Insp nspe ect ction ion Proc roce edur dure e 00-S 00 -SAIP AIP -71
31 J anuary anuary 20 2005 05
Plant Inspection Index Document Responsibility: Inspection Department
Saudi Saudi Aramco Aramc o Desk DeskTop Top Standards Standards Table of Contents
1 2 3 4 5
S cope......... cope................... ..................... ...................... ..................... .................... .......... 2 Referen eferences........... ces.................... .................... ....................... ...................... .......... 2 Objectiv Objectives.......... es.................... ..................... ..................... ...................... .............. .. 3 Responsibili esponsibilitties....................... ies................................. ...................... .............. 3 S coring coring P rocess.. rocess............ ..................... ...................... ...................... ........... 4
Attachm Attachment ent I – S ample ample PII P II S umm ummary Report…. eport….... ... 6 Attachm Attachment ent II – S ample ample P II Ent E ntry ry S heet…… heet……..… ..….. .. 7 Attachment III –Sample PII Chart….........……… 21
Previous Issue: New
Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008 Page 1 of 21
Primary contact: Nasser M. Balhareth on 874-5018
Document Responsibility: Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: Update: 1 February February 2008
1
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Inspection Performance Index Index
Scope This SAIP is to provide guidelines for Saudi Aramco Plant Inspection Units (PIUs) and the Inspection Department Engineering Unit (IEU) to periodically con duct scoring of the PIU performance and submit the results to IEU for semi-annual reporting to plant management. Plant inspection index (PII) is to cover performance of all inspection activities as per the listed seventeen (17) measures in the attachment.
2
References Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures SAEP-20
Equipment Inspection Schedule
SAEP-308
Operations Inspection Unit Reviews
SAEP-309
Inspection of Community and Operations Support Facilities
SAEP-316
Performance Qualification of Coating Personnel
SAEP-317
Testing and Inspection (T&I) of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers
SAEP-318
Pressure Relief Valve Program Authorization for Installation, Deletion and Changes Changes
SAEP-319
Relief Valves – Routine Test, Inspection, Quality Assurance and Regulation Regulation
SAEP-321
Performance Qualification Testing and Certification of Saudi Aramco Welders Welders
SAEP-322
Performance Qualification Testing and Certification of Saudi Aramco Brazers Brazers
SAEP-325
Inspection Requirements for Pressurized Equipment
SAEP-333
Cathodic Protection Monitoring
SAEP-343
Risk-Based Assessment for In-Plant Static Equipment
SAEP-1135
On-Stream Inspection Administration
SAEP-1140
Qualification of Saudi Aramco NDT Personnel
SAEP-1142
Qualification of Non-Saudi Aramco NDT Personnel
Saudi Aramco Inspection Procedures 00-SAIP-06
Pressure Test Requirements
00-SAIP-07
Positive Material Identification Requirements
00-SAIP-12
Equipment Deficiency Reports
Page 2 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
3
4
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
00-SAIP-51
Electrical Inspection
00-SAIP-72
Inspection Involvement in Management of Change
00-SAIP-73
Inspection Manning Determination Guidelines
00-SAIP-74
Corrosion under Insulation Inspection
00-SAIP-75
External Inspection
00-SAIP-76
Worksheet Control & Tracking
00-SAIP-77
Technical Alert Implementation & Tracking
00-SAIP-78
Inspection Records & Filing
00-SAIP-79
Assessment Recommendations Tracking System
01-SAIP-01
Small Pipes & Nipples Inspection Programs
01-SAIP-04
Injection Points Inspection Programs
Objectives 2.1
To measure and monitor the overall performance of the plant inspection units following a predetermined seventeen (17) measures that covers a ll inspection activities.
2.2
To identify gaps in the seventeen (17) inspection programs and function that include on-stream-inspection program, the relief valve program, welder tracking system and the equipment inspection schedules.
