Home
Add Document
Sign In
Register
4 Salgado vs CA, March 26, 1984 (128 SCRA 395)
Home
4 Salgado vs CA, March 26, 1984 (128 SCRA 395)
ty...
Author:
Perry Yap
14 downloads
305 Views
34KB Size
Report
DOWNLOAD .PDF
Recommend Documents
17. Maceda vs. CA 176 Scra 440
Pleadings
Republic vs CA 146 Scra 15
Credit Transaction
4. CIR vs. CA
Full description
BPI vs. CA 216 SCRA 51 (1992)
Torts Digest (Negligence)Full description
5. Zamora vs. CA 183 Scra 279
Civ ProFull description
Filmspiegel / 1984/26
DDR / Filmzeitschrift
Filmspiegel / 1984/26
DDR / Filmzeitschrift
Serrano v. CA (1984)
InsuranceFull description
Sales vs. CA (164 SCRA 717, 29 August 1988)
Case digest of Jovita Sales vs. CA (164 SCRA 717, 29 August 1988)
14. Eastern Shipping vs CA 234 Scra 78
credit transactionsFull description
261 SCRA 236 Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs CA 1996
s
Case Digest Ang Ping vs CA 310 Scra 343
case digestFull description
Fortune Express, Inc. vs. CA 305 SCRA 14
DIGEST for Transportation Law
Traders Royal Bank vs CA (269 SCRA 15) 1
1245
013 Ching vs CA 181 Scra 9 1990
thanksFull description
Case Digest Dbp vs CA 449 Scra 57
disclaimerFull description
Enriquez vs Cabotaje e-scra
full text e-scra copy
26 German vs Barangan
dzzsdhFull description
Sebastiao Salgado
Descripción: Sebastiao Salgado
Rocambole Salgado
Receitas boas e simples!Descrição completa
Daez vs CA
civil codeFull description
HIZON VS. CA
Hizon VS CA digest
Valdez vs CA
okFull description
3. Adorable vs CA
ashdgaj
SALGADO VS. COURT OF APPEALS
March 26, 1984 (128 SCRA 395)
MEDIALDEA, J.: FACTS:
PCIB filed acti! t rec"er ! a #r$i%%r& !te 'ith #ra&er fr 'rit f attach$e!t CI Ri*al lifted the 'rit f attach$e!t it #re"i+%l& #re"i+%l& i%%+ed after #etiti!er #etiti!er $"ed $"ed t +a%h +a%h it Ba!#%t #%ted ed .!d .!d /he /he C+r C+rtt f A##e A##eal al% % rec rec!% !%id ider ered ed a!d a!d a+thri*ed the i%%+a!ce f the 'rit f attach$e!t ISSUE:
Ca! a 'rit f attach$e!t i%%+e if !te %+ed +#! i% f+ll& %ec+red0 HELD:
Petiti! i% i$#re%%ed 'ith $erit /he chief #+r#%e f attach$e!t i% t %ec+re a c!ti!e!t lie! lie! ! defe defe!d !da! a!t t% % #r# #r#er ert& t& +!ti +!till #lai #lai!t !tif ifff ca ca! ! .ta .tai! i! a +d$e!t a!d ha"e %+ch #r#ert& a##lied t it% %ati%facti! r t $a-e $a-e % %$e $e #r" #r"i% i%i i! ! t +!%e +!%ec+ c+re red d de.t de.t% % i! ca ca%e %e% % 'her 'here e the the $ea! $ea!% % f %a %ati ti%f %fac acti ti! ! ther there eff are are lia. lia.le le t .e re$"ed .e&!d the +ri%dicti!, r i$#r#erl& di%#%ed f r c c!c !cea eale led, d, r t the her' r'i% i%e e #lac #laced ed .e& .e&!d !d the the reac reach h f creditr% Sec 1, R+le 5 %tate% the r+!d% ! 'hich attach$e!t $a& i%%+e
Sec 3, R+le 5 A! rder f attach$e!t %hall .e ra!ted !l& 'he! it a##ear% .& the affida"it f the a##lica!t, r f %$e ther #er%! 'h #er%!all& -!'% the fact% that there i% ! ther %+fficie!t %ec+rit& fr the clai$ %+ht t .e e!frced .& the acti! /he rea%! fr the r+le #rhi.iti! attach$e!t 'here i!de.ted!e%% 'a% alread& %ec+red i% t #re"e!t the %ec+red creditr% fr$ attachi! additi!al #r#ert& a!d th+% t&i! +# $re f the de.tr% #r#ert& tha! 'a% !ece%%ar& t %ec+re the i!de.ted!e%% / %+%tai! a! rder f attach$e!t, it i% i!c+$.e!t +#! the #lai!tiff t e%ta.li%h either f the%e 2 fact%: a) that the .liati! had !t .ee! %ec+red rii!all& .) that, if %ec+red at it% .ei!!i!, the %ec+rit& later .eca$e "al+ele%% Sec 13, R+le 5 a+thri*e% the di%chare f a! attach$e!t 'here the %a$e had .ee! i$#r#erl& r irre+larl& i%%+ed R+le a+thri*i! i%%+a!ce f 'rit f attach$e!t $+%t .e %trictl& c!%tr+ed i! fa"r f defe!da!t
×
Report "4 Salgado vs CA, March 26, 1984 (128 SCRA 395)"
Your name
Email
Reason
-Select Reason-
Pornographic
Defamatory
Illegal/Unlawful
Spam
Other Terms Of Service Violation
File a copyright complaint
Description
×
Sign In
Email
Password
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Our partners will collect data and use cookies for ad personalization and measurement.
Learn how we and our ad partner Google, collect and use data
.
Agree & close