DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
T2
Hydrocarbon Evaluation Evaluation and Interpretation Version 2.0
Written by the Training Department of DATALOG David P. Ha!er
"### Data$og This This manua manuall is for for the the sole sole use use of partic particip ipan ants ts in the Datal Datalog og Hydrocarb Hydrocarbon on Evaluation Evaluation and Interpretation training Interpretation training course. Datalog, 3030 9 th St SE, algar!, Al"erta, Al"erta, ana#a T$G 3%9 Tel &'03( $'3)$$$0* +acsimile &'03( $'3)$-$* e")site e")site http/.#atalog.a".ca http/.#atalog.a".ca
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
0
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
%O&T'&T( SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
5
SECTION 2
HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION AND CLASSIFICATION
9
2."
Petro Petro$e) $e)m m %ompos %ompositi ition on and %$assif %$assifi*at i*ation. ion..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ............. .......... ... #
2.2 (at)rated Hydro*arbons or A$!anes.................... A$!anes...... .............. .............. .............. .............. ............... ........ ...... .. "0 $.$.1 araffin............................................................................................................................. 10 $.$.$ 4aphthenes... 4aphthenes....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .......... ... 1$ 2.+
,nsat)rated Hydro*arbons or Aromati*s................... .............. .............. ............... ............. .."-
2.-
AP Gravity %$assifi*ation........ .............. ............... .............. .............. .............. .............. ........ ......."/ .
SECTION 3
SAMPLING, DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT
17
+." 3.1.1 3 .1 .$
'tra* 'tra*tin ting g Gas Gas fro from m the Dri$$ing Dri$$ing 1$)id.. 1$)id...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... .......... ..... " Agitator Agitator T!pe Gas Traps... Traps....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ... 1The Gasi5ar# T2 6 7uantit ati8e Gas in 2u# 2easurement........................ 2easurement.......................................... .................. $'
+.2 3.$.1 3.$.1 3.$.$ 3.$.3 3.$.' 3.$.< 3.$.; 3.$.;
Gas Dete*tion and 3e*ording......... .............. .............. ............... .............. .............. ................ .......... ...... 2# The atal! atal!tic tic om" om"ust ustion ion or ot ire ire Detec Detector. tor.... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... .... $9 Thermal on#ucti8 on#ucti8it! it! Detecto Detector.... r........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ... 3$ +lame :oni5ation :oni5ation Detector Detector &+:D(.... &+:D(........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ...... 3' :nfrare# :nfrare# Detector. Detector..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ........ 3; Total Gas Detector Detector Summar!.. Summar!...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ............. ......... .. 3 =n)mann =n)manne# e# Total otal Gas Gas Dete Detecti ction on S!st S!stem ems.. s..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... .... '0
+.+ 3.3.1 3.3.$ 3.3.$ 3.3.3
Gas %hromatography............ %hromatography............ ............... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ........... ..... ....... -2 . hromatographic hromatographic Operation.... Operation........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... '$ The igh igh Spee Spee# # Ther Thermal mal on#u on#ucti cti8it 8it! ! hrom hromato atogra graph... ph...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ... '3 TD >ersus +:D hromatograph?. hromatograph?..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ...... ''
+.-
,nits ,nits of 4eas)r 4eas)reme ement.. nt...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ............. ......... ... -
SECTION 4 -."
SURFACE GAS EVALUATION EVALUATION
49
(o)r* (o)r*es es of of Gas Gas at ()r ()rfa* fa*e.... e........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ........ 50 ..
-.2 %hange %hangess in Phase Phase.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ............. ........ 5+ . '.$.1 Temperature emperature onsi#erati onsi#erations.... ons........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... <3 '.$.$. ritical ritical oints... oints....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ...... <; '.$.3 '.$.3 hase hase hanges hanges in omple@ omple@ etro etroleu leum m 2i@tures. 2i@tures... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ... ;0 -.+
3e$ated 3e$ated Termino ermino$og $ogy... y....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .... /+
SECTION 5
ORIGINS OF GAS
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
65
1
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
%O&T'&T( SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
5
SECTION 2
HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION AND CLASSIFICATION
9
2."
Petro Petro$e) $e)m m %ompos %ompositi ition on and %$assif %$assifi*at i*ation. ion..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ............. .......... ... #
2.2 (at)rated Hydro*arbons or A$!anes.................... A$!anes...... .............. .............. .............. .............. ............... ........ ...... .. "0 $.$.1 araffin............................................................................................................................. 10 $.$.$ 4aphthenes... 4aphthenes....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .......... ... 1$ 2.+
,nsat)rated Hydro*arbons or Aromati*s................... .............. .............. ............... ............. .."-
2.-
AP Gravity %$assifi*ation........ .............. ............... .............. .............. .............. .............. ........ ......."/ .
SECTION 3
SAMPLING, DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT
17
+." 3.1.1 3 .1 .$
'tra* 'tra*tin ting g Gas Gas fro from m the Dri$$ing Dri$$ing 1$)id.. 1$)id...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... .......... ..... " Agitator Agitator T!pe Gas Traps... Traps....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ... 1The Gasi5ar# T2 6 7uantit ati8e Gas in 2u# 2easurement........................ 2easurement.......................................... .................. $'
+.2 3.$.1 3.$.1 3.$.$ 3.$.3 3.$.' 3.$.< 3.$.; 3.$.;
Gas Dete*tion and 3e*ording......... .............. .............. ............... .............. .............. ................ .......... ...... 2# The atal! atal!tic tic om" om"ust ustion ion or ot ire ire Detec Detector. tor.... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... .... $9 Thermal on#ucti8 on#ucti8it! it! Detecto Detector.... r........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ... 3$ +lame :oni5ation :oni5ation Detector Detector &+:D(.... &+:D(........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ...... 3' :nfrare# :nfrare# Detector. Detector..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ........ 3; Total Gas Detector Detector Summar!.. Summar!...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ............. ......... .. 3 =n)mann =n)manne# e# Total otal Gas Gas Dete Detecti ction on S!st S!stem ems.. s..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... .... '0
+.+ 3.3.1 3.3.$ 3.3.$ 3.3.3
Gas %hromatography............ %hromatography............ ............... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ........... ..... ....... -2 . hromatographic hromatographic Operation.... Operation........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... '$ The igh igh Spee Spee# # Ther Thermal mal on#u on#ucti cti8it 8it! ! hrom hromato atogra graph... ph...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ... '3 TD >ersus +:D hromatograph?. hromatograph?..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ...... ''
+.-
,nits ,nits of 4eas)r 4eas)reme ement.. nt...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ............. ......... ... -
SECTION 4 -."
SURFACE GAS EVALUATION EVALUATION
49
(o)r* (o)r*es es of of Gas Gas at ()r ()rfa* fa*e.... e........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ........ 50 ..
-.2 %hange %hangess in Phase Phase.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ............. ........ 5+ . '.$.1 Temperature emperature onsi#erati onsi#erations.... ons........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... <3 '.$.$. ritical ritical oints... oints....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ...... <; '.$.3 '.$.3 hase hase hanges hanges in omple@ omple@ etro etroleu leum m 2i@tures. 2i@tures... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ... ;0 -.+
3e$ated 3e$ated Termino ermino$og $ogy... y....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .... /+
SECTION 5
ORIGINS OF GAS
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
65
1
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
5."
%$assi %$assifi*a fi*atio tion n of Gas Gas (o)r (o)r*es *es.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ......... ... /5
5.2
Liberated Liberated Gas................ Gas........................... ..................... .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .......................................... ................................ //
5.+ <.3.1 <.3.1 <.3.$ <.3.$ <.3.3 <.3.3 <.3.'
Prod Prod)*e )*ed d Gas........ Gas............ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ............ .............. .......... ... /# erma ermanent nentBB on#it on#ition ionss of =n#er" =n#er"ala alance. nce.... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ..... .. ;9 Tempora emporar! r! on#it on#ition ionss of =n#er" =n#er"ala alance. nce.... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ... -0 ro#uc ro#uce# e# Gas from from :mpermea :mpermea"le "le +orma +ormatio tions.. ns.... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ...... ....... .... -0 Similar Similar 2echanisms.. 2echanisms...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ........ -$
5.-
3e*y*$e 3e*y*$ed d Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ........ + ..
5.5 <.<.1 <.<.1 <.<.$
%ontam %ontamina inatio tion n Gas........ Gas............ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ........ 6 .. The A##ition A##ition of etro etroleu leum m ro#u ro#ucts cts... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ..... .. -9 Oil %ase# %ase# 2u# S!stem S!stems... s....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... 0
SECTION 6
QUANTITY AND COMPOSITION OF RECORDED GAS
5
/." ;.1.1 ;.1.$
1ormat 1ormation ion %onsid %onsidera eratio tions. ns..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... .............. ............. .......... .... 65 orosit! orosit! an# Gas Saturation... Saturation....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ........ .. < Effec Effecti8e ti8e orosit! orosit! an# ermea"il ermea"ilit!. it!..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .............. ....... ;
/.2
Ho$e Depth.. Depth...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ......... .... #0
/.+ ;.3.1 ;.3.1 ;.3.$ ;.3.$ ;.3.3 ;.3.' ;.3.<
Dri$$ing Dri$$ing %onsi %onsider deratio ations. ns..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ...... #" Cate Cate Of enetra enetration tion an# ole ole Diamet Diameter.. er.... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ...... ..... .. 91 %it T!pe T!pe an# Cesul Cesultin ting g Drille Drille# # utting uttings... s...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... 9; oring..... oring......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ........ .. 9+lorate +lorate.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .......... ... 9 Differential Differential ressure............... ressure......................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... .......................... ............... 101
/.;.'.1 ;.'.$ ;.'.3
1$)id 1$)id nvasi nvasion on and 1$)shi 1$)shing. ng..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... "0+ :n8asion :n8asion an# +iltration.. +iltration...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ............ ............ ..... 103 +lushing.... +lushing........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ........ 10; +lui# +lui# :nflu@es. :nflu@es..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ............ ......... 111 111
/.5 ;.<.1 ;.<.$ ;.<.3 ;.<.'
4)d Type and and 3heo$o 3heo$ogy. gy..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ...... ""5 . 2u# T!pe.... !pe........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ......... .11< 2u# Densit!. Densit!..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ............. ............. ...... .11; 2u# Temperature.. emperature...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ............. ............ ..... 11>iscosit iscosit! ! an# Gel Strength..... Strength......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ......... .. .11
/./ ;.;.1 ;.;.1 ;.;.$ ;.;.3
()rfa* ()r fa*ee %onsid %onsidera eratio tions.. ns...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... ""# .. Desig Design, n, Effi Effici cienc enc! ! an# Locat Location ion of the Gas Gas Trap. Trap.... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ...... .119 The Gas Sample Sample Line..... Line......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ .......... .... 1$$ Losses Losses of Gas to the Atmospher Atmosphere.... e........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .... 1$3
SECTION 7
EVALUATION EVALUATION OF LIBERATED AND PRODUCED GAS
129
."
