widening

15

324/1

bypass

323+238

Single cell 2x3

Box

Widening

16

324/2

bypass

323+535

Single cell4x3

Box

Widening

17

324/3

bypass

323+910

Single cell 4x3

Box

Widening

Wilbur Smith Smith A ssoc ssoc iate s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Wilbur Smith Assoc Assoc iates Pvt. Ltd.

Nationa l Highwa Highwa ys Authority of India

Consultancy Service s for for Feasibility Feasibility Study Study and Detailed Projec t Repo Repo rt for 4-6 laning of Kunda pur - Surathka l Sec tion of NH-17 NH-17 in the State of Karnata ka und er NHD NHDP P ph ase –III –III (Pac (Pac ka ge No. NHD NHDP P-III/ DL5/ DL5/ 08)

Prelimina ry Projec Projec t Rep Rep ort Volume V – Resettlement Ac tion Plan

Sl no

CD No. No .

Chianage

Design Chianage

18

325/1

bypass

324+360

Single cell 4x3

Box

Widening

19

325/2

bypass

324+713

Single cell 5x2.8

Box

Widening

20

326/1

bypass

325+030

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

21

326/2

bypass

325+380

Single cell 2x2

Box

Widening

22

327/1

bypass

326+675

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

23

328/1

bypass

327+080

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

24

328/2

bypass

327+500

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

25

329/1

bypass

328+000

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

26

329/2

bypass

328+410

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

27

330/1

bypass

329+000

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

28

330/2

bypass

329+410

Single cell 2x2

Box

Reconstruction

29

330/3 330/3

bypass

329+730 329+730

Single Single cell 1.5x 1.5

Box

Widening Widening

30

331/1

bypass

330+420

Single cell1.5x 2

Box

Widening

31

331/2

bypass

330+565

Single cell 1.5x 2

Box

Widening

32

331/3

bypass

330+805

Single cell 1.5x 2

Box

Widening

33

332/1

bypass

331+161

Single cell 1.5x 2

Box

Widening

34

332/2

bypass

331+410

Single cell 1.5x 2

Box

Widening

35

332/3

bypass

331+707

Single cell 2x2

Box

New Construction

36

333/1

bypass

332+244

Single cell 2x2

Box

New Construction

37

333/2

bypass

332+430

Single cell 2x2

Box

New Construction

38

334/2 334/2

bypass

333+350

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

39

334/3

bypass

333+533

Single cell 1.5x 2

Box

Widening

Exisitng



Proposal

Existing 40

334/4

340+420

333+970

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

41

337/2

342+640

336+210

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

42

337/3

342+665

336+235

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No. No .

Chianage

Design Chianage

43

337/4

342+690

336+260

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

44

345/1

350+905

344+325

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

45

353/1

358+728

352+348

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

46

355/1

361+208

354+838

Single cell1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Exisitng



Proposal

Chavakkadu 47

357/1 357/1

bypass

356+930

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

48

358/1 358/1

bypass

357+410

Pipe 2X1.2

Pipe

New construction

49

358/2 358/2

bypass

357+488

Pipe 2X1.2

Pipe

New construction

50

358/4 358/4

bypass

357+820

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

51

358/5 358/5

bypass

357+965

Pipe 2X1.2

Pipe

New construction

52

359/1 359/1

bypass

358+108

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

53

359/2

bypass

358+360

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

54

359/3

bypass

358+450

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

55

359/4

bypass

358+520

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

56

359/5

bypass

358+580

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

Existing 57

359/6

365+610

358+920

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

58

361/1

367+625

360+835

Single cell1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

59

362/1

367+810

361+020

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

60

362/2

368+045

361+255

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

61

362/3

368+150

361+360

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

62

363/1

368+905

362+115

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

63

363/2

369+390

362+600

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

64

364/1

370+360

363+625

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

65

366/1

372+505

365+770

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Vadanappilly




Sl no

CD No. No .

66

Exisitng


Chianage

Design Chianage



371/1

bypass

370+550

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

67

372/1 372/1

bypass

371+110

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

68

373/1

bypass

372+700

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

69

374/1

bypass

373+410

Single cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

Proposal

Existing 70

375/1

380+705

374+035

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

71

375/2

380+778

374+108

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Tripra y a r 72

380/1

bypass

379+000

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

73

380/2 380/2

bypass

379+600

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

Existing 74

382/1

387+922

381+332

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

75

383/1

389+045

382+455

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Chendrappinni 76

384/1

bypass

383+422

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

77

384/2

bypass

383+845

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

78

385/1

bypass

384+240

Single Cell 2x1.5

Box

New construction

79

385/2 385/2

bypass

384+752

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

80

385/3

bypass

384+915

Pipe 1X1.2

pipe

New Construction

Existing 81

386/1

392+410

385+600

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

82

386/2

392+750

385+940

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

83

387/1

393+355

386+545

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

84

388/1

394+085

387+275

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Box

New construction

Moonnupeedika 85

389/1

bypass


388+195

Single Cell 1.5x1.5



Sl no

CD No. No .

86

391/1

Exisitng


Chianage

Design Chianage


bypass

390+682

Single Cell 1.5x1.5


Proposal

Box

Reconstruction

Mathilakam Mathilakam 1 87

393/1

bypass

392+520

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

88

393/2 393/2

bypass

392+645

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

89

393/3 393/3

bypass

392+940

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New construction

90

395/1

bypass

394+495

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

91

395/2

bypass

394+535

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

92

396/1

bypass

395+180

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

93

396/2

bypass

395+550

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction

Existing 94

397/1

403+420

396+740

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Widening

95

398/1

403+810

397+130

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

96

398/2

404+082

397+402

Twin Cell 3.0x2.5

Box

Widening

97

399/1

405+390

398+710

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Pipe

New Construction

Mathilakam Mathilakam 2 98

400/1 400/1

bypass

399+015

Pipe 1X1.2 Existing

99

400/2

406+450

399+880

Single Cell 3x2

Box

Widening

100

401/1 401/1

406+885

400+315

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

101

401/2 401/2

407+280

400+710

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Kodungallur 102

402/1

bypass

401+900

Single Cell 3.5x2

Box

New Construction

103

404/1

bypass

403+120

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

104

404/2

bypass

403+580

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

Pipe

Reconstruction

Existing 105

406/2

413+290


405+770

Pipe 1X1.2




Sl no

CD No. No .

Chianage

Design Chianage

106

406/3

413+505

405+985

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

107

407/2 407/2

413+965

406+515

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

108

407/3 407/3

413+700

406+780

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Exisitng



Proposal

Paravoor 109

407/4

bypass

406+950

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

110

408/1

bypass

407+150

Pipe 5x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

111

408/3

bypass

407+480

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

112

408/5

bypass

407+820

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

113

409/2

bypass

408+305

Pipe 4X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

114

409/3

bypass

408+435

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

115

409/4

bypass

408+745

Pipe 5x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

116

409/5

bypass

408+800

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

117

410/1

bypass

409+000

Pipe 5x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

118

410/2

bypass

409+390

Single Cell 2.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

119

410/3

bypass

409+500

Single Cell 2.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

120

410/4

bypass

409+605

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

121

410/5

bypass

409+715

Twin Cell 2.5x2.5

Box

New Construction

122

410/6

bypass

409+770

Pipe 4X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

123

410/7

bypass

409+815

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

124

410/8

bypass

409+960

Pipe 4X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

125

411/1

bypass

410+070

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

126

411/2

bypass

410+115

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

127

411/3

bypass

410+180

Pipe 2x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

128

411/4

bypass

410+225

Pipe 2x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

129

411/5

bypass

410+400

Pipe 5x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

130

411/7

bypass

410+865

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction





Sl no

CD No. No .

Chianage

Design Chianage

131

412/1

bypass

411+105

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

132

412/2

bypass

411+190

Pipe 2x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

133

412/3

bypass

411+680

Pipe 5x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

134

412/4

bypass

411+800

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

135

412/5

bypass

411+850

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

136

413/1

bypass

412+490

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

137

413/2

bypass

412+650

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

138

414/1

bypass

413+060

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

139

414/2

bypass

413+200

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

140

414/3

bypass

413+325

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

141

416/1

bypass

415+200

Pipe 4X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

142

416/2

bypass

415+895

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

143

416/3

bypass

415+995

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

144

417/1

bypass

416+110

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

New Construction

145

418/1

bypass

417+010

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

146

418/2

bypass

417+135

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

147

418/3

bypass

417+180

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

148

418/4

bypass

417+310

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New Construction

Exisitng



Proposal

Existing 149

421/1

429+600

420+800

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

150

422/1

429+810

421+010

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

151

422/2

429+925

421+125

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

152

422/3

430+015

421+215

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

153

422/4

430+045

421+245

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

154

422/5

430+125

421+325

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

155

422/7

430+365

421+565

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No. No .

Chianage

Design Chianage

156

422/8

430+480

421+680

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

157

422/9

430+655

421+855

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

158

423/1

430+945

422+145

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

159

424/1

432+085

423+285

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

160

424/2

432+235

423+435

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

161

424/3

432+375

423+575

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

162

424/4

432+460

423+660

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

163

424/5 424/5

432+590

423+790

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

164

424/6 424/6

432+750

423+950

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

165

425/1 425/1

432+940

424+140

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

166

425/2 425/2

433+160

424+360

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

Reconstruction

Exisitng



Proposal

Edappally 167

426/1

bypass

425+875

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

168

427/2

bypass

426+240

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

169

427/3

bypass

426+500

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

170

427/4

bypass

426+800

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

171

428/1

bypass

428+160

Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe

New Construction

Existing 172

429/1

bypass

428+658

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

173

429/2

bypass

428+870

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction

1.6.11 Toll ol l Plaza s Co nsidering nsidering the traffic c ha rac teristics teristics,, two Toll Plaz Plazas as are nee d ed . It It is reco mm end ed to c onstruct onstruct the Toll Plaz Plaza a s at follow follow ing loc a tions: tions: •

To ll Pla Pla za I – Km 344+160(De sig n C h. km 337+700)

•

To ll Pla Plaza za II – Byp Byp a ss(De sign ig n C h.413+700)

1.6.12 Truck La y b ay s and Rest Area





On str street eet pa rking king of trucks we re o bserved bserved a t m any p lac es in the p rojec t road and adequate number of truck lay byes shall be provided to segregate this from from the t hroug hroug h traffic. Pr Prop osed osed truck lay loc at ions are g iven in in Ta b le 1.20. 1.20. Tab le 1.20: Propo Propo sed Loc a tion o f Truck Lay -Byes     

       

              

       

   

   

           

   

1

Byp a ss

327+700

LHS

Po nna nn a ni Byp a ss

2

365+350

359+050

RHS

Tha ng a lp a d i

3

392+820 392 +820

386+020 386 +020

LHS

Ka ipa ip a m a ng a lam la m

4

431+850

425+150

LHS

Va rap ra p uzha

1.6.13 Bus Ba Ba y s / Bus She She lte rs Considering the overall safety of traffic and minimum hindrance to through traffic, bus bays have been proposed at 70 locations along the project road stretch. 1.6.14 Roa d Furniture, Traffic sign s, Roa Roa d ma rking , & La La ndsc a ping Road markings and road signs standards are designed as per IRC: 35 -1997 and IRC: 67 - 2001 respectively. Road and traffic signs are proposed at appropriate places to give caution and to inform the traffic (vehicular and pedestrians) for safe and smooth movement and the provision are made based on the IRC guidelines. Normally signs are placed on the left side of the road; in certain cases however these may be placed overhead or on either side of the road depending upon the site condition, for clear uninterrupted visibility. Wherever the width of the median is less than 5m in rural section, gla re Bloc Bloc kers / gla re sc sc ree ns ma y be prop osed osed for sa sa fe night time d riving iving . All All signs shall be of Retro-reflective grade, for undisturbed traffic movement in the night times. Wherever applicable, roadside landscaping will be planned. But care would be ta ken not to red uc e the sight dista dista nc e a t a ny of the intersec intersec tions. tions. Street ligh ligh ting a re p rop osed osed in urba n and sem i urb urb an sec sec tions of the p rojec t roa d , at ma jor intersec intersec tions, tions, Truc k lay lay b a ys an d a me nities nities a s p er the g uid e line line s g iven ive n in IS: IS: 1944 (Pa (Pa rt I & II) II) 1970. 1.6.15 Alternate Option for reducing the project cost for making the project viable





In order to reduc e the overall c ost ost to mee t required required financ financ ial viab viab ility ility to c arry arry out the p rojec t und er BOT BOT Toll ba sis, is, c onsultants onsultants have restri restric c ted the b ypa sses to tw o lane an d ha s exclud ed 14 und erpa sses, es, flyove flyove r which w ere p art of o rigina rigina l propo sa l.

1.6.15.1 Bypass Bypasses which aggregates to a length of 49.72 km are restricted to two lane with main c arri arriag ewa y 7m.

1.6.15.2 Widening Sc hem e Mod ified ified w idening sc sc heme afte r res restr tricting icting the b ypa sses to tw o lane a nd remo val of und erpa sses and flyove flyove r. Ea rthern should er is is reduc ed to 1m from from the sta sta nd ard 2m mentioned in manua l of Four Four laning. laning. Tab le 1.21: Propo Propo sed Wide Wide ning Typ e / CS CS-Existing Road Sl. No


Leng th in m

1

Conc entric entric widening without Servi Servic c e Roa Roa d(m ed ian 2m)-1A 2m)-1A Ec c entric wid ening withou t Servic ervic e Roa d ( me dia n 2m)-1B 2m)-1B

14430.00

New Four lane witho ut Servic ervic e Roa d (med ian 2m)-1C 2m)-1C

6290 6290.0 .00 0

Co nc entric wid ening with Service Roa d (med ian 2m)-2A 2m)-2A Ec c entric wid ening with 7m Service Roa d (me d ian 2m)-2B 2m)-2B New Four lane with 7m Servic ervic e Roa d on b oth side(m ed ian 2m)-2C 2m)-2C New Fou r lane with 7m Servic e Roa d on LHS (me d ian 2m)-2D Und erp a ss Ap p roa c h a t 318 318+09 +090 0 with 5.5 5.5m m Slip lip Roa d -3C

6080 6080.0 .00 0 8030 8030.0 .00 0 4690 4690.0 .00 0 1590.0 159 0.00 0 680.0 680.00 0

Sl. No


Leng th in m

1 2

RHS wid ening with ou t Servic e Roa d in in b yp a ss (me d ian 4.5 4.5m)-1D m)-1D New tw o lane in b yp a ss-1E

2255.00 2255.0 0 46835. 468 35.00 00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1582 15820. 0.00 00

Bypass

1.6.15.3 Service Roads Table 1.22 :Proposed Service Road Locations                    

                 

     

               

   

        

      

     

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

   

 

     

     

     

     

   

 

     

     

     

     

   

  



     


                   


                 

     

               

   

        

      

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

   

   

     

     

     

     

   

 

     

     

     

     

   

  

     

     

     

     

   

  

     

     

     

   

 

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

   

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

   

   

     

     

     

     

   

   

     

   

Tota l Leng th

34340

1.6.15.4 Junction Imrprovem Imrprovem ents Tab le 1.23: 1.23: Deta Deta ils of Imp rove me nt of Intersec Intersec tions         

      

          

        

     

    

       

                 

       

            

              



     



        

      

          

        

     

    

            

       

            

318+09 318 +090 0

318+09 318 +090 0

Kutt ipura m

3 leg ge d

Veh icu lar Und erp a ss

3 legge d


5 legg ed

At grad e Junction

4 legge d


3 legge d


       

    

1 2

319+440

319+060

Ponnani Start

3

Ponnani byp ass ass

330+4 330+400 00

Ed ap pa l,P l,Ponna ni

4

Ponnani b yp a ss

332+420 332+420

Ponnani Kolimp olimp ad i

5

340+160

333+715

Ponnani End

358+800

Chavakkad Bypass End

3 legge d


370+200

Vadanappilly Rea lignment Start

3 legge d


373+600

Vadanappilly Rea lignment End

3 legge d


Tripra ya r Rea lignment Start

3 legge d


3 legge d


3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3 legge d


6 7 8

365+590 376+930 380+270

Bypass

– Bypass

9

380+980

377+310

10

387+100

380+510

11

389+885

383+285

12

392+040

385+230

Tripra ya r Rea lignment Ends Chendrapinni Rea lignment Start Chendrapinni Rea lignment Ends

3 legg ed

At gra de Junction

13

395+170

388+350

Moonnupeedika Bypa ss sta rt

14

397+250

390+490

Moonnupeedika Bypa ss End s

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

15

398+610

391+850

Mathilakam-1 Bypa ss Sta rt

3 legg ed

At gra de Junction

396+335

Mathilakam-1 Bypa ss End s

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

16

403+030

17

406+020

399+220

Mathilakam-2 Bypa ss End s

18

407+970

401+100

Kodungallur Bypass Start

4 legge d


404+135

Kodungallur Bypass End

3 legge d


3 legge d


4 leg ge d

A t g rad e Junc tion

19

411+780

20

414+410

406+890

Paravur Start

21

Paravur Byp a ss

411+40 411+400 0

Ernakulam ,Pa ,Pa ravur


Bypass




        

      

          

        

     

    

            

       

            

3 legge d


4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

4 legge d


       

    

22

426+170

417+400

Paravur end s

Bypass

23

438+670

428+940

Ernakulam 438. 438.80 800 0 Aluva

1

Ponnani Byp a ss

322+310

Ponnani Cross Crossing ing

2

343+2 343+240 40

336+8 336+840 40

Kad ava nad u

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3

352+900

346+470

Kunnamkulam, Beac h

4 legg ed


4

358+1 358+190 90

351+8 351+800 00

Aviyoor,Bea Aviyoor,Bea c h

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

5

358+7 358+730 30

352+3 352+340 40


4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

6

363+1 363+110 10

356+7 356+760 60

Cha va kka kka du

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

7

370+640

363+850

Pulikkakadavu, Benglamkada vu

3 legg ed


4 legg ed


City

Minor Junc Junc tions Bypass

8

371+570

364+840

Pulikkakadavu, Manga lamkad avu

9

372+6 372+640 40

365+9 365+910 10


3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

10

375+280

368+540

Manappad, Pokkanc okkanc heri heri

3 legge d


370+975

Vadanappally Thris hrissur Roa d

4 legg ed

At gra de Junction

377+910

Trip ra ya r - Thriss Thrissur ur Roa d

4 legge d


379+450

Valappad – Village Roa d

4 legge d


13

Vadanapally Byp a ss Tripra ya rValappad Byp a ss Tripra ya rValappad Byp a ss

14

387+950

381+350

Murinathode Beac h

3 legg ed


15

389+1 389+110 10

382+5 382+510 10

Ka tto or, Kazhibram azhibram

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

16

Chendrapinni Byp a ss

384+670

Chandrappinni Vill Villag ag e Roa d

4 legge d


11

12


–

–




        

      

          

        

     

    

            

       

            

398+750

Mathilakm start

3leg 3leg ge d


392+980

Pa llivala llivala vu - Tipp u Sulthan ulthan Roa d

4 legge d


       

    

Bypass

17

405+420

18

Mathilakam Byp a ss

19

-

393+2 393+280 80

Iringa ringa lakkuda ,

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

20

413+5 413+560 60

406+0 406+060 60

Mo otha kunnam

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

21

Paravur Byp a ss

416+755

4 legge d


22

426+450

417+680

Chungam, Bypass Cross Crossing ing Karianthuruth, Kachanikode temp le

4 legg ed


4 legg ed


I

23

427+080

418+300

Koorikuzhi, Kottuvallikavu temp le

24

427+350

418+590


3 legge d


25

427+8 427+820 20

419+0 419+020 20

Aluva

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

26

429+200

420+400

Olanad, Devaswom Devaswom pa da m

4 legg ed


27

430+020

421+220

Puthenpalli, Varapuzha Varapuzha

4 legge d


421+760

Mannamthuruthi, Varapuzha Varapuzha

4 legge d


4 legg ed


28

430+560

29

431+380

422+580


30

431+80 431 +800 0

423+00 423 +000 0

Eloor, Ch era nelloo r

4 leg ge d

At g rad e Junc tion

31

433+5 433+535 35

424+7 424+735 35

Chitoo r roa d

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

32

Paravur Byp a ss

426+02 426+020 0

Byp a ss Cross Cross

4 leg g ed

At g rad e Junc tion

33

Edapally Byp a ss

426+620

Edappally - Cross Roa d

4 legge d


1.6.15.5 Underpass Wilbur Smith Smith A ssoc ssoc iate s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Wilbur Smith Assoc Assoc iates Pvt. Ltd.




Underpasses is proposed at one location for segregating local traffic and through traffic traffic thus red ucing t he c ong estion estion at the intersec intersec tion. Ta b le 1.24: Prop Prop osal fo r Und Und erp a sses Sl. No



Op ening Size ize

Usag e

1

318+090 318 +090

318+090 318 +090

1 x 10.5m x 5m


1.6.15.6 ROB A two lane ROB at km 437+700 (Design ch. 427+545) is already constructed in Eda pa lly lly bypa ss which c an c ate r for the proposed proposed two laning.

1.6.15.7 Bridg es and Cross Dra Dra inag e Structu Structu res The p rop osa osa l fo r Brid rid g es & C ross ross Draina g e struc struc tures d uring uring wid ening a nd improvement is given in Tab le 1.25 & 1.26 respectively. All new structures are prop osed osed w ith 3/6 lan lan e co nfiguration. All All bridg es an d c ulverts a long the byp ass asses are o f 3 lane c onfiguration onfiguration a s the b ypa sses are restr restricted icted to two lane c onfiguration. onfiguration. Tab le 1.25: 1.25: Widening Widening / Improve me nt propo sal for Majo r Bri Bridg dg es

Sl. No

Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design

Proposed Scheme

Span Arrangement

Typ e o f Super structure

Typ e o f Sub struc ture

Typ e o f Foundation

Chainage (Km) Abutment

Pier

RCC

RCC Rect.

Circula r Pier Pier

BRIDGES IDGES – Existing xi sting NH17 fa llin g in i n Proj Projec ec t stretc h 1

319+030 319+030

318+820 318+820

New Fou r lane

11x 32.5

PSC I girder

So lid 2

342+300 342 +300

336+000 336 +000

Ad ditiona l Two lane

1 x 16 .5+ 7 x 24.5 + 1 x 16.5

PSC I girder

RCC

RCC Rect.

Pile

3

369+520 369 +520

362+890 362 +890


12 x 26.5

PSC I girder

RCC

RCC Rect.

Well

4

412+180 412 +180

404+860 404 +860


1 x 31.7 + 7 x 32.3 + 1 x 31.7

PSC I girder

RCC

RCC circular

Well

5

412+800 412 +800

405+450 405 +450


1 x 32.73 + 9 x 33.3 + 1 x 32.75

PSC I girder

RCC

RCC circular

Well




6

431+000 431 +000


422+730 422 +730


4 x 20 + 5 x 30+3 x 50+ 1x 83 + 1x 120+1 x 83+ 3 x 50+5 x 30+3 x 20

PSC b ox +RCC +RCC bo x + RCC voided sla b

RCC

Well

357+740Chavakkad

New Two lane

1x20 + 1x30 + 1x20

RC C / PSC

RC C

RC C

beam

So lid

circular

PSC

RCC

RCC

BRIDG BRIDG ES – By By p a sses 7

8

1+145Chavakkad

4+564 Paravoor

410+620 Paravoor

New Two lane

3 x 25

I girde girde r 9

9+080 Paravoor

416+300 Paravoor

New Two lane

3 x 30

Pile

Pile

Rect.

PSC

RCC S

RC C

I girde girde r

olid

circular

Pile

Tab le 1.26: 1.26: Wide Wide ning/ Imp roveme nt prop osal for Minor Bri Bridg dg es

Sl. No

Existing Chainage (Km)

Design Chainage (Km)

Proposed Scheme

Span Arrangement


Typ e o f Substructure

Typ e o f Foundation

1

382+400 382 +400

375+670 375 +670

Ad dition al Tw o

1 x 7.1

RCC Slab

RCC

-

Op en

1 x 24

RC C Tbeam

RCC

-

Well

1 x 16.0

RC C Tbeam

RCC

-

Well

lane 2

413+750 413 +750

406+210 406 +210

Ad dition al Tw o lane

3

430+300 430 +300

421+465 421 +465

Ad dition al Tw o lane

BRIDGE IDG ES – Byp a sses 4

14+470Ponnani

333+200Ponnani

New Two lane

3 x 18

RC C Tbeam

RCC

RCC circular

Pile

5

1+428 Paravoor

407+215 Paravoor

New Two lane

1 x 18

RC C Tbeam

RC C

-

Pile Pile





6

1+716 Paravoor

407+770 Paravoor

New Two lane

1 x 18

RC C Tbeam

RC C

-

Pile Pile

7

2+244 Paravoor

408+085 Paravoor

New Two lane

1 x 18

RC C Tbeam

RC C

-

Pile Pile

2 Sum m a ry o f EIA EIA a nd IE IEE E 2.1 2.1 Environmenta Environmenta l Imp ac ts and Environmenta l Ma nag em ent Plan Plan ( EMP) MP) Environm ent a l Imp Imp a c t A ssess essm ent (EIA) (EIA) rep ort p resen resen ts the Environm en ta l Ass Assess essme nt of t he prop osed osed imp roveme nt fo r the 120.6 120.6 Km Km of NH 17 in the Sta te of Kerala. The The rep ort has wo rked rked out with mitigation m ea sures ures to minimis minimise e o r mitiga mitiga te t he imp ac ts identified during the course of project implementation. Guidelines formulated by Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India were referred for p repa ring ring EIA. Ap a rt from from this va rious India n Ac ts an d regulation s we re review review ed suc h as, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (amended in 1978 and 1988), 1988), Air (Preven (Preven tion a nd C on trol of Pollution Pollution ) Ac t, 1981 1981,, Environm Environm ent (Prot (Prot ec tion ) Ac t, 1986 1986 a nd EIA No tific a tions of 1994 1994 a nd 200 2006. 6. Field inspections at all the sensitive locations, collection of secondary information for all

the

environmental

components,

baseline

environmental

monitoring,

and

discussions with the officials, NGOs and local public were conducted to establish the baseline environmental status of the study area and to assess the impacts of the p rop osed osed imp rovem ents to the p rojec rojec t roa roa d . The ba seline eline environment al mo nitoring nitoring wa s c ond ucte d from from Sep tem be r 200 2006 6 to Oc tob er 200 2006. 6. The a mb ient temp erature erature d uring uring the mo nitori nitoring ng p eriod eriod varied varied be twe en 32.6 32.6 o C to 21.4 o C a nd relat ive humidity rang ed b etw een 96% 96% a nd 88% 88%. The solar solar rad iation recorded ranged between 28.2 Watt hour/sq m and 0.20 Watt hour/sq m. Average rain fall during the study period was around 404.01 mm. Predominant winds were mo stly from from Sout h-Sout h-Sout hw est est a nd Sout h West West d irec irec tions with freq uen c ies of 13.7 13.7% % a nd 11.5 11.5 % respe respe c tively. Calm c ond itions itions preva iled iled for 0.7 0.7 % for the tot al time . The b aseline aseline sta sta tus of a mb ient a ir qua lity lity ha s be en e sta blished blished through a sc ientific ientific a lly lly designed network of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) stations set up at 11 locations along the project road representing different conditions like rural, urban, resident resident ial and c om me rcial area s. The m onitoring w a s d one for 24 24 hrs hrs for tw o d a ys in a week for four weeks. All the ambient air quality parameters were well within the NAAQ Sta Sta nd ard s at a ll the loc a tions exce p t an Increa se in SPM level at Kotta pp uram Wilbur Smith Smith A ssoc ssoc iate s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Wilbur Smith Assoc Assoc iates Pvt. Ltd.




