International International Jo urnal of Operations Operations & Produc tion Manageme Management nt Measuring supply chain performance Benita M. Beamon
Ar t i cl e in f or m ati o n: To cite this document: Benita M. Beamon, (1999),"Measuring supply chain performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 Iss 3 pp. 275 - 292 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
Downloaded on: 31 March 2016, At: 01:52 (PT) References: this document contains references to 41 other documents. To copy this document:
[email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 35924 times since 2006*
Users Users who d ownl oaded oaded this artic le also also do wnloaded: (2009),"Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 Iss 6 pp. 422-428 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540910995192 (2001),"The Supply Chain Management Processes", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12 Iss 2 pp. 13-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806271 (1999),"Supply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 Iss 10 pp. 1034-1052 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910287064
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:352589 []
For Auth ors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
Ab ou t Emeral Em eral d w w w.emeral w.em eral di ns i gh t .co m Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download.
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
R
O
F
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
(
2
(
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
This article has been cited by:
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
1. Sanjay Sharma National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) Mumbai India Mohd. Asif Gandhi School of Engineering and Technology, Kalsekar Technical Campus Panvel India Philippe Gugler University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland RajeshKr Singh DTU Gurgaon India Dr Rajesh Kr Singh . 2016. Exploring Correlations in Components of Green Supply Chain Practices and Green Supply Chain Performance. Competitiveness Review 26:3. . [ Abstract] [PDF] 2. Madalena Moreira, Benny Tjahjono. 2016. Applying performance measures to support decision-making in supply chain operations: a case of beverage industry. International Journal of Production Research 54, 2345-2365. [CrossRef ] 3. Ali Azadeh University of Tehran Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of Mansour Zarrin University of Tehran Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of Nima Salehi University of Michigan Ann Arbor United States Zahir Irani Brunel University London United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Zahir Irani Brunel University London United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland . 2016. Supplier selection in closed loop supply chain by an integrated simulation-Taguchi-DEA approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29:3. . [ Abstract] [PDF] 4. Paulo Sampaio, Maria Sameiro Carvalho and Ana Cristina Fernandes Huy Truong Quang Department of Systems and Production, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal AND Department of Production and Operation Management, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Paulo Sampaio Department of Systems and Production, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal Maria Sameiro Carvalho Department of Systems and Production, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal Ana Cristina Fernandes Department of Systems and Production, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal Duong Thi Binh An Department of Industria l Management, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Estela Vilhenac Department of Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), Barcelos, Portugal AND Department of Biostatistics and Health Metrics, EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal . 2016. An extensive structural model of supply chain quality management and firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 33:4, 444-464. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 5. Luiz Eduardo Simão, Mirian Buss Gonçalves, Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodriguez. 2016. An approach to assess logistics and ecological supply chain performance using postponement strategies. Ecological Indicators 63, 398-408. [CrossRef ] 6. Irene Petrick, Carleen Maitland, Nicolai Pogrebnyakov. 2016. Unpacking Coordination Benefits in Supply Networks: Findings from Manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 54:10.1111/ jsbm.2016.54.issue-2, 582-597. [CrossRef ] 7. Associate Professor Per Hilletofth, Professor Olli-Pekka Hilmola and Professor Yacan Wang MingChuan Chiu Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Yi-Hsuan Lin Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan . 2016. Simulation based method considering design for additive manufacturing and supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems 116:2, 322-348. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 8. Baofeng Huo, Qiang Wang, Xiande Zhao, Sebastian Schuh. 2016. Threats and benefits of power discrepancies between organisations: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research 1-15. [CrossRef ] 9. Qingqi Long. 2016. A multi-methodological collaborative simulation for inter-organizational supply chain networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 96, 84-95. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
10. Claudia Colicchia, Alessandro Creazza, Fabrizio Dallari, Marco Melacini. 2016. Eco-efficient supply chain networks: development of a design framework and application to a real case study. Production Planning & Control 27, 157-168. [CrossRef ] 11. Sang M Lee Department of Management, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA Jin Sung Rha Department of International Business Administration, Dankook University, Yongin, South Korea . 2016. Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: building a resilient supply chain. Management Decision 54:1, 2-23. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 12. Patrik Appelqvist Amer Sports Corporation, Helsinki, Finland Flora Babongo Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Valérie Chavez-Demoulin Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Ari-Pekka Hameri Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausa nne, Switzerland Tapio Niemi Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland . 2016. Weather and supply chain performance in sport goods distribution. Inter national Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 44:2, 178-202. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 13. Premaratne Samaranayake School of Business, University of Western Sydney. Penrith, Australia Tritos Laosirihongthong Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand . 2016. Configuration of supply chain integration and delivery performance. Journal of Modelling in Management 11:1, 43-74. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 14. Shradha Gawankar Operations & Supply Chain Management, National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Mumbai, India Sachin Kamble Operations & Supply Chain Management, National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Mumbai, India Rakesh Raut Operations & Supply Chain Management, National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Mumbai, India . 2016. Development, measurement and validation of supply chain performance measurement (SCPM) scale in Indian retail sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal 23:1, 25-60. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 15. Esra Ekinci Department of Industrial Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey Adil Baykasoglu Department of Industrial Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey . 2016. Modelling complexity in retail supply chains. Kybernetes 45:2, 297-322. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 16. François Galasso, Yves Ducq, Matthieu Lauras, Didier Gourc, Mamadou Camara. 2016. A method to select a successful interoperability solution through a simulation approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27, 217-229. [CrossRef ] 17. Cory Searcy. 2016. Measuring Enterprise Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 25:10.1002/ bse.v25.2, 120-133. [CrossRef ] 18. Amin Maghsoudi Operations Management, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Ala Pazirandeh Department of Business Administration, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden . 2016. Visibility, resource sharing and performance in supply chain relationships: insights from humanita ria n practitioners. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 21:1, 125-139. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 19. Duncan McFarlane, Vaggelis Giannikas, Wenrong Lu. 2016. Intelligent logistics: Involving the customer. Computers in Industry . [CrossRef ] 20. Elisa Kusrini, Subagyo, Nur Aini Masruroh. 2016. Designing Performance Measurement For Supply Chain's Actors And Regulator Using Scale Balanced Scorecard And Data Envelopment Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 105, 012032. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
21. Uche Okongwu, Matthieu Lauras, Julien François, Jean-Christophe Deschamps. 2016. Impact of the integration of tactical supply chain planning determinants on performance. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 38, 181-194. [CrossRef ] 22. Han Wang, Richard Mastragostino, Christopher L.E. Swartz. 2016. Flexibility analysis of process supply chain networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering 84, 409-421. [CrossRef ] 23. Gokhan Egilmez, Murat Kucukvar, Yong Shin Park. 2016. Supply chain-linked sustainability assessment of the US manufacturing: An ecosystem perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption 5, 65-81. [CrossRef ] 24. Kottala Sri Yogi. 2015. Performance evaluation of reverse logistics: A case of LPG agency. Cogent Business & Management 2, 1063229. [CrossRef ] 25. Ching-Chin Chern, Tzi-Yuan Chou, Bo Hsiao. 2015. Assessing the efficiency of supply chain scheduling algorithms using data envelopment analysis. Information Systems and e-Business Management . [CrossRef ] 26. Dr Burcu Balcik Ira Haavisto Department of Supply Chain Management and Social Responsibility, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Jarrod Goentzel Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA . 2015. Measuring humanitarian supply c hain perf ormance in a multigoal context. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5:3, 300-324. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 27. Dr Burcu Balcik Marianne Jahre Department of Industrial Management and Logistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden AND Department of Accounting, Auditing, and Business Analytics, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway Nathalie Fabbe-Costes CRET-LOG Research Centre, Aix-Marseille Université, Aix-en-Provence, France . 2015. How standards and modularity can improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5:3, 348-386. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 28. Roberto Chavez, Wantao Yu, Cristina Gimenez, Brian Fynes, Frank Wiengarten. 2015. Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems 80, 83-95. [CrossRef ] 29. Vicky Arnold, Tanya Benford, Joseph Canada, Steve G. Sutton. 2015. Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 19, 1-16. [CrossRef ] 30. Pui-Sze Chow, Yulan Wang, Tsan-Ming Choi, Bin Shen. 2015. An experimental study on the effects of minimum profit share on supply chains with markdown contract: Risk and profit analysis. Omega 57, 85-97. [CrossR ef ] 31. Albert Munoz, Michelle Dunbar. 2015. On the quantification of operational supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research 53, 6736-6751. [CrossRef ] 32. Wojciech Piotrowicz Saїd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Richard Cuthbertson Saїd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK . 2015. Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: an exploratory study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64:8, 1068-1091. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 33. Hyun-Gi Hong. 2015. The Factors Affecting on The Implementation of Supply Chain Management System. Journal of Digital Convergence 13, 255-261. [CrossRef ] 34. José Holguín-V eras, Ning Xu, Miguel Jaller, John Mitchell. 2015. A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours. Transportation Science . [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
35. V. Mani, Rajat Agrawal, Vinay Sharma. 2015. Impediments to Social Sustainability Adoption in the Supply Chain: An ISM and MICMAC Analysis in Indian Manufacturing Industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management . [CrossRef ] 36. Meriam Jardioui, Semaa Alami, Chafik OkarWhat are the critical success factors for the implementation of supply chain performance measurement systems in SMEs 338-343. [CrossRef ] 37. Wen-Lung Shiau, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Chia-Han Tsai. 2015. Supply chain management: exploring the intellectual structure. Scientometrics 105, 215-230. [CrossRef ] 38. Mohamed Bahroun, Slim HarbiRisk management in the modern retail supply chain: Lessons from a case study and literature review 1161-1170. [CrossRef ] 39. Siham Lakri, Zied JemaiPerformance measurement and management systems of supply chains: A review of the challenges they raise 920-929. [CrossRef ] 40. Suhaiza Zailani, Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin, Khairul Razmi, Mohammad Iranmanesh. 2015. Influential factors and performance of logistics outsourcing practices: an evidence of malaysian companies. Review of Managerial Science . [CrossRef ] 41. V. Mani Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Roork ee, India Rajat Agrawal Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Roorkee, India Vinay Sharma Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India . 2015. Social sustainability in the supply chain: analysis of enablers. Management Research Review 38:9, 1016-1042. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 42. Francielly Hedler Staudt, Gülgün Alpan, Maria Di Mascolo, Carlos M. Taboada Rodriguez. 2015. Warehouse performance measurement: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research 53, 5524-5544. [CrossRef ] 43. Hamid Jafari Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden . 2015. Logistics flexibility: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64:7, 947-970. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 44. Ferry Jie, Kevin A. Parton, Mustafid. 2015. Supply chain performance flexibility in the Australian beef industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 1-18. [CrossRef ] 45. Baofeng Huo, Cheng Zhang, Xiande Zhao. 2015. The effect of IT and relationship commitment on supply chain coordination: A contingency and configuration approach. Information & Management 52, 728-740. [CrossRef ] 46. Gottfried Seebacher, Herwig Winkler. 2015. A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics 167, 177-186. [CrossRef ] 47. Don Jyh-Fu Jeng. 2015. Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering 87, 283-295. [CrossRef ] 48. László Torjai, Judit Nagy, Attila Bai. 2015. Decision hierarchy, competitive priorities and indicators in large-scale ‘herbaceous biomass to energy’ supply chains. Biomass and Bioenergy 80, 321-329. [CrossRef ] 49. Charles D'Haene Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium Sara Verlinde Research Group MOBI (Mobility, Logistics and Automotive Technology), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Cathy Macharis Research Group MOBI (Mobility, Logistics and Automotive Technology), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium . 2015. Measuring while moving (humanitarian supply chain performance measurement – status of research and current practice). Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5:2, 146-161. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 50. Imoh Antai Jönköping International Business School (JIBS), Jönköping, Sweden Crispin Mutshinda Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, Mount Allison University, Sackville, Canada Richard
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
Owusu School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden . 2015. A 3-R principle for characterizing failure in relief supply chains’ response to natural disasters. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5:2, 234-252. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 51. Nur Amlya Binti Abd Majid, Nur Fazidah Binti Elias, Noraidah Sahari Ashaari, Hazura Binti MohamedPreliminary study disruption in small and medium enterprise supply chain 87-92. [CrossRef ] 52. Alireza Tajbakhsh DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Elkafi Hassini DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada . 2015. Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains: a review and research questions. International Journal of Pr oductivity and Performance Management 64:6, 744-783. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 53. Ahmed Attia Department of Business Management, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt . 2015. Testing the effect of marketing strategy alignment and triple-A supply chain on performance in Egypt. EuroMed Journal of Business 10:2, 163-180. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 54. Anup Kumar School Of Management, IMS Unison University Dehradun, Noida, India Kampan Mukherjee Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, Kashipur, India Amit Adlakha School of Management, IMS Unison University Dehradun, Dehradun, India . 2015. Dynamic performance assessment of a supply chain process. Business Process Management Journal 21:4, 743-770. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 55. Adriana Tirado, Mariana Morales, Odette Lobato-Calleros. 2015. Additional Indicators to Promote Social Sustainability within Government Programs: Equity and Efficiency. Sustainability 7, 9251-9267. [CrossRef ] 56. Børge Sjøbakk, Ottar Bakås, Oksana Bondarenko, Tara Kamran. 2015. Designing a performance measurement system to support materials management in engineer-to-order: a case study. Advances in Manufacturing 3, 111-122. [CrossRef ] 57. Mohit Tyagi, Pradeep Kumar, Dinesh Kumar. 2015. Assessment of Critical Enablers for Flexible Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Using Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 16, 115-132. [CrossRef ] 58. Mohammad Tavassoli, Reza Farzipoor Saen, Gholam Reza Faramarzi. 2015. Developing network data envelopment analysis model for supply chain performance measurement in the presence of zero data. Expert Systems 32:10.1111/exsy.v32.3, 381-391. [CrossRef ] 59. Richard Bitange Nyaoga, Mingzheng Wang, Peterson Obara Magutu. 2015. Does Capacity Utilization Mediate the R elationship between Operations Constraint Management and Value Chain Performance of Tea Processing Firms? Evidence from Kenya. International Strategic Management Review 3, 81-95. [CrossRef ] 60. Hyo-Won Kang, Grace W Y Wang, Hee-Seok Bang, Su-Han Woo. 2015. Economic performa nce and corporate financial management of shipping firms. Maritime Economics & Logistics . [CrossRef ] 61. Yuming Xiao. 2015. Flexibility measure analysis of supply chain. International Journal of Production Research 53, 3161-3174. [CrossRef ] 62. Rajesh Katiyar Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technolog y, Roorkee, India Mukesh Kumar Barua Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India Purushottam L. Meena School of Management, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, New York, USA . 2015. Modelling the measures of supply chain performance in the Indian automotive industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22:4, 665-696. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