7asi* 7asi* Definit Definition ions.. s...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. .......... ... "2#
.2 -.$.1 -.$.1
7a*!gro 7a*!gro)nd )nd Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ........ "2# .. Statio Stationar nar! ! an# ircul irculatin ating g %acg %acgrou roun#s. n#s.... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... 130
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
-.$.$
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
+ormation +ormation %acgroun %acgroun#..... #......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ...... 13<
.+
nterp nterpre retat tation ion of of 7a*!gr 7a*!gro)n o)nd d Gas... Gas....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ....... ... "+
.-
(ho (ho 'va$)a 'va$)atio tion.. n...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... "-0 ..
.5
Gas &orm &orma$i8 a$i8ati ation. on..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ...... "-
./ -.;.1 -.;.1 -.;.$ -.;.$
'va$)a 'va$)atio tion n of of Pro Prod)* d)*ed ed Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... "5/ Seale Seale#B, #B, O8erpre O8erpressu ssure# re#,, erme ermea"l a"lee +orma +ormatio tions.. ns..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... 1<=n#erc =n#ercomp ompact acte# e# shales shales ith ith a trans transiti itional onal pressu pressure re increa increase.. se..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ..... 1<9
. -.-.1 -.-.$ -.-.$ -.-.3 -.-.3 -.-.' -.-.' -.-.<
%onne* %onne*tio tion n Gas...... Gas.......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ......... "/" .. auses auses of onnection onnection Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ......... ... 1;1 one one of increa increasing sing format formation ion pressu pressure re #ue to un#erco un#ercompa mpacti ction... on...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ..... .. 1;; =n#er" =n#er"alan alance# ce# permea permea"le "le 5ones. 5ones.... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ....... ...... ...... ... 1;Shape, Shape, #ura #uration tion an# an# timing timing of of conne connecti ction on gas gas pea.. pea..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... .. 1; Ceporting Ceporting of onnection onnection Gases... Gases....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ........ 1-1
.6 -..1 -..$
Trip Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .......... ... "5 The occurrence occurrence of Trip Trip Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... .......... .... 1-< :nterpretation :nterpretation of Trip Trip Gas...... Gas.......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ..... 10
.#
9e$$y 9e$$y Gas..... Gas......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ........... .... "6/
SECTION
CHROMATOGRAPHIC CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
193
6."
Gas 3atio 3atio Ana$ysi Ana$ysis... s....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ....... "#+
6.2 .$.1 .$.$ .$.3 .$.' .$.' .$.< .$.<
Gas 3atio 3atio P$ot P$ot )sing )sing *hr *hroma omato togra graphi* phi* va$)e va$)ess of methan methanee thr thro)g o)gh h pen pentan tane... e....... ........ ........... ......."#"#=se of the Catio Catio lot... lot....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ........ .. 19< E8aluation E8aluation of Oil %earing %earing ones... ones....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ..... 199 E8aluation E8aluation of Gas %earing %earing ones... ones....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .... $00 re#ic re#ictio tion n of on#ens on#ensate ate %earing %earing ones ones... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... $01 ompar ompariso ison n ith ith Drille Drille# # utting uttings... s...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... ...... $03
6.+ .3.1 .3.$ .3.3 .3.'
Wetn etness ess:: 7a$an* 7a$an*ee and and %har %hara*t a*ter er 3atio 3atio Ana$ys Ana$ysis... is....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ....205 etness etness Catio Catio &h(...... &h(.......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... .......... .... $0< %alance %alance Catio... Catio....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... .. $0=sing =sing %h ith ith h....... h........... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ...... $0 haracter haracter Catio... Catio....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ...... .$11
6.-
Oi$ ndi*at ndi*ator. or..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ......... .... 2"-
6.5
Limitat Limitation ionss to to Gas Gas 3ati 3atio o 'ffe* 'ffe*tive tivenes ness... s....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ... 2"/
SECTION 9 #." 9.1.1 9.1.$ 9.1.$ 9.1.3 9.1.'
FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
225
%onve %onventi ntiona ona$$ f$)or f$)ores* es*en* en*ee as as a e$$site e$$site eva$) eva$)ati ation on pro*e pro*ess.. ss...... ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. .............. ......... ..22/ 22/ Sample Sample reparation.. reparation...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ............. ......... .. $$; +luore +luoresce scence nce olou olourr an# %right %rightnes ness.. s..... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ..... $$ +luoresce +luorescence nce Distri"uti Distri"ution.... on........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... .. $$9 Sol8ent Sol8ent ut...... ut.......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........... ............. ............ ...... $30
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
9.1.< 9.1.;
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation Interpretation
Cesi#ue Cesi#ue.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .... $31 Sampling Sampling the mu#...... mu#.......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ............ ............. ............ ...... $31 ;)antit ntitat ativ ivee 1$) 1$)ores*en*e Te Te*hni hni<)eT4..................... ............................... ..................... ..................... ................................... ......................... 2+2
#.2 #.2
SECTION 1!
CASE STUDIES AND APPLICATIONS APPLICATIONS
239
"0." Geoste Geosteerin ering g Hori8ont Hori8onta$ a$ We$$s We$$s ,sin ,sing g Gas 3atio 3atio (ign (ignat) at)re res.... s........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... ..2-" 2-" ase 1 Geostee Geosteering ring using gas ratios..... ratios......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... $'3 ase $ Geostee Geosteering ring using gas ratios..... ratios......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... $'' ase 3 Geostee Geosteering ring using gas ratios..... ratios......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... $'< ase ' Geostee Geosteering ring using gas ratios..... ratios......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........... ............. ............. ......... ... $'; "0.2
%ase %ase 5 'stab$i 'stab$ishin shing g Prod) Prod)*ti *tion on Potent Potentia$ ia$ from from 4)d 4)d Logging Logging Data.... Data......... ............ ............. ............. .......2-6 2-6
"0.+
%ase %ase /
Determ Determinat ination ion of Gas=Oi$=W Gas=Oi$=Wate aterr %onta %onta*ts. *ts..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .......... ...2525-
"0.-
%ase %ase
3eserv 3eservoir oir and 1$)id 1$)id dentif dentifi*at i*ation ion from from Gas 3atio 3atio Ana$ysi Ana$ysis.... s........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ....25 25
"0.5 ,sing ,sing Gas 3atio 3atioss to dent dentify ify 4is*ib 4is*ib$e $e 1$oods. 1$oods..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ........... ..... 2/0 ase :#entificat :#entification ion of a misci misci"le "le floo#.. floo#...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .............. .......... ... $;1 ase 9 :#entificat :#entification ion of a misci misci"le "le floo#.. floo#...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. .............. .......... ... $;$ "0./ Predi*t Predi*tion ion of Gas >one >one Prod Prod)*t )*tivi ivity ty ith ith s)bse s)bse<)e <)ent nt D(T D(T res)$ res)$ts. ts..... ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............ ......2/2/ase 10 ro#ucti8e Gas one................ one........................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ............................... ..................... $;' ase 11 4on)pro#ucti8e gas 5one..................... 5one............................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... ........... $;"0.
1ra*t)re dentifi*ation........... .............. .............. .............. .............. ............... ........... ...... ........... ........... ...... 2/# .
"0.6
%ase %ase "2 Predi* Predi*tio tion n of a Tight: Tight: ,npro ,nprod)* d)*tiv tivee Gas >one... >one....... ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... ............. ............. ............. .......2+ 2+
"0.#
%ase %ase "+ 'viden* 'viden*ee and and 'ffe* 'ffe*tt of 1$)sh 1$)shing ing on gas respo response nsess and and ratio ratios.... s........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... ..25 25
"0."0
%ase "- The 'ffe*t of Heavier Oi$s on Gas 3atio Ana$ysis..... ............... .............. ............ ......... ...26 26
"0.""
%ase "5 The 'ffe*t of 4)d Vis*osity on Gas 4eas)rements.................. .............. ........... ...... .....26" 26"
"0."2
%ase "/ Determination of %hanging Oi$ Gravity thro)gh a 3eservoir........ ................ .......... ........2626-
"0."+
%ase " Predi*tion of the Approa*h to Dep$eted 3eservoir........... .............. .............. .....26/ 26/
APPENDI" REFERENCES
DATALOG DATALOG 1999 199 9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
27
'
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
H?D3O%A37O& 'VAL,ATO& A&D &T'3P3'TATO&
(e*tion "
&T3OD,%TO&
The "asis of mu# logging is the #etection, measurement an# e8aluation of h!#rocar"on flui#s an# other gases, that are containe# ithin the #rilling flui# & mud ( an# #rille# cuttings returning from the ell"ore an# relating this to a specific #epth an# litholog! that has "een penetrate# through #rilling.
This "asic principle ena"les an e@perience# mu# logger to rapi#l! #etermine a range of in8alua"le information as the ell is "eing #rille#/ )
Cecognition of h!#rocar"on "earing 5ones. Determination of reser8oir flui# t!pe, gra8it! an# contacts. E8aluation of reser8oir pro#uction potential. re#iction an# e8aluation of formation pressure. An essential component to ell safet! in the #etection of ics an# the a8oi#ance of "loouts.
The anal!sis of h!#rocar"on flui#s an# resulting #ata, together ith other mu# logging techniFues such as #rilling #ata e8aluation an# cuttings anal!sis, greatl! assists ell e8aluation in man! #ifferent applications/ )
:#entification of h!#rocar"on "earing 5ones that shoul# "e further teste#. :#entification of 5ones that ma! otherise go un#etecte# "! ireline or other measurements. ell planning in terms of mu# eight, ic tolerance an# casing points. Alternati8e to LD in the geosteering of ells. :#entification of misci"le floo#s. :#entification of thin "e#s an# fracture porosit!.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
<
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
oe8er, in or#er for formation an# h!#rocar"on "earing 5one e8aluation to "e of an! "enefit, se8eral consi#erations ha8e to "e ma#e/ )
%! hat mechanisms can gas enter the #rilling flui#?
o much of the in situB h!#rocar"on flui#, release# from the formation, is #etecta"le at surface?
o representati8e is the h!#rocar"on composition at surface to the composition, at #epth, in the potential reser8oir?
o #o #ifferent con#itions an# factors influence the amount of gas #etecte# an# the resulting measurement?
