AFFIDAVIT OF RESCISSION The Affidavit Affidavit of Rescission is intended to be sent with each income tax return you file to get your money back every year, if you are in the unfortunate position of having to do so because your employer refuses to cooperate in ending withholding after you withdraw your W-4 form or submitted your W-!
"ertified #ail $umber% &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&& 'ate% &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& c(o )*+* +ost ffice ox .//0 11")$T2 $A#3 "ounty 11"5T2 $A#3, 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic )nited *tates of America 6ip code exempt NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL EST OPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE RESCISSION RES CISSION AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF _________________
11*TAT3 $A#3 *TAT3(R3+)75" 11")$T2 $A#3 ")$T2
8 8 *ubscribed, *worn and *ealed 8 8
PREAMBLE
5, *tate "iti6en &&&&&&&&&&&&&, being a free *overeign adult, natural born in 11*TAT3 $A#3, living and working as a *tate "iti6en domiciled in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic since 9:;< and 5, as such status, hereby make this *pecial Appearance, Appearance, by Affidavit, In Affidavit, In Propria Propria Persona, Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, Juris, At 7aw, in "ommon 7aw, with Assistance, Assistance, *pecial, neither conferring nor consenting to any foreign =urisdiction, except to the =udicial power of 11*TAT3 $A#3 and(or America, and as such 5 willfully enforce all "onstitutional limitations respectively on all government agencies when dealing with them! Wherefore, the undersigned Affiant, Affiant, named herein and above, upon affirmation declares and evidences the following% 5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&, am of lawful age and competent! 5 am a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en domiciled in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic >see 9%<%<, 9%?%?, <%9%;, ?%<%9 and 4%<%9 in the )!*! "onstitution8, and thereby in the )nited *tates of America, America, in fact, by right of heritage, a *overeign *tate "iti6en inhabiting and domiciled in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic, protected via hereditary succession by my predecessors@ previous contracts with government as found in the $orthwest rdinance rdinance of 9, the rganic Act Act of 94: >the original "onstitution of 11*TAT3 $A#38, the Articles of "onfederation of 9, the "onstitution for the )nited *tates of America >9:8 including its +reamble, and the ill of Rights >9:98 including its +reambleB and, as such, 5 retain all my unalienable rights granted by Cod in positive law, embodied in the 'eclaration of 5ndependence >9D8 and binding rights upon myself and my parentage, on this day and for all time now and hereafter! And And further,
5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en, In Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, At 7aw, with Assistance, *pecial, receiving mail c(o )*+* +ost ffice ox .//0, 11"5T2 $A#3, 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic, 6ip code exempt >'## 9<from its inception8, due to the aforementioned fraud! And further, AFF5'AG5T A#3$'#3$T +RT3"T5$ "7A)*3 5, the undersigned, in order to protect my unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, inclusive of my right to the proper in rem and in personam *tate "iti6enship status, have been forced to amend certain legal documents and statements, due to the continued revelation and increased discovery of the continuous acts of fraud upon me by the de facto governments, both *tate and Federal, and therefore 5 declare that 5 am now and fully intend to remain free to amend any and all such documents and statements, as a matter of substantive right, for 5 cannot be held liable for either the acts or the omissions by governments which are out of my control, which acts and omissions constitute fraud in one form or another! Therefore, 5 proceed at all times EW5TH 3I+75"5T R3*3RGAT5$ F A77 #2 )$A753$A73 R5CHT* A$' W5TH)T +R3J)'5"3 T A$2 F #2 )$A753$A73 R5CHT*E, inclusive of my personal right to substantive and procedural due process proceedings under the Judicial +ower of both m y *tate and my $ation! And further, 5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, do state and affirm the following% 9! That material facts were withheld, such as Title <, )!*!"!, *ection 94D, *ubsections 9 K < >being without or within the E)nited *tatesE, respectively8, which caused me to be unaware that a completed, signed and submitted EForm 9L4LE or Eincome tax returnE and other 5nternal Revenue *ervice and *tate Franchise Tax oard forms and documents are voluntarily executed instruments which could be used as prima facie evidence against me in criminal trials and civil proceedings to show that 5 had voluntarily waived my "onstitutionally secured rights and that 5 had voluntarily sub=ected myself to the federal income(excise tax, to the provisions of the 5nternal Revenue "ode >hereinafter referred to as the 5R"8, to the authority of the *tate Franchise Tax oard >hereinafter referred to as the FT8 and to the authority of the 5nternal Revenue *ervice >hereinafter referred to as the 5R*8 by signing and thereby affirming, under penalty of per=ury >within the E)nited *tatesE8, that 5 was, in effect, a EpersonE sub=ect to the taxB that the above induced and(or forced action, via *tate and Federal governments, clearly indicates a violation of Article 9, *ection :, "lause ? >9%:%?8, to wit% E$o ill of Attainder or ex post facto 7aw shall be passedE and also Article 9, *ection :, "lause 4 9%:%48, to wit% E$o "apitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in +roportion to the "ensus or 3numeration hereinbefore directed to be takenE in the )nited *tates "onstitution! These above same in=unctions are found in the $orthwest rdinance and in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 "onstitution! And further,
