A Discourse on and Defense of the 'Waifu' 'Waifu' Movement
Hello, The word 'waifu' is one of the most misconstrued terms thrown around in today's imageboard culture. Several helpful images have been made, but each only scratches the surface of the correct implication of the term, as defined by scattered ronery individuals who stole it from the bowels of Japanese hikkikomori society. society. Of course, the originations of the term are not solely in one place, simply because the concept of waifu is something that, in one form or another, has at least scratched at the thoughts of a large amount of the anime viewerbase, as well as many who have never seen a single tsundere or recognized a moe attribute in their entire life. Thus, the term has coalesced from a variety of sources into a conventional idea employed in most 'learned' anime circles. However, with the influx of new anime viewers, as well as old anime viewers that remain out of touch with the waifu movement, the term is frequently butchered and misused. This essay is written to clarify that, while a waifu means different things to different people, there are many things that a waifu is believed to stand for, while in reality it does not by any definition. Just as a word has only certain usages, the waifu only is an embodiment of certain facets of one's psyche, no matter her perceived personality. personality. These facets I will explore, and will subsequently provide a defense of after the grounding in this esoteric subject has been completed. To preface this examination, I give you my thesis. Two-dimensional love is controversial, yet not psychologically, philosophically or biologically wrong. I. Initia Initiall Defen Defense se of of 'Waif 'Waifu' u' as as a Conce Concept pt It is a basic tenet of psychology that humankind is not meant to be divided. Man, generally speaking, cannot in good health live a solitary life. Invariably, Invariably, he will either crumble from the loneliness or reach out to to another human being. It is why prostitution prostitution and religion, the two oldest oldest industries, are still thriving thriving today. today. They offer man man the same service—companionship. service—companionship. The belief that that one is not alone, that one shares something with another gives man the feeling of acceptance, which he desires above all else after his survival is ensured. ensured. This has been written out in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, as well as being something of an inborn knowledge that most everyone understands without having to explicitly define it. it. So let us explore further. further. Prostitution and religion, most would argue argue they could not be further removed. As they pertain to this topic, their greatest difference difference is the greatest proof of the legitimacy of 'waifu'. It can generally be agreed that religion offers most people a longer-lasting longer-lasting sense of joy than fornication with a harlot. Yet, why is this? Should not man fulfilling his biological imperative give him the highest sense of joy? joy? No, because man is not merely a machine who must solely spread his seed. Man is also emotion, which gains no long-term satisfaction from empty lust and must supplement it with religion to achieve the sense of belonging he requires to continue living. This is why the priesthood, priesthood, who may never indulge in carnal desire their entire life, are generally a fulfilled fulfilled collective. To top it off, religion is even convenient enough to give them a sense of purpose, that they are serving in martyrdom to complete some grand deist orchestration that is indisputably their life's work. So, after mankind's needs of the body are met, we have boiled the remainder of his desires down to three core principles: fornication, belonging and purpose. Yet fornication we have already proved superfluous when overwhelmed by a proliferation proliferation of the other two two points. If one has significant significant belonging and purpose, fornication can be considered excess. However, by the same token it can also be seen in society that a lack of belonging and purpose breeds an excess of fornication, supplemented by a mockery of those who forgo it. Those souls who reside in every niche of humanity who are
deprived of their happiness by a lack of these points ridicule those fulfilled, and those fulfilled pity them. However, conventional fulfillment via belonging and purpose acquired through theology is decadent, corrupt and indicative indicative of an inferior inferior mind. But why? If they are living life happily, happily, why are they living life incorrectly? Because they are depriving others of their the ir happiness. Popular religion currently is, by definition of its scripture, the ostracism and desire to eradicate those who are not immediately part of your body. body. It perverts the desire for belonging into its reverse— reverse— the exclusion of all as a way to facilitate the growth of such a need. It also perverts the desire for purpose into a desire to attack those who are different, those whose desire desire is not homogeneous. Fornication too is not exempt, and is treated as a negative by those who have lost their need for it, rather than a neutral topic of little importance, as it should it should