63. Sumit Gupta, G.S. Dangayach, Amit Kumar Singh, P.N. Rao. 2015. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Evaluating Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Indian Electrical Panel Industries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 189, 208-216. [CrossRef ] 64. Jairo R. Montoya-TorresDesigning sustainable supply chains based on the Triple Bottom Line approach 1-6. [CrossRef ] 65. Christoph Bode, Stephan M. Wagner. 2015. Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management 36, 215-228. [CrossRef ] 66. Mattias Eriksson, Luc LeBel, Ola Lindroos. 2015. Management of outsourced forest harvesting operations for better customer-contractor alignment. Forest Policy and Economics 53, 45-55. [CrossRef ] 67. Konstantinos Petridis. 2015. Optimal design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under normally distributed demand. Annals of Operations Research 227, 63-91. [CrossRef ] 68. Yasushi Ueki. 2015. Trade costs and exportation: A comparison between enterprises in Southeast Asia and Latin America. Journal of Business Research 68, 888-893. [CrossRef ] 69. Chea Young Hwang, Chang-Kyo Suh. 2015. A Causality Analysis between SCM Integration and Firm Performance. The Journal of Information Systems 24, 27-44. [CrossRef ] 70. Marko Kohtamäki and Petri Helo P. Chithambaranathan PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, India Nachiappan Subramanian Nottingham University Business School China, Ningbo, China PL.K. Palaniappan Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, India . 2015. An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22:2, 309-334. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 71. Marko Kohtamäki and Petri Helo Ilkka Sillanpää Department of Strategic Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland . 2015. Empirical study of measuring supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22:2, 290-308. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 72. Kai Huang, Yiping Jiang, Yufei Yuan, Lindu Zhao. 2015. Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 75, 1-17. [CrossRef ] 73. Oscar Rodríguez-Espíndola, Juan Gaytán. 2015. Scenario-based preparedness plan for floods. Natural Hazards 76, 1241-1262. [CrossRef ] 74. Riccardo Silvi Department of Management Studies, University of Bologna, Forli, Italy Monica Bartolini Department of Management Studies, University of Bologna, Forli, Italy Anna Raffoni Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, London, UK Franco Visani Department of Management Studies, University of Bologna, Forli, Italy . 2015. The practice of strategic performance measurement systems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64:2, 194-227. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 75. Christoph Fuchs Business Administration, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany Andreas Otto Business Administration, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany . 2015. Value of IT in supply chain planning. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 28:1, 77-92. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 76. Ying Zhang, Lihua Wang, Jie Gao. 2015. Supplier collaboration and speed-to-market of new products: the mediating and moderating effects. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing . [CrossRef ] 77. Neeraj Anand College of Management and Economics Studies (LSCM), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India Neha Grover College of Management and Economics Studies (LSCM), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India . 2015. Measuring retail supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22:1, 135-166. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
78. Santosh Kumar Sahu Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India Saurav Datta Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India Siba Sankar Mahapatra Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India . 2015. Appraisement and benchmarking of supply chain performance extent. Grey Systems: Theory and Application 5:1, 2-30. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 79. Liliana Avelar-Sosa, Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, Osslan Osiris Vergara-Villegas, Aidé Aracely MaldonadoMacías, Giner Alor-Hernández. 2015. Impact of traditional and international logistic policies in supply chain performance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 76, 913-925. [CrossRef ] 80. Ville Hallavo Department of Information and Service Economy, Aalto University School of Business, Helsinki, Finland . 2015. Superior performance through supply chain fit: a synthesis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20:1, 71-82. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 81. Martin Tanco Industrial Management Department, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay Daniel Jurburg Industrial Management Department, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay Matias Escuder Industrial Management Department, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay . 2015. Main difficulties hindering supply chain performance: an exploratory analysis at Urug uayan SMEs. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20:1, 11-23. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 82. Trevor Cadden, Donna Marshall, Paul Humphreys, Ying Yang. 2015. Old habits die hard: exploring the effect of supply chain dependency and culture on performance outcomes and relationship satisfaction. Production Planning & Control 26, 53-77. [CrossRef ] 83. K. Govindan, S. G. Azevedo, H. Carvalho, V. Cruz-Machado. 2015. Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 12, 15-34. [CrossRef ] 84. Christopher L.E. Swartz, Han Wang, Richard MastragostinoOperability Analysis of Process Supply Chains —Toward the Development of a Sustainable Bioeconomy 355-384. [CrossRef ] 85. David M. Gligor, Carol L. Esmark, Mary C. Holcomb. 2015. Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile?. Journal of Operations Management 33-34, 71-82. [CrossRef ] 86. Payman Ahi, Cory Searcy. 2015. An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 86, 360-377. [CrossRef ] 87. V. Nicodème Fassinou Hotegni, Willemien J. M. Lommen, Euloge K. Agbossou, Paul C. Struik. 2014. Heterogeneity in pineapple fruit quality results from plant heterogeneity at flower induction. Frontiers in Plant Science 5. . [CrossRef ] 88. Injazz J. Chen, YeonYeob Lee, Antony Paulraj. 2014. Does a purchasing manager’s need for cognitive closure (NFCC) affect decision-making uncertainty and supply chain performance?. International Journal of Production Research 52, 6878-6898. [CrossRef ] 89. Michael Mutingi, Herbert Mapfaira, Robert Monageng. 2014. Developing performance management systems for the green supply chain. Journal of Remanufacturing 4. . [CrossRef ] 90. Weihua Zhang, Marc Reimann. 2014. Towards a multi-objective performance assessment and optimization model of a two-echelon supply chain using SCOR metrics. Central European Journal of Operations Research 22, 591-622. [CrossRef ] 91. Ki-Hoon Lee, Yong Wu. 2014. Integrating sustainability performance measurement into logistics and supply networks: A multi-methodological approach. The British Accounting Review 46, 361-378. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
92. Gregory R. Heim†, David Xiaosong Peng, Shekhar Jayanthi. 2014. Longitudinal Analysis of Inhibitors of Manufacturer Delivery Performance. Decision Sciences 45:10.1111/deci.2014.45.issue-6, 1117-1158. [CrossRef ] 93. Kannan Govindan, Susana G. Azevedo, Helena Carvalho, V. Cruz-Machado. 2014. Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 85, 212-225. [CrossRef ] 94. Morteza Shafiee, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Hilda Saleh. 2014. Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard a pproach. Applied Mathematical Modelling 38, 5092-5112. [CrossRef ] 95. David Gallear, Abby Ghobadian, Yanhong Li, Nicholas O’Regan, Paul Childerhouse, Mohamed Naim. 2014. An environmental uncertainty-based diagnostic reference tool for evaluating the performance of supply chain value streams. Production Planning & Control 25, 1182-1197. [CrossRef ] 96. Sarah Schiffling Logistics Research Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK Maja Piecyk Logistics Research Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK . 2014. Performance measurement in humanitarian logistics: a customer-oriented approach. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 4:2, 198-221. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 97. M. Doukas, F. Psarommatis, D. Mourtzis. 2014. Planning of manufacturing networks using an intelligent probabilistic approach for mass customised products. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 74, 1747-1758. [CrossRef ] 98. Arpita Khare, Anshuman Khare. 2014. Harnessing Supply Chain Efficiency Through Information Linkages. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain M anagement 5:10.4018/ IJISSCM.20121001, 86-104. [CrossRef ] 99. ManMohan S. Sodhi Cass Business School, City University London, London, UK Ekaterina Yatskovskaya Cass Business School, City University London, London, UK . 2014. Developing a sustainability index for companies’ efforts on responsible use of water. I nt ernational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 63:7, 800-821. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 100. Florian Kache Chair of Supply Chain Management, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany Stefan Seuring Chair of Supply Chain Management, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany . 2014. Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply cha ins via a review of literature reviews. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 19:5/6, 664-682. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 101. Young-Joon Seo Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK John Dinwoodie Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK Dong-Wook Kwak Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry, UK . 2014. The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 19:5/6, 733-746. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 102. Seyedehfatemeh Golrizgashti. 2014. Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 10. . [CrossRef ] 103. Khan Rai Waqas Azfar, Nawar Khan, Hamza Farooq Gabriel. 2014. Performance Measurement: A Conceptual Framework for Supply Chain Practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150, 803-812. [CrossRef ] 104. Suresh Kumar Jakhar, Mukesh Kumar Barua. 2014. An integrated model of supply chain performance evaluation and decision-making using structural equation modelling and fuzzy AHP. Production Planning & Control 25, 938-957. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
105. Dr Edgar E. Blanco and Dr Ely Laureano Paiva Emílio Della Bruna Jr Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil Leonardo Ensslin Post-Graduate Program in Business Administration, UNISUL – University of Southern Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil Sandra Rolim Ensslin Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil . 2014. An MCDA-C application to evaluate supply chain performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Manageme nt 44:7, 597-616. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 106. Supply Chain Simulation 205-226. [CrossRef ] 107. Richard Mastragostino, Christopher L. E. Swartz. 2014. Dynamic Operability Analysis of Process Supply Chains for Forest Industry Transformation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53, 9825-9840. [CrossRef ] 108. Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman Department of Industria l Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh A.M.M. Nazmul Ahsan Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh . 2014. Lean supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 63:5, 588-612. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 109. Michael Bourlakis, George Magla ra s, Emel Ak tas, David Gallear, Christos Fotopoulos. 2014. Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: Insights from Greek SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics 152, 112-130. [CrossRef ] 110. Alexis Nsamzinshuti, Caroline Van Elslande, Ndiaye Balle AlassaneManaging hospital efficiency and effectiveness: Designing a hospital performance measurement system 188-200. [CrossRef ] 111. Ming Juan Ding School of Business IT and Logistics, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Ferry Jie School of Business IT and Logistics, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Kevin A. Parton School of Business, Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia Margaret J. Matanda Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business & Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia . 2014. Relationships between quality of information sharing and supply chain food quality in the Australian beef processing industry. The International Journal of Logistics Management 25:1, 85-108. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 112. Dr Stefan Schaltegger, Prof Roger Burritt Adolf Acquaye Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Andrea Genovese Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK John Barrett Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK S.C. Lenny Koh Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK . 2014. Benchmarking carbon emissions performance in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 19:3, 306-321. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 113. Dr Stefan Schaltegger, Prof Roger Burritt Chung uang Bai School of Management Science and Engineering, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, China Joseph Sarkis WPI School of Business, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA . 2014. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 19:3, 275-291. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 114. Maria Caridi, Antonella Moretto, Alessandro Perego, Angela Tumino. 2014. The benefits of supply chain visibility: A value assessment model. International Journal of Production Economics 151, 1-19. [CrossRef ] 115. Chen-Yang Cheng, Tzu-Li Chen, Yin-Yann Chen. 2014. An analysis of the structural complexity of supply chain networks. Applied Mathematical Modelling 38, 2328-2344. [CrossRef ] 116. Federico Caniato, Davide Luzzini, Stefano Ronchi. 2014. Purchasing performance management systems: an empirical investigation. Production Planning & Control 25, 616-635. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
117. Pratima Mishra Department of Management and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India Rajiv Kumar Sharma Mechanical Engineering Department and Department of Management and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India . 2014. A hybrid framework based on SIPOC and Six Sigma DMAIC for improving process dimensions in supply chain network. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 31:5, 522-546. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 118. Junxiao Liu School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Australia Peter E.D. Love School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Australia Jim Smith Institute of Sustainable Development and Architecture, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia Michael Regan Institute of Sustainable Development and Architecture, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia Monty Sutrisna Department of Construction Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia . 2014. PublicPrivate Partnerships: a review of theory and practice of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 63:4, 499-512. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 119. Samsul Islam Information Systems and Operations Management, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Tava Olsen Information Systems and Operations Management, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand . 2014. Truck-sharing challenges for hinterland trucking companies. Business Process Management Journal 20:2, 290-334. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 120. Naoum K. Tsolakis, Christos A. Keramydas, Agorasti K. Toka, Dimitrios A. Aidonis, Eleftherios T. Iakovou. 2014. Agrifood supply chain management: A comprehensive hierarchical decision-making framework and a critical taxonomy. Biosystems Engineering 120, 47-64. [CrossRef ] 121. Baofeng Huo, Xiande Zhao, Honggeng Zhou. 2014. The Effects of Competitive Environment on Supply Chain Information Sharing and Performance: An Empirical Study in China. Production and Operations Management 23:10.1111/poms.2014.23.issue-4, 552-569. [CrossRef ] 122. Abderrahmane Sokri Defence Economics Team, DRDC CORA, Ottawa, Canada . 2014. Military supply chain flexibility measures. Journal of Modelling in Management 9:1, 78-86. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 123. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Rahul Desai, Nilima Walde, P B KarandikarNano warehouse: A new concept for grain storage in India 1-6. [CrossRef ] 124. Richard Mastragostino, Shailesh Patel, Christopher L.E. Swartz. 2014. Robust decision making for hybrid process supply chain systems via model predictive control. Computers & Chemical Engineering 62, 37-55. [CrossRef ] 125. Felix T.S. Chan, Ashutosh Nayak, Ratan Raj, Alain Yee-Loong Chong, Tiwari Manoj. 2014. An innovative supply chain performance measurement system incorporating Research and Development (R&D) and marketing policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering 69, 64-70. [CrossRef ] 126. Steven Thompson, Peter Ekman, Daniel Selby, Jonathan Whitaker. 2014. A model to support IT infrastructure planning and the allocation of IT governance authority. Decision Support Systems 59, 108-118. [CrossRef ] 127. Masoud Esmaeilikia, Behnam Fahimnia, Joeseph Sarkis, Kannan Govindan, Arun K umar, John Mo. 2014. A tactical supply chain planning model with multiple flexibility options: an empirical evaluation. Annals of Operations Research . [CrossRef ] 128. Masoud Esmaeilikia, Behnam Fahimnia, Joeseph Sarkis, Kannan Govindan, Arun Kumar, John Mo. 2014. Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: definition and review. Annals of Operations Research . [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