when dealing with government, T the legal status of a EtaxpayerE >any individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation sub=ect to federal excise tax8, that is, a EpersonE who is sub=ect to the federal excise tax and is, therefore, sub=ect to the authority, =urisdiction, and control of the federal government under the 5R", to the statutes governing federal taxation, and to the regulations of the 5R*, thereby imposing the tax on himself, waiving his Cod-given "onstitutionally secured rights to property and labor in respect to the federal income(excise tax statutes and their administration by the 5R*, and establishing himself as one who has privileges only, but no rights, in dealings with the 5R*, the same as a corporationB that it is my understanding that the change of status(state resulting from the signed 5R* documents is very similar to the change of status that occurs when one enlists in the military service and voluntarily takes an oath that sub=ects him to the authority, =urisdiction, and control of the federal government under Title 9L of the )nited *tates "ode > i.e., the statutes governing the armed forces and the regulations of the military service8, thereby waiving his "onstitutionally guaranteed rights in relation to dealings with the military services! And further, 4! That 5, as a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en and inhabitant in the )nited *tates of America, domiciled in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic, and as a Free #an, am endowed by my "reator with numerous unalienable(inalienable rights which include but are not limited to my rights to Elife, liberty and the pursuit of happiness >property8E, which rights are specifically identified in the #agna "arta >9<9;8 and the 'eclaration of 5ndependence >9D8, and protected and secured by the "onstitution for the )nited *tates of America >9:8 and the subseMuent ill of Rights, Articles in Amendment 9 thru 9L >9:98B that my birthright to the Elife, liberty and the pursuit of happinessE has been interpreted by both the Framers of the "onstitution and by the )!*! *upreme "ourt to include my unalienable right to contract, to acMuire, to deal in, to sell, rent, and exchange properties of various kinds, real and personal, without reMuesting or exercising any privilege or franchise from governmentB that 5 have learned that these unalienable property rights also include my right to contract for the exchange of my labor-property for other properties and remuneration, such as wages, salaries, and other earningsB that 5 have never knowingly, intentionally or voluntarily waived any of these unalienable rights, nor can 5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, be forced to waive any of these rights granted to me by Cod the Father, my "reator, because 5 am endowed with these rights by my "reator and by nobody else and nothing else >see Brady v. U.S., ?: )!*! 4< at 4 >9:L88! And further, ;! That 5 understand that, if the exercise of my rights were sub=ected to taxation, these same rights could be destroyed by increasing the tax rates to unaffordable levelsB therefore, courts have repeatedly ruled that government has no power whatsoever to tax or otherwise ElienE against the exercise of any rights, particularly the rights of *overeign *tate "iti6ens, as shown by the )nited *tates *upreme "ourt in the case of Murdock v. Pennsylvania, ?9: )!*! 9L; >9:4?8, which stated% EA state may not impose a charge for the en=oyment of a right granted by the Federal "onstitution!EB that unalienable rights are rights against which no lien can be established precisely because they are un-lien-ableB that America@s founding documents enumerate some of my unalienable rights, none of which rights 5 have ever waived knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionallyB that 5 freely choose to obey all American 7aw and to pay all 7awful taxes in =urisdictions which are applicable to me for the common goodB that 5 stand In Propria Persona with Assistance, *pecialB that my status and unalienable rights, as stated hereinafter and in the foregoing, are not negotiable! And further, D! That, for years past and at least since the year 9:D4, 5 have been influenced by numerous cases of people going to =ail and being punished, and also by numerous and repeated public warnings made by the FT and by the 5R*, via radio, television, the printed press and other forms of public communication media, warning of the EdeadlineE for filing *tate and Federal forms, such as a EForm 9L4L 5ncome Tax ReturnE and(or other 5R* forms and documentsB this therefore caused me to file said forms under threat, duress and coercion! And further, ! That, in addition to the aforesaid warnings, 5 have also been influenced by the misleading and deceptive wording of 5R* publications and 5R*-generated news articles, by the pressure of widespread rumors and misinformed public opinion, and by the advice and assurances of lawyers, "!