Full text of "One Hundred Authors Against Einstein"
HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN Pulished fro! Dr HANS ISRAE#$ Dr ERI%H RU%&HA'ER$ Dr RUDO#F (EIN)ANN (ith *ontriutions fro! Prof Dr DE#+NEGRO$ Prof Dr DRIES%H$ Prof Dr DE HARTOG$ Prof Dr &RAUS$ Prof Dr #EROU,$ Prof Dr #IN&E$ Prof Dr #OTHIGIUS$ Prof Prof Dr )E#UN$ Dr PETRAS%HE&$ Dr Dr RAUS%HEN+ 'ERGER$ Dr REUTERDAH#$ Dr -OGTHERR n.a /01/ R -OIGT %OUNTRIES 2 PU'#ISHING 3 #EIP4IG U' 5 %06/07/88 INNS'RU%&
%ONTENT
9age Fore:ord 1 Posts ; Other O99onents and Trans*ri9tions 71
Fontleitu=g> D r Rudolf ( ein!ann % o9?right /0 1/ ? R @-oigtlnderTB Pulishing in #ei9Cig Drue of the 'u*hdru*erei Ri*hard Hahn H Otto in #ei9Cig
FORE(ORD
It is onl? one in the s9iritual histor? of hu!anit? The *ase is that that a theor? is *alled and *elerated *elerated as a %o9er!an a*t (hi*h$ e.en in the *ase of its .alidit?$ ne.er taes our natural and :orld+ Pi*ture transfor!ation In the nature of :hi*h it is so di*ult To To e understandale understandale to the the general 9uli* 9uli* that their 9o9ularit? is A99ears The suggesti.e 9o:er of a re9eatedl? 9la*ated Na!e$ the !isunderstood and !isunderstood slogan of the "Rela+ "Snoish ad!iration of half+understood 9aradoxes Si!9le hel9less !ind Inde9endent thining and uniased s*ien*e ha.e een de.elo9ed ? 'eginning reellious Ha.e ex9ressed serious douts and uestions 9osed The? :ere dis!issed :ith :holl? ignoring 9assages Thus the *ounter *ounter+ex9res +ex9ression sion tou*hed on #enardJs #enardJs fa!ous /0/2$ the !ain 9oints :ere too little or too !u*h Not The sa!e :as re9eated on the Nauhei!er Naturfors*her+
/0K/ On the o**asion of the #ei9Ciger 4entenarfeier /0KK Lnall? /0 9h?si*ists$ 9h?si*ists$ and 9hiloso9hers sa: the!sel.es as a Protest$ :hi*h states that "?ou the undersigned$ In*luding #enard$ Gehre e$ #i9sius$ Flag?i$ )ohoro.i*i*$ Fri*e$ -ogt+ )r$ &re!er$ #othigius dee9l? de9lore the !isleading The theor? of relati.it? RTH RTH as a solution solution to the :orld+ :orld+ Riddles and the one is un*lear aout the fa*t Holds that !an? and also highl? res9e*ted s*holars of the three !entioned Resear*h areas the RTH not onl? as an unans:ered h?9othesis 'ut e.en as a funda!entall? !issed and To To reMe*t durale L*tion L*tion 6 All this :as hardl? no:n )agaCines and ne:s9a9ers$ :hi*h alone the .oi*e of Enlighten!ent And *riti*is!$ or at least dout$ efore the hundreds of thousands To To ring :ould :ould e ale to a99ear :ith .anishing little little
Ex*e9tions$ Ex*e9tions$ e.er? one to ring e.en the !ost stu9id ?es$ E.er? no The sa!e goes for the 9osture The 9ulisher 9ulisher and$ in the the !eanti!e$ the the sa!e Fun on Resear*hers of the greatest na!e no: ho: to re9ort this Thus it *ould *ould e de9ri.ed of the generalit? generalit? that the RTH$ RTH$ Far fro! eing a safe s*ientiL* 9ossession$ !ore re*entl? '? irrefutale argu!ents as a *o!9lex in itself *ontradi*tor?+ Full *lai!s$ 9ro.ed as 9ossile and su9eruous Is It has not een no:n that the s9iritual fathers had alread? Steins$ )a*h and )i*hels on$ the RTH It is unno:n That their o99onents o99onents in nu!er nu!er and i!9ortan*e i!9ortan*e to the the follo:ers At least (hat is !ore$ the unheard+of fa*t that neither of Einstein hi!self$ e.en fro! his *o!!entators /
1 The atte!9t is !ade$ the !ore !ore and !ore !ore a**u!ulating a**u!ulating Argu!ents of the o99onents An o9en letter fro! Prof &raus Prague to Einstein and #aue /0K;$ In the de*isi.e ans:er to de*isi.e
To :hi*h alone it goes If !agaCines and ne:s9a9ers :ere the dut?$ Not to saotage the ex*hange of o9inions The 9ur9ose of this 9uli*ation is to 9rote*t the terror of the Einsteinians O.er.ie: of the nu!er and :eight of o99onents and deli.er The 9ur9ose is to *larif? the generalit? and to *larif? the In uestion The editors are 9re9ared for the fa*t that the other side is dire*ted at Unuestional? :eaer$ !ore .ulnerale argu!ents$ %ontradi*t legal dis*re9an*ies et:een the indi.idual authors and So the 9resent S a!!els*hrift :ill tr? to de9re*iate De!+ It :as estalished in ad.an*e that a unifor! and authenti* one Also$ the theor? of relati.it? is neither on the side of the stone Nor fro! his nu!erous *o!!entators )u*h !ore The RTH shi!!ers in all *olors Einstein hi!self has
Inter9retati.e inter9retations see the uestion of the ether$ the *lo*$ the .alidit? of the The *onstan*? of the s9eed of light$ :hi*h in turn is ex9ressed in O**asionall? *ontrar? to the inter9retations of )ie$ Rei*hena*h$ Thirring$ 'orn$ Friendl?$ So!!erfeld$ Rieesell$ (e?l$ S*hli*$ Plan*$ PetColdt$ a!ong others$ :hile the? are 9h?si*all?$ !ath+ )athe!ati*al and e9iste!i* theories )ore details on this '? Gehr*e$ &raus$ #enard$ #i9sius$ #efte aua E.en .ia ele!en+ Su*h as "ti!e $" realit? the s9a*e shortening Et* there is dee9 *onfusion and disagree!ent Of the A!iguous and !isleading *ounter+ )ental self+front 'ut *ertainl? there is To e.er? argu!ent of the Einstein side the *orres9onding un!asing %ounterargu!ent In the *ase of unae*ted and Must exa!ination$ )aterial in its entiret? in all *ir*u!stan*es Einstein and e.er? reading of his theor?
The 9ulishers 6 %ONTRI'UTIONS Professor Dr (A#TER DE#+NEGRO SA#4'URG THE *hanges the relati.e s9eed of a s?ste!$ so *hange
Thus also the !easuring results a.ailale fro! it$ :hi*h the RTH ? a*tuall? *hanging the s9a*e+ti!e of this s?ste! The s9a*e+ti!e .alues of a s?ste! are thus deter!ined ? the relati.e !otion generated Sin*e ho:e.er the relati.e !o.e!ent itself deLnes in a s9a*e+ti!e (hi*h in turn are *onditioned ? relati.e !otion Et*$ then a regr In inLnit? Thus the RTH *ontains ontologi*al I!9ossiilities If one re9lies$ the RTH :ants onl? a *on.enient sign s?ste! (ithout ontologi*al *lai!s$ is thus the *on*e9tion of the theor? As L*tion to the o99onent of the RTH On the other hand$ Onl? it !ust e the non+9ositi.ist :ho is atta*hed to a 9h?si*al realit? The RTHJs Lnalit? (hisers %f "On the dis9ute o.er the 9hiloso9hi*al !eaning of EinsteinJs RTH" Ar*h F S?st Phuos$ NF ,,-II$ /81 "RTH and Se*urit? Prole!s"$ iid
,,-III$ /K Professor Dr HANS DRIES%H #EIP4IG ) )AIN FURNITURE AGAINST THE RE#ATI-IT+ THEORIST / The *lear *on*e9t "the one e!9iri*al realit?" is !issing "Nature"$ :hi*h is ine.itale in the one ti!e It is the sa!e (hether nature is *on*ei.ed as a 9heno!enon 66 or in the sense of realis! 'e*o!es / st 9age /$ 9 67 K It :drd o.erloo that for nature a totalit? asolutel? 'inding state!ents "realontolog?" *f 9ages ;1 and 0 # %f "RTH and (eltans*hauung 66$
(hi*h is .i*iousl? not fulLlled 6 It is o.erlooed that ti!e is essentiall? so!ething funda!ental Other than s9a*e / * P 61 ; That "si!ultaneous" !an? "ti!es" should e$ is an in*o!9lete+ / st 9age 6/$ In a *o!9letel? una**e9tale :a?$ That !o.e!ent$ :hi*h is onl? to e relati.e$ is an asolute real one Ee*t s*ale shortening$ :at*h exa!9le$ # *$ 9 K/$ K;$ K 7 It has een sho:n to ha.e sho:n a !erit of a stone$ that toda? no )eans to a**uratel? deter!ine si!ultaneit? 'ut a li!it Deter!inateness is not a li!it of ideal gratitude and #i!its of 9ra*ti*al deter!inailit? *an ne.er e *reated #ogi*all? asurd *onstru*tions 2 The RTH goes onl? to the 9ra*ti*al s*ientiL* :or of the )athe!ati*al 9h?si*s$ :hi*h en*ounters *ertain osta*les ?ou
'ut it has no ideologi*al signiL*an*e at all Dr S FRIED#AENDER HA#EN #A&E A#'ERT EINSTEINJS SPE%IA# RE#ATI-IT+ THEOR ' ERNST )AR%US DEFINITI-E DIS%O-ERED It is eas? to .isualiCe the fa*ts> a**ording to the H?9othesis of the light is the !o.e!ent of the light Inde9endent of all !o.e!ents of the od?+:orld$ :ould *onseuentl? ha.e to Against the! Sur9risingl?$ ho:e.er$ this is not the *ase Ex9eri!ental ex9erien*e does not sho: su*h a *ontrast (hat Does the s9e*ial RTHW The? relati.iCed to e ne.ertheless at the no: On*e un*he*ed 9re.ailing h?9othesis of light 9ro9agation E.en the ti!e itself and all !easure!ents In ?our She does not drea! of the inde9enden*e of the light !o.e!ent$ To her se*ond She rather douts aout the :orld
hi!self Un*ons*iousl? un*riti*al$ she holds the su9eriorit? #ight :ide i Id hol? 'ut this is ? no !eans una.oidale ne*essar? On the in.iolale su99ositions of the s9e*ial RTH The theore! *eases> the la: of lengthening re!ains for the !o.ing one S?ste! sa!e as for the resting 'ut then it :ould e ne*essar? %ontrasts$ de9ending on ho: the light !o.es in a dierent :a? 'od? In fa*t$ no *ontrasts *an e !ade ex9eri!entall? deter!ine Therefore Alert Einstein does not relati.iCe ho: *lose The 9resent light :ould e far+rea*hing On a dor!ant s?ste!$ in relation to this$ others 2th ,eit.erhltnisse as in relation to a !o.ed + Is this The :hole due$ :ho$ :ith this !antle$ falls Entire s9e*ial RTH Then this is 9h?si*all? i!9ossile
And in this assertion hides$ as )ar*us stri*tl? follo:s+ Is an error T:o 9ossile relationshi9s are 9ossile> dierent Either in the *ontext of the !utuall? inde9endent Or interde9enden*e and suordination Einstein *onfuses the inde9endent !o.e!ent of the light (ith order His assertion that the !o.e!ent of the #ight$ as inde9endent$ no *ontrast to other !o.e!ents Is groundless and in*o!9rehensile$ so the :hole theor? Durale One hears> the light !o.e!ent is inde9endent$ therefore$ should e Against the others The ex9eri!ent$ ho:e.er$ Do not fall ? an? !eans Is not this strangeW Should not e here$ lie E!st )ar*us$ *o!e to the si!9le thought that these are thoughtless Presu!ed inde9enden*e of the light !o.e!ent through these Ex9eri!ental ex9erien*e :ould e doutfulW 'ut no$ to God+
(ill ha.e to e held to this inde9enden*e$ and rather the ti!e 'e relati.iCedX The light is *aused ? odies and is therefore of the! de9endent Ne.ertheless$ should it e inde9endent in its !o.e!entW And so that the ill onl? agrees ?es$ one relati.iCes the ti!e (ithout All 9h?si*al MustiL*ation treats EinsteinJs ti!e as one (ith or odies !o.ed ? odies (ith su*h 9h?si*al Unsustainale !eans *an not e sol.ed It is true$ ho:e.er$ that this re.ersed solution 9oints to the real 9role! And its *orre*t solution> the light !o.e!ent is inde9endent Or de9endentW Ho: does the strange *ontrast e resol.edW #ight$ *aused ? odies$ is ne.ertheless inde9endent in its !otion e W Su99osedl?$ the light$ after the trans!ission$ in all+ Radiate in all dire*tions of s9a*e$ as :a.es in the (ater This reuire!ent of the s9e*ial RTH is untenale )ar*us
Assu!es that on the light fro! radiation$ not onl? on one side the o+ Sender$ ut on the other hand$ the sender and re*ei.er are in.ol.ed A relation lie that of the 9olarit? et:een light 9oles The :hole :orld+ 'odies :ould onl? e inter*onne*ted ? light streas$ in et:een Gloo! darness Here :e :ould reall? ha.e a ne:$ :onderful #ight i!age Planets :ould not onl? de9end on solar Due$ ut rather$ as a re*i9ient$ hel9 to e!erge Of the light The light !o.e!ent loses its asolute *hara*ter Of 'oth the re*ei.er and the re*ei.er !aintain their distan*e$ so the? rest #ight$ the light !o.es onl? at its o:n s9eed The It is also ex9eri!entall? 9ro.ed that the light is in its %an not e inuen*ed ? the earth !o.e!ent Here This !ira*le is ex9lained naturall?$ :ithout eing *on.erted into 0 To re!ain in dout and re!ain .er? 9role!ati*
Should e taen If ?ou do not :ant to follo: )ar*us$ lea.e that Prole! :ould rather e unsol.ed Prote*tion of a 9role! efore A99arent solutions are i!9ortant Goethe has alread? 9ointed out that the Of a h?9othesis ? !athe!ati*al for!ulas Of the *orre*tness )athe!ati*ians$ :ho la* 9er*e9tion To e ale to That is$ renoun*e ex9erien*e Not at all is that Natural s*ien*e$ to !ae h?9otheses ased on Trolled ? intuition The !ost astruse h?9otheses are de.ised to 9ro.e$ That the !o.e!ent of the light$ although it does not detra*t fro! others$ ne.ertheless does Inde9endentl? 'ut the light *an not e in the sa!e 'reath soon inde9endent$ soon de9endentX The 9re.ious light + S9read h?9othesis *an e false This e.entualit? is Had not een res9e*ted It *an e !istaen to su99ose that the light
Is asolute Ex9eri!ents of ex9erien*e argue against these Solut? (h? is it self + e.ident in the 9re.ious h?9othesis of light + S9readW It is enough$ instead of ti!e and !easure Onl? to relati.iCe the light !o.e!ent "The 9hiloso9her E!st )ar*us as su**essor to &ant 66 'aedeer$ Food Dr I& GEISS#ER RINGGEN'ERG %ON%#USION (ITH THE EINSTEIN+ERRORX It is funda!entall? !isunderstood$ the ex9ression "relati.it?" or " "Relati.it? 66 :ith the na!e" Einstein 66 as inse9arale to *o9ulate$ As it is an i!!ense ad.ertise!ent at the la? 9u and a 9art of the S*holars Ne:ton alread? tals a lot aout the relati.e And asolutes in !athe!ati*s and 9h?si*s )odern 9h?si*ists$ lie E )a*h$ :ho no:s and uses Einstein exa*tl?$ ha.e the ter!s Relati.e s9a*e$ relati.e ti!e$ and !otion
#ong efore Einstein$ /2;$ /08/ "The !e*hani*s in their de.elo9!ent 66 and later )ansion Paris$ /21 held the asolute !o.e!ent And the Ptole!ai* and %o9erni*an s?ste! for ine+ )ati*all? eual A *oherent general "9ossile I ha.e !?self the do*trine of relati.it? in s9a*e$ ti!e$ and so on /088$ :hile Einstein not until /08; a lot o.er Relati.it? has 9ulished !? oo "A Possile 'eing + state!ent $ 66 ut does not indi*ate Di*ulties arising at the %onsideration$ es9e*iall? of !o.e!ent$ of for*es in 9h?si*s And :ith :ho! Ne:ton$ although far !ore *autious than Ein+ "Had fought$ Einstein looed for a uite .iolent and Illogi*al :ith fault? *ir*uit He leads In his :ritings !an? things :hi*h are good$ ut long efore hi! said has een The di*ult? of the dierent s9eeds$ ho:e.er$ /8
In :hi*h there is ti!e and s9a*e$ he elie.es to sol.e ? using for*e Ti!es$ :hi*h are designated as the sa!e$ *an e dierent$ a**ording to Dierent s9eeds$ this is e.en to e the *ase in nature It is freshl? negle*ted that in the *on*e9t of s9eed 'ut also the *on*e9t of ti!e and s9a*e Su*h a *on*e9t *an I!9ossile as the original (hat Einstein *ontinued (as also alread? 9resent Alread? #orentC had efore hi! The transfor!ation for!ulas$ :hi*h Einstein no: 9ulished in "his 6 Relati.isti* sense and a**ording to its assertion aout ti!e Instead$ lie #orentC$ :ith *ertain sutle exa!inations and ex9erien*es %ertain shortenings of the test s9e*i!ens during the $ Einstein no: !aes u9 his o:n theor?$ so that The od? does not shorten itself :ith res9e*t to the sa!e S9a*e$ ut si!9l? that the s9atial lengths are shorter X$ As soon as the? :ere on a dierentl? !o.ing od? He does not noti*e$
That in the introdu*tion of su*h *hanges he al:a?s has the sa!e Of the ti!e and s9a*e lanes$ that :ithout these$ %hanges are not at all *on*ei.ale$ are nothing at all He !aes It is si!ilar to the non+Eu*lideans$ if the? are a non+Eu*lidean S9a*e$ :hi*h the? other:ise onl? arith!eti*all? for exa!9le$ ? telling of /$ K$ 1 di!ensions to a fourth and nth For exa!9le$ if the? ha.e a Lnite$ self+returning S9a*e instead of the inLnite$ ? !aing a one Parale$ :hi*h is ased entirel? on the a*tual Eu*lidean inLnite s9a*e One should get a s9heri*al surfa*e I!agine$ on the one *ir*led a* to the eginning again + %an return In this *ase$ ho:e.er$ it is assu!ed that it has a surfa*e in And that su*h a surfa*e is al:a?s 9resented onl? :hen Outside of this s9heri*al surfa*e is the ex9anding s9a*e$ 'ut other:ise it is alread? in the *on*e9t$ in :hi*h intuition is i!9ossile In the
A*t$ Einstein si!9l? relies on non+Eu*lidean tea*hings and Re9orts 'ut in this :a?$ ? a fault? *ir*uit One does not get rid of the inLnit? As on a s9here$ sa? The earthJs surfa*e$ "hu!9 66$ the s9a*e is also su99osed to e E.en hu!9a*ed$ uasi+s9heri*al Si!ilar to the roo! lengths Einstein *hange ? the dieren*e in s9eed $ The s9a*e itself !ust e deter!ined ? the a*tion of "!asses S!all *hanges + as if su*h hu!9+ (ould e understandale and ha.e an? sense if not Pro.ided that there is the nast? os*ene$ of :hi*h the hun*ha* Of *ourse$ these :onderful things$ To e :ritten to nature$ :e are usuall? said nothing Re!ar> "e.en !asses of the siCe of a sun ae*t the )etri* of the surrounding s9a*e onl? !ini!al 66 So$ there sits these Sun in s9a*e + or not in s9a*eW And this sun$ :hi*h is *alled
)ass has 9roal? a "s9atial extension or is the sun // As a !ass$ a *o!9letel? !eta9h?si*al$ extraneous thingW W$ No: is To the s9a*e$ na!el?$ the "surrounding a ha.e an inuen*e :hen Also !ini!al$ :hi*h !aes this s9a*e itself hu!9+lie Su*h an "RTH 66 does not !o.e an? further :ithin the fra!e:or of the Ph?si*s$ e*o!es !eta9h?si*al$ ut unfortunatel? !eta9h?si*al :ith errors of thought$ (ith the use of a 9resu99osition a s9a*e :ith :hi*h the hun*ha* $ (hi*h :ithout this assu!9tion *an not e hu!9ed at all %an *o!9letel? destro? this *on*e9t$ ie :ith the use of a Prereuisite for the "refutation of this *ondition + + This reuire!ent One *an not go into the Leld of 9hilo+ So9hie$ if one is not 9hiloso9hi*al$ not logi*al The roadest 9uli*it? *an hel9 Not onl? in the *ase of 9eo9le :ho ha.e onl?
Or not at all (hoe.er :ants to Mudge here$ (hi*h right Einstein rightl? and hi! as a great 9h?si*ist and 9hilo+ So9hen$ !ust *ertainl? e either 9h?si*all? and 9h?si*all? Philoso9hi*all?$ or at least the other Site Audiatur et altera 9ars + + thoroughl?$ not Onl? after a rief exhortation "%on.erted Refutation of the For!al Relati.is! of Einstein and related "/0K/$ AR)IN GI))ERTHA# 'ONN THE RE#ATI-IT PRIN%IP#E OF %#ASSI% )E%HANI%S AND ITS FA#SE ' EINSTEIN In a :or I ha.e Must Lnished$ I 9ro.e "four relation sets And a relation s?ste!$ a *o!9lete refutation of RTH 66> / The fa*t that REST is in *ontradi*tion :ith irrefutale reasoning$ In 9arti*ular the addition 9rin*i9le and the relati.it?+
Prin*i9le of *lassi*al !e*hani*s K That EinsteinJs for!ulation of the 9rin*i9le of relati.it? is a falsiL*ation And that he !ust ha.e *arried the! out in order to To e ale to di.ide 1 that all transfor!ation euations satisf?ing these assertions Are false 6 that intuiti.e intuitions aout s9a*e and ti!e are untenale In 9arti*ular$ that the *on*e9t of "si!ultaneit?" )easured ideas That a relati.iCation of si!ultaneit? is a !anifest nonsense that )ino:siJs "(orld 6 6" is a !athe!ati*al 9heno!enon$ As a result$ is a *ounterfeit )athe!ati*s of the theor?$ 9ro9erl? understood$ Are full? *onLr!ed
Errors and falla*ies in RTS " #angendreer /0K )otto> "'ut the la:s of thought are inexorale" D ingier Y Professor Dr #UD(IG GO#DS%H)IDT QENA UN&NITNESS AND (E#%O)E In !? essa? /Z$ state!ents of the e!r?os are ush and no:+ And so+*alled "RTH" Understands nothing aout the relati.it? of sensor? no:ledge and Does not ser.e the na!e of a "theor?" E.er?thing in the And his founder (e?l$ Is 9artl? an*ient (hat *ould e des*ried as ne:$ Is an error :hi*h$ fro! !? ?ears ago and$ as !? :riting sho:s$ Is 9redi*ted ? &ant Einstein and (e?l !o.e in a Leld for :hi*h exa*t And se*ure 9hiloso9hi*al no:ledge our
Ignoran*e$ ho:e.er$ is onl? sur9assed ? the grotesue ination of one It is also *ons*ious of itself$ :hi*h *an e *hara*teriCed ? the follo:ing :ords> E.er?thing Einstein does not understand$ e*ause to understand no:ledge Are ne*essar?$ :hi*h are :anting hi!$ "is :ithout sense and dar To see the error of their s9e*ulations$ Einstein And (e?l ha.e to stud? for se.eral ?ears I ha.e not s9oen a :ord of the :ritings of !? :or$ In*rease Professor Dr AH DE HARTO G A)STERDA) PHI#OSOPHI%A# 'ASI% FIE#DS Not for the sae of EinsteinJs great talent and i!9ortan*e on the geo+ 'ut to the extent that !an? elie.e that '? its theor? e.er?thing "has e*o!e relati.el? and nothing !ore Lxed $ (e are also *ontriuting to this :or For this reason$ ho:e.er$ he taes our *ontriution in the :hole of this :or
A 9e*uliar 9la*e (e do not :ant to agree in the 9ost+ O99ressi.e "66 of this 9uli*ation and still :ish to 9arti*i9ate To *oo9erate :ith it to !ae 9re!ature *on*lusions and unfounded *on*lusions Se9ti*is! There are L.e 9oints to :hi*h :e :ant to 9oint To the Lrst$ if fro! a suMe*ti.e 9oint of .ie: the s*ale The te!9oral orientation !a? e altered$ it is not ?et said$ That the ti!e is not a "for! of existen*e" in the oMe*ti.e a*tion+ See$ for exa!9le$ Ed -on Hart!anns transCendentaler Realis! The suMe*ti.e orientation in the !idst of te!9oral e.ents )a? e relati.e$ ut at the sa!e ti!e an oMe*ti.e ti!e+ S9atial *onstellation$ :hi*h is not readil? *o!9atile :ith the su+ Orientation Se*ondl?$ if the suMe*ti.e orientation in ti!e / "Against EinsteinJs )eta9h?si*s A *riti*al lieration "#[e* /0K1
/1 If it :ere found to e relati.e$ the And geo!etri* nu!ers and for!ulas :ith :hi*h the SuMe*ti.el?+relati.e orientations$ as su*h$ as *onstant Arith!eti* and !athe!ati*al data$ under :hi*h the relati.e Of te!9oral orientation Thirdl?$ if relati.is! should e !entioned$ so This relati.is!$ in the !idst of the RTH itself$ is onl? 9h?si*al$ ie 'ut onl? in relation to natural$ !aterial e.ents 'ut these natural$ !aterial$ 9h?si*al e.ents ex*eed those Aestheti*$ ethi*al$ 9hiloso9hi*al and religious .alues$ the :hole And do not stand or fall :ith a 9ossil? 9h?si*al Done This is e*ause these .alues are sho:n as "dut?" 6$ "idea"\ "Ideal 66 et* o.er +natural$ indeed against+natural The e.aluation of this -alues are therefore not a 9h?si*al$ ut a !eta9h?si*al one
To the fourth$ e.en if these .alues should turn out to e relati.e$ et the hu!an !ind still refers to all these relati.e .alues To the Asolute$ to the thought$ the S9irit$ God or :hat (ord One !a? also *hoose to !ean that the unit? is in+ In the heart of s*ien*e$ :isdo! and religion To the Lfth is Must the assertion of a li!ited s9a*e -er? suitale for s*ientiL*$ 9hiloso9hi*al and theologi*al Dis*ussions on the s9irit trans*ending this all trans*endentl? To e used Di9#+ing Dr HANS ISRAE# 'ER#IN )ATHE)ATI%A# DIS%HARGE OF RE#ATI-IT+ THEOR The !athe!ati*al *o!9utation of the RTH is so error+ That onl? his astonish!ent at the %an ex9ress So!e sa!9les should su*e for the light+
Of his !ethod> / The sustitution x + .t + x Jdoes not a99l? to the ree*ted$ The )i*helson+Inter+ Fero!eters The *oin*iden*e of the stationar? and !o.ing !irror e*o!es In this *ase ? the sustitution x 5 .t ] x J After that The 9rin*i9le of relati.it? is no longer general Einstein *al*ulates in Its dierential euation itself :ith the .elo*ities * + . and %.$ *orres9ond to the ao.e sustitutions So he has hi!self Refused K The relati.isti* shortening ^ M ^ + /# results onl? fro! that J% K )ean interfero!eter$ :hile at the other t:o )irrors a uite dierent .alue *an e *al*ulated 'ut Einstein *lai!s %onstant After that$ e.er?thing has shortened e.enl?X /6
1 The addition theore! of .elo*ities is gi.en ? Einstein Onl? otained ? the rough *al*ulation error$ t:o s9eed+ %$ *o ? the sa!e *oordinates _$ r$ and In s9ite of the ne: sustitution ` ] *ot the fa*tor * Q of the #orentC+ Tion$ instead of re9la*ing * 9ro9ortionall? ? ! 6 Einstein o.erloos the relati.it? fa*tor The rotation i!9ulse of the earthJs surfa*e of 6K ! se*$ :hile still+ Silent the !o.e!ent of the solar s?ste! to the state of the solar s?ste! Her*ules of /0 ! se* Thus$ the To the referen*e s?ste!$ :hi*h !eans that the light+ In *ontrast to the relati.it? 9rin*i9le ; Sin*e the aerration is a *onseuen*e of free ether .irations$ The )iehelson interferen*e o**urs in earth+ound light There is no reason for the t:o t?9es of light to eha.e identi*all? Rather$ earth light !ust e internall? related to the earth 9otential
'? transfor!ing the )ax:ellian light :a.e euation> , K 5 ? K +f+C K + + * K t K + /$ the t+*oordinate is gi.en a *ertain 9osition$ :ithout (hi*h results in a 9h?si*al *hange or a fourth di!ension 7 The gra.itational Leld *an not e *ontrolled ? an a**elerated s?ste! Sin*e oth s?ste!s are not eui.alent The sustitution + + + ■ M Y b There is therefore no *oin*iden*e of the gra.itational Field :ith the o99ositel? a**elerated s?ste! 2 The Ne:tonian la: of gra.itation Lnds Einstein onl? through the In.alid sustitution ds ] dx 6 ] dt It inter*hanges *ategories Dierent !eaning and thus *onfuses !athe!ati*al eualit? (ith 9h?si*al eui.alen*e 0 As the strongest ele*tri*al inuen*es are not su**essful$ #ight ea!$ it is unheard of$ *redile to !anind To !ae the gra.it? get the read? Rather$ :e no:$ That the solar at!os9here$ lie a gas all$ *an end the in*andes*ent light
/8 )er*ur? de.iation is otained onl? ? the fault? Einstein To *al*ulate this relati.isti*all?$ the *lassi*al rotation K n ho:e.er$ to e deter!ined ? the usual !ethod A 9h?si*al Ex9lanation is not gi.en In our .ie:$ ho:e.er$ ? the rotating solar ele*tri* 9otential a fettering of )er*ur? arise$ through :hi*h it hurries fast // An agree!ent of ele*tri*al and !e*hani*al 9ro*esses is i!9ossile 9ur9oses$ e*ause their !asses eha.e dierentl? :ith res9e*t to the inertia This is *on*eded that the dieren*e is alogis*her nature Sin*e Einstein ao.e error of his :or has taen note / :ithout eing ale to refute it thus has the Las*o of RTH !ono+ stood i See "d -" 9roof :h? Einstein RTH shel.ed is to la? " Hi!anu$ #ei9Cig Further!ore$ "dissolution of *ontradi*tion &antJs do*trine 6 S*h:ets*he u Son$ 'erlin
/; HUGO &E##ER #c'AU i S THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT The RTH !aintains the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light for ea*h aritraril? !o.ing s?ste! (hen t:o hea.enl? odies :ith the s9eed .elo*it? . a99roa*hing ea*h other and one of these t:o odies a light ea! e!its$ so is the RTH a**ording to the assess!ent of light s9eed regardless of :hether the light .ehi*le is !o.ing and the other ( elt=r9er at rest or$ *on.ersel?$ the light *arrier in 9ea*e and other :orld od? is !o.ed to:ard hi! The state of asolute Pea*e does not exist$ ut onl? to the relati.e !o.e!ent To the light ges *h :indiness for ea*h aritraril? !o.ing s?ste! *on+ to lea.e his stant$ are s9a*e and ti!e di!ensions of the state of )o.e!ent *hanged Roo! di!ensions are in the dire*tion of !o.e!ent shortened$ :at*hes go An oser.er ' is at an oser.ation
A eighth :ith .elo*it? . + /88888 ! !o.es Then follo:s fro! the RTH that for ' Mudged ? A of the &ilo!eter!a on 787 !$ thus 188$888 ! to K/K$/88 !$ total a!!ens*hru!9f s ' no: stated not a light s9eed of K/K /88 ! the se*ond$ ut for hi! are onl? 8787 se*onds ela9sed thus taes and ' for the s9eed of light the .alue of 188 888 ! through the Se*ond ' !ust therefore al:a?s Mudged fro! A e &ilo!eter!a alate 6K6 188 ti!es$ ? the distan*e of 188$888 !$ :hi*h light the a* in one se*ond to get Exa*tl? the sa!e di*ulties s9eed results in the deLnition of . :ith res9e*t to the resting or !o.ing s?ste! If the thesis of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light ea*h aritraril? !o.ing s?ste! :ould a99l?$ then it :ould e the Ls*al 9assed$ the 188$888th 9art of the se*onds +#ight 9ath as ilo!eter Lxed enfor*e Either that &ilo!eter!a :ould e dierent for all
!o.ing s?ste!s the sa!e$ or it :ould e + and thus also of the light 9ath + dierent In oth *ases$ a relati.it? :ould no longer !aes sense A train is Mudged fro! the e!an!ent of .arious length ha.e$ a**ording to :hether he is at rest or !o.ing If I ha.e a !o!ent+ 9hotogra9h of a !o.ing train doing so$ the results of a dierent length as the 9hotogra9h of the stationar? train$ although the train during short duration of the re*ording *an oth *ases are *onsidered dor!ant Thus a dierential *al*ulus should not e 9ossile$ as e.er the un*onditional ( ahrheit our !athe!ati*s ? the RTH in uestion is 9ro.ided If t:o exa*tl? glei*hgehendea *lo*s A and '$ the *lo* ' !aes a tri9 around the :orld$ it is the ( iederCus a!!entre en :ith the *lo* A to Su99ose that the tri9 around the :orld in 9erfor!s against the earthJs rotation K6 hours$ so is the see!ingl?