2.3
To verify that Saudi Aramco standards and procedures are being properly implemented along with the applicable industry standards.
2.4
To highlight to plant management gaps in the PIU for timely corrective action.
Responsibilities 4.1
The PIU Supervisor shall form a team, two times a year, including representative(s) from other inspection units to measure the performance of his respective unit.
4.2
The PIU Supervisor shall, with transmittal letter from his Div. head/GS, also send all the performance results supported by all documents if requested to the Inspection Department (ID) to update the respective Unit's performance by June th st 30 and December 31 .
4.3
Upon request of the Facility Manager, the ID should spot-check the performance of the respective Inspection Unit.
Page 3 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
5
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
4.4
The IEU shall make the calculation spread sheet available for the PIUs through ID web site and maintain it as required.
4.5
The IEU shall send the semi-annual PII Report of the PIU to its respective Facility Manager.
Scoring Process 5.1
Every six months (End of June and end of December every year), the Plant Inspection Unit Supervisor shall form a team, including a representative(s) from another Plant Inspection Unit (Sr. Inspector or above), to perform the PII scoring of his respective Unit.
5.2
The team shall cover the seventeen (17) measures listed in attachment I.
5.3
The team shall submit the results to the PIU Supervisor with all the documents supporting the Unit's performance calculations.
5.4
The PIU Supervisor should review and confirm the results with the team prior to submittal to ID/OID.
5.5
The final calculations of the Unit performance should be available with all supporting documents for possible verification by IEU.
5.6
IEU/OID can request support documents for verification. Any nonconformance will be returned back to the respective Inspection Unit for correction or clarifications.
5.7
If all results are accepted by IEU, then the Units performance will be reflected in the PII and forwarded to the PIU plant manager.
5.8
In each of the 17 measures, there are questions (Attachment II) that need to be answered to calculate the total scoring for that specific measure. Each question is given a maximum score that can be achieved if the Unit is fully meeting the requirement. Some questions are based on a "yes" or "no" answer while others are percentage-based to help clarify the answer (i.e., the experience level of the unit is to be scored based on the given percentages).
5.9
Questions that are not applicable can be marked with N/A and the program will not consider that specific question in the final calculation (i.e., the rupture disks may not be available at some of the plants in which case the question will not be considered in the total score).
5.10
Each one of the 17 measures has been given a weight factor based on how important they are to the overall performance of the facility.
Page 4 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
5.11
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
The minimum acceptable PII score shall be set as 80% for the overall and 60% for the individual programs. These levels will be revised based on performance by the PIU units. Commentary Note: These percentages are based on the results obtained after testing this index on selected PIUs.
5.12
The calculation sheet will automatically calculate the overall performance of the Unit based on the calculated scores of the measures. A chart (attachment III) will be generated reflecting the Unit performance for each one of the 17 measures.
5.13
The PII scoring sheet can be obtained from the ID website Operations Inspection Division http://id.aramco.com.sa/site/index.asp?Module=OID.
31 J anuary 2005
Revision Summary New Saudi Aramco Inspection Procedure.
Page 5 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
ATTACHMENT I SAMPLE (PII) SUMMARY REPORT
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Plant Inspecti on Index Report Unit
XYZ Inspection Unit
Evaluation Jan-Jun, 2005 Period Systems and Programs Evaluation
#
INDICES
1
Technical Administration
2
Training & Certification
3
Relief Valves
4
Mechanical Inspection
5
Equipment Inspection Schedule
6
On-Stream Inspection
7
Corrosion Control & Monitoring
8
Welding/Repair Inspection
9
Coating
10
Filing/Records Keeping
11
Civil and Structural Inspection
12
Electrical Inspection
13
Nondestructive Testing Operations
14
Management of Change
15
Worksheet & Reporting
16
Management of Recommendations
17
Positive Material Identification
PLANT INSPECTION INDEX:
PII 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.9
COMMENTS
13.1 89%
Reduced PII Due to Incident Related to Inspection Signed by: Plant Inspection Unit Supervisor Signed by:
84%
Page 6 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
Other Inspection Unit Representative
ATTACHMENT II SAMPLE (PII) ENTRY SHEET (Only Shaded Fields are to be filled)
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
Has the unit had a study of the workload and experience level to decide the number of inspectors and number of supervisors and whenever new plants are added?
n o i t a r t s i n i m d A l a c i n h c e T
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
4
4
00-SAIP-73
4
3
00-SAIP-73
3
1
What is the average experience level in the Unit?