+!A!@s, and income tax preparers which misled me to believe incorrectly that the 9Dth Amendment to the "onstitution for the )nited *tates of America abolished the Fifth Amendment of that same "onstitution and authori6ed "ongress to impose a direct tax on me, my property, my exchanges of property and(or property received as a result of exercising my "onstitutionally secured right to contractB that 5 was further misled into believing that 5 had a legal duty and obligation to file a EForm 9L4L 5ncome Tax ReturnE and other 5R* and *tate tax forms, schedules, and documents, and that 5 was unaware of < )!*!"! 94D, wherein there are two per=ury clauses% >98 one stating that you are without the E)nited *tatesE and also ><8 the
other stating that you are within the E)nited *tatesE, respectively! The per=ury clauses on both *tate and Federal tax forms stipulate, under penalty of per=ury, that 5 was stating unknowingly, involuntarily, and unintentionally that 5 was within the E)nited *tatesE! This is an act of fraud by both *tate and Federal taxing agencies! And further, ! That 5 have also been further influenced, misled, and alarmed by rumors, by misinformed public opinion, and by the advice and assurances of lawyers, "!+!A!@s, and income tax preparers to the effect that Ethe 5R* and the FT will get youE, and that it would be a crime punishable by fines and(or imprisonment if 5 did not fill out, sign, and file with the 5R* a EForm 9L4LEB that, in point of fact, the only person actually named within the 5R" as a person reMuired to collect an income tax, to file an income tax return, and to pay an income tax is a EWithholding AgentEB and that, to the best of my knowledge, 5 am not now, nor have 5 ever been,, a EWithholding AgentE! And further, :! That, in addition to all of the reasons stated in paragraphs D, , and above, 5 was influenced by the common and widespread practice of employers who, either knowingly or unknowingly, without +ower of Attorney, misled me and their employees to believe that they and 5 must have a *ocial *ecurity $umber and that all are sub=ect to the withholding of Eincome taxesE from their earnings, either with or without their permission, based upon the employers@ possibly mistaken assumption that they, as employers, are reMuired b y law to withhold Eincome taxesE from the paychecks of their employees, which is contrary to the *ections ?4L<>n8, ?4? and L9>a8>9D8 of the 5R", absent a voluntary execution of Form W-4, the E3mployee@s Withholding Allowance "ertificateE! And further, 9L! That 5 have also been mistakenly influenced and mistakenly impressed by annual public displays and indiscriminate public offerings by the 5R* and the FT of large Muantities of the Forms 9L4L and ;4L in banks, in post offices, and through the )!*! mail, which public displays and indiscriminate public offerings also had the effect of reminding me of, and inducing me to respond mistakenly by filling out, signing, and sending EForm 9L4LE to the 5R* and EForm ;4LE to the FT! And further, 99! That said EForms 9L4LE contained no reference to any law or laws which would explain =ust exactly who is and who is not sub=ect to, or liable for, the income tax, *tate or Federal, nor did it contain any notice or warning to anyone that merely sending said completed EForm 9L4LE to the 5R* would waive my right to privacy, as secured by the 4th Amendment in the )!*! "onstitution, and also waive my right to not be a witness against myself, as secured by the ;th Amendment in the )!*! "onstitution, and that a completed EForm 9L4LE would, in itself, constitute legal evidence, admissible in a court of law, that the filer is sub=ect to and liable for the income(excise tax, even though and regardless of the fact that 5, as a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en, am actually and legally not sub=ect to the statutory =urisdiction of the 5R", nor liable for any income(excise tax, and regardless of the fact that, to the best of my knowledge, 5 have no legal duty or obligation whatsoever to complete and file any EForm 9L4LE or *tate income tax forms, nor did they ever evidence < )!*!" 94D! And further, 99:9D8 and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., <4L )!*! 9L? >9:9D8, identified the income tax as an indirect excise tax in accordance with Article 9, *ection , "lause 9 >9%%98 of the )nited *tates "onstitutionB that the so-called 9Dth Amendment to the )!*! "onstitution, as correctly interpreted by the )!