129. Ing-Long Wu, Cheng-Hung Chuang, Chien-Hua Hsu. 2014. Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 148, 122-132. [CrossRef ] 130. Saadettin Erhan Kesen. 2014. Capacity-constrained supplier selection model with lost sales under stochastic demand behaviour. Neural Computing and Applications 24, 347-356. [CrossRef ] 131. Leandro C. Coelho, Jean-François Cordeau, Gilbert Laporte. 2014. Thirty Years of Inventory Routing. Transportation Science 48, 1-19. [CrossRef ] 132. Anoop Kumar Sahu Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India Saurav Datta Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India Siba Sankar Mahapatra Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India . 2014. Supply chain performance benchmarking using grey-MOORA approach. Grey Systems: Theory and Appl ication 4:1, 24-55. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 133. Kunal Ganguly Operations Management and Decision Sciences, IMT Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, India and Operations Ma nagement, IIM Kashipur, Kashipur, India . 2014. Integration of analytic hierarchy process and Dempster-Shafer theory for supplier performance measurement considering risk. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 63:1, 85-102. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 134. William Groves, John Collins, Maria Gini, Wolfgang Ketter. 2014. Agent-assisted supply chain management: Analysis and lessons learned. Decision Support Systems 57, 274-284. [CrossRef ] 135. Nenad Stefanovic. 2014. Proactive Supply Chain Performance Management with Predictive Analytics. The Scientific World Journal 2014, 1-17. [CrossRef ] 136. Mohit Tyagi, Pradeep Kumar, Dinesh Kumar. 2014. A Hybrid Approach using AHP-TOPSIS for Analyzing e-SCM Performance. Procedia Engineering 97, 2195-2203. [CrossRef ] 137. Sufian Qrunfleh, Monideepa Tarafdar. 2014. Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performa nce and f irm performance. International Journal of Production Economics 147, 340-350. [CrossRef ] 138. Roberto Cigolini, Margherita Pero, Tommaso Rossi, Andrea Sianesi. 2014. Linking supply chain configuration to supply chain perfrmance: A discrete event simulation model. Simulati on Modell ing Practice and Theory 40, 1-11. [CrossRef ] 139. Weihua Liu, Zhicheng Liang, Shuqing Wang, Yang Liu, W enchen Xie. 2014. Scheduling Performance Evaluation of Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on the Dynamic Index Weight. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014, 1-14. [CrossRef ] 140. U.S. Bititci, S.U.O. Firat, P. Garengo. 2013. How to compare performances of firms operating in different sectors?. Production Planning & Control 24, 1032-1049. [CrossRef ] 141. Jing Chen, Haihong YuPerformance Simulation and Optimization of Agricultural Supply Chains 131-137. [CrossRef ] 142. Gyan Prakash, R. R. PantPerformance measurement of a dairy supply chain: A balance scorecard perspective 196-200. [CrossRef ] 143. 나나나, Donghyun Choi. 2013. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process to Determine Best Practices for Green Supply Chain Management. Korean Journal of Logistics 21, 35-50. [CrossRef ] 144. Per J. Agrell, Adel Hatami-Marbini. 2013. Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: State of the art and research directions. Computers & Industrial Engineering 66, 567-583. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
145. Sidong Xian, Dong Qiu, Shiyun Zhang. 2013. A Fuzzy Principal Component Analysis Approach to Hierarchical Evaluation Model for Balanced Supply Chain Scorecard Grading. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 159, 518-535. [CrossRef ] 146. Jane Davies, Nitin Joglekar. 2013. Supply Chain Integration, Product Modularity, and Market Valuation: Evidence from the Solar Energy Industry. Production and Operations Management 22, 1494-1508. [CrossRef ] 147. Teresa Wu, Simin Huang, Jennifer Blackhurst, Xiaoling Zhang, Shanshan Wang. 2013. Supply Chain Risk Management: An Agent-Based Simulation to Study the Impact of Retail Stockouts. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60, 676-686. [CrossRef ] 148. Carine Rongier, Matthieu Lauras, François Galasso, Didier Gourc. 2013. Towards a crisis performancemeasurement system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufactur ing 26, 1087-1102. [CrossRef ] 149. Rasib Khan, Md Munirul Haque, Ragib HasanModeling a secure supply chain integrity preservation system 741-747. [CrossRef ] 150. Christoph Fuchs. 2013. IT steigert die Supply-Chain-Leistung — immer?. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 50, 107-114. [CrossRef ] 151. Fernando Robles Professor M. Lee Sang Department of Management, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA Sung Rha Jin Department of Management, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA Choi Donghyun Department of Management, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA Noh Yonghwi College of Business Administration, Myongji University, Seoul, South Korea . 2013. Pressures affecting green supply chain performance. Management Decision 51:8, 1753-1768. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 152. Heewook Choi, Hun-Koo Ha. 2013. The Priority of Supply Chain Designs for Humanitarian Relief with AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). Korean Journal of Logistics 21, 121-134. [CrossRef ] 153. Yao-Fen Wang, Su-Ping Chen, Yi-Ching Lee, Chen-Tsang (Simon) Tsai. 2013. Dev eloping green management standards for restaurants: An application of green supply chain management. International Journal of Hospitality Mana gement 3 4, 263-273. [CrossR ef ] 154. Cassandra Elrod, Susan Murray, Sundeep Bande. 2013. A Review of Performance Metrics for Supply Chain Management. Engineering Management Journal 25, 39-50. [CrossRef ] 155. Faranak FattahiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran Ali S. NookabadiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran Mahdi KadivarDepartment of Food Science, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. 2013. A model for measuring the performance of the meat supply chain. British Food Journal 115:8, 1090-1111. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 156. Katri Karjalainen, Claire Moxha m. 2013. Focus on Fairtrade: Propositions for Integrating Fairtrade and Supply Chain Management Research. Journal of Business Ethics 116, 267-282. [CrossRef ] 157. Christos Vidala kis, James Sommerville. 2013. Transportation responsiveness and efficiency within the building supply chain. Building Research & Information 41, 469-481. [CrossRef ] 158. Khalid A. Al-Mutawah. 2013. An Intelligent Approach to Assess Tacit Knowledge Fitness in Networked Enterprises. International Journal of Technology Diffusion 2:10.4018/IJTD.20110401, 1-18. [CrossRef ] 159. Abhijeet GhadgeSchool of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK Samir DaniSchool of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK Michael ChesterSystems Engineering Innovation Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK Roy
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
KalawskyResearch School of Systems Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 2013. A systems approach for modelling supply chain risks. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18:5, 523-538. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 160. Fei Ye, Zhiqiang Wang. 2013. Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering 65, 370-377. [CrossRef ] 161. Abirami Radhakrishnan, Dessa David, Douglas Hales, V. Sri Sridharan. 2013. Mapping the Critical Links between Supply Chain Evaluation System and Supply Chain Integration Sustainability. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences 2:10.4018/jsds.20110101, 44-65. [CrossRef ] 162. Xuemei Fan, Shujun Zhang, Longzhao Wang, Yinsheng Yang, Kevin Hapeshi. 2013. An Evaluation Model of Supply Chain Performances Using 5DBSC and LMBP Neural Network Algorithm. Journal of Bionic Engineering 10, 383-395. [CrossRef ] 163. Suraksha Gupta, V. Kumar. 2013. Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance. Journal of World Business 48, 311-320. [CrossRef ] 164. Ferry JieSchool of Business IT a nd Logistics, R MIT University, Melbourne, Australia Kevin A. PartonInstitute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia Rodney J. CoxFaculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia. 2013. Linking supply chain practices to competitive advantage. British Food Journal 115:7, 1003-1024. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 165. Johanna A. Badenhorst, Claus Maurer, Tersia Brevis-Landsberg. 2013. Developing measures for the evaluation of information flow efficiency in supply chains. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management 7. . [CrossRef ] 166. Rajesh Rajaguru, Margaret Jekanyika Matanda. 2013. Effects of inter-organizational compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration. Industrial M arketing M anagement 42, 620-632. [CrossRef ] 167. R. Ruiz-Femenia, G. Guillén-Gosálbez, L. Jiménez, J.A. Caballero. 2013. Multi-objective optimization of environmentally conscious chemical supply chains under demand uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Science 95, 1-11. [CrossRef ] 168. Na FuLeadership, Innovation and Knowledge (LInK) Research Centre, DCU Business School, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland Patrick C. FloodLeadership, Innovation and Knowledge (LInK) Research Centre, HRM & Organizationa l Psychology Group, DCU Business School, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland Janine BosakLeadership, Innovation and Knowledge (LInK) Research Centre, HRM & Organizational Psychology Group, DCU Business School, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland Tim MorrisSaïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Philip O 'ReganK emmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. 2013. Exploring the performance effect of HPWS on professional service supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18:3, 292-307. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 169. Patrik AppelqvistAmer Sports Corporation, Helsinki, Finland Valérie Chavez‐DemoulinFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Ari‐Pekka HameriFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Jussi HeikkiläDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Vincent WautersAmer Sports Corporation, Helsinki, Finland. 2013. Turnaround across diverse global supply chains using shared metrics and change methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 33:5, 622-647. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 170. Susana AzevedoManagement and Economics Department, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal Helena CarvalhoMechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal V. Cruz‐MachadoMechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal. 2013. Using interpretive structural modelling to identify and rank performance measures. Baltic Journal of Management 8:2, 208-230. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 171. Dewan Md Zahurul IslamNewRail, School of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Thomas H. ZunderNewRail, School of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Ronald JornaMobycon, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 2013. Performance evaluation of an online benchmarking tool for European freight transport chains. Benchmarking: An International Journal 20:2, 233-250. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 172. Kaushik Subramanian, James B. Rawlings, Christos T. Maravelias, Jesus Flores-Cerrillo, Lawrence Megan. 2013. Integration of control theory and scheduling methods for supply chain management. Computers & Chemical Engineering 51, 4-20. [CrossRef ] 173. Jesús Muñuzuri, Jaime Beltrán, Enrique Martín, Luis Onieva. 2013. ISO 9001 and standardised logistics management: an empirical analysis in Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24, 479-495. [CrossRef ] 174. Dominique Estampe, Samir Lamouri, Jean-Luc Paris, Sakina Brahim-Djelloul. 2013. A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International Journal of Production Economics 142, 247-258. [CrossRef ] 175. Dean Elmuti, Grace Khoury, Omar Omran, Ahmed S. Abou-Zaid. 2013. Challenges and Opportunities of Health Care Supply Chain Management in the United States. Health Marketing Quarterly 30, 128-143. [CrossRef ] 176. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Padmabati Gahan. 2013. Supplier performance measurement in discrete manufacturing industry-empirical study on Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Economics and Management 14, 330-347. [CrossRef ] 177. Sanna PekkolaBased at the Lahti School of Innovation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lahti, Finland. 2013. Managing a network by utilizing performance measurement information. Measuring Business Excellence 17:1, 72-79. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 178. Ian D. BlackmanBusiness and Information Systems, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Christopher P. HollandManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Timothy WestcottDirector of Treasury, EMEA, Motorola, Basingstoke, UK. 2013. Motorola's global financial supply chain strategy. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18:2, 132-147. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 179. Eelco van Asperen, Rommert Dekker. 2013. Centrality, flexibility and floating stocks: A quantitative evaluation of port-of-entry choices. Maritime Economics & Logistics 15, 72-100. [CrossRef ] 180. Constantin Blome, Tobias Schoenherr, Daniel Rexhausen. 2013. Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research 51, 1295-1318. [CrossRef ] 181. P. Subramanian, N. Ramkumar, T.T. Narendran, K. Ganesh. 2013. PRISM: PRIority based SiMulated annealing for a closed loop supply chain network design problem. Applied Soft Computing 13, 1121-1135. [CrossRef ] 182. Trevor CaddenDepartment of Management and Leadership, Ulster Business School, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK Donna MarshallUCD Business Schools, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Guangming CaoUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK. 2013. Opposites attract: organisational
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
culture and supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18:1, 86-103. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 183. Andrea Prinz, Thomas Bauernhansl. 2013. Risk-Value-Cost-based Optimization of Global Value-adding Structures. Procedia CIRP 7, 103-108. [CrossRef ] 184. Joachim Metternich, Jörg Böllhoff, Stefan Seifermann, Sebastian Beck. 2013. Volume and Mix Flexibility Evaluation of Lean Production Systems. Procedia CIRP 9, 79-84. [CrossRef ] 185. S Cannella, A P Barbosa-Póvoa, J M Framinan, S Relvas. 2013. Metrics for bullwhip effect analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 64, 1-16. [CrossRef ] 186. Ron Berger, Anat Hovav. 2013. Using a Dairy Management Information System to Facilitate Precision Agriculture: The Case of the AfiMilk® System. Information Systems Management 30, 21-34. [CrossRef ] 187. Dmitry Ivanov, Boris Sokolov. 2013. Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 224, 313-323. [CrossRef ] 188. Dominik Pfeiffer, Sarah Anwander, Bernd HellingrathA Simulation Approach to Evaluate Supply Chain Flexibility 1134-1143. [CrossRef ] 189. Norberto García, Rubén Ruiz-Femenia, José A. Caballero. 2012. Teaching mathematical modeling software for multiobjective optimization in chemical engineering courses. Education for Chemical Engineers 7, e169e180. [CrossRef ] 190. Jing Yang, Hua Jiang. 2012. Fuzzy Evaluation on Supply Chains’ Overall Performance Based on AHM and M(1,2,3). Journal of Software 7. . [CrossRef ] 191. Johannes I. M. Halman, Johannes T. Voordijk. 2012. Balanced Framework for Measuring Performance of Supply Chains in House Building. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 138, 1444-1450. [CrossRef ] 192. M. Aghdasi, S. E. Malihi, Y. Asadi, Sh. GhadamiCritical business objects and its applications in designing performance management systems 1558-1562. [CrossRef ] 193. Michael BourlakisBrunel Business School, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK George MaglarasDepartment of Business Administration in Food and Agricultural Enterprises, University of Ioannina, Agrinio, Greece Christos FotopoulosDepartment of Business Administration in Food and Agricultural Enterprises, University of Ioannina, Agrinio, Greece. 2012. Creating a “best value supply chain”? Empirical evidence from the Greek food chain. T he International Journal of Logistics Management 23:3, 360-382. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 194. Ahmad Saleh ShatatFaculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman Zulkifli Mohamed UdinCollege of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia. 2012. The relationship between ERP system and supply chain management performance in Malaysian manufacturing companies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 25:6, 576-604. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 195. Karen Ka-Leung Moon, Candace Ying Yi, E.W.T. Ngai. 2012. An instrument for measuring supply chain flexibility for the textile and clothing companies. European Journal of Operational Research 222, 191-203. [CrossRef ] 196. Leandro C. Coelho, Jean-François Cordeau, Gilbert Laporte. 2012. Consistency in multi-vehicle inventoryrouting. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 24, 270-287. [CrossRef ] 197. Rohit Joshi, D.K. Banwet, Ravi Shankar, Jimmy Gandhi. 2012. Performance improvement of cold chain in an emerging economy. Production Planning & Control 23, 817-836. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