Does the gas interpretation correlate ith other in#icators?
ith all these possi"le factors an# 8ariations taen into consi#eration, the anal!sis of h!#rocar"ons #etecte# at surface is recogni5e# as "eing an important metho# in pro8i#ing rapi# an# in8alua"le information in terms of real)time ell e8aluation.
+or meaningful interpretations of gas #etecte# at surface to "e ma#e, the mu# logger or ellsite geologist must first "e a"le to #etermine the source of the gas an#, secon#l!, assess the influences that coul# affect the magnitu#e or composition of gas seen.
This information must "e presente# in such a a! that it can "e rea#il! un#erstoo# an# e8aluate#, not onl! hile the ell is "eing #rille# "ut also at an! time in the future hen ells are "eing re)e8aluate# or correlate#.
:n the preparation of a h!#rocar"on log, or mu# log, the mu# logger must first "e aare of the #ifferent mechanisms "! hich gas can originate from the formation an# enter the #rilling flui#. These #ifferent origins shoul# "e clearl! i#entifia"le from the log, thus pro8i#ing concise information as to formation porosit!, permea"ilit! an# pressure. Gas originating from the formation must also "e separate# from gas that originates from other sources.
Data, or information, shoul# "e pro8i#e# that clearl! informs the user a"out con#itions, or changes in con#itions, that influence the amount of gas #etecte# in or#er for consi#ere# e8aluations to "e #ran from the log.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
;
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
The aim of this course an# manual is to/ )
:#entif! the 8arious mechanisms an# h!#rocar"ons can enter the #rilling flui#.
:#entif! an# #iscuss all of the 8arious con#itions that pla! a part in #etermining the final gas recor#ing in the logging unit.
:llustrate the operation an# measurement of total gas #etector t!pes an# the comparison to chromatographic measurement.
:n8estigate recent a#8ances in technolog! an# e8aluation techniFues.
:llustrate ho real)time an# #epth)"ase# gas tren#s an# information can "e interprete# an# e8aluate#.
Sho ho gas ratio #ata is calculate# an# illustrate ho this #ata can, hen use# correctl!, gain an accurate profile of potential reser8oirs.
:llustrate, ith the help of case stu#ies an# e@amples, ho h!#rocar"on interpretation an# e8aluation can "e use# in man! #ifferent applications.
DATALOG 1999
influences
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
"!
hich
-
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
H?D3O%A37O& 'VAL,ATO& A&D &T'3P3'TATO&
(e*tion 2
2."
H?D3O%A37O& %O4PO(TO& A&D %LA((1%ATO&
Petro$e)m %omposition and %$assifi*ation
Petroleum is the term that is applie# to an! h!#rocar"on, hether gas, liFui#, or soli#, that occurs naturall! in the earthBs crust. As ell as h!#rocar"ons, petroleum ma! also contain 8aria"le "ut minor amounts of impurities, such as car"on #io@i#e, sulphur an# nitrogen.
:n liFui# form, petroleum is t!picall! referre# to as crude oil , hich ma! "e compose# of a comple@ mi@ture of h!#rocar"ons 8ar!ing in molecular si5e an# eight. hen reco8ere# to surface, the h!#rocar"on compoun#s can "e separate# through refining an# #istillation to !iel# a 8ariet! of petroleum pro#ucts.
%! #efinition, h!#rocar"on compoun#s are those that consist of h!#rogen an# car"on atoms. These compoun#s, the simplest of hich are the h!#rocar"on gases, can "e classifie# into $ t!pes, #epen#ing on the molecular "on#ing of the car"on atoms.
4%
1. Saturate# !#rocar"ons
compoun#s that possess one single co8alent "on# "eteen the car"on atoms
$. =nsaturate# !#rocar"ons
compoun#s possessing #ou"le "on#s "eteen the car"on atoms
A co8alent "on# results from the simultaneous attraction of to nuclei for a share# pair of "on#ing electrons. A #ou"le co8alent "on# occurs hen to pairs of electrons are share# "! to atoms.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
9
DATALOG 1999
2.2
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
(at)rated Hydro*arbons or A$!anes
These compoun#s consist of short chains of car"on atoms saturate# ith h!#rocar"on atoms that occup! all a8aila"le car"on "on# positions.
The car"on atom chains ma! "e straight, "ranche# or c!clic, gi8ing rise to 3 series of alanes. The straight an# "ranche# series are non as Paraffins an# the c!clic series as Naphthenes.
2.2.1
Paraffin
araffin is the most common form of h!#rocar"on, hether foun# in liFui# cru#e oil or in a gaseous state. The group inclu#es to of the alane series, the straight an# "ranche#)chaine# car"on atoms.
The straight chaine#, or normal , alanes are gi8en "! the folloing general formula an# are illustrate# in +igure $.1
n $n $ here n ranges from 1 to 10, the paraffin mem"ers are methane &1(, ethane &$(, propane &3(, "utane &'(, pentane &<(, he@ane &;(, heptane &-(, octane &(, nonane &9( an# #ecane &10(.
hromatographic gas anal!sis at ellsite usuall! e@ten#s from methane through pentane, since hea8ier mem"ers of the series ill, t!picall!, remain in a liFui# state at surface pressure an# therefore "e un#etecta"le as a gas. 2inor amounts of he@ane can sometimes "e #etecte# "ut reFuires a longer anal!sis time. This o"8iousl! restricts the #epth resolution of acFuire# #ata hich is necessaril! reFuire# for effecti8e reser8oir e8aluation.
ertainl!, at normal surface temperature an# pressure, methane through "utane ill e@ist as gases an# are easil! #etecte#. At am"ient pressure, pentane con#enses into a liFui# state at a "oiling point of 3; &Ta"le '.$(, so #epen#ing on the temperature of the circulating mu#, is normall! e@tracte# as a gas. Am"ient temperature ill control hether part, or all of the pentane re)con#enses "ac to liFui# form an# goes un#etecte#. (tr)*t)re
DATALOG 1999
&ame
Abbreviation
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1orm)$a
10
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
2ethane
1
'
Ethane
$
$;
ropane
+igure $.1
3
3
4ormal %utane
n'
'10
4ormal entane
n<
<1$
The normal alanes of the paraffin group
The "ranche#, or iso, chain series of alanes ithin the paraffin group are gi8en "! the same general formula as the straight chaine# series an# are illustrate# in +igure $.$
n $n $
The "ranche# alanes contain four or more car"on atoms, therefore commenceB from iso) "utane through to the hea8ier h!#rocar"ons. hromatographic #etection at ellsite is t!picall! restricte# to the iso)"utane an# iso)pentane mem"ers.
(tr)*t)re
&ame
:so %utane
DATALOG 1999
Abbreviation
i'
1orm)$a
'10
11
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
:so entane
i<
<1$
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+igure $.$
The "ranche# or iso) alanes of the paraffin group
A further isomer of entane is calle# 4eo entane. 2olecularl!, ' car"on atoms each occup! one of the a8aila"le "on#s on the < th car"on atom in the group. As ith the other alanes, each a8aila"le "on# on the outer ' car"on atoms is occupie# "! h!#rogen. This isomer is illustrate# "elo in +igure $.3
4eo entane
+igure $.3
2.2.2
4<
<1$
4eo entane isomer
Naphthenes
4aphthene is the name gi8en to the thir# group of the alane series &+igure $.'(. ar"on atoms in this group are close# chaine# an# again saturate# ith h!#rogen atoms occup!ing e8er! a8aila"le "on# position. The names alrea#! gi8en to the paraffin series are prefi@e# ith c!cloB to #istinguish the naphthene series i.e. c!clopropane, c!clo"utane, an# ha8e the general formula/ )
n $n
(tr)*t)re
DATALOG 1999
&ame
1orm)$a
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1$
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+igure $.'
!clopropane
3;
!clo"utane
'
!clopentane
<10
The naphthene group of alanes
Since there are $ less h!#rogen atoms than ith the normal or "ranche# alanes, molecularl!, the naphthenes are slightl! lighter than the paraffins.
T!picall! associate# ith higher #ensit! cru#e oils, onl! c!clopropane an# c!clo"utane normall! remain in the gaseous state at surface pressure an# temperature. =nfortunatel!, since the molecular eight is so similar, the! are anal!5e# "! chromatographs as if the! ere propane or "utane from the paraffin series. Slo separation at lo pressures is reFuire# to #istinguish "eteen naphthene an# paraffin. This time constraint is o"8iousl! impractical at ellsite.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
13
2.+
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
,nsat)rated Hydro*arbons or Aromati*s
Similar to c!clo)alanes or naphthenes, the aromatic series comprises close# chaine# car"on atoms. =nlie the alanes hoe8er, the aromatics are not h!#rogen saturate#, i.e. h!#rogen atoms #o not occup! e8er! a8aila"le "on#. The series is usuall! onl! a minor component to cru#e oils, "ut the most common aromatic, "en5ene &+igure $.<(, is ne8ertheless present in most petroleum compoun#s.
The series has the general formula
(tr)*t)re
+igure $.<
n $n ) ;, ith %en5ene "eing ;;
&ame
1orm)$a
%en5ene
;;
Toluene
;<3
The aromatic group
%en5ene is the simplest aromatic compoun#, a close# chain, or ring, of si@ car"on atoms. Alternating single an# #ou"le co8alent "on#s lins the car"on atoms. This "en5ene ringB forms the "asis of further compoun#s in the aromatic series. Since the car"on atoms are unsaturate#, "on#s unoccupie# "! h!#rogen atoms are free to "e taen up "! further car"on atoms. Thus, outsi#e of the close# ring, as shon in +igure $.<, further aromatics such as toluene &one "en5ene ring one 3( comprise one or more "en5ene ring together ith one or more 3 elementsB occup!ing the free "on#s. 4ote that 3 also forms the final lin in the straight)chaine# alanes. %en5ene is e@tremel! solu"le, in fact this group is often referre# to as the solu"le h!#rocar"on group. :t has "een i#entifie# that this can pro8i#e a 8er! useful e8aluation parameter, in that it
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1'
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
is more su"Hect to flui# mo8ements an# can therefore "e an in#ication as to the pro@imit! to a h!#rocar"on source. =nfortunatel!, the same characteristic, "en5eneBs high solu"ilit!, also maes it e@tremel! #ifficult to e@tract from the #rilling flui#, so that it has ne8er "ecome a component to normal ellsite anal!sis.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1<
2.-
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
AP Gravity %$assifi*ation
A classification of cru#e oil, "ase# on the #ensit! or specific gra8it! &gmcc( of the oil, is #efine# "! the American etroleum :nstitute &A:( an# i#el! use#.
igh A: gra8it! oils ha8e a high content of the gasoline h!#rocar"ons & ' to 10(.