*! *upreme "ourt, does not authori6e a tax on all individuals but is applicable to nonresident aliens > e.g., Frank R! rushaber8 who involve themselves in activities, events or occupations which come under, or are within, the taxing authority of the E)nited *tatesE, as explained in Treasury 'ecision i.e., ?D8 did not meet the lawful reMuirements for amending the "onstitution at that timeB and that a mass of incontrovertible material evidence available since the year 9:; proves that the act of EdeclaringE the socalled 9Dth Amendment EratifiedE was an act of outright fraud by +hilander "! Nnox in the year 9:9?! And further, 9?! That at no time was 5 ever notified or informed by the FT nor by the 5R*, their agents or employees, nor by any lawyer, "!+!A! or tax preparer, of the fact that, because of various rulings of the )!*! *upreme "ourt in such cases as Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., <9:998, and Pollock v. Farmer's oan and Trust Co., 9; )!*! 4:< >9:;8, the indirect excise tax on incomes identified by the so-called 9Dth Amendment is also a tax upon corporate privileges granted by government, which tax is measured by the amount of corporate income >see "orporations Tax Act,
*tatutes at 7arge, 9:L:, vol! IIIG5, section ?, page 99<8B that this indirect excise tax is also imposed on the taxable income of foreign corporations, and on the taxable income of nonresident aliens to the extent this >latter8 income is either effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, or derived from sources within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE although not effectively connected with the conduct of trade or business within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, according to *ections 9 and < of the 5R"! And further, 94! That my attention has been called to Report $o! L-9:A, entitled E*ome "onstitutional Ouestions Regarding the Federal 5ncome Tax 7awsE published by the American 7aw 'ivision of the "ongressional Research *ervice of the 7ibrary of "ongress, updated January 9, 9:LB that this publication describes the tax on EincomeE identified in the so-called 9Dth Amendment to the )!*! "onstitution as an indirect excise taxB that this report stated% EThe *upreme "ourt, in a decision written by "hief Justice White, first noted that the 9Dth Amendment did not authori6e any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article 5 of the )nited *tates "onstitution, Muoted above!EB and this report further stated% ETherefore, it can clearly be determined from the decisions of the )nited *tates *upreme "ourt that the income tax is an indirect tax, generally in the nature of an excise tax !!!!E, thus proving in my mind that the Eincome taxE is not a tax on me as a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en, but is, rather, an indirect excise tax as described by the )!*! *upreme "ourt in the case of lint v. Stone Tracy Co. supra, wherein the high "ourt defined excise taxes as E!!! taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges !!!!E, none of which aforesaid classifications apply to me! And further, 9;! That 5 was unaware of the truth of the rarely publici6ed statement by the 5R* that the EincomeE tax system is based upon Evoluntary compliance with the law and self-assessment of taxEB that 5 was unaware before June of 9::L of a posted notice in the main lobby of the Federal uilding in *an Francisco, 11*TAT3 $A#3, outside the offices of the 5R*, which notice reads, in pertinent part, EThe purpose of the 5nternal Revenue *ervice is to !!! encourage and achieve the highest degree of voluntary compliance in accordance with the tax laws and regulations!EB that 5 was unaware before June of 9::L that #r! Roger #! lsen, Assistant Attorney Ceneral, Tax 'ivision, 'epartment of Justice, Washington, '!"!, made the following statement to an assemblage of tax lawyers on #ay :, 9:% EWe encourage voluntary compliance by scaring the heck out of you!EB that it has never been either my intention nor my desire to voluntarily self-assess an excise tax upon myself, nor to give up my right to property, nor to voluntarily sub=ect myself to such an excise taxB that 5 had always thought that compliance was reMuired by law! And further, 9D! That 5 have examined *ections 9 thru , 9449, 944<, 944?, ?4L9>c8, DLL9, DL99, DL9<>a8, D??9>a8, a8>948, which states% EThe term @taxpayer@ means any person sub=ect to any internal revenue tax!E And further, 9! That, after the study and consultations mentioned in paragraph 9, the only mention of any possible reMuirement upon me, as an individual, to pay a tax on EincomeE, that 5 could find, or was shown in the 5R", was the title of +art 5 under *ubtitle A, "hapter 9, *ubchapter A >which is deceptively titled ETax on 5ndividualsE8 and *ection DL9<>a8, *ubtitle F, "hapter D9-A, +art 55-, *ubpart , and the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Tax *tatutesB that a careful study and earnest examination of these parts of the 5R" revealed that the EindividualsE to whom these sections refer are, in fact, either individuals who work within a foreign nation like France and are taxed according to a tax treaty, or they are nonresident aliens who receive income which is either effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, or derived from sources within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, although not effectively connected with the conduct of trade or business within