. Surfac urfac e w ate r sam sam ples we re c ollec ollec ted from from seven loc ations along the p rojec t road . Imp orta nt c hem ic a l p a ram et ers like like Ch lorid lorid es, es, Hardn ess ess a nd Tot Tot a l Diss Dissolve d S Solids olids were observed to be very high at five locations due to the backwater influence. Biologic al Indic at or – tota l Coliforms – is is also also found to be higher tha n the pe rmiss rmissible limits at five locations. Faecal Coliforms were present at four locations. Ground water sam ples we re c ollec ollec ted from from six loca tions. tions. All the physica physica l and c hemica l pa ram eters of g round wa ter a t a ll the loca tions we re within the IS:105 :10500 00 sta sta nd ard s. Tota l Coliforms Coliforms we re m ore tha n the p ermiss ermissible limits limits,, but fa ec al Co liforms liforms we re ab sent Out of the 11 locations where ambient noise level monitoring was done along the project road, eight locations represented residential areas and three locations represented commercial areas. Among the eight locations representing residential areas, noise levels at four locations were below the permissible limit set by the CPCB during during d ay time and night night t ime. At two loca tions the noise noise levels during during d ay time and night time were above the permissible limits. Out of the remaining two locations representing residential areas, day time noise level at one location and night time noise level at other location was above the permissible limit. Among the three loca tions rep resenting esenting c om mercial a rea s, noise noise level at one loca tion wa s be low the p ermiss ermissible limits limits for co mm ercia l areas d uring uring d a y time a nd night time . Day time noise noise level at the rem a ining ining tw o loc a tions wa s a bo ve the p ermiss ermissible limit. limit. The projec t roa d is not p ass assing t hrough any forest forest a reas, reas, wildlife wildlife sanc tua ries ries and protected areas. However, the project road is passing through Vembanad-Kol we tland system ystem , whic h is a Ra msar msar Site. Site. Ma ng ala vana m Bird ird Sanc tua ry is is situate d 5 Km away from the project road. No rare/threatened species of flora or fauna is present in the project area except the mangroves along the canals, rivers and estuaries crossing / abutting the project road. About 56,300 trees – mainly coconut trees - are present in the proposed 45-m right of way of the project road since it is p ass assing throug h a gricultural area s. The c ost ost of imp leme nting a bo ve m itiga itiga tion me a sures as estima estima ted in Ta b le 2.1 2.1,, works ou t t o Rs.15 Rs.15.31 .315 5 Crores. Crores. The op era tion a l c ost ost o f the sa me is estima estima te d a t Rs Rs. 1.5 1.5 lakhs per annum during the first three years and Rs. 27.93 lakhs per annum from 4 th year onwards Tab le 2.1Cost Estima tes for for Environm Environm enta l Ma nag em ent P Plan lan

Item

Assum Assum ptio ns

Cost in Rs

1. Provis Provision ion o f Sew Sew ag e an d san itation facilities for the construction camps, inc luding ma intena nc e for 3 yea rs

Lum p Sum

1,000,000.00

2. Provision of Water Supply Facilities for the c onstr onstruction uction ca mp s

Lum p Sum

600,000.00

3. Plantat ion o f twice the numb er of trees to b e c ut (5630 (56300 0 x 2), an d the ir

Rs.900/ Tree re e x 112,600 Tree s

101,340,000.0 0

A. Tota Tota l Co st During During Constructio n P Phase hase




Item


Assum Assum ptio ns

Cost in Rs

4. Shrub hrub planta tion in the me dian for the th e e ntir nt ire e c o rrido rrido r @ 500 sa p lings (sing (sing le row) per kilometer for built-up areas with 1.5m 1.5m o f me d ian a nd @1000 1000 sa p lings lings (d (d oub le row row ) for rur rura a l area s with 4.5 4.5 m o f me d ian, a nd their fenc ing and ma intenanc e for 3 years

Rs. 500/ Shrub hru b x 80300 Shrub hru b s (@ 500 shru shrub b s/ Km x 53.6 Km Km + 1000 shrub shrub s/ Km x 53.5 Km Km )

40,150,000.00

5. Transp ransp lanta tion of M a ngrove s a nd their ma intena nc e for 3 yea rs

Lum p Sum

2,500,000.00

6.1.. Air Qu a lity 6.1 lity Mo nito ring ring

Rs. 200 2000/ 0/ loc a tion x 10 locations x 3 seasons x 3 years

180,000.00

6.2.. Wat er Qu a lity 6.2 lity Mo nito ring ring

Rs. 2500/lo 2500/lo c a tion x 4 locations x 2 seasons x 3 years

60,000.00

6.3.. Noise 6.3 Noise Mo nito ring ring

Rs. 500/ 500/ loc a tion x 10 locations x 3 seasons x 3 years

45,000.00

6.4.. So il Qu a lity 6.4 lity Mo nito ring ring

Rs. 2000 2000// loc a tion x 10 locations x 2 seasons x 3 years

120,000.00

6.5. Mo b ilis ilisa a tio n Ch a rge s

Rs. 35000/ 35000/ sea son x 3 se a so ns x 3 yea rs

315,000.00

7. Dust Dust Sup p ress ression a t Site

Rs. 800/ trip x 10 trips/ d a y x 365 365 d a ys x 2 yea rs

5,840,000.00

8. Sev era nc es & O the rs (inc luding training training , w orkshop orkshop s, a wa rene ss ca mpa igning gning etc .)

Lum p sum

1,000,00 1,000,000.00 0.00

fencing and ma intenanc e for 3 years

6. Environmental Monitoring

Tota l c ost d uring c onstruc onstruc tion ph ase

153,150,0 153,15 0,000. 00.0 0 0

B. An nua l Co st During During Op eratio na l Pha Pha se d uring Firs Firstt Three Three Yea rs




Item


Assum Assum ptio ns

Cost in Rs

1.1.. Air Pollution Mo nitoring 1.1

Rs.20 .2000/lo 00/lo c a tion x 5 locations for 3 seasons

30,000.00

1.2.. Noise 1.2 Noise Mo nito ring ring

Rs.50 .500/ 0/ loc a tion x 10 locations for 3 seasons

15,000.00

1.3. Mo b ilis ilisa a tio n Ch a rge s

Rs. 35000/ 35000/ sea son x 3 seasons

105,000.00

1. Environmental Monitoring

Tota l annua l c ost during op erationa l pha se during firs first three three ye ars

150,0 150,000 00.0 .00 0

C. Annua l Cost Dur During ing O pe rational Phase Phase from from 4 th Year Onwards 1. Ma inte na nc e o f trees tre es a nd shrub s

Rs.25000/ .25000/ km x 111.73 111.73 Km

Tota l annual c ost during op erationa l phase from from 4 th ye ar onw a rds

2,793,25 2,793,250.00 0.00 2,793, 2,7 93,250 250.00 .00

Sourc e : Analysis

UNITS 1 hec ta re 1 hec ta re 1 hec ta re 1 hec ta re 1 ac re 1 c ent 1 me te r 1 sq . me te r

= = = = = = = =

2.47 2.47 ac res 10,0 10,000 00 sq. me ter 11,959 11, 959.90 .90 sq . ya rds 2.5 2.5 Ac res 100 100 c ent s 40.47 40.47 sq . mt s. 3.28 3.2 8 foo t 10.76 10.76 sq . foo t

: : : : : : : : : : : :

Be low Pove Pov e rty Line Sc hed ule of Ra tes Ma nga lore lore Circle Com munity Ba sed Orga nizat nizat ion Co mm on Prop erty Resourc esourc es Dep uty Co mm iss issioner Det a iled iled Projec t Rep ort District District Reset eset tlem ent a nd Reha bilita tion Off ice r Execut ing Ag enc y Environm ent a l a nd Soc ial Deve lop me nt Unit Fo Fo c us G rou p Disc Disc uss ussions io ns Government of Karnata ka Grieva Grieva nc e Red ress ress Co mm ittee

A BBR BBREV IAT IA TIONS IO NS BPL SRMC CBO CB O CPR DC DPR DP R DRR DR RO EA ESDU FG Ds GoK GRC GRC




Ha IA LA LAA / LA Ac t R&R M& E NGO NH Ac t NHAI NH AI NHDP NH DP NPR NP RR PAF PAP PC PIU RAP RoW Existing xisting Mile sto ne Chainage Proposed Design Chainage


: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Hec ta re Imp leme nting nting Age ncy La nd Ac q uisition uisition Land Ac q uisiti uisition on Ac t Reset eset tlem ent a nd Reh a b ilita ilita tion Monitoring and Evalua tion Non-Gove rnmenta l Orga nisat nisat ion National Highwa y Ac t Nationa l Highwa y Autho rity of Ind ia Nationa l Highwa y Deve lopm ent Prog ramm e Nat iona l Polic y on Resettlem en t a nd Reha bilita tion Projec t Affe c te d Fa mily Projec t Affe c te d Person erson Projec t Co nsulta nsulta nt Projec t Imp lem en ta tion Unit Reset eset tlem ent Ac tion Plan Right of Way Right 00/000

:

00+000



DEFINIT INITIO ION NS Assistance refers to the support provided to PAPs in the form of ex-gratia payments, loans, asset services, training and skills development, etc. in order to improve the stand ard of livi living ng a nd m itiga itiga te the ne ga tive imp imp ac ts of the Projec Projec t. Below Poverty Line (BPL) Households are households whose monthly income is less than a de signated sum a s de termined termined by the G overnment of India. Compensation refers to the amount paid under the National Highways Act, 1956 for private property, structures and other assets acquired for the project. In this context, compensation refers to payments made by the Government when title of a property is transferred from a private entity to the government. Cut-off-Date. The d at e of no tific tific at ion unde r Sub sec tion (1) of Sec Sec tion 3A, of Nationa l Highw a ys Ac t, 19 1956 56 will be c onsidered onsidered as c ut-off d at e for PAPs PAPs who ha ve leg a l title title to the land / p rope rty, prop osed osed for ac quisiti quisition. on. In In the c a se of Squa Squa tte rs, Enc roa c hers and unauthorized occupants the date of census/socio-economic survey conducted by the Design DPR Consultants will be considered as the cut-off date for entitlements under the Project. Deputy Commissioner is the Administrative head of a District and overall in charge of a ny Lan Lan d Ac q uisiti uisition on fo r pub lic lic purpo ses within the resp resp ec tive d istri istric c t. Enc roac hers are persons who have extended their building, agricultural lands, business premises or work places into government lands. Private Property Owners / Titleho lde rs are tho se w ho ha ve leg al title title to land , stru struct ct ure ure and other assets. Project Affected Person (PAPs (PAPs)) a re p ersons ersons who hav e ec ono mic interests interests or residenc residenc e within within the project project impac t area a nd w ho ma y be ad vers versely affec affec ted direc direc tly tly by the Project. Project Affected Persons include those displaced, those losing commercial or resident resident ial structures structures in in w hole o r pa rt, those those losing losing a gricultura gricultura l la la nd or hom estea estea d s in who le or pa rt, an d t hose hose losing losing inco me source s a s a result result of p roject ac tion, or having losses as described in the Entitlement Matrix. PAPs include both titled and non-titled persons experiencing resettlement impacts due to the Project. Project Affected Family (PAFs) me a ns c onsis onsisting of suc h p ersons, ersons, his or he r sp sp ouse, minor sons, unmarried daughters, minor brothers or unmarried sisters, father, mother and other mem be rs resi esiding w ith him him a nd de pe nde nt on him him fo r their their livel livelihood. ihood. Project Impact Area refers to the area proposed for the project under NH Act 1956, involvi involving ng pe rma nent land ac quisiti quisition. on. Replac eme nt Value of the acquired assets and property is the amount required for the Project Affected Household to replace/reconstruct the lost assets through purcha se in ope n ma rket. Squatters are those who have illegally occupied lands for residential, business and or othe r p urposes urposes.. Tena nts, nts, Lea Lea seho lde rs and Sharec ropp ers are those persons having bonafide written or unwritten tenancy agreements, with a private property owner having clear



property titles, to occupy a structure or land for agricultural use, residence and b usine usine ss. Vulnerable Households,

for

Project

compensation

entitlement

purposes,

are

households households hea de d by w ome n (not ha ving ving a ny other earning earning m emb ers in the family family above 14 years of age), disabled persons, indigenous persons, and BPL households.



3 Sum m a ry o f Re Re se ttl tt le m e nt Ac tio tio n Pl Pla n 3.1

Introduction

The p roject road c om p ris rises the p ortion of NH-17 NH-17 from c ha inag e 317+71 317+710 0 at Kuttip Kuttip puram in Malappuram district to chainage 429+440 at Edappally in Ernakulam district of Kerala. Top og raph ica lly lly this stretc h runs through p lain lan lan d pa ra llel llel to t he c oa st line line e xcep t for firs first 3 km, whic h runs through the rolling rolling t errain errain of M ala pp uram d istri istric c t. The projec t roa d pa sses throug throug h t hree a dm inis inistrative bo und aries– aries– Mala pp uram, Tris rissur and Ernakulam districts of Kerala state Out of the total 111.730 km. first 25.14 km. passes through Malappuram district where the settlement pattern is less dense comprising residential, c om me rcial a nd ag ric ric ultura ultura l land land s. As the road ente rs Thris hrissur distri distric c t the p op ulation d ensity ensity increases and the land use is predominantly residential with commercial hubs in between. This stretc h, which ac c ount s for 53% 53% of th e t ota l projec t leng th p a sses through ma ny c omm ercial ce nters with d ense ense ribb ribb on d evelopm ent o n either side side o f the roa d. The The last last stretch of 24.182 km. in length, passes through urban centers of Paravur and Kanayannur taluk in Ernakulam and has very narrow winding roads with very closely and densely knit settlements. Following are the demarcations of the entire project road based on a dm inis inistrative b ound aries: aries: Sec tion-I - Ma lap puram Dis Distric tric t - (Exis (Existing ting Cha inag e 317+ 317+ 710 710 to 349+2 349+280 80 & Desi Design gn c haina ge : 317+710 to 342+820) Sec tion- II - Thriss hrissur District District -

(Existi (Existing ng Chaina g e 349 349+ + 280 to 409 409+11 +110 0 & Design Design c haina ge : 342+820 to 405+260)

Section-III - Ernakulam District - (Existing Chainage 349+ 280 to 438+600 & Design chainage: 405+260 to 429+440)

3.2

Projec t A rea Profile

Although project stretch has 65% rural settlements and an urbanization rate of only 12 per c ent, itit has a mixed mixed c harac ter of urba urba n and rural ural settlements settlements due to the pe c uliar uliar settlement settlement pattern of Kerala which is called as urban-rural continuum. An analysis of the socioeconomic indicators like literacy rate and work force participation shows that level of d eve lop me nt is mo re or les less s sa me in all leve leve ls of a na lysis lysis - sta sta te , district district a nd p rojec t a rea . The project area has a high literacy rate of 82 per cent and a WFPR of 30 per cent, which is just b elow t he sta sta te a verag e o f 32 p er ce nt. Gen de r d isp isp arity in in terms of litera litera c y rat rat e a nd WFP WFPR is less in project area as well as state and districts, except Malappuram, which shows very low p articipa tion of wo me n in ec ono mic a c tivities tivities.. The a na lysis lysis of w ork force c om po sition ition in the

a nd a red uc tion in the w orkers orkers in ag ricultural sec sec tor. The d ec lining lining sta sta tus of a gricultura gricultura l sector of Kerala is further established by the finding that marginal and small sized land Wilbur Smith Smith A ssoc ssoc iate s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Wilbur Smith Assoc Assoc iates Pvt. Ltd.

3.1 3.1

National Highwa ys Authority of India

holdings dominates the agricultural sector and the presence of medium or large holdings that give mo re e c onom ic returns returns are very limi limited ted . Since Kerala’s Kerala’s ec onom y is do minated by secondary and tertiary sector, especially tourism and construction industries, adequate infrastructure facilities like highways are a pre-requisite to boost and sustain the growth in these these sec sec tors. tors. Moreover, the p roject highw highw ay has a very strategic strategic impo rtanc e in the state of Kerala due to following three reasons – Firstly, NH -17 is one of the three major transportation routes of the state; secondly, it gives easy access to major cities in Karnataka and Maharashtra and the regional transportation network, and thirdly, it increases the connectivity of the Kochi Port to the surrounding region. Hence the project, once c om pleted , will will increa increa se the c onnec tivity tivity of the project a rea as well as the state state as a whole to the surrounding region and the rest of the country, thereby facilitating an increased ma rket a c c ess ess, loca lly, ly, nationa lly lly a nd glob ally. ally. The initial initial field field rec onna iss issan c e c ond uc ted show s tha t the land use use a long the p roject stretc stretc h is dominated by residential and commercial activities with ribbon development at commercial nodes along the hig hwa y. The siz size e o f these these c om me rcial nod es varies wid ely and it repeats freq freq uently a t irreg irreg ular interva interva ls. ls. The resident resident ial b elts in be tw ee n the se n od es have small shops as well. In addition to commercial buildings, these nodal centres have religious structures, institutional structures like schools, hospitals, panchayat offices, post offices etc. Following are t he soc soc ially ially sens sensiti itive ve stretc hes ident ified ified for the p roject a rea. Malap puram distr district: ict: The e xis xisting h ighw a y here p a sses throug h tw o t yp es of sensi sensitive tive a rea s. The hea vily vily built built up a rea in the c omm ercial area area s of Cha mrava ttom and Poona ni tow n and the presence of numerous mosques very adjacent to the existing ROW, which is c onc entrat ed mo re tow a rd s RHS., due to the ab ove said soc ial sens sensiti itivene vene ss b ypa ss is propo sed a t the sam sam e loc loc ations. Tric hur di stric t: Following are the socially sensitive features along the existing road passing through Tric ric hur distri distric c t, whic h are sav sav ed by e ither rea rea lignm lignm ent o r bypa ss. •

Presenc resenc e o f nume rous mo squ es till till itit reac hes Cha vakkad Munic ipa lity lity

•

Hea vily vily b uilt uilt settleme settleme nts of Cha vakkad and Kod unga lloor lloor m unic unic ipalities ipalities

•

Presence

of

numerous

commercial

nodes

and

centers

with

ribbon

development on either side of the highway that repeats at frequent but irregular irregular intervals. intervals. These hese a c tivity tivity c entres ha ve he avily built up area s on either sides of the road . Ernakulam district: The sett lemen ts along the existing existing hig hwa y in Ernakul Ernakula a m distri distric ct w as characterized by following socially sensitive features, which are also saved by either rea lignment or byp ass ass •

All the settlements here are in urban areas – except at Moothakunnam. Hence sett lemen ts are d enser enser and c losely losely pa c ked t han p revious stretc hes. hes.

•

The sett sett leme nts in Paravur Paravur a re very de nse; nse; the a lrea lrea dy p ropo sed b ypa ss reduc es the imp ac t up on its soc ial fab fab ric.

•

Even thoug h the m ain temp le co mp lex at Thirumoo hirumoo pp am on RH RHS is loca ted aw ay from from the ed ge of exis existing ROW, ROW, peop le are ag ainst ainst c utting utting o f big b anya n tree tree in front front of it and are not will willing to pa rt with the temple c omp ound a nd p ond for the project purpose. purpose.

Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .

E-2 Nat iona l High High wa ys Aut hority of India

•

For the d ense ense sett sett leme nts of Che rana llur, llur, Kunnump uram a nd Ed Ed ap pa lly lly a b ypa ss is und er c on struc tion f or 30m. ROW. ROW.

3.3

R&R Policies and Entitlement Framework

This Resett esett lemen t Ac tion Plan Plan (RAP (RAP)) do c ume nt d esc esc ribes the p rinc rinc iples an d a p proa c h to b e followed in minimizing and mitigating negative social and economic impacts of the project. The RAP RAP has has been d evelope d ba sed on a pp lica lica ble a c t/ po licies viz. viz. National Highwa Highwa ys Ac t1956 1956,, a nd Nationa l Policy Policy o n Res Resett ett leme nt a nd Reha bilita bilita tion-200 tion-2003 3 (NPR (NPRR) a nd follow follow ing a re the ma in R&R R&R Polic Polic y Princ Princ iples: iples: (i) (i)

The nega tive impa c t on pe rsons affec ted by the project wo uld uld be avoided or minimized.

(ii) (ii)

If individ individ uals or a co mm unity must must lose lose all or pa rt of their land , me ans of liveli livelihoo hoo d , or social support systems, so that a project might proceed, they will be compensated and assisted through replacement of land, housing, infrastructure, resources, income sources, and services, in cash or kind, so that their economic and social c irc irc umsta umsta nc es will be at lea st restored restored to the pre-projec t level.

(iii)

All acquisition of land would be under National Highways Act, 1956, which provides for c omp ensation ensation for prop prop erties erties to b e a c quired quired . Supp ort would would b e extende d for meeting the rep lace ment va lue lue of t he p rop erty. erty. The p ersons ersons affec ted by the p rojec t who does not own land or other prop erties erties but who have ec onom ic interest interest o r los lose e their liveli livelihoo hoo d s will be ass assisted isted as per the broa d p rinciples b roug ht o ut in this p olicy .

(iv)

Broad entitlement framework for different categories of project-affected people has been assessed and is given in the entitlement matrix. Provisions will be kept in the bud ge t for those those w ho w ere not present present a t the time o f enume ration. How How ever, anyone moving into the p roject area afte r the c ut-off dat e w ill ill not be entitled entitled to a ssistanc istanc e .

(v)

The PAPs APs will be fully informed informed and c losely losely c onsulted onsulted . All informa informa tion relate d to resettlement esettlement p rep aration and implementa tion will will be d isc isc losed losed to a ll c onc erned, and people’s participation is being ensured in planning and implementation of the project.

(vi)

Before taking possession of the acquired lands and properties, compensation and R&R ass assista ista nc e w ill ill be m ad e in ac c orda nc e w ith this p olicy.

(vii)

Institutions of the PAPs, and, where relevant, of their hosts, will be protected and supported. PAPs will be assisted to integrate economically and socially into host communities so that adverse impacts on the host communities are minimized and social harmony is promoted.

Compensation and assistance: In g ene ral terms, terms, the PAPs PAPs und er the p rojec rojec t w ill ill be e ntitled t o five types of compensation and assistance: (i) Compensation for loss of land, crops/trees; (ii) Compensation for structures (residential/commercial) and other immovable assets; (iii) Ass Assista ista nc e fo r los loss s of b usines usiness s/ wa g e inc om e; (iv) A ssista ista nc e fo r shifting shifting ; an d , (V) Ass Assista ista nc e fo r re-building and/or restoration of community resources/facilities. A detailed description of ea c h c om pe nsat nsat ion me asures asures an d a ssista ista nc e is provide d in the Entitlement Entitlement M a trix. trix. Ce nsus Surve Surve ys: Census Census of PAP PAPs s loca ted within within the p rojec t impa c t a rea will will be und ertaken as pa rt of implementa tion to d oc ument their stat us. us. This his will will provid provid e a de mo grap hic ove rview of Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


the a ffec ted p op ulation, profiles profiles of ho useho useho ld a ssets and ma in source source s of livelihoo livelihoo d. The The survey will identify occupants/users of land/property other than owner/titleholders such as tenants,

sharecroppers,

leaseholders,

encroachers,

squatters,

wage

labourers

and

employees of business. Owners without title deed but having customary rights over the a ffec ted prop erty will will also also b e ident ified ified an d rec orde d . This will ma inly inly inc inc lude sc sc hed ule trib trib es/ es/ nom ad ic t ribes. ibes. Census survey will c ove r 100 100% % of the PAPs APs within the p rojec t imp ac t area Cut-off-Date: Final technical drawings and topographic details will be used for reference d uring uring the Ce nsus nsus Surveys urveys an d FGDs. GDs. The c ut-off d at e for tho se w ho ha ve lega l title title is the d at e o f Notifica tion und er Sub -sec -sec tion (1) of Sec Sec tion 3A of NH Act . The d at e o f c ensus ensus d uring uring revalidation of RAP would be the cut-off date for those who do not have legal standing for eligibility of assistance under the project. People moving into the project area after this cutoff d at e w ill ill not b e e ntitled ntitled for supp supp ort. Pers Persons ons,, who were no t e numerated during during the c ensus ensus but c an show do c umenta tion or evide evide nce that he/ she is rightfully ightfully an Affec ted Person, erson, will will be include d. The Project Autho rity (NHAI) (NHAI) is respo respo nsible nsible fo r suc suc h ve rifica rifica tion d uring uring reva lida lida tion o f RAP. Only those PAPs within the project affected area will be considered eligible for support under the project. Com mo n Property Property Resour Resourc c es: es: All the a ffec ted fac ilities ilities should b e restored restored , if not p oss ossible, will be replaced by the project. Affected community will be closely consulted during the same. In case of reconstruction, pucca structure will be constructed irrespective of condition of affe c ted structure d uring uring c ensus ensus survey. Outstanding loans: In cases where the land/property is under mortgage, the outstanding amount shall be paid to the lending agency from the total compensation package. Land ow ners sha ll p ay un-expired un-expired lease lease to leaseho leaseho lders an d renta l de p osits osits to tena nts. nts. The same shall be done by government in case of government lands which are given on lease/tenancy. The Entitleme Entitleme nt Ma trix trix provide s guida nc e for co mp ensat ensat ion, resett resett leme nt, and reha bilita bilita tion a ssista ista nc e p lann ing. The The Entitlem ent Ma trix lis lists va riou riou s typ es of loss losses, es, ide ntific a tion / eligib ility ility and entitlements and provides basic parameters for preparation of compensation and resett resett leme nt b ene fits. fits.

3.4 3.4.1

Assess Assessm m ent o f Resettlem ent Imp a c ts RoW Sta Sta tus Verific a tion tio n

The ROW ROW ob served in the projec t road va ries from 10 m. to 30 m exc ep t a t few loc at ions, ions, w here it is a s less less a s 7m. ROW p illars illars a re miss missing a t m a ny p lac es. es. The limite d ROW c oup led with po or roa roa d ge ome try try ma kes the p resent esent riding riding c ond itions itions along this roa d extreme extreme ly ba d.

3.4.2

Proposed Project Design

The hig hwa y de sign inco rporating the soc soc ial co nc erns envisag envisag es wid ening o f the e xis xisting road to a uniform uniform ROW ROW of 45m. 45m. inco rporating t he b ypa sses a lrea lrea d y prop osed osed by NH-divis NH-division ion of PWD, Kera la. These These byp a sses, es, prop osed osed for 30m. ROW, ROW, a vo id th e he a vily built up settlements of Ponnani, Chavakkad, Kodungallur, Paravur and Edappally. It also proposes 6 mo re b ypa sses in ad dition, to red uce the soc soc ial imp imp ac t a t Vad ana pp ally, ally, Tripraya ipraya r, Valappad, Chendrapinni, Moonnupeedika, Perinjanam and Mathilakam. Among the PWD Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


p rop osed osed byp a sses, es, Ponna Ponna ni byp ass ass is und er c onstruction onstruction for a n ROW ROW o f 30m., 30m., land ha s be en surveyed for 30m. ROW in Chavvakkad, Kodungalloor and Paravur and land has been ac quired quired fo r Eda pp aly bypa ss 3.4.3

Loss of Land

The a dd itional itional land req uir uired for the w idening of the e xis xisting ting roa d to fo ur lane lane wa s estimate estimate d based on the land acquisition plan prepared by consultants. Accordingly, an additional area of 753.80 acres (305.06 Ha.) would be required which includes both private land and government land. Out of this an area of 734.39 acres would be required for road, 9.21 acres for to ll p laza, 3.21 3.21 ac res for truc k la la y b a ys a nd 6.9 6.98 8 ac res for rest rest a rea s. The sa me is summarized in Ta b le 3.1 Tab le 3.1: 3.1: Land Land requireme requireme nt for the prop osed highwa y d esign esign Design Feature

Land to be ac quired quired (sq.mts.)

(Acres)

Roa d

2972058.171

734.39

Tol l Pla za

37291.15

9.21

Truc k La y b ay s

13009.97 13009.97

3.21

Rest A rea

28266.61

6.98

To ta l

3050625.901

753.80

3.4.4

Lo ss o f Struc Struc ture s

This c at eg ory include s loss loss of structures and sem i-op i-op en within p riva riva te or g ove rnment p lots. lots. The c ensus ensus survey urvey c ond ucte d for all the stru struc c tures tures affec ted unde r the project c overed ma jor structures like residential, commercial and religious buildings as well as minor structures like c om po und wa lls lls bus stop s, pum p houses houses,, wells, wells, wa ter ta ps etc . ItIt revea ls tha t a tot al of 5596 5596 structures are affected out of which, 3991 are major buildings and remaining are minor structures or imm imm ova b le ass assets. ets. Structures whic h are loc at ed in the land alread y ac q uired uired for b yp a ss is no t c on side red in this survey, d et a ils ils a re g iven in Ta b le 3.2

Tab le 3.2: 3.2: Categ ory of b uildings affec affec ted Major buildings

No. of struc truc tures tures

Percenta ge to total

Reside ntia l

2120

53.12

Com me rcial

1499 1499

37.5 37.56 6

Resi. + Co m m .

106

2.66

Pub lic b uilding s

223

5.59 5.5 9

Relig iou s

43

1.07

To ta l

3991

100

*Inlc *Inlc ud es tap s, grave yard s, pum p houses, houses, wells, wells, po nd s, shed shed s, bus stop stop s etc .