The A: gra8it! is #efine#, at 1; an# atmospheric pressure, "! the folloing formula/ )
A: I
1'1.< ) 131.< SG
The larger the A: rating then the lighter the oil. The A: rating can "e 8isuall! appro@imate# "! the colour of the oil or "! the colour of the fluorescence un#er ultra)8iolet light/ )
Gravity
Type
%o$o)r
1$)ores*en*e
Lo A:
hea8! oil
#ar "ron to "lac
re# "ron to orange
2e#ium A:
me#ium oil
me#ium to green "ron
!ello, gol#, green
igh A:
light oil
colourless, light
"lue &pale "lue is often interprete# as hite un#er => light.
on#ensate
8iolet or ultra)8iolet &non)8isi"le(
4ote, that at that the lo A: en#, the intensit! of the fluorescence ma! "e so lo that it ma! not "e 8isi"le. At the high A: en#, particularl! hen #ealing ith con#ensate flui#s, the fluorescence ma! "e in the ultra)8iolet range of the spectrum, again not 8isi"le ith the nae# e!e. These limitations ill "e #iscusse# in more #etail in Section 9.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1;
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
H?D3O%A37O& 'VAL,ATO& A&D &T'3P3'TATO&
(e*tion +
+."
(A4PL&G: D'T'%TO& A&D 4'A(,3'4'&T
'tra*ting Gas from the Dri$$ing 1$)id
The main reFuirement in pro8i#ing effecti8e ellsite gas anal!sis is that of a continuous, uninterrupte# e@traction an# measurement of the gas entraine# ithin the #rilling flui#. +rom the point of 8ie of ell safet!, this ena"les changes to "e rapi#l! i#entifie# an# the appropriate action taen. +rom an e8aluation point of 8ie, it again ena"les changes in formation or gas 8olume an#or composition to "e accuratel! i#entifie# an# relate# to the e@act #epth of its li"eration. This is important in applications such as the i#entification of reser8oir gasoilater contacts, the #etermination of specific 5ones to "e teste# or fracture#, an# the geosteering of hori5ontal ells on the "asis of gas ratio anal!sis pro8i#ing a cheaper option to #onhole LD tools. hate8er form of gas e@traction is use#, the important consi#erations are/ )
o efficient is the gas e@traction?
o Fuantitati8e is the gas measurement?
:f the sample is #ilute# in air, ho #oes the gas)in)airB measurement relate to the total 8olume of gas hel# in the mu#?
Does a surface gas measurement "ear an! relation to the 8olume of gas in the formation?
3.1.1
Agitator Type as Traps
The trap, or #egasser, is positione# in the returning mu# stream, t!picall! in the shaer "o@ &hea#er "o@ or possum "ell!(, in or#er to ha8e a continual flo of nel!B returning mu# from hich to e@tract a consistent as possi"le gas sample.
Agitator t!pe traps ha8e "een historicall!, an# are still, use# i#el! in the in#ustr!, principall! "ecause the! are relati8el! cheap, mechanicall! an# operationall! simple, although reFuiring a certain amount of maintenance.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1-
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
The trap operates "! #raing in mu#, t!picall! from an orifice at the "ase of the trap c!lin#er. The mu# is then su"Hecte# to e@treme agitation from a rotating "la#e, or agitator, to "rea out an# e@tract the #issol8e# gas together ith the free gas "u""les entraine# in the mu#. Once free from the mu#, the gas is lifte# to the top of the trap "! a constant flo of air circulate# through the trap from the logging unit. The gasair mi@ture is then carrie# on to the #etectors in the mu# logging unit. This t!pe of suction is necessar! since methane is the onl! h!#rocar"on gas that is lighter than air. ea8ier h!#rocar"ons ill not rise on their on accor#, so reFuire lifting "! the air floing up through the trap. >ariations ha8e "een use#, here"! the mu# is first #ran off from the shaer "o@, then passe# to a 8essel here agitation is applie# to "rea gas out of solution. Although i#el! use#, this con8entional trap #oes ha8e certain limitations that lea#s to concern o8er the accurac! an# relia"ilit! of su"seFuent gas measurements an#, ultimatel!, that potential pro#ucti8e 5ones ma! "e "!passe#/ )
>aria"ilit! in gas measurement ith operating con#itions such as mu# flo rate, in# spee# an# #irection. hanges in florate lea# to a change in mu# le8el &in the shaer "o@( an# therefore the 8olume of mu# "eing sample#. hile this lea#s to the possi"ilit! of more gas "eing e@tracte# from a larger 8olume of mu#, the increase in mu# 8olume also e@erts more loa# against the agitator, #ecreasing its efficienc!. Although a significant factor, immediate or significant changes in mud level should never present an operational problem, since, whenever a change in flowrate occurs, the first priority of the mudlogger should be to reset the height of the gas trap. oe8er, the shaer "o@ is Fuite a tur"ulent en8ironment so that there are continual minor fluctuations in the mu# le8el, lea#ing to inconsistent operation of the trap an# therefore of the amount of gas e@tracte#. A##itional effects, as a result of florate changes, ill "e #iscusse# in section ;.3.' in#, on entering the air intae, ill increase the #ilution of the gasair sample lea#ing to a re#uction in the gas measurement. :n fact, research "! Te@aco an# the Gas Cesearch :nstitute &SLA, June 1993( has shon that a in# spee# as lo as mph, #irectl! into the port, can lea# to a <0K #rop in the gas 8alue. Again, while this is quite an alarming statement, wind is not such an operational hazard !n most modern day rigs, certainly offshore vessels, the flowline and sha"ers are enclosed or protected Even where open, the mud level is usually sufficiently below the top of the sha"er bo# to provide protection to the air inta"e. oe8er, shoul# the trap "e e@pose# to in#, then 8ariations in spee# an# #irection can "e a maHor effect on gas #ilution that cannot "e o8erlooe# so that e8er! effort shoul# "e ma#e to pro8i#e some protection.
The effect of trap loa#ing, here gas is actuall! e@tracte# from the mu# at a greater rate than it is "eing e8acuate# from the trap. This lea#s to a "uil# up, or concentration, of gas ithin the trap that ill tae a longer time to "e completel! e8acuate#. This can result in erroneousl! high gas measurements e@ten#e# o8er a longer perio# of time, possi"l! masing
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
1
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
changes in gas 8olume o8er the same perio#. This pro"lem has "ecome more pronounce# o8er recent !ears ith the impro8e# efficienc! of gas traps. Although e@traction of lo 8olumes of gas has impro8e#, the higher 8olumes lea#ing to trap loa#ing #oes create a pro"lem, especiall! for engineers ho are concerne# a"out mu# con#ition an# ell control.
The potential of losing gas as a result of the agitation process. As the gas is "roen out of solution, a proportion of the free gas "u""les ma! "e carrie# straight out of the trap "! the e@pelle# mu#. The significance of this ill 8ar! ith the rotational spee# of the agitator, trap immersion #epth an# mu# properties, all of hich #etermine the pattern of the mu# flo through the trap.
The efficienc! of gas e@traction is #etermine#, to a large #egree, "! the rotational spee# of the agitator. This, naturall!, lea#s to concern from operators hen #ifferent spee#s ¬ to mention o8erall trap #esign an# t!pes of #etectors "eing use#( lea# to 8aria"le gas measurements from #ifferent ser8ice companies, maing ell correlation #ifficult.
The other pro"lem ith rotational spee# is that, e8en for a gi8en rpm, the e@traction efficienc! is relati8e to in#i8i#ual h!#rocar"on components. ea8ier h!#rocar"ons are more solu"le an# therefore more #ifficult to "rea out of solution. ith lighter h!#rocar"ons, not onl! is a significantl! smaller 8olume hel# in solution, "ut the! are also easier to "rea out. Therefore, for an! gi8en composition, the e@traction of light h!#rocar"ons is liel! to "e more complete than that of the hea8ier components.
2u# t!pe an# rheolog! also pla!s an important role in the efficienc! of the trap. The hea8ier or more 8iscous the mu#, the sloer the rotation of the agitator an# the less efficient the gas e@traction. This, again, amplifies the effects #ue to the relati8e solu"ilit! of #ifferent gas components. Oil "ase# s!stems ill hol# a much greater Fuantit! of gas, especiall! the hea8ier components, in solution.
Se8eral of these limitations are eliminate# or re#uce# "! the gas trap use# in the Te@acoGas Cesearch :nstitute patente# 7G2 T2 &7uantitati8e Gas 2easurement( s!stem. The sensiti8it! to changes in florate an# mu# le8el are minimi5e# "! the interior #esign of the trap an# rotational spee#. The trap e@haust "eing "eneath the mu# surface eliminates 8ariations in air #ilution an# gas loss.
electric motor airgas sample to anal!sis agitator e@tracting entraine# gas
am"ient air Direction of mu# flo, entering mu# e@it port shaer "o@ from the floline Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation DATALOG 1999
19
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+igure 3.1 T!pical gas trap assem"l!
DatalogBs agitator trap &+igures 3.1 an# 3.$( comprises a c!lin#rical trap ith mu# intae from the "ottom an# a com"ine# port for mu# e@haust an# air intae, hal8e a! up. The gas sample is #ran to the mu# logging unit, from the top of the trap, "! air "eing pumpe# at a constant rate of ' scfh &stan#ar# cu"ic feet per hour(. The agitator has a tripo#B configuration, hich, in comparison to a single or crosse# "la#e, is more efficient at lo immersion le8els an# less suscepti"le to fluctuations in the mu# le8el. :t is poere# "! an electric or air motor that, #eli8ering 1-$< rpm, pro8i#es 8er! efficient agitation an# gas e@traction.
The location an# positioning of the trap is o"8iousl! 8er! important an# the folloing points shoul# ala!s "e o"ser8e# &+igure 3.$(/ )
The trap shoul# "e site# #irectl! here the mu# enters the shaer "o@, not off to the si#e here the mu# ma! ha8e "een stan#ingB for a perio#, all the time losing gas to the atmosphere, an# not representati8e of the lagged depth.
There must "e a sufficient #epth of mu# in or#er that the trap can "e set at the correct #epth for ma@imum efficienc!. The trap shoul# not "e o"structe# "! cuttings "uil# up in the shaer "o@.