4
3
Does the Unit have up-to-date written orientation Program for new inspectors?
2
2
Is the inspection function independent from other organization to prevent influence?
4
4
Has an incident or unplanned shutdown taken place that was found to be a result of inspection program failure since the last assessment?
6
0
Does the Inspection Unit participate in all Management plant walkthrough inspections and participate in the review meetings?
2
2
CLPM
Does the unit conduct at least monthly safety/communication meetings?
2
2
CLPM
Has the unit conducted the annual self assessment?
4
4
SAEP-308
TOTAL FOR TECHNICAL ADMINISTRATION
35
25
Based on the above study, does the unit have the proper number of Inspectors, Senior Inspectors and Field Supervisors? Is the Supervision assignment continuous?
CLPM
Page 7 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
s n o i t a c i f i t r e C & g n i n i a r T
s e v l a V f e i l e R
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Does the unit have an individual to coordinate inspector training?
4
4
Is the AJTS training program implemented in the Unit?
4
4
Is there a 1:4 mentor–to-mentee ratio in the unit to verify and sign off tasks?
4
4
Is there a written schedule for in-house training?
2
2
Does the Unit have a IDP's for each inspector?
4
4
GI-1809.001
Are Aramco and body certification obtained per Job description for all inspectors?
4
3
AJ TS/J ob Description
Does the unit have a system for regularly informing its inspectors of the revised Standards and procedures?
4
0
Does the Unit have a tracking system for NDT personnel certification validation?
4
4
Is the schedule for in-house training followed?
2
2
Do all inspectors have at least one week inspection training course per year?
2
2
TOTAL FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION
34
29
Is a Quality manual for PZV in the PZV shop available and followed? If not has the unit highlighted deficiencies to management?
4
4
SAEP318/319
Are all your RVs tested within EIS (i.e. none overdue without approved deviation request per SAP RV System)?
4
4
SAEP318/319
Do you physically check Rupture Discs for integrity?
4
NA
SAEP318/319
AJ TS/J ob Description
GI-1809.001
Page 8 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Are internal audits conducted on maintenance shops per schedule?
4
4
SAEP318/319
Is physical check conducted on RV after installation and check list filed including correct installation, car sealing, color-coding, etc…)?
4
4
SAEP318/319
Are mothballed RV properly designated and tracked?
4
4
Is the testing interval reviewed and adjusted based on service, performance and conditions?
4
4
Are valves open to atmospheres regularly checked for open drain
4
4
SAES-J -600
Is the relief valve coordinator trained in SAP system and operations?
4
4
SAEP318/319
Has the relief valve coordinator completed the AJTS for relief valve inspection?
4
4
J ob Description
36
36
Are pressure vessels being inspected by API certified inspectors or by inspectors having more than 20 years inspection experience or have completed AJTS requirements?
4
4
Are all mechanical inspections being done by API/AWS certified inspectors or under their immediate supervision?
4
3
Is a checklist being utilized when conducting external inspection?
4
4
00-SAIP-75
Are tanks being inspected by API certified inspectors or by inspectors having more than 20 years inspection experience or have completed AJTS requirements?
4
2
AJ TS/J ob Description
TOTAL FOR RELIEF VALVES
n o i t c e p s n I l a c i n a h c e M
XYZ Inspection Unit
SAEP318/319 SAEP318/319
AJ TS/J ob Description
Page 9 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Are piping and pipelines being inspected by API certified inspectors or by inspectors having more than 20 years inspection experience or have completed AJTS requirements?
