People v. Badilla (G.R. No. 218578) - August 31, 2016 Chain of Custody rule - Section 21 of RA 9165.
Full description
Lumauig v. People - G.R. No. 166680 (July 7, 2014) Article 218 of the Revised Penal Code - Failure of Accountable Officer to Render AccountsFull description
people vs durango case digestFull description
digestFull description
CrimPro digestFull description
consti2Full description
Constitutional law 2 Rights of the accusedFull description
Digest in Crim 2
Constitutional Law Bill of RightsFull description
Full description
crim rev
sFull description
CrimProFull description
case digestFull description
PEOPLE V. MENDOZA
G.R. No. 137405Full description
Full description
Digest of Comerciante v. PeopleFull description
Topic: VI. LAWS 2. Parts of a law; (c) Preamble People v Echavez, 95 SCRA 663 (1980) Facts: Fiscal Abundio R. Ello fil ed separate informations against sixteen people for squatting which was punishable under PD No. 772. FIve of the informations were raffled to Judge Vicente Echavez, Jr. The Judge dismissed the five informations before the accused could be ar raigned. One of the Judge's grounds for the dismissal was that under the rule of ejusdem g eneris the decree does not apply to the cultivation of a grazing land. The fiscal asked that the dismissal order be r econsidered. Issues: Whether PD No. 772 which penalizes squatting and similar acts, applies to agricultural lands. Ruling/Held: No. The court ruled that PD No. 772 does not apply to pasture lands because its preamble shows that it was intended to apply to squatting in urban communities or more particularly to illegal constructions in squatter areas made by well -to-do individuals. The squatting complained of involves pasture lands in rural areas. Stat Con ^^