3.4.5

Loss of other Immovable Assets

Loss of other immovable assets include loss of compound walls, fences, loss of taps, wells, bus stops, sheds, pump houses etc. From the census survey of structures it has been found that there are 431 431 PAF PAFs s whose whose c omp ound wa ll alone is affec ted . Majority Majority of the c omp ound wa lls lls Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


are pucca and privately owned. Impact on other minor structures like public taps, bus shelte rs, rs, etc . ca uses uses loss loss of a no the r a d d itiona l 117 1174 4 struc struc tures. tures. These co mp ensation f or structures have been budgeted in the RAP budget as per prevailing schedule of rates p ublished ublished by PWD.

3.4.6

Imp ac t on Livelihood Livelihood / Tenure

Out of a total of 3991 PAFs being affected by impact on structures, 1605 PAFs, which comprises owners of commercial structures and res-commerical structures looses their livelihood due to the loss of commercial spaces. As the census survey covered only the structure affected PAFs who are owners of the affected structures, the number of people who are employed in these commercial buildings and looses their livelihood are not c ove red. The non-a vailab ility ility of upd at ed la nd rec ords wa s ano ther co nstraint nstraint in in estima estima ting the a c c urate num be r of P PAF AFs s.

3.5

Public Consultation Consultation a nd Inf Informa orma tion Diss Dissem ination

To e nsur nsure e tha t p eop le’s c onc erns erns are incorpo rate d in the p rojec t d esign esign and to p romo te public understanding about the project and its implications public consultation and informa informa tion d iss issem ination is treat ed a s a t wo wa y proc ess ess whe re the informa tion is p ass assed on to pub lic a nd their feed feed ba c k is is soug ht to understand understand their iss issues at the p rojec t p rep aratory sta g e itself. itself. The m a jor key key sta sta keholde rs who p articip at ed in c onsultations onsultations at va rious rious sta ge s include all Project Affected Families/Persons (PAF/Ps); elected representatives, Community leaders of PAPs, representatives of CBOs; designated staff of Project Management Unit (PIU); DC / officials from DC’s office and local Revenue officials; and representatives of local NGOs. The c onsultative onsultative p roc ess ess is c ontinued throug h out the p rojec rojec t p eriod eriod – d esign esign prep ara tion, project initiation, initiation, project impleme ntation and po st imp imp leme ntation pe riods. iods. In the projec projec t prepa ration stag stag e t he informa informa tion ga thered from field sur surveys veys are inco rpo rat ed in the d esign esign phase of the project and preparation of RAP. At this stage methodologies used for public consultation and information dissemination includes reconnaissance survey; Focus Group Disc Disc uss ussions; ions; c en sus of PAFs AFs a nd p ub lic lic c onsulta onsulta tions. Duri During ng the c ensus survey p ub lic lic consultation were held with different stakeholders of the project at various locations, the de tails tails of w hich a re g iven in in the Ta b le 3.3 3.3.. Tab le 3.3: Details of Public Public Con sultation Details of c onsultation

Subje c ts and iss issues discussed discussed

Consultation with tenants & employees Date & Time Time : 23/ 23/ 11/ 11/ 06, 06, 4 pm, Ve nue: Vyap ara Bhavan ha ll, Tripp ripp ay ar

Objective of the project was shared with the people Demand for parking spa spa ce During During the p ublic c onsultation onsultation a t Tripaya r peo ple str strongly ongly de ma nded for a b ypa ss. Objective of the project was shared with the people During the consultation people demanded on going market rates as compensation for their affected properties properties.. Objective of the project was shared with the people During the public consultation at Chandrappinni people strongly demanded for

Consultation with land owners and building owners. Date & Time Time : 27/ 27/ 11/ 06, 4 pm Venue : G.L.P G.L.P.. Sc Sc hoo l, Moo nu Pee Pee d ika Consultation with Building owners, Tena nts & Emp loy ee s Date & Time : 25/ 11/ 06, 11Am Venue: Vyapara Bhavan hall, Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Details of c onsultation

Subje c ts and iss issues discussed discussed

Chend rapp inni

a Byp ass. ass.

Consultation with land owners and building owners Date & Time : 27/ 11/ 06, 6 Pm Ve nue : SR SRV UP Sc ho ol, ol , Chendrappinni Consultation with Polititians , Govt. offic ials & Public Public Date & Time Time :11 :11// 06/ 07, 10 10 Am to 12. 12.30P 30Pm m Venue: Munsipa Munsipa ll town hall ,Kod ,Kod unga llur Consultation with Polititians , Govt. offic ials & Public Public Date & Time Time :11 :11// 06/ 07, 2 Pm Pm to 5 Pm Venue: Munsipa Munsipa ll town hall ,Guruvayur

Objective of the project was shared with the people People strongly expressed their anxiety regarding the mode of payment and conpensation rates. The w idth of the roa d shall be 20m/ 20m/ 30m 30m instead of 45m 45m so that numb er of affected buildings ca n be reduced . There should should b e p roper resettleme resettleme nt ac tion plan c onsideri onsidering ng the ma rket value value ac c ording to the policy of Central Govt for those who lost the home and livelihood livelihood in spec spec ified ified time fram fram e. Reha bilitation, resettl resettlem em ent and inc om e restoration for all persons getting affected due to project Rehabilitation and income restoration for road side vend ors. ors. Iss Issues disc uss ussed an d c onc erns raised

Gov t. offic ials me t Dr.M.Beena.IAS, District Collector and Distric Distric t Ma g istra istra te, Thrissur hrissur Distric Distric t. Mr.K.Premachandra Kurup, District Collector and District Magistrate, Malappuram District. Smt.Rama Devi, Deputy Collector (LA), Eranakulam, District Mr. T.N. T.N. Prath Prath a p an , M .L.A, .L.A, Na ttik a ,.Thrissur hrissur

3.6

Updated the officials about the detailed objectives and current status of the project so that they can also disseminate information to the peop le to make them a ware of the the sam sam e. Soug ht the required c oop eration for the collection of secondary data including land records. Odfficials expressed the opinion that rehabilitation and resettlement issues such as loss of livelihoods and assets of the people espec ially STs, SCs, SCs, OBCs OBCs should should be ad eq aue tly take n c are in the RAP. AP. Appraised the officials about the objectives and c urrent urrent status status of the projec t.

Institutiona Institutiona l Fram Fram ew ork

NHAI NH AI has an Environm nvironm ent al a nd Soc ial Develop me nt Unit Unit (ES (ESDU DU)) a t the c orpo rate level. ESDU DU// NH NHAI AI will und ertake the revalida tion o f RAP RAP befo re the sta rt of RAP RAP imp imp leme nta tion and will engage services of Project Consultant (PC) for the same. For the project implementation NHAI will set up Project Implementation Unit (PIU) at Palakkad. PIU will be head ed by Projec Projec t Direc Direc tor (PD), (PD), GM/ DGM level officer.

NHAI

General ManagerESDU Project Consultant Deputy General Ma na ge r- Environm nvironm ent Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .

Resettlement Manager

Independent Monitoring


Project Director - PIU

Figu re 3.1: Institutiona Institutiona l Fram Fram ew ork: RAP RAP Imp Imp lem enta tion R&R Cell will be established as a part of PIU, and three District Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officers (DRROs), one for each project district, will be appointed to R&R Cell. DRROs will assist PD in all land acquisition and resettlement activities under the project. Institutional arrangement for RAP implementation is given in Figure 6.6. NHAI will be the Exec uting Ag enc y (EA) (EA) fo r p rojec t. ES ESDU of NHAI w ill ill oversee oversee a ll RAP imp imp leme nta tion activities, and will engage service of non-governmental organization (NGO) for RAP implementation and an independent agency for external monitoring. DRROs (R&R Cell) at PIU will underta ke RAP RAP imp imp leme nta tion, with t he help of NG O a pp ointed b y ES ESDU DU.. All the RAP RAP a c tivities will be regu larly rep rep orte d to ESDU by PIU PIU. PIU PIU// R&R Cell will esta esta b lis lish ne tw orking w ith district administration (District Collectors office, Revenue Department etc.) to ensure timely implementation of RAP. Networking with central/state/town departments will also be established (i) so as to link proposed income restoration packages with government schemes, if any; (ii) for restoration/replacement of community infrastructure such as water supply,

sewerage,

electricity/telephone

network,

irrigation

canals

etc.;

and

(iii)

for

restorat restorat ion/ replac em ent of CPR CPR’’ s/ p ublic am enities suc h a s shrines hrines,, sc sc hoo ls etc . Impleme ntation Sc Sc hedule: Implementation of RAP will include land acquisition, and resett resett leme nt a nd rehab ilitation ilitation (R&R (R&R)) a c tivities tivities.. The imp lement at ion p roce ss will c ove r (i) (i) identification of cut-off date and notification; (ii) verification of properties of PAPs and estima estima tion of t heir typ e a nd level of loss losses and d istri istribut but ion of ide ntity ca rds; rds; (iii (iii)) prep arat ion of PAPs for relocation through consultation, however, the process of consultation will continue throughout the RAP implementation and (iv) Relocation and resettlement of the PAPs. It is assumed that implementation will take minimum 10 months to hand over land for civil works. Training raining fo r inc inc om e restorat restorat ion, ifif prop osed osed , howe ver sha sha ll c ontinue fo r anoth er mont h, estimating a total period of 11 months for RAP implementation. No civil works should begin until all PAPs receive the approved compensation package. Civil works should therefore be linked linked w ith the c omp letion letion o f land ac quisiti quisition, on, sche sche dule a re g iven iven in Ta b le 3.4 Tab le 3.4: 3.4: Sc hed ule of Land Land Ac quisition and Resettlem Resettlem ent Ac tivities Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Sl. No .

Land Ac quisition quisition and Resettlement Activities

Start Date

Com pletion Date

Duration (days)

1

Rev alid atio n of RP

1st 1st of Mo nth 1

30th of Mo nth 2

90

2

RP Ap pro va l by NHAI

1st 1st of Mo nth 3

30th of Mo nth 3

30

3

Iss Issue of ide ntity c a rds

1st 1st of Mo nth 4

30th of Mo nth 4

30

1st 1st of Mo nth 3

30th of Mo nth 3

30

4 5 6 7

8

9

Recruitment of Impleme nting nting NGO Information sharing, consultations and disclosure meetings Payment of compensation and assis assistanc tanc e for reloc reloc ation Reloc ation and resettleme resettleme nt of PAPs Skill Training Training of vu lnerab le groups / incom e restor restoration ation activities, if proposed during revalidation Possession of acquired property

All through the RP RP imp leme ntation p eriod 1st 1st of Mo nth 5

30th of Mo nth 7

60

1st 1st of Mo nth 6

15th of Mo nth 8

75

15th of Month 8

30th of Month 11

90 (Optional)

1st 1st of Mo nth 9

30th of Mo nth 9

30

10

Internal Internal mo nitoring nitoring

All throug throug h the RP imp leme ntation pe riod

11

External mo nitoring nitoring

All throug throug h the RP imp leme ntation pe riod

12

Handover acquired lands to c ontrac tors for construc construc tion

1st 1st of M onth 10

13

Start of Civil Works

5th of Mo nth 10 onw ard s

Source: WSAPL’s WSAPL’s Soc ia l Tea Tea m

Monitoring and Evalua tion: RAP implementation will be closely monitored to provide Project Implementation Unit (PIU) with an effective basis for assessing resettlement progress and identifying potential difficulties and problems. For monitoring and evaluation (M&E), PIU will ap po int int an indep end ent a ge ncy to und ertake external external monitoring monitoring of the entire entire p roject . The independent agency will monitor the project on a half-yearly basis and submit its reports d irec irec tly to the PIU. This This mo nitoring nitoring will inc inc lude, a d ministrative ministrative m onitoring, soc soc io-ec ono mic monitori monitoring a nd impa ct evaluation. evaluation. Internal monitoring will track indicators such as the number of families affected, resettled, assistance

extended,

infrastructure

facilities

provided,

financial

aspects,

such

as

compensation paid, grant extended etc. R&R Cell at PIU will carry out internal monitoring, who will report to the Project Director on monthly basis in prescribed monitoring formats. These form ats, to b e filled by District District Resettlem Resettlem ent a nd Reha bilita tion O ffice rs (DRR (DRROs) at R&R R&R Cell, will indicate actual achievements against the targets fixed, and reasons for shortfall, if any. Based on the reports, the PIU will monitor and evaluate every three (3) months the ove rall prog ress ress on ea c h R&R R&R c om po nent within the the projec t and d etermine a c tions to be take n by the PIU PIU in situations situations where the set obje c tives are not b eing m et.

3.7

RAP Budget

RAP b ud ge t, ca n b e b road ly sub divide d into following t hree subs subsec ec tions: tions: The fina l RAP RAP bud ge t is given in tab le 6.1 6.15 5



(a ) Assis Assista ta nc e fo r Loss Loss o f Land (b ) Assis Assista ta nc e fo r Lo Lo ss of Struc tu res a nd Asset Asset s (c ) R&R Imp leme nta tion

Assistance for Loss of Land Ass Assistanc istanc e for land land has be en p rep ared ba sed on the land a c quisiti quisition on p lan where the e xtent of land a rea t hat nee ds to b e a c quired quired is c alculate d for eac h sur survey vey numbe r in ea c h vil village. Based ased on the land use use of the a rea to b e a c quired quired along the exis existing ting roa d and the b ypa sses, es, unit rat rat es of land is ap p lied lied to g et t he to ta l ass assista ista nc e fo r loss loss of land . The land va lue include s 30% 30% sola tium, 12% interest and Reg istrat istrat ion a nd sta mp d uty.T uty. Tab le.3.5 Ta ble 3.5: Cost of Lan Lan d Sl. No.

Com po nents of Cost

Unit (Ac res) res)

A : Tota l Affec ted Land Area

753.8 753 .8

B : LA Co st

Co st (in INR Crore s)

1

Co st of LA

178.52 178.52

2

Sola tium @30% of the LA Co st

53.56

3

Inte rest @12 % of the LA c ost

21.42

4

Reg istration istration rate (8%) and stam p d uty (1%) (1%) charges

16.07

To ta l

269.57 269.57

Include s co st of land for 2 toll plazas and other a menities Note: * Include

The c ost of a c q uiring uiring lan d o f 753.8 753.8 Ac res fo r the p rojec t c om es to Rs. Rs. 269 269.57 .57 Crores, of t hese Rs 53.56 c rores are so so lat ium (30%) (30%) a nd a n a d d ition a l Rs Rs. 21.42 21.42 Crores a nd Rs. 16.07 16.07 cro res would be required to be disbursed to the PAFs as interest rate and Registration expanses respectively. Intrest would be paid at the rate of 12% while registration expanses are at the rate of 9 %( %( 8% registration registration a nd 1% sta mp d uty) This This solat ium w ould be given t o t ake c are o f other exigencies like registration of newly purchased property and stamp duty fees etc.

3.8

R& R Ass Assista ista nc e

R&R ass assista ista nc e a nd othe r co st inc lude the one time ex-gratia a mo unt Rs Rs 1000 10000/fa 0/fa mily.T mily.The c ate go ry wise wise num be r of affec ted fam ilies ilies is given in table 3.6 Ta b le 3.6: R&R Assista Assista nc e Sl.No

Assistanc Assistanc e

Unit

Quantity (Nos)

Unit Rate (Rs.)

Amount in Rs. Crore

1

R&R Assistance to Land(Only Land)affected PAF*

PA F

23744

10000

23.74

2

R&R Assistanc Assistanc e to la nd & structures affecte d Fam ilies

PA F

5596

10,000

5.60

PA F

4815

10,000

4.82

3

3.9

R&R Assistance to Non title holders To ta l

34155

34.16

Fina l RAP RAP Bud Bud g et

Final Res Resett ett lement Ac tion Plan Plan a nd b ud ge t ha s be en summ summ a rized ized in Tab le 3.7 3.7.. Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Ta ble 3.7: Fina Fina l RAP RAP Bud Bud g et Final RAP Budget

A : Land Land Co st Total A ffected Land Area (in a c res) res)

753.8

Sl. No.

Com p one nts of Cost

Cost (in INR Crores)

1

Co st of LA

178.52

2

Sola tium @30% of the LA Co st

53.56

3

Inte rest @12 % of the LA c ost

21.42

4

Reg istration istration rate (8%) and stam p d uty (1%) charges

16.07

Sub Tota ot a l

269.57 B .S .Struc ture Co st

Tota l No of Affec ted Structure

5596 559 6

Sl. No.



1

157.77

2

Rep lac em ent value of structures includ ing com pound walls walls Rep lac em ent value of sem i-op en struc truc tures tures

3

Rep lac em ent value of other fixed assets assets

1.18 1.18

Sub Tota ot a l

7.01 7.01

165.96 C .R&R Assista Assista nc e

Tota l Numb er of Affec ted Fam ilies

34155 341 55

Sl. No.



1

R&R Assistanc Assistanc e to La nd a ffec ted PAF* AF*

23.74

2

R&R Assis Assistan tan c e to la nd & structure structure s affec ted Families

5.60

R&R Assistanc Assistanc e to Non title ho ld ers Sub Tot a l

4.82 34.16

3

Grand Tota l (A+B+C) (A+B+C)

469.68 469 .68

4 Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Project C o st Estimates Project Background The cost estimates have been prepared for widening of the of the existing two lane road to a four/six lane carriageway including strengthening of the of the existing pavement, strengthening / widening of existing of existing bridge structures, construction of new of new bridges, rehabilitation and reconstruction / widening of cross of cross drainage structures, longitudinal drains, underpasses, junction improvements, road furniture, street lighting, toll plaza, bus bays, rest area ,Social and Environmental cost etc. Th e C o n st ru c t io n c o st o f t h e p ro je je c t ro a d h a s b e e n w o rke d o u t fo r f o llo w in g o p t io n s 2

Wide Wide ning ning to four lanes lanes.. (co nce ntric ntric w idening)

3

Wide Wide ning ning to four lanes lanes.. (ec c entric entric Wide Wide ning) ning)

4

New Constr Construct uct ion a long e xisting isting c arriage arriage wa y

5

New c onstr onstruct uct ion for byp ass ass

5.1

Methodology

The p roce ss involved in the c ost ost estima estima tion ha s b ee n de sc rib rib ed und er the fo llow llow ing sec sec tions. tions.

4.2.1

Ba sic Ra tes te s

The rate analysis has been carried on the basis of STANDARD of STANDARD DATA BOOK for analysis of rate of rate (First revision) and adopting Schedule of rate of rate provided by Kerala PWD. The basic rates for each construction items were analyzed on the basis of material of material study undertaken, the prices of construction materials collected from various sources and on the anticipated distance of source of source to the site of work. of work. For items where these rates are not available, the rates were adopted as per previous experience of the of the consultant / Market rates and prevailing percentage over these rates were considered.

4.2. 4.2.2 2

Quantifica tion of Items

The quantification of road of road works, Bridges and CD structures items are calculated from typical cross sections and drawings. The construction items covered in cost estimates are: site clearance; earthwork in new embankment, and widening; Pavement in carriageways and shoulders; culverts; Bridges, ROB s and under passes; Repair to bridges and culverts; Repair and Rehabilitation for structures; Road Junctions; Pavement markings, Signs and other Appurtenances; Drainage and Protective works; Service Roads; Toll plaza ,Parking and Lay bye; Environmental Protection and Resettlement; Land Acquisition; Electrical Works, Miscellaneous items, Utility relocations, etc.

4.2. 4.2.3 3

Land / Environme Environme ntal / Soc Soc ial c osts osts

The p roject c orridor orridor pa sses through p lain area . Wid Wid ening of the existing existing c a rriag riag ew ay ha s be en a ssumed to be on e ither ither side side o f the exis existing p ave ment or symme symme trica trica l ce ntral ntral wide ning ning where the exis existing ca rriagew ay c ome s under the me dian. Land ac quisiti quisition on c ost ost has be en calculated as given in social screening report based on the area calculated from the a lignm lignm ent repo rt. Environm nvironm enta l c osts osts include the c ost ost of cutting of trees (c om p ensat ensat ory afforestation), rehabilitation of water source such as hand pumps, wells, bore wells and ponds, noise protection measures near sensitive locations, air, water and noise quality monitoring at different stages and the cost of environmental enhancement along the project project road . Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


4.2. 4.2.4 4

Strengthening / Wide ning & New Constr Construc uc tion of Roa ds

Estimates have been worked out on the basis of typical cross section of the pavement. Pavement composition for overlay and new construction are taken as per the pavement designs.

4.2.5

Bridg es, Culv erts & Other Oth er Struc tures ture s

All structures including CD works are proposed to be widened/ constructed to suit 4/6‐lane configuration in general. The structures comprise of major of major and minor bridges, ROBs, underpasses ,culverts and Flyover.

4.2.6

Rep a irs to Bridg es & Culv erts

A stud stud y of th e e xis xisting Br Bridg es a nd Culverts ha s be en c a rried ried out to a sc ertain the structure to be retained or reconstructed and the cost of the Repairs, Rehabilitation, and upgrading is worked out based on the condition survey by experienced bridge engineers and re ha b ilita ilita tion exp erts. erts. The c ost ost thus a rrived rrived is inc lude d in the b ill. ill.

4.2. 4.2.7 7

Junction Imp rovem ents

The e xis xisting road requires requires horizonta horizonta l & vertic vertic al ge om etric imp rove me nts an d a lso lso c am be r correction and profile correction. In order to link the project road with cross roads, major and minor type type s of junction improveme nts have be en c onsidered. onsidered.

4.2.8 4.2 .8

Long itudin al Side Drains Drains

Longitudinal unlined drains are provided in rural stretch and RCC drains are provided in built up an d Hill ill cut ting sec sec tions. tions. Nec ess essary p rovision for the sa me is ma d e in the c ost ost e stima te.

4.2.9

Ro a d Furnit ure

Road furniture such as crash barriers/guard-rails, road signs, pavement markings, mileage ston es, es, retro retro reflec tive sign sign b oa rds, rds, etc . have a p rovision in the c ost ost e stima te.

4.2.10 To ll Pla za There will be Two to ll pla zas a long the p rojec rojec t c orridor orridor at selec selec ted loca tion for co llec llec tion of traffic. Suitab le provision provision is ma d e in the c ost ost e stima te for this p urp urp ose. ose.

4.2.11 Bus Ba y s Bus-ba us-ba ys a re prop osed a t 35 loc a tion s on b ot h side side s. The s shelte helte r struc ture sha sha ll b e struc struc tura lly lly safe and functional so as to protect the waiting passengers adequately from sun, rain, and wind.

4.2.12 4.2 .12 Utility Relo Relo c a tion Broad provision is made in the cost estimate for raising and or shifting electric supply lines, telephone lines, OFC lines and other utilities.

4.2.13 Contingencies The c onting enc ies a re co nsidered nsidered as 3% of the tot al c onstruction onstruction c ost. ost.

4.2.14 Contractor’s Profit As this projec t is pla nning t o imp lemen t o n B BOT OT sc hem e 10% 10% c ontrac tor’ s profit is not c onsidered onsidered du ring the rate ana lyis lyis..

4.3

Projec t Co st

The estima estima ted c ost ost for 4/ 4/ 6-lane 6-lane w idening o f 4-6 4-6 laning of Kuttipuram – Ed ap ally Sec tion of NH – 17 , projec t roa d is p resent resent ed in Ta b le 4.1. Table 4.1 : Cost Estimate for 4‐6 laning of Kuttipuram – Kuttipuram – Edapally Section Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


BILL BILL NO .

BILL BILL NA M E

A M OUNT (Rs.)

1

SITE C LEA LEA RA NC E A ND DIS DISM M A NTLI NTLING NG

2

EA RTH WO RK

3

SUB-BA UB-BAS SE A ND BASE C O UR URS SES

1,696, 1,6 96,670 670,7 ,777 77

4

BIT BITUM UMINO INO US WO RKS

1,490,59 1,49 0,591,3 1,381 81

5

C RO SS DRAINAG DRAINA G E WO RKS

6

NEW BRIDG BRIDG ES A ND UND UNDER ER PAS PA SSES

7

RO A D O VER BRIDG BRIDG ES (ROB'S (RO B'S))

198,759, 198, 759,957 957

8

TRAFFIC SIGNAGES, ROAD MARKING AND OTHER A PPURT PPURTENA NC ES

106,968,600

9

PRO PRO TEC TIVE WO RKS RKS, DUC TS & O THER SERVIC ES

640,2 640 ,246, 46,019 019

10

ELEC LEC TRICA IC A L WO RKS

123,456, 123, 456,650 650

11

TO LL PLA PLA ZA

170,357, 170, 357,894 894

12

REPAIR A ND REHABIL HA BILIT ITA TION IO N

57,279,4 57,2 79,451 51

13

M ISC ELLA LLA NEOUS

98,165,8 98,1 65,867 67

17,215,3 17,2 15,348 48 497,948, 497, 948,090 090

298,189,283 298,189,28 3 3,442, 3,4 42,290 290,1 ,179 79

8,838,139,543

TO TA L CO NSTRUCTIO UCTIO N C O ST

928.001

10& 10& esc esc ala tion for one ye ar (c rores) rores) C O NTING NTING ENC IES IES/ Q C @ 3% O F C IVIL C O ST (c rore ro res s)

27.84

IC & PRE PRE-O PERAT PERATIVE IVE EXPE EXPENSE NSES S @1% OF O F EPC (c ro re s)

9.558

FINA INANC NC ING C O ST @ 2% DEBT DEBT A T 70:30 70:3 0 DER (c rore ro res s)

12.824

ESC LATIO LATION N @ 5% PE PER A NUM DURING C O NSTRU RUC C TION IO N PER PERIOD (C O NST NSTRUCTION UCTION PER PERIOD 30 M O NTHS NTHS)) (c rore ro res s) INTE INTEREST DURING C O NSTRU RUC C TION IO N @ 11% PA O N DEBT (A T 70:30 DER DER) (TE (TERM LOA N) (c rores) ro res)

79.454 87.280

TO TA L CO NC ESSIO NA IRE IRE CO ST(c rores) rores)

1144.957

TO TA L LE LENG TH O F PR PRO JEC JEC T RO A D ( KM) KM )

111.73 10.25

PER PER KM KM C O ST ( C RORES RORES ) NHAI COST LAND ACQUISITION, ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION,R&R, UTILITY ILITY SHIFT SHIFTING IN G ETC ., ( c ro re s)

485.20

TO TA L NHAI C O ST(c rores) ro res)

485.20

TO TA L PR PRO JEC JEC T C O ST ( C O NC ESSIONA IO NA IRE IRE + NHA N HAII C O ST ) (c rore s) TO TA L PR PRO O JECT JEC T PER KM C O ST ( C RORE RORES S)

1630.16 14.59

5 Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Εχονομιχ & Φινανχιαλ Αναλψσι σ 5.1 5.1.1

Ec ono mic Ana lysis lysis Introduction

The o bjec tive tive o f the c ost ost b enefit ec onom ic a nalysis nalysis is to identify and qua ntify ntify the b enefits and costs associated with the project (with respect to 4/6 laning of Kuttippuram- Edappali (NH-17) (NH-17) in in th e S Sta ta te of Kerala from the existing existing d oub le lane ). This a na lysis lysis will help in identification of the optimum solution along with the economic viability in terms of its likely investm investm ent return return p ote ntial. This is c a rried ried out in order to test test the ec ono mic fea sibility ibility of the identified improvement to the project road and assist National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), (NHAI), Go vernment of India in ta king king d ec ision. ision. The e c ono mic fea sibility ibility stud stud y is c arried arried out using using the ove rall guid elines stipulat ed b y the Indian Roads Congress (IRC) and the World Bank in their manuals (Economic Evaluation of Hig Hig hw a y Projec Projec ts in Ind Ind ia (SP (SP – 30, 30, 199 1993), 3), Ma nua l for Roa Roa d Investm Investm ent Dec ision ision M od el’ (SP (SP – 38, 38, Feb Feb ruary 1992) 1992) a nd Ma nua l for HDM - 4 Version Version 1.3 (World Bank, 2000)). 2000)). The se ma nua ls a re ac c ep ted by the World World Ba nk, Minis Ministry of Roa Roa d Transpo ranspo rt & Highwa ys (MORT (MORT&H) a nd Nationa l Highwa Highwa ys Autho rity rity of India (NHAI) (NHAI) for highw highw ay p rojec rojec ts in India India . The c ost ost – bene fit ana lysis lysis is c a rried ried out by using using the disc disc ount ed c a sh flow (DCF) (DCF) tec hnique to obtain the economic internal rate of return (EIRR) and economic net present value (ENPV) for the p rop osed osed investm investm ent s linked linked w ith the p rojec t. This is follow ed b y a ‘ sensitivity ensitivity an a lysis lysis’’ carried out by increasing or decreasing the critical factors affecting the cost and benefit streams of the p rop osed osed project, in order to asc asc ertain their effec t o n the ec onom ic fea sibility ibility ind ic a to rs i.e. ENPV, EIR EIRR R. In b roa d terms, terms, the soc soc iety co sts pe rtaining taining t o the highw highw ay d evelopm ent, to b e c onsidered onsidered in this analysis includes:

Agenc y costs costs •

Ca pital cost cost

•

Rec urr urrent c ost ost for ma intena intena nce (annual & p eriod eriod ica l)

•

Residua esidua l value a t the end of a nalysis nalysis p eriod eriod

Roa d user c osts •

Vehicle ope rating rating c ost ost

•

Trave l time c ost

•

Acc ident cost cost

The a na lysis lysis pe riod riod of th e p rojec rojec t ha s c onsidered onsidered 30 yea rs op eration p eriod eriod from the completion of the improvements. Base year for the analysis is 2006. Hence the period from 2006 2006 to 2040 2040 has be en c onsi onsid ered for ec onom ic eva luation luation for the p roject roa d.

