A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment on Feb. 16, 2018, against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities accused of violating U.S. criminal laws in order to...
Full description
This case involves the issuance by the SC of the Philippines of the writ of Kalikasan. The main issue involves jurisdiction.Full description
People v. Pugay Case Digest
Criminal Procedure Rule 126Full description
digestFull description
People v. Badilla (G.R. No. 218578) - August 31, 2016 Chain of Custody rule - Section 21 of RA 9165.
Full description
Lumauig v. People - G.R. No. 166680 (July 7, 2014) Article 218 of the Revised Penal Code - Failure of Accountable Officer to Render AccountsFull description
people vs durango case digestFull description
digestFull description
CrimPro digestFull description
consti2Full description
People v. Lava et al. G.R. No. L-4974-8 May 16, 1969 FACTS: FACTS: Lava Lava et al wer were char charge ged d with with the the comm commi ii io! o! o" the the crim crime e o" re#elli re#ellio! o! com$le% com$le%ed ed with m<i$le m<i$le m&rder, m&rder, aro! aro! a!d ro##eri ro##erie. e. 'ei(ed doc&me!tary a!d other article were $laced i! the c&tody o" the )hili$$i!e *o!ta#&lary #eca&e they had to #e $ree!ted a evide!ce i! the trial o" re#el e#elli lio! o! cae cae $e!d $e!di! i!g g i! othe otherr co&r co&rt t.. Mot Mot o" the the orig origi! i!al al o" the the doc& doc&me me!t !tar ary y evid evide! e!ce ce wer were #&r #&r!ed !ed d&ri d&ri!g !g the the +re +re that that g&tt g&tted ed the the head&arter o" the )hili$$i!e *o!ta#&lary o! 'e$tem#er 1, 198. /he 'olicitor Ge!eral +led a $etitio! "or the reco!tit&tio! o" the #&r!ed e%hi#it. /he $etitio! "or reco!tit&tio! reco!tit&tio! wa give! #y the *o&rt. /he a$$ella!t aail the reco!tit&tio! o" the e%hi#it that were detroyed, a!d claim that the reco!tit&ted reco!tit&ted e%hi#it ho&ld !ot #e co!idered. 0!. GR. No. L-4974, i! the co&re o" the trial i! the R/*, the evide!ce relied &$o! were o!ly doc&me!t that were ei(ed d&ri!g raid o! diere!t $lac $lace e wer were Lav Lava had had #ee! #ee!.. 'ome 'ome o" the thee e doc& doc&me me!t !t wer were Lava Lava2 2 ha!dwriti!g, or were ig!ed #y him &i!g hi alia !ame. /hee were clearly eta#lihed #y the tetimo!y o" a ha!dwriti!g e%$ert that wa $ree!ted #y the $roec&tio!. /he co!cl&io! o" the ha!dwriti!g e%$ert wa #aed o! the $ecime! o" Lava2 ha!dwriti!g which were &ed a ta!dard i! com$ari!g with the ha!dwriti!g a!d3or ig!at&re i! alia5 o" the a$$ella!t that a$$ear i! the the doc& doc&me me!t !t that that wer were $re $ree! e!te ted d a evid evide! e!ce ce agai agai! !tt him. him. 'ome 'ome doc&me!t were $ree!ted "or com$ario! o! Lava ig!at&re are: 1. ! a$$l a$$lic icat atio io! ! "or "or em$l em$loy oyme me!t !t ig! ig!ed ed #y oe oe Lava Lava.. /he /he ig! ig!at at&r &re e thereo! wa teti+ed to #y wit!e d&ardo Rom&alde( !ow 'ecretary o" i!a! i!a!ce ce55 a loo;i loo;i!g !g
. card#oar card#oard d co!tai!i!g co!tai!i!g a lit o" #oo; re&e re&eted ted #y oe Lava Lava while the the latter wa detai!ed i! ?ili#id )rio!. ?&e!ave!t&ra @illa!&eva, @illa!&eva, to whom the lit wa give!, teti+ed that he aw Lava writi!g the lit o! the card#oard. Lava co&!el co!te!ded that !o ge!&i!e $ecime! o" Lava2 ha!dwriti!g wa $ree!ted a ta!dard "or com$ario!. ISSUE: 1. Ao&ld reco!ti reco!tit&ted t&ted doc&me!t doc&me!t #e admitted a evide!ceB evide!ceB
>. Ao&ld the co!cl&io! o" the ha!dwriti!g e%$ert that it wa Lava ha!dwriti!g &CceB HELD: 1. De. /he reco!tit&tio! wa made i! accorda!ce with the $roviio! o" ct E11, which $rovide "or the $roced&re i! the reco!tit&tio! o" co&rt record. 'ectio! 9 o" aid act $rovide that detroyed doc&me!tary evide!ce hall #e reco!tit&ted #y mea! o" eco!dary evide!ce which may #e $ree!ted to a!y &tice o" the '&$reme *o&rt or a!y other oCcer commiio!ed #y the *o&rt. 'ectio! 14 o" the act $rovide that the detroyed or lot doc&me!tary evide!ce hall #e re$laced #y eco!dary evide!ce. $hototatic co$y o" a! origi!al doc&me!t i admii#le a a eco!dary evide!ce o" the co!te!t o" the origi!al a!d they co!tit&te evide!ce o" a ati"actory !at&re. >. De. /he ha!dwriti!g o" a $ero! may #e $roved #y a!y wit!e who #elieve it to #e the ha!dwriti!g o" &ch $ero!, a!d ha ee! the $ero! write. vide!ce re$ecti!g the ha!dwriti!g may alo #e give! #y com$ario!, made #y the wit!e or the co&rt, with writi!g admitted or treated a ge!&i!e #y the $arty agai!t whom the evide!ce i oered, or $roved to #e ge!&i!e to the ati"actio! o" the F&dge. /he ha!dwriti!g e%$ert who made the com$ario! i! thi cae $oitively ide!ti+ed the ha!dwriti!g o" oe Lava o! the doc&me!t $ree!ted a evide!ce agai!t Lava, e$ecially the ha!dwritte! !ame o" Gregorio 'a!taya!a, Gato!, Gato! 'ilaya!, Gavi!o a!d Greg.