the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, according to *ections 9 and < of the 5R"B and that, to the best of my knowledge, 5 have never conducted any trade or business within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE, nor have 5 ever derived income from sources within the corporate =urisdiction of the E)nited *tatesE! And further, 9:! That, after the study and consultations mentioned in paragraph 9 above, my attention was called to the 5R", "hapter <9, entitled EFederal 5nsurance "ontributions ActE >*ocial *ecurity8, and my attention was also called to *ubchapter A of "hapter <9 entitled ETax on 3mployeesE, which includes *ection ?9L9, wherein the *ocial *ecurity tax is identified as a tax on EincomeE, not as an E5nsurance "ontributionE, not as a ETax on 3mployeesE, and not as a tax on wages or earningsB that my attention was further called to these facts% there is no provision in the 5R" that imposes the tax on employees or reMuires them to pay the taxB a voluntarily signed and completed Form W-4, E3mployee@s Withholding Allowance "ertificateE, allows an employer to withhold money from a worker@s pay for *ocial *ecurity EincomeE tax, even though the worker has claimed on that form to be EexemptE from the graduated EincomeE taxB and an employer has no authority to withhold money from a worker@s pay for the *ocial *ecurity EincomeE tax, for the graduated EincomeE tax, nor for any 5R*-imposed penalty or assessment, if there is no voluntarily signed EForm W-4E in force and no EForm a8 of the 5R", which lists items that are sources of EincomeE, and to the following facts% that 5R* "ollections *ummons Form DD? >9<-<8 confirms that these items are sources, not EincomeE, by stating that the following items are EsourcesE% Ewages, salaries, tips, fees, commissions, interest, rents, royalties, alimony, state or local tax refunds, pensions, business income, gains from dealings in property, and any other compensations for services >including receipt of property other than money8!EB that sources are not EincomeE, but sources become EincomeE if they are entered as EincomeE on a signed EForm 9L4LE, because the signer affirms, under penalty of per=ury >within the E)nited *tatesE8, that the items entered in the EincomeE section of the EForm 9L4LE are EincomeE to the signerB that *ection D9>b8 clearly indicates which sections of the 5R" identify and list items that are included in EincomeE by stating% EFor items specifically included in gross income, see +art 55 >sec! 9 and following8E! And further, <9! That my attention was then called to the said +art 55 entitled% E5tems *pecifically 5ncluded in Cross 5ncomeEB that 5 studied sections 9 thru and noticed that wages, salaries, commissions, tips, interest, dividends, pensions, rents, royalties, etc!, are not listed as being included in EincomeE in those *ections of the 5R"B and that, in fact, those items are not mentioned any!"ere in any of these sections of the 5R"! And further, <within the E)nited *tatesE8, that the information on such EForm 9L4LE was true and correct, and that any amounts listed on the EForm 9L4LE in the EincomeE block were EincomeE, and thereby acknowledging under oath or affirmation, that 5 am, or was, a taxpayer sub=ect to the tax and have, or had, a duty to file a EForm 9L4L 5ncome Tax ReturnE and(or other 5R* forms, documents and schedules, none of which instruments 5 have ever signed with the understanding that 5 signed them knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally and by means of knowingly intelligent acts done Ewith sufficient awareness of all the relevant circumstances and likely conseMuencesE >see Brady v. U.S. supra8B and that, when 5 have sent in *tate and Federal tax forms purposely not signed, they were returned to me with a letter instructing and stipulating that 5 must sign the forms under the penalty of per=ury, thereby claiming that 5 was a E)nited *tates citi6enE due to the wording of the per=ury clause >see < )!*!"! 94D><88! And further, 9:98, to lawfully contract, to lawfully work and to lawfully acMuire and possess property, 5 am convinced and satisfied that 5 am not now, nor was 5 ever sub=ect to, liable for, or reMuired to pay an income(excise taxB that 5 am not now, nor have 5 ever been a EtaxpayerE, and there has never been a Judicial +ower proceeding in which it was ruled that 5 was a EtaxpayerE as that term is defined and used in the 5R"B and that 5 have never had any legal duties or obligations whatsoever to file any EForm 9L4LE or to make any Eincome tax returnE, or to sign or submit any other 5R*
EindividualE forms or documents or schedules, to pay any EindividualE income tax, to keep any personal financial records, or to supply any personal information to the 5R*! And further, <4! That the )!*! "ongress, the 5nternational #onetary Fund, the Federal Reserve anks and the 5nternal Revenue *ervice, by means of vague, deceptive and misleading words and statements in the 5R", in the "ode of Federal Regulations >"FR8, in official statements by 5R* "ommissioners in the Federal Register, in 5R* publications and in 5R*-generated news articles, committed constructive fraud and misrepresentation by misleading and deceiving me, as well as the general public, into believing that 5 was reMuired to file EForm 9L4L 5ncome Tax ReturnsE and other 5R* forms, documents, and schedules and that 5 was also reMuired to keep records, to supply information and to pay income taxes! And further, <;! That, by reason of the aforementioned facts, 5 do hereby exercise my rights as a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en, upheld by various court decisions, to rescind, to cancel and to render null and void, #unc Pro Tunc, both currently and retroactively to the time of signing, based upon the constructive fraud and misrepresentation perpetrated upon me by the Federal government, the )!