5.1.2

Alternatives



Th e p ro j e c t ro a d is d iv id e d in to th re e se c tio n s, fu rth e r d iv id e d in to se v e n te e n h o m o g e n e o u s se c tio n s ( HS) , fo r a n a ly sis o f th e im p ro v e m e n t p ro p o sa ls. Th e d e ta ils a re g iv e n in Ta b le 5.1. Tab le 5.1: Details of Sec Sec tions on the Projec t Roa Roa d Sec tions Chainage (Start)

Cha inag e (End) (End)

Leng th (Km)

1.KuttipuramChavakkad 2.ChavakkadKodungallur 3. Ko d ung a llur- Ed a p a lly

318+000

362+000

44.00

362+000

407+700

45.7

407+700 407+700

438+600 438+600

30.9

To ta l

318+800

438+600

120.60

The fo llow llow ing alte rna tives a re c onsidered onsidered for the ec ono mic an a lysis lysis.. •

Without Projec Projec t Situa tion: tion : The first first is a ‘ without proje c t’ (d o m inimum) where the existing two lane project road is considered as such in its present condition and without wid ening. In this c ase, the future future traffic traffic v olume is assume assume d to c ontinue to flow along the existing existing road only. In the HDM HDM mod el ana lysis lysis,, this this ‘d o m inimum’ a lternative will form form the first first / ba se strategy strategy a ga inst inst whic h all other strategies strategies will be c om pa red.

•

With Projec Projec t Situa Situa tion: tion : This c om prises prises of the strate strate gy of the ‘ with p rojec t’ situation situation in the HDM model. In order to arrive at the net benefits associated with this strategy, these these a re com pa red to the ‘do minimum’ /

‘without projec projec t’ alternative. alternative. The

imp rovem ent prop osals osals conside conside red for ‘with projec t situation’ situation’ are a s follows: Ta ble 5.2: Proje c t Prop Prop osals Sec tio ns HS

1.KuttipuramChavakkad 2.ChavakkadKodungallur

Existin g Length (Km)

Proposals

1.K 1.Kuttipuram - Cha va kkad kkad

44.0 44.0

1. Cha vakkad to byp ass ass

1.2 1.2

2. Cha va kkad Byp a ss sec tion

2.2

Wide Wide n to 4L a long exis existing a lignm lignm ent Wide Wide n to 4L along exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss

3. Cha vakkad- Vad ana pp ally ally

11.6 11.6

4. Va d a na p p a lly lly Byp a ss

3.2

5. Vad ana pp a llylly- Tripraya ripraya r

3.7 3.7

6. Tripra rip ra ya r b yp a ss

3.4

7. Trip rip raya r- Ch end rap p inni

3.8

8. C he nd rap p inni Byp a ss

0.9

9.Chendrapinni Moonnupeedika 10. 10. Mo on nup ee d ika Byp a ss

-

3.4 1.9

11.Moo 11.Moo nnnup ee dika- Ma thila thila kam

1.4 1.4

12. M a th ilaka m Byp a ss 1

4.3


Wide Wide n to 4L along exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss Wid Wid en to 4L along exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss Wide n to 4L a long exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss Wide n to 4L a long exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss Wid Wid en to 4L a long exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss


Sec tio ns

3.KodungallurEdapally

HS

Existin g Length (Km)

Proposals

13. 13. Ma thilaka thilaka m

2.5 2.5

14. M a th ilaka m Byp a ss 2

0.6

Wid Wid en to 4L along exis existing a lignm lignm ent 4L Byp a ss

15. 15. Ma thilaka thilaka m- Kod unga llur llur

1.6 1.6

1. Kod ung a llurllur- Ed a p a lly lly

30.9 30. 9

Wid Wid en exis existing Wide n exis existing

to 4L along a lignm lignm ent to 4L a long a lignm lignm ent

All the se p ropo sa ls are c onsidered onsidered with flexible flexible pa vem ent o p tion only as it is is reco mm end ed during feasibility study. By c om pa ring the ab ove alternatives, alternatives, the net ag enc y c osts osts,, the net user user co sts and the ne t project benefits associated with the project during its analysis period of 30 years, are c alculate d for the p rop osed osed improvement op tions. tions. These hese c alculations are p erformed erformed in orde orde r to arrive at their economic internal rate of return (EIRR) and economic net present value (ENPV). Based on the results of the analysis, the economic feasibility for the project was determined.

5.1.3

Analysis Model

HDM model (HDM III Manager, Version 3.0, 1995) has been further improved by the World Ban k in their rec rec ently released released HDM – 4 (Vers (Version 1.3). 1.3). Co nsidering nsidering the imp roved ad van ta ge s, HDM – 4 (Version 1.3) is used for the present economic analysis, which also calculates vehicle user costs based on the pavement deterioration models. However, as there is no provision available for sensitivity analysis in the HDM – 4, computer spreadsheets developed for this p urp urp ose ose a re used used for sens sensiti itivity vity ana lysis lysis,, for whic h the HDM m od el b ased ased out put s are used used as inputs. The Wo rld rld Ban k initiated initiated a Highw ay De sign a nd Ma intena nc e stud stud y in 196 1969 9 using using lea d ing research institutions and road agencies during which empirical relationships between road roughne ss, ma intena nc e

a nd

vehicle

op erating

co sts we re d erived erived .

These hese

we re

incorporated in the HDM III in 1987, which was the result of 18 years research in Australia, Brazil, razil, Franc e, India , K Kenya enya , Sw ed en , UK UK a nd USA. USA.

Bet w ee n 19 1971 71 a nd 1982, 1982, fo ur ma jor

em piric piric a l stud stud ies we re c a rried rried out whic h includ ed the Roa d User Co st Stud Stud y (RU (RUCS CS)) c arried arried of b y MO ST, Go vt. o f Ind ia (Dr. L.R L.R Ka d iya li). The results results of t his stud y a nd tho se o f Ken Ken ya , Brazil Brazil and the Caribbean were the basis of the relationships developed for HDM III model released in 1987 1987 and further imp roved on in its HD HDM M M a na g er Version Version 3.0. This version version relea sed in June 1995 was tested in more than 20 countries before its release and because of its strong development background in India, considered most appropriate for the analysis of this project. The late st ve rsion rsion HD HDM M – 4 (Version 1.3) 1.3) rele ased in 2000 by the World World Bank , is the further improvement over their HDM Manager Version 3.0, supported with adequate test ap plic ations in d ifferent ifferent situations situations,, inc luding the Ind ian highwa y p rojec ts. ts. This This justifi justifies es the relevanc e of HDM HDM – 4 for India India n highwa y p rojec ts and use use for the present study. study.

5.1.4

Input Data

5.1.4.1Capital cost The c ap ital cost cost of c onstr onstruct uct ion o f the p rop osed osed widening including the pha sing ing of investm investm ent d uring uring the c onstruction onstruction p eriod eriod ha s be en c alc ulate d. Thes These e includ e the c osts osts for Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


c onstr onstruct uct ion pa c kage be ing eva luate luate d in the ec onom ic a nalysis nalysis.. The c osts osts of d ifferent ifferent pa vement op tions tions have b een c onsi onsidered. The ana lysis lysis pe riod riod of t he p roject for is ta ken a s 35 yea rs from t he b a se ye a r:

•

Base Year 2006

•

Construction period – 2008 to 2010

•

Projec t op ene d fo r traffic – 201 2011 1

•

End o f the a na lysis lysis p eriod –204 2040 0

Number of operating years after project improvement, considered for economic analysis – 30 yea rs. rs.

Com po nents c onsi onside red for the c alc ulat ulat ion of c onstr onstruc uc tion co st in inc c lude: •

All highw highw ay c onstr onstruc uc tion c om po nents inc luding sur survey, vey, d esi esign etc .

•

Soc ial d isplac eme nt c osts osts

•

Land acquisition

•

Costs Costs of e nvir nvironm enta l protec tion me asur asures es

•

Cont inge nc ies and Qua lity c ontrol duri during c onstr onstruc uc tion pe riod

The c a p ita l co st is sum m a ris rised in Ta bl e 5.3. 5.3 . Tab le 5.3: 5.3: Deta Deta ils of the Co nstructio nstructio n Cost co nside nside red for Ec Ec ono mic Ana lysis Flexible Option

Sl. No.

Sec tion

Fina nc ial C ost (Rs. (Rs. In Millions)

1

Kut tip ura m - Ed a p a lly

13955.1 13955.1

Ec onom ic Co st (Rs. In Millions)

12559.6 12559.6

5.1.4.2 Ma intenanc e Co st (Rec (Rec urrent urrent Co st) The m aintena nc e wo rks c onsidered onsidered for the alternatives in in the a nalysis includ e: Flexible Pave me nt: •

Annual Maintenance (Routin (Routine e m aintenance ):

•

Surfac e d ress ressing / Resealing

•

Overlay

Details of the maintenance programme followed for the project road sections under different situations along with their unit rates, followed in the analysis, are summed up below in Tab le 5.4 (a) to 5.4 (c ). All the financial costs pertaining to construction and maintenance (Agency Cost) were converted into economic costs by using the conversion factor of 0.9 and the same were used used in the e c on om ic fe a sibility ana lysis lysis.. This is a s p er the gu ide lines lines of Inte rnat iona l funding



institutions institutions for highwa y p roject s in IInd nd ia, thoug h IR IRC sugg sugg ests ests a c onve rsion rsion fa c tor to b e in the rang e o f 0.80 – 0.8 0.85 5 (IRC: SP - 30, 1993). Tab le 5.4(a): 5.4(a): Annual / Periodic al Ma intenanc e Programm Programm e for the Im proved Project Roa d Sec Sec tions – Flexible Pavement Sl. No. Ma intena nc e Starting Interval Interval / Intervention Intervention Overlay Ty p e year Thic kne ss (mm )

1

Resea ling

2015

Sc he d uled (e ve ry 5 ye a rs) rs)

25 SDBC DBC

2

O ve rla rla y

2020

50 BC

3

Pa tc hing

2010 201 0

Respo nsive nsive (Whe n Rou g hne ss > 4.0 IRI IRI & c um ula tive ESAL > 150 MSA) MSA) Ann ua l (Rep (Rep a iring iring a ll p ot ho les) les)

100% 100%

Tab le 5.4(b): 5.4(b): Annua l / Periodic al Ma intenanc e Program Program me for all Exis Existing ting R Road oad Sec tions under under unimproved situation Sl. No. Ma intena nc e Starting Interval Interval / Intervention Intervention Overlay Ty p e year Thic kne ss (mm )

1

Resea ling

2010

Sc he d uled (e ve ry 5 ye a rs) rs)

20 SDBC DBC

2

Ov erlay

2015 2015

Sc hed uled (eve ry 10 yea rs) rs)

25 SDB DBC C

3

Pa tc hing

2005 200 5

Ann ua l (Rep (Rep a iring iring a ll p ot ho les) les)

100% 100 %

Tab le 5.4(c) : Unit Unit Cost Rate Rate s for for Ma intena nc e – Flexib Flexib le SI. No. Details

Financ ial Cost

Ec ono mic Cost

1

Pa Pa tc hing (Rs (Rs p er Sq m )

328.0 328.0

295.2 295.2

2

Resea ling 25 m m (Rs (Rs p e r Sq m )

80.0

72.0

3

Resea ling 20 m m (Rs (Rs p e r Sq m )

52.95 52.95

47.66 47.66

4

Ov erla y (50 m m ) (Rs (Rs p er Sq m )

173.0 173.0

155.7 155.7

5

Ov erla y (25 m m ) (Rs (Rs p er Sq m )

96.0

86.0

6

Ed g e Rep a ir

382.67 382.67

344.4 344.4

5.1.4.3 The Resid Residua ua l Va lue Considering the remaining life of the construction items the Residual value (salvage value) has been assessed at the end of the analysis period. For structures, the life is assumed to be 50 yea rs a nd a s suc h the rema ining life is ta ken from 204 2040. 0. Values of the selected construction items such as LA, structures, sub-base, social displac displac eme nt c ost ost e tc . are included in the ec onom ic a nalysis nalysis as res residual idual values at the e nd of t he a na lysis lysis pe riod riod s. These hese residua residua l values a re c onsidered onsidered , as bene fits to the p roject in the analysis. In order to maintain uniformity among studies, National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) has suggested that 20% of the project cost shall be considered as salvage value at the end of the an alysis alysis p eriod eriod for ec ono mic eva luation stud stud ies for BOT BOT highw a y projec ts in India . The sa sa me has b ee n ad op ted for present present stud stud y.

5.1.4.4 Roa d User Co sts The e c ono mic c ost ost inputs that a re req req uired uired for estima estima ting Roa Roa d user c osts osts are: •

Price o f selecte selecte d (pop ular) ular) mod els, els, by vehicle typ e

•

Tyre pric es



•

Fuel c ost ost inc luding o il price price

•

Crew c ost ost (w a g es of Drive Drive rs / Ass Assista ista nts) nts)

•

Time c o sts for: •

Passenger

•

Freight (holding c ost) ost)

The c ost ost of vehicles and tyre tyre w ere c ollec ollec ted from from the d ea lers lers loca ted in the influ influenc enc e a rea of the p roject roa d . All the transfer transfer pa yme nts suc h as sales ta x, excise excise d uty, roa roa d ta x oc troi etc . are ded ucte d from the financ ial co st to a rrive ive a t the resource resource c ost. ost. A vehicle op erator’s survey urvey has be en c ond uct ed to e stimate the w ag es of d rivers ivers and their a ssista ista nts. nts. Finally, inally, the c rew c ost ost is estima estima ted with a p prop riate hours of w ork time time p er annum for different vehicle types. With With respe respe c t to ma intena intena nce labo ur costs costs,, loc loc al wo rkshop kshop s have be en c onta c ted to a ssess ess the ve hicle type wise wise w ag e b ill ill for rep airs airs and am ount o f labo ur time time spe nt on them. Bas Based ed on these these labo ur c osts osts have b een c alculate d p er hour, hour, for ea c h vehicle ca teg ory. ory. Tim e c osts: osts: Pa Pa sseng ers The a verage incom e of full-ti full-time me e mp loyed pe op le in in the study study region wa s c omp uted from from published macroeconomic and demographic data, with a premium of 33% to allow for b usines usiness s ov erhea d s. This va lue (22.53 (22.53// ho ur) wa s a p p lied lied to p a sseng er-hours in work time. Journeys Journeys in non-wo non-wo rk time time were va lued lued at 30% 30% of the averag e inco me of full-ti full-time me emp loyed p eo ple (Rs (Rs 6.76 6.76// hour). This proc ed ure is in keep ing w ith the guid elines c onta ined in the World World Ba nk’ s IInfras nfrastruc truc ture Not e No.O T-51. -51. Particularly in the case of subsistence workers and self-employed workers in the informal sec tor, the c onc ep t of ‘ work time’ is questionab questionab le, but we ha ve ad hered to the p rinciple inciple that a distinction should be made between time that is lost to productive effort and time that is not. We feel that ab ove va lues lues estimated estimated at ma cro level ca n represent represent b us pa sseng ers. ers. Henc e a step-up approach is followed to estimate the passenger time value by other better modes. Accordingly a notional increase is followed to estimate the time value for passengers by minibus, minibus, two whe elers a nd c ars, ars, as given in Tab le 5.5. Tab le5.5(a): Time Time Value Ad op ted for Pass Passeng eng er Vehic les, 2005 2005 Vehic le Typ e Time va lue (Rs (Rs / Hour), 200 2005 5

Work

Non wo rk

Bus

21.79

6.54

M ini Bus

26.15

7.84

TW

30.51 30.5 1

9.15

Car

45.77 45.77

13.73 13.73

Tab le 5.5(b): Derivatio n of the Value of P Pass asseng eng er Time Time - 2005

1

Kenn et h M Gw illi illiam am , ‘The ‘The Value of Time in Ec Ec ono mic Eva luation of Trans Transp p ort Projec Projec ts: ts: Les Less sons from from recent Research’.



Details

Unit

Value

Datum yea yearr

Annual Growth (%)

2005

20012002 2001

6.5

1,581,417

1.5

64.95

Input… G ross ross Sta te Dom estic Prod uc t (NSDP (NSDP)) Pop ula tio n

A

Rs m illion

B

Rs m illion

1,309,17 5 62.11

Working population: main Working population: marginal Working population: FTE** E** Computed…

C

%

38.13

2001*

1.5

39.87

D

%

6.64

2001*

1.5

6.95

E=C +D/ 2

%

41.45

F=A×0.7 0 G =(F/ =(F/ B)/ E H=G/240 0 I=H×1.33

Rs m illion

1,106,992

Rs/ ye a r

39,320

Rs/ ho ur

16.38

Rs/ ho ur

21.79

J=H×0.30

Rs/ ho ur

6.54

Assumed NSDP (70%) to households Ave rage inco me p er FT FTE worker Ave rage inco me p er FT FTE worker*** Work time value, with 33% 33% ove rhea d s Non-work time value at 30%

43.35

( No t e : *C e n su s; in t h e a b se n c e o f e v id e n c e t o t h e c o n t ra ry it is a ssu m e d t h a t a v e ra g e h o u se h o ld size a n d t h e p ro p o rt io n o f p e o p le in t h e w o rkin g p o p u la t io n h a v e re m a in e d c o n st a n t . ** Fu ll-t im e e q u iv a le n t w o rke rs, a ssu m in g m a rg in a l w o rke rs a re e m p lo y e d h a lf-t im e . ** *A ssu m in g 2,400 w o rke d h o u rs p e r ye a r.

•

Time c osts: osts: freig ht From the discussions with the vehicle operators in the region and axle load surveys on the road , an esti estima ma te wa s ma de of the a verag verag e load ca rried by ea ch ca tegory of truck, truck, and its ec ono mic va lue on Sta Sta te level. This wa s then used used as the b asis asis for co mp uting a n hourly hourly inventory cost (or freight holding cost), using the social discount rate as the cost of working c ap ital locked up in go od s in tran tran sit and ass assuming a n effec tive 2,40 2,4000-hour hour wo rking rking yea r. Ta b le 5.6 presents the derivation of the values used in the model for the three classes of freight freight vehic le. All three values we re rounde d to the ne a rest rest rrup up ee p er vehic le-hour. le-hour. Tab le 5.6: Derivation of the Time Value of Freight in Transit Transit Details LCV

2- ax le truck

3-a xle truck

Multi-axle truck*

Av era g e va lue of loa d (Rs (Rs.)

190,000 190,000

275,000 275,000

690,000 690,000

725,000 725,000

Interest nterest c ost ost fo r a yea r ( × 12%) 12%)

22,800

33,000

82,800

87,000

Interest cost per working hour ÷ 2,400 2,4 00 at 1999 1999 price

9.5

13.75

34.5

36.25

(Note: Average value of load is arrived from the discussion with the vehicle users in the stud stud y reg reg ion.) For uniformity, National Highways Authority (NHAI) had suggested economic road user costs in November 2000, in consultations with the Design Consultants, to be used as HDM Model inputs for ca rryi rrying ng out ec ono mic an alysis alysis for BOT BOT highw a y projec ts in Ind Ind ia. After a c areful Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


comparison of the road user costs collected from the field and other secondary sources, it was decided to adopt data collected from the field for the present analysis. Wherever nec ess essa ry, ry, the NH NHAI AI sugg sugg ested ested roa d user user c osts osts also also sup plem ente d. Based on the above considerations, the economic costs estimated for different VOC c om po nents are presented presented in Ta bl e 5.7. 5.7 . Tab le 5. 7: Ec Ec ono mic Roa d User Cost Inputs Vehicle Vehicle type Model

New vehicle Eco nomic price (Rs.)

New tyre Ec onom ic pric e (Rs.) (Rs.)

Maint.* Labour (Rs./h (Rs./h our)

Crew co st * (Rs./ (Rs./ c re w hour)

C a r (NT) (NT)

M a ruti, C S E1 (M )

140113

947

22

27

C a r (O T)

Am b a ssa d or, 1.5DL

291648 291648

1431

19

27

58985 58985

555

19

27

Au to ricksha ricksha w s Bus

LP1512TC / 52

878439

5670

38

98

Mini Bus

Ma hind ra Mini Bus

444500 444 500

2396

30

46

TW

436

19

-

LCV

Hero Hond a Splend our LPT LPT407 LB

436440 43644 0

31 3144 44

31

46

2-A xle Truc k

LPT1613TC 1613TC / 48

869483

5670

33

68

3-A xle Truc k

LPT2515TC 2515TC

1084629

5670

39

99

M AV

LPS4021TC 4021TC

1661611

5670

47

101

– 36121

(*- based on the information collected from the vehicle operators / workshops during traffic surveys. )

The e c ono mic c ost ost of p etrol, diesel, diesel, oils oils and lubric lubric ant ad op ted for the p resent esent a na lysis lysis is given in Ta b le 5.8. 5.8 . Tab le 5.8: Details of Ec Ec ono mic Cost for Fuel Fuel - 200 2005 5 Item Market Pric ric e

Ec onom ic c ost

Fac tor to arrive arrive Ec onom ic C ost* ost*

Rs/ litre

Rs/ litre

Petrol Pet rol

42.15

23.88

0.5666

Die se l

29.40

23.34

0.7971

Eng ine O il

90

67.56

0.7507

Lub rica nts

95

71.32 71.32

0.7507 0.7507

G rea se

110

82.58 82.58

0.7507 0.7507

*Ba *Ba sed on ADB TA Stud Stud y o n Rural Rural Roa Roa d Sec to r Projec Projec t - I for M P & C hha ttisg ttisg a rh Sta te s, 2003 2003

The vehic le c ha ra c te ristics istics of rep resent esent a tive ve hicles used used a s input for HDM HDM - 4 a re given in Ta b le 5.9 5.9.. Tab le 5.9: 5.9: Vehicle c hara c teristic teristic s (HDM (HDM Input Data ) Vehicle GVW No. of No. of No. of type (Ton (Ton ne s) Axles Tyres passeng ers

Service life (Years)

Hours driven/ Year

Kms. driven/ Year

Annual interest rate (%)

C a r (NT) (NT)

1.4

2

4

5

10

1950

32000

12

C a r (O T)

2

2

4

4.6

10

1950

32000

12



Vehicle type

GVW (Ton (Ton ne s)

No. of Axles

No. of Tyres

No. of passeng ers

Service life (Years)

Hours driven/ Year

Kms. driven/ Year

Annual interest rate (%)

Bus

14.9

2

6

39.5

10

2000

66000

12

M ini Bus

2.5

2

4

15

8

1500

60000

12

TW

0.2

2

2

1.6

10

700

21000

12

LC V

5.3

2

4

-

12

1500

60000

12

2-Axle Truc k 3-Axle Truc k M AV

15.7

2

6

-

10

2100

85000

12

25

3

10

-

10

2100

85000

12

40.2

5

12

-

12

2400

120000

12

5.1.4.5 Roa d Cha rac teristics teristics The road c ha rac teristics teristics for the c onsidered onsidered netw ork req uired uired as input to t he HDM HDM mo de l we re co llec llec ted d uring uring the rec onna iss issan c e a nd o ther eng ineering ineering surveys surveys.. The roa d characteristics for those proposed improvements are adopted from the design proposals. The roughness roughness of the new flexi flexible ble p ave ment at the time of o pe ning ning to t raffic in 2011 2011 have been set at 2.0 (IRI) for the ‘with project’ alternative. For the flexible, the deterioration model will predict the roughness at any point in time during the project life.

5.1.4.6 Traffic No rm a l Tra ff ic : Tra ffic g ro w th ra te s, c o v e rin g th e p e rio d o f a n a ly sis a d o p te d fro m th e Tra ffic Se c tio n o f th is Re p o rt a re g iv e n in Ta b le 5.10 b e lo w fo r a ll th e Pro je j e c t Ro a d Se c tio n s.

Diverted a nd Ge nerated Traffic raffic : The d iversion version expec ted to the project roa d afte r the proposed improvements and additional traffic from the proposed Vallarpadam c ont a iner terminal a t Er Erna kula kula m, a s g iven in the Tr Tra ffic C ha pt er, is is d isc isc ount ed to 2005 2005 and ad de d with the no rma l traffic traffic t o a rrive at the b ase ase yea r traffic traffic in 2005 2005.. Considering the existing landuse and the proposed developments in the project region, it is felt that there is better scope for new traffic generation due to the improvement to the project roa d. Hence , on c onservativ onservative e a pp roa ch, 10% 10%-generated traffic traffic is c onsidered onsidered fo r the analysis in ‘one stroke’ during the initial year for the widening road sections. For new bypass sec tions, tions, whe re road s are pa ssing t hrough Tab le 5.10: 5.10: Projec Projec ted Traffic Grow th Rate Rate s ad op ted for the Projec Projec t road Yea r Moto rised rised Vehic les

20052009 20102014 20152019

Non Moto rised rised vehicles

Two Wheelers

Auto

Ca r

LCV

Bus/M ini Bus

Truc ks

MA V (3 Axle, >3 Axle)

Cycle

Cart

9.6

4.0

5.0

7

4.7

5.0

7

2.0

2.0

9.8

4.1

5.1

6.0

4.3

4.3

6.0

1.8

1.8

9.9

4.1

5.2

5.5

3.9

3.9

5.5

1.6

1.6



Yea r

20202024 20252029 >2030

Moto rised rised Vehic les

Non Moto rised rised vehicles

Two Wheelers

Auto

Ca r

LCV

Bus/M ini Bus

Truc ks

MA V (3 Axle, >3 Axle)

Cycle

Cart

9.5

4.0

4.9

5.0

3.5

3.5

5.0

1.5

1.5

9.1

3.8

4.7

4.5

3.2

3.2

4.5

1.3

1.3

7.8

3.2

4.1

4.0

2.9

2.9

4.0

1.2

1.2

(Note: A growth rate o f 3% 3% is ad op ted for old tec h ca rs) Sec tion w ise ise A ADT for the b a se ye a r 200 2005, 5, are g iven in Tab le 5.11. 5.11. Tab le 5.11(a): Distribution Distribution o f Ave rage Annua l Daily Traffic Traffic (AADT) (AADT) – 2005* 2005* Vehicle Kuttipur uttipuramam- Chavakka d Chavakka d- Kodungallur Kodungallur Type Sec tion (Sec (Sec tion I) Sec tion (Sec (Sec tion II) Nos. % Com po sition Nos. % Com po sition sition

Kodung allur- Eda Eda pa lly Sec tion (Sec (Sec tion III) Nos. %Comp osition

Motorized Vehicles Bus

298

3.5

860

9.7

879

5.9

M ini Bus

85

1

313

3.5

223

1.5

M AV

211

2.5

204

2.3

223

1.5

3 A xle

91

1.1

88

1

95

0.6

2 A xle

836

10

705

7.9

864

5.8

LC V**

455

5.4

733

8.3

998

6.7

TW

2633

31.4

1708

19.3

5943

39.9

C a r (N)

2167

25.8

2963

33.4

4225

28.4

Ca r(O)

241

2.9

329

3.7

469

3.2

AR

1382

16.5

966

10.9

971

6.5

TO TA L

8399

100

8869

100

14890

100

Non-Motorized Vehicles Animal Carts C yc les

22

3.4

1

0.3

3

0.4

619

96.6

286

99.7

831

99.6

TO TA L

641

100

287

100

834

100

(No t e : *- Exp e c t e d t ra f fic d iv e rsio n t o t h e p ro je je c t ro a d a n d a d d it io n a l t ra f fic fro m Va lla rp a d a m C o n t a in e r t e rm in a l is d isc o u n t e d t o y e a r 2005 a n d a d d e d w it h n o rm a l t ra f fic in 2005. ** in c lu d e t ra c t o rs)

Tab le 5.11(b): Deta ils of Traffic c onsidered for Byp Byp asses asses of Sec Sec tion II - 200 2009 9 Veh ic le Typ e Byp ass Traffic Existing Roa d Traffic No.

%

No.

%

258

4.5

774

14.3

Motorised Vehicles Bus Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Veh ic le Typ e

Byp ass Traffic

Existing Roa d Traffic

No.

%

No.