4
2
AJ TS/J ob Description
Have all inspectors completed the AJTS for assigned mechanical jobs?
4
4
AJ TS/J ob Description
Is SAEP-325 being followed all the time when inspecting pressurized equipment?
4
4
SAEP-325
Is risk based inspection or prioritization based on SAEP325 being used to optimize mechanical inspections?
4
0
SAEP-325, SAEP-343
Are the mechanical inspection tools available to perform the required mechanical inspections (e.g. flash light, pit gauge, hammer, magnet, magnifying glass, etc.)
4
4
Is the external inspection required by SAEP-20 being performed timely (no overdue)?
4
4
SAEP-20 & 00-SAIP-75
Is inspection formally informed of maintenance activities such as during OME meetings?
4
4
00-SAIP-72
44
35
Are all pieces of equipment included in the EIS as required SAEP-20?
4
4
SAEP-20
Are deviation requests submitted to the Inspection Department (complete & timely)?
4
0
SAEP-20
Is the discretionary letter for over due equipment issued timely?
4
4
SAEP-20
Do you have a computerized tracking system for EIS with reminding capabilities and can be accessible by Operations and T&I Planning?
3
3
SAEP-20
TOTAL FOR MECHANICAL INSPECTION
n o i t c e p l e s u n d I t e n h e c S m p i u q E
XYZ Inspection Unit
Page 10 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Have you completed initial T&I for all new equipment per SAEP-20?
4
4
SAEP-20
Have you complied with the external inspection requirement as per SAEP-20?
4
4
SAEP-20
Is RBA conducted to optimize inspection?
2
0
SAEP-20
Is EIS evaluation for possible adjustments after T&I conducted and documented?
3
3
SAEP-20
4
NA
SAEP-20
4
NA
Are all Operations Support Facilities listed and inspected per EIS and schedule?
4
4
SAEP-20 SAEP20&SAEP309
Are mothballed equipment identified and monitored per SAEP-20 and SAER 2365 ?
3
3
TOTAL FOR EQUIPMENT INSPECTION SCHEDULE
35
29
Do you have an individual coordinating the On-Stream Inspection?
4
4
Do you have a system for verifying OSI data errors within 90 days?
4
4
Do you have OSI drawings for all equipment and piping in hydrocarbon service or critical service?
4
4
SAEP-1135 Para 3.1.3.b
3
0
SAEP-1135
4
4
01-SAIP-01
Are road crossing inspection & revalidation conducted per EIS? Is a sub-sea pipeline inspection program functional?
n o i t c e p s n I m a e r t S n O
XYZ Inspection Unit
Does the inspection Unit have a system to ensure modifying OSI isometric drawings when changes are made to plant? Do you have a program for Nipple surveys?
SAEP-20 , SAER 2365
SAEP-1135
Page 11 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Do you have chemical injection points and system to monitor them?
4
NA
01-SAIP-10, API570, Alert -30/97
Are dead legs identified and being monitored?
4
4
SAES-L-310 Para 11.4.5
Are all vessels susceptible for Corrosion Under Insulation and fireproofing identified and included for CUI Inspection?
4
0
SAEP-1135 Para 3.2.5
Is there a system for Inspecting transition area soil/air interface) and splash zones?
4
NA
SAEP-1135
Do you perform OSI 6 months prior to T&I?
3
0
Are all your equipment up-to-date with their TML’s (i.e. No backlog)?
4
3
SAEP-1135
Are process piping classified per SAEP-1135?
4
4
SAEP-1135
Do you monitor and document heaters in the creep range for metallurgical aging, creep and/or creep cracking?
4
NA
SAEP-325
Do you perform thermography for monitoring hot spots and refractory damage where other methods can not produce the needed information?
