Basso Continuo Realization on the Cello and Viol

Basso Continuo Realization on the Cello and Viol

Robert Smith February 2009

A Masters Thesis at the Conservatorium van Amsterdam

Table of Contents Acknowledgments................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................8 Part 1 Historical contexts for basso continuo realization on the cello and viol............................................12 1.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................14 1.2 Italy 16th Century – Lirone to Lyra-Viol ...............................................................................14 1.3 England 17th Century – The golden age of the Lyra-Viol .....................................................14 1.4 The “Cello” in Italy in the 17th Century .................................................................................16 1.5 What's in a title? Violone o Cembalo, Cello, harpsichord or both? .......................................21 1.6 The Viol in 17th and 18th Century France .............................................................................23 1.7 Tra le Fiamme – Solo viol continuo........................................................................................28 1.8 Frets ........................................................................................................................................29 1.9 Idiomatic cello accompaniment in the 18th Century ..............................................................29 1.10 The first cello tutors and the accompaniment of recitativo in opera ....................................31 1.11 Conclusion to Part 1...............................................................................................................36 Part 2 A personal account of developing and practising basso continuo realizations on the cello and viol.38 2.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................40 2.2 The Cello..................................................................................................................................40 2.3 The elements of basso continuo realization on the cello.........................................................41 2.4 The Viol...................................................................................................................................44 2.5 The elements of basso continuo realization on the viol...........................................................44 2.6 Developing Harmonic Skills....................................................................................................45 2.7 Breaking Chords......................................................................................................................47 2.8 Notation – Figures and Fingers................................................................................................48 2.9 Bass Violin...............................................................................................................................48 2.10 In Practice..............................................................................................................................49 Part 3 A short guide for other cellists and violists who wish to realize basso continuo...............................52 3.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................54 3.2 Harmony Exercises..................................................................................................................54

3.3 Timing......................................................................................................................................55 3.4 Doubling..................................................................................................................................55 3.5 Recitative.................................................................................................................................56 3.6 Other advice.............................................................................................................................56 General Conclusions...........................................................................................................................60 Appendix B: Track list of audio examples Appendix C: Log of basso continuo

on CD......................................................................62

realizations to date...........................................................64

Bibliography.......................................................................................................................................65

Robert Smith Basso Continuo Realization on the Cello and Viol

February 2009

Page 5 of 67

Acknowledgments I would like to thank Johan Hofmann, my harpsichord / harmony / basso continuo teacher, for his advice, interest, help and encouragement in all the activities that have led to this thesis. Mr. Hofmann's willingness to share his broad knowledge with me and his open-mindedness to the subject made it a joy to explore. I would also like to thank my musical colleagues and friends who during recent times have willingly endured my “basso continuo experiments,” not all of which were successful. I am indebted to my parents whom, not knowing the ins and outs of the subject, spent hours proofreading this thesis for me.


February 2009

Page 7 of 67

Introduction

Long before I had thought of research, and even before I played the viol, I was fascinated by the little numbers appearing in the bass lines I played on the cello, known to everybody as “figured bass.” Without understanding much about the harmony, I enjoyed “playing the numbers” and observing how another element was created in the music – something like an inner-part.

Learning to play the viol, and being influenced by its rich harmonic repertoire, opened up even more possibilities of playing chords over a figured bass. Over time I realized that if I was going to continue realizing bass lines seriously, I would have to gain a deeper insight into the matter. Was it historically appropriate to play harmonies on these instruments in accompaniment, and how could I develop my technique to make such realizations presentable on a professional platform?

There were no easy answers to the questions above. There are no treatises or tutors from the baroque period which provide a method for realizing basso continuo on the cello or viol though there are many for other instruments such as lute, guitar and keyboard. Recent research has thoroughly documented the development and performance of basso continuo in general, (e.g. Borgir, “The performance of the basso continuo in seventeenth century Italian music,” 1971 and Zapulla, “Figured Bass Accompaniment in France,” 2000). However, references in this literature to basso continuo realization by the cello and viol, if there at all, are usually vague or not followed up.

Valerie Walden devotes an entire chapter to cello accompaniment in “One Hundred Years of Violoncello,” (1998), that surveys many sources from 1740 – 1840. The chapter contains a useful summary of late 17th and early 18th Century methods for realization of basso continuo in opera recitative, but still leaves the early history of the cello in the dark. David Watkin takes initiative in his article, “Corelli’s op.5 sonatas: ‘Violino e violone o cimbalo’?” (1996), by probing the

Page 8 of 67


February 2009

question of what the cello might have done in terms of realization if it was accompanying alone. The article by Watkin was very important to me as the issues discussed raised both my interest and questions that I wanted to find answers for myself (for instance, “is it really possible to make a convincing realization of Stradella's Sinfonias on the cello alone?”).

I found more fuel for gaining insight in various recordings such as David Watkin's accompaniment of Corelli's “Sonata a Violino,” Op. V, (1996, Appendix B, CD Tracks 1 – 11), and viol accompaniment in Biber's “Mystery Sonatas” by Ars Antique Austria (1996, Appendix B, Track 25).

The shreds of evidence that can be found in such literature as the above led me to define the first area of my research, namely to carry out a broad survey of music for the cello and viol that contains “harmonic” writing. This “harmonic” writing is usually apparent in chords but also appears in other guises e.g. “alberti bass.” The aim of this first part of research was twofold: firstly to gain a knowledge of, and feel for, what kind of harmonic capability would have been be idiomatic on the cello and viol; and secondly to see what historical instances, if any, would allow basso continuo realization by these instruments.

The second area of my research is practical and looks at the way I have tried, and continue to try, to bring my skills of realizing basso continuo to a high level on the cello and viol. This area forms two parts: Part 2 is a description and discussion of the way I worked on these techniques, and Part 3 is a short “instruction book.” The “instruction book” of Part 3 is necessary to help me summarize the most important aspects of my practical work and also to help others wishing to realize basso continuo on the cello and viol – since until now no method exists, at least for the baroque period.

Musical examples are largely found in a separate accompanying volume, Appendix A. The intention is that the reader can benefit from seeing music in a larger context than just a few bars without disturbing the flow of the text. Appendix B is a CD of audio examples. The tracklist for


February 2009

Page 9 of 67

this CD can be found at the end of this thesis.

English terminology is largely used for instruments: cello for violoncello, viol for viola da gamba or viole, and bass violin for basse de violon.

Bibliographical references in footnotes contain the name of the author and the date of the publication, full details of which can be found in the bibliography.

Part 1 Historical contexts for basso continuo realization on the cello and viol


February 2009

Page 13 of 67

1.1 Introduction Both the cello and the viol have been playing chords as long as they have been around, and this has often been in the context of accompaniment. Whether such chordal playing could constitute a real basso continuo line or not is sometimes clear and sometimes debatable. Examining chordal playing in both solo and accompanying roles can bring us closer to the nature of an instrument. If playing chords is really in the nature of an instrument, then it follows that such an instrument can make basso continuo realizations.

1.2 Italy 16th Century – Lirone to Lyra-Viol One of the earliest examples we find is in Ganassi's Lettione seconda printed in Venice in 1543 (Example 1 – see Appendix A). Here, a bass viol accompanies a tenor viol, or voice, using some simple double-stops. This can be seen as one of the first examples of what came to be known (especially in England) as playing the viol lyra-way. “Lyra-way” is a reference to the lirone which was an instrument in use in Italy approximately 1500 - 1700. Between the size of a bass and tenor viola da gamba, it was played between the legs, had between nine and twenty strings, frets, a re-entrant tuning system, and an almost flat bridge. It was difficult to play less than four strings at any one time, and this meant the primary use of the instrument was to supply blocks of sustained harmony in (usually vocal) accompaniment. It was used for example by Giulio Caccini (“La liberazione di Ruggiero,” 1625), Luigi Rossi and Bernardo Pasquini.1

1.3 England 17th Century – The golden age of the Lyra-Viol In the early 17th Century, a great many compositions were printed in England for the viol to be played lyra-way, for instance by John Playford (Ex.2) and in the so-called Manchester Lyra Viol Book. Perhaps the great popularity and fashion in playing the viol lyra-way was that as well as accompanying other instruments, one could simply accompany oneself. Music was written for one, two or more viols playing lyra-way together, and even a piece for two to play upon one viol. 1 Headley Lirone, Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 21 Feb. 2009 .

Page 14 of 67


February 2009

It is interesting that in the two books of Ayres (1610 and 1612) by William Corkine, one can find songs with a chordal accompaniment of the lute and only the bass line for the viol (Ex.3c). In the second half of each book, only pieces for one or two lyra-viols are found. Moreover, in the Second Booke of Ayres (Ex.3a), a number of songs have accompaniment of “Base-violl alone” (Ex.3b) which is always a bass-line and never chordal. Perhaps this is Corkine telling us that he likes the lyra-viol, but for harmonic accompaniment of the voice, the lute cannot be beaten, and the viol should stick to the bass-line. If this is the case, he would be in disagreement with the likes of Tobias Hume and Robert Jones (Ex.4) who did write lyra-viol accompaniments for the voice and for the treble viol.2 One of the few known facts about William Corkine is that he did play with John Dowland in 1612. If Corkine happened to be on Dowland's “side” in the battle for “supremacy of the viol over the lute,” then it would surely have been looked down upon by his colleagues had he written a full chordal song accompaniment for viol. Though we will probably never know if this was the case or not, it is easy to imagine a group of “traditional” musicians opposed to the viol developing new idioms in the hitherto lute-territory of song accompaniment. Around 1680 the Italian violinist, guitarist and composer, Nicola Matteis, published The False Consonances of Musick in London. Intended as a thorough bass manual for the guitar, the title page also states that it would be “a great help likewise to those that would play exactingly upon the Harpsicord, Lute or Base-Violl, Shewing the delicacy of all Accords and how to apply them in their proper places.” Regardless of whether it is a great help or not, no specific instructions for the viol are found inside the manual. According to Rousseau, it was the ‘English who were the first to compose and play chordal pieces on the viol, and who exported their knowledge to other Kingdoms’3. At the turn of the seventeenth century this influx of English viol players into Germany, the Low Countries and Spain must also have had an effect on the development of basso continuo skills on the viol across Europe.