!o.ing *lo* ' !o.es at rest and the other see!ingl? dor!ant A / A :ould thus e in.ol.ed against '$ and the *lo*s [ .olunteering is *o!9ared other in 9ursuing Or A no: *o!ats against '$ ie at the sa!e S9eed I need for a tri9 around the :orld dierent Ti!e$ :hether I dri.e around so or .i*e .ersa At the sa!e ti!e it follo:s that the soil !ust ha.e a dierent extent de9ending on :hether I in Sense or anti+sense of the :at*h fair For the sa!e distan*e So t:o dierent .alues In so!e dar ind of "eli!inating" the RTH this *ontradi*tion :ith the hel9 of gra.it? The ti!ing is dierent in Lelds Gra.itational a !u*h faster A**ordingl?$ t:o *elestial odies of dierent siCe$ fro! the sa!e !o!ent the U!eel in*urred$ !is*ellaneous old$ e*ause :hat for a hundred thousand !ean ?ears$ are for the other !ore or less E.en the one
indi.idual 9arts of a 9lanet :hose *o!!on irth s hour the irth is hour of the 9lanet$ ha.e dierent age$ e*ause their gra.itational Leld is dierent And :h? stries us the RTH su*h Un -orstellareiten toW The ans:er is that it is a "si!9le ex9lanation for us 66 no:n :ants to ring and :olegr[ndete 9heno!ena$ it :hile on the Areas of ne: resear*h fails The nu*lear resear*h$ :ith :hat uni!aginal? high s9eeds and short distan*es to do ie the gi.en area for RTH has$ has no RTH Than to their su**ess The su**ess of the RTH is that the? tae the 9la*e of a 9ro+ le! of *lassi*al !e*hani*s set hundreds of ne: 9role!s Has It is also understood that the RTH to *ontradi*tions and ")isunderstandings" Must egging See D - "The instailit? of RTH and" *ounter+e.iden*e against the RTH "
Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig Professor Dr 8 &RAUS PRAGUE THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT / The e!9lo?ees of )i*hels on o9ti*al ex9eri!ent see!ed to sho: that the light e!itted ? a terrestrial light sour*e to su99l? exa*tl? hold$ as if the earth :as resting$ and as if the light sour*e o the light hurl lie a !issile$ as if thus etiltheorie a ProMe*t as Ne:tonJs and Poissons :ould a99l? or :hen a to+:a.e theor? / See d - "/$ arti*le> Franfurter 4eitung$ No /1$ 1$ III$ /0K7$ :here the ao.e Text is taen + K "L*tion and h?9othesis in EinsteinJs RTH"$ Ann d Phil II$ 1$ /0K/ S9e*ial Issue for RTH ++1$ &ant studies$ ,,-$ /$ /0K8 K/ "to Do*trine of s9a*e and ti!e "$ 'rentano estate + 6 &ant studies$ ,,-I$ 1 and 6$ /0K/st KK @@ The *onfusion of 'es*reiungs!ittel and 'es*hreihungsohMet in the in9uts EinsteinJs RTH " + ; #otus$ 78$ /0KK$ JS 111 + + Arrange$ ,,- /0K/ "The
I!9ossiilit? of EinsteinJs theor? of !otion " + + 7 "O9en letters to Einstein and #aue " 'rau![lleT$ (ien u #ei9Cig /0K;th K Einstein /7 reasons shall> as if the light ether :ould taen fro! the earth as aout the air in a shi9Js *ain disagreed 'oth assu!9tions ut the lord ni!le ele*trod?na!i* theor? of a stationar? ether of HA #orentC A**ording to this theor?$ our earth *an in their Mourne? *o!9letel? through the unresisting *os!i* ether this alone therefore sent )i*helson in his fa!ous ex9eri!ents light :a.es in the tra.el ex9enses dire*tion of the 9lanet and in de.iating Dire*torate a* and forth$ so one had a**ording to the theor? of a stationar? ether of #orentC ex9e*ted that the light :a.es de9ending shorter or a longer ha.e long :a? to go and sooner or later$ :hen the? arri.e :ould arri.e :hen the ether :ould entrained
So ho: should :e ex9lain that the )i*hels on+- esee*h so o fell$ as if the #orentC !arriage theor? :ould e :rongW It :as a .er? daring h?9othesis$ as #orentC$ instead of *hanging his theor?$ su99osed that the )i*helson a99aratus and in fa*t e.er? od? uantu! tati.e *hange :hen it !o.es$ and in su*h a :a? that the )i*helson a99aratus and e.er ea*h od? in the dire*tion its !o.e!ent along 9referX Through this$ &ontrationsh?9 o thesis "V su**eeded #orentC$ his theor? :ith their *ontradi*tor? results ringing the )i*helson ex9eri!ent in har!on? This h?9othesis #orentC !a? see! strange$ ut it is *ertainl? an atte!9t$ the so+*alled "Negati.e result" of )i*helson - urge s :hile !aintaining *ausall? to ex9lain the h?9othesis of a stationar? ether After Einstein ut the *ontra*tion is "Must a *onseuen*e of .ie:ing tion exa!9le$ an? *hange in a 9h?si*al realit? "'orn :hi*h *an e seen :ith all e.iden*e fro! the fa*t that the Einstein
%ontra*tion onl? "for the non+!o.ing oser.er" statthat$ THEREFORE orhandensein of the - and the aritrar? stand 9oints of an oser.er de9ends$ :hile the #orentC + & ontr a*tion as an inde9endent fro! an? oser.ation of 9h?si*al - organg GE is *o.ered Fter Einstein arises a .er? re!arale Re9roCit t> for Oser.ers re!ains un*hanged on the sa!e s?ste! all for hi! it is not true that an? length of his od? due to :orld shorten the !o.e!ent$ or that an? of its *lo*s slo: go 'ut the oser.er on the not !o.ing s?ste! !easures the #engths of the other s?ste! as shorter ti!es than longer Eddington English ad.o*ate of RTH$ has ex*eeded in its at Teuner translated :ors s9e*iL*all? on the fair?+tale of the re*i9ro*al Pseudo !easure!ent out that has nothing in *o!!on :ith the #orentC H?9o+ thesis of a real redu*tion than the !athe!ati*al for!ula
Here onl? had so !u*h to sa? that EinsteinJs 9rin*i9le of relati.it? "Postulates" that there !ust e at the !easured *o!9aring the rate a light 9ro9agation * :ith that of a re*tilinear unifor! )o.e!ent . an? other !o.ale thing al:a?s a Dieren*e in s9eed of 188$888 ! se* in fa.or of light /2 result in other :ords$ the s9eed of light "9la?s the role an inLnite s9eed J$ o99osite ea*h other GE s9eed disa99ears The 9aradox that !easured for the %o!9arison al:a?s * + + . + * is sho:n is that re*i9ro*al *o!9arison *hange of ti!e s*ales :at*hes and *ontinue the Rau!!aste to !ae understandale sear*hed / The *hange redu*tion of s9a*e standards taes RTH Although uantitati.el? the sa!e$ ut + as ao.e fro! + in one of the #orentC *ontra*tion efore .arious :a?s$ na!el? onl? for
the oser.er on a non+*o+!o.ing s?ste!s It is 'ut it is of *ourse$ not to a*tual ex9erien*es ut "9ostulates" and ? erlaufe in another roo! di!ension and te!9o P) e euated :ith ti!e and s9a*e$ resulting those o.erturning tea*hings aout the relati.it?$ si!ultaneit? and 6 the frailt? of e.er?thing that *o!!on sense as :ell as that of Ne:ton$ Euler and &ant holds e.ident for a 9riori RTH ut against it re!ains at the *ritiue Prof (ieners in #ei9Cig$ :ho :ith e!9hasiCes !? *riti*is! unani!ousl?> "(e ne.er *an solel? ? the %hoi*e of the s*ale the siCe of a s9eed to disa99ear ring$ as in the 9rin*i9le of relati.it? ? *hoosing the ERS is :ithdra:ing o:n s9eed 9ossile "" Dr ( &UNT4 SPANDAU EinsteinJs Relati.it? -OID AN EFFE%T ON #ENSES
If hu!an resear*h ne.er to a *hi!eri* ste9 "Asolute 6 9enetration is so ut its histor? has 9ro.ed that their 9rogress is the suMe*ti.it? and relati.it? it? of hu!an *on*e9tions ? the oMe*ti.e .alidit? to re9la*e Qust the lieration of relati.it? is the !easure rod for ne: insights The RTH ut rises in *ontrast$ relati.it? itself to the asolute 9rin*i9le$ :hi*h the? the!sel.es *ontradi*ts She goes in the other side of the o9ti*al ex9erien*e and negle*ted the Lndings of tou*h$ the original as the Ge is .isual sense$ as it is a99arent that there are !an? lind$ ut no *o!9letel? Tastlosen are The :ord "understanding indi*ated *ons9i*uous in this Originalit? out of tou*h A99l?ing the 9rin*i9les of RTH and relati.is! on other intelle*tual areas$ so is e.er? general guideline for
hu!an eort redundant and e.en the dieren*e et:een Error and *orre*t no:ledge falls a:a? l %f . D%> "EinsteinJs theories of relati.it? and 9h?si*al realit?" 'arth$ #ei9Cig$ /018Js K /0 Dr E)ANUE# #AS&ER 'ER#IN ANTINO) THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT EinsteinJs dedu*tion o.erloos the fa*t that the ex9erien*e o.er e!9t? s9a*e *an !ae an?thing '? * for the e!9iri*al .alue of aout 188$888 ilo!eters 9er se*ond uses and argues as if the .oid the astrono!i*al s9a*e is unuestionale$ he arri.es at a Antino!? In realit? li! !ust e * ] oo$ as I in /0/0 ha.e ex9lained$ and thus the antino!? is resol.ed The !ethod of Dedu*tion Einstein is uite in*on*lusi.e and the !ethod of
Dis9ute that he follo:ed is irrele.ant Professor Dr Q #E ROU, RENNES THE 'AN&RUPT% OF THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT Translated ? Dr E Huth fro! it / Einstein RTH has her.or+ a .irant s9iritual !o.e!ent laun*hed and .arious theoreti*al and ex9eri!ental resear*h *auses that ha.e *ontriuted to the ad.an*e!ent of s*ien*e The theor? itself holds M edo*h a thorough exa!ination not stand In light of the *riti*is! is found that the 9redeter!ined s?nthesis a sha! is that onl? in a fa.orale 9rote*ti.e half+ dar *ondition *an+ The 4usa!!enhangiosigeit the argu!ents and the *hildishness the h?9otheses are of the sa!e ind The *on*lusions ha.e so!eti!es not Relation to the 9re!ises$ the asi* *o!9onents of the *al*ulations tae as a result of a !eaning that is deLned in the underl?ing
does not *orres9ond to :hat data One !ight of the !ethodologi*al error ggehen hin:e$ if the results of a real F rogress :ould ring to our no:ledge Unfortunatel?$ this is not the *ase The one or other otained results are inde9endent of the theor? and *an e used in an? :a? to to su99ort the! It is no:n that the s9e*iL* RTH on+ the o**asion of )i*hels *o!9arison Su*hes arose No: has her o:n Author nods the results of this ex9eri!ent understood 9ro9erl? anal?Ce He has dra:n fro! the! *on*lusions$ :hi*h in realit? does not *lose in the!sel.es Thereafter$ he has this to ex9lain *on*lusions ? a series of h?9otheses tried the *ontradi*t and no relationshi9 to the 9heno!enon to ha.eX The theor? of gra.itation is uite :eird 'ut here *o!es
to the la* of ailit? nor i!!ense Du9erie in the alleged De*laration of se*ular F orts*hreitens the Perihele :e su99l? the )er*ur? The oser.ed se*ular for:ard !o.e!ent is aout 176 " Einstein Theor? is a shift of aout 6K Jat Those Ne:ton K8 ex9lained on the asis of *urrent Lndings$ these 9re+ u9:ard !o.e!ent u9 to 11 " li! therefro! to o9en the su9eriorit? of EinsteinJs theor? is a little !ore than ne*essar? lindest and ano!alste ( I##F hrigeit The i!9oten*e of RTH in this regard in all their su99l? *o!9osition founded She taes her o:n 9rin*i9le to out9ut 9oint of their o:n$ ee9ing it undertaes$ !aterial !o.e!ents ? geodeti* !easure!ents in the for! of suare dierentials darCu+ :ith four .ariales$ through s9a*eti!e :ith four di!ensions 9ut This h?9othesis is in*onsistent :ith the gra.it?
The atte!9ts of !athe!ati*ians :ho !ore diligentl? than *lear+ are *arefull?$ logi*all? in*o!9atile things re*on*iled to ring ne*essar? failed and :ill *ontinue to fail ln aout Lfteen ?ears sin*e the General RTH des*ried has een founded$ it :as i!9ossile for her an a99roxi!ate re9resentation 9osition of the !o.e!ent of the solar s?ste!$ or an? other deri.e s?ste! The 9ro!ises !ade are not e9t een$ this is a !ore signiL*ant failure K The )e elson+ atte!9t ex*ludes fro! the )i*hels on+ atte!9t the RTH that the relati.e light 9ro9agation s9eed for the Oser.er is the sa!e in all dire*tions This *on*lusion is in*orre*t The isotro9? of the interferen*e :a.e does not ex*lude that of the F ort9anCungs:elle in to / At !ost one *an *on*lude that the agent$ in :hi*h the light 9ro9agates$ or *alled Aether other:ise$ under *ertain
%onditions ho!ogeneous and isotro9i* in relation to a gi.en referen*e s?ste! is Returns to n ln that the ether is ae*ted ? gra.it?$ so e.en the 9ro9agation la: GE the follo:ing *onditions n[gen> a It is a referen*e s?ste! S exists$ 9ro*ure su*h that the F ort9 anCungs !ediu! re!o.ed in an? of the !aterial !asses Area :ith res9e*t to S is ho!ogeneous and isotro9i* in.arial? atta*hed to the sa!e referen*e s?ste! for ea*h #ight sour*e is the interferen*e :a.e isotro9i* in a s9e*iL* Leld e For ea*h ound to a !aterial *o!9osition and of their !ediu!+ led light sour*e is the interferen*e :a.e also in a s9e*ial Areas isotro9i* There are inLnitel? !an? solutions$ :hose *o!!on 9ro9erties are eas? to deter!ine
The exa*t anal?sis of the 9heno!enon thus does not allo: the *urious %on*lusions :hi*h for! the asis of s9e*ial relati.it? The highl? a**urate results of ne: ex9eri!ents of )iller are of the highest Interest e*ause it *an hel9 us to that :e of the inuen*e Q #e Roux$ "relati.it restreinte et geo!etr? of s?ste!es ondulatoirs"$ 9K/ Paris /0KK Qournal de )athe!atiues$ S KK1 /0KK K/ &ennen+ !atter on the *onditions of the 9ro9agation of light to learn 1 The relati.isti* ex9lanation of )i*hels on+- ersu*hs After the relati.isti* s*hool in*orre*t F olgerungen fro! )i*helson - dre: esee*h$ the? tried to ex9lain the! Sin*e the rush euation :ith 9artial deri.ati.es of the s9read of ( for anal?ti*al transfor!ation that a re*tilinear unifor! Translation is$ not :ithstanding *hanges to the !eaning of :ords
The transfor!ation of +#orentC oigt :hi*h of the anal?ti* for! reser.es in uestion euation$ is na!ed "Translation 6 a9tiCed This is a ridi*ulous legerde!ain Translation is a Ding$ the -+oigt #orentC transfor!ation see another There is a Grou9 of translations as there is a -oigt+#orentC see grou9 The oth grou9s ha.e in !athe!ati*s ea*h their o:n territor? and their exa*t !eaning As these are !atters of deLnition$ *an the? do not !ix If I !a? use the -+oigt #orentC see grou9 taes Einstein t:o referen*e s?ste!s ea*h of the! is the oser.er added$ the letters :ith a *o!9lete set of !easure!ent and o ti!ers is 9re9ared Ea*h of the t:o leads in his o:n s?ste!$ the length !easure!ents of$ ? la?ing the standards$ a**ording to the !etal !ethods of Eu*lidean geo!etr? The oser.er and the oMe*ts
ha.e *ontinued existen*e and e.en$ it is said$ ? a S?ste! go to another Finall?$ the relationshi9 et:een the *oordinates of the sa!e$ related to oth s?ste!s ER+ eignis9untes 9rodu*ed ? the for!ulas of #orentC One noti*es i!!ediatel? that these h?9otheses do an?thing :ith the 9ro9ortionalit? ratios as the? atte!9t elson+ 9resent at )e$ ha.e in *o!!on$ :here onl? a single oser.er is 9resent$ neither of its ti!er to e still the nu!eri*al .alue of the s9eed of light e Lxed has set 6 in*o!9atiilit? of Y *onditions Einstein 'ut !ore> EinsteinJs h?9otheses are !utuall? self logi*all? un+ *o!9atile There !a? t:o s?ste!s :ith .ariale S ,$ $ 4$ t and S Jx ^ ? ^ C ^ - ea*h !at*h a**ording to the for!ulas of #orentC If a 9oint in the S?ste! S to e Lxed$ so ha.e x $ Je *onstant$ :hile tJ ? ^ C
re!ains aritrar? The euation that t Jdeter!ined$ then does not Role Under these *ir*u!stan*es Y indeed suer all ound to S r M unW e e ne 1 re*tilinear unifor! translation :ith res9e*t to S ut f Y ie nalen x$ ?$ C are not %artesian re*tangular *oordinate ordinates :ithin the !eaning of S The sa!e a99lies a99arent :hen one Y Fir! and t Y sls an? nniinint Einstein did not distinguish et:een the Lxed instantaneous .alues KK and the .ariale of aritrar? .alues t and t ^ et:een a 9er!anent oMe*t and a !o!ent e.ent No: ha.e the oser.ers$ their standards and ti!e9ie*es the s?ste! to :hi*h the? are atta*hed$ *onsidered as a 9er!anent things e*o!e After one of EinsteinJs asi* h?9otheses regarding the length
di!ensions in one of the s?ste!s are t:o of the sa!e ite!s that the the sa!e s?ste!s are$ ? !eans of the J.ariales of the s?ste! efore taen Eu*lidean T ransfor!ation interrelated On the other hand$ the oser.ers after the !ade h?9otheses$ the standards and the ti!e9ie*e !utuall? fro! one s?ste! to the other relati.e The :hole of these *onditions :ould e a*hie.ed de!and that the transfor!ation of a Eu*lidean sustitution ? !eans of a #orentC transfor!ation still a Eu*lidean sustitution re!ains + :hi*h is not the *ase EinsteinJs inter9retation of the #orentC grou9 thus en*ounters a logi*al *ontradi*tion The entire s9e*ial RTH is ased on this fragile foundation ; S9a*e and Fa*ilities In general$ there is a RTH %o!!ingling of t:o things :hi*h unre*ht!iger+ !athe!ati*ians as denoted ? the sa!e na!e> the geo!etri* s9a*e and
the anal?ti*al areas In *ases :here // -ariale auftret s gi.ing anal?sts often a s?ste! of nu!eri*al .alues$ :hi*h are to di.ided these .ariales$ the na!e "Anal?ti*al 9oint 6 and the total of these 9oints the na!e "Anal?ti*al roo! 66th The nu!er of di!ensions of the *onte!9lated anal?ti* s9a*e is the nu!er of .ariales that *o!9osed hi! These deLnitions are 9urel? anal?ti*al and inde9endent of the *on+ reten !eanings of gi.en .ariales The 9oint of the sur.e?or is another For hi!$ the nu!er is the di!ensions are not a 9ro9ert? of s9a*e$ ut an euit? e*ono!? of s9a*e do ite! This reuires an ex9lanation The lo*ation of a geo!etri* 9oint is deter!ined ? three *oordinates *ertainl? The totalit? of the 9rin*i9les of geo!etri* 9oints :ould
therefore for! an anal?ti* three+di!ensional s9a*e 'ut a straight line is deter!ined ? four nu!ers$ also no:n as their *oordinates e*o!e the 9osition of a solid od? is six *oordinates deter!ined$ et* If one *onsiders the line as an ele!ent$ for!s the totalit? of the 9ossile 9ositions of an anal?ti*al area of four Di!ensions Pl[*ers orderl? roo! The totalit? of the la?ers a solid od? :ould e as a six+di!ensional anal?ti*al deter!ine s9a*e For the Geo!eter the lo*us of 9oints is the sa!e as that of #ine or the solid od?> it is al:a?s the sa!e s9a*e K1 So the sense in the sur.e?or looed at as a 9la*e has no roo! *ertain nu!er of di!ensions %lassi*al !e*hani*s *onsidered s?ste!s$ the 9osition of a an? nu!er n de9ends on 9ara!eters The set of 9ossile
union do*u!ents of this s?ste! is an anal?ti* s9a*e of di!ension tl sions the lo*ation of these 9ossile 9ositions al:a?s heard the sa!e un+ *ertain s9a*e on the Geo!eter The 9oint of an e.ent in the relati.isti* sense is three 9osition *oordinates$ :hi*h are *onne*ted to a .alue deter!ined Their totalit? for!s a four+di!ensional anal?ti* s9a*e If the e.ent fro! the si!ultaneous .ie:ing of t:o Positions and a ti!e .alue is *o!9osed$ is the Total an anal?ti* s9a*e of se.en di!ensions The set of 9ossile *o!inations of t:o *o!9letel? inde+ 9endent trigger 9oints :ould an anal?ti* s9a*e of eight for! di!ensions F urther exa!9les are unne*essar? The satisf?ing gi.en here to !ae *lear :hat the !ain dieren*e for Sur.e?ors exists et:een the real s9a*e and the total s9a*e There are
t:o dierent ter!s$ :hi*h are referred to :ith the sa!e na!e The relati.isti* s9a*eti!e and the anal?ti* s9a*e the 'e:tons*hen gra.it? Relati.it? has onl? a four+ di!ensional s9a*eti!e in !ind that the? in the for! of suare Dierentials in.estigated this is to 9la? a role si!ilar to the #i!enele!ent a surfa*e in geo!etr? Gra.it? :ould hereafter suare ? starting fro! this tales of the for! are deter!ined The natural !o.e!ent of a !ate+ ellen 9oint :ould stand+ ? a geodesi* line of the s9ee*h in the dierential for! e sho:n This geodesi* is his (orld line E.er? !o.ing thing *orres9onds to a geodesi* line In *lassi*al !e*hani*s$ there is so!ething si!ilar The 9rin*i9le the s!allest ee*t results in that the re9resentation of the loading !otion of a s?ste! of a geodesi* in the for! of suare Roo!!ate dierentials e!anates 'ut one has there? the !otion of a
the :hole s?ste!$ :hi*h is *onsidered as a solid :hole$ in uge$ and !ore that of a single ele!ent The suare sha9e *o!9rises then as !an? .ariales as ne*essar? San to deter!ine the .ague of the s?ste!$ and it is the !o.e!ent it :hole that sho:n ? a line of the for! in uestion is 9ro.ided /u P s Y t Y U/ nsi* C ' the uni.erse as a :hole ? Y Assen9ui!ie si for!ed$ The 9osition of the :hole of 1n .ariales a Y taage! The *orres9onding anal?ti* s9a*e 1T# di!ensions a E "%li Jdoes not for! *o!9le!entar? *oordinate$ e*ause the !o.e!ent Y Y /ceS he !es 2 series :hate.er it !a? e$ leads fro! the totalit? of the )o.e!ents of the uni.erse a:a? K6 The !entioned uadrati* for! is the follo:ing> U4 !ds K
U refers to her as a fun*tion of the *oordinates of the s?ste! The *al*ulation taes t to see the introdu*tion of an auxiliar? .ariale$ deLned ? the euation - !ds K dt ] K KU is deter!ined This allo:s the re*?*ling of the geodesi* Dierential euations in the usual for! of the euations of )e*hani*s This auxiliar? .ariale t is the *anoni*al ti!e of *lassi*al )e*hani*s The *anoni*al referen*e s?ste! is the one for :hi*h the ineti* energ? of the oser.ale uni.erse is !ini!a (hen ?ou Lnall? U after a !ini!u! reuire!ent for the deter!ined energ? of the a**elerations$ one Lnds U ] f K J! 5 h
r i :herein ntZ and the !asses of t:o ele!ents and T V their re!o.al des*rie This is the Lrst la: of Ne:ton The euations of !otion then ha.e the for! d K ,i d! Jdt ] dx $ These euations *ontain not onl? the *oordinates of the loading sought 9oint$ ut also those of all other 9oints of S?ste!$ so that the unit? of the :hole is gi.en An interesting fa*t of the relati.it? :hi*h *lassi* the )e*hani*s re.eals$ ut the s*hool Einstein has es*a9ed$ is the relati.e nature of the 9rin*i9le of eualit? of a*tion and *ounter ee*t This 9rin*i9le does not s9ea of a 9ro9ert? of !atter> It is a 9ro9ert? that *o!es fro! the *hoi*e of the referen*e s?ste! 7 Aout the U n!= 9ossile s9eed of 9resentation of the 9heno!ena
gra.it? through EinsteinJs theor? It re!ains to 9ro.e that it is i!9ossile to sho:n the 9heno!ena of gra.it? see if :e start fro! the asi* h?9othesis Einstein It is a suare sha9e of dierentials of four .ariales T ,i x K$ xa$ x 6 #et the euations of geodesi* lines of this for! e :ritten as follo:s> dT d dx dT d dx dT dT d dx$ dT dT
dx9 d dx Q Q #e Roux$$ Prin*i9es de la !athe!atiues theor? de la gra.itation " Paris /018Js K; The? allo: three of the *oordinates as a fun*tion of the fourth and ex9ress six aritrar? *onstants of integration T:o solutions dier solel? ? the nu!eri*al .alues of these six %onstants %onsider t:o solutions :hi*h the !o.e!ents et: r eggs des*ried *onstitute aritrar? !aterial ele!ents Su99ose under f9 ? K 7sJ ? the *oordinates of the ele!ents of the Lrst$ C 1$ C K$ C 1$ C 6 DieQ enigen the se*ond to understand One *an assu!e C ' that ? l0 ?s as a fun*tion of ? 6 are su99ressed fro! Ge$ as :ell as 4 6$ 4 K$ 4 1 as a fun*tion C 6 'ut there is no ne*essar? relationshi9 et:een ? and C 6 6>
There are generall? no ne*essar? relationshi9 fro! ele!ent to Ele!ent et:een t:o geodesi* lines It !ight see! a Su*h herstelien ?$ for exa!9le$ ? 6 + is t$ :here t is a ti!e + C 6 designated This agree!ent is in no :a? essential To the Dierential Euations K :ould not *hange an?thing if ?ou Lrst for 6 line ? ] t and for the se*ond C 6 ] t 5 a sat$ :here a is an aritrar? !eans *onstant The asen*e of a regular relationshi9 et:een the e.ent 9oints of t:o dierent geodesi*s is the !ain reason the fa*t that EinsteinJs theor? is ina99ro9riate$ gra.it? 9heno!ena re9resent One *an fro! the theor? dierential euations 9rodu*ed lei th$ :hi*h is !ore or less that of the !o.e!ent of a single are a99roa*hing the 9oint ?ou :ill ne.er fro! the euations refer to the !o.e!ent of$ no !atter :hat$ Lxed s?ste! *an At the Seheite! of atte!9ts to GE in this sense
has 9o:er$ is not the di*ult? of the 9role! or the inailit? the authors fault$ ut it is in the essential *ontradi*tion founded et:een the 9rin*i9le of EinsteinJs theor? and the Fa*t of unit? there #s is not e.en !anaged to the euations for the !otion of a estalish s?ste! of t:o odies$ :hi*h des*ried on a referen*e s?ste! e attra*ted$ not as the starting 9oint has one of these odies The se*ret of this i!9oten*e is the restri*tion of the Prole! of gra.it? *orres9onding anal?ti*al s9a*e on four Di!ensions The anal?ti*al !e*hani*s$ fro! the su9erstition of s9a*eti!e is irei$ sol.es the 9role! neatl? and 9re*isel?$ ? the ne*essar? arialen nu!er of ^ introdu*es The relati.isti* !e*hani*s sto!9s on the sa!e s9ot$ unale get out of their fourth+di!ensional 9rison
The four+di!ensional anal?ti* s9a*e Einstein does not *ontain the 1 n+di!ensional anal?ti*al 9oints :hi*h ea*h la?er of a :hole !eet of n !aterial ele!ents (hile onl? indi.iduall? for this reason$ the relati.it? of the ele!ents *an handle$ *lassi*al !e*hani*s deals :ith the :hole of the oser.ale uni.erse in its totalit? K 2 Gra.it? is a 9ro9ert? of the in in its histor? totalit? *onsidered oser.ale uni.erse One des*ried sees *o!!onl? gra.it? as a la: of a**eleration or intera*tion ut the 9role! is its true In this :a?$ Nature de9ri.ed The so+*alled Ne:ton *he ee*t :hi*h is in.ersel? 9ro9ortional is the suare of the distan*e$ is .alid solel? for the on 9arti*ular agreed referen*e s?ste!s related !o.e!ents Sin*e these s?ste!s ? oriented the stars$ the? hang in realit? of the
See *o!9lete fro! the oser.ed stars The ( ording of the la: of attra*tion is also the *hoi*e a s9e*ial sho99ing 9oint for the ti!e ahead$ so that the a**eleration tion *an e deter!ined This *anoni*al ti!e is also Lxed set theor? ? *onsidering the entire uni.erse$ 9ra*ti*all? illustrated ? the a99arent rotation of the starr? s? It is al:a?s the :hole of the uni.erse$ :hi*h *o!es into its o:n e!:irungen The *on*e9t of t:o eual and dire*tl? o99osite F initiall? see!s to resist our !inds (e 9ro.e ho:e.er$ that> ( hat ind is a !o.ing :hole also$ :hi*h also the !o.e!ents of the ele!ents that *o!9ose it are$ + There is al:a?s referen*e s?ste!s that are sound for so that the relati.e !o.e!ent of the :hole :ith res9e*t to a 9arti*ular aritrar? indi.idual onl? in hi! and solel? on the asis of t:o
!utual$ eual and dire*tl? o99osite ef+ u*tuations a99ears to o**ur The !utual distan*e ee*ts are therefore essentiall? a Fa*t of relati.it?$ :hi*h results fro! the deter!ination of the sus*ri9tion s?ste! results EinsteinJs !ethod !ade it i!9ossile$ this signiL*ant result un*o.er To Lnall? the la: of re*i9ro*al a*tion in one of the %hoi*e of referen*e ex9ress .ariale inde9endent for!$ :ould is the totalit? of the 9ara!eters of for deter!ining the 9osition oser.ale uni.erse Total ser.e use Also ex*eeding the 9ossiilities of the !ethod of Einstein The *ertiLed ? the relati.isti* s*hool results a99ear onl? :hen adding the! as satisfa*tor? :ithout *riti*is! this a99lies C ' fro! the de*e9ti.e indi*ation of 6K "for the )er*ur? rather than 176"
and the inailit? of the !ethod to ex9lain the rest 0 %on*lusion These general Lndings !ae an in9ut go to .arious irregularities in the :a? and on the 9seudo+ geo!etri* theories of relati.it? ex9endale ou :in :ith the! sa!e i!9ression and Lnds the sa!e la* of *riti*is!$ *onne*ted :ith so!e assertions !ean the outright asurdities )? .er? *lear *on*lusion is that the RTH Einstein not 9art of the Leld of 9ositi.e s*ien*e K7 Professor Dr PF #EFT QENA THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT AND PS%HO#OGI%A# TI)E )? o99osition to the RTH o**urs after this elie.es to !ae 9hiloso9hi*al ideologi*al state!ents In itself$ it !a? e denied an? 9h?si*ist$ its s*ien*e %o!!unit?$ as no: *usto!ar? in a *o!9letel? or at least in its essential
Points 9ositi.ist instru!entalistis*hes Erenntniss?+ s?ste! to install and sa?> 9h?si*al re*ords are "true" if it is 9ossile :ith their hel9$ so!e due to oser.ation *al*ulate 9heno!ena other 9heno!ena$ and thus *orre*tl? "Predi*t" In the one so understood 9h?si*s uilding$ the RTH allo*ates not onl? *asual one$ ut also for!s a 9arti*ularl? 9enetration union 9ro.e its feasiilit? The onl? uestion is :hether this feasiilit? DER not at the ex9ense Menigen oMe*t of the resear*h is to e a*hie.ed$ so far as their .alue+ !ost$ so real as her and$ if Ideologi*al Issues in sa:n *ostu!e *o!e de*isi.e een .ie:ed the Ergx[ndung the truth 'e*ause "truth" in the sense of 9ositi.isti* understood 9h?si*s is funda!entall? dierent fro! :hat the natural !an under
( ahrheit understood and to understand has a right (hile the real Truth al:a?s refers to an existing 9er se eing$ :ants the 9ositi.ist "truth" to e nothing !ore than a !ere instru!ent to %al*ulation of 9heno!ena and *an :ithstand aout a foundation es resisted ? 9rin*i9les that :rong in the sense of the real truth !a? e !anding> it re.eals itself as a + + in other )eaning te*hni*al !atter of 9eri9heral no:ledge :orth (orld on s*hauun gs9role !e no i!9ortan*e> e*ause :here *an the nature of the *ase e ser.ed ahrheit onl? :ith the real :est + Daii a 4uendedenen *ategori*al asi*s of RTH tat neuter leads to logi*al di*ulties$ al!ost is to a *andid se*ret One of these di*ulties Must e*ause the? ele!entar? to tarsten *onditions of the theor? in uestion heard often o.erlooed :ill e outlined rie? R (ein!ann has 9ointed out that Einstein in his 9h?si*al
i*al deLnition of si!ultaneit? si!ultaneit? alread? ahead + setirt "T:o s9a*ed a9art light signals$ A and '$ are for hi! si!ultaneousl?$ :hen it is in the !iddle ) "!eet" + na!el?$ :hi*h also =rnte this other:ise hotW tae the sa!e "/ ou :ill re9l?> EinsteinJs deLnition *on*erns naturall? onl? the si!ultaneit? of e.ents in dierent 9la*es> the? all s tehe in uestion The si!ultaneit? of t:o e.ents at the sa!e the s9:een RTH "Nature u %ulture$ Issue 6 T?rolia$ Innsru*+ ( len+)uni*h /018Js K2 T?9e or to t:o dire*tl? adMa*ent is :holl? un9role+ !ati*all? 'ut is that the *aseW Si!ultaneit? reuires ti!e and e*ause it are se.eral eual ti!es after RTH$ !a? e ased$ :ithin the !eaning :hi*h ti!e here si!ultaneit? exists Hugo 'erg!ann
are for this lie for lie hours all follo:ing 'ergson the ans:er :ord that here extends the 9s?*hologi*al ti!e in the Ph?si*s / In fa*t$ the 9h?si*ist is al:a?s :hen he !aes ti!e Lndings$ *o!9elled dire*tl? ex9erien*ed si!ultaneities na!el? that of the a*hie.ed to inuiring 9h?si*al Ges*hehnisses :ith the 9ointer 9osition his e stated 9! and thus a dire*tl? ex9erien*ed ti!e in his in*or9orate results 'erg!ann does not re*ogniCe it as a *ontradi*tion$ "that 9h?si*s is *a9ale of the 9s?*hologi*al ti!e entirel? of their deLnitions uilding ex*luded ut also is unale to 9ro.ide the! :ith their sa:n *o9e atta*ed 6 K Of *ourse$ to the ?et nothing essential against the *ategori*al stru*ture of !odern 9h?si*s and thus also the RTH state$ e*ause + as it said + "the :orld of 9h?si*s is a a*hie.ed :orld of astra*tion$ and :e !a? no longer of 9h?si*s :ait$ as that ter! :ithin their !eans astra*tion 9urel? out
out is 66th No: this is *ertainl? true$ onl? one :ould ha.e strange astra*tion e$ that :ould e ale in the astra*tion found *ontradi*tions s*re:ing in *arr?$ :hi*h are not 9resent in the$ fro! :hi*h it is astra*ted If I and fro! the ter!s of tales$ *hairs$ en*hes$ *ainets 'eds of the furniture astra*ting the so this !? astra*tion :ould *ertainl? defe*ti.e if in the ter! of the furniture a ( :ould ha.e iders9ru*h Ao.e all$ there is a 9s?*hologi*al ti!e in the for:ard+here set 'ergsonian sense as so!e of the 9h?si*al ti!e *oordinate ned not at all The so+*alled Ps?*hologi*al ti!e is rather the Ti!e ex9erien*e as o99osed to the ti!e itself the a99rehended in ex9erien*e and ? the .ie:$ !ore or less !odiLed ti!e ?ou eha.e at the ti!e e.en as the as*ending of our i!!ediate ex9erien*e *o!ined nu!er aout a 9oint grou9 to fa*tuall? 9resent nu!er eha.es Fro! a 9s?*hologi*al ti!e in another as this .er?