198. Sang-Gyun Na, Jian-Xin Wang. 2012. Factors Affecting Corporations Practice of Supply Chain Management: With a Focus on Information Sharing and Performances. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science 14, 193-205. [CrossRef ] 199. Harri LorentzTurku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Juuso TöyliTurku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Tomi SolakiviTurku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Hanne‐Mari HälinenTurku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Lauri OjalaTurku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 2012. Effects of geographic dispersion on intra‐firm supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17:6, 611-626. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 200. Baofeng HuoSchool of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. 2012. The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17:6, 596-610. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 201. Marco TiemanFaculty of Business Management, Universiti Tecknology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia Jack G.A.J. van der VorstLogistics, Decision and Information Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Maznah Che GhazaliFaculty of Business Management, Universiti Tecknology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia. 2012. Principles in halal supply chain management. Journal of Islamic Marketing 3:3, 217-243. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 202. Sunhee Youn, Ma Ga (Mark) Yang, Paul Hong. 2012. Integrative leadership for effective supply chain implementation: An empirical study of Korean firms. International Journal of Production Economics 139, 237-246. [CrossRef ] 203. Izunildo Cabral, Antonio Grilo, Virgílio Cruz-Machado. 2012. A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4830-4845. [CrossRef ] 204. A. Najmi, A. Makui. 2012. A conceptual model for measuring supply chain's performance. Production Planning & Control 23, 694-706. [CrossRef ] 205. Amalia Nikolopoulou, Marianthi G. Ierapetritou. 2012. Optimal design of sustainable chemical processes and supply chains: A rev iew. Computers & Chemical Engineering 44, 94-103. [CrossRef ] 206. N. Agami, M. Saleh, M. Rasmy. 2012. A Hybrid Dynamic Framework for Supply Chain Performance Improvement. IEEE Systems Journal 6, 469-478. [CrossRef ] 207. Umit Bititci, Patrizia Garengo, Viktor Dörfler, Sai Nudurupati. 2012. Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow*. International Journal of Management Reviews 14:10.1111/ijmr.2012.14.issue-3, 305-327. [CrossRef ] 208. E. Simangunsong, L.C. Hendry, M. Stevenson. 2012. Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4493-4523. [CrossRef ] 209. Giovanni Mazzuto, Maurizio Bevilacqua, Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica. 2012. Supply chain modelling and managing, using timed coloured Petri nets: a case study. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4718-4733. [CrossRef ] 210. Paul Hong, David Dobrzykowski, and Young Won ParkSufian QrunflehOperations and Information Management Department, The University of Scranton, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA Monideepa TarafdarThe University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA T.S. Ragu‐NathanThe University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA. 2012. Examining alignment between supplier management practices and information systems strategy. Benchmarking: An International Journal 19:4/5, 604-617. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
211. Kuo-Hsiung Chang, Hsu-Feng Huang. 2012. Using influence strategies to advance supplier delivery flexibility: The moderating roles of trust and shared vision. Industrial Marketing Management 41, 849-860. [CrossRef ] 212. Ray Collins, Ximing Sun, Chong Guang Li. 2012. Are supply-chain relationships more influenced by buyer-supplier relationships or the business environment of the country itself? Evidence from the ‘China Australia’ trading relationship. Asia Pacific Business Review 18, 391-405. [CrossRef ] 213. Marcelo BronzoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil Marcos Paulo Valadares de OliveiraFederal University of Espírito Santo, Espírito Santo, Brazil Kevin McCormackDRK Research, Fuquay Varina, North Carolina, USA. 2012. Planning, capabilities, and performance: an integrated value approach. Management Decision 50:6, 1001-1021. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 214. P.R.C. GopalDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India Jitesh ThakkarDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India. 2012. A review on supply chain performance measures and metrics: 2000‐2011. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61:5, 518-547. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 215. Patrick Qiang, Anna Nagurney. 2012. A bi-criteria indicator to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46, 801-812. [CrossRef ] 216. S. J. Gorane, R. kant, M. D. SinghFunctional benchmarking of organisations on the basis of supply cha in performance measures 146-151. [CrossRef ] 217. Alessandro Creazza, Fabrizio Dallari, Tommaso Rossi. 2012. An integrated model for designing and optimising an international logistics network. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2925-2939. [CrossRef ] 218. Daniel Rexhausen, Richard Pibernik, Gernot Kaiser. 2012. Customer-facing supply chain practices—The impact of demand and distribution management on supply chain success. Journal of Operations Management 30, 269-281. [CrossRef ] 219. Janne Engblom, Tomi Solakivi, Juuso Töyli, Lauri Ojala. 2012. Multiple-method analysis of logistics costs. International Journal of Production Economics 137, 29-35. [CrossRef ] 220. Chunguang Bai, Joseph Sarkis. 2012. Supply-chain performance-measurement system management using neighbourhood rough sets. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2484-2500. [CrossRef ] 221. Orrin Cooper, Pandu Tadika malla, Jennifer Shang. 2012. Selection of a Third-Party Logistics Provider: Capturing the Interaction and Influence of Performance Metrics with the Analytical Network Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 19:10.1002/mcda.v19.3-4, 115-128. [CrossRef ] 222. Antônio Márcio Tavares ThoméIndustrial Engineering Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Luiz Felipe ScavardaCenter of Excellence in Optimization Solutions (NExO), Industrial Engineering Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Nicole Suclla FernandezElectrical Engineering Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Annibal José ScavardaSchool of Business and Management, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. 2012. Sales and operations planning and the firm performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61:4, 359-381. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 223. Vildan Özkır, Hüseyin Başlıgıl. 2012. Modelling product-recovery processes in closed-loop supply-chain network design. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2218-2233. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
224. Young-Chan Lee, Hyung-Jin Oh. 2012. An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors, Practice Level, and Performance of Green Supply Chain Management. The Journal of Information Systems 21, 173-203. [CrossRef ] 225. Kwang-Oh Park. 2012. Empirical Research on Performance of SCM Adoption - Structural Equation Modeling Approach -. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 12, 295-310. [CrossRef ] 226. Xingxing ZuDepartment of Information Science and Systems, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Hale KaynakDepartment of Management, Marketing and International Business, The University of Texas‐Pan American, Edinburg, Texas, USA. 2012. An agency theory perspective on supply chain quality management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 32:4, 423-446. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 227. Parikshit CharanAssistant Professor at the Indian Institute of Management Rohtak, Rohtak, India. 2012. Supply chain performance issues in an automobile company: a SAP‐LAP analysis. Measuring Business Excellence 16:1, 67-86. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 228. Madhawanand Mishra, Felix T.S. Chan. 2012. Impact evaluation of supply chain initiatives: a system simulation methodology. International Journal of Production Research 50, 1554-1567. [CrossRef ] 229. Heather Lutz, David O. Vang, William D. Raffield. 2012. Using game theory to predict supply cha in cooperation. Performance Improvement 51:10.1002/pfi.v51.3, 19-23. [CrossRef ] 230. I-Chiang Wang. 2012. Cost Reduction in Supply Chain Management by Shorter Purchasing Lead-time: A Case Study of Flexible Printed Circuit Boards. Journal of Applied Sciences 12, 271-278. [CrossRef ] 231. Helena Carvalho, Susana Garrido Azevedo, V. Cruz-Machado. 2012. Ag ile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics Research 4, 49-62. [CrossRef ] 232. Adisak Theeranuphattana, John C.S. Tang, Do Ba Khang. 2012. An Integrated Approach to Measuring Supply Chain Performance. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 11, 54-69. [CrossRef ] 233. Po‐Young ChuDepartment of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Kuo‐Hsiung ChangDepartment of International Business, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan Hsu‐ Feng HuangDepartment of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. 2012. How to increase supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies?. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 27:2, 115-131. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 234. Ing-Long Wu, Ching-Hui Chang. 2012. Using the balanced scorecard in assessing the performance of eSCM diffusion: A multi-stage perspective. Decision Support Systems 52, 474-485. [CrossRef ] 235. Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti. 2011. A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. International Journal of Production Economics 134, 177-187. [CrossRef ] 236. Susana G. Azevedo, Helena Carvalho, V. Cruz Machado. 2011. The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 47, 850-871. [CrossRef ] 237. Liu Tenghong, Chen LiThe Research for the Performance Evaluation Index System of Supply Chain Based on Internet of Things 176-180. [CrossRef ] 238. H. Lorentz, Y. Shi, O.‐P. Hilmola and J.S. SraiUsha RamanathanNewcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Angappa GunasekaranDepartment of Decision and Information Sciences, Charlton College of Business, University of Massachusetts, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, USA Nachiappan SubramanianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, India. 2011. Supply chain collaboration performance metrics: a
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal 18:6, 856-872. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 239. Dr K.L. Choy, Dr Kris M.Y. Law, Prof S.C. Lenny KOHSwee Siong KuikSchool of Advanced Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Sev Verl NagalingamSchool of Advanced Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Yousef AmerSchool of Advanced Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. 2011. Sustainable supply chain for collaborative manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 22:8, 984-1001. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 240. R. Dhanalakshmi, P. Parthiban, K. Ganesh, T. Arunkumar. 2011. Genetic Algorithm to Solve MultiPeriod, Multi-Product, Bi-Echelon Supply Chain Network Design Problem. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management 2:10.4018/ijisscm.20091001, 24-42. [CrossRef ] 241. Renata Gomes Frutuoso Braz, Luiz Felipe Scavarda, Roberto Antonio Martins. 2011. Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research. International Journal of Production Economics 133, 751-760. [CrossRef ] 242. Roberto Cigolini, Margherita Pero, Tommaso Rossi. 2011. An object-oriented simulation meta-model to analyse supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Research 49, 5917-5941. [CrossRef ] 243. Hwal-Sik Chang, Jong-Hyun Jun, Kwang-Oh Park. 2011. A Study on the Impact of the RTE Characteristics for SCM Performance. The Journal of Information Systems 20, 161-186. [CrossRef ] 244. Su-Han Woo, Stephen Pettit, Anthony K C Beresford. 2011. Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments. Maritime Economics & Logistics 13, 250-277. [CrossRef ] 245. W.H. IpDepartment of Industrial a nd Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China S.L. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China C.Y. LamDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China. 2011. Modeling supply chain performance and stability. Industrial Management & Data Systems 111:8, 1332-1354. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 246. Rohit Joshi, D.K. Banwet, Ravi Shankar. 2011. A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 10170-10182. [CrossRef ] 247. Mahesh Srinivasan, Debmalya Mukherjee, Ajai S. Gaur. 2011. Buyer–supplier partnership quality a nd supply chain performance: Moderating role of risks, and environmental uncertainty. European Management Journal 29, 260-271. [CrossRef ] 248. Wiljeana J. Glover, Jennifer A. Farris, Eileen M. Van Aken, Toni L. Doolen. 2011. Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics 132, 197-213. [CrossRef ] 249. Ci Chen, Hong Yan. 2011. Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 213, 147-155. [CrossRef ] 250. Nitesh Khilwani, M.K. Tiwari, Ihsan Sabuncuoglu. 2011. Hybrid Petri-nets for modelling and performance evaluation of supply chains. International Journal of Production Research 49, 4627-4656. [CrossRef ] 251. Richard CuthbertsonSaï d Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Wojciech PiotrowiczSaïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2011. Performance measurement systems in supply chains. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 60:6, 583-602. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
252. Kim Sundtoft HaldDepartment of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark Chris EllegaardCopenhagen Business School, Center for Applied Market Science, Herning, Denmark. 2011. Supplier evaluation processes: the shaping and reshaping of supplier performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31:8, 888-910. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 253. Carlos F. GomesISR‐Institute of Systems and Robotics, School of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud M. YasinDepartment of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA. 2011. A systematic benchmarking perspective on performance management of global small to medium‐sized organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal 18:4, 543-562. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 254. Candace Y. YiInstitute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong E.W.T. NgaiDepartment of Management and Marketing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong K‐L. MoonDepartment of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea. 2011. Supply chain flexibility in an uncertain environment: exploratory findings from five case studies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 16:4, 271-283. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 255. Pamela P. Rogers, Divesh Ojha, Richard E. White. 2011. Conceptualising complementarities in manufacturing flexibility: a comprehensive view. International Journal of Production Research 49, 3767-3793. [CrossRef ] 256. Emilio Della Bruna Junior, Leonardo Ensslin, Sandra Rolim EnsslinSupply chain performance evaluation: A case study in a company of equipment for refrigeration 969-978. [CrossRef ] 257. M. Adel El-Baz. 2011. Fuzzy performance measurement of a supply chain in manufacturing companies. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 6681-6688. [CrossRef ] 258. Wen-Chih Chen, Chen-Fu Chien. 2011. Measuring relative performance of wafer fabrication operations: a case study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22, 447-457. [CrossRef ] 259. Fengye Wang, Zhiyong Huang, Aifen FengThe rate problem in bulk: A game theoretical model in logistics network 517-520. [CrossRef ] 260. Afdiman AnuarDepartment of Automotive Technology, Advanced Technology Training Center, Melaka, Malaysia Rosnah Mohd YusuffDepartment of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. 2011. Manufacturing best practices in Malaysian small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Benchmarking: An International Journal 18:3, 324-341. [ Abstra ct] [Full Text] [PDF] 261. Izunildo Cabral, Antonio Grilo, R. Puga-Leal, V. Cruz-MachadoAn information model in lean, agile, resilient and green supply chains 776-780. [CrossRef ] 262. Hiroko Nakamura, Shinji Suzuki, Tomobe Hironori, Yuya Kajikawa, Ichiro Sakata. 2011. Citation lag analysis in supply chain research. Scientometrics 87, 221-232. [CrossRef ] 263. Yinan Qi, Xiande Zhao, Chwen Sheu. 2011. The Impact of Competitive Strategy and Supply Chain Strategy on Business Performance: The Role of Environmental Uncertainty*. Decision Sciences 42:10.1111/ deci.2011.42.issue-2, 371-389. [CrossRef ] 264. Hsin‐I HsiaoDepartment of Business Administration, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Ron G.M. KempWageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen The Netherlands, and Netherlands Competition Authority, The Hague, The Netherlands Jack G.A.J. van der VorstOperations Research and Logistics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands S.W.F. (Onno) OmtaDepartment of Business Administration, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 2011. Logistics outsourcing by Taiwanese and Dutch food processing industries. British Food Journal 113:4, 550-576. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