2 Robert Jones, London 1601. Tobias Hume, London 1605 and 1607. 3 Ian Woodfield and Lucy Robinson. "Viol." Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 8 Feb. 2009 .


February 2009

Page 15 of 67

Summary It is almost certain, looking through his works, that a violist such as Tobias Hume would have no trouble in realizing a simple bass line on the viol. Already by the beginning of the 17th century, the viol possessed the capability to provide a full bass realization and the English had gained an international reputation for their chord-playing skills. Whether Hume or any other violist at this time would have chosen to realize a bass in ensemble settings or even been permitted to, remains unanswered.

1.4 The “Cello” in Italy in the 17th Century In 17th Century Italy, bass lines were often intended for either a keyboard instrument or a cello (or similar instrument) alone (Tharald Borgir4 pp51-59). In the second half of the 17th Century, along with the development of the solo- and trio- sonate da camera we begin to see in printed works the term “... e violone o cembalo,” appear in regard to accompaniment. One of the first instances is in the “Correnti, e Balletti” of G. B. Vitali in 1666. Vitali was based at the time in Bologna as a member of both San Petronio and the Accademia Filarmonia. One wonders if the appearance of this new term had anything to do with the new liberties brought to the “cello” by the invention of metal-wound gut strings, which also came from Bologna around 1660.5 The increased mass of these strings, whilst maintaining a manageable thickness, allowed cellists a much sought-after combination of low bass notes and agility comparable to that of the violin. Perhaps the most well known and most often performed of these works today is Corelli's Opus 5, “Sonata a Violino e Violone o Cimbalo” (Rome 1700). Despite the fact that it was common to hear sonatas with accompaniment of a lone cello in the 17th Century,6 it is very unusual to hear such a performance of Corelli's Op. 5 now. Today, performers choose to use a harpsichord, or a harpsichord and cello. However they would only resort to an accompaniment of a single cello if circumstances were unfavourable (usually lack of funds to rent and transport an instrument). It 4 Borgir, 1971. 5 Bonta, 1977. 6 Borgir, 1971p.57: “Works in which both violone and spinet are required normally refer to the keyboard part as the basso continuo. The same is true of the organ part in church sonatas. The expression "violone or spinet" therefore carries no implication that both instruments should be used.”

Page 16 of 67


February 2009

would not be unfair to say today's preferred choice (of three possibilities) is harpsichord and cello. It would be very interesting to know the preference of 17th Century performers (of two possibilities given by Corelli) in this matter, although it is unlikely that we shall ever find the answer. David Watkin is one of the few performers I know of who has taken issue with the question of accompanying Corelli's Op. 5. In his article “Corelli's op.5 sonatas: 'Violino e violone o cimbalo'?”7 Watkin presents practical and historical arguments for the use of a cello alone in accompaniment, and this article gave me many leads to follow up for this research. One big question that remains is, would a cellist accompanying an instrument or voice in the baroque time play the bass line as written, or would he add extra notes? And if he added extra notes, how would he add them? In Corelli's Op. V we find no double stops at all written in the bass line. This is not at all out of the ordinary but it makes life difficult for somebody like me who is very interested in realizing a bass line on a cello. Keyboard and lute players in the 17th Century may have had treatises and tutors to guide them but the first cello method appeared in 1741 (Michel Corrette) and that only gives the briefest mention of playing chords! So we have to look a little harder to find hints of what a cellist might have done to realize a bass line. Borgir's research shows that “a bass-line instrument is obligatory in canzonas and church sonatas when the part is contrapuntal.” (1977, pp 62.) In Corelli's Op. V, we find many different functions of bass line from purely contrapuntal to simple harmonic support. Perhaps we could take from Borgir that when Corelli's bass is highly contrapuntal, the cellist should concentrate on bringing out the counterpoint rather than adding extra notes, but when the bass is more vertical the cellist could look for possibilities to add extra notes (Ex.5). Compare Borgir's findings with Sébastien de Brossard's entry for "Suonata" later in this text. Alessandro Stradella was active in Rome for around ten years in the 1660's and 1670's. He is especially of note because he was the first known composer to use Concerto Grosso textures. Being in Rome at that time, Stradella must have had some influence on Corelli who is known to have written a concerto grosso at least as early as 1690. 7 Watkin, 1996, p. 645


February 2009

Page 17 of 67

Watkin, in his article, quotes passages such as the one in Ex.6, which show added notes in the bass parts of some of Alessandro Stradella's instrumental works. Would Corelli have also expected bass lines to be realized something like this? According to Watkin, these added notes “suggest a cello accompaniment.” The bass lines of Stradella's works for violin(s) and bass are sparsely figured and Watkin correctly points out that, “Many of these can be realized by a cellist.” Thought: Having looked at many of Stradella's instrumental works myself as a result of reading Watkin's article, I find however that it was not Stradella's main intention that a cellist should play these bass lines and add extra notes. Although the excerpts Watkin gives do suit the cello very well, there are other passages that do not fit the cello well in terms of figuration (e.g. “Sinfonia 6” mm 24- 26, Ex.6), and in terms of range (e.g. “Sinfonia 8” (II) mm 11-12, Ex.7).8 Passages such as these would seem to fit an archlute better than a keyboard or cello. Stradella uses the archlute in the concertino section of the first known concerto grosso. I find it much more likely that Stradella had an archlute in mind as the main candidate for playing the bass of his sinfonias. Watkin only mentions the lute briefly and seems to play down the probability of its use in favour of the cello. The evidence is again inconclusive: since Stradella did not publish his sinfonias as a set – they come down to us through various sources – we will never know if he intended the same instruments for basso continuo in each of his sinfonias or not and therefore it is difficult to make any generalizations regarding performance of his bass lines. There is an interesting set of (undated) pieces for bass instrument – violone - by Giuseppe Colombi (1635 – 1694). Colombi never worked in Bologna, but he shared the position of assistant Maestro di Capella to Duke Francesco II with the cellist G. B. Vitali from 1674. Vitali was new in Modena after many years in Bologna. Though he was known as a violinist, perhaps Colombi was inspired to write for “violone” by his colleague. The pieces in question appear to be for a solo instrument (with an option for a simple continuo line) which we might today call the bass violin, that is with four strings and a tuning one whole-tone below modern cello tuning. The pieces are interesting because 8 We could assume that a cello with more strings or higher-pitched strings (e.g. one fifth higher than the instrument we call a cello today) was used, but then we are still confronted with difficult figures such as a “7” over d'. Even if this was realized on a cello, the idea of doubling the solo line at pitch on such a familiar instrument (the result of playing the figures) is dubious.

Page 18 of 67


February 2009

they are characterized by many double-stops that very, very rarely go out of first position (Ex.8). The lack of shifts in the double-stopping passages of Colombi is an argument against a full realization of the works in question by Corelli and Stradella since these would require many shifts in position. I think Colombi's pieces do not represent high-level virtuosity but it is a very big jump from playing his harmonically-simple realizations to the more complex ones of Corelli. In the Ricercarte and Sonatas of Domenico Gabrielli (1659 – 1690) we see the first solo works written for solo “violoncello” in name. These pieces contain occasional double-stops, added for special or grand effect. These chordal passages do present more of a technical challenge than those of Colombi, but again are not advanced enough to make a cellistic realization of Corelli's Op. V. In the last twenty years of the 17th Century, Gabrielli became famous as a cello virtuoso earning himself the nickname Mingéin dal viulunzèl, or “Domenico of the Violoncello”. If the cello technique of such a master had been appropriate to make realizations of Corelli sonatas, wouldn't more chords have found their way into his solo works? Thought: David Watkin suggests the realization in Ex.9 of a passage from Corelli's Op. V. Although I think it can sound very beautiful and appropriate in the hands of a good cellist, I find it hard, looking at our evidence so far, to imagine the famous cellist of Bologna, Domenico Gabrielli, making such a realization himself – if we look at his published cello works we see no sign of this style, not even in his double-stopping passages (Ex.10). Intervals of 6ths and 3rds fit very well on the cello, and we find many examples of this in the 12 Sonatas of Antonio Maria Bononcini (1677 – 1726). Bononcini was active as a musician in Bologna for the last fifteen years of the 17th Century before leaving for Vienna. Apparently written in 1693, when Bononcini was only 16, the sonatas contain lines full of alternating 6ths and 3rds (Ex.11), with the occasional 2nd and 7th. There is a much bigger range of double-stops than found in Colombi and Gabrielli, but they mostly fall “under the hand” and the shifts, though there are many of them, are quite manageable. We see from these sonatas that in one respect it is quite practical to harmonize a bass line using simple 3rds, 5ths and 6ths on the cello. However, when it comes to accompaniment, a bass realized on a cello in this way will often double the solo voice and that can lead to problems of sonority.