s9ea se*ondar? !eaning$ is :rong in fa*t as :ell as if ?ou s9ea of a 9s?*hologi*al nu!er and sa? aout :anted :hen /K; 9er*ei.ed 9oints are esti!ated at 8$ so is here a 9arti*ular s9e*ial 9s?*hologi*al nu!er of 8 9oints a.ailale If there is no: no s9e*ial 9s?*hologi*al ti!e$ so the? *an are also not used to the un*o.ered to9 of us logi*al eli!inate in*onsisten*? Rather$ these re!ain un*hanged as su*h *onsist j + 3 l "Aout so!e 9hiloso9hi*al argu!ents against the RTH" &antstudien -ol 11$ S 12r Aa 8$ S 686th K0 '? the :a?> fro! an a*tual Eli!inating the uestion *o!+ unani!it? is at 'erg!ann no uestion$ :hat he is doing$
is onl? to soften the!$ to 9ush the! to s9ea on a dead tra* 'ut ?et she is also for hi!$ and it re!ains ne.ertheless noted that su*h a staun*h ad.o*ate of RTH as Hugo 'erg!ann here has re*ogniCed and highlighted one of its funda!ental :eanesses See D - "RTH nn d relati.is! 66$ AMan d Phi# II$ 1$ /0K/$ Professor Dr STEN #OTH,G,US STO%&HO#) THE %#ASSI% PRIN%IP#E OF RE#ATI-IT IS -A#ID FOR PHSI%S IN (HO#E AND #ARGE AND A#SO FOR THE OPTI S%H + E#E% S%HE (OR#D / (hile 9h?si*al theories generall? on the 9rin*i9le the usual rate are estalished$ so tae u9 this theor? for the interferen*e of light an ex*e9tion She has e*o!e the *ornerstone the re.erse s9eed sele*ted In itself this is not a Error (hen in in.oi*es the *ornerstone of a theor? and forgets
9erfor!s arith!eti* o9erations$ :hi*h *ontradi*t this$ ?ou :ill e on Stu!ling lo*s !eet In this *ase$ :here a 9er se and relies *orre*t theor?$ a !istae is forgi.ale He *an ha99en to the est> Ne!o o!nius horis sa9it Su*h ro:s " errors are$ ho:e.er$ extre!el? anno?ing and di*ult to dete*t$ and$ on*e on*e !ade$ the? ha.e a tenden*? to e*o!e *hroni* E.en after had getnden that the logi*al *onseuen*es :ere essentiall? !eaningless and thus :as a !is*al*ulation$ ?ou *ould uite long thin aout :hat this internal o99osition :as ased One :anted *ertainl? not Ltting a theor? :hi*h e.en :ith a re9eated Exa!ination 9ro.ed to e *orre*t It onl? re!ains$ in a logi*al :a? to *onsider the letC te asis of the theor? and *onsider :hether these :hi*h is onl? *on*ei.ale or of an? o99ortunit? and$ in su*h a *ase$ the *orres9onden*e et:een this other asi*s and the range of ea*h ex9lain
ru // 1/ Y light is referred to in the :ater$ :ith the * S9eed of light in a .a*uu!$ :ith : that in the stationar? ater and the :ater .elo*it? is . granted FiCeau has "I 'ef author !!!t$ *on*erning$ of light$ a .er? !e*hani*al .ie: :Li E l eraehtet Jthat Fi*ht ra?s and the ele*trons are elasti* :ires :hose S:T s1 Y Y I0KoT Not:endi Srit an? ether held Es!sse the TrQrf 2dtW e! T /0KK Jthe author as his .ie: e!9hasiCes that Nf ST / #or*ntK the !athe!ati*al as9e*ts ans$ is fault? In its 9la*e in Ger!an translation a short ex*er9t out and the Turtle Y ! s*:e khs*her language *o!e out :oring> "A*hilles 18 a**ording to his fa!ous ex9eri!ent as to the s9eed of the #ight in the *urrent :ater$ a**ording to the theor? of interferen*e$ as GE sear*hed retardation found> V
: % : 6 .$ K. ( K. / * 0 After the di.ision of the :a.elength it rea*hed a .alue e.en on*e ti!es as large as the one :hi*h aus:ies the ex9eri!ent$ and$ therefore$ and in Follo:ing Fresnel theor? /$ he ex9lained$ the )i tf[hrungso e*ientl? :hether in this 9arti*ular *ase 7/ + No: to the 9role! *on*erning A*hilles and the tortoise No: ut :e do not deal :ith the a!ount of ti!e it reuires for hi!$ rea*h$ ut :e *al*ulate the 9ath of the !o.ing+!ade
theoreti*al one$ as :e do at 9resent$ in a (a? to *al*ulate the dis9la*e!ent of the interferen*e :ishes :hi*h$ a**ording to the dierent s9eeds of the t:o light ea!s e!erged$ it is of *ourse ne*essar?$ the ( to no: Lrst eguntersehied$ efore one *an engage in it$ to e di.ided ? the :a.elength If * is the s9eed of A*hilles and the s9eed : is of turtles$ ?ou :ill$ as a turtle :ith the s9eed ness of ( 6 "- runs and another onl? at the rate of ( + -$ Lnd the 9ath dieren*e> S?ste! If K. * If the ex9ression is di.ided :ith the :a.elength #$ is re9la*ed ? %
one nu!eri*all? the *o!9arison found ? FiCeau through ex9eri!entation dis9la*e!ent of the fringes of interferen*e This is a .i*tor? for the *lassi*al 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ as is de!onstrated ho: the histor? s9eed of light to 6 is *hanged . :hat s9eed the s9eed of the :ater o: :as Professor Dr HQ )E##IN HE# SIN GFORS THE UNHA#TRAR&EIT THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT *he* !aes for a logi*al things in the ex9ert *o!+ .er? short and si!9le outline durailit? of RTH 'e*ause the Si!ultaneit? ter! and the euall? *entral *on*e9t of existen*e + 'oth to the indeLnale 9ast *ir*u!stan*es or asi* l The idea of Fresnel deals :ith dierent densities In !? silent sense$ I assu!e that :hen a *arafe of :ater on the tale has follo:ed aout :aling :ith the *arafe in the roo!$ the :ater in the t:o %ases :ill ha.e the sa!e densit? Fresnel :as of the o9inion that a 9art of the ether re!ained
and another 9art :as *arried a:a? + it is a old and so!e:hat aritrar? #i*he arith!eti* o9eration$ the arith!eti* !ean nu!er fro! the struggle of 9ulling "%al*ulated et:een these t:o ethers 1/ *o!9rehended in*lude :ithout :hi*h no thining is 9ossile + are !ediu!+ another su*h i!trennar *onne*ted that e.en :ith the *on*urren*e thought and asserts the existen*e of *ertain things is> in the )athe!ati*s the existen*e of thought things in 9h?si*s$ the existen*e of real things "%on.ersel?$ e.en existen*e :ithout asolute Si!ultaneous things asolute nothingness Sin*e the RTH asolute Si!ultaneit? denies it denies it un*ons*iousl? not onl? !athe!ati*s$ ut also the e!9iri*al realit? So faulous short and si!9le *an e a *o!9elling e.iden*e of the e!9iri*al !ae and logi*al in*onsisten*? of this "theor? 66th The e? 9oint in the i!!ense relati.isti* *onfusion
earned :hile in so!e detail in the *ontext of other fun+ !ental *on*e9ts a9art to e laid (ithout the Must GE *alled t:o asi* *on*e9ts$ as I said$ no thought 9ossile E.en the indeLnale uantit? ter! C ' reuires that the intended oMe*ts in uestion as *oexisting or e 9ostulated$ :hether the? are !o.ing or not denies If the si!ultaneit?$ so den?ing a99arentl? also the 9a?ing ter! (ithout si!ultaneit? *an also unifor!it?$ Unelie.ers ei*hf=r!igeit$ s9eed and a**eleration e.en no uestion %onsider$ in fa*t$ the !ost general *ase$ :here t:o odies or 9oints P and < along their res9 ' ahnur. en !o.e fro! the initial 9ositions P$ < 8 si!ultaneousl? It !a? rest the traMe*tories :ith res9e*t to ea*h other or !o.e as :ant An?:a?$ :e sa? f that the !o.e!ent of P unifor!l? aut res9e*t that of <$ if the ratio of the a* at the sa!e ti!e
geiegten routes rail:a?s P 8 P> < 8 < *ontinuousl? in ea*h )o!ent ti!e !aintains the sa!e *onstant .alue % or shorter> if an? ut the sa!e distan*e tra.eled ? < distan*es *ontains al:a?s the sa!e 9ro9ortional distan*e tra.eled ? P distan*es s9ea % is the .elo*it? of P$ :hen the !o.e!ent .ie:ed fro! < as nor!al !o.e!ent or ti!e this is a The a!enerlrungen o*ial deLnition or true sense :ith N No!inaldeL!tionen !ust not e *onfused Here$ then$ !ust e asolutel? si!ultaneous la?ers of P and < un+ *onditionall? e 9ostulated if the unifor!it? and the :ants to !ae s9eed *on*e9t at all and a99l? At this DeLni tion is onl? a %o!9are i!aginar?$ no "+ ut *onsistentl? to oser.ations$ let alone !easure!ents Thining is to *o!9are and settling of relations / Of the ern 9oint of relati.isti* *onfusion is no: Must in
the funda!ental !is*on*e9tion that a 9h?si*al ter! ? )easure!ents and oser.ations *ould e deLned The *hara*teristi*s Z In the a*tual thining :e here do not ex9e*t that all thining aout Dn!de hegende i!agining 1K :orth? of this is that an exa*t o9inion on this issue onl? reuires asi* no:ledge in the theor? of uantit? the relati.ists So la* the !ost asi* no:ledge in the theor? of uantit?$ ne.ertheless the? also :ant to e a !athe!ati*ianX In fa*t$ one !ust ha.e es9e*iall? no: :hat to !easure$ efore ?ou *an !easure at all Of the Ter! the siCe !ust e in the *ons*iousness thus either as indeLnale Datu! or e 9resent as alread? deLned ter! The attending a9t ter!$ in other :ords in all *ases an e!9iri*al and logi*al reuire!ent of !easuring> an e!9iri*al$ e*ause the )easure not i!9le!ented a logi*al$ e*ause it is not intended
!a?$ :ithout 9re.iousl? the ter! as one to e !easured Asserti.eness has een thought In short$ the ter! is e!9iri*all? and logi*all? 9ri!ar?$ F r[here a 9riori$ !easuring the Se*ondar?$ s:arf tere a 9osteriori )easure!ents and oser.ations 9ut so :ithout ex*e9tion al:a?s so!ething )easuring or to (at*hful$ ie an alread? Lnal ter! ahead Thus if the 9h?si*s and an e!9iri*all? logi*all? *alled exa*t s*ien*e$ so it !ust ne.er a 9hrase DeLne ? !easure!ents and oser.ations This *reates un+ fallile a logi*al *ir*le If one has this un u!st=li*hen logi*al ( !ade *lear ahrheiten$ as :ell as the e!9iri*al and logi*al U nh A#T' axeit the RTH is :ithout Another *lear It is e!9iri*all? untenale$ !ainl? e*ause the? asolute the Si!ultaneit? dis9ute :ithout :hi*h the e!9iri*al realit? *an not e thought 'e*ause the nature of this realit?$
that !aterial things exist si!ultaneousl?$ as :ell as to lie !o.e It is a logi*al i!9ossiilit?$ !ainl? e*ause the? the asolute si!ultaneit? dis9ute :ithout :hi*h unifor!l? !o.ing inertial s?ste!s ":hi*h it 9resu99oses ha.e no !eaning (ithout the asolute si!ultaneit? *an of unifor!it? e.en no uestion These are the F ollo: the enor!ous error of RTH that it the logi*al *o!9are re9la*ed ? the te*hni*al !easuring ?ou do not e.en no: :hat unifor!it? and s9eed is$ e*ause other:ise the? :ould no: that :ithout the asolute of these ter!s Si!ultaneit? *an e no uestion$ and :ould e.en less to i!agine the 9ointless tas$ !easure si!ultaneit? $ :hat that reason is an i!9ossiilit? e*ause no si!ultaneit? "SiCe 6 isX To sol.e this senseless oMe*t is a "9re+ !agaCine 6 setX Su*h s innl osen "Fors*hriften 66 *alled" assign!ent
deLnitions 66$ and although the? are *alled so in relati.isti* "Axio !ati X + The RTH is the !onstrous frea of illogi*al Thining and is for all ti!e a *autionar? tale of an un*riti*al Ti!e re!ain The ao.e+!entioned here has o.iousl? fro! all 9hiloso9hi*al .ie:s regardless of ti!e and s9a*e %ure the !ost ele!entar? no:ledge of ) 1 Einstein the siCe of tea*hing ha.e een used u9 It should therefore not a*hie.ed 9resent *onsiderale di*ulties$ the general 9uli* a right AU# tea*h astra*t of the unsustainailit? of the RTH exe*ution "The air:a.es and the Q A (A : )- Tr + Y 7 + + + + "The ether and the ether .oltage" J$ iid ,,, 6; 9 +
Ether .oltage "$ iid ,,, /8 9 + "The Y eltgeude in light of the fW .oltage u$ iid ,,, 1 9 + Se9arate> A*ade!i* 'oostore$ Heis!gto #OTHAR )ITIS -IENNA FA%TS AND A STONE The fa*ts !isre9resented ? Einstein *an e 9ro9erl? follo:s 9oint:ise su!!ariCe> / All nor!al natural 9heno!ena$ :hether oaet energeti*all? e *onstrued !aterial$ suMe*t to ex*e9tion$ the !ost 9o:erful au )onis!s$ gra.itation$ the? are hea.? A!ong the! is 9arti*ularl? also the sound !ediu! air and the light !ediu! ether K exist for sound and light$ a9art fro! the )alaar their F ort9anCungs!ittel also listen to nu!erous far go e Analogies> 'oth 9heno!ena are .irations$ in :hi*h their ess )e ? .irating$ or$ lu!inous odies are !ixed 9la*e oth other things eing eual in eual ti!es sa!e :a?
a*$ so need to re9rodu*e a s9e*iL* ti!e In Alie Y = )ediu! done their re9rodu*tion straight 'oth are reeti e or fro! other:ise dire*ted 'oth !o.e in :a.es 9ur9ose e Per*e9tion ha.e *he* in the sensiti.e *reatures o:n Orga[MM edu*ated And so on The to the 'ari !edia of Y Y and light relating analog? is therefore a .eritale Selst.erstndli* ness The sa!e result is also fro! the Plan*Js theore! " Undulation al:a?s :ith &or9usulare:egung Together tra9 eT/ie ! e.en after 'roglie$ :ho also 9h?si*al for a #i*ht:elten taes 1 The etheri* gra.it? !ust therefore nor!all? the fa*t + $ A ; 'ea! :ith a99ro9riate a99roa*h to a :elding 8 is *ur.ed [ur*h attra*tion least Su*h *ur.ature uur*h Eddington also stated 6 As a result of air se.erit? nood? should get the idea de*a?ing Y ;/ Y
:anting a*ousti*all? dete*ted ? aout angeno!Q Y :as that the .elo*it? of the S*hall:eUen e dierent M na* e! this in the dire*tion dire*tion of EarthJs EarthJs !otion or in a to f$ Y Re*t oser.ed 'e*ause the sound is in a[en *ases ird T JS8mte nood? Y Earth!o.ing o9ti*all? gf :ant to 9ro.e rd$ 2*h* light ea!s )i*heon$ de the A 16 hea.? :as still strange$ :anted to 9ro.ide these o9ti*al dete*tion$ ut a*hie.ed no su**ess The failed atte!9t sho:ed that Earth and earthl? light ea! the sa!e !otion s?ste! to in*lude$ that the light ether is di*ult Ho: no: res9onds Einstein on all these Lndings that :hi*h soer 9hiloso9hers$ 9h?si*ists and astrono!ers as naed 'insen+ truths re9resentW The 9oint / ether ether seriousness seriousness he denies denies The light light is for hi!
a 9urel? astra*t$ intangile and therefore fro! Ar?an !ar.el The 9oint K analog? analog? for sound sound and light light he e.ades Also fro! the sets of Plan* and 'roglie he dra:s no or at least not here rele.ant *onseuen*es The 9oint 1 Ar?an *ur.ature *ur.ature of light light ra?s he treats treats also :ith the eli!ination of gra.it? This *ur.ature is o**ur not as a result attra*tion$ ut for reasons :hi*h on the fantasti* notion of *ur.ed and Lnite s9a*e ased Fro! his starting Ar?an attitude regarding 9oint 6 ut )i*helson Test Test !eans that that all ad.enturous ad.enturous :orld :onders to hi!self hi!self RealiCation of unifor! entrain!ent of air and ether dire*tl? .olatiliCe$ 9ur9ose a:areness of "negati.e" result of /2 )i*helson +-ersu*hes + for 'arier this result is 9ositi.e + 9ro.ides Einstein t:o "9ostulates" un9ro.en *onditions :onderful
dearest sort on$ na!el?> Postulate / is the s9eed of light * ] 188888 ! as *o inLnite :ith all !athe!ati*al 9ri.ileges this greatest SiCe No: astrono!? ex9e*ts *ountless light ?ears 'ut * is onl? an inLnitesi!al fra*tion of a single light ?ear$ then euating this tin? (egleins :ith oo a ttentat all Reason This :anton :anton use Einstein Einstein estalishing estalishing Postulate Postulate K "%onstan*? of the s9eed of light\ :hi*h states> : ] * ] 188$888 ! ] * 6+n$ ie> In % o!9arison at an? other GE s9eed is * for * ] *o ] *o +Q n ] * *onstant$ and not as an a99roxi!ation in a 9ra*ti*al sense$ ut in stri*t theor? theor? On su*h unfairl? *an no: 9ossil? also the relati.it? a*hie.ed the ti!e and the transferred s9here of a*ti.it? in*luding those of s9a*e
gi.e For if the sa!e light ea! o!9arison in - to dierent s?ste!s !o.ing the sa!e sa!e s9eed * ] * + * ] ! + + n ha.e shall$ so shall this !ira*le e!ste!is*h ? a rene:ed :onder na!el? ? "de*lares / that the ti!e and s9a*e units dierent !o.ing oser.er uneual soon igger soon s!aller are This RTH RTH is the si* 9rodu*t 9rodu*t of of a si* ti!e ti!e S See D - "EinsteinJs funda!ental error" Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /018Js 1 1; Dr -IN%EN4 Na*hreiner NEUSTADT ad Haardt AGAINST THE EINSTEIN THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT #INGERIE Philoso9h?> The "S9a*eti!e thing" of the RTH *ontradi*ts the un+ the unsettledIn &ant S*ho9enhauer *hen theor? of s9a*e$ ti!e and )atter
Anal?ti*al )e*hani*s> )e*hani*s> (hen *hanging the la: of gra.it? ?ou *an not do the !asses the!sel.es for s9heri*al hea.enl? hea.enl? odies as the *enter fo*uses ring in in.oi*e Dr & 8 Petras*he )UNI%H S9e*ial relati.it? AS SO#UTION AN APPARENT PRO'#E) / The Einstein of his s9e*ial RTH underl?ing 9rin*i9le the asolute *onstan*? of the s9eed of light$ :hi*h in the *onditions tion is that the light for the oser.er al:a?s :ith the sa!e S9eed 9ro9agates$ :hether these in*o!ing efore 'ea! ees or is a99roa*hing the sa!e 9 K /$ na!el? *loses $ A *ontradi*tion in for!al logi* Sion not 9 ;1$ as the Assu!ing a 9resu99osed oMe*ti.e$ ie ex*luding *ons*ious in lo*ated ereignende s9eed *or9oreal :orld snderung need to not suMe*ti.el? sho:ing in the *ons*iousness of the oser.er as su*h$
*ontains no thought i!9ossile$ ut 9roal? in the !aterial+logi*al or a*tuall? e9iste!ologi*al sense This is to e understood that :a? The Prin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light is eual to the to hi! *onstituting s9e*ial RTH a 9h?si*al theor? and tae as Su*h 9ri!ar? real things and e.ents in the outside :orld 9;6 The therefore theor? stands on the ground of *riti*al realis!$ after :hi*h it one fro! indi.idual *ons*iousness inde9endent$ te!9oral+s9atial *or9oreal :orld gint o oi$ A oll no: this s9atio+te!9oral nature of the 9re+ ex9osed real not lose an? ex9lanator? .alue ( in*e$ so !ust the oMe*ti.e for!s of existen*e of s9a*e and ti!e as the su+ Me*ti.e 9er*e9tion of the sa!e *ategor? a**ording a**e9ted 9;K The o99osite assu!9tion :ould the 9ro+ la!ierung of *ontradi*tion as a !eans of no:ledge and eual thus the utter anru9t*? of all real $$ di e?ond !ere ga!es + inno.ati.e .ie:ing logi*al 9ossiilities and the o:n *ons*iousness
!iiei#s addition ranging no:ledge !ean S ;6 Sin*e di sa:n assertion of the Un .ariailit? of the s9eed of light and :ith i s9e*ial RTH a*tuall? !aes those *ontrar? assu!9tion$ : those lie this fro! realisti* le.el of no:ledge as a 9oint ! to *onsider Y *ontradi*tor? do*trine$ therefore$ a *onLr!ation iT+ii / JJ The asi* *ontradi*tion in the s9e*ial RTH and its *onseuen*es "6 !ll!ann$ #ei9Cig /0KK r 1 su99l? + and of *ourse also a refutation + ? ex9erien*e is *ertainl? in*a9ale as the ex9eri!enter no stand9oint outside tae his *ons*iousness *an$ :hi*h allo:ed hi! that in )irror his sensualit? eheld 9ro9ortions :ith the! *orres9onding real siCe ratios to a *o!!on *o!9are s*ale 9;1 K The logi*al or 9s?*hologi*al e9iste!ologi*al idealis!
*an the de*ision on the !aterial+logi*al sense *ontradi*tor? de!anding nature of the 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light Must o s9eed and the foot ends !ainl? on hi! s9e*ial RPH soft$ not he *an ans:ered the uestion ar!ati.e or negati.e ans:er On the other hand he !ust ans:er its neither 9h?si*s left S ;/$ A 'ut sin*e e.en de!anded an ans:er !ust e so is 9arti*ularl? e.ident on the exa!9le of E into teins *hen Relati.it? 9arti*ularl? *learl? the need of a idealisti* fortCns*hreiten a realisti* no:ledge stand9oint *he *f Petras$ "The logi* of the un*ons*ious"\ )uni*h /0K$ -ol II$ S ;6K$ text and notes 1 The 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light lie$ the for s9e*ial RTH due to the a**e9tan*e of these *ontradi*tor? 'asi* assu!9tion$ ho:e.er$ e*o!e ne*essar? relati.iCation s9atial and ti!e inter.als + and thus also the si!ultaneit? + 0
*an not as a s9a*e the 9ers9e*ti.e shifts analogous 9heno!enon 9heno!enon or as a the no !atter :hether suMe*ti.e or oMe*ti.e ti.e for!s of intuition of s9a*e and ti!e itself 9oignant e understandale o9eration 9 62$ 71 f (ith the !entioned Relati.is! has !odern relati.it? s9rinCi9 :hi*h onl? the Eualit? of all against ea*h geradlinig+ unifor!l? !o.ing !eans s?ste!s for the for!ulation of the general la:s of nature K8$ in and of itself has nothing to do K0 6 Sin*e the 9rin*i9le of asolute *onstan*? of light s9eed as the 9rin*i9le of inde9enden*e :ith res9e*t to the oser.er to+understand light s9eed of a 9ossile !o.e!ent of #ight sour*e in relation to this sa!e oser.er e for!ulated !a?$ at the reasoning follo:ed ? )i*helson and )orle? interferen*e ex9eri!ent ut$ on the negati.e result$ the s9e*ial RTH to *onLr! the a**ura*? of her underl?ing 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of
to in.oe the s9eed of light !aintains$ a !o.e!ent of the oser.er does not *o!e :ith res9e*t to the light sour*e in uestion$ so this - for!s esee*h no 9ossile asis for de*iding the uestion of the distan*e de9enden*e of light s9eed of the !o.e!ent of the light sour*e /0 and therefore also no 9ossile *onLr!ation or *ontradi*tion Inter9retation of s9e*ial RTH ; fro! the *ontradi*tor? 9re*ondition of the deri.ed s *hle*h thinnigen U n.ernderli*heit the s9eed of light Euations for the *oordinate transfor!ation to toda? straight+ linig unifor!l? !o.ing s?ste!s$ des9ite their external o.er+ a**ordan*e :ith the fro! the .ie:9oint of #orentC *ontra*tion tion h?9othesis deri.ed transfor!ation euations :rong e*ause the Ex9ression Ex9ression of *ontradi*tor? *ontradi*tor? fa*ts the *ontradi*tion the? *o.er onl? :ithout eing ale to eli!inate it$ enters into its full Strength onl? in the extended !eaning a99arent to the! Einstein
? the !isguided use of the !odern 9rin*i9le of relati.it? granted not onl? to the dis*harge$ ut also on the result P1;$ 10 $ shares :ith the #orentC transfor!ations in the inter9retation of Einstein the list dra:n u9 ? this addition theore! of .elo*ities that *ontradi*tor? nature The o99osition also o**urs here in a for! on :hi*h the s9e*ial RTH either to the ad!ission its inailit? to the a*tual s9eed of !o.e!ent to deter!ine or dro.e re9ealing its o:n asis !ust 9 /$ 1 7 As a *onseuen*e of the 9rin*i9le 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light the assertion of the i!9ossiilit? of the Ausreitun gs ges*h :in+ o s9eed of light o.er rising !o.e!ent s9eed as :ell Culehnen as understood in the relati.isti* sense asi* for!ula for the de9enden*e of the !ass of a !o.ing od? fro! the .elo*it?
its !o.e!ent the uestion of the MustiL*ation of the ado9tion of a su*h a fun*tion and an i!9assale GrenCges*h:indig+ ailit? that relies on the oser.ation of fa*ts$ is *hara*teriCed not ae*ted 2 The assertion that all si!ultaneit? *ase onl? relati.e :as$ sa?s the a*tual *ontent of su*h state!ents in9uts A**ording steins and other relati.ists Must that ? using #ight signals to deter!ine the si!ultaneit? of t:o e.ents this Si!ultaneit? long as not to e taen in an asolute sense$ as one the asis of the ether theor? of light$ the !o.e!ent the signal re*ei.er and the t:o e.ent lo*ations against the h?9otheti*al !ati* light ether and thus the exa*t .alue of the s9eed of !utual light signals does not no: in relation to the signal re*ei.er Here$ then$ is *ontrar? to the s9e*ial RTH :ith the 9ossiilit? ex9e*ted ailit? of dierent light s9eeds 92 f$ and therefore
a "relati.it? of si!ultaneit? and thus the ti!e !easure!ents e.er 9ro.ided :hi*h is suitale for introdu*tion to the understanding of the s9e*ial RTH a*tuall? !eant relati.it? of ti!e and lo*alZ Distan*es as entirel? unsuitale 9ro.ing 90 f 0 The s9e*ial RTH stri.es for the solution of a 9role! ill Therefore$ Therefore$ the? !ust !at*h !at*h the D[r*hs*hauun D[r*hs*hauung g the note the fate fate of Share Prole!es to e set aside 97 12 Dr (A#THER RAUS%H 'ERGER FRAN&FURT ANTI+ A STONE / In )i*hels ons*hen atte!9t is not a funda!ental 9role! He ex9lained in the si!9lest !anner in that the light ea!s *arried ? the earth$ :hi*h is the *ase e?ond all dout The #ight ra?s are also *arried as ele*tri* :a.es of :ireless telegra9h? Here no one is sur9rised that the ele*tri*al
(a.es in the dire*tion of EarthJs !otion run as fast as after o99osite dire*tion K The Grundsinnlosigeit the s9e*ial RTH is the assu!9tion that one and the sa!e light ea! to:ards an? !o.ing ten odies ha.e the sa!e .elo*it? is XXX This is asolutel? asolutel? i!9ossile i!9ossile + it is a *o!9letel? insane insane Thought It is onl? natural that fro! this idea :hen it further fro! lo.ing$ !ore asurdities arise$ the list in indi.idual is not ne*essar? )ention is onl? to illustrate the follo:ing A ( id ersinnigeit is that the ti!e stand still or e.en run in the 9ast$ that od? to t:o+di!ensional eings e$ if ?ou loo at saturated :ith light *h:indigeit or merli*htges*h:in+ s9eed !o.e This asurdit? is not *an*eled ? so no one *an !o.e :ith the s9eed of light$ or that the
Su9erlu!inal is "9rohiited" ? the relati.it? .is th The Dire*tion of ti!e for:ard is a 9riori *ertain It is !ost *ertain Fa*t that there is It is set :ith the e.ent itself E.er?:here N :here !o.e!ent taes 9la*e$ there is a 9assage of ti!e$ e.en if it !o.es a od? :ith s9eed of light thining T:o+ di!ensional eings there is not$ in realit?$ ho:e.er$ is it is .er? 9ossile that there is a faster !o.ing than the light$ C ' gra.it? Euall? asurd is the assu!9tion that S9a*e and ti!e ex9and or *ontra*t od? *an to ex9and or *ontra*t in ti!e and s9a*e$ not ti!e and the roo! itself The 9ea of :it ut is one for the RTH :anting to Lnd *onLr!ation in the ex9erien*e 1 The !easure!ent of a od? ? an oser.er :ith the 'od? is Lxedl? *onne*ted$ o99osite hi! rests$ has under all *ir*u!stan*es stands the *hara*ter of a**ura*?$ sin*e the result of the Lnan*ial
.ie: sinns M eder ti!e ta*tile sense *onLr!ed ? other 9ur9oses$ eg '$ or *an e Lxed An? other *o!ing fro! a !o.ing S?ste! is in *ontrast su shifted M e*ti.e$ 9ro.ided the! to others S*ores 9asses Our *on*e9tion$ the :a? ho: :e see things that !a? e ae*ted ? the light$ ne.er Things the!sel.es 6 %o!9letel? asurd is the assu!9tion that the si!ultaneit? is relati.e 10 Ea*h ti!e is identi*al :ith itself No: although there is no Ti!es in the realit?$ ut onl? te!9orall? extended 9re+ gears 'ut it *an e a 9ro*ess of realit?$ C ' the ash a light$ as a unit Asst on gef$ and it *an all the o9erations of Realit? is related !athe!ati*all? to the said 9ro*ess This is Must not 9ossile :hen there is faster - orgnge as the light !o.e!ent For this reason is the fastest 9ro*ess
the asis of the ti!e !easure!ent So far onl? the light has a I!9ortan*e for the ti!e If a faster !o.e!ent$ as in gra.it? *an e dete*ted in the future$ so this :ould e the ti!e #i*he s*ale for all 9ro*esses in the uni.erse ; )u*h !ore enig!ati* than the *ontent of RTH is the fa*t that the? e*a!e :ides9read %o!!on sense and logi* see! to e too si!9le and o.ious$ as the? 9eo9le on the duration *ould satisf? Rather ha.e here a99arentl? of Ti!e to ti!e seta*s and disasters as :ars in the *ulture + Histor? of !anind o**ur$ so that the reason ane: *olle*t and their light of hu!anit? !a? again e .isile The re*ognition of RTH is one of the strangest aerrations the hu!an !ind re!ain !e!orale See D - "The Asolute in !otion"$ ar*hi.e f$ s?ste! Philos$ -ol K0$ Issue 16 "For RTH"$ #ei9si* Tagel /0KK "For RTH" Franf Uni.+4eitung$
1/ /K /0K/st Dr AR-ID REUTER DAH# ST PAU#$ )inn$ USA THE Einsteinis! ITS FINA#S RENDERED AND I##USIONS Translated ? Dr E Rn*haer The %lassi*al Relati.it? is *orre*t$ ut the E!steinis!us is not *orre*t The ter! "relati.it? 6 !a? therefore not :ith the in9uts steinis!us e asso*iated The !odern t:ist the true Relations ti.it? !ust e laeled as$ E!stei!s!us so health? s*ien*e %o!!unit? !en and health? s*ien*e :hi*h :ith fa*ts do not :or :ith !athe!ati*al L*tions against false sus9i*ion to e 9rote*ted His *hief falla*ies / The falla*? of the asolute s9eed of light EinsteinJs 9ostulate that the s9eed of light is asolute$
entirel? false The 9ostulate of an Asolute as a *ounter9art to the Relati.ities relati.it? destro?ed as a true uni.ersal 9rin*i9le EinsteinJs Lrst :or /08; is !athe!ati*all? :rong$ e*ause he !ade his #ight sour*e a s9heri*al :a.efront instead of elli9soidal o 9asses 68 E.er?thing !o.es$ in*luding light$ has in relation to the oser.er relati.e and not an asolute s9eed If the light is ex*luded fro! this la:$ so is the uni.ersalit? of a la: to a ( ort!irau*h The fa*t+ things *ontradi*t the 9ostulate of Einstein K The falla*? of the FitCgerald+#orentC - he [r Cun g The FitCgerald+#orentC *ontra*tion h?9othesis see is a 9urel? !athe!ati*al !ati* L*tion :hi*h in.ol.e no:n and oser.ale ? an? fa*t is su99orted It :as in.ented to the alleged negati.e ER+
result of ex9laining !?self on i*e +)orle? s *hen Interfero!eter.ersu*hs (hen the ti!e for oth 9aths in the interfero!eter is the sa!e$ then the Reason for this result$ the ee*t of external a*tuators F in 'au!e and not an alleged shrinage of Interfero!eterar!es If Lnd a real shrinage instead$ the? !a?$ in a**ordan*e :ith true (is s ens*haft e !easured This alleged shrinage is no: has ne.er een !easured It is therefore a 9ure L*tion If during the 9eriod of the t:o 9aths is a dieren*e$ then the relati.e !o.e!ent et:een the earth and the ether a fa*t In oth *ases$ shrin EinsteinJs 9ostulate of asolute light s9eed along to nothing 1 The falla*? of Aui -alenC9rinCi9s The Einsteinis! asserts the eui.alen*e of a**eleration and gra.it? In other 9la*es (> He tea*hes that an ee*t
A**eleration is eui.alent to their *ause gra.it? is These Thesis is a 9lu!9 asurdit? 6 The falla*? of the "s9a*e+ti!e" The Einsteinis! thins that the real s9a*e+ti!e onl? one and that oth s9a*e and ti!e artiL*ial 9rodu*ts of the !ind are This is a falla*? The truth is that although s9a*e and There are al:a?s *onne*ted irungs far in this 9heno!enal ($ nothing+ the less the s9a*e of ti!e so funda!entall? dierent$ that an? unit *an e set u9 On the *ontrar?$ a dualis! et:een the t:o is the *orre*t understanding of 9h?si*al ee*ts essential The s9a*e is re.ersile The ti!e is not re.ersile Of the S9a*e is stati* The ti!e is d?na!i* 'oth 9ut together the Done is that oth 9osition and *hange of 9osition in*ludes Ti!e *an not$ neither ? the Einsteinis!u s still ?
