reviewers's copyright to the authors.Full description
digest
DigestFull description
Full description
This is the digest of the Neypes v. Court of Appeals where the Neypes Rule originated. It is discussed for Civil Procedure.Full description
ObliconFull description
People V. Dy Case digest
ggFull description
Digest Agency DoctrineFull description
Civil ProcedureFull description
Prov remFull description
ACHACOSO v. MACARAIG G.R. No. 93023 March 13 1991 Cruz Tomas T omas D. Achacoso A chacoso petitioners responden Catalino Macaraig (E!cuti"! #!cr!tar$% an& Ru'!n Torr!s (#!cr!tar$ o Do)E% *os! ts #armi!nto
Tomas -as -as a++oint a++oint!& !& A&mini A&ministra strator tor o th! th! /EA on /cto' /cto'!r !r 1 19. 19. ! assum!& assum!& o4c! o4c! on /cto'!r 2 19. /n *anuar$ 2 19905 th! r!si&!nt a&&r!ss!& a r!6u!st to all 7D!+t !a&s5 8#!cs5 Assistans #!cr!tari!s5 #!cr!tari!s5 ur!au !a&s an& oth!r go"!rnm!nt o4cials: to ;l! a court!s$ r!signation. Tomas ollo-!& /n A+ril A+ril 10 19905 19905 #!c #!c o )a'or )a'or r!6u!s r!6u!st!& t!& Tomas to to turn turn o"!r his his o4c! o4c! to th! th! D!+ut$ D!+ut$ A&ministrator as th! o4c!r,in,charg!. ! +rot!st!& his r!+lac!m!nt an& &!clar!& h! -as not surr!n&!ring his o4c! '!caus! his r!signation -as not "oluntar$ 'ut ;l!& onl$ in o'!&i!nc! to th! r!si&!nt> o M!m'!r o th! Car!!r #!r"ic! o th! Ci"il #!r"ic! an& thus !n?o$s s!curit$ o t!nur! (on! as+!ct -hich &i@!r!ntiat!s it rom th! non,car!!r s!r"ic!%. ! argu!s that h! has th! ran= o un&!rs!cr!tar$5 un&!rs!cr!tar$5 thus coming un&!r Articl! B #!ction o th! Ci"il #!r"ic! D!cr!! ositions in th! Car!!r E!cuti"! #!r"ic!> 8s!c5 Assistant #!c5 ur!au Dir!ctor5 Assistant ur!au Dir!ctor5 R!gional Dir!ctor (RD%5 Assistant RD5 Chi! o D!+artm!nt #!r"ic! an& oth!r o4c!rs o !6ui"al!nt ran= as &!t!rmin!& '$ th! Car!!r E!cuti"! #!r"ic! oar&5 all o -hom ar! a++oint!& '$ th! r!si&!nt. r!si&!nt. o n "i!- o th! s!curit$ o t!nur! !n?o$!& '$ th! on!s a'o"!5 it -as thus '!$on& th! +r!rogati"!s o th! r!si&!nt to ma=! th!m r!sign. an$5 th! r!signation -as ma&! out o &ur!ss sinc! th! r!si&!nt can ;r! th!m an$tim!. Accor ccor&i &ing ng to th! th! /#G> /#G> o Although th! o4c! o /EA A&min is a car!!r !!cuti"! s!r"ic!5 Tomas hims!l is not a c!r!!r !!cuti"! s!r"ic! o4cial !ntitl!& to s!curit$ o t!nur!. As +roo5 th! /#G o@!r!& a c!rti;cation rom th! C#C sa$ing that h! is not a Car!!r E!cuti"! #!r"ic! (CE#% !ligi'l! or ailur! to +artici+at! in a Car!!r E!cuti"! #!r"ic! D!"!lo+m!nt rogram o n conn!ction to his ailur! to '! !ligi'l!5 art Articl! B o th! nt!grat!& R!organization lan on th! car!!r !!cuti"! s!r"ic! +ro"i&!s that th! r!si&!nt shall '! ma&! rom a list o CE# !ligi'l! +ro"i&!& '$ th! 'oar&. n !!c+tional cas!s ho-!"!r5 th! r!si&!nt ma$ a++oint som!on! not in th! list +ro"i&!& that such a++oint!! shall su's!6u!ntl$ ta=! th! r!6uir!& CE# Eamination an& that h! shall not '! +romot!& to a high!r class until h! +ass!s
,
issue as Tomas !ntitl!& to s!curit$ o t!nur! NO
Ratio 1
hat ha++!ns -h!n a +!rson -ho lac=s all th! 6uali;cations is a++oint!&F t!m+orar$ to '! t!rminat!& at th! -him o th! a++ointing authorit$ , t is s!ttl!& that a +!rman!nt a++ointm!nt can '! issu!& onl$ to a +!rson -ho m!!ts all th! r!6uir!m!nts or th! +osition to -hich h! is '!ing a++oint!&5 inclu&ing th! a++ro+riat! !ligi'ilit$ +r!scri'!&. #inc! Achacoso &i& not m!!t all th! r!6uir!m!nts5 h! can onl$ '! gi"!n a t!m+orar$ a++ointm!nt5 -hich coul& '! -ith&ra-n '$ th! a++ointing authorit$ at -ill an& at a mom!nt