February 2009

Page 19 of 67

Thought: Example 12 shows sample realizations I made of Corelli's Op. V No. 1, Adagio (extract). The first example is how a cellist familiar with Colombi and Bononcini might realize the bass naturally, though unaware of the solo voice and therefore creating unisons. This realization on its own has good voice leading. The second version avoids the unisons but also avoids a large amount of shifting, leaving some areas a bit empty and creating an inconsistent texture. The third version throws caution to the wind and aims for a full harmony despite creating more work for the left hand. Despite maintaining nice voice leading, this realization is quite cumbersome and risks dominating the solo voice. Tomaso Pegolotti was an amateur musician and worked as a court clerk not far from Modena in the town of Scandiano. His only publication is the “Trattenimenti armonici da camera” of 1698, for solo violin and violoncello. We find some interesting text in Pegolotti's preface to the work where, apologizing for his limited compositional abilities, he suggests the cellist may add additional notes above the bass if it is found too empty. This tells us that certainly Pegolotti would find it normal for a cellist to realize a bass in some way when accompanying a solo. However we do not know if it reflected any general trends of the time. Scandiano was not the musical centre of Italy, but its proximity to Modena may have allowed a cellist such as Vitali to be of influence, and Vitali, as we know, worked for almost twenty years in Bologna before moving to Modena. Something else to consider about the Trattenimenti is that the only surviving examples were printed in two part-books, one for violin and one for cello. Perhaps Pegolotti did not mind the cellist sometimes doubling the violin whilst adding extra notes, since publishing in score format would have made doubling much easier to avoid. In the twelfth Trattenimento, Pegolotti adds an alternative violin part. Perhaps he would also expect an alternative cello part to look like this too (Ex.13). Giovannino del Violone was the nickname for Giovanni Lorenzo Lulier (1662 – 1700) who was the cellist of choice for Corelli, and known as an excellent player. We might hope to find some cello sonatas by this person with such a close connection to Corelli but alas none exist and we are none the wiser. Lulier composed mostly vocal works but in a survey of many works by La Via9, none were found to have outstanding cello parts. Though Lulier and A.M. Bononcini both worked for 9 S. La Via: Il violoncello a Roma al tempo del Cardinale Ottoboni: ricerche e documenti (diss., U. of Rome, 1983– 4), pp. 109–19, 187–92 quoted in Lindgren. "Lulier, Giovanni Lorenzo." Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 21 Feb. 2009,

Page 20 of 67


February 2009

Cardinal Pamphili, it was only when Pamphili was relocated to Bologna from 1690 – 93 that Bononcini was in his orchestra, Lulier staying behind in Rome with Corelli. Summary Unlike the viol in England, the cello in its early development as a solo instrument did not show itself to be as at home playing chordal passages as playing melodic figures as illustrated by the ricercarte and sonatas of Gabrielli. Of course, cellists must have enjoyed passages of chords (prolonged ones in the case of Bononcini) but these passages usually seem to gravitate back towards melodic work again. In light of this, when considering the idea of realizing Corelli's Op. 5 on the cello perhaps one should not aim for a full and consistent realization, but rather to add extra notes here and there, if they happen to fall under the hand, and have good reason be it textural, rhythmic, dramatic and so on.

1.5 What's in a title? Violone o Cembalo, Cello, harpsichord or both? Although not directly related to the question of realization on the cello or viol, it is very useful to consider what instrumentation a basso continuo line requires. In a larger continuo group with a variety of instruments, a bowed-bass would logically do best to sustain the fundamental bass line of the music, and leave realization to instruments with a more obvious chordal facility. If a cello or viol is playing alone or in a smaller group on the bass line, it could possibly improve the music by adding extra notes, if not a full "realization." If one was always to take title pages of works literally in their meaning, then it would usually leave no question about the instrumentation of the accompaniment. Earlier I looked to Borgir and Watkin regarding the performance of bass lines in 17th Century Italian sonatas and found that in this time and place "or" really did mean "or," especially without the qualification of the term basso continuo. However, it is very hard to believe that all composers who published works were rigid in their scoring of the basso continuo (intending the exact specifications of the title page), and we should probably accept that sometimes "and" or "or" meant "and/or." This leaves us with the difficult task of deciding whether the composer meant and, or or and/or or if he did not mind. One argument on the side of ambiguity is that and/or does not look as attractive as one word on its own, and takes up more space - title pages are designed to please by their appearance and are limited in


February 2009

Page 21 of 67

space for words. Looking through the first several hundred pages of the bibliography of works published by John Walsh10, one of the leading European publishing houses in the 18th Century, one can find a large variety of titles. We can divide certain works into two categories: Category 1: publications that have " ... with a thoroughbass for harpsichord or bass-violin" or something similar in the title. Category 2: publications where basso continuo instruments are either not specified (...and a bass) or something other than the cello e.g. "... and a thoroughbass for Ye Organ, Harpsichord or Archlute." The instances of publications in each category can be found in the following table: Approx. Instances in Volume 1 Approx. Instances in Volume 2

Category

Total

of Walsh's Catalogue, 1655 -

of Walsh's Catalogue, 1721 -

1720.

1766. (A - G)

1

36

37

73

2

89

46

135

In the years after 1720, we find a rise in the number of Cat. 1 publications (the or category) relative to those of Cat. 2. This could represent the intentions of the published composers in specifying the continuo group, but I find this hard to believe, especially as it is approaching the era where, according to C. P. E Bach, the combination of cello and harpsichord is free of criticism.11 It is also conceivable that the rise was purely due to fashion and not musical intention - perhaps the term of "violone o cembalo" which appeared towards the end of the 17th Century in Italy took a few decades to become fashionable in England.

10 William C. Smith A bibliography of the musical works published by John Walsh during the years 1695-1720. London Bibliographical Society1948, Bibliographical Society publication for the year 1941. William C. Smith and Charles Humphries A bibliography of the musical works published by the firm of John Walsh during the years 1721-1766. London Bibliographical Society1968, Bibliographical Society publication for the year 1966. The first volume contains works listed chronologically whilst the second lists composers and publications alphabetically. I looked at the entire first volume, and the second up to the letter "g." 11 C.P.E. Bach, 1753-1762.

Page 22 of 67


February 2009

More insight into the meaning of "bass" can be easily found by looking into a publication to see if the parts specify the instruments. For instance “L'Art de la Modulation / Quatuors / Pour un Hautboy, 2 Violons, et Basse”12 by Philidor (1726 - 1795) actually contains parts for Flauto Traversiero, Violino Primo, Violino Secondo and Violoncello. The Violoncello part contains a full figuring so it is likely a keyboard instrument is also required to play from this part. Where it is not possible or practical to look through the parts, we are left in the dark. In this respect, my small survey of Walsh's catalogue is not very useful. Given more time, it would be interesting to look inside the works to see how the parts correspond to the title. In 1736 the French cellist J.B. Masse (c. 1700 – c. 1757) published his “Sonates à Deux Violonchelles”, Op. 2. We can see from the title page that they can also be played on other instruments such as two bassoons, two viols and two violins. The part of the second cello contains figures for realization - note that no mention of a keyboard instrument or basso continuo is given in the title. Valerie Walden (1998, pp. 257) uses it as "Evidence...that chord filling [by cellists] was...added to accompaniments of continuo sonatas," and that the figures are, "presumably for realization by the second violoncellist." Unfortunately, looking beyond the title page shows that the figures are obviously not for a cello. Only a small number of the figures can be added by a second cellist with a degree of ease and without doubling the first cellist (Ex.14). They must be intended for a keyboard instrument even though it is not mentioned in the title. Summary In a brief review of title pages, I have found that information given in title pages on accompaniment is often misleading. A better idea of the intended instruments for accompaniment can usually be arrived at by looking inside a score or publication to see what it is practically suited to.

1.6 The Viol in 17th and 18th Century France The period around 1680 – 1690 was somewhat of a crossroads for the viola da gamba in France. Here we find the first book of solo viol music published in France (de Machy, 1685), the first basso continuo accompaniment to solo viol music (and indeed any solo instrumental music in France13) by 12 François-André Danican Philidor, L'Art de la Modulation..., Paris 1755. 13 Dunford, Marin Marais http://www.goldbergweb.com/en/magazine/composers/2003/12/18206_print.php


February 2009

Page 23 of 67

Marais in 1689 and treatises by Danoville and Rousseau both in 1687. There was conflict in the nature of the instrument, especially between de Machy and Rousseau. It is difficult to read more than a few pages of Rousseau's 150-page Traité de la viole without encountering some pejorative reference to “l'autheur de l'avertissement” i.e. de Machy. This conflict stemmed from the instrument's old association with harmonic instruments such as the guitar and lute on the one hand (jeu d'harmonie), and the progressive melodic style being developed on the other hand (jeu de mélodie). De Machy sought to preserve the harmonic style characterised by style brisé and chords (Ex.15), considering it the true nature of the instrument. He agreed that a simple melody could be played beautifully on the viol but likened it in his “Avertissement”14to playing beautifully on the harpsichord or organ but with only one hand. Rousseau found the art of the jeu de mélodie in imitating the pleasantness and charm of the human voice: “the melodic style is simple and consequently requires a lot of delicacy and tenderness.”15 Perhaps more profoundly, the jeu de mélodie represented for the progressives a path of independence away from old associations with the lute.16 In the end, looking through the music for viol of the following 50 years, there was no clear winner and we find highly developed pieces fully integrating both melodic and harmonic style (take, for instance, the first two movements of C. P. E. Bach's Sonata for Viola da Gamba and Basso Continuo in D c.1745, Ex.16). The implications of this heated argument however are very important to the subject of this paper. If the composer sees the viol in the same group of instruments as the lute, theorbo and guitar, then he might expect it to realize basso continuo. If the viol is seen in the same group as the voice and the violin then it would not be expected to play realizations of the bass. Does it belong to one group or both? There is unfortunately no black-andwhite answer as we shall see by looking through some pieces of evidence from this time in France.

14 Le Sieur De Machy, Pièces de violle, en musique et en tablature (Paris, 1685). 15 Rousseau, 1687. p.56, Translation of the author. 16 Bol, 1974, p.46.

Page 24 of 67


February 2009

The continuo group in France in the 17th and first half of the 18th Centuries was usually made up of both chordal and sustaining instruments in various combinations, one of the most common being bass viol, theorbo and harpsichord.17 In this latter combination, perhaps the most obvious role for the viol would be sustaining the bass line – something it can do much better than the harpsichord or theorbo. Jacques Bonnet would also have agreed with this role. Bonnet complains, in a criticism of bass group execution, that the continuo group (in this case just a harpsichord and viol) often resembles more a solo Pièce de viole than an accompaniment, which smothers the solo voice through chords and arpeggiation. He points out that one should play the simple bass whilst the other makes a realization.18 Bonnet's advice does not hide the fact that it became quite common in early 18th Century France for a viol player to make a realization, even at the same time as the harpsichord. It is also evident that there was some disagreement as to whether such a manner of realization was in good taste or not. In 1699, Nicolas Derosier (guitarist and composer) published his “Nouveaux principes pour la guitarre, avec une table universelle de tous les accords qui se trouvent dans la basse-continüe sur cet instrument. Ce qui peut servir aussi aux personned qui joüent du luth, du théorbe et de la basse de viole.”19 However, just like the treatise by Nicola Matteis mentioned earlier, there is no reference within the publication for the viol.20 I would like to read into his title page that Derosier was one of a group of musicians who considered the viol as an instrument with the capability of basso continuo realization. It is also possible that Derosier thought the viol should only play the bass-line but nevertheless could find some useful information on accompaniment in general from his treatise e.g. rhythm, articulation, dynamics, etc, but this was the case, wouldn't Derosier have also mentioned the basse de violon in the title?