265. Ezutah Udoncy Olugu, Kuan Yew Wong, Awaludin Mohamed Shaharoun. 2011. Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55, 567-579. [CrossRef ] 266. Tzu-Su Li, L. C. Lin. 2011. A unified model for the implementation of both CMMI and 6σ. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 22, 407-424. [CrossRef ] 267. Po-Young Chu, Kuo-Hsiung Chang, Hsu-Feng Huang. 2011. The Role of Social Mechanisms in Promoting Supplier Flexibility. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 18, 155-187. [CrossRef ] 268. Li LiuThe Effects of Manufacturing Firm's Supply Chain Performance on Competitive Advanta ge 1259-1262. [CrossRef ] 269. Seyed Gholamreza Jalali Naini, Ali Reza Aliahmadi, Meisam Jafa ri-Eskandari. 2011. Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: A case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55, 593-603. [CrossRef ] 270. Helena ForslundSchool of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden. 2011. The size of a logistics performance measurement system. Facilities 29:3/4, 133-148. [ Abstract] [Full Tex t] [PDF] 271. Sander de Leeuw, Jeroen P. van den Berg. 2011. Improving operational performance by influencing shopfloor behavior via performance management practices. Journal of Operations Management 29, 224-235. [CrossRef ] 272. Adrienn Molnár, Xavier Gellynck, Filiep Vanhonacker, Taras Gagalyuk, Wim Verbeke. 2011. Do chain goals match consumer perceptions? the case of the traditional food sector in selected European Union countries. Agribusiness 27:10.1002/agr.v27.2, 221-243. [CrossRef ] 273. Byoung‐Chun HaDepartment of Logistics/Supply Chain/Service Operations Ma nagement, School of Business, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea Yang‐Kyu ParkDepartment of Human Resource Management and Organization Behavior, School of Business, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea Sungbin ChoDepartment of Management Science, School of Business, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea. 2011. Suppliers' affective trust and trust in competency in buyers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31:1, 56-77. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 274. Carlos F. GomesSchool of Economics, ISR‐Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud M. YasinDepartment of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA João V. LisboaSchool of Economics, ISR‐Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 2011. Performance measurement practices in manufacturing firms revisited. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31:1, 5-30. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 275. 2011. Volume Removed - Publisher's Disclaimer. Energy Procedia 13, 1-10380. [CrossRef ] 276. Ehsan Nikbakhsh, Reza Zanjirani FarahaniHumanitarian Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief Operations 291-332. [CrossRef ] 277. Ki Yeon Chung, Yoon Seok Chang, Hannu Vanharanta, Jussi Kantola. 2011. Evaluation of radio-frequency identification projects in public sectors of Korea. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 21:10.1002/hfm.v21.1, 44-51. [CrossRef ] 278. Y. Boulaksil, M. Grunow, J.C. Fransoo. 2011. Capacity flexibility allocation in an outsourced supply chain with reservation. International Journal of Production Economics 129, 111-118. [CrossRef ] 279. Jan Holmström, Antti Tenhiälä, Mikko Kärkkäinen. 2011. Item dwell time in project inventories: A f ield experiment. Computers in Industry 62, 99-106. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
280. Ing-Long Wu, Cheng-Hung Chuang. 2010. Examining the diffusion of electronic supply chain management with external antecedents and firm performance: A multi-stage analysis. Decision Support Systems 50, 103-115. [CrossRef ] 281. Sirirat Pungchompoo, Apichat SopadangA supply chain performance measurement improved with integrated methods FDSM, MOO and DEA part I: A conceptual of performance measurement framework in Thailand: Frozen shrimp chains 235-239. [CrossRef ] 282. AVINASH D. SARODE, V. K. SUNNAPWAR, P. M. KHODKE. 2010. IMPROVING EFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPLY CHAIN BY SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE SUPPLIER: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPROACH. Journal of Advanced Manufacturi ng Systems 09, 129-144. [CrossRef ] 283. Chunguang BaiSchool of Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People's Republic of China Joseph SarkisGraduate School of Management, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA Xiaopeng WeiSchool of Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People's Republic of China. 2010. Addressing key sustainable supply chain management issues using rough set methodology. Management Research Review 33:12, 1113-1127. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 284. Anna TrifilovaClever G. EsturilhoFederal Technological University – Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil Renault, Curitiba, Brazil Carla EstorilioFederal Technological University – Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil. 2010. The deployment of manufacturing flexibilit y as a function of company strategy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 21:8, 971-989. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 285. Carlo A. Mora‐MongeDepartment of Accounting and Information Systems, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA Arash AzadeganDepartment of Management, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA Marvin E. GonzalezSchool of Business, University of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 2010. Assessing the impact of web‐based electronic commerce use on the organizational benefits of a firm. Benchmarking: An International Journal 17:6, 773-790. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 286. Wei-hua Zhang, Lin-lin Hou, Wan-hua QiuAssessing supply chain performance based on problem discovery and analysis 1271-1275. [CrossRef ] 287. Dimitris PapakiriakopoulosELTRUN, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece Katerina PramatariELTRUN, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece. 2010. Collaborative performance measurement in supply chain. Indus trial Mana gement & D ata S ystems 110:9, 1297-1318. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 288. Lie-Chien Lin, Tzu-Su Li. 2010. An integrated framework for supply chain performance measurement using six-sigma metrics. Software Quality Journal 18, 387-406. [CrossRef ] 289. Erik Hofmann, Herbert Kotzab. 2010. A SUPPLY CHAIN-OR IENTED APPROACH OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT. Journal of Business Logistics 31:10.1002/jbl.2010.31.issue-2, 305-330. [CrossRef ] 290. Jeong Soo ParkDepartment of Business Administration, Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul, South Korea Deok Shin ChangCollege of Business Administration, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea. 2010. A study on the difference of supply chain performance from the fitness between competitive priorities and supplier selection criteria. Asian Journal on Quality 11:2, 183-189. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 291. Ogan M. YigitbasiogluDepartment of Accounting, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. 2010. Information sharing with key suppliers: a transaction cost theory perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 40:7, 550-578. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
292. Margarita Protopappa-Sieke, Ralf W. Seifert. 2010. Interrelating operational and financial performance measurements in inventory control. European Journal of Operational Research 204, 439-448. [CrossRef ] 293. You-Shyang Chen, Ching-Hsue Cheng, Chien-Jung Lai. 2010. A hybrid procedure for extracting rules of production performance in the automobile parts industry. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21, 423-437. [CrossRef ] 294. YING LIAO, PAUL HONG, S. SUBBA RAO. 2010. SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY FLEXIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS. Journal of Supply Chain Management 46, 6-22. [CrossRef ] 295. Fernando Bernardi de SouzaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil Sílvio R.I. PiresMethodist University of Piracicaba (UNIMEP), Piracicaba, Brazil. 2010. Theory of constraints contributions to outbound logistics. Management Research Review 33:7, 683-700. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 296. 2010. Erratum. British Food Journal 112:6, 653-667. [ Abstract] [PDF] 297. Professor Joseph SarkisSarah ShawLogistics Institute, University of Hull, Hull, UK, David B. GrantLogistics Institute, University of Hull, Hull, UK John ManganSchool of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. 2010. Developing environmental supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal 17:3, 320-339. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 298. Jianfeng Li, Jun Zhai, Yan Chen, Yuhong JiangSupply chain dynamic simulation with information coordination V1-279-V1-283. [CrossRef ] 299. Ingo Westphal, Klaus-Dieter Thoben, Marcus Seifert. 2010. Managing collaboration performance to govern virtual organizations. Journal of Int elligent M anufacturing 21, 311-320. [CrossRef ] 300. Dong‐Young KimCoggin College of Business, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA Vinod KumarSprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Uma KumarSprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. 2010. Performance assessment framework for suppl y chain partnership. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15:3, 187-195. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 301. Liu Yongsheng, Ji LiDesign of Early Warning Indicator System for Enterprise Logistics Risks Based on Balanced Scorecard 27-31. [CrossRef ] 302. 나나나, 나나나, 나나나, Kim, Hyun-Soo. 2010. Framework for ROI Analysis of RFID System: Focused on Manufacturing Industry. Korean Journal of Lo gistics 18, 103-120. [CrossRef ] 303. Hu Song, Xiao LeiThe Analysis and Coordination of the Cooperation Risk in Supply Network 3447-3450. [CrossRef ] 304. Xiaohang BiResearch on Distribution Performance Evaluation of Agile Supply Chain 1-4. [CrossRef ] 305. Kim P. BrycesonSchool of Integrative Systems, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Geoff SlaughterSchool of Accounting Economics and Finance, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. 2010. Alignment of performance metrics in a multi‐enterprise agribusiness. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59:4, 325-350. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 306. Hsiao-Lan Wei, Eric T G Wang. 2010. The strategic value of supply chain visibility: increasing the ability to reconfigure. European Journal of Information Systems 19, 238-249. [CrossRef ] 307. Roland Bardy. 2010. Comparative supply chain performance: Measuring cross-cultural effects. The example of the Bratislava regional automotive manufacturing cluster. Knowledge and Process Management 17, 95-110. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
308. Ezutah Udoncy Olugu, Kuan Yew Wong, Awaludin Mohamed Shaharoun. 2010. A Comprehensive Approach in Assessing the Performance of an Automobile Closed-Loop Supply Chain. Sustainability 2, 871-889. [CrossRef ] 309. Sarita Koendjbiharie, Otto Koppius, Peter Vervest, Eric van HeckNetwork transparency and the performance of dynamic business networks 197-202. [CrossRef ] 310. Michel Leseure and Mel Hudson‐SmithJérôme ChandesCooperación Logística Solidaria, Lima, Peru and Université de la Méditerranée (Aix‐Marseille 2), Marseille, France Gilles PachéUniversité de la Méditerranée (Aix‐Marseille 2), Marseille, France BEM – Bordeaux Management School, Bordeaux, France. 2010. Investigating humanitarian logistics issues: from operations management to strategic action. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 21:3, 320-340. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 311. José A. Faria, Eusébio Nunes, Manuel A. Matos. 2010. Cost and quality of service analysis of production systems based on the cumulative downtime. International Journal of Production Research 48, 1653-1684. [CrossRef ] 312. Gunjan SoniMechanical Engineering Group, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani, India Rambabu KodaliMechanical Engineering Group, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani, India. 2010. Internal benchmarking for assessment of supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal 17:1, 44-76. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 313. H.I. Hsiao, R.G.M. Kemp, J.G.A.J. van der Vorst, S.W.F. (Onno) Omta. 2010. A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry. International Journal of Production Economics 124, 75-86. [CrossRef ] 314. Elcio M. Tachizawa, Cristina Gimenez. 2010. Supply flexibility strategies in Spanish firms: Results from a survey. International Journal of Production Economics 124, 214-224. [CrossRef ] 315. Jussi LehtinenBoston Consulting Group, Helsinki, Finland Tuomas AholaHelsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland. 2010. Is performance measurement suitable for an extended enterprise?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30:2, 181-204. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 316. Govindan MarthandanFaculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia Chun Meng TangFaculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia. 2010. Information technology evaluation: issues and challenges. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 12:1, 37-55. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 317. Jianfeng Li, Yan Chen, Shuyong Liu, Gang SunPort supply chain simulation based on system dynamics method 428-432. [CrossRef ] 318. Harri Lorentz, Pervez N. Ghauri. 2010. Demand supply network opportunit y development processes in emerging markets: Positioning for strategy realization in Russia. Industrial Marketing Management 39, 240-251. [CrossRef ] 319. A Jayant, S K Jhamb, P Gupta, S K GargSCM: An integrated approach for effective management: A case study of manuf acturing unit 221-225. [CrossRef ] 320. Margherita Pero, Tommaso Rossi, Carlo Noé, Andrea Sianesi. 2010. An exploratory study of the relation between supply chain topological features and supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics 123, 266-278. [CrossRef ] 321. Paolo TaticchiLuca CagnazzoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy Paolo TaticchiDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy Alessandro BrunDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. 2010. The role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
initiatives at supply chain level. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59:2, 163-185. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 322. Jiulong ZhuEvaluation of supply chain performance based on BP neural network V1-495-V1-499. [CrossRef ] 323. Étienne St-Jean, Luc LeBel. 2010. La dépendance commerciale et l’autonomie décisionnelle influencentelles la performance et les choix stratégiques ?. Revue internationale P.M.E.: Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise 23, 95. [CrossRef ] 324. Adrienn Molnár, Xavier Gellynck, Robert Weaver. 2010. Chain member perception of chain performance: the role of relationship quality. Journal on Chain and Network Science 10, 27-49. [CrossRef ] 325. Barbara B. Flynn, Baofeng Huo, Xiande Zhao. 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management 28, 58-71. [CrossRef ] 326. Jose Jaime Arana Coronado, Jos Bijman, Onno Omta, Alfons Oude Lansink. 2010. Relationship characteristics and performance in fresh produce supply chains: the case of the Mexican avocado industry. Journal on Chain and Network Science 10, 1-15. [CrossRef ] 327. Nurcin Celik, Young-Jun SonSequential Monte Carlo-based fidelity selection in dynamic-data-driven adaptive multi-scale simulations (DDDAMS) 2281-2293. [CrossRef ] 328. Rajat Bhagwat, Milind Kumar Sharma. 2009. An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management. Production Planning & Control 20, 678-690. [CrossRef ] 329. Yinan Qi, Kenneth K. Boyer, Xiande Zhao. 2009. Supply Chain Strategy, Product Characteristics, and Performance Impact: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturers. Decision Sciences 40:10.1111/ deci.2009.40.issue-4, 667-695. [CrossRef ] 330. Kim Sundtoft Hald, Carlos Cordón, Thomas E. Vollmann. 2009. Towards an understanding of attraction in buyer–supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 38, 960-970. [CrossRef ] 331. Marc Reimann, Philippe Schiltknecht. 2009. Studying the interdependence of contractual and operational flexibilities in the market of specialty chemicals. European Journal of Operational Research 198, 760-772. [CrossRef ] 332. Andrea J. CullenSchool of Computing, Informatics and Media, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK Margaret TaylorSchool of Management, Bradford University, Bradford, UK. 2009. Critical success factors for B2B e‐commerce use within the UK NHS pharmaceutical supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29:11, 1156-1185. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 333. Murali SambasivanFaculty of Economics and Management/Graduate School of Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia Tamizarasu NandanHitachi Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia Zainal Abidin MohamedFaculty of Economics and Management/Graduate School of Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. 2009. Consolidation of performance measures in a supply chain environment. Jour nal of Enterprise Information Management 22:6, 660-689. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 334. Peter H. Tatham, Karen M. Spens and David TaylorSabine F. SchulzLogistics Department, University of Technology Berlin, Berlin, Germany Ian HeighGlobal Emergency Group, Middleburg, Virginia, USA. 2009. Logistics performance management in action within a humanitarian organization. Management Research News 32:11, 1038-1049. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
