3G New Site AUH2797 on Air Acceptance Report

REVISIONS Rev.

Date 07-12-2010

Description

3G New Site Integration Drive Test Report

SITE AUH2797

DRIVE TEST ENGINEER NAME

Khalid Samir

SITE ON AIR DATE

00-00-2010 (mm-dd-yyyy)

DRIVE TEST DATE

1-0-2010

REPORT PREPARED BY

Faisal Naveed

Approved

Received

………………………..

…………………………..

Huawei RF Manager

RF Planning Manager

New BTS Site Integration Drive Test Report AUH2873

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. ........ ......3 2 RADIO DESIGN PERFORMANCE CHECK............................................................................... ........ ....6 3 SITE PERFORMANCE TEST ...................................................................................................................13 4 ACCEPTANCE..................................................................................................................................... .......17

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page2, Total17


Introduction 1.1 Area and site overview A drive test was performed to verify and validate the new site integration for AUH2873. The drive was done within the circle area as shown in the map below.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page3, Total17


1.2

Site information data

Site ID

RNC

Longitude

Latitude

Area Class

Site Type

Infra type

AUH2873

331

54.68211

24.38887

Urban

Permanent

Etisalat Sharing

1.3

Cell information data

Elements Cell Name

Antenna Ht Antenna type Feeder Type Feeder Length Tilting (2100-E/M) Azimuth BTS Type Frequency Service area code LAC / RAC Scrambling Code Number of Carrier CPICH Power HSDPA Power CE Elements (UL / DL) Max HS-PDSCH Codes Min HS-PDSCH Codes HS-SCCH Codes

2010-12-07

Sector 1

Sector 2

Sector 3

AUH27977 AUH27974

AUH27978 AUH27975

AUH27979 AUH27976

25 HBX-6516DS-VTM 7/8" at 2100 MHz 35 4/0 20 Macro 10662/10687



27977/27974 3311/3 226/228 2 33 dBm Dynamic 384/384 15 1 2

27978/27975 3311/3 227/226 2 33 dBm Dynamic 384/384 15 1 2

27979/27976 3311/3 228/227 2 33 dBm Dynamic 384/384 15 1 2

Confidential

Page4, Total17


1.4

Test procedures TEST CASES

DRIVE TEST METHODOLOGY

Radio Design Performance Check

Drive Test to be done using UE and Scanner. (MS in Dedicated Mode). UE is locked on 3G Only.

Coverage and quality performance check

1. Coverage performance of each sector (Best Server RSCP) 2. Quality performance of each sector(Best Server EcNo)

Call Performance Check.

Short calls: Static test on each sector. C all duration is 20 seconds and 10 seconds idle. Long Calls: Drive around within the coverage objective of each sector.

Handover Performance Check

Handover performance to be verified by driving in clock wise and anti clock wise around the Site, for all three sectors. Then perform handover test towards its surrounding neighbors (at least 3 neighbors) R99 & HSPA test for the following: 1. PDP context activation (5 attempts) 2. Throughput test (based on 10MB downloaded file from the FTP server. 3 SMS/MMS per cell at different locations with 10 sec break after each SMS/MMS

Data Performance Check

Supplementary Services Check

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page5, Total17


2 Radio design performance check 2.1

Drive Test Route The drive to be performed considering that the Scrambling code of the desired cell is the primary server for most of the time.

2.2 Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3

General observation on coverage and quality Coverage observation Good coverage as RSCP is larger than

Quality observation Good Quality as related CPICH Ec/Io is larger

–70dBm within 100m of sec 1 Good coverage as RSCP is larger than –70dBm within 100m of sec 2 Good coverage as RSCP is larger than –70dBm within 100m of sec 3

than –10dB within 100m of sec 1 Good Quality as related CPICH Ec/Io is larger than –10dB within 100m of sec 2 Good Quality as related CPICH Ec/Io is larger than –10dB within 100m of sec 3

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page6, Total17


2.3

Coverage performance – Scanner mode

Chart- Serving CPICH RSCP (Scanner mode)

Acceptance Criteria: If no special note is for a cell, the related CPICH RSCP should larger than –70dBm within 100m from the Node B. 2010-12-07