17 Zappulla (2000) p.56 in reference to Julie Ann Sadie, 1980, The bass viol in French baroque chamber music (UMI Research Press) p.25. 18 “L'on n'entend en général dans la Musique qu'une basse continue toûjours doublée, qui souvent est une espèce de batterie, d'accords, & un harpegement ... de ceux qui accompagnent ou du clavessin, ou de la viole; il faudroit donc que des deux Instrumens, il y en eût un qui jouât le simple de la basse, & l'autre le double; ces B.C. Passeroient plutôt pour des Pièces de viole, que pour un accompagnement qui doit être soumis au sujet, & ne point prévaloir.” Jacques Bonnet, Histoire de la musique, et de ses effets, Depuis son origine jusqu'à present Paris, 1726 pp. 297-298. Quoted in Bol 1974, p.50. 19 Derosier, Nicolas. 1699. Nouveaux principes pour la guitarre, avec une table universelle de tous les accords qui se trouvent dans la basse-continu:e sur cet instrument. Ce qui peut servir aussi aux personned qui jou:ent du luth, du théorbe et de la basse de viole. Paris, Ballard, 1699. 20 According to Zappulla (2000) p.7


February 2009

Page 25 of 67

When reading the Grove Music Online article on “Continuo,”21 I was happy to find Jean Rousseau quoted as saying in his Traité of 168722, “Chords should mostly be played with generous bow strokes, and smoothly connected like an organ...” For a few days after reading this I attempted to connect chords on the viol as they might sound on an organ. Later, when I read the facsimile of Rousseau's Traité, I found that the Grove article appears to have misinterpreted Rousseau. Rousseau concludes one paragraph that appears to be about blending into an ensemble thus: “...c'est pourquoy il faut sur tout estre attentif à écouter les autres Parties, afin de frapper les accords bien à propos.” And begins the next paragraph: “Le Jeu de l'accompagnement doit estre un Jeu lié avec de grands coups d'Archet qui succedent les uns aux autres sans interruption de Son, comme un Tuyau d'Orgue...” I found this information made more sense when applied to the idea of playing one bass note at a time rather than chords, especially as Rousseau speaks of an organ pipe in the singular. However, a question mark still remains over exactly how one might “frapper les accords” in the context of the previous paragraph. Sébastien de Brossard, unlike Derosier, clearly belongs to the group that believes the viol (and the bass violin) should play only the bass-line as written. In his “Dictionnaire de Musique”, first published in 170123, under the heading “Basso Continuo,” Brossard writes “One also often plays basso continuo simply and without figures on the bass viol or bass violin....”24 He later confirms this view under the entry “Suonata,” stating that sonatas are, “usually for solo violin, or two different violins with a basso continuo for the harpsichord and often a more figured (figurée not

21 Williams and Ledbetter, Continuo. Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 2 Dec. 2008 . 22 Rousseau, 1687 23 Brossard, c.1708 24 “On la jouë aussi souvent simplement, et sans chiffres sur la Basse de Violle, ou de Violon, avec le Basson, le Serpent, et cetera”

Page 26 of 67


February 2009

chiffrée) bass for the viol, the fagot etc.”25 Shirley Thompson provides us with more clues in her article “Marc-Antoine Charpentier and the viol”26. We learn that, although the precise instrumentation of the continuo group often remains a mystery, Charpentier (1643 – 1704) sometimes offers interesting insights such as an instruction under the final note of “Psalmus David nonagesimus 9nus”, H194, that the viol should play a chord of D with a major 3rd (Ex.17a). Thompson also draws our attention to other instances of Charpentier colouring final notes in this way e.g. a written-out five-note chord in the continuo line of the cantata “La descente d'Orphée aux Enfers”, H488. Most interesting is a passage for two obbligato bass viols in “Élévation”, H408: one viol essentially makes a realization of the bass with 2, 3 and 4-note chords whilst the other adds double stops on top of this (Ex.17b). This writing for the two obbligato viols elicits the questions from Thompson: “did viols take some part in realizing harmonies? And did Charpentier notate the parts more fully here because of the presence of two players, and the need to avoid collisions?”27 It is a pity that there are no accounts of Marais accompanying on the viol – instead we have to imagine how he might have played a bass-line, and if he would have realized a bass line how would it have sounded? Presumably, and hopefully (he was “the Angel” after all), rather different to that which Ancelet reports of Forqueray (the younger?) in 1757: “He never executes the bass just as it is written; he claims to greatly improve it with the great number of brilliant traits he throws at it; he fights, so to say, with the person playing the solo; and often the Composer is just as unhappy as the violinist who is playing.”28 Summary We can say from looking at the viol repertoire in France that to play harmonically – or the jeu 25 “ordinairement elles sont à Violon seul ou à deux Violons différens avec une Basse-Continuë pour le Clavessin, et souvent une Basse plus figurée pour la Violle de Gambe, le Fagot, et cetera.” 26 Thompson, 2004 27 Ibid, pp. 501. 28 Ancelet, Observations sur la musique, les musicians, et les instruments, A Amsterdam, Aux dépens de la Compagnie, 1757, Quoted in Bol, 1974, p.50.


February 2009

Page 27 of 67

d'harmonie – is in the nature of the instrument and therefore it clearly has the means to make a basso continuo realization, but of an idiom clearly different from the lute and keyboard families. We know that viol players did realize basso continuo in practice but this knowledge is often brought down to us through sources that found it done in rather bad taste and it would be good to heed the warning not to make a pièce de viole out of a basso continuo. Some thought the viol should stick to the bass-line, like the bass violin, and in many circumstances this will be the most useful application of the instrument. Could Charpentier have been suggesting that a little bit of realization here and there goes a long way in creating certain colours at special moments?

1.7 Tra le Fiamme – Solo viol continuo Perhaps two of the most famous examples of realization on the viol are in Handel's oratorio “La resurrezione” (Ex.18) and cantata “Tra le Fiamme”. The viol has its own line of figured bass in the score of Tra le Fiamme in addition to the line for the other continuo instruments (Ex.19). In the first movement Handel writes out the first seven chords for the violist (though not very "handy" chords as far as a viol player is concerned - perhaps Handel was just giving a sketch). It is a very interesting part since it switches from an obbligato instrument to continuo instrument several times. Handel gives an idea of what kind of realization he wants in each movement, and leaves the rest up to the player. It is thought this cantata was written for Hesse who had earlier studied (with and abrupt end29) with both Marais and Forqueray. Hesse was a virtuoso player and could well have inspired Handel to write such a part. The famous aria, “Komm, Süßes Kreuz,” from J.S. Bach's “St. Matthew Passion,” is essentially a written out continuo part for the viol that only occasionally departs from the bass. Bach saw the capability of the viol to realize figured bass in a similar way to that of the theorbo, since the theorbo also has a written out accompaniment for the same aria in a different version.

29 Dunford, The Viola da Gamba, http://www.goldbergweb.com/en/magazine/essays/2001/09/245_print.php Marais and Forqueray were jealous rivals at court. One story has Ernst Christian Hesse, a German violist, attempting to study with both masters. Knowing of their rivalry, Hesse studied with one under his real name and with the other as “Sachs”. Unfortunately for him, Forqueray and Marais eventually got around to bragging to one another about their respective brilliant German students. A competition between Sachs and Hesse was arranged. Needless to say, poor Hesse showed up alone and tried to calm the roiled waters by playing first in Marais’ style, then in Forqueray’s. For this impertinence he was packed off home to Darmstadt and was seen no more in Versailles.

Page 28 of 67


February 2009

1.8 Frets We tend to assume that the viol is an instrument with frets, and a cello is an instrument without frets. This is true most of the time, but not all of the time: “If the violoncello has frets, as is customary upon the viola da gamba, the violoncellist must, in playing notes marked with flats, depress the strings a little above the frets, and apply a little more pressure with his fingers, in order to stop them with the additional height (that is, of about a comma) that their ratios require as opposed to those of notes marked with sharps.30” In the big switchover from viol to cello I am sure that not every violist became a cellist, and not every cellist was previously a violist. Surely there must have been quite a number who did switch from one to the other, or made the best of each world and played both instruments at the same time (which is the case of this author). With this category of musicians one can imagine that frets would sometimes have been kept as a feature on the new cello, and with it, the viol system of fingering that has a facility for chordal playing. Thought: To what extent does the presence of frets affect the nature of an instrument (melodic / harmonic) and even its player? The great-grandfather of the viol, the oud, is without frets and does not play chords though it is held and strummed as a guitar - the Arabic music is much stronger in the elements of melody and rhythm than it is in harmony. At what point were frets added? When the musician wanted more resonance or chords, or both?

1.9 Idiomatic cello accompaniment in the 18th Century It is not difficult to find examples of "basso continuo" lines from the 18th Century that are obviously written down with the cello in mind. Tartini would have been only one of several violinists touring at this time with only a cellist (for obvious logistical reasons) and it would not be surprising if that cellist took a few liberties in filling out the bass lines. In Tartini's Op.2 we can see examples of Tartini specifying exactly which extra notes he wanted added (Ex.20). It is also 30 Quantz, 1752, Chapter XVII, Section IV – 15, p. 245.