335. J. Q. Chang, G. Cheng, X.F. MaStudy on supply chain partnership selection based on grey matter element method 1607-1610. [CrossRef ] 336. Khalid Al-Mutawah, Vincent Lee, Yen Cheung. 2009. A new multi-agent system framework for tacit knowledge management in manufacturing supply chains. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20, 593-610. [CrossRef ] 337. Xiao Li, Xin Jian Gu, Zheng Gang Liu. 2009. A strategic performance measurement s ystem for firms across supply and demand chains on the analogy of ecological succession. Ecological Economics 68, 2918-2929. [CrossRef ] 338. Ming-ming Liu, Hong-jun Xiao, Shun-dong GaoThe Study of the New Mode of the Strategic Management Based on the Construction and the Evaluation of Value-Assisted Management System 1-4. [CrossRef ] 339. Jie Li, Shouming ChenFuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Evaluating Online Bookstores 1-4. [CrossRef ] 340. Hee-Cheol Moon, 나나나, 나나. 2009. Determinants and Performance of Supply Chain Partnership Levels of Korean Companies in China. The e -Business Studies 10, 343-369. [CrossRef ] 341. Dr Hokey MinJitesh ThakkarMechanical Engineering Department, A.D. Patel Institute of Technology, Vitthal Udyognagar, India Arun KandaMechanical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India S.G. DeshmukhMechanical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India IIITM Gwalior, Gwalior, India. 2009. Supply chain performance measurement framew ork for small and medium scale enterprises. Benchmarking: An International Journal 16:5, 702-723. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 342. Olivia Pinon, Kelly Fry, John-Paul ClarkeThe Air Transportation System as a Supply Chain . [CrossRef ] 343. Chieh‐Yu LinDepartment of International Business, Chang Jung Christian University, Taina n, Taiwa n Yi‐Hui HoDepartment of International Business, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan. 2009. RFID technology adoption and supply chain performance: an empirical study in China's logistics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14:5, 369-378. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 344. Ming-Lang Tseng, Jui Hsiang Chiang, Lawrence W. Lan. 2009. Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process a nd choquet integral. Computers & Industrial Engineering 57, 330-340. [CrossRef ] 345. Chen YaoliConstruction of Supply Chain Quality Performance Measurement System Based on the Excellent Performance Criteria 89-91. [CrossRef ] 346. Lie-Chien Lin, Tzu-Su Li, Judy P. Kiang. 2009. A continual improvement framework with integration of CMMI and six-sigma model for auto industry. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25:10.1002/ qre.v25:5, 551-569. [CrossRef ] 347. G. Weichhart, C. StaryCollaborative Learning in Automotive Ecosystems 235-240. [CrossRef ] 348. Lusine H. Aramyan, Miranda P.M. Meuwissen, Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink, Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst, Olaf van Kooten, Ivo A. van der Lans. 2009. The perceived impact of quality assurance systems on tomato supply chain performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 20, 633-653. [CrossRef ] 349. Sarah Jinhui WuGraduate School of Business Administration, Fordham University, New York, New York, USA David J. ClossDepartment of Supply Chain Management, The Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 2009. The impact of integrating return components planning with purchasing decisions on purchasing performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management 20:1, 57-78. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
350. Ioannis ManikasSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece Leon A. TerryPlant Science Laboratory, Institute of BioScience and Technology, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK. 2009. A case study assessment of the operational performance of a multiple fresh produce distribution centre in the UK. British Food Journal 111:5, 421-435. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 351. P. Richard Martin, J. Wayne Patterson. 2009. On measuring company performance within a supply chain. International Journal of Production Research 47, 2449-2460. [CrossRef ] 352. Murali SambasivanGraduate School of Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia Zainal Abidin MohamedFaculty of Economics and Manag ement, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia Tamizarasu NandanGraduate School of Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. 2009. Performance measures and metrics for e‐supply chains. Journal of Enterprise Information Manage ment 22:3, 346-360. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 353. Herwig Winkler. 2009. How to improve supply chain flexibility using strategic supply chain networks. Logistics Research 1, 15-25. [CrossRef ] 354. F. T. S. Chan, R. Bhagwat, S. Wadhwa. 2009. Study on suppliers’ flexibility in supply chains: is real-time control necessary?. International Journal of Production Research 47, 965-987. [CrossRef ] 355. Xiaoyong ZhangLEI, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands Lusine H. AramyanLEI, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands. 2009. A conceptual framework for supply chain governance. China Agricultural Economic Review 1:2, 136-154. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 356. Arif Khan KManagement Development Institute, Gurgaon, India B. BakkappaInstitute of Management Studies, Kuvempu University, Davangere, India Bhimaraya A. MetriManagement Development Institute, Gurgaon, India B.S. SahayInstitute of Management and Technology, Ghaziabad, India. 2009. Impact of agile supply chains' delivery practices on firms' performance: cluster analysis and validation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14:1, 41-48. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 357. Gyöngyi KovácsSupply Chain Management and Corporate Geography, Department of Marketing, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Peter TathamCentre for Human Systems, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK. 2009. Humanitarian logistics performance in the light of gender. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 58:2, 174-187. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 358. A. Senthil Kumar, R. Jeyapaul, A. Noorul Haq. 2009. Analysing the performance of supply chain designs. International Journal of Business Performance Management 11, 72. [CrossRef ] 359. Liu Yongsheng, Ji LiDesign of Early Warning Indicator System of Enterprise Logistics Risk Based on Supply Chain Management 918-923. [CrossRef ] 360. Olga Ormandjieva, Victoria MikhnovskyEnterprise Integration Performance Modeling and Measurement Based on Category Theory 432-437. [CrossRef ] 361. Guojun Ji, Bingrong GuoStudy on the performance evaluation of sustainable tourism supply chain based on balanced scorecard 652-657. [CrossRef ] 362. Ygal Bendavid, Élisabeth Lefebvre, Louis A. Lefebvre, Samuel Fosso-Wamba. 2009. Key performance indicators for the evaluation of R FID-enabled B-to-B e-commerce applications: the case of a five-layer supply chain. Information Systems and e-Business Management 7, 1-20. [CrossRef ] 363. A. Ramaa, T. M. Rangaswamy, K. N. SubramanyaA Review of Literature on Performance Measurement of Supply Chain Network 802-807. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
364. Jian Cai, Xiangdong Liu, Zhihui Xiao, Jin Liu. 2009. Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision Support Systems 46, 512-521. [CrossRef ] 365. Ming-Chang Lee, Mei-Wen HanKnowledge Value Chain Model Implemented for Supply Chain Management Performance 606-611. [CrossRef ] 366. Gunjan Soni, Rambabu Kodali. 2009. Performance value analysis for the justification of the leagile supply chain. Internati onal Jour nal of Business Performance Management 11, 96. [CrossRef ] 367. Kim Bryceson, Geoff SlaughterIntegrated Autonomy A Modeling-Based Investigation of Agrifood Supply Chain Performance 334-339. [CrossRef ] 368. Marcello BragliaDipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy Marco FrosoliniDipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy Francesco ZammoriDipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 2008. Overall equipment effectiveness of a manufacturing line (OEEML). Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 20:1, 8-29. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 369. Anu Bask and Karen SpensHelena ForslundDepartment of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management and Economics, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden Patrik JonssonDivision of Logistics and Transportation, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden Stig‐Arne MattssonDepartment of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management and Economics, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden. 2008. Order‐to‐delivery process performance in delivery scheduling environments. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 58:1, 41-53. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 370. Chyan Yang, Yi-fen SuThe impact of ERP implementation on corporate SCM performance: From an operational and information integration perspective 1668-1672. [CrossRef ] 371. Rajesh K. PillaniaArif Khan KOperations Management Area, Management Development Institute, Sukhrali, Gurgaon, India Rajesh K. PillaniaManagement Development Institute, Sukhrali, Gurgaon, India and Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 2008. Strategic sourcing for supply chain agility and firms' performance. Management Decision 46:10, 1508-1530. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 372. Pravin KumarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India Ravi ShankarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India Surendra S. YadavDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India. 2008. Flexibility in global supply chain: modeling the enablers. Journal of Modelling in Management 3:3, 277-297. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 373. David Walters and Stan GlaserElizabeth BarberSchool of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia. 2008. How to measure the “value” in value chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38:9, 685-698. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 374. Jose A. Faria. 2008. A canonical model for the analysis of manufacturing systems. Production Planning & Control 19, 632-644. [CrossRef ] 375. Wing S. Chow, Christian N. Madu, Chu-Hua Kuei, Min H. Lu, Chinho Lin, Hojung Tseng. 2008. Supply chain management in the US and Taiwan: An empirical study. Omega 36, 665-679. [CrossRef ] 376. Qi YueA Case Study of Supply Chain Management and Competitive Advantage in Manufacturing 1-4. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
377. Fabio Krakovics, José Eugenio Leal, Paulo Mendes, Rafael Lorenzo Santos. 2008. Defining and calibrating performance indicators of a 4PL in the chemical industry in Brazil. International Journal of Production Economics 115, 502-514. [CrossRef ] 378. Margot J. Hutchins, John W. Sutherland. 2008. An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1688-1698. [CrossRef ] 379. C.Y. LamDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, People's Republic of China S.L. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, People's Republic of China W.H. IpDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, People's Republic of China C.W. LauDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, People's Republic of China. 2008. Collaborative supply chain network using embedded genetic algorithms. Industrial Management & Data Systems 108:8, 1101-1110. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 380. Harri LorentzLogistics, Turku School of Economics, Rehtorinpellonkatu, Turku, Finland. 2008. Collaboration in Finnish‐Russian supply chains. Baltic Journal of Management 3:3, 246-265. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 381. Wei Liu, Wen-shun Li, Wendy HuangStudy on managing effects of information technology applied on transportation 1687-1692. [CrossRef ] 382. Gyan Prakash, Kripa ShankerAchieving competitive advantage and organisational performance through service quality initiatives in the supply chain 1104-1109. [CrossRef ] 383. Matthew WallerAlan BlankleyDepartment of Accounting, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. 2008. A conceptual model for evaluating the financial impact of supply chain management technology investments. The International Journal of Logistics Management 19:2, 155-182. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 384. Parikshit CharanDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India Ravi ShankarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India Rajat K. BaisyaDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India. 2008. Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Business Process Management Journal 14:4, 512-529. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 385. Anupam GhoshICFAI Institute for Management Teachers, ICFAI University, Hyderabad, India Jane FedorowiczBentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. 2008. The role of trust in supply chain governance. Business Process Management J ournal 14:4, 453-470. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 386. Siddharth VarmaInstitute of Management Education, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, India Subhash WadhwaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India S.G. DeshmukhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India. 2008. Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 20:3, 343-356. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 387. Chee‐Cheng ChenDepartment of Business Administration, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan, Republic of China. 2008. A model for customer‐focused objective‐based performance evaluation of logistics service providers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 20:3, 309-322. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 388. Tae-Soo Moon, Sung-Bae Kang. 2008. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Environmental, Organizational, IS Characteristics on the Organizational Balanced Performance of SCM Systems. The Journal of Information Systems 17, 1-26. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
389. Kevin McCormackNorth Carolina State University, Fuquay Varina, North Carolina, USA Marcelo Bronzo LadeiraCEPEAD/UFMG – NIPE‐LOG/UFMG, Rua Curitiba, Centro, Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil Marcos Paulo Valadares de OliveiraCEPEAD/UFMG, Rua Oliveira, Cruzeiro, Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil. 2008. Supply chain maturity and performance in Brazil. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13:4, 272-282. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 390. Richard CuthbertsonSaid Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Wojciech PiotrowiczSaid Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2008. Suppl y chain best practices – identification and categorisation of measures and benefits. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57:5, 389-404. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 391. Yolanda Polo-Redondo, Jesús Cambra-Fierro. 2008. Influence of the standardization of a firm's productive process on the long-term orientation of its supply relationships: An empirical study. Industrial Marketing Management 37, 407-420. [CrossRef ] 392. Chieh-Yu Lin. 2008. Determinants of the adoption of technological innovations by logistics service providers in China. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 7, 19-38. [CrossRef ] 393. Bülent SezenDepartment of Business Administration, Gebze Institute of Technology, Gebze, Turkey. 2008. Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13:3, 233-240. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 394. Marc Wouters, Celeste Wilderom. 2008. Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33, 488-516. [CrossRef ] 395. Shams-Ur Rahman. 2008. Quality management in logistics services: A comparison of practices between manufacturing companies and logistics firms in Australia. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 19, 535-550. [CrossRef ] 396. Francesco Longo, Giovanni Mirabelli. 2008. An advanced supply chain management tool based on modeling and simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering 54, 570-588. [CrossRef ] 397. S. Wadhwa, A. Saxena, F. T. S. Chan. 2008. Framework for flexibility in dynamic supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research 46, 1373-1404. [CrossRef ] 398. Dean ElmutiLumpkin College of Business and Applied Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA William MinnisLumpkin College of Business and Applied Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA Michael AbebeLumpkin College of Business and Applied Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA. 2008. Longitudinal assessment of an integrated industrial supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13:2, 151-159. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 399. Wai Peng WongDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore Kuan Yew WongFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. 2008. A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal 15:1, 25-51. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 400. Paul D. CousinsManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Benn LawsonSchool of Management and Economics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK Brian SquireManchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2008. Performance measurement in strategic buyer‐supplier relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 28:3, 238-258. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