%

M ini Bus

94

1.6

283

5.2

M AV

241

4.2

27

0.5

3 Axle

103

1.8

11

0.2

2 Axle

643

11.1

214

4.0

LC V**

577

10.0

384

7.1

TW

739

12.8

1725

31.9

C a r (N)

2521

43.6

1080

20.0

C a r(O)

259

4.5

111

2.2

AR

339

5.9

791

14.6

TO TA L

5775

100

5402

100

Anim a l Ca rts

-

-

1

0.3

C yc les

-

-

309

99.7

TO TA L

-

-

310

100

Non-Motorized Vehicles

In ord er to suit suit the ve hicle c a teg ories ories a vailab le in HDM HDM - 4, the vehic les ob served in the traffic survey have b ee n group ed as show n in Tab le 5.12.

Tab le 5.12: 5.12: Vehic le Cla ssifica sifica tions HDM HDM - 4 Group

Traffic Survey Vehic les

Motorised Vehicles Car

Car (New (New technology)

Pickup

Ca r (Old tec hnology),

Bus

Bus

Minib us

Minib us, us, Pa ssen ge r Tem p o / Va n

LCV

LCV, trac to r and trac tor trailer trailer

Truck

2 Axle truc k

HCV

3 Axle Axle truck

MA V

Multi Axle Axle truck

Two Whee lers

Sc oo te rs, rs, Mo to rbikes

Auto ric ric kshaw kshaw

Auto ric ric kshaw kshaw

Non - Mot oris orised Vehic les Anima l Draw Draw n

Bulloc ulloc k / Horse orse Dra Dra wn Ca rts

Cyc les

Ped el c ycles

5.1.5

Ec onom ic Eva luation o f the Projec Projec t Roa Roa d



Ec onom ic e valuation wa s c arried arried o ut for the individua individua l homog eneo us sec tions and sec tions separately as well for the full Project Road. In the analysis, the ‘with project’ alternative of widening the project road is compared with the base option of ‘without project’ alternative of m ainta ining ining the exis existing roa d only withou t imp roveme nts. nts. This is to arrive arrive a t the net economic benefits, which consist of reduction in vehicle operation cost, reduction in travel time and reduction in accident cost. Results of the analysis, carried out through HDM – 4 (Version (Version 1.3), a re sum sum ma ris rised b elow in Ta b le 5.13. Tab le 5.13: Results Results of the Ec ono mic Ana lysis Ec ono mic Internal Rate Rate of Return Return in %(EIRR) HS / Sec tion No

Full Project Road

•

VOC Sav Sav ings only as Projec Projec t Benefit

All Sav Sav ings only a s Project Project Benefit

8.5

21.4

Ec onom ic Net P Pres resent ent Va lue of Net Benefits at 12 % Disc Disc ount Rate (Rs (Rs in M illions) VOC Sav Sav ings only as All Sav Sav ings on ly Project as Projec Projec t Benefit Benefit

-2777.83

9975.53

Full project road is economically feasible for the proposed improvement, c o nsid nsid ering th e EIRR IRR va lues (21.4% (21.4%).

5.1.6

Sensitivity Ana lysis

Sensitivity ensitivity a na lysis lysis wa s c a rried ried ou t to t he e c on om ic fe a sibility ibility results results,, for the follow ing sc ena rios: rios: •

Sc en a rio rio - I Ba se Co sts a nd Base Base Bene Bene fits

•

Sc en a rio - II Ba se C osts p lus 15% a nd Ba se Bene fits

•

Sc en a rio - III III Base Co sts a nd Ba se Bene fits m inus 15%

•

Sc en a rio - IV Ba Ba se C osts p lus 15% a nd Ba se Ben ef its min us 15%

Sensitivity ensitivity a na lysis lysis to the ec on om ic e va luat ion c rite rite ria ria (EI (EIRR a nd ENP NPV) V) w ere a lso lso c a rried o ut for the fo llow llow ing situations situations:: •

Red uc tion in VOC only is c onsidered onsidered as p rojec rojec t b ene fit

•

Red uct ion in in VOC, Time Time c ost ost a nd A c cide nt c ost ost tog ether are c onsi onside red as project benefit

Results esults of the sen sitivity itivity a na lysis lysis w ere summ a ris rised b elow in Ta b le 5.14. Ta ble 5.14: Results Results of the Sensitivit y A na lysis Flexible Pavem ent Op tion EIRR (%) (% )

ENPV ( %)

VOC Savings only a s Project Project Benefit

VOC , Time Co st VOC , Time Co st VOC Savings & Acc ident Cost Cost & Acc ident Cost Cost only as Savings together Sav ings tog ethe r Project as Projec Projec t as Projec Projec t Benefit Benefit Benefit

8.5

21.4

-2777.83 -2777.83

9975.53 9975.53

15% increase in Agency 7.6 c ost ost Sc Sc en a rio rio

19.5

-3,876.41

8,876.94

S. No

Sensitivity Sc ena rio

1.0

Full Proje c t Roa d

1.1

No rma l Sc en a rio

1.2



Flexible Pavem ent Op tion EIRR (%) (% ) S. No

Sensitivity Sc ena rio

ENPV ( %)

VOC Savings only a s Project Project Benefit

15% d ec rea se in User User 7.4 Bene fit Sc Sc ena rio rio 15% increase in Agency cost + 15% decrease in 6.6 User Ben Ben ef it Sc Sc en a rio

1.3 1.4

5.1.7

VOC , Time Co st VOC , Time Co st VOC Savings & Acc ident Cost Cost & Acc ident Cost Cost only as Savings together Sav ings tog ethe r Project as Projec Projec t as Projec Projec t Benefit Benefit Benefit

19.3

-3,459.74

7,380.62

17.5

-4,558.32

6,282.04

Conc lusions lusions and Rec omm enda tions

The p rojec t road sec tion of NH 17 from from Kuttipu ra m to Ed ap p a li is ec ono mic ally feasible for the proposed widening to four lanes considering the positive values of EIRR (21.4%) and ENPV (Rs. 9975.53 Million). It has also been established that the proposal is economically feasible in the worst-case scenario developed in sensitivity a n a lys ly sis (EIR (EIRR: 17.5%, ENPV: ENPV: Rs Rs. 6282.04 6282.0 4 Millio Mill ion n ).

5.2

Finan c ial Ana lysis lysis

5.2.1

Background

The roa d c on sisting isting of NH17 NH17 from from Kutt ipura m t o Ed Ed a p p lli lli (km (km 318+000 318+000 to km 438+600(Deign ch.429+440) is proposed for improvement including widening to 4lane . The p rop osed osed lengt h o f the p rojec t roa d is 111. 111.73 73 km, c onsidered onsidered a s a single pa c kag e.

Two toll plazas plazas are prop prop osed osed o n the project road , ie; at Km Km

344+150(Design ch.337+700) and km Bypass(Designch.413+700). Present section discuss about the financial feasibility analysis carried out for the package, so as to help NHAI to take a decision whether the project can be implemented under BOT concept. The d et a ils ils of th e p rojec t road c onside onside red for the p resent esent financ ial fea sibility ibility ana lysis lysis are g iven in Ta b le 5.15. 5.15. Tab le 5.15: Projec Projec t Roa Roa d Details PAC KAG KA G E

RO A D

STA RT

END

PRO PRO POSA L

LEN LENG TH

Pa c kag e 1

NH17 NH1 7

317+710 317 +710

438+600 (Designc (Designc h.429/ h.429/ 440 440))

4-laning

111.73

New MC A: The p rovis rovision of ne w M CA ha s be en c onsidered onsidered for via via bility bility a nalysis nalysis

5.2.2

Ap proa c h to Finan Finan c ial Eva Eva luatio n on BOT BOT Ba sis

The viab ility ility of the p rojec t d ep end s on the wo rking king c ash ash flows ava ilab ilab le to servic ervic e the de bt a nd e quity. This wo rking rking ca sh flow flow is b asica asica lly lly dep end ent up on the fo llow llow ing:•

Project Cost

•

Traffic & Traffic Traffic Grow th



•

To ll Struc Struc tu re

•

Operation and Maintenance expens expenses es

•

Interest on Debt

•

Ta x

The m ain ob jec tive of Financ Financ ial Ana lysis is to e xamine t he viab ility ility of imp lemen ting the p roject o n a BOT ba sis. is. The a na lysis lysis at tem pt s to a sc ertain the e xtent to whic h the investm investm ent can be recovered through toll revenue and the gap, if any, be funded through Grant / Subsidy. ubsidy. This c ove rs a spe c ts like like fina fina nc ing through d eb t and eq uity, loan repa yme nt, de bt servicing, taxat ion, de p rec iation, etc . The viab ility ility of the p rojec t is is eva luate d o n the ba sis of Projec t F FIIRR (Finan (Finan c ial Interna l Ra Ra te of Ret urn on to ta l inve inve stm ent ). The FIRR is estima estima te d on the basis of cash flow analysis, where both costs and revenue have been indexed to take ac c ount of inflation. inflation. Financ inanc ial analysis analysis has be en c arried arried out for the p rojec t with de bt eq uity ratio of 70:30 70:30..

5.2.3

Cost of Civil Works

The to ta l cost cost of t he p rojec rojec t includ es c ost ost of c ivil ivil wo rks rks including the imp roveme nt of e xis xisting c arria arria ge wa y a nd c ost ost of to ll p laza laza .

The estima estima ted p roject c ost ost is is c onsidered onsidered e xcluding

shifting of utilities, land acquisition, acquisition of structures, rehabilitation and resettlement a nd en vironm vironm enta l mitiga tion mea sures whic h are to be b orne by NHAI. NHAI. Co st of Civil Civil Works Works a t 2006 price s is g iven in Ta b le 5.16. 5.16 .

Tab le 5.16: Details of Projec Projec t Civ il Co st Pac ka ge No.

Package-I

5.2.4

Desc Desc ription ription

From Km 317+710 - Km to km 429+440(Desi 429+440(Desig g n c h.438/ 600) o f NH 17 (4-laning) Esc a lat ed c ost for one yea r

Cost of Civil Works (Rs in crore)

Rate per Km (Rs (Rs in cro re)

884

7.91

928.00 928 .001 1

8.29 8.2 9

Cost Es Esc ala tion

The ba se c osts osts have b een e sc ala ted a t a rate of 3% pe r annum to ob tain the ac tual c osts osts in the ye ar of exp end iture. This is ba sed o n ave rag e WPI WPI for for the last 5 ye a rs. rs.

5.2.5

Interest During During Co nstructio nstructio n (IDC)

The interest interest during c onstruction, onstruction, whic h on the c ost of funding inc urred urred on the p rojec t, has bee n c alc ulated on the ba sis of an interes interestt of 11 perce nt per annum a s per the c urrent urrent ma rket rate for lend lend ing Highw Highw ay Projec ts. ts.

5.2.6

Tota l Projec Projec t Co st

The total lande d c osts osts for the the pa ck ag e a t the end o f the co nstr nstruction uction p eriod eriod has been estima estima ted b y a dd ing Co ntingenc ies, ies, IC IC & Pre-op Pre-op erative exp enses, enses, Financ ing Cost, Esc ala tion, Interes Interestt during Construc Construc tion (IDC) (IDC) etc . The tota l land ed c ost at the tim e of c om missioning missioning is thus thus estima estima ted o n Pac Pac ka ge ba sis and presented in Ta b le 5.17. 5.17. Ta ble 5.17: Tota l Proje Proje c t Cost Deta ils



Sl. No .

PARTICUL IC ULA A RS

Co st (Rs. (Rs. in Cro re) re )

TO TA L KM

111.73

A

Co nc ess essionaire Co st

1

Tot a l Civil Co nstruc nstruc tion c ost ost (1)

883.8 883.810 10 928.001

2

Civil Construction cost escalated at 5% for 1 year Co nting enc ies/ ies/ QC @ 3% of Civil Co st (2) To ta l EPC C o st (3)

955.841

3

IC & Pre-o p era tive exp en ses @1% of EPC (4)

9.558 9.558

4

Fina nc ing Co st @ 2% Deb t a t 70:30 70:30 DER DER (5)

14.484 14.484

5

Esc a lat ion @ 5% Per An num During Construction Period (Construction Period 30 months) Inte rest rest During During Co nstruc nstruc tion @ 11% 11% p a on Deb t (a t 70:30 DER) (Term (Term Loa n). n) . (6)

14.484

Tot a l Co nc ession ession C ost

1144.957 114 4.957

TO TA L C O NC ESSION IO N C O ST/ PER PER Km. Km .

10.25 10.2 5

6

27.84 27.84

79.454

B

NHAI C o st

1

Lan d Ac q uisiti uisition, on, Environm nvironm enta l Mitiga tion, R&R, Utility Utility Shift Shift ing et c . TO TA L NHA I C O ST

485.2

TO TAL PRO PRO JEC JEC T C O ST (C o nc e ssion a ire C o st + NHAI Cost) TO TA L PRO PRO JECT C O ST/ PER PER Km. Km .

1630.16

5.2.7

485.20 485. 20

14.59 14. 59

To ll Ra te s

Tolls c an be set either to m a ximize imize revenu e o r ma ximiz ximize e the utiliz utilizat at ion of t he p roject withou t c ausing ausing c ong estion. estion. How eve r, in no c ase, ase, tolls tolls a re set set a t a level highe highe r tha n the p erce ived b ene fits of using using the fac ility. ility. Toll rat rat es are e stima ted b ased ased on t he Na tiona l Highw Highw a ys (NHAI)) (NHAI)) New Dra ft Toll Polic y. The fe e und er sub sub -rule -rule for projec ts involving c onv ersion ersion into fou r-lane r-lane s of exis existing two -lane -lane of na tional highw highw ays shall not e xceed the c ap ping rates given be low a t June June 1997 1997 rate s esca esca lated in acc ordanc e with the ave rag e WPI WPI. Ac c ording to d raft NH toll policy, Rates were recommended for different types of vehicles for the year 2006-07 based on WPI WPI of 1st Janu a ry 200 2007 7 (WPI (WPI 208. 208.2) 2) whic h a re g iven in Tab le 5.18. 5.18. Tab le 5.18: Per Per Km C ap ping Rate s

Ra te (Rs/ (Rs/ Km) JANUARY 2007

S. No. Typ Typ e o f ve hic le

4/ 6 La ne 1. 2. 3. 4.

Ca r or Jeep or Van Light Co mm erc ial veh icle s inc luding Mini Bus Bus o r Truc k Multi Axle Vehic le


0.65 0.65 1.05 1.0 5 2.2 3.45 3.4 5


Ra te (Rs/ (Rs/ Km) JANUARY 2007

S. No. Typ Typ e o f ve hic le

4/ 6 La ne 5.

Heavy construction earthmoving earthmoving equipment

machinery

and

4.2

NHAI NH AI toll c ap ping rates have b een e sc alate d at a rate of 5% every yea yea r and rounded off to nearest rupee. As p er the ne w Toll Toll policy, fee for use use o f a ny structure structure o r byp ass ass, having a n estima estima ted c ost ost exceeding Rs. Fifty Crore and forming part of a section of National Highway, shall be levied at the rates specified in the rule 4(b) separately from the fee levied (rule 4(f)) for the use of the rema inin ining g pa rt of such sec tion of the National Highwa Highwa y.

Ta ble 5.19: Byp a ss/ struc ture Toll Cha rges as pe r rule 4(f) 4(f) Cost

of

struc ture

Ba se Ra Ra te of Fee Fee ( Rs. Rs. Per Ve hic le p er Trip) Trip)

(Rs. (Rs.in in Car

crore)

,Jeep,

Light

Commercial

Van or Light

Vehicle, Light Goods

Motor

Vehic le or Mini Bus Bus

Truc k o r Bus

HCM,EME or MAV

Over

sized

vehicle

Vehicle 10 to 15 For every additional Rs.5 Crore or part there of, exceeding Rs.15 Cr. And up to Rs.100Cr. .100Cr.

5.2.8

5 1

7.5 1.50

15 3

22 4.50

30 6

Grant and Its trea trea tme nt

A) Equity Support: Support: It shall be equal to the sum specified in the bid and as accepted by the autho rity but in no c ase ase g rea ter than the eq uity uity and shall be further restr estricted icted to a sum no t exc ee d ing 20% of TP TPC i.e. m a ximum 20% of TP TPC (Tot (Tot a l Projec Projec t C ost). Here TP TPC is exc lud ing eq uity supp ort. Formula is to b e wo rked rked out with the help of c irc irc ular referenc e. It sha sha ll b e d ue a nd p aya b le to the Co nc ess essionaire afte r it has expe nde d th e Eq Eq uity. Further it sha sha ll be disbursed proportionately along with the loan funds. B) O & M Supp Supp ort: O&M support will be equal to the minus of equity support discussed above from t he p ossible ossible t ot a l 40% 40% sub sidy. This This O & M sup sup p ort is fixed fixed wh ic h is eq ua l to sev sev en a nnua l instalments. Ac c ordingly, ordingly, maximum 20% Grant has been c onsidered onsidered during during Constru Construc c tion Peri Period od and the sam e ha s be en reduc ed from from t he Tota Tota l Pr Project Cost. Cost. Balanc e O & M supp supp ort has be en c onsidered onsidered in 7 yea yea rs from C OD in eq ual insta insta llme llme nt. Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


5.2.9 •

Con c ession ession to Loc al Traffic Traffic The c on c ess essiona ire ire sha sha ll a llow llow the d isc isc oun ts a s g iven in Sc Sc he d ule R a nd a s p er The Nationa l Highwa Highwa ys (Co llec llec tion o f fee for the use use o f Nat iona l Highw Highw a ys) ys) Rules Rules,2 ,200 007 7

5.2.10 Traffic Tra ffic su rv e y s fo r se v e n d a y s v o lu m e c o u n ts h a v e b e e n c a rrie d o u t d u rin g 28th No v e m b e r 2005 to 4th De c e m b e r 2005 a t k m 345.10 ( a t V e lia n c o d e ) , k m 381.2 ( a t Th a lik u la m ) , k m 413 ( a t Ko tta p p u ra m t) & k m 426.4 ( a t V a llu v a lly ) . Th e A A DT in th e b a se y e a r 2005 a re g iv e n in Ta b le 5.20. Ta ble 5.20: AADT in the Base Year 2005 SI. No .

Descrip tion

AA DT for 1st 1st section

AA DT for 2n d section

AADT for 3rd section

Average

1

Ca r/Jee p / Aut o

3790 3790

4258 425 8

5665 5665

4571 457 1

2

M ini Bus

85

313

223

207

3

Bus

298

860

880

680

4

LC V

455

733

998

729

5

Truc k-2 Axle

836

705

864

802

6

Truc k-3 Axle

91

88

95

92

7

Mu lti Axle

211

204

223

213

To ta l

5767

7161

8948

7295

PCU

11795

G ro w th ra te s fo r p ro je j e c tio n s o f th e tra ffic a re g iv e n in Ta b le 5.21. Ta ble 5.21: Growth Rates for Proje Proje c tion s of the Traffic SI. No .

Mod e

1

Growth Rates Upto 2009

2010 – 2014

2015 – 2019

2020 – 2024

2025 – 2029

Car/Van/ Jeep LC V’ s

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

4

Bus / Bus Truc ks

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5

M AV

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

2 3

Mini

2030 onwards

95% v e h ic le s h a s b e e n c o n sid e re d a s To lla b le Tra ffic o n a c c o u n t o f n o n - to lla b le , le a k a g e in Tra ffic a n d Erro r in Tra ffic Pro je j e c tio n s e tc .

5.2.11 To ll Re Re ve nue The to ll revenue is the p rod uct of the forec forec ast ast traffic traffic expec ted to use use the roa d and the appropriate toll fee for the vehicle category. A toll indexing pattern @ 5% per year as per the old Toll Toll Policy (100% (100% of a verag e WPI WPI of 5%) 5%) has be en a d op ted a nd round ed off to nea rest rest



one Rupe e. Toll Toll revenues have have be en c alculate d for eac h of toll fee fee struct truct ure ure p rop osed osed above. Pena lty for overload ing There is a p rovision ovision fo r pe nalty fo r overload ing a s und er:•

if vehicle is load ed for mo re tha n 10% 10% then 50% 50% of fe e

•

if vehicle is load ed for more tha n 20% 20% an d a bo ve the n 100% 100% of the fee

Differential fees After 5th 5th a nnivers nniversary ary of the ap po inted inted da te the re is a d iffer ifferential ential fee a pp lica ble a s under:•

p ea k hours = < 6 hrs in a d a y

•

off p ea k hours = twic e t he p ea k hours i.e. i.e. 12 hrs hrs

Concessionaire may determine and collect a premium of up to 25% of the fee during peak hours. hours. Offering Offering a disc disc ount d uring uring off pea k hours hours at a rate eq ual to twic e the said said p remium. If revenue be c ause ause of d iffer ifferential ential fee is ga ined ined then 80% of the differenc differenc e shall shall be c red ited t o Sa fe ty Reserve. Reserve. Ho w e v e r, n o e ffe c t to th e a b o v e h a s b e e n g iv e n in th e Fin a n c ia l A n a ly sis a s o ld To ll Po lic y is c o n sid e re d .

5.2.12 Other Incom e Ap art from from the Toll Toll Inco Inco me, there m ay b e o ther str strea ea ms of revenue g enerated by e xtend ing land de velopm ent rights rights to the Conc ess essionaire ionaire a nd revenue from from any other servi service ce fac iliti ilities es like like A d vertisem vertisem en ts, ts, Truck Parking Parking Termina ls, ls, Pa Pa rking rking A rea s, Aut om ob ile Servic Servic e C ent re, Pet Pet rol Pump s, and Ca ble Duc ting etc . How eve r, a s pe r the p olicy of NHAI, NHAI, no a d vertisem vertisem ents a re a llow llow ed in the projec t highw highw ay.

Also Also for other stream s of revenue the re is no c lear cut

guidance and ac co rdingly dingly no income on these these a cc ounts has been co nsi nsidered.

5.2.13 Dis Disc oun ts for Conc ession ession To To Loc Loc a l Traffic , Exe Exe m pte d Ve hic le An a pp ropriate d isc isc ount o f s shall hall be a llow llow ed a s given in Sc Sc hed ule R an d a s p er The Na tiona l Highw ays (Collec (Collec tion o f fee for the use use of Nation al Highw Highw a ys) ys) Rules Rules,2 ,200 007 7

5.2.14 Tax Ca lc ulation Mod ule Ta x Ra t e : Th e ta x ra te a d o p te d fo r th is stu d y is 33.66% ( 30% ta x + 10% su rc h a rg e + 2% e d u c a tio n ta x ) fo llo w in g th e d e d u c tio n o f d e p re c ia tio n a n d a m o rtiza tio n . M in im u m A lt e rn a t e Ta x (M A T): M in im u m A lte rn a te Ta x ( M A T) o f 11.33% ( 10% ta x + 10% su rc h a rg e + 2% e d u c a tio n ta x ) h a s b e e n ta k e n in to a c c o u n t fo r th e to ta l c o n c e ssio n p e rio d . Ta x Ex e m p tio n s ( Un d e r Se c t io n 80 IA ) : A c c o rd in g to th e sc h e m e u n d e r se c tio n 80- IA , 100% o f th e p ro fit is d e d u c tib le fo r te n y e a rs. Ho w e v e r th e b e n e fit d e d u c tio n is a v a ila b le o n ly fo r te n c o n se c u tiv e a sse ssm e n t y e a rs fa llin g w ith in a p e rio d o f tw e n ty y e a rs fro m th e y e a r th e Pro je j e c t b e g in s its o p e ra tio n s. Prop osed Sourc es of Financ Financ e In general, the developer shall crystallize the sources of finance by optimizing his equity returns keeping in view the project cash flows, terms, and conditions of various financing op tions a vailab le. Further the ma rket rket sta sta nding a nd financ ial strengt h of the Develop er wo uld Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


largely determine the terms and conditions of finance offered to the Developer by various lending a ge nc ies. ies. For the p urpose urpose of the stud stud y, following source source s of financ e have b ee n taken: •

Equity: To b e p rovided by t he Deve loper

•

Subsidy ubsidy / Grant for viab viab ility ility of funding, funding, to be provide provide d by the c lient. lient.

•

Debt: To To b e a rrang ed by the Developer / Conc ess essionaire ionaire

5.2.15 Expenses Expenses can broadly be classified based on the phases in which they are incurred, viz. c onstr onstruct uct ion period period expenses expenses and op eration & m aintenanc e p eriod eriod expenses expenses.. C o n stru c tio n Pe rio d Ex p e n se s •

Preliminary reliminary and p re-ope rative expe nses nses

•

Contingency Contingency a llowa nce

•

Interest nterest d uring uring c onstruction onstruction p eriod eriod

•

Finance Cha rge s

O p e ra tio n a n d M a in te n a n c e Pe rio d Ex p e n se s •

Toll c ollect ion e xpenses xpenses

•

Administrative expenses for day-to-day operation including insurances

•

Ma intena intena nce expenses expenses,, whic whic h inc inc lude routine and p eriod eriod ic ma intenanc e

•

Interest expenses incurred for servicing term loans

•

Ta x

•

Co nc ess ession Fee

•

Electricity & Patrolling expenses

•

Insura Insura nc e @ Rs. 0.15% o f TPC/ TPC/ a nnum nn um

To ll C o lle c tio n Ex p e n se s To ll c o lle c tio n e x p e n se s a re e stim a te d a s Rs 1.25 c ro re s p e r a n n u m p e r to ll p la za . C o n c e ssio n Fe e A s p e r n e w M C A , n o C o n c e ssio n Fe e is p a y a b le b y th e C o n c e ssio n a ire

5.2.16 Operation and Maintenanc e Cost Cost Routine maintenance costs comprise of maintenance of the pavement, collection of litter, traffic

management

(policing),

accident

repairs

and

all

ancillary

works

including

beautification. The p eriod eriod ic m aintenanc e c osts osts inc inc lude lude co st o f overlay, overlay, repa ir/ ir/ renova tion of roa d furnitu furniturre, d rains, rains, build build ings etc . The p eriod eriod ic ma intena nc e includ es pe riodic rene wa ls at e very 5 yea rs. rs. Routine maintenance/ Periodic maintenance costs have been considered as per the estima estima tes b ased ased on t he M ORT ORT&H guide lines lines 1997 1997 p ric ric es. es. The d eta ils ils of th e m a intena nc e c osts osts an d a d ministration ministration c harge s are g iven in Tab le 5.22. 5.22. Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Tab le 5.22: 5.22: Maintena nc e & OM Cost (2006 (2006 pric e) Sl. No

Desc Desc ription

Am ount (Rs. (Rs. in Lac s)

1

3.00

3

Routine ma intena intena nc e in every year c ost ost pe r km for the four lane s w ith pa ved shou lde r (R (Rs La c s / Km) Period eriod ic ma intena nc e eve ry five yea rs c ost ost pe r km for the four lane s w ith pa ved shou lde r (R (Rs La c s / Km) Rou tine ma inten a nc e p er Toll Plaza (Rs (Rs La c s / a nnum )

125.0 125.00 0

4

Ot he r Offic e Expe nses nses

200.00 200 .00

5

Pa tro lling lling & Elet ricit y Expe nses nses (Rs (Rs La c s / Km )

1.00

2

25.00

5.2.17 Resourc esourc e Mob ilization ilization Sc hed ule The Projec Projec t imp lemen ta tion p eriod eriod has b ee n ta ken a s 30 mo nths sprea d into three ye ars. ars. Based on the implementation period, the project cost has been phased as given in Ta b le 5.23. Ta ble 5.23: Pha sing of Proje Proje c t Co st Desc Desc ription

Perce nta ge of tot al c ost ost incurred incurred

1st 1st ye ar

2nd ye ar

3rd Yea r

5%

35% 35%

60% 60%

5.2.18 Minim um Return Criteria Keeping in view the present market condition, the minimum return criteria for the B.O.T p rojec t is c onsidered onsidered as follow follow s:•

Pro Pro jec t FIRR IRR – Post Post Ta x

:

M inim um o f 13%

•

Ret urn on Eq uity (Eq (Eq uity IRR IRR)

:

Minim um o f 15%

•

Deb t Servic e Co vera g e Ra tio (DSCR (DSCR))

:

Minimu m 1.3 1.33 3

•

Net Presen resen t Va lue (NPV) @ 12%

:

Sho uld b e p ositive

•

Payb a c k Period eriod

:

Should not be mo re tha n 16 yea rs

Co nc ess ession Period Period of 30 Yea rs 5.2.19 Concession Period Since the projec t is not viab le on BOT ba sis for 20 and 25 years, years, a higher p eriod of 30 yea rs inc luding C onstruc onstruc tion Period Period from 2008 - 2037 2037 ha s b ee n c onsid onsid ered fo r Finan c ial Ana lysis lysis..