February 2009

Page 29 of 67

possible that Tartini only wanted the cellist to play extra notes exactly where they were written, but that possibility could make life less exciting for the cellist. Jean Barrière (1707 – 1747) expanded the virtuoso cello technique with his four books of cello sonatas published between 1733 and 1739. Though double stops are rarely found in the basso continuo line, the way the harmonic outline is given in places like the Andante of the first sonata of Book 1 (Ex.21) shows us that it is very much for the cello. A different composer may have only written simple repeated crotchets (quarter notes) for the bass. The solo part aside, it is quite common to see passages of double stops in the bass parts of Boccherini's cello sonatas. A rather interesting example can be found in the first movement of two different versions of a sonata in E-flat (Ex.22). The bass parts are almost identical except that most of the double stops in one version are inverted in the other. Perhaps Boccherini was of the same mind as Baudiot, mentioned below, in that the particular inversion of a chord does not have to be something of major importance. Whatever the reason, both versions of double-stops, like all the other double-stops I looked at in Boccherini's bass lines, fall neatly under the hand. Boccherini never asks the accompanist to perform a difficult task with the sole purpose of filling out harmonies. Another cellist, famous for accompaniment of recitativo secco, was James Cervetto (1748 – 1837), son of the “Father of the solo cello in England,” Giacomo Cervetto (1682 – 1783). James Cervetto worked in the King's Theatre from 1774, earlier than Robert Lindley, and published several works almost entirely for cellos. In his “Three Duets for Two Violoncellos”, Op. 6, (1795) we find technically challenging material for both cellos – these duets are obviously aimed at very accomplished cellists. No matter how challenging the passage work, when Cervetto asks for double-stops (often “tremolo-ed” several to a bow), they almost always fall under one hand position (Ex.23). Also as one might expect from this kind of repertoire, there are many other clever ways in which Cervetto outlines the harmony without playing chords at all. Summary Lots of inspiration can be found in basso continuo lines and cello literature for elaborating on a bass. When adding extra notes on the cello, we can take heed from Boccherini and Cervetto and only add what comes naturally under the hand. They did not ask us to exert ourselves to reach a

Page 30 of 67


February 2009

certain special harmony, so why should we ask it of ourselves? (Perhaps the author is referring in particular to his own aspirations at present.) Looking at examples such as these show us that there are also many other ways to add harmony than just playing chords.

1.10 The first cello tutors and the accompaniment of recitativo in opera In 1741 the first cello tutor was published by Corrette in Paris.31 As well as all the basic instruction one might expect from a cello tutor (including special advice for viol players who wish to play the cello) we find chapter 12 devoted to chords and arpeggios (Ex.24). Corrette gives examples of the augmented fourth, diminished fifth and seventh along with their resolutions. The main point seems to be giving advice on how to finger such intervals. The “Arpegio” section shows a handful of different ways to arpeggiate a 3-note chord, again with a little fingering advice. Alas Corrette gives us absolutely no hint on the context in which we might like to use these skills. Was it too obvious to even mention? The only other help we get is to hardly play chords on the lowest string due to the heavy and obscure sound produced.32 Johann Baptist Baumgartner (1723 - 1782) was a German cellist active in Nothern Europe and England. Baumgartner's “Instructions de musique, théorique et pratique, à l’usage du violoncelle”33 was printed in Den Haag in 1774 and it is particularly interesting because of its emphasis on accompaniment: “I give in this method the most sensible and easiest approach, not only to play pieces but even to accompany well since that is its [the cello's] primary role and consequently the essential thing to know.”34 Chapter Nine of Baumgartner, “On technique and shifting”, is a much more thorough version of Corrette's effort on fingering chords. Perhaps the aspect that we can most benefit from in this fingering advice is that it is always given in a harmonic context, e.g. “Fourths are always played 31 Corrette 1741 32 Corrette, 1741, p. 38: “Sur la 4e corde on ne fait guere d'accords, les sons étans très graves, et par consequent trop obscurs.” 33 Baumgartner, 1774. 34 Baumgartner 1774, in “To the Reader”


February 2009

Page 31 of 67

with the little finger and the second finger since the resolution is to the third.” I am sure any cellist thinking of chordal accompaniment would benefit from Baumgartner's advice here, since it is not only the head and the ears that learn good harmony, but also the fingers. At the end of the chapter Baumgartner refers the reader to an exercise (Ex.25), warning, “It is not sufficient to know the rules. It is also necessary to have the technique which is the effect of exercise and practice which depends on you and not me.” Baumgartner devotes Chapter Twelve to the “Accompaniment of Recitatives”: accompanied and ordinary, or secco. Regarding "accompanied" recitatives, the option of not playing extra notes is given, since the harmony is provided by the other instruments. With “ordinary” recitatives, there is no option but to play chords. Here follows a summary of his guide: •

One should be able to read all clefs (of the solo part) quickly in order to play unfigured basses.

•

The tone is never sustained. In the rest between chords, find the next notes. [by plucking quietly?]

•

The bass note of the chord comes on the beat.35

•

Octavation is permitted when the bass note is too high.

•

Triple-stopped chords are more likely to be out of tune, so use double-stops most of the time.

•

Do not play a wrong chord.

•

Read Rameau or Rousseau etc. for a more thorough explanation of chords and harmony than given here.

Chapter Thirteen, “On General Bass” is the only explicit evidence I have seen advising cellists to play extra notes in a regular basso continuo situation: “It is very good, when you accompany a symphony or other large ensemble music, to sometimes play chords if there is occasion.” 35 Baumgartner 1774, Chapter 12 “give a dry stroke with your bass note at the same time as the principal chord note of the melody. You have enough spare time while following the melody to search for your concordant note.”

Page 32 of 67


February 2009

Baumgartner advises playing certain chords based on the way the bass line moves, enabling the cellist to play without figures. He advises playing without chords only when the line is highly figured and finishes with the general observation: “The ear, if you have one, will guide you.” In his “General instructions for Good Accompanying”, we are told “never hazard to accompany a solo, trio or a quartet.” Whether this means not to play additional notes or only to play them if one is completely sure, I do not know. I think it is probably the latter since he immediately goes on to suggest practicing realization in symphonies as the other cellists will “cover the mistakes you will make”. We are also told, “it is good to play figures when accompanying a symphony or a choir,” and to play the notes down an octave if there is no contrabass. Again, regarding accompaniment of solo, duet, trio or quartet, there is an ambiguous instruction of, “play the notes exactly,” which could mean without realization or without mistakes (quite possible given his ironic nature seen elsewhere in his Instructions). Valerie Walden, writing on accompaniment in 1998,36 summarizes the instructions on accompaniment of recitative from the major early cello tutors37 (e.g. Baillot, Ex.26) and evidence of its implementation: •

It was considered normal for a cello to accompany recitatives with chords from around 1790, across most of Europe.

•

The core instruments of the recitative group were the cello and the contrabass. The presence of a keyboard instrument varied in different places, however there is evidence that in the absence of a cello, the keyboard was not able to satisfactorily provide a strong enough harmony on its own.

•

It was common for the contrabass to sustain the bass note of the recitative (as written) whilst the cellist arpeggiated chords in various manners at the changes of harmony.

•

Some (like Baumgartner) said that the bass note must not be changed (except in the case of octavation downwards), whilst others (Baudiot, Stiastny) considered that changing the inversion of the chord did not create any bad effect for the listener – one can imagine that it does not matter which inversion the cellist plays so long as the fundamental bass note from

36 Walden, 1998, Chapter: The Art of Acoompaniment pp. 241 – 269. 37 e.g. Baumgartner, 1774; Baillot, Levasseur, Catel, Baudiot, Méthode de violoncelle et de basse d'accompagnement, Paris 1805; Baudiot, Méthode pour le violoncello, op. 25, 2 vols, Paris 1826, 1828.


February 2009

Page 33 of 67

other instruments is strong enough. •

Some cellists played their arpeggios in a way that the highest note was the next note of the singer. Others did not even include the singers note in their arpeggio.

•

Personality appears to have had as much effect on the way of accompanying as the style of a particular place or time.

An intriguing yet questionable source is found in Raoul's cello method of 1797. Two pages are devoted to chords and the accompaniment of recitative. Raoul gives examples of chords in a kind of regola d'ottava but strangely harmonizes from the top-note downwards (Ex.27). The chords also go very high up on the cello with an unusual fingering recommended, and I wonder if Raoul seriously expected such risky chords to be used in the accompaniment of recitative. Perhaps the most famous accompanist of recitative on the cello was the Yorkshire-born Robert Lindley (1776 – 1855). Together with the contrabass player, Domenico Dragonetti, Lindley achieved something like a superstar status for his recitative work (Ex.28) at the King's Theatre in London. From around the turn of the century until 1837 they were: “without rival in the performance of their parts, which light the musical heavens like sudden thunderbolts of Jupiter.”38 Several contemporary reports of their work are found in Fiona Palmer's book on Dragonetti.39 From these reports we get the impression that no matter where one went in Europe, nothing compared to the, “fanciful and exquisite manner in which Lindley does this at our Italian Opera-house.”40 Useful to know is a quality that one commentator, “never found in any other violoncellist, viz. that when accompanying a recitative, he gave the full chord, and frequently the note on which the singers were to commence. Some one or two tried his mode, but all failed.” Needless to say, Dragonetti received just as much praise. Disappointment was reported when finally in 1837, a piano took over the accompaniment of recitativo secco at the King's theatre. Summary In the first cello tutors there appears to have been a natural expectation that cellists should develop not just a strong theoretical knowledge of harmony, but also a motoric reaction to it in the fingers, entirely specific and unique to the cello. The latter, if not the former, is missing from today's cello 38 Planyavsky quoting a contemporary report. Quoted in Palmer, 1997. 39 Palmer, 1997. pp. 115 – 118. 40 Ibid. p. 116.

Page 34 of 67


February 2009

schools. Accompaniment of recitativo secco by a cello and contrabass, and often but not always a keyboard instrument, was the norm across Europe towards the end of the 18th Century and the beginning of the 19th. (The score for Mendelssohn's recreation of Bach's “St. Matthew Passion” had a bass part for two solo cellos playing chords and the double bass on the bass line.41) Currently this scoring is not the norm when performing works of that period, even with groups on historical instruments. Realization of basso continuo by a cello outside of recitative probably did happen, but the contexts in which it might have happened are still vague. When cello accompaniment of recitativo secco died out in the second half of the 19th Century so did the skills needed for it, and also the motivation for the next generation of cellists to continue to learn these skills. Since this practice of performing recitative is well documented, we can look forward to its rebirth in the field of historical performance in the coming years.