an? other ind of al*he!?$ in a*tual s9a*e as its a *oordinate are transfor!ed The L*titious !athe!ati*al *on*e9t$ the no:n as the "root of !inus /" is too :ea to !ae a Realit? to transfor! it into a dierent realit? 6/ ; The Trugs ehiii it d *ur.ed s9a*e )atter *an aCieren onl? other !atter ou *an no *hange !ents ring to 9rin*i9les and la:s S9a*e and ti!e are No !atter$ therefore the existen*e of !atter in s9a*e+ti!e *an not *hange the nature of s9a*e and ti!e S9a*e is not a !aterial Thing :hi*h !a? enter as the :alls of a ox slightl? He is not *ur.ed e*ause a *ur.ature onl? !aterial 9resent in s9a*e *an send existing oMe*ts F therefore follo:s the roo! is not li!ited and en.elo9ing The roo! is a asi* fa*t + urgr[ndli*h as a 9rin*i9le$ e*ause its 9ossile a99li*ations un+
are li!ited The *reation of s9a*e and ti!e ? the oser.er + A falla*? The E!steinis!us tea*hes that !an ? !easuring rods and (at*h s9a*e and ti!e *an do This is 9ure so9histr? (hat GE is !easured$ is in 9la*e efore the end of !easure!ent is dis9la?ed s9a*e and ti!e not *o!e through the a*t of !easuring the :orld On the *ontrar?$ the )easure is a uantitati.e assess!ent of the a!ount of realit? There kS9a*e and ti!e are funda!ental realities$ all nor!al Heads dra: the sa!e *on*lusions aout their nature 7 )athe!ati*al *al*ulations deter!ine the nature of S9a*e and ti!e + + A falla*? Des9ite *lai!s of Einsteinis! tea*hes 9ra*ti*al$ that the nature of s9a*e and ti!e ? !athe!ati*al s9e*ulators
tion is deter!ined The falla*? lies in the fa*t e*o!es i!!ediatel? on The real tas of !athe!ati*s is the exa*t and *on*ise Re9resentation of 9heno!ena The !athe!ati*s *an ut a*hie.ed nothing *reate + not e.en four or II+di!ensional s9a*es 2 The .ie:s of !ollusis*hen referen*e s?ste! the Einheftsfel del + *on*o*tions of i!agination :ithout %onta*t :ith realit? Einstein Gauis*he 'eCugs!olluse is$ lie the east$ to :ho! it is na!ed$ !ainl? fro! a o:l (ithin the shell is nothing ut the .ain ho9e that the a99aratus fun*tion e*o!es Sin*e the !ollus is not in *onta*t :ith realit?$ the? *an not e.en itself out of the s:a!9 of in*onsisten*ies$ :hi*h the? ga.e irth$ u9lifting The sa!e *riti*is! a99lies to EinsteinJs ne:est 9rodu*t s9e*ulation + the unit Leld in his essa? "On the uniLed Leld theor? Y
■
/0K0 is set out (hen generaliCing 9rin*i9le generaliCed$ to ea*h tra* a realit? *ontinues is s:e9t$ and s:irls a !athe!ati*al Dust$ :hi*h !aes the one tein+ du9es *o!9letel? lind 6K 0 Alleged e.iden*e through oser.ation + either .alue+ Go or entirel? :ithout *losing for*e a dee*tion of light The 9hotogra9hs :ere sele*ted so that the? EinsteinJs h?9othesis should *onLr! DieQ enigen ele*ted$ not *onLr!ed / 9er*ent$ a dieren*e in health? and honest s*ientiL* nal Safet? is not allo:ed In addition$ Einstein does not *onte!9late the gaseous at!os9here of the sun *aused refra*tion into a**ount rotation of the 9lane of the 9lanet )er*ur? Einstein :as for*ed to a!9utation of his theor? to to re.eal Ne:tonJs for!ula in a !agi*al ind Gerers$
he$ :ithout !entioning it$ used to !ae its *al*ulations Therefore$ the !o.e!ent of )erure ene 9ro.es the *orre*tness of Gerers Ne:toniseher *al*ulation$ ut not the a**ura*? of Einsteinis! * dis9la*e!ent of S9etraUinien The oser.ations on the shift of the line after the red out are :ithout S *hlur aft The *areful :or of 'u!s$ %urtis$ )eggers and other s!ooth *ontradi*t the *lai!s Einstein The Oser.ation !a? *onLr! another theor? than DieQ 9ie*e Einstein and so their Pru*h Ans$ the onl? to e relati.e to the s9e*tral lines$ refute This also a99lies to the Sha9le? ee*t /8 The Einsteinis! + A s9e*ulati.e net:or *o!9ared !utual *ontradi*tions Sin*e the E!steinis!us fro! L*titious and in*oherent ase! is s9un$ the :hole s?ste! is full of !utual *ontradi*tions In /0// EinsteinJs theor? led a light dee*tion eual
821 ' fro! ogenseunden /0/ :as Einstein the dee*tion eual /7 ar*se*onds The latter is a99roxi!atel? t:i*e that of the for!er On+ stone are no ex*uses or ex9lanations for these glaring ( iders9r[*he This :ill ee9 the! in his :or as 9er!anent !onu!ents the *olossal s*ientiL* *ou9 of all ti!e In /0/0$ Einstein announ*ed oldl? that there is no ether In his address in #eiden ut )a? ;$ /0K8 he *hanged his !ind and tried in the 9la*e of a real !ediu!$ a )athe!ati*al to 9ut *ontinuu! )ean:hile light :a.es *an not , s and Js are !ade In 2 a 9arti*ular theor? Einstein asserted that the light+ s9eed is the sa!e in all dire*tions in s9a*e$ regardless on the s9eed of the light sour*e and that of the oser.er Ho:e.er$ in his General Theor? he reMe*ts this alleged A*t and oldl? asserts that in a gra.it? Leld su*h as that
the sun does not a99l? #a:s that *ontradi*t ea*h other$ the *ore are and the essen*e of EinsteinJs ridi*ulous *onstru*tion 61 /# The aestheti* *lai!s and allegations faetr Singleness + False In s*ien*e *an onl? :hat is true$ right to 9erfe*ting raise safet? The Einsteinis! therefore$ e*ause it is :rong$ not ni*e All 9role!s Einstein *an :ithout resorting to its fantasti* !athe!ati*al s9e*ulations are sol.ed Therefore its argu!ent falls that his theories are true e*ause the? are the onl? alleged$ the (ater The de*e9tions of Einstein Eini s!us / 'o!asti* ad.ertising As the Einsteinis! as a ood :a.e ooded the :orld$ *alled I Einstein e*ause of his o!asti* 9uli*it? nrri+
rule in.asions as the 'a!u! s*ien*e Sin*e these uns*ientiL* #i*he ad.ertising has not di!inished$ the a**usation is still rightl? K A !ere !athe!ati*al s9e*ulation His entire stru*ture rests not on fa*ts ut on !athe!ati*al rule s9e*ulation :hi*h of the 9la?s on :ords and so9histries unridled S*ho loads still on oer 1 The Noel PriCe Einstein re*ei.ed the Noel PriCe res9e*t due to his la: the 9hoto+ele*tri* ee*t This la: :as 9re.iousl? estalished ? resear*h 9ro.ed !ixtures the A!eri*an 9h?si*ist RA )illi an e false een s :hose :or "The ele*tron 6$ 9 K18$ edition /0/7 Dt OE (estin in S:eden rought this de*e9tion to light '? EinsteinJs unMustiLed (ortrag on the suMe*t "Relations ti.it? 66$ :hi*h .iolated the 9ro.isions of the Noel PriCe "Dire*torate$
the :orld has een led to elie.e$ the Noel PriCe+Dire*torate had *onsented to Einsteinis! as a health? and ex9eri!ental gi.en tall? 9ro.en theor? 9resented The Noel Dire*torate ut in his PreisCuerennung ex9li*itl? that this is not the %ase The Dire*torate reuires ea*h re*i9ient of a Noel PriCe a le*ture on the suMe*t$ on the asis of :hi*h the re:ard is !eilt$ :ithin a s9e*iLed ti!e In Finn "*ase :as the > Not reia for relati.it? ut for his de*e9ti.e la: eCgl+ the 9hoto+ ele*tri* ee*t issued 6 EinsteinJs 9riorit?W a )ino:si and Einstein ado9ted$ ut distorted the original 'ehe idea of )el*hior Palg?i$ the great Hungarian 9hiloso9her$ *on*erning the ti!e as a di!ension asso*iated :ith the s9a*e$ r alag?i also introdu*ed the ter! "root of !inus one" :ith res9e*t "nt
66 the ti!e Pafg?is :or :as 9ulished in /$08/th On+ steins Lrst :or is dated /08; )ino:siJs Lrst signature a99eared /087th Palg?i not taught the unit? of s9a*e and ti!e$ ?et said he e.er$ that the length of the !easuring rod of the ti!e of its oser.ations estee! de9ended EinsteinJs for!ula of /0// is for the dee*tion of light in %ores sa!e as DieQ 9ie*e of Qohann Georg .on Soldner fro! ?ears /28/ Sold agent for!ula ased on the ne:toni see *elestial !e*hani*s #a9la*e %ontrar? to :hat Dr Roert Tru!9ier I ha.e sho:n that the 9a? agent using the siCe K g instead of g is to re *htfertigen * Paul GererJs for!ula fro! /202 :as ? Einstein in /0/ used to the a!ount of rotation of the 9lane of the 9lan+
Neten )er*ur? to deter!ine d authors of this do*u!ent drafted in /08K the idea of a unit Leld :hi*h old e!ra*ed all inds of &r$ na!el? in a le*ture :hi*h is "The ato! ele*tro*he!istr? ; " *alled and held in the A!eri*an Ele*tro*he!i*al So*iet? has een In /0/1$ I *oined the h?9henated ter! "s9a*e+ti!e\ :ho re*ei.ed /0/; *o9?right$ and although o**asionall? !? 9resentation GE ee9 the &ansas State Agri*ultural %ollege and the Uni.ersit? of &ansas and titled "The S9a*e +Ti!e 9otential$ a ne: *on*e9tion of the Gra.it? and ele*tri*it? 66th Einstein is )olluseneCugss?ste! uilt a**ording to the 9lan of !? 9otential Cone s?ste!$ onl? :ith the i e? dieren*es that !? referen*e Cone due to Tat u9 Me:elr? and other on real 9h?si*al Lndings :as turned :hile Einstein !ollus a !ere !?thi*al *onstru*tion is :ho has no *onta*t :ith realit?
)? s9a*e+ti!e &ine!atrix fro! /0K1 in*ludes all t?9es of Ee*t of gra.it?$ the ele*tri*al$ ther!al$ !e*hani*al et* Again$ this :as used in the deLniti.e Lndings On+ steins unit Leld of /0K0 + a 9ie*e of 9ure !athe!ati*al L*tion + has no real ailit? to a99li*ation$ na!el? e*ause not on fa*ts ut on !athe!ati*al s9e*ulations$ :hi*h suMe*t falla*ious assu!9tions$ is founded Dr GUSTA- RI%HTER 'O4EN THE relati.iCation of s9atiote!9oral )ASSTA'ES %AN ON# ' )EANS OF AN A'SO#UTE )ASSTA'ES 'E ESTA'#ISHED The RTH Einstein lie the role in s*ien*e al:a?s 9la?$ for 9hiloso9h? is either a analit? or nonsense It is anal :hen :hi*h :ith regard to the .arious Mudg!ents$ 6;
.arious oser.ations on the te!9oral order or the ti!e Duration of *ertain e.ents !ae to the di! .ie: 9ro.ides and !aintains that ea*h oser.ation is relati.e$ d$ h of the %ir*u!stan*es is de9endent and therefore no asolute safet? *ould *lai! unit that his Mudg!ent is asolutel? true This is *lear fro! the relati.it? of all !otions A nonsense ut it is to sa? that :e of this relati.it? u9 dierent .ie:ing o99ortunities Must as the Asolute ha.e engage!ent$ :hile our need is the ( ider s9eaing edu*ate and 9rodu*e a uniLed$ logi*all? *orre*t :orld.ie: or at least the 9ossiilit? of su*h a uniL*ation to elie.e should thro: as osolete in the lu!er roo! The relati.ist Mudges if he is honest$ as follo:s> I$ too$ stri.e for unit? of :orld .ie:$ ut I see this unit in the Unit of the natural la: that is in the fun*tioning of this un*o!9laining
found !athe!ati*al for!ulas or in that the !athe!ati*all? estalished euations to go *o!9letel? And :hen the? in fa*t not *o!9letel? asored$ ut e.er?:here Rest$ e.en if onl? a little left o.er$ so IJ! read?$ the unit Natural #a: aufCuo9fe! the unit? of s9a*e and ti!e di!ension$ d$ h These de.iations re9resented ? the .arious s9atial and te!9oral 9ositions or :ith the !o.e!ent of the oser.er *hanging to !ae s9atial and te!9oral extent res9onsile This is not illogi*al in itself Nonsensi*al is Must the fa*t deri.ed *on*lusion that the dierent s9atial and te!9oral di!ensions not ha.e relati.e ut asolute *hara*ter$ ie$ the s9a*e and the ti!e !easure asolutel? right 'e*ause either it *an e stated ers*hiedenheit or not this - #et the! do not realiCe$ then :ould the theor? !aes no sense lets ut test uestions$ then ?ou need aout the relati.e s9atial and
Te!9i nor an asolute s9a*e and ti!e s*ale 9resu99ose :ith the hie ?ou *an noti*e this dieren*e And this !easure is for the RTH Must the natural la:$ the for!ula Fro! the de.iation of the lo*ation and the ti!ing of the e.ent of this for!ula *an e a**ording to the ho!e!ade ado9ting the exa*t %hanging the s9atial and te!9oral di!ension :ith res9e*t to the asolute s9a*e and ti!e di!ensions are *al*ulated So lie also the s9atial and te!9oral relationshi9s e.er %hange the lo*ation and s9eed$ so :e *an ut the *hanges estalish !ents and therefore ex9e*t a !easure that and 9la*e Y Rate is inde9endent And *onstru*t :ith the hel9 of this !easure asohiten s9a*e and an asolute ti!e$ as :e our :oring : 2 ua* B !eI uniLed :orld order *an not do .iolen*e End thought 4Ug t Jhas not the relati.isti* idea 6
Dr ERI%H Ru*h 'UT 'ER#IN THE TOTA# OF RE#ATI-IT illogi*alit? STHEORIE That ea*h !easure!ent is relati.e$ has not dis*o.ered until Einstein On+ ut stone *onfuse suMe*ti.e and oMe*ti.e relati.it? The )eter!a is a relation to the *ir*u!feren*e of the earth Self+e.ident *onditions reuisite for its general use$ it is no: that all !en it fro! the sa!e distan*e$ the sa!e distan*es fro! the !easured 'od?$ ut not the one fro! this$ the other fro! that distan*e use Is a !easure!ent a99roa*h *arr?ing the !etering rod to the 'od?$ so fro! a distan*e Cero$ not 9ossile$ it !ust indire*tl? ha99en *orre*ts the !athe!ati*al *onsideration of the distan*e then the !easure!ent and rings the! into line :ith the alone .alid oM e*ti.e+relati.e !easure!ent of the distan*e to Cero For the ti!e !easure!ents a99lies exa*tl? the sa!e as for roo! !easure!ents Einstein ut aords the Moe that he !ade ti!e !easure!ents *o!9arison
dierent distan*es gi.es the sa!e oM e*ti.e .alidit?$ suMe*ti.e .ie:9oints oMe*tiLed and thus also that of the hu!an union oser.ation *o!9letel? inde9endent transsuMe*ti.e :orld e.ents e.en relati.iCed Not enough that one for hi! and the sa!e e.ent at the sa!e ti!e *an ha.e t:o ti!es$ !an is generall? a 9o:erful eings to a little god$ e*ause he *an !ae things$ their siCes and ti!es$ *hange their se.erit? so desired ? nothing *ontinue to do has to e laid as its 9osition The funda!ental error of Einstein$ as :ell as one of its ad.antages 9rede*essor )a*h$ PetColdt$ a!ong others$ is a 9urel? logi*al and is .er? regardless of an? e9iste!olog? or !eta9h?si*s All s*ientiL* 9rogress *onsists 9re*isel? ? un*o.ering the suMe*ti.e relati.it? to oM e*ti.e relati.it? to arri.e$ and the Great A*t of %o9erni*us is Must for the !ost 9heno!enal as for the idealists as the realists$ for the se9ti*s as for the Dog!e
*ians as a99lies to all ha.e the sa!e logi*$ the identit? of the ter!s$ the uneui.o*al adheren*e !ade R E Onl? that is :hat !atters$ that on*e agree!ent rea*hed is *learl? res9e*ted Einstein does not noti*e that he si!9l? taes the logi* underfoot Out InMur? 9rin*i9le of identit?$ the le.?ing of a!iguit? the 9rin*i9le$ follo: ne*essaril? .iolations of other la:s of thought A**ording to Einstein$ the state!ents "The stone falls Must and" The Stone falls *rooed 6 oMe*ti.el? euall?$ ie the sa!e stone *an for hi! at the sa!e ti!e et: r ei uite dierent 9aths$ t:o dierent o**u9? s9a*es Einstein *ontradi*ts hi!self :hen he one of Stones$ sin*e that one is 9re*isel? that denied hi! transsu M e*ti.e :ould e a third 9art? Einstein does not as :h? the *ornerstone of the a 9osition Must for the other *rooed falls$ a uestion :hose
Ans:ering the suMe*ti.e relati.it? raises and an oMe*ti.e results @Einstein so des9ised as the 9rin*i9le of *ontradi*tion as the reason A hea.ier 9urel? logi*al error$ it is also$ fro! the *ur.ed s9ea s9a*e as "*ur.ature 6 a !otoriCed ter! and E.er? !o.e$ in*luding an? *ur.ature alread? 9resu99oses the roo! )ur *onfusion 9atient !athe!ati*al for!ulas :ith the $ Understand realit?$ the little *ares aout the! let as Einstein the length of a od? fro! the ti!e in :hi*h it !o.es for:ard$ *an e addi*ti.e is the redu*tion of ti!e to ush the the sa!e as if ?ou :anted to redu*e the !o.e!ent of the rest Also here there is a serious eui.o*ation One !a? :ell stati*s ah S9e*ial *ase of d?na!i*s ex9lain$ ut not the d?na!i* that Urfatu!$ redu*e the stati*$ and it is the height of asurdit? to sa?$ the roo! had s:allo:ed u9 the air:a.es and the ti!e
The )i*hels on+ esee*h *an ne.er rise to a relati.is! the ti!e$ sin*e nu!erous d?na!i* fa*tors$ the a99arent to ex9lain ano!al? *a9ale also the *al*ulations in9uts steins$ as Dr Israel 9ro.ed Must after EinsteinJs o:n - oraus+ tions Ni*ht!itf[hrung the light ea! are in*orre*t The esee*h Einstein$ the *ontradi*tion et:een hi! re9roa*hed the s9e*ial and the general RTH$ after the latter of the light ut *an e inuen*ed to eli!inate Y is totall? failed$ e*ause of the this *o!9arison !ade :ith ele*trostati*s and "d?na!i*s Must the o99osite of EinsteinJs *on*lusion follo:s$ na!el? the 9rin+ Ci9ielle suggestiilit? of the light ea! Here is a .er? s9e*ial + 'arer deL*ien*? of logi* EinsteinJs "*on*lusion" that there is no greater s9eed than DIB !a? e the s9eed of light$ is not an end$ ut an aritrar? nothing MustiLed assu!9tion E.en though in the ex9ression
the .alue of the (urCei is less than /$ it is ne.ertheless not i!aginar? In an essa? in the "Annals of 9hiloso9h?" -ol /8 /018$ unit 2/8$ I ha.e *o!e to 9ro.e that the negati.e nu!ers al:a?s re9resent real .alues$ it follo:s of itself$ that there is no i!aginar? nu!ers The ex9ression under the root therefore *orres9onds to a real$ no !atter :hat .alue$ in an? *ase des*ried He suggested "siCe elo: Cero" 'lo* "*on*lusion" therefore is Lrstl? transferred no *on*lusion se*ondl? :ould e if it :ere a real *ir*uit$ the *ondition on :hi*h it is ased$ in*orre*tl? The theor? of relati.it? is a !athe!ati*al !asuerade ehind the an al!ost inextri*ale tangle of 'egris.ertaus*hungen$ resistan*e languages$ histor? falla*ies aritrar? assu!9tions and )ia*htungen sunder logi* hides The :orld e*o!es a of inLnitel? !an? 9ossile union *oordinate s?ste!s !ade *o!9osite undle$ ! 62
:hi*h ea*h d?na!i*s and *ausalit? so ut an? a*tual Ph?si*s disa99ears This relati.it? is a :orld of lo:n egg our re*ord rea*hes the theor? of relati.it? and re.erse ilit? of the ter!s and N orher aehher$ *ause and "ee*t$ and Si!ilar )o.ies &id$ :ho is good at least that the? also one :ho does not hindur*h+ throughout this GeDaNEn%hAoS *an Lnd$ o9en ?our e?es (hatJs to Lght e.en !ore than this nonsensi*al theor? itself$ that is the auda*it? of a 9art of the 9ress$ of all i!aginale are troule$ su*h an un9re*edented feat of illogi* as the to tru!9et elief of the future and *on*eal!ent$ that the o99osition far larger than the serious trailer %o!!unit? :ho !islead 8 9uli* See D - "The RTH refuted ? the ( iders9ru*hs9rinCi9 and the natural Ex9lanation of )i*helson - ersu*hs 66 HiQl!ann$ #ei9Cig and the satire "Relati.ia$ the
Ro!an a Pro9het 66 Dr ( &untC$ 'erlin @S9andau Professor Dr STREH# HOF RE#ATI-IT THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT The theor? of Einstein for !e is a fun*tional transfor!ation of ( irli*heit His referen*e s?ste!> -ariale s9a*e and ti!e ! ate + rod$ in.ariale s9eed of light des9ite .ar?ing *rushing .alue is not !? taste See d - $$ ( elle o9ti*s 6 in*luding literature %entral Ti!e f o9ti*s$ /0K+K7 Dr &AR# -OGT #ord &AR#SRUHE REFUTATION THE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT The RTH !a? e reutted if it is 9ossile$ one of its funda+ 9ro.e la?ing 9re*onditions to e in*orre*t As su*h$ :ant :e the assertion Einstein single out that one aout to e !easured Si!ultaneit? GlC Of e.ents at dierent lo*ations "a *an !ae Lxing dis*retion 6 Q or as H Rei*hen+
a*h ex9resses that this GlC (ithin the ui*est of the ef+ ung transfer left o9en 9eriod "no oMe*t of &no:ledge ut a dis*retionar? de*ision is 6K + (e as us Lrst :hat :e no: :i th safet? of s9a*e and ti!e$ efore :e !easureW An? 9erson !ust$ as long as he erstnde in health? is to ad!it that a straight line that is of an un*hanged dire*tion *an not e *losed to returning in line$ Must that not !ore di.ergent line through the sa!e t:o x The S9e*ial and General RTH @;th Edition$ 9 /; K 9hiloso9h? of s9a*eti!e tea*hing$ S /;8$ /0K2th 6 Einstein 60 *an go 9oints If *he* in the "higher" geo!etr? dierentl? should eha.e$ so this is *hara*teriCed for the untainted .i.id Thin thoroughl? un9alatale to a !eaningful e!9t? 9la? on :ords$
:here nothing gras9ale underlies These axio!s are a9odi*ti*all? a 9riori *ertain and an? *orre*tion ? future reLned oser.ation estee! and !easure fro! the outset de9ri.ed in.ariale general *o!9rehensi.e and stri*t ne*essit?$ ie m n!c 9ossiilit? a *o!9ared introdu*e 9art eha.ior are their hall!ar Fro! these re*ords Art no: *an e deri.ed all the geo!etr?$ so :e need to onl? three a*tuall? geo!etri* axio!s> / T:o gi.en 9oints des*ried are entirel? one and onl? one dire*tion and one and onl? one Route / K seg!ents and angles *o!es to stead? siCe 1 It are at an? gi.en distan*e and at an? gi.en angle a *ongruent 9ath and a *ongruent angle in an? 9osition All other reuired axio!s are a 9riori *ertain sets of general nerer i!9ortan*e + This *ondition *an e the :a? also un+ indire*tl? 9lausile set 9ro.e that at an? gi.en three+ e* a *ongruent !ust e in an? 9osition K That further!ore the
( inelsu!!e in the triangle *an not e greater than t:o right angles$ *an ho: long no:n$ fro! the set of single line through t:o Points$ ie deri.ed fro! Axio! / 'ut that the angle su! not less than t:o !a? e rights *on*erns in the follo:ing :a?> The Qust as :e deLne the line of un*hanged$ identis*h+ sa!e dire*tion Se*tions ha.e the sa!e straight line so identis*h+ sa!e dire*tion to ea*h other Fro! this deLnition$ it follo:s that t:o Straight or an? se*tions thereof in onl? one dire*tion relationshi9 *an relate to ea*h other$ as :ell as C ' an oMe*t of *onsistentl? the sa!e *olor :ith another Must su*h onl? in a %olor relationshi9 as regards the nature and degree of the *olor dieren*e *an stand T:o line$ :hi*h interse*t$ ha.e dierent dire*tions dire*tion and a dire*tional dieren*e$ :hi*h the 9ointed for!ed ( in+ *les *orres9onds If no: a half line a$ the 9oint ' of a :agre*ht featured straight * goes out and one to the right and ao.e
o9en a*ute angle :ith these for!s$ rotated so to * that this angle is al:a?s a*ute and s!aller than e.en the s!allest GE *an e added angle$ so the theore! that the dire*tion of a the dire*tion of * a99roa*hes :ithout end If in the sa!e :a? a Half ea! $ :hi*h go fro! the 9oint A of the straight line * to the left of ' fro! let and :ith * a left and u9 o9en a*ute angle s It is also :ell *ountera*t the dire*tion A' of the dire*tion 'A as this distinguished set$ ut :hi*h 9resu99oses the !o.e!ent idea$ so do not is intended stri*tl? geo!etri*al Ho:e.er$ :ould e.en in this .ie: of the follo:ing ile+setting *an e *arried out and onl? the 9resentation :ill e so!e:hat *hanged ha.e to The 9roof *an result fro! the nature of the line or the dire*tion and seeing to de!onstrate else:here$ ;8 for!s$ and *ounter *$ so that this (inei !ore and !ore fro! "
a**e9ts$ then the 9ro9osition is true$ that the dire*tion of $ the dire*tion of * a99roa*hes :ithout end All this re!ains un*hanged in for*e :hen A' the ful*ru!s *o!9arison aout these rotations$ the distan*e is enlarged$ as this does not *hange the dire*tion relations Fro! oth follo:s sets that in su*h !otion$ right at the *ontinuit? su*h la?ers$ the dire*tion of a and of the sa!e dire*tion a99roa*h :ithout end$ :hi*h dire*tl? fro! the *onte!9lation of the Lgure e.ident to In other :ords$ the dire*tion of eualit? sa!e identis*h+ Dire*tion is the li!it of the dire*tion of a and of :ithout a99roa*hing end No:$ if the linear extensions of a and also fro! this interse*tion p interse*t so!e:here$ so !ust un+ indire*tl? autting se*tions are the sa!e$ the? !ust also a99roa*hing identi*al +Sa!e dire*tion :ithout end$ so *an not a *onstant angle and dire*tion dieren*e of C ' 08 q$ ie$ the !axi!u! 9ossile dire*tional di.ersit?$ ha.e un*hanged
sin*e t:o straight lines *an onl? e in one dire*tion and relationshi9 sin*e the dire*tion of the adMa*ent se*tions % is identi*al to the Dire*tion of the A and ' adMa*ent se*tions This is the "t:o+ fold as?!9toti* triangle "of h?9eroli* geo!etr? and thus thereof$ 9ro.ided that the su! of angles less than t:o triangle !a? e rights$ as de!onstrated i!9ossile /Z Thus a99lies solel? Eu*lidean geo!etr?$ :hi*h all sets a 9riori true and a9odi*ti*all? are *ertain In the Leld of !athe!ati*al ti!e$ :e Lnd the follo:ing i!!ediatel? *ertain insights> / Ti!e is a one+di!ensional *on+ *ontinuu! K The ti!e runs e!sinnig$ ie there is onl? one transition fro! earlier to later$ ut not .i*e .ersa 1 Dis*onne*t the ti!ings Q The logi*al or relations theoreti*al fra!e:or of this e.iden*e is ? its s9e*iL* *ontent inde9endentl? #et the! set C ' tae dire*tions routes$ nu!ers$ *olors
or sounds in the sa!e relationshi9 of eualit? + to di.ersit? and stead? Nheras stand$ and *an e rea*hed in the sa!e :a? to a for! after sa!e result Those ans:ers also sho: that the !o.e!ent$ so the idea of ti!e$ is not essential for our 9roof$ e*ause e.en nu!ers C ' *an not e in the !o.e ti!e The !o.e!ent ser.es us onl? for si!9ler and shorter ex9ression in 9la*e of the seuen*e of dire*tions Q0\X\ et*$ et:een :hi*h a *ontinuous o.er+ gang is + The alleged 9roof of un9ro.ailit? the Lfth 9ostulate of Eu*lid an d the *ontradi*tionX E STRENGTH of non+Eu*lidean geo!etries has een usual asi* *on*e9ts and 9rin*i9les 9rereuisite to eing the :a?$ :hat the "s9heri*al s9a*e" refers to the set of single line through t:o 9oints ignored ? ta*it agree!ent He o!itted :hen another 'asi* *on*e9t of the 9ure$ sensuous intuition i!!ediatel? taes$ the$ although e.er?one is fa!iliar :ith$ not used in the s*hool geo!etr?$ na!el? the the dire*tion Also lose the 9roof of the (iders9ru*hslosig*it not +eulidi+ rule geo!etries ? re*?*ling the sa!e to the *ontradi*tion of
Arith!eti* *ourse an? .alidit?$ if the for!er in the lighting of a *on*e9t 9ro.ides that as dire*tion no siCe ter! The non+Eu*lidean geo!etr? is Thus geo!etr? after the eli!ination of sense 9er*e9tion$ a ind of in*o!9lete settled or !utilated geo!etr? 6 ;/ 4eitstre*eil fro! :hat !athe!ati*al #arge elongs 6 The ti!e #ie the roo! li!itless ; There is a *lear and general+ .alid GlC at dierent 9la*es + The latter *an e in the follo:ing ex9lain nature> let us su99ose the one leg of a re*tilinear Angle rotated against the other$ then !eet :hen oth *oin*ide$ the t:o euidistant 9roMe*ting fro! the a9ex 9oints the t:o ar!s si!ultaneousl? #ie:ise$ if t:o eual Angle in the :a? are !o.ed to:ards ea*h other$ that t:o of the legs al:a?s *oin*ide and extend the other t:o 9arallel$
!eet t:o of the a9exes euidistant 9roMe*ting Points of the 9arallel legs at the sa!e ti!e$ and the sa!e is true of the end9oints of t:o euall? long distan*es that *o!9ared to a straight line are !o.ed together see 9 ;2 ao.e$ Referen*e 7$ 9 /7 This !athe!ati*al tales GlC is "asolutel?"$ ie *learl? a 9riori e.ident and of inLnite #i*her e!9hasis of his a**ura*? It *an not e "redeLned" and re9la*e aritraril? ? another :ithout ha.ing :ith geo!etri* Truths falls into deadl? *oni*t Of i!9ortan*e is further that fro! these si!9le *on*urren*? re*ords that :a? easil? in a single axio! *an e su!!ariCed$ the so+*alled Set the 9arallelis! hologra! of s9eeds the addition theore! of the "*lassi*" Ph?si*s *an e 9ro.ed that the? therefore in addition to the rates of geo!etr? the foundation of the :hole 9ure ine!ati*s su*ient :hi*h Thus lie:ise$ as :ell as the 9ure and &au!+ ti!e tea*hing$ a s*ien*e is a 9riori %o!!unit? of a9odi*ti* nature
No: it is for the 9h?si*ist ut aout the 9la*e and Sha9e of real oMe*ts and ti!e of real e.ents e deter!ined ? !easure!ent and it raises the uestion$ :hi*h guarantee is that the !eters used ? hi!$ the *o!9asses$ s*ales$ !easure rulers$ ea!s and honor "right"$ ie that the? a*tuall? #i*h rigid or straight are deli!it or eual stret*hes of ti!eW This of *ourse *an not e itself again ? !easure!ents of ordinar? #i*her ind identif?$ ut nor 9resu99ose readil? is Under these *ir*u!stan*es an aritrariness deLnition of !easuring instru!ents e.en 9ossile W No:$ as far as the roo! Lrst$ then ")easure *orre*tl?" here ha.e no other !eaning than that as a !easuring instru!ents used 9h?si*al lines and 9h?si*al lines de9artures *learl? the *oin*iden*es in the *o!!uni*ations :ith the! fro! *onstru*tions and o.erla?s the de!anded ? the geo!etr? of straight lines and derten *oin*iden*es *orres9ond in e.er? 9arti*ular *ase 'e*ause there is onl? one
a 9riori *ertain geo!etr? and 9h?si*s and 9h?si*al )easure!ent Hegt ased on the geo!etri* re9resentation of s9a*e and !ust underlie the!$ the? therefore *an not *ontradi*tor? s In short> !ore a9art softening 9h?si*al line *an go nor ? the sa!e t:o 9oints as 9re*isel? the 9ure Geo!etr?$ e*ause the? are to e realiCed and geo!etri* Qust no: The sa!e a99lies to the 9h?si*al 9ath Ex9erien*e has sho:n that arises ;K out$ so that the deLned 9h?si*al line and stret*hing at the sa!e ti!e are ex*ellent in *ausal relationshi9$ it is the solid od? under *onstant *onditions of te!9erature$ the train$ 9ressure$ et* and the light ra?s in ho!ogeneous !edia to :hi*h no lateral Inuen*es a*t -er? 0$ 9 /88 Ho:e.er$ *an e$ if ?ou 9urel? !athe!ati*al thining$ !ae the oMe*tion that the so deLned rigid 'od? and 9h?si*al lines in their transfer to another
Pla*e *alled "Una!iguous stead? 9oint transfor!ations 6 6 suMe*t *ould$ :ould thus stret*h and end :ithout ? this a *hange of the oser.ed *oin*iden*es e.er etra? 9h?si*ists ut *onsidered+radi*all?$ su*h an assu!9tion of a *auseless %hange or :e asi*all? fore.er hidden *auses and For*es a !ost fantasti* h?9othesis and !ere !athe!ati*al Fi*tion And if :e su*h highl? i!9roale assu!9tions aiehnen and in their 9la*e the to all our other natural no: !ost 9ut #iel?$ :e do so not J..iU+ Irli*h S o :ith i!9lies our deLnition of s9atial !easuring instru+ !ente at est a h?9othesis of a .er? high 9roailit?$ the? ut re!ains free of an? aritrariness Regarding the deLnition of "*lo*$ there is !eant the for!al Possiilit? the duration of under to follo:ing the sa!e 9ro*edures Alie either eual or uneual !athe!ati*al
*lassif? stret*hes of ti!e If :e do the latter$ so resulting a**elerations or - erC=gerungen of sa!e o9erations Alie and :e should all a* in this F either on the 9rin*i9le of su*ient reason *learl? the 9eriod of 9h?si*al - orgnge :ai.e or i!agine$ that these a**elerations and - erC=gerungen ha.e a reason in us hidden *auses and for*es (e 9ro*eed ? no reasonal? aritrar?$ if :e *onsistentl? to the 9rin*i9le of su*ient reason hold and on the other hand su*h hidden$ the ( in eltalauf all in the sa!e :a? e.er?:here a**elerating or retarding reMe*t inuen*es as fantasti* and highl? unliel? :hat :e *an do the sa!e 9leas as in the Defor!ations in s9a*e Thus$ the *lo* *an e in aritrar? free !anner deLned as a !e*hanis! :hi*h ? itself$ ie the natural o:$ sa!e o9erations Alie ga9s stringing together ? the initial *onditions again
itself !anufa*tures Ho:e.er$ the !easure!ent of the ti!e of e.ents reuires not onl? the "%lo* 66 at the sa!e 9la*es$ ut" *lo*s 66 at dierent lo*ations$ :hi*h Sho: the sa!e ti!e$ that the s?n*hronis! Ho: *an the GlC deter!ined ? !easure!entW Assu!ing that the !otion of a od? desolate the 9ro9agation of a signal is *arried fro! A to ' under :ell sa!e *onditions as fro! ' to A or fro! A to p or % to D if A' ! A% + %D$ so she needs in these :a?s for the sa!e ti!e and thus deter!ines the GlC at dierent 9la*es ;1 -er? 7$ 9 6Z / This :e alread? no: efore :e !easure fro! the *he:ing sal9rinCi9 and :e use this no:ledge to !easure MX C A Sound signal C$ as deter!ined :ith no :ind and all sa!e 9ro9ortionalit? Nissen the te!9erature$ air 9ressure$ et* the GlC at all euidistant fro! the 9oint of sti*ing 9oints To exa!ine$ although the
*ausal *onditions are the sa!e$ on the one+:a? A' !ore Ti!e than on the other A%$ the od? or training :ould reitungs.organg at one end 9oints or at one of t:o sa!e+ A far fro! 9roMe*ting 9oints a greater instantaneous .elo*it? and thus ha.e a greater ineti* energ? than the other$ C ' here *an *lose an ele*tri*al *ir*uit$ there is not Out sa!e *auses *ould thus arise uneual ee*ts :hat after & ausal9rinCi9 is i!9ossile Sin*e the sa!e *onditions on the sa!e long distan*es are 9ossile or an inLnite a99roxi!ation to it$ so is the "asolute 6 and una!iguous GlC 9ossile at .arious lo*ations #i*h or an inLnite a99roxi!ation to the sa!e$ in fa*t e.en efore (e !easure and irres9e*ti.e of the t?9e of !easure!ent The 9h?si*al GlC So Must lie the 9ure !athe!ati*al GlC ne*essar? *learl?$ uni.ersal and deter!ined ? the thing itself$ and therefore not aritraril? e Lxed and not "u!deLnierar 66 K
It !ust$ ho:e.er$ for 9ra*ti*al reasons of !easure!ent a**ura*? GlC e deter!ined ? light or ele*tri*al signals (e !ae No: that it is a s?ste! a**e9tan*e in e.er? 9la*e a roo! and onl? one it is !o.ed relati.e to the 9osition o**u9ied or stationar?$ ased on :hi*h the .a*uu! and$ after eli!ination all of the !atter aout outgoing inuen*es the light at all 'e*ause sa!e re9rodu*ti.e *onditions$ and *onseuentl? the sa!e GE rate has$ and *all it a resting i!ther S?ste! 1 Further :e assu!e that a *ontra*tion of the rigid od? in its notiL*ation !o.e!ent through the ether no one rode Fro! t:o assu!9tions and the negati.e results of )i*hels on +-ersu*hs :ell as in the 9re.ious *orres9onding (ra99ed s9a*eti!e axio!s and 9rin*i9les of s9a*e +Ceitli*hen !etri* Es9e*iall? the theor? of the )i*hels on+- ersu*hs needed$ follo:ing the ao.e / This GlC is deter!ined ? a signal fro! an inLnitel? high s9eed GlC logi*all? eui.alent
' This oMe*ti.e uniue GlC E.en if the? are not !easured ? e.ents and *ould e deter!ined :ith 9roailit?$ refuted the RTH$ at least 9ro.ided that it !aintains :ith H Rei*hena*h$ that the transition of !o.ing slo: P) "? itself and :ithout an? hu!an inter.ention" o**urs This leads na!el? *orres9onding -oi*e arrange!ent to that 9er*e9tile things or e.ents that in a S?ste! are *ontinuousl? 9resent or 9ro*eed fro! one to the !o.ing s?ste! of .ie:$ no longer exist or ne.er o**ur see FIG 1$ $ S ;K$ 2$ / 1 The ado9tion of the ether as the ho!ogeneous !ediu! of light :a.es *an au indu*tion a99ointed$ na!el? generaliCation of the oser.ations of other Y Eiienhe:egungen footing as in solids$ liuids and gases to in soft f all :e the !ediu! of :a.e !otion sensual tangile in !ind ha.e and the *onstan*? of the .elo*it? relati.e to (eil ho!ogeneous !ediu! *an oser.e dire*tl? The indu*tion$ ho:e.er$ is not an aritrar? 9rin*i9le ;6
guided GlC +StCen It follo:s that the ether s?ste! at the surfa*e lo: or *o!9letel? at rest$ at least at the translational !o.e!ent Earth taes 9art 1 The no: ne*essar? ex9lanation of Fixste!aerration I ha.e 9re.iousl? gi.en -er? K$ 6$ ;$ it is ased on the assu!9tion that the inertia of the light energ? in *on.ersion of light in the ether of others !o.ing state The total of the original :a.e theor? de!anded *hange in dire*tion is dela?ed or *an*els K These three dri.es too no !eans aritrar? *onditions or sti9ulations and the? are *onne*ted :ith the o99osite assu!9tion not in 9rin*i9le on the sa!e le.el Rather$ the? are real h?9otheses$ assu!9tions aout a: ah rs*heinli*hes eha.ior that in 9rin*i9le$ that at su*ientl? tested ad.an*ed deli*a*? of oser.ation ? ex9eri!ent *an e 1 Sin*e the )i*hels on +- esee*h sho:s that the ether of EarthJs surfa*e rests or its !o.e!ent relati.e to the earth far re!ains elo: the oser.ation a**ura*?$ so it is ne*essar? for in.estigation
After the result of the ex9eri!ent ? )i*helson and Gale !ust e other neh!eEt that the etheri* en.elo9e of the Earth does not 9arti*i9ate in the dail? rotation of the earth (hat :ith the assu!9tion that the ether is s!oothl? and onl? ? gra.it? at the EarthJs surfa*e is read held$ is in agree!ent It does not see! i!9ossile$ hei i!9ro.ed - ersu*hsanordnung after Trouton ?et to further in*rease Nole oser.ation a**ura*? and ado9ted to the surfa*e at the euator 61 ! se* to dete*t relati.e !otion of the ether$ :here? the RTH :ould refute the aundan*e ex9eri!entall? (e :ant this *ru*ial ex9eri!ent ringing here? 9ro9osed K This assu!9tion also has the a99ro.al of a 9h?si*ist fro! the Range P #enard found that his h?9othesis that a s9e*ial sustan*e$ :hi*h he *alls "Urther" should tae the lead of the light in the *ase of aerration$ re*entl? aandoned see!s to ha.e See SitC+'er Heidel A D ($ /0K0$ 2 Ahhandl K/ 1 An atte!9t to dete*t the ether s?ste! is deLned in Note /$ 9age ;0$ 9re+ eaten + (hat is the length *ontra*tion :ithin the !eaning of #orentC hi!self is *on*erned$
Also *onsider these as a result of its aliated defor!ation of the earthJs surfa*e and Polh=hen+ *hanging the 9rin*i9le Erdorte oser.ale$ if it is 9resent$ as %our.oisiers sho:n has Astr )sg KK$ 9 K6/ Ho:e.er$ these tests still need to e In.estigation and :e therefore elie.e the length *ontra*tion until further noti*e as unliel? liel? ahlehnen allo:ed to Ho:e.er$ it is theoreti*all? interesting to note that e.en :ith 9re+ handensein a length *ontra*tion !o.e!ent of the ether s?ste! and thus the GlC *ould e deter!ined oMe*ti.el?$ :hat is often o.erlooed + A ut onl? as Gedanenex9eri!ent 9ossile deter!ination of the state of !otion of the star thers? and thus the oMe*ti.e GlC$ regardless of the ado9tion of a length *ontra*tion *an e a**o!9lished in the follo:ing :a?> ou *onne*t three rods in the !anner of re*tangular s?ste! of axes :ith ea*h other$ 9ut in the interse*tion of the sa!e one #ight sour*e and at the sa!e distan*e on the rods of six fro! the light sour*e Points 9er a highl? sensiti.e a99aratus$ the intensit? of light radiation
)easure Ku allo:ed It is *lear that onl? the sa!e intensit? at all six 9oints !a? e 9resent :hen the a99aratus is in the ether s?ste! rests$ and ?ou *an iterate Tr? Lnd out in :hi*h of !utuall? !o.ing inertial This Instead 9la*e This thought ex9eri!ent 9resu99oses no other ine!ati* set as the fa*t that the light !o.ing in a gi.en s?ste!$ the "ether S?ste!"$ ? all dire*tions is the sa!e$ and therefore refutes the *lai! that it is not onl? is te*hni*all?$ ut in 9rin*i9le i!9ossile that GlC to deter!ine :ithout a :el+ [rli*he Lxing deLnition of the sa!e or an? other aritrar? ine!ati* Postulate 9refa*e s H Rei*hena*h iid + Aout astrono!i*al !easure!ents$ :hi*h allo: to *onsider the third assu!9tion$ s -er? 6 and ;$ ;; !ent of GlC at the surfa*e ? light signals until no: none %orre*tion *arr?ing the Ether!o.e!ent ill And sin*e our all *onditions 9artl? a 9riori true state!ents$ 9artl? h?9otheti*al Assu!9tions$ no aritrariness *an also in*lude in the F olgerungen
e and is thus in the !anner indi*ated$ the 9resent for our &no:ledge liel? GlC deter!ined in aritrar? free !anner 'ut this !aes the aritrar? Lxing of GlC su9eruous$ ?es illi*it and the Lrst and fore!ost reuire!ent of RTH is :ell :ith as their nt9 V [o. i9s.dog dete*ted Or !a?e should Einstein dis*o.ered ? hi! relati.e and 9erha9s una!iguous GlC the!sel.es ha.e not understood$ nor the authoriCed ? the inter9reters of his tea*hingW ( it ould e in*on*ei.ale$ that e.en Einstein GlC is not aritrar? ut h?9otheti*all? or as a state!ent aout the 9roale 9h?si*al and real GlC at least *an e thought ofW Fro! :hat :e ha.e alread? done fro! sho:s that this is i!9ossile and the dis*o.erer of the relati.e GlC this has Mudged rightl? Sin*e$ as sho:n$ oth the !athe!ati*al and 9h?si*al$ of the !easure!ent 9re.ious GlC on+ is *learl? and asolutel?$ the? *an not 9ossil? ahrs*heinli*heit :ith ( as
are deter!ined relati.e and a!iguous Indeed$ e.en if the 9h?si*al GlC in fa*t$ *ould e Lxed onl? aritrar?$ ut this does not true$ :ould Einstein GlC reMe*t For i!agination of ti!e and GlC :e 9ossess efore their !easure!ent and the A 9rereuisite of the !easure!ent$ *an not e *an*eled ? !easuring and e eli!inated and :ould also at the aritrar? Lxing the GlC for 9ur9oses of !easure!ent i!9eriousl? de!anding *onsideration )ention should es9e*iall? not that the RTH :ith the true *on*e9t of 9h?si*al !o.e!ent is in*o!9atile The !o.e!ent an oMe*t or the rest of an oMe*t or *oordinate s?ste! is as !eaningless as the oM eti . and *onsidered 9h?si*all? U9 and do:n$ right and left$ and is onl? the sensile *o!9arison ans*hauli*hung The true 9h?si*al *on*e9t of !otion is the the distan*e and 9osition *hange Ph?si*al as !athe!ati*al des*ri9tion !o.e!ent is a relationshi9 et:een t:o or !ore arti*les$
as :ell as C ' "'rudersein" a relationshi9 et:een t:o or !ore Persons -er? 2$ 99 0 et se 16 and The assertion of RTH$ a !o.ing *lo*J! al:a?s slo:er than an eual *rafted dor!ant$ *an not e su99ressed fro! ge and ? sheer distan*e *hange is on a 9ar :ith the assertion that a right+!ost ear go al:a?s slo:er than a lo*ated on the left Not e.en as a :el+ [rli*he Lxing or *onseuen*e of su*h :ould e su*h a :el*o!e as it indeed has nothing to Ph?si*al OMe*t E.en :orse ut$ :hen the ears of the RTH "? itself :ithout hu!an inlet do "so to eha.e / + + in*o!9rehensile it is :hen See SH Rei*hena*h$ axio!ati* of Eansteins*hen s9a*eti!e tea*hing /0K6 S 78th ; Ex9eri!ents in.ents to alleged the *onseuen*es of ?et #i*h aritrar? GlC *he* deLnition C ' the transitional slo:do:n the !o.ing *lo* as "trans.erse Do99ler+ee*t" ItJs nothing
another$ as if so!eone "Lr!l? set" aritrar?$ in front of hi! stationar? .essel e in*luded /;61 (heat grains and then it :anted to !ae re*ount if itJs true Unfortunatel?$ these Ex9eri!ents *an not e exe*uted$ sin*e the? reuire a !easuring a**ura*?$ the has not ?et een a*hie.ed (hat strange uirs 9hiloso9h? of relati.it? theorist Ceitigt$ is also a99arent fro! the follo:ing> The ti!e seuen*e of sa!e 9la*e$ although an i!!ediatel? gi.en$ of H ri*h + a*h "deLned /" "$ na!el?>" Is E K the ee*t of E /0 is as E K later than _ r This is the to9ologi*al assign!ent DeLnition of ti!ing " Philoso9her ie the s9a*e+ti!e tea*hing$ S // )a99ing deLnitions are 'ut ho: Rei*hena*h e!9hasiCes re9eatedl?$ aritrar? Lxed tions "The? are lie all deLnitions aritraril? of their *hoi*e onl? de9ends on the s?ste! of *on*e9ts$ :hi*h is rea*ted :ith 9rogression of ER+ no:ledgeale re*ei.esJ "iid$ 9 K1 A**ordingl?$ it :ould therefore an aritrar?