5.2.20 Construction Period Co nstruction nstruction Period Period o f 30 mo nths sprea d into three yea rs ha s be en c onsidered onsidered effe c tive from yea r 2008. 2008.

5.2.21 Financ ial Via bility The ma in ob jec tive o f und ertaking t his stud y is to a ssess ess whe ther th e projec t is financ ially ially viable or not. It is important to note tha t the p rop osal osal should should be an a ttract ive propositi proposition on for Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


p riva riva te sec sec to r p a rticip a tion und er Build, Build, Op era te a nd Trans Transfer fer (BOT (BOT)) sys syste te m.

The b a sic

methodology followed for estimating the financial viability of the project is to calculate the FIRR (Financial Internal Rate of Return) on the investment for the project. The following a ssump tions are ta ken into c onsidera onsidera tion fo r the financ ial a nalysis nalysis::•

Deb t – Eq Eq uity rat io :- 70:30 70:30

•

Sub sidy – ma ximu ximu m o f 20% 20% d uring uring c on struc tion a nd 20% 20% d uring uring O & M

•

Co nc ess ession p eriod (Inc (Inc luding 30 mo nths c onstruction onstruction pe riod ) – 30 30 yea rs. rs.

•

Esc a lat ion – 5% 5%

•

Inte rest rest o n Deb t – 11% 11%

•

Inte rest rest During Co nstruc nstruc tion – 11%

•

Projec t Pha sing : Firs Firstt y ea r – 5% , Sec Sec o nd ye a r – 35% , Third Third ye a r – 60%

•

Loa n Rep Rep aym ent p eriod eriod – 10 yea rs

•

Ta x reb reb a te – 10 yea rs (100% (100% exem p tion f or 10 yea rs ou t o f b loc k of 15 yea rs). rs).

•

Mo rato rium – 3 yea rs during c onstruction onstruction pe riod

•

Dep rec iation b y Straight Straight line me thod - 100 100% % for 27.5 27.5 yea rs

•

Deprec iation b y Written Written do wn va lue lue m ethod – 10% 10%

•

Finan c ing c osts - 2% 2% of p rojec t co st

5.2.22 Results a nd Ana lysis Based on the project structure traffic study and toll rate analysis, financial feasibility analysis ha s be en c arried arried o ut as pe r the me thod olog y outlined outlined in ea rlier rlier sec tions. tions. The ob jec tive of the financial analysis is to ascertain the existence of sustainable project returns, which shall suc c ess essfully me et the exp ec ta tions of its fina nc ial investors. investors. The a na lysis lysis revea ls va rious rious FI FIRR va lues c orres orrespo po nding to e a c h yea r of toll ope ra tion. FIRR for the Returns Returns on Investm Investm ent a nd Returns on Equity for the years from 2010 to 2037(concession period is 30 years including Construction Period) with maximum 40% subsidy Results for 4 laning with 40% Grant and 30 yea rs Co nc ess ession Period Period are given in Ta b le 5.24. 5.24. Tab le 5.24: Fina Fina nc ial Fea Fea sibility Results Results

SCENARIOS

Post Ta Ta x FIRR %

(With 40% Gra nt/ Sub sidy) fo r 30 15.58 years of concession period

Return on Equity %

NPV NPV @ 12% (Rs Crore)

Pay Back Period

19.25

321.38

10 ye a rs Pro fita b ility

Sta te m e n t The p rofit and loss loss sta tem ent ind ica tes the ne t p rofit rofit ea rned d uring uring the c onc ess ession pe riod riod . Results esults for 4 laning with 40% 40% Gra nt a re g iven in Ta b le 5.25. 5.25 . Tab le 5.25: Proje Proje c t Profita Profita bi lity Results (Rs (Rs in Crore s)



Ne t Revenue

Years

Case

2011

With 40% 62.87 Grant/ Sub sid y 1114.31

2038

Tot a l O&M Cost

Ne t Operating income

Profit o r Loss before ta x

Tot a l Ta x

Profit o r Loss After tax

6.03

56.84

3.4

0.39

3.02

40.36

1073.97

1032.33

359.13

673.20

5.2.23 C onclusion It would be seen that considering the enhancement of toll rate on the basis of structure/ b ypa ss c ost, ost, the projec t is financ ially ially viab le on BOT ba sis with m aximum of 40% Grant and 30 years Concession Period. Accordingly, project should be undertaken either on a nnuity b a sis or EP EPC c ont rac t b a sis. is. To g et minimu m via b ility ility c rite rite ria ria of 15% 15% Eq uity IRR IRR, 10.65 10.65% % grant is req uired uired .

Executive Summary Projec t Ba Ba c kground The M inistry inistry of Roa Roa d Trans Transp p ort & Highw a ys, ys, MORT&H, Go vernm ent of Ind ia ha s d ec ide d t o take up the development of various National Highway Corridors for augmentation of c ap ac ity for safe a nd e ffic ffic ient movem ent of traffic traffic b y widening to 4/6 lane lane s. One such such set set of c orrid orrid ors is 10, 10,000 000 km of NHDP-I NHDP-IIII sp rea d o ver the c oun try. Nat iona l Hig Hig hw a ys Aut ho rity rity of India (NH (NHAI) AI) ha s be en e ntrus ntrusted ted to implement the de velopm ent p rojec ts for these these selecte selecte d stretc hes/ hes/ c orridors orridors either throug h p ublic-p rivate p artnership artnership (PPP (PPP) b a sis or its ow n b ud ge ta ry sou rce s or loa ns from A DB DB,, World World Bank or an y suc suc h org a nisa nisa tion. The s stretc tretc h of a round 111 111.73 .73 km on NH 17 from Kuttipuram to Edapally in the state of Kerala is a part of the NHDP-III projects. M/ s Wilb Wilb ur Smith Smith Ass Assoc iat es Inc Inc . US USA in joint Limited hav e b een entrusted entrusted b y NHAI NHAI the prepa ration of Deta iled iled Project Rep ort Ass Assess essment for reha reha bilitation bilitation a nd upg rad ing ing

ven ture (JV) w ith Wilbur Smith Smith Ass Assoc iat es Pri Priva va te t ask ask of c arrying arrying o ut t he Fea Fea sibility ibility Stud Stud ies and including including Envir nvironme ntal a nd Soc ial Imp Imp ac t to 4/6 lane divided highw highw ay.

Project Description

The p roject stretc stretc h is is loc at ed in the sta sta te o f Kerala Kerala a nd c onne c ts Kuttipuram km 318+0 318+000 00 on Northe rn side a nd Ed a p a lly lly km 438+6 438+600 00 (Design (Design C h. Km Km 428+940) 428+940) in the sou sou the rn side side a nd p a ssing th roug h Ernakulam Ernakulam , Thrissur and Ma lap uram d istrict istrict s. The t ot a l de sign leng th o f the p rojec t road is 111. 111.73 73km.T km.The Project Project Highwa y also also lea ds to M ang a lore, lore, Go a a nd M umb ai from Kuttipuram, forming an important link connecting northern districts of Kerala which includes Kozhicode, Kannur, Kasargod and Wayanad. NH-17 links to southern districts of



Kerala via. NH-4 NH-47. 7. Kod Kod ung allur byp a ss is exclud ed from t he sc sc op e o f w ork since since it is exec uted b y PWD, NH Divisio Divisio n The salient salient p ropo sals for up g rada tion a nd imp rove me nt o f the NH NH47 47 a re cla ssified ified into the following engineering aspects. Wide ning ning o f the project road into 4 lane c onfigurations onfigurations ba sed on traffic traffic c ap ac ity. ity. • Wide horizonta l and vertic vertic al ge om etry of the existin existing g roa d ba sed on the de sign • Imp roving the horiz sta nd ard s Inc luding rea lign lign me nt w here eve r jus justifi tifiab ab le. Design of p ave ment for widening a nd streng treng thening of the exis existing ting roa d. • Design intersec ec tions. tions. • Imp rovem ent o f all ma jor and minor inters • Rehabilitation and widening of the existing structures including bridges, culverts, ROBs, und erpa sses, es, grad e sep sep a ra tors etc a nd d esign esign of new one s.

rehensive roa roa d furniture furniture for co mp lete roa d safe safe ty. • Provision of c om p rehensive Widening Proposals Based ased on t raffic c onsideration onsideration s, geo me tric tric sta nd ard s and exis existing site site c ond ition ition it is p rop osed osed to ha ve the follow follow ing c onfiguration onfiguration for the four laning laning

•

Med ian: 4.5 4.5m m / 2m

•

Me dia n Shy Shy aw a y: 0.2 0.25m. 5m.

•

Shy aw a y at Divid er: 0.25 0.25m. m.

•

Ma in Carriag Carriag ew a y in in ea c h direc tion: 7.0 7.0m m (2 x 3.5m 3.5m La La ne).

•

Servic ervic e Roa Roa d at ma jor built built up s in bo th d irec irec tions: tions: 5.5 5.5 or 7m.

•

Pa ved Shou lde r: 1.5m 1.5m

•

Ea rthe n Sho Sho uld er: 1.0m 1.0m

•

Ea rthe n Drain o f suitab suitab le d imension imension

•

Right of Way: Pla Pla in 45 m

Typ ic al Cross Sec tions The e ntire ntire a lignm lignm ent p ass asses through p lain terrain terrain . The The Co nsultants nsultants have prop osed osed a RoW o f 45 m ba sed on sett sett lemen t p at tern & Land -use, -use, Nat ure ure o f b uilt-up uilt-up & De ta ils ils of soc soc ially ially sens sensiti itive ve struc truc tures tures Wide Wide ning ning op tions for the p rojec t road we re a rrived a t b ased ased on, La ne requirement s ba sed on traffic c a pa c ity ana lysis lysis.. Req uirem uirem ent o f servi servic c e roa d s along b uilt-up uilt-up a reas. reas. Leng ths of projec t roa d und er various c ross ross sec tions a re summ summ arized arized in tab le Sum ma ry of Typ Typ ic al C ross ross Sec tions Existing Road Sl. No

Wide ning Typ e/ CS

Leng th in m

1

Conc entric entric widening without Servi Servic c e Roa Roa d(m ed ian 2m)-1A 2m)-1A Ec c entric wid ening withou t Servic ervic e Roa d ( me dia n 2m)-1B 2m)-1B New Four lane witho ut Servic ervic e Roa d (med ian 2m)-1C 2m)-1C

14430.00

Co nc entric wid ening with Service Roa d (med ian 2m)-2A 2m)-2A Ec c entric wid ening with 7m Service Roa d (me d ian 2m)-2B 2m)-2B New Four lane with 7m Servic ervic e Roa d on b oth side(m ed ian 2m)-2C 2m)-2C New Fou r lane with 7m Servic e Roa d on LHS (me d ian 2m)-2D

6080 6080.0 .00 0 7380 7380.0 .00 0 4690 4690.0 .00 0 1590.0 159 0.00 0

2 3 4 5 6 7


1582 15820. 0.00 00 6290 6290.0 .00 0



8 9


Und erp a ss Ap p roa c h with 2m me d ian with 5.5 5.5m m Slip lip Roa d -3B Und erp a ss Ap p roa c h a t 318 318+09 +090 0 with 5.5 5.5m m Slip lip Roa d -3C

650.00 650.00 680.0 680.00 0

Bypass Sl. No

Wide ning Typ e/ CS

Leng th in m

1 2 3 4

RHS wid ening with out Servic e Roa d in b yp a ss (me d ian 4.5 4.5m m )-1D New Fou r lane in b yp a ss(4.5 m m ed ian) -1E New Fou r lane with 7m Servic e Roa d in b yp a ss(4.5 m me d ian )-2E Und erpa ss Ap p roa c h with 4.5m 4.5m me d ian and 5.5m 5.5m Slip lip Roa d -3A -3A

2255. 2255.00 00 22225 22225.00 .00 14635. 146 35.00 00 8925 8925.0 .00 0

5

ROB Ap proa c h (3D)

610.00

Geometric Improvements Horiz Horizontal ontal Geo me try Existing project road has a number of deficient stretches with a design speed less than 100 kmph. Ca re has be en taken to improve the geo me tric tric stand stand ard of the project road to sui suite te d esign esign sta sta nda rd s of Na tiona l Highwa Highwa ys with 100 kmp h d esign esign sp sp eed . A summ summ ary of imp roved horiz horizonta l geom etry are are g iven iven in tab le below . Summ ary of Proposed Proposed Horizontal orizontal Alignm ent Chainage (Km)

ROW (m )

Ra d ius (m )

LHS/ HS/ RHS

Im p rove m en ts

319+450 319+450

36.50 36.50

40.000 40.000

Lef t

319+600

44.00

40.000

Right ig ht

Ne w Byp a ss p rop osal from km 319+450 to km 340+350

320+200

21.65

20.000

Le ft

320+200 to 334+800

10.50 10.50

Right-11, left-12 an d reverse-7 reverse-7

344+85 344+850 0

9.80 9.8 0

30 sha rp c urves less than 50m radius 30.00 30.000 0

Right

Imp rove d Cu rve Ra d ius

337+75 337+750 0

12.20 12.20

30.000 30.000

Left


341+700 341+700

37.00 37.00

300.000 300 .000

Le ft

Imp rove d C urve Ra d ius

342+750 342+750

29.70 29.70

200.000 200 .000

Righ t


343+450 343+450

25.50

80.000 80.000

Righ t


348+600 348+600

15.60 15.60

300.000 300 .000

Righ t


355+700 355+700

13.20 13.20

250.000 250 .000

Righ t


358+100 358+100

15.10 15.10

350.000 350 .000

Le ft


362+600 362+600

18.60 18.60

200.000 200 .000

Le ft


363+10 363+100 0

8.95 8.9 5

25.00 25.000 0

Left


363+650 363+650

10.75

30.000 30.000

Righ t


376+300 376+300

23.45 23.45

200.000 200 .000

Righ t


377+100 377+100

10.80 10.80

150.000 150.000

Lef t

377+700

21.60

150.000

Right ig ht


378+100

22.90

60.000

Re ve rse rse C urve





Chainage (Km)

ROW (m )

Ra d ius (m )

LHS/ HS/ RHS

379+350

11.20

400.000

Right ig ht

380+050

29.60

250.000

Le ft

381+700 381+700

20.90 20.90

350.000 350 .000

Righ t


382+75 382+750 0

32.60 32.60

250.0 250.000 00

Reve rse rse Curve


385+150 385+150

22.60 22.60

150.000 150 .000

Rev erse erse Cu rve

386+150

17.30

60.000


389+900 389+900

16.20

30.000 30.000

Righ t

Ne w Byp a ss p rop osal from km 383+850 to km 387+250 Imp rove d C urve Ra d ius

390+02 390+025 5

11.20 11.20

40.000 40.000

Left


390+20 390+200 0

24.20 24.20

40.000 40.000

Left


391+250 391+250

22.10 22.10

60.000 60.000

Lef t

391+500

17.85

50.000



393+00 393+000 0

21.25 21. 25

40.00 40.000 0

Reve rse rse Curve


394+50 394+500 0

17.40 17. 40

80.00 80.000 0

Reve rse rse Curve


395+800 395+800

18.50 18.50

60.000 60.000

Rev erse erse Cu rve

396+900

15.90

25.000

Right ig ht

397+450 397+450

18.60 18.60

250.000 250 .000

Righ t

Ne w Byp a ss p rop osal from km 395+300 to km 397+250 Imp rove d C urve Ra d ius

398+250 398+250

19.60 19.60

200.000 200 .000

Lef t


399+000 399+000

16.60 16.60

100.000 100.000

Lef t

400+050

16.60

60.000

Right ig ht


402+000

17.00

80.000

Right ig ht

402+200

15.00

90.000


405+450

10.70

25.000

Right ig ht

405+650

13.15

50.000

Le ft

405+900

8.40

40.000

Right ig ht

406+060

12.25

35.000

Right ig ht

406+70 406+700 0

11.75 11. 75

90.00 90.000 0

Reve rse rse Curve


407+700 to 411+600

13.50 13.50

7 right right and 5 left

413+700 413+700

30.80 30.80

12 sha rp c urves less than 50m radius 300.000 300 .000

Le ft

New Bypa ss p rop osa osa l from km 407+700 to km 411+800 Imp rove d C urve Ra d ius

414+45 414+450 0

25.80 25.80

20.000 20.000

Left


414+450 to 424+600

9.55 9.5 5

9 Right, 3 left & 4 reverse reverse c urves

New Bypass proposal from km 414+450 to km 426+160

424+800

10.80

16 sha rp c urves less than 60m radius 50.000


Im p rove m en ts

Right ig ht




Chainage (Km)

ROW (m )

Ra d ius (m )

LHS/ HS/ RHS

Im p rove m en ts

425+100

10.40

100.000

Right ig ht

425+600 425+600

10.65 10.65

90.000 90.000

Rev erse erse c urve s

425+750

7.70

150.000

Right ig ht

426+200

12.50

200.000

Right ig ht

427+40 427+400 0

8.80 8.8 0

90.00 90.000 0

Right


428+65 428+650 0

8.70 8.7 0

70.00 70.000 0

Right


432+250 432+250

29.80 29.80

300.000 300.000

Righ t

435+250

35.50

25.000

Re ve rse rse c urve

New Rea lignm en t proposal from km 435+000 435+000 to km 438+600 438+600

436+150

7.20

20.000

Re ve rse rse c urve

436+400

9.30

35.000

Right ig ht

436+550

8.10

40.000

Le ft

436+600 to 438+600

16.50 16.50

5 Sha rp c urve s radius less than 50m

2 reverse curve, 1 left and 2 right curves

Vertica Vertica l Geom etry Vertica Vertica l geom etry of the e ntire ntire length o f the p roject is found satisfac atisfac tory exc exc ep t for a sma ll stretc h o f km 320+0 320+000 00 – km 323+00 323+000 0 but this has no signifi signific c an c e on the improve me nt propo sal b ec ause ause o f the Ponnani bypa ss Realignments The fo llow llow ing realignme nts a re prop osed osed by c onsultants onsultants aft er thoroug h stud stud y. Ponna ni Byp Byp ass The c onstruction onstruction w ork of a t wo lane b ypa ss for Ponna Ponna ni tow n is alread y und er prog ress ress. The Ponnani bypass starts at Km 319+450 (Design ch .319+060) after Kuttipuram Bridge and ends at Cha inag e Km Km 34 340+3 0+350 50 (Design (Design c h 333+7 333+715 15)) nea r Pud upo nna ni Br Bridg e (Ana pp a di). Tota l leng th o f the b yp a ss is 14. 14.655 655 km. Fea tures of th is b yp a ss a lig lig nm en t are d esc esc rib rib ed in three sec tions. The first first sec sec tion (4 km long ) is from Km 319+450 319+450 to Km 323+30 323+300 0 nea r Aya mka lam , wh ere it c ha ng es the existing existing a lig lig nm ent of NH 17. 17. This sec tion is p a ssing th roug h rolling rolling te rra rra in. The sec ond sec tion (7.5 km km long) sta rts from from Km 323+3 323+300 00(i. (i.e. e. from Aya mka lam ) a nd end s at Km 334+800 near Chamravattom. For first and second section, two lane single carriage way is under construction vide contract no . 11/ 11/ SE/ NH/C C/ KOC HI 200 2003 3 DT 26/02/ 200 2004. 4. Co mp letion p eriod for this p rojec t is 28 mo nth s. Although the construction of pavement is in initial stage, considering this cost, necessary c orrec orrec tion has be en effec ted in the c ostin osting g p art. The la st s sec ec tion (3.15 (3.155 5 km long) is from from Cha mrava tto m a t Km 334+8 334+800 00 a nd end s nea r Pud upo nna ni at Cha inag e Km 340+ 340+35 350(D 0(Des esign ign c h.3 h.333 33+71 +715). 5). In this stretc h, two lane b ypa ss road is already constructed for a length of 2.50 Km. Land acquisition of 30m wide ROW for en tire 15 Km lon g b yp a ss is c om p lete d . This b yp a ss is trea te d a s the sta rting stretc stretc h of t he study corridor in place of the original National Highway stretch. Consultant has carried out the d eta iled iled study of this alignme alignme nt a nd the d eta ils ils of the propo sal a re d isc isc uss ussed be low.





The rea lignment ma inly inly p ass asses through through c oc onut p lantation a nd pa dd y fields fields thus avo iding iding Ponna ni tow n built built up a nd a lso lso giving giving a be tter ap proac h to P Pudup udup po nnani Br Bridge. While While designing the alignment, due care has been exercised to utilize the maximum extend of ac quired quired 30m 30m ROW ROW a nd this has be en a c hieved hieved without c omp romisin omising g the d esign esign stand stand ards. ards. This 14.65 14.655K 5Km m long p rop osed rea lig lig nm ent h a s 12 c urves d esigne esigne d fo r a s sp p ee d o f 100 100 kmp h. . No other alternative options for Ponnani bypass are studied because Kerala PWD has alrea alrea d y co mp leted t he land ac quisiti quisition on of this byp ass ass for 30m 30m wide ROW Chavakk ad Bypass Bypass Chavakkadu bypass starts at Km 363+200(Design ch.356+350 ) near Manathala temple and joins b a c k the existing existing NH-17 NH-17 at Km 365+40 365+400(Des 0(Design ign c h.358+80 h.358+800) 0) ne a r Willi Willia a ms Bri Brid dge (Oruma na yur). yur). This 2.45 2.45 km long b ypa ss ma inly inly pa sses through c oc onut pla nta tion a rea a nd sma ll built-up area t hus a voiding C ha va kka kka d to wn b uilt uilt up. Prop osed osed byp ass ass ha s 6 c urves designed for a speed of 100 Kmph and a major bridge at Design Chainage km 357+740 in the byp ass ass Vadanappally Rea lignm lignm ent has been propo sed to byp ass ass built-up built-up a t Va da nap pa lly lly a nd Thalikk halikkul ulam am from from Km 377 377+00 +000(Des 0(Design ign c h.370+2 h.370+200 00)) to Km 380 380+200 +200(Des (Design ign c h.373+60 h.373+600) 0) on left ha nd side of the exis existing a lignm lignm ent. This will a void a c quisiti quisition on of hea vy built-up built-up a rea in Va Va d ana pp a lly lly and w ill ill bypass two sharp curves between Km 377+500 and Km 377+750 having design speed less tha n 3 30 0 Kmp h. During During the fea sibility ibility sta g e 3 alte rna tive alignme nts hav e be en stud stud ied a nd found that left side side a lignm lignm ent is more viab le. Hence more detailed investigations on left hand side alignment have been carried out. Soc io eco nom ic impa c t of ac quiring quiring 45m 45m has be en c onsidered onsidered fo r fea sibility ibility stud y. This propo sed alignm alignm ent m ainly ainly pa sses through through c oc onut p lantations and low lying lying area. Length of this rea lign lign me nt is 3.5 km. Triprayar- Vala pp ad Various op tions we re co nsidered nsidered for Trip rip rayar vala pp a d b ypa ss. Amo ng t his the p ropo sal on the left hand side side realignm realignm ent found feasibl feasible e sin sinc c e it avoid large c omm ercial built-up built-up at Tripraya ripraya r and sha rp, blind blind reve rse rse c urve at Va lap p ad (Km (Km 386+15 386+150). 0). The c urves at this loca tion have de sign spee spee d less less than 30kmph 30kmph a nd thus ma king king this loca tion one of the ma in a c c ide nt pron e area s. The p rop osed osed b yp a ss sta rts a t km 383+8 383+850( 50(Des Design ign c h.377+3 h.377+310) 10) a nd en d s a t km 387+200(D 387+200(Desi esig g n c h.380+5 h.380+510) 10) .The p rop osed rea lig lig nm ent ma inly p a sses throug h ag ricultural a rea s. Stud y has be en c arried arried o ut for ass assess essing the soc soc io ec ono mic imp a c t of a c q uiring uiring 45m wid e RoW. RoW. Leng th o f this rea lig lig nm ent is 3.2 3.20 0 km km Chendrappinni Left hand side realignment has been proposed for one of the accident prone area of the p rojec t s stretc tretc h a t Che nd rapinni. The reverse reverse c urves b etw ee n Km Km 391+00 391+000 0 and Km 392+0 392+000 00 on the he avy b uilt-up uilt-up a rea is one o f the ma jor bo ttlene c ks of the p roject roa d . This prop osed osed realignment starts at Km 390+000(Design ch.383+280) and ends near Km 391+900(Design ch.385+230). Consultant has fixed the shortest possible route for this alignment and study has b ee n ca rried rried o ut for ass assess essing the soc soc io ec ono mic imp ac t of ac q uiring uiring 45m 45m wide RoW. This realignme nt m ainly pa sses thoug h a gricultural la la nd . Leng th o f this realignme nt is 1.95 1.950 0 km. km. Moonnupeedika Kaipamangalam, Moonnupeedika and Perinjanam are having heavy commercial built-ups from Km 395+000 to Km 397+000. Kaipamangalam is one of the major built-up areas in the stretc h b et we en Trip rip raya r a nd K Kod od ung a llur. llur. Exis xisting RoW RoW varies from 10 to 17m. The horizonta horizonta l alignme nt a t Km 396+70 396+700 0 is very po or w ith mo re tha n 2 reverse reverse c urves with de sign speed less than 50 kmph. The p rop osed b yp a ss a lign lign me nt sta sta rts from Km 395+30 395+300(Des 0(Design ign c h. 388+3 388+350)and 50)and en d s nea r Km 397+250( 397+250(Des Design ign c h.390+4 h.390+490). 90). Stud ies ha d b ee n c on d uc te d for a ssess essing t he soc soc io Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




ec ono mic imp a c t of ac q uiring uiring 45 45 RoW . This alignme nt pa sses thoug h sma sma ll resident resident ial areas a nd a g ric ric ultural area s. Leng th of this rea lig lig nm en t is 2.1 2.14 4 km Ma thilakam Sec tion 1& 1& 2 The p rop osed osed rea lig lig nm en t fo r Firs irst sec sec tion o f Ma thilaka m sta sta rts a t Km Km 398+700(Des 398+700(Design ign c h.391+8 h.391+850) 50) a nd end s ne a r Km 403+000 403+000(Des (Design ign c h.396+33 h.396+335). 5). Sec on d sec sec tion o f this b yp a ss sta rts a t 405+500(Desi 405+500(Desig g n c h.398+750) h.398+750) an d e nd s a t km 406+060(Design 406+060(Design c h.399+220) h.399+220) This rea c h has more than 6 reverse-curves with less than 50 kmph design speed and passing through hea vy built-up built-up a rea. Large numb er of sc sc hoo ls, ls, religious religious structures a nd g oo d resident resident ial buildings are p resente resente d in this loc at ion. Propo sed realign realign me nt initia initia lly lly runs through resident resident ial a rea for a leng leng th of 400m 400m and a fterwa rd s p ass asses throug h co c onut p lanta tions. tions. It c ross rosses tw o important roads, which lead to Moonnupeedika and Iringalakkuda at Km 400+900 and Km 401+05 401+050 0 resp resp ec tively. From Km 401+ 401+050 050 a lign lign me nt p a sses throug h built-up a rea fo r a leng th of 700m 700m a nd rejoins rejoins on left ha nd side o f exis existing roa d at km 403+0 403+000 00.. The rea lignm lignm ent o f the sec tion fo r km km 403+0 403+000 00 to Km 405+5 405+500 00 is through existing existing a lign lign me nt a nd d ue t o t he p resenc resenc e of a c ana l, which is include include d in national inland inland w at erway o n left hand side w ithin ithin 50 m. Then this a lign lign me nt shifts shifts to rig rig ht ha nd side a t Km 403+30 403+300 0 and runs for 500m 500m a nd a g a in shifts shifts to left hand side. From Km 405+500(Design ch.398+750), the second section of realignment starts and runs through agricultural area on left hand side and ends at km 406+060(Design ch 399+220). Leng th o f firs first a nd sec ond sec tions of rea lig lig nme nt is 4.48 4.485 5 km a nd 0.47 0.47 km resp resp ec tively Kod unga llur Byp Byp ass Co nsultant nsultant d ec ided to retain the alignme nt prop osed osed b y NH NH Divis Division ion and PWD Kerala for temple town of Kodungallur, which starts at Km 407+700(Design ch.401+100) near Ch a tha p ura a nd end s a t Km 411+80 411+800(Des 0(Design ign c h.404+13 h.404+135) 5) nea r TKS Puram b efo re the starting of Kotta p uram Bridg Bridg e. Leng th of th is b yp a ss is 3.0 3.035 35 Km. Co nsulta nsulta nts review ed the d et a ils ils of the proposed bypass alignment and identified improvements required to meet the design standards. This b ypa ss p ass asses through mo de rate b uilt-up uilt-up a rea a nd ha s 3 curves de signed for a sp sp ee d of 100 kmph. Kodungallur bypass is excluded from the scope of work since it is executed by PWD, NH Divisio Divisio n Para vur Bypa ss Proposed bypass for Paravur starts at Km 414+450 (Design ch.406+890)near Moothakunnam and will bypass Paravur town and join the existing alignment at Km 426+160 (Design c h.417+40 h.417+400)nea 0)nea r Va lluva lluva lly, lly, inc luding t he Ch eriyap a lli lli Brid rid ge . Leng th of the b yp a ss is 10.51 10.51 Km. This This is a n existing existing p rop osal as p a rt of th e 2 lan e rea lig lig nm en t initiate d b y PWD PWD NH d ivision, sta rting rting from Kod unga llur llur at Km 407+7 407+700 00.. The c onstruction onstruction of t he b ypa ss stretc h b etw ee n Km 411+900 to Km 414+450 including Kottapuram twin bridges and Varappuzha bridge have b ee n c om plet ed . The Land ac q uisiti uisition on fo r this this stretc h from Km 414+4 414+450 50 to Km 430+00 430+000 0 has b ee n c om p lete d fo r 30m R RoW. oW. This rea lign lign me nt will b yp a ss the b usy usy built-ups like like Pa Pa ravur, Che riap illy illy and Valluvally. Valluvally. This a lignm lignm ent m ainly p ass asses throug h co c onut p lanta tions. tions. Consultants have reviewed the existing data and proposed improvements to meet design sp eed of 100k 100kmp mp h and ha ve fixed fixed this b ypa ss alignm ent w ith 13 13 c urves. urves. Since t he a c q uired uired ROW of 30m is below the stipulated ROW for National Highways, socio economical impact of acquiring 45m RoW has been considered as part of the feasibility study options and no alternative alternative ha ve b een sugg ested ested be ca use use o f rea rea d y ac quisiti quisition on o f land by PWD PWD Kerala Kerala Eda pa lly lly Manjumelkava la Realignment Realignment As part of improvements proposed by PWD, NH Division, Kerala, land acquisition is in progress from Kottapuram to Edapally for a width of 30m. ROB, Viaduct and approach roads are und er c onstruction onstruction at Km 437+70 437+700 0 vid vid e job numb er: 017 017// KL/ 2004 2004// 673 673 and ag ree me nt numb er 9/SE 9/SE/ NH NHCE CE// Koc hi200 hi20055-20 2006 06.. Date of c om me nc em ent of this projec t w as 02/09/ 02/09/ 2005 2005 and completion date is 01/09/2007. Deductions have been considered for a total length of 1775 1775m m including including 559m 559m viad uct and imp rovem ents have be en p rop osed osed for exis existin ting g roa d . Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