The e@it port shoul# "e positione# #onstream so that mu# &agitate# an# li"erate# of an! gas( is not rec!cle# "ac into the trap.
:f the shaers are not enclose#, e8er! effort shoul# "e ma#e to ensure that the air intae is not e@pose# to changes in am"ient in#.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$0
DATALOG 1999
+igure 3.$
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
T!pical trap assem"l!
Gi8en that a resulting gas measurement represents the gas)in)air 8olume, the Fuestion remains as to ho this compares to the gas)in)mu# 8olume. Depen#ing on the efficiencies an# limitations #iscusse# a"o8e, it is clear that a proportion of the entraine# gas ill remain in the mu# an# "e rec!cle#. Of the gas that is e@tracte# from the mu#, su"seFuent processes can, also, occasionall! lea# to erroneous &a"solute( measurements.
The length of the gas sample line, "eteen trap an# #etector, lea#s to a #ela! in gas responses, sometimes as long as se8eral minutes.
T!pical pol!flo tu"ing is no non to a"sor" the hea8ier h!#rocar"ons until a saturation point is reache#. hen gas le8els in the sample re#uce, the a"sor"e# h!#rocar"ons can then "e #esor"e# an# release# "ac into the sample line.
!#rocar"ons ma! arri8e at surface, in the hot mu#, as a gas. Once e@tracte# an# su"Hecte# to the col#er am"ient temperature in the gas sample line, the hea8ier components ma! con#ense into liFui# form an# therefore not "e #etecte#.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$1
DATALOG 1999
The 8olume of air in the trap, sample line an# #r!ing 8essels lea#s to a large #ilution of the e@tracte# gas. Such #ilution can cause e@ten#e# an# #ampene# gas responses ith poorer sho #efinition. Accurac! can therefore "e lost in the i#entification of thin "e#s an# fractures for e@ample.
>ariations in gas response #ue to fluctuations in sample pump rate can "e cause# "! flui#s con#ensing in the gas line, free5ing of the gas line etc, so that the s!stem reFuires a high #egree of maintenance in or#er for consistent operation.
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
As a result of all the pro"lems associate# ith agitator t!pe traps, as #escri"e# a"o8e, it is clearl! recogni5e# "! mu# loggers an# ellsite geologists that the resulting gas measurement is e@tremel! Fualitati8e, so that e8aluation has to "e "ase# on relati8e changes in gas response. >arious metho#s ha8e "een use# to attempt to Fuantif! the gas)in)air measurement, to impro8e the Fualit! of gas #ata. ro"a"l! the most accepta"le is "! cali"rating, or appl!ing a correction factor, to the gas)in)air 8alue from an actual gas)in)mu# 8olume. This can "e o"taine# "! taing a mu# sample from the floline, then remo8ing all h!#rocar"ons ith a steam still, or as ith the Te@acoGC: 7G2 s!stem, a microa8e still, an# measuring the gas 8olume. The theor! is that ha8ing o"taine# a Fuantitati8e measurement of the gas 8olume in the mu#, it can "e #irectl! eFuate# to the 8olume of gas in place in the reser8oir, there"! o"taining a measurement of apparent gas porosity. This can "e achie8e# "! #etermining the ratio of cuttings to the mu# 8olume &the rate of penetration an# hole #iameter #etermines the 8olume of roc that gas is li"erate# from, an# the florate #etermines the 8olume of mu# that the gas is li"erate# into(, together ith e@pansioncompressi"ilit! factors of the #ifferent gas components.
hilst this is goo# theor! an# the #esire# en# goalB, there are pro"lems associate# ith the process of o"taining an accurate Fuantitati8e con8ersion/ ) :f the mu# sample is taen from an!here other than the "ell nipple hen the mu# first returns to surface, the gas)in)mu# measurement ill not "e accurate since losses to atmosphere ill ha8e occurre# &especiall! the light en# components(.
A goo# Fualit! sample is #ifficult to o"tain, ith a true gas)mu# ratio, if the mu# is gas cut an# "u""ling.
o often shoul# the mu# sample "e taen? A ne con8ersion factor ill "e reFuire#, as minimum, hene8er there is change in gas 8olume, gas composition, mu# rheolog! an#or temperature, florate etc. :n other or#s, hene8er there is a change in actual gas measurement or in an! parameters that affect the gas measurement, a ne correction factor shoul# "e applie#. :n realit! this means, for effecti8e Fuantification of gas measurements, corrections ha8e to "e applie# on a real)time "asis. This is o"8iousl! impractical at ellsite.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$$
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
E8en gi8en i#eal circumstances, ith the mu# sample taen from "ell an# a freFuent cali"ration factor #etermine#, the measurement ill still not account for changes in gas saturation of the mu# &i.e. not #irectl! eFuating to the gas li"erate# from a gi8en 8olume of roc( #ue to/ )
+lushing of formations that lea#s to the #isplacement of formation flui#s aa! from the formation su"seFuentl! to "e #rille#. The li"erate# gas 8olume recor#e# at surface ill therefore "e less than the true gas 8olume of the formation.
The influence of "orehole influ@es, so that pro#uce# flui# floing from the formation a##s to the li"erate# gas 8olume for a unit 8olume of roc.
ole ashouts in the "orehole can lea# to a #ecrease in the gas saturation of the mu#, since, as mu# circulation is #istur"e# through the ashe# out area, the gas is #isperse# in a larger 8olume of mu#.
Although these situations can "e rea#il! i#entifie# at ellsite, hen the! occur the! cannot "e accounte# for Fuantitati8el!. :n such situations, it remains 8er! #ifficult, in practice, to relate surface measurements to the gas 8olume in place in the formation, so that, relati8e changes in 8olume an# flui# t!pe is still a 8er! important component of ellsite e8aluation.
3.1.2
The as!i"ard T# $ %uantitative as in #ud #easure&ent
Cather than tr!ing to appl! corrections to the inconsistent an# Fualitati8e gas measurement pro8i#e# "! the agitator trap an# sample line s!stems, Datalog ha8e intro#uce# an e@traction s!stem that eliminates "oth of these maHor sources of error. The sensor ors on the principle of gas &hether free or in solution( passing through a gas permea"le mem"rane positione# in the returning mu# stream. noing the e@change capacit! of the mem"rane, an# "! measuring the 8olume of gas that has passe# through the mem"rane, the 8olume of gas in the mu# can "e mathematicall! #etermine#. The Gasi5ar# T2 &+igure 3.3( pro8i#es continual, quantitative gas measurement #irect from the returning mu# stream for the first time in the histor! of mu# logging an# ellsite gas anal!sis. The s!stem pro8i#es actual gas percentage "! 8olume so that the specific 8alues of recor#e# gas are no 8er! significant an# meaningful.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$3
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
signal
e@plosion proof unit housing #etector, pump an# anal!sis eFuipment
ca"le
Sensor ith gas permea"le mem"rane
+igure 3.3
fle@i"le hose carr!ing gas sample to #etector
The Gasi5ar# T2
The sensor is insensiti8e to changes in the mu# le8el, pro8i#ing continuall! accurate gas measurements, regar#less of florate 8ariations, an# alloing more effecti8e ell correlation.
The Gasi5ar# s!stem pro8i#es a Fuantitati8e measurement of the gas entraine# in the #rilling flui#. Accuratel! noing the gas percentage, "! 8olume, in the mu# lea#s to further applications in Fuantitati8e gas e8aluation such as the #etermination of apparent gas porosit! an# the #etermination of the #egree of gas cut mu#.
Since the #etector is locate# at the point of installation, there are minimal transit #ela!s "eteen gas e@traction an# gas measurement. This rapi# response time lea#s to much "etter #epth resolution an# more accurate #etermination of formation tops an# contact points for e@ample.
Greater sensiti8it! results from the sampling mechanism. Onl! 8er! small Fuantities of gas an# air are reFuire# "! the s!stem, so that there is no o8er)#ilution of the gas sample in large air 8olumes resulting in #ampene#B, poorl! #efine# responses. This #egree of sensiti8it! pro8i#es more effecti8e formation e8aluation in situations such as the i#entification of thin "e#s or fractures an# in the #etermination of minor changes in porosit! or permea"ilit!.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$'
DATALOG 1999
%ecause there is no gas trap, there are no erroneousl! high gas measurements associate# ith trap loa#ing. Although geologists are 8er! aare of the Fualitati8e aspects of gas measurements, engineers are 8er! frustrate# ith gas reports of 0 or 90 percent, for e@ample. :f that as the true 8alue, there oul# "e no mu# column in the annulus an# the ell oul# ha8e "lon outM 4o, engineers ill "e pro8i#e# ith the e@act 8olume of gas in the mu#, a 8alua"le component to ell control.
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
The Gasi5ar# sensor is not effecte# "! changes in mu# #ensit! or 8iscosit!.
The sensor can "e positione# #irectl! in the floline to minimi5e the error of lighter gases "eing lost to the atmosphere. Similarl!, it can "e mounte# in the pump suction line so that the 8olume of gas "eing rec!cle# in the s!stem can "e accuratel! #etermine#.
The carrier air is #rie# at the point of intae, "efore it reaches the sensor. There are therefore no pro"lems ith h!#rocar"ons "eing a"sor"e# "! #r!ers an# filters an# not "eing recor#e#.
The gas sample is heate# #uring its transit to the gas #etector, so that the hea8ier gases ill not con#ense to liFui# form an# go un#etecte#.
The Gasi5ar# is not effecte# "! hether gas is free or #issol8e#, an# is therefore accurate in oil "ase# s!stems here gas is pre#ominantl! in solution. E8aluation onsi#erations
The Gasi5ar# s!stem #oes not #ifferentiate as to hether the gas in the mu# is present as free gas "u""les or as #issol8e# gas. :t is not su"Hect to the irregularities of agitator traps hen "reaing gas out of solution, cause# "! 8ar!ing h!#rocar"on composition, 8ar!ing "u""le si5e, mu# temperature an# 8iscosit!. This principle #oes contri"ute, hoe8er, to #ifferences in gas measurements &than oul# ha8e pre8iousl! "een e@perience# ith agitator traps( that nee# to "e un#erstoo#.
General Differences &+igure 3.'(
One thing that e8er! ellsite operator is familiar ith, from agitator traps, is the gas rea#ing falling to 5ero hen connections are ma#e. This is simpl! #ue to the fact that the mu# le8el #rops in the shaer "o@ so that the trap is no longer in the mu#. This is not seen ith the Gasi5ar# &see 3.'A(. Although the gas le8el falls, it #oes not go to 5ero since there is still am"ient gas in the floline surroun#ing the sensor, hich ill pass through the mem"rane. :t is also possi"le that the mu# #oes not completel! 8acate the floline o8er the #uration of the connection, so that gas is still measure#.
