Cascio Tracks - New Theoretical Evidence'

Cascio tracks - NEW THEORETICAL 'EVIDENCE' A lot has been said about the Cascio tracks. The truth is three of these tracks are on the "MICHAEL" album, released around December 10th, and 9 others could pop up on future albums. A lot has been said about ab out who the singer is, with fans having havin g taken a stance on who they think it is. Something we lack is background info on the controversy. Cartman, myself and a few others have been looking into this and we've come across something that hasn't been mentioned before and is definitely significant to this controversy. We've all seen Eddie Cascio and Teddy Riley on Oprah. We've also seen a statement from Howard Weitzman in name of a lot of people. This statement is known to leave out certain information on certain subjects, like not mentioning that Cory Rooney and Taryll Tar yll Jackson were also at the listening session and did not agree it was Michael singing. But there's one inconsistency that hasn't been mentioned. Let's take a look at two parts of this statement: After the tracks were submitted to Sony, three of these Cascio songs were selected to be on the album, and “Breaking News” was one of the three. The day after the submission and selection of the album tracks, for the very first time, the authenticity of Michael’s vocals on the Cascio tracks was questioned. Because of these questions, I was immediately asked by co-Executors John Branca and John McClain to conduct an investigation regarding the authenticity of the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks. Just to be absolutely certain, I also contacted Jason Malachi, a young singer who some persons had wrongfully alleged was a “soundalike” singer that was hired to sing on the Cascio tracks, and I confirmed that he had no involvement with this project whatsoever. These two statements are presented separated in the statement, when they should've been put together. You see, that last statement is intentionally vague when it comes to the word "persons". Is he talking about the fans after hearing the "Breaking News" stream or people from inside the Estate? I personally thought he always meant the fans, but let me tell you right here, right now: it means people inside the Estate. We have confirmation that the name "Jason Malachi" was connected with these tracks before the day "Breaking News" premiered. When Jason Malachi's Facebook page was hacked to display a message saying he confessed, someone called Thaddeus Nauden denied it being posted by Jason. He is Jason's manager. He is the president of "Sta ge Recordings & Publishing, LLC" and is also Jason's manager. He also blogs. He likes to blog about things that would make him look cool, like being contacted by powerful or important people. First, just so we're clear it's Nauden that's posting. The profile page: http://www.blogger.com/profile/10781089282365237302

Titles you can't find anywhere else

Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.





It clearly says "President of Stage Recordings & Pub lishing.", which is him. Then, here's one statement of his regarding Jason Malachi that should already raise some eyebrows, from November 22nd called "No statement needed.": http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...nt-needed.html





Why should Jason Malachi make a statement? People only think he's the actual lead singer on tracks labelled as Michael Jackson tracks. Why would he issue a statement denying that? But the interesting posts are made sooner. Not a few days after "Breaking News" came out, but a few weeks before. On October 18th 2010, Thaddeus made a post called "Michael Jackson's Estate and John Branca": http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...hn-branca.html





On that day, Jason Malachi's manager received a call from John Branca. Not Howard Weitzman as the statement above seems to claim, but John Branca, one of o f the two MJ Estate executors. At least 3 weeks before the release of "Breaking News", Jason Malachi was known as the possible singer of the Cascio tracks within the Estate. Some people think it's ridiculous to think Jason Malachi is on these son gs, but the Estate had thought it themselves! The day after that, October 19th, h e makes another post, called "Michael Jackson's Estate Part 2.": http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...te-part-2.html

John Branca (and not Howard Weitzman) called him again on that day. To add further credibility to this claim, we cross-reference these blog posts to the source th at always got the exclusive news regarding the Cascio tracks: R oger Friedman. Roger Friedman got to





http://www.showbiz411.com/2010/10/19...songs-in-limbo











The day after Jason Malachi's manager gets a call from the Estate, the very ver y first article about the vocal controversy appears. The Th e very first article mentioning John McClain, the other Estate executor, having doubts about ab out the vocal tracks on the th e Cascio songs. Is this date a coincidence or did d id John McClain realise that it was Jason Malachi singing at this point in time? Jackie Jackson confirmed that he and John McClain wanted to have certain tracks removed from the album for weeks on November 9th, three weeks after a fter this date: https://twitter.com/#!/JackieJackson5/status/2040574249017344

Roger Friedman claims John McClain was adamant adaman t right up to the deal for the album that









Yes, the "More" part says in the end he went ahead with the deal, which is obvious because there are 3 Cascio tracks on the album. But if Jackie Jackson says on November 9th that he and John McClain had insisted to have them removed for weeks (not "insisted", but "have insisted" in his wording, which means he still wasn't fully on board), I'm more inclined to believe him than Roger Friedman on that. After all, when you hear Jason Malachi in those tracks, you don't just go back you know. Back to Thaddeus now. After being contacted by the Estate, Thaddeus decided to generate a bit of buzz (despite no one reading his blog) for the new Michael Jackson track "Breaking News" and later reviewed the "MICHAEL" album - of which he of o f course loved "Keep Your Head Up": http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...l-jackson.html

http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...king-news.html





These posts regarding the "MICHAEL" album are the only times he doesn't talk about his h is business or artists he represents in the history history of the blog. Or does it talk about artists he represents? Still not convinced there's something seriously wrong about this whole Jason Malachi thing? Well then, let us go back all the way to January of 2010: http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...y-mottola.html

You read it correctly. In January of 2010, 2 010, there were talks between Tommy Tomm y Mottola and





Click here for comparisons of "All I Need", " Breaking News", "Keep Your Head Up", Up ", "Monster" & "Stay" with Jason Malachi. They are also on The Pirate Bay. Search for "Michael Jackson".

Cascio Tracks - New Theoretical Evidence'

Recommend Documents