At Km 438+600, a staggered 4-leg intersection is present, where a grade separator is propo sed . Soc io eco nomic impa c t of ac quirin quiring g 45m 45m R RoW oW has be en co nsidered nsidered for the fea sibility ibility stud stud y. This a lignm lignm ent w ill ill bypa ss b usy usy built-up built-up at Ed a pp ally and imp rove the p oo r ge om etry of exis existing alignme nt. Alignm ent sta rts at Km 435+ 435+00 000 0 (Design (Design c h.4 h.425 25+30 +300)and 0)and an end at Km 438+600(Design ch.428+620) and approximate length is 3.320 Km Pave me nt Design Design The d esign esign for new pa veme nt o f b oth flexible flexible a nd rigid igid pa veme nt a s we ll as strengthening (overlay) of existing pavement has been carried as per IRC guidelines for the project stretch. The life life c ost ost an alysis alysis of flexib flexib le pa vem ent a nd rigid rigid p ave me nt op tion reve reve a led tha t flexible flexible pavement option has better economic return than the rigid pavement. Hence the flexible pavement design for 15 years life period is considered and recommended for the entire project road stretch. The reco mm end ed pa veme nt c om po sition ition for the p rojec t road stretc tretc h from from km 318+ 318+00 000 0 to km 438+600 438+600 is is g iven b elo w Rec omm ended Pavem ent Comp ositi ositions ons Rec omm ended Pavem ent Comp ositi osition on in mm Sections

Design Traffic (MSA)

For Streng thening & Wide Wide ning

For New Con structio n

Overlay Overlay o n Existing Road

New 2/ 4 Lane Lane Road

Widening Portion of Existing Road

New Service Road (If req req uired uired )

Sec tio n I: From From km 318+000 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 357 357+250 +250 + 85 DBM + 85 DBM + 50 BM 20 + 85 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 318+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 363+000) Se c tio n II: II: From From km 357+250 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 402 402+940 +940 + 95 DBM + 95 DBM + 50 BM 35 + 95 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 363+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 407+000) Se c tio n III: III: From From km 402+940 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 428 428+620 +620 + 105 DBM + 105 DBM + 50 BM 45 + 105 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WM WM M + PCC 407+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 438+600) Re m a rks: rks: Overlay thickness on existing road is suitably modified to match with widening thickness to avo id ve rtic rtic al joints in DBM DBM layer. GSB GSB- Gra nular Sub Sub -ba se is p rovide d ove r sub sub g rad e soil of CBR > 10%. 10%. 500 500 mm Sub gra d e of CBR > 10% is p rovide d w hereve r the existing existing Sub g rad e soil CBR is < 10%. 10%. Pa ve me nt C om p osition osition is d esigne esigne d fo r 15 yea rs life. life. How ev er WMM & GSB GSB laye rs a re d esigne esigne d f or 20 yea rs life. life.

Junction Junction Improvements Imp rovem ents have b een p rop osed osed fo r all the junctions along the p roject road . Junc tions are c lass lassified a s follow s:


The




Ma jor Junctions with NH/ NH/ SH/Arterial roa roa d s and othe r imp ortant road s Junctions with minor ac c ess ess road s 23 major junct ions are p ropo sed for improve me nts in the projec t stretc stretc h. The The lists lists of m a jor & minor junc junc tions a long w ith the summ summ ary of improve me nts are g iven in in tab le Loc ations of Junction Imp roveme nts Proposed

Sl. No. No .



Roa d Lea ds To

318+090 318+090

Kut tip ura m

Junctio n


Major Junctions 1

318+090 318+090

2

319+440

319+060

Ponnani Sta rt

3

334+80 334 +800 0

330+4 330+400 00

Ed a p p a l,Ponn l,Ponn a ni

4

Ponnani b yp a ss

332+420 332+420

Ponnani Kolimpadi

5

340+160

333+715

Bypass

3 le e d 3 legg ed 5 leg ge d

Vehic ular Und Und erpa ss At grade Junction unction Vehicular Unde rpa ss

– 4 legg ed


Ponn a ni Byp a ss End

3 legg ed


3 legg ed 3 legg ed

6

365+590

358+800

7

376+930

370+200

Chavakkad Bypass End Vadanappilly Rea lig lig nm ent Sta Sta rt

373+600

Vadanappilly Realignment End

3 legg ed


377+310

Tripra ya r Rea lig lig nm ent Sta Sta rt

3 legg ed


380+510

Tripra ya r Rea lignm lignm ent End s

3 legg ed


3 legg ed


8 9 10

380+270 380+980 387+100

At grade Junction unction At grade Junction unction

11

389+885

383+285

Chendrapinni Rea lig lig nm ent Sta Sta rt

12

392+040

385+230

Chendrapinni Rea lignm lignm ent End s

3 legg ed


13

395+170

388+350

Moonnupeedika Byp a ss sta rt

3 legg ed


14

397+250

390+490

Moonnupeedika Byp a ss End s

3 legg ed


15

398+610

391+850

Mathilakam-1 Byp a ss Sta rt

3 legg ed


396+335

Mathilakam-1 Byp a ss End s

3 legg ed


3 legg ed


16

403+030

17

406+020

399+220

Mathilakam-2 Byp a ss End s

18

407+970

401+100

Kodungallur Bypass Sta rt

4 legg ed


404+135

Kodungallur Bypass End

3 legg ed


19

411+780




Sl. No. No .


Design Chainage (km ) 406+890


Roa d Lea ds To

Junctio n


Para vur vu r Byp a ss Sta rt

3 legg ed

At grade Junction unction Vehicular underpa ss

20

414+410

21

Paravur Byp a ss

411+400 411+400

Erna kula m ,Pa ,Pa rav ur

4 leg ged

22

426+170

417+400

Paravur ends

3 legg ed


23

438+670

428+940

Ernakulam 438.800 438.800 Aluv a

4 legg ed

Grade sepa rator

1

Ponnani Byp a ss

322+310

Ponnani Cross Crossing

2

343+2 343+240 40

336+8 336+840 40

3 4

352+900 358+1 358+190 90

5

Bypass City

Minor Junc Junc tions Bypass 4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

Ka da va nad u

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

346+470 351+8 351+800 00

Kunnamkulam, Beac h Aviyoor,Bea Aviyoor,Bea c h

4 legg ed 3 legg ed

At grade Junction unction At grad e Junction

358+7 358+730 30

352+3 352+340 40


4 legg ed

6

363+11 363 +110 0

356+7 356+760 60

Ch a va kkad u

3 leg ge d

At grad e Junction Vehicular Underpass

7

370+640

363+850

Pulikkakadavu, Benglamkadavu

3 legg ed


8

371+570

364+840

Pulikkakadavu, Manga lamkad avu

4 legg ed


9

372+6 372+640 40

365+9 365+910 10


3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

3 legge d

At grad e Junct Junct ion

4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

4 legge d

Vehicular Underpass

10

375+280

368+540

Manappad, Pokkanc okkanc heri heri

11

377+800

370+975

Vadanappally Thriss hrissur Roa d

12

384+700

377+910

Trip ra ya r Roa d

4 legge d

Vehicular Underpass

-

–

Thriss Thrissur ur

13

386+100

379+450

Valappad – Village Roa d

14

387+9 387+950 50

381+3 381+350 50

Murina Murina tho de Bea c h

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

15

389+11 389 +110 0

382+5 382+510 10

Ka tto or, Ka zhibra m

4 leg g ed

At gra d e Junc tion

16

391+500

384+670

Chandrappinni Vill Villag ag e Roa d

4 legge d

Vehicular Underpass


–



Sl. No. No . 17

Existing Chainage (km) 405+420



Roa d Lea ds To

Junctio n

398+750

Mathilakm start

3leg 3leg ge d


4 legg ed

Vehicular Underpass


Bypass

18

400+000

392+980

Pa llivala llivala vu - Tipp u Sulthan Roa d

19

-

393+2 393+280 80

Iringa ringa lakkud lakkud a,

4 legg ed

At grad e Junction

20

413+57 413 +570 0

406+060 406 +060

Mo ot ha kunna m

3 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

21

425+450

416+755

Chungam, Cross Crossing

4 leg g ed

Vehicular Underpass

417+680

Karianthuruth, Kachanikode temple

4 legg ed


418+300

Koorikuzhi, Kottuvallikavu temple

4 legg ed


3 legge d


22

23

426+450

427+080

Bypass

24

427+350

418+590


25

427+8 427+820 20

419+0 419+020 20

Aluva

3 legg ed

At grad e Junction

26

429+200

420+400

Olanad, Devaswom Devaswom pa da m

4 legg ed


421+220

Puthenpalli, Varapuzha Varapuzha

4 legge d


421+760

Mannamthuruthi, Varapuzha Varapuzha

4 legge d


4 legg ed


4 leg g ed 3 legg ed

At gra d e Junc tion At grad e Junction

27

28

430+020

430+560

29

431+380

422+580


30 31

431+800 431+800 433+5 433+535 35

423+0 423+000 00 424+7 424+735 35

Eloor, Che rane lloo lloo r Chitoo r road

32 33

436+700 437+400

426+020

Bypa ss C ross

4 leg g e d

Vehicular Underpass

426+620

Edappally - Cross Roa d 4 legge d

Vehicular Underpass

Service Roads In view of soc soc ial aspe aspe c ts an d d ensity ensity of p op ulation of Kerala Kerala ,Service ,Service roa ds nee d s to b e provided with all the built up.But Considering economy of the project ,proposal of service Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




road s a re res restri tric c ted a t unavo ida b le loc loc at ions. ions. Ta ble show show s the loc at ion ide ide ntified ntified for the provision of service roads along the project road. Proposed Service Roads



Sl. No.

From ro m

To

From ro m

To

Side ( LHS HS// RHS HS/ / Both)

1

318400

318800

318+440

318+670

Bo th

230

7

2

342000

342300

335+570

335+900

Bo th

330

7

3

342600

343000

336+100

336+600

Bo th

500

7

4

344460

345400

338+100

338+930

Bo th

830

7

5

349200

350400

342+740

343+940

Bo th

1200

7

6

352200

353090

345+770 3 45+770

346+690

LHS

920

7

7

353090

353390

346+690

346+990

Bo th

300

7

8

353390

354060

346+990 3 46+990

347+660

LHS

670

7

9

354060

354200

347+660

347+800

Bo th

140

7

10

357000

357600

350+610

351+210

Bo th

600

7

11

359800

363200

353+420

356+370

Bo th

2950

7

12

376400

377000

369+670

370+580

Bo th

910

7

13

382600

383850

375+930

377+520

Bo th

1590

7

14

388600

389920

382+010

383+290

Bo th

1280

7

15

-

-

383+900

384+280

Bo th

380

7

16

-

392150

385+060

385+340

Bo th

280

7

17

407700

411800

401+000

404+020

Bo th

3020

7

18

413100

414450

406+450

406+900

Bo th

450

7

19

414450

-

406+900

410+580

Bo th

3680

7

20

-

-

410+650

416+250

Bo th

5600

7

21

-

427000

417+160

418+220

Bo th

1060

7

22

427000

427200

418+220

418+420

Bo th

200

7

23

427200

427700

418+420

418+920

RHS

500

7

24

427700

431000

418+920

422+100

Bo th

3180

7

25

432000

434200

423+370

424+500

Bo th

1130

7

Tota l Len g th

61770

Length (km )

Width (m)

Way side Amenities Adequate provisions of wayside amenities are provided on the project road to improve the safe ty for the c onve nienc e of roa roa d users users.T .Two rest rest area s a re p rop osed osed a t the projec t roa roa d, which comprises facilities such as toilet, drinking water, telephone booth & sufficient off / on stree t p a rking rking sp sp a c e. Rest est a rea is p rop osed osed a t km 353+40 353+400(Des 0(Design ign c h.348+9 h.348+900) 00) a nd De sign c h.3 h.394 94+50 +500(B 0(Bypa ypa ss) of the projec t roa d . The summ summ ary of wa yside yside a me nities nities is given in tab le Summ ary of Wayside Wayside Am enities SI. No.

Typ e of Am enity

Loc ation - Design Design Chaina ge (Km) (Km)

1

Truc k La y Ba ys

Designch.327+700(bypass),365+350(Design c h.359+050),392 h.359+050),392+820(Des +820(Design ign c h.386+020 h.386+020 )& 431+850(Des 431+850(Desig ig n c h.425+150) h.425+150)





SI. No.

Typ e of Am enity

Loc ation - Design Design Chaina ge (Km) (Km)

2

Rest Are a

At km 353+300(Desi 353+300(Desig g n c h.348+900) h.348+900) & 394+600(b 394+600(b yp a ss)

3

Bus Ba ys

At 70 Loc a tio ns

4

To ll Plaza

Km .344+160(Des .344+160(Design ign c h.337+700) h.337+700) & Byp a ss(De sign c h.413+700) h.413+700)

Roa d Furniture Roa d m arkings arkings a nd roa d signs signs sta nd ards are p ropo sed ba sed on IRC IRC sta sta nd ard s. The summary of traffic signs and road furniture proposed along the project road are given in table. table . Prop osed Roa Roa d Furniture Furniture alo ng the Projec t Roa Roa d Sl No

List ist o f Sig ns

Unit

Quantity

1

Sto p sign

No

120

2

Curve sign

No

242

3

Median openings

No

49

4

Side roa d

No

110

5

Che vron Signs Signs for c urves (for c urves <=1000m radius)

No

6

Red reflec reflec tors

No

600

7

Kee p left

No

27

8

Ca t’s eyes

No

6000

9

Ad vanc ed Dir Direc tion sign

No

47

10

Rou t M a rker sig n

No

90

11

Plac e Id entifica tion sign

No

40

12

Ove rhead Ca ntileve ntileve r Sign Boa rds

No

18

13

Ove rhead Ga ntry Sign Boa rd s

No

12

14

Bus Sto p sig n

No

70

15

Me ta l Bea m Cra sh Ba rrier rrier

m

12624

16

Retroreflectorised sheets on crash b a rriers rriers,, railing railing s et c .

sq m

1772

1268

ROB A tw o la ne ROB ROB co nstruc nstruc tion is in prog ress ress a t km 427+545 427+545 (Design (Design c h.437+7 h.437+700 00)) a t Ed Ed a p p a lli lli where the p roject roa d e nc ounter with a level c ross ossing. An ad ditional 12m 12m wide ROB ROB is p rop osed osed at t his loc at ion. Deta ils ils of p rop osed osed ROB a re given in ta ble Details of Propo sed ROB Sl. No



Spa n

Found Found at ion

1

437+700

427+545

13 x 21.6+ 1 x 7.85+ 30+1 x 7.85+13 x 21.6

Pile

Flyover Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




Flyove r is p rop osed osed a t km 428+94 428+941 1 (Design (Design c h.438+6 h.438+600) 00) whe re p rojec t roa d me et s NH-47 NH-47.T .The Deta ils ils of prop osed osed flyove r is given in ta ble Details of Proposed flyover Existing Chainage (Km)

Sl. No

1

438+600


Spa n

Found at ion Found

428+940

5 x 35+1 35+1 x46+5x35-Se c o nd Tier ie r 10 x 35+1 x46+10x35-T x46+ 10x35-Third hird Tier ie r 10 x 21+1x 38+1x15-Arm

Pile

Vehic ular Unde Unde rpass Vehic ular unde rpa sses a re p rop osed osed at fifteen loc at ions for ea sy c ross ossing o f ve hicles. hicles. The Deta ils ils of Vehicula r underp ass asses are given in tab le Proposal for New Vehicular Underpasses Sl. No



Op ening Size ize

Usa g e

1

318+090 318 +090

318+090 318 +090

1 x 10.5m x 5m


2

322+310 322 +310

1 x 10.5m x 5m

Ve hic ula r Unde rpa ss

3

Byp a ss Bypass

330+40 330+400 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


4

363+110

356+76 356+760 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


5

Bypass

370+97 370+975 5

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


6

Bypass

377+91 377+910 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


7

Bypass

379+45 379+450 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


8

Bypass

384+67 384+670 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


9

Bypass

388+99 388+990 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


10

Bypass

392+98 392+980 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m x 5m


11 12 13 14 15

413+560 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass

406+06 406+060 0

1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m 1 x 10. 10.5m 5m

Veh ic ular Und erp ass Vehic ular Und erp a ss Veh ic ular Und erp ass Veh ic ular Und erp ass Veh ic ular Und erp ass

411+400 416+75 416+755 5 426+02 426+020 0 426+62 426+620 0

x 5m x 5m x 5m x 5m x 5m

Slip Roads Slip lip Roa Roa d s are p ropo sed a long w ith vehic ular underpa ss . The ta b le be low g ives the loc a tions of slip roa d s. Proposed Slip Roads Existing cha inage

Design Design cha inage

side

Sl No

From

To

From

To

Bo th/ LHS/ HS/ RHS

Len g th( m )

Width(m)

1 2 3 4 5

Byp a ss Byp a ss 362740 Byp a ss Byp a ss

Bypa ss Bypa ss 363520 Bypa ss Bypa ss

321920 330010 356370 370585 377520

322700 330800 357150 371365 378300

Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th

780 790 780 780 780

5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5




Existing cha inage


Design Design cha inage

side

Sl No

From

To

From

To

Bo th/ LHS/ HS/ RHS

Len g th( m )

Width(m)

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss Byp a ss 412490 412910 413160 425145 Byp a ss 433930

Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss Bypa ss 412910 413160 413305 425960 Bypa ss 433858

379060 384280 388595 392585 405640 406060 406310 416345 425630 428370

379840 385060 389385 393375 406060 406310 406455 417160 428200 428442

Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th RHS Bo th Bo th Bo th Bo th

780 780 790 790 420 250 145 815 2570 72

5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5

Bridg es & Cross Draina Draina ge Structu res There a re 15 bridg es along the e xis xisting road including e ight m a jor b ridg es and seve n minor bridg bridg es. es. Navigational c learance is provid provid ed on a ll ma jor bridg bridg e loc ations. ations. Out o f the t ota l 15 15 bridges, 6 are bypassed (4 minor bridges and 2 major bridge) and 8 new bridges are p rop osed osed at byp ass ass loc at ions. ions. There a re 124 124 culverts on t he p roject stretc h a long t he e xis xisting road Propo sal for c ulverts

Proposals for Bridges The p ropo sa l of bridg es and Cross Cross Draina Draina ge Structures d uring uring w idening an d improve me nt is given in table Details of p roposals for bridge s Sl. No



Proposed Scheme

Span Arrangem en t


Typ e o f Substructure

Typ e o f Foundatio n

Abutment

Pier

I

RC C So lid

I

RCC

RC C Rect. RCC Rect.

Circular Pier Pile

PSC I girder RCC Slab

RCC

RCC Rect. -

Well

PSC girder

I

RCC

Well

PSC girder

I

RCC

RCC circul ar RCC circul ar

RC C beam RCC

T-

RCC

-

Well

T-

RCC

-

Well Well

BRIDGES IDGES – Existing Existing NH17 falling in Proje c t stretc h 1

319+030

318+820

2

342+300 342+300

336+000 336 +000

3

369+520 369+520

362+890 362 +890

4

382+400 382+400

375+670 375 +670

5

412+180 412+180

404+860 404 +860

6

412+800 412+800

405+450 405 +450

Ad d ition a l Two lane

7

413+750 413+750

406+210 406 +210

8

430 430+300 +300

421+465 +465

Ad d ition a l Two lane Add itiona tiona


Ne w Fo ur lane Ad d ition a l Two lane Ad d ition a l Two lane Ad d ition a l Two lane Ad d ition a l Two lane

11x 32.5 1 x 16 .5+ 7 x 24.5 + 1 x 16.5 12 x 26.5 1 x 7.1 1 x 31.7 + 7 x 32.3 + 1 x 31.7 1 x 32.73 + 9 x 33.3 + 1 x 32.75 1 x 24 1 x 16.0 16.0

PSC girder PSC girder

RCC

Op en

Well



Sl. No



Proposed Scheme


Span Arrangem en t

l Two lane 9

431+000 431+000

422+730 422 +730


Typ e o f Substructure Abutment

Typ e o f Foundatio n

Pier

be am

Ad d ition a l Two lane

4 x 20 + 5 x 30+3 x 50+ 1x 83 + 1x 120+1 x 83+ 3 x 50+5 x 30+3 x 20

PSC b o x +RCC box + RC C voided sla b

RCC

RC C beam

RCC

Well

BRIDG BRIDG ES – Byp a sse s 10

14+470Ponnani

333+200Ponnani

New Four lane

3 x 18

11

1+145Chavakka d 1+428 Paravoor 1+716 Paravoor 2+244 Paravoor 4+564 Paravoor 9+080 Paravoor

357+740Chavakk ad 407+215 Paravoor 407+770 Paravoor 408+085 Paravoor 410+620 Paravoor 416+300 Paravoor

New Four lane Four

1x20 1x30 1x20 1 x 18

Four

1 x 18

Four

1 x 18

Four

3 x 25

Four

3 x 30

12 13 14 15 16

New lane New lane New lane New lane New lane

+ +

T-

RC C / PSC beam

RC C Solid

RC C beam RC C beam RC C beam PSC girder PSC girder

T-

RCC

RCC circul ar RC C circul ar -

Pile

T-

RCC

-

Pile

T-

RCC

-

Pile

I

RCC

Pile

I

RC C So lid

RCC Rect. RC C circul ar

Pile

Pile

Pile

Propo sa ls for for Cu lve rts Culvert Details Existing

Bypass

Typ e o f culvert

Ne w constructio n

Reconstructio n

Widenin g

Ne w constructio n

Reconstructio n

Widenin g

Pipe Box

0 0

25 31

0 3

55 27

0 8

1 23

Sum m a ry o f EIA EIA Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




Introduction Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report presents the environmental assessment of the p rop osed osed improve me nts for the 121121-K Km Kuttipp uram – Ed ap pa lly lly stretc stretc h of NH 17 in the Sta Sta te of Kerala, and the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to minimise or mitigate the impa c ts ident ified ified . Guide lines lines formulat formulat ed b y Ministry Ministry of Envir Environm onm ent and Forest orest (M oEF oEF) w ere referred for preparing the EIA. Apart from this various Indian acts and regulations were review review ed suc h a s, Wate r (Prevention (Prevention a nd Co ntrol of Polluti Pollution) on) A c t, 1974 1974,, Air (Prevention (Prevention a nd Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and EIA Notifications of 1994 1994 and 2006 2006.. Following Following are t he m a jor tasks tasks c ond uc ted a s a pa rt of EI EIA Stud Stud y. •

Preliminary reconnaissance survey and collection of secondary information to identify environmentally sensitive issues relating to the project ;

•

Identification of base-line status of various environmental parameters through environmental monitoring study;

•

Ass Assess essme nt of p ote ntial imp imp ac ts of the p roject o n these these b ase-li ase-line ne c ond itions itions;;

•

Formulation o f Envir Environm onm ent Ma nag em ent Plan Plan (EMP) (EMP) inco rporating a pp rop riat riat e mitigation measures to offset the identified adverse impacts, and Environmental Monitoring Monitoring Plan for eva luating luating the effec tive implementa tion of EMP; MP;

•

Estima tion o f c ost ost fo r EMP EMP and Mo nitoring nitoring Plan; a nd

•

Formulation of institutional institutional a rrang em ents for the implem enta tion o f EMP. EMP.