*! "ongress, the 5R*, the E*tate of 11*TAT3 $A#3E, and the FT, all 5R* and FT forms, statements, documents, returns, schedules, contracts, licenses, applications, articles, certificates and(or commercial agreements ever signed and(or submitted by me, or on my behalf by third parties >including but not limited to Forms 9L4L and attached schedules, Forms W-<, Forms W-4, and Forms 9L::8 on the accounts bearing the account numbers 11*"5A7 *3")R5T2 $)#3R, and :-D;4?<9 and all my signatures on any and all of the aforementioned items, including the original E*ocial *ecurityE application, which caused the account bearing the account number 11*"5A7 *3")R5T2 $)#3R to be establishedB that this notice of rescission is based upon my rights with respect to constructive fraud and misrepresentation as established in, but not limited to, the cases of Tyler v. Secretary of State, 94 F!9:D<8 and also !l Paso Natural "as Co. v. #ysar $nsurance Co., DL; +acific 9::8, which stated% E"onstructive fraud as well as actual fraud may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument!E And further, 9:<<8, 'e %i&a v. Bid(ell , 9< )!*! 9D, 9:, and "erth v. United States, 9?< F! *upp! :4 >9:;;8! And further, <! That evidence now available to me proves that the 5nternal Revenue *ervice has to date failed to comply with the clear and unambiguous reMuirements imposed on all federal government agencies by the following "ongressional statutes% the Federal Register Act >44 )!*!"! 9;L9 et se$.8, the Administrative +rocedures Act >; )!*!"! ;;9 et se$.8, and the +aperwork Reduction Act >44 )!*!"! ?;L9 et se$.8B that the 5R* failure to comply with the reMuirements of these statutes constitutes further constructive fraud, breach of fiduciary trust between *overeign *tate "iti6ens and public servants, and violations of the solemn oaths of office reMuired of federal government officials, thereby relieving me of any and all legal duties which could or might otherwise exist for me to file any returns, schedules, or other documents with the 5R*B and that, after having read these three statutes and summaries of related case law, 5 thereby conclude that there is no reason why the 5R* would be exempt from any of the clear and unambiguous reMuirements imposed upon federal government agencies by these three statutes, notwithstanding any and all allegations to the contrary that heretofore may have been published by the 5R* or the Treasury 'epartment in the Federal Register without also citing the proper legal authorities, if any, for such allegations! And further, <! That recent diligent studies have convinced me of the above, and that as such 5 am not Esub=ect toE the territorially limited Eexclusive legislationE nor to the foreign =urisdiction mandated for the 'istrict of "olumbia, federal enclaves, federal territories, and federal possessions by Article 9, *ection , "lause 9 and 9 and Article 4, *ection ?, "lause < of the )!*! "onstitution, including its EinternalE governmental organi6ations therein >hereinafter referred to as the EFederal 7egislative 'emocracyE and elsewhere referred to in this Affidavit as the Ecorporate =urisdiction of the )nited *tatesE8B that 5 am not Esub=ect toE this foreign =urisdiction by reason of any valid contract or any valid commercial agreement resulting in adhesion thereto across America, nor are millions of other *overeign *tate "iti6ens, unless they have provided Ewaivers of rights guaranteed by the "onstitutionE by means of Eknowingly intelligent actsE, such as contracts or commercial agreements with such government>s8 Ewith sufficient
awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely conseMuencesE, as ruled by the )!*! *upreme "ourt in rady v! )nited *tates supraB and that 5 myself have given no such EwaiversE! And further, <:! That these same diligent studies have also proved to me that misrepresentation and a shrewd and criminal constructive fraud have been perpetrated upon *overeign *tate "iti6ens by government, under counterfeit Ecolor of lawE, through the apparent entrapments of Ecertain activities >monopoly occupations8 and privileges >other benefits8E allowed by statutory acts or otherwiseB that, by reason of American 7aw which has never been repealed, such sources of past and present criminal element in and behind government should be brought to =ustice in a "onstitutional "ourt of 7aw for aiding and abetting this misrepresentation and constructive fraud as willing accomplicesB that it is for such a "ourt, with a 9<-member =ury of peers, to decide who is and who is not guilty among personnel of government, media, schools, lawyers, accountants, clergy and other purveyors of misinformation and other mind-set propaganda, in this and related regards! And further, ?L! That, due to such shrewd entrapments over many years, 5 have unwittingly signed