Confidential

Page7, Total17


2.4

Quality performance – Scanner Mode (Ec/No)

Chart- Serving CPICH EcNo (Scanner mode)

Acceptance Criteria: If no special note is for a cell, the related CPICH Ec/Io should larger than –10dB within 100m from the Node B. 2010-12-07

Confidential

Page8, Total17


2.5

Coverage performance – Dedicated Mode (CPICH RSCP)

Chart- AS CPICH RSCP (Dedicated mode)

Acceptance Criteria: If no special note is for a cell, the related CPICH RSCP should larger than –75dBm within 100m from the Node B.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page9, Total17


2.6

Quality performance – Dedicated Mode (Ec/No)

Chart- AS CPICH EcNo

Acceptance Criteria: If no special note is for a cell, the related CPICH Ec/Io should larger than –10dB within 100m from the Node B.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page10, Total17


2.7

Best Server Plot

UE Best Server Plot

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page11, Total17


Scanner Best Server Plot

Acceptance Criteria: The scramble configuration is consistent with the planned configuration. No cross TX feeder observed.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page12, Total17


3 Site Performance Test Site acceptance performance test should be performed in static mode and in good RF conditions, CPICH_RSCP > -80dBm & CPICH_EcNo > -8dB

3.1 Accessibility Sector – 1 1st Carrier/2 nd Carrier

Voice

PS(R99)

HSDPA

HSUPA

SMS

MMS

Attempts

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Success

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Block Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

Drop Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

CSSR (%)

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%100%

>=90%

>=80%

>=80%

>=80%

100%

100%

Voice

PS(R99)

HSDPA

HSUPA

SMS

MMS

Attempts

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Success

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Block Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

Drop Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

CSSR (%)

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%100%

>=90%

>=80%

>=80%

>=80%

100%

100%

Voice

PS(R99)

HSDPA

HSUPA

SMS

MMS

Attempts

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Success

10/10

5/5

5

5

3/3

3/3

Block Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

Drop Call

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

Success Criteria

Sector – 2 1st Carrier/2 nd Carrier

Success Criteria

Sector – 3 1st Carrier/2 nd Carrier

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page13, Total17


CSSR (%) Success Criteria

3.2

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%/100%

100%100%

>=90%

>=80%

>=80%

>=80%

100%

100%

Handover Test

Handover tests will be performed to demonstrate the mobility feature supported by the network. The test will also include Neighbor checks which shall be performed by driving around the site in clockwise and anti-clockwise direction for cells in the same site; and inter cell handover with the closest surrounding sites. Handover detection

Soft & Soft-Softer Handover Sector 1 & 2 in AS Clockwise Yes Anti-Clockwise Yes

Sector 2 & 3 in AS Yes Yes

Sector 3 & 1 in AS Yes Yes

Sector 2 21387

Sector 3

Soft & Soft-Softer Handover Sector 1 Neigh 1 21387 Neigh 2 Neigh 3

Acceptance Criteria: The SHO between the sectors of same site should be successful The SHO between the sites should be successful.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page14, Total17


3.3 3.3.1

Throughput performance R99 PS384 Downlink & HSDPA Throughput performance – sector 1

3.3.2 R99 PS384 Downlink & HSDPA Throughput performance – sector 2

3.3.3 R99 PS384 Downlink & HSDPA Throughput performance – Sector 3

Acceptance Criteria:  Using R99 384kbps bearer, average FTP DL throughput should not be less than 340kbps.  Using HSDPA bearer, average FTP throughput should not be less than 3Mbps (Without transmission limitation).

Test method: The data transfer will be from a test FTP server. The file format should be a txt or data file.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page15, Total17


3.4

Initial tuning summary sheet

Sr.

Cell Name

1.

AUH27977

No tuning required.

2.

AUH27978

No tuning required.

3.

AUH27979

No tuning required.

3.5

Sr.

Problems

Action Taken

Responsibility

Status

Responsibility

Status

Optimization Comments

Cell Name

Problems

Action Taken

1. 2. 3.

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page16, Total17


4 Acceptance Acceptance Remarks Signed by (Huawei) Signed by (du) Date of acceptance

2010-12-07

Confidential

Page17, Total17

3G New Site AUH2797 on Air Acceptance Report

Recommend Documents