401. Árni Halldórsson and Gunnar StefánssonJuuso TöyliDepartment of Business Technology, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Lotta HäkkinenTurku School of Economics, Business Research and Development Centre, Turku, Finland Lauri OjalaDepartment of Marketing, Turku School of Economics, Turku, Finland Tapio NaulaDepartment of Marketing, Turku School of Economics, Turku, Finland. 2008. Logistics and financial performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38:1, 57-80. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 402. Dr Adam Lindgreen and Dr Martin HingleyHull University, UK and Harper Adams University College, UKJacques TrienekensDepartment of Business Administration, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Ruud van UffelenAgricultural‐Economics Research Institute, WUR‐LEI, Wageningen, The Netherlands Jeremy DebaireDepartment of Business Administration, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Onno OmtaDepartment of Business Administration, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 2008. Assessment of innovation and performance in the fruit chain. British F ood Journal 110:1, 98-127. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 403. Benita M. BeamonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Burcu BalcikUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2008. Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. International Journal of Public Sector Management 21:1, 4-25. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 404. Chun-Wang Li, Ming-Hung Shu, Chun-Ya n LiEvaluating Supply Chain Performance Based on Delivery Performance Analysis Chart Approach 48-48. [CrossRef ] 405. Lidong WangEvaluation of operational performance of supply chain: Based on the analyses of conformity character and dissipative structure in supply chain 2411-2414. [CrossRef ] 406. Sander De Leeuw, Loek Beekman. 2008. Supply chain-oriented performance measurement for automotive spare parts. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 8, 56. [CrossRef ] 407. Kee-Hung Lai, Christina W.Y. Wong, T.C.E. Cheng. 2008. A coordination-theoretic investigation of the impact of electronic integration on logistics performance. Information & Management 45, 10-20. [CrossRef ] 408. Ming-Hon Hwang, Hsin Rau. 2008. Establishment of an outsourcing selection model for supply chain management. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 29, 129-151. [CrossRef ] 409. Ning Liu, Jia Jiang, Dong ShaoResearch on the method about performance of the whole ecotype supply chain 2485-2489. [CrossRef ] 410. Adisak TheeranuphattanaSchool of Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand John C.S. TangSchool of Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand. 2007. A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 19:1, 125-148. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 411. Yingli WangCardiff University Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre, Cardiff , UK Cha ndra S. LalwaniBusiness School, The University of Hull Logistics Institute, Hull, UK. 2007. Using e‐business to enable customised logistics sustainability. The International Journal of Logistics Management 18:3, 402-419. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 412. Mustafa Özbayrak, Theopisti C. Papadopoulou, Melek Akgun. 2007. Systems dynamics modelling of a manufacturing supply chain system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15, 1338-1355. [CrossRef ] 413. Chang Won LeeDepartment of Venture Management, Jinju National University, Jinju, South Korea Ik‐ Whan G. KwonDepartment of Decision Sciences and MIS, Consortium for Supply Chain Management Studies, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA Dennis SeveranceSchool of Business, University of Michigan‐Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2007. Relationship between supply chain
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
performance and degree of linkage among supplier, internal integration, and customer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12:6, 444-452. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 414. Mihalis GiannakisWarwick Business School, Coventry, UK. 2007. Performance measurement of supplier relationships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12:6, 400-411. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 415. Elcio Mendonça TachizawaDepartment of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Cristina Giménez ThomsenESADE Business School, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain. 2007. Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: an exploratory study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27:10, 1115-1136. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 416. Paul Folan, Jim Browne, Harinder Jagdev. 2007. Performance: Its meaning and content for today's business research. Com puters i n Ind ustry 58, 605-620. [CrossRef ] 417. Paolo Gaiardelli, Nicola Saccani, Lucrezia Songini. 2007. Performance measurement of the after-sales service network—Evidence from the automotive industry. Computers in Industry 58, 698-708. [CrossRef ] 418. Roman Wecker, Bernd W. Wirtz. 2007. Erfolgswirkung des internetbasierten Supply Chain Managements. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 77, 911-954. [CrossRef ] 419. Bin Ma, L.X.X. Xia, R. LimModeling supply chain's reconfigurability using fuzzy logic 234-241. [CrossRef ] 420. Pierre HadayaDepartment of Management and Technology, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada Luc CassiviDepartment of Management and Technology, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada. 2007. The role of joint collaboration planning actions in a demand‐driven supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems 107:7, 954-978. [ Abstra ct] [Full Text] [PDF] 421. Helena ForslundDepartment of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management and Economics, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden Patrik JonssonDivision of Logistics and Transportation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. 2007. Dyadic integration of the performance management process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 37:7, 546-567. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 422. Jia Jiang, Gui-Chu Mao, Rui-Jiang WangStudy on the Performance Evaluation of the Whole Ecotype Supply Chain 243-248. [CrossRef ] 423. Mike Bourne, Steven Melnyk and Norman FaullHelena ForslundDepartment of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management and Economics, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden. 2007. The impact of performance management on customers' expected logistics performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27:8, 901-918. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 424. Mike Bourne, Steven Melnyk and Norman FaullChris Morg anCLSCM, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK Adam DewhurstCLSCM, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK. 2007. Using SPC to measure a national supermarket chain's suppliers' performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27:8, 874-900. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 425. Chieh-Yu Lin. 2007. Supply chain performance and the adoption of new logistics technologies for logistics service providers in Taiwan. Journal of Statistics and Manag ement Syste ms 10, 519-543. [CrossRef ] 426. Lusine H. AramyanWageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Alfons G.J.M. Oude LansinkWageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Jack G.A.J. van der VorstWageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Olaf van KootenWageningen University, Wageningen, The
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
Netherlands. 2007. Performance measurement in agri‐food supply chains: a case study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12:4, 304-315. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 427. Mark StevensonDepartment of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK Martin SpringDepartment of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. 2007. Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: def inition a nd review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27:7, 685-713. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 428. Angappa Gunasekaran, Bulent Kobu. 2007. Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research 45, 2819-2840. [CrossRef ] 429. Walter W. C. Chung, Kim Hua Tan and S. C. Lenny KohK.L. ChoyDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China Harry K.H. ChowDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China W.B. LeeDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China Felix T.S. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. 2007. Development of performance measurement system in managing supplier relationship for maintenance logistics providers. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14:3, 352-368. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 430. WenAn Tan, Weiming Shen, Jianmin Zhao. 2007. A methodology for dynamic enterprise process performance evaluation. Computers in Industry 58, 474-485. [CrossRef ] 431. Kathryn CormicanCIMRU, Industrial Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland Michael CunninghamCIMRU, Industrial Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. 2007. Supplier performance evaluation: lessons from a large multinational organisation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 18:4, 352-366. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 432. Juan José Alfaro SaizDepartment of Business Organisation, Financial Economy and Accounting, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Angel Ortiz BasDepartment of Business Organisation, Financial Economy and Accounting, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Raúl Rodríguez RodríguezDepartment of Business Organisation, Financial Economy a nd Accounting, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 2007. Performance measurement system for enterprise networks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56:4, 305-334. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 433. Abby Ghobadian, Nicholas O'Regan, Howard Thomas and David GallearKobe NaesensCentre for Industrial Management, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium Ludo GeldersCentre for Industrial Management, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium Liliane PintelonCentre for Industrial Management, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium. 2007. A swift response tool for measuring the strategic fit for resource pooling: a case study. Management Decision 45:3, 434-449. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 434. Balram Avittathur, Paul Swamidass. 2007. Matching plant flexibility and supplier flexibility: Lessons from small suppliers of U.S. manufacturing plants in Indi a. Journal of Operations Management 25, 717-735. [CrossRef ] 435. Ana Maria Garcia Perez, Marian Garcia Martinez. 2007. The agrifood cooperative netchain. A theoretical framework to study its configuration. Food Ec onomics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C 4, 31-39. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
436. Shankar PurbeyIndian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India Kampan MukherjeeIndian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India Chandan BharIndian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India. 2007. Performance measurement system for healthcare processes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56:3, 241-251. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 437. Jan Olhager, Erik Selldin. 2007. Manufacturing planning and control approaches: market alignment and performance. International Journal of Production Research 45, 1469-1484. [CrossRef ] 438. S.C.L. Koh and S.M. SaadJeff PursgloveHull City Council, Kingston upon Hull, UK Mike SimpsonSheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 2007. Benchmarking the performance of English universities. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14:1, 102-122. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 439. Samuel H. Huang, Harshal Keskar. 2007. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics 105, 510-523. [CrossRef ] 440. Su-Yun Shin, Jeong-Ah Cho. 2007. A Study on the Factor and Performance of e-Supply Chain Management for Internet Fashion Shopping Malls. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles 31, 95-106. [CrossRef ] 441. Hsiao-lan Wei, Eric WangCreating Strategic Value from Supply Chain Visibility- the Dynamic Capabilities View 7-7. [CrossRef ] 442. Zhengping Li, Xiaoxia Xu, Arun KumarSupply chain performance evaluation from structural and operational levels 1131-1140. [CrossRef ] 443. Laura XU Xiao Xia, Bin Ma, Roland LimAHP based supply chain performance measurement system 1308-1315. [CrossRef ] 444. JEAN-PAUL RODRIGUE. 2006. Transportation and the Geographical and Functional Integration of Global Production Networks. Growth and Change 37:10.1111/grow.2006.37.issue-4, 510-525. [CrossRef ] 445. Pan Jingming, Ma Hongjiang, Tang XiaowoStudy on Multi-Products Supply Chain Volume Flexibility Decision Model Related to Producing Under Demand Uncertainty 1409-1414. [CrossRef ] 446. Bernhard J. Angerhofer, Marios C. Angelides. 2006. A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision Support Systems 42, 283-301. [CrossRef ] 447. Subhashish Samaddar, Satish Nargundkar, Marcia Daley. 2006. Inter-organizational information sharing: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence. European Journal of Operational Research 174, 744-765. [CrossRef ] 448. Qingyu ZhangDepartment of Economics and Decision Sciences, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA Mark A. VonderembseDepartment of Management, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA Jeen‐Su LimDepartment of Marketing, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA. 2006. Spanning flexibility: supply chain information dissemination drives strategy development and customer satisfaction. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11:5, 390-399. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 449. Tommaso Buganza, Roberto Verganti. 2006. Life-Cycle Flexibility: How to Measure and Improve the Innovative Capability in Turbulent Environments. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23:10.1111/ jpim.2006.23.issue-5, 393-407. [CrossRef ] 450. Fiorenzo Franceschini, Maurizio Galetto, Domenico Maisano, Luciano Viticchiè. 2006. The Condition of Uniqueness in Manufacturing Process Representation by Performance/Quality Indicators. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22:10.1002/qre.v22:5, 567-580. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
451. K. VasileiouCranfield University, Silsoe, UK J. MorrisCranfield University, Silsoe, UK. 2006. The sustainability of the supply chain for fresh potatoes in Britain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11:4, 317-327. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 452. Yildirim YilmazAkdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey Umit BititciUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. 2006. Performance measurement in the value chain: manufacturing v. tourism. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55:5, 371-389. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 453. Pedro M. ReyesHankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA. 2006. A game theory approach for solving the transshipment problem: a supply chain management strategy teaching tool. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11:4, 288-293. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 454. Siddharth VarmaUniversity of Petroleum and Energy Studies, New Delhi, India Subhash WadhwaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India S.G. DeshmukhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India. 2006. Implementing supply chain management in a firm: issues and remedies. Asi a Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 18:3, 223-243. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 455. V. Mahadevan, J. Agbinya, R. BraunAnalyzing Usability Alternatives in Multi-criteria Decision Making During ERP Training 296-309. [CrossRef ] 456. Changrui Ren, Jin Dong, Hongwei Ding, Wei WangA SCOR-Based Framework for Supply Chain Performance Management 1130-1135. [CrossRef ] 457. P. Folan, P. Higgins, J. Browne. 2006. A communications framework for extended enterprise performance measurement. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 19, 301-314. [CrossRef ] 458. Shams‐ur RahmanThe University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. 2006. Quality management in logistics: an examination of industry practices. Supply Chain Management: An Internati onal Journal 11:3, 233-240. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 459. Benita M. BeamonIndustrial Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Stephen A. KotlebaIndustrial Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2006. Inventory management support sy stems for emergenc y humanitarian relief operations in South Sudan. The International Journal of Logistics Management 17:2, 187-212. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 460. Luc CassiviDepartment of Management and Technology, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada. 2006. Collaboration planning in a supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11:3, 249-258. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 461. S. Sivadasan, J. Efstathiou, A. Calinescu, L. Huaccho Huatuco. 2006. Advances on measuring the operational complexity of supplier–customer systems. European Journal of Operational Research 171, 208-226. [CrossRef ] 462. Jillian MacBryde and Zoe RadnorJairo R. Montoya‐TorresPontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia. 2006. Manufacturing performance evaluation in wa fer semiconductor factories. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55:3/4, 300-310. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 463. Jillian MacBryde and Zoe RadnorCraig ShepherdThe Institute of Work Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Hannes GünterETH Zurich, Organization Work and Technology Group, Zurich, Switzerland. 2006. Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55:3/4, 242-258. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