Deter!ining that the ee*t is later than the asso*iated *ause and %ontrar? "9rin*i9le ha.e the sa!e"X The *onseuen*es of this t?9e of 9hiloso9h? are trul? outrageous %onsider$ for Exa!9le$ to the Qusti*e %an ?ou tolerate that defendants due to a :el+ [rli*hen Lxing :ere *on.i*ted and senten*ed still e*o!e W Innu!erale 9ro*esses in :hi*h .eriLed due to a Aliis a*uittal :as !ade or due to the te!9oral a**ess *ontext rele.ant e.iden*e to *on.i*t$ :ould ui*l? e re.isedX E.er? so *on.i*ted *ould *iting the RTH at least sta? of exe*ution reuest to the uestion is s*ientiL*all? *lariLed (hat the la: sa? learned :hat sa?s the Su9re!e %ourt on thisW An a*ade!i* uestion for as9iring relati.it? theorists$ it :ould also$ as :ith the o99osite Lxing a self+ !urder is 9ossile %an a dead !an 9ut his !ind to ill hi!self and ring hi! to 9erfor!W
Regarding the general RTH$ as :as rie? noted that it is asolutel? un! =gli*h$ a gra.itational Leld as a relati.e$ "%o.ariant 6 ter! aufCufas s s An unreal gra.itational Leld a!li*h :ould nonsense$ a real ut *an not e relati.e e*ause a relati.e realit? is lie:ise nonsense 1 Further$ the general RTH alread? reMe*ted for the reason that$ as sho:n$ a non+ Eu*lidean geo!etr? is a 9riori i!9ossile$ so do not for! the 9h?si*al 1 The sa!e argu!ent !ust also against the relati.it? and re*i9ro*it? the 9h?si*al !o.e!ent are .oig*ra*ht in heri*= !Cnli*hen .ie: 'ie 9h?si*al !o.e!ent$ it :as *onsidered onl? ine!ati* or d?na!i*$ !ust ris "in.ariant"$ d$ inde9endentl? Qu u9 the *oordinate s?ste! or referen*e od? e taen as solel? for the !utual distan*e and 9osition *hange a99lies -er? 2 ;7 sh? *an e a realit? / It !ust also e e!9hasiCed that the
Ne:tonian d?na!i*s not the notion of asolute s9a*e in the Ne:tonian sense 9resu99oses rather of this inde9endent no:ledge theoreti*all? *orre*t !anner *an e *arried for:ard$ so ?ou not 9ushed u9 to the de*ision of asolute s9a*e or RTH sees as the latter is usuall? so 9la*ed on the 9art of the trailer -er? 2$ 9 16 K See D - > / "On the *os!i* !o.e!ents of the ether"$ N atur:issens*haft+ #i*he :eel? .ol K8$ 9 101$ /0K/ + K "Aout uestions of the aerration and light + 9ro9agation "$ iid -ol K/$ 9 K8$ /0KK + 1" A ne: *lo* 9aradox \ iid -ol K/$ 9 607$ /0KK + 6 "aerration and the )i*helson ex9eri!ent$" astrono!er After+ Mudge -ol K/7$ No ;K81$ /0KK + ; "Re!ars to the light 9ro9agation in !o.ing Ether "$ iid -ol KKK$ No ;1/7$ /0K6 + " (here does the RTH " %riti*al loading siderations fro! 9h?si*al and e9iste!ologi*al 9oint of .ie: Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /0K1 + 7 "Ree*tions on the ti!e and ti!eee9ing" Ph?sia X Ti!e"
)agaCine$ ?ear of irth K;$ 9 80 + /7$ /0K6 + 2 "Is gra.it? relati.eW" %riti*al Ree*tions on relati.is! in the latest 9h?si*s )a*lot$ &arlsruhe /0K + 0 "Relati.it? and #ogi*"$ Annals of Philoso9h?$ -ol 7$ Issue K u 1 /0K2 Professor Dr ( (A#TE HA)'URG SO)E O'QE%TIONS AGAINST EINSTEIN THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT / EinsteinJs assu!9tion that the .a*uu! s9eed of light *onstant is$ *ontrar? to the hitherto generall? a**e9ted 9rin*i9le that :hen t:o s9eeds a and on a !ass at an angle a are trans!itted si!ultaneousl?$ this to+e to a resultant sa!!ensetCen :hose !agnitude and dire*tion ? the diagonal of fro! the 9arallelogra! t:o s9eeds for!ed is deter!ined (hen a light ea! :ith the !o.ing around the sun to+earth *ollides and is ree*ted there?$ so sti* to the su99ort of #ight$ the ele*tron$ t:o s9eeds$ the ree*ted
#ight and the ne:l? added ? the !otion of the earth His arri.al a*uisition :ould e *orre*t onl? if this diagonal is al:a?s the sa!e siCe deate ho: the .a*uu! s9eed 9erfor!ing *o!9onent This ut found onl? in the ex*e9tional *ase instead if *os K R + ■ ix Ka J (here (hat good are all the "Gaussian *oordinate" :hen Gauss hi!self sa?s> "There is suering no dout that those i!9ossiilit? f.on triangles :hose ( inelsu!!e /28 8 ex*eeded in*reases to 9ro.e the!sel.es to the stri*test lea.es "(ors$ -ol 2$ 99 /2$ /76$ /08 Thus *an 9ro.e the i!9ossiilit? of general RTH "rigorousl?" ? gauss e*o!e X The alleged e!9iri*al *onLr!ations of general RTH through Oser.ation lie 9artl? not 9ro9erl? efore red shift$ so!eti!es the? do not agree
:ith the e!9iri*all? deter!ined a!ount su*ient agree!ent Perihelah:ei*hung of )er*ur? so!eti!es the? *an *asuall? another Erlrun g Y light dee*tion on Sox!enrand Fro! a 9ro9er e!9iri*al %onLr! *lothes :hi*h$ in*identall?$ at a e9iste!ologi*al theoreti*all? i!9ossile theor? is ruled out$ sin*e it is al:a?s dierent Inter9retations exist *an therefore e no uestion ;2 is the s!aller rate$ ie ka 'efore he therefore his H?9othesis dared$ he :ould ha.e to 9ro.e the ao.e senten*e as in*orre*t ha.e to This e.iden*e is la*ing so far K Is this :ell+no:n senten*e still .alid$ so is the )i*helson ex9eri!ent :ith the 9re.ious ideas :ithout an? di*ulties to !e!ershi9 of ex9laining ho: in the oo> (alte$ "strength and energ?" Otto Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig$ no //8$ 9 /1K is set Then falls for single+ stone the onl? o**asion on$ the su99l? hi! to 9re9are his theor? has anlat The #orentC h?9othesis is thus done as other
:at*hing 1 Fro! his for!ula for tf *on*ludes Einstein that of t:o and for exa*tl? the sa!e setting *lo*s one :hen it rises at the North Pole is ased$ is faster than the other$ if this is on a 9oint the euator is$ and this is e*ause the 9ole rests$ on the other hand the Euatorial 9oint$ on*e e.er? K6 hours to rotate aout the axis of the earth The For!ula for\ J9resu99oses that x and . ha.e the sa!e dire*tion are the dire*tions are dierent$ *an e fro! onl? the 9roMe*tion onto the . Dire*tion of x eligile 'ut x$ the .ie: of the oser.er at the 9ole to the euator$ and .$ the :a? of the euator 9oint u9$ are 9er9endi*ular to ea*h other$ then the 9roMe*tion of . to x is eual to Cero$ So t ]] t Thus Einstein :rong fro! his o:n for!ula %on*lusion dra:n 6 In the for!ula for t J*an . and x and o99osite dire*tion ha.e oligations then .x is negati.e$ and + + K + 9ositi.e$ then !uH tf greater
% in t$ :hile it should al:a?s e s!aller ? Einstein ; Fro! t:o to e exa*tl? the sa!e *ontinuous :at*h is lo*ated$ the a a* at the North Pole$ the other on the euator in an after GE south tra.eling *ourse$ the !inute hand on oth the east oriented so that their ti9s !o.e south A! Pol is the I , , S9eed of the 9ointer ti9 + at the euator et:een these t:o s9eeds$ a dieren*e$ at least a**ording to in9ut stone$ exist ut he !ust e .er? s!all$ e*ause this s9eed liailities !easured ? the! ti!es !ust e 9ro9ortional$ this ut ha.ing su*h a s!all dieren*e a**ording to Einstein that he ? our !ost sensiti.e instru!ents *an not e deter!ined Then is through estalish!ent of EinsteinJs .alues for x Jand tJ
otained an euation that after due redu*tion in t * ex*eeded goes The s9eed of the 9ointer ti9 of the !inute hand in the P! at the North Pole is then nearl? the s9eed of light 'ut that is nonsense ;0 Fro! his F unda!entalfor!ein 9asses Einstein euation ago> and *on*ludes that$ sin*e the deno!inator right s!all than /$ x ^ + x JK greater than xx + x is K$ that therefore ha.e a length in ruhen+ the s?ste! re*ei.es an in*rease in length in the !o.ing s?ste!$ so a 'od? a od? gro:th gains This gro:th$ ho:e.er$ is a %hange the state of nature *onne*ted su*h is :ithout *o!9arison storage not of energ? 9ossile$ at least as long as the energ? + 9rin*i9le is re*ogniCed as *orre*t 'e*ause :hen energ? is neither disa99ear It *an not e *reated$ a *hange in the nature *an onl? *aused ? relo*ation of energ? and the onl?
The reason for the latter is the dieren*e et:een the le.el of height Energ? at adMa*ent 9oints$ *ou9led :ith the 9ursuit of ea*h Energ? to eli!inate the dieren*e in le.el Thus is the in9ut fro! steins for!ulas deri.ed enlarge!ent of a od? :ithout energ? ex9enses :ith the energ? 9rin*i9le in o99osition Dr RUDO#F (EIN)ANN 'ER#IN S9e*ial relati.it? The insu*ient reason + the false assu!9tion + The asurd *onseuen*es + The other o9tions A theor? :hi*h *lai!s to e *on.erted our :hole :orld.ie: Cugestalten under$ ad!ittedl?X$ outrageous i!9ositions on our thining and :ai.ing an? .i.idness$ has a*hie.ed *reased oligation to de!onstrate their need ? all others$ easier :a?s turns o and the *o!9elling reason for its for!ation 9ro.es
Neither *an the s9e*ial RTH The reason is> )i*hels on+ atte!9t "*ontradi*tion et:een this and the FiCeau +Tr?$ !aintaining the *lassi*al relati.it? 9rin*i9le in *onne*tion :ith the 9re+relati.isti* la: of &onstanC the s9eed of light This rise$ *on*rete+o9ti*al in his Nature itself in grotesue dis9ro9ortion to Gesa!t:eltild+ re!odeling$ not holding stit*h and does not lead to Einstein *hen o asolute *onstan*? of the s9eed of light$ the *ore and a*tual *ontent of the s9e*ial RTH$ :ith this$ that the relati.e .ation of s9a*e and ti!e$ stands or falls / The )i *h el son + - esee*h 9ro.es :ith or :ithout ado9ting a Ether$ under all *ir*u!stan*es 'onding of light 9ro9agation :ith the !o.e!ent of the *elestial od? ground$ ut not :ith intra+terrestrial S?ste!s rail:a? (OU#D %HOOSE et* A )i*helson - esee*h latter not a.ailaleX + And *an not exist 'e*ause o!is*her :ith 9horon
E.iden*e is arianC ? %onstan*e d # to ( elt=r9ern ]] * 8 to !o.ing s?ste!s on *elestial odies ] * . *onditionall? A and sa!e !o.ing 9oint *an not e dierent !o.ing 9oints ha.e the sa!e .elo*it? A 9ar un Exe*utale GE Than ?ou X '? the :a?$ :h? tr? the relati.it? theoreti*al 9h?si*ists not last the + *ertainl? arguale Must for the! + ex9eri!ental tellen 9roof of asolute *onstan*? d # ? )i*helson - esee*h in train or 9laneW X K The FiCeau - esee*h *onLr!ed the )i*helson ex9eri!ent$ instead to *ontradi*t hi!> he also 9ro.es the *onstant d # to Tue regardless of the !o.ing !edia :ater$ air et* &onstanC to the Lxed to the tue Earth s?ste!$ ie he s9eas + e.en if one *lings to the air:a.es + not for rest$ ut onl? for resting the earth ether$ lie the )i*helson
Atte!9t And he !aes it *lear that a )i*helson ex9eri!ent ased on intra underground !o.e!ent * :ould not su99l? us 1 The 9rin*i9le of relati.it? :ithin itself *onstan*? of natural ae*tion for ea*h 9arent s?ste!$ ut ex9ressl? -arian*e of s9eed to *oordinate s?ste!s / The "Natural e.ents is not in our *ase$ the s9eed of a and the sa!e light ea! or 9ointHo9e ut the s9eed of light This is *onstant :ith res9e*t to the s?ste!$ the light that + + D?na!i*X + #istening> earth$ :orld od? Proof of Must )i*helson and FiCeau tr?X The single light ea! 9oint ho:e.er$ de9ending on *onstant or .ariant Einstein lined 9urel? !athe!ati*al and$ !ore generall?$ a light !o.e!ent :ith all aritrar? *oordinate s?ste!s$ :ithout this as real + ao.e or siling + od? s?ste!s to dier (hat !aes S9a*e and ti!e to the *o!9utational a99roa*h sae its uniue loading
:as losing Must lie :hen one and the sa!e sound$ ?ing ird$ dri.ing *ar et* 9ut *onstant at dierent !o.ing odies$ instead of a single sound$ et*$ raises ea*h od? Einstein the 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ :hile he at the sa!e ti!e for:ard relates + The solution *an onl? e> (hen light$ e.en starlight :orld =r9errt o99osite + onl? this *an e after :hat has een said a*t + under all *ir*u!stan*es is *onstant$ so :ill %lea.age$ Di.ision of the light distriution of the light ea!s on the in enor!ous distan*es fro! one another and not in eli!inator ungs+ loose translation as e!an!ent and train lo*ated in the :orld od? the :a? 9la*e that it :as in their !o.e!ent ea*h re*ei.ed it ? gra.it? or other:ise ? d?na!i* lining inde9endentl? of the !o.e!ent of the light sour*e This assu!9tion is su*ient in the si!9lest !anner ? the relati.eX +
SQE!ste! Ge!ein.erst$ 9 2 + S /K is the %on.erse eil *lai!s of S /1 the "dile!!a 6 / thereof stated and as + stges*haeuen sol.e this se / Dile!!as s9e*ial RTH 9ostulated / susidiarit? alone reuired and onl? 9ossile relati.e *on+ sustan*e d # If there :ere ut e.en entfernungslos e Translation et:een Hea.enl? odies$ :ould a99l? on the other side reall? * also against Train$ et*$ so :ould Must here holding on oard either of the di.ided light !ediu! or a s9lit light ea! to a**e9t Of *ourse$ :ithout this su9eruous s9a*e and 4eit.ernde+ tion Ho: sound in air :ith guide ea*h *onstant$ if not + entrain!ent .ariant s9eed !o.ing odies ha.ing These 9h?si*al h?9othesis is instead a *lear *ause and unsustantial$ !athe!ati*al L*tion a *lear *ausal 4ure*htlegung / is *o!9atile :ith an? theor? of light e.en and es9e*iall? uantu! theor?
*an + in the sense of the :hole rest of 9h?si*sX + Our la:s of thought and untou*hed our s9a*e and ti!e to the *hauung and s9ared us all asurdities eu9he!isti*all?> di*ulties of Einstein theor? na!el? ti!e dilation$ R oo! shortening$ lagging the (at*hes$ shrinage of the od? + "fro! the stand9oint of the rest Oser.er fro! further relati.it? of si!ultaneit?$ for!ation a li!it s9eed This astruse$ 9urel? !athe!ati*al *on+ seuen*es of asolute *onstan*? d # ex9ose their *ondition$ 9re*isel? this *onstan*?$ as false and i!9ossile$ therefore$ are also not to sa.e the 9ossil?$ *orre*t !athe!ati*al :a? and des*ried suggest a *o!9letel? funda!ental and senseless destru*tion of ea*h$ of *ourse union and e9iste!ologi*al$ (irli*heitsegriifes Sin*e the %hange of .ie:9oint is theoreti*all? at an? ti!e enfor*eale there existed the earth$ for exa!9le> after RTH as !an? realities on*e in all its fullness as :e no:$ at the sa!e ti!e and Must as real$
:ith an a99ro9riate *hoi*e of the oser.er *oordinate s?ste!$ as a thin Dis*$ ie .irtuall? not at all N atur:irli*heit has *eased to e a i!aginale to e a *on*ei.ale stale So!ething "The 'e :hether estee!$ 9osition 6 6 *oni*ts :ith the sense of Ph?si*s$ :ho lent the su9ernatant *ounteralan*e all .ie:9oints$ at an? stationing of oser.ers$ ai!s 'ut if one :anted the RTH another logi*$ other la:s of Thining and intuition grant + in itself an i!9ossile *o!9an? *at*h$ e*ause these la:s are ti!eless and therefore *o!9anies no *hange een + so it has res*inded the RTH itself on that deal :ith their %on*lusions and e.iden*e of generall? .alid ne*essar? to the instan*e ter! hu!an reason a99lies + to :ho! else WX Therefore> e.en if the indi*ated 9ossiilities 9ositi.e ER+ de*laration *an e *onte!9lated and the solution of rele.ant issues$ :hi*h !ust e added the + also 9urel? o9ti*al + the aerration$ Do99ler
$ ee*t et* *o!e$ Lrst o9en or other light+theoreti*al i It should e noted> The )i*helson+- esee*h$ thus a real underground o9eration$ is e it ex9lains not L*titious$ ine!ati* e.ents in the gra.it?+free Roo!X 'ut this does not ex9lain the RTH$ the? stated onl? + :rong + the result of )+- K Resear*h :ould e left if ?ou do not alread? 9resent$ non+relati.it? theoreti*al ex9lanations of great si!9li*it? :ant to a**e9t + 3 EinsteinJs solution is under all *ir*u!stan*es :ere una**e9tale GanB and *an not fro! a 9ositi.e he no:ledgeale theoreti*al !eaning of this )T' of the uestion E.en !ethodologi*all? leads aout e9iste!ologi*al no :a? of 9h?si*al oser.ation Positions The 9heno!enalis! and suMe*ti.is! ut also
e9iste!ologi*al idealis! of an? .ariet?$ has doule inMusti*e ! to see the RTH a ind of "e!9iri*al *onLr!ation 6> the 9h?si*al !etalli* ' e :hether estee!$ 9osition has nothing to do :ith the Lndings ex*eeded nistheoretis*hen referen*e s?ste! of hu!an *ons*iousness all + and Must the idealisti* e9iste!ologist !ust :ith his 9ro*lai!ed 9ri!a*? of *ons*iousness the la:s of that 9reLxing *ons*iousness an? ex9erien*e The realist is fro! For o.ious reasons$ the RTH as fro! the start as ontologi*all? reMe*t logi*all? i!9ossile The Phano!en=loge Lnall? has the 9o:er Stein relati.it? of s9a*e and ti!e as asurd$ the idea oth *ontrar?$ reMe*t + So :hat is ut the e.ents fro! :hi*h and to the *onfused *onfusing allegations of RTH :as the o**asionW #ight and light signals$ in*luded in the general *os!i* )otion ga!es ?et to a 9roal? .er? *o!9li*ated$ 9erha9s ne.er
.er? identiLale st?le$ allo: no asolute ti!e and s9a*e !easure!ents in the *os!os$ :hi*h onl? :ould e 9ossile in an asolutel? at rest Roo! o99osite asolutel? !o.ing in his odies E.en the "dor!ant Ether + + for hire$ a 9ositi.e result of the test or )iehelson+ Ex9lanation of the aerration$ or in the sense of #orentC + :ould e Lrst onl? eui.alent to one :ith the sun instead of the Earth Lr!l? *onne*ted s?ste! The *o+!o.ing :ith stati* oser.ers alone a*hie.ed the *orre*tion Needing no or readil? *orre*tale !easure!ent results$ it :as ? s*ale a99li*ation$ either ? suordinate signals :hether light$ if sound$ et* in its o:n s?ste! In light so res9e*t the earth (orld od? or on the! !o.ing od? trains$ et* The suordinated EinsteinJs 9ostulate of all odies at on*e Signal ra9ed nature and reason and *ontradi*ts itself ? the astruse *onseuen*es of astruse 9horono!is*hen *ondition
It !aes sense$ onl? the assertion of the res9e*ti.e (orld 'od? %onstan*e d # indeed$ to the suordinate signals (herefore for ea*h oser.er !o.ing "the light$ ie light ea! the rate * for Eigen:elt od? s?ste!$ ut of *ourse * + on the other hand$ !o.ing the :orld od? s?ste! :ith the sa!e !otion dire*tion of signal and od? + during :hi*h *o!o.ing oser.ers eighth for his light ea! * !easures This res9e*ti.e *onstan*? of #ight does not lead to ti!e Ra u!relati .ation$ d h To 9ursue 1 the :at*h !o.e!ent ? and for shortening of routes for the stationar? oser.er$ ut onl? at a dierent lo*ations the *lo*s ? light signals fro! a *o!!on starting 9oint fro! :hen alread? taing 9la*e !o.e!ent of s?ste!s
I!9ulseX (ith s?n*hroniCation on the asis of !utual 9ea*e *an the later onset !o.e!ent *ourse not Ee*t her argu!ent$ :hi*h alread? This :as 9re*eded ? the Einstein ?es translated Relati .it t s9rinCi9 + Einu'losigeit the unifor! loading !o.e!ent on all o9erationsX + Is i!9ossile> The *lo*s re!ain the sa!e and retain !at*hing hand 9ositions The Haunting of in9uts EinsteinJs 9aradox Cerstiet in nothing The 9ossiilit? of ? #ieht + odies signals dierent uestions !a? :at*h on :orld re!ains in the ao.e added har!less for! an idle )ind ga!e For our$ no: on*e oriented fro! Earth Astrono!? !a? ha.e no results Still less of *ourse in Einstein See for!X The alleged astrono!i*al sa:n *onLr!ations !ust e rando! or aritrar? deri.ed + e*ause it is the nature of the theor? that it not on realities *an !ae state!ent
It s9eas not 9la?ed against the s9e*ial RTH that the General RTH the! to the area of the gra.it?+free s9a*e one ore nt$ the does not exist in the real 9h?si*al :orld that the uestion of the %onstant .elo*it? of light in the general RTH *o!9letel? is forgotten + Einstein s*ien*e one :a? or the on the *lassi*$ ie the one and true and eternal 9rin*i9le of relati.it? led out The light$ the ele*trod?na!i*s oe?s this$ self+ of *ourse$ if one light !otion the *os!i* e.ents sense *lassiLes Intelle*t$ intuition$ nature *an not e diti older that * 5 . + * is That :ould onl? if * inLnite is or . inLnitel? s!all Pra*ti*all?$ itJs *onsidered *on*retel? aout as And that is :h? Einstein .irtuall? no da!age other Mudge 'ut 9ro*eedings efore the foru! of s*ien*e$ the truth dislie to insist his theor?$ * ] *i. destro?ed the !eaning of the
Nu!er and thus the sense Must of !athe!ati*s$ to :hi*h the RTH re9eatedl? in.oes (ithout Einstein and against hi! the idea of relati.it? re!ains and the relati.it? 9rin*i9le untou*hed$ ut ?ou f [hr s not lie at hi! aout the asolute *onstan*? of the s9eed of light to the asolute %haos See D - "- esee*h a deLniti.e refutation of the s9e*ial RTH ( Hill+ !an$ #ei9Cig /0K + + "Anti Einstein uintessential" ar*hi.e f s?ste! Philoso9h?$ -ol 18$ Issue 1 and 6 + "The asurdit? and the su9eruit? of s9e*ial RTH 6$ Annals # Philoso9h? /0K0$ -ol 2$ Issue / u K + "The in*onsisten*? of s9e*ial RTH "$ Nature u %ulture in /018$ K7 ?ear of irth$ Nr 6$ 6 GEORG (ENDE# #I ER %IT East Prussia 1; THESES RESIST THE STONE ON #INGERIE THEOR OF RE#ATI-IT
/ R e foundations on :hi*h Einstein uilds on its RTH$ are highl? 9role!ati* nature He taes so!e errors elderl? 9h?si*ist sier or !athe!ati*ians readil? as fa*ts and uild a Theor? on gi.ing :ithout an? reasonale grounds It re9resents onl? allegations So he a**e9ted the four+di!ensional lea s9a*e$ an idea that Rie!ann and H El!holt ! one !ust sa? on*e had in their :eaest hours$ :hile a four+di!ensional s9a*e *an ne.er e Fro! !erel? notional ti.e 9ossiilit? that this is not e.en$ it !aes a fa*t As :ell he a**e9ted the errors of non+Eu*lidean geo!etr?$ :here it !erel? dealing here :ith dierent no!inal deLnitions of Eu*lidean Roo! ut in ( irli*heit al:a?s re!ains the sa!e and onl? three di!ensions are the s9a*e 9ossile He a**e9ted the do*trine of a Lnite S9a*e$ :hile the s9a*e *an ne.er e Lnall? and after all 'EITEN out !ust ne*essaril? extend to inLnit? That had &ant
and S*ho9enhauer long ago *learl? re*ogniCed K Einstein *onfused !easure s9a*e and real s9a*e$ GE ti!e allo:ed and real ti!e S9a*e and ti!e$ the are funda!entall? dierent the s9a*e has three di!ensions$ the ti!e onl? one and is in us$ he *onsidered as a unit and 9ro.ides so the false notion of a s9a*e+ti!e Union to the 9hiloso9hi*al untenale onl? for 9h?si*al 9ur9oses *an e ti!e and s9a*e in *ertain *al*ulations unite$ ut a 9urel? !athe!ati*al )atter is The 9hiloso9hi*al *on*e9t of s9a*e+ti!e Union :ould sa? the sa!e thing$ as if so!eone as :ater and iron for that sa!e de*lared and of a ( ater+iron U nion tals 1 Einstein *onfused s9a*e and !ass The s9a*e sti*s to hi! the oMe*ts$ :hile rather the oMe*ts are in s9a*e ?es it is hi! an oMe*t$ so that ea*h od? has a s9e*ial ind of S9a*e Cu!e The roo! is it a 9ie*e of !atter He no:s nothing
of the intuiti.e for! of s9a*e$ of the great dis*o.eries &ant$ he has 9roal? not read The roo! has :ith the odies and !atter in itself has nothing to do onl? that the od? in s9a*e is 6 The Lrst senten*e of his alleged RTH is totall? :rong A stone statuiert the utter relati.it? of !otion$ *lai!ing that state!ents aout !o.e!ents su*h as :hether the dri.ing of a train thro:n stone falls .erti*all? or in the 9arale$ eual are So an? suMe*ti.e a99earan*es he de*lared euall? true$ Thus fell the stone in a .ariet? of *ur.es or lines$ and an? assertion aout it :ould e euall? *orre*t Thus :ould also ea*h Ther!o!eter fro!X esung :hether the ther!o!eter fro! a *ertain height ; ; _ liutda
is read or fro! elo:$ on an eual footing is of *ourse onl? one *orre*tl? :hen the e?e is in the le.el of !er*ur? " )irror is ; Einstein *an*els the Ne:tonian !ass la:$ :hen he !aintains that it is *o!9letel? eual to assert that the earth around the Sun or the sun rotates around the earth Ne:tonJs gra.itational la: is !athe!ati*all? 9ro.en Einstein denies there? the loading graed an a*ting for*e$ he denies the fa*t that it for*es the :orld all are$ and also highlights the *on*e9t of *ausalit? Einstein tea*hes a *ur.ed s9a*e + an in*redile )istae$ e*ause the roo! has no design and to all dire*tions oligations to:ards ex9ands into inLnit? Einstein also tea*hes that the straight line a* into itself return He 9ushes her so under a *ur.ature and is 9roal? thining the !eridians The straight line is 9erfe*tl? straight and after
oth sides into inLnit? 7 The !ost in*redile !istae is his assertion of relati.it? it? of si!ultaneit? Thus :ould the 9resent ti!e$ in I :rite this$ as on the Sirius uite dierent The ti!e is e related to the state of !otion of the od? Thus :ould Peo9le are ?ounger or older de9ending on the state of !otion in :hi*h the? are lo*ated One *an su!!ariCe this theor? onl? *o!edi* on In realit?$ the ti!e 9rogresses *onstantl? ad.an*ing$ e.er? ti!e is Lxed deter!ined$ is there an extraordinar? (hether he *hli*heit of Thining to assert that the ti!es *ould e relati.e 2 'ut Einstein goes further He e.en *lai!s that !a? *o!!uni*ate :ith *ause and ee*t at one 9oint in the "Annals of Ph?si*s / He therefore *onsiders it 9ossile that the ef+ ung *ould 9re*ede the *ause again So the shot *ould go rather go efore the ha!!er is *o*edX The *hi*en *ould efore
e the egg sin*eX 0 The ether ex9lains Einstein for asent :hile through hi! a 9ro9agation of light is onl? 9ossile and ga n Ce *on+ *ontinuit? of the uni.erse :ould e destro?ed :hen no light ether et:een the !ole*ules and ato!s and e!9t? et:een the Lxed stars nots a**e9ts Rather$ the ether is a asi* *onstituent of !atter$ and I 9ointed out that it is the ra: !aterial fro! :hi*h all !atter has de.elo9ed onl? K # A**ording to Einstein$ it is entirel? to sa? :hether the oser.er or the en.iron!ent !o.es (hen a EisenhahnCug suddenl? holds$ so n l[te after RTH the ground a sudden Mer re*ei.ed the la: of inertia in a**ordan*e After RTH should in+ "On s9rinCi9 de!anded ? the relati.it? of inertia of energ?"$ Annals d Ph?si*s$ -ol K1$ K In !? un9ulished treatise "Nene h?9othesis aout the s?ste!s
!ati*s of the uni.erse and galaxies " follo: the !isa99li*ation of relati.isti* thought all ho!es and stee9les lie houses of *ards *olla9sing$ and ?ou :ant to good *are not to li.e in su*h a :orld$ :here e.er?thing is relati.e !o.es and all that !atters is the 9osition$ :hat is no:n as the e )o.ing *onsidered It is al!ost unelie.ale$ C ' :hen the Shore !o.ing shi9 to a*hie.ed the .isual ins9e*tion for the sa!e true *larif? as if the oMe*ts o99osite the shore of tra.el ex9enses dire*tion !o.ing a:a? :hat the? do not drea! 'i ah RTH it :ould e *o!9letel? to !aintain the sa!e> the train !o.es for:ard and the e!an!ent rests Or> The train is silent and the e!an!ent !o.es a*:ard // Einstein :ould$ as ?ou loo at all the !o.e!ent as a relati.el? *an$ the outer!ost Lxed stars high !ulti9les of the s9eed of light
ha.e ailit? to gi.e the theor? itself refuted$ sin*e the for!ulas then e 9ointless Einstein had this to go hi!self and has thus his RTH itself alread? gi.en on + :hile his dis*i9les further de+ :ieelten + + It is therefore the odd F all efore that the theor? ? is itself refuted Ex*e9t that it does not no: the :orld and elie.eX /K$ ti!e and s9a*e disa99ear ? Einstein and )ino:si to S*he!es to nothing That the? are a it$ ut e.er?one is Re!e!er$ a99roxi!atel? the distan*e fro! 'erlin to &=nigserg or e.en Si9 :anted to Sirius or tried the 9eriod :egCu+ et:een the antiuit? of the earth and the *urrent
*an e *o!ined iii 9urel? 9ra*ti*al sense$ ut ne.er in realit? )oreo.er$ the s9a*e has three di!ensions$ the ti!e onl? one and is also iii our *ons*iousness exists$ the s9a*e is not This also had 'alg?i o.erlooed in his *on*e9t of s9a*e+ti!e Union /1 Aout the alleged *hange in the lengths and di!ensions the od? is 9roal? to sa? hardl? a :ord #orentC had a de fa*to A!end!ent ado9ted due to a !isleading *on*e9tion )i*helsonJs ex9eri!ent Of *ourse$ I sit here a note the fa*ts ahead + + Einstein *o!!its the funda!ental !istae of the #ength of odies ? !easuring ti!e 9ro.isions The earth :ould$ : hen she !o.ed :ith the s9eed of light$ a**ording to the RTH to a asolute s9a*e are so *ir*ling as "area 6 in the uni.erse + e hie in*redile idea + and their ineti* energ? :ould ne.ertheless e inLnite Alas$ :hen a *elestial od? :ith this inLnite energ? *ontinues he? 9ath ends fa*e to *ollideX
left ens :ould the length of a !o.ing s9eed of light his rod eual to Cero so he :ould Must disa99ear + )an su*h a 9h?si*s 9roal? des*ried as a fair? tale or as :it*h*raft 7 ; /6th The ineti* energ? of the radioa*ti.e Y "ra?s sho:ing the nearl? rea*h the s9eed of light$ :ould e al!ost inLnitel? large and su*e to lift the uni.erse to 9ie*es + :hi*h is not the *ase /; For the *o!9anion star of Sirius Einstein *al*ulated the s9e*iL* (eight ;1888X Although logi*all? 9ossileX 'ut :oe if these a99alling #i*he !ass falls again to the earthX The se.erit? of a 9erson :ould e !onstrous in this rating Sixteenth EinsteinJs exa!9le of that no:n a**elerated in eual f=r!ig U9:ard !o.e!ent ?ing ox is :rong and 9ro.es nothing e*ause the oser.er :ould e .er? foolish if he did not fro! indire*t
*ould de.elo9 *riteria easil?$ :hat reall? !o.es A stone sets a .er? har!less and 9h?si*all? .er? unedu*ated oser.ers eighth ahead /7 Einstein )ino:si ti!e is a fourth di!ension of the roo! I ha.e alread? 9ointed to the utter i!9ossiilit?$ s9a*e and ti!e in realit? to unite in this :a? and the roo! e.en a I!e di!ension to dense 3 The s9a*e has Eu*lidean :ith his three Di!ensions enough and *an ne.er e so!ething uite dierent$ tae hi! heterogeneous in itself$ so little it u9 as iron in itself *an tae He is not digested 9ardon the MoeX /2 Einstein *onstru*ted a s9heri*al s9a*e and tea*hes Finite nature of ti!e and s9a*e The a**e9tan*e of the End sensiti.it? of the ti!e is a gross !istae of thining sin*e the ti!e ne*essar? in the inLnite runs$ so lie under the i!age of a straight$ inLnite line is 9resented$ :hi*h ne.er ends and not
runs a*:ards The sa!e is true .i*e .ersa fro! the roo!$ the three inLnitel? extending di!ensions$ therefore has no design$ therefore ne.er e s9heri*al and *an not end see Thesis /0 A 9erson :ho eltall fro! a 9oint in ($ :ithout his dire*tion %hange to$ straight runs or ies$ :ould after the RTH at the sa!e Point a* return This is onl? the *ase on the ground and an entirel? false generaliCation earthl? relationshi9s Of the InLnite S9a*e is si!9l? *onsidered s9heroid s Thesis K8 Einstein *onfused 9urel? 9horono!is*he and d?na!i* )o.e A d?na!i* !o.e!ent he did not no: and denies it$ is told as in Pro9osition ;$ the *on*e9t of for*e and hen*e the *ausalit?$ sin*e :ithout for*e no *ausal relationshi9 !a? instead ha.e The Einsteinianer go in 9art e.en further$ sin*e the? *an also a99l? to an? la:s of nature + %ertain !athe!ati*ians de*lare toda? the !athe!ati*al deLnitions of aritrar? e*ause
ee9 the! falsel? all deLnitions for !ere no!inal deLnitions$ and Neointuitionis!us e.en denies due !i.erstndli*her %onsiders *ertain !athe!ati*al theore!s$ C ' the inLnite Dual fra*tion$ the 9rin*i9le of *ontradi*tion Here is the ter! the inLnite s9e*ulation :rong$ :hi*h is taen in realit?$ :hile onl? the negation of the Lnite is 2 K/ Einstein denies the inuen*e of unifor! *olle*ti.e )o.e!ents on the s9e*ial !o.e!ents of a s?ste! If this :ould e *orre*t$ so C ' :ould the earthJs rotation ha.e nu*lei inuen*e *an on the - erlauf the trade :inds$ :hi*h is not the *ase The attening Earth :ould e inex9li*ale or in a *o!9letel? i!9ossile :a? !ust e ex9lained ? gra.itational for*es " KK+ Right Palg?i sa?s in his oo "Ne: theor? of s9a*e and the ti!e that "the :hole 9la? a :ith the transfor!ations
dangerous tautolog? e*ause it arouses d! ill as if the? a de!onstra+ stration of the relati.it? 9rin*i9le *ontained$ :hile onl? the logi* .oltage !ethodologi*al 9rin*i9le ex9resses that :e the asolute legislator te!9eran*e !o.e!ent in dierential euations$ the *on*rete ele!ent !ente sa!e *ontrast is in integration *onstants 9ro.ide 6$ K1 Einstein deLned the s9a*e as a uintessential s9atial Ex9erien*e + :hi*h is a tautolog? So nothing is said nor still less 9ro.ed The roo! is a*tuall? a three+di!ensional -ie: for! in :hi*h :e ha.e to loo at the things ne*essar? The ti!e is not the fourth di!ension of s9a*e$ ut of intuition Q q r! of the inner sense$ as &ant sa?s$ etter *ons*iousness / K6 Einstein lea.es the geo!etri* *hara*teristi*s of the roo! ter? e due to )a In realit?$ the roo! is a it of )atter Heterogeneous and *onditionall? rather ho: &ant had re*ogniCed *orre*tl?$ ex9erien*e the :orld of 9er*e9tion$ therefore Ans*h is auungs for!