41 Brown, 1999, p.603.


February 2009

Page 35 of 67

1.11 Conclusion to Part 1 I can summarize the historical evidence I looked at above as follows: 1. There is solid evidence that says it was a common practice for able viol players to realize basso continuo. 2. No evidence or accounts have been found that suggest it was common for the cello to realize normal basso continuo lines. 3. It was normal practice for the cello to realize harmonies in the accompaniment of recitative at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries.

1. It would have been useful in completing the picture of the viol as a harmonic continuo instrument to have found a tutor or method from that period. During this investigation none has been found and so it seems that the viol player of the 18th Century might have had to select the relevant points of tutors for other instruments in order to develop their own harmonic continuo skills. Aside from this the picture is complete with Ganassi's accompaniments, English lyra-viol song, Charpentier's “colourings” using the viol, Handel's fully independent continuo lines in Tra le Fiamme, and written accounts from the likes of Bonnet. The independent viol lines that Handel wrote, along with their figuring, shows that at least Handel, if not others, expected a real continuous basso continuo from the instrument. It is no surprise that today that various viol players are using chords as an extra colour in the continuo group – this can be heard in recordings as varied as Biber (Gunar Letzbor, 1996, Appendix B, Track 25), Cipriano de Rore (Paolo Pandolfo, 2006, Appendix B, Track 26) and Handel (Cecilia Bartoli, 2005, Appendix B, Track 27). The viol was abandoned and lay forgotten for around 150 years before it was reanimated in the 20th century. Perhaps it tells us something about the nature of this instrument that, even in the absence of a “viol-continuo tutor,” today's revivalists are incorporating continuo realization into their playing, just as did good viol players of the 17th and 18th Centuries. Perhaps it just comes naturally.

Page 36 of 67


February 2009

2. We know that the cello had the capacity to play chords even from its earliest solo repertoire (Gabrielli, Bononcini) but chords on the cello were rarely more than a special effect in the baroque period. The cello has not had any tradition of jeu de harmonie – where the presence of chords forms the basis of a composition – although J.S. Bach shows us many ways in which the cello can accompany itself without chords. Together with the absence of any contemporary reports of basso continuo realization on the cello, these facts seem to say that the cello did not usually play more in accompaniment than what was written in the music. The two instances we have looked at that tell us otherwise (Pegolotti's “permission” to add more notes, and Baumgartner's advice that it is “sometimes good” to play chords “if there is occasion.”) are vague and suggest that cellists sometimes added extra notes here and there rather than a full realization of the bass line. This is not a negative finding, since nowadays it is unusual for a cellist even to add occasional extra notes, and it presents another path to be explored by today's baroque performers. 3. It is something for cellists to look forward to that before long they will hopefully be playing luscious chords in recitativo secco from the early 19th century and before. There is too much evidence of this practice to ignore since there is an abundance of contemporary accounts and several methods on how to perform it. Perhaps the good things to remember are that everybody did it differently, and, as Baumgartner suggested, to let our ears guide us.

Part 2 A personal account of developing and practising basso continuo realizations on the cello and viol


February 2009

Page 39 of 67

2.1 Introduction This section charts my attempts to methodically develop my skills at realizing basso continuo. The way it is written represents the way I organized my thoughts and is often intended to be thought provoking – for my own benefit as much as the reader's. One and a half years of “research” into these skills does not make one an expert, but it opens up many paths to follow and it is my intention in this section to show these paths to the reader.

2.2 The Cello A cello can always produce an extra note of harmony above the bass as long as there is higher string free. In first position, this means G on the D-string is the highest note on which one can play a chord. I like to stay in the same position (usually first) when playing chords on the cello since it is easier to take care of intonation and maintain the flow of the bass line. This is also the example set to us in historical examples of chord playing (see section 1.8).

Case study: I remember one of my first errors in playing some figures was to realize the following typical progression: fig.i.

Thus:

fig.ii.

What came naturally to the fingers did not make good accompaniment. The 7th is not resolved and the voice leading is not good. With hindsight, a better solution could have been:

fig.iii.

Page 40 of 67


February 2009

However the above solution involves a shift to 2nd position which is not very difficult, but nevertheless can interrupt the flow of the bass line and has more intonation risk. We can find a safer 1st-position solution by octavating the bass:

fig.iv.

Figures iii or iv could both be good solutions. Only the context can determine which is most suitable. One solution might be chosen over another to avoid doubling the solo line, or because of texture (4 has a richer texture). To play no extra notes is, of course, always an option.

2.3 The elements of basso continuo realization on the cello The mini case-study above illustrates the main issues (or elements) confronting a cellist who wants to realize a bass, namely: •

how to maintain good voice leading

•

how to shift as little as possible

•

how not to double the melody line / lines

•

how to create the appropriate texture

•

how to shape the fundamental bass line whilst playing chords over it

All these elements make up a dynamic whole. It is not possible to alter one issue without affecting one or more others. In particular, improving one element will usually take away from another so that any successful basso continuo realization on the cello is a delicate balance of all the elements. This balance allows the cellist to provide as much harmony as possible with the least effort.

Voice Leading Voice leading is the way different voices move in the same piece of music. Good voice leading is considered to be when each individual voice progresses to the next one in the way it should, with


February 2009

Page 41 of 67

minimal jumps and a good balance between contrary and conjunct motion. One of the limitations of the cello is that there are often only one or two possibilities to realize a bass with good voice leading. This is due to the instrument having only four strings and a tuning in fifths. A keyboard instrument has almost endless possibilities for good voice leading because ten fingers can make sure that every voice is leading into another without offending the rules of counterpoint. Often a good voice leading on the cello will double the melody. When it is not possible to have good voice leading without doubling the melody, it is perhaps better to play the simple bass, and focus attention on playing it very well. (See “Keeping the bass line,” below.)

Shifting Shifting whilst playing chords has two main implications. The first is that it poses a risk to good intonation, and secondly it can disrupt the way a bass line is normally articulated on a cello if one is not playing chords. We could say that the more sure a cellist is of his intonation, the more he can shift to increase the possibilities of chords at his disposal.

Doubling the melody I have found that doubling the melody with the highest notes of a chord is never good. Although doubling can work with a plucked instrument such as the harpsichord, I think the nature of the cello as a sustaining instrument prevents it from doubling successfully. Since it accompanies other sustaining instruments, the result of doubling is something like a sonorific clash.

Another reason not to double is wasting effort on a note that is already present in the harmony. In a composition for one melody and a bass there is usually one, occasionally two voices missing. Perhaps the cellist should concentrate on filling in the missing voice wherever possible.

Texture Out of the usual group of continuo instruments it is the cello that has the most presence (also the bassoon, but the bassoon obviously cannot play chords). The cellist should always be aware of his

Page 42 of 67


February 2009

capability to overpower the solo instrument and cloud the texture. The advice we get from Corrette (Section 1.9) not to play chords on the lowest strings is a good one. Keyboard players are often warned against playing chords too low on the keyboard. Perhaps today's cellist is used to playing chords in loud places (opening of Dvořák and Elgar Concertos, Boccherini's famous sonata in C major etc.), but we should put some effort into exploring different ways of playing chords. How transparent can a four-note chord sound on the cello?

Keeping the bass line It is easy to lose track of the bass, especially when one is not used to playing chords,. The bass note is the most important one the cellist plays and it should not be sacrificed for an interesting harmony. A bass line normally played legato by a cellist (such as figure v. below) can easily suffer if chords are played above it (figure vi.).

fig.v.

fig.vi.

To perform figure vi. well with the suggested fingering, a cellist would have to take into account the following: 

placing of the bass note (i.e. on the beat)



the volume of the bass note in relation to the others



the length of the bass note in relation to others – or how long the bass note is sustained before breaking the chord upwards


February 2009

Page 43 of 67



the beginning articulation of each bass note as it would be when played without chords



to keep the finger on the bass note as long as possible with sufficient pressure to sustain its resonance, especially between chords 2 and 3 where there is a shift – if the bass note is lost too early, we have the effect of a different inversion.

All these things taken into account, the cellist can give an effect of a legato bass line, whilst providing a full harmony. Needless to say it takes a lot more concentration and precision than playing the bass line alone.

2.4 The Viol As Section 1 shows, the viol is an instrument on which chords come naturally. Frets, quartal-tuning and a greater number of strings make the viol more flexible than the cello at realizing basso continuo. These attributes should be kept in mind to make good realizations on the viol. The general principle of holding down the fingers as long as possible for resonance is as important as ever.

2.5 The elements of basso continuo realization on the viol The viol shares the same elements of basso continuo realization as the cello, but since it is a another instrument, they are treated differently. Through practical experience I have found that these elements on the viol are more independent than on the cello - that is to say often one element of basso continuo can be varied with little or no effect to another.

Voice Leading The viol usually has several possibilities for a chord (see figure vii below) and these possibilities should be used to make good voice leading. Often one has to learn a new chord shape and it can take a while for the fingers to find it quickly so that it becomes useful in continuo playing. It is always worth the effort and it is not only continuo playing, but also solo playing, that will benefit from this extra dexterity.

Page 44 of 67


February 2009

Doubling I try to avoid doubling the melody with the top note of a chord on the viol (as is the general practice in accompaniment of French music), but it often happens that a melody note is doubled within a chord (I often play chords of three or more notes on the viol and mostly two notes on the cello). I have not found doubling the melody within a chord to be a problem so far, and it is not always unacceptable when the top note of a chord doubles the melody. Perhaps this is due to the more subtle sound the viol produces compared to the cello.

Texture If the cello's tendency is to be a bit too brash in playing chords, then perhaps the viol tends to be too watery. This is often an advantage because it allows the viol to play lots of notes in a chord without getting in the way. It is a disadvantage when the bass line needs strong articulation. I sometimes find myself playing a lot of harmony “just because I can,” so it is very good to be aware of moments when the bass alone or a simple third is the best solution.