464. Kanchana Kanchanasuntorn, Anulark Techanitisawad. 2006. An approximate periodic model for fixed-life perishable products in a two-echelon inventory–distribution system. International Journal of Production Economics 100, 101-115. [CrossRef ] 465. Patricia M. SwaffordDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, USA Soumen GhoshGeorgia Institute of Technology, College of Management, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Nagesh N. MurthyLundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA. 2006. A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 26:2, 118-140. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 466. Carlos F. GomesSchool of Economics, Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud M. YasinDepartment of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA João V. LisboaSchool of Economics, Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 2006. Performance measurement practices in manufacturing firms: an empirical investigation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Mana gement 17:2, 144-167. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 467. Angappa Gunasekaran and Goran D. PutnikMohammed SaadBristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK Bhaskar PatelKITS, Ramtek, Nagpur, India. 2006. An inv estigation of supply chain performance measurement in the Indian automotive sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal 13:1/2, 36-53. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 468. P. Gary JarrettKaiser, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. 2006. An analysis of international health care logistics. Leadership in Health Services 19:1, 1-10. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 469. Marco BusiDepartment of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway and SINTEF Industrial Management, Trondheim, Norway Umit S. BititciCentre for Strategic Manufacturing, University of Strathcl yde, Glasgow, UK. 2006. Collaborative performance management: present gaps and future research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55:1, 7-25. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 470. Tony Davila, Marc WoutersManagement Accounting in the Manufacturing Sector: Managing Costs at the Design and Production Stages 831-858. [CrossRef ] 471. M. Dotoli, M.P. Fanti, C. Meloni, MengChu Zhou. 2006. Design and optimization of integrated E-supply chain for agile and environmentally conscious manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 36, 62-75. [CrossRef ] 472. E.T.G. Wang, J.C.F. Tai, Hsiao-Lan WeiIT-Enabled Virtual Integration as a Mechanism for Mediating the Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Suppl y Chain Performance 7c-7c. [CrossRef ] 473. Stephan Vachon, Robert D. Klassen. 2006. Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of the package printing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 661-671. [CrossRef ] 474. Hulya Julie YaziciCollege of Business, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, USA. 2005. Influence of flexibilities on manufa cturing cells for faster delivery using simulation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 16:8, 825-841. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 475. Andy NeelyCranfield School of Management, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield, UK. 2005. The evolution of performance measurement research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25:12, 1264-1277. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 476. Gary GrahamChee Yew WongCenter for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark Jan Stentoft ArlbjørnUniversity of Southern Denmark, Engstein, Denmark John JohansenCenter for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 2005. Supply chain management practices
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
in toy supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10:5, 367-378. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 477. Marc WoutersSchool of Business, Public Administration and Technology, University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands Mark SportelAccenture Technology Solutions, Twente, The Netherlands. 2005. The role of existing measures in developing and implementing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25:11, 1062-1082. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 478. M. Dotoli, M. P. Fanti *, C. Meloni, M. C. Zhou. 2005. A multi-level approach for network design of integrated supply chains. International Journal of Production Research 43, 4267-4287. [CrossRef ] 479. Li‐Ling HsuNational Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2005. SCM system effects on performance for interaction between suppliers and buyers. Industrial M anagement & Data Systems 105:7, 857-875. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 480. Jalal AshayeriDepartment of Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands Willem SelenMacquarie Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia. 2005. An application of a unified capacity planning system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25:9, 917-937. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 481. Paul Folan, Jim Browne. 2005. A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management. Computers in Industry 56, 663-680. [CrossRef ] 482. P. Folan *, J. Browne. 2005. Development of an extended enterprise performance measurement system. Production Planning & Control 16, 531-544. [CrossRef ] 483. Pedro M. Reyes. 2005. Logistics networks: A game theory application for solving the transshipment problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation 168, 1419-1431. [CrossRef ] 484. Aref A. HervaniDivision of Business Administration, Dalton State College, Dalton, Georgia, USA Marilyn M. HelmsDivision of Business Administration, Dalton State College, Dalton, Georgia, USA Joseph SarkisGraduate School of Management, Clark University, Worcester, Massachussets, USA. 2005. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12:4, 330-353. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 485. Tosanwunmi C. Maku, Terry R. Collins, Mario G. Beruvides. 2005. The impact of human interaction on supply chain management practices. Performance Improvement 44:10.1002/pfi.v44:7, 26-33. [CrossRef ] 486. T. Wu, P. O'Grady *. 2005. A network-based approach to integrated supply chain design. Production Planning & Control 16, 444-453. [CrossRef ] 487. Photis M. Panayides, Meko So. 2005. Logistics service provider–client relationships. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Revie w 41, 179-200. [CrossRef ] 488. Roberto Verganti, Tommaso Buganza. 2005. Design Inertia: Designing for Life-Cycle Flexibility in Internet-Based Services*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22:10.1111/jpim.2005.22.issue-3, 223-237. [CrossRef ] 489. Amit SachanManagement Development Institute, Gurgaon, India B.S. SahayManagement Development Institute, Gurgaon, India Dinesh SharmaManagement Development Institute, Gurgaon, India. 2005. Developing Indian grain supply chain cost model: a system dynamics approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54:3, 187-205. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 490. Umit S. BititciCentre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Kepa MendibilCentre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Veronica MartinezCranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK Pavel AlboresAston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. 2005. Measuring and m anaging performance
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
in extended enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25:4, 333-353. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 491. Mário AugustoInstitute of Systems and Robotics, School of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal José FigueiraInstitute of Systems and Robotics, School of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal João LisboaInstitute of Systems and Robotics, School of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud YasinDepartment of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA. 2005. An application of a multi‐criteria approach to assessing the performance of Portugal's economic sectors. European Business Review 17:2, 113-132. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 492. David Walters *. 2005. Performance planning and control in virtual business structures. Production Planning & Control 16, 226-239. [CrossRef ] 493. Kim Langfield-Smith, David Smith. 2005. Performance Measures in Supply Chains. Australian Accounting Review 15:10.1111/auar.2005.15.issue-35, 39-51. [CrossRef ] 494. Carlos F. GomesInstructor in the Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud M. YasinProfessor of Management, Department of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA Joã o V. LisboaProfessor of Management, in the Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Coimbra, Portugal. 2004. A literature review of manufacturing performance measures and measurement in an organizational contex t: a fra mework and direction for future research. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 15:6, 511-530. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 495. Nelson K. H. Tang, Helen Benton, Doug Love, Pável Albores, Peter Ball, Jill MacBr yde, Nick Boughton, Paul Drake. 2004. Developing an enterprise simulator to support electronic supply-chain management for B2B electronic business. Production Planning & Control 15, 572-583. [CrossRef ] 496. Clemens Lohman, Leonard Fortuin, Marc Wouters. 2004. Designing a performance measurement system: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research 156, 267-286. [CrossRef ] 497. Carlos F. GomesFaculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Coimbra, Portugal Mahmoud M. YasinDepartment of Management and Marketing, E ast Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA João V. LisboaFaculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Coimbra, Portugal. 2004. An examination of manufacturing organizations' performance evaluation. International Journal of Operations & Production Manag ement 24:5, 488-513. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 498. Carlo RafeleAssistant Professor in the Department of Production Systems and Business Economics, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.. 2004. Logistic service measurement: a reference framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 15:3, 280-290. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 499. Injazz J Chen, Antony Paulraj. 2004. Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management 22, 119-150. [CrossRef ] 500. Kee-Hung Lai, E.W.T Ngai, T.C.E Cheng. 2004. An empirical study of supply chain performance in transport logistics. International Journal of Production Economics 87, 321-331. [CrossRef ] 501. I. J. Chen, A. Paulraj. 2004. Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Research 42, 131-163. [CrossRef ] 502. J. SchmitzUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK K.W. PlattsUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 2003. Roles of supplier performance measurement: indication from a study in the automotive industry. Management Decision 41:8, 711-721. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
503. Ronald E. Giachetti, Luis D. Martinez, Oscar A. Sáenz, Chin-Sheng Chen. 2003. Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Economics 86, 47-62. [CrossRef ] 504. Felix T.S. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong H.J. QiDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong H.K. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Henr y C.W. LauDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Ralph W.L. IpDepartment of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2003. A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Management Decision 41:7, 635-642. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 505. M B Masuku, J F Kirsten, C J Van Rooyen, S Perret. 2003. CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SMALL-HOLDER SUGARCANE GROWERS AND MILLERS IN THE SUGAR INDUSTRY SUPPLY CHAIN IN SWAZILAND. Agrekon 42, 183-199. [CrossRef ] 506. Felix T.S. ChanFelix T.S. Chan is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.H.J. QiH.J. Qi is a Research Student, in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.. 2003. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 8:3, 209-223. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 507. Felix T.S. ChanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong H.J. QiDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2003. Feasibility of performance measurement system for supply chain: a process‐based approach and measures. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14:3, 179-190. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 508. Élisabeth Lefebvre, Luc Cassivi, Louis A. Lefebvre, Pierre-Majorique Léger. 2003. E-collaboration within one supply chain and its impact on firms’ innovativeness and performance. Information Systems and eBusiness Management 1, 157-173. [CrossRef ] 509. E. Lefebvre, L. Cassivi, L.A. Lefebvre, P.-M. LegerAn empirical investigation of the impact of electronic collaboration tools on performance of a supply chain 10 pp.. [CrossRef ] 510. Shams‐ur RahmanInstitute of Transport Studies, School of Business, The University of Sydney, Sydney , Australia. 2002. The theory of constraints’ thinking process approach to developing strategies in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 32:10, 809-828. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 511. Kee-hung Lai, E.W.T Ngai, T.C.E Cheng. 2002. Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Revie w 38, 439-456. [CrossRef ] 512. F. T. S. Chan, H. J. Qi. 2002. A fuzzy basis channel-spanning performance measurement method for supply chain management. Proc eedings of t he Institut ion of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 216, 1155-1167. [CrossRef ] 513. S. Vachon, R.D. Klassen. 2002. An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49, 218-230. [CrossRef ]
) T P ( 6 1 0 2 h c r a M 1 3 2 5 : 1 0 t A s e i r a r b i L U S A y b d e d a o l n w o D
514. A.M. AhmedBradford University School of Management, European Centre for Total Quality Management, Bradford, UK. 2002. Virtual integrated performance measurement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 19:4, 414-441. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 515. Fredrik Persson, Jan Olhager. 2002. Performance simulation of supply chain designs. International Journal of Production Economics 77, 231-245. [CrossRef ] 516. Dean Elmuti. 2002. The Perceived Impact of Supply Chain Management on Organizational Effectiveness. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 38:10.1111/jscm.2002.38.issue-3, 49-57. [CrossRef ] 517. S. SivadasanManufacturing Systems Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK J. EfstathiouManufacturing Systems Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK G. FrizelleInstitute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, Mill Lane, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK R. ShiraziInstitute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, Mill Lane, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK A. CalinescuManufacturing Systems Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2002. An information‐theoretic methodology for measuring the operational complexity of supplier‐customer systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22:1, 80-102. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 518. Danny C. K. Ho, K. F. Au, Edward Newton. 2002. Empirical research on supply chain management: A critical review and recommendations. International Journal of Production Research 40, 4415-4430. [CrossRef ] 519. Shui-ying Zhou, Rong-qiu Chen. 2001. A decision model for selecting participants in supply chain. Journal of Shanghai Universi ty (Eng lish Edition) 5, 341-344. [CrossRef ] 520. Michael MilgateMichael Milgate is a Lecturer in the Department of Business, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.. 2001. Supply chain complexity and delivery performance: an international exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 6:3, 106-118. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 521. Willem SelenProfessor of Operations Management at Vesalius College, Free University, Brussels, Belgium, and the School of Business, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.. 2001. Learning in the new business school setting: a collaborative model. The Learning Organization 8:3, 106-113. [ Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 522. Alberto De Toni, Guido Nassimbeni. 2001. A method for the evaluation of suppliers’ co-design effort. International Journal of P roduction Economics 72, 169-180. [CrossRef ] 523. Michail Kagioglou, Rachel Cooper, Ghassan Aouad. 2001. Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics 19, 85-95. [CrossRef ] 524. María Jesús Sáenz, Maria Pilar Lambán, Eva NavarroFlexible Supply Chains 211-238. [CrossRef ] 525. Changrui Ren, Yueting Chai, Yi LiuActive performance management in supply chains 6036-6041. [CrossRef ] 526. Edward SweeneySupply Chain Integration 1-26. [CrossRef ] 527. P. Udomleartprasert, C. JungthirapanichThe supportive infrastructures enhancing the supply chain performance 1203-1207. [CrossRef ] 528. Edward SweeneySupply Chain Integration 221-246. [CrossRef ] 529. Abirami Radhakrishnan, Dessa David, Douglas Hales, V. Sri SridharanMapping the Critical Links between Supply Chain Evaluation System and Supply Chain Integration Sustainability 329-352. [CrossRef ]