a 9riori The ratio is thus a straight re.erse + Aout the %onfusion of s9a*e and ground$ and the *onfusion of !easure!ent s9a*e and real s9a*e s theses K and 1 K; EQ (alter sa?s in his essa? "ET H and Philoso9h? 6 ! the "Qournal of the So*iet? of Natural S*ien*es to 4uri*h K #a:> "The inho!ogeneous$ hun*ha*ed s9a*e Einstein is Must 9urel? des*ri9ti.e *on*e9tuall? alread? ho!ogeneous !ental s9a*e Eu*lid ad.an*e 6 + That is$ ? the :a?$ :ith all su99osedl? ne: s9a*e *on*e9tions of ui*ht+Eu*lidean geo!etr? of the *ase$ the onl? other No!inaldeLni+ tions do!inate$ ut in realit? al:a?s on the Eu*lidean s9a*e !ust uild intuition ne*essar? A !is*hief is all tal of the su99osedl? at inLnit? interse*ting 9arallels ?ou interse*t ne.er and do not re!e!er so little Must #ine thins aout returning to ?ourself$ or the roo! itself end *ra!9 in honor of RTH 3 One loos toda? uite
Ne: :a? and :ants e.er?thing old$ s*ientiL*all? 9ro.en a See !? 9a9ers "*riti*is! of so!e asi* *on*e9ts of the trans*endental Idealis! \ Ar*hi.es of S?ste!ati* Philoso9h? /082 /6 'd#$ 1 Issue "Under+ studies on the .olu!e$ siCe and ti!e 9er*e9tion "$ iid /0/1$ /0 .ol$ 1 a:areness @@ For roo! tea*hing stu!9 and related theories "$ Ar*hi.e for Histor? of 9hilolog? so9hie /0K6th K0th -ol / u K$ 'oo$ and !? :or "%ritiue of *ognition " %arl Georgi$ 'onn /0/6 # Au out K 0th ?ear of irth "K Heft$ /0K6th 0 o.erthro:$ to !ae it a99ear as if one ne: great dis*o.eries !ade K The "asolutel? stationar? s9a*e" Ne:ton intended ? the assertion tions of Einsteinianer e dis9ensale In realit?$ the rest Periodi*all?$ and *an not !o.e$ e*ause it is a !ere for!alit?$ no od? is In realit?$ there is onl? this one rest roo!
and in his !o.e!ents of !asses$ ut not a !o.e!ent of the S9a*e itself$ :hi*h is a *ontra diet io in ter!s K7 The assertion is asolutel? false$ that all !otion onl? relati.e e Aller relati.e !o.e!ent is ased on an asolute else *ould one does not s9ea "relati.e" of This is a asi* logi*al error of RTH This$ in*identall?$ is itself e.er?:here asolute -alues ad.an*e C ' s9eas Einstein of the alleged "*onstan*? of S9eed of light "$ :hi*h is$ in*identall?$ nothing to 9ro.e K2 The 9erihelion of )er*ur? is not onl? through the RTH e ex9lained$ ut it !a? in*lude ' inter9lanetar? !asses e*ause and there are liel? to e The s*ientiL* a!ount to this to use an ex9ression on*e$ *an e a*hie.ed ? su*h alleged "sa:n exa!9le "of the RTH onl? lull One sees the serious logi*al error of not RTH K0 A**ording to Einstein and the Einsteiniane! *onsists of the line
Points along :hi*h lines and areas are !ergers of inLnitel? !an? 9oints + again$ a .er? serious and on the Hand l?ing !athe!ati*al a: e*ause an inLnite nu!er of !ath+ !ati* 9oints ne.er a line$ *o!9letel? not an area or e.en gi.e the three+di!ensional s9a*e Harr? S*h!idt$ a Einsteinianer$ Einsteinianer$ *alled C ' the *?linder a one+ di!ensional di!ensional *ontinuu! e*ause he allegedl? !ade louder sa!e %ir*les *o!9osed$ he *alls hi! also t:o+di!ensional + )an out loos$ the *on*e9ts of "one+di!ensional" and "t:o+di!ensional" are di*ed ea*h other$ and the !athe!ati*al *on*e9ts are turned on re9eatedl? nixed Of *ourse$ the *?linder is three di!ensional and not !ade u9 of *ir*les$ as an inLnite !an? *ir*les ne.er found a od? 18 The s9a*e is not an inLnite nu!er of 9artial s9a*es together$ ut *an onl? e !athe!ati*all? de*o!9osed into s9a*e 9arts
'ut there is no 9h?si*al s9a*e 9arts :ith :hi*h ?ou handle *ould and fro! :hi*h he is to e *o!9osed onl? Rather$ the S9a*e unifor! nsehauungsfor!$ in &ant translu*ent sense a 9riori$ that is gi.en 9rior to the ex9erien*e$ :hi*h extends into inLnit?$ and there are an inLnite nu!er of odies :hi*h o**u9? s9a*e 9arts and therefore ha.e *ertain ".olu!es" E.er?:here ?ou *an Lnd in the RTH a *o!9lete re.ersal of the a*tual *onditions E.en+ understood the *on*e9t of s9a*eti!e is illogi*al 1/ s9a*e and ti!e should e de9endent on the !ass or ? the !atter e *aused Here is a !ix of s9a*e uad !ass efore s Pro9osition 1 and K6 This error goes 'ie!ann Cnr=et and is one of the fe: serious a: of this great )athe!ati*ian$ ut had unex9e*ted ri! 1K (hat re!ains after the RTH of the :orld$ are referen*e !olluss The RTH leads to a dissolution of the :orld$ e*ause the
Re!o.ing asi* *on*e9ts of s9a*e$ ti!e$ 9o:er and *ausalit? are s:it*hed 11 The Einstein RTH :ould u9 the la: of *ausalit? e lifted e*ause there :ere no for*es in the uni.erse for her and no d?na!i* !o.e!ent e.en the *on*e9t of nature ges et Cli*heit :ould !u!le so Thus fell the :orld *olla9ses t 16 Dali FiCeaus*he and )i*helsonJs test in realit? s9eed not *o!!uni*ate :ith ea*h other in o99osition$ ut unite lan$ and that the )i*helson ex9eri!ent see a 9re.iousl? ignored Sour*e of error is 9resent$ Eri*h Ru*h 'ut has Lrst sho:n in its 9re+ ex*ellent :riting "The RTH refuted ? d as o99osition 9rin*i9le and the natural ex9lanation of )i*helson *o!9arison su*hs "/ This ex*ellent resear*hers united in a rare !anner *o!9rehensi.e 9h?si*al no:ledge :ith a shar9 .eral and 9hiloso9hi*al *larit?
1; The oser.ations of Gree in 'onn o.er the redshift //O =ung the s9e*tral lines are i!9erfe*t$ outdated 6 : Q# !ade de.i*es$ are therefore .er? unreliale The oser.ation e.aluations of the dee*tion of light ra?s at the solar li! :ere too s!all .alue and those :hi*h the inuen*e of the refra*tion tion and aerration *orres9onded There are here so ordinar? 9h?si*al *auses efore and of the su99osedl? stri*t "Pro.e 6 Lr the RTH is no tra*e ?et + Gi.es the :hole theor? loo at us as a !onstrous thining error$ *o!9osed of a large !ass of loud hea.? thining errors *o!9osed and a serious *riti*is!$ as I deli.ered the! into !ost *on*ise soon as e! house of *ards *olla9sed E9ilogue
I :ould also 9oint to the egregious errors that at the R iii %onne*t and !ore or less the sa!e *onseuen*es As to K ' ha.e e*o!e staggering the la: of *ausalit?$ e*ause the oriting ele*trons release their energ? in uantu! One *an *ertainl? not ahead of Mointed energ? of ele*trons + %al*ulate$ said "it should e noted that here e.er?thing is still h?9othesis 'as is the si!9le fa*t Fro! this :e :ill *on*lude at on*e that on a gi.en *ause the sa!e or e.en an ee*t onl? :ith Proailit? follo:s If this :ere reall? the *ase$ and :ould not e aur a defe*t in the oser.ation and in theor?$ :e should ha.e the / See 9 60th 7/ (ide ne*essar? long e Cusa!!engefalien e*ause it :ould then C '$ ? no !eans *ertain that the earth and all our od? attra*ts 9er!anentl?$ and the !oon :ould ha.e C ' long *an fall to the ground ":ithout *ause"
:hi*h it does not no:$ e*ause the la: of gra.it? inds hi! It *ould e ex9e*ted that I ? C ' ":ithout *ause to Sirius$ as it then it is not *ertain that the earth attra*ts !e 9er!anentl? This 9ossiilit? s9eeds are ne*essar? *onseuen*es of the theor? that the la: of *ausalit? not is safe and onl? a *ertain 9roailit? has This refers on Rei*hena*hJs theor? of si!ilarl? *ausalit? and so that I aturgesetCli*heit *an*els and !e a *ertain ( ahrs*he!h*h+ ness :ant to a**e9t Euall? asurd is the axio!ati* Hilert$ after :hi*h the !athe!ati*al and logi*al 9rin*i9les are onl? a99oint!ents that are des*ried *an tae aritraril? So of *ourse ?ou *an do e.er?thing and estalish an? deLnitions Onl? one :ill soon realiCe that the not e tried :ith asi* la:s of thought One *an *ourse u9 aritrar? deLnitions the? are$ ho:e.er$ .er? soon 9ro.e nonsensi*al The real axio!s *ontrast
eternal .alidit? and the !athe!ati*al theore!s ha.e a9odi*ti* %ertaint? It is a foolish tal that the 9arallels in a**ident to *ut Lnite$ that the straight line return in hi!self and the lie$ :hile the 9o9ular de!onstration> 8 ; + 8 1$ ie ; + 1$ is uite !isses It is here si!9l? a terrile !athe!ati*al error$ e*ause 8 no a*tual nu!ers$ ut onl? the negation of a nu!er #ie:ise$ one !a? .alue *o not elie.e in realit?$ he onl? Ne gation of the Lnite is &ant has alread? sho:n + and this is one of his Hau9tleistnngen + that !athe!ati*s and !athe!ati*al s*ien*e a9o ha.e ditis*he *ertaint? 'ut toda? re9resents one aritrar? "De+ deLnitions Y and "axio!s" in ex9lains all ter!s for relati.el? and :ants e.en the la: of *ausalit?$ so the logi*al 9rin*i9le of *ontradi*tion lift entitle!ent to$ on its asolute .alidit? our thining ased This ne*essaril? leads to a *o!9lete nihilis!$ the Su9er.isor?
sur.e? of all s*ien*e This is the true !eaning of the "RTH and the alleged "Re.olution in the north aturerenntnis 6 $ :hi*h the? has *aused I note Lnall? e.en that far t:o rilliant satires against the RTH ha.e een :ritten that :ill e the !ost unno:n liel? It is the rilliant satire of Gilert "The 9rin*i9le of relati.it? + The re*ent )odenarrheit no:ledge shee9 /$ and the 9ros ex*ellent satire of E Ru*h 'ut "Relati.ia" K The ti!e has ho9efull? not far o :hen the huge !istae of s*ien*e as one Lnall? su*h re*ogniCed See 9age 7$ 2 *itations$ Gilert a See S 60th 7K )ORE OPPONENTS AND AGAINST SE%URITIES
It is of *ourse i!9ossile to !e nearl? all the .otes to *a9ture to exhaust all the rele.ant literature$ e.en all o**asional !aing utteran*es lo*ate + + so it Must for the 9ur9ose This :or ser.ed If 9ossile$ e elo: an o.er.ie: on the other o99onents of Einstein and at least a 9art of their gi.en :ritings Araha!$ ) Paris$ / Theor? of the ele*trons #ei9Cig+'erlin /0K1 K 'd$ S 16$ 12th K The ne: !e*hanis! S*ientia ,-$ in /0/6 u a Adlet "He$ #o*al ti!e$ s?ste! ti!e$ 4one ti!e -olsu*hhdlg "-ienna The /0K8s Alliata$ G #o*arno$ !ind
*ontrasting relati.it? #ei9Cig /0KKnd Anderson$ ( Dor9at$ Astro+ no!i* !sgs$ K/K u K/6th 'ai he st$ ($ The error in the Einstein RTH Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /0K2th E$ Prof )uni*h$ (orld uilding S$ /21 Deli*ious$ A$ Prof Radiologis*hes Institut Heidelerg #enedi*s$ &$ Prof$ Sto*hol! ergson$ H$ Professor Paris$ Duree et si!ultanit a 9ro9os de ta d theor? Einstein Paris /0K/st 'ottlinger$ &F$ /st *ent Rad
"3 Ele*tr$ ,-II /0K8 r K Astron )sg$ K// /0K8 'u*herer$ AH$ The Planetene: u general %rit d Einstein RTH R=hrs*heid$ 'onn /0K6th 'udde$ E$ Prof Halle$ / *risis !ati* for Rel+Pr -erhandl di Philos Ges$ ,-I$ /0/6 K 'er d Ph?si*s Ges /0/0 Dennert$ E$ Prof Godeserg Dingler$ H$ Prof$ )uni*h / Funda!entals d Ph?si*s /0/0th + K &rit %o!!ents Cd Grundl d RTH #ei9Cig /0K/st + 1 RTH u e*ono!? 9rin*i9le
HirCel$ /0KKnd + U .a Dre*hsler$ Q$ Grund:issens*haft+ see asing for Einstein RTH Reason :$ K .ol /0K/ Ehrenfest$ P$ Prof #e?den On the *risis d #i*httherh?9o+ thesis S9ringer$ /0/1th Fri*e$ H$ Reg %oun*il 'erlin$ # The error in Einstein RTH He*ner$ (olfen[ttel the /0K8s + K Ph?s )agaCine$ /0K/$ 9 1 to 10th + 1 (h? Einstein RTH !ust reMe*t N?a Dagligt
Allehanda$ translated ? #othi+ gius$ Sto*hol! Friedri*hs$ G $$ The :rong RTH Einstein$ Osnar[* the /0K8s Fris*heisen+&=hler$ )$ Prof$ The ti!e 9role! %ent F Phil$ /0/1th Gartel!ann$ H$ / To relati.it? ttslehre The /0K8s K Real u A99arent sa:n !o.e!ent Ann d$ Phil$ /0K7 'd$ No 2 / 4uaa!!engestellt of Df R ( ein!anL 7; Ga:rons?$ D$ / The RTH in9uts
steins in light d Phil !ain$ 'ern /0K6th + K The 9h?si*s %ontent d S9e* RTH Engelhorn$ Stuttgart /0K;th Gehr*e$ E$ Prof 'erlin$ / The RTH$ a S*ientiL* !ass sensuggestion$ Areitsge! D Naturf$ /st Issue /0K8 + + K The *harges against the RTH OMe*tion Natural s*ien*es$ I$ /0/1 + 1 A series of arti*les in> -erhandl d D Phil Ges$ /0//$ /0/K$ /0/2$ /0/0 'oardroo! er d Aad d !eado:$ )uni*h
/0/K Natur: /0/0$ /0K/ Uhland ren9aradoxon &ant studies$ /0/6 4eits*hrift f te*hn Ph$ /0K8$ /0K/$ /0K1 Astron )sg$ /0K1 &os!os$ /0K Posts 4 Philoso9h? dd Ideal$ K .ol$ / Issue$ /0K/+KK Ge99ert$ H$ The :orld is asolutel? or relati.eW Rei$ &arlsruhe /0K1rd Gilert$ #$ The Rel+Pr that re*ent )odenarrheit d (iss 'reitena*h /0/6th D%$ G of #ud:igsurg / Astron Na*hr$ -ol K1$ 9 /;$
/0K0 in.ariants u Gra9hite .itation + K 4eits*hrift f Ph?s$ -ol 66$ S //2$ /0K7 'ern Cd gra.itational :a.es tationsglei*hungen d gen RTH + 1 Iid$ .ol 67$ 9 K28$ /0K7 To deLne d Ti!e *on*e9t + 6 Iid$ .ol ;8$ 9 7K;$ /0K2 For 9h?si*s d Diagra!s + + ; Iid$ .ol ;$ 9 KK$ /0K0 Aout the Grundl d Einstein rule Gra.it+Th + U .a Gross!ann$ E$ Astron )sg$ K/6 /0K/st
Haring$ Th$ Prof$ Philos d Na+ tur:iss Paetel$ 'erlin /0K1rd Ha!ei$ G$ Prof 'erlin$ to in9uts stone see gra.itational theor? /0K/st Hart:ig$ Prof 'a!erg HirCei$ IEG$ RTH ad #ei9Ciger *entenar? Ne:s (interthur Tagelatt$ /0KK No K2;+K08 HoLer$ A$ dida*ti*s d Hea.en *usto!er Isenrahe$ %$ Professor$ to ele!ents !ental anal?sis d RTH -ie:eg$ 'runs:i* /0K/st
Qo.i*i*$ 'an d D .alue RTH -ienna /0K6th &arollus$ Fr$ Prof 'rno$ (here :rong and :hat o.erloos EinsteinW (inier$ 'rno /0K/st %herr? )an$ A #ei9Cig$ (undt and relati.it? Posts 4 Phil Dd Ideal$ K 'd$ Rear heft$ /0KKnd &la ges$ #$ &il*herg / The S9irit as ad.ersar? of the soul$ K 'd + K The do*trine of the :ill$ S 70/ to 707th &raue$ A Eers:alde
&re!er$ I$ / Einstein and :orld intuition *risis St?ria$ GraC u -ienna /0K/st + K Rei*hs9ost$ -ienna $$ /8th /Kth /0KKnd + 1 GraCer -olslatt$ K8 /0K1rd &rets*h!ann$ E$ On d Ph?si*s )eaning d Rel+9ostulates Ann d Ph?s$ 6th e9isode$ ;1 -ol /0/7 &ries$ Q .$ Prof$ / logi*$ S 78Knd + K &antJs theor? . Ti!e V S9a*e in their relation to the !od Ph?si*s Natur:$ /K 'd /0K6 #auer$ HE -ienna #e*her$ E$ Professor$ Ne: -ienna
Tagel$ KK 0$ /0/K 7 #enard$ P$ Prof Heidelerg / Aout Relati.it? t s9rinCi9$ ether$ Gra.itation HirCei$ #ei9Cig /0K/st K ether and Urther #ei9Cig /0KKnd + 1 together :ith F S*h!idt Eighth A*ti.it? Re9ort d$ Ra audiologi* Institute d Uni+ .ersit? Heidelerg 4eits*hrift _ Te*hn Ph?si$ .ol $ no 1$ /0K;th #eo9old$ %$ Atinonen Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /0K7th
#i9sius$ F$ Prof #ei9Cig$ / The log Grundl the s9e* RTH Ann d Phil$ K 'd$ 1rd Issue /0K/ + + K Truth and Error in d RTH Siee*$ T[ingen /0K7th )a*h$ E$ Prof + S %rossing I-$ ; 10th )aier$ H$ Prof 'erlin$ truth safet? and realit? Siee*$ T[ingen /0Kth )authner$ FritC 'erlin )ohoro.i*i*$ St$ Prof Agra! / ether$ !atter$ gra.it? and RTH 4eits*hrift f Ph?s$ -ol /2$ S$ 16 /0K1
+ K The Einstein see RTH De Gru?ter$ 'erlin /0K1rd + 1 Relations d #orentC rule ud Galilei see Trans + for!+ euations Ann d Ph?s$ 7 'd /0KK N?!an$ A Einstein + + 'ergson + -aihinger Ann d Phil$ 'd$ +7 Heft$ /0K7th Painle.e$ P$ %o!9tes Rendus$ -ol /71$ 99 77 et se$ Paris /0K/st Palag?i$ )$ Prof$ to (elt!e*ha+ ni 'arth$ #ei9Cig /0K;th Pe*Ci$ G$ *riti*is! d RTH Einstein T?rolia$ Innsru* /0K1rd
Pfa$ A )[n*hen$ and for against Einstein see 9rin*i9le Huer$ )uni*h /0K/st Pode* 'erlin$ A*htuhr e.ening leaf$ 'erlin$ /1 1 /0K0th Poin*are$ Prof Paris$ #ast Thoughts Paris Pre?$ A$ Prof Prague$ Oser.ator? Ras*he.s?$ N of$ Prof$ &rit Unters$ Cd 9h?sial Grundl d RTH 4eits*hrift f Ph?s$ /6 -ol /0K1 Reh!e$ Q$ Prof Greifs:ald Rei*hen*her$ E$ /st Ann d Ph?s$ -ol ;K /0/7
+ K Natur:$ -ol 2$ /0K8 a!ong others Riedin ger Qena$ / Gra.itation u inertia 4eits*hrift f Ph?s /0 'd$ No / in /0K1 + K The 9osition d 9! in d RTH Iid$ /K 'd$ No ; Ri9e+&[hn$ # 'erlin$ &ant *ontra Einstein Pul d Ger!an Phil Ges$ Erfurt /0K8th Rothe$ R$ 4eits*hrift f 9h?si*s u *he! Tea*hing$ 18 'd$ PK7$ /0/7th Ru99$ E Heidelerg$ Radio+ *al Institute Sagna*$ G Paris$ %o!9tes 9ension
dus$ .ol /;7$ 9 782$ /6/8 /0/1 S*hultC$ Q$ L*tions d El +Tea*hing Ann d Phil /0K/ Ro*er$ O$ A ga9 id see Ter! u.d Einstein RTH Puhla$ 'erlin+ SteglitC /0K/st See$ TA$ Prof USA$ / Fourier *ault and Einstein S*ien*e$ ;2$ /0K1rd + K Astron )sg$ KK$ 68/ in /0K Seeliger$ H .on$ Prof )uni*h Selet?$ Fr$ InLnit? d Suede !es u gen RTH Ann d Ph?s$ 71 -ol /0K0
Sittig )agdeurg Sti*ers$ # #uCern$ True RTH d Ph?s ud lunders Einstein 'reitena*h$ /0KKnd 77 Strasser$ H 'ern$ Einstein S9e* RTH$ a *o!ed? d Trials /0K1rd Thedinga$ Eddo 'erlin$ / single stone u :e la? Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /0KKnd + K EinsteinJs elief in !ira*les Iid$ /0K7th Thir?$ R Strasourg$ Re.ue gen d S*ien*es 9ures et APP#I
/0KKnd To!as*he$ R Radiologis*hes Institut$ Heidelerg$ Aout 'ut ration u Asolute !o.e!ent Ann d Ph?s$ 6th e9isode$ 6 'd Trieei$ H 'erlin T u!!ers$ QH N?!egen$ The S9e* RTH Einstein ud logi* Hill!ann$ #ei9Cig /0K0th Del -e**hio Ro!e Guardian$ F (einstein$ )'$ Prof &o.no / The funda!ental la:s of nature 'arth$ #ei9Cig /0//th + ■ K The 9h?si*s d e: !atter
ud RTH 'arth$ #ei9Cig /0/1th (estin$ OE$ Prof Sto*hol! Einstein RTH FahlerantC$ Sto*hol! /0K/st (ie*hert$ QE$ Prof G=ttingen Relati.it? u Ether Ph?s 4eits*hrift /K -ol /0// -ienna$ ($ Prof$ The RTH fro! Position d Ph?s u Er+ Tea*hing 'arth$ #ei9Cig /0K/st -ienna$ OH$ Prof #ei9Cig The 'asi* #a: d Natural ud Grade d As s9eed s9eed in the ether #ei9Cig /0K/st (ittig$ H )agdeurg$ the gel
tion d RTH Sa*$ 'erlin /0K/st (odetC?$ I$ Prof Dere*en Astron )sg$ K/7 -ol /0KK (olf$ )$ Prof Eers :alde Astron )sg$ K/K -ol /0K8 4oril$ #$ Prof 'ratisla.a / + C or the RTH in the light ( d Truth /0K6th 4iegler$ QH 4uri*h$ The Thing se and the end of the so+*alled RTH 4uri*h Pulling$ Th$ Prof Halle$ / *risis Roo!!ate re9ort on the literature tur /0/;+/0K;$ Qahr d Phil$
-ol 1$ 'erlin /0K7$ Se*t Natural 9hiloso9h?$ S /2 + K Grundl d Natur9hilos9ohie$ P7 %$ #ei9Cig /0KKnd 4 / a ti!es$ H$ The ratio d see Einstein RTH eg 9re*ise N aturfors*hung 'rau![ller$ -ienna and #ei9Cig 72
ter! and for their alleged *onLr!ation ? the oser.er tions of SonnenLnste!isex9edition great a stir There ha.e 'ut the .oi*es in*reased in re*ent ti!es those :ho theor? reMe*t as *o!9letel? asurd and logi*all? untenale It is here in as si!9le and *lear !anner the issue 9resented and the asi* error of Einstein are dis*ussed EinsteinJs !athe!ati*al theor? on t:o alleged ":orld 9ostulate 6; on uilt$ of :hi*h he *lai!ed to e the "una:eis+ are *onseuen*e 66 o9ti*al ex9eri!ents The Lrst 9ostulate of Relati.it?$ :hi*h ga.e the :hole theor? the na!e$ is the less .ulnerale$ har!less$ so to s9ea It asserts the eualit? authorit? at dierent s9eeds$ ut unifor!l? !o.ing s?ste!s If the 9ostulate fro! the stand9oint of the 9h?si*ist of the highest )easure!ents !a? e *hallenged e*ause it for the 9resen*e of the su99ort of the o9ti*al
Pheno!ena$ the light ether$ no *onsideration shall e so ut at least no logi*al on :alls does 9re.ail$ that it after all$ still e regarded as a .alid h?9othesis ( in*e :orse is there ut :ith the se*ond 9ostulate$ the *onstan*? of light s9eed relati.e to an? unifor!l? !o.ing oser.ers *lai!s Here egins the *oni*t :ith the usual logi* Fro! EinsteinJs follo:ers is usuall? the onl? one "9rin*i9le %onstan*? of the s9eed of light "6 s9oen :hat 9h?si*all? har!less sounds and therefore de9artures fro! *riti*s unfortunatel? !an? har!less has een taen Onl? ? e!9hasiCing the oser.ers stand 9oint is the inner *ontradi*tion easil? re*ogniCale A 9h?si*al !etalli* a99earan*e that generall? as if M e*ti.el? and s9ea tangil? is *onsidered$ the light ea! is then the re!arale 9ro9ert? ha.e to all oser.ers$ e.en if the? *ontain relati.el? lo*ated throughout o99osite dire*tions !o.e unifor!l?$ al:a?s the sa!e
to gi.e .alue The 9oint of this !onstrous assertion *an e JEasil? illustrate %o!9li!entar? others :ill a**o!9an? a ri.er so *an that the o: relati.e to hi! at least a99roxi!atel? at rest is no: #et us tr?$ ho:e.er$ to i!agine a ri.er that relati.e to t:o !o.ing in .er? dierent dire*tions hiers restingX And No: i!agine$ a large *ro:d in front$ after the ans all sides unifor!l? !essed o:s$ and to a ri.er$ 28 the relati.e to e.er? indi.idual restsX This exa!9le see!s !e to 9ro.e Har$ that it is EinsteinJs 9ostulate of the *onstan*? the s9eed of light relati.e to an? unifor!l? !o.ing oser.ers aft not an allo:ale h?9othesis$ ut a *o!9lete 'egrisanarehie *on*erns that !ust lead to the strangulation of all 9h?si*s Einstein denies the *ontrast et:een his F or!ulierung and the "Ordinar? *o!!on sense stands and the usual logi*
:ell not$ ut *lai!s that the o99osition is assu!ing a *o!9arison intri*ate fun*tion of the ti!e of !o.e!ent of the oser.er :ould disa99ear )an has this su99osedl? .er? ":itt? idea :anted to !ae *lear$ ? "t:ins$ one of :hi*h is eual to sent after his irth on a Mourne?$ returns ho!e as a s*hoolo?$ and his rother Lnds an old !an :ith :hite hair$ if this is not e.en dead alread? (hat nonsense in the logi*al -an*ed leadershi9 of this idea *o!es out Gehr*e has in his :or "The RTH$ a s*ientiL* !ass suggestion - su**u!ed &=hler$ #ei9Cig in .er? hu!orous :a? through 'e*ause after Einstein na!el? ea*h of the t:ins due to the relati.it? of all !otion$ e.en at rest$ ut his rother *onsiders e!otional$ e.er?one is allo:ed to others re!ained for ?oung ut herself aged for or e.en een for + died ex9lain Gehr*e *o!9ares the situation *reated ? the RTH Situation :ith that in AndersenJs fair? tale "The E!9eror
Ne: %lothes 6 des*ries :here a gar!ent is :o.en$ onl? this *an see Menigen :ho are s!art enough to do and :here e.entuall? all ad!iration and a!aCe!ent stand efore the e!9t? loo!s No: *lai!ing Einstein$ its 9rin*i9le :as the "ines*a9ale *onse+ freuen*? 6 of the oser.ations On :hat asis su*h a sa:n assertion is ased$ *an the reader to Mudge if he learns that )easure!ents of the s9eed of light in dierent dire*tions een not ?et 9erfor!ed !o.ing oser.ers on Earth are (here so!ething has een !ade in this dire*tion$ as in the ex9eri!ent of Sagna*$ has the exa*t o99osite result of the$ :hat :e had ex9e*ted after Einstein Einstein ased in Er!ang+ !ent dire*t oser.ations of *os!i* on an intri*ate reinter9retation Atte!9ts to 9ro.e an?thing in this regard So he *lai!s$ the atte!9ts ? )i*hels on and FiCeau :ell as those on the aerration tion stands ea*h other in an insolule *ontradi*tion$ although
all *an enlighten these atte!9ts *asuall?$ assu!ing the %arrier of the light :a.es$ the ether$ things :ere so$ as if he :ere on the earth !o.e!ent :ere 9arti*i9ating See This Gehr*es *ontro.ers? :ith Einstein$ Ratio d 9h?s Ges /0/2 and /0/0 further Fri*e$ le*ture in Qena in /0K/$ Ph?s -er? tent P 1+10 and "The a: in Einstein RTH J$ (olfen [ttel$ /0K8 It lies sho:n on an illustrati.e % o!9arison fro! a*ousti*s are$ as 9heno!ena on the t?9e of "*onstan*? of the s9eed of light s9eed 66 *on*lusion An oser.er$ the sound of a 9arti*ular Einstein 2/ Sound sour*e e.en in the laorator? or in still air outdoors$ then in a *losed+9ro9elled rail *ars and Lnall? e.en in a no: here and soon signed ? the :inds there dri.en Freiallon in.estigated Y is des9ite its di.erse in al!ost all *ases$ !o.e!ent
state al:a?s Y relati.e to a "*onstan*? of the s9eed of sound oser.e Ne.ertheless$ it is of *ourse for e.er? 9h?si*ist that it is a ":orld 9ostulate of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of sound relati.e to aritraril? !o.ing oser.ers / " *an not gi.e$ ut rather that the State of !otion of the :earer of the sound :a.es$ the air$ the de*isi.e di.idend i!9ortan*e It is o.ious that the strange ideas aout Einstein the !?sterious fun*tion of the s9eed of light fro! the oser.ation a*hterstand 9oint :ith the ado9tion of an oMe*ti.el? .eriLale su+ stantiellen ether$ 9re.iousl? the asis for s?ste!ati* 9re+ De*laration of ele*tri*al and o9ti*al 9heno!ena for!ed$ in*o!9atile is Therefore$ the theorists :ho follo: Einstein elie.e e.er? 9h?si*ist$ the still elie.es in the old ether to e allo:ed hinsteilen as a*:ard The life :or of 9h?si*ists :ho .ie:ed a re*onnaissan*e of Aether Ph?si*s and its o.ious inter9retation ha.e set the goals$ is of the
Re9resentati.es of Einstein therefore loo to:ards hera+ at e.er? o99ortunit? set Not Einstein is the atta*ed$ ut he has the other logi*al foundations of s*ien*e in su*h a terrile :a? gras9ed that it is onl? self+defense$ :hen 9h?si*ists are in*reasingl? unite against hi! to also a !odern *o!at lead against in all areas threateningl? gro:ing anar*h? As it no: eha.es :ith the alleged ex9eri!ental e.iden*e for RTHW Einstein initiall? a for!ula for the dee*tion the )erur9erihels indi*ated that its fro! a generaliCation RTH is to follo: Ho: little su*h a s9e*ial *al*ulation for!ula for general %o!!on theories 9ro.es est sho:s :ell the fa*t that exa*tl? the sa!e for!ula alread? /2 ?ears efore Einstein Gerer fro! the ether + 9h?si*s has een deri.ed Further!ore Einstein has the dee*tion of #ight ea! through the S *h :erraftf eld of sun as e.iden*e of the %orre*tness of his theor? a* as o99osed to the theor? of Ne:ton
9osed No: has !ore than a hundred ?ears efore Einstein Ger!an s*holar . Soldner the sa!e dee*tion of the light ea! *al*ulated ? the solar gra.it? fro! the theor? of Ne:tonX #atel? has es9e*iall? StMe9an )ohoro.i*i*$ 4agre$ in the natural S*ientiL* (o*hens*hrift /0KK$ unit //$ 99 /6;+;1$ an ele!entar? theor? de.elo9ed ? the gra.itation$ :herein the results Einstein :ithout the Relati.iCation of s9a*e and ti!e are deri.ed EinsteinJs gra.itational :a.es tationstheorie therefore a99ears to re!ain *o!9letel? inde9endent of the RTH des*ried i!9ossile 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light e found In fa*t$ Einstein in his theor? of gra.it? This 9rin*i9le is alread? li!ited it is onl? for *onstant hea.? for*e Leld e .alid$ ut should a99l?$ for exa!9le$ on Earth Qust 2K here ut its .alidit? is highl? unliel?$ e.en !issing here far an? *he*s The 9rin*i9le loses ? this li!itation
So nothing of its internal *ontradi*tions Thus$ there re!ains nothing left ut the unfortunate idea of the relationshi9 of light s9eed to the 9oint of oser.ation and the ti!e relati.iCation at all$ and thus e.er?thing to dro9 :hat in EinsteinJs theor? the usual no:ledge *haftli*hen !indset disagreed All in9uts stone anLihrt 9roof of his :orld 9ostulates$ *an e o.iousl? !u*h easier and !ore natural to ex9lain :ithout the s9a*e+ti!e relati.it?$ so that for the o.erthro: of the *on*e9t of s9a*e and ti!e and the aolition of Uni.ersal ether also not the slightest e.iden*e re!ains V
Sieren Eu*lidean geo!etr?$ the si!ultaneit? itself$ e*ause ?ou *ertain light ea!s do not si!ultaneousl? 9er*ei.es 66 91/ f "Is the 9hrase" e.er?thing is relati.e "onl? of relati.e .alidit?W he 9unishes his o:n assertion lies WX Or is su*h stu9idit? least asoluteW "911 "It *onfused toda? the !athe!ati*al F Or!el$ :ith a fold Aout one+Ne:ton "916 "Einstein identiLed diale*ti*al !athe!ati*s and ineti*s Of the Ph?si*ist Einstein is transCendentallogis*h untrained e!9iri*is! and Mudg!ent :ea *olla9se relati.is! dis*o.ered ? &ant$ stri*tl? 9ro.en truth that the 9o:er of the intelle*t o.er all sensiilit? and nature is "" Eu*lid and &ant should e o.er*o!e> to ( ahrheit not$ ut to "o.erhaul$ o.er*o!ings" it is to do the! Fro! the RTH the oM e*ti.e realit? aside 9ushed she is onl? interested in the relation to the oser.er and