3
3
SAEP-20
Do you inspect bolts and guy wires for stacks and flares for structural soundness?
4
4
API 572
Have all your new plants had TML’s baseline readings?
4
4
SAEP-122
Is susceptible flare lines periodically checked for fouling to ensure adequacy for emergency relief?
4
4
API 571
Is the OSI computer program currently functioning to analyze the gathered field data?
4
4
SAEP-1135
57
46
TOTAL FOR ON-STREAM INSPECTION
Page 12 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
r o t i n o M / l o r t n o c n o i s o r r o C
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Does the unit/division have a corrosion engineer? Or CP specialist for Terminal and Bulk plants?
4
4
Has the corrosion engineer completed the required 3month training program?
4
4
Is the CE responsibility defined in the OSI procedure?
3
3
SAEP-1135
Is failure analysis conducted on all failures that impact reliability or safety?
4
4
API 571
Is there a leak reporting system documenting leaks and failures impacting reliability or safety?
4
0
GI 2.401/2 & 2.104
Is there a system in place to assure that equipment susceptible to environmental cracking (amine, caustic, wet H2S, deaerators) inspected at appropriate intervals with appropriate NDT method?
4
4
SAEP-325
Do you have a unit-specific corrosion control document (CCD’s) or equivalent in place for each of your existing processing units?
4
4
Do you have effective CP for your Tanks, sub-sea structures and buried piping?
4
4
SAES-X300, 400, 500, 600
Are damage mechanisms other than pitting and general thinning reviewed by a corrosion engineer during set up of the inspection plans?
3
3
SAEP-1135
Is the yearly and quarterly schedule as applicable for monitoring the CP system available, implemented and reported?
4
4
SAEP-333
Is the SAEP-333A survey report forms utilized for the CP system survey?
2
2
SAEP-333
Page 13 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Is the low potential reading and/or the CP system deficiencies reported and tracked?
4
4
SAEP-333, GI 428.001
Is the capacity test for the solar system performed every 2 years
4
4
SAEP-333
Is the result of the CP inspection communicated to the inspection Units if done by others?
4
NA
SAEP-333
48
44
Are all welding jobs inspected by certified welding inspectors?
4
4
AJ TS/J ob Description
Is Welder Tracking System installed and updated?
4
4
SAEP-321
Do you enter welder performance in the WTS?
4
4
SAEP-321
Do you repair ASME vessels by certified shops?
4
NA
SAES-D-008
Are welding inspection tools available?
4
4
SAES-W10/11/12/13
4
4
4
4
24
24
TOTAL FOR CORROSION CONTROL/MONITORING
n o i t c e p s n I r i a p e R / g n i d l e W
XYZ Inspection Unit
Are shop and field weld inspection covered and roles specified? Is shop electrode ovens and electrode handling process periodically checked, results documented and recommendations followed up? TOTAL FOR WELDING/REPAIR INSPECTION
SAES-W10/11/12/13
Page 14 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
n o i t c e p s n I g n i t a o C
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Are blasters and painters certified by the Unit or are qualifications of contractor personnel (blasters and painters) checked by Unit?
4
4
SAEP-316
Are all coating inspection performed by certified inspectors?
4
4
AJ TS/J ob Description
Is holiday testing conducted on all critical coating?
4
4
SAES-H-
Are major and premature coating failures investigated and results documented?
4
0
Are coating jobs QA forms filled in and filed?
4
4
SAEP-316
Are sufficient coating inspection tools available to inspect the blasting &coating operations?
4
4
SAEP-316
24
20
Is there a clerk in the Unit?
3
3
Is there a procedure to set guidelines for record keeping, retention, indexing etc?
4
4
00-SAIP-78
Are Equipment Files updated/complete?
4
4
Are Aramco report format used always (NDT, HT, etc.)?
4
4
00-SAIP-78 00-SAIP-78
Do you have a system for back-up of Inspection records?