Gas responses are Fuicer as a result of the faster transit time from sensor to #etector &3.'%(.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$<
DATALOG 1999
Sharper an# "etter #efine# changes are seen in the gas response &3.'(. This results from the smaller 8olume of air in the s!stem. ith agitator traps, the gas is #ilute# in a large 8olume of air so that responses "ecome smeare#B or #ampene#B o8er an e@ten#e# time inter8al.
Large gas 8alues, of -0K or 0K for e@ample, are common ith agitator traps "ut not recor#e# "! the Gasi5ar#. These large 8alues result from trap loa#ing, here gas is e@tracte# from the mu# at a Fuicer rate than it is "eing 8acate# from the trap. The concentration therefore "uil#s up in the trap, lea#ing to erroneousl! high 8alues that tae a longer perio# of time to "e completel! 8acate# from the trap. >alues recor#e# "! the Gasi5ar# are a true measurement of gas 8olume in mu#.
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
A
GasWi8ard T4
Agitator Trap
% 1 minute inter8als
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$;
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+igure 3.'.
T!pical #ifferences in gas response of the Gasi5ar#.
ater)%ase# 2u# S!stems
Gas 8alues are t!picall! loer than those recor#e# "! the agitator trap as a result of the trap loa#ing #escri"e# a"o8e. This is particularl! true for larger gas 8alues, in e@cess of 10K.
+or loer gas concentrations, hen #ealing ith principall! methane, gas 8alues are liel! to "e 8er! similar. :f the Gasi5ar# is installe# in the floline at the "ell nipple, hoe8er, rea#ings ill "e higher since gas that oul# otherise escape to the atmosphere, "efore the mu# reaches the shaer "o@, is "eing #etecte#.
Gas composition ma! also cause a #ifference in response. :f hea8ier oil is "eing sample# ith a greater proportion of hea8ier en# gases &propane through pentane( present, the response ill "e higher ith Gasi5ar#. This is "ecause a greater proportion of these components is in solution an# not efficientl! e@tracte# "! agitator traps. This ill mae no #ifference to the Gasi5ar#, since it #oes not matter hether gas is in solution or present as free gas.
Oil %ase# 2u# S!stems
Gasi5ar# rea#ings are t!picall! higher than those recor#e# "! con8entional agitator traps. This is simpl! a result of gas phase. Oil has a much higher "u""le point than ater so that gas #oes not "rea out of solution until a higher saturation is reache#. Oil "ase# mu# arri8ing at surface therefore has a far greater proportion of #issol8e# gas. This, as e ha8e seen, #oes not influence the Gasi5ar# measurement since #issol8e# an# free gas are e@tracte# alie, "ut it can lea# to inefficient e@traction an# loer measurements ith agitator traps.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$-
DATALOG 1999
+.2
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Gas Dete*tion and 3e*ording
Once the gas sample has "een passe# through 8arious arrangements of filters an# #r!ing agents in or#er to remo8e moisture an# contaminants, it is route# to the gas #etectors. T!picall!, these ill inclu#e an instrument for measuring the total gas an#or total com"usti"le gas an# a chromatograph to pro8i#e a precise "rea#on of the gas.
Tota$ Gas 4eas)rement
+irstl!, it shoul# "e recogni5e# that no gi8en #etector t!pe has overall superiorit! o8er the others. Each has their on particular "enefits an# each has their limitations. Detector response an# measurement 8aries accor#ing to the particular gas propert! that is "eing anal!5e#, "e it com"usti"ilit!, thermal con#ucti8it! or ioni5ation energ!. :n or#er for effecti8e e8aluation of Total Gas measurements, the user shoul# "e aare of the capa"ilities an# limitations of in#i8i#ual #etectors an# the 8ar!ing response that can "e e@pecte# hen there are changes in gas concentration or composition.
3.2.1
The 'atalytic 'o&bustion ('') or Hot !ire *etector latinum
This is the earliest an# simplest gas #etector use# ire in the mu# logging in#ustr!. :t is still a i#el! use# #etector for total gas measurement. The sensor contains a 8er! fine platinum filament em"e##e# in a "ea# of alumina to hich, a catal!tic mi@ture is applie# &+igure 3.<(. A current is passe# through the #etector coil, raising its temperature to a 8alue at hich h!#rocar"ons ill "e o@i#i5e#. The gas sample is passe#, at a constant rate, through the com"ustion cham"er an# the tin! fraction of gas coming into contact ith the filament is "urnt off, releasing heat that then further heats the filament an#, in #oing so, increases itBs electrical resistance. The filament forms one si#e of an Alumina electrical heatstone "ri#ge circuit so that the %ea# an# change in resistance pro#uces a potential atal!st #ifference across the circuit. This can "e measure# an# cali"rate# in terms of the com"usti"le gas concentration. +igure 3.< atal!tic om"ustion The #etector is cali"rate# in terms of K E2A &EFui8alent 2ethane in Air(. T!picall!, a Detector concentration of "eteen 1 an# $K methane is use# for cali"ration. The #etector pro8es to "e 8er! accurate for lo concentrations of methane.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
$
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
As the molecular eight increases, hoe8er, hea8ier h!#rocar"ons pro#uce a 8ar!ing response &than that pro#uce# "! methane( from the #etector, proportional to their calorific energ!. The hea8ier the h!#rocar"on, the greater the response gi8en "! the #etector. The 8aria"le responses are #etaile# in Ta"le 3.1 an# as can "e seen, the response "! "utane, for e@ample, oul# "e almost #ou"le that pro#uce# "! the same 8olume of methane.
The response of the #etector is also effecte# "! 8ariations in gas concentration &+igure 3.;(. 2ethane respon#s linearl! to
At a concentration of 100K methane, the response oul# "e 5ero since there is no o@!gen to allo com"ustion. This pro"lem is amplifie# if the proportion of hea8ier h!#rocar"ons is greater, since the hea8ier the molecule the more o@!gen is reFuire# for complete com"ustion.
Gas 2ethane Ethane ropane i)%utane n)%utane !#rogen Sulphi#e Ta"le 3.1
Cesponse &relati8e to 1( 1.000 1.'- 1.1$ 1.93 1.-10 $.'<;
Celati8e atal!tic om"ustion responses
2o#ifications can "e ma#e in terms of increase# #ilution ith a non Fuantit! of air in or#er to measure higher gas 8olumes. This ensures that the gasair mi@ture is ept "elo the L.E.L in or#er to maintain as linear response as possi"le an# allos concentrations of up to 100K E2A to "e measure#.
A further mo#ification can "e ma#e, "! re#ucing the temperature of the filament, so that methane is not com"uste#. This pro8i#es a recor#er for hea8ier gases onl! an# can therefore "e use# as a wet gas or gas richness in#icator. Again, hoe8er, the molecular eight an# #ifferent Detector responses from the hea8ier gases lea#s to inaccurac!. Cesponse
3
DATALOG 1999
$
1
$9
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
<
10
1<
oncentration in Air
DATALOG 1999
+igure 3.;
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
!#rocar"on com"ustion ith the atal!tic om"ustion #etector
A#8antages
Linear response at lo concentrations. >er! relia"le, ro"ust an# cheap. +amiliarit! an# ease of use.
Disa#8antages
The resistance of the filament changes o8er time #ue to constant "urning an# ear. The filament can "e poisone# an# ma#e less sensiti8e, to h!#rocar"ons, "! corrosi8e gases. The sensor reFuires regular re)5eroing an# cali"ration. 2easurements are su"Hect to non)linearit! as gas composition changes #ue to #ifferent reaction rates, heat generate# an# resulting filament temperature changes. This ill affect su"seFuent com"ustion rates an# instrument response.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
30
DATALOG 1999
3.2.2
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Ther&al 'onductivity *etector (T'*)
Similar to the #etector, the Thermal on#ucti8it! Detector operates "! a! of a filament forming one si#e of a heatstone "ri#ge circuit ith changes in resistance representing changes in the concentration of gas.
=nlie the #etector, hoe8er, hich measures the temperature increase #ue to com"ustion, the TD ors "! measuring the cooling effect on an element #ue to the thermal con#ucti8it! of the gas. The #etector has to sensing elements. One is enclose# in air pro8i#ing the controlB against hich, the response #ue to the gas sample on the secon# element is compare# &+igure 3.-(.
The thermal con#ucti8it! of a gas is #epen#ent on its molecular inetic energ!. Different gases therefore ha8e a 8ar!ing cooling effect, pro#ucing #ifferent responses from the #etector. 2ethane has a positi8e response &1.$<@ the response gi8en "! air, at 0 ( an# is t!picall! use# as the cali"ration me#ium ith the measurement "eing e@presse# in terms of K E2A &as ith the #etector(. A methaneair mi@ture ill ha8e a linear response all the a! to 100K methane, maing it an i#eal #etector for measurement of large methane concentrations associate# ith h!#rocar"on gas 5ones.
sample
Ceference +igure 3.-
Acti8e
Schematic of the Thermal on#ucti8it! #etector elements
oe8er, linearit! an# accurac! of the TD is lost hen other gases are intro#uce# to the mi@ture. All other h!#rocar"on gases, e@cept methane, ha8e a loer thermal con#ucti8it! relati8e to air, pro#ucing a re#uce#B response from the #etector &Ta"le 3.$(. The #egree of error is o"8iousl! #epen#ent on the proportion of the hea8ier h!#rocar"ons to the methane concentration. Ethane, for e@ample, at 0 , results in N the response of air & 3< of that of methane( an# ill cause a loer sensor output for the eFui8alent concentration. A #rop in the total gas 8alue, or
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
31
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
rather, in the rate of increase, can therefore ha8e to possi"le causes* either a #rop in methane concentration, or, an increase in the proportion of hea8ier h!#rocar"ons.
GAS
Thermal on#ucti8it! &relati8e to Air( 0 100
Air 2ethane Ethane ropane %utane entane 4itrogen ar"on Dio@i#e Acet!lene !#rogen elium
Ta"le 3.$
1.00 1.$< 0.-< 0.< 0.<< 0.<$ 0.99 0.;0 0.--.0 <.9
1.00 1.'< 0.90 0.-0 0.;; 0.< 0.99 0.-0 0.< ;. <.<
Thermal con#ucti8it! of gases relati8e to air
Similarl!, non)com"usti"le gases also pro#uce a 8aria"le response from the #etector. +or e@ample, car"on #io@i#e an# h!#rogen sulphi#e "oth ha8e a loer cooling effect than either air or methane hereas gases such as h!#rogen an# helium pro#uce a large positi8e response.