many related documents, contracts and commercial agreements, some even under the Eper=uryE =urat >!it"in the E)nited *tatesE8 as was supposedly reMuiredB with American 7aw on my side, 5 hereby rescind and cancel any and all such signatures and render them null and void, nunc pro tunc, except for those which 5 may choose to have considered as being under ET'"E >Threat, 'uress and(or "oercion8, past and presentB that this is also my lawful notice that all such signatures of mine in the future on instruments of government or other entities, including banks, which might otherwise result in contract adhesion, are to be considered as being under ET'"E, whether appearing therewith or otherwiseB that my "onstitutional E+rivileges and 5mmunitiesE >per Article 4, *ection <8 are apart from those mandated for the Federal 7egislative 'emocracy by Article 9, *ection , "lauses 9 and 9 and by Article 4, *ection ?, "lause <, and shall not by 7aw be violated everB and that my status, in accord, is stated for all to see and to know in 9%<%<, 9%?%?, <%9%;, ?%<%9 and 4%<%9 of the "onstitution for the )nited *tates of America! And further, ?9! That, with this accurate knowledge and with Ethe supreme 7aw of the 7andE >Article D, *ection <8 again on my side, 5 do 7awfully and EsMuarely challengeE the fraudulent, usurping, octopus-like authority and =urisdiction cited above in paragraph <, which authority and =urisdiction do not apply to me >see )agans v. %avine, 49; )!*! ;< at ;??8B it is, therefore, now mandatory for any personnel of the Federal 7egislative 'emocracy or its agents to F5R*T +RG3 its E=urisdictionE, if any, over me before any further procedures can take place in my regard, per Title ;, )nited *tates "ode, ECovernment rgani6ation and 3mployeesE, *ection ;;D>d8, specifically by disclosing in writing any and all contracts or other commercial agreements whereby the Federal 7egislative 'emocracy and its agents claim to have obtained controlling interest in me such that my specific performance to any third party debt or obligation can be compelledB R 37*3 any of its personnel and accomplices who willfully violate this statute can and shall be personally charged as citi6ens under Title 9, )nited *tates "riminal "ode, *ections <49, <4<, 9LL9 and(or otherwiseB and, in fairness, it must be added that, to my knowledge, 5R* agents have $ written lawful E'elegation of AuthorityE within the ;L *tates of the )nion and their so-called EForm 9L4LE appears to be a bogus and bootleg document on its face! And further, ?see paragraphs 9<, 9? and 9 above8, including but not limited to Form W- >E"ertificate of Foreign *tatusE8 or its eMuivalent for banks and(or other financial institutions, Forms 9L4LI >EAmended )!*! 5ndividual 5ncome Tax ReturnE8 and 9L4L$R >E)!*! $onresident Alien 5ncome Tax ReturnE8 for refunds and for correcting the administrative record, and 5R" *ection ?4L<>n8 which authori6es certificates of exemption from withholding! And further, ??! That, since my date of birth on 115RTH'AT3, 5 have always been a $$R3*5'3$T A753$ with respect to the Federal 7egislative 'emocracy of the E)nited *tatesE, never having resided, worked, nor having any income, to the best of my recollection, from any sources within the 'istrict of "olumbia, +uerto Rico, Girgin 5slands, Cuam, American *amoa, $orthern #ariana 5slands, the Trust Territory of the +acific 5slands, or any other territory or possession within the E)nited *tatesE, which entity obtains its exclusive legislative authority and =urisdiction from Article 9, *ection , "lause 9 and 9 and Article 4, *ection ?, "lause < of the )!*! "onstitutionB that 5 have always been a non-taxpayer outside the venue and =urisdiction of the 5R"B that, to the best of my knowledge, 5 have never
had any E)!*! trade or businessE as defined in the 5R", in a8! And further, ?4! That my use of 5R* Forms 9L4LI and 9L4L$R shall be presumed to mean that they were filed solely to correct the administrative record permanently, retroactively to 115RTH'AT3, so as to claim any lawful refunds that may be due, to rebut any erroneous presumptions and(or terminate any erroneous elections of )!*! EresidenceE which may have been established in error b y the filing of any prior 5R* forms, schedules, and other statements by mistakes resulting in part from the demonstrable vagueness that is evident in the 5R" and its regulations, and by mistakes resulting also from the constructive fraud and misrepresentation mentioned throughout this AffidavitB that 5 was neither born nor naturali6ed in the E)nited *tatesE, 5 have never been sub=ect to its =urisdiction, and 5 have never been a E)nited *tates citi6enE as defined in c8 and as defined in the so-called 94th Amendment to the )!*! "onstitution! And further, ?;! That the federal government has committed fraud, duress and coercion, exercised undue influence, and evidenced unlawful menace against the American people by representing the so-called 94th Amendment as a lawfully ratified amendment in the )!