so lurs the distin*tion et:een a99earan*e and realit? (ith $$ Four+di!ensional s9a*e+ti!e "one raises neither Eu*lid nor &ant fro! the Fishing %o!ine the !easure!ent of ti!e and the roo! siCes in a single F Or!el$ ut i!agines$ re9resented ti!e and s9a*e itself !ixes to ha.e (ithout &ant 9riori ele!ents that not relati.e are$ ?ou *an not ring aout RTH "S 1; f "In Dinglers atta* on s*ien*e )athe!atis!$ E!9iri*is! sees )ar*us "a da:n of s*ien*e" Our !odern o.er+&o9e!iusse and O. he +Ne:tons$ )r "o.er+ :inder "Eu*lid and *lassi*al !e*hani*s he re9ri!ands dul? J6 968 i Des9ite *ontriution Friedlander 2 are of hi!$ later on &raus and left$ still led so!e signiL*ant re!ars 21 in*identall?$ it is the asi* defe*t of !odern relati.isti*
rule 9h?si*s that it su99oses to e ale to do :ithout d?na!i*s The 9ure !athe!ati*s *ourse it !a? e.entuall? e regardless of :hether ?ou Ptole!ai* or o9 he ex9e*ts nianis *h 'ut eort rings onl? %o9erni*us the true solution "966 "As a result of fault? e9iste!ologi*al training has Einstein !athe!ati*all? useful L*tions :ith realities *onfused He asserts C '$ ought u9 all health? -$ that a sha! )o.e!ent do not dier fro! a d?na!i* real !o.e!ent *ould> + the train is !o.ing or the e!an!entW (h? *an e*ause the e!an!ent is not e.en as the train ? le.er 9ressure in sa:n !o.e!ent set WX "9;7 "It is easier$ e.en sensational$ the ( ahrheitsegri se9ti*al to de*o!9ose$ *onseuentl? !odern "S ;0 "Einstein is not des*ried ex*rete enough !erel? to e a 9h?si*ist$ as su*h$ it is onl? :ith the ha.e e!9iri*all? fulLlled ti!e to do Einstein de.i*e$ :ithout realiCing it$
to 9hiloso9hise$ and in this he is not a !aster lie &ant :ithout the unrelati.e 9riori the e!9iri*al ti!e not a !o!ent :as long !a? *onsist$ for the a 9riori ti!e is the *ondition of its duration It is not a 9h?si*al oMe*t$ and the 9h?si*ist :ho her goes to the od?$ is non una:ares to 9hiloso9hers$ na!el? to a .er? ad Sustituting no unifor! e!9t? ti!e ahead$ so *an one !aterial 9ro*esses in res9e*t of their ti!e siCe is not at all *o!9are !ore If the e!9t? ti!e relati.el?$ so :ould the *hara*ter lost e.er?thing di!ension (ith the unit? of ti!e :ould e of the intelle*t$ the ex9erien*e$ all *o!!on la: re9ealed (ithout the unifor! e!9t? ti!e :ould the relati.ities of satisLed unfeststell+ ar$ hen*e the RTH i!9ossile itself our Into ungling in &ant$ ie in the sound Mudg!ent !eans their o:n sui*ide "96 f Professor ) Fris*heisen+ &=hler$ aa 8W S /K "It is *ru*ial that raising and re*ognition of
all 9heno!ena *o!9rehensi.e s9a*e+ti!e s?ste! is indis9ensale " "#ets the theorists re dierent referen*e s?ste!s against one another in unifor! translation to !o.e$ he *an do this ? referen*e s?ste!s light signals a* and forth$ then he *an e seen for these dierent referen*e s?ste!s a *o!9rehensi.e the!$ *o!!on$ 9resu99oses for the! so asolute fra!e of referen*e Folgert ex no: therefro!$ that the ti!e reuire!ents of dierent oser.ers in the *o!9arison dierent referen*e s?ste!s dier fro! one another$ so is an allegation tion aout this dieren*e onl? on the asis of an asolute sa:n referen*e s?ste! 9ossile "In fa*t$ the RTH sets a unifor! Referen*e s?ste! in the 9re*ise sense of Ne:ton and &ant in the roo! ahead$ in :hi*h the !o.e!ents o**ur " If one reuires an asolute freedo! of the 9roMe*tion of the :orld in s9a*e and ti!e$ then 26 disa99ears e.er? o99ortunit? alige!eingiiltige state!ents aout a !aMorit?
to !ae use of ex9erien*es$ then lifts the *on*e9t of natural la: itself on "Oie de!and a uniLed .ie: of a99earan*e o9enings in a *ausal relationshi9 in*ludes the redu*tion of it *o!9rehensi.e uni.ersal referen*e s?ste! that is$ if *ertainl? not is itself 9er*e9tile$ e9iste!ologi*all? indis9ensale the *orres9onding s9eas that our theoreti*al 9h?si*s of uarters out $ an "asolute 6 theor? stri.es to:ard (hi*h !eaning hen*e the Einstein See Ti!e DeLnition *o!9utationall? ean !a? s9ru*hen> 9hiloso9hi*all? it is liel? e*ause the? onl? a ti!e *ontent$ does not go e.en to the ti!e a*tuall? no funda+ e.oe legends *ou9 "" ( hen it *o!es to the state!ents Nator9 !ight a99ear as deli.er the RTH a ind of *onLr!ation of trans*endental idealis! :hen Coldt ? Pet !ost 9erfe*t should !ean 9roation of 9ositi.is!$ as *an no: e *on*luded e that the? in+ against all for!s of idealis! and 9ositi.is!
is dierent So little one ut asi*all? 9ossile 9ositi.e training *ase of the )i*helson see - ersuehes the asolute !otion or asolute Ti!e :ould ha.e 9ro.en to e "existing 66$ as little e.iden*e of negati.e result so!ething aout the oMe*ti.it? of a ti!e in the sense of *riti*al Realis! The de*ision on this *an not ? oser.ing and ex9eri!ents are :on 6 N D Ed It is signiL*ant that e.en the Einsteinianer E R$ IN Neu!ann$ 9erha9s the *learest inter9reter of RTH$ Ca the result *o!es that also this EinsteinJs theor? nor the re*ei e a 9referred s9a*eti!e s?ste! ased is$ therefore$ the ado9tion of *ertain ex*e9tional s9a*e s?ste! and also a *ertain ex*ellent *hronolog? (e *an sa? this> E.en the Einstein see s9e*ial RTH is the idea of an asolute s9a*e and an asolute ti!e asis "" Introdu*tor? #e*tures on the RTH J$ Fis*her$ Qena /0KK ;; Professor E Gehr*e$ aa 8 /
" $ Einstein o.er ti!e .er? dierent .ie:s had and *hanged its 9osition se.eral ti!es It :ould ha.e the Flu*tuations in the o9inion of Einstein on su*h a funda!ental uestion as the 9rin*i9le of relati.it? a*tuall? een ale to satisf?$ the ex9ert to !ae :orld sus9i*ious and to !eet :ith se9ti*is! the RTH " 92 "The 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ :hi*h 9la?s a role in the RTH relates$ the relati.it? of ' e:egungs o9erations OMe*ti.el? nothing to do has this relati.it? of !otion all that in the 9ress and also so!eti!es in Mournals else :ith the :ord relati.it? is !eant That "all relati.e 66 is the theoreti*al RTH ha.e su*h generalities nothing to do As *hlag:ort$ a*ting on the !asses$ in :hi*h e.er?one elie.es so!ething he reasonal? to hear the fa!iliar and in :hi*h hardl? t:o thining the sa!e thing$ 'ut is the "Relati.e 6 for the introdu*tion and for re*o!!endation of RTH e!inentl? suitale 66 S /8f
2; "The relati.it? of s9a*e and ti!e to a s9iritual rene:al and a turning 9oint in the hu!an !indset !ean In *ontrast$ *o!9arison of the a*ts %o9erni*us$ &e9ler and Ne:ton 9ale The relati.it? of s9a*e and ti!e is as a solid learning Thing 9resented !athe!ati*all? *lothed$ so that !an? of the non+ re*ei.ed !athe!ati*ian the i!9ression that heJll ne.er e ale to gauge the de9th of this :orld tu!ling thoughts ea*h and *o!9rehend And is hardl? an oMe*t around the RTH :ith so little eort :all of learned ex9ressions and for!ulas to !ae *lear$ as Must this The !athe!ati*al for!ulas gi.e us also onl? u9 *ir*uit aout ho: ig the indi.idual are the erre 9a.ed ee*ts$ Ho:e.er$ the? sa? nothing aout the underl?ing stand 9oint "9// f
"If the !an" *on*e9t of ti!e 9ers9e*ti.e "\ so ?ou destro? the idea of a general$ oMe*ti.e nature "The result is" the 9osition a 9h?si*al soli9sis! " "The RTH leads to an old$ de*re9it$ di! .ie: This is the "ne: re.olution of !odern thought " "P / # Gilert$ su9ra ")ost 9eo9le of the ne: 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ ie RTH s9ea$ no: ? its o:n ad!ission nothing *ertain aout it$ ut the? "elie.e" that ehind an?thing 9heno!enall? dee9 9ut no nonsense had 66 "to !ae a re*less S*heingluig+ s9eed *ontends that !o*s all logi* and the 9erfor!an*e of the largest Ghosts of the 9ast in the Leld of !e*hani*s and 9h?si*s negated and re9la*ed ? 9hantas!s As a result$ the :ors Ph?si*s of the last de*ades in theor? !ore and !ore in a !aCe into :hose !ost fa!ous in the histor? of the i!9asse relati.it?
should e in 9rin*i9le 6 S 0f "The )isunderstood is al:a?s the iggest een !?ster?$ the hu!anit? ent (ill ?ou su**eed$ are darX Sil in*o!9rehensileX Es9e*iall? for naturalistsX Es9e*iall? for exa*tX And !ost of all for !athX Our !athe!ati*ians !athe!ati*ians had the instin*t al:a?s her Flourishes that onl? ? thiners )eaning$ *ontent and :eight get$ for sa*red to &aalaCei*hen hold$ :here li.e di.ine s9ells The? are sustained su99orted ? its s9irit :hi*h is 9urel? for!al$ and the an? understanding of the si!9le ut ig 9i*ture nature going on "92 f "The si!ultaneit? of e.ents$ that enor!ous enor!ous *on+ troll A*t$ :hi*h :e alone still thining$ *o!9aring$ e! *he*ing !aes a dete*tion 9ossile + the la: of the asolute si!ultaneit? of inLnitesi!al dieren*es
2 tials of the !o!ent$ the narro:l? the 9ast fro! the inlet future retires$ and :e *all the 9resent + this raCen *o!9arison nunftgesetC raises an arrogant 9rofessor$ to the *heers of other Professors si!9l? onX th "This is no: no: and here is here This re!ains re!ains sa*rosan*t$ sa*rosan*t$ the onl? onl? thing that ErCasolute$ ErCasolute$ :e on the uild> The Here in the !o!ent of no:X The shi9Js *a9tain taes an exa*t *ontinuous *hrono!eter on the ride and *on+ statiert it the no: on all the :orld o.er It :ould e an asolute Done? :hen instead the Einstein *he #i*httelegra9hie used "Onl? the" si!ultaneit? in itself !ore e.ents is the Dout lots$ is the Lxed 9oint of thining$ 9h?si*s$ !e*hani*s$ is the onl? asolute is the onl? steel *lue in restless fer!enting .ortex$ in the *haos of e.ents :hi*h :e *all :orld P _ 78
"Ea*h 9ro9agation .elo*it?$ ie ea*h ra? su*h As the #i *htes$ taes 9la*e in a !ediu! o:ns the !edia a so!e !o.e!ent and dire*tion in s9a*e$ so does the ea! these :ith he is as it :ere in a .ehi*le$ on the he !itfhrt So see the result of the )i*helson ex9eri!ent is + :hat HertC sus9e*ted for a long ti!e + easil? and naturall? ThatJs the iggest iggest !istae !istae of !en> the? ignore a self+ self+ intelligiilit? intelligiilit? to in.ent a !onstrosit? !onstrosit? to e allo:ed to 9 26 f "EinsteinJs 9rin*i9le 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light 'ring the 9h?si*al 9heno!enon of light in la:ful De9enden*e ding to a a9h?sialis*hen astra*t thought$ a *o!9letel? e!9t? *oordinate s?ste! that e.er?od? so!eho: *on*ei.ale 9h?si*al 9ro9ert? 9ro9ert? is di.ested "EinsteinJs *on+ sustan*e *an therefore onl? those F or!el!ens*hen 9er!anentl? satisf? the are unale to ex*eed a larger grou9 of natural 9heno!ena
see and the .arious for!s of :orld a*tion in solidarit? a**ess *ontext ring onl? those for :hi*h "*oordinate s?ste! $" "- e+ tor F% fetishes are The higher !athe!ati*s is the fetishis! )odern Ph?si*s S /8 "Sustituting" "Sustituting" for the s9eed * is a inLnit?$ the result is the old$ *lassi*$ right N e:tons*hen relati.it? s+ senten*e (hat does it !ean :hen :e set * eual to inLnit?W The !eans that a .alue * is s!uggled in the ti!e distortion$ the see!ingl? ut the s9eed of light$ in realit? a 9ro9agation .elo*it? of ti!e 9retending '? For!ulas *reated$ all relati.ists un*ons*iousl?$ the a9h.sialisehe :onder % Kf as if the !o!ent at the s9eed d in (orld s9a*e :ould 9ro9agate This enters the *uriosit? that the training 9ro9agation 9ro9agation s9eed of the ti!e de9endent is of the translational
S9eed a the earth as all odies at all 9 //1f " 27 "A thing *an not itself e uneual$ :hi*h is the Lrst set of logi* A ea! *an not e t:o relati.el? !o.ing odies or *oordinate s?ste!s or e.en an inLnite nu!er of one and the sa!e ha.e relati.e s9eed 'e*ause then the ea! :ould si!ultaneousl? t:o or 9ossess !an? dierent s9eeds Those :ho do not realiCes the is not to hel9 9 /K/ "Su!!a Su!!aru!> The #or en tC +one te in +)ino :sisehe" de.elo9+ *o.er 6 is a Irr:is *hlehre 3 It suggests the old$ fa!ous Relati.it? Relati.it? set Ne:ton + Galileo oldl? and Mo?full? fa*e 'e indi*ated that in$ high :is tiL* "for! 9la*ed genius of 'ut :it 6 9/K1 A &irs*h !an$ aa 8th The "*on*e9t of relati.it? relati.it? liale i!!e!orial i!!e!orial a *ertain *ertain
!ist? at indeter!ina*? indeter!ina*? of the latest 9hase of its de.elo9!ent !ent that Einstein see RTH$ fro! :hi*h the ul of !anind alread? so egins to s9ea as if Einstein "relati.it? "relati.it? in.ented 66 ha.e$ is ? no !eans free 66 "If ?ou a99l? the relati.it? of e.er?thing :hen the Relati.e Asolute nothing *an e *o!9ared$ then *o!!its su*h a relati.isti* 9hiloso9h? 9hiloso9h? + Must as that of the radi*al Se9ti*is! Se9ti*is! + + sui*ide in the !o!ent of its irth If e.er?thing is relati.e$ then the *on*e9t of relati.it? at least *o!9letel? redundant 6 6 S;2f "There *an e no !axi!u! siCes The EinsteinJs theor? ut assu!es that this not the *ase for the s9eed ?ou sets a !axi!u! siCe of the s9eed$ the s9eed of light Lxed there? negating the 9rin*i9le of relati.it? as a general real estate A*t$ :hi*h 9er!its no ex*e9tion ut it is 9re*isel? the s9eed ness of all siCes the one that reuires the !ost relati.it?
The idea of a s9eed li!it is not *o!9atile :ith that of the Relati.it? of !otion 66 97K Professor 8 &raus$ aa 8 ; and 7 "See The Einstein s9e*ial RTH is no 9h?si*al theor?$ it is a GE using asurdities !athe!ati*al L*tions 9redissol.ed sa!9le *al*ulation ";$ 9 16/ "The? de!and Einstein that in a *o!9arison of GE s9eed :ith ea*h other an? siCe to s9eed al:a?s the sa!e siCe$ al:a?s exglei*sresultat sa!e -$ al:a?s the sa!e GE s9eed sunt ers*hied$ na!el? 188888 ! se* is *learX (hat here s9ea$ is not onl? not ine.itale$ ut it is one of
■
Funda!entall? asurd$ ie a 9riori i!9ossile de!and that ?ou to Natural !ae 3 (hen I sa? ?our In.arianC9ostulat is logi*al un+ fulLlled$ I elie.e that nothing in realit? *orres9ond to it 22
*an and e.er?thing is inferred logi*all? fro! hi! in thought or !a? e Lxed on the 9a9er$ as a *onseuen*e of an asurd 9re+ !isse "The uilding of s9e*ial RTH is nothing !ore than the Stru*ture of all !athe!ati*al dedu*tions resulting fro! the + in *he* asurd + *an infer In.arianC9ostulat the s9eed of light It is and re!ains a dedu*tion fro! i!9ossile 9re!isses a !ath+ !ati* ter! sealing "The stailit? of the ases for *o!9arison is .alid generall? granted for Lxing the loading gries of the !easure!ent It is 9art of the deLnition of the !easure!ent$ that the unit is thought i!!utale 66 7$ 9 K0 The "intelle*tual asurdities start :ith the Lrst :ords RTH and in*rease :ith ea*h of its stages The RTH is at est if a 9ro9erl? dissol.ed *al*ulation> ho: !ust the ") easure!ent"$ ie in.oi*e$ the unit of ti!e and s9a*e
designed to gi.e the s9eed of light as in.ariantW The !atter oils do:n to a .ariation of the *on*e9t of the unit " "It is 9aired :ith 9hiloso9hi*al *o!9rehension Su*ien*? :hi*h in the 9hiloso9hi*al utteran*es of !ost Relations rights a*ti.ists is that disgusted !e ItJs all so far usual degree of Puli*it? aout rising eha.ior of a large 9art of the da? and Trade 9ress that *onfuses the !inds It is the fa*t that ea*h uar$ :hi*h see!s to e the theor? of the relati.ists is greeted :ith a friendl? gesture and )r Einstein 9refa*es re*ei.es XXX :hile a serious *riti*is! is ill+treated 6 J "The *olla9se of the theor? is ine.itale" 7$ 9 0/ Dr Q &re!er$ aa 8 I$ K and 1 "The" ti!e relati.it? 66 sur9asses all 9re.ious (ith the *on*e9t of si!ultaneit? of the *on*e9t of 9resen*e is a*hie.ed shaen$ the o!ni9resen*e of the :orld inLnit? sins and de*o!9oses
frag!ented into loud single+suMe*ti.e !o!ents :ithout *o!!on ond " " 3 3 it is 3 the + + aleit unintentional + + !erit of the "RTH" the asurdit? of an "asolute relati.is! 6 to self+*ontradi*tion to ha.e inter9retation s9anned 66 /$ 9;7 "It no:s toda? ? the follo:ers of Einstein hi!self not to sa? :hat a*tuall? the result of the se*ured e in+stone + see RTH is After the one hand it is a 9h?si*al after other eg as the Einsteinianer H$ Rei*hena*h a 9hiloso9hi*al Theor?$ a**ording to Einstein it is neither$ ut 9urel? 9heno!enologi*al !enologis*h " "I do not no: if a si!ilar in the histor? of s*ien*e %ase of !ass suggestion and !isleading serious s*holar in a is hardl? o**urred for 9ossile+held s*ale It see!s in*o!9rehensile$ as !athe!ati*ians$ 9h?si*ists$ 9hiloso9hers$ indeed reasonale 20
e.er e su*h e.en te!9oraril? *on.in*e 9eo9le *ould lea.e "K "There are so !an? theories of relati.it? as a dierent -$ the setting einthe or? to understand 6 e*ause nonsense *an not e understand That is also the se*ret that the !utual Allegations of Ni*ht.erstehens 6 of Einstein theor? a!ong 9h?si*ists and 9hiloso9hers is ased " "It is unsee!l?$ et:een" 9h?si*al 6 and "9hiloso9hi*al 6$ ( to distinguish ahrheit$ the Einstein theor? :ithin a *ooie half of the area reser.ed for 9rofessional 9h?si*ists$ 9h?si*al "truth to a* u9 It needs no 9hiloso9h? to an asurdit? as su*h to dete*t and dis*ard$ ut erstn+ onl? a health? de "" That "all !easure!ents are relati.e !eans that an? *o!!onl? !easured length is a !ulti9le of a true rando! sele*tale$ ut in.ariale unit is$ therefore$ uite dierent fro! the
Einstein see *hange in the sele*ted unit as a "*onseuen*e" an aritrar?$ o**urring in thoughts *hoi*e of the referen*e s?ste! ? the 9h?si*ist$ ? :hi*h the :hole )atur order of aritrariness the 9ositi.ist 9h?si*ist is deli.ered 1 Professor P #enard and F S*h!idt$ aa 8 / and K "(e no: lea.e the i!aginar? train a signiL*antl? une.en !ae lie !otion Here$ if ? inertia ee*t s e.er?thing *o!es in the :ae to rule$ :hile outside e.er?thing re!ains unda!aged$ so is$ I !ean$ not a health? !ind another Lnal :ant to !o.e$ as the it :as Must the train that Mer :ith his *o!9laint !otion has *hanged and not the surroundings "(e :ant as N aturf ors tend not !athe!ati*al su99l? in.estigating 9er!eailit? or usefulness of *oordinate ele*tions ut :e :ant to non+*ontradi*tor? 9i*ture of realit? rea*h$ and in this *ase$ t:o *oordinate s?ste!s$ one of :hi*h
leads to su9erlu!inal .elo*ities of !aterial odies + EarthJs rotation + the others do not$ ? no !eans eui.alent to /$ 9/; one !ust ad!it that taste Dens*h:ierig+ liailities that are not di*tated to ? the nature of things$ for *ontradi*tor? !a? e naturall? held 6 /$ 9K/ "(e tae a Urthei of :hi*h is e.er?:here and at the loading !o.e!ent of the earth does not tae 9art$ :hile the earth$ as ea*h 9ie*e )atter$ its o:n etheri* has to Lll it :ith :ashed+out li!it surrounds and !o.es :ith her to The #i*htfort9 anCung is al:a?s at the s9eed 1 /N% /8 *! se* and al:a?s relati.e to the ether$ in :hi*h the light tra.els "On this h?9othesis *asual De*laration ? the )i*helson ex9eri!ent + + e.en :ith Lxed star light + :hi*h Aerration of #i*ht:egr[!!ung :ho see % )iller ex9eri!ents in great Erdh=he K$ 9 2/ 08
Professor PF left$ aa 8th "That" these the ":orld.ie:s" 9age RTH .er? seriousl? is ex9osed to re*ei.ing oMe*tions$ are no: 9roal? e.er?one at the *he* here honestl? to a setting other than the endea.or + unfortunatel? .er? s9read + the !ere un*riti*al ad!iration 9 100 "Nothing is !isguided as Einstein *alled relati.iCe the *on*e9t of ti!e as a to address e9iste!ologi*al Po:er 9 687 "In truth unit is the 9h?si*al and 9hiloso9hi*al ti!e so *losel? related as 9ossile> the idea to ha.e oth the sa!e No e!9iri*al Ti!e route *an e used as ti!e stret*h dierentl? "ela9se as the ideal Ti!e In all this is the i!9ossiilit? of regarding the ti!e of a dierent siCed Ahlaufsges*h:indig*it to s9ea #eading in e.er? res9e*t to asurdit? 'e*ause ho: do ?ou s9eed deter!ine dierent than Must re+using the ti!eW It is therefore on a .i*ious *ir*le out This of *ourse is the relati.it? of
Si!ultaneit? i!9ossile 'e*ause if the ti!e and e.er?:here is al:a?s the sa!e and it therefore no dierent "s?ste! ti!es are$ all te!9oral distan*es in all referen*e fra!es$ the sa!e Re!e!er> :hat is a sa!e in ter!s of$ *an not regard #i*h of others e 9ulled a9art in ti!e Of *ourse$ the intended for A Si!ultaneous ' as non+*onte!9oraneous$ are !easured 'ut then onl? one of these 9ro.isions 9ro9erl?$ the other ne*es+ !anoeu.rale :rong The 9ossiilit? of a .ariet? of ti!e extending it itself has nothing to do ou !ust due to the do*trine of e reMe*ted ho!ogeneit? of ti!e Y S$ 61 Professor F #i9sius$ *ited ao.e / and K "The tas of 9hiloso9h? is $ '? the ter! again due intuition The astra*t lenses as *onsideration *an not e the last solution of the :orld riddle$ the realit? is !ore than General *on*e9t or !athe!ati*al for!ula All oMe*ti.e no:ledge
is thus relati.e ut s*ien*e !ust not e forgotten that the Asolute an?ti!e the ad.an*e se t tion of Relati.e re!ains "The radi*al relati.is! 9ro.es to e a doule+edged :ea9on He reuires us either that :e si!ultaneousl? o99osites for to hold true$ so *o!es to the la: of *ontradi*tion$ or he ex9lained the 9rin*i9le of su*ient reason to :arX /$ S 666 also the friend of RTH ought to gi.e that a A**ount !a? e 9erfor!ed ? 9erfe*tl? *orre*t$ ut :hile the a99roa*h on :hi*h it is ased$ is :rong And the *ontradi*tions &raus and others$ see the Tea*hing Einsteins$ stu* ex*lusi.el? in the *onditions The "'eaut? 6 a for!ula s?ste! ne.er a 9roof of its .alidit? in the real :orld ad!ittedl? see! so!e !athe!ati*ians to forget that their euations has inherent sense of :ell regardless of the s?!olis! of itself 0/
Tensor in :ords should e ansdr[*en also not a99l? this for all the :a?$ the 9asses through the ill$ ?et essential for its sour*e and its destination An asurd result e*o!es e.en ? the !ost elegant for!ula !ore 9alatale are not 6 K$ 9 ;f "EinsteinJs asi* idea is in itself *ontradi*tor? and therefore i!9ossile 'e*ause the foreign s?ste! is undoutedl? one of !? o:n S9atial and te!9oral :orld$ e*ause I other:ise his 9osition *hange at all *ould not relate to !? :orld$ and the state!ent is asurd that in !? s9a*e and !? ti!e in another roo! and another ti!e 9ursue their a*ti.it? The s*ale redu*tion is neither an o9ti*al nor e.en a sensuous 9heno!enon$ ut the result a !ere &orretionsre*hnung 9/1 "Here in the 9rin*i9le of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light$ :e ha.e the fa!ous Hexenein!aleins the relati.ists> s9eed of light
less s?ste! s9eed is eual to the s9eed of lightX After the sa!e logi* :ould o.iousl? also the sound .elo*it? e.er?:here e the sa!e$ or ?ou *ould sa?$ the s9eed of the &rani*h ight is al:a?s the sa!e Possessing ut the irds a dierent s9e*ies a.erage airs9eed :hose #arge$ nature is suddenl? sailed deter!ined 'ut all these s9eed + rules ha.e for the real Rela ti .it AETS s atCe sense onl? if s9e*if?ing the referen*e s?ste! Einstein on the other hand !aes + a selt+ sa!e *onfusion of thought + fro! a relati.e s9eed a "Natural #a: and aused so the *on*e9t of la:$ :hile at the sa!e ti!e the *lassi*al 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ rather than$ as he thins to su99l?$ i!9ro.e and su99le!ent distorted and funda!entall? *orru9ts S / _ EinsteinJs "do*trine re.ealed as a 9urel? !athe!ati*al and for!al Theor?$ :hi*h$ far fro! us the .ie: of a ne: natur9hilo+ to o9en so9his*hes :orld.ie:$ !erel? ree*ts the *urrent
unsatisfa*tor? state of s*ien*e is She is an internall? *ontradi*tor? !ediation h?9othesis :ithout the 9o:er to real %reation 6 9/2 "Of the internal logi*al *ontradi*tion in the 9re!ises of the Theor? is os*ured and so to s9ea$ !ade !athe!ati*all? har!less ? the relati.it? of s9a*e and ti!e The in relati.it? .ation of s9a*e and ti!e *ontradi*tion *ontained is in the Pro9osition that s9a*e and ti!e fro! the state of !otion of the oser.er are de9endent 'ut no: it is :ithout an? dout the !o.e!ent that turn ti!e and s9a*e 9resu99osesX This tea*hing of shortening of s9a*e and stret*hing the ti!e *ourse is reall? an e9iste!ologi*al theoreti*al !onstrosit? It is not the ti!e or e!9t? s9a*e sha9e *an stret*h or )at*hing %a9s nCi address$ ut onl? the s9a*e and ti!e *ontent su*h !a? efall "S /0 _ "(hat *an not e !easured$ that is not a.ailale to Einstein
'ut the danger is o.ious that ?ou also get as of this 9rin*i9le 0/ !aing use$ :here onl? the a*tual li!itation of our auxiliaries !ediu!$ so not a theoreti*al$ ut onl? a te*hni*al arrier to ostru*ted 9ath to no:ledge "RTH$ the a**usation is a to !ae su*h a !istae guilt? :ill not e s9ared 6 9 K6 _ The s9e*ial RTH is asolutel? the :rong a99roa*h 66 "ItJs reall? also for the one :ho has gras9ed the !eaning of the theor?$ e*ause of the unnatural Thoughts *ontortions that she ex9e*ts of us$ not al:a?s eas?$ their )eaning also un!istaal? re9rodu*e 66 9K7 $$ si!ultaneit? "%an not deLne 66$ e*ause it is a dire*tl? :ith our *ons*iousness of ti!e set fa*t 66 " "The :orld in :hi*h :e li.e and :or$ is onl? one :hose e.ents :e therefore also need to !entall? *lassif? a single ti!e *ourse 66 918 f " and the *ontro.ers? o.er the ex9eri!ental ases is still
not Lnall? settled The 9re.ious ex9eri!ental ase !u*h too narro: to her a natural 9hiloso9hi*al uilding eual to the see Einstein Ri*herX 66 1 "Inertia and gra.it? *an onl? ex*hange$ as long as ?ou ho!ogeneous gra.itational Lelds taes into a**ount An asolutel? ho!ogeneous ut the gra.itational Leld is a !ere thing of thought The !an in 'ox has 9rin*i9le .er? :ell the 9ossiilit? to Lt anges told deter!ine ex9eri!ents if his oser.ation roo! in a gra.itational Leld sus9ended freel? or$ *orres9onding to the a99arent dire*tion of fall o99ositel?$ attra*ted ? an unno:n for*e *ontinued ge 66 9 //; "Has the natural s*ien*es not onl? the tas of the a99earan*e to ta*le *o!9utationall? *al*ulations$ the? should us a satisfa*tor? O.erall 9er*e9tion of s9a*e and ti!e fro! outstret*hed realit? Oer The RTH gi.es us *ontrast *ountless$ see!ingl? .erti*all? aligned
legiti!ate :orld.ie:s 6 " The general RTH for our natural s*ientiL* ( eltild irrele.ant has onl? the .alue of a interesting !athe!ati*al s9e*ulation and is aout 9h?si*al +radi*all? *onsidered$ e?ond true and false 6 9//7 "The gradual dissolution of the Puli*ation %o!9lex !o.ing Train + Earth reuires that :e to+the rest or !otion of the train next to the ground and not in a RE%O-ER ig ele*ted another *oordination *oordinate s?ste! relate That is *o!9letel? inserted into d?na!i* relationshi9 una!iguous fa*ts$ :e ? no aritrar? "9osition + *an distort ut !ost + la?ing 66 *hange 66 "single steins fusion of gra.it? and inertia gi.es us although it a ne: unit$ ut the loss is ex9e*ted to e greater in this *ase than the ex9e*ted gain 66 9 /K8 "So *ontradi*tions et:een the 9erfor!ers Einstein> (inte!itC$ S*hli*$ Thirring entertain the uilders of RTH alread? together in