Baseline Environm Environm enta l Profile Profile of the Projec t Area Field inspections at all the sensitive locations, collection of secondary information for all the environment al co mp one nts, nts, ba seline eline environme nta l mo nitoring nitoring from Sep Sep tem b er 200 2006 6 to October 2006, and discussions with the officials, NGOs and local public were conducted to esta esta blish blish the ba seline environment al sta sta tus of t he stud stud y area . Top og raphy . raphy . Except a small portion in the Ponnani bypass, the entire project road passes through through plain terrain, terrain, which fa lls lls in the low land region a long the Arabian Sea c oa st of Kerala. Meteorology. The e ntire ntire p rojec t a rea ha s a tropic a l humid c lima lima te. The The ho t sea sea son from Ma rch to Ma y is follow follow ed by t he Sout Sout h West West M onsoo onsoo n sea sea son from June to Sep tem be r. The period from October to November is the North East Monsoon season, and the period from Dec em b er to Feb Feb ruary is g ene rally dry. The Sou Sou th West Mon soo n is usua usua lly lly very he a vy a nd nea rly 75 75 % of t he ann ual rains a re rec rec eived d uring uring this sea son. The The rang e o f te mp erature varies between 32°C and 22°C. The a verag e a nnua l rainfall is 280 280 mm/ yea r a nd the a verag e relative hum idity is is 81.5 81.5% %. An Auto ma tic Wea ther Mo nitoring nitoring Sta Sta tion w a s set up at Vad ana pp ally ally as pa rt of t he b aseli aseline ne environme environme ntal mo nitorin nitoring. g. The The a mb ient temp erature during the monitoring period varied between 32.6 o C and 21.4 o C and relative humidity rang ed b etw ee n 96% 96% and 88% 88%. The solar solar ra ra dia tion rec rec orde d rang ed be tw ee n 2 28. 8.2 2 Watt hour/sq m and 0.20 Watt hour/sq m. Average rain fall during the study period was around 404. 404.01 01 mm. Predo minant wind s we re mo stly from from South -Southw est est a nd South West West d irec irec tions with frequencies of 13.7% and 11.5 % respectively. Calm conditions prevailed for 0.7 % for the total time. Geology and Minerals. Geologically the project area is composed mostly of Archaean gneisses and crystalline schists with a narrow coastal belt of recent sediments and mud b anks. anks. The p roject area is not rich in m inera inera l wea lth exce pt the d ep osits osits of lime shells shells found in the c oa stal be lt of Ponnani and d ep osits osits of Ilme Ilme nite nite a long with mona zite found in the b ea c h sand of Ponnani, Ponnani, Veliy Veliyam am kod and Cha vakkad a rea a long the project road . Soil Characteristics. Coastal alluvial soil is seen in the project area. the texture is dominated b y sand sand frac tion with very ra ra pid pe rmea bility. bility. These hese soils soils a re gene rally rally ac idic a nd o f low fertility fertility lev el. La La te rite rite soil typ e is ob served in the hilly hilly te rra rra in of Ponna ni b yp a ss. Soil Soil sa sa mp ling ling





do ne a t seven seven loc ations along the p rojec t road shows that the soil soil texture texture a long the p roject road va ries ries from from silty ilty c lay to sa ndy loam an d the p H varies varies from 5.5 to 9.3. 9.3. Hydrology. The p rojec rojec t road is c ross ossing / ab utting utting a numb er of wa ter bo dies through through out t he stretc h. Different Different b ranc hes of Peri Periyar, yar, the largest largest river in in Kerala Kerala , a re c ross rossing th e p rojec rojec t roa d at seven locations. Bharathapuzha, the second largest river in Kerala is crossing the project road at Kuttipuram. Proposed National Waterway No. 3 (NW-3) from Kovalam to Kasargod, which is part of different rivers and canals is crossing the project road at four locations and runs p arallel to t he p rojec rojec t roa d intermittently on LHS LHS and RHS in be tw ee n the se loc at ions. ions. Kanjiramukku River is crossing the project road at Puthuponnani. Ground water level in the p rojec t a rea is shallow in the p lain terrain, terrain, va rying rying from 1 to 3 met ers. ers. Ambient Air Quality. The b aseline aseline sta sta tus of a mb ient air qua lity lity mo nitored a t 11 loc a tions along the p rojec t road show s that all the am bient a ir qua lity parame ters we re w ell within within the NAAQ Sta Sta nd ards at a ll the loc at ions exce pt a n Inc Inc rease rease in SPM level at Kotta pp uram. Wate r Quality. Surfac urfac e w ate r sam sam ples were c ollec ollec ted from from seven loc ations along the p rojec t road . Impo rtant c hem ica l pa rame ters like like C hlorides hlorides,, Hardness Hardness and Tota l Diss Dissolved Solid olid s we re observed to be very high at five locations due to the backwater influence. Biological Indicator – total Coliforms – is also found to be higher than the permissible limits at five locations. Faecal Coliforms were present at four locations. Ground water samples were c ollec ollec ted from from six loca tions. tions. All All the physica physica l and c hemica l param eters of g round wa ter at a ll the loc at ions we re within the IS:105 :10500 00 sta sta nd ard s. Tota l Co liforms liforms we re mo re tha n the p ermiss ermissible limits, limits, b ut fa ec a l Co liforms liforms we re a bsent. bsent. Am bient Noise Leve Leve l . Out o f the 11 loca tions where a mb ient noise noise level mo nitori nitoring ng wa s do ne along the project road, eight locations represented residential areas and three locations represented commercial areas. Among the eight locations representing residential areas, noise levels at four locations were below the permissible limit set by the CPCB during day time and night time. At two locations the noise levels during day time and night time were above the permissible limits. Out of the remaining two locations representing residential areas, day time noise level at one location and night time noise level at other location was above the permissible limit. Among the three locations representing commercial areas, noise level at one location was below the permissible limits for commercial areas during day time and night time. Day time noise level at the remaining two locations was above the permissible limit. Biological Environment. The projec t roa d is not p ass assing th roug h a ny fo rest est a reas, reas, wildlife wildlife sanc tuaries tuaries and protec ted areas. areas. How How ever, the project roa d is pa ssing through through Vemb ana dKol we tla nd syste yste m, w hic h is a Ra Ra msa msa r Site. Ma ng a lava na m Bird Bird Sa Sa nc tua ry is situa te d 5 Km Km away from the project road. No rare/threatened species of flora or fauna is present in the project area except the mangroves along the canals, rivers and estuaries crossing / abutting the project road. About 56,300 trees – mainly coconut trees - are present with in the prop osed osed 45-m 45-m right right of w ay o f the p rojec rojec t road since it is is pa ssing throug h ag ric ric ultura ultura l areas. areas. Land Environment. The p redo mina nt land use use a long the p rojec t road is resident resident ial follow follow ed by ag ricultural icultural and c omm ercial. Ribbo n deve lop ment is found through out the p rojec t rroa oa d. The p roject road pa sses through fo ur municipa lities lities nam ely Ponna Ponna ni, Cha va kka kka d, Kod unga lloor and Paravur, Koc hi Municipa Municipa l Corporation a nd a numb er of ot her sma sma ll tow ns. ns. Pa dd y, Coc onut, Tap Tap ioc a, Arec a nut , Cashew Cashew nut, Bana Bana na , P Puls ulses es,, and Bete l vine vine a re the impo rtant c rop s a long the p roject roa d . The p rojec rojec t road fa lls lls und er Coa sta l Reg ulation Zone Zone (CRZ) a t six sixte te en loc a tions. Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts Projec t Bene fits: fits: B Beneficial imp imp ac ts of the project will will be t he reduc tion in in a ir po lluti llution on d ue to be tter servi servic c e levels of the roa d, reduc tion in in travel time time and ac cide nts, nts, bette r connec tivity tivity to Cochin – the industrial hub and major sea port of Kerala - from northern parts of Kerala and neighbouring states, better connectivity to the proposed Vallarpadam Container Terminal a nd prop osed osed LNG Terminal Terminal a t C oc hin and different sma ll-s ll-sc c a le fishing fishing ha rbours Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




a long the sea c oa st o f Er Erna kulam kulam , Thri Thris ssur and Ma lap puram d istri istric c ts, ts, ea sy a c c ess ess to the fam ous Guruvayo or Tem p le from from n orthern and south south ern part of Kerala, Kerala, ge neration of loc al emp loyment during during road c onstru onstruc c tion, and Imp rovem ent of loca l ec onom y and industry industry due to b ett er infras infrastructure. tructure. Negative Negative Impac ts : Ma environme ntal imp imp ac ts expec ted d ue to the project a re the cutting : Ma jor environme of about 56,300 trees – mainly coconut trees, loss of productive agricultural lands and the da ma ge of ma ngrove a rea s in CRZ CRZ loc ations. ations. No No signi signifi fic c ant imp ac ts are a nticipate d on the ecology of the Vembanad-Kol wetland system and CRZ areas since no reclamation of we tlands or wa ter bod ies is propo sed for the project . Temp orary imp imp ac ts are a nticipate d on air quality, water quality and noise levels in the project area during the construction phase. An increase increase in a mb ient noise noise level is expec ted during during the o pe ration p hase. hase. Envir nvironme ntal mod ellin elling g wa s c ond uct ed to p red ict the co nc entration of Ca rbo n Monoxide Monoxide an d no ise ise levels a long the p rojec t road in 201 2011 1 and 2016 2016 and t he results results we re co mp ared with the pe rmiss missible limits set by CPCB. CPCB. T The he CO mo d elling elling results results show tha t c onc entrat ion o f C O will will be within within the stand ards at all the sens sensiti itive ve rec ep tor loca tions along the project roa d for the projected years. Noise modelling results show that the noise levels within 20m from the centreline of the road in 2011 and within 50m from the centreline of the road in 2016 will exce ed the pe rmiss rmissible limits limits for resident resident ial area s in ce rtain stretc stretc hes of th e p roject road . Public Consultations Consultations Public ublic Consultations Consultations were c ond uct ed at Vill Villag ag e level at four loc loc ations and at distr district ict level at tw o loc at ions along the p roject roa d . The m ain iss issue raised raised d uring uring th e c onsultation onsultation p roce ss was the demand for market rate for land acquisition. All the issues raised during the c onsultation onsultation p roce ss a re ad d ress ressed in the EMP EMP and the Resett esett leme nt Ac tion Plan. Plan. Mitiga tion of Impa c ts and Environmenta l Mana ge me nt Plan Plan (EMP (EMP)) Project sp sp ec ific ific Environm nvironm enta l Mana ge me nt P Plan lan (EMP), (EMP), sta ting the va rious imp ac ts an d t heir mitiga tion me asures asures,, is is formulate d to a void / minimise minimise the a nticipa ted imp a c ts. ts. The responsibility of implementing suggested mitigation measures lies mainly with Contractor, Co nstruc nstruc tion Sup Sup ervision ervision C onsulta onsulta nt a nd PIU PIU. An Environm Environm en ta l Mo nitoring Pla Pla n is p ropo sed as part of the EMP to evaluate the efficiency of implementation of mitigation measures rec omm end ed in the EMP EMP and fac ilitate ilitate ma nag eme nt de cisions cisions for the p rojec t. Bloc k Co st Es Estima tes for Environm Environm enta l Mana ge me nt P Plan lan The c ost ost of imp lemen ting the m itiga itiga tion me a sures ures sugg ested ested in the EMP EMP a nd c ond uc ting the environmental monitoring as per the Environmental Monitoring Plan works out to Rs.15.315 Crores du ring the c onstruction onstruction ph ase. ase. The The op erationa l c ost ost o f the sa me is estima estima ted a t Rs Rs. 1.5 1.5 th lakhs per annum during the first three years and Rs. 27.93 lakhs per annum from 4 year onwards. Conc lusions lusions and Rec omm enda tions With proper implementation of mitigation measures proposed in the EMP, the proposed project does not lead to any significant irreversible environmental impacts in the project infl influenc uenc e a rea . The e nvir nvironme ntal mo nitoring nitoring plan a nd rep orting orting mec hanism hanism p rop osed osed as p art of t he EMP EMP will will ensur ensure e th e p rope r imp leme nta tion of th e EMP. EMP. Through p rovid rovid ing b ett er transpo transpo rta tion fac iliti ilities es,, the p rop osed osed project w ill ill create a de velopm enta l boo m in the in the project area leading to an improvement in the socio-economic conditions of the entire reg ion. Thus the o verall b enefits of p rojec t outw eigh the nega tive imp imp ac ts of the project. The p roject req uires uires the fo llow llow ing environm environm enta l c learanc es: es: Environmental Clearance from MoEF: Since the p rop osed osed p rojec t is for the exp ansion ansion of existing National Highway greater than 30 Km involving additional RoW greater than 20 m involving involving land a c quisiti quisition, on, it fa lls lls und er Ca teg ory “ B” as per the EI EIA Not ific ific at ion 2006 2006 an d req uires env iron iron me nta l clea ranc e from SEIAA . But But SE SEIAA is not c on stitut ed in Kera Kera la Sta Sta te a nd henc e this project shall shall be trea trea ted as a C at ego ry “ A” project, which requires requires c learance from from Mo EF. Since the EI EIA Doc ume nt o f the p resent resent p rojec t is p repa red b efo re 30 30th June, 2007, 2007, a nd Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




since it is include d in the Sc Sc hed ule of EIA No tific tific at ion 2006 2006,, EI EIA a pp raisa raisa l of this p rojec t m ay b e d one a s pe r the Interim Interim O pe rationa l Guid Guid elines till till 13th Sep te mb er 2007 2007.. Clearance from Kerala Forest Department: Prior Clearance is required from Kerala Forest Depa rtme nt for c utting utting of trees within within the propo sed RoW a nd their transpo transpo rtation. Consent to establish from Kerala State Pollution Control Board: Co Board: Co nsent nsent to esta esta b lis lish is req uired uired for the p rojec t from the Kerala Sta Sta te Pollution Pollution Co ntrol Boa Boa rd unde r the Wate r (P (Preve ntion a nd Co ntrol of Polluti Pollution) on) Ac t, 1974 1974 a nd Air (Prevention (Prevention a nd Co ntrol of Polluti Pollution) on) A c t, 1981 1981 CRZ Clearance from Kerala Coastal Zone Management Authority and MoEF: Since ma ny parts of the project road passes through CRZ areas, and since the project cost is more than five crores, clearances from Kerala Coastal Zone Management Authority and MoEF are req uired uired for the p rojec t.

Sum m a ry of RAP RAP

The p roject road c om p ris rises the p ortion of NH-17 NH-17 from c ha inag e 318+00 318+000 0 at Kuttip Kuttip puram in Malappuram district to chainage 429+440 at Edappally in Ernakulam district of Kerala. Top og raph ica lly lly this stretc h runs through p lain lan lan d pa ra llel llel to t he c oa st line line e xcep t for firs first 3 km, whic h runs through the rolling rolling t errain errain of M ala pp uram d istri istric c t. The projec t roa d pa sses throug throug h t hree a dm inis inistrative bo und aries– aries– Mala pp uram, Tris rissur and Ernakulam districts of Kerala state Out of the total 111.730 km. first 25.14 km. passes through Malappuram district where the settlement pattern is less dense comprising residential, c om me rcial a nd ag ric ric ultura ultura l land land s. As the road ente rs Thris hrissur distri distric c t the p op ulation d ensity ensity increases and the land use is predominantly residential with commercial hubs in between. This stretc h, which ac c ount s for 53% 53% of th e t ota l projec t leng th p a sses through ma ny c omm ercial ce nters with d ense ense ribb ribb on d evelopm ent o n either side side o f the roa d. The The last last stretch of 24.182 km. in length, passes through urban centers of Paravur and Kanayannur taluk in Ernakulam and has very narrow winding roads with very closely and densely knit settlements. Following are the demarcations of the entire project road based on a dm inis inistrative b ound aries: aries: Sec tion-I - Ma lap puram Dis Distric tric t - (Exis (Existing ting Cha inag e 317+ 317+ 710 710 to 349+2 349+280 80 & Desi Design gn c haina ge : 317+710 to 342+820) Sec tion- II - Thriss hrissur District District -

(Existi (Existing ng Chaina g e 349 349+ + 280 to 409 409+11 +110 0 & Design Design c haina ge : 342+820 to 405+260)

Section-III - Ernakulam District - (Existing Chainage 349+ 280 to 438+600 & Design chainage: 405+260 to 429+440)

Loss of Land The a dd itiona itiona l land req uired uired for the wide ning of the existing existing roa roa d to four lan lan e wa s estima estima ted based on the land acquisition plan prepared by consultants. Accordingly, an additional Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




area of 753.80 acres (305.06 Ha.) would be required which includes both private land and government land. Out of this an area of 734.39 acres would be required for road, 9.21 acres for to ll p laza, 3.21 3.21 ac res for truc k la la y b a ys a nd 6.9 6.98 8 ac res for rest rest a rea s. The sa me is summ arized arized in tab le Land requirement for the proposed highway design Design Feature

Land to b e ac quired quired (sq.mts.)

(Acres)

Ro a d

2972058.171 2972058.171

734.39

To ll Plaza

37291.15

9.21

Truc k La y b a ys

13009.97

3.21

Re st Are a

28266.61

6.98

Tot a l

3050625.901

753.80

Loss of Structures This c at eg ory include s loss loss of structures and sem i-op i-op en within p riva riva te or g ove rnment p lots. lots. The c ensus ensus survey urvey c ond ucte d for all the stru struc c tures tures affec ted unde r the project c overed ma jor structures like residential, commercial and religious buildings as well as minor structures like c om po und wa lls lls bus stop s, pum p houses houses,, wells, wells, wa ter ta ps etc . ItIt revea ls tha t a tot al of 5596 5596 structures are affected out of which, 3991 are major buildings and remaining are minor structures or imm imm ova b le ass assets. ets. Structures whic h are loc at ed in the land alread y ac q uired uired for bypass is not considered in this survey, details are given in table Catego ry of buildings affected Majo r building s

No. of structures

Perce ntag e to total

Resid esid e ntial nt ial Co m me rcia l Resi. esi. + Co m m . Pub lic b uilding s Re ligio us Tota ot a l

2120 1499 149 9 106 223 43 3991

53.12 53.12 37.56 37. 56 2.66 5.59 1.07 100

*Inlc *Inlc ud es tap s, grave yard s, pum p houses, houses, wells, wells, po nd s, shed shed s, bus stop stop s etc .

Loss of Immovable Assets Loss of other immovable assets include loss of compound walls, fences, loss of taps, wells, bus stops, sheds, pump houses etc. From the census survey of structures it has been found that there are 431 431 PAF PAFs s whose whose c omp ound wa ll alone is affec ted . Majority Majority of the c omp ound wa lls lls are pucca and privately owned. Impact on other minor structures like public taps, bus shelte rs, rs, etc . ca uses uses loss loss of a no the r a d d itiona l 117 1174 4 struc struc tures. tures. These co mp ensation f or structures have been budgeted in the RAP budget as per prevailing schedule of rates p ublished ublished by PWD.

Impa c t o n Livelyhood/ Livelyhood/ Tenure enure Out of a total of 3991 PAFs being affected by impact on structures, 1605 PAFs, which comprises owners of commercial structures and res-commerical structures looses their livelihood due to the loss of commercial spaces. As the census survey covered only the structure affected PAFs who are owners of the affected structures, the number of people Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .




who are employed in these commercial buildings and looses their livelihood are not c ove red. The non-a vailab ility ility of upd at ed la nd rec ords wa s ano ther co nstraint nstraint in in estima estima ting the a c c urate num be r of P PAF AFs s.

RAP Budget RAP b ud ge t, ca n b e b road ly sub divide d into following t hree subs subsec ec tions: tions: The fina l RAP RAP budget is given in Table E 19 (d ) Assis Assista ta nc e fo r Loss Loss o f Land (e ) Assis Assista ta nc e fo r Lo Lo ss of Struc tu res a nd Asset Asset s (f) R&R Imp leme nta tion

6.8.1

Assistance for Loss of Land

Ass Assistanc istanc e for land land has be en p rep ared ba sed on the land a c quisiti quisition on p lan where the e xtent of land a rea t hat nee ds to b e a c quired quired is c alculate d for eac h sur survey vey numbe r in ea c h vil village. Based ased on the land use use of the a rea to b e a c quired quired along the exis existing ting roa d and the b ypa sses, es, unit rat rat es of land is ap p lied lied to g et t he to ta l ass assista ista nc e fo r loss loss of land . The land va lue include s 30% solatium, 12% interest and Registration and stamp duty. table Cost of Land Sl. No.


Unit (Ac res) res)

A : Tota Tota l Affecte d Land Area

753.8 Co st (in INR Crore s)

B : LA Co st 1

Co st of LA

178.52 178.52

2

Sola tium @ 30% of th e LA Co st

53.56 53.56

3

Inte rest rest @ 12 % of th e LA c ost

21.42 21.42

4

Reg istrat istrat ion rate (8%) (8%) a nd sta mp d uty (1%) (1%) charges

16.07

To ta l

269.57

Include s co st of land for 2 toll plazas and other a menities Note: * Include

The c ost of a c q uiring uiring lan d o f 753.8 753.8 Ac res fo r the p rojec t c om es to Rs. Rs. 269 269.57 .57 Crores, of t hese Rs 53.56 c rores are so so lat ium (30%) (30%) a nd a n a d d ition a l Rs Rs. 21.42 21.42 Crores a nd Rs. 16.07 16.07 cro res would be required to be disbursed to the PAFs as interest rate and Registration expanses respectively. Intrest would be paid at the rate of 12% while registration expanses are at the rate of 9 %( %( 8% registration registration a nd 1% sta mp d uty) This This solat ium w ould be given t o t ake c are o f other exigencies like registration of newly purchased property and stamp duty fees etc.

6.8.2

Assistance for Loss of Structures Structures and Assets

Ass Assista ista nc e fo r los loss s of struc struc tures a nd mino r ass asset s like like w ells, ells, pu mp ho uses, uses, c om p ou nd w a lls lls et c , within res resident ident ial and c om me rcial plots ha s be en summ summ a riz rized in ta b le. le . Cost of Structures and Assets. Sl. No.

Co mp one nts of Co st


1

Rep lac em ent va lue of structures including com pound w alls alls

157.77





Sl. No.

Co mp one nts of Co st


2

Rep lac em ent value of sem i-op i-op en structures

7.01 7.01

3

Rep lac em ent va lue of ot her fixed fixed ass assets Tota l Assistanc Assistanc e for Loss of Struc tures

1.18 1.18 165.96

The c ost of struc struc tures is estima estima te d a t Rs Rs. 157. 157.77 77 w hic h is eq uiva lent to rep lac em ent va lue (without de prec iation). The The sam sam e fo r sem sem i-op i-op en struct struct ures ures a nd fixed fixed a ssets are e stima ted a t Rs. 7.01 7.01 cro res a nd 1.18 c rores resp resp ec tive ly. The t o ta l ass assista ista nc e fo r loss loss of struc tu res th s c om es to Rs. Rs. 165.96 165.96 c rores.

6.8.3

R&R Assistance

R&R ass assista ista nc e a nd othe r co st inc lude the one time ex-gratia a mo unt Rs Rs 1000 10000/fa 0/fa mily.T mily.The c ate go ry wise wise num be r of a ffect ed fam ilies ilies is given in tab le R&R Assista Assistanc nc e Sl.No 1 2 3

Assistanc Assistanc e R&R Ass Assista ista nc e to La nd (On ly Land)affected PAF* R&R Assistance to land & structures affec ted Fam ilies ilies R&R Assis Assista ta nc e t o No n tit le holders To ta l

Unit

Quantity (Nos)

Unit Rate (Rs.)

Am ount in Rs Rs. Crore

PAF

23744

10000

23.74

PAF

5596

10,000

5.60

PAF

4815

10,000

4.82

34155

34.16

.

6.8.4

Final RAP Budget

Final Resettlement Action Plan and budget has been summarized in table. Fina l RAP RAP Bud Bud g et Final RAP Budget

Assis Assistan tan c e

Am ount in Rs. Crore

La nd Co st

269.5 269.57 7

Struc ture tu re Co st

165.96 165.96

R& R Assis Assistt a nc e

34.16

To ta l

469.68

Project Cost Estimates





The estima estima ted c ost ost for 4-6 4-6 laning of Kuttipuram – Ed ap ally Sec tion of NH – 17 , project roa d is p resente resente d in tab le. Co st Estima te for 4-6 4-6 laning o f Kuttipu Kuttipu ram – Eda pa lly Sec Sec tion BILL BILL NO .

BILL BILL NA M E

A M OUNT (Rs.)

1

SITE C LEA LEA RA NC E A ND DIS DISM M A NTLI NTLING NG

2

EA RTH WO RK

3

SUB-BA UB-BAS SE A ND BASE C O UR URS SES

1,696, 1,6 96,670 670,7 ,777 77

4

BIT BITUM UMINO INO US WO RKS

1,490,59 1,49 0,591,3 1,381 81

5

C RO SS DRAINAG DRAINA G E WO RKS

6

NEW BRIDG BRIDG ES A ND UND UNDER ER PAS PA SSES

7

RO A D O VER BRIDG BRIDG ES (ROB'S (RO B'S))

198,759, 198, 759,957 957

8

TRAFFIC SIGNAGES, ROAD MARKING AND OTHER A PPURT PPURTENA NC ES

106,968,600

9

PRO PRO TEC TIVE WO RKS RKS, DUC TS & O THER SERVIC ES

640,2 640 ,246, 46,019 019

10

ELEC LEC TRICA IC A L WO RKS

123,456, 123, 456,650 650

11

TO LL PLA PLA ZA

170,357, 170, 357,894 894

12

REPAIR A ND REHABIL HA BILIT ITA TION IO N

57,279,4 57,2 79,451 51

13

M ISC ELLA LLA NEOUS

98,165,8 98,1 65,867 67

17,215,3 17,2 15,348 48 497,948, 497, 948,090 090

298,189,283 298,189,28 3 3,442, 3,4 42,290 290,1 ,179 79

8,838,139,543

TO TA L CO NSTRUCTIO UCTIO N C O ST

928.001

10& 10& esc esc ala tion for one ye ar (c rores) rores) C O NTING NTING ENC IES IES/ Q C @ 3% O F C IVIL C O ST (c rore ro res s)

27.84

IC & PRE PRE-O PERAT PERATIVE IVE EXPE EXPENSE NSES S @1% OF O F EPC (c ro re s)

9.558

FINA INANC NC ING C O ST @ 2% DEBT DEBT A T 70:30 70:3 0 DER (c rore ro res s)

12.824

ESC LATIO LATION N @ 5% PE PER A NUM DURING C O NSTRU RUC C TION IO N PER PERIOD (C O NST NSTRUCTION UCTION PER PERIOD 30 M O NTHS NTHS)) (c rore ro res s) INTE INTEREST DURING C O NSTRU RUC C TION IO N @ 11% PA O N DEBT (A T 70:30 DER DER) (TE (TERM LOA N) (c rores) ro res)

79.454 87.280 1144.957

TO TA L CO NC ESSIO NA IRE IRE CO ST(c rores) rores)

111.73

TO TA L LE LENG TH O F PR PRO JEC JEC T RO A D (KM )

10.25

PER PER KM C O ST ( C RO RES ) NHAI COST LAND ACQUISITION, ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION,R&R, UTILITY SHIF SHIFT TING ETC ., (c ro re s)

485.20

TOTAL NHAI COST(c rores) rores)

485.20

TOTAL PROJECT COST ( CONCESSIONAIRE + NHAI COST ) (crores) TO TA L P PROJ ROJECT ECT PER PER KM C O ST( C RORES )


1630.16 14.59



Economic Analysis

&


Financial

Ec onom ic Analysis Analysis Economic evaluation was carried out for the full Project Road. In the analysis, the ‘with project’ alternative of widening the project road to 4 lane configurations were compared with the b ase ase op tion of ‘w ithout projec projec t’ alternative alternative of m aintaining aintaining the exis existing ting road only and witho ut improve me nts. nts. This is to a rrive rrive at the ne t ec ono mic b ene fits, fits, which c onsis onsistt of reduction in vehicle operation cost, reduction in travel time and reduction in accident cost. Ana lysis lysis pe riod riod wa s ta ken as 30 yea rs from from the d at e o f op eration. The p roject roa d sec sec tion of NH 17 from from Kuttipuram to E Eda da pp a li is ec ono mic ally fea fea sible forthe p rop osed osed wid ening to four lan es co nside nside ring ring the p ositive ositive va lues of EIRR IRR (21.4% (21.4%)) a nd ENP NPV V (Rs (Rs. 9975 9975.5 .53 3 Million). Million). It It ha s a lso lso be en esta esta b lis lished tha t t he prop osa osa l is ec ono mic ally fea sible in the w orst-c orst-c a se sc en a rio d ev elo p ed in sen sen sitivity a na lysis lysis (EIR (EIRR R: 17.5%, 17.5%, ENPV: ENPV: Rs Rs. 6282.04 6282.04 Million).

Financ ial Ana lysis lysis Based on the project structure traffic study and toll rate analysis, financial feasibility analysis ha s b ee n ca rried rried ou t as pe r the me tho do logy outlined in ea rlier rlier sec tions. tions. The ob jec tive of the financial analysis is to ascertain the existence of sustainable project returns, which shall suc c ess essfully me et the exp ec ta tions of its fina nc ial investors. investors. The a na lysis lysis revea ls va rious rious FI FIRR va lues c orres orrespo po nding to e a c h yea r of toll ope ra tion. FIRR for the Returns Returns on Investm Investm ent a nd Returns on Equity for the years from 2010 to 2037(concession period is 30 years including Construction Period) with maximum 40% subsidy Results for 4 laning with 40% Grant and 30 yea rs Co nc ess ession Period Period are given in Ta b le 5.24. 5.24. Tab le 5.24: Fina Fina nc ial Fea Fea sibility Results Results Post Ta Ta x FIRR %

SCENARIOS

(With 40% Gra nt/ Sub sidy) fo r 30 15.58 years of concession period

Return on Equity %

NPV NPV @ 12% (Rs Crore)

Pay Back Period

19.25

321.38

10 ye a rs Profitability

Statement The p rofit and loss loss sta tem ent ind ica tes the ne t p rofit rofit ea rned d uring uring the c onc ess ession pe riod riod . Results esults for 4 laning with 40% 40% Gra nt a re g iven in Ta b le 5.25. 5.25 . Tab le 5.25: Proje Proje c t Profita Profita bi lity Results (Rs (Rs in Crore s)

Ne t Revenue

Years

Case

2011

With 40% 62.87 Grant/ Sub sid y 1114.31

2038

Tot a l O&M Cost

Ne t Operating income

Profit o r Loss before ta x

Tot a l Ta x

Profit o r Loss After tax

6.03

56.84

3.4

0.39

3.02

40.36

1073.97

1032.33

359.13

673.20

Conclusion It would be seen that considering the enhancement of toll rate on the basis of structure/ b ypa ss c ost, ost, the projec t is financ ially ially viab le on BOT ba sis with m aximum of 40% Grant and 30 years Concession Period. Accordingly, project should be undertaken either on Wilbu r Smit h Ass Asso c ia te s Inc . USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Assoc iat es Pvt. Ltd .


Project Four Laning of NH-17 NH-17 from from Kuttipura m-Ed m-Ed ap ally in th e Sta Sta te of Kerala und er NHDP Phase III III on BOT Ba sis


a nnuity b a sis or EP EPC c ont rac t b a sis. is. To g et minimu m via b ility ility c rite rite ria ria of 15% 15% Eq uity IRR IRR, 10.65 10.65% % grant is req uired uired .



Project Report Edappally-Kuttippuram

Recommend Documents