Attorneys for Plaintiffs CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON SUBSCRIBrNG TO CONTINGENCYFull description
case digestFull description
legitimes
commercial lawFull description
GFOJHFDR
digest
Baranda vs. Gustilo Digest.docFull description
legal ethics case digest
case digest for Lunod v. Meneses
Consti 1
JIL vs Pasig | LocGov
Full description
Full description
criminal lawFull description
inquiries in aid of legislation, Article 6 of the 1987 constitution
Petitioner: DESAMPARADOS M. SOLIVA 15 Respondent: The INTESTATE ESTATE of MARCELO M. VILLALBA nd VALENTA BALIC!A VILLALBA ".R. No. 15#$1% De&e'(er )* +$$, -ACTS: 1. On M/ 5* 5* 10)+* 10)+* Petition Petitioner er Soi2 Soi2 fied fied &o'pin &o'pintt for re&o2er/ re&o2er/ of o3ner o3nership ship** possessio possession n nd d'4e d'4es s 4inst Respondent Respondent Vent Vent Vi( e4in4 tht she is the o3ner of pr&e of 4ri&tr 4ri&tr nd o&&pied (/ the respondent. +. On 6n 6n r/ r/ #* 107 1077* 7* the the te te Cpt Cpt.. Mr&e Mr&eo o Vi Vi( ( s8ed s8ed her her per' per'iss ission ion to to o&&p o&&p/ / her her hose hose on on sid sid nd* pro'ised to (/ the hose nd ot pon re&eipt of his 'one/ fro' Mni nd 42e her P7$$.$$ for the o&&ption of the hose9 ,. tht tht Cpt. Cpt. Vi Vi( ( died died in 10%) 10%) 3ith 3itho ott h2in4 h2in4 pi pid d the &on &onsid sider ertio tion n for for the ho hose se nd nd ot9 ot9 nd tht tht fter the deth of Cpt. Vi(* his 3ido3* Respondent Vent refsed to 2&te the hose nd ot despite de'nds* destro/ed the hose thereon nd &onstr&ted ne3 one. #. The The &ort &ort rend render ered ed d4 d4'e 'ent nt rest restor orin in4 4 to petit petitio ione nerr her her ri4ht ri4ht of o3ne o3ners rshi hip p nd poss posses essi sion on of the the propert/ 5. The The CA rend render ered ed d4 d4'e 'ent nt dis' dis'is issi sin4 n4 the the &o'p &o'pi int nt hd hd (rre (rred d her &ti &tion on to re&o2 re&o2er er the the disp dispte ted d propert/ fro' the Vi(s. 7.
;en&e this petition.
ISS!E: ;ELD: 1
?es* (e& (e&se se to o3 o3 s&h s&h &tion &tion 3od 3od (e ine@it ine@it(e (e nd nd ns nstt to the the defen defendn dnt. t.
+. One One of the the essen essenti ti ee'e ee'ents nts of of &he &hes s is tht tht the the De/ De/ (/ (/ the &o'p &o'pin innt nt in sse sserti rtin4 n4 his his ri4ht ri4ht fte fter r he hs hd 8no3ed4e of the defendnts &ond&t nd fter he hs hd n opportnit/ to se9 ,. The The Petit etitio ione nerr &o'p &o'pi ied ed 3ith 3ith her her o(i o(i4 4ti tion on to dei dei2e 2err the the prop proper ert/ t/ in 1077 1077.. ;o3e2er* respondents hs(nd fied to &o'p/ 3ith his re&ipro& o(i4tion to p/* 3hen the 'one/ he hd (een e=pe&tin4 fro' Mni ne2er 'teriied. +5 ;e so fied to '8e frther inst'ents fter M/ 1,* 1077. +7 #. As er er/ / s 1077 1077** theref therefore ore** petit petitio ione nerr re red/ d/ hd hd the ri4ht ri4ht to &o'p &o'pe e p/' p/'en entt or to s8 s8 for for res&is res&issio sion* n* prsnt to Arti&e 1170 of the Ci2i Code* 3hi&h reds: 5. Tht Tht thos those e o(i4 o(i4ed ed to dei dei2e 2err or to do so'e so'eth thin in4 4 in&r in&r in de de/ / fro' fro' the ti'e ti'e the the o(i4 o(i4ee ee di di&i &i / / or e=tr di&i/ de'nds fro' the' the ffi'ent of their o(i4tion. 7. In re&i re&ipr pro& o& o(i o(i4 4ti tion ons* s* neit neithe herr prt/ prt/ in& in&rs rs in de de/ / if the oth other er does does not not &o'p &o'p/ / or is not not red/ red/ to &o'p/ in proper 'nner 3ith 3ht is in&'(ent pon hi'. -ro' the 'o'ent one of the prties ffis his o(i4tion* de/ (/ the other (e4ins. %. None Nonethe thee ess* ss* petit petitio ione nerr fied fied to se se for for &oe& &oe&tio tion n or res&is res&issio sion. n. De De to insf insffi& fi&ie ien&/ n&/ of of e2ide e2iden& n&e* e* the the o3er &orts (rshed side her ssertions tht she hd 2ied hersef of e=trdi&i re'edies to &oe&t the (n&e or to ser2e n e=trdi&i de'nd on Vi(* prior to her e4 &tion in 10)+. ). Me Men3hi n3hie e** resp respon onde dent nt hd hd spen spentt &ons &onsid ider er( (e e s' s' in reno reno2 2ti tin4 n4 the the hos hose e nd nd intr intro od&i d&in4 n4 +% i'pro2e'ents on the pre'ises. 0.
In 2ie3 2ie3 the thereo reof* f* the the ppe ppe te te &ort &ort pt pt/ / re red d tht tht petiti petition oners ers & &i' i' 3s 3s re red/ d/ (rre (rred d (/ &h &hes es..
1$. 1$. it 'st 'st (e stresse stressed d tht tht ni8e ni8e pres pres&ri &ript ption ion** &hes &hes is not &on& &on&ern erned ed 'ere 'ere/ / 3ith the the f&t of de/ de/** (t e2en 'ore 3ith the effe&t of nreson(e de/ There 3s de/ (t it 3s (rred (/ &hes. 11. <;ERE <;ERE-OR -ORE* E* the Petit Petition ion is prt prt/ / "RANTE "RANTED. D. The The De&isio De&ision n of the Cort Cort of App Appe es s is A--IR A--IRME MED* D* 3ith the MODI-ICATION MODI-ICATION tht respondent is ordered to p/ the (n&e of the pr&hse pri&e of P1*+5$ ps 7 per&ent interest per nn'* fro' M/ 5* 10)+ nti the finit/ of this d4'ent. Therefter* interest of 1+
per&ent per /er sh then (e i'posed on tht 'ont pon the finit/ of this De&ision nti the p/'ent thereof. No &osts.
The foo3in4 re the essenti ee'ents of &hes: 1 Cond&t on the prt of the defendnt tht 42e rise to the sittion &o'pined &o'pined of9 or the &ond&t of nother 3hi&h the defendnt &i's 42e rise to the s'e9 + De/ (/ the &o'pinnt in ssertin4 his ri4ht fter he hs hd 8no3ed4e of the defendnts &ond&t nd fter he hs hd n opportnit/ to se9 , L&8 of 8no3ed4e (/ or noti&e to the defendnt tht the &o'pinnt 3i ssert the ri4ht on 3hi&h he (ses his sit9 nd # Inr/ or predi&e to the defendnt in the e2ent reief is &&orded to the &o'pinnt.