Dis9utes$ :here it a99lies$ the Lrst foundations of their 'a?lonian to:er to uild 66 "In addition$ ho:e.er$ arises fro! :hat has een said aout the rotating Dis* the *o!9elling *on*lusion that the S9e*ial and General 01 RTH are ased on *onditions that ea*h asolutel? un+ are *o!9atile e*ause the Lrst fro! the stand9oint of their state!ents in !o.ing s?ste!s are not !o.ing$ the se*ond theirs fro! the Stand 9oints of *o+!o.ing oser.er fro! !aing 66 9 /K7 "The non+Eu*lidean s9a*e is a L*tion 6 9/K0 "In realit? s9eed there is onl? at and *ur.ed surfa*es$ not one :a? or another ind$ Roo!s 9/1/ "(hile *o!fort is the la?!an :ho sh? a:a? fro! the non+Eu*lidean Mu!9 *auldron e*ause he fears :ith right here the ground losing underfoot$ lie it$ :ith the e.iden*e that the
Stru*ture of !athe!ati*s Aout indeed$ in*on*ei.ale $ ut 9roal? *on*ei.ale ar are + of *ourse on a 9rofessionall? trained Thin X Ho:e.er$ sin*e the s9atial intuition ualitati.e a fa*t of *ons*iousness tati.e nature is so uni!aginale s9a*e is also unthinale The ter! *an ne.er as so!ething that the la:s of our 9re+ Llters *ontradi*ts so unite t:o - orsteliungen that *o!9ared to side to lift$ as in the 9seudo+*on*e9ts of the suare *ir*le the *rooed s9a*e or interse*ting 9arallels :ould e the *ase Therefore$ :hen re*entl? a su99orter of RTH$ 9erha9s a little too o9ti+ ti*$ said that the ne: *on*e9tion of s9a*e and ti!e ha.e ex*eeded the!sel.es naturaliCed sur9risingl? fast$ so re!ains to e seen if not a:e efore the 9riests of the ne: faith and their esoteri* language !an? heads for*ed u9on a sa*riL*e of the intelle*t has 6 9 /1 " $In realit? there is no Rie!ann see s9a*e Gi.es it also no s9a*e se\ so :e *an not ut hel9 ut
an oMe*ti.e order of things or e.ents 9resu99ose to ha.e as their adeuate re9resentati.e Onl? the Eu*lidean *an a99l? s9a*e 9 /6/ Professor St )ohoro.i*i*$ aa 8 K ")ohoro.i*i* has the !erit in a series of !athe!ati*al distan*e to ha.e sho:n treat!ents that$ if ?ou need to go$ a to de.ise RTH$ euating a lot$ na!el? endless *an asor share s9e*ial theories of relati.it? as :ell as in other *ases$ *an e Must the one :orld of nature endless 9ossiilities 9ossiilities of !athe!ati*all? for!ulated ( nits and o99ositel? of 9h?si*s 9ut Ph?si*ists$ ) ? its .er? si!9le for!ula for the so+*alled redshift of S9 E&TR aUinien o9en e?es aout that the RTH is not ne*essar? to 9ro.ide a red+shift of the s9e*tral lines theoreti*all? deri.e 9;$ fore:ord ? Gehr*e I ha.e su**eeded in re*ent ti!es$ in a .er? ele!ental :a? the
#orentC euations see Transfor!atione Cur[*Cu see the Galilei + :ent :here the Ne:ton see addition la: of Ges*h:ind ig ties a99lies I ha.e sho:n si!ultaneousl? that the t:o oser.ers :ho *o!9ared hi!self !o.e together$ in ( irli*heit the N Ne:ton see !easure asolute ti!e I 06 ha.e e!9hasiCed that all inferen*es Cu:ei*hen us dieEinsteins*he s9e*ial theor? leads ; onl? a L*tion are "9 K$ n K; $$ 3 that of the ex9eri!ental *onLr!ation of the general !? RTH *an e no uestion$ the !ore so as :ell other theories to the sa!e results *o!e "One :a? looing at Gerer$ Seeliger$ Rei*hen*her$ (ie*hert 96K "The Einstein see RTH is onl? a lin in the series of 9urel? s9e*ulati.e !athe!ati*al+!eta9h?si*al theories "96; "The h?9othesis of the *onstan*? of the s9eed of light for all Oser.ers$ :hi*h is 9la?ed :ith a *onstant relati.e
S9eed !o.ing .$ in the e.ent that no gra.itational Leld exists Or in a ho!ogeneous 9arts su*h Leld X$ is the darest Fun*t around s9e*ial RTH "9K "The !aMorit? of relati.ists are .i*ti!s of a suggestiilit? gestion no one :anted to run the ris$ 9ossil?$ their o:n *o!+ to sho: ignoran*e$ and has the other GE :ith itself 9ulled 66 Note on Gehr*e 91 "The RTH is satisLed onl? :ith the !athe!ati*al des*ri9tion of the Natural 9heno!ena$ and the? agree to forgo an? 9h?si*al ex9lanation The *hara*ter of this theor? is 9urel? for!alisti* +9hno!enalistis*h $ :ithout taing a *onsideration of the realit? Rightl? sa?s H Dingler> *onfusion *o!es aout onl? :hen the !athe!ati*ian thins he *an dri.e in this :a? 9h?si*s 6 "97 "The axio! of EinsteinJs theor? that no ex*ellent %oordinate s?ste!s exist and that all *oordinate s?ste!s in the
Des*ri9tion of natural 9heno!ena are eui.alent is unsustainale ar In 9h?si*s$ so!e *oordinate s?ste!s an ad.antage efore the other if :e others use$ :e Lnd unne*essar? !athe!ati*al *o!9li*ations This o**urs est :hen the rotation to light 6 "Einstein is in*onsistent e*ause it :ith the Lnite (orld has introdu*ed a s?ste! of inertia$ and it uses the roo! in Ne:ton see sense 66 92 f "The Einstein see RTH leads us to *on*lusions :hi*h serious a Naturalists *an a**e9t under an? *ir*u!stan*esX The A+ steinJs theor? is onl? an e9he!eral theor? Also A$ . -ine?ard is *o!e to the *on*lusion$ re9resented the theor? to rot slo:l? on the horiCon The relati.isti* shi9 sins$ and !an?$ in*luding ex*ellent relati.ists Mu!9 alread? in the #ifeoats into !an?$ in*luding the Lrst 9h?si*ist to sing$ ?ou alread? the gra.e singing 66 "QH 4iegler :rites that it
nothing etter> as the :orldJs large ( ahrheit for loading *ons*iousness ring that e.er? great ne: truth so!ething si!9le and !ust e generall? understandale The di*ult? of understanding a thing is al!ost a *riterion for their ina**ura*? E.er? truth is reuired a *larit? and therefore no darness$ ho: the loads s*hroene relati.it? 6 66 9age 7/ 0; A N?!an$ l* "There are in our ti!e arel? t:o s?ste!s of thought$ the larger O99osites to ea*h other than the theor? of relati.it? and 9hiloso9h? 'ergson "'ergson" :or>$ Duree et si!ultanit A 9ro9os de la theor? dJEinstein 6 is not onl? e*ause of interest$ e*ause the? GE no: asi* reuire!ents of relati.it? adding hard signiL*ant agree!ent :ith the L*tion do*trine and Hans - aihingers As +(hether +Tea*hing in the inter9retation of the theor? of relati.it? $ 66 data
:ith return "to the !ore *autious inter9retation $ The #orentC had gi.en "'oth euations" * 5 . ] e and * + . ] * "Are algerai*all? eual oensi.e an?:a? (ill e on an? of the to9+ !entioned 9rin*i9les 66 !e*hani*al relati.it? 9rin*i9le and 9ostulate *onstant s9eed dis9ense "$ then adMusts the .oltage *hara*teriCed ? the fa*t that instead the *on.entional *on*e9ts ti!e and s9a*e *hanged 66 S /72 ft$ /28$ /2K "Ho: does the !ulti9le Einstein are *autious ti!es Fro!W are the? reall? the sa!e sense as the "Funda!ental ti!e 66$" la dure 66$ regarded as reall?W 'ergson ans:ers> no The? are artiL*ial$ !athe!ati*al ti!e L*tions and$ 9ro9erl? understood$ *onLr! the in9uts steinJs theor? etter than an? earlier the *o!!on Ann i!itate one for all *o!!on$ uni.ersall? .alid ti!e 6 "" And he :arned .igorousl? against these 9ers9e*ti.e$ !athe!ati*al de*ision taen o Press ( irli*heiten to see 66 99 /08$ /06
Professor ) Palg?i$ aa 8th "Union 6 of s9a*e and ti!e This idea of Palg?i$ in its full extent and de.elo9ed :ith daCCling 9resentation $ has e*o!e the asis of suseuent RTH One :ould thin Palg?i :ould e the 9hiloso9hi*al founder of RTH for follo:ers of all e*o!e :orld *a9ti.ating do*trine$ ut this is not the *ase Palg?is shar9 intelle*t :as the i!9ra*ti*alit? and fro! s*rat*h )issed the RTH *lear and he !o.ed earl? on in an o99osite Position to her$ although he :as a*tuall? the s9iritual father of the theor? He *o!!ented to !e on se.eral o**asions ex9ressed his dis9leasure that his ideas aout s9a*e and ti!e ? relati.it? theorists ha.e een so distorted and he *ould 9lent? aout$ nai.ete 6 %o!9uter s*o that the dis9arate nature of ti!e and s9a*e lur sought $ )athe!ati*s does not 9rote*t against foll? 6$ so ran He on*e his listeners to If again the idea of a
E.olution has 9re.ailed in s*ien*e$ then is 9erha9s the uestion e used if it has then een 9eo9le des9ite all suggesti.e fads her *al! Mudg!ent had 9reser.ed and its *lear .ie: of the large line of 9rogress Su*h :as )el*hior Palg?i "9 -f$ Fore:ord ? Gehr*e ")ust su99l? !? .ie: the autono!ous and 9olar 0 dierent nature of ti!e and s9a*e are e!9hasiCed !ore shar9l?$ the !ore :e feel 9ushed us oth to a single doule Regulation of the 9heno!enal :orld together s?ntheti*all? 'e*ause onl? the 9olar - ers*hiedenheit of ti!e and s9a*e *o!9els our !inds$ to regard the! as ne*essaril? elong together ut (ho s9a*e and lea.es ti!e sin to indis*ri!inate shado: that *o!es un+ noted there to *onfuse the t:o *on*e9ts of order to one another$ ie t:o funda!entall? dierent *on*e9tual *ontent identi*al :ith ea*h other
f?$ :hi*h a99arentl? in.ol.ed a logi*al *ontradi*tion "91; f "%uriousl? goes Einstein see RTH dire*tl? thereon out to anish the *on*e9t of the ether fro! the theoreti*al 9h?si*s and thus Must destro? their Lnest a*hie.e!ent " "Ho:e.er$ there is a ind of 9hiloso9her :ho" Pfano!enalisten " lo.e not tolerate the *on*e9t of sustan*e and the ether :ant to referen*e$ in*luding the !atter of 9h?si*s$ ut this ind of Thiners *o!es a arren$ se9ti*al stressed :ord *ontending ne.er e?ond Na!el?$ it is a 9ure i!9ossiilit? of a i!agine !o.ing :ithout one :ould ha.e to assu!e a so!ething !o.ing$ e*ause this thing is ?es$ at dierent ti!es o**u9ies dierent 9la*es 66 "The do*trine of unit? of s9a*e and ti!e exists not that :e ers*hiedenhei th the - of the t:o orders$ ut their *o!+ den? de9enden*? 66 ")onisti* thiners tal usuall?
for *o!!itted funda!ental Jdieren*es in nature and in our *on*e9t of *ontent exist$ su**essi.e "due 66 and thus the funda!ental distin*tions that :ere in the initial the!sel.es are for*ed to Lx$ after:ards *o!9letel? re.ersed to do Destro?ing the existing in nature asi* *o!9arison dieren*es of and thus also i!9ro.e the ualit? of hu!an distin*ti.eness assets$ the hu!an !ind to '? *ontrast$ see!s us to 9ass the !ain tas of hu!an thought in it$ existing and su**essi.e irredu*ile Grund.e r dierent ene to in.estigate !atters and a dee9 insight into their 9ossile *o!9ared sided *onditionalit? or *orrelation$ so their a*tual unit? to :in 66 S 77 "(ell ne.er :as in !?sti*al+!athe!ati*al gar o**urring do*trine aroused su*h a stir$ so !u*h enthusias! and Fanati*is! *ourse Must a:aened in those :ho ? a :ord her
understand 'ut there are in*reasing also *riti*al .oi*es$ es9e*iall? in the %ir*les the !ost le.el ex9eri!ental 9h?si*ist :ho those alleged sa:n seriousl? 9ull i!9ortan*e of relati.it? in dout ou !ean$ that the so+*alled Relati.it? thought is far fro! the 9h?si*al to unif? do*trine$ on the *ontrar?$ *arr? this idea to S9irit of un*ertaint? and dout in the exa*t nature of resear*h$ ?es he De*o!9ose the asi* ter!s thereof$ :ithout .iale on its to !old od? 66 9 26 7 Einstein 07 Dr # Ri9e+&[hn$ *ited 8th "Einstein RTH$ so right or :rong their indi.idual lists !a? ha.e s9e*ial 9h?si*al and resear*h results$ as O.erall thought for! untenale e*ause the *on*e9t of theoreti*al rule a*tuall? destro?ed ? a relati.is! :hi*h
The!sel.es ha.e uried under the deris " 'ut this is not the eginning of a ne: :a? of thining$ this is the End of all thiningX " I !aintain that three uarters of the di*ulties *ulties and !istaes :ould ha.e een a.oided if our 9h?si*al rule Sear*hers *ertain asi* *on*e9ts$ dieren*es ? *ategor? and s9a*e+ti!e for! of 9heno!enal and real$ of 9horono!is*her and d?na!i* !o.e!ent had !ade reall? *lear The s9here the 9urel? 9heno!enal that no:s no truth in the stri*t sense and !a? no: eats to the s9here of realit? In order our s*ien*e either$ des9ite s*holarl? detours to a 9ri!i+ ti.sten stand9oint thro:n a*$ or :hat the ee*t on the sa!e *o!es out$ de*o!9osed in su*h a 9osition again :here the issue is the truth !eaningless Did Einstein o.erthre:$ asolutis! JJ$ he has thro:n the s*ientiL* truth$ the theo+ theoreti* *on*e9t of realit? in its ne*essar?
Uniueness s!ashed " :e !ust assu!e$ The oser.ed that is also deter!ined $ inde9endentl? of one Position$ le.el$ asolute ^ Other:ise :e dra: :ater in a sie.e and *an gi.e at all our thining If so!ething does not onl? su99l? !a? a99ear resigned$ ut also se Y dierent $ 6$ itself$ is relati.el? $ ie de9ending on the 9osition and *ondition of loading s*hauers$ + not onl? in the di!ensional *onditions$ ut in Ls*al !easured itself$ *eases all thining The rest is se9ti*is!$ - er:irrung$ relati.is! "9 6 )an "se.enth 9h?si*al theorists Mealousl? full? the ran*h o sa:ing$ on :hi*h he sits hi!self$ ie to the asi* *onditions of theoreti*al thining ound resear*hers the foundation of all theoreti*al destro? !ati* deter!ining at all> it is the a 9riori *onditions tion of uniueness$ !ore 9re*isel?$ the identit? of the intended Natural 9ro*esses to :hi*h the inter9retation eort It is aout
to the aandon!ent of the last unal=saren the theoreti*al 9rin*i9le$ that the Rele.ant standards$ in fa*t 6 s9e*iL* to onl? one (a? to eha.e The eui.alen*e 9rin*i9le of the General RTH Einstein is the sla9 in the fa*e of the theoreti*all? ne*essar? and a 9riori gi.en notion of truth P2 "Einstein !isunderstands ao.e all the asi* su de9arted fro! Phorono!is rass and D?na!i* as in &ant is alread? *arried out in exe!9lar? fashion$$ the real asi* e.il the argu!ents The eui.alen*e and - ertaus*hareit t:o O9erations *an usefull? at all onl? as a 9heno!enal$ 9ure 02 Phorono!is*hes e understood$ their a99li*ation on D?+ *al is the t?9i*al os9ring of this *onfusion of ter!s$ therefore a* to &ant and its *lear distin*tion fro! Phoro+ ergo+ no!i* and D?na!i*$ 9ure !o.e!ent and the
For*es energies$ *auses of the !o.e!ent$ ie$ arri.al s*hauungs+ and *ategori*al for!s 6$ of Phno!enali+ it? and realit? in stri*tl? .alid senseX "" Einstein RTH *an neither theoreti*all? nor e!9iri*all? *onsidered a:less e*o!e Theoreti*all?$ not e*ause the? self+annul!ent of a theor? e.er results E!9iri*all? not e*ause$ as !ost of the %ases itself ad!its$ its *onditions are not the de fa*to tale gi.en e!9iri*al *onditions *an reall? *he*$ :hether it :as that not the s9eed in uestion$ it :as that not the ne*essar? !aterials *an e a99lied$ the 9resent to hi! theoreti*all? to sho: :hi*h the? ex9ress ee*t "" A not onl? relati.el? 6 inter9retale$ ut de9ending on the .ie:$ relati.el? "eha.ing realit? in of the o9erations so or !a? eha.e dierentl? is$ euall? asurd in itself$ as a relati.el? existent at relati.e Truth "9 //
"The relati.it? in ter!s su*h as gra.it?$ et* :restle hineinh is$ the entire ex9erien*e in ine!ati*s transfor! The d?na!i*s Sets sustanti.e !otion$ original for*es ad.an*e "D A.ail ai!ed 9ri!aril? at the General RTH "This li!it for real Y )otion 6 that therefore then also a real *ause and ee*t$ ie theoreti*al real .alid *onseuen*es !ust not e ex*eeded ? the RTH e "9/; f "The li!it of RTH is thus the for*e 66 "The theoreti*al tale Reale !ust e *learl? deter!ined (ho on this entr? :ai.ed a!iguit?$ to dis9ense :ith the s*ien*e in their %ore "9 /2f "The !ere a99earan*e of t:o !a? in fa*t o99osite Reasons arising the no:ledge *an onl? assu!e a asi* 6 S K/ " :e are interested in not at all$ thin :asder'eoa*hter
*an + ut he !a? thin ut seriousl? target The real *ause$ the one or the other> e *lai!ed e so Einstein *ontinues at so the fatal lo: to the funda!ental la: of all thought that so!e one and onl? one !a? *ause that oser.ation does not$ de9ending on the *hanges 9K1 f "that The oser.er is not readil? 3 !a? dier Oh gra.it? or a**eleration is$ of *ourse$ ut$ :ith Another 6 he !ust de*ide and !a? e dierent$ other:ise there He !ade the 9heno!enal range not out 6 P17 7 00 Dr QE Thedinga$ aa 8 / "(hen the !easure!ent of the s9eed of light on the ground al:a?s the
sa!e siCe results$ this *an not !ean an?thing else than that Must the 9ro*ess of light 9ro9agation is the Earth s?ste! elongs$ so that :hen the o9ti*al o9erations of an? de9enden*? S9eed of light !ust *onsist of the ground !otion In the #ight sour*e *an not e a**ording to ex9erien*e this de9enden*e$ *onseuentl? all$ the? !ust e to loo at the light+re*ei.ing od? Fro! the !o!ent :here a hurr?ing to Earth ea! the sun lea.es$ it is the Earth s?ste! elongs$ indeed :ithout the hirde :ould that 'ea! not e 9ut into o9eration so that the desired t?9e s9eed enters into the light ea! Attra*tion theor? This theor? is *onsistent :ith the 9rin*i9le of relati.it?$ a**ording to :hi*h the light 9ro9agation as an? other !o.ing o9eration onl? one of 'odies de9endent *an e $ (hile the RTH Einstein the standards of our thining itself !ust *hange to this to a*hie.e har!on? (ith su*h a !ethod ut under!ines
Theor? the soil itself$ on :hi*h it stands e*ause onl? 9ro.ided tion of U nu!st=ii*heit these standards *ould the theor? the sa:n setting 9ro.ide their a**ura*?$ ie or!en in the north of our thining e Moined *hain of *on*lusions dedu*ed that their :a? of *orre*t one The RTH thus !aes use of this 9roof of an agent$ its suitailit? for the!sel.es in dout 9ulls 6 9 K8$ 1 _ Professor ' v s in+stone$ *ited ao.e / and K "As in all the 9ro.isions onl? of radiation is the s9ee*h and of Deter!ination of si!ultaneit? ? radiation$ !a? of these Theor? as nothing e *on*luded that refers to so!ething else on ea!s and on+ti!e *ontrol ? radiation Therefore$ :hen a said of the *onseuen*es of Einstein that :hen a *lo* :ith a se*ond *lo* lo*ated at a dierent lo*ation at the sa!e ti!e asolutel? S?n*hronous goes$ the si!ultaneit? is lost as soon as this :at*h has !o.ed to:ard the se*ond *lo*$ so this !a? !ean i!9ossile
the *lo* has a*tuall? *hanged its *ourse due to the !o.e!ent$ hereinafter has re!ained$ it !eans onl? that the relati.e si!ultaneit?$ :ith ra?s *ontrolled$ not ? the !o.e!ent of the *lo* to the se*ond *lo* is 9resent$ the asolute re!ains " $ A rod relati.el? *onsidered is *onsidered asolutel? not unlie a ar 3 In short$ it n[9ien on this theor? no 9h?si*al %on*lusions$ ut onl? for!al+geo!etri* /$ 9 /; et se "So a all goes in the relati.e s?ste! for a stationar? oser.ation eighth o.er in an elli9soid of re.olution :hose Fro! 9lattung and situation *onstantl? *hanging To *on*lude fro! this that su*h eha.ior also real od? is *on*erned$ is not 9er!itted ItJs a !athe!ati*al Transfor!ation " Onl? ra?s .alue :ins if a /88 oser.er at rest$ the ti!e and length of the !o.ing ea!s so is for*ed to re*on$ as assu!ed So also are all those
Details$ su*h that odies !o.ing the stationar? oser.er e.en !a? a99ear inLnitel? attened and stret*hed into inLnit?$ na!el? :hen the odies !o.e :ith the s9eed of light$ .er? idle$ it *on*erns not the od? Si!ilarl? :ith a *orres9onding *on*lusion :ith res9e*t to ti!e The :at*h as )e*hanis! is not retarded$ onl? the *ontrols ? !eans of sho: ra?s " a lag on At the starting 9oint a* s:e9t$ is found ? the sa!e *ontrol again s?n*hronis! 66 K> K2f "It is this relati.it? and theories of s*ien*e !u*h etter to those li!ited to :hat the? *an e none Naturalists it o**urred earlier$ in the fa*t that the solution a dierential euation *ontains aritrar? *onstants$ so!ething else e seen as a !athe!ati*al result :hi*h has to follo: fro! the :a? in as :e ha.e Must set u9 the dierential *al*ulus 'ut :hat has
this 9arti*ular !athe!ati*al de.i*e :ith :orld.ie:s doW "K$ 9 180 H (ittig$ aa 8th "In su!!ar? GE rie? aout the .alidit? of the s9e*ial RTH sa?s she axis of the 9h?si*al anal?sis as a theor? of Y sluggish oser.ations 6 a99arent$ as a *onseuen*e of Dis*o.er? of Lnite energ? .elo*it? *$ the *orres9onding Natural 9ro*esses are 9er*ei.ed dierentl? in ti!e in the self+s?ste!$ as the? ha99en to e in the third+9art? s?ste! As efore$ ho:e.er$ re!ains that fro! astra*t ine!ati*$ ie$ !o.e!ent geo!etri* oser.ations not reall? !aterial$ so *an ?ield !aterial 9ro*esses Oser.ation )oderate shifts the e.ents are not 9h?si*al F or!nderungen of things the outside :orld$ neither in ti!e nor s9atial or !aterial Res9e*t "
"There is onl? one 9h?si*all? real ti!e" 917 f "The oser.er b in the ox of the general RTH *ould a*tuall? ? an "a**elero!eter" M alread? :ithin its o:n s?ste! realiCe that his !o.e!ent "u9" M no Gra.it? !o.e!ent "" The general RTH does not entail *o!9ared to an? general 9h?si*al relati.iCation relati.e !otion s?ste!s "9 ;/ "GE The resting in his Leld generating gra.itational ether therefore su*es all the reuire!ents$ :hi*h the 9h?si*s aut reason of ER+ !ust 9ro.ide results of .arious o9ti*al tests on hi! And :hat is !ost i!9ortant$ it satisLes the!$ :ithout the need for a relati.it? reuires .ation of ti!e and s9a*e in .arious s?ste!s /8/ :ould "" The *lassi*al 9rin*i9le of relati.it? has general a99li*ation for all 9h?si*al 9ro*esses "
"The onl? atte!9t of estalishing the light *onstan*? 9rin*i9le led$ has een ausgel[hrt in a !o.ing for*e Leld and not in a slo: idle s?ste!$ su*h as the astra*t 4ugeis9iel one sho:ed "Is for the 9h?si*s no o**asion of the ado9tion of$ ether 6 refrain (ould the s*ien*e on the asis of 9urel? for!al de*ision de.elo9!ents the air:a.es *an*el altogether$ it :ould ha.e !ade sustanti.e ut engage reasons again to another auxiliar? h?9othesis to the %ontiguous a*tion e.er eing ale to ex9lain the! to the 9la*e of introdu*ed ern:irungen Ne:ton see F has "9;0 f Professor Th Pulling$ aa 8K "(hat the a*tual foundations of EinsteinJs theor? *on*erned$ so these li!ited initiall? to the )i*hels on see - esee*h and so!e other ex9 eri!entelle oser.ations It is .er? doutful and is Must ? !an? res9e*ted 9h?si*ists
douted :hether these !eager atte!9ts e!9lo?ed 9ersons .er? !an? ex9lanations *an e enough to see the Einstein h?9othesis to su99ort uilding j 'ut e.en if one assu!es that all Oenses in another 9ro.ide oser.ations Lgures that loo entirel? ? Einstein Theor? *oin*ide$ so this is this :ould not 9ro.e The histor? of 9h?si*s urges in this res9e*t to the allergen greatest *aution )athe!ati*all? *orre*t de.elo9!ent of for!ulas and *onLr!ation ? indi.idual oser.ations so is not al:a?s su*ient$ Lnall? to 9ro.e the *orre*tness of a theor? Es9e*iall? is al:a?s to thin of the 9ossiilit? that the use at issue Theor? *ontains indi.idual *orre*t assu!9tions$ and that this *ontent of right assu!9tions ?ou to so!e$ e.en !an? *onLr!ations hel9s that it ut in its totalit? e*ause of nu!erous hinCu+ %andidate false assu!9tions and *on*lusions is ina**urate Qust in E in+stone see theor? in :hi*h su**essi.e !an? assu!9tions
grafted$ *an e ex9e*ted :ith this 9ossiilit? to a large extent One should therefore also 9ro.isionall? al:a?s stri*tl? et:een the indi.idual Einstein see dierent assu!9tions and .er? *areful of the theor? as a :hole s9ea Right has sin*e also in the roen re*ent ?ears !ore and !ore *on.in*ed 9ath that relati.it? uestion e.er not onl? a 9h?si*al or e.en onl? is !athe!ati*al 9role!$ ut Lrst in the last resort heard the Foru! of e9iste!olog? and thus of natural 9hiloso9h? It is highl? re!arale that Must su*h an ex*ellent 9h?si*ist as #orentC these e9iste!ologi*al *hara*ter onl? re*entl? her. or lifted and the other Einstein see h?9otheses 9ro.isionall? reMe*ted " For ox test> "If :e :ere the F alle:egungen the od? /8K on Earth on an a**elerated u9:ard !o.e!ent of the oser.er
tra*ed or :anted this one outside+the+ground oser.ations do eighth$ :e should$ as e.er?:here in the :orld su*h *ase !o.e!ents are oser.ed$ the assu!9tion *an e !ade that the earth through a9art !?sterious for*es of the Lxed stars in all dire*tions a! torn :hat ut Must reall? is not the *ase In the o.erall *o!9lex our Lndings therefore e seen onl? the .ie: of the oser.ations a*hters in a ox$ after :hi*h the *ase through an attra*tion of an? ind on the 9art of the earth taes 9la*e$ ho:e.er + des9ite the asen*e of Dieren*es of !easure!ent results + not on an ex9edited )o.e!ent of the ox ased u9:ard " "For r e s enntni the or?$ there :ill al:a?s e i!9ortant to to rea*h a !ini!u! of relati.it? (e see it as a Progress$ if I$ instead of the relati.e !o.e!ent of the lands*a9e I oser.e fro! a !o.ing train fro! the less relati.e !? train set (e *onsider it as a ne: ste9 for:ard if
I note that the train at the sa!e ti!e the rotation of the earth around itself Et* 9arti*i9ates IJll get it Ne.er hold a Lnal o asolute !o.e!ent$ ut for the e9iste!ologi*al 9osition is ut *learl? the dire*tion in :hi*h the no:ledge is 9rogressi.e Also fro! this 9oint :e *o!e to the *on*lusion that of an eui.alen*e of dierent relati.e .ie:9oints *an e no uestion " .$ Against the !eta geo!etri* *hara*ter of 9h?si*al s9a*e is still oMe*ted in 9arti*ular that the stru*ture !etageo!etris*hen and sets initiall? onl? are logi*al+algerai* L*tions for the "9ure" !athe!ati*s !a? oer great interest$ their s9atial i!9or+ tan*e and their signiL*an*e for the N atur:irli*heit ut is uite doutful " "It should e Lnall? onl? noted that Must re*entl? also no:n 9h?si*ist in in*reasing nu!ers EinsteinJs argu!ents
dout or dire*tl? reMe*t "P 27 + 0/ /81 REPERTOR %ontriutions Del Negro$ (alter 7 Dries*h$ Hans 7 Friedlander$ 9 2 Geissler$ Q& /8 J Gi!!erthal$ Ar!in /Kth Golds*h!idt$ #ouis /1$ Hartog$ AH de /1 Israel$ Hans /6th &eller$ Hugo /th &raus$ 8 /7th &untC$ ( /0th
-i*es$ E!anuel K8th #e Roux$ Q K8th #eft$ PF K2th #othigius Sten 18th )eilin$ HM 1/st )itis$ #othar 16th Na*hreiner$ - in*enC 1th Petras *he$ &O 1th Raus*henerger$ (al+ ther 10 Reuterdahl$ Ar.id 68$ Ri*hter$ Gusta. 6;th Ru*h 'ut$ Eri*h 67th Strehl 60th -ogtherr$ &arl 60th
(alte$ ( ;2th (ein!ann$ Rudolf 8th (endel$ Georg ;th Other o99onents and refutations Araha!$ ) 7;th Adler$ Fr 7;th Aliiata$ G 7;th Anderson$ ( 7;th 'alster$ ( 7; @ )ugs$ E 7;th 'e*er$ A 7;th 'enedi*ts$ & 7;th 'ergson$ H 7;th 'ottlinger$ &F 7;th
'u*herer$ AH 7;th 'udde$ E 7;th Deanert$ E 7;th Dingler$ H 7;th Dre*hsler$ Q 7;th Ehrenfest$ P 7;th "/86 Fri*e$ H 7;th Frederi* G 7;th F+dri.en iron+&=hler$ ) 7 ; Gartel!ann$ H 7;th Ga:rons?$ D 7th Gehr*e$ E 7th Ge99ert$ H 7th Gilert$ # 7th
D%$ G fro! 7th GroCnann$ E 7th Haring$ Th 7 " Ha!ei G 7th Hart:ig 7th HirCel$ QEG 7th HoLer$ A 7th Isenrahe$ % 7th Q o.i*i= 7th &aroUus$ Fr 7th %herr? )an$ A 7th &lages$ # 7th &raue$ A 7th &re!er$ Q 7th &rets*h!ann$ E 7th
&ries$ Q of 7th #auer$ HE 7th #e*her$ E 7th #enard$ P 77 " #eo9old$ % 77th #i9sius$ F 77th )a*h$ E 77th )aier$ H 77th )authner$ FritC 77th )ohoro.i*i*$ St 77th N?!an$ A 77th Painle.e$ P 77th Palg?i$ ) 77th Pe*Ci$ G 77th Pfa$ A 77th
Pode* 77th Poin*are 77th Pre?$ A 77th Ras*he.s?$ N of 77th Reh!e$ Q 77th Rei*hen*her$ E 77th Riedinger 77th Ri9e+&[hn$ # 77th Rothe$ R 77th Ru99$ E 77th Sagna*$ G 77th S*hultC$ Q 77th Ro*er$ = 77th See$ TA 77th Seeliger$ H of 77th
Selet?$ Fr 77th Sittig 77th Sti*ers$ I 77th Strass he$ H 72th Thedinga$ Eddo 72th Thir?$ R 72th Torna she$ R 72th Engines el$ H 72th Tu!!ers$ QH 72th Del -e**hio 72th Guardian$ F$ 72th (einstein$ )' 72th (estin$ OE 72th (ie*hert$ QE 72$ -ienna$ ( 72th
-ienna$ OH 72th (ittig$ H 72th (odetC?$ I 72th (olf$ ) 72th 4oril$ I 72th 4iegler$ QH 72th Pulling$ Th 72th 4la!al$ H 72th
