Case digest for Hacienda Leddy vs. Villegas; Labor 1
Originally made by JVs Learning Hub
Full description
case digest
banking laws
case digest for 1-United Transport Koalisyon v. COMELECFull description
asd
Case Digest Criminal LawFull description
Full description
civil law case digests
PIL case
criminal procedureFull description
Case Digest
For Political Law IFull description
election law case digest
Jurisdiction Case DigestFull description
SDGSDGSDGSDGSD
labrelFull description
Wisconsin v yoderFull description
Salcedo v. Mendoza case digestFull description
Case Digest of Jardeleza v. SerenoFull description
Full description
Case No. 1
MARIVIC A. MORALES Labor Law I – Block A
CARLOS vs VILLEGAS G.R. No. L-24394 August 30, 1968 FACS!
Starting September 16, 195, petitioner an! ot"er members o# t"e $ni#orme! %orce &i'ision o# t"e (anila %ire &epartment "a'e been re)*ire! an! or!ere! b+ t"e C"ie# o# t"e (anila %ire &epartment to be - "o*rs on !*t+ an! - "o*rs o## !*t+, alternatel+ t"is sc"e!*le contin*o*s t"ro*g"o*t t"e !a+s o# t"e week regar!less o# Sat*r!a+s, S*n!a+s an! "oli!a+s. %iremen are gi'en time to rest #rom 1/00 noon to -/00 oclock in t"e a#ternoon, an! time to sleep #rom 9/00 oclock in t"e e'ening to 6/00 oclock t"e #ollowing morning. 2n 3*l+ 10, 195, t"e C"ie# o# t"e (anila %ire &epartment re)*este! t"e 2##ice o# t"e 4resi!ent #or t"e members o# t"e $ni#orme! %orce &i'ision an! o# t"e %ire Alarm an! a!io &i'ision o# t"e !epartment to ren!er ser'ice wit"o*t o'ertime pa+ be+on! t"e -0"o*r5!a+ a week re)*irement o# t"e law. 2n &ecember 9, 196, a petition was #ile! claiming pa+ment #or o'ertime ser'ices ren!ere! an! !eman!ing t"e en#orcement o# t"e -0"o*r a week work law wit" respect to t"e $ni#orme! %orce &i'ision o# t"e (anila %ire &epartment t"e answer to t"e petition was t"at ser'ices ren!ere! be+on! a reg*lar perio! #i7e! b+ .A. No. 1880 will not entitle t"e emplo+ee to o'ertime pa+ as a matter o# legal rig"t. "en, on &ecember 6, 196, petitioner a!!resse! a petition to t"e 4resi!ent o# t"e 4"ilippines pra+ing t"at t"e latter or!er t"e Cit+ o# (anila to pa+ petitioner an! ot"er members o# t"e (%& $ni#orme! %orce &i'ision #or o'ertime ser'ices ren!ere! an! to en#orce t"e -0"o*r a week law *n#ort*natel+ t"ere was no #a'orable repl+. ISS"E!
Are emplo+ees #alling *n!er t"e ci'il ser'ice law s*c" as members o# t"e $ni#orme! %orce &i'ision o# t"e (anila %ire &epartment, w"o were re)*ire! to ren!er o'ertime ser'ice on work !a+s an! "oli!a+s, entitle! to collect o'ertime o 'ertime pa+ #or o'ertime ser'ices ren!ere!: R"LING!
No, s*c" emplo+ees are not entitle! to collect o'ertime pa+ #or o'ertime ser'ices ren!ere!. "e ;ig"t ;ig"t