*! "onstitution, when contrary proof, published court authorities, and other competent legal scholars have now established that it was $T lawfully ratified! >*ee State v. Philli*s, ;4L +!9:;8B 'yett v. Turner , 4?: +!9:D8B < Tulane 7aw Review <which are not lawful *pecie8 etc!, have all been hereby rescinded ab initio, due to the fraudulent withholding of material facts, which became a snare and a trap and, as such, are a ill of Attainder on this *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en and inhabitant in the )nited *tates of America, for 5 cannot become a nexus by the effect of a fraudulent nexum, because my status and unalienable natural rights are not negotiable, and the government, both *tate and Federal, have not proved that they ever had =urisdiction to change my status, as reMuired by Title ; )!*!"! *ection ;;D>d8, or as defined and set out as a "onstitutional reMuirement in Hagans v! 7avine supra >see also rady v! )!*! supra8B that any change of status would lawfully have to take place in a "ommon 7aw >=udicial power8 court under the due process clause of the ;th Amendment to the )!*! "onstitution! And further, ?! That this is to certify that 5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, am a *overeign natural born free *tate "iti6en and inhabitant in the )nited *tates of America, domiciled in the 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic, living and working in &&&&&&&& "ounty, living under the "ommon 7aw, having assumed, among the powers of the 3arth, the *eparate and 3Mual *tation to which the 7aws of $ature and $ature@s Cod entitles me, in order to secure the lessings of 7iberty to #yself and my +osterity, and in order to re-acMuire the irthright that was taken from me by fraud, do hereby asseverate nunc pro tunc and rescind, ab initio, all feudatory contracts with the Federal government and its agencies, and with the corporate *tate of 11*TAT3 $A#3 and its agenciesB for 5, &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, being of sound mind and body, do not choose, nor have 5 ever chosen, to give up, relinMuish, or otherwise waive any of my Codgiven, natural, fundamental, "onstitutionally secured rights! And further, ?! That my use of the phrase EW5TH 3I+75"5T R3*3RGAT5$ F A77 #2 R5CHT* A$' W5TH)T +R3J)'5"3 )"" 9-)""A 998 that 5 explicitly re=ect any and all benefits of the )niform "ommercial "ode, absent a valid commercial agreement which is in force and to which 5 am a party, and cite its provisions herein only to serve notice upon A77 agencies of government, whether international, national, state or local, that they, and not 5, are sub=ect to, and bound by, all of its provisions, whether cited herein or notB ><8 that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon A77 agencies of government of the ERemedyE they must provide for me under Article 9, *ection ?8 that my explicit reservation of
rights has served notice upon A77 agencies of government that they are A77 limited to proceeding against me only in harmony with the "ommon 7aw and that 5 do not, and will not, accept the liability associated with the EcompelledE benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreementsB and >48 that my valid reservation of rights has preserved all my rights and prevented the loss of any such rights by application of the concepts of waiver or estoppel! And further, ?:! That 5 reserve my unalienable right to amend this Affidavit at times and places of my own choosing, according as new facts and revelations are made available to me at various future times and places as yet unknown, and as yet to be determined, given the massive fiscal fraud which has now been sufficiently revealed to me by means of material and other reliable evidence which constitutes satisfactory and incontrovertible proof of the fraud to which 5 refer in this paragraph and elsewhere in this Affidavit! And further, 4L! That 5 affirm, under penalty of per=ury, under the "ommon 7aw of America, without the E)nited *tatesE, under the laws of the )nited *tates of %merica that the foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, per < )!*!"! 94D>98B and Further this Affiant saith not! *ubscribed and affirmed to #unc Pro Tunc on the date of my ma=ority, which day was 11'AT3! *ubscribed, sealed and affirmed to this &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& day of &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, 1123AR! 5 now affix my own signature to all of the above affirmations W5TH 3I+75"5T R3*3RGAT5$ F A77 #2 R5CHT* A$' W5TH)T +R3J)'5"3 )"" 9-)""A 9see paragraph ? above8% &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&, *tate "iti6en and +rincipal, by special Appearance, In Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, *pecial, with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and without pre=udice to any of my unalienable rights &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& c(o )*+* +ost ffice ox .//0 11"5T2 $A#3, 11*TAT3 $A#3 Republic 6ip code exempt >'## 9<or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence8 to be the +erson whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in His authori6ed capacity, and that by His signature on this instrument the +erson, or the entity upon behalf of which the +erson acted, executed the instrument! +urpose of $otary +ublic is for identification only, and not for entrance into any foreign =urisdiction! W5T$3** my hand and official seal! &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& $otary +ublic