Although #etrimental to h!#rocar"on e8aluation, the #etection of these gases is eFuall! important in the #rilling of a ell/ )
car"on #io@i#e h!#rogen sulphi#e helium
ell an# personnel safet! fracture #etection in geothermal applications
TD A#8antages
2easurement to 100K methane concentration. Detection of non)com"usti"le gases. Long life, cheap an# relia"le. TD Disa#8antages
>aria"ilit! of response #ue to the presence of other gases. oor sensiti8it! "elo concentrations of 0.1K. oor 5eroB sta"ilit! since the #etector is sensiti8e to flo.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3$
DATALOG 1999
3.2.3
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+la&e Ioni"ation *etector (+I*)
The +lame :oni5ation Detector, similar to the , operates "! a! of gas com"ustion. =nlie catal!tic com"ustion, hoe8er, here onl! a fraction of the gas is "urnt off, the +:D relies on complete com"ustion of the gas sample. assing the sample through a proportionall! larger h!#rogen flame, hich has the a#8antage that an! heat generate# through gas com"ustion is negligi"le hen compare# to the heat generate# "! the h!#rogen flame, ensures this. This pro8i#es a constant temperature an# com"ustion rate an# ensures a uniform response at all concentrations.
The +:D respon#s to the ioni5ation process that occurs hen the high flame temperature "reas #on the car"on)h!#rogen "on#s.
' methane
3)
3)
3
e)
electron
The meth!l anion & 3)( pro#uce# #uring the initial com"ustion is attracte# to an ano#e that surroun#s the flame. :n #oing so, it #ischarges an electron, "ecoming neutral, an# completes com"ustion.
The h!#rogen cation is attracte# to a catho#e, here it gains an electron to "ecome neutral an# com"usts further &+igure 3.(.
earth
A
om"ustion ham"er &catho#e(
DATALOG 1999
:oni5ation ell &ano#e(
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Air
Sample !#rogen
33
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
+igure 3.
Schematic of a +lame :oni5ation Detector
This ionic transfer across the com"ustion cham"er, representing the num"er of molecules "urning, completes an electrical circuit. The resulting current flo, proportional to the concentration of organic 8apour, can "e measure# an# cali"rate# in terms of h!#rocar"on concentration.
As ith the other #etectors, methane is t!picall! the cali"ration me#ium ith the result "eing e@presse# in terms of K E2A. =nlie the other #etectors, hoe8er, the response is #ue to the num"er of car"on)h!#rogen "on#s "eing "roen an# is therefore proportional to the car"on content. :.e. ethane an# propane ill pro#uce tice an# three times, respecti8el!, the response that methane pro#uces.
The +:D therefore pro#uces a Fuantitati8e measurement of gas richness an# E2A "ut, as ith the other total gas #etectors, is una"le to #etermine hether a change in measurement is as a result of changing 8olume or changing composition.
+:D A#8antages
=niform an# linear measurement of gas richness. E@cellent sensiti8it! an# range from a fe parts per million to 100K.
+:D Disa#8antages
3.2.,
The h!#rogen reFuirement maes the sensor unnecessaril! #angerous. E@pensi8e No response to non$hydrocarbons Electronicall! comple@. %aseline #rift ith the presence of impurities, reFuiring re)5eroing.
Infrared *etector (I+-)
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3'
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
A further total gas #etector, not commonl! use#, is the infrare# #etector. !#rocar"ons &as ell as other gases( ha8e a ell)#efine# a"sorption spectrum signature in the infrare# region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The #etector &+igure 3.9( contains an infrare# source an# a p!ro) electric sensor. The infrare# stream passes, in#epen#entl!, through to cells, one containing the sample gas an# the other containing a reference gas.
Gas Sample ell +ilter :nfrare# Source
Detector
Ceference ell
+igure 3.9
:nfrare# Detector schematic
Alternatel!, the infrare# energ! from the to cells pass through a filter, selecte# to remo8e all "ut the specific spectrum freFuenc! that h!#rocar"ons a#sor", to the infrare# #etector. %! comparing the energ! le8els emitte# from the to cells, the #etector can #etermine the energ! a"sorption from the sample gas, hich can "e cali"rate# in terms of h!#rocar"on concentration.
The :+C #etector cell length #etermines sensiti8it! an# range, ith a range of 0 to 100K methane possi"le. oe8er, the energ! emitte# is a function of molecular "on#ing, so that the output increases in response to hea8ier h!#rocar"ons. This error can "e minimi5e# "! the filter selection "ut each h!#rocar"on has a slightl! #ifferent a"sorption spectrum, so that a filter ith a "est fittingB freFuenc! range has to "e chosen &+igure 3.10(. :ntensit! Cange of filter
1
$
+reFuenc! +igure 3.10
DATALOG 1999
:#eali5e# schematic of h!#rocar"on an# filter freFuenc! range
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3<
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
:+C A#8antages
A range of 0 to 100K is possi"le. There is no ear or #egra#ation #ue to poisonous gases.
:+C Disa#8antages
The #etector gi8es a non)linear output. :nterference from other gases. The #ifferences in car"on)car"on an# car"on)h!#rogen "on#ing gi8es continuous "an#s of o8erlapping a8elengths, pre8enting precise concentration measurement. E@pensi8e
3.2.
Total as *etector /u&&ary
Effecti8e formation e8aluation ith total gas #etectors #oes reFuire a goo# nole#ge of the #ifferent responses that can "e e@pecte# ith the #ifferent #etector t!pes. On the "asis of com"ustion, an# +:D #etectors ill ala!s gi8e proportionall! higher responses as the content of hea8ier h!#rocar"ons increases. ith ' or < times the response of methane gi8en "! "utane an# pentane content, +:Ds ill gi8e larger responses than the hen hea8ier components are present. :n certain situations, these responses ma! appear to "e erroneousl! large #ue to the hea8ier composition, as illustrate# in Ta"le 3.3. urel! on the "asis of h!#rocar"on e8aluation, the +:D is the most effecti8e total gas #etector since it #oes pro8i#es a linear, Fuantitati8e measurement of h!#rocar"on content, in terms of eFui8alent methane. oe8er, lie ALL total gas #etectors, the +:D cannot #istinguish "eteen specific h!#rocar"ons an# flui# t!pe. This, together ith the #isa#8antages of the instrument comple@it! an# the reFuirement of h!#rogen #o not mae it the automatic choice for total gas #etection. Each #etector t!pe has itBs on particular merits an# limitations.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3;
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
T #etectors are e@tremel! effecti8e for gas 5one #etection #ue to the linear response of methane up to 100K. ith the a##ition of hea8ier components, the response is loer than those responses gi8en "! an# +:D #etectors, "ut ill o"8iousl! remain positi8e in most situations. ith certain flui# t!pes, hoe8er, o8erall response ma! "e 8er! small #epen#ing on the relati8e changes of methane an# hea8ier components. :n the case of hea8ier oil for e@ample, the methane content an# response ma! #ecrease "ut the increase in response gi8en "! the hea8ier components ma! not "e sufficient to gi8e an o8erall significant response.
Actual omposition K 2ethane Ethane ropane %utane TOTAL Ta"le 3.3
< ; 3 1 #5
TD response <.0 3.; 1.' 0.' #0.-
response <.0 .9 <.' 1. "0"."
+:D response <.0 1$.0 9.0 '.0 ""0.0
omparison of E2A responses of total gas #etectors
Essentiall!, total gas anal!sis pro8i#es a 8er! useful, continuous, recor#ing of "ul gas 8olume ith a Fualitati8e anal!sis of gas richness an# of relati8e changes in gas 8olume "eteen #ifferent formations an#or reser8oirs. :t also pro8i#es an in8alua"le safet! monitoring s!stem. oe8er, accurate Fuantitati8e anal!sis an# e8aluation of changing flui# t!pe is not possi"le since it cannot pro8i#e an a"solute "rea#on of the actual composition of the gas mi@ture, hether h!#rocar"ons, com"usti"le or non com"usti"le. +or this e ha8e to loo to gas chromatograph!.
An! total gas measurement is #epen#ent on the particular sensor t!pe an# relati8e response to #ifferent concentrations an# compositions.
%enefits
Total gas #etection is effecti8e hen 5ones are ell #ocumente# or hen onl! one flui# t!pe is e@pecte# &i.e. chromatographic anal!sis is not reFuire# to #etermine contacts(. Therefore, it is i#eal for gas ells an# #e8elopment ells.
:t can assist the ellsite geologist or mu# logger in picing core points an# formation tops.
Total gas #etection can "e utili5e# in a stan#)aloneB ellsite monitoring s!stem &see "elo( hen a full logging unit is not reFuire#.
:t pro8i#es an essential component to ell safet!.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3-
DATALOG 1999
:t pro8i#es a "acup to chromatographic anal!sis.
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Limitations
an not #istinguish h!#rocar"on compoun#s or i#entif! flui# t!pe.
ersonnel not un#erstan#ing the #ifferences in operation an# resulting measurement.
hen using a gas chromatograph, as a "ac up Datalog use a total gas s!stem that incorporates "oth a atal!tic om"ustion #etector an# a Thermal on#ucti8it! #etector. +or itBs accurate an# linear response at lo le8els of gas, the #etector is use# for concentrations of "elo '.0K E2A. :f the gas e@cee#s this le8el, the s!stem automaticall! sitches to the use of the T #etector "oth for itBs capa"ilit! of measurements of up to 100K E2A an# "ecause it pro8i#es "etter safet! monitoring in the #etection of non)h!#rocar"on gases. hile the T #etector is pro8i#ing the measurements, the #etector is automaticall! sitche# off to minimi5e ear on the filament, so prolonging itBs life an# accurac!. 3.2.0
n&anned Total as *etection /yste&s
As mentione# a"o8e, hen a full logging s!stem is not reFuire# or arrante# &gas ells, #e8elopment ells(, total gas #etection can "e incorporate# in a stan#)aloneB, eas! to operate ellsite monitoring s!stem. This gi8es the operator a cheaper alternati8e to a manne# mu# logging unit an#, in situations here the "u#get #oes not pro8i#e mu# logging, ena"les the operator to maintain an effecti8e safet! an# e8aluation tool.