4
4
Do you have an up-to-date master list of all equipment?
4
4
00-SAIP-78 SAEP-20
Do you use computerized inspection data management system to store inspection history?
4
4
00-SAIP-78
Are all Deviation requests and discretionary letter available?
4
4
SAEP-20
TOTAL FOR COATING INSPECTION
s d r o c e R d n a g n i l i F
XYZ Inspection Unit
Page 15 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Are critical records properly protected (e.g. fireproof cabinet) or electronically backed up?
4
4
00-SAIP-78
Do you have all reference material in the Unit if not available through the Intranet?
4
4
00-SAIP-78
39
39
Is the civil inspection performed by a qualified civil inspector?
4
4
J ob Description
Do you inspect your pipe rack structure/foundation?
4
4
SAEP-20 Para 5.5.8
2
2
AJ TS/J ob Description
3
0
Do you grade the concrete deterioration and failure as per the classification described in Aramco standard?
4
4
SAEP-309 Attachment ll
Do you use the checklists for concrete pre-pour inspection, during pouring etc?
4
4
SAEP-20 Para 5.5.8
Do you follow up with the laboratory results of the concrete compressibility tests and keep records in the file?
4
4
SAES-Q-001 Para 16
Are sufficient civil inspection tools available?
4
4
SAES-Qseries
Does the unit have a back up inspector for inspection units that has only one inspector?
4
4
Is the civil inspection required by SAEP-20 being performed timely (no overdue)?
4
4
TOTAL FOR FILING/RECORDS
n o i t c e p s n I l i v i C
XYZ Inspection Unit
Is there a qualified refractory / insulation inspector available? Do you have a Database for all the concrete structures and fireproofing in your plants (both onshore and offshore)?
SAEP-20 & 00-SAIP-75
Page 16 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
Do you make sure that the concrete supplier is approved by the Vendor inspection unit, Dhahran and report to them any standard violations in the concrete plant & transport truck? Is the unit informed of all civil activities (daily/weekly schedule)
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
SAEP-112
4
4
4
45
42
Is the electrical inspection performed by qualified inspectors?
4
4
Does the unit have a back up inspector for inspection units that has only one inspector?
4
4
Is the electrical inspection required by SAEP-20 being performed timely (no overdue)?
4
4
SAEP-20 & 00-SAIP-75
Does the electrical inspector have tools and technical resources?
4
4
00-SAIP-78
Is the unit informed of all electrical activities (daily/weekly schedule)
4
4
00-SAIP-72
Do you verify that cable splicing is done by certified cable splicers?
4
4
SAES-P-104
20
20
Is there a proper NDT personnel performance tracking program for certification validation?
4
4
Is contractor personnel qualification checked?
4
4
Does the Unit have enough NDT equipment and material available?
4
4
TOTAL FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
e v i t c g u r i n t s t e s e D - T n o N
J an-J un, 2005
4
TOTAL FOR CIVIL INSPECTION
n o i t c e p s n I l a c i r t c e l E
XYZ Inspection Unit
AJ TS/J ob Description
SAEP-1140 para 9.4 & 9.5 AJ TS/J ob Description SAEP1144/1146 & ASME V
Page 17 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A SAEP1144/1146 & ASME V AJ TS/J ob Description SAEP-1143
Do you have a documented program for calibrating NDT instruments?
4
4
Does the unit have certified level II RTFI?
4
4
Does the unit have a dark room available?
2 22
2
22
Is the Inspection Unit involved in the Management of change (MOC) for issues affecting equipment integrity?
4
4
00-SAIP-72
Does the Unit get involved in the review of all relevant design packages, repair and modifications?
4
4
00-SAIP-72
Does the Unit get Involved in periodic meeting with operations, maintenance and Engineering (OME) on equipment integrity related issues?