be be handled, again to increase this sense of exclusiveness which leads to such destructive hedonism. So conventional theism can be seen to be defunct due to its destructive destructive nature. Those who want to lead a wholesome life are therefore sent back to square one. How to fulfill the two necessary desires for peace of mind? This is where the waifu comes in. A waifu is, generally speaking, a two-dimensional female character out of the Japanese an ime, manga, visual novel, light novel and video-game subculture. There are probably delineations of otakudom that I am glossing over, but these are the main sources from which waifus are derived from. There is of course, the the less-popular 'husbando', favored amongst male male homosexuals and females. There will inevitably be a complaint here that all females are 'bitches and whores' and thus could co uld never understand the concept of 'waifu'/'husbando'. Such arguments are are generalizations and ad-hominem, whether or not the concept of 'waifu'/'husbando' can be realized depends on the individual, not solely on their gender. For now, we will treat the waifu as female, if only for the sake of simplicity. The proper waifu is a wholesome supplement for o ne's intrinsic need for belonging and purpose. pu rpose. One generally discovers his waifu after a disillusionment in the three-dimensional world, particularly after some form of romantic romantic rejection. If one is into the otaku culture, a waifu is an alternative to the uncaring and sometimes sometimes unreachable 3D. However, this is where our first first and perhaps most major misconception of waifu crops up. A waifu is not meant not meant to be merely a second choice. If you only claim you have a 'waifu' because you want to distract yourself from lingering desires towards towards 3D, you are a hypocrite of the worst kind. Think of how she how she might perceive it, or even of how a 3D female might. You are settling are settling for her. her. This putrefaction of waifu by nature leads to a lack of belonging and purpose, for she is merely purposed to be a sham to shield you from your inability to fit in where you want, to romance where you need. Such a waifu waifu will inevitably fail. Waifu is meant to be a combination of belonging and purpose to the fullest degree. It is meant to be a different path entirely, one that is only acceptable to tread as long as one is genuinely happy, or at the very least progressing towards happiness. So yes, it is similar to religion religion in that regard, but differs from it for a key reason, one that is another misconception that must be addressed. Unlike those who believe in God, the healthy man does not actually believe his waifu is a real human being. Indeed, the moment she assumes a fleshly form is the moment she is reduced to human capacity, capacity, and subsequently is fettered fettered by the drawbacks of this world. world. Such dangerous delusion is reminiscent of schizophrenia, and probably indicates an actual disorder. The crux of the issue here is that a waifu is imagination personified. personified. By definition, she is how you fantasize her, and this thought is aided in taking form through a personality set forth in the original source material she came from. from. The healthy man knows he is imagining imagining his waifu, and accepts this. this. He revels in these fantasies, yet accepts they are fantasy. fantasy.
At this point the most common riposte is along the lines of “isn't he deluding himself either way?” The answer is, simply, “yes”. He is deluded, but would not have it any other way. Any other way leads to either loneliness or disappointment shortly followed followed by loneliness. The correct waifu is not used in place of something but rather for something. for something. The nuance here means all the difference. difference. Furthermore, it is not like this delusion is an unusual thing. Humanity may revile the concept of 2D love, but if one we re to hold it up to a mirror, mirror, one would notice it is not quite so far removed as it would like to think. One person can never love another. another. One person can only love their concept of concept of another. Because you do not have a telepathic link with with your spouse, you cannot know her in in her entirety. entirety. You have fallen in love with a set of personality traits that have presented themselves to you. This is where 2D love and 3D love converge. Both involve infatuation with concepts. This is all humanity all humanity can ever hope to achieve with our current technology limitations. The next argument that will present itself here is that the waifu is a creation of another human's mind, and cannot hope to be a complex or realistic realistic character. character. This is wrong as well. Just as your impressions of people can vary by how much you know of them, your waifu is the same. In both events, your imagination will always fill in the the blanks. There is no difference between how your brain handles 2D and 3D. True, your knowledge of a female may eclipse the knowledge of your waifu her source material provides, but this is irrelevant simply because your imagination will inevitably close the gaps. Procedurally, Procedurally, there is a difference but the end result is the same: you are confronted with with a set