Administrative Law Case Digests Pelaez vs Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569 Case Digest G.R. No. L-23825 December 24, 1965
Administrative Law Case Digests Florendo vs Enrile, 239 SCRA 22 Case Digest A.M. No. P-92-695 December 7, 1994
Administrative Law Case Digests Masangcay vs Comelec, 6 SCRA 27 Case Digest G.R. No. L-13827 September 28, 1962
Administrative Law Case Digests Lovina vs Moreno, 9 SCRA 557 Case Digest G.R. No. L-17821 November 29, 1963Full description
Administrative Law Case Digests Edu vs Ericta, 35 SCRA 481 Case Digest G.R. No. L-32096 October 24, 1970Full description
Administrative Law Case Digests Blaquera vs Alcala, 295 SCRA 411 Case Digest G.R. No. 109406 September 11, 1998
Administrative Law Case Digests Lumiqued vs Exevea, 282 SCRA 125 Case Digest G.R. No. 117565 November 18, 1997
Administrative Law Case Digests Padua vs Ranada, 390 SCRA 663 Case Digest G.R. No. 141949 October 14, 2002
Administrative Law Case Digests Dario vs Mison, 176 SCRA 84 Case Digest G.R. No. 81954 August 8, 1989
Administrative Law Case Digests Christian General Assembly, Inc. vs Ignacio, 597 SCRA 266 Case Digest G.R. No. 164789 August 27, 2009Full description
Administrative Law Case Digests People vs Rosenthal, 68 Phil 328 Case Digest G.R. Nos. L-46076 and L-46077 June 12, 1939
Administrative Law Case Digests US vs Barrias, 11 Phil 327 Case Digest G.R. No. 4349 September 24, 1908
Administrative Law Case Digests Echegaray vs Secretary of Justice, 297 SCRA 754 Case Digest G.R. No. 132601 October 12, 1998
Administrative Law Case Digests Radio Communications of the Philippines vs National Telecommunications Commission, 184 SCRA 517 Case Digest G.R. No. L-68729 May 29, 1987
Administrative Law Case Digests Eugenio vs Civil Service Commission, 242 SCRA 196 Case Digest G.R. No. 115863 March 31, 1995
Administrative Law Case Digests National Housing Authority vs Almeida, 525 SCRA 383 Case Digest G.R. No. 162784 June 22, 2007Full description
Administrative Law Case Digests Kilusang Mayo Uno Labor Center vs Garcia, Jr. 239 SCRA 386 Case Digest G.R. No. 115381 December 23, 1994
Administrative Law Case Digests Guerzon vs Court of Appeals, 164 SCRA 182 Case Digest G.R. No. 77707 August 8, 1988
Administrative Law Case Digests Chavez vs National Housing Authority, 530 SCRA 235 Case Digest G.R. No. 164527 August 15, 2007Full description
Administrative Law Case Digests City of Baguio vs Nino, 487 SCRA 216 Case Digest G.R. No. 161811 April 12, 2006
Administrative Law Case Digests Antipolo Realty Corporation vs. National Housing Authority, 153 SCRA 399 Case Digest G.R. No. L-50444 August 31, 1987
Administrative Law Case Digests Tatad vs Secretary of Energy, 281 SCRA 330 Case Digest G.R. No. 124360 November 5, 1997
Adminstrative Law Arellano Univeristy School of Law aiza ebina/2015
CERVANTES vs AUDITOR GENERAL 91 SCRA 359 Delegation to Administrative Agencies Sufficiency of Standards FACTS: It appears that petitioner was in 1949 the manager of the NAFCO with a salary of P15,000 a year. By a resolution of the Board of Directors of this corporation approved on January 19 of that year, he was granted quarters allowance of not exceeding P400 a month effective the first of that month. Submitted the Control Committee of the Government Enterprises Council for approval, the said resolution was disapproved on August 3, 1949. The Government Enterprises Council was created by the President under Executive Order No. 93 pursuant to Republic Act No. 51, authorizing the President of the Philippines, among other things, to effect such reforms and changes in government owned and controlled corporations for the purpose of promoting simplicity, economy and efficiency in their operation. The petitioner challenged the action of the Government Enteprises Council, contending that Executive Order No. 93 was an undue delegation of power. ISSUE: Whether or not Executive Order No. 93 is null and void because it is based on a law that is unconstitutional as an illegal delegation of legislative power to the President RULING: No. As to the first ground, the rule is that so long as the Legislature "lays down a policy and a standard is established by the statute" there is no undue delegation. Republic Act No. 51 in authorizing the President of the Philippines, among others, to make reforms and changes in government-controlled corporations, lays down a standard and policy that the purpose shall be to meet the exigencies attendant upon the establishment of the free and independent government of the Philippines and to promote simplicity, economy and efficiency in their operations. The standard was set and the policy fixed. The President had to carry the mandate. This he did by promulgating the executive order in question which, tested by the rule above cited, does not constitute an undue delegation of legislative power. RATIO: Delegation to Administrative Agencies. Under the sufficient standard test, there must be adequate guidelines or limitations in the law to map out the boundaries of the delegate authority and prevent the delegation from running riot. To "promote simplicity, economy and efficiency" is a sufficient standard. ---