Keeping the bass line Sustaining the bass line while playing chords above it is easier on the viol than the cello because of the extra resonance that the frets give. The fingers on bass notes still need to be kept down as long as possible, at least until the next bass note and perhaps longer if it does not sound bad. Shifts in position are sometimes necessary – in this case it can be helpful to organize the fingers so that they travel to their new destinations at different times. If all the fingers move at once, there might be an undesirable gap in the sound.

2.6 Developing Harmonic Skills I knew about Dandrieu's Principes de l’accompagnement du Clavecin (Paris, 1719) from elementary harpsichord studies. It is a simple and effective method for learning basso continuo on the harpsichord. Because of its simplicity, it is also easily adaptable to other instruments such as the cello and the viol. The method introduces harmonies and harmonic progressions step-by-step.


February 2009

Page 45 of 67

Each step consists of three pages of progressions, all identical except the first contains a full figuring (obbligato figuring, to learn and understand what is considered to be good voice leading), the second part has the basic “shorthand” figures (that form the usual abbreviation of whole chords in scores of that period) and the third part is unfigured. In this way Dandrieu leads us to understand harmony without relying on the figures. I have been practising these exercises regularly and found them very useful. They help to develop a physical feel for the harmony as well as the aural. Since Dandrieu's obbligato figuring is only applicable to a keyboard instrument I made my own adaptations and some of these are to be found in Appendix A (Ex.29).

I found it useful to set myself small tasks such as “how many different G major chords can I play?” The answer to this particular question is below in figure vii. Tasks like these helped me to get to know the cello and viol harmonically. Other tasks that helped were downward scales of 7-6 chords (see figure viii.) or upward scales of 5-6 chords. Many simple harmonic exercises can be made up in this way and it has the advantage that it is naturally specific to the instrument fig.vii.

fig.viii. Descending scale of 7-6 chords, with obbligato figuring for the viol.

Page 46 of 67


February 2009

Scales in 3rds, 4ths and 6ths are always useful on the cello, but they become especially important to a cellist wishing to realize basso continuo since he will use them much more frequently. The viol does thirds very well, and since thirds are needed in most chords it will help to practice them in scales as well.

2.7 Breaking Chords One big difference between a bowed instrument (e.g. viol, cello, lirone) playing chords and a plucked one (e.g. lute, harpsichord etc.) is the ability to strike all notes of a chord simultaneously or not. The cello and viol cannot usually play more than two notes at the same time. This limitation aside, there are still endless different ways of playing chords. However, because of this limitation, extra care should be taken with the placing of the bass note. Logically the bass note of a chord should be played exactly where it is written, “on the beat.” In practice this can be more difficult – a problem I experienced is that my brain would start counting from the moment I reached the top note of a chord – the result being that the next bass note was late. Different ways of breaking the same chord can give different effects such as a percussive accent, a cloud of harmony, rhythmic ostinato etc. Figure ix, below, shows several possibilities to break a simple C major chord on the cello. More ways are possible. It is good to develop and master many of these ways so that continuo realizations become more flexible and can provide any texture for any situation.

fig.ix. Ways of breaking chords on the cello.


February 2009

Page 47 of 67

2.8 Notation – Figures and Fingers Since a cello cannot always play all the figures printed (if there are figures at all), I would often prepare a bass by writing down which figures I wanted to play, next to the printed ones. Which figure(s) I chose, would depend on consideration of the elements mentioned in section 2.2. In addition to figures, I would sometimes add fingerings to a score, and lthough the page begins to look rather messy I have not found a more efficient solution so far. An examples of my working scores can be seen in Appendix A, Examples 30 and 31.

2.9 Bass Violin

Fig.x. Photo of frets on bass violin.

Almost one year ago I was having difficulty preparing a realization of Corelli's violin sonata Op.5, V on the cello. My realizations only seemed to make the music more cumbersome and did not at all improve the music beyond playing the bass line alone. Around the same time I had noticed Quantz's mention of the cellist using frets (see section 1.7). Since part of my frustration was to do with not being able to sustain the bass note when breaking a chord, I decided to put frets on an instrument (see figure x). I immediately noticed the advantages, and made a good realization of the sonata (Appendix A, Ex.30).

Page 48 of 67


February 2009

The bass violin which I used is basically a large cello which could have been typical in Corelli's Rome. The hard surfaces of the added frets , compared to the soft pad of the finger, allow the strings to resonate much longer. Every note approaches the quality of an open string (as on a viol). The main advantage of this is that the bass continues to resonate strongly under a chord after the bow has moved to another string.

I often found myself using “viol fingering” (i.e. using two fingers to stop two adjacent strings at the same point) in order to take advantage of the extra resonance, particularly in a chord like the one shown in figure xi:

fig.xi. “Viol fingering” used on a cello chord.

Stopping intervals of a fifth without frets is always a bit tricky as one has to “balance” the finger across two strings. Slight changes in weight from one string to another can make a fifth obviously impure. Being able to use two different fingers to play a fifth increases resonance and leaves the hand in a more natural position. The presence of frets also makes intonation with two fingers (4 and 3 in the case of figure vii) reliable.

The main disadvantage I have found to the use of frets is playing for an extended time with no opportunity for tuning e.g. in an opera. When the strings go out of tune as they naturally do, it is very hard to blend into the continuo group, and there is nothing that can prevent this except being very good at tuning very quickly, very quietly.

2.10 In Practice I have kept a log of all the basso continuo realizations I have made over the last two years, and that can be found in Appendix C. I have covered a wide variety of repertoire though as can be seen, it has mostly been on the viol.


February 2009

Page 49 of 67

I feel more invited to realize basso continuo on the viol, and it comes very naturally. It blends in with other instruments and is easily accepted by other musicians whom I play with. My abilities to realize basso continuo on the viol have really benefited from this, and I hope they will continue to improve. Several recordings, some more successful than others, can be heard on the CD of Appendix B. Two examples of accompanying recitative have been written out in Appendix A, Examples 32 and 33.

Realizing chords on the cello is quite different. I often feel awkward and too present to continuously add notes, and it is difficult to make a good blend in an ensemble. (Though it is notable that when I played some chords in a concertino cello part, it was not very audible above the orchestra, on the recording made of the concert (Appendix B, Tracks 12 - 14). I have had the most success on the bass violin with frets but am mostly happy just playing the bass line well on the cello. Despite not realizing basso continuo as extensively as on the viol, I think my harmonic awareness on the cello has increased greatly and my fingers are often hovering around a possible harmony that could be played, even if eventually I do not play it. One area I have not yet practiced is accompaniment of recitativo secco on the cello. It is my intention to explore this practice in the future and the large amount of documentation about it (see Section 1.9) demands that it receives a lot of attention.

Part 3 A short guide for other cellists and violists who wish to realize basso continuo


February 2009

Page 53 of 67

3.1 Introduction The third part of this paper is intended to be a short and practical guide for experienced cellists and viol players wishing to learn more about, and experiment with, techniques of basso continuo realization for accompaniment on their instruments. A basic knowledge of figured bass is expected. This section is partly a summary of the practical information contained in Parts 1 and 2, so some repetition of content is to be expected, hopefully to the benefit of the reader (especially if he/she wants a “quick start”).

3.2 Harmony Exercises Practise harmonic exercises such as those contained in Dandrieu's Principes

•

d'Accompagnement*. Frequent practice of simple harmonic progressions will train the fingers and the ear well, and make them more reliable in performance. It is fun to realize Dandrieu exercises especially because the progressions can be very beautiful. •

Be creative and find a variety of ways to play chords and express harmony.

It is also stimulating to find many different ways to realize the bass – plain chords quickly become boring! If inspiration is lacking, look to historical examples of harmonic playing (see Section 1.8). •

Always be aware of good voice leading.

The figures in Dandrieu are usually obbligato for the harpsichord, so they should be read in no particular order on the cello or viol. Instead, the cellist or violist should take the spirit of Dandrieu's obbligato figuring and always play with good voice leading. 

Use sensible fingerings

Viol players usually have a good idea of what fingers to use because of the luxury of original fingerings printed in much of their music. For cellists it may be more difficult at first, but bear in * The Dandrieu book can currently be found online at http://imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/b/bf/IMSLP23224PMLP53044-dandrieu_continuo.pdf

Page 54 of 67


February 2009

mind that every dissonance has to resolve and it is useful to finger accordingly. e.g. A diminished 5th resolves to the 3rd and there is only one possible fingering for this as shown in figure xii. Chapter nine of Baumgartner's Instructions (1774) † gives detailed information on fingering chords for cellists.

fig. Xii. Resolution of a diminished 5th.



Hold fingers down as long as possible.

This will create more beautiful resonance. It is especially important with regard to the bass note to keep it ringing after the bow has moved to another string, If the bass note is not strong enough, or disappears, there can be the illusion of a different (or wrong) harmony.

3.3 Timing 

Play the bass note on the beat.

Do not get distracted away from the proper placement of the written bass note when playing chords. Playing chords and keeping a good flow in the bass line requires more brain power than playing the bass alone, but it should be a priority that the placement of the bass note in a chord does not suffer. The bass note is the most important note and should usually be played “on the beat” as opposed to the top note of a chord. There may be exceptional circumstances where the bass note is not wanted on the beat.

3.4 Doubling



Avoid doubling the melody line(s).

It usually sounds bad when the melody line is doubled for a note or two by the highest note of a chord on the cello or viol. It is fine if the doubled note is within the chord.

† Baumgartner, Jean, Instructions de musique, théorique et pratique, à l’usage du violoncelle Den Haag, 1774.




February 2009

Page 55 of 67

Read the melody line as well as the figures.

This will help to avoid doubling. It will also show what notes are missing from the chord, and these are the best notes to add wherever possible and suitable.

3.5 Recitative The cello usually played short chords in the accompaniment of recitativo secco from around 1790 – 1840. This was performed together with sustained notes on the double bass. There are several methods which teach this practice, including Chapter twelve of Baumgartner's Instructions (1774). It is possible to make the highest note of the chord the next note of the singer.

3.6 Other advice 

Change the octave if the bass note is too high.



Always ask yourself if playing more notes really improves the music.