of attributes that you either do or do not find appealing. From these facts, we can draw a conclusion. A waifu waifu is for those who genuinely do not care for the 3D alternatives. They are not using not using her in place of a 3D love, but rather to fulfill identical needs via similar means. The only remaining difference between the two is capability for fornication, which we ha ve already proven to be a nonissue. However, while on the topic of lust this this may be a good time to address the last major issue that plagues the interpretation of 'waifu'. A waifu is not your not your favorite character to masturbate to. to. She is not a not a sex object. It may ring of feminism but, if anything, she is more deserving of such treatment than the average 3D, for she is the embodiment of that which you admire admire and love most in the concept of 'female'. Of course, that's not to say you can't find find her attractive. attractive. Such a provision would would be ridiculous. There is a difference between admiring beauty and seeking to defile it. It is perhaps a provision of your waifu that you believe her to be the most beautiful woman in the world, 2D or otherwise. But we have yet spoken only of the the unenlightened or unbelieving. Now we shall talk on the ones who walk the 2D path. II. 'W 'Waif aifu' u' as a Lifest Lifestyle yle When one has a waifu, sooner or later, one will be confronted with the issue of lust and love butting heads. It is not wrong to address this issue first, as it is the one that often crops up first, and can be used as a segue into further pontification. The viewing of pornography when one has a waifu is not wrong, and I will elucidate why. Fundamentally, Fundamentally, you are treating the women in your porn (2D or otherwise, though otherwise is a bit strange for one who has a 2D lover) differently than your waifu. You are using them only to satiate a carnal lust, which in an ideal world you y ou would not have to satisfy, satisfy, but because humans are a re altogether too human, must appease. Because there is no emotional attachment between you and the objects of your pleasure, there can be no usurping usurping of your waifu as a source source of belonging and purpose. The
pornographic woman is transient, only a conduit for which you may purge yourself of desire. At this point you may ask: isn't it okay to pleasure myself to my waifu? Yes, but there is a caveat. The difference between correct and incorrect implication of your waifu into your sexual ritual is a matter of perspective. perspective. To put it in simple terms, it should be treated as love made with your wife, whereas whereas pornographic characters are treated as mere hookers. As long as this pleasure is done with respect rather than casual uncaring, it remains well. well. This is why most who have a waifu object to owning o wning or seeing any pornographic material of her—because it treats her as one would treat a whore. To that end, if you wish to involve your waifu in your self-cleansing, it would be prudent to leave her to your imagination. There may be feelings of guilt that stem from involving different women in your pleasure, but these women are nothing more than than means to an end. The worry is unfounded and should not be entertained. The last issue of sex that must be replied to is the inevitable complaint that if one does not marry and have children, one has not lived a significant (in the Darwinian sense) life. Artificial fertilization fertilization is a reality reality.. Marriage is not a necessity. necessity. This argument is defunct. So sexuality is under wraps, next comes society. How do you tell people your love is 2D? You don't. Again, a main difference between the waifu and religion is the waifu is not out to hurt or provoke others, nor is it to facilitate a holier-than-thou holier-than-thou attitude. Anyone who you tell will likely likely be unable to understand. If they are close to you, they may fear for your sanity and ask you to seek help, becoming personally upset and embroiled in your choice of lifestyle. You have just deprived another of their happiness by shoving your belief down their throat. Ring familiar? To clarify, this is not an not an issue of embarrassment embarrassment or, at least, it should not be. The healthy man keeps his affections to himself, himself, not because he is shamed because of them. If he is, 2D is not for him, for he has not accepted it into himself. He keeps his affections to himself because he knows that no one will understand, and that it will cause nothing but discord wherever it is revealed. So how does one live with his waifu? One's waifu must inspire feelings of both belonging and purpose to be considered a conventional 'waifu'. Belonging gives man his happiness. Purpose gives him the blueprint for his life. Belonging is acquired via imagination, imagination, as previously discussed. Purpose is acquired via the waifu's waifu's specific personality, personality, which will inexorably drive the man to live his life in a way that would please his waifu's sensibility sensibility.. That's it. Live life the way your waifu would enjoy. enjoy. Live, and forever forever daydream of you and she. This delusion is not at all wrong, rather it it is necessary, necessary, because we are human. All too human.