4
4
00-SAIP-72
4
4
GI 2.60
4
4
00-SAIP-72
4
0
00-SAIP-72
4
4
00-SAIP-72
28
24
TOTAL FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
) C O M ( e g n a h C f O t n e m e g a n a M
XYZ Inspection Unit
Is GI 2.60 being followed for acceptance of Units after T&I? Are temporary piping installation/repairs tracked through open worksheet until removal or replacement with permanent fix? Do you have limits established for all key and critical process variables that affect corrosion and materials degradation, and are they documented in the operating instructions? Does the material specialist or corrosion engineer evaluate the potential corrosion impact of the proposed change? TOTAL FOR MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Page 18 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P g n i t r o p e R & s t e e h s k r o W s n o i t a d n e m m o c e R f o t n e m e g a n a M
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
Does the unit have a computerized system for Tracking Worksheets?
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
4
4
00-SAIP-76
4
4
00-SAIP-76
4
4
00-SAIP-76
4
4
API 570
4
4
00-SAIP-76
20
20
Do you have a procedure for assuring proper handling and compliance with Technical Alerts?
4
0
00--SAIP-77
Do you have a system for tracking self assessment recommendations?
4
0
SAEP-308
Is there a system for tracking and follow up on recommendations issued for proper and timely completion such as PZV shop audit recommendations?
4
4
Are OID Assessments Status reports issued on time to the Inspection Department
4
4
SAEP-308
Do you have any OID Assessment recommendations exceeding the ETC?
4
4
SAEP-308
20
12
Do you reference standards in your WS's? Do you highlight WS that are outstanding more than a year? Is the Work sheet kept open for temporary repair until it is properly reviewed as permanent or permanent repair is done? Are worksheets highlighted monthly to plant manager for critical or long outstanding worksheet review? TOTAL FOR WORKSHEETS REPORTING
TOTAL FOR RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION
Page 19 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
RANKING FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES m e t s y S r O m a r g o r P ) l I a M i r P e ( t a n o i M t e a c v i i t i i f s t o n e P d I
Parameter to Measur e for the Last 6 Month s
XYZ Inspection Unit
J an-J un, 2005
e r o c S x a M
e r o c S Reference l a Standard u t c A
Is PMI inspection done by the Unit on received material?
4
NA
SAES-A-206
Is PMI of alloy material verified after fabrication?
3
NA
SAES-A-206
Is SAES-A-206, 00-SAIP-07 followed for marking, reporting and documentation?
4
4
SAES-A-206 00-SAIP-07
Is existing low alloy piping/equipment PMI spot checked during T&Is?
4
NA
TOTAL FOR POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION
4
4
Page 20 of 21
Document Responsibility: Inspection Department Issue Date: 31 January 2005 Next Planned Update: 1 February 2008
00-SAIP-71 Plant Inspection Performance Index
ATTACHMENT III SAMPLE PII Chart for XYZ Inspecti on Uni t
% 0 0 1
% 0 8
% 0 6
% 0 4
% 0 2
n o i t a c i f i t e n g e n d a I h l a C i r g f e n o i t t t a r n o e M p e e e v e i g R m t g i n & s a a t o n h e a C e g f M P h n o i s t t k s n e o s e r T m W m e n e v e o i g i t t t a c c n u e r a s t y p n s s M S o e n i I t d l c n a n e o c p i N r o s t g i n c n I t i e l l p c a E e r e e u t K n c p o s u i r t s d t r c S n o e I c p d e s n n n a o I R i / l t i g g c v n i n i e i l t i C p a F s g o n n I i r C r i o t a i p n o e n o M R i t g c & n e i l p o d l r s e t l e n n I u o W d m C e a h n c o n r i t S e o s i S t n o r c o n r i e t o O p c C s s e e n p I v s l l n a a I c V t i f n n n e e a i o l i h t e c a p i R e m c i u f i M q t r n E e o i t C a r & t s i % n n i g i 0 n i m d a r A T l a c i n h c e T
e c n a m r o f r e P
Page 21 of 21