Playing lots of extra notes just because it is possible is not a good reason to play them. The cello and the viol can play beautiful bass lines without any chords, and should also remain beautiful when played with chords. 

Use your ears (in the spirit of Baumgartner)

If it sounds wrong or bad, then do not do it!

General Conclusions


February 2009

Page 59 of 67

General Conclusions Part 1 shows that it was common for the viol to realize basso continuo in the baroque period. In Part 2, along with the recorded examples in Appendix B, it is shown how I explored and developed basso continuo realization on the viol to a high level, using it regularly in concerts. Overall I feel that the techniques on which I worked fit very naturally with the viol.

Despite the lack of a specific method for realizing basso continuo on the viol, the rest of the historical evidence is supported by my positive practical experience of developing these accompanying skills on the instrument. The instrument invited players to play harmonically then just as it does today. I would like to see basso continuo realization on the viol become more normal and more widespread – not as something to replace already established elements of the continuo group, but to add another unique colour.

Just as the historical and practical areas of my research complement each other in terms of the viol, so they do with the cello, however differently. Part 1 shows that the cello can play extra notes and chords above a bass but nothing points to it being a common practice until the late 18th Century in opera recitative. There is always a certain vagueness that seems to surround the shreds of evidence that suggest the cello might have been realizing basso continuo. Similarly in Part 2, I found many possibilities to expand my harmonic capacity on the cello, but never felt entirely comfortable using this way of playing in accompaniment. I can, and I know how to, play plenty of extra notes above the bass on the cello, yet most of the time I now choose not to, unless it is for a special effect.

The practice of accompanying opera recitative with chords on the cello is something I did not know about before beginning this research. This surprises me for a couple of reasons, firstly that it is so well documented and secondly that it must be a lot of fun! I am looking forward to exploring this practice, and I also hope to see it become more widespread.

Page 60 of 67


February 2009

I have been struck by one aspect of the old cello methods and that is the focus on harmony – to know where all the dissonances and their resolutions are and even use it to dictate fingering. This is a very interesting aspect of learning the cello and it is perhaps missing from today's cello teaching. When I began to study “baroque cello” at the Conservatorium van Amsterdam, I also took second study basso continuo lessons on the harpsichord. On retrospect, it would have made more sense to have taken basso continuo lessons on the cello because gaining this knowledge and the skill to use it (even if I choose not to most of the time) is an invaluable tool in interpreting any basso continuo line, and that is the primary job of a “baroque” cellist.


February 2009

Page 61 of 67

Appendix A: See separate Volume Appendix B: Track list of audio examples on CD Track No.

Artist, Composer, Track Name and Info

Comments

01

David Watkin and John Holloway, Corelli, Op.V (Novalis, 1996). Sonata 4, Adagio (extract)

02

Ibid, Allegro (extract)

03

Ibid, Vivace (extract)

04

Ibid, Adagio (extract)

05

Ibid, Allegro (extract)

06

David Watkin and John Holloway, Corelli, Op.V (Novalis, 1996). Sonata 5, Adagio (extract)

07


08

Ibid, Adagio (extract)

09


10

Ibid. Giga: Allegro (extract)

11

David Watkin and John Holloway, Corelli, Op.V (Novalis, 1996). Follia (extract)

12

Robert Smith and Academia Montis Regalis. Avison, Concerto Grosso (extract)

I play the concertino cello, and add a couple of extra notes.

13

Ibid

As above

14

Ibid

Chords played on repeat, not the first time.

15

R. Smith and ensemble, Liebhold, Cantata Movement.

Playing “fretted” bass violin.

16

R. Smith and M. Arbouz, Lawes, “Speak speak at last reply”

Lyra style realization on viol.

17

R. Smith and M. Arbouz, Lanier, “Weep no more”

As above

18

R. Smith and M. Arbouz and A. Verhage, Purcell, “What a sad fate”

Song on a ground with theorbo and viol continuo.

Page 62 of 67


February 2009

19

R. Smith and Les Elements, Campra, Arion recit.

“lirone” style – sustained chords on viol, with theorbo. See also Appendix A, Ex.32.

20

R. Smith and Les Elements, Bernier, Aminte et Lucrine recit.

Solo viol accompaniment See also Appendix A, Ex.33.

21

Ibid

As above

22

R. Smith and Les Elements, Boismoitier, Diane et Acteon recit

As above

23

Ibid

Viol, then theorbo accompaniment.

24

R. Smith and R. Kimura, Francoeur, violin sonata VI.

Solo viol Accompaniment.

25

Ars Antique Austria, Gunar Letzbor. (Arcana A 901, 1996), Biber, Mystery Sonata 1

Arco and pizzicato used

26

Paolo Pandolfo (Improvisando 2006), Cipriano de Rore, Ancor che col partire

Improvised accompaniment

27

Cecilia Bartoli (Opera Proibita, 2005), Handel, from La Resurezzione.


February 2009

Appendix C: Log of basso continuo realizations to date

Page 63 of 67


February 2009

Page 65 of 67

Bibliography BACH, C.P.E, Essay on the true art of playing keyboard instruments by Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. Berlin, 1753-1762, transl. and ed. by William J. Mitchell, New York Norton, ca. 1980. BAILLOT, P., Levasseur, Catel and Baudiot, Méthode de violoncelle et de basse d'accompagnement, Paris, A l'Imprimerie du Conservatoire, 1805. BAUMGARTNER, Jean, Instructions de musique, théorique et pratique, à l’usage du violoncelle Den Haag, Daniel Monnier, 1774. Translation by [unknown copy] Year [unknown]. BOL, Johan Hendrik Daniël, La basse de viole du temps de marin Marais et d'Antoine Forqueray, Proefschrift – ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor... 15 February 1974, Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. BONTA, Stephen, From Violone to Violoncello: A Question of Strings?, Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society, 3 (1977), pp.64 – 99. Terminology for the Bass Violin in Seventeenth – Century Italy, Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society, 4 (1978), pp. 5 – 42. BORGIR, Tharald, The performance of the basso continuo in seventeenth century Italian music (PhD diss., U. of California, 1971). BROSSARD, Sébastien de, Dictionaire de Musique, Contenant une Explication Des Termes Grecs, Latins, Italiens et François les plus usitez dans la Musique, Troisieme Edition (Amsterdam: Estienne Roger, c.1708; repr. ed. Genève: Minkoff, 1992). BROWN, Clive, Classical and Romantic Performance Practice 1750 – 1900, Oxford 1999. CORRETTE, Michel, Méthode théorique et pratique pour apprendre en peu de tems Le Violoncelle dans sa perfection. Paris 1741. CYR, Mary, Basses and basse continue in the orchestra of the Paris Opéra 1700 – 1764 (Early Music, 10, no. 2, April 1982). DANDRIEU, Jean-François, Principes de l’accompagnement du Clavecin (Paris, 1719).

Page 66 of 67


February 2009

DUNFORD, Jonathan, Marin Marais, The Viola da Gamba, HEADLY, Erin,. Lirone, Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 21 Feb. 2009 . HUME, Tobias, The first part of ayres, London 1605. Captain Humes Poeticall Musicke, London, 1607. JONES, Robert, The Second Booke of Songs and Ayres, London 1601. MARX, Hans Joachim, The Instrumentation of Handel's Early Italian Works, Early Music, Vol. 16, No. 4 (Nov. 1998), pp.496 – 505. MACHY, Le Sieur de, Pièces de violle, en musique et en tablature (Paris, 1685). LINDGREN, Lowell . Lulier, Giovanni Lorenzo, Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 21 Feb. 2009 . MATTEIS, Nicola, The false consonances of musick (London, c.1680). PALMER, Fiona, Domenico Dragonetti in England (1794-1846) the career of a double bass virtuoso, Oxford 1997. QUANTZ, J. J., On Playing the Flute (1752), London 2001. RAOUL, J. M. Méthode de violoncelle, Paris: Pleyel, c.1802. ROUSSEAU, Jean, Traité de la Viole, Paris, 1687. SADLER, Graham and THOMPSON, Shirley, Marc-Antoine Charpentier and the Basse Continue, Basler Jahrbuch für historiche Musikpraxis, xviii (1994), pp.9 – 30. SARTORI, C, Bibliografia della musica strumentale italiana stampata in Italia fino al 1700 (Florence, 1952).


February 2009

Page 67 of 67

SMITH, W.C., A Bibliography of the Musical Works Published by John Walsh during the Years 1695–1720 (London, 1948, 2/1968). SMITH, W.C., and Humphries, C. A Bibliography of the Musical Works Published by the Firm of John Walsh during the Years 1721–1766 (London, 1968) . THOMPSON, Shirley. Marc-Antoine Charpentier and the viol, Early Music November 2004, pp. 497 – 510. WALDEN, Valerie, One hundred years of violoncello: A history of technique and performance practice, 1740 – 1840. Cambridge University Press, 1998. WATKIN, David, Corelli’s op.5 sonatas: ‘Violino e violone o cimbalo’? (Early Music, Vol. 24, No. 4 November 1996) pp. 645 – 663 WILLIAMS, Peter and LEDBETTER, David . Continuo. Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 2 Dec. 2008 . WOODFIELD, Ian and ROBINSON, Lucy, Viol, Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 8 Feb. 2009 . ZAPULLA, Robert, Figured Bass Accompaniment in France, Turnhout 2000. Recordings Corelli: Violin Sonatas, Op 5 (12 sonate a violino e violone o cimbalo), Trio Veracini: John Holloway (violin), David Watkin (cello), Lars Ulrik Mortensen (harpsichord). (Novalis 150128, 1996). H. I. F. Biber: Sonaten über die mysterien des rosenkranzes, Ars Antique Austria, Gunar Letzbor. (Arcana A 901, 1996). IMPROVISANDO Il jazz del Cinquecento, Paolo Pandolfo, Guido Morini, Thomas Boysen et al. (Glossa, GCD P30409, 2006) Opera Proibita, Cecilia Bartoli, Les Musiciens du Louvre, Minkovsky (Decca, 475 7029, 2005)

Basso Continuo Realization on the Cello and Viol

Recommend Documents