This unit, hich can "e operate# "! a ellsite geologist, pro8i#es the folloing "enefits/ )
Assist in picing core points an# formation tops. an "e automate# ith lagge# gas #ata an# COBs. ro8i#es continual printout an# #ata storage. ost effecti8e #etermination of porosit! an# formation pressure changes. :n8alua"le ai# to ell safet!. ro8i#es insurance against ireline tools not "eing a"le to "e run or against E)log #ata "eing effecte# "! su"seFuent formation in8asion.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
3
DATALOG 1999
+igure 3.11
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
The Geologger, DatalogBs stan# alone gas #etector
2inimal training can re#uce the one #ra"ac, in that, hen total gas s!stems are the responsi"ilit! of the ellsite geologist, e@perience in unit operation an# interpretation of resulting measurements ma! not "e holl! sufficient. DatalogBs total gas monitoring s!stem, the Geologger &+igure 3.11( incorporates a catal!tic com"ustion #etector, ith automate# #ilution to eep the gas sample "elo the loer e@plosi8e limit, pro8i#ing total gas measurement from 0 to 100K E2A. The s!stem is complete ith a real)time #ispla! an# har# cop! printout &+igure 3.1$(. Data is store# an# a8aila"le in LAS format maing it compati"le ith geological strip log softare.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
39
DATALOG 1999
+igure 3.1$
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Ceal)time printout from The Geologger
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'0
DATALOG 1999
+.+
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
Gas %hromatography
3.3.1
'hro&atographic peration
Gas chromatographs can operate on the "asis of an! of the #etector t!pes alrea#! #escri"e# "ut ha8e the capa"ilit! of ph!sicall! separating in#i8i#ual components of a gas mi@ture. T!picall!, to#a!, either the +:D or TD #etector t!pe is use#.
%eing a"le to #etermine the e@act concentration of in#i8i#ual h!#rocar"ons, as ell as other gases, allos for/ )
Determination of reser8oir flui# t!pe. :#entification of gas, oil an# ater contacts. :#entification of changes in oil gra8it! or gas #ensit!.
This maes the chromatograph an in8alua"le tool hen #rilling e@plorator! ells here little is non a"out the regional geolog! or reser8oir characteristics.
=pon sample inHection, separation of in#i8i#ual compoun#s an# gases occurs as the sample is passe# through columns containing a me#ium that has #ifferent retention rates for compoun#s of #ifferent chemicalph!sical properties. :n#i8i#ual components are then passe# through the #etector here the! are anal!5e# an# measure#. The in#i8i#ual gas peas are integrate# to #etermine the area "eneath the resulting cur8e. This 8alue is then e@presse# as an a"solute concentration "! comparison ith a cali"rate# 8alue &i.e. a gi8en area correspon#s to a gi8en gas 8olume(.
The particular gases that are anal!5e# "! the chromatograph #epen# on se8eral factors/ )
The separating me#ium use# in the columns. The carrier gas carr!ing the gas sample through the columns. The pressure an# temperature of the columns. The length of columns an# separation time alloe# i.e. in the case of alanes, the longer the time alloe# for each sample to pass through the columns, the hea8ier the alanes that can "e separate#.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'1
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
ith all chromatographs, samples ha8e to "e separate# an# anal!5e# "efore a further sample can "e taen. Although this ma! allo more h!#rocar"ons to "e measure#, the #isa#8antage of a longer separation time is that sampling is less freFuent. This is a 8er! significant #ra"ac in gi8en situations/ )
3.3.2
hen #rilling rates are fast. :n the #etection an# anal!sis of fracture gas. recise i#entification of formation tops or reser8oir contacts. :#entification of thin formation stringers.
The High /peed Ther&al 'onductivity 'hro&atograph
olumn
+igure 3.13
Detector
The porta"le, micro), high spee# gas chromatograph
Datalog uses a state of the art, porta"le, high spee#, micro)chromatograph &+igure 3.13( that anal!ses 1 to < in less than 30 secon#s. This spee# of elution is in8alua"le for accurate #etection of reser8oir contacts, formation tops, thin stringers, coal seams an# fractures, an# is facilitate# "! the small si5e of #etector so that onl! a small sample 8olume nee#s to "e inHecte# &+igure 3.13(.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'$
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
The chromatograph ors on the thermal con#ucti8it! principle so that the stan#ar# columns also accuratel! monitor non)com"usti"le gases such as nitrogen an# car"on #io@i#e, ithout interfering ith h!#rocar"on e8aluation. This is a "ig a#8antage o8er com"ustion "ase# chromatographs & or +:D(, especiall! in un#er"alance# #rilling &using nitrogen( or geothermal applications. The columns, t!picall! ' to < m of micro)tu"ing, an# the t!pe of carrier gas are selecte# #epen#ing on the reFuirements of the particular operation. 4ormall!, helium is the carrier gas use# in h!#rocar"on #etection, pro8i#ing a much safer alternati8e to h!#rogen. %ut, for e@ample, argon carrier gas an# specific columns can "e use# to #etect helium an# other inert gases in geothermal applications. The chromatograph use# in stan#ar# applications contains to in#epen#ent columns that anal!5e methane, ethane, nitrogen, o@!gen an# car"on #io@i#e, an# propane through pentane &+igure 3.1'(.
Some of the #istincti8e features of the chromatograph inclu#e/ )
3.3.3
The lo inHection time &t!picall! 30 6 <0 millisecon#s( pro8i#es a small sample that can "e anal!5e# through to pentane in un#er 30 secon#s. onstant column temperature is softare controlle#. ali"ration is performe# for each in#i8i#ual compoun# "eing #etecte#* therefore calculate# concentrations are a"solute. Operates from a fe parts per million through to 100K. eroing of the "aseline is #one automaticall! hen each sample is inHecte#.
T'* 4ersus +I* 'hro&atograph5
:t is a commonl! hel#, "ut mistaen, "elief that Thermal on#ucti8it! chromatograph! is inferior to +lame :oni5ation. oe8er, the micro)chromatograph #oes not ha8e the limitations associate# ith a T total gas #etector.
The 8ariation in response ith air flo is not a factor since the gas sample is carrie# through the columns "! helium at a constant pressure, or rate. Each time a sample is inHecte#, the response #ue to the carrier gas is automaticall! measure#, pro8i#ing a 5eroB against hich, the gas responses can "e measure#. Therefore, an! 8ariations in the "aseB rea#ing are cancelle#.
>aria"le response #ue to #ifferent gases is not a factor, since gases are separate# an# anal!5e# in#i8i#uall!.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'3
DATALOG 1999
The micro)#etectors pro8i#e a linearit! that is compara"le to +:D chromatographs. The importance, here, is the si5e of the #etectors 6 the smaller the! are, the faster the response an# the more linear the measurement.
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
olumn A
composite !%&N %
olumn %
'( ') i'*
n'*
i'+
n'+
'%
'!%
10 1!
+igure 3.1'
$0 2!
elution time &secon#s( hromatographic column anal!sis
30 3!
One pro"lem that ALL t!pes of chromatograph ha8e is non)linearit! an# possi"le column o8erloa#ing resulting from gas 8iscosit! an# sample si5e.
Gas 8iscosit! has an o"8ious effect on the rate at hich gi8en gases ill flo into the inHector. +or a gi8en inHection time, a #ou"ling in gas 8olume ma! not result in tice the recor#e# measurement since not all of the gas ma! ha8e ha# sufficient time to flo into the inHector. This non)linearit! can "e minimi5e#, or re#uce# to 5ero, "! lengthening the inHection time an# alloing more time for the gas to flo. oe8er, this presents another possi"le pro"lem, in that, "! increasing the time an# alloing more gas to enter the column, the ris of o8erloa#ing the column or reaching the full)scale limit of the amplifier is increase#. olumn o8erloa#ing occurs hen there is a larger 8olume of gas than the column can retain, so that the response is not #irectionall! proportional to the gas concentration. ith the TD micro)chromatograph, the operator easil! recogni5es this con#ition since sample chromatograms can "e 8iee#. Amplifier sensiti8it! an#or inHection time can "e a#Huste#
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
''
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
accor#ingl! so that full range measurement is maintaine#. :n this a!, the chromatograph can measure up to 100K gas, hereas +:DBs ten# to ha8e a ma@imum saturation threshol#, a"o8e hich the! are no longer a"le to measure the gas.
ith linearit! compara"le, the onl! significant #ifference "eteen an +:D an# TD micro) chromatograph is that an +:D can #etect gas le8els to the parts per "illion &pp"( an# maintain linearit!, hereas the TD has a loer #etecta"le limit of "eteen 1 an# 10 parts per million &ppm(. This le8el of accurac! is more than sufficient for ellsite gas chromatograph!.
A further operational consi#eration is the carrier air emplo!e#. The TD chromatograph uses helium hich is inert an# hich can "e supplie# at a constant pressure. The +:D reFuires air as a carrier gas an# also a h!#rogen suppl! to maintain a constant flame. Air is t!picall! supplie# "! the rig an# reFuires filtering an# #r!ing to pro8i#e pure, #r! air. !#rogen is t!picall! supplie# "! generators, rather than "! compresse# c!lin#ers hich create a safet! concern. !#rogen generators reFuire a high #egree of maintenance to ensure that the! are operating safel! an# pro#ucing a constant suppl! rate. An! slight 8ariation in the rate an# pressure at hich the h!#rogen is "eing supplie# ill result in an inconsistent flame si5e. This ill alter the com"ustion rate of the #etector an# mean that the cali"ration is inaccurate.
!#rogen generators are also a large safet! concern, since, in the e8ent of a leaage, highl! com"usti"le gas is leaing into an enclose# or area. ith a nae# h!#rogen flame alrea#! present in the chromatograph, or ith the possi"l! of a cigarette "eing lit, e@plosions are a real #anger an# the! have happene#.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'<
+.-
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
,nits of 4eas)rement
Ta"le 3.' shos the con8ersion "eteen the 8arious units t!picall! use# in the oilfiel# to report gas Fuantit!.
arts per 2illion &ppm(
ercentage &K(
1 10 <0 100 1000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
0.0001 0.001 0.00< 0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
Ta"le 3.'
Gas =nits &ana#a(
0.1 0.< 1 10 100 1000 10,000
Gas =nits &=.S.A(P
0.$ 1 $ $0 $00 $000 $0,000
Gas unit con8ersion chart
P 4% man! companies a#opt their on gas unit con8ersion.
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
';
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
DATALOG 1999
Hydrocarbon Evaluation and Interpretation
'-